Patrick Soon-Shiong: Cures for cash

5 Dec 2023 · 40 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Good Bad Billionaire - Episode Summary: Patrick Soon-Shiong: Cures for Cash

Podcast Overview Podcast Title: Good Bad Billionaire Hosts: Simon Jack (BBC Business Editor) & Zing Tsjeng (Journalist & Author) Episode Title: Patrick Soon-Shiong: Cures for Cash Episode Description: The episode delves into the life of biotech billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong, exploring his journey from apartheid South Africa to the elite echelons of Los Angeles, his controversial medical claims, and the lawsuits he faces.

---

Key Themes

  1. Background and Early Life
  2. Birth and Upbringing: Born in South Africa in 1952 to Chinese immigrant parents during the apartheid era.
  3. Family and Early Influences: His father was a herbalist, which influenced Soon-Shiong's view on health and medicine.
  4. Education: Attended medical school in Johannesburg, navigating apartheid restrictions.
  1. Medical Career and Innovations
  2. Transition to the U.S.: Moved to Canada, then to UCLA, where he became the youngest professor of surgery.
  3. Biotech Ventures: Co-founded a biotech startup, Vivo RX, focusing on diabetes treatments and islet technology.
  4. Controversial Claims: Promoted his diabetes treatment as revolutionary, leading to skepticism and backlash from the medical community.
  1. Business Strategies and Legal Challenges
  2. Financial Growth: His companies, including American Pharmaceutical Partners (APP), garnered significant profits through innovative drug delivery systems.
  3. Legal Issues: Faced multiple lawsuits, including ones from his brother and celebrity Cher, regarding business practices and alleged fraud.
  4. Media and Public Image: His ownership of the LA Times and high-profile friendships with political figures and celebrities.
  1. Philanthropy and Ethics
  2. The Giving Pledge: Committed to donating half his fortune during his lifetime, contributing to various medical causes.
  3. Critique of Medical Commercialization: Discussion on the ethics of making money in healthcare, with a focus on the American healthcare system's commodification of illness.
  1. Current Status and Legacy
  2. Wealth and Influence: Estimated net worth around $5 billion, having peaked at $12.5 billion.
  3. Public Perception: Struggles with the dichotomy of being seen as a visionary vs. a profit-driven businessman.
  4. Future Impact: Questions remain about his long-term legacy in medicine and business.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Rags to Riches: Soon-Shiong's journey from a segregated society to a billionaire reflects significant personal and professional achievement, earning an 8/10 in this category.
  • Villainy: Criticism for exaggerating medical claims and profiting from healthcare leads to a 6/10 rating, with contrasting views on his ethical implications.
  • Philanthropy: While he has committed to significant charitable contributions, he has not yet reached the halfway point of his Giving Pledge, receiving a 4/10 rating.
  • Power: His influence as a surgeon and businessman gives him clout in both healthcare and media, with an 8/10 rating for power.
  • Legacy: Lacks groundbreaking medical breakthroughs, resulting in a 3/10 rating for legacy potential.

---

Final Verdict

  • Overall Assessment: While Soon-Shiong has made substantial contributions to medicine and amassed significant wealth, he remains a controversial figure due to his business practices and medical claims. The hosts ultimately categorize him as "just another billionaire", acknowledging both his achievements and the murkiness of his methods.

---

Next Episode Teaser

  • Upcoming Billionaire: Michael Bloomberg, known for revolutionizing financial market technology with the Bloomberg terminal.

---

Contact Information Feedback: Listeners are encouraged to send their thoughts on the episode via email at [goodbadbillionaire@bbc.com](mailto:goodbadbillionaire@bbc.com) or text/WhatsApp at +1 (917) 686-1176.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.

0:30It's a big dog. SAP Concur helps your business move forward faster. Learn more at concur.com. Vanity Fair calls BritBox a delicious streamer. Kaleida says everyone should be watching. Catch Britain's next best series with BritBox. Stream acclaim new originals like Code of Silence. You read lips, right? And Linley, based on the best-selling mystery series. Say hi, Linley. Take it from here. And don't miss the new season of Karen Pirie, coming this October. You don't look lip, please. I'll take that as a compliment. See it differently when you stream the best of British TV with Britbox. Watch with a free trial today.

1:09BBC Sounds. Music, radio, podcasts.

1:18Welcome to Good, Bad, Billionaire, the podcast where we pick a billionaire and find out how they got so rich. And then we judge them. Are they good, bad or just another billionaire? I'm Simon Jack, I'm the BBC's business editor. And I'm Zing Sing, I'm a journalist, podcaster and author. And our subject today, I'll confess, I'd never heard of. But let's put it this way, he's got an interesting story that takes him all the way from apartheid era South Africa to the billion dollar halls of American biotech industry. Yeah, with a lot of famous friends along the way. It is Patrick Soon Chong, surgeon, businessman, biotech billionaire.

