Whiplash Review (Archive)

4 Feb 2026 · 32 min · 16 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Filmspotting Podcast Episode Summary

Episode Details

  • Title: Whiplash Review (Archive)
  • Date of Original Review: October, 2014
  • Duration: Not specified in the transcript.
  • Hosts: Adam Kempenaar and Josh Larsen
  • Overview: Adam and Josh review the film *Whiplash*, directed by Damien Chazelle, which won the Grand Jury Prize and Audience Award at Sundance Film Festival in 2014.

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. Film Overview
  2. Synopsis of *Whiplash*: The film revolves around Andrew Neiman (played by Miles Teller), an aspiring jazz drummer who faces intense pressure from his instructor, Terence Fletcher (played by J.K. Simmons), at a prestigious music conservatory.
  3. Central Conflict: The narrative explores the cost of perfection in art, the sacrifices made in pursuit of greatness, and the abusive dynamics between student and teacher.
  1. Perfectionism and its Costs
  2. Ambition vs. Reality: The characters grapple with the consequences of their ambition. Andrew's journey is marked by alienation from family and personal relationships, and physical tolls, highlighting the darker aspects of striving for excellence.
  3. Chazelle's Personal Connection: Adam mentions that Chazelle's own background as a former jazz protege informs the film's authenticity regarding the pursuit of artistic perfection.
  1. Complex Characterizations
  2. Andrew Neiman: Initially a relatable character, his drive for success leads him to become increasingly unlikable and obsessed.
  3. Terence Fletcher: J.K. Simmons' portrayal is lauded for its complexity. He embodies both a mentor and a tormentor, pushing students to their limits while revealing the moral ambiguities of his teaching style.
  1. Contradictory Nature of the Film
  2. Affirmation vs. Caution: Adam notes that the film is both inspiring and disturbing, leaving audiences questioning the value of the sacrifices made for artistic success.
  3. Audience Reception: The film’s climactic scenes can evoke conflicting responses, from exhilaration to discomfort, challenging viewers to reflect on their own values surrounding success.
  1. Artistic Choices and Cinematic Techniques
  2. Editing and Pacing: The use of quick cuts and rhythmic editing mirrors the jazz aesthetic, enhancing the film's emotional impact and keeping the audience engaged.
  3. Musical Integration: The film’s structure parallels musical performance, with intense sequences designed to elevate both tension and excitement, particularly in pivotal scenes.
  1. Cultural Commentary
  2. Critique of 'Good Job' Mentality: The film critiques a contemporary culture that often rewards mediocrity. J.K. Simmons' character reflects a harsh truth about the nature of success and the hard realities faced by those pursuing greatness.
  3. Ambition and Purpose: The discussion touches on a deeper philosophical inquiry into the meaning of life and success, raising questions about ambition and the definition of a fulfilled life.

Key Takeaways

  • *Whiplash* serves as both a cautionary tale and an inspirational narrative about the pursuit of excellence in the arts.
  • The film adeptly navigates the complexities of ambition, mentorship, and the psychological toll of striving for perfection.
  • Adam and Josh engage in a nuanced discussion, unpacking the moral implications of Fletcher's teaching methods and Andrew's journey, ultimately concluding that the film invites ongoing reflection on the nature of success.

Conclusion The episode effectively captures the essence of *Whiplash*, offering listeners a profound analysis that goes beyond surface-level entertainment to explore deeper themes about ambition, artistry, and the human condition. The hosts encourage audience feedback and highlight the benefits of joining the Filmspotting family for additional content.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Reflecting on Whiplash's Legacy

0:47 to 1:15

A discussion on the impact and awards of Whiplash since its release.

“12 years ago, Damien Chazelle's Whiplash won the FES Grand Jury Prize and it won the Audience Award.”

The Essence of Whiplash

1:15 to 1:58

Exploring the themes of ambition and perfection in Whiplash.

“I think this is one of the most liked reviews I've posted on Letterboxd of Whiplash.”

Character Analysis: Andrew and Fletcher

1:58 to 4:00

An analysis of the complex relationship between Andrew and his teacher Fletcher.

“Don't worry about what the other guys are thinking.”

The Cost of Perfection

4:00 to 7:10

Examining the personal and social costs of pursuing perfection in art.

“In the broader sense, I know what you're really getting at is, did I like this movie?”

Artistic Ambition vs. Personal Well-being

7:10 to 10:40

Debating the balance between artistic ambition and personal health.

