In short
EUVC Podcast Episode Notes: VC #282 with Jonathan Sibilia
Overview In this episode of EUVC, co-hosts Andreas Munk Holm and David Cruz e Silva interview Jonathan Sibilia, Partner at Molten Ventures. The discussion revolves around various topics including exit strategies in venture capital (VC), the impact of current market conditions, and Jonathan's personal journey into the VC space.
Guest Introduction
- Jonathan Sibilia
- Partner at Molten Ventures since 2009.
- Over 80 fund investments and 2200 portfolio companies under Molten Ventures.
- Significant background in technology and finance with experience at Jefferies International, Rothschild & CIE, and Apax Partners Corporate Finance.
- Holds degrees from EM-Lyon, University of St. Gallen, and University of Paris IX Dauphine.
Episode Highlights
- Journey into Venture Capital
- Jonathan shares his early fascination with technology and the internet, which led him to pursue a career in VC.
- Discusses his journey from banking to investing in VC and the transition to Molten Ventures.
- The Role of a Public Model
- Molten Ventures went public in 2016 to provide a more patient approach to capital and support entrepreneurs over long periods.
- Discusses the advantages of being a public VC firm, including the ability to recycle capital back into new investments.
- Importance of Exit Strategies
- Exit planning is critical but often overlooked in VC discussions.
- Stresses that too much focus is placed on making deals rather than preparing for successful exits.
- Jonathan highlights the need for alignment between founders and investors throughout the exit process.
- De-risking Investments
- Advocates for recovering initial investments when opportunities arise, especially in a volatile market.
- Encourages emerging managers to focus on generating DPI (distributions to paid-in capital) rather than solely on making new investments.
- Navigating Today's Investment Environment
- Discusses how the current economic climate poses challenges for entrepreneurs but can also lead to opportunities.
- Emphasizes the importance of discipline, cash management, and the shifting focus from growth at all costs to sustainable profitability.
- Collaboration within the Ecosystem
- Highlights the importance of collaboration among LPs and VCs, referencing the supportive nature of partnerships with firms like Isomer.
- Encourages sharing resources and networks to strengthen the European VC landscape.
- Emerging VCs and Fundraising Tips
- Top Tips for Fundraising:
- Differentiate yourself with a unique approach or idea.
- Trust your instincts and differentiate based on talent and vision.
- Practice discipline in fund size relative to your team's capability to deploy capital efficiently.
- Counterintuitive Insights
- Jonathan argues that VCs often operate with high ego, but the true success lies in supporting entrepreneurs.
- Believes that the perception of venture capitalists as the "kings of the land" is misleading; it is ultimately about empowering founders.
- Uncommon Beliefs
- Shares his belief that the unit of ego per dollar return in VC is higher than in other asset classes, emphasizing the disparity between sales pitches and actual performance.
Key Takeaways
- Effective exit strategies are essential for long-term success in venture capital.
- Public models can provide unique benefits for VCs, allowing for a longer investment horizon.
- Collaboration and support within the VC ecosystem can enhance opportunities for both investors and entrepreneurs.
- Trusting instincts and maintaining discipline is crucial for emerging VCs looking to establish themselves in the market.
Closing Thoughts The episode wraps up with Jonathan encouraging a focus on collaboration and support within the venture capital community, urging listeners to nominate deserving VCs for the European VC Awards.
---
For more insights and full access to the episode, visit [eu.vc](https://eu.vc).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Hey, everybody, and welcome back to the European VC. I hope you're ready for a great episode because today we're going to be talking to Jonathan from Molten. Jonathan is a partner with Molten and has been there right from the beginning. And he is really an important player in our ecosystem as he's one of the main LPs. He has made more than 80 fund investments. He has 2 ,200 underlying portfolio companies, meaning Molten does, of course, not just Jonathan. So you are really in for an episode. 2 billion in AUM in total. This is going to be great. Let's get into it.
1:02a story of new beginnings, new, new beginnings. Let's start acting, acting, acting, acting. So Jonathan, I am so happy to have you with us today because first of all, you are quite the giant in Mantra, quite the giant in the LP side. There's not many that really come with the background of knowing and speaking and investing actively in the VC space. And then also being an as active LP as you are. As I just said, 80 fund investments. That is incredible. Jonathan, welcome to the show. Thank you so much for joining us. Thanks for having me, Andres. Now tell us all about how you got into venture to begin with.
1:46Gosh, I think part of that generation that remembers the first time that they went online. And I remember very well what happened. I went to NBA.com. I was a big, well, still is, but still am, but big basketball fan. And I was afraid that the virus come out of my computer to bite me, really. That was like where we are at the time. It was in 1996, I think. And since that day, you know, it really was something that I kept inside me, you know, this geeky kind of interests. And I remember when I was at business school, I sent my first applications for an internship, 1999. And it was all VC firms. and I got as many rejection letters.
2:31Actually, some of those firms, I'm involved with them today. So it was that. But that's basically, that was the first point. And then I spent too much time in banking, but I learned the toolbox and it was at a very, very interesting time actually. And when I thought I got to the max of the learning curve, I decided to move to VC and that was 2009. And yeah, I've been with Molten for 14 years. And what made you want to not only do VC, but also do LP investments in VC? So this comes back to our IPO. When I started my career as a venture capital investor, so early 2000, this is something that I say a lot, but it's true.
3:16You know, the average Series A was$3 million at$8 million,$9 million per year. and a B round was 5 to 7 million at, I don't know, 15, 20 million per year. And that was a game I was involved with for five, six years. And, you know, at Molten, we are very entrepreneurial, like are the people that we are backing, actually. And we did something quite bold back in 2016, which is to decide to go public. And the reason why we did that was actually twofold. But the first was we believe that European tech is a long game. You know, companies stay private longer and unlocking shareholder value from seed to Series C potentially takes eight to 10 years.
