Gatecrashers and Gatekeepers

27 Jun 2025 · 1 h 13 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Fashion People Podcast Episode Notes

Episode Title

Gatecrashers and Gatekeepers

Guest

  • Robin Givhan, Pulitzer Prize-winning fashion and cultural critic, and author of *Make It Ours: Crashing the Gates of Culture with Virgil Abloh*.

Host

  • Lauren Sherman, Puck correspondent and fashion industry insider.

---

Episode Summary

In this episode, Lauren Sherman and Robin Givhan delve into the life and legacy of late fashion designer Virgil Abloh. The discussion covers Abloh's upbringing, his unique approach to design, and the significant impact he had on the luxury fashion industry, particularly during his time at Louis Vuitton. Additionally, Lauren shares insights from a recent dinner event she co-hosted in Paris and addresses the recent news regarding Anna Wintour stepping down from her role as editor-in-chief at American Vogue.

---

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. Virgil Abloh's Influence on Fashion
  2. Background: Givhan discusses Abloh's journey, from his upbringing to becoming a prominent figure in high fashion.
  3. Anti-Perfectionism: Abloh's design philosophy focused on imperfection and experimentation, which contrasted with traditional expectations in the fashion industry.
  4. Louis Vuitton: His appointment as the artistic director marked a significant shift in luxury branding, emphasizing cultural relevance and accessibility.
  1. Changing Definitions of Luxury
  2. Cultural Impact: Abloh redefined what luxury could entail by incorporating diverse cultural narratives into mainstream fashion.
  3. Collaborations and Accessibility: His collaborations, particularly with brands like Nike, highlighted a democratization of luxury, allowing broader demographics to engage with high-end fashion.
  1. Anna Wintour's Transition at Vogue
  2. Lauren shares insights about Wintour stepping down from her role, explaining the shift at Condé Nast toward a more modern editorial structure where traditional titles are being replaced by heads of content.
  1. Industry Reception and Criticism
  2. Givhan reflects on her prior criticisms of Abloh's work, particularly regarding the quality of Louis Vuitton shows compared to the fandom he inspired.
  3. The complexities of the fashion industry’s relationship with cultural appropriation and authenticity were explored, particularly regarding the treatment of Black culture in fashion.
  1. Virgil’s Design Philosophy
  2. 3% Rule: Abloh's principle of making minimal changes (3%) to existing designs drew parallels to his background as a DJ, emphasizing remixing over original creation.
  3. The idea of viewing every piece as a prototype allowed for rapid production and a unique approach to fashion that encouraged dialogue.
  1. Cultural Commentary in Fashion Journalism
  2. Both Lauren and Robin discussed the importance of context in fashion journalism, suggesting that understanding the social implications of fashion is as crucial as the product itself.
  1. Legacy and Future Influence
  2. Givhan posits that Abloh’s legacy is one of empowerment, encouraging designers and creatives from marginalized backgrounds to ask, "Why not me?" in pursuing opportunities in fashion.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Empowerment in Design: Abloh's work encourages a rethinking of who gets to tell stories in fashion and who is considered a luxury consumer.
  • Cultural Relevance: The episode emphasizes the importance of cultural narratives in defining luxury and accessibility in fashion.
  • The Role of Criticism: The discussion highlights the delicate balance between critique and appreciation within the fashion industry.
  • Next Steps in Fashion: Givhan's insights into Abloh's approach suggest a shift toward inclusivity and innovation that future designers can learn from.

---

Conclusion The conversation between Lauren Sherman and Robin Givhan offers an in-depth look at Virgil Abloh's impact on the fashion industry, exploring themes of cultural identity, the definition of luxury, and the evolving role of fashion journalism. Their reflections underscore the importance of storytelling and context in understanding fashion's future trajectory.

---

Additional Notes

  • Production Team: Produced and edited by Molly Nugent; executive producers include John Kelly, Ben Landy, and Gobby Grossman.
  • Next Episode Teasers: Upcoming discussions will address Jonathan Dior and Louis Vuitton.

Links for Further Reading

  • [Puck's Fashion and Beauty Memo](https://puck.news)
  • [Robin Givhan’s Book: *Make It Ours*](https://example.com)

---

Feel free to explore the themes discussed in this episode further, as they provide valuable insight into the current state and future direction of the fashion industry.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:03Hello and welcome to Fashion People. I'm Lauren Sherman, writer of Puck's fashion and beauty memo line sheet. And today with me on the show is Robin Gavon, Pulitzer Prize winning journalist and author of Make It Ours, Crashing the Gates of Culture with Virgil Adler. Before we get going, I wanted to remind you that if you like this podcast, you'll definitely love Puck, where I send an email called Line Sheet. If you're a fashion person, you get that reference. It's an original look at what's really going on inside the fashion and beauty industries. Line Sheet is scoopy, analytical, and above all, fun.

0:44Along with me, a subscription to Puck gains you access to an unmatched roster of experts reporting on powerful people and companies in entertainment, media, sports, politics, finance, the art world, and much more. If you're interested, listeners of Fashion People get a discount. Just go to puck.news slash fashion people to join Puck or start a free trial.

