In short
A 10th-anniversary rewatch review of Spike Jonze’s Her, focusing on how it portrays “soft sci-fi” AI, relational authenticity, embodiment, and Joaquin Phoenix/Scarlett Johansson’s performances; also compares the film’s tone to other AI cautionary tales and discusses modern AI fears.
Guests
Josh (Film Spotting Archive host/reviewer) and Adam (co-host/reviewer). They reference their earlier 2014 Film Spotting review and a prior “bonus show” that discussed Theodore’s performance in Her.
Key claims
The movie is less about predicting technology and more about love, loneliness, and growth “anytime, any place, any technology.” Its muted palette (no blue; red/warm ambers) supports a wistful, cocoon-like future. Sound design and close-ups make Samantha’s voice feel intimate, mirroring the viewer’s headphone experience.
Notable examples
Theodore’s close-up acting; the first successful sex scene (including a black screen); the next-day awkwardness; the surrogate-body sequence; Theodore’s 50th-anniversary letter role-playing; the ending reconciliation via email.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOOverview of 'Her'
2:29 to 2:49
Discussion of the film 'Her' and its significance in the context of Joaquin Phoenix's performances.
“you can personalize your workouts and train with confidence.”
Overview of 'Her'
3:29 to 4:16
Discussion of the film 'Her' and its significance in the context of Joaquin Phoenix's performances.
“Plenty of discussion of his performance took place on that bonus show, so we put Her in the penalty box for our top five list.”
Visuals and Themes in 'Her'
4:16 to 5:44
Exploration of the cinematography and thematic elements of 'Her'.
“We're excited, Josh, to talk about Spike Jones's Her, a film that we did review together back in January 2014.”
Human Connection and Technology
5:44 to 7:50
Discussion on how 'Her' addresses themes of human connection and technology.
“that I would love to see more of, but for now, at least we've got her to take another look at.”
Color Palette and Emotional Tone
7:50 to 9:21
Analyzing the color choices in 'Her' and their emotional implications.
“I don't think this movie is that concerned about predicting anything or nailing any specific tech experience we're having.”
Joaquin Phoenix's Performance
9:21 to 14:00
In-depth analysis of Joaquin Phoenix's role in 'Her' and its impact.
“and according to what I found, it was after 2013.”
Exploring Joaquin Phoenix's Performance
14:00 to 15:10
Discussing Joaquin Phoenix's layered and expressive portrayal in 'Her'.
“Was there anything that surprised you or was it pretty much what you remembered?”
Character Development Through Close-Ups
15:10 to 20:30
Analyzing the impact of close-up shots on character connection and viewer investment.
“And then when I knew we weren't going to talk about it that week, I put it off and I started it from the beginning and watched it in its entirety.”
Scarlett Johansson's Voice Performance
20:30 to 23:10
Understanding Scarlett Johansson's vocal nuances in portraying Samantha.
“I think this is the performance where I really became keenly aware of how talented she was.”
Themes of Embodiment and Connection
23:10 to 25:50
Discussing the film's exploration of embodiment and human connection.
“And then I get angry at myself for even having pain.”
Show all 15 chapters
The Complexity of AI Relationships
25:50 to 28:00
Examining the nature of relationships between humans and artificial intelligence.
“He's sitting there with Amy Adams, who is so good in this movie, by the way, just incredible.”
Exploring Authentic Relationships in 'Her'
28:00 to 36:24
The hosts discuss the complexities of authentic relationships portrayed in the film 'Her', focusing on the emotional dynamics between Theodore and Samantha.
“I suppose it's not that subtle to actually go to black on the screen.”
The Role of Surrogates in Relationships
36:24 to 38:00
The discussion highlights the intriguing concept of surrogates in relationships, contrasting Theodore's role as a writer with Samantha's role as an AI.
“Yeah, I'm just the letter writing thing is so fascinating to me.”
The Human Experience and AI
38:00 to 42:10
The hosts reflect on how 'Her' portrays the human experience and emotional connections, emphasizing gratitude and understanding in relationships.
“I don't know how many other depictions of AI there are to draw from, but the ones that I can think about, certainly a movie we both love comes to mind like Ex Machina, right?”
Exploring Themes of AI and Relationships in 'Her'
42:10 to 45:24
The hosts discuss the themes of gratitude and the implications of AI in relationships as depicted in the film 'Her'.
“Again, the bodies that we have and the ways those allow us to participate in relationship.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human. This is Matt Rogers from Las Culture East. That's with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang. This is Bowen Yang from Las Culture East. That's with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang. You know when people try a new food and suddenly it's like, okay, hold on. I got a new favorite food. That's the reaction a lot of people are having when they first try Kewpie mayo. Yeah, it's the one with the red cap and the little baby on the bottle. You've probably seen it at the grocery store. And this mayo is different. Mm-hmm. Most mayonnaise uses whole eggs. Kewpie only uses egg yolks, which gives it this rich umami flavor.