“in the paper mache head mask leading a band.”

Navigating Direction and Purpose

10:40 to 12:20

Discussing how characters in Whiplash pursue their goals and their implications.

“Another interesting question to ask along the lines of yours would be, what shifts did you make during this film?”

Final Thoughts on Whiplash

12:20 to 14:00

Concluding reflections on the film's themes and character arcs.

“Andrew takes this girl he's interested in.”

Introduction to Nicole's Character

14:00 to 14:35

Discusses the importance of the character Nicole in 'Whiplash.'

“I'm glad you mentioned the character of Nicole.”

Editing and Pacing in Whiplash

14:35 to 15:37

Explores how editing choices reflect the film's musicality and energy.

“She's played by Melissa Benoist, I believe is how you pronounce it.”

Climactic Scene Analysis

15:37 to 16:40

Analyzes the formal choices in the climactic scene of the film.

“But we also get these accent beats in other scenes where you wouldn't expect them.”
Show all 16 chapters

Miles Teller's Transformation and Performance

16:40 to 17:56

Examines Miles Teller's performance and transformation in 'Whiplash.'

“But it is the big scene at the end, the one that won me over on the movie overall.”

Drumming Skills and Authenticity

17:56 to 19:47

Discusses the importance of authentic drumming in Teller's performance.

“That's how caught up in the end of this film I was.”

Character Dynamics and Unlikability

19:47 to 22:49

Explores the dynamics between characters and the protagonist's unlikability.

“the question comes up, well, are we really awarding or recognizing the performance as an actor or actress?”

J.K. Simmons' Role as Fletcher

22:49 to 24:50

Analyzes J.K. Simmons' performance as Fletcher and its complexities.

“I mean, the role is built for a big performance.”

Manipulation and Complexity in Fletcher's Character

24:50 to 28:05

Discusses the layers of manipulation and depth in Fletcher's character.

“We get a very quick shot of him talking to, you get the sense it's a former co-worker's younger daughter in a nicer voice.”

Exploring the Character of Fletcher in Whiplash

28:05 to 30:42

A deep dive into the complexities of Fletcher's character and his methods.

“He has such little regard for anyone else around him that when he walks into this room, it's like a hurricane comes in the room.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Josh Larsen:Film Spotting is presented by Regal Unlimited. Regal Unlimited is the all-you-can-watch movie subscription pass that pays for itself in just two visits. See any standard 2D movie anytime with no blackout dates or restrictions. Save on tickets, save on snacks. Members get 10 % off all non-alcoholic concession items. Sign up now in the Regal app or at regmovies.com slash unlimited.

0:25Adam Kempenaar:Josh, it's time to drop something from the Film Spotting Archive into the main feed. And with the Sundance Film Festival award winners having just been announced, we thought we would pick one of those award winners, actually a double award winner from our review history and share that with our audience. 12 years ago, Damien Chazelle's Whiplash won the FES Grand Jury Prize and it won the Audience Award. Of course, it went on to much more acclaim later that year as well.

1:03Josh Larsen:12 years? It actually, this is a case where it actually seems longer. I mean, Chazelle has done a lot of stuff since Whiplash, but yeah, what a breakout for him. A breakout for me on Letterboxd, Adam. I think this is one of the most liked reviews I've posted on Letterboxd of Whiplash. Did you deserve it? You know the insight I gave that got that response? See, I love it. That's why I asked. This was my review.

1:31Adam Kempenaar:Okay. Good job. See, it's always the pithy. It's always the two words when it's clever. It's what the people want on Letterboxd. You actually spend time crafting real criticism and you get three likes. Yeah, just scroll right on by. Good job's funny, though, Josh.

1:48Josh Larsen:I say good job to you. Thank you. Thank you, sir. All right. We reviewed the film when it came to theaters that October. Here's that conversation. The key is to just relax. Don't worry about the numbers. Don't worry about what the other guys are thinking. You're here for a reason. Have fun. Five, six, and... I want to be great. And you're not.

2:13Adam Kempenaar:We got Buddy Rich here. A little trouble there. You're rushing. Here we go. Five, six, and...

2:20Josh Larsen:On a recent show, Adam, we played a clip from Whiplash in which J.K. Simmons' demanding music instructor berates Miles Teller's aspiring jazz drummer, and I made a joke that he sounded like R. Lee Ermey's drill instructor in Full Metal Jacket. I hadn't seen the film yet, but it turns out I was on to something. In both Full Metal Jacket and Whiplash, the harsh demands of a superior, play a part in an instance of suicide. And this is a small detail in Whiplash, so don't worry that I've just given the entire picture away. All that is to say, though, that Whiplash, which is written and directed by Damien Chazelle, is a pretty dark film.

