In short
Film Spotting’s Golden Brick nominee discussion of Sophie Ramvari’s Blue Heron, a memory-driven family drama. The episode focuses on how the film blends memory and reality through point of view, still/stationary camera work, and formal “time warp” techniques (including a darkroom/photography motif and a later formal break between past and present).
Key claims
Ramvari’s “lens of memory” approach makes details (sound, hands, objects) feel like what a child would actually remember; the camera’s mostly stationary style makes POV about older Sasha’s recollection rather than literal child perception; the film’s meta elements set a high Golden Brick bar, though one host feels the ending closure is slightly too clear.
Notable examples
opening moving-truck door reveal; a pool rescue seen only via an arm reaching with a rake; potato-peeling closeups during tense dialogue; diegetic tinny music from the father’s computer; a magical-realism-like trampoline/glass reflection “fissure” moment; darkroom “developing film/time warp” sequence; comparisons to The Tree of Life and Aftersun.
Guests
Adam Kempinar and Josh Larson (hosts of Film Spotting). No other guests are interviewed in this episode.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOIntroduction to Golden Brick Nominee
1:00 to 3:06
Discussion of the Golden Brick award and its criteria.
“Another podcast from some SNL late night comedy guy.”
Analyzing Blue Heron
3:06 to 11:55
In-depth analysis of the film Blue Heron, its themes, and filmmaking style.
“What kind of a show are you guys putting on here today?”
Thematic Elements in Blue Heron
11:55 to 14:05
Exploration of the thematic elements and point of view in Blue Heron.
“And that's true of any eight year old kid in any house, much less a house that's this volatile, right?”
Struggles in the Pool: A Moment of Memory
14:05 to 16:51
Explore a child's perspective on distress and the disconnect with caregivers.
“a little bit of trouble because she gets into the swimming pool of one of the neighbor's houses with the cover still on it and and then she realizes that oh she's actually in some trouble here.”
Moments of Childhood: Peeling Potatoes and Conversations
16:51 to 18:58
Delve into the significance of mundane tasks in shaping childhood memories.
“The lens of memory and phrase makes me think of another shot.”
The Role of Sound and Atmosphere in Memory
18:58 to 20:25
Understand how sound design contributes to the emotional landscape of childhood.
“And so there are so many moments in this movie that uses imagery in this way.”
The Power of Stillness in Filmmaking
24:03 to 28:06
Learn how stillness in camera work enhances storytelling and memory.
“That's the kind of thing we remember from our childhoods, watching and paying attention and noticing that and feeling like that's how this is made.”
Exploring Bedos' Performance
28:06 to 29:02
Discussion on the complex performance of Bedos and its impact on the film.
“And as you, you're just describing it, it doesn't mean not just when he's disruptive, even when he's just off to the side, Bedos is doing something that has real presence to it.”
Cinematic Techniques: The Power of Zoom
29:02 to 31:57
An in-depth look at the use of zoom in the film and its thematic implications.
“He's listening to music with headphones on.”
Juxtaposition of Tension and Grace
31:57 to 34:08
How the film balances moments of tension with graceful family interactions.
“This really is a good case study for the possibilities of the zoom because, you know, we're, we're probably making it sound like she's employing it all the time in this movie.”
Show all 15 chapters
Time Warp: Past and Present in Film
34:08 to 37:16
Discussion on the narrative structure and its blending of past and present.
“And, and maybe only certain filmmakers in particular, it's not commonly used.”
Comparing Blue Heron and Aftersun
37:16 to 41:44
A comparative analysis of themes and emotional impact with Aftersun.
“And here we see, it's like this gentle convergence and, you know, for different viewers, one might be more effective than another, but I think it's a key distinction.”
Contemplating Closure and Ambiguity
41:44 to 42:00
Exploration of how the film's ending provides closure yet lacks full resolution.
“And the imagery itself, the mechanism for the closure, here's where I'm being vague, the mechanism for the closure maybe felt just a little bit too facile, for lack of a better word.”
Discussion on Film Techniques
42:00 to 42:50
Explore the use of film techniques and their narrative impact in 'Blue Heron'.
“didn't, we're at odds a little bit with the, the challenging nature of so much of the rest of the film.”
Thoughts on 'Blue Heron'
42:50 to 43:13
Hear the hosts invite listener feedback on the film 'Blue Heron'.
“Blue Heron is out now, like we said, still rolling out, I believe, to more theaters this spring.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed Human. This episode sponsored by PointMe. Want to know the secret to booking flights with points and miles? Let's say you've got 80 ,000 points and you're looking at a business class flight to Europe. Cash price? Around$3 ,000. You check your credit card travel portal? 300 ,000 points. Way too high. But shh, here's what you should do instead. Go to Point.me and run that exact same search. In seconds, it shows you better ways to book that same flight across dozens of airline programs. Now, instead of 300 ,000 points, you're seeing options closer to 65 ,000.