0:33It's smoother, deeper, almost buttery. Once people try it, they start putting it on everything. Egg sandwiches, fries, burgers. Chefs use it. Restaurants use it. People who really care about flavor use it. Put it on just about anything. Then you'll understand. Kewpie, the original Japanese mayonnaise. If you like YouTube, you'll love YouTube Premium. Hi, I'm Sean Evans from Hot Ones, and I want to tell you about YouTube Premium. It has offline downloads, so you can watch without Wi-Fi. Background play, so you can lock your phone and it still plays, baby. Oh, and it is completely ad-free. Yes, I said it, ad-free.
1:09Try YouTube Premium for two months free at youtube.com slash premium. Trial eligibility varies, terms apply, cancel anytime. Amazon Health AI presents Painful Thoughts. Why did I search the internet for answers to my cold sore problem? Now I'm stuck down a rabbit hole filled with images of alarmingly graphic sores in various stages of ooze. I can clear my search history, but I can never unsee that. Don't go down the rabbit hole. Amazon Health AI gets you the right care fast. Healthcare just got less painful. You gave everything you could give and now it's time to take the next step. Hey, it's Emily Tisch-Sussman.
1:53And this season on She Pivots, the podcast where women share bold career moves and personal turning points. I sit down with culture-shifting women who share their pivots like Elizabeth Smart. I still feel that drive that I can still make a difference. So I'm going to keep going. And feminist legend, Gloria Steinem. All of us were trying to express women's real lives. Listen to She Pivots on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. This episode is brought to you by Peloton. Break through the busiest time of year with the brand new Peloton Cross Training Tread Plus.
2:27Powered by Peloton IQ. With real-time guidance and endless ways to move, you can personalize your workouts and train with confidence. Helping you reach your goals in less time. Let yourself run, lift, sculpt, push, and go. Explore the new Peloton Cross Training Tread Plus at OnePeloton.com.
2:49what kind of a show are you guys putting on here today you're not interested in art no
2:53Josh Larsen:well look we're going to do this thing we're going to have a conversation hey film spotters josh here the film spotting archive has reviews top fives and more going back to 2005 access to the archive is just one of the benefits you get as a film spotting family member, which you can learn more about at filmspottingfamily.com. As you'll hear on this week's show, our top five Joaquin Phoenix performances from 2023 has a notable omission. His performance as Theodore in Spike Jonze's Her. That's because Her was the subject of that month's bonus show. Plenty of discussion of his performance took place on that bonus show, so we put Her in the penalty box for our top five list.
3:39Josh Larsen:That Her conversation was a bonus show that only went to family members. So here for the first time in the main feed is our 10th anniversary review of Her. Mr. Theodore Twombly, welcome to the world's first artificially intelligent operating system. We'd like to ask you a few questions. Okay. Are you social or antisocial? I guess I haven't been social and a while. How would you describe your relationship with your mother? Thank you. Please wait as your operating system is initiated. Hello, I'm here. Hi. Hi, I'm Samantha.
4:20Adam Kempenaar:We're excited, Josh, to talk about Spike Jones's Her, a film that we did review together back in January 2014. A fix episode referenced this, I think, on our last show, a double feature her and inside lewin davis talked about those movies we didn't have a full show crossing over into the new year but had a couple big titles we knew we wanted to talk about and we figured our listeners would want to hear us talk about both of those films worthy of revisits like the one we're going to give to her now upon its 10th anniversary i think the way i would start out this discussion is to simply say, Spike Jones, make another movie challenge.
5:03Josh Larsen:Yeah. How about it? I mean, that's one of the first things I looked up and there's been what some TV or is it mostly music video TV?
5:11Adam Kempenaar:He was doing something for Viceland. I think it has been more music videos, but for films, Josh, is that right? We get her, maybe not going in order here, but her where the wild things are, of course, adaptation and being John Malkovich. These are all really good films.
5:28Josh Larsen:Yeah. I mean, I guess I can understand the temptation having done all those to say, I'm good. I don't know if I can top any of that, but still this is a filmmaker, especially after this revisit where I came away liking her even a little bit more than I did initially that I would love to see more of, but for now, at least we've got her to take another look at.
5:49Adam Kempenaar:I don't want to dwell on any negatives, especially as you said, you gave it a positive review the first time, but you did like it even more the second time. What did you like more? And maybe what did you not give enough credit to the first time around?
6:03Josh Larsen:Yeah, I don't know if I had any specific complaints. I think I opened my written review at least saying a little talky. The movie's a little talky. And of course it is, right? That's the nature of this narrative. And maybe it was just, you know, someone as visually inventive as Spike Jonze. My expectations going in perhaps is what was at play there and knowing it was going to be sci-fi and all the different visualizations you could have. But you know what? That's underselling what we do get here. It is. Right? Because the cinematographer, Hoyt Van Hoytema, it's soft sci-fi. The way we've talked about, say, you know, after Yang.
6:43Josh Larsen:Koganad is after Yang. I was going to reference it too. Right? It's in the lighting, the softness of the lighting, the softness of the costume design. the colors here, the color scheme. And these are all things I did appreciate to a degree when I first saw it. I described the pastel hues as like candy hearts that have gotten old and lost their pop. And what I was trying to get at there is this is a movie that it's wistful. It's sad, but it's also full of possibility. And it's excited about potential and it holds those things together. The visuals do that too. So I think maybe I was just expecting a different type of visuals that I didn't get.