1:58So let's break him down by numbers. How much is he worth right now? Right now,$5 billion is his current net worth. Amazingly, he's not the richest doctor in the world, but he's certainly one of them. I mean, he's a dabbler. He's dabbled in curing a lot of things. Diabetes, cancer, even COVID-19. Although some of his colleagues in the medical profession would raise their eyebrows at the word cure. He's a good marketer, let's put it that way. In 2006, a dose of his cancer drug, Abraxane was selling for$4 ,200, which is 25 times the cost of the generic equivalent. Yeah, he owns the LA Times, which he bought along with the San Diego Tribune for$500 million.

2:38And he also likes splashing the cash. So he's got a full size basketball court under his LA mansion. In fact, it's right under his living room. And his friend, the late basketball superstar Colby Bryant, played on this court and said it was one of the best courts he'd ever played on. He's got other celebrity friends, Burt Bacharach, the songwriter, very close. And he's rubbed shoulders with some of the most powerful people in the world, Bill Clinton, Joe Biden, the Pope and Donald Trump. But he's not liked by everyone. So a lot of people say he exaggerates how effective his treatments are. And he has been sued a lot of times, including by his own brother.

3:13And even Cher, the pop star, also sued him. and it's interesting this thing because I want to look into some of that tension between the medical establishment and making a ton of cash and how easily those two things sit together. Right because at least in the UK I'm not so sure about America if you're a doctor and you kind of flash the cash like that I don't know if you come off well in the medical establishment. And if you tend to sort of overhype your work in the medical world people get very sniffy about that. So we're going to be asking, is he the ultimate good billionaire, literally trying to cure cancer, or do these lawsuits hint at something a bit murkier beneath?

3:50But let's hear from him himself. Here is Patrick Soon-Shiong talking to the BBC World Service in January 2022 about why he signed the Giving Pledge. Well, I just think it's a moral obligation. I was born in South Africa, grew up under apartheid, privileged to come to America, learnt what we've received, and it's the right thing to do. It just is the right thing to do. And it's not just me. And I think really, as I said, there needs to be a rallying cry from the developed countries to support this. And I think Europe, the EU, and hopefully the United States will, like they did with PITFAR for HIV, will step up to this need.

4:32So there he is talking about his starting out in South Africa. So let's wind back right to there because it's a fascinating background he's got, which I think does influence his future career. Oh, definitely. So he's born in South Africa in 1952 to Chinese immigrant parents. And for context, South Africa is actually home to one of the oldest and largest Chinese communities in Africa. And South Africa at the time in the apartheid era was discriminating incredibly severely against people of colour, mainly black Africans. But it was not easy as well for people of Asian heritage. I don't think that could have been easy for him.

5:06Yeah. And his father ran two small grocery stores. His mother was raising 10 children. That's a lot of children. And he says, interestingly, his father had been a herbalist in China, in Chinese herbal medicine. And he said every two months, a metal biscuit tin would arrive from China filled with what was described as foul smelling weeds. If anybody had a fever, a cough, a boil, there'd be a knock on the door. They'd walk into the house and he would concoct something out of these ingredients. Having had Chinese herbal medicine forced on me, I would add that foul-smelling weeds is a good description of it.

5:40And it's interesting that because clearly he's watching this, which is, you know, different, non-traditional, experimental medical treatment. That's kind of the inspiration for his career. Oh, yeah, like knocking stuff together. That is something that will define the way he approaches medicine. And he said that it started influencing his beliefs that in the human body, it has the innate ability to heal itself. and you've got to try and give that capability the best chance to thrive. And actually what we find out with some of his drugs is he tries to do that so the body doesn't fight against you.

6:12So in 1969, he goes to med school in Johannesburg. But under the strict apartheid rules, the med school only allows two Chinese students from the entire of South Africa, this is crazy, to go to med school. So he has to be an excellent student. Yeah, and so they set up experience in hospitals in black townships. But this is interesting. He asked to be moved to Johannesburg General Hospital for the white patients because he thought he'd get better training and more money there. Unfortunately, that did not turn out to be the case because after graduating, when he was one of the first non-white surgical residents on staff, he earned$1 ,000 a month.

6:49But that was half the rate of his white peers. So I kind of wonder if this was what lit a fire in his belly to want to earn more. Yeah, maybe. But the odd thing about South Africa, clearly it was cut off from a lot of the rest of the world. You had the Glen Eagles Agreement over sport. It was banned in lots of other areas. So it kind of was slightly out there, isolated. And that actually allowed it to have an experimental, adventurous medical culture. In 1967, a surgeon called Christian Bernard performs the world's first human heart transplant in South Africa. Yeah, and Sun Xiong himself trained under a guy called Bert Mayberg, who performed the country's first kidney transplant.

