Marty Supreme Review, Avatar: Fire & Ash, Dead Man’s Wire, Voice of Hind Rajab (#1047)

9 Jan 2026 · 1 h 43 min · 32 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Filmspotting Episode #1047 Summary: Marty Supreme Review, Avatar: Fire & Ash, Dead Man's Wire, Voice of Hind Rajab

Podcast Overview

  • Title: Filmspotting
  • Hosts: Adam Kempenaar & Josh Larsen
  • Description: Affable, insightful film analysis of new and classic movies since 2005.

Episode Highlights Intro (00:00 - 04:33)

  • Adam and Josh return from New Year’s break.
  • Discussion of their holiday season and resolutions.

Marty Supreme (04:34 - 50:40)

  • Overview: Review of Josh Safdie's film featuring Timothée Chalamet as Marty Mauser, a 50s-era table tennis player.
  • Key Themes:
  • Exploration of the American Dream.
  • Complex character dynamics: Marty as charming yet destructive.
  • Cinematography by Darius Khondji and production design.
  • Critical Opinions:
  • Alison Wilmore's Take: Marty represents a chaotic pursuit of talent; a compelling and repellent character.
  • Josh's Evaluation: Enjoyed the film but found it lacking compared to other works from 2025. Ratings noted.
  • Adam's Perspective: Appreciates the depth of Chalamet's performance, highlighting the balance of charisma and destructiveness.

Filmspotting Family (50:41 - 56:50)

  • Encouragement for listeners to participate in the community and provide feedback.

Avatar

Fire & Ash (56:51 - 01:04:53)

  • Overview: Josh reviews the latest installment of James Cameron's Avatar series.
  • Key Points:
  • More focus on character dynamics and less visual spectacle compared to previous entries.
  • Highlights of individual character arcs, notably Nateri’s complex feelings regarding humans.

Dead Man’s Wire (01:04:54 - 01:15:38)

  • Overview: Review of Gus Van Sant's new film based on a true story of a man who takes a banker hostage.
  • Key Themes:
  • Examination of economic disparities and the notion of heroism.
  • Strong performances by Bill Skarsgård, Coleman Domingo, and Al Pacino.

Poll

2026 Most Anticipated (01:15:39 - 01:29:26)

  • Listeners invited to vote on their most anticipated films of 2026 from a selection of titles.

The Voice of Hind Rajab (01:29:27 - 01:37:34)

  • Overview: Review of Kowther Ben Hania's film focusing on a true story of a young girl's tragic experience during conflict.
  • Key Themes:
  • Blurring of fiction and reality, highlighting the experiences of Red Crescent volunteers.
  • Emotional impact derived from the juxtaposition of scripted performances and real audio from the emergency call.

Credits / New Releases (01:37:35 - 01:40:30)

  • Recognition of contributors and announcements of upcoming films.

Key Takeaways

  • Marty Supreme: A film that explores ambition, the American Dream, and character complexity through a chaotic narrative.
  • Avatar: Fire & Ash: Focuses on character depth and the implications of conflict rather than just visual spectacle.
  • Dead Man's Wire: A commentary on economic disparity and the nature of heroism, supported by strong performances.
  • The Voice of Hind Rajab: A poignant reminder of the ongoing humanitarian crises, utilizing a unique narrative structure to evoke emotional responses.

Additional Notes

  • The episode encourages listener engagement through feedback and participation in polls.
  • Highlights the importance of community and shared experiences in film analysis.

Links and Resources

  • Website for Filmspotting Episodes: [Filmspotting.net](https://www.filmspotting.net)
  • Feedback Email: [feedback@filmspotting.net](mailto:feedback@filmspotting.net)
  • Support Filmspotting: [Filmspotting Family](https://filmspottingfamily.com)

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Discussion on Upcoming Year-End Wrap Party

1:15 to 3:14

The hosts discuss their upcoming year-end wrap party and how listeners can participate.

“It's been a little while since we've seen each other, though we've been churning out the content still for our listeners.”

Introducing This Week's Reviews

3:14 to 5:01

The hosts preview the films being discussed this episode, including 'Marty Supreme'.

“Opening scene, funniest and most moving moment.”

Insights from Alison Wilmore on 'Marty Supreme'

5:01 to 7:55

The hosts share insights from Alison Wilmore's review of 'Marty Supreme'.

“Have you ever thought about what you're doing to me?”

Josh's Perspective on 'Marty Supreme'

7:55 to 10:56

Josh shares his thoughts and ratings on 'Marty Supreme' compared to other films.

“Apparently, I can't know for sure unless you click the heart next to it.”

Character Analysis of Marty in 'Marty Supreme'

10:56 to 13:10

The hosts analyze the character of Marty and Timothee Chalamet's performance.

“And I think perhaps a reason why Marty Supreme is not as high on my list from last year is because I do appreciate Uncut Gems a bit better in treading similar ground.”

Chalamet's Duality in Performance

13:10 to 14:00

Discussion on Timothee Chalamet's portrayal of complexity within his character.

“I'm not prepared to start breaking down and comparing all of his lead performances, but she's right.”

Exploring Marty's Character and Performance

14:00 to 18:48

Discussing the depth of Marty's character as portrayed by Chalamet.

“and says, you see, he's saying I got natural character.”

Rachel's Role and Performance Dynamics

18:48 to 22:52

Analyzing Rachel's character and her relationship with Marty.

“There's been so much interesting meta stuff.”

The Ensemble Cast and Unique Character Portrayals

22:52 to 28:00

Examining the ensemble cast and how unique faces add texture to the film.

“This is why she does not exit stage left and instead sticks with him.”

Character Depth and Casting in Marty Supreme

28:00 to 29:40

Learn about the intricate character backgrounds created for extras in the film.

“And just yesterday, Josh, I listened to the DGA podcast where Ben Affleck interviews Josh Safdie.”
Show all 32 chapters

Sound Design: A Bombastic Experience

29:40 to 31:20

Discover how the sound design enhances the film's energetic atmosphere.

“But when he's saying lines like what is now the most famous line maybe in this movie, I was born in 1601.”

Visual Techniques and Cinematic Intimacy

31:20 to 33:20

Explore the visual style that creates intimacy and urgency in character interactions.

“clientele who have been coming out in droves saying, you have to turn it down.”

Controversial Needle Drops and Their Impact

33:20 to 35:00

Delve into the debate on the effectiveness of needle drops in the film's narrative.

“When we widen out, like with great dance numbers, it's with the ping pong scenes where we see the full physicality on display.”

Marty's Journey: Chaos vs. Purpose

35:00 to 40:00

Analyze the duality of chaos and purpose in Marty's character arc throughout the film.

“And, and I feel like separate from the music.”

Future Implications for Marty

40:00 to 42:00

Speculate on Marty’s future and the potential evolution of his character.

“If you think that it's some kind of blessing, it's not.”

Exploring Marty Supreme's Complexity

42:00 to 44:05

Discuss the complexities of the character Marty in 'Marty Supreme' and the themes of ambition and morality.

“And I think that's different both from what Allison was talking about in terms of pursuing chaos and if I'm hearing you correctly, different from what you're talking about.”

Marty Supreme vs. 70s Anti-Heroes

44:05 to 47:48

Contrast the portrayal of Marty Supreme with anti-heroes from 1970s cinema and audience expectations.

“And I know that there's discussion out there about Marty as a character and there's I find the hand wringing, the moralizing about characters in movies to be a bit much.”

The Safdie Brothers' Characterization

47:48 to 49:51

Analyze how the Safdie Brothers depict characters like Howard Ratner and Marty Supreme with complexity and love.

“had in the back of my head from the 1970s, the great anti-hero performances.”

Listener Feedback and Community

52:56 to 55:26

Share a listener's feedback, their cinephile journey, and discuss community perks for family members.

“Let's just say that on maybe the film, maybe the film as a whole, we might have discovered at the end of that conversation.”

Upcoming Voting and Movie Discussions

55:26 to 56:00

Discuss upcoming voting options for bonus content and past opinions on classic films.

“We're not exactly sure as we are recording in this moment.”

Initial Impressions of Classic Films

56:00 to 57:20

Discussion about various classic films and differing opinions on them.

“One of us, maybe on the show, maybe not on the show, had a different opinion about.”

Avatar: Fire and Ash Review

59:06 to 1:06:02

In-depth analysis of the film Avatar: Fire and Ash and its character development.

“This is the only pure thing in this world.”

Dead Man’s Wire Overview

1:06:02 to 1:10:00

Overview and critique of Gus Van Zant's film Dead Man's Wire.

“Don't they always say they have to see how much money it makes and this thing's already bringing in like, you know, millions, possibly billions.”

Character Dynamics in 'Dead Man's Wire'

1:10:00 to 1:13:21

Explore the character relationships and their psychological depth in Dead Man's Wire.

“Even when something goes wrong, the opening of the film is him showing up in his car.”

Cinematic Techniques and Real-Life Connections

1:13:21 to 1:17:19

Learn about the unique filmmaking techniques and real-life events that influenced the narrative.

“And Dacre Montgomery is someone I didn't recognize as Dick Hall.”

Upcoming Film Highlights and Events

1:17:19 to 1:17:50

Get insights into upcoming film events and notable releases in the industry.

“This is just in that you made time for it and are giving it some attention.”

Final Thoughts on Upcoming Films

1:18:38 to 1:22:08

Discuss the significance of various films and their potential impact on the audience.

“but, you know, this is just how it worked.”

Anticipating Upcoming Films: A Poll Discussion

1:24:00 to 1:28:30

The hosts discuss their previous methods of selecting anticipated films for the year and brainstorm new ideas for their upcoming film preview.

“Time for a new deeply flawed film spotting poll.”

Exploring New Releases: Wuthering Heights and More

1:28:30 to 1:31:41

The hosts introduce several upcoming films and express their thoughts on what stands out among them, including notable casts and directors.

“your most anticipated film of the new movie year that comes out before Memorial Day.”

Review of The Voice of Hind Rajab

1:31:41 to 1:38:00

A detailed review of 'The Voice of Hind Rajab,' discussing its themes, emotional impact, and the mix of fiction and nonfiction in its storytelling.

“we do have one more quick review to get in this is just some viewing josh that i did right before we started recording.”

Emotional Impact of Tough Films

1:38:00 to 1:38:36

Explore the emotional challenges of watching difficult subject matter in films.

“tough viewing experience with or to be affected by emotionally.”

Importance of Highlighting Ongoing Issues

1:38:36 to 1:39:44

Discuss the significance of bringing attention to ongoing tragedies through film.

