Alan Waxman - Building Sixth Street - [Invest Like the Best, EP.433]

15 Jul 2025 · 1 h 14 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: Invest Like the Best with Patrick O'Shaughnessy

Episode Title

Alan Waxman - Building Sixth Street - [Invest Like the Best, EP.433]

Episode Overview In this episode, Patrick O'Shaughnessy interviews Alan Waxman, co-founder and CEO of Sixth Street, a unique investment firm with a flexible "go anywhere, do anything" mandate. With over $110 billion in assets under management (AUM), Sixth Street's approach spans various asset classes, geographies, and time horizons. Alan shares his journey from Goldman Sachs to founding Sixth Street, discussing key investments, firm culture, and innovative strategies.

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. Background and Formation of Sixth Street
  2. Alan Waxman transitioned from being the CIO of Goldman Sachs’ Special Situations Group to establishing Sixth Street.
  3. The firm emphasizes flexibility and adaptability across investment opportunities.
  4. Importance of a strong investment framework learned at Goldman Sachs, which emphasized unitizing risk and return.
  1. Investment Philosophy
  2. Unitizing Risk and Return: Alan explains how the firm evaluates investments by assessing risk units against return units across various sectors and geographies.
  3. "Face the Tiger" Philosophy: Emphasizes facing challenges head-on, fostering a culture of accountability and collaboration.
  1. Notable Investments
  2. Spotify: Alan discusses how Sixth Street provided crucial financing during challenging times for Spotify, highlighting the importance of the management team's alignment with values and vision.
  3. Airbnb: The firm invested during the COVID-19 pandemic, recognizing the potential of Airbnb’s business model despite the challenges presented by the pandemic.
  1. Cultural Insights
  2. Hiring Philosophy: Focus on recruiting individuals who are "over themselves" and prioritize teamwork, reducing egos within the firm.
  3. Continuous emphasis on personal development through structured personal business plans, fostering a supportive and demanding environment.
  1. Strategic Partnerships and Innovations
  2. Alan details Sixth Street's partnerships in sports, including innovative deals with Real Madrid and FC Barcelona, leveraging technology and global brand recognition.
  1. Future Perspectives
  2. Alan expresses the importance of maintaining a culture centered around investment and collaboration, with a commitment to lifelong learning and adaptation to changing market dynamics.
  3. He shares insights on the future of private markets, emphasizing the potential shifts in investor behavior and the growing interest in private alternatives.

Key Takeaways

  • Flexibility in Investment: The ability to adapt to market dynamics and pivot investment strategies is critical for successful investing.
  • Cultural Alignment: Establishing a culture that promotes teamwork and accountability is essential for long-term success and employee retention.
  • Importance of Relationships: Building genuine relationships with management teams can facilitate better investment outcomes.
  • Attention to Risk and Return: A nuanced approach to evaluating risk and return—considering both explicit and implicit risks—can distinguish successful investments from unsuccessful ones.
  • Focus on Themes: Developing actionable investment themes based on thorough research and sector knowledge can lead to better investment decisions.

Conclusion Alan Waxman's insights into the formation and operation of Sixth Street provide valuable lessons in investment strategy, firm culture, and the importance of adaptability in the ever-changing financial landscape. This episode of "Invest Like the Best" underscores the significance of collaboration, risk evaluation, and proactive engagement in building a successful investment firm.

For more details, check out the full episode [here](https://www.joincolossus.com).

---

Note: This markdown file summarizes and highlights the key points from the podcast episode, structured for readability and easy navigation.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00The best operators have a relentless focus on leverage, finding ways to multiply their impact rather than just working harder. But here's what I see happening in finance teams everywhere. Brilliant people getting buried in expense management busy work. If you think about it, you become a finance leader because you love strategic work. Modeling scenarios, optimizing capital allocation, finding the insights that actually move the business forward. But instead, you're chasing receipts and categorizing transactions. It's the opposite of leverage. This is exactly why I'm so bullish on what the team at Ramp has built.

0:28Kareem and Eric understood that every minute spent on manual expense management is a minute stolen from high leverage work. So they automated all of it. Automatic categorization, receipt matching, spending controls that actually work. I love the network effect that this creates. When finance teams at companies like Shopify and Stripe automate the mundane stuff, they free up cycles to think bigger, to ask bigger questions, spot patterns others miss, and make the kind of strategic bets that separate great companies from good ones. The math is simple. Get your time back, focus on what matters. Check out ramp.com slash invest and see what happens when you eliminate the busy work.

1:01Long-time listeners of this show will know that AlphaSense is the market intelligence platform I've admired for years. It gives institutional investors access to over 500 million premium sources, from company filings and broker research to news, trade journals, and more. Plus over 200 ,000 expert calls covering the world's most important companies and industries, all of it in one platform so investment teams can move faster, go deeper, and make high conviction decisions with confidence. I'm excited to join AlphaSense at their inaugural Alpha Summit 2025 this October in Brooklyn. I'll be on stage alongside leaders from UBS, Wells Fargo, Accenture, Google, Stripes Group, the Carlyle Group, and more to talk about how AI is reshaping investment research and decision-making.

1:41Alpha Summit is about showing the real workflows and strategies that top firms are using today. The event features an incredible lineup of industry-leading keynote speakers over three days. You'll hear from these industry leaders, connect with peers across finance and corporate strategy, and be part of the conversations you won't find elsewhere. Join me at Alpha Summit 2025, October 6th through 8th at the Refinery at Domino. To register and to see a complete list of speakers and the full agenda, go to alphasense.com slash invest. In asset management, growth often depends on customization. It's the nature of the beast in our industry.

2:12And I know having experienced the problem firsthand as an active manager, it's a competitive differentiator to tailor products and services to clients' preferences. Those of us growing our businesses always want to say yes to customers. It means delivering a tailored portfolio, a tailored report, or a tailored expectation for service. Saying yes leads to growth, and it also leads to customization and a big trade-off. The more you grow, the more complexity you absorb. The more you say yes, the harder it is to scale efficiently and consistently. That's where Ridgeline comes in. Ridgeline automates customization.

2:42It gives assay managers the ability to deliver personalized experiences at scale without adding headcount, manual work, or operational risk. Having been an early design partner myself, I saw firsthand the power of taking an entirely clean sheet of paper to building the system we've all been waiting for, a front-to-back platform that combines all of a firm's core functions on a single data set. It's how leading firms stop choosing between growth and efficiency and start saying yes to both. I believe the best firms will be built on Ridgeline as their operating system. I also believe there'll be a leading case study in combining the power of systems of record and AI.

3:16If you haven't spent time with them yet, I urge you to see what Ridgeline might unlock for your business.

3:23Hello and welcome, everyone. I'm Patrick O'Shaughnessy, and this is Invest Like the Best. This show is an open-ended exploration of markets, ideas, stories, and strategies that will help you better invest both your time and your money. If you enjoy these conversations and want to go deeper, check out Colossus Review, our quarterly publication with in-depth profiles of the people shaping business and investing. You can find Colossus Review along with all of our podcasts at joincolossus.com. Patrick O'Shaughnessy is the CEO of Positive Sum. All opinions expressed by Patrick and podcast guests are solely their own opinions and do not reflect the opinion of Positive Sum.

3:59This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a basis for investment decisions. Clients of Positive Sum may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this podcast. To learn more, visit psum.vc. My guest today is Alan Waxman. Alan is co-founder and CEO of Sixth Street, one of the most unique investment firms with a go-anywhere, do-anything mandate across asset classes, geographies, and time horizons, and over$110 billion in AUM. He describes his journey from CIO of Goldman Sachs' Special Situations Group and the frameworks he brought with him to lay the foundation for Sixth Street.

4:38Allen details their famous investments like Spotify and Airbnb during challenging periods, their innovative sports partnerships with Real Madrid and FC Barcelona, and their$30 billion cow vehicle that allows them to write billion-dollar checks while keeping individual fund sizes match the opportunities. We discuss hiring people without egos, enabling a true multi-strategy approach, and Sixth Street's Face the Tiger philosophy. Please enjoy this great conversation with Alan Waxman. All right, I don't know where to begin this one. Sixth Street is so incredibly interesting in that it can do anything.

5:13It can go anywhere. It's extremely opportunistic, extremely flexible, open mandate. We'll talk a lot about the history and the different kinds of investing that you've done. But I think a fun place to begin would be for you to tell us about your Goldman days and specifically the group of people that you were investing with back then, which I've heard described by you and others as the Navy SEALs or special forces of finance. Maybe describe that group in as much detail as you can and why it was so formative and impactful on you. It was lucky that I even got into that group. I met a guy on an airplane.

