In short
Podcast Summary: How I Invest with David Weisburd - Episode E324
Episode Title
How The University of Cambridge Built Their Privates Portfolio Guest: Sam Sturge, Head of Private Equity, University of Cambridge Endowment Release Date: [Insert Release Date]
---
Key Themes and Topics
Introduction to Sam Sturge
- Background: Sam Sturge transitioned from Morgan Stanley to Partners Capital before taking on the role at Cambridge.
- Position: Head of Private Equity for the University of Cambridge’s £4.5 billion endowment.
Building the Private Equity Portfolio
- Objective: Rebuild the private equity investment team and significantly increase the allocation to private equity.
- Mission Statement: Preserve or increase the endowment's real value for generations with a target return of inflation plus 5%.
Investment Philosophy
- Focus on Buyouts and Venture Capital:
- Buyouts: Managers have the ability to influence operations and pursue long-term strategies, leading to higher returns.
- Venture Capital: Investment in early-stage disruptive technologies can yield significant outlier successes if aligned with the right firms.
Alignment and Trust
- Manager Relationships: Well-aligned incentives between limited partners (LPs) and general partners (GPs) are crucial for trust and performance.
- Psychology of Investment: Successful investors are inherently competitive and motivated by generating returns rather than asset gathering.
Market Dynamics
- Current Challenges:
- DPI (Distributions to Paid-In Capital) crisis affecting private equity and venture capital allocations.
- Contrarian view: Less competition among limited partners could provide opportunities for better returns.
Liquidity Management
- Importance of understanding net asset value (NAV) marks and maintaining a sustainable liquidity profile.
Quality vs. Quantity in Investment
- The value of focusing on a smaller number of strong relationships, enhancing trust and ensuring alignment in objectives.
---
Key Discussions
Manager Selection and Evaluation
- Historical Performance Analysis: Must differentiate between luck and actual skill.
- Openness in Mistakes: Transparency from managers about missteps can build trust.
Innovation and Competitive Landscape in Venture Capital
- Shift in Power Dynamics: Founders now hold more power in choosing venture capital partners, making differentiation crucial for firms.
- Structural Alpha: Some firms consistently outperform; the challenge lies in predicting who can sustain success.
Long-term Perspective
- The University of Cambridge’s long-term investment strategy aligns well with their historical legacy and time horizon.
- Importance of maintaining continuity in investment strategy and team to foster long-term relationships.
Advice for Young Investors
- Networking: Building a strong professional network is essential for career development and investment opportunities.
- Focus on Relationships: Investing time in nurturing connections with mentors and peers pays long-term dividends.
---
Conclusion This episode of How I Invest provides deep insights into the strategic approach of the University of Cambridge's private equity portfolio under Sam Sturge's leadership. Sturge emphasizes the importance of alignment, long-term thinking, and the value of strong relationships in investment success. The discussion reflects broader trends in the private equity landscape, addressing challenges and opportunities for institutional investors.
Call to Action: If you found this conversation insightful, consider sharing it with someone in your network or leaving a review to help more investors discover the show.
---
End of Summary
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOBuilding Cambridge's Private Equity Portfolio
0:45 to 2:30
Sam discusses his role in building the private equity portfolio at Cambridge University.
“At the core of it, what is the mission objectives for the endowment as a whole?”
Mission Objectives and Target Returns
2:30 to 4:40
Overview of Cambridge's endowment goals and return targets.
“And within that, it comes down to alignment.”
Core Strategies: Buyouts and Venture Capital
4:40 to 7:00
Discussion on the strategies of buyouts and venture capital in the investment approach.
“For decades, only the largest hedge funds could afford extensive channel research programs to spot inflection points before earnings and to stay ahead of consensus.”
Manager Alignment and Incentives
7:00 to 10:10
Exploration of manager incentives and alignment with limited partners.
“I think at the end of the day, it comes down to people.”
