In short
Hitmakers, Season 2 - Episode Summary: What is Next for Merch?
Overview In this episode of *Hitmakers*, co-hosts Lee Maschmeyer and Anna discuss the evolution of merchandise (merch), its cultural significance, and the shifting landscape of consumer goods. They explore the origins of merch, its commercialization, and what the future holds for this phenomenon as it increasingly intersects with status, identity, and cultural capital.
Key Concepts
Definition and Evolution of Merch
- Original Meaning of Merch:
- Initially associated with music, merch referred to items like band T-shirts sold at concerts, representing allegiance to a cultural artifact.
- Merch has intrinsic value due to the social and cultural capital it carries, contrasting with commodities which are interchangeable.
- Commoditization in the 1990s:
- Merch began to lose its unique cultural significance as brands like Hot Topic commoditized it, making band T-shirts widely accessible.
- This change diluted the original meaning, as consumers could purchase merch without genuine cultural engagement.
The Shift in Meaning and Value
- Contemporary Context:
- Although merch has evolved into a broader category, it still serves as a status symbol and identity marker, especially in social media culture.
- The episode reflects on the duality of merch being both a cultural artifact and a commercial product.
Merch as Big Business
- Merch is no longer a niche; it has become a significant part of the retail economy.
- The hosts discuss the business implications: how brands utilize merch as a means of storytelling, cultural engagement, and driving sales.
Discussion Points
- Merch 1.0 vs. 2.0 vs. 3.0:
- Merch 1.0: Cultural items created by fans for fans, embodying genuine engagement with the culture.
- Merch 2.0: The commercialization of subcultures, leading to widespread availability and the dilution of meaning.
- Merch 3.0: A return to niche, secretive forms of merch that prioritize authenticity over broad appeal. This phase anticipates a new wave of consumerism focused on personal connection to culture rather than public display.
- Cultural Commentary:
- The hosts highlight that many recent fashion collaborations (e.g., Balenciaga's IKEA bag) act as commentary on culture rather than mere fashion statements.
- They discuss the cycle of trends and how nostalgia influences current branding strategies, as seen in campaigns by brands like Chick-fil-A revamping archival items.
Key Takeaways
- Merch reflects identity and status: It is a tool for signaling one's connection to a community or subculture, though its meaning has evolved.
- From niche to mainstream: What began as small-scale cultural expressions have been commodified and are now central to major retail strategies.
- Navigating authenticity: The future of merch may lean towards niche, private items that foster genuine connections rather than being used as mere status symbols.
Conclusion The episode concludes with the notion that as culture continues to fragment, merch will adapt, potentially returning to its roots as a unique cultural artifact, albeit in ways that prioritize intimate connections and personal significance over commercial transactions.
Next Episode Teaser In the following episode, the discussion will turn to the theme of virality in the digital age, exploring how algorithms that once fostered viral content are now hindering it.
---
For more insights and discussions, visit [Hitmakers on Substack](https://andjelicaaa.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOIntroduction to Merch's Cultural Impact
0:00 to 0:43
Learn how merchandise has evolved into a significant cultural and economic force.
“Is Millionaire's PD a luxury bag or merch?”
Anecdotes and Atmosphere at Wild Cherry
1:00 to 1:46
Discover a personal story about an exclusive dining experience in New York.
“Oh, well, it's a lovely day here in New York.”
The Importance of Music and Space Design
1:46 to 4:12
Explore how music and layout affect the social experience in restaurants.
“it's the atmosphere that's thanks to the one and only sue chen of house of chen she arranged for myself and my husband Brian to go there for his birthday.”
Name-Dropping and Personal Connections
4:12 to 6:13
Enjoy lighthearted banter about personal connections and name-dropping moments.
“This is like the name-dropping segment of the show.”
Market Moves: Saks Bankruptcy and American Eagle
6:13 to 8:14
Get insights into Saks bankruptcy and American Eagle's growth amidst challenges.
“They did an amazing, amazing job with that.”
Chick-fil-A's Nostalgia Campaign and Brand Strategies
8:14 to 10:21
Learn how Chick-fil-A and other brands leverage nostalgia in their marketing.
“comparable sales growth, showing that the holiday outperformance was not led by the flagship banner.”
Legacy Brands and Control of Narrative
10:21 to 13:03
Understand how legacy brands are reshaping their narratives and marketing approaches.
“Fashion retailer Aritzia reported a Q3 2026 net revenue of$1 billion, which is a 43 % increase year over year, with comparable sales surging 34%.”
The Return to Analog Living
13:03 to 14:01
Discover the growing trend of embracing non-digital, analog lifestyles.
“recently hired a chief entertainment officer.”
The Impact of Screens on Reality
14:01 to 14:13
Discussion on how screens hinder real-life interactions.
Valentino's Influence on Fashion
14:19 to 14:31
Exploration of Valentino's impact on high-profile clients and red carpet events.
“He was the go-to designer for the jet set, famously dressing Jackie Kennedy for her wedding to Aristotle Onassis and creating red carpet history for stars like Julia Roberts and Elizabeth Taylor.”
Show all 38 chapters
J.Crew's New Collection for the U.S. Teams
14:31 to 14:59
Overview of J.Crew's collaboration with the U.S. Ski and Snowboard Teams.
“J.Crew has launched its first collection with the U.S.”
Design and Style of the J.Crew Collection
14:59 to 15:23
Discussion about the design elements and target market of J.Crew's collection.
“anchored by vintage-inspired patches and alpine graphics pulled from J.Crew's archives.”
Market Trends: Value vs. Vogue
15:23 to 15:39
Analyzing the discrepancy between value and luxury brands in the market.
“and launches with a campaign featuring athletes including Colby Stevenson, Haley Langland, Rel Harwood, River Radimus, Tess Johnson, and Zach Miller with community-focused activations planned at U.S.”
Retail Challenges for Mid-Tier Brands
15:39 to 16:03
Examining the struggles of mid-tier brands like Target and Caring.