0:37That's because you can move your credit card points into airline programs, where the pricing is usually way lower. Same flight, same seat, for less than half the points. And PointMe doesn't just show you the options. It walks you through exactly how to book it. If you want to get more value from your points without becoming a points nerd, visit point.me and see what your points are really worth. Get 25 % off an annual membership with code POINTS25. Another podcast from some SNL late night comedy guy. Not quite. On Humor Me with Robert Smigel and friends, me and hilarious guests from Bob Odenkirk to David Letterman help make you funnier.
1:14funnier. This week, my guests, SNL's Mikey Day and head writer Streeter Seidel, help an acapella band with their between songs banter. Where does your group perform? We do some retirement homes. Those people are starving for banter. Listen to Humor Me with Robert Smigel and friends on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Last night, a blown call changed the game. This morning, the internet lost its mind, and nobody's telling you exactly what happened. That's where Sports Slice comes in. I'm Timbo, and every episode, we're cutting through the noise, breaking down the biggest moments in sports, and giving you the real story behind the headlines.
1:51And we're going straight to the source, the athletes themselves, their locker room stories, their reactions in the moment, and the stuff nobody gets to hear. Listen to Sports Slice on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. And for more, follow Timbo Slice Life 12 and the TikTok Podcast Network on TikTok. There are times when the mind becomes a difficult place to live. This is David Eagleman with the Inner Cosmos podcast. And for Mental Health Awareness Month, we'll talk with singer-songwriter Jewel about anxiety. I started living in my car and then my car got stolen.
2:24I was having panic attacks. I was agoraphobic. This is a month of deeply personal and honest conversations about what happens when the brain goes off course. Listen to Intercosmos on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
3:06What kind of a show are you guys putting on here today?
3:09Josh Larsen:You're not interested in art? No. Now look, we're going to do this thing. We're going to have a conversation.
3:15Adam Kempenaar:Hey, film spotters, Adam and Josh here. Coming Friday, our Pantheon Project review of Terrence Malick's The Tree of Life at 15. Is it Terrence Malick's best film? I know you're prepared to answer that question. I saw on Letterboxd, it's been in that number one position for quite some time, Josh.
3:35Josh Larsen:I mean, pretty much since it came out and none of his films since have dethroned it. So I will be eager to hear on Friday where it sits for you after this revisit. That's Friday. However, today, finally, Adam, we're going to get to our first golden brick nominee of 2026. Usually at this point, we have maybe two, possibly three titles thrown in the mix here. But we're just getting to that now. The Golden Brick, of course, is our annual award that we give to an up-and-coming filmmaker whose maybe early film doesn't have to be a debut, shows distinct vision, some adventurous choices perhaps. And I think you can say that is the case for Sophie Ramvari's Blue Heron.
4:25Adam Kempenaar:Who is that?
4:26Josh Larsen:Jesus, he wanted to let us know that our son is dead on the front step.
4:31Adam Kempenaar:I told him not to worry. He will come back to life soon.
4:36Josh Larsen:Blue Heron opened in April 17 in select cities. It's been expanding regionally since then. And we both have had a chance to catch it, Adam. And this is, I guess you could call it a bit of a memory piece. It is an adult young woman's thinking through processing her early years as an eight-year-old when her family had recently moved to Vancouver Island. And this family consists of her parents. She has two brothers around her age and then an older teenage brother who is struggling with some difficulties, clearly troubled in some way, and causing increasing disturbances for their family. and she's trying to process this and a lot of the film certainly the first half i think we can say for now are recreations of this woman's memories as a fairly tense family drama i guess the first thing i'm curious about adam is in this golden brick consideration is there one aspect of blue heron that does jump out at you as making it worth consideration for golden brick given those parameters that we usually look for.
5:45Yeah.
5:45Adam Kempenaar:Well, there's a lot to the filmmaking. And I think maybe the most obvious is some of these meta elements that you're referring to. I think how Rambari uses point of view specifically in this film, and maybe that's going to get a little too into the weeds to start off with. So I'll hold on that. But I do want to talk just generally about my reaction to the film. And even before that, I'll say, I know I do this all the time, but I love that it just magically works out this way so often. And it is completely random. We're discussing this movie the same week. We're discussing, as we said, Terrence Malick's The Tree of Life.
6:24Adam Kempenaar:Did you think about the crossover between these two films? I watched them. I watched them back to back. And maybe you didn't. I know you watched Blue Heron at least a week ago. And you had watched The Tree of Life something like three times since it came out. But I watched them just a day apart. We have an adult reliving their childhood, instigated by an event involving a sibling, trying to reconcile their complicated relationship with a family member whose difficult nature shaped everyone's experience in that home. And it even begins with a voiceover.
7:00Josh Larsen:there's a lot here there's a lot just in terms of the narrative but i think it's as i think you were going to get to the filmmaking that point of view element and the immersion in specific three to eight second snippets of a memory of what it was like at that age that somehow capture as much as a novella could yeah in just a few seconds of filmmaking and i think ultimately
7:27Adam Kempenaar:Ranvari and Malik use the camera very, very differently, again, as we'll get into. But you knew I was going to go for this. The portrait of a filmmaker as a young girl and a movie that plays in the same stylistic and thematic sandbox as, to name a few, After Sun, All of Us Strangers, Kirastami's Close-Up. There's even a moment where a sort of space-time fissure occurs, where I felt almost the same thrill I felt during a similar meta moment watching Jafar Panahi's The Mirror. Now, almost is the key word. The moment ultimately didn't deliver quite the way The Mirror did, nor did Blue Heron stagger me the way any of those four movies did.
