In the Mood for Love (Archive)

16 Jul 2025 · 40 min · 11 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

A Film Spotting Archive discussion of Wong Kar-wai’s In the Mood for Love (2021 Juan Car Wai Marathon), focusing on its growing critical reputation, restrained romance, role-playing/rehearsal structure, visual style (veiling, reflections, mirrors), and themes of loneliness, unfulfilled desire, and time/instability (including Cambodia newsreel/Angkor Wat ending).

Guests

Adam and Josh, hosts of Film Spotting Archive (film reviewers; Adam and Josh discuss their marathon experience and personal viewing history). No other guests appear in the episode.

Key claims

The film’s reputation has risen since release (Guardian/NYT/BBC critic rankings). It’s Wong’s “pinnacle” and a perfection of restraint/aesthetics. The emotional core is love that’s “good when it’s not realized/consummated,” reinforced by performances and design.

Notable examples

Tony Leung/Maggie Cheung’s neighbor setup; “rehearsal” scenes where spouses are heard but unseen; noodle-stall slow-motion montage; rain/awning jacket-and-silence moment; hot-mustard dinner power dynamic; Charles de Gaulle newsreel and Angkor Wat finale; debate over whether Cheung’s final-scene child could be Chow’s.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

The Legacy of 'In the Mood for Love'

3:20 to 5:30

The hosts discuss the film's critical acclaim and legacy over the years.

“In the Mood for Love debuted at the 2000 Cannes Film Festival, where it was nominated for the Palme d 'Or and star Tony Leung won the Fess Best Actor Prize.”

Plot Overview and Characters

5:30 to 8:00

A summary of the plot and main characters of 'In the Mood for Love'.

“I didn't have it on my top 10 list that year, which I know we had some fun at Trivia Spotting with my 2000 top 10 list.”

Personal Reflections on the Film

8:00 to 11:20

Josh shares his personal experiences and feelings towards the film through multiple viewings.

“And it's a perfection of what he was working on in that film, I think.”

Themes of Loneliness and Desire

11:20 to 12:20

Exploring the major themes of loneliness and unfulfilled desire in the film.

“Well, here, I mentioned the whole film was about restraint.”

Role-Playing and Emotional Pain

12:20 to 14:00

Discussion on the characters' emotional struggles and the role-playing dynamics in the film.

“I also think that the title transitions perfectly to the next obsession, and it's that use of the words kind of like.”

Exploring Emotional Depth in 'In the Mood for Love'

14:00 to 21:40

Discuss the emotional complexities and performances in the film.

“That feeling is real and intense and maybe more intense and something more transcendent than actually succumbing to your desires.”

The Power of Cinematic Role-Playing

21:40 to 28:00

Analyze the significance of role-playing in film and its impact on viewers.

“Speaking of listeners, yes, it was Ellen Cheshire at C-H-E-S-H-E-L-L-E-N on Twitter who suggested the Tonys, which is just fantastic.”

Exploring Sexual Tension in In the Mood for Love

28:00 to 32:01

The hosts discuss the intimate scenes in the film, focusing on a dinner role-playing scene that showcases sexual tension and power dynamics.

“And they just, that to me, I don't know why, is like incredibly sexy.”

Politics and Historical Context in Wong Kar-wai's Films

32:01 to 34:58

A discussion on the political undertones in the film and its connection to the socio-political landscape of Hong Kong and Cambodia.

“Let's go to something far less sexy and talk about politics because it's something you brought up.”

Interpretations of In the Mood for Love's Ending

34:58 to 41:20

The hosts analyze differing interpretations of the film's ending, particularly regarding the implications of a child in Maggie Cheung's final scene.

“You know, eventually, what, 30 years later, would have been transferred from colonial rule to China.”
Show all 11 chapters

Interpretations of In the Mood for Love's Ending

41:29 to 41:52

The hosts analyze differing interpretations of the film's ending, particularly regarding the implications of a child in Maggie Cheung's final scene.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Adam Kempenaar:This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human. If you like YouTube, you'll love YouTube Premium.

0:08Josh Larsen:Hi, I'm Sean Evans from Hot Ones, and I want to tell you about YouTube Premium. It has offline downloads, so you can watch without Wi-Fi. Background play, so you can lock your phone, and it still plays, baby.

0:19Adam Kempenaar:Oh, and it is completely ad-free. Yes, I said it, ad-free. Try YouTube Premium for two months free at youtube.com slash premium. Trial eligibility varies. Terms apply. Cancel any time. Amazon Health AI presents Painful Thoughts. I, um, I can't stop scratching my downtown. Yeah, but I'm not itching to go downtown and tell a receptionist I'm here to talk about my downtown. Some things you'd rather type than say out loud. There's no question too embarrassing for Amazon Health AI. Chat your symptoms and get virtual care 24-7. Healthcare just got less painful.

