Episode 34: Michael Chu - Global Chairman and Co-Founder of L Catterton

4 Sep 2025 · 49 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Generating Alpha Podcast - Episode 34: Michael Chu - Global Chairman and Co-Founder of L Catterton

Podcast Overview

  • Title: Generating Alpha Podcast
  • Description: A platform where the next generation of investors engages in conversations with finance legends, discussing personal stories and lessons that shape investing strategies. Hosted by a 16-year-old, it aims to provide insights for students and young professionals. New episodes release every Thursday.

Episode Details

  • Title: Episode 34: Michael Chu - Global Chairman and Co-Founder of L Catterton
  • Description: Featuring Michael Chu, the Global Co-CEO of L Catterton, the largest consumer-focused private equity firm globally. The episode discusses Michael's journey from a boutique investor to leading a powerful enterprise, and explores enduring brand principles, consumer behavior, and investment strategies.

Key Themes and Insights

  1. Michael Chu's Background
  2. Childhood:
  3. Immigrant parents from China faced challenges adapting to American life, instilling values of hard work and resilience.
  4. Emphasized the importance of education, leading to his attendance at Bates College.
  • Education and Career Path:
  • Studied Psychology and Economics at Bates, where he cultivated critical thinking and communication skills.
  • Initial career driven by alumni connections, leading to roles in banking and finance across global markets (New York, London, Hong Kong).
  1. Founding L Catterton
  2. Initial Vision:
  3. The firm started as Catterton Simon Partners in 1989, focusing on consumer investments during a recession.
  4. Recognized emerging consumer demands from Baby Boomers, leading to investments in restaurant and health sectors.
  • Building the Firm:
  • Early investments included PF Chang's, Restoration Hardware, and health-oriented products like Adwalla juices.
  • Transitioned from generalist approaches to specialized consumer-focused investments.
  1. Investment Strategy and Cultural Relevance
  2. Enduring Brands vs. Fleeting Trends:
  3. Characteristics of enduring brands include strong relationships with consumers that transcend transactional dynamics.
  4. Importance of emotional connectivity over mere functional utility.
  • Consumer Behavior Insights:
  • Consumers today exhibit adaptability, shifting preferences with technological advances (e.g., online shopping, mobile, AI).
  • The emergence of brands reflects changing consumer expectations and the need for emotional resonance.
  1. The Global Landscape of Consumer Investing
  2. Merging with LVMH:
  3. In 2016, L Catterton partnered with LVMH, enhancing their positioning in the luxury consumer market.
  4. This partnership capitalized on insights from LVMH's experience in scaling luxury brands across global markets.
  • Trends Over the Next Decade:
  • Anticipation of technology further equitably distributing opportunities for entrepreneurs to build new brands.
  • Need for established companies to adapt to contemporary consumer behaviors driven by technology.
  1. Advice for Young Investors
  2. Follow Your Passion:
  3. Emphasizes authenticity, suggesting young individuals pursue what genuinely interests them.
  • Value of Travel and Technology:
  • Travel fosters respect for diverse cultures and broadens perspectives beyond sanitized news narratives.
  • Staying current with technology is essential for adapting to rapidly changing market dynamics.

Conclusion Michael Chu's insights illustrate the intricate dynamics of consumer investing and brand endurance in a globalized world. His journey emphasizes the importance of adaptability, emotional connections, and the role of technology in shaping the future of consumer behavior and investment strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • Follow your dreams and be authentic in your pursuits.
  • Understand consumer behavior as a blend of emotional and functional needs.
  • Recognize the evolving landscape of consumer brands influenced by technology and cultural shifts.
  • Embrace travel for a deeper understanding of global perspectives.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This week on Generating Alpha, I'm joined by none other than Michael Chu, the global chairman and co-founder of Elkaterton, the largest consumer-focused private equity firm in the world with over$35 billion. under management. Over the last three decades, Michael has helped transform Mel Catterton from a boutique investor into a global powerhouse with offices across North America, Europe, Asia, and Latin America. Along the way, he has backed and scaled some of the most iconic consumer brands of our time, including Restoration Hardware, Birkenstock, Equinox, Peloton, and Vitamin Water. Michael has built a reputation as one of the foremost thinkers on what makes consumer businesses succeed, and more importantly, what allows them to endure across generations.

0:40In this episode, we'll explore his playbook for building lasting brands, the lessons he's learned from scaling Al Catterton into a global leader, and his perspective on the future of consumer investing. If you enjoyed this episode, please follow the podcast and give it a five-star rating on Spotify, subscribe to the YouTube channel, and share it online or to any friends and family who you think might find it interesting. I really appreciate you tuning in. Thank you. Thank you, Michael, for joining me. I really appreciate it. Great to have you on. Great. My pleasure. So I'd like to start where I always start.