1:09happy friday everyone what a week on tuesday i hosted a puck dinner with shop my at a lovely restaurant called le petit chaise which i am definitely mispronouncing and a nice man today explain to me how but i'm still gonna get it wrong it is the oldest brasserie in the city and it's run by this very nice group of guys apparently including antoine arnaud he was not around at the restaurant, unfortunately, but there were tons of amazing executives from across the fashion industry here who came out. And thanks to all of them and to Tiffany and Anisha from Shop My for making it happen. I mean, without them, we wouldn't have been able to do it, but I think it was very productive for everyone involved.

1:57It was a really good vibe. They enjoyed meeting people, everyone wanted to be introduced. That's the point. I love these things. I don't know if we have time to do any more this year. I have so many booked, but if you want to do one, call Alexandra or email Alexandra at puck.news and maybe we can squeeze you in. I also have been going to shows. I've been going to tons of meetings and I wrote a lot of letters, a lot of letters this week, including one that you will have to read next week because on Thursday night, as I was walking into the stadium in the 13th, a Ron a small to watch faith Kibiegaan, try to run a mile under four minutes, which apparently no woman has ever done.

2:47And Nike put together this event breaking for, I got a text as I'm going into breaking for, I skipped the Rick Owens show for it. and the text says, did you hear? I immediately think like something bad happened. So I call this person and it turns out it's about Anna Wintour stepping down. The reality is, and I'm not clear why the company did not send a press release after the announcement was made internally because I think it would have made it a lot easier. But I found out very quickly that she she's stepping down from being the editor in chief of American Vogue because there are no editors in chiefs at Condé Nast anymore.

3:35There are heads of content and they're regional. So this job, the regional head of content for American Vogue has been technically on the org chart for like since COVID, like for five, they did a big, the company did a big reorg chart and this is on there. And I guess Anna and whoever else has not had time to fill it because they've been really busy with a lot of other stuff. Uh, but she's still going to be the head, the global head of editorial content for Vogue sort of like that's Will Welch's title, I think at GQ. She is also still the chief content officer of Condé Nast. So she is in charge of everyone and she still runs the Met.

4:17So I think this means that I thought maybe she would just fully retire next year and go on a speaking tour, but I don't think that's happening. So best of luck to whoever gets this job. In line sheet on Thursday, I kind of went through who the obvious candidates are and who I really think is going to get it. And I will say I'd made a guest appearance on How Long Gone, where I kind of went into all my picks. My top pick when I was talking to the guys at How Long Gone changed within, I'd say, 30 minutes of our conversation because I had more conversations. I was thinking it was going to be Samira Nassar when I chatted with them.

5:06But then I like got off the phone, talked to someone else and I was like, oh, actually, that doesn't make sense. You're right. And it's actually this person, but you have to read line sheet to see who it is. I'll, I'll discuss her in, in later weeks. Anyway, it was crazy. I left my sweatshirt at the stadium. If anyone finds a vintage gray sweatshirt at the stadium in the 13 Aranisman. I would love to have it back. And I hope you enjoy this conversation with Robin. It was interesting. And maybe I'll write more about this at some point, but to have the Nike conversation that Robin and I have about Virgil and then to be at this Nike event.

5:48And then it was Nike earnings on Thursday night. And it's just a lot of worlds coming together. And in the middle of it. I wrote this Anna email, so enjoy it. And please enjoy this conversation with Robin. I think I'm going to have her back in a couple of weeks to just talk more about her career and also more about Virgil. We could have done another hour. So thanks again to her. And I hope you all have a great weekend. I'm sure I forgot a bunch of stuff. Oh, Monday, it'll be all about Jonathan Dior, LVV, all that good stuff. Robin Givon, welcome to Fashion People. Thank you for having me. It's such an honor.

6:31I'm so happy that you're here. Congratulations on the publishing of your book, Make It Ours. How happy and relieved are you? I was a bundle of excitement and anxiety prior to publishing, but now I'm in a state of like exuberance. I'm just really happy that it's out there. And that people feel like, so far, people feel like it is a fair assessment of Virgil's fashion career. Yeah. So what made you want to do this book? What was the sort of jumping off point? And you, I remember chatting with you about it early in the process and you did say, I'm really focusing on this specific time in his life.

7:26And obviously you go into his background and how he got to Louis Vuitton, which was sort of the most symbolic part of his life and fashion. But what spurred the idea? Was it his passing? It was a combination of things. After his passing, I was really kind of taken aback by the degree to which there was this outpouring of emotion from people that seemed to feel like they had lost a friend. There was this sense of intimacy that was surprising to me. And then a couple of people asked me if I had ever thought about writing about Virgil's career, and I hadn't. And then that kind of put the bug in my ear, and I thought, hmm, is that something that I would want to do?

8:22And what made me ultimately want to do it was the fact that, as anyone who has access to Google knows, I was often critical of his work in fashion, particularly the women's. And yet, I was a witness to the amazing fandom that surrounded him. And it was a disconnect. And there was this tension there. And as a journalist, when there's this space where there's tension and you're trying to figure out, okay, why are these two things in opposition seemingly? It's ripe to explore. So that criticism of the actual work and show by show, and I think about this a lot with Louis Vuitton in particular because the Louis Vuitton shows were not well-received generally.