8:13Adam Kempenaar:But then in fairness, as you know, I'm talking about two recent movies I named number one of their respective years. And another close-up I nominated for the Pantheon, our Pantheon a couple months ago. And another, the Mirror, that I would nominate for the Pantheon if I thought it would get any support. Yes, absolutely, Blue Heron is setting a high brick bar for the rest of the year. So POV, I'm going to try to dissect that a little bit more later. You've alluded to the filmmaking that definitely stood out to you and those snippets that are so powerful here. What is it for you that really stands out as far as a brick resume?
8:49Josh Larsen:Yeah, I think it is, I guess we could call it the meta element. It's the formal breaking of what we're seeing and the mixture of memory and reality, changing time, changing eras so fluidly. And in the second half, almost not changing at all, but melding them together at once in ways we'll probably get to don't want to spoil right now. Now, I'm glad you made the Malick distinction in terms of the filmmaking as well, because Malickian is thrown around a lot and you get these ideas in your head of nature imagery and that sort of thing. And this really is doing something distinct. I would describe it as there's an observational elegance that Romvari has that is both soft and searing.
9:36Josh Larsen:There is something about the incisiveness and maybe it's part of the story she's telling to where there is always a tension in the air, what Jeremy, this older brother might bring when he walks into a room, no one knows. Um, and somehow Ramvari translates that into the imagery itself so that boy, I'm just thinking of an early shot that maybe seems like a throwaway, but mentioned how this family has moved to this new home. And we understand this where the camera is inside the moving van. It's all dark and you're, you're, you're not sure where you are. It's one of the opening shots of the movie.
10:15Josh Larsen:You're right. It is a very early shot, except you hear the rumble of traffic and there's this horizontal slit at the bottom of the screen. That's kind of getting a little wider and a little smaller. And eventually it dawns on you. Okay. This is a moving truck and that door isn't all the way closed. And sure enough, the truck comes to a stop. The father pulls open the door and we can see that they've arrived at the home. I still haven't put my mind around why that is such a gripping image that somehow captures some of the things we've touched on. The tension, the instability, the glimmer of something more that you might find if you just look hard enough.
10:52Josh Larsen:How much of this movie, Adam, is about recordings. The father is constantly taking photos or video of his family. And Sasha, the girl at this age, at the age of eight, is sometimes taking video as well. There's something about that early choice to hide what's happening from us, give us a hint and then reveal it. That sets the stage for so much of what is to come. And I think, just to go back to the golden brick thing quickly, this is something that we're looking for is like, how many memory pictures do we see about going back to a filmmaker's childhood? How many times does that involve moving to a new place or a new neighborhood?
11:31Josh Larsen:How many ways could you show that that just gives us the facts. And here in the early moments, Ramvari instantly gives us something we've seen a million times on screen in a way I don't think I have ever seen on screen that connects with everything else she's doing in the rest of the film.
11:47Adam Kempenaar:Yeah, absolutely. You expressed that very well. I loved that shot. I was similarly disoriented and that was, it felt to me like the entire purpose. I knew from that point on that throughout the entire movie, I was probably going to find myself at times not lost, but like our main character, Sasha disoriented, like a little girl in this house, I was going to find myself struggling to make sense of what exactly is happening. And that's true of any eight year old kid in any house, much less a house that's this volatile, right? You just can't wrap your head around this type of situation. And so you, you knew you were disoriented and you knew that, that with that, with that door opening of the truck, that something was going to be revealed, but our answers going to come, is anything really going to be revealed?
12:45Adam Kempenaar:That's that, that felt like, you know, it almost felt like a movie screen, right? Being lifted up and you're, you're watching a picture being revealed there. So it felt, it felt so appropriate. it. The point of view stuff I wanted to talk about, Josh, I found it so striking because it wasn't in an obvious or restrictive way. This is very much, as we're saying, a movie about Sasha. It's about her experience growing up and the way she does see the world, the way she hears the world, the way she is trying to process the world around her. But Ranvari doesn't only use the camera or doesn't use it. She doesn't focus on trying to use it this way to reflect Sasha's one-to-one observation of the world, right?
13:31Adam Kempenaar:It's not told directly from her point of view or again, nor does she try to really make it that way more often than not. We spend most of our time as viewers, you suggested this, watching her watch or watching her listen and where her specific point of view then becomes more apparent and is employed so effectively is in a scene like the one early on where she is playing with some new friends in the neighborhood and she gets into a little bit of trouble because she gets into the swimming pool of one of the neighbor's houses with the cover still on it and and then she realizes that oh she's actually in some trouble here.