1:09Tell me a little about your childhood, where you grew up. What was that experience like? I think what's most important is both my parents immigrated from China. So they were first generation on the first generation. And they met here in the U.S. They didn't know each other in China. But look, they both, it's kind of an American story. They both had incredibly privileged lives respectively in China, but due to war and circumstances, had to drop everything, leave everything, and came to the U.S. and literally started over. Didn't know the language, didn't know the culture, didn't know anything. Certainly didn't have the privileged life.

1:58and uh you know and and the one thing i recall which is really an important lesson is i i don't think i've ever heard them complain and they inculcated themselves to the culture if you ever met them you would never know that they were born in a foreign country that's how acclimated They became, in terms of their mannerisms, their ability to speak, write, think. And so it was quite extraordinary. I didn't fully appreciate it. But very middle class. My father was a really accomplished scientist. Worked for one company his entire career. My mother was a great educator, super smart. And, you know, against the background, they raised four of us.

2:44And they had incredible sacrifices. But, you know, kind of lived the American dream. So you go off to start your kind of college education at Bates. And if I'm correct, you majored in psychology and economics and graduated in 1980. What led you to Bates? And what was your kind of time like there? Because I know you're really still involved in Bates. Just tell me about that time. Yeah, look, my mother in particular was a great educator, super smart. And growing up, we always valued education. And she believed that the best education at that time was in sort of very small liberal arts type colleges.

3:26because you get to have very intimate relationships with the professors and the other classmates. I will say the most important thing out of that experience that I met my wife, okay? So God forbid if I didn't say that. And we're still married after all these years. And so the M.A.B. Bates and other schools of a similar cohort provided back then, and they still provide today, is sort of requirement to take a wide curriculum. That was a requirement to graduate. So you would take organic chemistry and physics as much as you would take math or science or literature or philosophy. And I think there's a pure good to that myself.

4:15And what they really do is they juxtapose that curriculum against a couple sort of foundational principles of the best schools, which is critical thinking, how to learn and how to communicate. And those elements, which I think are best seen in these kinds of small schools, are lifelong capabilities. And I use them every day. And when I did psychology and economics, they appear like very odd bedfellows. But in fact, the whole behavioral economics that Daniel Conaham and others sort of pioneered was really the intersection of behavior against economics. And I won't go into all the treaties, but Bates didn't have that, obviously, at the time.

5:05I was interested, and I literally created my own curriculum in my last two years. And I was the only student, but multiple professors. And I don't think you could have done that in a larger school. Wow. How did you kind of, from behavioral economics to starting your career in Wall street how did that kind of what was that path yeah these are these idiosyncratic things um after four years in in in the rurals of maine the last thing i wanted was staying in the rurals of some other area and i wanted to go to the city and uh uh and i was fortunate because one of the alums uh was the head of a bank a merchant successful merchant bank and took me on as sort of a young person and threw me into there.

5:53And I was living in New York. The following year, I went to London, learned some amazing things. And so it was great. So it was really through the alumni connection of the college that got me into this track. And, you know, and I didn't know anything and but i learned really fast and um i was heading off to business school uh when i was 24 and i got this phone call and uh without going into all of it i ended up getting um this job in san francisco as uh sort of a very senior executive at a bank out there and um i'm not quite sure what the people thought of me when I walked in. So I was pretty young.

6:43And I did that. Then I went to a company in Holland that was owned by the parent company of the company that owned the bank. And then I ultimately made my way to Hong Kong and became the director of finance of that company. Very big, kind of complicated, global sort of position. And it was really in that role up in Hong Kong that I sort of got my first semblance of what was going on in venture capital and private equity, because they had a portfolio of investments that were non-strategic that would fill them in this bucket that I oversaw. And I soon fell in love with that sort of bucket, as opposed to my day job, and said, I want to go expand that.

7:27And after a lot of storm and grong, So the CEO finally relented. I was persistent like you. And he said, okay, I'm going to go support you. I'll give you some money. And no sooner did that happen, I moved back to the US to go start this. Because you remember back in the 80s, the venture private equity world, it was still pretty nascent and small. And so armed with a couple hundred million of capital was like a big deal in those days. and right before I was launching sort of sort of mid-year sort of early June 1989 Tiananmen Square broke out in Beijing why was that relevant because the Hong Kong stock market crashed like over 20 percent in one day and this being a Hong Kong public company just basically said we're going to pull on our horns we can't give you this capital you know come back and at that time I'd gotten married and my wife said, Hong Kong is a great place to visit, but not to live.