The Psychology of Successful Investors
11:30 to 13:00
Insights into what drives great investors versus asset gatherers.
“general partners having theoretically less competition should be a great thing looking forward.”
Navigating the Current Venture Capital Landscape
13:00 to 14:00
Discussion on the venture capital market and its challenges.
“So naturally, if one is holding it at a much higher valuation or even a much lower valuation than the others, that's good impetus to start a conversation.”
Understanding Valuation Challenges
14:00 to 15:22
Learn about the complexities of aligning capital managers and the importance of data transparency.
“It comes back to the alignment point that we talked about before.”
The Importance of Long-Term Transparency
18:52 to 19:55
Explore the significance of long-term thinking and transparency in investment relationships.
Building Trust Through Performance
19:56 to 22:16
Understand the dynamics of trust between LPs and GPs based on performance and relationships.
“And as people see that, they're incentivized to think more long term versus other organizations.”
Learning from Mistakes in Investment
22:17 to 26:04
Hear an example of how acknowledging mistakes can strengthen partnerships with investors.
“And I think you can kind of take this multiple ways.”
Show all 15 chapters
Focus and Simplicity in Investment Strategy
26:05 to 28:00
Discover the benefits of simplicity and focus in investment strategies for better outcomes.
“capture that lightning in a pan, they just assume, well, how about over here?”
The Value of Time and Experience in Investing
28:00 to 29:50
Learn how high-quality interactions with experienced managers shape investment success.
Understanding Competition in Venture Capital
29:50 to 31:41
Explore the shifting dynamics in venture capital and the role of founders today.
“The science is being quickly commoditized by AI.”
The Art and Science of Investment Performance
31:41 to 33:15
Discover the balance between analytical tools and human judgment in investing.
“The art is, will they continue to perform?”
Networking as a Key to Career Success
33:15 to 34:19
Understand the importance of building a strong professional network over time.
“I don't think you can ever invest early enough in your network and build that up over time.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Sam Sturge:So Sam, you've had an incredible career going from Morgan Stanley to then Partners Capital. But I want to start with, how did you came to run private equity at Cambridge University?
0:11David Weisburd:Six years ago now, our CIO had joined a few months before, was looking to rebuild the whole investment team, and also just looking to increase the allocation to private equity substantially. I think all those kind of factors really kind of married with, I guess, my long term ambitions and motivations, which for some reason I love private equity and the ability to kind of take this brand and use that to leverage to build a world class portfolio was just too good an opportunity to pass up.
0:42Sam Sturge:You were building for one of the most historic institutions in the world, but you were more or less building it from scratch. How did you go about doing that?
0:51David Weisburd:At the core of it, what is the mission objectives for the endowment as a whole? It is to preserve or increase the real value of the endowment for not just decades, but centuries to come. We have a distribution rate of 4 % and we want to have a margin of safety. So that means we have a target return for the whole endowment of inflation plus 5%. I'll admit that's a relatively high return target. And so it's therefore really important for us to have a meaningful allocation to risk assets. Um, we believe that priority should have the highest return out of all asset classes. And so naturally makes sense for us to have a large allocations to the asset class.
1:30David Weisburd:Why do we think that's the case? Um, I think firstly, I'm going to, I think probably for me, and just trying to keep it simple because there's many different strategies. It's kind of focusing mainly on buyouts and venture capital as the two core asset classes here, two core strategies here. Within buyout, we just believe managers have the ability to influence the operations and strategic directions of businesses. And they also have a longer term focus than say in public markets where people are very focused on quarterly earnings and shorter term decision making. And so managers that have that skill and differentiation should lead to kind of longer term revenue and earnings growth and naturally then higher returns.
2:13David Weisburd:on the venture side i don't think we necessarily believe the market will have the highest absolute returns out of all asset classes but we do believe investing in early stage disruptive technologies has the potential to deliver outlier success if you're partnered with the right firms who are investing in the right companies it is a people business a private fund can last for 15 years or more and that's a considerable amount of time to be spending with these people and i I think there is just a fundamental question of, do you want to be in business with these people for that amount of time? And within that, it comes down to alignment.