7:27Josh Larsen:And while I appreciated what I did get, should have maybe just set my expectations entirely aside. So yeah, that's kind of where the two responses compare. But overall, Adam, I think what I liked about the movie better this time is not worrying so much about it being, what is it predicting? What is it saying about where we're at? And having had a fair amount of what it predicts take place since then, I'm starting to realize this is a movie that's really about relational authenticity, anytime, any place, any technology. I don't think this movie is that concerned about predicting anything or nailing any specific tech experience we're having.
8:09And about growth as a human being and how technology can impact that positively and negatively.
8:18Adam Kempenaar:And of course, also how you grow and evolve as a human being, even if you're not actually a human being and how those two concepts interact with each other. Definitely thought about after Yang because – and I appreciated this the first time around as well. This depiction of the future is one where it's not what we expect in that it's neither a utopia that's maybe truly a dystopia. Then we're going to have some reveal that way. Or it's also not clearly a dystopia. It just seems like an extension of our current world. It seems like a near future. I can completely buy it. And I don't question it as a near future or need to be wrestling with the rules of the universe.
9:03Adam Kempenaar:It all somehow coheres. And I think part of it is, of course, what it did accurately predict. I maybe came across the wrong information, but Josh, this is what I found when I Googled it. I was trying to look up when AirPods were invented, when the whole idea of earbuds were created. and according to what I found, it was after 2013. I mean, maybe there were very early incarnations like in the mid 2004, 2005 range, but otherwise they weren't really a thing until 2015, 2016 around there. And of course, that's entirely how people in this world communicate. They're really not communicating with each other at all, which is very much like the world we live in right now.
9:50Adam Kempenaar:This feels just slightly heightened, right? Where he's on mass transit or he's walking in the street or walking around his building. And it's not as if people seem crazy unhappy or dissatisfied with their lives, but they are completely within their own universes. The earbuds in and they're focused on whoever they're talking to digitally somehow and not the people around them. And so that that that feels right. and maybe I said they're not outwardly suffering necessarily, but maybe just like Theodore, they're all a little bit lonely too. And that's why they feel this need to have this constant connection to something, even if it's a voice or it's checking their email or whatever it is.
10:38Adam Kempenaar:And you mentioned Hoyt Van Hoytema, the cinematographer. This is one of his early films. He hadn't done the Nolan movies yet, but he had made Tinker Tailor, Soldier Spy, maybe at least one other film. I was looking up a detail today and I came across the fact that apparently this checks out with my rewatch of the film anyway. There's no blue in the movie. Yeah, that makes sense. They didn't want to include a color. Certainly didn't want it to be dominant, but it's not in there at all. They just took it out of the palette. They said, we're not going to use the color that's most typically associated with science fiction.
11:14Adam Kempenaar:So as you said, we don't get those blues. We instead get the reds and the warm yellows and even some browns, those amber hues. We do get some gray. We get some gray in the buildings in the urban environment as we see the buildings and those landscapes. But it's muted. It's not techno. It's not sleek at all. And that use of color really is so striking here because you think about how dominant red is. It's easy to think about. you see the cover of the poster or the DVD or whatever. It's him wearing a red shirt against a red background. You immediately associate that color with this film. And you think of red as this very intense color, a very passionate color.
11:59Adam Kempenaar:It can be even a little maybe off-putting or it can make you a little anxious perhaps. And they use it here in a way that doesn't suggest any of that, but it's so dominant. He is often wearing that red shirt. the red operating system when it when it starts up the lighting in his apartment i mean it really is constant it's in almost every frame i even noticed josh that the text of the os packaging like when he takes it out of the box it's white paper with red lettering which you'd never have red lettering probably against something you'd go with just black but it's red here and something about that use of red.
12:43Adam Kempenaar:Again, I mentioned all the different ways you think about red. And I think about Theodore as a very passionate character, a very soulful character. And that red makes sense. But red can also be something that is, I'll use the word intense again. And you don't feel that here. And it doesn't feel like it clashes. It doesn't feel like it doesn't make sense, that use of color against this world, even though he's so melancholy. I guess that's really it. I don't think of such a melancholy, wistful movie. I don't associate that with the color red, but that's kind of the point is that he's someone who is passionate and is soulful and is sensitive and is seeking that kind of color, I suppose, in his life.
13:29Josh Larsen:It's almost like a womb-like red. And I think there's something about or cocoon like that all of the people we meet are in. It's this future is, yeah, it's not a dystopia. Everyone's very comfortable and almost so comfortable that they don't realize it's anesthetizing. If I said that right, in a way they don't realize their loneliness fully because there are these devices that are distracting them from their loneliness by making them think they're not lonely. and the color scheme around that that's very enveloping and comforting again i think plays a part in that so you we already touched on you know we're doing this partly because we were thinking about walking phoenix performances right and um i'm curious to see because i think this is something i did underrate a little bit though i thought he was good before what did you think of the performance in light of the things we talked about in the top five we recently did.