“And finally, the most brutal market move of the past two weeks is the widening gap between, quote-unquote, value and vogue.”
The Great Separation in Retail
16:03 to 16:18
Discussion on the phenomenon of the great separation in retail markets.
“And which, by the way, I think that is one of the biggest changes happening that not enough people are talking about.”
Economic Shifts and Their Impacts
16:18 to 16:50
Exploring the K-shaped economic recovery and its broader implications.
“Like I see, you know, articles here and there talking about it.”
Historical Context of Wealth Concentration
16:50 to 17:27
Analyzing the levels of wealth concentration compared to past eras.
“And I think that it started really not now.”
Comparison of Today's Wealth Concentration
17:27 to 18:24
Discussion on how today's wealth concentration compares to the Gilded Era.
“It's like Gilded Era levels of wealth concentration.”
Wealth and Social Responsibility
18:24 to 18:58
Examining the social responsibilities of wealthy individuals today.
“islands and building things in New Zealand and Hawaii where only them and like their 10 people can like hide while the world class.”
Transitioning to Discussions on Merch
18:58 to 19:52
Shifting focus to the relevance of merchandise in today's culture.
“There was a different social consciousness display.”
The Evolution of Merchandise
19:52 to 20:56
Exploring the transition of merch from music to mainstream culture.
“We should get back to like a whole conversation about merch right now.”
Merch as a Cultural Signifier
20:56 to 22:36
Discussing how merch represents fandom and cultural allegiance.
“Like you said, it's massive, massive business.”
Disney's Merch Strategy
22:36 to 23:24
Analyzing Disney's massive merch business and its strategic direction.
“And so, like, Disney's merch business is massive.”
Merch as Consumer Goods
23:24 to 24:06
Exploring how the definition of merch has shifted to consumer goods.
Aesthetic vs. Meaning in Merch
24:06 to 25:04
Debating the aesthetic value of merch versus its original meaning.
“shows in a town only for a day or a couple of days and so on, is they took dynamics of merch and commodified it.”
The Role of Art in Merch
25:04 to 27:30
Discussing the intersection of art and merch in contemporary culture.
“that it still has its special place because aesthetically it represents certain subculture.”
Three Waves of Merchandise Evolution
27:30 to 28:00
Outlining the three phases of merchandise development over time.
“But because there is actual meaning and social commentary, it does have that previous role of merch that it had, but not aesthetically.”
The Evolution of Merch: Waves 1.0 and 2.0
28:00 to 29:09
Explore the first two phases of merchandise and their cultural significance.
“is that there's effectively like three waves of merch.”
Merch 2.0: The Commercialization of Subcultures
29:10 to 30:36
Discuss the impact of commercialization on subcultures and the concept of selling out.
“And then the logic of capitalism took over.”
Merch 3.0: The Shift Towards Niche and Meaning
30:37 to 32:45
Delve into the emerging third wave of merchandise focused on private, meaningful items.
“That was actually the real merch at the commercial level because Nike made it.”
The Aesthetic vs. Meaning in Merch
32:46 to 35:17
Analyze the aestheticization of merchandise and its implications for culture.
“Yes, but there will always be those types of people who want to just pay that much because it has a logo on it.”
The Future of Merchandise: Private Signals
35:18 to 36:54
Consider how future merchandise may focus on private signaling rather than public display.
“And rather than doing it at scale, do it in a more niche way.”
Secret Societies and Exclusive Merchandise
36:55 to 39:25
Explore the concept of secret societies and how they influence merchandise culture.
“I mean, you know, humans always have this need to signal status.”
Rapid Fire: Merch or Not Merch Game
40:04 to 42:01
Engage in a rapid-fire segment determining whether various items are considered merch.
“So, Ana, do you want to go first or do you want me to go first?”
The Merch vs. Not Merch Debate
42:01 to 43:31
Exploration of various products and whether they qualify as merch.
“No, you can steal it and say I was there, but it's part of their, you know, you get that when you stay at the hotel.”
Analyzing Luxury Brands and Their Offerings
43:31 to 45:28
Discussion on luxury brand items and their classification as merch.
“I think you had seven correct ones, three wrong ones.”
Swag vs. True Merchandise
45:28 to 47:25
Debate on the distinction between swag and actual merch.
“But it's not merch because that's like Labubu, not merch.”
Defining New Forms of Merchandise
47:25 to 49:20
Discussion on unconventional forms of merch and their implications.
“Because that's what you get at a corporate event.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02Is Millionaire's PD a luxury bag or merch? What about MaxiPack? We've heard that merch is a status symbol, a subgenre, a style statement, identity marker. We also heard that merch has reached its peak and went past it. All those statements may be true, but they miss the reality that merch has become a big business. What used to live at the edges of culture has firmly moved to the center of economy. The side show has become the main act. In this episode, we unpack what happens when consumers learn to buy everything as merch. Welcome to the season two of Hitmakers, the show that tracks how culture moves margins, multiples and market cap.
0:59Morning. Hey, Anna. How are you doing? Oh, well, it's a lovely day here in New York. I want to hear how you got into Wild Cherry. Oh, well, this is a story for another time. Actually, it's not. Did you just walk up to the door, look the door open, straight in the eye and say, I am Anna? Do you know who I am? And then she stepped to the side and like waved his arm, letting you pass by. You know what? I came in. I said, I'm Anna. And they said, happy birthday, Brian. just ignored the woman and went straight for the man they said welcome anna you almost made me spit out my coffee all over my keyboard well okay so while cherry the food is excellent and so it's the atmosphere that's thanks to the one and only sue chen of house of chen she arranged for myself and my husband Brian to go there for his birthday.
2:01And Shu Chen, she does all events for A24. So you know what? You have to have friends at high places. Oh, that's nice. So what was it like? I haven't been, so what was it like on the inside? Well. Or did you have to sign an NDA to tell just to keep the mystique? Come on. It's a night in that sense. It's a central bar and they have boots on the side and they're really nice and friendly. And it's, you know what makes it nice? It was not super crowded. Music was excellent. That's what I remember. Music was excellent. And very rarely in a restaurant you ever remember music unless it's so loud that you can't talk.