2:56Josh Larsen:In his quest to become one of the great jazz drummers of all time, Teller's Andrew alienates family, snuffs out a burgeoning romance, and spills a whole lot of blood. I didn't realize that drumming could involve this much blood, actually. Meanwhile, J.K. Simmons Fletcher, an abusively intense teacher at the elite music school Andrew attends, is on hand to push Andrew even further than that. Their goal is nothing short of perfection. And considering the potential, the value, and the cost of perfection is largely what Whiplash is all about. One thing I've learned about you, Adam, since joining the show is that you have a perfectionist streak.

3:33Josh Larsen:Would you say that's fair? That's fair. And to be fair, I can relate. They're a bit of the pot calling the kettle black here. Still, I wonder what it was like for you to watch this striving for musical perfection. Did you find Whiplash affirming of such tendencies or cautionary about them? Perhaps it was something in between. And is the movie itself, which is a bold incorporation of the musical aesthetic in visual form, anywhere close to artistic perfection? Great stuff.

4:01Adam Kempenaar:Whether a piece of art can ever be perfect, of course, is a very loaded subject, but it is one I'd maybe like to return to if we have time, because I do think it's interesting to consider in relation to jazz specifically. In the broader sense, I know what you're really getting at is, did I like this movie? Do I think it's a good movie? And yes, I did really like this movie. I think it's a very good film. And the first part of your prompt nails one of the aspects of Whiplash I appreciate the most. it absolutely is both affirming of such striving and cautionary about it, which is really the only honest position to take.

4:39Adam Kempenaar:I think it would have been so easy for Chazelle to show the personal cost of Andrew's ambition physically, psychologically, socially, and have him renounce that by the end of the film and be in a much healthier place. Maybe be the kid again who could actually play the drums just for fun. but chazelle maybe because this is a personal film for him what little i've read he was a former jazz protege himself and now he's an artist of course making movies he knows how disingenuous that would have been he knows how crucial that drive is in any artistic endeavor dangerous yes but necessary and by the end of this film it's a neat little trick chazelle has pulled off he gets to have it both ways.

5:21Adam Kempenaar:It's crowd pleasing and inspirational, but also really problematic and disturbing to really think about it from the main character's point of view. So there's this element of cliche to this film in terms of hitting some notes that we want a film like this to hit in terms of being uplifting. And then you sort of find yourself after you've risen out of your seat and find yourself cheering, sitting back down and thinking, what am I excited about? What am I really cheering for. It is dark in that way. And I respect quite a bit that little trick that Giselle's pulled off.

5:54Josh Larsen:Yeah, I like that you use the word trick because that's exactly what he does in a way. All the questions that are at the beginning of this film really are still there, aren't they, when the lights come up? And that's what I loved about it because it explores all the possibilities of this being cautionary and how the direction this kid is going is dangerous for himself personally, certainly for his relationships. Yeah. And even for his physical health. But then it opens up to consider without ever really condoning the methods that the Simmons character uses, but to make us really ask, is there something that's worth all of this that the kid has gone through.

6:39Josh Larsen:And maybe perfection, we don't want to get too derailed by that as a topic. Maybe it's just to be your best or to truly achieve something, it's going to take some sort of sacrificing, some sort of suffering. And then you ask yourself, okay, is that worth it? Or would I be better off having other elements of my life be healthier and richer, but I never attained that than maybe one moment. And we get that moment. This was a movie that very much worked for me personally as a viewer along the same trajectory as Frank, the Michael Fassbender film, with him in the paper mache head mask leading a band.

7:19Josh Larsen:And both pictures I was enjoying quite a bit all the way through, wasn't crazy about. And both of them culminates in a performance that ties everything together, brings it all together in this climactic scene and also leaves you still questioning, I think. So this doesn't wrap things up neatly, but I can totally see how an audience would go out of this picture thinking, oh, wow, how inspiring that was. But really, the Teller character, Andrew, he doesn't have any clear idea of how he should live his life as a jazz artist where this film ends than maybe he did a few scenes earlier. And that's what I liked about it.