14:17Adam Kempenaar:She doesn't know how to get out of this pool. And she starts calling for help. But the other girls, they just maybe think she's playing or they're still hiding from her and they're ignoring her. Another parent comes and gets her out by giving her the end of one of those pool leaf rakes to grab onto. But we don't see, here again, unconventional choices, right? We don't see the parent notice her struggling. We don't see the parent run over to her. We don't even see the parent at all, except for the arm reaching out with the rake. We just hear the footsteps and their voice say, here, grab onto this and stay calm.
15:01Adam Kempenaar:And then a question, this movie is filled with these kinds of questions, the type of questions that people can't answer because there kind of isn't really an answer or, or the people you're asking can't answer them. They're not equipped to answer them. Why'd you do that, honey? And of course she's silent. She can't explain it. She just, she just did it. And, and the camera, the camera here doesn't mimic her exact point of view, but it, man, does it put us precisely into her perspective. And if you think about it, I think that that is mirroring the lens of memory as it makes sense for the context of this movie.
15:40Adam Kempenaar:These are the details that she would remember. She would remember it that way. She would just think about the arm reaching out to grab her and what the person would say. She doesn't remember the details of that person or even probably their name. She may have not even had any other interactions with that person, right? Now, Ranvari would probably also say it's a lot more straightforward and cheaper to shoot that way without all that coverage. But that's also the strategy that Ranvari chose to employ with this type of memory film. And it's so much more effective because it ties directly to all the big ideas this movie is dealing with.
16:18Josh Larsen:I really like that phrase, the lens of memory. I think that perfectly encapsulates what this movie is trying to do. And the challenge of trying to make that come alive, not just in the filmmaking, but because it's impossible for anyone. Our memories are constantly not exactly what happened, right? They're not exactly what happened the next day, let alone there's maybe 20 years or so have passed, you might guess here. And so the movie is mostly about how even when you remember things distinctly, they don't answer the questions you have about your childhood. In this case, particularly with the brother.
16:53Josh Larsen:The lens of memory and phrase makes me think of another shot. And it's interesting because it's the same in that, as you describe in that pool sequence, it's not what she sees from her perspective. Right. So think about how it works similarly in the scene where she and her mom are making something at the stove. They've been peeling potatoes together before we've seen, this is a long process. Now they're over at the stove using the peeled pieces and they're going to be frying them. Um, and as they're having this difficult conversation about Sasha wanting to have a friend over for dinner and her mom talking about, well, I don't know if you want to do that.
17:28Josh Larsen:And, and, you know, because Jeremy's unpredictable and I don't want you to be embarrassed. And they're having this, you know, what for, for a kid is a monumental conversation that that is one you would remember till you were an adult for sure, because you're so invested in having a friend over. you're so conflicted about this older brother who, let's be clear, she loves and has affection for. She's not just afraid of him, right? But she's afraid of what he might do in certain situations. So this is a distinct memory, but how does Ramvari capture it? It's similar to how you describe the pool sequence, a closeup of the bowl of potato peelings waiting to be put in the pan.
18:10Josh Larsen:And in the background, we can see mother and daughter and we can hear them, but they're blurred. We're just looking at this, these potato peelings. And I thought when I was watching it, this is exactly, I can remember like hard conversations as a little kid with my parents. I can remember the fabric on the couch that I was sitting on better than their facial expressions. and this is what she knows as a filmmaker and captures in this scene that I am sure the idea is that Sasha at one point, or maybe the whole time is staring at that bowl of potato peelings, you know, all this inner turmoil is going on and she's just laser focused on that as a safety net.
18:53Josh Larsen:I guess we do that. I don't know why we do that, but then that's what locks into our brains. And we carry it for decades. And so there are so many moments in this movie that uses imagery in this way. And it's not just the visuals either, Adam, you mentioned, I think, how Sasha is always listening. So key to this movie is, first of all, this is a very quiet home. I mean, for kids, for active kids, it's usually pretty quiet in there, but then we can notice things like the thudding against the wall in that one scene where the mother and father are having a tense, yeah, they're having a tense conversation.
19:29Josh Larsen:And again, disorientation, we don't know what the thudding is it's a rhythmic thudding.
19:33Adam Kempenaar:Oh yeah.
19:34Josh Larsen:And, and we wait until the mother goes outside to take the kids away. And then she comes around the corner and tells Jeremy get in the car. Yeah. And we see he's been bouncing the basketball against the exterior wall of the house. Yeah. So great sound design there. And also how about there is some scoring, but every once in a while we get diegetic music that I realized is coming from the dad's computer, which is in the main family room. and he's on it a lot. And that's where he's playing music. And I love the quality of it. It's distant. It's tinny. It's quiet. And just a little, it's a little off because it's not coming from a clear speaker.
20:14Josh Larsen:Great point. That just, you get a sense that this is part of the family's atmosphere, is this sort of music that is so distinct to them and their home and her lived childhood experience. Have you ever heard about a family like this?
20:34Jeremy, look at me. Look at me, please. This episode sponsored by Chicx. Summer heat is coming, and if you're already waking up hot at night, you need to try Chicx. I switched to Chic's because I was constantly overheating, throwing off the covers, flipping the pillow, waking up sweaty. Their sheets are made with the same performance fabric used in athletic wear, so they help keep you cool, dry, and comfortable all night long. And they're incredibly soft. Not slick or stiff, just cool, breathable comfort that actually helps you sleep better. Even better, the fitted sheet stays put, thanks to their Stay Fit Corners.