2:49And this was none of that. And I was like, oh, my God, this is like the soundtrack is so good. So actually, that's a really good point. And there are two things that I always pay attention to when I go to these like kind of social venues, whether it's a bar or a restaurant and things like that. One is the flow of people. Like, is it laid out in a way that allows you to circulate around it without like having to climb over people and like you're a linebacker dodging tackles to move through the space? I think that's a really underestimated point of these spaces. And then the second one is music.
3:30And I completely agree with you because it can pull you out or it can be completely ignorable and just become Muzak in the background. But it's like this Goldilocks zone where it actually becomes something you notice and you enjoy. And you're like, that is a really good song. What is that? And so my friend is the creative director for the Crane Club. and actually it was fascinating listening to him talk through how he selected music for the space because it was so intentional he spent so much time curating that and you don't really hear people talk about that you know particularly with restaurants so for me it was just really fascinating to to learn about i think that's such a great point and also especially because they say that it's lighting and I agree like it's really important to lighting creates atmosphere in restaurants it there is nothing worse than having like this harsh lighting or wrong lighting so lighting was very right here it was very intimate and so on but good music you don't need to talk you can enjoy in like companionable silence or you can just like enjoy music which is great.
4:46Speaking of friends in high places. Go on. Do tell more. This is like the name-dropping segment of the show. This is the name-dropping segment. Who is this? Who that? Oh, there you go. That barista. The barista. The barista. You have to say it rolling your R's. The mythical Starbucks barista. It's a she, actually. So show some respect. You with your Did I say he? Did I misgender the bear? You did. It's a she and she's a beauty. She's absolute beauty and even better in person. So when I came back after three weeks over the holidays, she was waiting for me. And I mean, it was like heartwarming. Speaking of, let's go to market moves, you.
5:36Okay. All right. Because you don't have any friends in high places, but I don't want to put you on a spot. And I don't have a barista. Crane Club is actually, like, everyone who has them being guys go. Even, do they let non-members? Did they just ruin? So, wait, just real quick on Crane's Club. So, they have the restaurant, which is at street level, which is fantastic. I've eaten there a bunch. Love eating there. And then they have the members lounge, which is in the basement below it, which is also fantastic. And, yeah, you have to be a member there and stuff. But, obviously, non-members can be brought in by members and stuff.
6:10Think of getting the lighting, the music, the atmosphere. Highly recommend it. Oh, yeah. Yeah. They did an amazing, amazing job with that. OK. All right. So let's dive into our segment where we track how companies are building cultural capital to move markets. So the first market move that we're going to talk about today is Saks Global filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on January 13th. Just over a year ago, Saks Global bought Neiman Marcus Group for$2.7 billion. This past Christmas, however, the retailer sold Neiman Marcus's marble-covered Beverly Hills store. After that, it missed$126 million interest payment.
6:52Its boss Mark Metrick resigned and S &P labeled it in default. Saks Fifth Avenue shops now remain open thanks to$175 billion lifeline from investors. Many of Saks' troubles are not unique. The global department store sales fell by 4 % to 6 % in 2025, and high-end brands now prefer to sell directly to consumers or through online aggregators. One bright spot for Saks is that it owns property worth$4.4 billion, including its Fifth Avenue flagship. And liquidation seems unlikely, at least for now. Since co-founders also recently won back control of their company. after a dramatic four-month battle with creditors.
7:37The founders were selected as the winning bidders in a court-supervised sale process, partnering with a Canadian multifamily office to secure a definitive purchase agreement. The transaction is expected to close on February 13th, pending court and regulatory approvals. The victory caps a high-stakes fight that began in September of last year when Sens filed for creditor protection after owing$200 million to banks and brand partners. Next up, American Eagle Outfitters had a positive fourth quarter so far in comparable sales with single-digit growth through January 3rd of this year. The company noted their namesake, American Eagle Brand, delivered only low single-digit comparable sales growth, showing that the holiday outperformance was not led by the flagship banner.
8:23Instead, Aerie and its active offshoot offline were the primary engines of growth, with Aerie posting comparable sales gains in the low 20s and offline named as a standout performer. A broader category mixed shift towards higher growth, higher engagement brands coupled with disciplined margin execution gave American Eagle Outfitters room to raise its fourth quarter operating income outlook to$167 to$170 million, up from prior guidance of$155 to$160 million on anticipated consolidated comparable sales growth of 8 to 9%. And in news of a brand you never thought would be on this podcast, Chick-fil-A recently kicked off a year-long nostalgia campaign, joining a wave of major brands turning their archives into strategic brand assets.
9:11The fast food chain is releasing retro-inspired packaging and merchandising based on vintage design signaling a shift in how consumer brands monetize heritage. Chick-fil-A's play follows moves by Prada, Banana Republic, and Gucci, all reframing archival assets as platforms for cultural storytelling and commerce. For example, Prada is considering public access to its 53 ,000-piece archive. Banana Republic, Anna's old stomping ground, went further, acquiring a fan-run vintage archive and turning it into an official resale platform. Oh, it's worth saying that we did that in 2021 in June. That was the first thing that I did because that's the way to go.
9:59Go back to go forward. Sorry to interrupt. Go on. And Gucci turned its Florence archive into the literal stage for its Cruise 2026 collection at the end of last year. Across sectors, legacy brands are reclassifying archives as engines of brand equity, fueling limited drops, experiential spaces and new revenue streams. In a market obsessed with novelty, history is becoming a high margin differentiator where the public can engage with history through interactive and digital experiences and cultural products. Fashion retailer Aritzia reported a Q3 2026 net revenue of$1 billion, which is a 43 % increase year over year, with comparable sales surging 34%.