3:58How do we have a model that is patient and permanent at the same time in our approach to capital? In other words, how can I look at an entrepreneur in the eye and tell him, hey, if you're on your way to build a big business, we'll be supportive over time. That's our model. And that's the reason why we went public. The other reason was obviously capital. You know, tapping into city money was a very interesting thing. And we thought that by being public and offering liquidity, that would be an easier bridge to institutional capital. So we went public byproduct of the IPO was that we had to go later stage.
4:34But I always scratch my head about, you know, how can I get involved with the early stage and knowing that I can't really do it directly. and this is what triggered the decision to invest in funds. And my first fund was actually Carlos and Reshma back in 2016. Oh, really? That was a good first pick. Very. Let's stay on the thought about taking a fund public because I think it's something that anyone in venture would always think, huh, someone would think, why the hell would you do that? Others would think, huh, maybe I should do that. Maybe that's a way to do it. What would you say now, looking back, are the pros and cons of it?
5:15I think this is the right model for entrepreneurs. And I think that's the most important thing. I think we are here to serve, help entrepreneurs to grow. And the public model is, by definition, capital patient. And again, you know, I'm going back to my previous point. I think that is the most important thing to be able to recognize that as an entrepreneur, scaling a company, you know, an overnight success takes many years in the making. And, you know, this is also why we have a very buoyant and active secondary market, right? GP that require liquidity, DPI, to raise the next fund. We don't want to be in a situation, if you are on a board of a company, driving that investment to have a need for liquidity at a time where, you know, the inflection point of the company hasn't happened.
6:06And we know how much time it can take. So I would say, you know, the public model is definitely a good fit for this because it makes us much more patient in our approach to return of capital. And the other thing that is very interesting is in a standard LPGP model, you need to return capital to your investors. We don't have to do that. We don't have LPs. We have shareholders. What we do, every exit, every pound from an exit of today will be recycled in the entrepreneurs of tomorrow. And I think that's what makes the model very attractive. When you think about how you have kind of grown the firm, I imagine that there's a very well-written book around how to grow a firm that is in a standard GPLP model.
6:49There's a bit less of a well-described path for the public fund, at least inside venture, right? What has been your learnings from that and your reflections on that? Is the playbook as different as one might think, or is it actually quite similar? I think that book has yet to be written. And I think, you know, we've been public for about eight years now. And it's probably within more time to really understand in the long term how it's going to play out. But what I want to say is, I think it hasn't, it doesn't change the way we talk to entrepreneurs and we invest in companies. You know, we are, it's just a different way of raising capital.
7:34and also giving us the ability to be patient and to keep funding our companies without being restricted by the end of a fund, for instance. And now, of course, being public has benefits and also in a market like today where it's complicated, it also has its issues. But I think in the longer term, it's all beneficial for entrepreneurs. And also being public allows us to have this platform play strategy where you've said it at the very beginning, you know, where we can do direct investing, that's our bread and butter, series A +, but also have this strategy of the fund-to-fund, which is not something that we could have done with a GPLP structure.
8:17And on top of that, if you add a secondary, you know, we've always been very, very opportunistic in the way we provide liquidity to entrepreneurs and also GPs and LPs. That is something that we wouldn't have been able to do with a standard GPLP model. So I think it's several things. It's access to capital. It's the ability to have a long-term view. And it's also the ability to become a platform play in the venture industry. I think that's very interesting. Now that we have had enough of an introductory talk for everyone in the audience, for those that might not know you already, to really understand what a solid investor and thinker you are in the venture space and power in the European ecosystem.
8:59I now want to first of all say thanks a million for joining us in the judging panel for the European VC awards. We always, when we designed this, we kept saying every contest, every award show really lives and dies with its integrity. For that reason, it was super important for us to get the best LPs that we have in the European VC space with us on the judging panel. and your name was one of the very quick ones to surface. Appreciate that. But I want to ask you, Jonathan, why did you accept? Why obviously, you know, yes, it was friends asking, but it was probably also because you think it was a worthwhile initiative.
9:44So I'd love to just ask you to put a few words. Yeah, no, you're absolutely right. I mean, how can you say no to Chris, right? But no, but to be more serious, there's a lot of awards out there, a lot of panels, a lot of judging competitions. But most of them, in my opinion, is very good for self-confidence for entrepreneurs. But do they really mean anything? I think also the proliferation of those events has diluted the impact of each of them. This one is different, in my opinion. First of all, it's about the quantity of the judging panel. Here, you are judged by your peers, by maybe your friends, maybe not, but by people that matter.
10:31And the integrity of the process is also very important. You know, this is not about, not only about winning something, this is about appearing on the radar screen of very serious people. And, you know, I think it's not just an award for ego glorification or a nice PR. It actually really means something. And I was super happy to see so many engaging GPs in the nomination process and great name. The quality of the selection is really second to none. So yeah, for all those reasons, I'm very, very happy to be part of this panel. Thank you for having me. And we're super thankful as well. So now with us congratulating each other and slapping each other on the back.
11:15Yeah, let's not send flowers to each other. That's exactly. Let's get into our usual question where we will ask you to share with us a pivotal moment in your life and how it has shaped you as an investor. Yeah. So I thought about that one and it's actually an easy one because it's really what happened. What changed everything for me was this. And honestly, for those only listening in, Jonathan just took his iPhone and... I just took my iPhone. Yeah. Sorry. And actually, I really mean the iPhone, not the smartphone. I think our industry is driven by breakthrough cycles or inflection point. We are definitely going to a very important one right now with Gen AI.
12:01But I think the iPhone changed the world, right? In 2007, I was in banking. SaaS was not really a thing, actually. And more importantly, we're still playing the snake game on our Nokia or BlackBerrys. And the iPhone changed everything, right? Actually, you could say that the iPhone killed the phone. The phone part was the least important aspect of the iPhone. And it really defined the smartphone era, not because it was the first smartphone, but because it was the first product that bundled smartphone features together in a package with genuine mass market appeal. And it was the first truly device that put the internet in your hands for mainstream users.