“that people need to see that is out now.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Film spotting is presented by Regal Unlimited. Regal Unlimited is the all-you-can-watch movie subscription pass that pays for itself in just two visits. See any standard 2D movie anytime with no blackout dates or restrictions. Save on tickets. Save on snacks. Members get 10 % off all non-alcoholic concession items. Sign up now in the Regal app or at regmovies.com slash unlimited.

0:29What kind of a show are you guys putting on here today? You're not interested in art? No. Now look, we're going to do this thing. We're going to have a conversation. From Chicago, this is Film Spotting. I'm Josh Larson. And I'm Adam Kempinar. How do you live? Well, I live with the confidence that if I believe in myself, the money will follow. And what do you plan to do if this whole dream of yours doesn't work out? That doesn't even enter my consciousness. Maybe it should. In Marty Supreme, Timothee Chalamet is a 50s-era table tennis player bent on success at any cost. Josh Safdie's film is part of this week's slate of reviews.

1:07Also this week, Gus Van Zandt's new one, Dead Man's Wire, and James Cameron's Avatar Fire and Ash. It's all ahead on Film Spotting.

1:20Welcome to Film Spotting. Happy New Year to all of our listeners. Happy New Year to you, Josh. It's been a little while since we've seen each other, though we've been churning out the content still for our listeners. how are you how was your holiday season and i think we've talked about this before any resolutions you want to share you don't strike me as a resolution kind of guy oof uh well happy new year to you as well yeah it's been a good break from school from the show honestly a lot of the stuff we've been sharing is stuff you and michael put in the can months ago uh and even as far back as film spotting fest last march so yeah it's been a nice break I can't wait to get back to doing this.

2:04And yeah, no resolutions for me. I mean, can I just say I plan to finish this master's program. I'll come back from Scotland, hope to get that dissertation in. That should be, that's enough, right? I don't need to add anything on top of that. I think you have enough on your plate. It is a new year, but we are going to remain in 2025 for a little bit. Next week, we will have our year-end wrap party. It's going to be a quiet affair. We will be doing it as we are recording right now from the comfort of our homes as that goes. Anyway, Josh, can we call what you're in a home? Yeah. I mean, I'm supposed to say flat over here now, but it feels homey at this point.

2:44It is not going to be as much fun as our live shows, Adam, though, which most of these wrap parties have been really throughout the show's history. I think, you know, during COVID, obviously there was a year, maybe two or maybe even three. We did it remotely. We're going to return to that this year, but the topics, these are always fun. So I think we're still going to have a good time. We will. It's our scenes of the year and we expect to get back to a live show wrap party at some point. But this year we are going to be doing it remotely and we will share our scenes of the year. Opening scene, funniest and most moving moment.

3:22our favorite music moment, and of course, we will crown our scenes of the year. You can be part of that show. Send your pics to feedback at filmspotting.net. And since we are a video show now, you know, you don't have to just send an audio voicemail. You could send us a video with your phone and be part of the video show too, right, Josh? Brave New World. I hadn't thought about that? I don't think we've done that yet. So that would be an exciting way to just shake it up in 2026. Again, that email feedback at filmspotting.net. This week, you are our Pandora correspondent. You were live on the scene.

4:03You're going to fill us in on Avatar, Fire, Nash. I can't wait. You know what, Adam? I can breathe on Pandora now. I don't need the mask anymore. It's a whole new experience. I'm sure I can report on Gus Van Zandt's new one, Dead Man's Wire, which opens this weekend in limited release. And we also have a new poll for you looking ahead. We want to know your most anticipated film of 2026, though we do have the asterisk that comes out pre Memorial Day. So the first yes of 2026. As we just said, we are going to remind you that film spotting is now available as a video podcast. If you're a Spotify listener, you can toggle between audio and video.

4:47You can also watch the show on YouTube. Our YouTube is youtube.com slash film spotting. And for a link to all of our episodes and a link to those video episodes, just go to filmspotting.net slash episodes. But first, Marty Supreme.

5:11Have you ever thought about what you're doing to me? Give us all money! During part one of our Top Ten show, Alison Wilmore spoke at length about her number nine film of the year, so why not start with the insightful foundation she provided? Alison described the tale of aspiring table tennis champion Marty Mauser, loosely based on the real-life story of Marty Reisman, as a, quote, spectacularly entertaining, chaotic, stressful, wonderful experience, unquote. Invoking the Cone Brothers creative split, she spoke of the Safdie Brothers' individual output, allowing us perhaps to understand how Josh's contributions are unique from Benny's.

5:51Marty Supreme suggests that what she considers the Safdie Brothers' sensibility, that desire to center movies on characters who are basically addicted to writing on the edge of chaos and courting disaster almost compulsively, should be attributed to Josh. She called Marty someone who believes he has an obligation to pursue his talent, and that Safdie and his co-screenwriter and co-editor, Ronald Bronstein, are using this compelling and repellent character, her words, to represent everything compelling and repellent about the American dream, our capacity for self-mythologizing, and the achievement of individual success.

6:28As for the actor portraying Marty, this is Timothee Chalamet's best role to date, in large part because his charisma and conviction are such that, despite being so destructive and irritating to everyone who is close to him or comes into contact with him, you never doubt why people continue to help him. I think the ways in which it manages to have this character be both so appealing and so kind of awful is an incredible art, summarized Allison. Formally, she praised Darius Kanji's cinematography and Jack Fiss's production design for how lived-in the early 1950s setting feels, bearing none of the weight of nostalgia such period pieces typically do, as well as the eclectic array of faces assembled by Safdie and casting director Jennifer Vendetti, which includes business mogul Kevin O 'Leary and indie filmmaker Abel Ferrara, plus relative newcomer Odessa Azayan, who plays Marty's childhood friend and lover Rachel, to compliment established stars like Gwyneth Paltrow as a former Hollywood star and socialite named Kay Stone, who has an affair with Marty.

7:33Ultimately, Allison loved all that the movie shares with the Safdie's uncut gems, but also believes that it, and specifically the ending, which I think we might get to in some separate spoiler talk, offers something more substantial than the sheer thrills of watching a chaos addict. Josh, I know you like Marty Supreme. I know you like Marty Supreme because I saw your three and a half star letterboxd rating. That should tell me you liked it. Apparently, I can't know for sure unless you click the heart next to it. Four out of five could mean didn't like. Two out of five could mean did like. Up is down.

8:10Black is white. Numbers are meaningless. Whatever. I'm not that chaotic. Come on. Here are some more numbers. It didn't make your top 10, nor your top 25. with allison's case in mind tell me the biggest reason why you did click the little letterboxd heart for margie supreme i saw it but more importantly what muted your enthusiasm for a movie that seems destined for multiple oscar nominations and i'm going to repeat just briefly here your menu of choices the abundant energy that accompanies the josh safdi sensibility to follow a character who compulsively courts disaster, Timothee Chalamet's lead performance, the inspired supporting performances and cameos, the cinematography and production design, its examination of the American dream, and or any other lofty ideas the film provoked you to ponder.

9:03I think I appreciated every element on that list, just obviously a degree less than Allison, and I think a degree less than most people. I don't really even have a significant bone to pick with this movie, minor quibbles. It was a great movie year, and that's why it was a little bit lower. I think other films from 2025 did some of these things better. And in fact, where I had quibbles in particular, movies like one that did make my top 10, Kelly Reichert's The Mastermind, when it came to this American dream question, I found to be a more provocative exploration. of that. The ending of Marty Supreme, which we are going to get into, I don't have major problems with.

9:51I think it's far less successful than the ending of The Mastermind. And this wasn't something where I was comparing the two side by side, even while I was watching The Mastermind in the wake of them. While I was watching, I should say, Marty Supreme after watching The Mastermind. This is more, I'm putting in this context because of our top 10 lists. So I think it was just a matter of finding other films that did similar things a little bit better for me in 2025. That said, I don't know that I found a film that had this level of hurtling intensity, compounding chaos, thrill ride experience as Marty Supreme.

10:34And so I completely understand the rapturous responses people are having to this movie, especially freshly coming out of it, catching your breath and wondering what you just watched. I think it delivers on that front and is extremely exciting, simultaneously troubling on that front. I could say the same of Uncut Gems. And I think perhaps a reason why Marty Supreme is not as high on my list from last year is because I do appreciate Uncut Gems a bit better in treading similar ground. I think that's the case in terms of the propulsion, the performances, and I would say the ending of Uncut Gems 2, which I had quibbles with, but had a conviction, I want to say, that perhaps I don't find in Marty's Supreme.

11:29But before we get to those quibbles, I do want to spend more time hearing from you what you liked about it. I think you're higher on it than me, though it didn't make your top 10 list either. And yeah, I want to spend some time having fun with this movie because it was one of the more unique experiences of last year in the theater. Yeah, and it's funny I mentioned this on that Top 10 Roundtable show. So we're on opposite ends now with the two movies you mentioned in terms of the endings. You very much approve of the ending of The Mastermind. Me, not so much. You quibble with the ending of Marty Supreme.

12:03I'm now fully on board with the ending of Marty Supreme. But yeah, Sam tried to shame both of us this week in the family newsletter for not liking Marty Supreme enough, even though I had it as my number 14 film of the year. I do get it, though, when you really swoon for a movie and have it as your number two of the year, as he did, it can feel like anything less is an insufficient level of an excitement. Right. Again, I get it. I did just rewatch this two days ago because it had been at least a month since I saw it. I felt like I needed to revisit it and fortunately had a chance to do that. my estimation for the film did only grow, largely because it did allow me to work through something that was holding me back a little bit from embracing it more strongly.

12:52And it is something, we're going to mention it again, even though I don't know that our non-family members are going to get a chance to hear it. It allowed me to work through something with the ending. And it's something that Alison Wilmore and I, it turns out, actually disagree about. Generally speaking, though. Allison and I couldn't be more in line. And why don't we start with Chalamet? I'm not prepared to start breaking down and comparing all of his lead performances, but she's right. His combination of appeal and awfulness, I think is an art. He's magnetic and he's maddening. The contradiction that Chalamet gets is that Marty has an outsized ego and sense of pride, but absolutely no shame no shame whatsoever and i know you know this bit because you have just seen this film in the past couple of years and are a big fan of it as i am the color of money the the martin scorsese film you know that that bit early on in the film where eddie says to vincent you're some piece of work you're also a natural character and vince misunderstands him and says, you see, he's saying I got natural character.