10:43The company beat earnings expectations with adjusted net income per diluted share, climbing 55 % to$1.10, driven by exceptional U.S. market performance, where revenue jumped 54 % to$621.1 million and now represents 60 % of total sales. CEO Jennifer Wong attributed this quarter's success to the launch of Aritzia's mobile app, new boutique offerings, and a strategic marketing investment that fueled up, quote-unquote, unparalleled demand for the brand's everyday luxury offering. Looking ahead, Aritzia projects a net revenue of$3.6 billion, which is a 33 % increase from fiscal 2025 and supported by 13 new boutique openings, 12 in the U.S.
11:28alone, and four repositions. The BBC reported that the USK beauty market has hit$2 billion, overtaking China as the number one market for Korean beauty brands. Viral TikTok ingredients like snail mucin, I have no idea what that is, heartleaf and rice water, move from niche into mainstream, triggering a turf war between Sephora, Ulta, Target and Costco as they race to lock in exclusive. Snail mucin, that means that thing that snail leaves behind. Korean beauty store chain, Olive Young, is preparing for its 2026 store debut. And the next phase of Korean beauty brands growth will be less about single product virality and more about discovery led retail.
12:12Category expansion into color and hair and consolidation of Korean beauty conglomerates. In board news, Ralph Lauren is adding NBC Universal News Group chairman Cesar Conde to its board. This falls in line with a broader shift in luxury where boards are being reshaped around brand perception, cultural relevance, and direct-to-consumer storytelling, with new power seats going to chief brand, culture, digital, and media operators. In other words, control of the narrative is becoming as valuable as control of the supply chain, especially as brands behave more like entertainment franchises. Players like Gucci and Masika have added or re-added chief brand officers whose remit spans PR, celebrity partnerships, social events, and visual merchandising, effectively centralizing narrative control as a C-suite power seat rather than mid-level marketing function.
13:04Even Gap, Inc. recently hired a chief entertainment officer. For decades, we've celebrated the rise of the smart home, knobless, switchless, effortless, and entirely orchestrated via apps. But as the Wall Street Journal recently reported, evidence suggests that screen-free, quote-unquote, dumb spaces are making a comeback. Many smart home features are losing their luster as they raise concerns about surveillance, and frankly, they just don't work. Google searches for, quote-unquote, how to reduce screen time reached an all-time high in 2025. And in the past four years on TikTok, videos tagged with, quote unquote, analog life hashtags, which catalog users embrace of old technology, physical media and low tech lifestyles received over 76 million views.
13:51And last month, Architectural Digest reported on nostalgia for old school tech. Landline in hand, cord twirled around fingers type of stuff. People are waking up to the idea that screens are getting in the way of real-life interactions and are taking steps through design choices to create an alternative place where people can be fully present. In sad news, Valentino Garavani passed away peacefully in his home in Rome at the age of 93. Born in 1932, Valentino founded his house in 1960 and became the architect of Valentino Red, a shade so specific and powerful it became a global brand asset. He was the go-to designer for the jet set, famously dressing Jackie Kennedy for her wedding to Aristotle Onassis and creating red carpet history for stars like Julia Roberts and Elizabeth Taylor.
14:42J.Crew has launched its first collection with the U.S. Ski Team and U.S. Snowboard Team, debuting a three-year partnership that names the brand the official lifestyle apparel partner for U.S. Ski and Snowboard as athletes head towards the Milan Cortina 2026 Winter Games. The 26-piece lineup spans refined knitwear, elevated loungewear, and essential cold-weather accessories for women, men, and kids anchored by vintage-inspired patches and alpine graphics pulled from J.Crew's archives. to capture a retro ski spirit with modern fit and color. Positioned at the intersection of style, sport, and community, the collection is designed for both sloped-side leisure and off-mountain wear and launches with a campaign featuring athletes including Colby Stevenson, Haley Langland, Rel Harwood, River Radimus, Tess Johnson, and Zach Miller with community-focused activations planned at U.S.
15:36ski and snowboard events throughout the winter season. And finally, the most brutal market move of the past two weeks is the widening gap between, quote-unquote, value and vogue. Mid-tier giants like Target and Caring, as we know as owner of Gucci, have struggled in the first two weeks of 2026. Target is losing value customers to Walmart, and Caring is losing prestige customers to Hermes. Retail analysts are calling this the great separation. Brands like Bershka and H &M have already responded by systematically reducing the number of items in their lower price tiers by 15 to 25 percent to move up market and avoid competing with ultra low cost entities like Xi 'an.
16:17And which, by the way, I think that is one of the biggest changes happening that not enough people are talking about. Like I see, you know, articles here and there talking about it. But with everybody talking about AI as the big kind of like structural tech driving change happening. I actually think this whole kind of K-shaped shift of the economy and its impact on literally everything, everything is such a huge story. And I just don't feel like enough people are talking about this. I agree with it. And I think that it started really not now. I think it started in 2019. And but because of pandemic, it sort of got interrupted.
17:02And then because of the influx of money in the economy afterwards, it got sort of masked. And now you see it again. But it did start back then when you had sort of two luxuries, super high and then super low and nothing in between. But I do agree that there has never been people who were ultra rich and ultra not. It's like Gilded Era levels of wealth concentration. I've seen a stat that is even worse because Robert Barron's controlled. I've seen I've seen it and I'm going to misspeak, but so don't like zero zero point four percent. And now today's Robert Barron's of the economy control like 11 percent.
17:57So even more. Oh, wow. I hadn't seen I hadn't seen that one. But yeah. Yeah. I have to see. I think it was in Financial Times or somewhere that I saw that they control a bigger percentage of economy than Robert Barron's. And that was an insanely unequal time. And even then, Robert Barron's gave back to society. Obviously, I'm not defending them, but they were building Cardinkey Hall, Met Museum. And those guys today, they're like building bunkers to hide from us. We pick up our pitchforks. islands and building things in New Zealand and Hawaii where only them and like their 10 people can like hide while the world class.