Read the full transcript
21:15No slipping off the mattress in the middle of the night. Right now, Sheiks is running their Memorial Day sale with up to 50 % off site-wide, up to 80 % off clearance, plus free shipping on orders over$75. If you sleep hot, this is your sign to upgrade before summer really kicks in. Try Sheiks risk-free with their 60-night guarantee at Sheiks.com. That's S-H-E-E-X dot com. Another podcast from some SNL late-night comedy guy. Not quite. On Humor Me with Robert Smigel and Friends, me and hilarious guests from Bob Odenkirk to David Letterman help make you funnier. This week, my guests, SNL's Mikey Day and head writer Streeter Seidel, help an acapella band with their between songs banter.
22:00Where does your group perform? We do some retirement homes. Those people are starving for banter. Listen to Humor Me with Robert Smigel and Friends on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Last night, a blown call changed the game. This morning, the internet lost its mind. Highlights are trending, opinions are flying, and nobody's telling you exactly what happened. That's where Sports Slice comes in. I'm Timbo. Every episode, we're cutting through the noise, breaking down the plays, the controversies, and the stories behind the headlines. We go straight to the source, the athletes themselves, their locker room stories, their reactions, the stuff nobody gets to hear, the laughs, the drama, the triumphs, the moments that never make the highlight real.
22:39From viral moments to historic games, from buzzer beaters to controversial calls, we break it down, give you context, and ask the questions everybody wants answered. Sports Slice brings you closer to the action with stories told by the people who live them. Listen to Sports Slice on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. And for more, follow TimboSliceLife12 and the TikTok Podcast Network on TikTok. The story I've told myself about love or relationships can then shape my behavior, and that can lead me to sabotage the possibility of connection. This Mental Health Awareness Month, tune into the podcast Deeply Well with Debbie Brown and explore the journey of healing, self-discovery, and returning to yourself.
23:24We explore higher consciousness, emotional well-being, and the practices that help you find clarity, peace, and self-mastery. in a world that can feel overwhelming. The world is becoming lonelier. We're not becoming more social and connected. We're becoming more individualized, but we actually need people in connection. If you've been searching for a soft place to land while doing the work to become whole, this podcast is for you. To hear more, listen to Deeply Well with Debbie Brown from the Black Effect Podcast Network on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
24:02Adam Kempenaar:Just the way Ramvari's camera focuses on the mom's hands getting into the potatoes and the squishy sound of it. That's the kind of thing we remember from our childhoods, watching and paying attention and noticing that and feeling like that's how this is made. My mom has to do that. My dad has to do that. Their hands get that dirty. And you mentioned something else that reminded me, an element I really like is, and this is something else that speaks to the economy of this film, which just makes it stronger and more authentic, is the way through that dialogue. There are little bits of dialogue, but just the insinuations where we understand that, of course, everybody on this street and probably everybody within about a three block radius knows what's happening with Jeremy.
25:00Adam Kempenaar:They have to. Right. Because he at a certain point for sure. He's being that disruptive. And, you know, it's the talk of a neighborhood like this. But do we ever see the neighbors? Do we ever get shots of the neighbors looking over or whispering or any scenes of them actually gossiping? No, we don't. We don't need to. We just, we get enough. We get enough little bits of dialogue that we understand what's happening and we understand how powerful it can still be without needing those types of scenes. How much of an impact that can still have that we can have the mom saying, no, you can't have a friend over because of this, that it is something that you need to be aware of, even though right now you're blissfully ignorant.
25:49Adam Kempenaar:You mentioned the incisiveness of the camera and I think the stillness. And I also want to say with the POV by not restricting it or trying to restrict it too much to her actual point of view. That makes the moments when we do see through Sasha's eyes more powerful. But I think it's the stillness of the camera. And this is where it's very different from Malik, especially something like the Tree of Life, where the camera is just flying all over the place. Right. The camera does not move here, maybe at all. And so what you come to realize, it zooms, it tilts, it pans. Yeah, she uses zooms a fair amount, effectively.
26:24Adam Kempenaar:But it's very stationary. And so what you come to realize is that the point of view that matters most is really not young Sasha's. Here's the lens of memory, right? It's older Sasha. It's her memory reliving and re-envisioning the past. And that, I think, is shown. This is not spoilers at all, but it's in that scene I was referring to as the the fissure scene, right? The moments that precipitate it. Josh, this scene for me is is is magical because and that really is what it is. And in terms of the construct of the film or the context of the film, it is it is effectively magical realism. it it is a moment too that i re-watched it josh and it feels like this is the one moment that feels actually like it almost could have been taken out of the tree of life because the sequence begins with a magic hour shot of the sun it's rays coming through the trees but what it is it's when they're all playing outside all the kids are playing outside and including sasha the little boys and the little girl are all on the trampoline and Jeremy is just in his world like he usually is being quiet like he is.