14:06And he says, that's not what I said, kid. I said, you are a natural character. You're an incredible flake. Vincent has got nothing on Marty in the flake department. And Marty, too, is even more of a character. But Chalamet plays him so magnetically, but also so naturally, so unaffectedly, that you never see him. I never saw him as a character. I never saw him playing that character. You see his humanity. You understand his ambition. And you can admire his drive and his single-mindedness, even as his choices do consistently. Sometimes they shock you, consistently disappoint you and disappoint others around him.

14:51And I do think this, I think that he's good at convincing people to give him what he wants, not necessarily because he's an exceptional con man. I think it's because he makes everyone around him feel alive. He has a line that alludes to that. That's kind of a throwaway line that happens over the course of an argument. But he says to someone, I give you meaning. He gives you money. I give you meaning. And Chalamet as a performer has to live up to that with Marty, where you feel like he gives everyone around him meaning. And I think he does. There's a generosity that Chalamet has to bring to balance out the selfishness of the character.

15:34And he may be lying almost all the time, but Josh, he's always authentically himself, which I think is also what separates him from some of the other people in the movie who may seem more straightforwardly honest. And maybe that's something that's uniquely Safdian, actually, about this character and some of those other characters, is that the irony is that maybe he's the only one in the movie who isn't actually a phony. He's exactly who he is all the time. Even if sometimes he has to play a role to get what he wants, there's never any question about his identity and his sense of purpose. The brilliant moments in this performance are the ones not where he is lying, bald-faced lying to people.

16:21Because he does do that quite a bit, right? And he's mesmerizing and charismatic and convincing and entrancing when he's doing that. He has to be for the people to buy his lie, and then we're caught up in it as well as the audience. The scenes that show you what a great performance this is are the ones where he's talking to someone who knows pretty much who he is but has not kicked him out of their life yet. Yes. And so he's doing exactly what you just described. He's being his authentic, genuine self. He's not lying to their face. What he's doing is selling his mania and conviction and single-mindedness and manages still to get them to buy.

17:06So is he tricking them? Is he lying to them? No. Is he being good to them? Is he being a healthy presence in their life? No. Do they still follow along? In most cases, yes. And I think that's the magic of the performance is getting us to buy that. One of my hiccups, however, I will say, is that a performance I really like better. Uh, Chalamet was just outside my ballot for best performances of the year. As we talked on that show, Odessa, as I am as Rachel, uh, is did make my ballot. And it's because the moment I didn't quite believe is when the script required her to still follow through with him longer on the film.

17:57Because I felt her performance was so strong and authentic and independent that you sense this woman who she was, as she was being performed, might have been the one to say, hold up. This is enough. I'm getting off this train. So that's maybe not, it's not a fault of his performance because in those scenes with her, I think he's, he's threading that same needle. And I think that's when Chalamet is at his best. Another thing that's interesting about him here and though in this movie, and this is entirely unfair, I'll, I'll confess to it. It's been hard for me to separate Marty, the campaigner for the, for the direction of his life for this ping pong championship and Chalamet, the campaigner for the best actor Oscar.

18:44And I think it's working out for him. I haven't seen any of that, fortunately. There's been so much interesting meta stuff. He's campaigning as a campaigner and it's funny, but it's also the same energy and I'm sure it's meant to be. It's the same energy as Marty. and so it's hard for me in a sense to kind of separate that even though i know i should there's a line actually that speaks to this directly that marty says at one point great line in the context of the movie but kind of captures all what i've been talking about drama is very important to me i don't want to undercut the drama i mean that's it's great i think he's talking at that point trying to convince the sponsor about the ping pong tournament in Japan, right?

19:33Right. And he's saying this is how they have to set it up. There has to be drama involved. And I think you definitely feel that extra textural sense of pursuing the drama seeping into the movie. I don't know that there's any other way to do this role, though. Sure. I am with you on Odessa Zion's performance. I think this movie and I here I'll say there's a lot to unpack. I don't know if we'll get to it. There's a lot to unpack with the depiction of female characters in this movie and certainly with her character, Rachel, as well. But the movie as it's scripted still needs her especially. But every character in this movie to still needs need them to be orbiting around Marty.

20:19So I never had any doubts about or the doubt that you expressed about whether or not she would ever shoot off from that orbit. She's always still within his gravitational pull. But that said, the brilliance of the performance for me, and I'll give you the exact moment where it really clicked. I mean, I liked her from the moment she appeared on screen, but where it really clicked for me, I'll get to in a moment. On paper, if I just started listing for you who Rachel is, her traits and the basic demographics about her and what she does in the movie, even just sort of listing them as facts. I think you'd get a very different picture of her than the willful, complex woman that Zion portrays.

21:06In some ways. Yes, and that's it. That's where I'm going. Okay, yeah. I know which scene you're going to talk about. That's it, right? She can't talk like Marty does. No one in the movie can, even though she does have some of the same desires. So her eyes have to do the work for her of saying and expressing a lot of the things that her character can't. And the unlock for me happened for the character and the performance. it's the scene where we realize that she's willing to hustle to get what she wants just as much as he is and she might even be as good a hustler or an even better hustler than him that she can perform that well even if it means hustling him as much as she loves him and what what marty what chalamet through marty expresses in that moment too there's a little pause in this scene that i love what Marty what Chalamet expresses in that pause is simultaneously both a sense of complete betrayal and hurt and also respect total respect it's like game meets game he gets it in that moment yeah and she has you know she has a face that's easier to believe which you know I think is is why she might be better at this than Marty if she really wanted to go down this path and I I will say that without spoiling it, the story gives her a reason where you could believe she might stick with him through all this out of desperation, out of no other choice.

22:41I don't know that the script plays it that way. That might have been a little bit more honest. I found that it played it more romantically, which I didn't quite buy. I would agree. You could point to that as a defense. This is why she does not exit stage left and instead sticks with him. Sure. I do want to keep going with that eclectic array of faces, though, because I do think that is an incredible strength of this film, the ensemble. I don't know whether some of these names or the majority of the names that you would see if you go to IMDb have done a lot of acting. If they've done no acting, I know that there are cases where nobody has done acting, but it doesn't matter.

23:24the fact that they're they're unique faces that in some cases they are unknown to me they give this movie so much texture how about just in that opening scene ralph calucci the guy who plays lloyd is someone i could watch i could watch all day luke manley the guy who plays dion who who he enlists to help him with the orange ping pong balls but even someone like giza roerig as Kletzky, the British Open champion that he defeats and that he's really close friends with, who gives us one of the most interesting scenes of the year at the dinner scene with Kevin O 'Leary as well. And here's someone I know because I looked him up just to make sure.

24:09Someone like, you know, this is such a minor scene in the grand scheme of things, but I'm just giving an example of adding that texture. Someone like Donato P. D 'Addario, who's Officer Sal, in the scene where his uncle is trying to teach him a lesson and he pays off a cop friend of his to handcuff him and work him over a little bit, make him think he might actually take him to jail. that that is one of those faces that just feels so authentic and yeah i looked him up of course he has no other acting credits and the the point here is that you could list a hundred with this film and and that doesn't that of course isn't stunt casting but there are others that are stunts even if there are subtle stunts because you may not be aware of it for example i mean you're a bigger basketball fan than me, but I'm guessing you didn't recognize that the guy who owns the, the, the place that he goes to practice ping pong and he occasionally sleeps.

25:11That's George Gerben, George, the ice man, right? I had no idea until I looked that up just yesterday, but he's another interesting face on screen, another interesting presence on screen and sneaking in. Yeah. This time I couldn't believe it because I admitted I, I didn't pick him out somehow. And Allison told me, you know, Mamet was the stage director. Of course he was. Now, before I even saw him, I heard his voice and I knew it was David Mamet. And then he appears on screen. But then you get to someone, Josh, like Abel Ferrara, who I've never seen before. I don't know what he looks like. I didn't know that was him, the filmmaker playing that character, Ezra.

25:48And he is both the most terrifying and maybe the most sympathetic character in the movie. and he's completely unforgettable. Well, it's the transition he makes from being, and I think this is representative though. He gets more screen time than all these people you're listing. I think it's representative of why they work. He, that character makes the transition from being doing one bit for one moment to becoming a thread. And you start to see him as a more whole person. Now, what you learn is terrifying and you may be wish you'd hadn't learned it. But when we first meet him, he's entirely sympathetic.

26:27And that's captured, yeah, in the performance. But I think, Adam, even these two, three scene people we've been describing, they manage to not only bring that unique texture because they don't look like stars or familiar, but they also, and this is where the writing should get some credit too, get lines that speak to who they are in this life beyond just who they are to Marty. And, you know, I think his, his friend or cousin who you mentioned, I'm, I'm forgetting the name, but who comes up with the idea for the orange ping pong balls. Yeah. Like he's a perfect example of that. All of his scenes are very short, but by the end of each of them, I feel like I know that guy's whole life.

27:13I know how it relates to Marty, but I also feel like I know how it relates to his parents, his desires for his own life. And it's rare that you get a movie that allows these bit parts to have that sort of richness. And richness, I think, is a good word for this movie. It goes back to a lot of these more technical craft elements we've been talking about from the cinematography and other elements like that, the production design. There is a texture to this movie that is also, I think, rare. There definitely is. And I know now, I mean, I felt it the first time I saw it. I certainly felt it again the second time I saw it.

27:56And then having rewatched it, I took producer Sam's advice. And just yesterday, Josh, I listened to the DGA podcast where Ben Affleck interviews Josh Safdie. And guess what? It's not an accident. It's not just randomly or some weird alchemy that's happening on screen that we feel all this texture and everything you just described in terms of these characters feeling like they're bringing an entire life to the screen. Josh Safdie wrote backgrounds for every single one of the extras. They know at minimum, if not their entire life story, they know exactly what that character was doing in the scene before their scene and in the scene after that scene.

28:40What they were bringing to that moment for every single extra. There are 3 ,800 extras in the movie. 3 ,800. They cast all of them. Which means they didn't just say, hey, company, go out and get a hundred, a thousand extras and have them show up on the day. No, they cast each one of them specifically for this movie. And he provided them with that background, that richness, so that they brought that to the film. And it's there on the screen. We are all sensing it there on the screen. It's really remarkable. You could definitely feel that is, yeah, I was going to say for sure. I wish someone like Fran Drescher, as his mother, had a little bit more to do, got a little bit more of that depth.

29:25She still brings a bit of mystery to an otherwise one-note minor character. Great couple of scenes, I think. Great couple of scenes. And I do think you can tell that Kevin O 'Leary isn't an actor, especially when he's in scenes with so many incredibly talented actors. But when he's saying lines like what is now the most famous line maybe in this movie, I was born in 1601. I'm a vampire. I've been around forever. I'm okay, Josh, with it feeling a little forced because everything that guy does is overbearing and is a little too insistent. And you understand who that guy is and you understand how overbearing and honestly, how kind of awful he is the moment he appears on screen.