2:52David Weisburd:Are the managers' incentives and motivations truly aligned with what we view as success?
2:57Sam Sturge:How do you ascertain that? How do you look at incentives and figure out whether you as the LP are aligned with the manager?
3:07David Weisburd:That's a really good question. The endowment is about four and a half billion pounds, which is obviously a lot of money, but in the grand scheme of financial assets is relatively modest, which I think gives us the real privilege that we are focused to deliver the best risk adjusted returns rather than on deploying capital. And so that alignment really boils down to that, which is, are the key decision makers at an investment organization, are they motivated to deliver outlier returns rather than necessarily build a large business focused on asset management and focused on gathering management fees?
3:52Sam Sturge:What do you find psychologically that drives those that want to be great investors versus great asset gatherers?
3:58David Weisburd:We spend way too much time or maybe it is the right amount of time talking about this amongst the team if we look at our managers that have sustained our performance for a considerable amount of time it comes down to she just a inert competitiveness they want to win and they view winning is generating the best returns compared to their peers and they will move heaven and earth to do that even after kind of reaching financial security and in some ways doing doing it more for the love of generating those returns than the economic incentives that flow from that.
4:35Sam Sturge:One of the hardest things of investing is seeing what's shifting before everyone else does. For decades, only the largest hedge funds could afford extensive channel research programs to spot inflection points before earnings and to stay ahead of consensus. Meanwhile, smaller funds have been forced to cobble together ad hoc channel intelligence or rely on stale reports from sell side shops. But channel checks are no longer a luxury. They're becoming table stakes for the industry. The challenges has always been scale, speed, and consistency. That's where AlphaSense comes in. AlphaSense is redefining channel research.
5:08Sam Sturge:Instead of static point-in-time reports, AlphaSense channel checks delivers a continuously refreshed view of demand, pricing, and competitive dynamics powered by interviews with real operators, suppliers, distributors, and channel partners across the value chain. Thousands of consistent channel conversations every month deliver clean, comparable signals, helping investors spot inflection points weeks before they show up in earnings or consensus estimates. The best part, these proprietary channel checks integrate directly into AlphaSense's research platform trusted by 75 % of the world's top hedge funds with access to over 500 million premium sources.
5:44Sam Sturge:From company filings and brokerage research to news, trade journals, and more than 240 ,000 expert call transcripts. That context turns raw signal into conviction. The first to see wins, the rest follow. Check it out for yourself
5:57David Weisburd:at alpha-sense.com slash how I invest.
6:01Sam Sturge:It's where the managers get their ego and their ego attachment. Some managers get their ego from, I have all this AUM, I have all these management fees. Other managers actually get it from, I have the best fund. I'm not an asset gatherer. I have the best returns. I have the smartest strategies and I'm doing well for my LP. So it's really about where you get your sense of purpose and your ego.
6:24David Weisburd:That's completely right.
6:26Sam Sturge:So let's double click on venture specifically. Andres Norwich just raised the largest venture fund in history. There's other venture managers that are very tactical and very capacity constrained and focus on having smaller funds. Where in the market is it an asset to have capital and where in the market do you really want to be constrained?
6:52David Weisburd:Million dollar question, isn't it? We believe there are many ways to win. Um, and I think kind of taking that example that you, that you just highlighted with Andreessen, I think at the end of the day, it comes down to people. And so how many exceptional people do you have that are seeking to invest the amount of capital that you have? And that can be in a fund of$20 million through to an institution that's, that's raised$15 billion. dollars um and i think the manager needs to know or any asset owner or manager needs to know what are their competitive advantages and what are their rights to win within venture there is this reinforcing brand effect where people that have a desire to be successful want to be associated with successful brands and firms that have backed those amazing companies before and And in a world which has never been so competitive, having that, the scale and resources to make their portfolio companies heard sounds like a very attractive strategy.