9:22They weren't seen as good runway shows. But the thing that you talk about quite a bit in the book that, and everybody who is listening to this should have read the book already, but if they haven't, please buy the book immediately and then re-listen to this. But you talk about this 3 % rule he had. And I feel like for me, the way I bristled at his work is connected to the 3 % rule. And can you explain what that was and what it did to the way he operated? Yeah, I mean, I think that was foundational to the exasperation that many in the industry felt. I mean, his 3 % principle was this notion that if you change an existing item by 3%, you had essentially created something new.

10:26and a little bit of it I felt comes from the sort of DJ ethos because he was a DJ and DJs are constantly remixing and for them yeah like you take someone else's melody and you take someone else's lyrics and you remix it and you have created this sort of new entity and in fashion that doesn't play very well. And, you know, he would often take things that other people had created. And, you know, I think you can make a really strong argument that, you know, he hadn't changed it by 3%. And even if he changed it by 20%, it still was not like his to say that, you know, his to put his brand on it. And, you know, it was an interesting way of thinking about doing fashion.

11:25It was an interesting way of skirting around criticism. It certainly got him sued and got him, you know, made him the recipient of cease and desist orders. But it also kind of rolled off his back. And he kind of put it in the category of, you know, shortcuts. I mean, he loved shortcuts and sheet codes as, you know. Did you like talking to him? And how many times did you do like a sit down, longer interview with him? my relationship when he was you know alive and working was very very distant i mean we had a professional relationship and i never did a like one-on-one sit down with him um you know i talked to him um you know in those sort of circumstances where like there's a lot going on and there are like people around and he's talking about this project or that project but i would say the most interesting and the longest conversation that I had with him was really during COVID.

12:41And he was talking to a group of students that were part of his scholarship fund. And like we sat down beforehand and chatted, and then we did a whole conversation for the benefit of these students. And then I facilitated a conversation between the students and between and him. And that was interesting because it was a chance to see him sort of one on one, one on one in front of an audience and then one with students. and you know he didn't he didn't change his tone at all he was very much himself in all those circumstances and he had a way of speaking that was in big paragraphs and he used this kind of language of like, I mean, it was an interesting combination of sort of both intellectualism and also sort of wide-eyed, tell me what I don't know.

13:51I'm just a kid working through this. And I think it was that combination that was so engaging for people who felt like they were outside of the industry or just really trying to learn from him, that he could come across as both an expert while at the same time channeling their curiosity and sense of being an outsider. Yeah, I only did one longer one-on-one with him, but in those scrums, which are either backstage or at a store opening when you get 15 or 10 minutes with him or what have you. And I don't do tons of those, but I found him to be, he was so open. And sometimes I'd be like, oh my God, this is amazing.

14:50My mind is blown. And then I'd listen to it and be like, what does this mean? It doesn't mean anything. Or it felt like all the sort of slapdash, I'm going to do everything really fast and do a ton of stuff. And it being good isn't important. It's about doing it was the art. And the interviews he did in many cases also felt like that. Like Like the fact that he would ask for the recording of the interview, which I remember the first time the guy who was his sort of right hand, I forget his name, but he would be like, he would love the recording of the interview afterwards. Can you send it? And I was like, is that ethical?

15:40I don't know. It was so weird. But I was like, this is so interesting that he wants the recording. But I just like on that point, I was going to say that I don't know if you were. Well, two things. One, I listened to so many of those talks that he gave at Columbia and the High Museum. And, you know, there's a lot of Virgil speaking to groups of students like that. And that's when I realized that sometimes it was like he was working things out in real time and he would listen to him and he would contradict himself. And in one sentence, it would sound like this very weighty realization about the ways of the industry.

16:31And then in the next sentence, he would contradict that. And I don't know if you remember, just in like one of the, my first sort of searing memory was when he was up for the LVMH prize. And we went to that, it was the semifinals and like all of the finalists were there in their little booth with their collections. and he was there and I remember sort of trying to get to his collection and there was this sort of scrum of cameras there and it was because like his ultimate hype guide the artist formerly known as Kanye was there and was literally sort of sitting there pulling pieces off of the racks and going, isn't this the best jacket you've ever seen?

17:28I mean, it was quite sweet, but it was also like, let me get around you so I can actually get to the guy. And he was there and, you know, had this very sort of chill, low-key personality and just really just sort of wanted to engage and was willing to engage and just talk about the clothes and sort of do that kind of, you know, very humble, vulnerable work of chatting up like all of these editors who were coming in and being quite honest about it.

18:11Can you talk a bit about, I do think I was there, was Kanye wearing a RAF jacket, a RAF Simmons jacket? Probably, yes. I think, well, was this like 14 maybe? It was either 2014, 2015. Yeah. It was the second season round of the prizes. Because I remember I interviewed Delphine Arnault and she said Nicola Gessgare. So, or no, she said Nicola Gessgare. And I was like, okay, I guess that's how you say it. But everyone says it different. And then I remember Kanye being there and I think having a photo like with Karl Lagerfeld and it was a big to do. But can you I wanted to talk about his relationship with Kanye.

19:00But then also there were, there was this group of guys that he came up with, many of whom have, um, become successful designers and fashion designers. And they all sort of do a bunch of different things. And there was something Heron Preston, one of these designers said that he said that they all met. I think it was in the La Skeena part of the book where you'd kind of talk about their scene at La Skeena and about them talking to a Nike executive and the Nike executive saying you got to get under their skin. And I can't get that out of my head. now I'm going to this Nike event tonight. And it is such the definitive thing of what makes all of this stuff work is you have to get under the skin.