27:35Adam Kempenaar:He barely has any lines of dialogue in this film. The actor's name is Edick Beddoes and he's very good. I mean, what he does with very little dialogue here is something.
27:49Josh Larsen:And Adam, like just a quick aside, as far as I can tell, this is his first role. And, and I think what's key about this character is that he keeps a distance as the character, which is necessary, but he brings enough to the screen to still have a presence, you know? Yes. And as you, you're just describing it, it doesn't mean not just when he's disruptive, even when he's just off to the side, Bedos is doing something that has real presence to it. So he fully exists in, in that moment, even if he's a bit apart, it's, it's, I think it's a really incredible performance.
28:23Adam Kempenaar:And I think you could even go so far as to say, even though he is very rarely in the film, very rarely, if ever, do we actually see him being towards other people aggressively or violently disruptive. I would also still say he's almost never very likable in the film. He's not he's not an affable person. And yet there is something about the way Bedos plays him that when we do hear someone in the film later describe him, I believe, as soulful. You see that from the first moment you look at him in this film. You believe that is there, which is what makes part of this story so, so tragic. And so we're watching them.
29:03Adam Kempenaar:He's listening to music with headphones on. The kids are bouncing. And this shot in a lot of ways then is the whole movie. because it's this point of view shot of the mind's eye of Sasha, older Sasha, looking back as the kids are playing, including on herself. And she's looking at the house through the glass and what's happening inside the living room. Mom's on the phone having a conversation. We don't know with who yet having a conversation about Jeremy, a tough conversation about what we're going to do with him and how she doesn't know what to do. and she doesn't want to make a very tough decision.
29:42Adam Kempenaar:What's dad doing? Dad's doing what dad always does. Dad's filming. So we've got the mirror, the reflection of the camera pointed back at the camera. And then something happens there too, Josh, which is we do get, speaking of soulful, we do get a moment where just as the sequence is ending, Bedos turns and looks right at us and looks at the camera. And just for a moment, it holds on him. And then just for a moment, he starts to give a little smile. And Ranvari has the right instinct to not stay on that smile and let that moment become more saccharine than it could be. She just lets the smile just start, right?
30:30Adam Kempenaar:And then cut away because the scene that's actually playing out is something that's way more tense and difficult. And it's going to be the thing that launches the entire second half of this film. But what the camera does here, Josh, is that it's stationary the entire time. And so it tilts a little bit, as I said. It pans. It'll even wiggle. But what it starts doing is it's just this slow zoom forward toward the glass on the parents. And I think the way I see that, the way it works so effectively for me in the moment is that I do see it as grown-up Sasha, Sophie, Ranvari. It is her mind's eye looking back on this scene.
31:13Adam Kempenaar:And by being stuck like that, the camera being fixed, it feels to me like the character, the director's eye being fixed, being stuck. You can only go so far back. You can only capture so much. And when it starts to zoom, it's almost like when you squint to try to look at something and try to get a better view, to try to get a clearer picture. Yes, you can move in a little bit. You can try to see things a little more clearly, but you're just never fully going to get there. The past will always elude us. And certainly seeking any easy answers from the past is something that's always going to elude us.
31:57Josh Larsen:This really is a good case study for the possibilities of the zoom because, you know, we're, we're probably making it sound like she's employing it all the time in this movie. And I think it's actually just very effective and noticeable, but not in a bad way when she does employ it. And I think Adam, in the moment you're describing and in another one here, I'll get to, it makes me realize that the zoom is very effective to convey searching, right? You're, you're, it's like, you're trying, you're trying to get closer to what's happening. And that moment I mentioned where he's throwing the basketball against the wall of the house and his mother comes out and says to get in the car where all the kids were all going somewhere, get in the car.
32:39Josh Larsen:And he just ignores her. This is where she employs another one of those zooms, almost imperceptible. Like you, you just, you suddenly, you notice we're seeing, we're a little closer to Jeremy, a little closer. And here, of course, it's searching. It's asking the question, why isn't he responding? What's he going to do next? So there's a curiosity, but also attention to it as well. Right. It's like the moments getting more, the more he ignores her, the more she calls, we are feeling that time. Who's going to give. And so who's going to give. And so the zoom is effective there. I also like the opposite though.
33:12Josh Larsen:And there's only one instance where she does this that I can recall. Maybe there are more, but the kids and the mom go to the beach. and I like how she starts in close on this rocky beach from the water. And we see, you know, the, maybe the younger brothers come first, I think, and they're running towards the water. And as the family approaches and they come from between two larger rocks, as the family approaches, she's zooming back and out. And there suddenly we have it. I found it to be like maybe one of the few moments in the film where I took a breath because the zoom is now opening. It is breathing.
33:51Josh Larsen:The screen is breathing and it's creating a welcoming atmosphere as the family spills out onto the beach. So yeah, just effective use of zoom here, which I don't know. I don't know how much we call attention to that, except for maybe I always think of it as like a seventies technique, you know, as it's being probably employed in the seventies.
34:08Adam Kempenaar:Yeah. Without a doubt. And, and maybe only certain filmmakers in particular, it's not commonly used. Most filmmakers are going to use tracks. They're going to set up a dolly or they're going to use a steadicam. They're not going to use
34:20Josh Larsen:or just cut to where to where they want to be.