8:04David Weisburd:On the other side, whilst we're living in this era of incredible innovation, there's still how many truly transformative companies are going to be created per year? and how does that then, how many of those companies or what market share does a firm raising that amount of capital need to invest in?
8:24Sam Sturge:For endowments, where does your capital structure give you an advantage and how do you push that advantage in venture?
8:31David Weisburd:Well, I just said in terms of the managers, I think we need to put onto ourselves. And I think, I talk about it a lot with my colleagues where I think we need to look at ourselves and say, well, what is our advantages? And I think, yes, we can go with endowments initially where they are long-term perpetual pools of capital where they should have the ability to be consistent and loyal investors. And I think also another key point is that the returns are going to charitable and positive activities, which I think on the margin will, investment managers do prefer. But I think then we have to look at ourselves and we can say, well, I mentioned our size before, which gives us an advantage where we can maybe make smaller commitments to managers.
9:28David Weisburd:So with those capacity-constrained managers, a$10 million commitment is a lot easier to get into these capacity-constrained managers. And that can still be very meaningful for us. We're also increasingly looking at how can we connect the venture managers with the research centers within the university. In the end, Cambridge is one of the world-leading centers of excellence for artificial intelligence, for robotics, for quantum computing, for material science, which acting as a conduit for that should be incredibly attractive for venture capital firms.
10:10Sam Sturge:right now there's this dpi crisis as some people have labeled it which is before 2024 you have on average 24 dpi per year last two years have been nine percent dpi in alternatives so a lot of lps are asking themselves should we be deploying more into private equity into venture or should we wait until more DPI is made available? The contrarian point to that would be everybody is vacating the space. Why not be offensive and capture market share? Where do you sit on those two sides of the continuum and why?
10:55David Weisburd:I think it's great if everyone is saying not to invest. I think private equity has matured as an asset class over the last 30 years. And I think for us, I think as people kind of, that may be kind of more here for shorter term, I think for us where we just fundamentally believe in what I talked about earlier in terms of the reasons why private equity has a right to generate significant returns above and beyond public markets. I think net fewer limited partners competing for those best general partners and those general partners having theoretically less competition should be a great thing looking forward.
11:40David Weisburd:On the kind of specific point on liquidity and DPI, for us, it's always been very important to manage our liquidity and not get over us as skis on the liquidity and be truly reliant on distributions in any particular year. How much do you trust your nav marks in your portfolio today?
12:02Sam Sturge:How much credence do you give to them?
12:06David Weisburd:It's a good question. We obviously speak to our managers on a regular basis, spend a lot of time traveling and spending time with them in person, reviewing the monitoring, the quarterly reports. And every six months we do a big exercise across the portfolio on looking at the earnings growth and revenue growth and the margins and the leverage and everything like that. So we have very good visibility into the underlying assets that we hold. A job for us is not to question whether or not a company should be marked up or down by 5%, 10%. But I think with that, you get a good feeling of whether or not a manager is more aggressive or more conservative on their marks.
12:50David Weisburd:our general bias has been towards more quality focused managers where they are more focused on i would say they prefer to give good news and so we've generally seen more prudent valuations slower markups as public comparables have risen up and i think on average we see a markup on exit of our buyout companies in the region of 20 to 30%. When we're looking, re-underwriting a manager, we spend a lot of time going through historical portfolios and making sure that we feel comfortable with how they're marking and compare and contrast them to the rest of the portfolio. And so it's always interesting to see when you have a venture-backed company as owned by multiple managers within our portfolio, and we can kind of compare and contrast to see the valuations that each of them are holding at.
13:49David Weisburd:So naturally, if one is holding it at a much higher valuation or even a much lower valuation than the others, that's good impetus to start a conversation.
