In short
Archive Drop Wednesday discussion of Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner (2017/2019 setting), focusing on why it flopped in 1982, how its visuals and sci-fi-noir fatalism hold up, narrative/story weaknesses, and the long-running question of whether Deckard is a replicant.
Guests
Roxanna Haddadi (Vulture) is mentioned as an upcoming guest for a later Ridley Scott draft; she is not part of this Blade Runner conversation. The episode features hosts Michael Phillips and Josh (with additional co-host Adam referenced).
Key claims
The film’s production design and atmosphere still look “made yesterday,” making it influential and “definitive sci-noir.” Story is more vignette-like and sometimes patched together; Rachel’s character is underwritten, and the sex scene feels disturbing and narratively unearned. Roy Batty’s performance and “tears in rain” are central to the film’s mortality theme.
Notable examples
glowing Venetian-blind billboard light beams; the unicorn/implanted-memory sequence; the origami at the end; the “goldish red glow” in replicant eyes; the plate-glass window scene; the Batty vs. Deckard showdown; Harrison Ford’s disaffected Deckard characterization.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOExploring Blade Runner's Legacy
3:04 to 6:05
Discussion on the cultural impact and evolving perception of Blade Runner since its release.
“We did a sacred cow review of that film.”
Visual Aesthetics and Themes
6:05 to 9:04
Hosts analyze Blade Runner's groundbreaking visuals and thematic depth in sci-fi and noir genres.
“So when I saw the film at 21, guys, you weren't even born yet, I know.”
Character Analysis and Plot Structure
9:04 to 14:00
In-depth conversation about character motivations and the unique plot structure of Blade Runner.
“do I prefer this or Ridley Scott's Alien?”
Exploring Themes of Mortality in Blade Runner
14:00 to 22:23
Discusses character depth, themes of mortality, and the complexity of replicants.
“You know, I was a little disappointed him being a hero of my youth from all these other films.”
Exploring Themes of Mortality in Blade Runner
23:22 to 24:05
Discusses character depth, themes of mortality, and the complexity of replicants.
“You know, I recently learned that every 36 minutes, another child in the U.S.”
Critique of Narrative and Characterization
24:42 to 28:00
Analyzes the narrative limitations and character development in Blade Runner.
“But damn, I wish it had a better narrative, people said.”
Exploring Themes of Humanity in Blade Runner
28:00 to 30:07
The discussion delves into the characters' portrayals and Ridley Scott's direction.
“God knows I wouldn't, you know, that film can only accommodate so much levity at all.”
The Replicant Debate: Deckard's Identity
30:08 to 35:51
The hosts analyze the implications of Deckard's possible status as a replicant.
“What would you say if you had just watched, say, the final cut?”
The Impact of Visuals and Score in Blade Runner
35:52 to 38:20
Discussion on the film’s visuals, score, and emotional resonance during viewing.
“and this speaks to your question, Michael, does it make it a better film if he is or if he isn't?”
The Impact of Visuals and Score in Blade Runner
40:49 to 41:16
Discussion on the film’s visuals, score, and emotional resonance during viewing.
“Here to share every moment with T-Mobile.”
Show all 11 chapters
The Impact of Visuals and Score in Blade Runner
41:18 to 41:49
Discussion on the film’s visuals, score, and emotional resonance during viewing.
“This is Lorna LaRosa from the latest with Lorna LaRosa, the podcast.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human. If you like YouTube, you'll love YouTube Premium. Hi, I'm Sean Evans from Hot Ones, and I want to tell you about YouTube Premium. It has offline downloads, so you can watch without Wi-Fi. Background play, so you can lock your phone and it still plays, baby. Oh, and it is completely ad-free. Yes, I said it, ad-free. Try YouTube Premium for two months free at youtube.com slash premium. Trial eligibility varies. Terms apply. Cancel any time. Amazon Health AI presents Painful Thoughts. I, um, I can't stop scratching my downtown. Yeah, but I'm not itching to go downtown and tell a receptionist I'm here to talk about my downtown.
0:50Some things you'd rather type than say out loud. There's no question too embarrassing for Amazon Health AI. Chat your symptoms and get virtual care 24-7. Healthcare just got less painful.
1:27or with your trusted travel advisor. Apple Vacations, where your story starts. Waiting for your sign? Here it is. Shop Labor Day appliance deals at Lowe's before they're gone. Get up to 45 % off select major appliances. Plus, get free delivery, haul-away, installation and parts, and a two-year Lowe's protection plan on purchases of$999 or more. Labor Day deals are on now at Lowe's. In-store and online. Valid through 916, while supplies last. Selection varies by location. See Lowe's.com for more details.
2:04Josh Larsen:Film Spotting is presented by Regal Unlimited, the all-you-can-watch movie subscription pass that pays for itself in just two visits. See any standard 2D movie, anytime, with no blackout dates or restrictions. Sign up now on the Regal app or at the link in our description and use code FILMSPOT26 to receive 15 % off.