Read the full transcript

30:13And that's enough. Hey, he sold me in that moment. I was like, maybe he is a vampire. Like he could be, that might be unlocking a lot of things here. Exactly. Yeah, in terms of the formal elements to bringing up the production design and the cinematography as well. The first time I saw this, it was a screener. And our friend Scott Tobias, I was texting with him that day, that morning. And I mentioned to him that I was going to see Marty Supreme later that day. And I didn't understand why he said this, but I was able to put it together, especially later after seeing it. He said, play it loud. I think he put it in all caps, play it loud.

30:55Right. So then I got it that this is this is a bombastic film in every way, but including with the sound design. Well, I got I got to see it the second time in the theater. I got to see it at film scene in Iowa City. And Sophie, our PA, my daughter, she works at film scene and she says that they have been getting killed with complaints from some of the old clientele who have been coming out in droves saying, you have to turn it down. Too loud. Interesting. And of course, they can't turn it down. That's the way this movie is calibrated. It is just calibrated at that volume. And for me, especially seeing it in the theater and really feeling it, that propulsiveness that we've talked about, but getting the volume on full blast for those anachronistic needle drops and that Daniel Lopatin score.

31:51What a treat. What a treat that was. And here again, I couldn't agree more with Allison that with this focus that Safdie is bringing to the casting with authenticity, there's nothing overly reverential or nostalgic in the visual approach as well. And I think part of that is how reliant it is in its construction on medium close-ups and close-ups. And this is something we see in Uncut Gems too, right? That's part of the jittery, the handheld approach that makes it feel really claustrophobic. There's not a lot of extra room in the frame when it's that close to the characters and you feel like you're that close to the characters.

32:31But that's not what's happening here. This movie doesn't feel the same as Uncut Gems feels. And thank God. I think it does feel very different. But it never is about showcasing the location. It's never about wasting time with establishing shots. It isn't about making you dizzy, like I said, with Uncut Gems. But I do think that Safdie and Kanji are almost always, they're tracking characters and they're showing characters with these tight shots. And it does create urgency. It creates intimacy with the characters. I think it's another reason why we're talking about the textures that all these characters bring and the layers of the performances.

33:12Because we see all the nuances. We see the nuances in their faces, in their emotions, in their reactions. And when do we widen out? When we widen out, like with great dance numbers, it's with the ping pong scenes where we see the full physicality on display. That's when he brings the camera fully out so we can see the table, we can see the bodies in motion. And that's remarkable as well. Can we go back to the needle drops? I like them. Because I'm not a fan. Not a fan, I got to say. And this isn't because they're anachronistic or that I'm opposed to needle drops in general. I just found it to be somewhat tied to a pattern, a little bit related to what I was talking about with Chalamet's performance.

33:59And again, perhaps unfairly having the campaign in my mind, an insistence that for me was a little separate from the propulsion of the film. They're, they're related, but to me, there were two separate things where the movie was insisting on its own intensity at times where uncut gems felt like that was just in the air where you breathe the, you just breathe the chaos in uncut gems. you felt the construction of the chaos just a tad more here. I do think it's a, it's a, as I said at the top, it's a remarkable distinct quality of the film. And perhaps this is just an unfair comparison, uncut gems, but the needle drops are connected to this.

34:47It just felt like it's trying a little bit hard. The recurring bit with the dog, there's like maybe one scene with the dog where I'm like, we, we, we've got it. We know we're already quite distressed about the dog. We don't need another one. And, and I feel like separate from the music. Is that what you're saying? It's separate from the music, but it's the same insistence to me. Like there's an insistence to Chalamet's performance. There's an insistence to the dog scene. And there's, there's an insistence to like, I'm insisting this needle drop in here. Um, that is maybe just push it. It just, the movie wants to impress us as much as Marty wants to impress us.

35:28And a little bit of space between those two things, I think would have gone a long way. I think I didn't feel that, especially because from the moment we got Forever Young in that credit sequence and the entire fertilization moment, if you will, which actually does, someone reminded me of this, a colleague that I was texting with reminded me that uncut gems, I'd forgotten this opens with something similar with the colonoscopy. Right. So I was, I was so on board from that moment that, that those never felt those needle drops to me somehow never felt obtrusive. Now it's funny that you bring up the dog because this transitions nicely into something I did want to bring up in terms of just kind of what for me, what the film's all about and the experience I had the second time and why I'm so why I'm actually so much on board with it more the second time, even though I really liked it the first time.

36:28And one of the one of the revelations I suppose I had is I'm watching this film and I realize, OK, this film really is two halves. It it is a movie that's about Marty up through the British Open with that that first match that he has with with endo the the japanese table tennis player and then it's it's really it's post british open and the second half is where it really feels like a safety film right that's that's where allison talked about marty is a chaos addict that's that's all there marty getting getting himself into deeper and deeper trouble everything seems to be just going off the rails getting progressively crazier.

37:13I recognize that this is what made it distinct. In the moment I was watching it the first time, I was feeling, well, this is that Safdie insensibility. I like that this is essentially a sports movie, but they're doing something, he's doing something so dramatically weird and different with it. But I have to be honest, I found it unwieldy like you, Josh, the hustle at the bowling alley. You're like, do am I really going to have to sit through this entire like we know how this is going to end. This is feeling a little long. How how long is this going to take to play out the stuff with the dog? We're back at the house now with the dog.

37:54I I got I got the excess. I understood it intellectually. My attention was was waning. But where the second viewing was clarifying was that structure. What's the structure of Marty Supreme? It's actually a pretty conventional sports movie in this respect anyway. It's an athlete trying to avenge an earlier loss to a rival. Act one, he loses. Act two is the buildup to the rematch and the rematch itself. And I'll leave it at that. Where the hero trains and through hard work and grit and determination, hopefully, usually in sports movies, the hero wins. except here. This is the brilliance of the screenplay here and what Safdie and Ronald Bronstein are bringing to the table, except here, the training is about 30 seconds of actual ping pong practice and 90 minutes of hard work and grit and determination just to get the money to buy the plane ticket to travel to get to the rematch.

39:00It's kind of incredible when you think about it. And so the epiphany for me, and I'm open to anyone quibbling with this, I'm quibbling with Allison's take on the film and others who might be associating Marty too closely with Howard Ratner in Uncut Gems. I don't think Marty is addicted to chaos. I don't think he is courting chaos. I think he is more comfortable with it than a lot of us are. He sure seems to find it. I don't think he's afraid of it, but he isn't just hustling for the sake of hustling. He is hustling with purpose because he has a purpose. There's even a line at one point in the movie, He says, everything in my life's falling apart, but I'm going to figure it out.

39:51In the second half, he says that someone who's courting disaster, courting chaos doesn't say everything in my life's falling apart. And what does he say to Rachel? I have a purpose. If you think that it's some kind of blessing, it's not. It means I have an obligation to see a very specific thing through. And so maybe I still didn't necessarily need Josh the second the second trip with the dog. But what I can tell you is, is that watching it again and having that click into place and realize that every single thing that happens in the second act, it's not just an introduction of a new example of chaos.

40:27yet again Marty's spinning out of control it's actually just step by step him doing everything he can do the thing that's directly in front of him to earn enough money to get a plane ticket to go to Tokyo that's it he's singularly focused on only that objective once I realize that that he's just too broke to go to Tokyo and if he can't compete then he can't fulfill his purpose. I had a different experience with the film, with the second half of the film, certainly. And it didn't feel like excessive storytelling to me. It actually felt like pretty efficient storytelling. Yeah. This raises a question that we can't, it's a crucial question, but we can't really know the answer to until we see the next movie and we find out what Marty does next, because I think I agree that he's not addicted to chaos.

41:28He's not seeking new forms of chaos. He definitely has a goal. Um, but what I do wonder, you know, if you consider Marty to be like a narcissistic personality, and I don't know that we know for sure enough to say that, but there's hints that it's possible, right? There's plenty of evidence. So for someone like that, is it really the goal or is it that having a goal reshapes the world and everyone around them to be about their needs? And I think that's different both from what Allison was talking about in terms of pursuing chaos and if I'm hearing you correctly, different from what you're talking about.

42:11Well, it's certainly closer to what I'm talking about. Yeah, but if I'm hearing you, it's similar to what I read the movie as wanting is like his methods may be unhealthy, but his purpose is in a way noble. And by achieving it, he will have attained something valuable. and uh i wonder based on the character traits we see if i had to put money on it it's that the next day no matter what's happened to him in the final scene marty will have a new goal that will require everyone to once again and i mean the new people now to orbit themselves around his next goal That's my instinct from what I've seen in terms of his behavior and how he's treated people throughout this film And so that's why I think if you do see marty supreme as a redemption story of some way, it doesn't ring true to me I don't know that's how we're supposed to see it But I it's more difficult for me to see it that way because i'm a little suspicious of this goal Really giving him the meaning he expects it to Okay.

43:36Does that make sense?

44:05And I know that there's discussion out there about Marty as a character and there's I find the hand wringing, the moralizing about characters in movies to be a bit much. You know, I mean, when did we start to expect art to be so reassuring and so comforting as opposed to something that that is is challenging and our characters to be complicated? That's the point is that they should be complicated and they're not real. In this case, he's certainly not real, whether or not he's based in some way loosely on a real person. So we get to observe and contemplate and think about these things and have these kind of moral and ethical provocations because of the character.

44:51So the the wanting to dismiss Marty that some some people I know want to do and dismiss the movie because they don't like Marty and his behavior. I I simply don't understand. And when I say I'm going to soften my read of Marty a little bit, I don't mean I want to make him be a better a better person. I don't care whether or not for this conversation he's a good person or a bad person. I don't like the binary nature of those terms. What I think the movie, in terms of its complexity, is getting at, though, through Marty and through his ambition and through this sense of purpose is I think all of the things that build his identity matter.

45:44I think his class matters. I think his Jewishness matters. And there's a reason why that comes up in multiple ways in the film and multiple times in the film. Everything he does in the movie, as I read it, no matter how misguided it is, and again, this doesn't justify everything he does, but everything he does as he sees it is in service of his obligation. And so what makes Marty Supreme great to me is that Safdie transforms a sports saga into a biting portrait of ambition, class, and identity. It's a relentless odyssey of purpose and survival where every hustle feels like a claim to value in a world that's eager to deny it.