14:32Josh Larsen:Was there anything that surprised you or was it pretty much what you remembered?
14:35Adam Kempenaar:I'm looking forward to you articulating in a way I've been struggling to come up with why Joaquin Phoenix is so remarkably good in this role. I don't know that I have it. I'll try to get at something here, but I love this performance. And I think one of the reasons why I could revisit this movie again and again, I actually kind of watched it twice for this review because we were initially going to talk about it a week ago, I think. And I started watching it and I got through 90 minutes of it. I had 30 minutes left. And then when I knew we weren't going to talk about it that week, I put it off and I started it from the beginning and watched it in its entirety.
15:16Adam Kempenaar:So I've seen more or less the film twice in the past two weeks. And I feel like, Josh, I have such a warm feeling about it, and I have such a warm feeling about Phoenix's performance, Johansson's performance, their interactions with each other, that I kind of just want to put it on and have it in the background a lot. And he's playing a character. He's got that mustache. He's got the glasses that he frequently touches up to the bridge of his nose. There's some mannerisms in terms of not quite Freddy Quell-like, but in terms of the way he stands and some faces that he makes that it's Phoenix putting on a character, but nobody puts on a character better than Joaquin Phoenix, where it's never distracting.
16:02Adam Kempenaar:It never feels fussy or overly theatrical. He just comes off as, I'll say the word again, sensitive and lonely, but not depressed, not someone who is disengaged or wants to be disengaged with the world. And the one thing I remember saying during our top five Joaquin Phoenix performances that applies here, one of the reasons why it was in my head wasn't just the movies we were talking about, but having at the time watched most of her again. Think about how much of this film is just Joaquin Phoenix's face and him reacting, him reacting to things. He's reacting to what he's hearing. He doesn't have an actor opposite him most of the time to feed off of.
16:44Adam Kempenaar:and he's so expressive and there's so much yearning that naturally comes through in him that I love the character. I love the performance. Again, I'm struggling a little bit because it's not as if I can point to one, two or three choices Phoenix makes that I think get us to that point. It's just Joaquin Phoenix doing what he almost always does on screen, which is be really fascinating.
17:09Josh Larsen:I think it's recognizing the high degree of difficulty unassuming difficulty like you wouldn't initially think this was a hard part right but these doing two things and you've hinted at both of them incredibly well that are way more difficult than they might appear one of them is to be in close-up and this often this frequently this intensely held close-up the other thing is to act with yourself so there's no one on the screen giving you anything back and a, that he pulls this off and does it so masterfully that we're completely invested in Theodore's inner life and rooting for him, feeling we understand him fully feeling.
17:56Josh Larsen:We might know him better than Samantha. I think we almost become possessive of Theodore. I had that feeling of kind of the feeling was, and this is all related to Phoenix's performance and the way he nudges his way into our hearts as viewers, I had the feeling of the best friend who is watching your friend begin a new relationship you're not quite so sure about, and you don't know how to tell it to them. When he begins this relationship with Samantha, you're a little bit suspicious because of the technological aspect, but I think we're more suspicious because at that point, Phoenix, through those close-ups, through opening himself up to us, being that tight on the camera and authentic in that closeup, um, and doing all this without someone else on the screen to distract us.
18:45Josh Larsen:We're not, this is why we're so attached to him too. It's just him and us. Now it's not, he's not speaking to the camera, but so often there's no one else in the scene, but that he's still bringing all this, all this authenticity to it. Um, I think is why we do form such an attachment to him. So it's a masterclass in those two things, Acting alone and acting within a closeup. And then just to go back to your note about, you know, how he carries himself. This was one of the first things I noticed is the unhurried slouch he has at the start when all he has are his earbuds and he's talking to his, you know, device.
19:27Josh Larsen:This is a guy who has nowhere to go. He tells us that by the pace and the posture of his walk. And then what happens once he meets Samantha, his step picks up a little bit and his posture picks up a little bit. Purpose.
19:44Adam Kempenaar:He has a sense of purpose. He's got a purpose now. You feel it.
19:47Josh Larsen:And it's, you know, as we describe it, it's obvious, right? And it seems like these would be obvious things that an actor would do, but I don't think most actors would do it. And it's something, again, we talked about physicality so much in our top five, that Phoenix is deeply attuned to the full body physicality of his characters. And he brings that to a performance that most of the body we see is his face. So it's just, you know, it's almost in the context of all his other performances that this becomes even more impressive. Not just in the gentleness or quietness, but in those scenes where so many tools are taken away from him and he still registers this strongly.
20:26Adam Kempenaar:Yeah, I also feel that way or close, certainly about Scarlett Johansson. I think this is the performance where I really became keenly aware of how talented she was. I was a little down on Scarlett Johansson, kind of Brad Pitt like earlier in her career. She was someone like Pitt who I thought had a movie star sensibility to her, but I thought when she tried to veer too much into playing characters, it felt a little bit of force. She didn't have the natural instincts, it seemed to me, just like Pitt, that someone like Joaquin Phoenix has when it comes to playing characters. And we never see her here, but all of her vocal choices, the fact that, of course, she doesn't play it, the movie wouldn't work this way.