7:28So you've got some superstar surgeons operating in South Africa. But Patrick isn't happy just staying in South Africa. So in 1977, he marries a university friend called Michelle Chan, who is also Chinese and South African, and moves to Canada for his junior residency. She was actually a budding actress. And she ended up getting bit parts of MacGyver. MacGyver. Gosh, that takes me back. When I lived in the States for a bit, that was like daytime TV gold. I actually cannot remember what MacGyver is about. It's about some law enforcement guy who's, you know... Classic. Classic American, North American TV.

8:03So they moved to California. So he becomes the youngest professor of surgery at UCLA. I mean, that's superstar status. You know, if you're head of surgery at somewhere like UCLA, you really must have a streak of genius about you. And he says the big transition for him, right, It wasn't the jump in a small hospital to a big one or to somewhere prestigious like UCLA. It was the business of medicine in the US. It's one of the biggest changes I still haven't figured out. Yeah, that's what he said. The idea here in the UK, we're just not familiar with the industrialisation, the commoditisation, the corporatisation of medicine and some of the huge quantities of money.

8:41A friend of mine who worked in this area said that the worried well is a multi-billion dollar industry in the US. There's a pill for everything, you know, as well as a pill for everything in everyday life. There's also a very, very lucrative industry in tackling things like the big diseases like cancer, like diabetes, like leukemia. And I didn't understand how big an industry medicine was in the US until I went to my first ever pharmacy in the United States. And I saw how much choice they had and how many products there were. now. It's like, wow, this is big bucks here. Yeah. So he performed the first whole pancreas transplant ever done at UCLA.

9:17But he also is interested in less invasive alternatives than surgery to treat things like diabetes. And in 1991, he actually leaves UCLA to go and pursue his business interests. And he co-founds a biotech startup called Vivo RX with his property developer brother Terrence. Now, Patrick describes Terrence as being the businessman of the family. And these two brothers are going to form quite the alliance but they're also going to create an unholy fallout with each other. So he learns about this emerging technique called islet technology which is where you transplant islets which are cells that produce insulin into the pancreas.

9:54Now one of the problems with these kind of treatments is that often organs reject anything that's put into them and he comes up with a solution to this by wrapping these cells in a gel which is derived from seaweed, also used to thicken ice cream. It's kind of genius, but also it has that real vibe of just knocking stuff together, you know, like that old Chinese medicine kind of putting the weeds in. Yeah. And in 1992, he put these capsules into a dog, I think a pig as well, and that seemed to work. So by 1993, he implants these cells into a human diabetic patient, Stephen Craig, for the first time.

10:32And Stephen was very ill, so he needed to walk with a cane. You know, his eyesight was failing. He was not in a good way. Yeah, and a week after the surgery, CBS Evening News, big news channel there in the US, shows Craig eating a meal without insulin for the first time in 30 years. So they're making this a very high-profile, wow-e, eureka case. But, you know, crucially, if you're going to appear on TV a week after the surgery, you can't really determine the long-term results of this treatment yet. But that doesn't stop him. In fact, he published his results in the well-known medical journal The Lancet, claiming a new technique that might herald a cure for type 1 diabetes, which raises the eyebrows and some sharp words from medical colleagues.

11:13So the president of the American Diabetes Association, a guy called Dr. James R. Gavin III, called it inappropriate and premature to make that kind of declaration. We don't need this kind of inappropriate hype. So there was immediate pushback. And even his own boss at UCLA, Dr. Michael Zinner, said he told the world he was curing diabetes. But in the scientific realm, this is his quote, you need to have your results reproduced by others to have them validated. His results were controversial. And they remained controversial because after a couple of years, Stephen's remaining kidney begins to fail and he becomes depressed.

11:45And in 1998, he checks into a hotel in Orange County and takes his own life. Yeah. Now, his suicide has not been blamed on Sun Xiong, But Bussain John clearly benefited from the early publicity that Stephen Craig gave him. And you get the sense that there's a kind of almost budding sense of hubris here, right? You know, he's got a willingness to embellish or overstate things. Yeah. And it's funny having a surgeon's background in this world, because surgeons the world over sometimes do have this kind of godlike complex. I mean, you can understand it in a way. You're fixing people. Sometimes you've got someone's heart in your hand.

12:19You patch them together. and I know quite a lot of surgeons and this kind of complex in a way it can be quite prevalent. And also if you're not a surgeon or you're not in the medical establishment people have a tendency especially if they're not a doctor themselves to just award this kind of godlike confidence. Defer to them yeah exactly. And what's interesting is he perhaps takes that kind of feeling of supremacy from surgery into an area which he's not an expert in which is the development of medicines and the medical world is usually very, very specialised and specific. It's interesting, isn't it?

12:54Because on one hand, you can look at a billionaire like that and say, well, billionaires take risks. That's what they're supposed to do. But when the risk is potentially having people's lives in your hands, it kind of gives it a whole different kind of profile. A whole different complexion, for sure. So anyway, Stephen Craig takes his own life in 1998. A few years previous to that, VivaRx got$5 million worth of funding from a big generic drug maker called Mylan Laboratories, specifically to fund diabetic research. But at the same time, Patrick also forms American Bioscience, which is a company pursuing cancer research.