1:27Josh Larsen:Online, valid through 9-9, while supplies last. Selection varies by location. See Lowe's.com for more details. Soil offer excludes Alaska and Hawaii.

1:35Adam Kempenaar:Apple Vacations, where your story starts. The Friends and Family Sale is here at Apple Vacations. Book by September 24th and save up to 50 % on all-inclusive vacations with instant savings. Whether it's a getaway with friends or a family vacation, there's always a reason to make more memories with your favorite people. Travel through August 2027 and start planning your getaway today at AppleVacations.com or with your trusted travel advisor. Apple Vacations, where your story starts.

2:08Adam Kempenaar:What kind of a show are you guys putting on here today?

2:11Josh Larsen:You're not interested in art? No. Now look, we're going to do this thing. We're going to have a conversation.

2:17Adam Kempenaar:Hey, film spotters, Adam and Josh here. You know the Film Spotting Archive has reviews, top fives, and more going back to 2005. And access to that archive is just one of the benefits you get as a Film Spotting family member. We are sharing our discussion of In the Mood for Love from our Juan Car Wai Marathon back in 2021. Why? Well, there are many reasons, including it's the film's 25th anniversary. And Josh, it did clock in at number four on the New York Times list of the best movies of this century so far.

2:55Josh Larsen:Heartening for me to see that because I had it even higher, Adam, when we did that list on the show right there at number one for me. My favorite film of the century so far. Now, for Chicago listeners, Wong's film is playing at the Music Box Wednesday and Thursday this week. So that's July 16 and 17 if you want to see it there on the big screen. So let's get to it. Our review of In the Mood for Love.

3:34Adam Kempenaar:In the Mood for Love debuted at the 2000 Cannes Film Festival, where it was nominated for the Palme d 'Or and star Tony Leung won the Fess Best Actor Prize. It opened here in the States in March 2001 to pretty universal critical acclaim, but maybe this is something we can talk a little bit about, Josh. My feeling is that its reputation has only grown over the last 20 years. For example, back at the end of the last decade in late 2009, The Guardian had In the Mood for Love as its 48th best film of the decade. Fast forward 10 years later, for a best films of the 21st century list, Mood had moved up all the way to number five.

4:11Adam Kempenaar:And then in 2016, the BBC pulled over 100 critics for a best movies of the 21st century list and In the Mood for Love landed at number two right behind, no real surprise to me, my beloved Mulholland Drive from director David Lynch, another film that has probably only grown in esteem over the years. Quickly, the plot, it's set in early 1960s Hong Kong, sort of picks up where Days of Being Wild left off. Josh, it's part of an informal trilogy with that film and Wong's later film 2046. Tony Leung and Maggie Chung are neighbors in a cramped boarding house. They're both married. They're both lonely.

4:50Adam Kempenaar:And they soon realize that their spouses are having an affair with each other. Lee Young and Chung bond over this betrayal and eventually do get quite close, but never act on their feelings for each other, this being a Wong Kar Wai movie after all. Josh, give us a little bit of your history within The Mood for Love, and how did it play this time for you in the context of the marathon? I feel like you deemed Happy Together, the last movie we discussed, as the high point of the marathon so far, maybe even rated it slightly higher than Chungking Express. Have we gone to yet another level here within the mood for love?

5:30Josh Larsen:For me, yes. And I think, you know, thinking back on when I first saw this, it's a little murky for me because I've seen it a handful of times since 2000, but it wouldn't have been within the first, you know, six months or year of its release, probably because I've never written about it. I didn't have it on my top 10 list that year, which I know we had some fun at Trivia Spotting with my 2000 top 10 list. All of them are suspect, but trust me, I would not have overlooked this if I had seen it in time. Why I didn't see it within that first year, I can't remember or really explain, but I remember seeing it fairly soon after, loving it then and just loving it more.

6:12Josh Larsen:The time or two, I saw it since. It's been a few years now. And yeah, I think if its reputation isn't any stronger than it was initially. It has certainly, you cited those lists that it's made, it's certainly fended off a lot of comers in the years since it's been released to still stand as a monumental achievement, not only for Wong, but cinema itself. And as far as Wong's filmography goes, I do think it's the pinnacle. I think at this point, I only have one Wong film left that I need to see my blueberry nights, but I don't think that's going to knock this off. Maybe the happy together distinction for me is that, um, it's just so assured and confident and a little, I'm trying to think of the right phrase that doesn't sound like I'm dismissing the previous films, which I've loved, but a little calmer, a little, um, less forced isn't the right word, because if you think about restraint, it's all about restraint and the filmmaking matches that.