8:32And, and so you were kind of forced into this, you know, pivot point where you either follow your dream, uh, or which is a life lesson or to take the safe route. Cause I could have taken the safe route. And I said, the hell of it, I'm going to go follow my dream. And, uh, and, and, and that That was the genesis of the firm. And kind of be more specific. What was your dream at the time? What was the beginning vision of Al Catterton? Because you founded it named Catterton Simon Partners with Frank Vest in 1989. What was the beginning vision? What was the beginning kind of idea? And did you know from the get-go you were going to become global?

9:09Because if I understand, like you were at that Hong Kong bank and it was a pretty global position. Did you know at that time? Because I'm pretty sure global private equity firms were pretty rare in those days. I don't think there was one. So the answer to that was clearly no.

9:24But one of the things this company had, it was a global portfolio of businesses, quite large, many of which were consumer businesses. And the company in Holland, where I was the director of finance for a year or so, was a very, very large consumer products, marketing, trading, distribution company. quite large. And the, the, and so you learned, you know, what it meant to be a consumer and, and, and market and market their products and services across 50 different countries around the world. And so, so that was a very, very sort of trial by fire, jump in the middle of the pool, you know, sort of situation.

10:06And the, the, but you got to see and study instantaneously consumer behavior back in the 80s, you know, before the internet, before anything, you know, and it was an extraordinary thing. And I fell in love with the consumer. And remember, I was a, I was sort of a budding behavioral economics person. So I was interested in not just classic economics around rational behavior, efficiency, but what the behavioral economics sort of said, it's not so easy as that. There are idiosyncratic or cultural, there are cognitive biases that do influence consumer behavior that need to be taken into account. And I was fascinated by that.

10:59And then if you overlay that against a global perspective, you have even more sort of more interesting, complex, you know, analyses to go through. So I kind of fell in love with that. And so I always knew that I wanted to do something in the consumer space. In those days, in the 80s, private equity was pretty generic and mostly leveraged buyouts. And the kind of generalist, I'm not even sure how many industry specialists there were at the time. But, you know, look at it. I think the second takeaway here is follow your dreams and also, you know, do what you really have high passion in. And so I was passionate about the consumer.

11:39I studied it in college. I practiced it prior to starting the firm. And so I said, that's what I want to do. I don't really care about being the biggest or the best or whatever. This is kind of what I want to do. So I embarked on this journey really to be the best consumer investor we could possibly be, by the way. And the other part that was relevant was we were in the middle of a recession. People forget that in the late 80s. And it was quite a deep recession from a consumer standpoint, number one. Number two, the consumption was really driven by baby boomers. And today we talk about millennials or Gen Z.

12:19they're really the children of the baby brewers. And, but, so this was a big wave of people and scale. And more importantly, they were really quite different psychologically from their predecessor generation. So, so what, what arose out of this wave of new demographics was new forms of companies, brand channels, et cetera, that arose literally from the baby brewers. So we were kind of in the early innings of that wave. You could see it in plain light that this was going to be different. And so I love the alchemy of all that. What were kind of the early deals that shaped the firm's vision or the firm's mission or just what the firm eventually became?

13:03Were there any early deals that, I mean, fast forward from 1989 to maybe mid-2000s, what were the deals that shaped the firm? Well, the deals that I look at and think about are deals that not necessarily were the most successful or deals that people knew about. But I like the deals that began to sort of evolve our firm into a different definition of consumer. So the first couple of deals we did were in the restaurant category, broadly speaking. And at a very high level back in the 80s, early 90s, there was more demand than supply. And as a result, the more you bought a restaurant chain and you could predict with some level of efficiency how the next unit would look like given the disequilibrium between demand and supply.

13:57Today, by the way, that's not the case, right? So it's about market share graph, which is a very different sort of economic treatise. and the the but back then because you had this sort of structural imbalance uh we saw that and and we invested and and one of the deals we did many of them but one of the deals that was notable was a company called pf chang's um we did it when there was two two units and it wasn't and and it was sort of a restaurant business on the one hand but it began to evolve two other vectors that were really relevant. One was what we call polished casual. So it was casual dining, but at a very polished, more elevated, not fine dining, but more elevated.