18:38I mean, I think the point that you make about the robber baron era and how, you know, explicitly the idea was, is like, how do you make as much money as possible so that you can do as much good in society as possible? I mean, if you read... PR tactic, they didn't want to do good, but in order not to be like, held. They had to, you know. Well, and there was probably some... There was a different social consciousness display. Yeah. And I mean, that's the main point that I'm kind of saying. Different aspiration, yes, of display of that wealth. Here's the interesting thing. If you look at the history of Rockefeller, because he was in oil and railways and everything, his entire belief system as a Christian was that it was his God-given responsibility to do anything he could to make as much money as possible so that he could then donate it and spend it to help as many people as possible.
19:33Like that is truly how he thought. And you can debate and argue with that and say that that's a perversion of Christianity and whatever. But the point here is that it's very different than what's happening now. And it's just, I don't know. I mean, we're sort of diverging. We should get back to like a whole conversation about merch right now. So it's sort of like how hard. Back to merch. I think that's absolutely relevant as we slide into conversation about merch. Because when you think about merch, it was something that existed completely outside of this. Completely outside of commodities system.
20:14And because it was tied to first music, it was made by fans and amateurs. It was not part of any retail company or brand. You went to a concert, you got a T-shirt, you were playing a video game. So it started in music and then it went to streetwear, to sport, to video games, to films and so on. But that was a signifier of your allegiance, of your fandom. And in that sense, it was not just a T-shirt. It was a symbol. Yeah. And why I think this is, and I know you agree, this is such like an important topic to talk about is because merch just isn't this like side game anymore. Exactly. Like you said, it's massive, massive business.
20:59It's the only genre that exists today, really. Wait, say more about that. Because you don't have any more menswear, womenswear, tailoring, sports. Like everything is one genre. You have urban sport. You have genre-less. You have like presenting one collection. You have what do you wear? Evening wear is now also sportswear. Before you had, I don't know, prep is now combined with grunge, is combined with streetwear, and streetwear is combined with luxury. You know, everything is sort of like, and also people don't search, oh, I need tailoring. They search for like, oh, I just like I want Balenciaga or I want X, Y, Z, you know.
21:44So in that sense, when you say you kind of like distinguish what merch is from the rest. Yeah. We don't need to kind of stick to that. But I do think that it is it has become a category of its own. It was not that thing, oh, you get something at the concert or you get something at the bar when your favorite band is playing. Not only to support the band, but more importantly, to signal that your taste, basically. In the simplest form to signal your taste, to signal where do you exist in that entire taste environment. And in that sense, it's not just a T-shirt. It's the opposite of a T-shirt because otherwise it's just cotton and whatnot.
22:32Yeah. And actually what makes this really relevant is, you know, if you look at what Disney did, Disney hired Bobby Kim as its global creative director of merch. And so, like, Disney's merch business is massive. It's$62 billion in sales. It sells products across 180 countries, across 100 categories, activates at all levels of the market. And so like Bobby's trying to like push all of this and do all these different collaborations with all these different fashion houses, trying to make it work at Walmart, trying to make it work on the Paris fashion runways. Like this is a huge pillar of Disney's business.
23:12And I think it's just it's emblematic of exactly what you said, that merch is its own genre. Merch is a business within itself now. Yes. And this is also where, so the first thing is merch was a signifier of a subculture of taste of fandom, allegiance, amateurs and specific niche, taste, niche, taste community. And now with Bobby, nothing against Bobby, it's the evolution, Disney calls that division consumer goods, which is unbelievably telling because merch went for something that's like a signifier into consumer goods, thanks to places like Hot Topic or Paxson and thanks to streetwear, which took merch from subculture to mainstream.
24:05When you think about what Supreme did over decades, which is having Thursday drops of merch in limited edition scarcity, which is by very definition, merch has to have scarcity because band shows in a town only for a day or a couple of days and so on, is they took dynamics of merch and commodified it. So Disney doesn't call it merch, it calls it consumer goods. So now if merch is a consumer good, it just took a signifier, separated it from that subculture and is selling a subculture as aesthetic. And I do think that is that friction removed. So there is no logic of a subculture. There is just aesthetic of subculture.
24:52And that is what makes this conversation now that we are having relevant, because is that really merch or is that a consumer good? that it still has its special place because aesthetically it represents certain subculture. So there is no meaning, there is no logic, but there is aesthetic of, say, collaboration with the streetwear. Or let's take Miss Chief's ultimate participation trophy that they did a few years ago with Tiffany, which is really the joke. Oh, I was just going to compliment you for subtly integrating some Hegelian philosophy into your description. Anytime. Anytime. Well done. I see you and I appreciate it.
25:43Thank you. Unfortunately, I'm showing heart to those who are not watching. But you know what? We do podcasts are the thing. Lee, you and I have a bright future. Let's go on YouTube because YouTube is now for years been watched on TVs. So I think we need it. First of all, we need an agent. And then we need some glam team, clearly. Well, for all the people who want extra credit from this podcast, go read Hegel and Dorada. You'll understand some more of the kind of key concepts that Ana's heading on. Anyway, back to much. Or the sociology of business on Substack. Yeah, yeah. It's always good to go to source material, though.
26:23Oh, don't. I have hyperlinks there. I'm sorry. No, finish your thought, and then I'm going to build on it. Well, my thought was, and I actually did want to start our examples with mischiefs because it is taking something completely out of context, something that seems like a merch, a trophy. Is that a merch or is it a work of art? Because it actually subverts what it's. The Ultimate Participation Trophy is actually not merch because it plays on Tiffany's long history of creating trophies for US Open. But it combines polo and tennis and when I say combines the figure that's represented on the actual trophy, has both a racket and has both a polo stick and is also on a horse and so on.
27:16It does multiple sports at the same time. And it's released in 100 units and anyone can buy it. So in a sense, there is scarcity of merch and there is a drop nature of merch. But because there is actual meaning and social commentary, it does have that previous role of merch that it had, but not aesthetically. What is the role that it aesthetically has? So that's a question for you, Lee. So it's a great question, but I want to take a step back for just a minute because I want to structure a little bit of what you said for everyone. So I think what's been really interesting in what you said and what we can kind of see over the history of merch is that there's effectively like three waves of merch.