2:29What kind of a show are you guys putting on here today?
2:32Michael Phillips:You're not interested in art? No. Now look, we're going to do this thing. We're going to have a conversation.
2:38Adam Kempenaar:It is Archive Drop Wednesday. Ridley Scott has a new movie coming out, Josh. The Dog stars in theaters, and this is a post-apocalyptic tale with Jacob Elordi, Josh Brolin, Margaret Qualley. Sounds a little dystopian, whether it's dystopian or not. we're thinking Ridley Scott, why not dip into the archive and pull out something from that filmmaker? And we've got Blade Runner 2017. We did a sacred cow review of that film. We also have coming up, and I know we're both doing a little bit of homework, a Ridley Scott draft. I don't, I don't want to divulge anything about our draft strategies, but don't you think Blade Runner is a pretty obvious number two pick?
3:27Adam Kempenaar:in that draft?
3:29Josh Larsen:Probably. I'm assuming, you're assuming Alien goes first. I am. And, but Roxanna's a wild card. I know. I was just going to say, we are going to have a guest with us, Roxanna Haddadi from Vulture. And what's fun about doing guests is we're not always quite certain of what their particular taste is, especially when it comes to a filmmaker's entire career. So yeah, depending on where she lands in the order and if she has an idiosyncratic pick that could throw things for a loop i tend to think at least between the two of us yeah blade runner alien one and two but we'll see what happens we will and
4:08Adam Kempenaar:from september 2017 here is our sacred cow review of blade runner they jumped the shuttle off world
4:15Michael Phillips:killed the crew and passengers they found the shuttle drifting out the coast two weeks ago so We know they're around. Embarrassing. No, sir, not embarrassing, because no one's ever going to find out they're down here. Because you're going to spot them and you're going to air them out. I don't work here anymore. Give it to Holt. He's good. I did. You can breathe okay, as long as nobody unplugs him. The film Blade Runner survives in several different versions, and point-by-point, replicant-by-replicant comparisons between the eight cuts, most of which are actually available today, They've fueled many a Comic-Con conversation and countless film nerd arguments since the first version was released to mainstream bafflement and disappointing box office figures back in June 1982, when I was 21 years old.
5:03Michael Phillips:That same day, in June, John Carpenter's remake of The Thing came out, too, and both those films have grown in stature over the years. That's kind of an obvious point, but it's true. And you can find plenty of fans who would pick either The Thing or Blade Runner, very different brands of science fiction, as their number one film of that year, 1982, whether they were born then or not. Blade Runner comes from the Philip K. Dick story, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? And even those who didn't care much about the film version, directed by Ridley Scott, they had to acknowledge the density and fascination of the visual quality of the film, the production design, the effects, and the overall atmosphere.
5:40Michael Phillips:This was Los Angeles in the year 2019. Perpetual rain falling, miserable crowding, huge looming video billboards that, well, actually did come to pass more or less by 2017, more so than the flying cars. Blade Runner Deckard, played by Harrison Ford, who may or may not be a replicant himself, depending on the version of the film you're watching, chases down four rogue replicants targeted for elimination, but he meets a formidable match in Rutger Hauer's uber-mensch of a lemon-haired god. So when I saw the film at 21, guys, you weren't even born yet, I know. I came out wildly conflicted but was very eager to see it a second time very soon to really see it, see all of it, or at least more of it.
6:22Michael Phillips:Two questions I have for you. One, did Blade Runner flop back in 82 because George Lucas had reoriented the mass audience's taste for retro futuristic science fiction so radically five years earlier with Star Wars? And two, is Blade Runner a movie for you today that was simply ahead of its time and now seems very much what Ridley Scott intended it to be, an L.A. story with legs longer than Joanna Cassidy's? So I wanted to end on that sleazy note. Thank you.
6:51Josh Larsen:Appreciate that. I think you're right why Blade Runner was probably initially rejected. You put this side by side with something like Star Wars, and it's absolutely a different experience. Contemplative. I was relieved though that it wasn't overbearing in that way. My memory of it, having seen probably the original theatrical release later in the 80s, I would have come across it, is what I initially watched. And my memory was that it was more ponderous, more existential on the surface in the way, oh, I don't know, Prometheus is now or even Alien Covenant a little bit. Covering similar ground.
7:25Michael Phillips:Yes, it is. You're actually promulgating the auteur theory.
7:28Josh Larsen:Well, but I think that in comparison to those films in particular, it wears those elements lightly. In comparison to Star Wars, it wears them heavily. So that's probably a reason. I really did enjoy it this time. For the record, watched the final cut. Looked amazing, the Blu-ray. I mean, the first thing we need to say, and you touched on it, Michael, is the visual aesthetic of this film. This thing could have been made yesterday, especially if you're watching it on a decent screen on Blu-ray. It just holds up absolutely from the flying cars to the... The here's the world building detail that jumped out at me this time.