13:26So he's basically backing two horses. Diabetes over here, he's got cancer treatments over here. And in 1995, Mylon invests more for an exclusive licence to market and sell this revolutionary diabetes technology. It was a couple of years later where we think he hit that milestone of becoming a millionaire when the companies he controlled signed two big deals in two days. And those two companies are called American Bioscience and American Pharmaceutical Partners, which, you know, we'll call APP for short. First was a five-year deal with Premier, which is the USA's largest healthcare alliance. And the very next day, a deal with the massive drugs company Glaxo.

14:03Welcome for supplies of the generic version of Zovarax. And this is kind of a key strategy of Sun Xiong's to distribute generic drugs once the patent for those drugs had expired. And like all good millionaires, he invests it back into his company. So he purchases two pharmaceutical factories that manufacture generic injectable drugs. Yeah, both of them have been losing money for nearly a decade, but he turns them around. They become profitable. He doubles APP's revenue. So he is the beating heart of a businessman here somewhere. Yeah, not just a surgeon. And in 1998, Sun Xiong states that APP sales are$75 million annually.

14:41So he's well over the million dollar mark at this point.

14:54so patrick is now officially a millionaire at this point you think you know time to build the underground basketball court i'd be celebrating but then family drama rears its head this is a weird story in 1998 patrick's brother terence and the investors mylon fire him and sue him for fraud and self-dealing. They say that he used consultants paid for to work on diabetes research to actually work on another on cancer research. So essentially, he's using Mylon's money to pay for work on a company that he then owns. So he's basically appropriating their staff and getting them to work on his project.

15:33Right. So the case goes to an arbitrator, but Patrick is cleared of any wrongdoing and Terence rehires his brother in, I'm sure, what felt like a very magnanimous gesture at the time. But 40 months later, he's suing his brother again on similar grounds. And this time, Patrick doesn't come off quite so well. He has to pay£32 million for the balance of Milan's American bioscience shares and to fund Terence's diabetes research. And Patrick agrees not to work on diabetes at all until June 2003. And he says something quite important here. He said in a New Yorker interview that stopping him working on diabetes for that five-year moratorium, in his words, evil.

16:12You've hurt mankind because I was this close to, well, in his mind, curing diabetes. I mean, it seems kind of self-aggrandising to me, to be honest. And actually, when that moratorium period was up, he didn't then return to it. So clearly, he wasn't that close or just got bored of it. Yeah, he clearly didn't have a burning desire to cure diabetes. I mean, we've referenced succession on this show before, but this level of brotherly fallout is so succession. Yeah, it really is. I wonder what the other eight siblings made of it. Where are the other eight? Anyway, that was his diabetes exploits. But where he makes his big money is in a cancer drug called Abraxane, which basically repackage an existing drug, but put it inside a protein which is produced by the liver.

16:57I'm way out of my depth here, but because it's wrapped in a familiar protein to the body, its rejection rate is lower and it becomes marginally more successful. So the top brand, the pre-existing brand, dissolved it in a kind of castor oil product. but that could cause allergic reactions. Not that frequently, but occasionally and sometimes even fatally, which is not a nice way to go. He starts this drugs trial for Abraxane and results suggest a kind of marginal improvement in survival rates. So the patent on Abraxane was owned by American Bioscience, a private company 80 % owned by Sun Xiong. And it licensed Abraxane to APP for around$85 million.

17:39Remember, Sun Xiong was the chief executive and largest shareholder of both companies. To an outsider like me, it sounds like he's licensing his own drug to his own company. So he benefits in both ways. I mean, isn't that just putting money back in your own pocket? I work in business and complex company structures are not unusual. But the kind of cross holdings of these ones seem more complicated than most. more kind of, if you like, sort of company engineering and chicanery than would be normal for something like this. Right, but APP is making money. So profits in 2000 are over$6.6 million. And in December 2001, APP does its IPO, which we've come across before, which is when a company sells shares itself to the general public.

18:23You get a real view then at that point of what the company is worth. The IPO raises$144 million, but the company itself is worth much more than that because they only sell a bit of the company. But APP is being targeted by short sellers. Now, OK, what is short selling? Does this have anything to do with GameStop? Well, funnily enough, it does. GameStop was a classic example of this. But let's go back to basics. Short selling is betting that a company's share price will go down, that its value will decrease. What I do is I go along and I borrow some shares in the company. So I go and borrow 100 shares.

19:00So I am short. I owe you 100 shares. But I think the share price is going to go down. It goes down from$10 to$5. I then go back and buy them for$5, give you back the shares I owe you, but I've pocketed the difference. Does that make sense? That's great. That's the Margot Robbie in a bathtub big short part of this podcast. I hope I did a reasonable job on that. But anyway, it's very common in financial markets. Now, the reason people sort of bet against companies is because they think there's something not quite right. And that's exactly what people thought about APP. They had spotted issues with Abraxane being owned by American Bioscience, which was still a privately owned company, rather than APP, the public company.