14:39And that created a whole new class of category, subcategory within the restaurant sector. And the other obviously was ethnic, by the way, in this case, obviously Asian. And so back then in the 80s, early 90s, it wasn't as prevalent to find a casual dining concept, higher price, more polished, ethnic. And we looked at that together with the management team and we said, wow, we're going to go back to this. And we could have just stayed as a restaurant investor, but we kind of consciously evolved our way. We knew there was a lot of health and wellness going on. we did a deal called Adwalla juices, we sold the Coca-Cola that was pure health and wellness by the way, Colaton is another health and wellness more recently, people know about that but the roots of executing an evolving strategy of how we entered new categories started with their, especially retail I would say restoration hardware back in the mid 2000s, beauty we did a beauty deal with a very well known hairstylist back then bought the business from Chanel, sold it to P &G.

15:54And that got us into the beauty, personal care category. And health services, we did a deal called Clear Choice. You see it on TV a lot. And again, that penetrated us into a whole new realm, a whole new category. We've done a lot with food, lots of food deals, but our early food deals included. We did a candy deal called Ferrara, sold into a very large business in Italy. We did kettle chips, by the way, that you see in the grocery stores through a friend, by the way, who owned it at the time, which again was gourmet snacking of a product that's obviously been around a long time. We did our early pet deals.

16:39Again, brand new category when we did those. We did wellness, pet vet, et cetera, on the veterinarian side. We did Montisol. You never know it, but it was a supply chain deal that provided the water soluble film that held the what is today the Tide Pods, dishwashing detergent, laundry detergent. And you always wonder, what is that film that surrounds the liquid and how does it know when to be released the product? OK, and and so this company was the leader in that pioneer. And and so, again, what in this board, by the way, I'll stop here. But the point being, each of these each of these investments were all successful.

17:26But the one thing that had in common was they was they incrementally moved our firm to and widen the aperture and the kinds of categories that we could that we invested behind and now have permission to invest. And if you took a step back and looked at mid-2000s versus today as an example, how would you define kind of differences and similarities across kind of the investment process as you scaled from, I think it was mid-hundreds of millions, early 2000s, to now it's almost$40 billion in assets under management. And also the culture from then to today. I mean, you guys have obviously scaled to very large assets under management.

18:02What's different in saying about the culture and the investment process? um look and i think the many of the people that um were around uh back in the earlier days you know the a that many of them retired by the way and the uh so they either retired they moved on um and obviously you have to bring in talent you have to bring in different capabilities but And I think there's only four or five of us that are still involved in the firm, you know, that go back over 20 years, by the way, or 25 years. And the, the, but what I would say is, so while there's obviously new faces and that's, that's always a good thing.

18:48It's always good to replenish with new people. I think, you know, when we think about the qualities of the people we want to bring on, there are a number of things that have remained the same. And I think that's probably the most important sort of takeaway. Number one, of course, table stakes, you got to be smart. You got to be hardworking and smart, et cetera. But there's a lot of those people, frankly, that are out there. I think for our business, and you have to think about it against a very unique situation or profile where we can invest literally as low as$5 million up to$3 billion per deal, and we can do that on a global basis, all in consumer.

19:32But that's a that's a kind of a unicorn profile. And so we're dealing with large scale, mature businesses as much as we're dealing with entrepreneurial, small, smaller type businesses. And so the range of characteristics and attributes is has to be definetially blotted. It's not just about how do the model, do I understand capital markets and corporate finance and so forth. you have to have a high EQ, right? That's certainly critically important. You have to learn how to communicate. Yeah, I would say you have to be humble, by the way, particularly when you're dealing with entrepreneurs. And I think sort of existentially, you know, the people that are most successful love what they do.

20:19It's passionate. It's not just a job, right? And it helps when we make many of them owners of the firm. And so they adopt an owner mentality. And the bridge between small and large, which is the root of your question, is partly through the function of our structure, how we take our partners and make them owners, how we manage that they become not just skilled practitioners, but also entrepreneurs, right? And so this is kind of a unique alchemy that I think is specific to our firm. And in the super early stages when you're interviewing these people, how do those kind of characteristics manifest themselves in like the interview if you're sitting down with them for an hour?

21:06What does that usually look like? Yeah, it's hard, by the way. And I think for young people, you know, there's an obvious tilt towards transactional capability. and uh but you look at what you try to find sort of the the glint in the eye of people who not only possess the table stakes of yeah i know how to run a model and i understand accounting and public finance uh got it um uh but also i have real high passion for this and i'm kind of a go getter and and and you can sort of glean that out by the way over the course of time I'd love for you to tell me about the L in L-Catterton. You guys merged with Catterton Partners, merged with LVMH, and then Bernard Arnault's family office, which I'm not going to pronounce because I don't think I'll get it right, to create L-Catterton in 2016.