7:56Adam Kempenaar:To your point specifically about the questions this movie is posing, it occurred to me that I actually think it would be a really fun personality test to give someone to have them watch a scene that happens near the end of the movie. And I'll be vague here to not spoil anything, but there's a conversation where Fletcher, J.K. Simmons, lays out his rationale. He explains why he pushed Andrew and his whole ensemble as hard as he did. Take that explanation out of the context of the movie. You're just meeting this instructor on the street and hearing his teaching philosophy. I'm curious how many people would listen and without hesitation dismiss him and say, I would never want to be taught by that man.

8:35Adam Kempenaar:I couldn't undergo that type of process. I don't even want to spend any time with him, much less be instructed by him. How many people would listen and think, okay, I get it. It sounds rough, but I get it. It could all be worth it. Sign me up. Now take those people, the people that said, sign me up. Have them watch the movie. Hear his philosophy where this scene appears within the context of the movie. You've seen his behavior. You see how far he goes. You see all the damage he's caused. How many of those people would still say, sign me up? And how many of them would switch their answer to, no way?

9:07Adam Kempenaar:I certainly wasn't unequivocally enthusiastically on board, but Josh, I was still on board. That's how messed up I am. That's how much I buy into this notion of artistic greatness. Not perfection, as you said, because I don't think it's attainable in art anyway. This isn't math or science. There's no formula. There's no hard answers, no hard right answers. But in the striving for a form of perfection, maybe you achieve something close. Maybe you achieve something transcendent. And in that way, maybe it is all worth it.

9:38Josh Larsen:And that's another trick the movie pulls is that just when you think you've got this guy figured out and demonized, here comes that speech. And, yeah, I was in the same boat as you. I'm thinking, well, he's maybe got it figured out here. And it ties into, you know, the one line, if it's the same conversation I'm thinking of, and I'm pretty sure it is, is when he says something about the worst two words in the English language are good job. Good job. And doesn't that tie into this culture now of every kid's team gets a trophy, right? Every kid comes home, whether you're in last place or first place, with a ribbon or something.

10:10Josh Larsen:And that's the idea behind it is that we're all just here to learn. Now, different contexts, of course, that happens with little kids. Here is, well, you know, a young adult, college age, and maybe making that transition between, okay, you're bad. Get out of my classroom. I'm bringing another guy in. And at some point you do have to have that restriction for the art to breathe. And so you see where he's coming from. And the movie shifts your perspective. Another interesting question to ask along the lines of yours would be, what shifts did you make during this film? Like, where were you agreeing with Simmons?

10:50Josh Larsen:Where did you just want to get him fired? Yeah. And I think it's a real emotional trajectory that this picture takes you through.

10:56Adam Kempenaar:There's no doubt. And I think a shorter version of this same challenge, it comes in the form of a question that happens in a dinner table conversation much earlier in the film where Andrew, in justifying his pursuit of this ambition, says basically, I'd rather die at 34, but be somebody that people are still talking about 50, 60 years from now versus someone who lives to be 90. Yeah. And nobody cares about not memorable in any way. That's another question. I think a lot of people listening probably have asked themselves at some point. And that reaching for greatness, I said this movie was one of my most anticipated movies of the year because that's something I am always drawn to.

11:32Adam Kempenaar:Those kinds of stories is something that has always fascinated me for whatever reason. It came up a lot recently in connection with my top five movie tattoos. Remember, I was I was paying tribute to, you know, Man on Wire, Philippe Petit pulling off this unbelievable feat and all that jazz, Joe Gideon, a character pursuing this perfection and always failing. It also connects, Josh, with something else I'm always preoccupied with. It comes up a lot here on the show, which is purpose. One of the reasons I think this type of ambition is so attractive, even though it's so obviously potentially harmful, is that it simplifies everything.

12:06Adam Kempenaar:Sure. If your entire focus is this goal, whatever that goal is, then virtually every decision you have to make has already been made for you or is at least much easier to decide. There's another great scene in Whiplash that gets directly at this in both dialogue and also how it's shot, which I know we want to talk about a little bit. Andrew takes this girl he's interested in. He asked her out at the movie theater. She's selling popcorn. Nicole, out for pizza. And she reveals that she really doesn't know what she wants to do with her life. There's no real reason why she decided to go to school at Fordham.