12:48So the last 10 years have definitely been 15 years, the iPhone decade. I was checking the number. I think they saw 2.3 billion of them. What's fantastic about the iPhone is that your iPhone 12 or 14 works really well. But if the 15 is going out, you'll buy it anyway. That's amazing marketing. But the ability, the iPhone has transformed from a niche product for early adopters to a dominant economic force. And I think the important bit is that it has set up the foundations for a whole ecosystem of application, which really have changed our everyday lives. You know, it's created billion dollar corporations and it rearranged existing industries and changed the world as we knew it.
13:29So when I saw all that, I understood that it was probably the time to leave banking and go on the other side of the table and start to help that ecosystem that was really blossoming, but still at a very nascent stage. Can I throw you a curveball here? Because you just said that the Gen.ai, we're living through the dawn of Gen.ai and liken that to the iPhone moment. Everyone has almost, right? But I'd love to ask you, what is it that makes you think that? And where do you see it maybe differing? And do you think it'll be, you know, even quicker adoption or will we see something similar? When will it get?
14:10Honestly, I think that we in venture tend to think that AI is everywhere because we see it in the people that are at the forefront. But then you go and talk to an average Joe in the supermarket and they still think that ChatGPT is a chatbot, right? I think AI will be truly democratized when you're using it without knowing that you're using it. Talking to a chatbot, for instance, on a website for support, or actually it's already happening. What I can say about AI is that I think the acceleration from now is going to be very brutal. And again, that's why I'm talking about these breakthrough cycles, right?
14:48It's all about how you respond to a changing environment. And we had a few very interesting trends recently, right? Cloud computing was one, for instance. But I think this one is very different because it changes the way we do things. Same way the iPhone changed the way we do things. And having said that, I think the perception of future revenues of AI is actually much higher than what is going to be, which is why there is a lot of inflation around the asset class. But there is no doubt, no doubt that it's going to change the way we interact with machines and probably with each other. We could go on down this vein for a very long time.
15:25But since you are such an important player in the LP space, I want us to... I think we agreed to stop sending flowers to each other, Andreas. Yes, we should. I have many beautiful flowers. Yeah, you do.
15:50Let's get into the Take a Stand section, where I will ask you to comment on a quote by Sarah Drinkwater from Common Magic. And she says, a little bit of chaos is good for you. Yeah, so this is a controversial one, right? Because chaos is by definition not good for anyone. on. But I will start by saying this, you know, the European VC landscape is clearly shaped right now for the last 18 months by a significant slowdown, whether you look at the number of deals or valuation. But more importantly, I think it's a very tough time now for entrepreneurs. I was having some conversation with our GPs in our program and some of them, actually one of them, but some of them had the same idea.
16:34But one of them told me that, and a very experienced GP, told me that 2023 was definitely the most painful year on the record in his venture career. And that gentleman has been going on for more than 20 years. In our broader ecosystem, we've heard stories of portfolio wipeouts and down rounds left and right. And it's brutal. But what is brutal is not necessarily the nature of the cycle we're in. I've been in three cycles since I'm working and I'm still there, you know. But it's how quickly it has changed. You know, overnight, two years ago, we were in a world where capital was very cheap, entrepreneur's time very expensive.
17:16Almost overnight, we shifted to a completely different environment where capital all of a sudden was very scarce. And I think what is important here is how you adapt. And this is why, you know, a little bit of chaos is good for you. Yes, because, you know, what I'm seeing right now is that best-in-class founders are always finding opportunities in a time of crisis, right? And actually, the data is pretty clear on that. If you're looking at in-crisis found vintages compared to pre-crisis found vintages, in-crisis found vintages are doing more than two times better than pre-crisis found vintages.
17:56And why is that? Because, well, number one, successful founders are very quick to adjust to ensure that they are alive. You know, they're moving to survival mode. Startups survive as long as they focus on the product they serve and keep their customers happy. I mean, it might sound a bit trivial, but that's the nature of the game. But the name of the game is discipline and resilience. And what I've observed is that teams are more focused, more productive. They learn how to do more with less. They have more ability to hire talents because talent is cheaper. And scarcity breeds intolerance for nonsense.
18:33So you're focusing on a thing that matters. And so clearly it's a time for tough conversation. It's a time for recalibration. It's a time for protecting cash. It's a time to be disciplined for GPs with sport for your management. And some of them talk about tech resets. What I think it has resets is the discipline of entrepreneurs, their resilience. And it has brought a new dynamic, which is profitable growth versus growth at all costs. And I think from that perspective, a little bit of chaos is good because we're going back to fundamentals, right? A company can only survive if it makes money. It's as simple as that.
19:10And we might have been, you know, in that world where this doesn't matter because there is always the next round. I think we've moved on from that. And entrepreneurs have clearly understood that. And you can see this, you know, on every cash protection plan that they are doing and becoming just more resilient.
19:34I want to get into our deep dive section. And I've been looking forward to this one because when I want to share the script with you, you send back a quote that I think must be mentioned here. way too many investors, in my opinion, are focused on doing deals and not generating DPI. Oh, right. The exit piece. Yeah. So for sure, let's dive into exit strategies now and try and give us an understanding why you, as an LP, would say that we have too much focus on only doing deals and too little on the exit strategy. So, yeah, sorry, it's maybe a bit of a controversial statement. But what I want to say is exit planning is vital and getting it right is more art and science.
20:22And way too many people, probably including me, are talking about the deal that they are doing, but not the deal that they are exiting. And I think exit discipline is probably underrated, but it's key. And as an investor in funds, it's important to show DPI, right? And actually, you know, Andrea, those are the two questions that I usually ask new GPs. But I wouldn't, 40 % of our GPs in the fund-to-fund program are emerging managers. And my definition of emerging is first-time fund. I know people have different, if you take like two or three funds, 100 % of them are emerging. But 40 % are emerging.