34:23Adam Kempenaar:Absolutely right. But but Rampari really, really uses it well here. I think there's also I wonder if you felt the same way. I think there's a scene of the year candidate potentially in this film. Oh, there's when I say there's a couple. Yeah. I mean, what, what comes to mind for you when, when I say that, is there one or two, when you say there's a couple, what stands out?
34:43Josh Larsen:The one that comes to mind is another moment of the dad capturing the family in looseness. And this is back in the kitchen.
34:53Adam Kempenaar:Yes.
34:54Josh Larsen:And yeah, the sifting of the baking powder,
34:58Adam Kempenaar:sifting of the bake. Yeah. And going into the dark room, that entire sequence, right? Yeah. Yeah. And the dark room is key.
35:05Josh Larsen:Like, you know, as we both touched on the father with this recording habit, what does he say at one point? And this isn't pushed to too heavily, you know, I almost don't want to say it because it makes the movie sound way more thematic than it is. But he just calmly says something about, you know, the developing film is it's kind of like going back in time. And he just casually mentioned, you know, the exact line.
35:28Adam Kempenaar:It's so good. And he does. He says it so casually, it is almost hard to catch. But he says it's in the fixer, you know, whatever the chemicals you use in the dark room. I haven't been in a dark room since seventh grade. So bear with me. But the picture is developing. It's coming to life. And think about the metaphor of that here, especially in this movie, based on everything we're saying about the construct of this film and this image of this family that was just taken minutes before. Now they're in the dark room bringing time back. And he says, time is going backwards. It's a time warp. He says, yeah, it is.
36:06Adam Kempenaar:This whole movie is a time warp. And of course that image itself is a time warp. Yeah.
36:11Josh Larsen:And it's played way more lightly than, than, you know, we're describing it. It works really beautifully. We should probably say the father played by Adam Tompa and the mother, Aringo Reti, both very good. And you mentioned how, you know, the tools, when we're talking about developing here, photography, the tools to try to recapture these memories. Of course, we get more of that in the second half of the film, which I think I probably, maybe we do want to leave as a surprise for viewers. Sure. Except to say it becomes more explicit about the tools that the older Sasha employs to recapture some of these memories as a filmmaker.
36:49Josh Larsen:And there's really sort of a formal break in this movie That's very bold where past and present.
36:57Adam Kempenaar:Yes. That's that I was referring to. Yeah.
37:00Josh Larsen:Yeah. There's a break, but then, then it comes, both come back together. Right. Magically in ways I do want to leave as a surprise, but are absolutely where I was. I was already in as on this as a golden brick, but at that point I was like, oh yeah, this fits so well. It's also connected to, you know, you mentioned the top after sun, which I've seen elsewhere. also charlotte wells brilliant brilliant film of just a couple years ago now and i think it's a fair comparison i do want to say to me there's a crucial distinction in how they handle this past and present blending and maybe helps me explain why after sun at least at this point after just one viewing of blue heron did have such a stronger impression on me is simply because that movie it sort of brings past and present together, like drops it like a hammer on you when that happens in that movie.
37:55Josh Larsen:And here we see, it's like this gentle convergence and, you know, for different viewers, one might be more effective than another, but I think it's a key distinction. I just don't want this to be, you know, thought of as like just another after sun. There are some similarities. It's very distinct in a lot of ways, but I still think at the same time, if you were incredibly moved by after sun, then you need to see Blue Heron as soon as you can.
38:18Adam Kempenaar:I would echo that. And I just briefly want to go back to the dark room and the pictures that they're developing there, even in this house with so much struggle and so much tumult and the weight hanging over it and all hanging over every moment, it seems of her childhood almost. And the weight that the parents have to carry that those performers do portray so well. Nevertheless, there are moments like that. And I'll go back to the tree of life for a second. There are such moments of grace and a moment of grace that we get is that that falling powder. Right. And even even with all of that, Jeremy can give us moments with his siblings and moments with his with his parents looking on or the dad looking on in this case.
39:05Adam Kempenaar:That's that's beautiful and touching and tender. And, and, and of course then, I mean, he's capturing everything, but maybe that's why he's capturing everything is because, because if he doesn't, he's, he's going to miss moments like that, which do occur, but they're rare.
39:19Josh Larsen:I think you're absolutely right. I think it's his recognition that all we will remember if we don't have these is maybe the difficulty. And of course, this is what makes it tragic as well is that this is not just a kid who's creating utter distress and violence in the home where some decisions might be easier than just out of protection for other kids. This is a family that still is able to have these moments together, and they're desperately trying to figure out how to make that their entire experience instead of these little intermittent, unexpected moments of grace you described that they have to capture with a camera.
40:03Adam Kempenaar:I do want to say, going back to your point about After Sun, and I'll close here, and I think we can get into this a little bit or I can express this without needing to divulge any spoilers. I don't think we have to for this review at this point. I do wish that perhaps like After Sun, it traversed that ambiguity of the liminal space maybe a little more deeply or it blurred the lines in a way. I like that it's distinct, but I think maybe what I'm getting at, Josh, is that in the end, for me, for the weight of this film to really hit as powerfully as something like Aftersun did, the mission of it felt a little bit too clear.