19:50But anyway, Kanye and Virgil, and how did that evolve as Virgil surpassed him in the world of fashion in so many ways? And then this other group, because for me, like Matthew Williams and Heron, who Heron is great. really like him. Matthew, I've interviewed a few times backstage and think he's interesting. But it always felt like to me that they were never going to sort of develop enough because it really was Virgil. I'm so curious how you see the dynamic between all these guys changing as Virgil's star rose? You know, I, starting with sort of the Kanye piece of it, what was helpful for me was like, this was such a discreet period of time before Kanye becomes yay and all of that yayness happens.

21:02And it was a great period to look at because it felt, in hindsight, so optimistic and so exciting because Kanye was coming off of those first two albums, College Dropout and Late Registration. administration he had his his star was ascendant he had financial means and this interest in fashion and this incredible ambition and it was like he was just sweeping so many designers of his generation into this sort of cyclone and if nothing else during the reporting I was sort of left thinking, my God, like who didn't he ask to work with and who didn't at some point contribute to a collaboration or advise him or something.

21:57And, you know, when Virgil came along, he talked about how in some ways they were kind of two sides of the same coin, that they connected with this ability or this desire to really talk about design in sometimes esoteric ways and to just, you know, talk and talk and talk in a way that they hadn't really found another person that they could really go into that kind of, go down those sort of rabbit holes with. So that was that initial connection. And then when you have them side by side, their temperaments were so different. And that was one of the other things that I felt was important to really talk about in the book, the way that Virgil invited people closer, and the way that he was caught in a constant state of sort of tell me what I don't know, tell me who I need to know, which can on the one hand seem a bit sort of cravenly ambitious, But on the other hand, is really an expression of vulnerability, of saying, I know I don't know everything and I'm looking for guidance.

23:14And that can be really attractive. and Matthew Williams said to me that you know one of Virgil's strengths was this idea that like everything was a prototype and he didn't feel the need for things to be perfect before he could let them out into the world which is really not how most designers operate and this notion of everything being a prototype everything being just sort of part of his practice one freed him to produce an insane amount of product it I think helped to buffer him from the criticism of some of that product because if it's just a prototype well then you're judging an unfinished thing I think it's just part of the process and if it's a prototype it is a way of saying that, you know, it doesn't have to kind of rise to the standards that you set.

24:20So it was, I think, both a really savvy way of thinking about the work, a savvy kind of marketing thing and also a really, uh, a really, uh, uh, consoling kind of way of protecting your ability to be creative and to experiment in a billion different fields. And I guess it's also this idea of it's not about perfection. It's about the idea. And if the idea is good. That's what shines through. I think one of the things that frustrated a lot of designers, more traditionally trained designers, is the point of it is to focus on the product and to make the most creative, the most beautiful, the most well-conceived garment that you can.

25:19and that wasn't Virgil's focus. I mean, in having conversations with people who worked with him in the realm of architecture, it really was not about the ultimate garment. It was, what does this garment mean to people? What does this garment say about a community of people? Which is a bit esoteric, but it really comes down to, I'm going to build this brand and I want the brand to resonate with people. And as long as people think that the brand means something in the same way that, like, you wear a sports jersey, it's not about the jersey. It's about the name of the team that's on the jersey and all the layers of meaning and community and identity that's connected with walking around wearing a Yankees jersey.

26:16Well, the story that you tell about the double RL, are they like double RL Rugby's or something? The Rufflorn Rugby's, yeah, from Pyrex Vision. Oh, yes, yes. So you tell the story of him rehashing this stuff and Gian Deleon, who I actually don't know if that's how you pronounce his last name, but that's the name of the game on this podcast. I don't pronounce any names correctly. Um, and I just saw him today, but you know, Jean is such a good writer and I've been thinking about it a lot. Like his, his work in that era was so important and he obviously has a really nice job at Nordstrom and I, I think he, he loves it, but he really, he really captured that time in a special way.

27:09But he says something. You quote a piece he wrote for Complex in the book, something about it's not awful that he's charging so much. It's awful that people will pay that much or something like that about these Ralph Lauren rugby's. But what it reminded me of to an extent, and I can't remember if you go into this or not, but it did remind me of what Dapper Dan did in the 80s with taking, and obviously he was taking like garment bags from Louis Vuitton and Gucci or whatever and remaking them into things. but did you feel like he, because he didn't, he didn't come up in a traditional fashion way.

28:01He also didn't grow up in a way that he, I don't even know if he knew who Dapper Dan was like, would that have even been a part of his sort of cultural history, um, growing up in the nineties and 2000s in Illinois or what have you. I know it's not actual Chicago suburbs, but I'm curious what you think. Yeah. I'm curious what you think, if there is some connection between that, what Dabber Dan did then and what Virgil started doing and evolved it to. I think there is a connection and I think that the same, I mean, there's some differences, but I think in the same way that what Dapper Dan was doing and the controversy connected to that, as well as the revisionism of that era, I think is really interesting.