21:02We are not shying away from backing people for the first time. But we need track record and we need evidence that, you know, they can return money to their investors. I wouldn't mistake first time fund manager for inexperienced fund manager. What we have to rely on is track record. And the two questions that I'm asking a GP right now is how long have you been in that business and what's your DPI? If you have been in that business for 20 years or 15 years and your DPI is 15 percent, maybe that's not the right line of work for you. And if you've been in that business for two years and your GPI is 4X, well, it's very good, but it might have to do with luck as well.
21:42So I really try to weigh those two things. And why it's important? Well, it's important because paper track record has proved to be unreliable, especially in times like this, right? So the ability to generate exits and liquidity to investors is very important to me as an LP, but also to me as a GP, right? Because I will be only alive in this industry if I can make money for my investors. And in the current climate, you know, plumping valuation, high interest rates, limited pool of buyers. This is, in my opinion, what makes a good VC, right? So now the question is how you do this? How do you prepare an entrepreneur for an exit or for a liquidity event?
22:27In other words, how do you unlock or maximize shareholder value for you and for your investors? If you want, we can go into the details, but I think there are several things here. One, work closely with your founders as a GP, because unless they are repeat founders, it's very unlikely that they have experience in driving an exit process. That's why we're here for, we've been doing this, in my case, for 14 years. And the other thing is making sure that those entrepreneurs are prepared. You know, if you want to exit, there's always something that, you know, keeps coming back, which says it's better to be bought rather than sold.
23:08Very true. But most of the companies are still being sold. And if you want to set an asset, you need to be really ready for this, you know. And I'm more than happy to extrapolate on this if we have time. Now we have all the time in the world. That's what this podcast is for. So at least five in. So, okay, let's dive in. So first thing, work with your founders very closely, right? They most of the time have no experience of an exit. And again, it's more art than science. But a lack of experience also means that you will make mistakes along the way and mistakes that can be avoided if you are well prepared.
23:47I'll tell you another thing. I read the other day that apparently two out of three LOIs don't happen. So even if you are getting at an LOI stage with a buyer, you only have 33 % of chances of getting it done. So a lot can go wrong. And how do you mitigate this? You mitigate this by building strategic relationships with the people that can potentially buy you. It might sound odd, but I'm convinced that as a founder, you probably already know who your buyer is. You don't know what that you know, but they're probably already appearing on your radar screen. It's pretty funny, Jonathan, because this is what I heard a lot in 2015 to 2017, 18, maybe 19.
24:40Companies are sold, not bought. If we actually look at reality, right? and that you want to be ahead of things with your exit strategy. Some would even say that you want to know the buyers before you invest, or you want to at least be able to see them as the investor. It's okay that the founders don't because they're not in the business of exiting. That's not something they've done years and years and years. But if you are at this time, I was at a DUS Industry 4.0 fund, or at least many of our investments was in that space. So that was very much the space where you would say exactly what you said now.
25:19When you make that investment, you will have a pretty good idea who will be the buyers in the end. We spoke just before we turn on the recording here, we spoke about Sebastian from Joint Capital, who also said very well to me when I was with him last week. he said, the fact of the matter is that with our LP base, we involve them very, very closely with our investment decisions so that they already get to meet the founders and the founders get to meet potential clients or future clients or customers. And if we don't end up doing the investments, well, at least we help them that way. And if we did, well, then we've helped them get the first customer.
26:00So that's pretty great too, right? Yeah. And as an LP in joint, I can confirm that. Absolutely. And I think, you know, I'll go even further. If you don't know who your buyer is, maybe you should, because it's all about articulating why and how you can be strategically important for that buyer. So it's understanding what they need, or it's making them understand what they need, and they don't know that. But what I was driving at was, then we came into a two-year period of 2020, 2021, beginning 2022, where you'd often hear the advice, don't think about exit. Exit is so far down the road that now we're just growing.
26:41Don't be obsessed with knowing the exit plan from the beginning and so on and so forth. I don't disagree with that. And again, because of our model, we're not thinking about an exit overnight, right? We have the flexibility to wait. But I think it's important to have that in mind. And I'm not saying the company will be... No, and this is the important part, right? Because I think that advice is good advice to founders, because they should be thinking about building. But as an investor, even at the early stage, the fact of the matter is that in many cases, you actually do want to know what the potential buyers are.
27:17So there's a difference there. And I think that we had such inflation in people coming to market with new VC firms that all the market information to founders about how to build a company had become VC wisdom for people who hadn't built businesses or invested before. Am I somewhat right in what I'm saying here? Yeah, no. Being a bit angry. But you said you're very right about building. And I don't think that founders should have an exit in mind from day one. That's not what I'm saying. No. What I'm saying is build your company, use your investors to help with your exit process because you don't know what you don't know.
Read the full transcript
27:56And they will also help you fix your business before going to an exit. Because there is one thing that is for sure. If there are skeletons in the closet, a buyer will found them in the due diligence. And you might not know that it's a skeleton. We can help, well, not me personally, but your investors can help you with that. It's also about being aligned. Most of the exits don't happen because shareholders and founders are not aligned. Alignment is not something that you create overnight. It's something that you create over time. And timing. Timing is critical, right? In an ideal world, you would time your exits strategically to take advantage of market trends or favorable economic conditions.
28:39We are not in that environment. So how do you time your exits? This is something that is not trivial. So, you know, again, work with your founders, with your entrepreneurs as a GP and as an entrepreneur, work with your VCs. This can only be successful if it's done in collaboration. And be prepared. This is about being ready for due diligence, for financial reporting, legal compliance, have proper governance, especially if you're thinking about going public. We can talk about that. For me, an IPO is not necessarily a liquidity event. But at the end of the day, it's about creating a story, right?
29:16We are all storytellers, especially when we are selling a company and use your VCs. The question that I'm always asking myself is, would I buy my own company? And if you can't answer that question positively, it means you have to work on it more and more and again, or maybe wait. But that's a critical question. You said, you talked a bit about driving an exit process. This is, of course, the one place where you can maybe add some criticism to European mentoring, the state of European mentoring, that many VCs haven't tried that. Could you add some words from your experience about what is it that, you know, are there any resources, any places where you'd say this is actually a good resource that you should listen to or read or whatever?