46:35Like not just claim to greatness, which he is aspiring to, but by aspiring to greatness, he's just he's just claiming that he has value. I think Marty recognizes the myth of the American dream, or he understands that as an outsider, that the American dream doesn't exist, that the notion that is open to everybody and it's just there for the taking. if you work hard is, in fact, that myth. And that the outsider is what he is and what everybody is constantly looking to relegate him to. And the only way for him to not be that outsider and get what he wants and take what he wants is to not play by those rules.

47:20Yeah, find a shortcut. Take whatever shortcut he can. And I think those are some of the larger questions that the movie opens up for me. Yeah, which are all interesting and totally agree with you about, you know, yes, we should be able to watch movies featuring characters, main characters who we disapprove of. And that can still be interesting and informative. And I think the more nuanced conversation, again, we keep saying this, but maybe that will come up in our spoiler talk, is how successful do we think Marty Supreme is at doing that compared to other movies I had in the back of my head from the 1970s, the great anti-hero performances.

48:08Last year, we had occasion to consider a couple of these, Gene Hackman in Scarecrow or Jack Nicholson in The Last Detail. And what the movie's attitudes were towards those characters in relationship to the audience's expectations and the willingness to subvert those or to comfort the audience. that's where I saw distinction a little bit between Marty Supreme and some of those 70s movies. And man, the people who are disturbed by Marty Supreme because it features someone who makes you uncomfortable, I don't know what they'd do if they watched some of those 70s movies with Hackman and Nicholson, right?

48:51It would blow their minds. I think you're right. Whether this ends up being part of a qualitative judgment in your analysis of this film or not, all you have to do is, well, first, watch this film, I would say. Watch Uncut Gems as well. But also, if you want, read anything either Safdie Brother has said about Howard Ratner or what they said to me in my interview with them on this show, which we dropped into the feed earlier this week, or what Josh Safdie has said about this character. they they love these men they they genuinely that doesn't mean they approve of every choice they make that's something different but they love these men in a way that i think is very different from the types of characters you're talking about and the relationship those directors those writers and directors probably probably had with with the figures you're mentioning Maybe.

49:51And if that's the case, maybe that's the distinction I'm picking up. And yeah, the end result, maybe I prefer one over the other. Yeah, I think there's romance here. I think there's a romanticization, if I said that correctly, of a romanticizing of characters like Howard Ratner and Marty Supreme that there is not. more Marty than Howard more Marty than Howard maybe more Marty than Howard but we as viewers may romanticize someone like B.A. in The Last Detail or R.P. McMurphy in One Fleur of the Cuckoo's S more perhaps than the filmmakers themselves offer us on screen I think that's a fair distinction we will stop there with Marty Supreme for now, Marty Supreme is playing in wide release if you have seen it and agree or disagree with our takes, you can email us feedback at filmspotting.net.

50:47We may share some of that feedback on a future show.

50:55And it's only a matter of time before I'm staring at you from the cover of a Wheaties box. You think it's that simple? Yeah, I do.

51:10Adam, you know, when we like to talk about Regal Unlimited, our sponsor, this is the all-you-can-watch movie subscription pass, we like to mention the movies that have to be seen in theaters. You can take advantage of a pass like this. And I don't know that there's a movie that demanded to be seen in theaters more from 2025 still playing now than avatar fire and ash that's where i saw it on the big screen to be enveloped in pandora where yes we're still trying to get you visa or passport access to but i got in i loved what i saw really good film and needed that giant screen if you want to have the pandora avatar fire and ash experience on a big screen how would you like to have it for free?

51:59That would be possible with Regal Unlimited. As I said, this is Regal's movie subscription pass that does pay for itself in just two visits. And right now, Regal is offering film spotting listeners endless movies for less. If you sign up for Regal Unlimited using code FILMSPOT25, you're going to get 10 % off a three-month subscription. Regal Unlimited is the only truly limitless movie subscription pass. You can see any standard 2D movie anytime. There are no blackout dates. There are no restrictions. And with Regal Unlimited, you won't just save money on tickets. You're going to save on snacks.

52:37Members get 10 % off all non-alcoholic concessions. Sign up now in the Regal app or use the link in the description and use code FILMSPOT25 to receive your discount.

52:56And we just wrapped up, I think, at least a half hour of spoiler talk on Marty Supreme. We have very different takes. Let's just say that on maybe the film, maybe the film as a whole, we might have discovered at the end of that conversation. It turns out it's pretty nuanced and might just be a matter of semantics, but we still talked about it for 30 minutes plus. And all of that is going to be in the Film Spotting family member feed, a special offering for our family members who we want to take a moment to thank because they are crucial support in allowing us to do this show. We want to thank one particular Family Plus member, we should say, and that is Grant Averitt in Lexington, Kentucky.

53:37Grant is on Letterboxd, as so many of us are. If you want to follow Grant there, look for Grant692. Now, filling out our questionnaire, Grant wrote this, a friend recommended film spotting to me in 2012 or so, and then I listened to Adam and Michael Phillips. Review It Follows and their top five 21st century horror movies, It Got Me Hooked. A review we got wrong for Grant, Everything, Marx Brothers, Duck Soup is one of the greatest and funniest comedies of all time. I think Grant has Michael's support on that, right, Adam? Yes, I'm pretty sure that he does. Michael holds that against us. Grant also shared a movie that he credits with becoming a cinephile, Casablanca.

54:20I watched it at a summer camp during the summer before my senior year of high school, and it blew my mind. I've seen hundreds and hundreds of films since, but none of them have been better. Good timing. I just watched last night in preparation for our upcoming Diane Keaton tribute. I just watched Play It Again, Sam. And of course, that whole film is really about, in some ways, Casablanca. It opens with it opens with like seven minutes, the ending of that movie and and the ending of Played Again, Sam steals directly from it as well. So have that film very much in mind. And guess what? Good movie.

54:59Casablanca. Josh, not sure if you were. I like it, too. I'm a fan. OK, yeah, we do thank Grant for being a family member and for all of his years of listening. It does come with perks being a family member. You get to listen early and ad free. You get the weekly newsletter. You get exclusive opportunities like being part of the FilmSpotting family discord. And yes, you do get monthly bonus shows or just monthly or regular bonus content. You might get consistent spoiler talk like that Marty Supreme spoiler talk Josh was mentioning. We're not exactly sure as we are recording in this moment. I could do a live update, but the voting has not ended yet, Josh, as we're recording.

55:40Give me a live update. This is always exciting. Ooh. I mean, this is the thing. It's so close. So family members get to vote. We gave them three options. January bonus is we were wrong once. So we take a movie that at least one of us was probably wrong about. The consensus is this is a great movie. One of us, maybe on the show, maybe not on the show, had a different opinion about. And the options we came up with were Boogie Nights, Bringing Up Baby, and Collateral. Real quick, I'm the naysayer on Collateral. We have never talked about it on the show. Bringing Up Baby, Sam and I are the naysayers on that.

56:25I don't know how you feel about it, Josh. You can chime in. But that was part of our Screwball Comedies Marathon back in like 2005 or 2006. And Sam and I somehow didn't go for that Howard Hawks classic at all. That's hard to believe for some reason, especially I feel on Sam's part, but I think I was cool on bringing up baby when I first saw it. I don't know that I actively, and I checked my website. I don't have a written review there. I don't know that I actively disliked it, but I think I was definitely lower, certainly than those who considered a screwball classic. And then Boogie Nights, maybe a little bit of a weird choice, but January, it's still one battle after another time.

57:06And we are going to give some time to one battle after another as a sacred cow review. We have that coming up. And maybe that was on producer Sam's mind when he suggested a Boogie Nights conversation. I love Boogie Nights. That's in my top five Paul Thomas Anderson films. But Josh, you have it at number eight on your list and Sam has it at number nine. So to be clear, I don't think either of you are saying Boogie Nights is a bad film. you do have it ranked very low. Yeah. And I think, you know, my original star rating was like three out of four when most PTAs are generally like three and a half or higher for me.

57:47So yeah, lower tier, perhaps I'm wrong. And it is as good as his best. If that's where listeners vote, we'll get a chance to consider that. So the live update again, as we are taping, the polls are still open for about nine more hours. So we'll see where it shakes out. but Boogie Nights is in the lead, but only by two votes over bringing up two votes over which votes bringing up baby is in second. Yeah. Okay. I think, I think collateral is not, not going to be in contention. It's going to be Boogie versus baby. All right. So you have that to look forward to. If you are a family member, a conversation about one of those films.

58:26And if you are potentially looking to become a film spotting family member, we have a promo code for you through January 31st. You can take 20 % off a film spotting family membership. Any film spotting family membership, just use the promo code. Josh, you'll like this one. Supreme use promo code Supreme for 20 % off film spotting family.com is where you can help us out. And another way you can help us out, take a minute, give us a rating or a review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Every review or rating does help us reach new listeners. This is the only pure thing in this world. The fire came from the mountain and burnt our forest.

59:17My people cried for help, but Ava did not come. Such a bummer, Josh. Turns out my passport to Pandora has been revoked. Couldn't take the trip, but you've taken all three trips enthusiastically, and you have a report from James Cameron's CGI playground. I would love to hear whether or not Avatar fire and ash.

1:00:18was enjoyable for you. fire and ash gives Adam and you're never going to believe it. Okay. Compelling characters. I have never praised, I have never praised any of these movies for compelling characters, but I think what helps is that the way of water dumped on us a whole bunch of new characters here. We now know who they are, which helps. And I think it's more in the screenplay as well. that is now giving us time to meet these characters as fully realized individuals. And Cameron is writing here with Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver. They also did Way of Water, but they were also instrumental in the Planet of the Apes films that we both have appreciated as screenwriters.

1:01:09And I don't think you felt their hand in Way of Water as much as you do here. The result for me is that we still have this wide-scale conflict, right, between the invading humans and the indigenous Navi on Pandora. This is not going to convince you to see this or the next one, Adam. That conflict is still unfolding at the end of this three and a half hour movie. Okay. But what's crucial here and that I did appreciate and actually liked quite a bit. This one is more about what the conflict means for individual characters and their evolving understanding of themselves. And this is really across the board for a number of characters.

1:01:45I'm just going to highlight two in the sake of our own time. But one is Nateri, who we've met since the beginning. This is Zoe Saldana playing the Navi who falls in love with Sam Worthington's Marine in the first film. The Marine, Jake Sully, becomes, is transformed into Navi. They have this relationship in Weight of Water. They have kids. And now they're a couple who's been together and they have these growing children. And Nateri has come to regret in this film, her involvement with humans. And the performance is ferocious and hissing. She gets lines like, I hate their pink little hands. And what's interesting here is that they have, you know, in our terms, we would say biracial kids, essentially.