28:03There's merch 1.0, which, as you said, came from the cultural markets and the cultural makers who were creating, you know, T-shirts and things like that for their fans. And like, you know, this is really what bands were doing at their concerts and stuff. You actually had to go there and experience the cultural moment. And you had this artifact to show that you were there. Then you get into the 2.0 phase, which where let's let's give hot topic credit they created the 2.0 phase where they would sell the nirvana t-shirt or these band t-shirts that you could buy without ever having had gone there right and so this is the mainstream commercialization of subcultures showing your association without actually having to participate in those cultures and so that's And even hundreds.
28:56And it's really relevant to say here that there was a concept of selling out and early streetwear brands were like, no, we are not going to produce more than 100 t-shirts and so on. But then the money was too good. And then the logic of capitalism took over. So, you know. Yeah, exactly. And then they all got rich and Bobby Huntworth is now the VP of Conumerable. Great job. You can hear it. Great job. It is a very funny thought to say that Supreme is just a descendant of Hot Topic. I think it exists. It's genetically related to the business model of Hot Topic. Anyway, moving on. So then there's merch 3.0, which is what we're starting to move into, which is like, you know, as you said in our conversation, it's about niche, secret.
29:49indecipherable merch, which is really hard to understand why people are so excited about it, why it's a big deal. And it's really responding to the fact that there is no such thing as mainstream culture anymore. Everything's fragmented. It's still - Oh, but wait, we're going to get to that. And I think we first need to stay with Merch 2.0, which is that mega commercial merch. And I do want to go back to ultimate participation trophy that makes fun of it. And it makes fun of it because it combines all sports together. It has a mainstream luxury brand under quotation marks. Tiffany was never luxury.
30:24Alvin Mates is trying to make it luxury. Good luck with that because Americans don't buy luxury. They do. But they're going to put rather like, they rather have a house with a garage for three cars than, you know, buy fifth Chanel bag. But that's just my observation. Correct me if I'm wrong. and that is a commentary on merch but other like for example take nike original high chicago which jordan wore where back at the time they released only in limited number of pairs made by htm team at nike only selected boutiques had there was a drop their only fans if you know you know could have them. That was actually the real merch at the commercial level because Nike made it.
31:18But it followed the original logic of merch, which is you need to know why is that relevant. You need to know the story, basically, not just aesthetic. I think that's one of the important kind of themes in all of this is that the merch has to have a if-you-know-you-know element to it. Not anymore, because look at Balenciaga IKEA bag made in the same color as IKEA but made in leather. That's closer to what Mischief has done with Ultimate Participation Trophy, because the joke is on you if you spend$2 ,000 and buy it. But isn't that still an if-you-know-you-know? It's a little bit of like... One in third European is inconceived in IKEA bed.
Read the full transcript
32:07Like everyone knows about IKEA. Like I guarantee that you had the Billy bookshelf at one point in your life. I didn't. I didn't. Statistically, it would seem that I would, but I didn't. But no, going back to the Balenciaga IKEA bag, but it's still... Or Gucci X, the hacker project, Gucci Balenciaga bag. That's like, that's merch. But like everyone knows the Gucci Balenciaga logo. So you wear that as a joke or the Hector bag from Tom Brown. But that's a bit of my point is like, you know the joke. That's why you pay for it. That's why it's made. It is commentary. Or you just want to be like, I have$2 ,000 to pay and I'm just going to buy like IKEA.
32:51It's, you know. Yes, but there will always be those types of people who want to just pay that much because it has a logo on it. Yeah. Sure, like Jonathan Anderson pigeon bag. Yeah, right. But it's the origination of the project has a story, has an insider point of view imprinted upon it, which drives the design and the decisions around it, right? That is the whole point, that that insider point of view has been commercialized and turned into aesthetic. It doesn't have any meaning. It's just aesthetic. Like H &M Dime Square t-shirt. Like Dime Square hasn't been cool in years. Like years. And now H &M, which belongs to, like, they're now even differentiating from Shien.
33:43They put it on a t-shirt and you wear Dime Square t-shirt and what? You're like cutting edge. You're cool. Like you're still signaling, oh, I identify with that scene. Aesthetic. Yeah. But not meaningful. Not logically. So what do you think has been the consequence of merch 2.0? It's just that it became aesthetic. It became a fashion genre. It's something that what we are seeing with nostalgia, it just became something that you use to sell more stuff, which is, again, it's a fashion genre. It's a fashion aesthetic. Right. So you basically take culture, take aesthetics from different subcultures and put it on a T-shirt, or you create objects through which you engage culture, but not in any real way.
34:29It's just, they're just commodities, which is exact opposite of Merch 1.0. But let's go back to Merch 3.0, which I think is going to go back to Merch 1.0, except none of us are going to know about it because it's going to be like small and they're going to be secret and they're going to be truly, if you know, you know, and we're not going to wear them for status signaling at all. So, I mean, I agree with that in that Merch 2.0 turned it into big business, but effectively like drained the soul from it. Whereas Merch 3.0 - Drain meaning we don't need to go like, we don't need to get emotional about it.
35:08We can just take, it just took out the logic out of it. It just took out the connection with the subculture. It's just pure surface, aesthetic, but we are. Okay. So then 3.0 says, well, this is still big business And there's still high value in this stuff from a commercial standpoint, but we need to get back to the point where there's the story and the meaning built into the products. And rather than doing it at scale, do it in a more niche way. Right. But I'm not going to wear or carry or have that merch in order to show you. I'm just going to have it for me and for those small others, small group of others that it connects me to.
35:52That's it. So like before, I would wear a T-shirt that is going to connect me before digital and say, hey, we are like-minded others. Right now, it was a signal that we belong to the same group. Here, it's not even going to be that. I think it's just going to be something that's super private and for me. So when I go to, like, say, a secret members club or something like that and they have matches or something, I'm not going to take a photo and put it on Instagram because that will be merch 1.0. I'm just going to have it because that is enough to say that I belong to that club. It's like secret society.