8:06Josh Larsen:That's just a small thing. But you multiply this, you know, 50 times and you get a full world. The handles of the umbrellas, how they glow fluorescent. And you add enough of those and you get this parade of bobbing glowing sticks down the street. It's just something like that in terms of prop design, production design that really fills out this world. And I think that's why the movie has been so influential and has lingered because it set that vision for so many people. And I think also because it's the definitive sci-noir. I mean, this is a merging of those two genres, science fiction and film noir.
8:43Josh Larsen:I think, and maybe we can get into this, that's absolutely the movie's strength in some ways. But it's also there are areas to this where if you're holding it up as a film noir, it does fall a teeny bit short for me. but absolutely love this revisit. Spoiler, it makes my top five films of 1982. Now the big question that's going to be harder for me is, do I prefer this or Ridley Scott's Alien? Because I think that's one we've bandied about on the show here, Adam, and have always said, well, it would really take a revisit of Blade Runner to answer that. Now we kind of have to, and I don't have an answer right now.
9:15Josh Larsen:I don't either.
9:16Michael Phillips:I think you've hit on another reason why the mainstream audience back in 82 was just sort of perplexed and a little bit turned off by Blade Runner because they had just, you know, the last thing they remember with that brand name on it, Ridley Scott, was Alien, which really, you know, grabbed people by the throat. Much more pure genre. Absolutely. And, yeah, the Psy Noir handle, I like that. And really only Spielberg's Minority Report would sort of compete maybe with more recent work in that same genre. Yeah.
9:44Adam Kempenaar:No, I want to echo a lot of what you said there, Josh, including the stuff about its noir influence. But first, the cinematography, Jordan Cronenwith. We'll talk about that a little bit, the art direction. Yeah, the visual look of the film is still incredibly stunning. And I'm thinking of this too a little bit, not just in the context of something like Star Wars, but we did a while back here on the show, a 70s sci-fi marathon. And we covered a lot of movies that were made in the early part of that decade that are kind of silly now, though I wouldn't say the Andromeda strain is necessarily silly.
10:14Adam Kempenaar:And I like that movie, but maybe something like Silent Running looks pretty quaint and cheesy from the 2017 perspective. But some of the stuff made in the mid to later part of that decade to Logan's run. Right. They feel way more than five or six years apart. They feel generations apart from a filmmaking standpoint. And it's almost as if this future dystopia had really never existed before Blade Runner. I feel like it has been the influence for every film that has followed it. And one of the things that really stood out to me was the sense watching it that it's terrifying. It does feel like a dystopia very much at times in terms of the overcrowding.
10:54Adam Kempenaar:We are clued into the fact that if you want to get away, and most people do, they go off world, right? That these are kind of the nobodies. And even the detective or the cop Bryant at one point says that to him, if you're not a cop, you're one of the little people. This is a world full of little people of leave behinds who really have kind of no future. So it's a scary place at times and terrifying. But it's also just because of the look of it, exciting and alluring and somehow inviting like you almost want to go and experience this version of Los Angeles.
11:24Michael Phillips:And you believe what you're looking at. And in a funny way, without any of the corny taglines like what we were affixed to Superman, a very different science fiction fantasy, a few years earlier, you can believe in what you're watching. Because the film takes place at night and it's raining and it's got the right texture and background, the kind of effects that Scott was working with and his team, they're pulled off. You don't see any of the usual blues lines around. A little bit here and there, but it just has a believability. Now, does it connect? Does it satisfy on story terms? That's what, you know, back in 82, audiences were kind of like, it's not an untrackable plot.
12:08Michael Phillips:It's a very simple plot. It's simply, okay, you know, one relatably, you know, kind of worn down private eye type figure, you know, in this case a Blade Runner, has to chase down, you know, one by one these targets, these replicants. the film's got a very kind of vignette structure and that's unusual you know especially coming off year before you had the second star wars film empire strikes back you know of course the main star wars film 77 you know that that kind of pacing for the time was just pure atari right you know like fast and you didn't get a sense of like even segments or big scenes it was just all one ride right blade runner very different and i think josh even if you didn't experience it as ponderous or heavy.
12:53Michael Phillips:At the time, I think it was kind of, it was disorienting. Sure.
12:57Josh Larsen:And, you know, as far as the story beats go, you can even sense in the final cut, which is, you know, Scott's preferred version, that things are still being a bit patched together in terms of Ford's identity, Deckard's identity, his relationship with the Shang young character. And even here, there's the one glimpse of the unicorn, right? The one dream sequence. And You somewhat know how to fit that in if you have familiarity with the lore about all these other versions. But seeing that just on its own, it's a little, it stands out. So you can tell that there are pieces trying to be forced together here narratively.
13:33Josh Larsen:And I think that does provide a little bit of a hiccup. But again, it's more of a mood that this movie is managing to evoke. It's that fatalism from film noir that it really latches onto and makes us feel. Of course, you have things like we've mentioned the floating billboard that has spotlights that are constantly streaming through all the windows. And all the windows have Venetian blinds. Right. In 2019, Los Angeles. So you get this noir sense. You get Harrison Ford. You know, I was a little disappointed him being a hero of my youth from all these other films. You know, Indiana Jones and Han Solo.