19:43And some investors challenged this structure. They also raised questions about the drug trial, which is controversial because the American company which began the trial was fired and the trial is completed in Russia. So the investment community doesn't think that this doesn't pass the smell test for them. Right. So for them, they're like, this investment seems a bit dodgy. The value of the share is probably going to go down because something's up. Correct. They thought there was something up with this. So the company faced a whole slew of shareholder lawsuits after they lost one billion dollars in value of the company.

20:15Yeah, and the lawsuits were based on a press release touting these positive results for Abraxane, but they failed to include any trial data, so they weren't giving enough information. And Patrick said, you know, the company needs more time to analyse the data, but once again we see him kind of putting the cart before the horse. Yeah, but despite all these lawsuits, the FDA, which is the Food and Drug Administration, granted Abraxane fast-track status, so approval could come as soon as 2004. And in 2003, Patrick appears on the Forbes billionaire list for the first time with an estimated wealth of$1.4 billion.

20:52So clearly, the short selling and the lawsuits didn't really put a dent in his fortunes. No, it's interesting that Abraxane, which was the blockbuster drug, was quite controversial, but was the one that made his fortune. And when the FDA finally approved Abraxane in 2005, the stock of APP jumps 30 % in a single day. And here's a very illuminating thing. He commissions paperweights for staff at the company with an image of that day's stock chart. That tells you everything you need to know about whether he's focused on the money or not. Yeah, I mean, let's put it that way. It wasn't a statue of a cancer patient getting treated.

21:29Yeah, a little statue of Hippocrates, the Hippocratic Oath. It wasn't one of those. It was a stock chart. So that jump in the stock sees him move up the rich list with an estimated worth of over$2 billion. But the criticism continues, right? So the New York Times reports Abraxone is selling for$4 ,200 per dose, which is 25 times the cost of its generic equivalent. And because of, like we said, the industrialisation of the medical industry in the US, doctors who administer the drug can get in a percentage of the price. Having said that, however, Abraxone is much less likely to trigger allergic reactions, which, you know, has made it popular with some US doctors.

22:10Yeah, but an independent review in the annals of oncology concluded that Abraxane and similar drugs like that did not, in their words, not really offer a significant therapeutic benefit over established medicines. In fact, described them as old wine in a new bottle. And many years ago, I knew quite an eminent haematologist who's no longer with us, and they would organise these medical conferences which were paid for by the big drug companies, all expenses paid in places like, it would be in Hawaii or Niagara Falls or somewhere, or Vesuvius or something like that, a really kind of incredible place.

22:47They'd be all expenses paid. They'd be strongly encouraged to prescribe these drugs. And not only that, some of the academic research that went hand in hand was also paid for and sponsored by the drug companies. So there are plenty of nudges and incentives to get physicians, doctors to prescribe certain things. Some would say it's not as academically pure as it should be. And it's certainly a big money-making opportunity. And for someone like Patrick, who, you know, came to America and said, oh, I don't understand the US healthcare system at all. He seems to understand its capacity to make a lot of money.

23:25So from 2007, Sun Xiong's been setting up various different companies, all with Nant in their name. Apparently, it's inspired by a Native American basket he has in the background of all his Zoom calls. So the first is Nant Health. Then there's also Nant Works, the umbrella brand. Nant Omics, Nant K West, Nant Pharma, Nant Cell. You know, names are changed. Various companies are floated. But an IPO for Nant K West in 2015 reveals Soon-Shiong's compensation package. And it is staggering. It's$147 million, which puts him among America's best paid CEO that year. Yeah. And so he's doing incredibly well at this stage.

Read the full transcript

24:05This is where his wealth is growing and peaking at around$12.5 billion. There are not many doctors who make$147 million in a year. Not many surgeons. No. And he becomes part of LA high society at this point. He's got famous friends like Burt Bacharach, you know, even his wife. He's still with her, who has been on the fringes of fame as an actress with that MacGyver cameo. You know, her acting career seems to have petered to a halt. But they have children. You know, I think she set up a charity. Yeah. And then as you do the ultimate trophy asset, you buy a stake in a sports team. He buys a stake in the L.A.

24:40Lakers from basketball legend Magic Johnson. The Lakers are so big in the U.S. That's the way you go and see people like Jack Nicholson in this audience, you know, or Kim Kardashian. You go and see them at the Lakers game. It's like being the front row at a fashion show with Anna Wintour or something. It means you are part of the LA elite. And he even becomes friends with their star player, Colby Bryant. And when Colby Bryant has an Achilles injury, he advises the surgeon on Colby's surgery. He sits in on it. I bet the surgeon actually doing it really loved that. Oh, my God. Imagine. It's like having your boss sit in on something.