5:47Basically, I was an international relations major at Penn, no finance history, anything. Got out of school and I was basically working in the mailroom for a bond-only management firm called Fisher, Francis, Trees and Watts. And it's punching books and all my friends, they all had jobs. Basically at Penn, I had 35 interviews, didn't have a job offer out of college. That's why I ended up in the mailroom. but I was always interested in companies. I just didn't know a lot about it because I didn't have a corporate finance background. I was on an airplane coming back from Texas, my home, and I met a guy on an airplane, this guy by the name of Jody Lanasa, and I was just asking him a bunch of questions.

6:24I ask a lot of questions. My wife makes fun of me because I ask questions all the time. I go to dinner sometimes. People say, well, you asked me a thousand questions. I didn't get a chance to ask you. That's just how I am. So I was on the airplane and this guy, Joe Del Nasse, who had started in this group, he was reading research reports, like 1 ,000 miles per hour, processing speeds I'd never even seen before. So I just started to ask him questions about, what are you doing? And what's your group? And we just started talking on the airplane. He came from Wachtel, a principal investing group at Goldman that literally is highly flexible, could really do anything, which, by the way, is the predecessor of the group that I was ultimately in.

6:59We ended up forming a relationship just because what I learned is the good thing about being curious, as you know, is you go away. You learn a lot and it just creates opportunities. He ended up getting me an interview and I got into this group, which ultimately became the special situations group at Goldman. That group was the largest principal investing business at Goldman. It was the firm's balance sheet. At its peak, I think we're like$25 billion of the firm's balance sheet. Our mandate was to basically, you could do anything, different asset classes, different sectors, different geographies, different durations.

7:34So we could do stuff that were two, three-year investment horizon or 10-year investment horizon, different return profiles. Some of us 10 % return stuff, some of us 20%, 30 % return profiles. Literally, we could do anything, but we couldn't lose money. So what we learned at the time is this group, we were a substantial amount of Goldman Sachs and Ed income with a very small team for 10 plus years. What made that group tick? I'm curious about all aspects of it, the recruiting, the culture, the investing style, the low loss rates. Is really the ability to unitize risk reward across different asset classes, geographies, sectors, return profiles, duration profiles.

8:16Take a real estate type investment, compare it to a U.S. corporate loan, compare it to buying a company, compare it to starting a company. and we unitize risk units and return units. And we did that across a bunch of different sectors, a bunch of different geographies and asset classes. And just that skill of being able to do that, you're constantly comparing relative risk units and return units. And it gives you the ability to find the best risk reward at that time. And the key principle there, and we learned this the hard way. So if you go back, Goldman was a bunch of fiefdoms of principal investing business.

8:47There were 10 fiefdoms, different partners running investing businesses, and none of them talked to each other. They all had their own balance sheets and never spoke to each other. So during 2001, 2002, a number of the businesses lost a lot of money. For example, we had in the US, the business I was in, which is a US corporate investing business, was pretty negative on fiber builds. If you remember Exo Communications or Williams, remember all the fiber, which was overbilled, all that. There was another group at Goldman who were great investors, but they were all in on fiber. Even though we were literally one floor apart, one group lost a bunch of money and we were anti, we didn't lose money.

9:26And after that, the firm basically said, let's put all these disparate principal investing businesses. Again, we didn't have outside LPs, put them all under one umbrella. And that ultimately became what was a special situations group, which became a substantial part of the firm's profitability. Can you say more about this notion of unitizing risk and return, the literal tactical way that that happened? So we think about the relationship of risk units and return units. So return units are easy. It's IRR, it's duration. Risk units are a lot harder. If you think about the two key variables of, let's say, evaluating any company or security, you basically got the cash flows, the volatility of the cash flows, so the risk of the cash flows and growth.

10:07So the way we think about it, and again, this has been refined over 25 plus years, our framework is basically take three things. First of all, what's the quality of the business? What's the quality of the sector? The second thing is, where do you sit in the capital structure? What we would say is your attachment points. And the last thing is documents. We take that framework and we sort of run that framework through that across sectors, geographies, and that's how we start to quantify risk units. So for example, if you take a consumer goods company that's a buyout of a consumer goods company, and let's say a private equity firm buys it for a 20 % return, and let's say they lever at 70%, you take a hyperscale data center that's got, let's say, a 15-year take or pay contract with an investment grade counterparty, that's going to be a required lower return.

10:54So that'd be an example. If you have a geography, let's say just as an extreme example, if you've got a 15 % structured equity investment for a company, exact same company, exact same sector in Australia, if it were in Ukraine, you're probably going to demand higher than 15%. Let's say we're a minority equity investor in a company. And one, you've got the control party can literally do whatever they want. They can dilute you. They can put a bunch of debt ahead of you. That's one set of risk units. If you've got traditional, hopefully good minority protections, that's another set of risk units.

11:25So we take all that. We do that across asset classes, sectors, geographies, durations. So some stuff like our capital, we can do stuff that's 10 % to 12 % returns. Some of our stuff is 20%, 25%, two to three times your money. And our whole view of the world is the world is very dynamic. It's always changing. And what happens is with investors, everyone thinks their baby's the prettiest. So if you're just a healthcare investor, you think your baby's the prettiest. You're just an energy investor. You think your base price. If you're just in Europe, you think Europe's only good. So we try to do a step back from that.

11:58And then constantly, as we go through economic cycles, credit cycles, secular cycles, geopolitical changes, and we think about things on a real-time basis. And what we do is in Sixth Street, we have about 450 to 500 deals coming into Sixth Street every month. Typically, we have about 15 to 25 themes running through our firm at any one time. And the key is, and this is what we learned at Goldman is that any theme that is good as a shelf life of somewhere between 12 months and 36 months, because ultimately there's a lot of smart people out there. It comes in and it's a good theme. Then it's a less good theme.

12:32Then it comes to okay theme. Then it comes to bad theme. And then people are overcorrect and they start putting leverage on it. And then you have a correction and our whole thing. And this is why we had the tracker we had come out at Goldman and do it at 6th Street is that we try to see through that and never get caught in that dynamic where the theme becomes less good, we migrate to other themes. So our average theme as a shelf life is a year to three years. If you take our themes from 2025 and you go back to 2022, the 15 to 25 themes might be a little bit over it, but most of them are different themes.

13:04And that's why we always think of Sixth Street. We have to be a firm of entrepreneurs. Because if you think about what we're doing, we're constantly migrating to the best risk units and return units. Obviously, also trying to be a value-added partner to CEOs and management teams. Because the world's always changing. We have to be constantly coming up with new themes. And that's what we learned at Goldman. How did you recruit people into SSG? Was there any lesson on the on-ramp? First of all, back then, it was the group to get into. It was the hardest group to get into. Even sounds like Special Forces SSG.

13:35The Wall Street Journal called the group the Navy SEALs. I think that created a little bit of halo. So it wasn't finding people interested. It's finding the right people. And for us, what we were looking for back then and still today at Sixth Street is, first of all, we want really nice people. We have a saying at Sixth Street, and it was true back then, something we learned from the San Antonio Spurs is we want people that are over themselves. The enemy of multi-strategy investing businesses, fiefdoms and silos. And if you have people who don't want to be team players and share information and share relationships, the whole unionization of risk units and return units, it all breaks down.

14:11So culture goes hand in hand with our investing style. So the first thing is, did they fit in culturally? And then the second thing, obviously, everyone's got to be smart enough, but we really wanted people that could think critically, but also were open to the anti of my babies, the prettiest people. They don't fall in love with whatever they're spending time on. They have the ability to sort of, what we would say at Sixth Street is to play tennis and like comparing a healthcare senior secured loan to buying a healthcare company to a European real estate deal to a Asian infrastructure deal, be able to sort to engage in what we call playing tennis to sort of compare relative risk reward and sort of the backdrop of whatever we think the macro environment is as well.

14:52I had never heard that phrase, people that are over themselves. I love that phrase. Anything else you learned from the Spurs? So I started running business, I think I was 25 years at Goldman. We always said, no politics, no BS, no egos, nice people. That's what we wanted to be around. So I grew up in Austin, Texas, and I was always a San Antonio Spurs fan. So I was always from afar, a big fan of Popovich and R.C. Buford, who's literally one of the best sports executives. He's unbelievable and almost like a brother to me now. He's an exceptional human being. But we went in there. I was describing Sixth Street and R.C.

15:27based on one of our first discussions says, yeah, we have a saying for that. Popovich said the same thing. It's, are you over yourself yet? I said, why do you say that? He goes, that is literally the ultimate expression is, can someone be a good teammate? And I thought about it deeply. We took no politics, no BS, only nice people. And we translated that to now we say, are you over yourself yet? If you think back to the SSG days, what was the investment or trade that you were most proud of that most encapsulates many of these ideas? We obviously did really well. There were a bunch of investments.