14:08Josh Larsen:Here he's just a harder drinking Indiana Jones. A little crabbier. Otherwise tries to float by on the same charisma. He's no Sam Spade, in other words. He's so disaffected. He's fine, but you could tell he's working against that charm that he brought to those other parts purposefully. You can see why he was drawn to this. I'm going to make my anti-Star Wars in a way, but I think that still makes for a somewhat less interesting character. The movie, really, for me, belongs to Rutger Hauer. And this is where the fatalism comes in. This is where this movie becomes about mortality. And the replicants just stand in for us.
14:49Josh Larsen:They have this four-year lifespan. And Roy Batty, the way he has a dreaminess, he's in wonder at the world, even as he despises his corporate creators who have given him this four-year lifespan. And the way Howard balances.
15:03Michael Phillips:I should say that's how it works at the Trib, too. It's just a four-year renewal.
15:07Josh Larsen:I was going to say, you've been renewed a few times. A couple of times. Not yet retired, thank goodness. The way Howard balances those two things, though, where there's this poet inside him, inside this assassin, and he recognizes his mortality and the way that reflects on all of us gives Blade Runner, despite any plot confusion, this heavy sort of noir fatalism that I think sticks with you.
15:33Michael Phillips:Yeah, I might argue with you on that. I think that, to me, that is where the eye-rolling I do experience, and I know this is sacrilege for the Blade Runner fans, and I am a fan. I mean, I saw it twice back then, and I've certainly seen it twice or three times since. Tears and rain doesn't work for you? Well, I do enough of my own. But I think other things about that movie really do point to everything Ridley Scott explored over and over with, you know, the alien sort of world of the more recent films. He loves this idea of, you know, life as it is lived or imagined by non-human, you know, creations.
16:13Michael Phillips:And it's a great theme, you know, and it gets right to the kind of, you know, everything from, you know, there's a lot of movies and novels right next door to this idea. And I think it's the point of this movie, but there is something a little dead about the Harrison Ford character. He's reactive. Yeah. He's sullen. There's no heroics. All that and all this Harrison Ford knew going in. He wasn't yet an interesting enough actor to play two notes at once within that ring.
16:41Josh Larsen:Yeah, he's coasting on his charisma here a little bit.
16:44Michael Phillips:Remember when you were six? You and your brother snuck into an empty building through a basement window? You were going to play doctor? He showed you his. When it got to be your turn, you chickened and ran. Remember that?
17:02Michael Phillips:You ever tell anybody that? Your mother, Tyrell, anybody?
17:06Adam Kempenaar:I am a big fan of the villain performances here. I would include actually even Pris, Daryl Hannah, in the mix here. That's a really good scene. I think William Sanderson is the actor who plays J.F. Sebastian, who sees them. And when he sees Roy Batty come in, he knows for sure, if he didn't know already, that both of them are replicants. And he says, you're just so perfect. And they are. There's something about them that instantly suggests that. But I'm with you, Josh, in terms of loving the Hauer character and performance. And I love that he is this character. He's built up as a bad guy. Bryant calls him the worst.
17:39Adam Kempenaar:And he's a menacing figure. And we are supposed to be afraid of him a little bit, I think. But he gets scared, which we don't see a lot from villains in these types of sci-fi movies. He gets emotional. And I do think that end soliloquy is still, for me, one of the most tragic and moving soliloquies in all of cinema. this idea that he's lamenting memories and locations and visions that are completely made up. They are meaningless to any human being listening to what he's describing. And yet the way he does it, the fact that he is so poetic about it and so evocative in his delivery, it makes it such a lament that you feel the power of that.
Read the full transcript
18:16Adam Kempenaar:So I do love that performance. And look, what I responded to when I saw this movie for the first time, and honestly, the last time, it was back in college. It was over 20 years ago I saw this film. But that question, of course, that typical sort of cliche, if you will, sci-fi question, what ultimately makes us human? And of course, the movie suggests that beyond emotions, beyond a capacity for imagination, maybe it is memories. And beyond memories, it's this instinct for survival, the desire to live, to go beyond your life expectancy, however you pull that off. And so we get into that similar ground to some of the Alien movies with Scott, where he loves the idea of meeting your maker, confronting your maker and asking for more life or demanding more life, which is something I think we would all probably do if we could.
19:03Adam Kempenaar:It is a fundamentally human quest. One of the things I missed, though, that really stuck out to me this time watching it that fits in with all of this is the end of the film, that showdown between Batty and Deckard. I always saw as Batty just kind of toying with Deckard, maybe ultimately having sympathy for him. He spares him, of course, but toying with him, but just kind of prolonging their confrontation that he is ultimately going to take him down. Whether he changes his mind or not is something we can discuss. But I thought maybe, OK, he has a cruel streak in him and he's going to take it out on Deckard, who has killed his friends, the other replicants.