29:11You know, people have celebrated Dapper Dan tremendously. And I think, you know, he did a lot for bringing, you know, a cultural sensibility to the forefront. But at the same time, he was also infringing on copyrights. And, you know, and Virgil had that same kind of sense that you can just take what's out there and make it yours in whatever way that your creativity allows. But when he was growing up in Rockford, which, you know, I go into the history, a little of the history of that town, because it has a really interesting sort of racial segregation history that would have affected him as he was growing up there as a high school student.

30:10I mean, it's kind of situated equidistant from Chicago and Iowa, and it's about an hour from the Wisconsin border. So it's both isolated. It's very Midwestern. But at the same time, it is close enough to Chicago. It is still, you know, it was an industrial kind of city. and you know he's growing up at a time when you can get access to European fashion magazines and big fashion magazines but you have to like order them from like the Barnes and Noble and so it feels that much more precious that you're getting these bits of information and you're seeing this stuff. And he was definitely a kid who was engaged with brands and logos and, you know, the big luxury brands, but also the streetwear brands that were coming along, the skatewear brands that were coming up.

31:12And I was fascinated because he talks so much about doing things for his, you know, 17-year-old self and speaking to the 17-year-olds. And fashion was in this incredible state of change in 1997 and the years surrounding that. So even if you had just like the slightest interest in fashion, you would have been pretty captivated by that. And if you were a kid who was interested in skateboarding and hip hop and Nirvana and all that, and you had people like Raph Simmons coming into the game, that was completely captivating and energizing for Virgil. And he continued to talk about how much he loved Raph's work, even as Raph criticized him as a designer.

32:11It's amazing to me that he knew who Raph was because I didn't find out who Raph was till the mid 2000s, probably when Kathy did that profile of him in the Times magazine. because it's just, I am, I think, two years younger than Virgil was and grew up in Pittsburgh and read tons of, I read British Vogue a lot. I was a really big Anglophile and was obsessed with fashion in the 90s and read Harper's Bazaar. And I'm sure I read you for your year at Vogue. but um but but and but I didn't have any sense of I guess also I mean it's menswear and but I thought I love that part of his of his history and the Rockford stuff and him growing up in the middle class neighborhood not where most of the black people grew up and also his mom being a seamstress and what kind of effect that must have had on him.

33:17And it just all of it together. And then studying industrial design, which is such a thing of the Midwest, I feel like Frank Lloyd Wright. And, um, there's so many great architects and it is such a, yeah. Um, it, to me that part of it, it informed so much. Do you think there was a time, and I want to talk about, I don't want to keep you forever, and I really have 50 million. I want to kind of talk about the business itself and how he changed it and also what you think his success reflects about the business. But when he got the job at Vuitton, A, can you sort of paint in a light of like what significance that ended up having and what it had when he was appointed.

34:13And also the executive who was the CEO, Michael Burke at the time. I don't think I knew before I read your book that he was the reason Virgil had. He used to be the CEO of Fendi and he had been the lead of a big Fendi turnaround when LVMH fully acquired Fendi in the early 2000s. And he was the one who engineered Virgil's internship at Fendi, which I guess I maybe knew because it's obvious, but that's a long way to say, do you think putting him in that job, it was really obvious from the outside why he was getting the job that the kind of product he was making was performing well and it and it fit well with the kind of Louis Vuitton's a culture brand it's not a fashion brand but can you tell me what you think it meant to to the industry to society and why you think Michael understood Virgil's value Yeah.

35:20I mean, Michael told me this great story about his first meeting with Virgil. And it was in Tokyo when he was at Fendi. And they were doing a product launch there. And Kanye was going to perform. And the night before their performance, Nigo, who had sort of suggested Kanye as a performer, said, you know, hey, do you want to meet Kanye? Do you want to have dinner? And so he gets together with them for dinner. And he's in this room with Nigo and Virgil and Kanye and what he describes as these incredibly cool young Japanese kids. And he's sitting there and, you know, he's sad, but they're looking at him like he is like the ultimate fashion insider.

36:18But he's sitting there not really talking all that much and looking at and feeling like the outsider and kind of absorbing and listening to the dialogue between these really sort of interesting, very culturally engaged, like pop culturally engaged young people. people. And I thought that was so interesting to me because he's the one at the table who is, who's got all this clout, certainly like this establishment clout. And he's not taking the lead, but rather he's sitting back and he's listening. And I think that says a lot about just the way that he operated in that moment as a CEO. And, you know, to bring in Virgil and Kanye as, you know, these interns, I think took a lot of confidence in his point of view, but also a lot of confidence in his position within the LVMH universe.

Read the full transcript

37:30And says a lot about his willingness to open things up when it looks like it could be of benefit. And when Virgil got the job, I think it signaled for a lot of people that there was certainly like this parallel path that you could take to reach that sort of, to reach that level in fashion. But I think it also said that the fashion industry was moving yet another step away

38:14from focusing on sort of design expertise and even more on marketing expertise. I think it was the sense that, you know, those skills that have so long been associated with what it means to be a designer were becoming more of a niche part of the industry or were sort of on their way to being that, certainly through Vuitton's eyes. And it was yet another step that Vuitton was taking, as you said, as a cultural brand, as a brand that saw itself as not really producing fashion, but as producing culture and helping people sort of put a stamp on themselves in some way. Yeah, it's... Oh, you know, and the other thing I would just add to that is the response that people had who were Virgil's fans, you know, clearly saw it as a huge win for them.