30:03You know, what would be the things you'd say to a GP that, you know, haven't done this before? And you can see they're really, really good. They're super exciting investment strategy, but they're definitely backing on the exiting experience side. Now I want to try and help them get to the next stage there. And it might be a bit controversial too here. If you look at where startup exits happen most frequently, it's after Series A. And I'm not saying it's at Series B. It's not happening after Series B. It's happening right after Series A. That's about this very interesting piece of data from Carta, actually.
30:40And what they're saying is about in 2022, and I think 2023 is about the same thing, but 30 % of the companies that had a successful exit in 2022, 2023 were post-Series A stage. Less than that, 25 % or 26 % was from Series B to Series X, B+. And the rest was seen in early stage. So the first piece of advice, and this is something that I'm applying to myself as well, is, and by the way, most exits happen between$100 and$300 million, right? But I think because we are coming from an environment where valuations were very high and the bar is always higher and higher and higher, everybody is going for the moonshot, for the unicorn shot.
31:27And I think this is why, you know, also we are not probably not being opportunistic when it comes to an exit. It's perfectly OK if you're an early stage fund manager and you invest in a company at 25 or 30 million pre to sell for 250 or 300. Right. Sure. The company is doing well. And you might think that you have a shot at a billion dollar valuation in a few years. But you don't know what you don't know. and market conditions can change, acts of God, as we call them, another war is striking us, investors' morale coming down. There's many reasons why it could go wrong. So what I want to say is, what does success look like?
32:13What does great look like as an investor? Go back to your initial thesis and don't forget, this is where most acquisition happens. Don't always hope for a higher price, a higher valuation. You know, greed is not good. Do you have any pointers as to how one might think through that 10x exit scenario where you're looking at selling something and taking the rewards while you have them versus staying in? Because for a long time you've said, you know, go big or go home, right? Eventually you don't realize exits. I don't agree with that. go big or go home. Yeah. I think there is a very interesting middle ground here, which still is showing decent return for investors and their LPs.
33:04I don't think it's my might. I don't think it's black and white. No, no, exactly. And that's exactly what I think you hear too rarely, right? And I think that that's what we learned now or the European ecosystem learned through the tech reset. There's actually a good point in realizing the gains when they're there. Your question is about... Any decision heuristics to try and make that call, right? Because when you're looking at the situation, how do you determine whether now it's one of those things where I should actually realize half of it now or all of it? Yeah, yeah, yeah. So this is where I wanted to get to.
33:46my philosophy is de-risk especially in an environment right now if you're offered secondary and you think that you might have a shot at a much bigger exit maybe later well recover your cost de-risk your investment don't sell everything if you feel that you are making a mistake but take the cash if offered honestly I mean, I've seen many examples where people were going for, or investors or angels were going for the bigger game, the bigger exit, and it never really happened. But they were offered the cash. So, you know, it's never easy because, again, you don't know, right? But I think it's good discipline.
34:37Yeah. And I guess what you're saying here is recover your investment or take home. So cover your initial cost and keep a bit of upside. Yeah, exactly. Or some percentage of your fund or something like that. Use some benchmark that makes your portfolio model work or matches what you had expected and promise the LPs and then say, but we're leaving a chunk in. But the reality, Andreas, is that in today's environment, rounds are not oversubscribed and secondary is not as frequent as it used to be, which makes the point all the more valid, right? And exits don't happen that often. Buyers are not, you know, queuing to buy post-Series A startups.
35:26You really need to show something. You really need to show strategic value. Let's get out of this exit conversation and into our shout-out section. Very interesting. Thank you for your questions. Thank you. Thank you.
35:45I will ask you to give a shout out to a co-investor, an LP, or someone you just love in the ecosystem. Well, you're going to love this one. Because I want to talk about iSummer. And I don't want to talk about iSummer because they are good friends of me or because they're doing an amazing job with this event. Or I want to talk about Isomer because, you know, our asset class is collaborative and competitive at the same time. You know, on the direct side of things, one day you may be partnering with one of your peers, another VC firm. But the next day, you might be also competing with that guy. Right.
36:24And the last thing I would do, the last thing I think any Series A or B investor would do is to openly share their pipeline with their peers. So collaboration might be possible if you're partnering on deals, but this is not the nature of the game. The nature of the game is to win deals against each other to the extent collaborating. But on the funder fund side, it's very different. You know, if it wasn't for government money and the folks at British Business Bank or the EIF or the BP in France, we wouldn't have a sufficiently funded early stage ecosystem. And, you know, I wouldn't be here doing my job if it wasn't for those early stage fund managers because they are taking the early risk.
37:06And I think Isomer seems the same way. And, you know, together with other people, right? And the list is long, but together we are contributing to building a buoyant and sufficiently funded early stage ecosystem. And they are really important in that relationship. and with Chris and Joe and the broader Isomer team, you know, we are VC investors first and foremost. We speak the same language, but more importantly, we are sharing. I mean, I have, every time I made an interesting fund, I call Chris or every time a GP is asking me for an introduction to Isomer, here you go. You know, there is no competition.
37:47And I think it's quite rare to see this level of collaboration and sharing at junior level because I know my colleague Mo and Chloe get along really well and they're also sharing information and also at senior level. And frankly, you know, this is how to better help the ecosystem. And I am really, really happy that we have people like them in business.
38:12I couldn't agree more. It's a bit funny because when we first partnered up with Isomer as a venture partner, David and I, everyone, and we still meet people in the ecosystem, and they're like, well, how do you manage that? Do you not bring other LPs on, other fund funds on the podcast then? Or, you know, isn't it competitive? Blah, blah, blah. I'm always like, I haven't experienced that from a single one of you. I had one or two of the newer firms kind of asking, right? Like, what does this mean? Does that mean you don't want to feature us anymore? And of course, it was an obvious answer. No, of course, we'd love to.