25:14So he says that the surgery he advises on is completely revolutionary. And the surgeon, you know, is a little bit salty about it. He says that was a little bit of an overstatement. And, you know, Colby can dunk again, but he's never quite the same. He doesn't win another championship. Yeah, and he's also making friends. It's not just sports stars. He's making friends with politicians. And he's sort of positioning himself as the man who one day will cure cancer. He shares a platform with Bill Clinton in 2014. When then-VP Joe Biden's son Bo gets cancer, he advises Joe Biden. But when Bo Biden dies in 2015, Sun Xiong launches the moonshot programme to develop a cancer vaccine.

25:51And he goes to the Vatican with Biden. He meets the Pope. He's awarded the 2016 Pontifical Key Visionary Award. Very nice. And even in the first weeks of the Trump presidency in 2017, Sun Xiong goes to the White House to meet him. And even the people who sue him are A-listers. He's sued by Cher, who claims he persuaded her to sell shares in one of his companies while withholding relevant information. But her case is dismissed. Yeah, it feels like a long way, this, doesn't it? From experimental herbal medicine in South Africa, starting out as a young surgeon at UCLA. This is a whole different ballgame that he's operating in now.

26:30Oh, and like any good billionaire, he's also making investments that are kind of way outside of his niche, you'd say. He ends up buying the LA Times for$500 million in 2018. It's a classic mogul thing to do is buy a newspaper. I mean, I work for the BBC, which is publicly funded. So, but, you know, why do people want to buy newspapers? I think it's about influence, right? So, you know, clearly you can be influential within your own business community. But Joe blogs down the street is not going to know who you are. And some people really like the sensation of being well-known and publicly admired.

27:04Oh, and it also makes you a political player without having to get elected, right? The LA Times is, you know, considered what, like the New York Times of the West Coast. Yeah, another classic mogul thing to do. Now he's got a stake in a sports team, owns a newspaper. And not only that, but also because he's got plenty of money, there'll be no shortage of people saying, why didn't you invest in this? And in fact, he invests some of his money in a little meeting software programme called Zoom. So you can bet that when the pandemic hit, Sun Xiong made even more money from that. Yeah, but of course, the pandemic was something which must have seemed like a bit of a challenge to him.

27:39So when the world's focus turns to COVID, inevitably, so does Sun Chiang. So in May 2020, his company Immunity Bio is selected for the federal government's Operation Warp Speed to help quickly develop a vaccine. But there's no obvious breakthrough. He doesn't, I mean, he's not the person who conquers COVID, that's for sure. So anyway, sports owner, newspaper owner, billionaire, friend of politicians and celebrities, a long way from where we started as a one of 10 siblings in South Africa in the 1950s.

28:28Your expense report will practically write itself. Quite the breakthrough. It's like we've been teleported into the future. All right. So just curious, would you give us written permission to convert your matter into energy patterns and reassemble you at, say, random travel destinations? Margaret, are you building a teleporter? No. Yes. SAP Concur helps your business move forward faster. Learn more at concur.com. AI is now a must for companies and the executives in charge of steering them. but the path to implementation is not so clear. Which function or scenario or the use case do I start with that gives me the most value?

29:04I'm Chip Kranixl, host of Resilient Edge, a business vitality podcast paid and presented by Deloitte. Our latest episode has the answers to all these questions and more. Available now wherever you listen to podcasts.

29:25Time conundrums. Murderous mayhem. Why are you doing that voice? I'm just getting in the mood for our new podcast. Murder They Wrote. Hey, I'm Laura Whitmore. And I'm Ian Sterling. Now anyone who knows us knows we are obsessed with true crime. We're here with a new podcast exploring the dastardly deeds of history's most atrocious criminals. There'll be mystery, madness and moments of... Oh my God. Murder They Wrote with Laura Whitmore and Ian Sterling. Listen on BBC Sounds.

29:59Let's come to Judge Patrick Sunxiang. Is he good, bad or just another billionaire? So on wealth, we reckon around 5 billion now. Peaked around 12 and a half billion. Not in the big leagues, but as we've said, probably the richest surgeon in the world. Yeah, and definitely the richest man in LA, which is a town with a lot of rich guys. Yeah, well, at one stage, I think he was the richest in LA. I think Steve Wynn is now the richest person in LA, but I don't know. And lives the full LA celebrity lifestyle, newspaper, steak and the Lakers, got a basketball court under his mansion. He's embracing the lifestyle, should we put it that way?

30:35Yes. Apparently the basketball court even has its own bowling alley. Plenty to do round at the Sun Xiong's house. In sheer numbers, it's not in the big leagues. But because of the trinkets and accoutrements he's accumulated along the way, I'm going to give him a seven simply because he's living the billionaire lifestyle. Oh, see, I would give him a six because, you know, I feel like a basketball court can't be as expensive as building your own golf course, which is what some of the other billionaires. Michael Jordan did, didn't he? Michael Jordan has his own golf course, so, you know. Okay, so middle of the pack there.