21:08Adam Kempenaar:She doesn't play it in any way as if she is playing someone or something that is not human, that the voice is going to sound computer-like or data-like. She sounds natural and authentically herself and someone who is – I think the key difference is it doesn't even have to be a matter of the voice. Like she's talking, quote-unquote, like a robot, which would be silly and she doesn't do. It's that she's also not responding to things too quickly or too matter-of-factly as if she's already processed everything and she's giving you her reaction because it's a reaction that's been preordained. It's been pre-programmed.
21:54Adam Kempenaar:It is truly as if in the performance you sense what she expresses about her and what makes her unique, which is she is constantly evolving. She has intuition. she's taking in all of the information around her and all of her experiences in the moment and is evolving that's exactly what we're all doing too and what Theodore is doing we're just not doing it with the pace or the same magnitude that it is for her character earlier I was thinking about how I was annoyed and I know this is going to sound strange but I was really excited about that. And then I was thinking about the other things I've been feeling, and I caught myself feeling proud of that, you know, proud of having my own feelings about the world, like the times I was worried about you, and things that hurt me, things I want.
22:55And then I had this terrible thought, Like, are these feelings even real? Or are they just programming? And that idea really hurts. And then I get angry at myself for even having pain. Oh, what a sad trick.
Read the full transcript
23:24Josh Larsen:Well, could there be a more vivacious voice than the one that Johansson is using here? And what I mean by that specifically is full of life, because that's what, you know, Samantha believes she's alive from the start. You get that sense, right? But we have to hear that. All we can get that sense of is hearing it in her voice. Not what she tells us, not the argument she makes for that, not the reasoning, but the actual vocal quality of a being that is so happy to be alive and is yearning for other ways of living. I think this connects with another thing that struck me about this viewing is that her to me is very much about embodiment and is helpful in being grateful to have a body and to be fully alive.
24:23Josh Larsen:I think that is what Samantha wants. How about the phrase she says? I think it's during the first sex scene. I can feel my skin. that, you know, that is what is exciting her is this sense of embodiment. And there's a shot, there's a throwaway shot that was crucial for me here where Theodore is watching dancers out. You talked well about, you know, we're all siloed off in this world, yet here's a moment where he gets outside of himself and he sees some people out in public dancing. And that's something you require a body for. And there are other moments where disembodiment does not work. How about the first sex scene where he is calling up some sort of chat, right?
25:10Josh Larsen:A woman. The cat. Yeah, yeah. And that kind of goes awry. Or even there's another one, Adam, too, when Samantha arranges the surrogate woman to be her body. I want to talk about that. To be her body. Well, this is what What registered for me here is that that doesn't work for him. And I think one of the reasons is because while it is attempted embodiment, it is still not Samantha's body. And there is a gap between soul and body that that encounter cannot cover. And I think that's, that's partly why that doesn't work. Even the ending of this film is an embodied real world experience, right? With another person.
25:54Josh Larsen:He's sitting there with Amy Adams, who is so good in this movie, by the way, just incredible. And they're sitting there doing something you can only do if you have eyes to see it and appreciate with someone who's there, there with you. And, and I don't mean all of this to say that the movie is making an argument for embodiments against an AI presence like Samantha. I think it is recognizing that's what Samantha yearns for as well.
26:19Adam Kempenaar:First, I'm glad you said that about Amy Adams, because I noted just some people in the cast here that we get that maybe we even forgot we're in this film. Like Amy Adams, who's so good. Like for the second time this week for us, Chris Pratt. Yeah, I totally forgot that. I know it's fashionable to hate on Chris Pratt. Guess what? There's a reason why I had him higher on my Chris Power ranking list than a lot of other people do. He's actually really talented. He's a really entertaining, charismatic, funny actor, but not just funny and entertaining. There is some depth to him, and he's really good here as well.
26:55Adam Kempenaar:Small scene, only has a few of them, but he's really good. Olivia Wilde shows up. Great scene. Oh, she's so good. Great scene, that date that goes very awry. Another side of Theodore you see there, too. Another side of Theodore. And then we also get even the voice of Brian Cox. I know. Is Alan Watts. A real character, Alan Watts. I had to look that up today. I didn't know. I'll confess my ignorance here. A real man who died, I think, in the 70s, and the idea that they brought him back, that also seems like something we're heading for so obviously, right? Where we're going to be able to talk with people from the past somehow through their writing.
27:29Adam Kempenaar:AI has already done some of that, taking people's voices. I'm thinking about the Anthony Bourdain doc, and it was just one line, but how controversial that was. But those performances are really good. One other part of the sex scene that I love, that first really successful sex scene between Samantha and Theodore, I love the choice to go to black in that moment and just let these two characters have this private moment there. I was going to say it's a subtle choice. I suppose it's not that subtle to actually go to black on the screen. But we only hear it. We let the characters have it. I think it's a great choice.