40:52Adam Kempenaar:And what I mean by that is both the mission as laid out by the voiceover at the beginning and then by the voice we get at the very end and what it's expressing. And that's the actress who's playing Ramvari. what she says in both the beginning and the end. For the lack of answers that the movie exposes, and it does. This movie, as we've said multiple times, I don't think this movie tries to suggest that there is any easy reckoning with any type of situation like this or that childhood itself is something we can just dwell on in our past and make sense of, anything like that. For me, in those final images and in the bookending, I suppose I felt like there was still a little bit too much closure.
41:44Adam Kempenaar:And the imagery itself, the mechanism for the closure, here's where I'm being vague, the mechanism for the closure maybe felt just a little bit too facile, for lack of a better word. If you know what I mean, some of the closing images were, for me, didn't, we're at odds a little bit with the, the challenging nature of so much of the rest of the film.
42:08Josh Larsen:Let me just ask, and I can be vague here. If the point of contention for you was a zoom, was it actually the use of a zoom and how that, um, because I actually found that it's not the last shot, but it might be the third to last or fourth to last.
42:26Adam Kempenaar:Yeah. Okay. Yeah. All right. Well, Well, I'm thinking about more who populates the shot, though, than I am the shot choice itself.
42:34Josh Larsen:Yeah. Okay. Okay. That worked for me, actually. Okay. I thought, yeah, I thought. But it does bring, you're right, it does bring a certain closure, even if it doesn't bring answers. I can see the distinction you're making.
42:48Adam Kempenaar:Yeah. Yes. Okay. Blue Heron is out now, like we said, still rolling out, I believe, to more theaters this spring. So you might get a chance to see it at a theater near you. If you do get a chance to see it or if you've already seen it and you would like to weigh in, we would love to hear your thoughts about the film. You can email us feedback at filmspotting.net. For Film Spotting, I'm Adam Kempinar.
43:11Josh Larsen:And I'm Josh Larson.
43:13Adam Kempenaar:Thanks for listening.
43:14Josh Larsen:This conversation can serve no purpose anymore. Goodbye.
43:25You did it. You wrote the book. But now what? If you're struggling to figure out how to get your manuscript published, Christian Faith Publishing is here to help. They are an author-friendly publisher that works with writers just like you. People with a message, a story, and a purpose. They will guide you through the entire process. Editing, cover design, page layout, printing, distribution. Your book can be available in bookstores and online everywhere readers are looking. And the best part? They review your manuscript for free. Stop wondering what to do next and start moving forward. Visit ChristianFaithPublishing.com today to get your free publishing guide.
44:05Chicago talks a lot. Hold on, let me step over here. People are talking too much. We debate about food, deep dish, tavern style, who's got the best beef? We yell across rooms, across blocks, across generations. Yes, nice earrings, Grammy. And now we're doing it on our phones, too. Video calls from the L train, group chats that never shut up. Neighbors texting you the score before your TV catches up. Get a load of this guy. Ketchup on a dog. Yeah, we've got thoughts. Because nothing here gets built without conversation. Nothing moves without connection. So if you think you know AT &T, it might be time to rethink that.
44:43Because their network has improved, like, a lot. which means Chicagoans can keep speaking their mind with the top-rated fiber internet in the city. Chicago won't stop talking. Our improved network backs it up. AT &T, connecting changes everything. AT &T Fiber, limited availability in select areas. Top-rated and fastest internet. AT &T Fiber, based on analysis by Ooclub's because intelligence data 2H 2025. Another podcast from some SNL late-night comedy guy. Not quite. Unhumor me with Robert Smigel and friends. Me and hilarious guests from Bob Odenkirk to David Letterman help make you funnier. This week, my guests, SNL's Mikey Day and head writer Streeter Seidel help an acapella band with their between songs banter.
45:24Where does your group perform? We do some retirement homes. Those people are starving for banter. Listen to Humor Me with Robert Smigel and friends on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Last night, a blown call changed the game. This morning, the internet lost its mind and nobody's telling you exactly what happened. That's where Sports Slice comes in. I'm Timbo, and every episode, we're cutting through the noise, breaking down the biggest moments in sports, and giving you the real story behind the headlines. And we're going straight to the source, the athletes themselves, their locker room stories, their reactions in the moment, and the stuff nobody gets to hear.
46:01Listen to Sports Slice on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. And for more, follow TimboSliceLife12 and the TikTok Podcast Network on TikTok.
From the publisher
Adam and Josh review Sophy Romvari’s debut feature Blue Heron, a semi-autobiographical "memory piece" that follows a Hungarian immigrant family on Vancouver Island in the late 1990s. They discuss Romvari’s distinct "observational elegance," the film’s striking meta-elements, and how it stacks up against other recent memory-focused masterworks like Aftersun. Plus, a look at why this is already a frontrunner for the 2026 Golden Brick.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.