7:18Josh Larsen:So if you think about, you know, what we had early on in in something like Fallen Angels and the antic-ness of that, which was really compelling or Chungking Express, those pop song rhythms, which I loved. All of those flourishes are strengths of Wong's filmmaking and his previous films. But here you just get something that is dialed down a little bit, even from Happy Together, I would argue because, you know, Happy Together has those black and white segments, maybe a little more ostentatious use of the camera here or there. In terms of slow motion, I think it's very familiar from Happy Together.

7:54Josh Larsen:Happy Together is the close. It's like this is just one step further in terms of the aesthetics from Happy Together. And it's a perfection of what he was working on in that film, I think. So, you know, I don't want to waste a lot of time, you know, saying why it's better than these other wonderful films. I just love this movie so much. And on another revisit, it's one that you might think, OK, there isn't a ton of plot here. So how many times can you watch this before there might not be enough to engage in? Well, you know, there will be a new lamp in the background that you'll engage with this time because you have the time now to just sit and appreciate why that lamp was chosen, where it's placed in the shot.

8:35Josh Larsen:what colors it's reflecting or working with, how the typewriter in this scene perfectly matches Maggie Chung's dress. And all these -

8:44Adam Kempenaar:Or maybe you just didn't pay attention to a certain dress the third time or fourth.

8:48Josh Larsen:Yeah, yeah. This is so rich that it's open to endless viewings. And I certainly enjoyed this most recent one I had. Yeah, I'm with you.

8:57Adam Kempenaar:And when we do ultimately finish this marathon, We will culminate with our World of Wong Kar Wai Marathon Awards. And we were looking for a name, and a listener on Twitter responded to us. And I won't get it right. I couldn't find it, so I apologize to the listener. Maybe you can find it, Josh, who threw out this suggestion. But we will definitely mention you when we get to those awards. They said, you know, you guys keep talking about Tony Leung and how great he is and how he's the unsung kind of master collaborator of this marathon. on, maybe unsung is not quite the right word because we keep talking about him.

9:32Adam Kempenaar:The suggestion was maybe we should call cheekily, we should call the awards the Tonys. And I know we both like that idea a lot. But of course, now you watch In the Mood for Love and I start to question whether or not it's really Tony Leung because maybe it's Maggie Chung who's been in multiple films so far. Or what about Christopher Doyle, who I think has lensed all of the movies so far? And maybe my real answer, as far as who is the MVP, the MVP collaborator, the MVC will go with Josh, William Chang as the costume designer and the production designer here.

10:10Josh Larsen:I mean, well, and that's interesting because those things work so well together, as I was already hinting at, that it makes perfect sense that the same eye is behind both.

10:20Adam Kempenaar:absolutely and cheng was at least the production designer i don't have his imdb yet but he was at least the production designer on every other film in this marathon and we have talked about it a lot i'm with you this is just this is perfection this is a perfect end to this marathon beyond some of those stylistic flourishes and the design and the costume design we're touching on this is the ultimate expression of all of the key themes and concerns we've discussed so far. Loneliness. When you think about it, how this relationship, if we can really call it that, how it starts is that these are just two people who need somebody to talk to.

11:05Adam Kempenaar:That's really it, They are so alone. And this idea of having unfulfilled desire or hopeless love, whatever terminology you want to apply to his films. And we've talked about how rarely in this marathon we've actually seen sexual passion or explicit eroticism. Well, here, I mentioned the whole film was about restraint. It's all built around the conceit of Chow and Mrs. Chan not acting on their feelings, right, and maintaining these appearances of propriety. And I've noted that Wong seems preoccupied with the notion that love is really only good when it's not realized, or maybe to put a finer point on it, when it's not consummated.

11:50Adam Kempenaar:and the Chinese version or one version of this movie's title, at least according to the Criterion Collection edition notes, is kind of like The Most Beautiful Times. And if you think about it, it's so appropriate, of course, because at the end of this movie, aren't they both trying to kind of recapture their past to an extent or at least parts of it? Even if they have no intentions of actually seeing each other again, They're romanticizing this time of their life, despite the fact that it's one in which both of their spouses were cheating on them and they had to completely withhold their feelings for each other.

12:29Adam Kempenaar:I also think that the title transitions perfectly to the next obsession, and it's that use of the words kind of like. Wong's characters love to act, to play pretend, to create scenarios, and to try on other roles in order to kind of try to process their feelings and their understanding of the world. And we see these characters here actually kind of trace the steps of their spouses and they play out and discuss how he's acting like her husband and vice versa. And that line, how devastating and great a line is Maggie Chung's, we won't be like them. she says it's so matter of factly but it's almost as if she by saying it is making it so it's this directive that she's putting out into the world and there's just a little bit of hesitation maybe or her being unsure when she says that line but it's just devastating because you immediately understand that motivation of not wanting to be like these spouses who have made them feel this way and of course you understand the consequences of that directive as well, saying we'll be better than them, basically, even if it means we're worse off, even if it means we have to pretend this very real thing is not real and it's just a fantasy to us.