19:40Adam Kempenaar:And then what I really tapped into this time is the way Scott emphasizes Deckard's struggle to survive, really keying in on the lengths he goes to in order to survive. climbing through those holes, climbing up on that bureau, whatever it is, going through the ceiling, going out on that ledge, the way he's hanging on for dear life, literally. And his fingers are about to fall. And we are constantly seeing that from Batty's perspective, too. I think in a lot of ways, it's a more intense and shortened version of the entire struggle of Batty and his replicants since they had their mutiny and escaped.
20:18Adam Kempenaar:It's basically, I think what he sees in him in that moment is that same desire to live, that same desire to survive that he himself feels. And so ultimately then sees a certain kinship with him.
20:31Josh Larsen:And there's a vulnerability there too. And I think, so this is what Ford does have. And this is what he had from the start. It's the same thing that Bruce Willis tapped into that made him an iconic action hero was vulnerability. This guy could get hurt. You know, he wasn't like Stallone or he wasn't like Schwarzenegger in this way. And we see that in Ford's performance here. I think it works really well. And I think what's so moving about that climactic showdown is that Batty just succumbs to his own exhaustion and weariness and maybe realizes the futility of this human emotion he's experiencing, revenge.
21:06Josh Larsen:Does that make him human? That he now wants to pursue vengeance for Deckard killing the other replicants? I don't know, maybe. And the speech itself works for me because it's almost as if Batty had been programmed for Shakespeare. It's That dramatically given, right? That's why we remembered. It's very melodramatic. He's theatrical. He's theatrical. He makes entrances. Underneath that, you can sense that there's something also deeply felt about what he's saying that Hauer is also bringing to the performance. And I think that's where the connection is made where then we start to realize, OK, this whole movie is about our own mortality, whether we're replicants or not.
21:41Josh Larsen:Maybe that's where it has a leg up on. I can see what you're saying, Michael. Alien. You could say Alien did this. It's a different kind of thing. But in terms of the artificially intelligent figure, you could say, well, Alien did this with one side character. You know, in Ash, everything that Blade Runner is doing, Alien did kind of off to the side. To a degree, I see that. But I think there's something larger and more universal about this sense of mortality that we're experiencing in Blade Runner that we don't maybe get in the character of Ash.
22:11Michael Phillips:Now, does it matter to you guys? The key question that everybody keeps coming back to is, is Deckard a rep?
22:17Adam Kempenaar:So I want to talk about that for sure. I don't know if I'm ready to get there yet, but I think we should close with that for sure. Apple Vacations, where your story starts. The Friends and Family Sale is here at Apple Vacations. Book by September 24th and save up to 50 % on all-inclusive vacations with instant savings. Whether it's a getaway with friends or a family vacation, there's always a reason to make more memories with your favorite people. Travel through August 2027 and start planning your getaway today at AppleVacations.com or with your trusted travel advisor. Apple Vacations, where your story starts.
22:52Amazon Health AI presents Painful Thoughts. I, um, I can't stop scratching my downtown. Yeah, but I'm not itching to go downtown and tell a receptionist I'm here to talk about my downtown. Some things you'd rather type than say out loud. There's no question too embarrassing for Amazon Health AI. Chat your symptoms and get virtual care 24-7. Healthcare just got less painful. Hey, this is Kevin. This is Joe. And this is Nick from Hey Jonas. You know, I recently learned that every 36 minutes, another child in the U.S. is diagnosed with cancer. Think about that for a second. Some of the bravest warriors you'll ever meet aren't professional athletes or superheroes.
23:37They're kids in this fight. And every day, these young warriors face challenges most adults couldn't imagine. Yet they continue to show up with incredible courage, determination, and hope. That's why we're proud to support Hyundai Hope on Wheels. For the past 28 years, we support from Hyundai, their dealers, and every new Hyundai sold. Hope on Wheels has contributed over$300 million to childhood cancer research, helping save more than 40 ,000 kids. But we're not done yet. We need your help. Together, let's bring every warrior home. Learn more at HyundaiUSA.com slash Hope on Wheels, or ask about Hope on Wheels at your local Hyundai dealer.
24:12Hello, appliance fans. I'm here at Grand Appliance where Bill just bought a premium Bosch benchmark dishwasher. Talk about your experience, Bill. My salesperson was an appliance genius.
24:23Michael Phillips:She told me about their free install offer on benchmark appliances and it was a done deal for me. Wow, free install from the pros at Grand? That's a no-brainer. Agreed. They make it so easy. There you have it. Grand for the win. Check out GrandAppliance.com for full details.
24:42Adam Kempenaar:I want to go back to something you both brought up in terms of the narrative and how successful or unsuccessful it is, because one of the co-screenwriters here, David Peoples, I saw a comment from him where he said, I think fairly recently, that if you're talking about Ridley Scott and you have to choose visuals over narrative, and I'm paraphrasing here, he says, you always go with visuals. But damn, I wish it had a better narrative, people said. So basically commenting on his own material that Scott envisioned on screen.