13:58Sam Sturge:Do you think all things being equal, LPs have incentive for their GPs to actually mark up their book and mark more aggressively?
14:06David Weisburd:It comes back to the alignment point that we talked about before.
14:09Sam Sturge:Because there's alignment with the manager of that pool of capital. There's this principal agent problem that exists on the LP side as well.
14:15David Weisburd:I can see that for us or say for me, where the time horizon looking forward and building this portfolio is for decades to come. I think the underlying value is what really matters. And so, and I think it is a far easier, you build a lot more trust with your stakeholders and with your limited partners and with the general partners. I would say if you are conservative on those valuations and then you surprise on the upside. we do take a lot of notes when say if a manager that is not doing so well on the performance side ahead of it the next subsequent fundraise you start seeing markups in that portfolio and i think that for us then is really important to when you have that underlying data of the revenue growth and the ebitda growth so i think it's a far easier conversation to have with a manager when you say well, you've marked up your portfolio by 30%, but your earnings are only up by 10%.
15:17David Weisburd:Can you please explain to us why you've changed the valuation multiple of these companies?
15:22Sam Sturge:When you want more, you start your business with Northwest Registered Agent. They give you access to thousands of free guides, tools, and legal forms to help you launch and protect your business all in one place. With Northwest, you're not just forming an LLC, you're building your complete business identity from what customers see to what they don't see, like operating agreements, meeting minutes, and compliance paperwork, you get more privacy, more guidance, and more free resources to grow the right way. Northwest has been helping founders and entrepreneurs for nearly 30 years. They're the largest registered agent LLC service in the US with over 1500 corporate guides, real people who know your local laws and help you every step of the way.
15:58Sam Sturge:What I love is how fast you can build your business identity with their free resources. You could access thousands of forms, step by step guides, and even lawyer drafted operating agreements and bylaws without even creating an account. Northwest makes life easy for business owners. They don't just help you from your company, they give you the tools you need after you form it. And with Northwest, privacy is automatic. They never sell your data because privacy by default is their pledge. Don't pay hundreds or thousands of dollars for what you could get from Northwest for free. Visit northwestregisteredagent.com slash invest free and start using free resources to build something amazing.
16:34Sam Sturge:Get more with Northwest Registered Agent at northwestregisteredagent.com slash invest free. When you want more, you start your business with Northwest Registered Agent. They give you access to thousands of free guides, tools, and legal forms to help you launch and protect your business all in one place. With Northwest, you're not just forming an LLC, you're building your complete business identity from what customers see to what they don't see, like operating agreements, meeting minutes, and compliance paperwork. You get more privacy, more guidance, and more free resources to grow the right way.
17:05Sam Sturge:Northwest has been helping founders and entrepreneurs for nearly 30 years. They're the largest registered agent LLC service in the US with over 1500 corporate guides, real people who know your local laws and help you every step of the way. What I love is how fast you can build your business identity with their free resources. You could access thousands of forms, step by step guides, and even lawyer drafted operating agreements and bylaws without even creating an account. Northwest makes life easy for business owners. They don't just help you from your company. They give you the tools you need after you form it.
17:35Sam Sturge:And with Northwest, privacy is automatic. They never sell your data because privacy by default is their pledge. Don't pay hundreds or thousands of dollars for what you could get from Northwest for free. Visit northwestregisteredagent.com slash invest free and start using free resources to build something amazing. Get more with Northwest Registered Agent at northwestregisteredagent.com slash invest free. Let's be honest, subscriptions out of fast streaming services, apps, memberships you forgot you even signed up for, and canceling them is usually a pain. That's where Experian subscription cancellation comes in.