13:53Adam Kempenaar:So they're driven maybe by morality to an extent and also perhaps masochism. But that kind of masochism is real. That feeling is real and intense and maybe more intense and something more transcendent than actually succumbing to your desires. At least that's what they hope, and at least that's what it seems Wong is exploring here.

14:16Josh Larsen:Yeah, I don't know how much actual pleasure they get from it, but they are inflicting more pain on themselves than necessary, not only by just being together, but by the role-playing that you're talking about. And Chiang has another devastating line, and we're going to be citing two lines here, even though there isn't a lot of dialogue in this movie. I think a lot of the exquisite work is done without dialogue, but there is another role-playing sequence where she's imagining her husband confessing. Mr. Chow's playing the husband here. And she just breaks down when he does and says, I didn't expect it to hurt so much.

14:52Josh Larsen:And what that reveals is that, you know, they've been doing this role playing as a way of building up defenses, as a way of not facing the reality. And at that point, it all falls apart.

15:12Adam Kempenaar:I don't think I'll really feel so sad.

15:22Josh Larsen:I think she is so magnificent in this movie because she has even more reticence than Liang does, at least her character, Mrs. Chan. I love going back to the dresses here. It's built into the costume design because these are these, I think they're Chung Sam dresses, so the neck, the very high neck. And it's like there's this wall actually built around her, under her chin, just keeping things out. And that sequence is where it just does all come. It invades. Like the hurt invades. And we see it on her face. This is where the implacable expression we've seen her have so much, even to Mr. Chow. She only lets him in so far.

16:08Josh Larsen:It does come crashing down here. And it echoes a later scene. years later where she's just standing by, she revisits the apartment complex and is just standing by a window and you see her forcing down those exact same tears. So I think Cheung is amazing in this and it's hard to talk about them separately because this is one of those paired performances where what one does helps the other in the performance. They have this, you know, they're in perfect rhythm. Her reticence is in perfect rhythm with Leung's reserve because he is kind kind of tapping into something we've seen before. I think he has more of the resigned melancholy we saw as the beat cop in Chunking Express than he did in Happy Together.

16:51Josh Larsen:There was more of a spurned anger, I think. Here he's more back to this resigned melancholy. I like how he claims at one point that he doesn't brood over his wife's infidelities. And his friend says, well, all that means is that you're, quote, bottled up, right? And so this is more costume design coming into play. His immaculate suits, his perfectly combed hair. That all suggests, yeah, he's not ruffled. It's like an armor. But it's an armor. Yeah. He's pretending not to be ruffled by this. But watch Leung's eyes. And this goes back to the, you know, we don't need dialogue. How they change every time he looks at her, at Mrs.

17:25Josh Larsen:Chan. It's like a, there's some panicked longing there. Because he, it's reminding him of what he's suffering. It's also reminding him of the pledge they made together. And how he really doesn't want to stick to that. because I think he makes more moves watching this again than she does to kind of break that pledge. He's always respectful, but he opens the door or at least knocks on the door a couple of times. And you see that in his eyes as well. So these two are just so perfectly in sync in this film that you can't imagine it working at all without one of them, if you substitute a different actor.

18:03Adam Kempenaar:Yeah. To your point, isn't it his hand we see one or two times reaching for hers? I believe so. It's never hers reaching for his, but you mentioned that scene, the role playing with the confrontation about the infidelity. And what I love about the two big scenes that I would call not just role playing scenes, but rehearsal scenes are that Wong really employs some fabulous misdirection to just add an extra bit of charge to the scene for the viewer. So in that scene, because he has made a decision from the very beginning to veil the spouses, we never see them. We hear them. Right. They're behind closed doors sometimes.

18:43Adam Kempenaar:They're on the other side of a wall. We see the backs of their head, but we never actually see them. That means that when she is seated there and we're looking at her seated to the side and he is directly in front of us with his back turned to the camera as he sits, there's a second where I felt anyway that, oh, the husband's returned and she's actually she is confronting him. and of course it turns out that it's not. It's the rehearsal. It's the rehearsal of that confrontation and she gets to act through it and see and experience those emotions with Tony Leung and then near the end, what seems to be their breakup.