12:37Adam Kempenaar:It was just there. She doesn't know what her major is yet. She's still searching. It's this very kind of vulnerable moment. And Andrew's reaction, he's a nice enough kid, at least at this point in the film. His reaction to that isn't mean or hurtful, but his questions are just pointed enough that it's quite clear to her and to us that he just cannot fathom being so directionless, so lacking in drive, so lacking in purpose. And she certainly senses it, and the exchange ends awkwardly. But the reason we sense it, Josh, it isn't just the words. It's because of the editing here in this sequence. it's been up to this point in the conversation a pretty standard shot reverse shot conversation and then he asks that first leading question and she recognizes the subtext and the pace of the editing quickens the editor here is tom cross it quickens just for that back and forth a little bit of if you've seen the movie double time swing if you will and it just completely heightens the intensity of that scene and draws our focus into what's really going on in the back of his mind which we can sense a little bit based on his personality, but it's really there because of the way that scene is captured and the way it plays out rhythmically.

13:44Josh Larsen:Hey. How are you? I'm good. How are you?

13:46Adam Kempenaar:I'm good, thanks.

13:47Josh Larsen:Good.

13:48Adam Kempenaar:Uh, the usual?

13:50Josh Larsen:Uh, you know. Look, I don't really know how... I see you in here a lot, and I think that you're really pretty, and would you want to go out with me? Ever?

14:06Adam Kempenaar:Please go away.

14:07Josh Larsen:Oh my God. I'm so sorry. I'm so sorry.

14:11Adam Kempenaar:I'm just messing with you. I'm messing with you.

14:14Josh Larsen:Oh my God. I'm sorry.

14:19Adam Kempenaar:That's actually pretty mean. I'm sorry. I didn't mean to. What's your name?

14:26Josh Larsen:Oh, I'm Andrew. Andrew. Yeah. I'm Nicole. Nice to meet you, Nicole. Nice to meet you too. I'm glad you mentioned the character of Nicole. She's played by Melissa Benoist, I believe is how you pronounce it. And she only gets a handful of scenes, but she's really crucial because there isn't really that opposing force in this film for the Miles Teller character. We do see his father played by Paul Reiser, but he's more of a ingratiating, supporting. He's not going to be real harsh with his son. Not at all. But she is that polar opposite. She doesn't, as you said, doesn't know what she wants to do and positions that as a worthy way to live your life, to explore and not have everything laid out in front of you and go after it with this driving force.

15:11Josh Larsen:So I like that she has that role in the film. And you're right about the editing. So crucial to talk about in this picture because we get so many insert shots, I noticed, that are not only there to convey information. But the pacing at which they come are like accent beats in a piece of music. And we get them where you'd expect when Andrew joins this elite group and we first see them warming up. So we get the moistening of the reeds, the tuning of the drum keys, all in these quick inserts. There's a real emphasis on procedure.

15:42Adam Kempenaar:Very much. Very much.

15:43Josh Larsen:But we also get these accent beats in other scenes where you wouldn't expect them. That date scene between the two of them. We'll get a quick one under the table of her foot inching toward his. or even the scene where he goes to the movies with his father, we just get an insert shot of popcorn. And all that does is give us this sense of fluidity and movement so that this is a movie that's always on the move. And that kind of incorporates this idea of jazz style as well. And I do like how Chazelle and the editor, Tom Cross, incorporate that into the film.

16:15Adam Kempenaar:Or whatever, just because he's so constantly in that space. But even when he's not listening to music, it seems as though the music's following him.

Read the full transcript

16:22Josh Larsen:Yeah, pursuing him, for sure. And even when we get establishing shots of New York City, they're quick shots cut to the beat of the song that is playing. I do want to ask you, though, how you feel about these formal choices in that climactic scene, which we won't necessarily give away what happens. But it is the big scene at the end, the one that won me over on the movie overall. Yet I did feel like the aesthetic approach that Giselle was taking throughout the movie by trying to match his visuals with the music almost went a little overboard there. I mean, we get tracking shots, swish pans, widescreen shots of the auditorium.

17:03Josh Larsen:This is a performance we can say is taking place at a jazz competition, I believe. And it was almost even for jazz. It was almost too much for me.

17:09Adam Kempenaar:Yeah, it wasn't for me. I think that that might have been, though, that as someone who does love jazz music and who has played in jazz groups since seventh grade, starting out in sort of middle school and high school bands where I didn't really know what jazz was, but then actually discovering bebop and that sort of thing and really appreciating it, playing in different jazz combos. was let's just say that I was really thankful or at least the audience was really thankful that when I saw this movie late on a Sunday night there was no one else in the row with me because I wasn't just tapping my foot I was I was pounding my leg I mean yeah I mean I was I was really into it so honestly I might have been so hypnotized by the music yeah and the playing that even though I was aware of some of the pyrotechnics of the camera it certainly didn't draw me out of it if anything it drew me in.