21:59Tell me about that partnership. How did it come about? Well, I think the background is because we were a consumer-focused firm, we recognized that we had the ability to bring on board partners in the corporate industry world and create sort of a disadvantage on insight and information. And then the question is, how do we then leverage those insights into investments? And so very early on, we kind of bear hugged many of some of the largest multinational consumer businesses. And, and, you know, LVMH was not the first of those. And in 89, I think, had the opportunity to go meet with Arnaud. This is, I always kid him.

22:53This is before Arnaud was Arnaud. People knew him, but didn't really know him. And the, and I think he took a liking. He You know, it's, you know, hey, I know a lot about luxury goods, but I don't know much about the rest of what's going on in the consumer landscape. So let me put some money with you and have the ability from time to time to have these conversations where I can test what we're doing relative to the world more broadly. And that conversation mimicked itself across different geographies and usually always at the highest levels of the firm. And so we were able to build a portfolio, as it were, of these relationships.

23:39Seabeans is one of them, by the way. And so I think we did a good enough job where they kept giving us money. And in a meeting, a conversation we had in 2015, at that time, LVMH was becoming incredibly successful. because it took the concept of luxury, which is predicated on scarcity, right? Never goes on sale, right? If you find it, you better buy it because if you come back a day later, it may be gone, right? And there's no substitute for that. And which is how they're able to charge very high prices. And they took that concept and they figured out how to scale it. And they scaled it two ways.

24:25One is they widen the aperture of the products that carry the brand. If you go back 25 years ago, they weren't in sneakers or sunglasses or this or whatever. They had a more narrow product line. So they've been able to be incredibly successful of scaling the aperture of the product categories that these brands present themselves in and create more of a lifestyle than a transactional utility. relationship, and they went global. So those are the two simple things that they did that created this enormous value for them. And as a result, Arnaud and his people were traveling the world, and they were seeing the successes.

25:11And there was one takeaway, and that is the consumers in Japan or China or Australia or Latin America or wherever were just as hungry for these brands as they were in Paris, right? Or Milan or whatever brand that happened to be. And so we ended up in this conversation about, you know, what are we doing to take advantage of that? Because here we are with, at the time, back in 2015, arguably one of the most prominent consumer-focused private equity firms, very research-intensive, very category-focused, but very North American-centric. And at the time, we had just started thinking about and executing against the Latin America strategy and basically testing what we call lift and shift.

26:01How do we lift the brand qualities in one region and shift it into another? And look at the road was well paid by what LDMH had done. And it showed that consumers globally, despite cultural language, geography, were actually quite similar and thereby, you know, more predictable than people would have thought. And so we then sort of had quite a number of conversations that led to, in effect, acquiring their private equity business, which was called, which was, had another name to it, merged it in effectively into ours. Because that's how the L got attached to our name, which is L for LVMH. And it was all public information.

26:50It was a deal that included both LVMH as a minority shareholder and financier Agash, which is the family office of our now family. And I want to touch a bit more on consumers because I just find this topic fascinating. And you're obviously the kind of person to talk to about it. But over the past three decades, like, what are the biggest lessons or what have you learned about consumer behavior that you didn't know 30 years ago? You know, the we could spend hours talking about this single topic. But, you know, look, I think there are clear cultural language differences, geographic differences that are relevant and that are meaningful.

27:32But I think what's happened over the course of the last 30 years, and in part, by the way, driven by technology, right, so the brain equalizes, is that there is an increasing sort of marriage between behavior in other geographies to geographies all around the world. and we're seeing that, which gives us higher conviction around what investments that we should be making because we kind of know what the analog looks like in other geographies. And we just closed a deal today, this morning in Japan and I was reflecting on the last four deals we've done in Japan. One of them was a high-end specialty kind of steak restaurant.

28:24one is a specialty furniture business one is a very very distinctive high-end apparel business and one was a sport fishing business right i could have said those things those four deals and it could have been anywhere in the world right and instead they were in japan which is a very idiosyncratic country that's actually quite closed off given language issues and so forth But the behavior, the demand side of that equation actually is quite predictable because we see analogs to these businesses and other geographies. And that's given us an ability to create high conviction, do the right diligence, and more importantly, think about how to grow these businesses in an outsized manner.

29:09So the, and there are, and literally at our meetings with investors, we literally just throw on the screen all the deals that we've done by description of that year without naming the geography. And they all could be in the Midwest or, you know, wherever. And then we throw out, you know, let me tell you the geographies and people are like, wow, okay, they're all over the world. And I think that to me is a telling attribute to consumer global. Again, companies like Unilever, Nestle, P &G, LB &Hs of the world, they've kind of paved the way. Coca-Cola, Pepsi, they've all kind of paved the way.