38:50What we're missing in Europe is more LPs. And the people that are the most sophisticated LPs, you know, we really need them to talk as much as we can so that we build the ecosystem. So I could not agree more with what you say. I'm super thankful that you choose to give your shout out to the Iceberg gang. But I also think it's systematic of, you know, Chris has never said anything bad about it. I think he actually said, I think he said, Jonathan is one of the first people I call about anything. the problem that I have with Chris is when I see him it takes two hours and I don't do the time passing and I've missed a few meetings, I can count on that, it's all cool, thank you, I appreciate that but this is because we collaborate, this is because we exchange this is because we talk, it's rare, I haven't seen this in the direct side of things and I'm glad for this.
39:45Yeah, I agree, I very much agree And I think that there's maybe a similar thing. And I think you've backed many emerging managers with that strategy as well, the co-invest strategy. I'd love to ask you how you think about that strategy and whether you see similar dynamic there. At least that's what I feel. And that's why I kind of naturally gravitate to liking them. Because they're not forced into a posture that's sometimes a bit down. So my perspective is that I'm seeing this ecosystem as you always have to hand over the keys to someone else, no matter where you are in that kind of value chain.
40:26If you are a seed investor, you would hand over the keys of your companies to a Series A investor. If you're a Series A investor, you would hand over the keys to your company to someone like me doing B rounds. and we will hand over the keys to a buyer or a growth stage fund or a pre-IPO investor. So you're only here for a certain period of time. My goal, and again, going back to that platform play, what Molten is doing is to make sure that we have a solution for follow-on capital for all those early stage businesses. And I know being an investor on the direct side of things, how much time it takes for an entrepreneur to raise capital.
41:08It's a year on the road where you kiss frogs. I mean, with me, literally, because I'm from France. But it's a year that you're not spending time growing your business. It's a year you are on the road. And if we can be of help to fast track those rounds by being a partner with our funds, well, I think we have done something important. For every pound that we've committed to the fund of funds, which is about拢150 million. We've deployed one pound, more than one pound actually, in the company that came from the funder fund, originated by one of our fund partners. And I think that's a good ratio. So it works for us.
41:47We are building that bridge between the early stage world and the late stage world. And we're helping those entrepreneurs to fast track their round and spend more time on what matters to them, which is growing their business. Just before we go into the next segment, and it's a bit connected and a weird place to ask you, but I just thought about this whole narrative side to retail investors on the stock market. What have that taught you in terms of making everyone understand the world of venture? Because that's a big question, right? Well, I would say that's our mission. You know, our mission is to democratize retail investing into our asset class.
42:32And it's also my thesis, right? That's why I invested in a business called Crowdcube. I'm a proud board member for more than seven years now. It's exactly the same philosophy. How do we make our asset class attractive to more people? Because a lot of people are very curious, if not excited. But I think investing in one or two companies is just not the way to do it. It's a numbers game, right? It's about being exposed to different things. That's what we do. That's what Crowdcube is doing. That's also what my esteemed colleague now, Nick Brisborn, is doing at Forward, right? This is why we were a backer of Nick Brisborn early on.
43:15Not only because he was an esteemed colleague from my DFJ days, DFJ's pre-days, but also because he was doing things differently. He went public with his early stage model forward at an IPO, I think, in 2018 or 19. And I thought that it was amazing. This is exactly, you know, my philosophy, my almost like my my the cornerstone of our investment thesis, which is, again, to make sure that all of us have access to exciting venture capital opportunities, because access was usually, you know, where things went wrong. How? Yeah, I would love to invest in technology. How do you find how do I find those deals?
43:52I'm not a professional. I'm a surgeon from London or I'm a vet from Manchester. And I would love to invest in those companies, especially the one that makes sense to me. So that's why, you know, I'm trying to encourage those approaches, those models. Yeah, I couldn't agree more. We actually just not too long ago had Stefan Pulse from Unfer on the podcast as well. And of course, one of the great... Very interesting play to hear. Democratizers, yeah. Absolutely. Same idea. Now let's get into the three biggest learnings from the last 10 years of your life. I'm looking very much forward to this. I'll start with a professional perspective.
44:32I think we mentioned this before. So I'll go back to that. Take the cash when offered. This is the first thing that I've learned from my 14 years in VCs. If I look back where we had to make those decisions, as an angel personally or as a professional investor, You know, don't settle for maybe more tomorrow. You know, de-risk your investments. Take the cash if offered. Remember what great looks like. Go back to your initial investment thesis. Is that what good look like? So that's number one. Number two, and this is an interesting one. A great idea is not a business until you make the first sale.
45:16And that is something that I live by, right? Our job as venture capital investors, our IP, I would say, is our ability to pick winners from the rest of them. That is our only IP. That's our product. So our job has to be almost like professional skeptics. But it's increasingly hard because most of the entrepreneurs we meet every day have true conviction that they will change the world. And they're also usually fantastic salesmen. So you can sit here all day hearing those pitches and your head will spin and every opportunity is exciting and tastes like the last. So, you know, it's a bit about like investigative journalism in a way.
46:01We spend our time to decipher what the GP is telling us and assessing with our prism if it's good or not. The judge of peace here is can you sell? You know, it's great. I agree. But can you sell? And when I started my career as a venture, as a VC investor, I remember those days, I thought everything was amazing. I wanted to invest in every company that came to see me. And the next phase was actually the opposite. Everything didn't pass the bar. I was a skeptic. This is never going to work. And now I've got a bit more of a balanced view. But I always go back to that point, right? It's a great idea.
46:43It's not a business. unless, and I'm not even going to say the first million dollars, the first sale, you know, proving that you can sell. But that's another thing. What's the fund investing equivalent in terms of it's not a great, it's not a great, it's not a business until, or idea is not a business until you've made a sale? Oh, but you mean from a fund perspective? Yeah, is that it's not a great fund until you've had an exit? No, I think it's different with funds, in my opinion, because, I mean, our whole game is about people. We invest in people. People are our key assets. Companies are people and people are companies.