Read the full transcript
18:12Sam Sturge:Experian can take the pain out of canceling subscriptions by handling it for you. You just keep the ones you want and put money back in your pocket. Over 200 subscriptions are cancelable. You can also save money by letting Experian negotiate the rates on your bills. They'll keep an eye out for new deals and saving opportunities and negotiate directly with your provider on your behalf. And the best part, you keep 100 % of your savings. Get started with Experian app today. Results will vary. Not all bills or subscriptions are eligible. Savings not guaranteed. Paid memberships with a connected payment account required.
18:50Sam Sturge:See Experian.com for details.
18:52David Weisburd:And I think unless you have that transparency see and the ability to kind of go into that amount of detail it is always going to be a a sticking point and this may be one of the real benefits the endowment where i think everyone has a long-term horizon where if i kept on coming to the boards that we have saying look we've had these amazing markups but then coming back to them six months or a year or two years later and saying oh yeah that great markup I told you about it ended up being sold for a discount to that I think that would quickly erode trust between us so I think it's again you have to get the incentives right within us as an organization and I think we need to be very much focused on that long term turtles all the way
19:42Sam Sturge:all the way down what are the incentives of the GPs what are the incentives of the people at the seat at the LP, what incentives are the underlying capital pools doing with those people in those seats? For example, some organizations, I interviewed the CIO of CalSTRS that was there for 23 years. He built a very enduring team. And as people see that, they're incentivized to think more long term versus other organizations. When they're turning people every three to five years, they're not going to have the same incentives as an organization that's known for giving people long runway. So it's really incentives all the way down.
20:21David Weisburd:Completely agree. And I think I mentioned it briefly at the start, but I think that we have the time horizon of the institution, which the university is over 800 years old now, which kind of thing really puts things into perspective. But I think also if you look at the time horizon of the team and of the individuals and without CIO joining in early 2020 and myself and my senior colleagues joining around a similar time, I think kind of having that mindset of the team where we're building something for the next 10, 20, 30 years and there's all having that long-term time horizon, I do think brings a lot more alignment, a lot more trust.
21:05Sam Sturge:Hi, Professor Steve Kaplan on. He wrote a famous paper, do private equity funds manipulate reported returns. And TLDR, on average, they tend to skew conservative, but managers on their fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth fund tend to be more conservative than emerging managers that may be struggling to raise capital. So there's also you have to look at those incentives. It's all fine and dandy to say the GP should have long term incentives if they're struggling to raise and they have this existential crisis. they're going to be more likely to over inflate their marks whether consciously or subconsciously versus somebody that's trying to build a hundred year relationship with cambridge and wants them
21:46David Weisburd:to invest for the next 10 funds completely agree and i think that's where we're in a very privileged position where we run a relatively concentrated portfolio so across buyout and venture capital we have around 30 relationships and uh you'll probably have a better number for me but there's well over 10 000 venture capital firms and i think a similar number for the buyout firms and so we have the privilege of being selective and kind of running through that and and again it comes back to this alignment point at the start i think if we find a manager that and we do our diligence and we find something erroneous in their reporting or their valuations it's very hard to start um a relationship when you don't have that trust we have a great team and i think we're incentivized to not just look at past performance and it's really to think about future performance so i'm really proud that we have backed managers in the past that were not the top performers and in some instances weren't even above the average in their performance and there were reasons for in the past what led to some difficult years of performance but they'd learned from those mistakes or they've evolved their capabilities and now we believe that going forward they can outperform and again that requires more work that requires more diligence but as long as you believe they they are applying some differentiated capabilities in a repeatable manner then we will spend the time
23:23Sam Sturge:to unpick that and take a look a lot of gps obviously very hesitant to be vulnerable and certainly there's an art to the kind of mistakes that lps accept versus ones that are unacceptable maybe double click on that and tell me about a case where somebody made a mistake and that actually helped them grow trust with you as LP?
23:54David Weisburd:It's a great question. And I think you can kind of take this multiple ways. Going back to a previous point on managers to focus on what they're truly great at. And we've had a particular manager comes to mind that was focused on a particular geography here in Europe.