29:58But in terms of private equity, I think we're probably the only one of scale that's doing this on a global basis. What's the key to understanding what consumers want? How do you kind of understand the demands there? Well, I'm still learning.

Read the full transcript

30:18You know, look, I think, you know, we always say it starts with a category. Right. And and I go back one step further, which is the consumer is always right. and never question that consumers are irrational. And they know what they want. They know what they're going to buy. They know what channels they're going to buy it in. And if you present a product or service with the right price value relationship, you're going to do okay. And the other thing, by the way, about what consumers have shown over the past 30 years is how adaptable they are. So if you think about it, the baby boomers in the US, they actually created big box retail.

31:05They created specialty retail. Then along came what? Along came online and they shifted and began to use that in terms of online. And then all of a sudden it became mobile, by the way, right? So now they're adapting to using mobile. And now you've got AI, which has got a whole nother, you know, another longer conversation, but it's got a whole nother sort of feel and impact, you know, to the consumer. And it'll be two-way. Up until AI, it's always been one way, right? The consumer to the product. And now, you know, with AI, you're going to have a kind of a truly bilateral, you know, dynamic going on, which will change things, you know, immeasurably.

31:47And you see the early evidence of that in social media, by the way. in terms of how that can impact consumer behavior and demand. So look at that. It starts with the consumer knows what they're doing. Don't ever try to over-question it. But they are adaptable, and they're willing to change. They're willing to learn. And the companies that are successful, the most important companies in consumer, I would say that are going to win, are those that have evolved their product or service beyond a functional utility, beyond a transactional relationship, which tends to be a price-driven relationship, into something that's got a little more emotional connectivity to it.

32:37The most extreme being the luxury goods category, right? People know that they're paying a very high value for a product that's much higher than the cost. so when someone goes into chanel you know or vuton or hermes they're not thinking what does this cost to produce all right but they have a completely different calculus you know with respect to that and so the the but there are many gradations beyond that but i think evolving from a transactional utility calculus to something that's more emotional in terms of attitude and the purchase behavior and the demand side, I think those are the businesses that are going to sort of win.

33:19And then you've got to have attributes and characteristics, you know, that are relevant and scalable and ownable. And if you have those things, you know, those are the best plans. I want to talk about an investment of yours for a second. And your partner, who I know well, suggested that I ask about Birkenstock. If I'm correct, you guys invested in Birkenstock in 2021. And by 2024, everyone I knew was wearing Birkenstocks. I can go downstairs right now and pick up three pairs of Birkenstocks. Tell me about that investment. Kind of give like a case study overview of it. What did it look like? What was the process?

33:56You know, it was a classic situation where it was family owned for eight generations. Never took, there was never a person on the capital shareholding registry that with last name didn't start with a B. and with a K. And so the very insular, highly protected German business, which means it was even more opaque, by the way, kind of by its very construct. And as luck would have it, it had been run for sort of nine, 10 years prior to that by an incredibly agile, thoughtful person person who the family brought in who, who you wouldn't, who no MBA student ever would have hired. Okay. It was a lesson there, by the way.

34:51And the, the, and this guy who never went to graduate school or whatever, figured out the business and figured out the architecture of consumer, figured out it on a global basis. It's a very complicated, vertically integrated business. and developed a point of view around the architecture of the business. And that still defines what we are today, only on a much larger scale. So we were very fortunate that this person was residing there because the person was just as interested in the future of the brand than just maximizing transaction value, particularly in what he would deem right or wrong to be in the wrong hands.

35:40And we come along and I think what got him and the family ultimately interested was the fact that all we've done was consumer. We had this sort of high glossy relationship with LDNH and I know, which helped by the way, but, you know, PerkinsBot is not in that cohort. Okay. It's not a luxury product. but having that affiliation was helpful in terms of credentializing if you want to call it in a very different sort of way but I think most importantly is that we showed great enthusiasm we loved the fact that it was what we call an end of one there was no analog if you didn't buy Berkestock what would you buy?

36:27You could buy sandals you could buy things of that nature but not of that sort and the it was really a health and wellness play as much as anything and it was huge tam okay had great margins because it was vertically integrated um and the people who were buying the product clearly were uh people buying it on an emotional relationship not transactional or utility relationship and you look at those things and you say wow there's a lot of raw material there to behind us. And what we did was, you know, support the team, added more process and systems and disciplines so that, so that the scaffolding, you know, of the business was secure as it grew.