31:06Middle of the pack for me. So seven from me, six from you. What about rags to riches? I mean, this is a good story, right? Apartheid South Africa, growing up in basically a segregated society, paid half the amount as your white colleagues to becoming an LA biotech billionaire. This for me is probably one of the higher ranked ones. Yeah, for sure. And also what was interesting, as we mentioned earlier, it was almost his sense of shock and wonder that medicine could be such a big business. That was one of his revelations when he went to North America. I would give him an eight on this. He's travelled a long way, even just geographically.

31:42Yeah, fair enough. I'm going to agree with that. It's an eight for me on Rags to Riches. What about villainy? Let's interrogate what he claims to have done versus his actual achievements, right? So he's made a lot of money, but the actual kind of groundbreaking medical breakthroughs, the things that save millions of lives around the world, that's kind of harder to find in his story. Yeah, he's been called the P.T. Barnum of biotech, as his claims, you know, the famous showman, as his claims don't always match the realities of his drugs. He's a very good talker. So an oncologist who met with Patrick around the time of a vaccine has a really interesting story about encountering him.

32:19So she says you go into his conference room and he just talks for like three hours straight, fills up this giant whiteboard with all his theories of the way things work. And other people, even clinical people who don't have expertise in oncology, you'd say maybe he's just brilliant. But you really have to be an oncologist to be able to say, you know, this stuff is kind of wacky. Yeah. So, you know, within the medical community, there are people who kind of look at him and say, maybe the numbers just don't add up. Yeah. I remember someone saying something about a person that people thought were clever.

32:48They said, this is a stupid person's idea of what a clever person looks like. And I just wonder whether there's something about that, which is that you can fill up, you know, you can blind me with science until the scientist comes along. goes hang on a second really and is he the skilled surgeon or snake oil salesman or is he somewhere on the on that spectrum and there's a feeling that he's a bit of a showman of sorts and for the scientists that rubs them up the wrong way but i guess you know at the end of the day how bad is that i mean you have to be a good marketer if you want people to invest in your company right but then the thing i come back to is if there are people's health people's health and their livelihoods are on the line for this you know people are dreaming of the thing that will cure them does it make it less ethical i remember when we were starting this out we sort of said very few people become billionaires without providing something people either need want or enjoy and although the culture in the uk around medicine is very different to that in the us you know you could argue that providing medical treatments is something that people really need and it just so happens in the US that is a very profitable big business and in other countries it isn't he occupies the year in the US so having been a successful businessman in biotechnology the riches are going to come if you're successful in that field however you feel about it from a logical standpoint that does make sense but you know just from my own perspective I just don't think people's health should be something that other people can become billionaires from you You know, I mean, maybe this is a very kind of UK centric point of view, but the way in which the US medical industry is so commercialized, the way you can make billions from other people's health conditions and, you know, probably quite health conditions that make them miserable, make their lives really difficult.

34:37You know, that to me just, I don't know, it gives me the ache. There's no other way of putting it. I understand what you say. The American capitalists would say, this is the way you solve problems. you bring capital and a profit motive to bear and that gives an incredible energy to solving problems and it has led to lots and lots of breakthroughs whether it's led to more breakthroughs in the US than other countries like Switzerland like the UK like Germany I've got no idea but that would be the American argument If you're a doctor and you know about this please let us know I would love to know I'm not a medical ethicist we're just here to talk about money and somehow it feels a little bit dirty when you're doing it in the medical sphere Definitely So let's judge him.

35:17Villainy, what would you give him? Oh, gosh. In scientific circles, making bolder claims than the science and the results actually deliver is considered a pretty big no-no. So I'm not going to say he's bad, but on Villainy, I would say I would give him more than half because of this particular sphere that he's in. So I'm going to give him a six. I would actually give him a seven. Okay. Yeah, because I mean, like I said, the idea that someone can make so much money off other people's health conditions for, you know, products that they clearly do the job because they haven't been recalled or anything like that, or overstated in terms of their efficacy, that to me nudges him up a bit in villainy stakes.

35:58People will just say, oh, you're such whinging, bleeding heart UK people, you know, is biotechnology a business? Yes, it is. If you're a successful biotech person, do you get rich? Yes, you do. Deal with it. So let's go on to philanthropy, because, you know, here he's done pretty well for himself, I think. Yeah, he signed the giving pledge, which I think requires him to give half his money away over his lifetime. And he hasn't quite got there yet. He's made a small dent in that. He's donated to hospitals and drug development in the US and also his home country of South Africa, including$213 million given to a COVID-19 vaccine project in South Africa.

36:35Yeah, and there was another$23 million to COVID-19 vaccine work in Seattle. But what's that? You add that up, that's$250 million. He's got a way to go to get to half. You're good at the fractions. I see an amount like this and I'm like, he's great. He's given away millions and I forget he's got billions. Remember, we talked about how much more a billion is than a million. It's a thousand times as much. OK, so on this one, on philanthropy, I'm going to say so far, I'll give him a four. I'll be more generous. I'll give him a five because he has signed the giving pledge. And while, you know, I'm fairly sure Bill Gates doesn't come and lock you up in jail.