24:15David Weisburd:they were very transparent that they thought they had a reason they they were a software specialist manager and had a deep domain expertise in that area and software can go across borders and so they had a belief and an ambition to expand beyond their their region in in europe to some other countries and i think for us what was important there was they reached out was said said that they were thinking of doing that we advised them not to and saying you've got plenty of opportunity in your area and they did um and they did that by building a new office hiring a new team because they wanted people that could speak a particular language here in europe um and that didn't work out um but to their credit they came to us and said yes this did not work out um we're going to take some time to reflect um here are our learnings from this in the sense of we are we have a distinctive culture and trying to hire in that culture didn't work um which i thought was a that shows true partnership with the manager kind of opening up to their mistake and kind of especially when when we guided them otherwise and actually a couple of years later so after all of that last year they said oh fine we're going to try again but here is what we learned previously um this is what we're doing differently this time and it's early days but actually in kind of the years since they've done that it seems to have actually it seems to have gone exceedingly well and so i think if you have that dialogue you can do that most people don't realize how incredibly difficult it is to actually have alpha in the private markets how much of a hurdle it is and once they
26:10Sam Sturge:capture that lightning in a pan, they just assume, well, how about over here? And the right way to think about it is every new strategy is default debt. You need something exceptionally unique. You need exceptional talent, exceptional synergies, or exceptional perspective and track record in order to capture alpha in another part of the market. It's almost like underwriting a strategy from scratch.
26:35David Weisburd:I completely agree. I think we say to our managers quite frequently, and whether this could be with co-investments or continuation vehicles, let alone new strategies, is there's a huge value to simplicity.
26:54David Weisburd:When you wake up in the morning, what's the first thing that you think about?
27:01David Weisburd:How many places do you want to be juggling? How much time do you want to focus? like you only have a certain number of hours in a day or the week or a year and how can you use that to the best of your ability to deliver the best returns that you can and we talked earlier there are some benefits to scale in certain situations but i think for in most scenarios we would argue that keeping things simple keeping things focused keeping things focused on those core areas of expertise will lead to better, more sustainable investment returns.
27:39Sam Sturge:As I turned 40, I started thinking about this finiteness of the year. Let's say there's 50 working weeks a year, there's five days, so 250 days. And I think high level thinking tops two hours per day of truly first principle thinking or very high output thinking. So you have 500 hours per year that you could focus where are you going to focus those 500 hours i think people assume they're off by an order of magnitude they think it's 5 000 or 50 000 hours but it's really 500 hours of really high level thought you have in a year i completely agree i think
28:14David Weisburd:you could argue maybe even less for a lot of people like one of the real joys of this job is and the seat that i'm in is that i get to spend a lot of my time speaking to some of the most successful intelligent people in the world most of the managers that we're investing with have been near the top of their fields they've got anywhere from five to 50 years of investment experience and it's in actually every interaction every meeting that we have there is something to learn um which i think i think it's just an incredible place to be or position to be in but i think to to your point you can either look at it as a benefit or a or a pro or a con of what we do where i'm coming up to six years here i think we've built a truly world-class portfolio where we have these 30 relationships and so i think what is really turning to now is unpicking with the managers that we have where we have our highest conviction what what has led to them being so successful and what has led to us having that conviction in them and what are the learnings that we can take from that to then say okay well how when we're meeting the next manager in that first meeting what are those questions that we can ask to kind of quickly get to that point where we think do they have those capabilities or values that we've seen
29:41Sam Sturge:successful firms before where is alpha in venture capital today great question it's clear that the as a class has never been so competitive um not just from a number of managers and a capital
29:55David Weisburd:raise perspective but also from the number of like underlying companies that are competing against each other through trying to do the same thing investing in ventures investing in innovation and it's just clear that we're living in unprecedented times at the moment and so therefore we do believe there is a lot of value to be created but this competition has really kind of switched how ventures worked over the last 30 years and they've gone are the days when a founder would have to go up sandhill road in palo alto kind of meeting the 20 firms and asking them for money so and now the power very much relies with the founders i think and those the founders that have the highest potential know that they have a choice over which venture capital firms they partner with and take money from and so the alpha really rely like lies with those venture capital firms that have a differentiated proposition or a reason why an exceptional founder would want to pick with them and work with them for the next decade of their journey
31:03Sam Sturge:what about structural alpha in venture in the end you have to say there is structural alpha where
31:10David Weisburd:there are a number of firms that consistently generate superior at performance compared to the rest of the markets um and then i think the question becomes well do you think they can continue it or do you think like at some point all of these storied venture firms they they started themselves at some point and then they got themselves into that position
31:35Sam Sturge:That's the art and the science. The science is being quickly commoditized by AI. You put in the portfolio returns over the last five funds and AI will give you the right answer whether it was a good fund. The art is, will they continue to perform?