17:57Adam Kempenaar:That's how caught up in the end of this film I was. Even as I said, I caught myself also thinking about kind of the ramifications of the end of the film. I love about it too, Josh, that I honestly didn't see it coming. You can say - Oh, I didn't either. No. Well, this is exactly where this type of movie is going, but the movie takes enough little detours that to get to that scene certainly was something I didn't expect.

18:16Josh Larsen:And that final scene, I think you could describe as having a three-act structure itself. For sure. So there's the initial detour, but it takes a few other turns also.

18:24Adam Kempenaar:Starting with Miles Teller, the star of this film, an actor that you've come to appreciate recently due to his performance in The Spectacular Now. I've been a little bit on the Teller bandwagon going back to a few earlier performances. What did you think of him here?

18:38Josh Larsen:Well, what I liked about his performance here is that he goes in a different direction than The Spectacular Now and one that was very encouraging because that was a movie which very much in the performance of the character relied on his charm. And he played that to the hilt. I mean, he just had you, even a kid with major faults, he had you won over instantaneously. He sort of drains himself of that here. And it's maybe not as ingratiating of a performance, but it's a perfect fit for the part and for the movie and for this story that's being told. And again, I was encouraged that he's not concerned with playing somebody who's likable necessarily.

19:15Josh Larsen:He was more than willing to go that direction. And you see it in that scene, that date scene again, because The Spectacular now is a teenage romance in some levels. So it's almost like it could have gone that way. And he really puts the emphasis on the drive that Andrew has and his willingness, especially in the second date scene, to just jettison what he at least thinks might hold him back.

19:38Adam Kempenaar:It's funny because whenever an actor plays a performer of some kind, and maybe there's Oscar talk, and I don't know if there's going to be for Miles Teller in this film, but the question comes up, well, are we really awarding or recognizing the performance as an actor or actress? Or is it just that we're all so wowed by the fact that, oh, look, Jeff Bridges can play the guitar or look at how great they sing in this scene. You're almost more wowed by the vocal performance than maybe any of the acting. I don't know whether or not we should give an actor extra credit for that, but maybe we should give Miles Teller some extra credit, Josh, for the drumming, because lots of people can sing pretty darn well.

20:15Adam Kempenaar:Not very many people, relatively speaking, on this planet can play the drums or even fake playing the drums at this level. And without that ability, and of course he got some lessons, he had some background in it, but he did go through a boot camp that paid off really well. Without his ability and the commitment he shows, this whole movie falls apart. I said that when we were looking ahead to this movie. You can't fake jazz drumming at this level, and the movie doesn't. I'm sure there are a few tricks at times where it cuts to some of those close-ups. Maybe he's not playing entirely, but there are plenty of scenes where it's entirely clear, there's no way around it, that Miles Teller is playing the drums in almost every moment.

20:53Adam Kempenaar:And most importantly, you believe it every second. You believe it every second. Beyond that, though, you're absolutely right that what he brings here is a little bit more of the wounded, vulnerable soul he played in John Cameron Mitchell's Rabbit Hole, though he was much younger then. And he doesn't rely on, you said charm, you can call it charisma, he displayed in the spectacular. Now, I wrote about this on Letterboxd when I shared a few comments about that movie. he has to convince us that he is one of the most popular kids in school, despite the fact that he's not one of the best looking kids probably in school.

21:21Adam Kempenaar:He's certainly not one of the most well-dressed kids in school, and he's certainly not one of the richest. And those are kind of the three general attributes that can help propel you to winning over any group, especially in high school. He doesn't have any of that. It's just his sheer persona. And I've talked about this a lot, but a movie like Footloose, he's playing that Chris Penn Willard performance. I didn't like that Craig Brewer remake at all, but the one thing I did enjoy watching in that film was the charisma of Miles Teller. Andrew, as you said, has none of that charisma. He is, in some ways, a blank slate beyond this drive.

21:55Josh Larsen:What does his dad say about him at one point? You have trouble looking people in the eye. Yeah.

21:58Adam Kempenaar:Right?

21:58Josh Larsen:That's the opposite of these other characters.