19:27Adam Kempenaar:It's the moment where you think they have finally decided that this surely isn't going to work. What is inevitable? What they even know is inevitable. That they're never going to come together so they say goodbye to each other and we as viewers, at least I did, Josh, again, maybe I wasn't paying close enough attention. I was watching though thinking, oh man, this is it. This is the goodbye. And then to find that Leung basically says, no, remember, that's just the rehearsal. You know, that's just the, that's just the practice. We still, we still get to be with each other for at least a little while longer.

19:58Adam Kempenaar:It's really powerful. And I think there's really something powerful to that whole notion of cinema. I think being this tool, I've argued this before cinema being a tool for us as viewers to rehearse how we engage with the world. We see how other people act and behave in situations that we have seen ourselves in or imagine ourselves could be in, or maybe imagine that we could never handle, and we see how they go through it. And maybe it informs our sense of the world. Well, now imagine if you were a filmmaker like Wong Kar Wai, who is not only a passive viewer, but you're the one who's getting to sort of act out.

20:41Adam Kempenaar:You're getting to rehearse. You're getting to stage these scenes and act out your deepest fears and longings through these mini plays within this larger construct. it's just something that that really appeals to me and I don't know if I've said it before in this marathon but that infatuation with role-playing I imagine is a reason why whether he's articulated it or not I don't know why Quentin Tarantino has always been such a fan of Wong Kar Wai because they share that same obsession so we're both talking with um you know

21:17Josh Larsen:fair confidence about the nature of this relationship and how it ends up and it's interesting because just before we start recording here, I had a comment from a listener on my letterbox logging of watching this movie, Warner West, who basically has a question for us about the ending. So maybe we'll return to that. And it happens to involve how we understand their relationship. So remind me that we'll return to it. Speaking of listeners, yes, it was Ellen Cheshire at C-H-E-S-H-E-L-L-E-N on Twitter who suggested the Tonys, which is just fantastic. So I think we've probably covered the performances, even though there's maybe more we could say, but definitely highlights.

Read the full transcript

21:59Josh Larsen:I want to jump back to the filmmaking and just talk about some of these pure mood moments that we get in this film where I'm afraid by my talking about this being a more reserved movie for someone who hasn't seen it. They might think it's more conventional than his other pictures. And it's absolutely not. Like this is, this is pure Wong Kar Wai because we get these mood moments, including the montage of them passing each other on the way to the noodle stall. Maybe my favorite sequences in the film, it's something that is recurring. It kind of at first shows us their loneliness. They're going out to get dinner because they are not going to cook it for someone else.

22:40Josh Larsen:There's no one else home. They're each in this situation and they pass each other a handful of times. And this is where the slow motion comes into play. This is where that theme music, the Shigeru Umbayashi's Yumeji's theme comes into play. And even that is interesting. You know how it has these lilting violins to it. It's somewhat similar to the tango music we heard in Happy Together. But also it seems like even a step back from that in terms of its pace and its rhythm. And it's just the slow motion in here is also very judicious. Sometimes it's raining when they're doing this. That adds another level to it.

23:22Josh Larsen:And I could have watched them go back and forth to get their noodles for the entire running time of this movie. Just for the little variations each time in where the camera is. How much lighting is allowed in that stairway so that they can not really see each other's faces the next time maybe they do see each other's faces a little bit more. And it's all these imperceptible changes that are so important. and that is where the emotional element of this just hits me the hardest. It's like you're watching these two halves of a broken heart throb when they pass each other and it captures everything that you need to know about where they are at in that moment and it carries through past where they even go together so that that's what their time together was, passing each other on those stairways, even if they do end up becoming a little closer later.

24:15Adam Kempenaar:I mentioned the veiling technique with the spouses. Everything is so secretive here. And Wong has so much fun, I would say, with that tension. As I was jotting down some notes, when I noticed this the first maybe one or two times, I posed a question to myself. Josh, you're an expert, film critic and note taker. Do you sometimes just write questions to yourself that you know you need to return to? You don't know the answer to, but you know you need to return to them? Yeah, sure, sure. So I wrote down, why does the camera hide? Oh, I love that. I love that touch. It's always down a hall, right? Yeah, as you keep watching the film, you realize even the camera in In the Mood for Love has to steal glances.

24:59Adam Kempenaar:The view is always through a reflection in a mirror, or it's under the table, or it's through a window, or it's through a curtain, or it's through a curtain of smoke. Talk about a movie that makes smoking look so glamorous. The way Christopher Doyle's camera captures that haze is really pretty magnificent. And just in general, how many times do we see them obscured? To go back to your point, too, about the lighting. And as they pass each other, it's as if you are eavesdropping on them. It's as if you are there in the hallway, that cramped hallway. Again, it's Wong relying on a very close technique, not a lot of master shots, though.