47:28But I think, you know, when you are investing at a later stage, it becomes very much about numbers, unit economics, addressable market, your ability to gain market shares, your ability to go back to a profitable state or be in a position where you can raise. So it is about numbers. When you are investing in a fund, it's only about people, especially when the track record is limited. So I think then the answer is, what do you do that is different? What makes you unique? Because there's a lot of people out there raising money, a lot of smart people with, you know, vested experience as operators, as venture capital investors.
48:13Some of them are, you know, even coming from a very, very different background and they're all super interesting. But they're all saying the same thing, which is we have a great network. This is what we do. What is really unique? You know, how do you stand out from the crowd? What makes you different? I think this is, you know, what makes me tick. Do you agree, though, that it's okay that the way you're different is actually that you're better? In the sense that I think, if I'm very honest, I think that the venture model, even though it is well-known and quite well-described, what you need to be good at to be a good venture investor.
48:55And sometimes, yes, you want to be etty or you want to be able to say, this is exactly where I'm different from others. But sometimes you're just a really, really good fintech investor that's networked to all the right people. And that's what makes you different. It's not that you have to come up with something etchy and unique. It can also just be that if you claim that you're the best fintech investor with the best network, well, then I just need to be able to pick up my phone and call the first 10 fintech investors that I know and respect, and they'll all mention your name. All true. I would add to that your ability to understand the future.
49:37You know, this is something that I quite like. Entrepreneurs are the only time travelers that I know. You know why? Because most people live in the present, and the future is actually an extension of the present. But the future is coming fast, all fully fast at us now. We talked about Gen.ai before. And how do entrepreneurs win? Entrepreneurs win when they break free of the present and they fast track the future. What happens is their ability to ride on those inflection points that we've mentioned before, cost of AI, access to mass auditions, cloud computing, and basically force the incumbents to react rather than the other way around.
50:25We're talking about those big companies out there. So as an investor, you should ask yourself the question, how do I understand the future? Because there is something that is for sure that the next category leading companies are probably raising a seed round today. How do you understand this? And at the end of the day, it's all about conviction. It's all about believing in what you do. It's a hindsight industry at the end of the day. So you'll know if you get it right or not four or five times from now. But I think that's what makes you different also, is your ability to look at the future with a different type of lenses.
51:05You always hear fund investors, good fund investors, say it's about what makes you unique. And then that kind of can leave an emerging manager thinking, I'm looking at my deck and it reads great network, great picking skill, great. Yeah, but if everybody is saying the same thing, how does it make you unique? Exactly. That's what I mean. that it's not that you have to have, you know, you don't have to pull a body wrap it up to be a good VC. It's just about what you're really, really good at. You're really, really good at. You're not mediocre at it. You're the fucking best in Europe. Unique is one thing.
51:42It's more about what makes you different. Yeah, exactly, exactly. Now, you had another one, which we didn't cover yet. It's, I always ask, why don't settle for uncertainty? I like that one because I think it speaks to your curiosity and your refusal to settle for uncertainty, which in both startup investing, but definitely in fund investing is absolutely integral. I agree. And, you know, personally, I'm always trying to make choices that put me against my own comfort zone. I think as long as you're uncomfortable, it means you're growing. Uncertainty is part of that. again success is about understanding uncertainty betting on it and getting it right and if you get it right what is the magnitude of your rightness?
52:35That is the next question people don't like uncertainty people like their routines but I don't think or I don't know if that's where really truly you're put to test I think people are much better when they're outside their corporate zone and this is again This is your IP, your ability to get it right. Now let's get into our quickfire round because in there we have what your top tips for emerging VCs is, so we need to be able to spend some time there.
53:15But let's start with the first one, which is what advice would you give to your own 10 years younger. Buy more Bitcoins 10 years ago. It's really a good one. I did buy a few, but not enough. No, more seriously. This is about trusting your talent, your ideas, your instinct. Again, in this line of work, your IP is your judgment. This is your product. This is your key asset. And if you don't trust yourself, nobody will trust yourself. The first thing is trust Trust yourself, trust your talent. I'll tell you a story. Back in 2001, I tried to start my own company, my own website. I was still at school.
53:55I was doing that with a friend of mine. And it was a student network, very much like what Facebook has was three or four years later. So what we had is we were taking pictures of people in parties, in business school parties. And we gave them the ability to comment on them. Oh, you kissed that girl. And you think we didn't see you. And then we put it out there. And we could see a lot of engagement in the school. It was called Planet EM. And we started by saying, okay, maybe we have something here. And we went to a few people who were trying to raise 5 ,000 euros. And we failed. But I knew deep down that we had something.
54:33And again, we had all the like. We had the like button. I like this or I will receive more of this. And it just disappeared because we couldn't raise 5 ,000 euros. And then we all went to banking and I have a different career. And I'm looking back at this as an interesting moment of my life because I didn't trust that we had something good because I couldn't raise the money. It was not even a lot of money, right? 5 ,000 euros. I'm pretty sure we could have found it. We really tried. But that killed our motivation. You know, people don't believe in it. It means it's never going to work. We should have trusted more our instincts and what we were doing.
55:10So I think, you know, follow your dreams. Remorse is always better than regret. At least you've tried, but trust yourself. The other thing that I would have given myself 10 years ago is probably, you know, I think most people overestimate what they can do in one year and underestimate what they can do in 10 years. Sense of urgency is always good. It's good stress. But is that really urgent? Just take a step back to think carefully about things and, you know, just give yourself time. It's not a race. It's a marathon. It's a marathon with a lot of hurdles. Don't get me wrong. But it's definitely not a sprint.