15:58I think the thing that we're most proud of is that during 2006 and 2007, when things were getting irrationally exuberant, we actually started to pause. We didn't know what was going to happen in the GFC. We're, I think, the only principal investing group, maybe there's one other that didn't lose money in 2008 on a lot of capital. We didn't make any returns, but we protected capital. And it was all from that process that we went through of really comparing relative risk units to return units. And we started to see things that just didn't make sense. We still invested, but we're investing in different things that we thought would be very protective.

16:35We didn't know when the party was going to end, but it just was getting out of whack. It's really what we didn't do leading up to GSC is probably what I'm most proud of. And quite frankly, had that not happened, I don't think we could have, when we started Sixth Street, raised the first fund we did had we not protected capital in 2008 because so many people in seats like mine blew themselves up during the GFC. Back then, did you think of yourselves as financiers doing a primary job for the person or group receiving the capital? Or did it feel more like arbitrageurs or something like that? We love investing.

17:11And it's really about trying to create solutions because our capital is so flexible. We could go sit down with any CEO or any management team. We go in there and we just listen. And this will sort of resonate. We were talking about earlier is one of our core skill sets is asking questions. So we just be asking questions. And we say the prototype deal at Sixth Street, but also back then is we can get on a whiteboard with a CEO management company. They have an idea of what they're trying to solve. And we get up there and we start whiteboarding it and we come up with solutions. Maybe it's a structured equity investment.

17:43Maybe we buy an asset. Maybe we do a joint venture on one of their assets. It could be anything, but we walk in there with a very entrepreneurial mindset, bespoke mindset on every deal. That is a six-street deal, whiteboarding with the CEO or management team. And we can do that at scale. Back then, I mean, that was really how we were thinking about things. When I think about arbitrage that short term, we're long-term investors. We're three years to 10-year investors plus. Arbitrists, to me, that's more trading. We weren't traders. We're terrible traders. That's not what we do. But thinking about fundamental value, but also trying to find the right management teams, the CEOs to back, and then getting to those giants where we're really their partner and we're able to get on a whiteboard.

18:24That was a prototype deal for us. It's like a fundamentally creative process. It reminds me of Richard Rainwater and all you heard about how he would structure things and take all comers, lots of whiteboards in that office, apparently. We always talk about it. We just had our offside. I talk about right brain thinking. One of our core principles is don't group think. That's why I benefit being out in San Francisco. I live with all the AI tech guys that are all on your podcast and I learned from them. I'm like a fish out of water there, but it's just that independent thinking. I mean, that's why I've never talked to competitors ever.

18:55Not because they're not super talented and great investors, because I don't want to be infiltrated with their thinking. So I get into groupthink. And that's why we try to really think about things through that right brain lens because that's how we start different businesses. That's how we find new themes. And we can't do our business if we're not using our right brain. It's a core part of what we try to do. One of the really cool things about your structure is this unit of risk concept. Hearing you talk makes me realize that basically every investor takes their specific unit of risk for granted.

19:25It's the same every time. And I find that fascinating. When we came out of Goldman, I'd never talked to an LP before. I didn't know how to talk to an LP. That's a whole other story. One of my mentors, and we call him the godfather of Sixth Street, Jamie Gates, our first fundraising meeting we went to was with a large sovereign wealth fund. I'm like reading every word on every page. He's doing these hand signals like, let's go, let's go, kick him in. It was not good. We never talked to an investor. But I remember getting out when we first started talking to investors on Sixth Street. We had a really hard time in the beginning because if you think about the LP world, the way it's set up, it's very siloed.

19:58You have your private equity group. You have your fixed income group. Now you have your private credit group. You have your real estate infrastructure. So we got lucky because David Vineyard was our CFO. We had one LP. So we were completely unconstrained and unsoled. We just couldn't lose money. You grew up in the world today. When I first got out and we're talking LPs from, let's say, a very big pension plan. And at first, I'm describing what we do, and they can't fit us in a bucket. They're like, wait a second. Are you in this bucket? Are you in that bucket? And then he said, we need 20 % returns.

20:30I was like, okay, how much leverage are you taking to get 20 %? It didn't matter. No one thinks about unit return risk. They only think about nominal returns. And that's why we've always talked about from beginning. And I think many LPs have gotten a lot smarter on return units and risk units. But nominal returns, they're just underlying risk because there's so much leverage out there. People can make returns, whatever they want through leverage, but it's not capturing units of risk. And at some point, the AI is going to figure out how to quantify units of risk for private capital. That'll happen someday.

21:03That has not happened. People still think about nominal returns versus just the skill of investing. So where I was going with it was, typically it's not a line of question. Walk us through your thinking about risk. Maybe they'll think about loss ratios, some basic stuff, but not multidimensional thinking around risk in a given asset class. And so I'm curious, because that's all you've ever really done as an investor, for you to teach us some of the surprising things about what you've learned assessing risk versus everyone's spent so much time assessing return. What could this be? What could the return be?

21:33Less time on the risk side. What would surprise people is the most important parts of that evaluation process? Human beings get into behavioral patterns. They look at the past and they just keep going. Direct lending has oscillated between a really great time to invest and a less good time to invest. And it's all driven by capital flows. Somewhat recently, you see a whole bunch of new money coming into, let's say, direct lending. And I think people get caught in these tunnels and have a hard time stepping back. Either they don't have the periphery to look at it or they don't have people around them that have been through cycles, but they get in these behavioral patterns and they have an inability to look back.

22:17And I think whenever there's a crisis and people lose money, and we saw this in 0102, I saw a little bit in August 98, definitely saw it on GFC, saw it in COVID before the Fed bailed everyone out and made some people that shouldn't have looked smart, look smart, but that's a whole other thing. I think people are surprised when that happens, but it's all right in front of you. In 06, 07, you could have looked at what's happened. There's over 100 % loan-to-value loans to houses. Anyone could get a mortgage. There are all these mortgage rents just pumping with no consideration for credit quality.

Read the full transcript

22:48And I think just the tunnel vision of ignoring not only the risk units on that particular deal, but the risk units of what's around you. That's one of the biggest mistakes that people make. And I don't know if people are surprised by that, but it's very hard to evaluate risk units if you're only looking at it through one lens versus multiple lenses. That's what we learned back in 2001, 2002. We had all those 10 disparate businesses where no one was talking to each other. And that's why they were actually put together. I give David Vineyard a ton of credit. Probably the best CFO, in my opinion, ever on Wall Street.

23:24He is one of my mentors. He is exceptional. We're the biggest investor out there back in the late 90s and early 2000s. And there was a bunch of loss-making businesses from all these disparate principal investing businesses. And that's why Goldman put them under one umbrella. I think that pattern of not thinking about things in a siloed way versus the overall periphery, I think that's what we're going to be talking about sometime here in the next two to three years. To continue to contextualize this notion of units of risk today, what do you think are some of the maybe overlooked sources of risk in the system as you see it, since you get to see it from every angle?

24:02And this is early summer 25. We have experts at Sixth Street. My partners, Marty Chavez, who's on the board of Google, and Adam Korn, and Rand Goldman Sachs, and Jeremy Biss, who are experts on AI. So I'm not an expert on AI. But I think one of the things that you've talked about on your podcast is just the whole transition. Once the productivity gains start to come, there's obviously going to be job losses and just the transition to sort of remobilize capital. How's that going to work with the real economy. I don't think enough people are talking about it. One of my good friends, Jeff Weiner, former CEO of LinkedIn, he's the chairman, him and I have been talking about this for a while.

24:43And I think for the first time, Anthropic CEO actually came out and said something publicly. So what I'm worried about there is that we're so focused on competing with the US stated against other countries, specifically China, the MAGAC, and they're all focused on competing with each other. And I don't think there's enough people talking about how we're going to manage this transition as, again, there's going to be lots of productivity gains, which I'm all for, but there's not enough talk about that. It should be code red people talking about it and that's not happened. So I'd say that's one. I think the other thing, and I think it's an opportunity, look at the average wealth investor.

25:21So the wealth channel, they're underexposed to private alternatives relative to say a pension fund at 40 % or an endowment at 50%. So at three to 5%, that should probably go up. But again, the transition, everyone's all about the wealth channel, everyone's talking about that, the transition to do that in a way that's responsible to those wealth investors, those end market. And I think getting to the right structures so that that's done in a responsible way, I think that is something to watch out for. Jamie Gates, the godfather of Sixth Street, one of the things he taught me early on is just because you can raise capital doesn't mean you should.

25:59As a manager, just because you can raise it in the Wealth Channel doesn't mean you should. And I would espouse that advice to all of our people in our industry. So I want to keep telling your story. After Goldman, but before TPG, what were you doing then? I actually told David Vineyard, who was a mensch in March 2008, that I wanted to basically rebuild what we did at Goldman, but doing a more entrepreneurial backdrop. I stayed through 2008 just to make sure everything was well because I wouldn't have felt good if the rails would have come off. There's no way I was gonna leave those guys at that time.