28:11Adam Kempenaar:And then I love The Next Day because I think this is one of the things the movie really wants to explore is the ways that a relationship with an OS like this, with an artificial intelligence is not quote unquote real, but all the ways that it is very much real. All the same things that you get from a conventional relationship. What are the things that transfer to this? And it really is no different once you allow your brain to look at it from that perspective. How about the next day after that sex scene, Josh, that it's now a little bit awkward between them? He kind of holds off, you can tell, on getting back online that day.
28:49Adam Kempenaar:And then when he does, they kind of talk over each other a little bit. It's the closest thing to a traditional rom-com moment we get in this film. But it feels it feels right. Any of us who've ever had any experience like that with any intimacy whatsoever, you know, the next day, it's sort of like, did that really happen? Like, what's the what's the new dynamic now? I love I love that part. I think another thing that really works about the performance. it's johansson's performance i don't want to take anything away from that but one of the ways the film overall ends up having the impact that it does and the the way we can buy in and we can believe that the relationship is as quote-unquote real and as authentic and as close to matching whatever we perceive as a traditional or real human relationship is the fact that just like she is a voice in his head she's a voice in our heads she she is a voice and we're having that same experience that he is but it's even the decision with the sound design to have most of the outside world closed off so that all you're hearing even at the beach right you don't hear beach sounds when he goes though it also struck me that the beach is the one place where people don't seem to be totally just obsessed with their devices.
30:14Adam Kempenaar:They're actually talking to other people. It's the only time we see that. Yeah.
30:18Josh Larsen:It's to set him apart, right? It's to set him apart. Yeah.
30:21Adam Kempenaar:But we don't hear any beach sounds when he's walking, he's going to work or going home. We're not hearing the clamor of the streets, the sounds of people walking, the sounds of people talking. It's all the soundscape of what earbuds, what AirPods sound like. where there's that noise reduction and you're only getting that voice in your head. And there is, and I'm saying this acknowledging, look, I not only have been doing podcasting for a long time, but I teach it now. And I talk about the intimacy of podcasting and there being something to the fact that you put on these headphones and you hear these voices in your head and you feel more connected to those people than you do watching the characters on the big screen or TV.
31:03Adam Kempenaar:It's just a fact. There is something more intimate about it. And that intimacy of her being in his head, it matches the exact same experience we have as viewers.
31:14Josh Larsen:I wanted to talk a little bit about the idea of role playing in this movie as well, because I think we get a hint at this, a hint of this very early on the scene where it's kind of a switcheroo. We hear him writing, but reading the 50th anniversary letter. And we think, right, is this him?
31:34Adam Kempenaar:We don't know it isn't him until he says something about like my naked body. And it's clearly, yeah, he's talking from a female perspective.
31:42Josh Larsen:Yes. And it's just hints a couple things is how invested he is in his work, that he's proud of it. He puts a lot into it, but he is playing a role there. And this is all connected to the idea of authentic relationships. What are authentic relationships? and we see it, I think maybe that night or the next night when he does have that late night chat with a woman and notice he's smiling, I think when he's composing the message, but then his face goes flat when he says send. And there's a, it's clear he's playing a role there, right? For a, yes, for a transactional purpose. So just as in doing his job, he has to play a role in meeting this woman for a late night chat there is a transactional purpose send send is and seen yeah exactly yeah
32:33Adam Kempenaar:it's the end of the scene and now he's back to normal theodore and notice what happens and notice
32:38Josh Larsen:what happens when he and samantha do have that sex scene she doesn't hang up afterwards like the two of them in that chat immediately hang up you know transaction made we're done we got what we needed here there's still some sort of relationship so i think these are all hints um in terms of what is an authentic relationship and how does role playing sometimes get in the way of that? How was it maybe a hurdle for Theodore? And it's not until he is able to drop all those masks that he's able to connect with Samantha on a deeper level. And this is all just goes back to the idea of, you know, this is really more about relationships than any sort of ethical concerns about AI for me.
33:17Adam Kempenaar:Absolutely. Absolutely. And I'm going to highlight or underscore something here about the work he does as a writer and that we see at the beginning. And a scene that you brought up that for me was the big surprise of the film on this rewatch. Surprise meaning I had completely forgotten that this scene was in the film. and it really surprised me and really kind of shook me and moved me as I watched it. And that's the surrogate scene. And I think some of this may get back to what you were saying, Josh, about the complexities or what the movie wants to explore in terms of physical embodiment. He can't accept the surrogate situation, despite the fact that all she is doing, if you really think about it, Josh, is being the surrogate for a relationship that he embodies every day multiple times at work.
34:17Adam Kempenaar:As the writer of those letters, he is her. He knows the people he's writing to. He has a sense of the history of their relationship. He has long relationships with these clients. Just like she feels like she knows them. She says, I'll always love you. And Josh, that's another thing to go off slightly off topic for just a second. That was another thing that seemed to me eerily prescient. A point I see that we could be going to with these types of relationships is that that woman. I don't think is some far-fetched thing. This idea that the way we live with these parasocial relationships and our, our relationships and connections to people we don't actually know, but we feel like we know them because you interact with them so much every day on social media.