25:43Adam Kempenaar:Of course, when we get on the street and there are some elements to the production design where we do kind of take in the expanse of the scene. But especially when they're indoors, when they're in those apartment settings, when they're moving in together, he's really emphasizing how close they are. You're always seeing them in a medium shot or medium close up or a close up. So that eavesdropping sort of effect adds to that tension. But then how about this? I'm going to ask you a question here, Josh. And I think the fact that there maybe isn't one answer or one go-to answer for 100 people you pose this question to helps signify just how special this movie is.

26:24Adam Kempenaar:But if I asked you, let's skip romantic gestures for now. We're going to get to that eventually, and there are multiple in this film, and there's one really amazing one that did, in fact, make your top five from this movie back in 2013. But when we do talk about eroticism, something close to sexiness, true sultry sexiness in this film, something that actually kind of radiates some real intensity. Do you have a moment like that from this movie?

27:01Josh Larsen:that one that i jotted down so um my three seconds response is maybe a strange one but how about when he says um then i'll spend some time with you here then i'll wait it out here when they she is caught in the rain in the alley under a light doesn't want to get that dress wet which i completely understand so she's kind of you know under an awning and he comes it's kind of that whole sequence, actually. He's coming from another direction, sees her. He's running in his suit in the rain, ducks under the awning next to her, offers his jacket to her. She says, we can't go in together. Or if they see your jacket, they'll know.

27:42Josh Larsen:He runs and gets an umbrella, brings it back. She says, I can't take your umbrella. So after all these romantic gestures, he finally just says, and I wish I could remember the words, but then I'll just be here with you and leans back against the wall. And I love the next beat, silence. They don't say anything to each other. And they just, that to me, I don't know why, is like incredibly sexy. They're just completely comfortable sitting there together.

28:10Adam Kempenaar:Silence is sexy for Josh Larson. There you go.

28:12Josh Larsen:What did you say? I think you just mischaracterized. Silence is sexy. Well, I just think it's, yeah, I don't know why. There's just something about that shared moment that they have together where nothing else needs to be said. Okay, well, I'm going to give you mine.

28:25Adam Kempenaar:Okay. I think it's during the dinner that is really their first true role-playing excursion, kind of a date, where they are taking on the characters of their spouses or the other spouse. and there's a moment where we see and the camera really does emphasize it because it cuts to as i recall cuts to tony leung's hand as he grabs what i think is probably some hot mustard and then it follows him as he puts it on her plate now even before this i'll just mention when we're talking about technique this is a movie where the camera is mostly pretty still we've talked about how restrained overall the I know where you're going is I love this camera move yeah but then all of a sudden just in this scene there's a couple quick pans yeah between them it's almost like a slide

29:19Josh Larsen:right it slides like from behind them right up next to them which is exactly as you're saying

29:24Adam Kempenaar:like very ostentatious compared to what we've been getting but I think it it helps just add some electricity yes to a scene in a moment that seems like it otherwise might be fairly I don't no harmless. And then we get that moment when he he dabs the mustard on her plate and you see her consider it. And just in that consideration in her silence, I think it's pretty clear to us that this isn't maybe something that she would normally eat. She clearly didn't grab it on her own and put it on her plate to eat with whatever she's eating. But he has put it on her plate for her and she hesitates. And then what does she do?

30:05Adam Kempenaar:She dips her entree into it and then eats it as voraciously as Maggie Chung does anything voraciously in this movie. But I swear to you, Josh, at the exact moment I'm thinking to myself, wow, that was hot. He says, do you like it hot? And let's be clear, Tony Leung is not Roger Moore. I don't know that there's any double entendre intended. There's nothing winking about his performance. He doesn't need double entendres. No, he really doesn't, right? I mean, he's a walking double entendre. But maybe the English translation even is sort of misleading because that's not really what he's saying. Or maybe Wong is winking at us there in that moment, even if Leung isn't.

30:51Adam Kempenaar:But he asks her, do you like it hot in the subtitle? And I'm telling you, in that moment, before he even said it, I really was responding to how charged that scene was. I could give you the play-by-play and really make my point, but I think, Josh, it would make you blush. And I don't want to embarrass you here on the show. But it is undeniably sexual. It's undeniably sexual because it's about power. He doesn't ask. He puts it on her plate. He makes the move to put it on her plate to basically suggest that he wants her to try that, to eat it, and she does. She submits to it. it's a pretty incredible scene.

31:33Josh Larsen:I'm so glad you asked this question because it clarified another important distinction between us, Adam. I prefer quiet intimacy and you like dirty talk. So I'm glad we know this now and hot mustard.

31:46Adam Kempenaar:I thought you were actually gonna put it in this way that I just realized my epiphany was, you find silence sexy, I find food sexy.