26:34And then I took six months off, got married, went on a honeymoon. But before that, really started constructing the idea of Sixth Street, which was formulated in a business plan called Project Austin. Project Austin laid out our values, our culture, our investment philosophy, all laid out our five-year strategic plan, which is a big thing at Sixth Street. We're now in our fourth five-year strategic plan. We've been doing that since day one of the firm. And that set out the idea of Sixth Street. TPG, we're set up a little bit differently. So we were never employees at TPG. We never gave up control of our business.

27:10We always controlled investments, hiring decisions. We were kind of a firm within a firm. TPG had a minority the equity stake and were great partners for while we were together. But that's how it all started. Say more about these consecutive five-year plans. How do you do that? Our view on business building is if you don't have a compass, it's hard to know where you're going. And more importantly, it's hard to get everyone on your team matched up with that five-year strategic plan. We just finished our five-year strategic plan. It's an 18-month process. Was 200 pages. I mean, this is hundreds and hundreds of hours of all the partners debating and trying to really narrow down what it is, the direction of the firm.

27:47We first started our 2015 plan, what we wanted it to be. And most recently, our 2030 plan, we typically have 80 ideas. We narrow it down to 40, what we call subplanks. And those are organized under five strategic planks. We'd actually just present it to our entire firm. But what we try to do, and this is something we learned at Goldman, is we basically take that five-year strategic plan, we break it up into one-year increments. And then we have every person at the firm do their own personal business plans. What we always say, and this is from day one, is that we want the summation of all those personal business plans to equal the five-year strategic plan.

28:23So we're matching every single person in the firm with the clear mission of what we're trying to do and what we'd say in our parlance, climbing up the mountain together. And that's just been a process. And it's something that we take very seriously. I think it's by, We spent 18 months and hours and hours of debating it and thinking about what we want to be and how we want to go about it. But it's something we've been doing. And it's our North Star. It's our compass. It's everything. And it's an important part of the process and the business building of Sixth Street. Can you talk us through the opening chapter, chapter zero or the prologue and chapter one back in 2009 or so?

28:57And what was going on? What the biggest challenges were? I'm always interested in how these firms get started and what challenges they have to overcome. Because often those are like the formative periods that then last a long time. We're values driven firm. Our values are number one, what we call our one life principle. You have one life. Do you want to be average or great? Everyone wants to be great. So that's the first thing. We want people that are all in. It's a competitive world out there. We want people that are all in. The second thing, and this goes back to one of the things we're talking about is we want curious people that are constantly learning, that actually are constantly trying to grow.

29:33So if you think about the idea of having to develop new themes every year and new ideas, we need entrepreneurial people. And then the third thing is a one-team culture. So people that are over themselves, no politics, no egos, no BS, just so we can all talk to each other. So those are the values. We always said we wanted to be the largest startup in the industry. That's literally day one. We want people that can play tennis so they can debate, not the, my baby's the prettiest type people. And then the last one, this is something my dad taught me about facing the tiger. My dad's a crazy person.

30:05He's like a black belt, yells at the TV. He's probably listening to this, but he's a pretty tough guy. But he always taught me growing up, you got to learn how to face the tiger. By the way, when you go to Sixth Street's offices, literally, you get off the elevator, there's a big tiger just staring at you. And there's three elevators. And no matter what elevator you get off, it's staring at you. Is there a sculpture? It's huge. Five feet. You'll come to our offices one day. The idea on culture is that when something goes wrong or there's a challenge, you go through different things. Most people are like pointing their fingers at other people or they're it's not my fault or they're running away.

30:37At Sixth Street, we're like, good, let's go. And we say, let's face the tiger together. The first thing is defining values and culture in our investment philosophy, which we spoke about. But then what's our genetic code? For us, the most important thing about our genetic code is we want to be an investor first firm. We love investing. We love this idea, this process we go through. We love meeting CEOs and management teams, particularly today where it was starting to happen back then. There's a little bit of asset aggregation. Now it's a completely different thing. Our ethos and what we want to be, we're investors.

31:11If you talk to our partners, the day we become not an investor first firm, we're not here. That's literally number one is every review process, every person we hire, it's designed around people that love to be investors. So that multi-strategy, so this idea of the world's dynamic, it's always changing, laying that part out in terms of being a multi-strategy investing firm, migrating the best relative risk units and return units, thinking about that. And then the last thing is that whole cross-platform collaboration at scale because our business model doesn't work if we don't have that cross-platform collaboration at scale because otherwise information and relationship get trapped in fiefdoms and silos.

31:50Sixth year, we have 10 investment platforms all organically built. All the people, the business leaders at each of our investment platforms, they all talk to each other all the time. We're all trying to think about where's the best place to think about comparing risk units and return units and obviously places where we can be value-added partners, the CEOs and management teams. What are the dimensions of facing the tiger well? If you were teaching a college seminar on how to do this, what would you tell the students? Human beings' natural reaction when there's a problem, and you can see this in so many facets of life, the first thing is to run.

32:24Particularly in our industry, I saw this happen in other groups at Goldman. I've seen this happen in different companies, and I have friends that have told me stories. All of a sudden, there's a problem or there's a bad investment, and all of a sudden, everyone starts to try to distance themselves from that and try to point the finger at them so it's not them. Or some people freeze. They start to get hyperactive and they start to make rash decisions. And for us, let's go. We're going to do it together. There's one of our worst investments of all time. It was a plastic bottle company. Only time at Sixth Street, knock on wood, we got defrauded.

33:00We made a structured equity investment, a company, I won't say which one, but a European company. I'll never forget, we were in the room in New York with 30 people. There was a bunch of different investors, a big company. we figured out that they had defrauded not only us other investors and i'll never forget we went to pj clark's in new york the burger place and there were like five of us there and we went over there all from different groups we knew things were not going as well and we're like holy shit what is going on here and we're like let's go steven plus you're gonna do this sam didder you're gonna do this i'll do this borna you're gonna do this and we just started doing we called on some other people.

33:39We literally had a team of 12 people, all different parts of the firm doing everything we could. And the reality is we ended up getting 50 cents on the dollar. We should have gotten two cents. And it was all because it was just game on. And that's what we do. When things are going well, obviously you don't have to do that. But again, what we always say, that's what defines cultures. And you have those moments of what are you going to do in this situation? Are you going to do the right thing? Are you going to come together? Are you going to point your finger at someone else? What are you going to do?

34:08And our whole thing is let's face the tiger together. And that's what we do. I would love to tell the stories of the Spotify and Airbnb investments that you made. People know those names, so it's very relatable. But also I think are good examples in the mid-2010s, a little bit later with Airbnb, of how you do business. So maybe start with the Spotify one and just tell that story. We love Spotify as a theme. We love live music. It's hard not to like live music when you grow up in Austin, Texas. But great product, great unit economics. But if you remember in 2016, there was starting to be a lot of commentary about threats from Amazon, Apple.

34:45There was a cloud over the company at that time. A lot of people don't remember that. So there's a little bit of volatility in the markets. But more importantly, people were worried about the competitive threats. When this came in as an opportunity, obviously, we had a number of themes, technology businesses or software businesses that we thought had really good unit economics. This was one of the tops of the list. That was at a time when they weren't producing cash flow, so they're still creating cash flow losses. They need some liquidity. So our investor group stepped in. We gave them a billion dollar financing, a convertible instrument.

35:17Obviously spent time with Daniel. It takes one second to figure out that guy's generational. The rest of the team that Daniel had put around him was great. Barry McCarthy at the time was a CFO, really smart guy. And then everyone we met on the management team, mission aligned. They had values. They had a culture. it was very clear everyone was on the same page. And sometimes in companies, you go in and you talk to the CFO, what's the vision? And that's different than the CEO, different than the head of revenue. And for them, it was just very clear that they were just dialed in. They obviously had first mover advantage.

35:50It ended up being a great investment for us, but it was a little bit contrarian when we made the investment. Maybe say a little bit more about the security itself, because you can operate at any part of the capital structure or whatever, like you said, I'm always curious the actual way you did it. On that one, what they were trying to solve is at the time, they didn't want to raise common equity. Because of the competitive threat from Amazon and Apple, or perceived, I should say, because the market volatility, they didn't want to sell equity because it was going to be at a lower equity than the last round.

36:22So they were looking for more of a whiteboard solution. Literally, Barry McCarthy, whiteboard, what are we doing? And he had certain principles and we just tried to solve around those principles. And that came up with, it was a convertible debt instrument. It had a cap. I think the cap was at$25 billion. It had a current yield component. And then obviously the whole idea was to bridge them to get public. So it was like a pre-IPO security to bridge them through that. And ultimately it was successful and went way through the cap, which created a win solution for them because they got to their IPO, which they were very focused on doing for a whole bunch of reasons.