55:47And maybe I was too impatient. I was too fast. So, yeah, that's what I would say. Now, what are your top tips for emerging VCs across Europe for fundraising? Yeah, so we talked about this before. You know, ask yourself why you are truly differentiated, what unique you bring to the table, because people will like that. If you don't have track record, fundraising might be an uphill battle. It's not over again. We backed people with limited track record. It exists, but we're not talking about 10 deals. Track record can be compensated, in my opinion, by exceptional vision and talent in many different ways.
56:35But again, what makes me really, really interested is somebody that is coming with a very different, truly unique approach. What I like to see in GPs is what I just mentioned before, which is people that are really trusting their instinct. You know, we have something special here. I call it then how you execute it. I call it the three Ds, you know, drive, determination and discipline. Part of getting an edge is to stay focused. It's not an easy thing, actually, when, you know, sectors and investments overlap with each other. And, you know, you see quite a few managers going slightly off-piste, which is easily understandable.
57:15Right. I think it's important also to break your own rules. Don't do it all the time because the rules matter, but have that flexibility. And the last thing that I would tell them is don't raise more capital than what you think you can deploy with discipline. You know, we've seen it in our program, a firm that have returned and raised significantly higher size funds, but it doesn't necessarily need more performance. I think what it means is less discipline. One thing is for sure, you'll be back on the road in two or three years raising for the next fund. The question that you have to ask yourself is, you want to be pushed to deploy or you want to do that with discipline?
57:56And, you know, if I give you out of 80 funds, I think the average size of our fund is about 70 million pounds, 7-0. I think that's a good size for a two to three people investment team. Of course, if you hire more partners and you're becoming a 10 people team, you can deploy more capital. But again, it's all about discipline. Now, what's the most counterintuitive thing you've learned in venture? Again, this is going to be controversial, but I think the most counterintuitive thing in an industry where ego is usually very high is that we are not the kings of the lands. VCs are not the kings of the lands.
58:34We just count it. This is all about entrepreneurs. And this is all about our ability to help them grow their business, hire people. Obviously, we're not philanthropists, so we need an exit at some point, right? We, most of the time, we are making it about ourselves. and I don't think that should be the case, which is why I usually shy away from those events, podcasts and stuff like that because it's not about me, it's about my entrepreneurs. It's about the people that I'm trying to serve and help. That is so true in mainstream media as well. I think we're accepted a little bit because we only talk to investors for other investors to hear.
59:12So that's what we should spotlight. But I fucking hate hearing the Dragon's Den and Lion's Den and whatever these programs are called, where you have, you even see front page pictures of the investor in the middle and then the founder group gathered around them. Like this was about the investor making the bet. What the fuck? Thank you. Thank you. I couldn't agree more with this. It's about them. Everything that we're doing is about them.
59:44Before we close, I want to ask you to give us your uncommon belief that most people around you do not believe in. That's the one sentence that you asked me. That's exactly. Well, I think we will also finish on a very controversial thing, which goes back to what I was saying before, right? And my statement is the unit of ego per dollar return is higher in VC than in any other asset class. Explain. You talk to many different people looking for capital, right? And the only thing that they are, and they're all great, and I'm sure they're great, right? But the only thing they talk about is track record, track record, track record.
1:00:27When it comes to dollar returns, there's not a lot of people actually in our ecosystem that have a truly great longstanding track record of returning proper capital to their LPs, especially in the early stage world. There are a few, and I'm glad to say that we've backed them. But what I'm hearing is a disproportionate sales pitch compared to what actually has been done, which makes me think about this line, right? You're talking to people and you're like, wow, that's amazing. You must be so rich. Well, actually, no, I haven't returned a single dollar to my investors. Well, maybe the sales pitch is a bit too pushy.
1:01:06I don't know. But this is something that I truly believe in. And again, it would be controversial. I'll get a deal for that online, but that's okay. Jonathan, thank you so much for speaking some truth with us here. Thank you so much for being a judge at the European VC Awards. Everyone tuning in, please do go and nominate all the great VCs that you believe we have in the ecosystem. Please do. This is important. Absolutely, absolutely. Thank you so much, everyone who tuned in today. I hope you enjoyed the episode as much as I did. But if you did, do make sure to drop a review, go on EUVC and subscribe if you haven't done so already.
1:01:44Thank you.
1:01:48Tear down this wall. It's more than just an alliance. This is a union of values. United and determined we can serve as a model for other regions of the world. The nature of a problem requires a European response. Europe is a story of new beginnings. Let's start acting.
From the publisher
Jonathan joined Molten Ventures in 2009. Prior to joining the company, he was a senior associate in the technology group at Jefferies International, advising on high-profile cross-border M&A, debt & equity offerings.
Previously, he worked at Rothschild & CIE in Paris. He also worked at Apax Partners Corporate Finance in France. Jonathan holds an MA in Management from EM-Lyon and the University of St Gallen in Switzerland and an MA in Advanced Corporate Finance from the University of Paris IX Dauphine.
Molten Ventures is one of the most active venture capital firms in Europe, developing and investing in disruptive, high-growth technology companies.
Go to eu.vc for our core learnings and the full video interview 馃憖
Chapters:
00:01:42 The Journey into Venture Capital
00:06:08 The Role of a Public Model
00:13:43 The Future of AI in Venture Capital
00:19:46 The Importance of Exit Strategies
00:20:13 The Role of Founders and VCs in Exit Strategies
00:33:07 Understanding the Importance of Realizing Gains
00:33:43 The Philosophy of De-risking Investments
00:35:03 The Reality of Today's Investment Environment
00:35:45 Shout Out to Collaborative Partners in the Ecosystem
00:36:45 The Importance of Collaboration and Sharing in the Ecosystem
00:38:51 The Role of LPs in Building the Ecosystem
00:42:06 The Challenge of Making Venture Capital Understandable to All
00:42:27 The Mission to Democratize Retail Investing
00:44:26 The Importance of Trusting Your Instincts and Talent
00:55:58 Tips for Emerging VCs: Differentiation and Discipline
00:58:20 The Counterintuitive Truth about Venture Capital
00:59:51 Closing Thoughts and Uncommon Beliefs