39:31You know, because Virgil loves speaking in the first person plural. Like it was always we. And which was, you know, fascinating. And when they said it was a win, it was to me this idea, okay, so there's no sort of notion of, you know, selling out, which was like a very kind of old fashioned, like baby boomer, Gen X way of thinking about it. It wasn't selling out. like going into that boardroom and getting a seat around that table and as opposed to trying to turn over the tables like that was the win like getting the big corporate job was a win was a victory and that was a very different way of thinking about um sort of succeeding in fashion by as through the eyes of a young person.

40:29Yeah, it is funny how that flipped from basically anyone under the age of 45 right now. It really is happy to sell out. And everyone over is like, I'm never selling out.

40:52This is a little bit niche, but how was he as a manager? Because he clearly managed himself well. Like, I just remember hearing he would be at home in Chicago for like a month. I mean, a week, a month. And then he was in Milan for a week to do Off-White because his partners were in Milan. Then he would be in Paris and then he would go back and then he'd have to be in New York for something. And that job, by the time he was named the menswear designer at Louis Vuitton, that did become a managerial executive job as well. And I think that's a big reason that these sort of more practical designers, in a way, are practical creative people or creative directors.

41:37I remember once you wrote something about how you hate the word creative, like using it as a person. And I was like, she's so right. I really try not to use it because of you, Robin. But it's hard to avoid. But it's hard to avoid. But you were right. I'll never forget. But did you think he, like, how was he managing his time and his processes and things? Because he was making things so quickly. That means he could do a lot. But it must, was he very organized? You know, I will give this, I'll answer it with this example, which came via Nike when he was working on the collaboration on the 10, the 10 sneakers, like iconic sneakers that he reimagined for Nike.

42:28and normally when they do that kind of thing you know there are obviously like these meetings that have to be had with various members of the team and they're usually set up via email and you know powerpoints and like the whole sort of formal thing and Virgil just created a text you know a text chain and, you know, his beloved WhatsApp and creates this text chain so that people can have conversations in real time and he can approve things in real time and he can send, you know, images and tweaks and, you know, ask to see, like at one point he wanted like to FaceTime in at the factory. So in some ways, he was an adept manager because he wasn't a micromanager, but he also used technology to strip away the layers that typically clog up big companies.

43:42and you know it was interesting because you know Nike said like that's not the way that things normally work and Virgil just sort of that was the way that he worked that's the way he was able to make things move so quickly and so I mean I think that's a good indication of sort of how he managed in the same way that he hired over Instagram. Yeah, it's all very fast and no split decision and no questioning. and and just stripping away what you could argue were just sort of the unnecessary uh formalities that sort of that just slow down the process and yeah and just and really and just really just clog things up i mean one of the things that nike really loved about working with him.

44:45And one of the things that they felt like made that collaboration so successful was that he didn't, his vision of the project didn't end with creating the product. It went all the way to how do I get the product onto social media? How do I get it into, in front of like the ultimate sneakerhead how do I then get it into their closet I mean he was he again the marketing the connecting to the trying to create a connection like a personal connection to the end consumer the time that the mid-2010s when Virgil was really sort of becoming the biggest thing that I, you know, we, A, in 20, it was 2018, right?

45:39That he got the LV job. And then 2015 or so when that's what, like, he really created that culture of lines out the door at stores and off white. And all of that together just became a, it was just the peak of this thing as fashion as pop culture, which is a hilariously a Ralph Simmons quote that I use all the time. It's like when fashion became pop. Um, and Virgil was at the center of that. And there was also a lot of conversation at that time around, it was like the height of me too, the height of the racial reckoning and bringing up Dapper Dan again. It was the whole Dapper Dan Gucci appropriation and bringing Dapper Dan into the fold of Gucci and Alessandro McKaylee and this conversation around like, where do things come from and how do we credit them?

46:35So this is something that he's commenting on by the way he does all of this stuff. And you go into this in depth and his process and the frustrations and also the fascinating, the compelling thing about it. But I, one thing I am curious to know from you, from the business perspective, fast forwarding to 2020, probably before Virgil passed away, but people kind of knew he was sick or they knew something was going on, but obviously it was also during COVID and, and things were crazy. And I remember when people in the U S got the, um, Stimulus checks. And I remember talking to a luxury executive and essentially what he said was that Virgil and then the fact that a lot of middle-class people, or I mean, which in the US is considered, I guess, considered middle-class, but still hard to live on$90 ,000 or whatever, had these stimulus checks and they were also getting paid.

47:50It sort of broke open. I think Louis Vuitton's best year in the US ever was 2022 or 2023. I mean, sure, 2024 was even better, but it really broke it open. And it was a lot of middle-class people, a lot of Black people who had never shopped luxury before or who were only starting to really open that door. And I remember having conversations, and I worked at BOF at the time, and Sheena, who wrote about diversity and inclusion, doing interviews with executives about they were so reductive about the entry consumer and not just the high net worth consumer. and also the black consumer and saying, oh, we're going to make things in bright colors or whatever, like just like really borderline racist shit.

48:50And I remember the way that Louis Vuitton had opened it up. It's an interesting, let me see how I can articulate this. Like so much of fashion is appropriated from black culture which you are the consummate every piece that you wrote during that time and sort of tracking what happened with Alessandro and all these different things. And it definitely feels like it kind of started in that early Kanye era. And I mean, it was before that, it was like as forever, but the modern luxury world sort of really taking from hip hop and Black culture and music with primarily Black artists and suddenly really commercializing it.