36:58and for us, it worked out. It was almost like an engineering and whiteboarding. And again, a lot of times the ideas aren't, here's the holy grail idea. It's from just talking, playing tennis, asking questions and listening. And that's what we do. That's what we train our team to do. How to ask questions, how to listen. That's literally the process that we went through with the other investors. Before we get to the Airbnb story, can you talk about Tao and the unique nature of this massive pool of capital that you've created that can do whatever it wants? I'm always fond of this idea that what you end up getting from an investor reflects their capital base, who it is, the duration, the terms.

37:34They then ship their capital base in the form of investments. And so I think understanding Tau and the overall structure is important. When we were doing Project Austin, we literally studied every GP. We had case studies on every single GP, what they did right, what they did wrong. We also spent a lot of time on figuring out some of the GPs that were big brand names and then just faltered away. What we concluded, and this is a pretty obvious thing now, but where people get into trouble as they raise larger and larger funds in a strategy that maybe it's the right time to raise a larger fund, but maybe it's not.

38:07What's the opportunity set? They kept raising larger and larger funds and we didn't want to have that pressure. And this was getting to tell, we want to design our architecture, our 6G, which is different than any GP out there, at least the ones that I know, as an investor-first architecture. And what we did is, although we have 10 investment platforms at Sixth Street, each one of the platforms. So think about our growth business. If we didn't have TAL, we'd probably raise an$8 billion fund because we want to be able to do the larger deals. But because we have TAL, we want to keep the fund sizes to the level of the opportunity.

38:41But we also want to be able to do the largest deals in the market. I mean, we want to be able to do the billion, two billion. We're one of the few handful of firms in the world that can consistently write billion-dollar-plus checks across asset classes. but architecturally, we keep our investment platforms funds at modest sizes, matched to whatever the opportunity is over whatever the investment horizon that fund. And then we have this vehicle called TAL on top, which is effectively, in our words, was when we first raised it, the synthetic Goldman Sachs balance sheet, which could do anything. Obviously, with the same principles that we've had for the last 25 plus years, we started investing at Goldman.

39:16That gives us stability in a growth deal. Let's say that the next Spotify deal comes and let's say it's a$2 billion deal. Well, if we only have a$4 billion growth fund or$3 billion growth fund, there's no way we're going to be able to do that in the growth fund. But by having a$30 billion fund over the top across the entire firm, we have the ability to keep the fund sizes small, but at the same time, speak to the larger deals. And then also anything that doesn't fit with any of our investment platforms, we have the flexibility to do that. Tau is flexible from asset classes. So it's got everything in there, real estate infrastructure, private credit, growth, mostly private, but has the ability to be public.

39:54It can go anywhere on the duration spectrum. So it could do a two to three year investment, but we have investments in there. We have a strategic partnership with Real Madrid and also a strategic partnership with FC Barcelona. We're probably the only people in the world that actually partners with Real Madrid and FC Barcelona because they trust us. but those extend further than 10 years. So we have maximum flexibility. You're unconstrained because again, that's what we learned at Goldman. The world is dynamic. It's always changing and you need that flexibility because you never know at that particular time or this particular environment, where's the best opportunity is going to be.

40:30We always want to have that flexibility to migrate to wherever the best opportunities are. I think the most important thing about Towel is that it's consistent with who we are as a firm and our ethos about we want to be an investor first firm. Now let's go back to Airbnb because I think this is like a classic early COVID example of the returns to flexibility. We were one of the few firms in the world playing offense at the beginning of COVID. And the reason we're playing offense because we had a good defense, very similar to what we saw in 06, 07, we started to see those same dynamics, tunnel vision of investing.

41:03We started to see some of those same dynamics in 18 and 19. We couldn't have called COVID, but things were getting skewed in a wrong way. So we protected the portfolio. We're in a position to play offense. Right when COVID hit, we went around and said, what are the best business models in the world that are most impacted by COVID? Think about 60 people across Sixth Street, working weekends, all day, every day, trying to figure out our 15 to 25 themes before COVID. Throw out the door. And what are our next 15 to 25 themes? One of the themes there was best business models most impacted by COVID.

41:39Airbnb, great business model. If you remember at the time, there was a lot of negative press on Brian Chesky at the time, which was, by the way, unfair and unwarranted, but there was a whole bunch of stuff going on at the board that didn't deter us. So we literally started calling into the board, people we knew on the board, calling in the bankers, because we didn't have a pre-existing relationship with Brian, but we knew people that were around him and ultimately came in. And that was an interesting time because the thing that Brian did that was really smart, he did a lot of things that were smart, the way he operated through that.

42:12And the first time we met him on a Zoom call, he had a lot of advisors. And despite all that, his values, the mission, the principles were all the same. We talk about a lot of special humans today, Daniel and Brian, David Vigneur, special humans, but they wanted to fortify their balance sheet so they could play offense. We and our friends over at Silver Lake basically gave them a billion dollars, was in a loan form, had some warrants attached to it, ended up getting them through the period. Obviously, things started to get better. But the most important thing after that happened, they were able to start playing offense versus playing defense.

42:49And I think the other thing it did is it really solidified what we already knew that Brian was such a great leader and he was able to get this done. I'm curious, again, in your framework about what do you need units of risk were in that specific transaction relative to those returns? That one was, first of all, we had to be right on the business model. So from afar, we wanted to make sure that the business model, what it was. The second thing is they wanted to get it done in seven days. So we had a team at Sixth Street in Asia, a team at Sixth Street in the US, a team at Sixth Street in Europe.

43:23So we had to do all that in a compressed time period. It was at the beginning of COVID. There wasn't a vaccine or anything. So our view is for us, it was as much about the fundamentals of the business as it was how much liquidity runway can they have. And we had to make the bet with that liquidity runway that there would be a cure, something would get better. They obviously had a lot of leverage to manage the business, but it gave them up to like four or five years of liquidity. This led to another theme on sports and live entertainment because we learned that we like experiences, humans like experiences, but that was our analysis.

43:54So the fundamental business analysis, make sure everything in the unit economics were what we thought, making sure that the management scheme and the CEO were what we thought. But the other thing, it was really a liquidity analysis and then making that not in the spreadsheet judgment, which sometimes you have to do. That was as much of a risk unit as anything as the liquidity analysis to make sure how much runway do they have. Do you try typically to boil things down to a simple bet like that so that you understand it in simple terms and you're not creating too much complexity where it doesn't need to exist?

44:26We like complex things, but in terms of the ultimate call, I mean, we do all the fundamental analysis, but ultimately investments come down to three or four or five things. I wouldn't say we simplify the overall investment, but we try to simplify what are the three or four or five things that matter. And we know those things inside out. We also understand, and this is the other thing, investors do. People only think about explicit risks. They don't think about implicit risk. So we always try to put that lens on it. What are the implicit risks that we're assuming away? One of them in the case of Airbnb is we're assuming away that there will be a cure.

44:59We can't all be locked in our houses forever. We were willing to take that risk, but we had to think about that because that was part of the investment. But ultimately, it comes down to three or four or five things. So I'd say, yes, simplify things, but it always comes down to those three to five things. When you think about what success means for the whole firm from a return and risk standpoint, how do you think about it? Is the ultimate comparable for units of risk and return like the S &P 500 or something? Is there an explicit goal? We exist to beat this thing or provide our investors with something more than this?

45:30Our investors have expectations, but ultimately we're an absolute return investor. Sometime if you just take an extreme example, let's say that every single asset class is flooded with liquidity, maybe that's not the right time to invest. And sometimes the best thing you can do as an investor is not invest. But in terms of returns, it really depends on the level of risk units. In 2017, we saw 15 % to 20 % deals, but it was too far out on the risk spectrum. So we said, listen, that's too much risk, even though that return is there. And some people kept doing that. And some of it worked out well until COVID.

46:06But we try to think about the environment that we're in and what things are giving us. Also, our investors have a set of criteria for each fund that we try to meet that expectation as well. I'm very intrigued by the fact that some of the great go anywhere investors gravitate towards sports at some point. Talk about the Real Madrid FC Barcelona transactions, what you're doing, why you're involved in the, what you like about that space. This is a theme coming off of COVID sports and live experiences. So 2020, a lot of the investments in sport teams, you weren't actually able to do as an institution.

46:41Once COVID happened and all these big franchises, revenues went to zero. People weren't going to games. They still had some of their media deals, but it went to zero. So for the first time ever, they started to reach out to institutional partners. Our whole thesis in sports is the biggest global brands in the world. And our whole thesis in sports, and we can talk about live entertainment is that these are historically local brands. And because of technology, you can be on your phone and you can actually watch anywhere in the world. You can be a Dallas Cowboy fan, Australia, watch or Real Madrid fan in China and watch that whole local to global.