22:00Adam Kempenaar:I think he's a character who, if he's not behind the drum set, is instantly forgettable. You wouldn't even be aware that he was in the room unless he was actually playing. Again, in sharp contrast to the other characters we've mentioned. More than that, I said that there's a point early in the film where he's pretty likable. Of course, as he gets more driven, he becomes more and more unlikable, downright rude. And that does get back to what I thought was a really interesting point that I singled out from Alex Ross Perry last week talking about Listen Up, Philip. This movie proves that it's not a genre film per se, like an action movie, though maybe it is if the genre is kind of the inspirational mentor-protege movie in some ways.

22:34Adam Kempenaar:And we've talked about how this movie contradicts some of those cliches. But we forgive narcissistic characters when we want to see them succeed, when they have a clear objective, something they're pursuing. And Andrew does. So even when he's unlikable, we really feel for him.

22:48Josh Larsen:We do. And the main reason I think we do is because he has an antagonist. And this is Simmons' movie. I mean, the role is built for a big performance. The scenery here has been pre-salted. And the real challenge for Simmons is just not to swallow the thing whole. I mean, because you could easily go bonkers with a part like this. And I don't think he does. I think he stays true to the mania and the cruelty, the harshness of this character. But he never seems to be doing it outside of the character. And maybe the best way to describe that is a lot of the stuff that he insults his students with is funny in a way.

23:30Josh Larsen:Yeah. Cruelly funny. Sure. But he never seems to take pleasure in the laugh. So Simmons doesn't pause and let that moment take over the scene because he's still angry that that kid screwed up. And that's what you see. So I really think you could call this one of those big Oscar baiting performances. It will get a lot of attention because it's so loud. But I think it's very subtle, too. I mean, think about the scene early on where he takes Andrew aside in the hall and asks him just some personal questions, talks to him in a quiet tone. And you think, oh, you know, you still think he's probably jerking him around, right?

24:06Josh Larsen:Because we've seen enough now. This can't really be him. But you're wondering, maybe, maybe. Well, maybe he's just jerking him around.

24:12Adam Kempenaar:This is what I was thinking anyway, in that he's just trying to put him at ease. So even though he is doing something, quote unquote, nice, it's still a form of manipulation.

24:20Josh Larsen:It's a form of manipulation on two levels. I think you're right. But then it becomes another form. He's putting him at ease. But then when he gets in there and screws up, he uses some of that information to insult him. And just it's diabolical. really. But even though the roles interchange a bit as the movie goes on, I also don't think we ever get hints of the other side of the Fletcher character, which would be a generic way to do it, you know, show a scene of him at home with his family or something like that. We get a very quick shot of him talking to, you get the sense it's a former co-worker's younger daughter in a nicer voice.

24:58Josh Larsen:But really, this movie is not too concerned with giving Fletcher this other nicer side. They're committed to his awfulness, and so is Simmons. You're right.

25:06Adam Kempenaar:And maybe there is one bigger scene beyond that scene with the daughter where a little bit of humanity comes out in him. We do learn a little bit later some information that undercuts the humanity of that scene a little bit. But the performance is absolutely genuine, and there seems to be real emotion under there. And I think that's what's so fascinating is even in the moment and then even thinking about it later, You can't help but think that this emotional scene that he has in front of his band where he seems to let his guard down. He's different than he's been at any other point in the film.

25:34Adam Kempenaar:You can't help but completely believe it. But then find yourself also saying, but he's probably doing it just because he's been writing them so hard. He's using something that's real, but he is going to exploit it for his own good. And that good is that he can only berate them so much. There has to be that one little break where he shows that to him, even if he doesn't really want to let them in. He has to show them that so they believe that he really cares about them, that all he's doing is really for them. He's hurting them, but it's for their own good. They need moments like that that he gives them there.

26:11Adam Kempenaar:And that that complexity that J.K. Simmons is playing there in that scene is really something.

26:17Josh Larsen:Why do you suppose I just hurled a chair at your head, Neiman? i i don't know sure you do the tempo were you rushing or were you dragging i don't know start counting five six seven four damn it look at me one two three four one two three four one two three now was i rushing or was i dragging and that brings us back to this idea of perfection because I don't ever get the sense with the Fletcher character that he's doing any of this to glorify himself as their instructor or even to win them first place so that he becomes known as this teacher who's won so many contests. He, you believe, is doing it because this is the best way he understands to get them to play as perfectly as they can.

27:07Josh Larsen:And there's something relatable, especially if you have perfectionist streak within you, there's something relatable to that. And so There's a separation between his tactics and his goal.