1:02:30And these two have a conversation about this and Natiri's grief over what has been lost in Way of Water from her son. It's real, it's palpable. You understand, again, how this conflict has affected her, how it's changed her, and the anger she has. The performance is so crucial to that. And the animation of the faces, I think there's even an advancement in this movie that helps that to register. All right. The other character I'll talk about is a new one, Varang, played by Una Chaplin, who is new to the series, part witch and part warrior. Varang leads this Navi clan. They're somewhat like pirates.

1:03:11She stalks the screen in this movie as if everything on the screen is potential prey. It's an incredible physical performance. But what's also interesting is that Varang has this theologically compelling background. I know I'm going to lose you here, Adam. Hang on. Hang on. Awa. Do you remember Awa, the goddess figure of Pandora? Okay. Supposed to keep everything, everything in unity, um, is, is what Awa is supposed to do. All right. So Varang, this new character, her clan, a volcano wiped, almost wiped them all out. Before that, she tells us this in a story at one point, she had prayed to Awa, save us, rescue us, wasn't rescued.

1:03:53So she has decided to defy this goddess and embrace the fire of the volcano and just became basically this violent leader of this pirate clan. She falls in with the invading humans. So she colludes because there's promise of weapons and it's a compelling character rooted in a, you know, the great villains need good reasons for their villainy and Varang has that. Now, I'll say before we get out of here that, of course, there have always been problems with Avatar in this equation it's making between the Navi and indigenous people on Earth, right? And how awkward that is. Is Cameron appropriating here?

1:04:36Is he honoring? And Varang is kind of like a flashpoint for that because terrible decision to have her clan, these pirates that she leads, like hoot and holler, like you're watching some 50s Western and they're the quote unquote savages. You know, what, why, why does the movie do that? Completely unnecessary. The same time, Varang has this interesting backstory. So she's definitely a flashpoint. And I want to point people to one review that's just obliterating fire and ash on this point in terms of the representation. And that's Walter Chow, who I've gotten to know for my time out in Denver, Boulder area.

1:05:14And I'll link to this in the show notes, but he just like, yeah, takes a flamethrower like Varang likes to the movie for some of these notions. So I do want to acknowledge that. And whenever this comes up, I think there's a more nuanced portrayal of her in the movie, but I always cede the point to those who have personal background at stake when these issues are raised. And I think Walter does make some interesting points to consider. So again, we'll link to that. I, however, I'm a fan of Fire and Ash. I think it's in the area of character and narrative, a significant advancement and honestly gives me hope for the series.

1:05:54If we do indeed get more of these. Thoughtful as always insightful. I don't know if it's convincing enough, Josh to get me. There's, there's going to be another one. I knew that was another one. I don't know. Don't they always say they have to see how much money it makes and this thing's already bringing in like, you know, millions, possibly billions. So likely there is. Yeah. I know this is the joke about this movie. At least it seems to be on social media that no one actually knows anybody who loves these movies, who really loves these movies. Like who are the people that are, that are just dying to see Avatar.

1:06:30And yet the box office proves that these movies are reliable and people are obviously excited about them. And you think that's justified at least with fire and ash. yeah and i'll say too you know to point to point to another conversation pop culture happy hour i'm sorry it was a guest critic i'm not pulling their name right now but they they're one of those people like they i believe they said they watch way to water like three or four times a year and avatar itself so so they're yeah these you know these movies it seems like the most obvious thing in the world to say but yes they've struck a chord okay what do you hear in indian Annapolis.

1:07:12It is Tuesday, February 8th. I'm DJ Fred Temple. I thank you for listening. Mr. Temple, sir, you have a caller? I have dinner in 30 minutes is what I have. That Tony Kuritsis fellow's on the line and he's asking to speak to you? The guy with the shotgun in the man's neck? You should open with that shit, James. Dead Man's Wire is the latest from Gus Van Zandt. It's the Milk and Goodwill hunting directors first since 2018's Don't Worry, He Won't Get Far on Foot. This is based on the 1977 true story of a man who wired himself with the explosive Dead Man's Wire of the title and kidnaps the mortgage banker who did him wrong.

1:07:53Bill Skarsgård and Dacre Montgomery star along with Al Pacino and Coleman Domingo. It opens in limited release this weekend. Adam, does Van still have the filmmaking chops. Yeah, it's good to see him back. He's crafted a tense, slyly funny caper anchored by a nervy performance from Skarsgård that flips the Dog Day Afternoon script. What if Sonny had a plan? One of the pleasures of watching Dead Man's Wire isn't just thinking about the movie in relation to Dog Day Afternoon. Both are mid-70s set crime movies that involve banks, hostages, and the hostage takers become folk heroes of sorts. But it's considering whether this folk hero, Tony Kiritsis, saw Dog Day Afternoon and was possibly even influenced by it.

1:08:53The movie came out in September 1975, and this event occurs in February 1977. 77. Tony even walks into the bank. As far as I know, as I recall, the movie never directly references this movie, never directly references dog day, but he even walks into the bank carrying one of those long florist boxes, just like sunny, except it turns out it's a bit of a surprise. There's no, there's no absurd tap dance with the shotgun. And it turns out there's not even a shotgun in it. There's a blueprint for this rig. He's actually got the gun on him, but there's There's a blueprint for this rig that he's created, that dead man's wire, to keep his hostage.

1:09:34And it's this guy Dick, who is played by Dacre Montgomery. Just in case anything were to happen that might separate him, it's ingenious, right? If any cop comes up, any sudden movements of any kind, Dick is going to get blown away. And Tony's not exactly cool, but, you know, he's a bit on edge, but he has thought every aspect of this through. He's rehearsed it. He's in control, unlike Sonny. Even when something goes wrong, the opening of the film is him showing up in his car. And when he turns the ignition, Josh, the key breaks off in the ignition and he can't restart his car. The plan was to leave in his car, but there's no panic, just kind of bemusement.

1:10:21He adapts. He carries on. The cherry on top of it all, you said his name, is the casting of Al Pacino as Dick's father in the movie. And he's the man Tony actually has the biggest beef with. He's the guy Tony actually intended to take hostage that day, ended up taking his son instead because the dad was on vacation. Another big difference here is that Sonny is an accidental rager against the machine. His intentions are personal, not political. For Tony, the personal is political. His outrage is theater. And Van Zandt clearly wants to relate his situation to economic conditions today and for us to sympathize with him as a victim of this mortgage company, as a victim of these sinister forces that a little guy like him simply can't combat.

1:11:16And this is his opportunity to take back some of the power, which is what, of course, gets some of that admiration and affection from the public and really gets the public on his side. now tony a lot of worried folk out here this is unbelievable okay dad if you wanted to take a moment to apologize i think it would expedite this release process i'm not going to admit guilt to something i didn't do just apologize for what you did just apologize no tony no stay strong richard hello what's true and what's fiction and all of this i i don't know i've picked a little bit here and there. I know that I liked Skarsgård's skittishness verging on derangement, but balanced by, I mean, you have to be a little bit deranged to do this, right?

1:12:06But balanced by rationality and focused indignation. And when he needs it, I mentioned the humor, self-effacing humor and charm. And you have to watch the way he walks in this movie. I said he was edgy. He walks always just a bit slouched forward, like he's consistently being pressed down upon. And then you've got Coleman Domingo, who's a prominent Indianapolis radio DJ named Fred Temple, real, real guy, like all of these, these guys are, and Tony respects him and confides in him. And the movie really takes advantage of Domingo's voice, his great voice and his natural charisma. And that character really adds to the revolutionary spirit of the movie.

1:12:51I wish there was more with that character, Josh. And I think it would have served that revolution aspect of the film, the political aspect of the film, a little bit better because he really just becomes an extension of the FBI and the police in helping them against Tony. And not that I'm suggesting, I think that character should be helping Tony, but there's never any sense really of conflict. Like he's helping the man in this. And I think it would have been interesting to sense a little bit of that antipathy, especially when everybody else in the public feels like Tony is the righteous one in this case.

1:13:32And Dacre Montgomery is someone I didn't recognize as Dick Hall. I guess he was a Power Ranger at one point. He was in Stranger Things for like five years. You're going to be seeing a lot more of Dacre Montgomery. He brings some real depth to this privileged character. And you understand that he has a little bit more in common with Tony than Tony may want to believe, than he may want to believe. And he's just such an interesting counter to Tony because Tony is physically, he's such a fast talker, but he is, again, that jittery kind of mover. and because of the nature of how he's confined, everything about Montgomery has to be internalized and completely still and quiet.

1:14:17And so watching those two play off each other is one of the enjoyable aspects of this movie. And I think it's fun to see Van Zandt in his bag here a little bit, not just with the effective use of the handheld camera, but he does incorporate real footage or footage that's made to look like real TV news footage. I'm guessing there's a little bit of both. I don't know for sure. Like there's one scene early on when he's walking with Dick and the police are surrounding them, but there's nothing they can really do. They're walking to Dick's car because, of course, he can't get in his car. And a car, just a normal citizen is driving a car.

1:14:53They come around a corner. And of course, they come upon this incredible scene and they come around and they go off into the into the side into a snowbank. And that footage then cuts in that moment to footage, TV news style footage of that happening. And it looks exact as if it's matching perfectly. And I don't think it adds verisimilitude, though it does. But I don't think the purpose of it is that so much as it just kind of adds to the chaos of the moment without the movie ever really feeling like a sensory assault. And there is one, I did look this up to confirm this wasn't an invention, and it's kind of incredible, Josh.

1:15:37There's a magical coincidence that happened here in real life that Van Zandt exploits in the movie and the screenwriter Austin Kolodny exploits. here when life and art collide, it required no extra manufacturing, just a little modulating maybe. He insists, I won't go into too many details, but at one point, Tony insists that he has to have a press conference and it has to go on TV nationally. And to accommodate that, they cut into the TV stations, cut into the people's choice awards. And this is 1977. And they actually do cut into the people's choice awards, right. As John Wayne is accepting a people's choice award for favorite actor.

1:16:26And this is, this is eight years after true grit. He's still, he's done some movies. He's done the shoot us recently, but this is, this is John Wayne at the, at the tail end of his career. And this is kind of a tribute to him. And They're even playing. We see the montage of of him. The montage is him entirely just shooting people, you know, mostly Native Americans, but just entirely shooting people. And that that moment in that montage, it it really does encapsulate something that the movie is getting at in terms of this question of who who are our heroes? Who are the real heroes? Who are our fake heroes?