47:17That was our thesis. So we literally just started through our relationships calling on the top global sports franchises in the world. Now we've got San Francisco Giants. We're partner with the Dallas Cowboys and New York Yankees. And then two of the biggest brands in the world, FC Barcelona and Real Madrid, we started calling on building relationships. I mean, the deal with Real Madrid was they wanted to do business with us and we wanted to do business with them. And it was, again, a whiteboarding exercise. That structure we did with Real Madrid where we basically formed a joint venture with them, partnered with them on their stadium renovation, which is the Bernabea.

47:54That was the use of funds, but we formed like a company that sort of owned the stadium. assets, when they came to us, they had an idea, we had an idea, and it was literally multiple whiteboard sessions to come up with that structure. And now a number of people have tried to deploy that structure elsewhere. FC Barcelona, again, because of COVID, it impacted their financials. They needed to do something. Joan Laporta, incredible human, as well as Forantino, two people I've become friends with through the Real Madrid and FC Barcelona process. They were trying to pull levers to basically be able to keep their roster together because their view was, if we lose key components of the roster, we won't be able to stay competitive.

48:32And you can see how they've done since then. But that's sort of how those deals came about. The stadium one is an example. There's this interesting push and pull. They know the money they need and for what. They're probably optimizing for giving up the least or finding great partners or whatever. And there's some minimum return that you need to get interested. What is that push and pull process like at the whiteboard? How do you communicate to them? Those are the things that we need? First of all, what are they trying to solve? They say, this is what we're trying to solve. We're investing a bunch of money into the Bernabeu Stadium.

49:03So those are the use of funds. So what structures? They didn't want to do debt. So we had to do effectively an equity joint venture with them. We come up with solutions. We price those solutions. We say, look, here's option A, here's option B, here's option C. They say, we kind of like a combination of option A and option B. We go back to the drawing board. We come back and we say, here's a hybrid of option A and option B, which is what happened on that deal. In those different options, what are the key levers? For every deal, they're different. If it's an equity deal, obviously price. If it's a hybrid deal where it's convertible deal, there's a yield component and a strike component.

49:38If it's just a private credit deal, it's just a yield component. Sometimes when we're doing joint venture, we're like, what are the value added operations? In that case, one of our portfolio companies, Legends, is providing services to them that is helping them uplift their premium offering within the stadium. So we underwrote that and put our money where our mouth was on that. So in each deal, the levers are different. And that's the thing. It's a whiteboard because we've got a toolkit, which we've been using for 25 plus years, but we feel like we can price anything that's not binary stroke of the pin risk.

50:10And then it's got to work for them. Or if it doesn't work for them, we go back to the drawing board and try to construct something that does work for them. But in all these deals, you see where it all takes place is the whiteboard. And it's not what we initially proposed to them or what they initially proposed. It's that partnership with CEOs and management teams. So in this case, there's a stadium that's mapped onto a bigger organization that produces lots of revenue and has lots of streams of revenue, et cetera. Are you always looking through to some underlying holistic whole thing and figuring out how the joint venture that you own equity in benefit?

50:42Because the stadium by itself is just a thing. So the ticket sales or something and the revenue associated with the stadium itself becomes the thing that the joint venture. So in that case, you got premium VIP suites. You have food and beverage, but premium offerings. You have a museum. If you ever go to the Bernabea, there's an incredible museum of all the history. It's the premium tickets. But in all these deals, there's different levers depending on what it is. In this case, it's a perimeter of assets, but it could be the whole company. A firm, Max Levchin's company, we did a$20 billion partnership with them where we formed a joint venture with them so they could originate more assets and have more operating leverage.

51:23So that one, my partner, Michael Dryden, who runs our asset-based finance business, has known Max a long time, gets on a whiteboard, they start mapping it up. It's not like you can pull it off the shelf. Most of our deals, you can't just pull off a shelf. It's right-brained. And that's why when I say one of our core principles that independent thinking, stay away from the group thing, just think differently. What is the process by which you develop the 15 to 20 themes at any given point in time? At any one time, we have 50 to 60 themes bubbling through Sixth Street. Because remember, we have 10 investment platforms.

51:55Sure, they each have a couple. They each have five. So they're constantly bubbling. And then from that, there's really good themes, but they're not actionable. So we narrowed down to 15 to 25 themes. Where those come from, it's from sector knowledge. We have 16 different sector franchises. So each of those sectors is doing primary research about their ecosystems, thinking about not only what does that ecosystem look like today, but what's it going to look like tomorrow? There's research. Some of it's we've got a whole bunch of longstanding relationships with CEOs and management teams. And they'll call, say, hey, we're seeing this in our sector.

52:29We're seeing this in our business or we're seeing this. So, hey, that's interesting. Let's follow it up. Sometimes we're looking at a company and we're looking at, that's an okay business. And then we look at the supplier to that company. Like, wow, the supplier is actually more interesting than the company we're looking at. or we're looking at a company and those customers more issues. And then the last thing is just sometimes all of a sudden you start to see free deals, data centers. Obviously, that's not a good example because we started doing data centers back in 2017 with AirTrunk, which we can talk about because that's a company we started, literally started the white sheet of paper, which is actually just got bought Blackstone for I think$16 billion or something like that.

53:06So we'll get a deal and it comes top down, bottom up. And sometimes we just have a view on something and we'll start doing a bunch of primary research. But a lot of it's through primary research, through relationships, but it comes from everywhere. It's not one place. It's everywhere. And that's the whole point of our firm is that because there's no silos and no fiefdoms, all those things get circulating up. All of a sudden, we see a theme from our power people. We have a team that all they do is power, our data comms people, data communications. And we see a com from our real estate people. And this is what's going on with AI, the constraint of power, putting all those on one umbrella.

53:41I'm like, hey, let's have you guys all work together on this. What are your favorite two or three themes right now? The ones that personally animate you the most? We have 25 themes running through the platform right now. I'll just give you a few of them. Number one is partnering with big companies, big corporates to help advance their business. A firm we talked about thinking about partnering with asset originators and banks to basically help their origination, help their operating leverage. So that's a big thing in our asset-based finance business. Our real estate business, the idea of people getting older.

54:16Wealth tech. So we talked about the wealth space, the percentage of private alternatives and wealth that's going to go up. There's a whole bunch of services and technology around it. So let's say wealth tech is one. Sports and live entertainment we've talked about. We talked about the sports piece, but again, live entertainment, the one thing we learned during COVID is that people like experiences. They value experiences more. As you know, from the younger generations, I know from my kids, they could care less about material things. They just want experiences. That is a big theme for us. And you'll continue to see us do more than that.

54:47Those are some of the bigger ones. Given how big this has all become, assets, number of people, strategies, investments, how do you spend your own time on individual investments versus on people and on teams? Because obviously you love investing. You know the investment by investment level detail, but there's way too much for you to like keep in your head at any one point in time. So what does your week look like? First of all, my partners that run the 10 different investment platform, they're great investors. When we first started the firm and investment committee, I was very vocal, probably 20, 30 % of the conversation, in some cases more than that.

55:24And each year that's gone by, people just keep growing. And again, these are great investors. And I just less and less. And to the point now on investment committee, I have views, but it's very rare where there's some issue or something we're thinking about or some way to create value in a particular company where through the course of all the conversation investment committee, I can just sit there because everything that I would have said or would have asked has already been asked. And a lot of cases asked better than I would have asked. And I'm on the big investment committee. Some of the smaller deals I don't get involved with.

55:58But again, I'm sitting there watching my partners. It's kind of what David Venter used to do, watching a tennis match. And again, not only listening to the partners, but also some of the junior people or mid-level people, because sometimes the best ideas come from them. So some deals I'll get involved with, I'll get involved with one or two deals a year. I deal like Airbnb. I was the front person. I deal like Real Madrid with my partner, Rich Berlotti. The bigger deals all step in and get actively involved. But in general, we have a great team, not only with the partners, but the next generation, the next generation.

56:32In terms of running the business, obviously, I think a lot about our strategic plan and executing the core strategic priorities. So I try to think about big boulders and there's five big boulders generally very related to our strategic plan. I'm maniacally focused on that. I got excessive amount of energy as you might be able to tell. What I try to do is keep the culture. Culture is everything. If I see something not working the way it is or some deal doesn't get passed to another group or some relationship doesn't do that in an unfettered way, it's so counterculture to like hive relationships or not call people back or not help people even though it's a deal not related to your particular sector.

57:12I'm trying to make that very counterculture. If I see people acting with ego or something, I'll pull them aside and I'll be like, that's not how we do it here. And I'm maniacal about that because it's not just culture and abstract, it's how we actually execute our business model and deliver great outcomes for LPs. And then the last thing I try to do is what I call toggle like a hawk. So I got the right people in the right seats, they bought into the culture, they're good investors, they're good managers and leaders. They know what we're doing. They know what we're trying to solve. They're willing to work with other groups.