31:51David Weisburd:we spend a lot of time analyzing historical performance and was it luck was it judgment do we think it's repeatable um but in the end it's a people business and it comes down to our assessment of those people what are their skill sets what are their motivations and i think it's really important to have those dialogues with managers and try and get a sense of when you think those skills capabilities motivations will will be changing or waning or passing on to the next generation and how you think about all of that is incredibly important as you think about the life cycle of an investment because in the end we want to be invested with managers for multiple fund cycles having this long-term horizon so spending that time so we can either double down and increase our commitment size next time around or decide to part ways is a really important part of the job once you are invested with the manager.
32:51Sam Sturge:Going back to another Professor Steve Kaplan study, 52 % of top quartile funds have persisted and stayed top quartile, which is why LPs are so focused on this top quartile. But said another way, 48 % do not persist. So you have a coin flip and figuring out who's going to continue to be great and who's going to revert to the mean is the hard part. If you could go back to 2012, when you had just started your career at Morgan Stanley, what is one piece of timeless advice you'd give a younger Sam that would have either accelerated your career or helped you avoid costly mistakes?
33:29David Weisburd:Network is incredibly important. I don't think you can ever invest early enough in your network and build that up over time. And over time, it becomes a compounding benefit. benefit and I think a lot of a young Sam was very focused on making sure that their call that model was done correctly on the day and I think actually spending that time whether it be finding mentors you can learn from finding peers that you can collaborate with and share ideas finding people that may not actually seem directly relevant right then but over time can do and um and overtime that compounds and really puts you in a very strong and privileged position and for example now i would say nearly all nearly all if not all of our venture capital investments that we've made over the last three years have come from referrals from our network whether that be other limited partners or or existing managers in our portfolio, or even when we've spoken to founders and entrepreneurs, they've mentioned some other firm and connected us.
34:44Sam Sturge:You have to understand who's playing the long-term games and who you spend your time on, where you focus your time. That is upstream of everything. If you think of people as downstream, as the most important upstream of it is what people are in your network and what people talk to on day-to-day. Sam, this has been an absolute masterclass. Thanks so much for Jump Hound Podcast.
35:06David Weisburd:Thanks for having me.
35:09Sam Sturge:That's it for today's episode of How to Invest. If this conversation gave you new insights or ideas, do me a quick favor. Share with one person in your network who'd find it valuable or leave a short review wherever you listen. This helps more investors discover the show and keeps us bringing you these conversations week after week. Thank you for your continued support.
From the publisher
What does it take to build a world-class private equity portfolio for an 800-year-old institution?
In this episode, I sit down with Sam Sturge, Head of Private Equity at the University of Cambridge endowment, to discuss how he rebuilt the program with a mandate to generate inflation plus 5% returns for generations. Before joining Cambridge, Sam worked at Morgan Stanley and Partners Capital, and today he oversees a concentrated portfolio of buyout and venture relationships within the university’s £4.5 billion endowment.