35:09Adam Kempenaar:You think, you know, them as people we joke, or you see people online joking about that couple. I love them so much. Yes. I know that's probably mostly hyperbole or it's an expression of love love or admiration for them, but it doesn't cross a line. Okay. But I could see it going there. I could see us further and further down that path where people like her aren't something we just see in quote unquote science fiction movies. But that was a connection I made this time that I definitely didn't the first time around that he is able to be the surrogate for all these other relationships. And it feels completely real to the people, the people getting those letters and procuring the letters, no, they know that someone else is writing them, not their lover.
35:55Adam Kempenaar:They don't care. It's real enough to them. It's real and it works. He's the surrogate for them. But when she's the surrogate for him and her relationship, there's something where a line has been crossed. He can't pretend.
36:09Josh Larsen:Yeah, I think it does come back to embodiment because he is an emotional surrogate with those letters. He's not a physical surrogate. And maybe, you know, there's something there about that being a particular distinction. Yeah, I'm just the letter writing thing is so fascinating to me. Just thinking about, you know, that would not fly to hire out an anniversary letter or something like that. But I can also see us getting to that point. And here we come to, you know, the whole chat GPT thing is like, to what extent if you use chat GPT, to get you started on your 50th anniversary letter to your wife or husband?
36:51Josh Larsen:Like, is that crossing the line? Is that? Yeah.
36:54Adam Kempenaar:I mean, Josh, I just want to say I'm with you. I completely understand how that's your initial reaction. Why would our partners be okay with us not putting in the work ourselves and not expressing from our hearts and minds how we feel about them and hiring someone else to do it? but we would also feel that way theoretically about falling in love with an OS. And what this movie suggests is the more ways those lines get blurred, the more ways that those relationships actually produce the same real feelings and real results, the type of intimacy that you want from a relationship. It's just a matter of, it's just a matter of subtly over time, kind of shifting your perspective on it.
37:41Adam Kempenaar:And I can see a world where couples who have very healthy relationships and do put in the work might nevertheless have a surrogate like someone like Theodore, who if they're doing their job right, it doesn't feel any different than as if the husband wrote the letter himself or the wife wrote the letter herself.
38:04Josh Larsen:you know just hiring someone to decorate decorate the room it's you approve it you give final say and there you go it's all yours you know we were talking about some of the ways too that
38:15Adam Kempenaar:this movie maybe challenges our expectations a little bit if you walk in thinking you're watching a science fiction movie or a movie that's gonna be about predictions at all i love the fact on the most basic level that we get a depiction of AI. I don't know how many other depictions of AI there are to draw from, but the ones that I can think about, certainly a movie we both love comes to mind like Ex Machina, right? Where the whole point of those films as science fiction films is to be a warning. They're cautionary tales. This is going to come back to haunt us. The Terminator films, all this stuff, the machines are going to become sentient and humanity is screwed, right?
38:58Adam Kempenaar:And Spike Jonze says, I'm going to make a movie that instead of being about how the machines are going to get smarter and they're going to become more human and by becoming more human, that means they're going to be even more set on their own survival and destroying anyone around them who might stand in the way of their survival. And instead, I'm going to say, I'm going to suggest that becoming more and more human means to be even more focused on trying to navigate and understand love. That's really what this film is exploring. Amy Adams' character says at one point, I think he says to her, do you think I'm crazy or something like that when he admits he's in love with an OS and she says, well, I think anybody who falls in love is mad.
39:49Josh Larsen:Yeah. I think like that. I think maybe it's a freak. It's a freak.
39:53Adam Kempenaar:Exactly. And I think maybe that that's, that's what this movie is definitely exploring. But I like that idea. Of course, I love that idea that this is, this is this movie that's driven by technology and makes us think about some of these really provocative things. But at its core, it's not about the machines coming to destroy us. It's about the machines becoming more human, which means they're more interested in love, which means they'll, they'll continue. They leave at the end. The machines leave and the movie doesn't really explore that or explain that. But what I took away is the idea that they finally discover that the more they get into these big, unanswerable human questions, the more that's something they need to do on their own.
40:41Adam Kempenaar:They need to do on their own, just like he needs to come to terms with these things on his own. And the fact that this movie, I never noticed this arc before. I didn't pay attention the first time around to the fact that it's not an accident, of course. This movie starts with him dealing with the loss of his relationship, the grief of the ending of that marriage to Rooney Mara's character. And it closes with him reconciling with her in a way by sending her an email. And everything he says could be translatable to everything he just went through with Samantha. But everything he goes through with Samantha somehow brings him back to a reality of needing to connect with and reconcile in some way what he's learned with an actual person that he loved.
41:26Josh Larsen:Yeah, I think that's, you know, it brings it back to the human experience. And I think the AIs leave so that we can be left with him. So I do feel like her is less, despite the title, less interested in the, although it gives a lot of time to this, the fate and wants and needs of the AIs. It's a better movie because it does pay attention to that. But where it wants to leave us is with Theodore's humanity and our humanity. And to your point about it being a positive spin on a futuristic movie like this, it wants to leave us, at least this is how I feel, watching the movie, grateful for what we do have and thinking about the authentic relationships we might have.