27:16Adam Kempenaar:He's so scary here that I think he's actually scarier than Vern Schillinger, who is the character most of us probably first saw J.K. Simmons on screen in. It was HBO's Oz. And Josh, he's playing there. I don't know if you ever watched Oz. He's playing a neo-Nazi, brutal, murdering rapist. Okay. Didn't see Oz, but I can picture it. He's one of the scariest guys in that entire prison, one that's full of scary characters. And he's actually probably more terrifying here because at least Schillinger has some fun. There is a little bit of a lighter side to him that, as you said, this movie doesn't really give us.

27:53Adam Kempenaar:There's a moment in this movie. It's like the second time we see the J.K. Simmons character. He walks into another band rehearsal, one that Andrew character, Miles Teller, is performing in. And just the way he walks into the room, I burst out laughing, actually. I mean, in a very good way. He is such a force. He has such little regard for anyone else around him that when he walks into this room, it's like a hurricane comes in the room. Everybody stops. It's super loud. Even the instructor, the other instructor, kowtows to him and sort of turns his back. Oh, it becomes his classroom all of a sudden.

28:24Adam Kempenaar:Yeah, and it just becomes his class. And I love that moment. I did think about a lot. You mentioned Full Metal Jacket. That's here. Black Swan, of course, this movie really mirrors closely as well. and the one key difference being in the mentor-protege relationship between Thomas and the Nina character in Black Swan and what we get here is there's that sexual element psychologically that really wreaks havoc in Black Swan. We don't get that here. But beyond that, there's also some more subtlety to a character like Thomas in Black Swan because he does have to sort of play a psychological game and insinuate himself to get her to do what he wants her to ultimately do.

29:02Adam Kempenaar:And we don't ever see that. it's not about suggesting the right way to do something or get at it through your own devices. He's going to compel you to do it the way he wants you to do it. To get on my tempo. Yeah, exactly right. And that doesn't mean that, of course, it doesn't still hurt when he compels you that way. But you know at least that he's going to be blatant about it, that he is going to impose his will on you. And I do think it gets back, actually, one of the things I love about this performance is it gets back to this idea of purpose. Everything he does is with a purpose. He knows exactly what he wants in every single moment.

29:39Adam Kempenaar:He comes into that classroom not to observe, but to find a new player. He comes in, he points him to exactly the bars he wants to go to. That scene where he looks at the score and eyes it for about three seconds and then says, cute, you know, he got out of it exactly what he needed to get out of it. And now he's going to have this transaction. And even what he wears, black, the same thing every day. Yes, it's kind of artsy, but it's also simple. He's not going to waste any time picking out his outfit. There's nothing wasted in his body as well. He's a very lean, muscular figure here. There's no extra hair.

30:10Adam Kempenaar:There's nothing he has to think about to take care of himself except music and driving this band and achieving that level of perfection if he can.

30:18Josh Larsen:And there's a certain honesty to a character like that as well. I mean, he is diabolical in the information he uses to motivate his players sometimes. But you do know, as you're saying, what his ultimate goal is. And so you know where you stand. It's very black and white. If you can't play to, quote, my tempo, you're out. If you can, you're in.

30:41Adam Kempenaar:And that's how the landscape is with him. I said maybe we could get to the topic of perfection and how it relates to jazz. I think maybe we can save it for a little bit of bonus content on another show. That's Whiplash. It is out now in limited release. If you see it and agree or disagree with our takes, you can email us feedback at filmspotting.net. A reminder that access to the complete Film Spotting archive is one of the benefits of joining the Film Spotting family. You get bonus shows, a weekly newsletter, early access to events, discounts, a lot more. Check it out, filmspottingfamily.com.

31:17Adam Kempenaar:Thanks for listening. This conversation can serve no purpose anymore. Goodbye.

31:27Thank you.

From the publisher

12 years ago, Damien Chazelle's WHIPLASH left the Sundance Film Festival with the Grand Jury Prize—and the Audience Award. For this week's archive review, we share Adam and Josh's October, 2014, review.

For full access to the Filmspotting Archive, ⁠⁠consider joining the Filmspotting Family⁠⁠. Membership also gives you an exclusive feed to ad-free and monthly bonus episodes, a weekly newsletter, access to the Filmspotting Discord, event pre-sales and more.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Filmspotting

All 198 episodes
Whiplash Review (Archive)Filmspotting · 32 min
Listen in VO