31:56Josh Larsen:Well, yeah, it kind of has a mixture of dirty talk and food. So I think with that, we should move on for everyone's sakes. So let's go to something. He's been read, everybody. I can see him. Let's go to something far less sexy and talk about politics because it's something you brought up. I forget if it was with happy. Charles did all. Very sexy. Totally. Happy Together, maybe you brought this up. And I don't have an answer, but I have. It was in the back of my mind since you touched on it. And I have like just an inkling from watching this film and where it ends up. You know, we have this sequence a couple of years later.

32:31Josh Larsen:I think we're about 66 now. And the politics kind of come into play in some oblique ways, I think. Though it is interesting before this last sequence, Adam, you get that comment. I think it's when we're back at the apartment building a couple of years later. It might be like 64 at that point. And a new resident, I think, says people are leaving Hong Kong because things have gotten, quote, too chaotic. So that's kind of like a little hint of some instability. But this sequence is in Cambodia at the end, 1966. And, yeah, we get this newsreel footage. All of a sudden, I guess to set, you know, at first I'm like, OK, this is setting the time and place.

33:11Josh Larsen:But it's this parade, I think, with the prince and princess and French president Charles de Gaulle. And so I'm thinking, okay, this is 66, did just some brief, very brief research, but it looks like that would have been just before the Vietnam War kind of destabilized Cambodia and spread into Cambodia. Then we get that final sequence in Angkor Wat, where we're just with Mr. Chao Leung. And he is, maybe I don't want to spoil all of it, but this is the romantic gesture. But he's basically wandering the ruined ancient temple complex there. So a lost civilization that is no longer, it's basically something that tourists go to visit at this point.

33:56Josh Larsen:And so I'm realizing that, you know, all of these things are suggestions of not only like territories that are being destabilized in Hong Kong, countries in Cambodia, and then an entire civilization that has failed to last. And I'm just thinking of, you know, how could he have expected that this relationship, first of all, his own marriage to last, then this relationship to last when like these massive civilizations crumble in the face of what? A Wong obsession, time. All of these things are suggestions of time bearing down. Things are about to change the way that things always change. And instability is the only constant.

34:42Josh Larsen:And as we've seen, unhappiness because of that is often the only constant. constant. So that's just kind of a vague stab at maybe some of the political tie-ins. I know it doesn't get into any of the details of the realities of Hong Kong during this era or later. You know, eventually, what, 30 years later, would have been transferred from colonial rule to China. But maybe that's something. Yeah.

35:09Adam Kempenaar:I think you've said it very well. I think there's always a sense, at least in these six films that we've watched of destabilization looming. It's always there. And sometimes it is more direct. Sometimes it's a little more oblique. Here, it is interesting. That moment when all of a sudden we cut to newsreel footage is so jarring compared to everything we've seen before. This mood piece where we are just enveloped in this world and these dresses and the production design that we've touched on. And then all of a sudden, we're watching Charles de Gaulle. It's like we've all of a sudden been thrust into the real world and we've been in a fantasy up until this point.

35:53Adam Kempenaar:It reminded me actually, in a way, in a completely different way, but it took me out of the moment in the same sort of fascinating way that the end of Kirastami's Taste of Cherry, where all of a sudden we get some home movie footage. And if I'm remembering correctly, we see Kirastami himself like making the movie that we just watched. So again, very different, But in some ways, for me, a similar effect where you are taken out of this kind of hypnotic reverie with this movie and reminded that, oh, all of this is happening in a real world, a much larger world where they're just one kind of tiny speck in the universe.

36:33Adam Kempenaar:And that, of course, I think does set up ultimately the grandness of that romantic gesture. So maybe that is a nice way to get back to the question you posed. And I don't know if we want to go ahead and throw out that if people want to not have In the Mood for Love further spoiled, they could stop listening at this point. But Warner West, I believe Warner West in Atlanta. He's in the ATL, Josh. What's his question? What's his query?

36:58Josh Larsen:Yeah, so again, this is on Letterboxd. He said that In the Mood for Love is likely my favorite Wong Kar-wai film. I was interested in the film's spotting team's take on the ending. I believe I got the same interpretation as you in my several watches, but I know others interpret their relationship differently, particularly in regards to who we see with Maggie Cheung in her final scene. so um i did not respond to him yet so i'm just kind of guessing what he's hinting at but um towards the end is where we see her return to rent an apartment in the same complex where they were years earlier and she has a child with her um so i'm wondering if what warner is suggesting i haven't read others takes but that this may be mr chow's child that they did in fact consummate The relationship, at some point, there is a scene where they, the role playing, they even go to a hotel where they believe their respective spouses have been meeting.