25:07Michael Phillips:This is, I think, a limitation of the film.
25:09Adam Kempenaar:You guys touch on this a little bit. I wondered if there were any more specifics about what specifically with the story didn't work. What I would single out does go back to what you were talking about, Josh, in terms of the Sean Young character. And I love her performance. And of course, part of what I love about her performance is the way Cronenwith lights her. And the fact that every time she walks into a room and the way she walks in and out of shadows, you are just mesmerized by her. And it is down to her movement itself is also fascinating. But, oh, that sex scene. Will you kiss me?
25:42Michael Phillips:I can't rely on... Say kiss me.
25:49Kiss me.
25:51Adam Kempenaar:The ramifications of it, everything that would go with this character Deckard, who we can talk about the replicant part of this later, but a human we perceive him to be, we believe he perceives himself to be, about to engage in this act with a replicant, the movie takes no time to really think about any of the consequences of that whatsoever. And I think that the whole thing is so bizarre that there is a noir inevitability. From the moment she walks in, she's a maul and they seem to be drawn to each other in some way. I'll give the movie that. But when it happens, it still feels like the movie hasn't completely earned that relationship between them.
26:30Adam Kempenaar:And I think you can even point to something like the fact that She plays a major role in the plot when she saves his life, pulling out a gun randomly on the street and killing a replicant who's trying to kill Harrison Ford. Where does that come from other than it's serving a plot need? Right, right. I think that's absolutely true.
26:46Josh Larsen:And I also think here's where the noir comparisons don't do the movie any favors because a strength of all the classic film noirs is the femme fatale. And Young, I wouldn't, you know, I don't think it's that arresting of a performance, but I think that's because of the script, Adam, not because of anything Young is doing. certainly she is lit in that way. They set her up to be that femme fatale, but they have not written her that way. The scene you talked about, the sex scene, rape scene almost is how it plays now. I mean, it's really disturbing when you watch the scene through today's eyes, maybe, that 1982 audiences might not have.
27:22Josh Larsen:But I think it's also just troubling because the character is never fully developed and it's a crucial character, right? Rachel should be the linchpin between the replicant world and the human world, and she's not given enough narrative support to make that work. I think she captures that otherworldliness.
27:39Michael Phillips:I would argue with, I think both those performances, it's not that they were spring chickens. I mean, they had done some work by then, Ford and Young, but I think those performances are not quite what they could be, even given that script. I think craftier, wittier performers, not necessarily playing for laughs or anything. God knows I wouldn't, you know, that film can only accommodate so much levity at all. But I think craftier performers would play that guessing game a little more about how human or how replicant we really are in different degrees with these two characters. But I think, again, I get the sense of kind of one note hit hard.
28:22Michael Phillips:I don't know if Ridley Scott's even really an actor's director, frankly. And I think Young, you know, I think you can get 100 actresses in Hollywood who probably would have pulled it off more so than Young. Wow. Yeah, medium talent at best, I think. Now, Ford, obviously, better than that on his high end. He wasn't there yet with this. And I think that's a limitation of the film. I think also just the storytelling rhythm, even if it's a simple, gonna do this, gonna do this, gonna do this, and then I'm gonna meet my Waterloo maybe at the end. That's a very methodical, segmented, vignette-oriented kind of structure.
28:56Michael Phillips:And I think that's probably why the screenwriter, David Peoples, the co-writer, was a little frustrated because it just is what it is. It's not much, you know. And you get all this set up. And one of my favorite scenes is the one with Joanna Cassidy as the snake handler, you know, in the window. And then she's, you know, that's a performer who is completely alive. I mean, she's a great actress anyway. And I wish she had gotten the role she deserved, you know, in her heyday. But obviously that Replicant's life story is over five minutes later after this sort of like baroquely sadistic series of running through the plate glass windows, which is like – even in the history of plate glass being smashed on film, that was a ton of plate glass.
29:36Michael Phillips:It was. And it's a bit, that's, to me, that moment is kind of, it's perfect. It's a perfect, you know, emblem of what Ridley Scott's up to. It's gorgeous, and it's unsettling, and it might be a tiny bit much. And that's Ridley Scott, you know, whether you love him or not.
29:53Adam Kempenaar:I have to say I did get really caught up in that question of whether or not Deckard is a replicant and one of my questions to you guys is why does it matter really why is it that some people refuse at this point to accept it what is it about the film or those characters or us as movie watchers that want to cling to some notion that he isn't but before we get there let's go ahead and try to answer the question because like I said it is something that I've been thinking about since I finished the film where do you guys come out.
30:23Josh Larsen:Well, I'd have to separate. What would you say if you had just watched, say, the final cut? I mean, is there enough there that we'd even be asking the question? I think that one sequence of the unicorn is maybe the biggest hint, especially after we've learned that memories have been implanted. He seems confused at where that has come from. And that may be just enough for you to say, oh, OK, in addition to the Rachel character, who has already been someone who's deluded to think they're real. So maybe you could surmise it. But honestly, just having watched the final cut, I think it's just a tantalizing possibility.