1:17:04What's real violence and what's fake violence? Where do these lines kind of start to blur? And what are we willing to accept? What are we not willing to accept? I don't have answers to those questions. Those are some of the questions that the movie provokes with sequences like that. So I enjoyed Dead Man's Wire. I'm so glad to hear it. This is just in that you made time for it and are giving it some attention. It's just part of the craziness of this year end that we have a filmmaker like Vincent. this is happening with the new Jim Jarmusch movie. I think just this torrent of releases at the end of the year from huge names in filmmaking.

1:17:45So yeah, good to hear that Van Sant is out there still doing important work. Dead Man's Wire is currently playing in limited release. Next week will be our year-end wrap party, the studio edition. Those opening scenes, funniest scenes, music moment, and more. We remind you to send your picks, video or audio feedback at filmspotting.net. We will also announce the 2025 Golden Brick winner, five finalists, Josh, and you as the listener, not only get a vote, you are one of four votes that determines that winner, but we award the listener's choice. So it's an important vote. Please do go to filmspotting.net slash bricks and vote now for The Brick.

1:18:33And here's the thing you especially need to know. We did not give you much time, but, you know, this is just how it worked. We kind of, we had a cutoff in the past of around Thanksgiving, but then that forced us to leave off some titles that we thought really were deserving of a nomination. And in this case, Zodiac Killer Project is a movie that if you were in a city that played it during its limited run, then you had a chance to see it. Otherwise, it just came out VOD the day we're recording this, actually, Tuesday, January 6th. So as you're hearing this, it's out now. But voting for The Brick closes Sunday night, the 11th at midnight.

1:19:15So hopefully you're hearing this before then and you have a chance to see that movie. I will tell you this, and this isn't about swaying the vote at all. I don't think it's probably going to determine anything in the end. Josh, it really is just encouraging people to seek this movie out, that it's worth seeking it out at the end here, having a little bit of urgency. Listeners get a vote. I get a vote. You get a vote. Producer Sam gets a vote. At least one of us has Zodiac Killer Project number one on their golden brick ballot. So, so it is worth your time. and hopefully you will have the time to see it and do finish up your homework and vote.

1:19:59It'd be great. Yeah. I mean, hopefully, uh, did you run through these titles? Should I do that real quickly? The others, uh, please go ahead and where people can find them. Hopefully Zodiac killer project, as you mentioned on VOD right now is the last one and listeners have been dutiful and that's all they have to knock out. And you've already seen boys go to Jupiter. If you haven't, That's on VOD right now. Grand Theft Hamlet is available only via MUBI, a top 10 lister for me though. So I think it's worth checking out. Predators available Paramount Plus. And then our last finalist here, a little bit more availability.

1:20:36Sorry, baby, you can find on HBO Max or VOD as well. So five really compelling titles to give some thought to and choose your favorite for the Golden Brick Award. Next week, it might just be the wrap party and the announcement of the Golden Brick. Certainly, that will be enough show. But you said it, Josh. Some other titles are rolling out and expanding to more theaters. And it really is just a matter, well, at least for me. I don't know where you are, how much availability there is with some of these titles. But it's a matter of time for me. And the Jarmusch film, Father, Mother, Sister, Brother is expanding.

1:21:15I have an opportunity to see that, may be able to see it and talk about it on next week's show. And then a title that I know has gotten a lot of love here, End of Year. Some listeners have written in and said that this is a movie that needs to be seen, that may be, in fact, the best film of the year and may contain the best scene of the year. That's Be Gone's Resurrection. That's expanding. And apparently it's one you have to see on the big screen, Josh. So maybe I will, and maybe I'll report back. We'll see. I would love to do that as well. I don't know if availability, plus the fact that I have travel coming up, will make that possible.

1:21:54I will say this about next week's show, though. I am leaning towards mostly, I think, choosing scenes for our wrap party from films that were not on my top 10 list. So there will be some variety, maybe hitting some titles that listeners were wondering, where was that? Why didn't that come up? Will Resurrection be in there? Will Father, Mother, Sister, Brother be in there? Maybe, likely not for me, but we'll see what happens in the next week. So wait, you came up with a policy for your wrap party list? You didn't share this? Not a policy. I just, honestly, it kind of happened naturally. As I lean towards those picks that came to the top, I thought, well, that's kind of nice.

1:22:38We haven't actually talked a lot about that film. So yeah, I think it'll shake out that way. Okay. I am excited to hear about some of these titles. It's likely, Josh, I haven't seen some of the ones you're going to mention. We'll find out. Quick note here about our sister podcast, The Next Picture Show, looking at cinemas present via its past. In case our lengthy conversation about Marty Supreme was not enough, they are going to be discussing it as well in conjunction with The Hustler. Such a great film. I don't, Adam, you might need to send the Next Picture Show folks an email and tell them Marty Supreme is not a hustler.

1:23:18I don't, this is, you negate this pairing. This doesn't, this doesn't compute for you. Okay. They didn't consult me. They didn't consult me. I don't know what's wrong with those folks. Also, if you would like more talk about Avatar, Fire and Ash, that is in their feed. That's a conversation with Tasha Robinson and Keith Phipps. I was just listening to that today. Their reactions after seeing Fire and Ash. And yeah, the Next Picture Show folks do have their best of 2025 show dropping soon. You can find new episodes every Tuesday, wherever you get your podcasts.

1:23:56What should you do, Heathcliff, if you were rich?

1:24:05It's Paul's. I do all rich men do. Time for a new deeply flawed film spotting poll. In a couple of weeks, we will do our 2026 preview. Now, in our notes, producer Sam has a question. In what format? We haven't discussed that. time for a little on-air production meeting now josh back in the day and this this even includes since you joined the show we used to do a crazy thing we would just do a straightforward top five our most anticipated movies of the year the easy and the obvious one yeah now sometimes i think i was able to convince you to do something that you i know hate to do which is we would we would set aside, kind of put in the penalty box some of the overly obvious ones.

1:24:54Like, nobody needs to hear us talk about how excited we are about the new Wes Anderson film. But for the most part, we would do a straight top five. Then we switched to the questions format. Our top five questions about the movie year. Then we went to, please do the honors. Fully adieu. We went to like death matches. Yeah. We pitted two upcoming movies against each other, and we had to choose which one we were most excited about. Inspired, we should say, by your abiding love for Joker Folia Dew. That's it. Yeah. Of course. You just always wanted ways to fit that into the show. That's right. Now, I can't wait to ask you this question because I would bet a significant amount of money that you have zero recollection of how we did this.

1:25:45And to be fair, to be fair, I knew what it was, but when I looked it up, there was a detail that I had forgotten. So, so I didn't know it 100 % either. Do you recall what our approach was last year with our movie preview? I think I have an informed guess and I need to back up though and fill in the history here. The reason we went away from the questions is because we discovered that our questions were too unique and we weren't talking about the biggest movies of the year. Right. The bigger movies. So then we were, then we were getting feedback like, why are you doing a 2020, whatever preview?

1:26:23And you don't mention the Wes Anderson. So then we had to contort ourselves. Well, we actually had too many movies that it ended up, we didn't, we didn't end up reviewing some of the movies. We didn't even be talking about the movies that were in our, our preview. So, yeah. So it's all, it's all a vicious cycle. And then we had the folia do debacle. And I know what we did. Here's my guess. We also went through an extreme. I don't think we were fully out of it, but we went through an extreme draft for a phase where everything had to be a draft. was last year's preview a draft. It was a draft. There you go.

1:27:00It was a draft. The detail that I forgot was we did a top 10. We did a top 10. So we each had five picks, but it was just 10 picks in order alternating. You had the first pick. You picked the movie you were most excited about. That title, by the way, Mickey 17. Then I picked my number. I got my number one pick. Turns out pretty smart one. one battle after another. Yeah. Too bad it wasn't your number one of the year. That would have been perfect. I know. I know. And then we just, we just went back and forth until we had 10 titles that were our most anticipated of the year. So we obviously have lots of options.

1:27:42What are we going to do? So despite the shade I just threw at the draft idea, I kind of like that. I like that we covered. I thought it worked too. I thought it was good. We covered that many titles. Let's bring it up at our real production meeting with Sam this week and see if he feels the same, but that's kind of where I'm leaning. I am as well. And we'll see what Sam thinks and we'll see if listeners, the fact that it was his idea probably, and that we both like it, knowing Sam, that means he's going to come in with some cockamamie new idea that we will never have conceived of. And we'll be doing that.

1:28:21Sam, bring it to the table. Listeners, you can bring your ideas to the table as well. Now let's get back to the matter at hand. Our new poll question asks you to choose your most anticipated film of the new movie year that comes out before Memorial Day. So most anticipated film that comes out first half of the year. Josh, please give our listeners the options. Emerald Fennell with Wuthering Heights. That's starring Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi. Maggie Gyllenhaal's The Bride with Jesse Buckley and Christian Bale. Lord and Miller's Project Hail Mary. Ryan Gosling. I know nothing about this. Sounds great.

1:29:02Oh, really? I've seen the preview. Yeah. Okay. How about Zendaya and Robert Pattinson in the drama? Sure. David Lowery's Pop World drama? Horror movie? Hmm. Mother Mary. Okay. I'm not sure what a pop world drama is, but I'm ready for it. Me either. This stars Anne Hathaway and Michaela Cole. The Devil Wears Prada 2 is another option. And then we will give you the choice of other. Yes. You can write in your pick if your most anticipated film is not there. Of those options, Josh, well, it turns out you don't know what most of those titles are. And I barely know what some of those titles are. So it's hard to pick.

1:29:46It's hard to pick. I guess just going off of actor or director, what stands out? I mean, The Bride, The Bride probably stands out to some extent. I've been aware of The Bride for quite some time. I'm still on a Frankenstein high. It was on our preview last year. I think it was. I think it was. Yeah. Del Toro's Frankenstein almost made my top 10.

1:30:09I'm belated but fully on board with Jesse Buckley after Hamnet. so I want to go there. You know what? I think I'm going to go there because excited about Wuthering Heights, really a novel I love, but you know, it's just an adaptation. The bride seems to be doing something a little differently. I'm leaning towards the Zendaya, Robert Pattinson, because I appreciate both of them so much as actors. And I assuming the drama is an original concept, perhaps not. I mean, it's not like something that's familiar. A new 824 film. Okay. Not as familiar as Frankenstein or Wuthering Heights. So right now I'm torn between the drama, knowing nothing else, and The Bride.