49:48And Virgil, to me, like you said it, like the way he said we and this was in ours and all of that stuff, like him getting that job was sort of like, okay, they've been stealing from me all this time. And I've been commenting on the way this industry has stolen. And now I'm actually the one who's in charge. And it seemed to make do an unlock for the industry where I think of a level of consumer of every race who didn't previously think that they could afford luxury fashion felt like it was, it was possible. That was extremely inarticulate, but do you think like, how do you see that process of, and what does Virgil being at Louis Vuitton open up commercially for the industry?

50:49And what does it, did it make any of it right of the way that the industry had been appropriating other cultures for forever? I think it began a process of making things right, or I should say, I think it was part of a process of making things right. you know Virgil's use of we was I mean I think was important in bringing in consumers and making them feel like they had a stake in what he was doing but I also think that it was reflective of this idea that you mentioned that here is this culture that is broad and prolific and that fashion has been scooping out bits and pieces of and using for inspiration.

51:47And now here is someone of that culture who is in a position to take hold of the storytelling and the narratives about it and decide what is perceived as luxury and what's perceived as valuable and beautiful and all of those things. And, you know, I love, and I can't lay claim to this take on it, but, you know, the idea that luxury has been so long described by as things, you know, brand DNA that involves, I don't know, like, you know, Italian nuns in a convent creating antique lace or, you know, the things about, like fine wines being the secrets held by monks and all this kind of sort of romantic storytelling that has lended an incredible amount of value to these products.

53:00And there's also storytelling that is wrapped around beautifully woven kente cloth or mud cloth or hand carved chairs from any number of, you know, in Ghana or wherever it might be, or, you know, ideas coming from the Bronx or Detroit and like the world of hip hop. And fashion has always felt like they needed to take those ideas and gussy them up with, you know, a designer name. And then they become luxury. And I love that what Virgil, a huge part of what Virgil was doing was saying, look, this is luxury because people value it. And just because, but what fashion hasn't been doing is taking the people who attach value to it as important, as their point of view as being important.

54:14And I love that he was essentially saying, luxury is defined by the people who are in charge of the storytelling. And they're the ones who are assigning labels to these things. And I am in a position to assign a label of luxury and value to this T-shirt that appeals to this community that I call we. Or I can assign luxury and value to a varsity jacket that has my logo on the back of it. and you know ultimately I think that was sort of the way that the process was pushed forward and I think that was the lesson that a lot of the people who admired Virgil respected even if they didn't love the product I think they respected his the way that he wove the narrative around it and how that narrative elevated the culture that he, you know, sort of felt that he was coming out of.

55:32I don't know if fashion as an industry took that, had that as like the lesson that they took away from Virgil's success. I think that in some ways the lesson that they took was not so much about you need to change the way that you think about the storytelling surrounding luxury. And it was more, we need to find someone who has that same sense of community and that same sense of fandom that we can bring in and then reach that customer. Yeah, it wasn't about the context, it was about the t-shirt. And now there is a whole new layer of business that all these brands have that won't go away even though there's not merch on the runway as much as there used to be.

56:25This layer of the business, it's in the triangle. It's wedged between beauty and handbags and that is ready to wear. And so that part of it, the sort of streetwear as a luxury category, that's how they saw it. They didn't see the context thing, though. I mean, one thing, you are best known outside of the fashion industry as the only fashion critic to ever win the Pulitzer Prize so far. I'm sure that it will happen for someone else someday. But for me, the real value in what you do and what I think you did differently than a lot of your peers is you moved. You brought context to clothes and to writing about fashion earlier than a lot of other people.

57:27and I remember once there was a Ralph Lauren runway show and I was like the beach or something. They're all the same. And I wrote a review and they were mad about the review. They called me. I was like, I don't think this feels modern or whatever. And I looked at your review and the headline was, do you think this is cool? No. And I was like, oh my God, that's what I was trying to say. And she just said it. And, but the thing is, you were a hundred percent right. We obviously really admire Ralph Lauren's work and et cetera, but you really always just got to the point and you also were able to give the cup, the cup, because once everyone could see the photos of the clothes, describing the clothes wasn't valuable anymore.

58:23And you got that really quickly. And I think that's why your work has been so important for the last 15 years of the industry, because it did become such a direct business. But I'm curious from your perspective, you now write about fashion still, but all different parts of culture. And you've covered the business, you covered runway shows, you did everything. You really understand the business holistically. What do you think about that idea of creating context? Do you think we're at a point now that we're kind of past that because everything is so granular? Or did you feel that shift where the context became more important than the thing itself?

59:16Good question. I'm not sure that the context has become more important than the thing itself in all cases. I sort of feel like the larger piece of the fashion pie, the context does sort of supersede the product because the product isn't necessarily that interesting. It's about who's putting it out and what are they telling me this is going to do for me? How is this going to make me stand out or who is this going to connect me to? What's sort of the meaning of it all? I mean, I feel like more than ever, fashion is political. and you know you can't for me I I certainly can't look at you know long ringlets of hair and false eyelashes and lots of makeup and a tight-fitting dress and not feel that that is a kind of political statement in this moment um do you like my republican hair Robin it's so not republican here thank you it's really it's too frizzy today sometimes i i am like give me a republican blowout but i do think that there remains this part of the industry that really is about creating beautiful well-crafted just product that is meant to bring an immense irrational kind of delight.