57:46We have really good reporting. So that's one thing I learned at Goldman. Communication and not fancy reporting. So I always know what's going on. And then obviously I talk to probably 20 or 30 people a day throughout the firm. My average conversation is probably two or three minutes. I literally talk to people all day, all the time, just to feel what's going on. And if there's ever a situation where I need to go 10 ,000 feet deep, I'll go 10 ,000 feet deep, but then I try to go back up so I can just see everything that's going on. If I'm 10 ,000 feet deep every day, I'm not doing my job. And that's kind of how I think about it.

58:19But those are really how I spend my time. But the reality is we have a great set of partners. A lot of the partners, we've worked together for 20 plus years. We have shared values, first principles on doing business the right way. So a lot of those first principles are already in place because we've worked together for so long, we all know what we're doing and we all buy into the mission of what we're trying to do. Keeping the culture the way it is and making those type of behaviors that life is too short, I just try to protect that with everything. All these fascinating stats that are coming out of Paul put out that stat about the percent of companies north of 100 million of revenue that are private is 93 % or something like that.

58:57It just seems like the private markets and let's say the allocation of an average high net worth wealth advisor client or something is 3 % and it's going to 30 % or whatever. Maybe they overshoot and that's the problem. And then they have a liquidity crisis and that's the problem. But I'm just curious for your commentary on, it's amazing to me how few net new pure public equity investors I interview. It's kind of a dying breed. It's kind of ironic when you step back and think about it. You basically have all these public companies. There's less public companies that's going on private. But now you have all these trends of people trying to take ETFs on private companies.

59:35So it's almost like a... It's a snake eating and stale. It's a little bit circular. That's really interesting when you start thinking about ETFs and now there's going to be trading private capital. So all this stuff is a little bit circular, but it's a real dynamic. And I think it's something that anyone that's thinking about investing and thinking about capital allocation needs to take real note of these dynamics because they're real dynamics. And by the way, I think for some of the traditional sovereign wealth funds and pension funds, they've had unfettered access to GPs. And I think they've got more competition coming in from the wealth channel and insurance channel.

1:00:12So it's going to be interesting to see how all that plays out. I think like anything, the very best GPs are a lot better than the average ones. This is the way the same, the best companies are a lot better than the average ones. It's an interesting point that the best LPs will have to compete for the best GPs in the same way the GPs do for companies. It's starting to happen. You're starting to see with some of the larger LPs that are the traditional sovereign wealth funds or pitch fund, they're looking for access because they're worried about access in the future because they see what's happening.

1:00:41They see all this wealth capital coming in. I mean, there's not an earnings call where people aren't talking about the growth through the wealth channel and how much money they're raising the wealth channel, obviously seeing the insurance. So I think access to your best GPs, those conversations are accelerating because again, ultimately everything's a choice of alternatives. And I think that dynamic is the other part of this. In addition to the beautiful people that are over themselves, Spurs idea, are there other outside sources of inspiration that have really fueled your thinking people, mentors, icons like Popovich, anyone else that has cemented the way you view the world that we haven't talked about?

1:01:20When I got to Goldman Sachs, I met Jody on the airplane and I showed up to Goldman Sachs. I didn't know anything about finance. And I remember going to the first analyst session with all these super smart kids from the best schools, all 4.0s and super intimidating. I had something very fortunate and also one of the most impactful things in my professional career happened is that when I first started, there was a bank called Amoresco in Dallas, Texas, and they were failing and they needed to raise liquidity. I got tasked and I literally knew nothing to basically lead the evaluation of buying a portfolio of loans from a group called RTV Ventures.

1:02:04So as part of Amoresco is basically a bunch of loans to radio and TV companies. Back then, this is before direct lending or private credit, because there was a lot of asset value to the radio stations and TV stations, but they had no cash flow, a traditional bank couldn't finance them. So what these guys had done, this is a little pocket in this big bank called Amresco. They basically had gone out and given these companies first lien loans at like 15 % coupons and warrants for 10 to 30 % of the company. You can imagine it's breaking my brain. They called it stick value, but they would take a radio station, a TV station.

1:02:45And these things traded, they were sold all the time of say$200 million and they would lend the first$50 million. So from their perspective, going back to sort of risk units, they were the first 25 % of the value of the company in a first lien loan, which at the time broke my brain. And the guy who ran that was a guy named Steven Plus. Steven Plus, who's now Sixth Street's chief risk officer, he's about 15 years older than me. We ended up buying the portfolio. It's about a$400 million portfolio. And I was basically in charge of the portfolio. And Steven's a slow-talking Texas guy. You meet him and you're like, is he going to get out the sentence or not?

1:03:23But he's one of the smartest guys out there. The fact I got a job at Goldman Sachs is pretty lucky. He basically, for two years, taught me finance, taught me investing, taught me about risk units, taught me everything, taught me about how to go through documents. I look back to it now. He was 15 years older than me. Here's some kid comes down from, even though I was Texan, I was coming down from a New York firm. Now, I still had a little bit of my Southern accent back then, which got beat out of me by all my friends in college. And here's this guy literally answering every week, every day, question after question.

1:03:58I used to have these yellow notepads and I literally would write down my 10 questions for Steven Plus for the day. And I'd literally call him and ask him. That whole process of him teaching me about investing and how to think about risk, how to think about return and just all that, it literally led to what made the start of my career at Goldman, where I started running businesses when I was like 25 years old. Because that whole idea with Steven is from that, I started to say, wait a second, these are really high rates of return. And when I started to actually understand what it was, but couldn't you take other businesses that are good businesses that banks for whatever reason won't lend to because they've got a very specific credit box and still earn a good return, but not that high and then have a much bigger Tam.

1:04:45Could you do that in the middle market? And I technically wrote it, but Stephen helped me write it, wrote a business plan when I was 23 or 24 years old. And that business plan was basically to do middle market direct lending. First of all, direct lending didn't exist. It wasn't a word. And Goldman Sachs had never done anything in the middle market. This is when I first met David Vineyard. But I just said, look, this could be new clients for Goldman. We could go out instead of earning on that portfolio, they were like 30 % returns on first lead. Maybe it's 10 % to 12 % or 13 % or something less than that.

1:05:18But again, doing something outside of credit box, but on good assets or good businesses. And that business at 24 years old, I went to present to Hank Paulson, Lloyd Blankfein, David Vainer, the executive committee. And that was the first time that Goldman ever got in the middle market is through that. By the way, that business, Julian Salisbury, one of my partners, told me it's over$50 billion now. But it all happened because this guy, Stephen Plus, took the time, answered all those questions, would have never happened. And that just taught me about developing people because I saw what happened to me.

1:05:50And that's why we put so much emphasis on developing the younger generation. Age is just a number. Get people that buy in the culture, work hard, that are intellectually curious to ask questions. That really changed everything. But it really taught me a commitment to developing. A couple of my partners, born of Mogbel and Matt Diller, they were associates when they joined Sixth Street on the first day. And I've been working with them every day since. Whenever there's someone who I think at Sixth Street needs development or could be better at reaching the potential, guess who I've had them work with?

1:06:24Steven Plus. Pretty amazing. It's incredible. But that was one of the most selfless acts and it changed my life. My friend Ravi Gupta has my favorite framework for this development concept, which is demanding and supportive, is the orientation he wants to have towards people. How do you think about the framework for developing people and talent? That guy's a smart guy. That podcast he did with him, I thought that was a great one. He's super talented. And for me, it starts with caring. You have to authentically care for that person and you have to authentically care for their development. That's one, two, three.

1:06:58And what I always tell all our leaders all the time is you got to be proactively as part of your day and part of your week and part of your month thinking about how do I develop this person? What are their strengths? What are their weaknesses? How do we do that? And that's why we have this personal business plan that we make everyone do, but it's not only that we have everyone in the firm do it, part of the process is not only having them do it, the other part of the process is having them go to their leaders and really sit down with them to sort of identify that. So for me, it's being intentional, it's being deliberate, but you got to have a plan.

1:07:29You can't do it in an abstract. You got to be very explicit. And the way I think about the personal business plans is every year you have a personal business plan. The format of everyone's personal business plan is the same. The content's different. You have five things or three things on your list you need to improve. You knock down 70 % of them. That's part of your toolkit. You leave the ones that you didn't knock down for the next year. Those go to the next year. And then you add two more. I talk about future self all the time. You go through that process. You do that for 20 years and you're deliberate about it.

1:07:58and you keep notes like you do on the yellow notepad and you're intentional about it, those people, while they're kind of getting to 20, they're going to be optimizing their return on time because there's such a wide toolkit to go through. And by the way, the corollary to that is allows them to spend more quality time with their family and their kids. Oftentimes people try to skip steps and the whole purpose of these personal business plans is the intentionality to really knock them off and be deliberate. You're not on an island, you're in partnership with whoever your leader of that particular investment platform is.