30:56Adam Kempenaar:Well, I did want to scan to this scene before I sat down here and I failed to do so in the original theatrical cut. But I think there's one other giveaway even before the unicorn. I think there are some other hints and clues potentially along the way. And yes, I only watched the final cut this time. But there is a hint that Ridley Scott puts in there that I assume is in the theatrical version originally, which is a question. She openly brings it up, right? She raises it to him in his apartment. She says, have you taken the test? Are you sure you want to? That's true. So it puts that in our minds as viewers.
31:31Adam Kempenaar:He doesn't hear it because he falls asleep. I think there are some other things that you could cling to if you were looking for the support. The way Bryant refers to him as a one man slaughterhouse, the fact that he does seem to have such a non life, almost like a replicant might. And he seems almost like he was programmed to do this job and do only that job. and he doesn't have the sense of empathy. There's a vulnerability and an emotion to someone like Roy Batty, but he has no problem hurting anyone along the way to get to what he ultimately wants. Deckard is very much the same way. I was even thinking about some of the dialogue where there is that line I reference where Bryant says about Batty, there is a bad one, he's the worst.
32:11Adam Kempenaar:He says to Deckard later, aren't you the good one? And it makes me think almost, I wonder if it's playing with the idea whether Batty knows something or Ridley Scott, again, is just sort of toying with us. the idea that, well, he's the good replicant who's serving the people. So anyway, that's there. There is a clue, I think, in the photographs on his piano. Remember, we see that. And we do learn earlier that the replicants, they love those photos. They cling to those. They're given those as memories of a supposed real past. So that's all there. And then we, of course, get to the unicorn. And I want to talk about that and the origami leave behind, Edward James Olmos, right, at the end of the film.
32:51Adam Kempenaar:That would seem to be pretty strong evidence, right? That this must be a case where he's a replicant because it is referencing his daydream, as you said, the unicorn earlier, which ties back to Rachel and the clip we heard and Harrison Ford informing her, no, you're really a replicant because that might've been Tyrell's nieces. Those were implanted in you. And it's as if Gaff, the Edward James Olmos character is saying, I've read your file just like you read hers that that was just an implant that unicorn that's why he made a unicorn there so that would seem to clinch it right that that he must be a replicant or the Ridley Scott is absolutely trying to say but it's the movie is but it's the movie better for it no I don't know so so we'll get there let me just finish my spiel here on whether he is because you can counter that and say in the original version we don't get the unicorn daydream Right.
33:43Adam Kempenaar:We do get the origami figure at the end. And all it conveys is nothing more than Gaff basically showing I was there. I could have killed her and I didn't. And that's how we all saw the first version of this film. And that was on your tail or that, too. I certainly read it as he was here. He had his chance to take her down. He's letting them get away. Deckard seems to realize that. And he kind of reacts nonchalantly. It's not as if Deckard reacts to that as if he's been stunned by some existential realization that he's a replicant. He sort of turns and with some urgency heads out the door with her.
34:17Adam Kempenaar:So this is all leading to the fact that I think the more emphatic giveaway is that goldish red glow that only the replicants have in their eyes. If you watch the whole film, only the artificial figures have that glow in their eyes. and damn it, Deckard has it in the scene back at the apartment where he's standing right next to her kind of behind her, behind her shoulder and she has it in her eyes and he has it in her eyes and why would that be there? Adam, that's the look of love. I mean, it does beg the question, why do we only see it that once in him? But why would he have that if he wasn't artificial?
34:52Adam Kempenaar:Right, and it does come and go for her as well, I believe.
34:54Michael Phillips:Yeah, it's not there all the time. Nobody questions whether or not Sean Young is a replicant at all. They know, you know it right away. Do you like my owl? I mean, that's not a human. That's not human. That's not human.
35:05Adam Kempenaar:I guess I would at least say this, and we should throw out there that Ridley Scott has been pretty clear now recently in saying, yeah, he's a replicant. I mean, if you're not agreeing with that, you're kind of an idiot. But I would argue that, OK, I think he's a replicant, meaning Scott thinks that's the most satisfying interpretation. And he's now basically made it impossible with this final cut for us to think otherwise. but I do think it was added after the fact. Post-mythology rather than pre-mythology, I think it's as if Ridley Scott had decided, I like the mythology of it better and I'm going to embrace it, but it wasn't necessarily there.
35:40Adam Kempenaar:I did hear Harrison Ford say in something though that it was something Scott was talking to him about on the set and he constantly rejected it and would act against that. So that counters my theory. So for me, the best film would be,
35:54Josh Larsen:and this speaks to your question, Michael, does it make it a better film if he is or if he isn't? The best film for me is the one where it is that tantalizing possibility, where we're not being directed or hit over the head with so many clues, maybe given hints, maybe given suggestions. Yeah. And you leave the film wondering. I mean, it's a little dispiriting that this movie has gotten so gobbled up by such a controversy when it leaves no room for wonder. No, not anymore. That's what the best science fiction does.