1:30:54How about you? It's written and directed by someone I'm not familiar with, Christopher Borgley. The logline here is a happily engaged couple is put to the test when an unexpected turn sends their wedding week off the rails. April 3rd is when the drama is scheduled to come out, Josh. So for some reason, that pushes me towards the bride. I just, I don't know. You heard wedding and you're like, I don't need it. Been there, done that. Let's go with, yeah, I wish I could go in a major different direction, but the bride, and especially with that cast, is where I'm leaning. So I'm going to pick the bride.

1:31:36you can vote in that poll and leave a comment at filmspotting.net. We will share your results in a couple of weeks.

1:32:03we do have one more quick review to get in this is just some viewing josh that i did right before we started recording. As harrowing as the experience was, I thought it was important to try to fit in. And the movie is called The Voice of Hind Rajab, directed by and written by, and I apologize if I'm mispronouncing the name here, Kowther Ben-Hania, who may be familiar to you, I can't remember, Josh, we did talk about and recommend Four Daughters on the show, but was that one that I recommended or did we discuss that movie together? Do you recall reviewing that movie? Yeah. Oh yeah. Yeah. If I, it's, if it's the one I'm thinking of, yeah.

1:32:53Yeah. It's 2023. I'm pulling it up now. A fascinating film. Yeah. Really good. Really interesting film, blending, blending fiction and nonfiction. And that is a movie I put in the category. I talked about it in terms of the the ecstatic truth documentary style. Very, very Herzogian, right? Where you have you have a woman who lost her two daughters who, without getting into the details, are no longer part of her family. And so the filmmaker casts two young women to play her daughters and in that artifice or through that artifice hopes to find some kind of answers and find some kind of catharsis in that.

1:33:41Really good movie. The voice of Hinn Rajab is doing something somewhat similar, only in the basic way that it is blurring fiction and nonfiction. It is deeply disturbing and vital. The film is about Red Crescent volunteers who receive an emergency call. It is based on a true story of a five or six year old girl named Hin Rajab, who is in a car, was in a car traveling with four of her cousins and her aunt and uncle. and she gets caught in fire in in a firefight in gaza and ends up on the phone pleading for rescue josh and she is only this little girl is only you know is only eight minutes away from these volunteers but of course getting an ambulance to her is not is not as simple as it should certainly be.

1:34:48The blurring here is that everyone who performs in the movie, it is completely focused on the Red Crescent volunteers. They are all actors, and they are all performing from a script that Ben Hania has written. But we hear the real girl, the real Hind Rajab, that is all her audio, the actual audio. From the call.

1:35:28You can imagine. How. How horrifying it is to. In what feels like real time. To have to sit with those characters knowing. How helpless they are. despite all of their efforts to try to get to her. And something that stands out to me from the film is there are two moments where the manager of this center, he brings up to the character who first, the man who first took the call, this guy named Omar. He's deeply affected by this, as you would expect. And he twice lights up a cigarette or tries to light up a cigarette. And the manager tells him, you can't smoke in here. And these moments pass by Josh very quickly, but you just can't help but watch and hear that and think about the absurdity in a way, right?

1:36:28Of this, this, I don't know what to call it other than a call center. That's what it feels like. And there's a sterility and a banality to the setting here. we never see the girl. We never see the firefight. We only hear it. Otherwise, we are focused only on those volunteers at the call center. You think about the absurdity of this world in which everything is dictated by protocols. The word coordination is used a hundred times in the movie, except everything seems to be uncoordinated and nothing is working the way it should, and it's a mess. And think about just the horror itself about what's occurring and what kind of just world do these things occur?

1:37:16What rules are being followed that allow these types of atrocities to occur? And yet in this place, you can't light up a cigarette. There's rules forbidding that that have to be followed. And then as absurd as that is, you think, well, that also that does matter. that that's important that we have rules that that in places where where civility does exist we need to keep making sure that we're enforcing rules and and those are some of the things that the the movie makes you consider while you're thinking about so many other things watching it and certainly it's not a movie it's not a movie that you have to be a parent to to have a a very tough viewing experience with or to be affected by emotionally.

1:38:05Absolutely not. But especially when you have a five or six-year-old young girl at home like I do, and when you hear your daughter and she is suffering in any kind of way, and your only instinct is to try to help her, and you hear this girl on the phone and you think about the way she's suffering and understand that nobody can help her, that's where the angst, for lack of a better word, really does occur watching this film. But as I said, I think it's an important film that people need to see that is out now. Yeah. That mixture of fact and dramatization, which, as you said, Four Daughters includes.

1:38:50In Four Daughters, it made me think also Herzog, as you said, but Abbas Kyrostami and films like Close Up, being in that tradition of pursuing truths about the human experience through the use of both tools, of fact, harrowing fact, and also dramatization that maybe brings us into the moment in a different way. It sounds, as you said, like a tough watch, but yeah, a crucial one, especially you think about hearing these stories like this. I remember when this broke, you know, and, and it made headlines, uh, in the States and then the next tragedy happens and you kind of forget about it. So there's also something important, I think about bringing this back to the fore because the situation that it describes is still ongoing.

1:39:43The voice of Henry job is out now in limited release. And Josh, that's our show. If you'd like to connect with us on social media, you can find Adam and the show on Instagram, Facebook, Letterboxd, and YouTube, all at FilmSpotting. Yeah, I think I'm at each of those places as well. You can find me at Larson on Film. We are independently produced and listener supported. You can support the show by joining the FilmSpotting family at FilmSpottingFamily.com. You can listen early and ad-free. You'll get a weekly newsletter, monthly bonus episodes, and access to the entire show archive. For show t-shirts and other merch, go to filmspotting.net slash shop.

1:40:27In that film spotting archive, you can find two conversations with the Safdie brothers talking about Uncut Gems, episode 757, and Good Time, episode 645. And yes, there's Avatar talk before you join the show, Josh, a film spotting fix from January 2010, and then later Avatar The Way of Water from December 2022. In limited release, Jim Jarmusch's father, mother, sister, brother with Adam Driver, Kate Blanchett, Tom Waits, and Charlotte Rampling. This is the winner of the Golden Lion at last year's Venice Film Festival. Kristen Stewart's directing debut, The Chronology of Water with Imogen Poots and Thora Birch, and as I mentioned, the voice of Hinn Rajab from the director of 2023's Four Daughters.

1:41:11In wide release, the sequel to 2020's comet-striking Earth movie Greenland with Gerard Butler, Greenland 2, colon, migration. Are you ready, Josh? Greenland's in the news. I was just thinking about this. Can Gerard Butler save Greenland from the Trump administration? I certainly, certainly hope so. I hope so as well. Also, Primate, the feature-length version of the most entertaining trailer of the new movie year, the tagline, there's something wrong with Ben. Ben is a chimp and here's the thing wrong with him. It's rabies. Come on. Come on. Hey, it seems to be anyway, as flight of the Concord said, leave those poor monkeys alone.

1:41:58They've got problems enough of their own. In other news, it's January at the multiplex next week. As we have mentioned a few times, come on back for our scenes of the year and we'll see what else we get up to. Film Spotting is produced by Golden Joe Dessau and Sam Van Halgren. Without Sam and Golden Joe, this show wouldn't go. Our production assistant is Sophie Kempinar. Special thanks to everyone at WBEZ Chicago. More information is available at WBEZ.org. For Film Spotting, I'm Josh Larson. And I'm Adam Kempinar. Thanks for listening. This conversation can serve no purpose anymore. Goodbye.

1:42:44film spotting is listener supported join the film spotting family at filmspottingfamily.com and get access to ad-free episodes monthly bonus shows our weekly newsletter and for the first time all in one place the entire film spotting archive going back to 2005 that's a filmspottingfamily.com panoply

From the publisher

Back from the New Year’s break, Adam and Josh go long on the majesty - and some of the shortcomings - of Josh Safdie’s MARTY SUPREME. Plus, Josh is positive on the new AVATAR, and Adam recommends Gus Van Sant’s DEAD MAN’S WIRE and Kaouther Ben Hania’s THE VOICE OF HIND RAJAB. 

This episode is presented by⁠ Regal Unlimited⁠⁠, the all-you-can-watch movie subscription pass that pays for itself in just two visits.

(Timecodes and chapter starts may not be precise with ads.)

Intro (00:00:00-00:04:33)

Marty Supreme (00:04:34-00:50:40)

Filmspotting Family (00:50:41-00:56:50)

Avatar: Fire & Ash (00:56:51-01:04:53)

Dead Man’s Wire (01:04:54-01:15:38)

Next Week / Notes (01:15:39-01:21:38)

Poll: 2026 Most Anticipated (01:21:39-01:29:26)

The Voice of Hind Rajab (01:29:27-01:37:34)

Credits / New Releases (01:37:35-01:40:30)

Links:

-DGA’s Director’s Cut Podcast w/Josh Safdie

https://www.dga.org/events/2026/february2026/martysupreme_qna_1225

-Walter Chaw’s 0-star review of Avatar: Fire & Ash

https://filmfreakcentral.net/2025/12/avatar-fire-and-ash-2025/

-Pop Culture Happy Hour on Avatar: Fire & Ash

https://www.npr.org/2025/12/19/nx-s1-5648236/avatar-fire-and-ash-is-one-battle-after-another

Feedback:

-Email us at feedback@filmspotting.net⁠⁠.

-⁠⁠⁠⁠Ask Us Anything⁠⁠⁠⁠ and we might answer your question in bonus content.

Support:

-Join the Filmspotting Family for bonus episodes and archive access.

⁠⁠⁠⁠https://filmspottingfamily.com⁠⁠⁠⁠

-T-shirts and more available at the Filmspotting Shop.

⁠⁠⁠https://www.filmspotting.net/shop⁠⁠⁠

Follow:

⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/filmspotting⁠⁠⁠⁠

⁠⁠⁠⁠https://letterboxd.com/filmspotting⁠⁠⁠⁠

⁠⁠⁠⁠https://facebook.com/filmspotting⁠⁠⁠⁠

⁠⁠⁠⁠https://twitter.com/filmspotting⁠⁠⁠⁠

⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/larsenonfilm⁠ 

https://letterboxd.com/larsenonfilm⁠⁠⁠ 

https://www.facebook.com/larsenonfilm

⁠⁠https://bsky.app/profile/larsenonfilm.bsky.social⁠⁠


Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Filmspotting

All 198 episodes
Marty Supreme Review, Avatar: Fire & Ash, Dead Man’s Wire, Voice of Hind Rajab (#1047)Filmspotting · 1 h 43 min
Listen in VO