1:08:29And that's how we think about it. We say, look, shoot high, because if you're doing 100 % of your plan of what you're trying to work on, you're probably not aiming high enough, but try to knock down 75 % and keep adding to it. And you'll wake up one day and your future self will thank you because you get to spend more time with your kids and go to all their sports games like I do today. Is the retention crazy high at Sixth Street? We've never lost a partner at Sixth Street. Crazy. I didn't think that's all culture. Maybe after this podcast, we will, but because you got so many listeners, but you could argue, maybe we should have lost some.

1:09:03Maybe there's a criticism there, but there's different forms of compensation. I think sometimes in our industry, everyone thinks about one form of compensation, which is monetary, but there's who you work with compensation. What's your culture like compensation? Are you getting developed compensation? There's opportunity. Do you have white space in front of you compensation? We try to take a more holistic view to that. and we coach that and people like to work there and we don't have, we don't tolerate it. Will that pop up every once in a while where two people get intense and then disagree? That happens as long as it's with respect and dignity.

1:09:38And again, people get intense, but that's not what we're doing because again, our business model is predicated on people working together, not having feathoms and silos. So they all work together, share information, share relationships. That is literally the essence of our business model. That's why we're so focused on it. say more about this concept of future self? I was very fortunate that my parents, we didn't grow up with a lot, but they always spent a lot of time with me. They were always present at all my sports games. They were just always there. So when I started working at Goldman, I had that in my mind.

1:10:13Whenever I had kids, I didn't know when I wanted to be able to be very present with them. My idea was, and it goes back to those yellow piece of paper is that if I I build the biggest toolkit possible. I invest all the time now, prior to when I have kids and a family and a wife, that I will be able to spend maximum time with them. I had a bunch of motivations. I was always thinking about my future self, not from a business perspective or career perspective, but that I could spend more time with my kids. These kids don't exist, by the way. So this is just like a future self. And my idea was it's all about return on time because investing is overwhelming.

1:10:50You could literally spend - You'll never reach the bottom. It never ends. It was like, you could spend all day on half a deal. It never ends. So I need to be able to be the most efficient at return on time. The way I want to be efficient at return on time, know what you like, have the biggest toolkit possible. And I got to build that toolkit as much as possible. That's why I started doing my own personal business plans when I was just starting the business. But it was always with the mindset of my future self so that when I got to that point, I could be a good husband, be a good dad, and be present like my parents were.

1:11:22I always talk about, think about your future self. You got to have fun, but the more time you put in now when you don't have a spouse and kids, you're going to basically set yourself up where you can spend more time. I think some people mortgage the future of it by having too much fun where you could have a little bit less fun and spend more time building your toolkit so you could spend more time with your family when it happened. And that was kind of always a motivation for why I was so focused on those yellow notepads and just that future self and that moment. Again, just to be clear, because I have friends probably listen.

1:11:55I did have fun, but I was also thinking ahead about that future self. If I apply future self to Sixth Street, to the whole thing, and you think five, 10 years hence, something like that, what do you hope it becomes that it is not yet? I want to stay an investor first firm. Other people in the industry want to be deployment factories. There's nothing wrong with that. All good. but that's not what we want Sixth Street to be. That's number one. Number two is culture is everything. To me, there's two tests I'm gonna always run. One test is that we have an offsite every year in Austin, Texas, where the whole firm comes and I go walk around, I meet a bunch of people and I'm like, did I meet any a-holes?

1:12:39Did I meet people that don't ask questions or just talk about themselves? And so far we're undefeated, 16 and 0. But the other test I'm going to run is when I'm an old man and 80 years old, and I come back in the firm, and I sit in a random investment committee or a random meeting, is that still true? And to me, that's the ultimate test. And would I introduce the people then to my family, to my grandkids and my kids? Because that's the ultimate test. We always talk about that when we're interviewing people. First of all, are they over themselves yet? Which again, in our industry, there's a lot of people not over themselves yet.

1:13:13Maybe they'll listen to this and get over themselves. That's a whole other topic. But what do you introduce into a family member? That to me is more important than anything is maintaining that. And wherever that journey takes us, that's where it will take us. But again, for our business, we're an investing business. Those things are what make up us trying to drive what we believe fundamentally, really religiously, because we've been doing it for 25 plus years, great outcomes for our LPs. And if we can do that and ultimately serve your customer, which in our cases are LPs, are people, we do all those things, that's where it will take us.

1:13:49To be clear, we have five-year strategic plans and very specific objectives, but that's what I think about on the horizon. And I've shared that broadly with our entire firm because it's how I think about it. My friend Boyd Vardy has this great phrase, which is, we don't know where we're going, but we know how to get there. Yeah, I like that. I like that. Which sounds a little bit like that. And you got to be able to adapt because think about software engineers. Every mom and dad in Palo Alto three years ago was telling their kids they had to do software engineers and now tell them not to do software.

1:14:17Things can change and you got to be adapting. We're headed into interesting times here. Well, I'm fascinated by what you've built. It's so interesting and fun to hear all about it. It's history and it's unique aspects and where it's led you. It's such a fantastic conversation. When I do these, I end with the same traditional closing question for everyone. What is the kindest thing that anyone's ever done for you? I think I'm gonna have to say the Stephen Plus being 15 years older than me and taking time to answer all my questions. In a lot of firms, I think they would have gone around me and said, what are you doing?

1:14:48And he took the opposite approach. That's the kindest thing anyone's ever done for me and probably the most impactful. I wouldn't be where I am today without him. Thank you so much for your time. Thank you. If you enjoyed this episode, visit joincolossus.com where you'll find every episode of this podcast complete with hand edited transcripts. You can also subscribe to Colossus Review, our quarterly print, digital, and private audio publication featuring in-depth profiles of the founders, investors, and companies that we admire most. Learn more at joincolossus.com slash subscribe.

1:15:33Thank you.

From the publisher

My guest today is Alan Waxman. Alan is the co-founder and CEO of Sixth Street, one of the most unique investment firms with a "go anywhere, do anything" mandate across asset classes, geographies, and time horizons, and over $110 billion in AUM. He describes his journey from CIO of Goldman Sachs’ Special Situations Group and the frameworks he brought with him to lay the foundation for Sixth Street. Alan details their famous investments like Spotify and Airbnb during challenging periods, their innovative sports partnerships with Real Madrid and FC Barcelona, and their $30 billion "TAO" vehicle that allows them to write billion-dollar checks while keeping individual fund sizes matched to opportunities. We discuss hiring people without egos, enabling a truly multi-strategy approach, and Sixth Street’s "face the tiger" philosophy. Please enjoy this great conversation with Alan Waxman. 

For the full show notes, transcript, and links to mentioned content, check out the episode page⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠here⁠.⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

-----

This episode is brought to you by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Ramp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Ramp’s mission is to help companies manage their spend in a way that reduces expenses and frees up time for teams to work on more valuable projects. Go to⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Ramp.com/invest⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to sign up for free and get a $250 welcome bonus.

–

This episode is brought to you by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ AlphaSense⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. AlphaSense has completely transformed the research process with cutting-edge AI technology and a vast collection of top-tier, reliable business content. Invest Like the Best listeners can get a free trial now at⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Alpha-Sense.com/Invest⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and experience firsthand how AlphaSense and Tegus help you make smarter decisions faster.

–

This episode is brought to you by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Ridgeline⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Ridgeline has built a complete, real-time, modern operating system for investment managers. It handles trading, portfolio management, compliance, customer reporting, and much more through an all-in-one real-time cloud platform. Head to⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ridgelineapps.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to learn more about the platform.

-----

Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://thepodcastconsultant.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠).

Show Notes:

(00:00:00) Welcome to Invest Like the Best

(00:04:57) Introducing Alan Waxman and Sixth Street

(00:05:58) The Formative Goldman Sachs Years

(00:10:21) Unitizing Risk and Return

(00:14:23) Facing the Tiger: Sixth Street's Culture and Values

(00:34:51) Spotify and Airbnb: Case Studies in Investment

(00:39:20) Ambitious Investment Strategies

(00:40:40) Strategic Partnerships in Sports

(00:41:23) Navigating COVID with Airbnb

(00:43:36) Risk and Return Analysis

(00:46:56) Investing in Sports and Live Entertainment

(00:52:23) Developing Investment Themes

(00:55:29) Balancing Leadership and Investment

(00:57:30) The Importance of Culture

(01:10:33) Future Self and Long-Term Vision

(01:15:09) The Kindest Thing Anyone Has Ever Done For Alan

More from Invest Like the Best with Patrick O'Shaughnessy

All 200 episodes
Alan Waxman - Building Sixth Street - [Invest Like the Best, EP.433]Invest Like the Best with Patrick O'Shaughnessy · 1 h 14 min
Listen in VO