36:23Michael Phillips:I will also say this. The best science fiction, a lot of it anyway, really doesn't give a damn about how if the narrative's working in conventional, satisfying terms. You know, a movie like Terry Gilliam's Brazil is unthinkable without Blade Runner. And it's got a very different sort of retro futuristic world building going on. But it's similarly amazing to watch and to look at. And that's another one that kind of tells a simple, maybe reductive story just enough to kind of hang Gilliam's preoccupations on. And that's written by good people. Tom Stoppard worked on that script. I mean, it's got a lot of – but it doesn't – it's not a story film.
37:08Michael Phillips:It just isn't. And I think a lot of – Metropolis, Fritz Lang's Metropolis back –
37:14Josh Larsen:Which, if anything, sets the tone for Blade Runner.
37:15Michael Phillips:Absolutely. Which influenced everything we're talking about, honestly. It's, you know, that's a bunch of kind of adolescent hooey. I mean, frankly, on story level, I don't care. You know, and that's, and as much as I admire Blade Runner and have happily kind of reentered its world and kind of puzzled through these questions about, you know, Replicant or no or whatever, you know, just as much, I'm still the 21-year-old I was struggling to kind of wonder, well, what would have made it, what would have made it really haunt my dreams as opposed to just kind of kind of encourage me to seek out its visual rewards, you know, which is a little different.
37:58Michael Phillips:It's, you know, the craft is unbelievable.
38:01Josh Larsen:I think bad is your answer. I mean, that's a very haunting experience that we're thrust in the middle of. And it's a non-human one. And yet somehow the movie in that climax makes it completely identifiable to me. I mean, that is what elevated this for me on the rewatch. I knew it would be visually stunning. I was glad to see that the visuals held up so well. But to recognize that it also had this undercurrent of fatalism that did hit, that did land, was probably one of the more rewarding aspects.
38:33Michael Phillips:Can we at least agree in closing that we wouldn't mind a different composer? Absolutely.
38:41Josh Larsen:The Vangelis score really dates it. I think they're in the sex scene scene. That's really brutal. The only point where it bothered me, to be honest. Yeah, I was going to say I found it to be almost like this alongside the rain, this synthetic storm that washed over the movie, especially when we were seeing any cityscape or having any sort of this immersive scene setting in the world. I thought the score worked really well to have this sort of electronic synth heavy score. But then you take those same musical techniques and put them in a love scene that's already not working and it's disastrous.
39:15Yeah, yeah, yeah.
39:18Adam Kempenaar:Reminder that you can join the Film Spotting family at filmspottingfamily.com. And don't forget to tune in this Friday to hear our Ridley Scott draft with Roxanna Haddadi. Thanks for listening. This conversation can serve no purpose anymore. Goodbye.
39:53We'll be right back.
40:09To decide what they're willing to risk to leave their mark. FX is the drop. Premieres September 8th on FX and Hulu. Apple Vacations, where your story starts. The Friends and Family Sale is here at Apple Vacations. Book by September 24th and save up to 50 % on all-inclusive vacations with instant savings. Whether it's a getaway with friends or a family vacation, there's always a reason to make more memories with your favorite people. Travel through August 2027 and start planning your getaway today at AppleVacations.com or with your trusted travel advisor. Apple Vacations, where your story starts.
40:48Honey, Felipe sent another photo. From Argentina? How? With T-Mobile, of course. Mira, he's video calling us. Hola, familia. Did you get my photos? We did. They're so pretty. Here to share every moment with T-Mobile. Enjoy data roaming at no extra charge in 21 Latin American countries. Switch now on the T-Life app or T-Mobile.com slash connectate. Qualifying plan required not for extended international use. You must reach out in the U.S. and primary usage must occur in our network. Visit T-Mobile.com. Hey, y 'all. What's up? This is Lorna LaRosa from the latest with Lorna LaRosa, the podcast. Remember Varnell Hill from the 90s Sipcom Martin?
41:25He's back. And now on Paramount Plus. More than 30 years later, Tommy Davidson is stepping back into the spotlight in an all-new Martin spinoff, The Varnell Hill Show. And Varnell has just one question. Did you miss me? Now he's got network execs, a wild writer's room, family drama, and everyone telling him he's passed his prime. Varnell isn't slowing down, bringing raw, unfiltered jokes every step of the way. From executive producer Martin Lawrence, The Varnell Hill Show is now streaming exclusively on Paramount+.
From the publisher
With Ridley Scott's The Dog Stars in theaters and our own Ridley Scott Draft (with Vulture's Roxana Hadadi) coming Friday, we're sharing this 2017 Sacred Cow review of Scott's sci-fi classic. Michael Phillips joined Adam and Josh.
Unlock the full archive, Filmspotting Discord, ad‑free + bonus episodes, and more when you join the Filmspotting Family.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.