42:12Josh Larsen:Again, the bodies that we have and the ways those allow us to participate in relationship. And all of that just does make this a movie that's about gratitude in a lot of ways for me.
42:25Adam Kempenaar:Yeah, I can see that. I think that's an appropriate word. I'll close out here some of my thoughts by just bringing up the fact that as much as I respect the fact that the movie isn't about the dangers of AI, or it is trying to be this cautionary tale. it's funny to just yesterday as we're taping us read an article in the new york times about the godfather of ai leaving google and warning of the dangers ahead josh and he has a part in this article where he basically says you know a lot of people of course understand that the stuff the movies warn us about that the machines are going to take over and try to kill us all is probably inevitable but we just thought it was we just thought it was 50 or 60 or so years down the road.
43:13Adam Kempenaar:So I just went about my life and continued to explore AI and help bring it to life. Now I think it's going to happen much sooner. So there's two parts of that. One, he feels like it's imminent. And two, 50 or 60 years down the road felt far enough away that it wasn't something to worry about. That would have given me pause. Yeah. But that is where we're at. We're now every day, every day you can read an article like that. And the things this guy, Jeffrey Hinton, Dr. Hinton is warning about can range from just the replacement of people doing jobs and that being bad enough in many ways to full on.
43:59Adam Kempenaar:Yes, actually, maybe Terminator hostile takeover, the Terminator. It it does feel right now more real than than maybe ever before. certainly ever before. It feels more real and more possible, not just the work of science fiction. And that's scary. And maybe that's why actually I had such a lovely experience with her this time around. I love, I mean, I had it the first time too, but it, it challenged me and it made me think about the problems that will come with this type of technology, but it does so with such a curiosity and sensitivity that it's maybe more science fiction than those science fiction films, because that's not how it's going to go at all.
44:51Adam Kempenaar:But it's the way I'd like it to go.
44:53Josh Larsen:Doesn't sound like it's going to go that way. And certainly that future seems more likely now than when Her came out just 10 years ago. I mean, 50, 60 years you're talking about, but just 10 years ago, you know, we were in such a different place than where it appears we are now. Can you feel me with you right now? I've never loved anyone the way I love you. Me too. Now I know how.
45:24Josh Larsen:Again, access to the full Film Spotting archive going back to 2005 is one of the benefits of joining the Film Spotting family. You'll also get bonus shows, a weekly newsletter, early access to events, and more. Check it out and maybe join filmspottingfamily.com. This conversation can serve no purpose anymore. Goodbye.
46:04Adam Kempenaar:Film Spotting is listener supported. Join the Film Spotting family at filmspottingfamily.com and get access to ad-free episodes, monthly bonus shows, our weekly newsletter, and for the first time, all in one place, the entire Film Spotting archive going back to 2005. That's filmspottingfamily.com. Panoply. You gave everything you could give, and now it's time to take the next step. Hey, it's Emily Tisch-Sussman. And this season on She Pivots, the podcast where women share bold career moves and personal turning points. I sit down with culture-shifting women who share their pivots like Elizabeth Smart.
46:41I still feel that drive that I can still make a difference. So I'm going to keep going. And feminist legend Gloria Steinem. All of us were trying to express women's real lives. Listen to She Pivots on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. On August 4th, 1962, Marilyn Monroe died. Then the rumors started, and she died again. And now, we're going to set the record straight and learn about the way Marilyn Monroe actually died. The third way. I'm Jake Brennan, and on my podcast, Hollywoodland, I revisit some of the biggest stories from Hollywood history, separating the myths people want to believe from the reality underneath them.
47:24Hollywoodland is part of the Exactly Right Network. Listen to new episodes every Monday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. On Big Lives, we take a single cultural icon. People like Jane Fonda, George Michael, Little Richard. And we pull apart the story behind the image. Discovering forgotten interviews that change exactly how we see these giants of our culture.
47:47Josh Larsen:We're here for the messy, the brilliant, the human version of our heroes. I'm Emmanuel Jochi. I'm Kai Wright. And this is Big Lives. Listen to Big Lives on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
48:02Adam Kempenaar:In February of 2024, celebrated illustrator and children's book author Petra Mathers and her husband Michael mailed letters to dozens of friends and family members to let them know they had died by suicide. Dear honeys, this is goodbye. By the time you get this letter, both Petra and I will be dead. Next stop, Wonderland. Why did they do it? And what did it do to the people they left behind? Listen to Death of an Artist on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
From the publisher
Coming up on episode #1024, Josh welcomes Michael Phillips for a review of Ari Aster's EDDINGTON. We'll also replay Adam and Josh's Top 5 Joaquin Phoenix Performances from April 2023. Notably absent from that Top 5? Phoenix's Theodore from Spike Jonze's HER. That's because the 2013 film was in the 'penalty box', having been the subject of a recent bonus show shared exclusively with Filmspotting Family members. Here it is for the first time in the main feed.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.