37:10Cause one of the risks of growth is that it could topple over it. It doesn't have a good foundation. And, and we partnered with the CEO. And by the way, as part of the deal, the family ended up deciding to roll over a piece which is worth a lot more than they ever thought. And they were not at the time we started the conversations willing to, they just wanted all their money off the table. And over the course of the dialogue, they said, well, wait a second, we're going to roll over because we kind of like what we hear. And so look, this is one where we didn't create 250 years of history. We didn't create the shoe.

37:48We didn't create any of that.

37:52But we, look, we did recognize, you know, if it was going to succeed on the next journey, how does it need to go about, you know, building that. And it was great, by the way. It has been and continues to be, you know, a lot of fun. And as a result of that, we've made a lot of money, which is great. But that's not the, and that's just a scorecard of all the things that we've done. And if that's a scorecard, what's the goal? What are you looking to achieve whenever you go into a business? Well, you know, look, you want to achieve enduring value to the consumer. And whether we take a company public in this case, or sell to a strategic or sell to some other group, you know, or sell back to management, this has happened, you know, our, you know, what we want to be able to do is, is we are not forever investors, right?

38:46That's not our structure. We're going to be time-based investors. That's the model of private equity. And I always say to entrepreneurs that I meet and business owners that, you know, we're not, I'm not going to tell you, we're not going to be here for 20 years. This is not what we do. Here's what we're going to do. We're going to open up the aperture to capabilities, resources globally, to the extent it's relevant, faster and more efficiently than you ever would have unwound. And we're going to be thoughtful partners along this journey and help you scale, by the way. And at some point, we're going to have to get out.

39:23That's the quid pro quo. And so be transparent about that up front. But the bargain of that recognition is we're going to support you in this sort of next journey because scaling a business, no matter how good or successful it is, is not a given, by the way. On a topic that you mentioned, building enduring brands, what are the aspects of like an enduring brand? What separates like a really great enduring brand from someone that just like a good brand? What's the aspect? What's the separation? You know, there's so many attributes that and each case has got its own idiosyncratic elements to it. So it's a little hard to generalize.

40:09But I would say enduring brands, like I said, whether they're large or small, you know, have a very special relationship with its target customer. And the most successful are those where that relationship expands a broad geography, right, and of scale and number. But it can be a very small. We bought a Japanese business that is an absolute leader in the denim, especially denim area. It's a small business. But my gosh, the amount of support it gets from its customers sort of off the charts. And in today's world of social media activation of target customers, the efficiency of that, you're able to scale that very efficiently, you know, in today's world using today's tools versus 25, 35 years ago.

41:02So to me, it starts with great product or service, great price value, attributes in that product or service that transcend the utility, which is all about price. And that the relationship with the end customer is that there's something going on that is much more emotional. And this gets back to, you know, Daniel Cunningham's behavioral economics. And he wrote about this in the 70s. And I want to touch on a little bit. I find this, I can keep on talking about this. The consumer's relationship with the brand is being emotional versus just being kind of like a utility. Super fascinating. But I'd like to touch on the future a bit.

41:51But over kind of like the next decade, what are the trends or tailwinds you see in your portfolio on the consumer side that most excite you over the next 10 years? Well, look, I would say the most interesting thing that we're focused on is technology and how that will transform. And because what technology does is to grade equalize it. The ability to build a new product, a new brand, reach a certain threshold of people quickly and efficiently is within that environment is now upon us. And you'll see more scale in that. And that's never been the case before. It was always large multinational incumbents had massive competitive advantage because it controlled the dollars, it controlled the marketing, it told you what to buy and where and use as a consumer product.

42:56And that's what created the whole marketing industry in the 50s and 60s and 70s. and today the marketing that industry has completely flipped and the marketing today is on TikTok or it's on Instagram or Reels or whatever and their corresponding equivalent in China and elsewhere and so the and what technology will do is it will allow, it will know everything about who you are, what you want you know, it'll read your mood, it'll read your time of day it'll know when you got paid you know everything and the and it will it will proffer up like opportunities to you that are bespoke and timely and i think that's that's a game changer and i think what you're going to see going forward is is a is an increase in more of these emerging brands founded by these these entrepreneurs and um and i think the challenge is going to be ahead of the big large you know incumbents you know adapt themselves in a more entrepreneurial way yeah to deal with all that it can it could be done they just need to they need to think about things in a different way so i i think you know you want to be careful about conflating the output which is lots of new brands and lots of new things but what's actually the root cause of all that and that i think is really the technology piece yeah i find it really interesting it's almost like a leveling of the playing field.