36:33When we talk about it in that sense of like it's intentionally private and sort of in a way protected to be private so that it isn't commercialized too much. It's sort of interesting when you think about it in the context of some of the other stuff that we kind of talked about, this sort of like anti-digital, this anti-social media type of stuff where we want to get off. We want to be analog. We want to return to something that exists entirely offline and stuff. I mean, you know, humans always have this need to signal status. Do you like how how really possible is that? But not signaling status is the ultimate status signaling.
37:11Yes, I agree with that. But there will always be those people who learn those codes and then try to to display their understanding of those codes for their own status. status and therefore that's the blend and then the heikla then moves on and that's how true that's how symbols evolve absolutely true absolutely yeah so would you say the tom brown hector bag is an example of merch 3.0 or 2.0 2.0 thousand percent because like you if if it was if tom brown was more popular i mean it's not a this it would you could find it on canal street Like knockoffs, like you see knockoffs of everyone else. So, because it's so, but maybe Tom Brown has something that I don't know about.
38:05And that's really for only those who are his inner circle. So what would be a merch 3.0? What's that? What is something you own? Well, if I tell you, I would have to kill you clearly. Well, you know, I think it still has to be analog objects. And we still have a lot, like, I think that's where the real creativity comes in. And that's where real craftsmanship and artistry and originality comes in. It's just that we won't have the need to broadcast it. Yes, you're absolutely right. Humans always have the need. But the point is that you don't want to go and wear a dime-squared T-shirt. You're going to live that.
38:51I'm just using dime squares analogy, which is probably not even like right. But if you have that secret society, just being in that secret society is your thing. And then once you have reverse network effects, when that secret society becomes too big, you're going to move to another one. And that is exactly that K-shaped aspiration when you have a lot of those who are super high secret private club societies and those that are mega mess and using those symbols. And of course, some of those symbols from private are going to leak out. But you had to be there, which is exactly the Merch 1.0, but you're not going to broadcast it.
39:33Because it's lame. Broadcasting is lame. I believe in that. No, no, no, no. I agree with that. Because we're back to analog. The fact that Banana Republic is doing this five years later, it's like still, it's lame. You know what I mean? The point is being ahead of time. Yeah. Do it when no one else is doing. Yeah. No, I get that. All right. So then let's do this. Let's move into a segment that we're doing specifically for this podcast. it's a new game show called merch or not merch i feel like we should have like a soundtrack of like a crowd saying merch or not merch yes then like team song okay yeah exactly
40:19okay so here's what we're doing in the merch anna's gonna ask me 10 different examples of what's merch or not merch in a rapid fire segment i'm gonna say yes or no i'll do the same thing with Ana, and this is trying to figure out what borderline objects are merch or not merch. So, Ana, do you want to go first or do you want me to go first? Sure, I'm ready. Ritz and frame hoodie that says concierge. Wait, what? I don't even know what you just said. The Ritz Hotel. Oh, the Ritz Hotel. And frame brand hoodie that says concierge. Oh. Not merch. Why? It is merch. Oh, it's merch. I mean, but like, who wants to wear concierge?
41:07Okay. Jumeirah Heritage Club Cap. Jumeirah Hotel in Dubai. Heritage Club Cap. Merch. Yes. White Lotus CB2 chair. Not merch. Correct. It's collab. Burberry Ice Cube. Not merch? Not. It's a brand activation. It's going to melt. I mean. There's no secondary market for it, therefore. It's not even a primary market past five minutes. Can you imagine, like, the Burberry superfan, like, obsessively buying this for, like,$10 ,000 and obsessively protecting this ice cube? I know. And put it in a glass case. Balenciaga and Erwan Black Drink. Not merch. No. It's activation. Balenciaga and Erwan hoodie. Merch.
42:05Yes. Erwan strawberry glaze smoothie. Not merch. It's a product. Amman bathrobe. Merch. No, it's not. It's part of their collection. But it's not a core offering. It is. The core offering is hospitality. No, you can steal it and say I was there, but it's part of their, you know, you get that when you stay at the hotel. Okay. All right. Supreme Brick. Supreme Brant. Ooh, Supreme Brick. Merch. No, I think it's art. Okay. All right. There's no, like, story behind it? I don't know. I would have to go back and find, but it's only 101. Okay. I mean, you know? Yeah, yeah, I get it. And then O32C, which is a magazine, remove before sex socks, which you have to put a specific, they're Berlin-based.
42:59And if you grew in Europe and watched in your middle school soft, erotic German movies, just for the giggles with your girlfriends, you would know that Germans were known to keep socks on during sex. So remove before sex white socks. Is that merch or not merch? Let's go with merch. Well, it's hard to tell. And I'm going to give you that one. It's hard to tell. It did start as merch. But that product sold so well that it spun the entire ready-to-wear line that created the entire O32C brand that presented Paris Fashion Week starting 24. But I'm giving you that one. So, one, two, three, four. I think you had seven correct ones, three wrong ones.
43:52Okay. So, congratulations. So I got a D. No, you get B minus. B minus. Or maybe strong C, C plus, C plus. Good. And then, you know. We're going to grade on a curve. The whole class did pretty poorly because, you know, borderline merge is really hard to tell. So, you know. No. 70 % is actually a C minus. See, I'm more like generous and you did well. Okay. All right. Okay. So, all right. Your turn. So. Yes. Let's start with the product sold at the current MoMA Mart, which is the MoMA Design Store's limited edition pop-up installation. I know what it is, and it is merch. It is merch. Agreed. And by the way, I'm just helping people on the listening side understand what it is.
44:38We know you know everything, so this is really to help other people catch up. This is Sauron's eye. Okay. Next up, Balenciaga's Gaffer Tape Bengal. Merch? Not merch. I don't even know what it is. It's part of their collection. Do you know what gaffer tape is? It's like a roll of tape. Oh, yeah, I know. Like a wide roll of tape that's a bangle on your head. I know exactly what you mean, but I just didn't know how you guys call it. Okay, my bad. Okay. One correct, one wrong. Okay. Not merch. Not merch. Dior's Book Totes that just came out. Yes. Merch for literati. Four literati. Rainbow Labubu, which is one of the most sought-after variants.