37:12And if you don't fulfill the giving pledge, he has made a commitment, which is more than what some of our billionaires have done. OK, you're taking him at his word and hoping that he'll deliver on that. Power. This is an interesting one. It goes back to what we were saying about the power of surgeons, literally your life in their hands. I would argue in individual cases he probably had more power as a surgeon than he did as a businessman. But now he's a businessman. He does have political connections. He's met presidents. Yeah, he owns a newspaper which could have a lot of influence. And I do think that old stereotype about people see a doctor and they immediately trust you and believe what you have to say is important, especially when it comes to health.

37:54That is an influential thing. So I would give him like an eight. Really? Okay, I'm going to be less generous than that. I wonder whether Patrick Soon-Shiong endorsing something immediately influences people or whether some of his background in slightly talking up some of his own products means that people are a little wary of the Soon-Shiong effect. So I'm going to give him a five. Okay, a more sober assessment than the one that I've given. I'm impressed by meeting the Pope. What can I say? Yeah, friends in high places. Okay, now we come to legacy. What do you think his legacy will be? When, you know, the obituaries come out, what are they going to say about Patrick Sunxiang?

38:36they're going to say that he was a brilliant surgeon who made a fortune in biotechnology but the long-term effects is there any eureka breakthrough here is there a kind of alexander fleming kind of moment i don't think there really is there's no penicillin moment here is there so i think he will be seen as a very smart biotech investor but i don't think he will be seen as are great in either medicine or in business. What would you give him? Two. Ooh, that's savage. What? I think that is savage. Okay, I would... I respect his life story, but people aren't going to look back and he's not going to be like the Richard Feynman in physics or the Alexander Fleming in penicillin or whatever.

39:25He managed to buy up a generic drug, wrap it in something else and got marginally better results. I would be marginally more generous and give him a three. having said that if he does end up curing cancer not him personally, someone at his company for instance if his company is responsible for curing cancer or diabetes or any other condition I'm sure we'll be re-evaluating this very hard in the years to come Yeah, all I will tell you is going back to a quote that the president of the American Diabetes Association said we don't need this kind of inappropriate hype that's not a ringing endorsement from the medical profession I wonder what they'll have to say if he comes out and says he's found a cure for cancer.

40:05Okay, well, listen, we'll re-record this episode if that happens. Good luck to you, Patrick Sunxiong. So is he good, bad, or just another billionaire? I hate this question every week. Don't know why we do this programme. And yet we ask ourselves this every single week. I don't know. You go first. Okay, I think, straight in, in the grand scale of medical villains and baddies who have made themselves enormously rich off the misfortunes of other people, like say the Sackler family, he doesn't really register, right? No, he's nowhere near as bad as that. So even though I personally find the idea that you can make so much money off other people's health conditions distasteful, him personally, for being a bit of a showman, for rubbing people up the wrong way, for doing a bit of horse trading with his company structures, is he's nowhere near the level of someone who's gotten, you know, of a Sackler, for instance.

41:03And I'm sure we'll do the Sackler family at some point during this program. So for me, unfortunately, he is just another billionaire. He's probably saved a lot of lives. I don't have any numbers on that. But and he certainly has never been, as you say, made money out of the misery of others. So I'm going to say he's marginally good. A billionaire will disagree on. so who's next week well next week we've got a guy you might have heard of called michael bloomberg yeah mike to his friends mike to most people in fact mike bloomberg invented the technology that underpins the world's financial markets you might have seen it in shows like industry it's the bloomberg terminal and it sits on the desks of traders the world over and if money makes the world go round bloomberg makes the money go round bloomberg's an important guy and he's our next billionaire thanks for listening to good bad billionaire this podcast is produced by hannah herford and mark ward james cook is our editor and it's a bbc audio production

From the publisher

Why was biotech billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong sued by his brother... and Cher? BBC business editor Simon Jack and journalist Zing Tsjeng trace his journey from apartheid South Africa to the upper echelons of LA society.

He’s tried to cure cancer, diabetes, and Covid-19, and along the way rubbed shoulders with some of the most powerful people on the planet: Joe Biden, the Pope, and Donald Trump. He's made his fortune selling drugs to sick people, but his results have been described as "controversial", "hype" and even “old wine in a new bottle”.

In the podcast that uncovers how the world's wealthiest people made their money and asks if they are good or bad for the planet, Simon and Zing judge a man who made cold hard cash from controversial cures.

We’d love to hear your feedback. Email goodbadbillionaire@bbc.com or drop us a text or WhatsApp to +1 (917) 686-1176.

To find out more about the show and read our privacy notice, visit www.bbcworldservice.com/goodbadbillionaire

More from Good Bad Billionaire

All 110 episodes
Patrick Soon-Shiong: Cures for cashGood Bad Billionaire · 40 min
Listen in VO