44:28And I mean, you can build much more now for much less, both in terms of cost and in terms of manpower. There's people with a couple of people building these gigantic brands. And so when you see a proliferation of brands, one could say, oh my God, there's a proliferation of brands. What does that mean? And one has to ask the question, why? What's going on? How did that occur? And what is structural and systemic about that? Yeah. And I actually was on some kind of a call recently where a kind of a person who runs a very big farm business in the U.S., like one of every four chickens in the U.S. hatch on his farm.

45:05He's like, how can I how can I adapt to this? Even though it's not a tech business, how can I adapt to this and how can I make sure that I'm staying through with the times? And someone told him, this tech investor, he told him, get two to five people that are 20 years old. Give them some money. Give them free reign. Put them in a box in your company. Let them do whatever they want and just kind of let them adapt. And I think that's very valid advice to a lot of big companies that are kind of stuck in the old times and suffering. But I want to wrap up with my final question. And I have to edit this question because this is the first podcast I've had when turning 16.

45:37And I used to ask, if you were to give one piece of advice to a 15-year-old today, what would it be? When did you turn 16? August 18th. Wow, okay. Yeah, around a week ago. But if you were to give one piece of advice to a 16-year-old today, what would it be? You know, I'll go back to my own situation is, you know, number one, follow your dream. Doesn't matter what it is. You could be a fireman, an artist, you could be a musician, you know, whatever. OK, a lawyer, doctor, finance doesn't matter. And but you got to be authentic. And so you got to follow your dreams because when you follow your dreams, you will be passionate.

46:22And when you will be passionate, you will generally be good because it won't feel like a job or work. It'll feel like part of who you are. And that will rouse sort of the animal spirits in you around curiosity, around going the extra mile, about working hard. those are just those are just attributes and characteristics of and the root of all that is why are you working hard why are you curious why are you going the extra mile you're doing that because you're passionate and you love what you do it's not just a job all right it needs to an end and the uh you know a lot of people unfortunately don't have the opportunity you know to do that and and so they retire at 65 you know or whatever and they you know live got a pension and they, you know, and they've worked all their lives for something else.

47:15Right. And, you know, that's a big 40 some year period of their lives. Yeah. That they didn't find other than the financial reward, they didn't find a lot of value. And I just say for people that are, you know, in a privileged situation and, you know, starting out, it doesn't matter what you do, just be passionate, right? And follow your dreams. And I would say two other things that are just sort of related. Travel. It's a big world, but it's highly accessible. And stay current on technology. And one last final, like, what do you think traveling teaches you? I just want you to verbalize that. What does traveling teach people?

48:01It teaches you how to be respectful to different cultures, different histories, different viewpoints. You watch the news, which is no matter what news you watch, it's pretty dumbed down and very Americanized and sanitized and often wrong as a result because there's so much more nuance going on. And unless you've traveled to these regions like we have, it's hard to sort of pick that up. And what happens is you then ossify your thinking around very short messaging that is not necessarily wrong, but certainly incomplete. And that doesn't help build the global world that we are in today. yeah i think yeah discovering nuance learning about the nuance is extremely extremely valuable um this has been a pleasure michael it's been a long time coming and i really appreciate you coming on you're very persistent but i appreciate it you're a lot of my friends you've talked to i try i try thank you all right

From the publisher

This week on Generating Alpha, I’m joined by Michael Chu — Global Co-CEO of L Catterton, the world’s largest consumer-focused private equity firm with more than $35 billion under management. Over three decades, Michael has helped transform L Catterton from a boutique investor into a global powerhouse with offices across North America, Europe, Asia, and Latin America. Known for his deep understanding of consumer behavior and brand equity, he has built a reputation as one of the foremost thinkers on what makes businesses not just succeed, but endure.At L Catterton, Michael has overseen investments in some of the world’s most iconic consumer brands, including Restoration Hardware, Birkenstock, Equinox, Peloton, and Vitamin Water. His career reflects a unique blend of financial expertise and behavioral insight, giving him a front-row seat to how timeless brands are built, scaled, and kept relevant across generations.In this conversation, we explore the principles that separate enduring brands from fleeting trends, the lessons Michael has learned from scaling L Catterton into a global leader, and the challenges of maintaining cultural relevance over time. We dive into his perspective on the future of consumer investing, what he believes defines the next wave of iconic brands, and the timeless insights he’s gained about growth, resilience, and long-term success in the consumer space.

More from Generating Alpha Podcast

All 47 episodes
Episode 34: Michael Chu - Global Chairman and Co-Founder of L Catterton Generating Alpha Podcast · 49 min
Listen in VO