45:22Is that a rare one? That is a super rare one. It's one of the most sought-after versions. But it's not merch because that's like Labubu, not merch. Yes, not merch. The sporty and rich health club sweatshirt. No, not merch. Exactly. It's fabricated. It's not actually representing anything. This one's a good one. the Ralph Lauren by Rake watch. The which one? Which is, it's a watch with the Ralph Lauren bear snowboarding on the face of the watch. It's a 300 piece limited. No, it's not merch. It's not merch. It's a collab. But really interestingly, it's a link to hip hop history where Raekwon from the Wu-Tang wore a remixed Ralph Lauren parka with the word Snow Beach on it.
46:19And it ended up becoming a very famous piece of hip-hop culture and stuff. Anyway, so this watch is a callback to that. And the parka that the bear is wearing on the front of it is the parka that Raekwon was wearing. And so it's actually more of like a limited drop collaboration than it is a piece of merch. Ralph is the best. Online ceramics t-shirts. I think they're merch by definition. Yeah, they're merch. Because everything they make is merch, even though it's their core offering, but they're always doing it in collaboration with like A24 and bootleg movies and stuff. A Chobani branded thermos.
47:01Yes, I think it's made to be merch, no? No, it's not merch. It's hot? Oh my God. No, it's just company swag. It's just, you know, a thing with a logo. stamped on it. Swag is merch. Yeah, it's not really merch. Really? Merch has to have a story behind it. It has to have some sort of cultural capital behind it. Just slapping a logo on a thermos isn't merch. I would argue that swag is merch. Why? Because that's what you get at a corporate event. That's how you know you've been there. When your boss asks you what did you do on Thursday morning after Christmas, you're like, I was at your corporate offsite.
47:37Well, maybe we can agree that swag is the lowest form of merch the saddest the saddest form of merch here's the sad merch okay i think it is because that's like at the event you get that stuff you know when you go also trade shows you go to little stress balls and shit that's also yeah all right it's smart lowest form saddest form of merch all right next up arame's bridge playing cards i don't think they are i think they're like product category correct it's not it's more of like an aspirational souvenir. Yeah. Okay. Last one. Donald Trump's meme coin. Oh, damn it. No, I think that's his revenue stream.
48:19One of his revenue streams. It's not merch. I actually think it's merch. You do? I absolutely think it's merch. Donald Trump runs a merch business, just like his gold shoes, like his whatever they are,$300 gold shoes. This is something that is like, it's a currency. You can like, you know, you can buy shit with it. You can't buy shit with gold and gold. You can't though. You can't trade the meme. You can't trade the Trump meme coin for something. You can't use Trump meme coin to buy stuff? It's just you hold it and then he liquidates all the money and he keeps it all. But like, that's what it is.
48:56It has a picture of him holding up his fist saying fight, fight, fight. So it's that whole story. How many of those are there? I have no idea. Well, there you go. Well, there's like... I don't know. Do they change value? Do they fluctuate in value? Yeah, they do. I don't think it's merch. I think it's an interesting, blurring the line, new form of merch. Anyway. I'm either 9-1 or 8-2. So either way, I win. So whatever you want. As long as I win. You always win, Ana. Always. Well, farm game, that's not true, dude. It's close. It's close. You keep me on my toes. You keep me on my toes at all times.
49:36In the next episode, we're going to talk why virality is dead or what happens when algorithms that one nourished virality are now the reason of its demise. Stay tuned. Thank you, Lee. Thanks, Anna.
From the publisher
Is Millionaire Speedy a luxury bag or merch? What about the Balenciaga Maxi Pack?
The term “merch” originally referred to items made for music fans, where items like t-shirts were sold on a band’s and musician’s tour. From music, merch spread to sports, film, gaming, art, fashion, design, travel, and entertainment. Merch’s original value has never been in the physical item itself–after all, a band shirt is just a tshirt, but in the social and cultural capital associated with it. Partly this stemmed from the fact that originally one could buy merch at concerts, thus signaling true allegiance to a cultural artifact. Thus, unintentionally, merch also operated on the concept of scarcity.
This social and cultural capital made merch the opposite of a commodity. Commodities are interchangeable (who can tell the difference between a Polo and a Tommy Hilfiger shirt if it wasn’t for the logo?); merch was a unique expression of a specific time, place, community, and context. First streetwear brands, often run by music enthusiasts in the pre-e-ecommerce age, also operated on the same principle.
The nature of merch changed as merch became commoditized in the early 1990s by Hot Topic, a chain store that gave access to band t-shirts to teenage mall rats. At the same time as streetwear became more important, it also turned merch into a commodity, which became even more ubiquitous with the rise of e-commerce. These developments removed the necessary friction that made merch a valuable cultural symbol. In the past, a person wearing a Nirvana t-shirt was probably a fan of the band’s music, today no such guarantee exists (and many more shirts are sold). This often precludes one of the original purposes of merch, a signaling of belonging to a certain subculture.
Still, the meaning of merch has not disappeared, but merely shifted. A person wearing a logoed Balenciaga tee is also signaling some kind of meaning, as is the person wearing one with the logo of A24, the trendy film production company or H&M’s infamous “Dimes Square” tshirt. The need for signaling through one’s possessions has not gone away, but, in the world of social media, increased.
Recently, we’ve heard:
Merch is a status symbol.
Merch is a subgenre.
Merch is a style statement.
Merch is an identity marker.
Merch is past its peak.
But all those takes miss the reality that merch has become big business.
What used to live on the edges of culture has moved to the center of the retail economy. The side show has become the main act.
In this episode, we explore what happens when consumers learn to buy everything as merch — and why the future of merch is niche, secret and indecipherable to the mainstream.
Listen to our conversation above, or on iTunes, Spotify or YouTube.
Get full access to The Sociology of Business at andjelicaaa.substack.com/subscribe