37:53Josh Larsen:And we don't see anything, but they're there. There's a room there. So it could have been something that happened off screen and resulted in this child that he doesn't know about, right? Because he happens to be visiting either at the same time or a few scenes later, stops in front of the door, thinks about knocking, but doesn't. It's another just great Wong Kar Wai-like, you know, time shifting in just the wrong way moment. So, yeah, I mean, I definitely considered this as I was watching is like, you know, have we just not seen them take that step? I like to think, Adam, for the reasons we've been talking about, that it's in keeping with all of the other films he has made that they would not have.

38:41Josh Larsen:And that retains it's not even really the moral question as much as the the auteurist question. You know, it retains the auteurist integrity of his filmography. But I can totally see that reading. And that, in fact, would add another layer of melancholy and sadness if he did not only miss on reuniting with her, but his child potentially. But I don't know. Where did you kind of come down on that?

39:09Adam Kempenaar:Well, I think anybody watching, no matter the experience you're having with the film or how you're interpreting it up to that point, I think that moment where you realize that she no longer seems to have a husband but does have a child, you do instantly wonder. I mean, we've seen this trope a million times in other movies, right, where a couple that had a fling, they separate and, oh, they had a child and the man doesn't know about it but eventually does discover the news. for me I just can't I can't abide that reading of the film I think it's it's too it's too in conflict with everything we've expressed everything we've seen in this marathon you're right that it does add another layer of melancholy which would seem appropriate so you could you could go with that argument.

40:03Adam Kempenaar:But for me, the idea that they ever did actually act like their spouses, that they gave in, in a way, maybe it makes them more human. But I don't think that's what Wong Kar Wai is really interested in here. I think he's interested in the provocation of these people and the philosophical kind of consequences, the existential consequences of them making that decision and sticking to it. We won't be like them. So I think my reading is the one where she has at some point separated from her husband or perhaps he's passed. She did get a child from that marriage and that you imagine allows her to be a little less alone in life, but it doesn't have to be Mr.

40:53Adam Kempenaar:Chow's kid.

40:55Josh Larsen:I'm glad, you know, we may not add, we may not agree on hot mustard as a sex toy, but I'm glad we agree on the ending of in the mood for love.

41:14Adam Kempenaar:remember you can access the full film spotting archive going back to 2005 by being a film spotting family member you get bonus shows a weekly newsletter and more learn more at filmspottingfamily.com

41:36Adam Kempenaar:film spotting is listener supported join the film spotting family at film spotting family.com and get access to ad free episodes monthly bonus shows our weekly newsletter and for the first time all in one place the entire film spotting archive going back to 2005 that's a film spotting family.com.

41:59Josh Larsen:A flawless makeup look starts with the right foundation shade. Sounds simple, right?

42:04Adam Kempenaar:But finding your perfect match can honestly be one of the hardest parts of your routine. But there is good news. Sephora has all the best brands in one place with so many shades, finishes, and coverage options to choose from. Plus their beauty advisors, shade matching tools and free samples make it so much easier to find the one that's just right for you visit sephora and find your match the friends and family sale is here at apple vacations book by september 24th and save up to 50 on all-inclusive vacations with instant savings whether it's a getaway with friends or a family vacation there's always a reason to make more memories with your favorite people.

42:47Adam Kempenaar:Travel through August 2027 and start planning your getaway today at AppleVacations.com or with your trusted travel advisor. Apple Vacations where your story starts. T-Mobile

43:00Josh Larsen:is reinventing business internet with Super Broadband. Whether you run a small office or a factory of 500, connection is everything. Powered by America's fastest 5G internet plus Starlink. Super Broadband from T-Mobile reaches every zip code in the U.S. Super Broadband, a new era of business internet. Visit SuperBroadband.com to learn more. This is 5G network based on analysis by Eucalypt speed test intelligence dated 2H2025. Speeds vary due to local network characteristics and management. Satellite requires hardware installation. Clear view of the sky for 36 month commitment.

43:30Adam Kempenaar:Hello, appliance fans. I'm here at Grand Appliance where Bill just bought a premium Bosch benchmark dishwasher. Talk about your experience, Bill. My salesperson was an appliance genius.

43:41Josh Larsen:She told me about their free install offer on Benchmark Appliances, and it was a done deal for me.

43:48Adam Kempenaar:Wow, free install from the pros at Grand? That's a no-brainer. Agreed. They make it so easy. There you have it. Grand for the win. Check out GrandAppliance.com for full details.

From the publisher

To celebrate its 25th anniversary, Wong Kar-wai's intoxicatingly romantic film returns to theaters in select cities. Adam and Josh discussed the film, which placed 4th on the New York Times' recent list of the 100 Best Movies of the 21st Century, as part of a 2021 marathon devoted to the filmmaker.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Filmspotting

All 198 episodes
In the Mood for Love (Archive)Filmspotting · 40 min
Listen in VO