1:01:03And I love that for fashion and I love that for fashion consumers. And I love that that sort of continues in this whole lineage of excellence in fashion and excellence and desire that everybody can participate in and everybody can aspire to. But I also think that the other part is really important and interesting and really powerful because that's telling us who we are in any given moment, for better or for worse. I have thought about Long Nguyen, our mutual close friend who died a couple years ago, a lot while I was reading your book, because he was a big Virgil fan and also was your biggest fan in the whole world.

1:02:08He idolized you. I just can't even imagine how much he came up for you while you were doing this, but what do you think, like thinking of someone like Long and what he would think about this book and what he would have, he would have obviously called it fabulous. But what do you think Virgil's sort of in the end, because we're still so close to it, it's still happening. His thing is still happening. What do you think his contribution is going to be to culture, do you think it is a matter of letting go a little bit and not understanding that perfectionism doesn't necessarily get you to the next plane of enlightenment?

1:03:04Or what do you think his thing, you know, 50 years from now, when some artist or a designer talks about him like he talked about Duchamp in the toilet? What do you think they are going to be saying? Well, first, I think Long would have had a lot to say and would have debated many, many aspects of this book. And one of my favorite pictures in this book is a photograph that Long texted me from the final show that was an homage to Virgil in Miami. And, of course, texted me the photograph with his usual vivid commentary on the entire experience. Oh, my God. So it brought me great joy to be able to use that photograph.

1:03:59So great. But the thing that a line that Virgil said when he was talking about getting the job at Routon, but also when he essentially voiced his desire to, you know, get the job at Givenchy when that was open. um you know he said you know people are surprised uh that you know i got this job but you know why not me i you know i built this company i design product i have a great sense of you know aesthetics and creativity and i loved that the question why not me wasn't something that he was asking himself He was asking the industry. And if there's any sort of like wonderful legacy that is not dependent on, you know, CEOs and the establishment or anyone else, it is that.

1:05:02It is that he, I think, has encouraged designers, other creative people who feel like they're outside, who feel like despite there being prizes and scholarships and various programs that are met to pave the way, but who feel like they can't even figure out where the front door is, let alone get access to these different programs. that they will ask, why not me? And not ask that of themselves, but ask it of the industry. And feel like, well, of course them. There is no reason why not you. And I think that leaning into that, celebrating that, holding on to that seems like a very simple thing, but it also can be an enormous thing because so often the hurdle for people who feel like they're outside is like the many questions they have about their own sort of right to be in a particular place.

1:06:27Robin I really want to talk to you about how you got into to fashion journalism and and also many other things but we are already way past an hour so you're gonna have to come back for for part two um please let me come back I would love yes I mean you should come you can just come back on um on news Tuesdays too because you I I always want your opinion but I I think like to end And A, congratulations, and B, why are you still a journalist? Why are you still doing it? Like, you've been doing this. You started it. Did you start at the Detroit Free Press or were you? I did, yeah. I started at the Detroit Free Press.

1:07:12And you've covered fashion for a long time now. As I said, you write more broadly about culture. But what keeps you going? Because I'm sure there's going to be a lot of young journalists who listen to this that aspire to say, why not me about having your job someday? Because I love writing and I'm curious about all kinds of people and ideas. and because I have been lucky enough to be able to write about creative industries, whether fashion, now being able to write more about visual artists, people who create and build culture and our sort of social structure. And those things are relentlessly fascinating.

1:08:13and forever changing. And just when you think that you know what's going to happen next, you're completely proven wrong. I mean, I think when I lose my ability to be shocked is when I would leave journalism. And for what it's worth, I am shocked every day. I guess that part of it's not that hard. That's a good rule to live by. Robin, thank you for everything. Thank you for being such an inspiration to so many people and teaching us so much about how life works, how culture works, and how fashion industry works. But I am so proud to call you my friend and thank you for being here. Thank you so much.

1:09:05Fashion People is a presentation of Odyssey in partnership with Puck. This show was produced and edited by Molly Nugent. Special thanks to our executive producers, Puck co-founder John Kelly, executive editor Ben Landy, and director of editorial operations, Gobby Grossman. An additional thanks to the team at Odyssey, J.D. Crowley, Jenna Weiss-Berman, and Bob Tabador.

From the publisher

Lauren's guest today is Robin Givhan, longtime fashion and cultural critic and author of Make It Ours: Crashing the Gates of Culture with Virgil Abloh. They chat about the late designer's upbringing, his anti-perfectionism approach to creation, and the imprint he made on Louis Vuitton. They also get into the changing definition of luxury, and Abloh's role in that transformation. Plus, Lauren shares a dispatch from Paris, where she co-hosted a Puck private dinner at Le Petit Chaise with ShopMy earlier in the week. By Thursday, though, everyone was obsessing over this Anna Wintour-stepping-down-from-American Vogue news, which Lauren addresses in relative depth.

To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Fashion People

All 182 episodes
Gatecrashers and GatekeepersFashion People · 1 h 13 min
Listen in VO