War, $200 oil, and the market’s reckoning

4 Mar 2026 · 1 h 10 min · 29 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: Investing Experts - Episode: War, $200 Oil, and the Market’s Reckoning

Episode Overview

In this episode of the Investing Experts podcast, James Kostohryz, a global portfolio strategist, discusses the geopolitical tensions involving the US, Israel, and Iran, the potential implications for the global economy, and key investment strategies in light of these developments.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Geopolitical Tensions in the Middle East
  2. Background: Kostohryz has been warning about the high likelihood of conflict between the US, Israel, and Iran. This tension has escalated recently into a prolonged conflict beyond the brief 12-day war noted last year.
  3. Existential Threat: Israel views Iran as an existential threat, especially with increasing missile capabilities from Iranian proxies.
  4. Strategic Objectives: The primary goals for Israel and the US include:
  5. Preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
  6. Destroying or capturing Iran's refined uranium and ballistic missile capabilities.
  1. Market Implications of the Conflict
  2. Oil Prices:
  3. The conflict could result in significant oil supply disruptions, with potential prices exceeding $200 per barrel if the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked.
  4. Historical context indicates that major oil shocks often lead to business cycle recessions and bear markets.
  5. Equity Markets:
  6. Current market conditions display complacency regarding the risks posed by the ongoing conflict.
  7. Kostohryz predicts a potential correction in the S&P 500, with declines of 10-20% if market participants begin to anticipate a longer conflict.
  1. Investment Strategies
  2. Gold and Precious Metals:
  3. Gold has historically served as a hedge against inflation and crisis, but Kostohryz suggests it may be overvalued currently.
  4. There's concern about silver's dependency on industrial demand and its vulnerability in a recession.
  5. Energy Sector:
  6. Kostohryz favors commodities like oil over energy producers due to the unpredictability in long-term pricing.
  7. He advises caution regarding investments in US energy stocks, given potential government interventions affecting pricing.
  1. Bond and Treasury Perspectives
  2. US Treasury Bonds:
  3. The podcast discusses the role of inflation expectations and real returns in bond pricing.
  4. Kostohryz highlights TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) as a favorable investment for those worried about inflation.
  5. Corporate Bonds:
  6. A potential recession could widen credit spreads, making corporate bonds less appealing.
  1. Overall Market Sentiment and Advice
  2. Kostohryz emphasizes the current market's complacency and advises investors to adopt a defensive stance.
  3. He encourages higher cash exposure and investments in short-term securities to mitigate risks associated with the ongoing geopolitical crisis.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Complacency in Markets: Many investors are underestimating the risks associated with the geopolitical landscape, which could lead to significant declines in equity markets.
  • Prolonged Conflict: The potential for a prolonged conflict in the Middle East could lead to major shocks in oil prices, impacting global economies.
  • Investment Caution: The need for caution in investment strategies is paramount, with recommendations to focus on commodities and less volatility-prone sectors.
  • Risk Awareness: Investors, particularly younger ones, should recognize that crises can and do happen, and prepare their portfolios accordingly.

---

Conclusion

James Kostohryz provides a nuanced view of the intertwining factors influencing the market amidst geopolitical tensions, emphasizing the importance of strategic investment approaches during uncertain times. His insights encourage listeners to remain vigilant and adaptable in their investment strategies.

For those seeking further guidance, Kostohryz runs the Successful Portfolio Strategy on Seeking Alpha, where he offers in-depth analysis and recommendations.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Kostohryz's Background and Expertise

0:45 to 2:10

James Kostohryz shares his extensive background in global portfolio strategy and the oil industry.

“Would appreciate a reintroduction, and thanks for coming back on.”

Impending Conflict in the Middle East

2:10 to 4:05

Discussion on the escalating geopolitical risks, particularly focusing on Israel, Iran, and the U.S.

“And this is something that I've been kind of highlighting this risk for quite a while.”

Understanding the Stakes: Israel's Perspective

4:05 to 6:00

Exploration of how Israeli leadership views the existential threat posed by Iran and its proxies.

“I think that the market is still greatly underappreciating, greatly underestimating the risks that this poses to markets.”

Iran's Missile Strategy and Its Implications

6:00 to 9:10

Analysis of Iran's missile capabilities and the strategic urgency perceived by Israel regarding defense.

“what a lot of market participants seem to think.”

Nuclear Threat and Regional Stability

9:10 to 12:20

Kostohryz discusses the connection between Iran's nuclear ambitions and regional security dynamics.

“And it would literally be impossible for Israel to defend against this type of onslaught, particularly these like low tech projectiles that had like a lower trajectory, because it's one thing for the Iron Dome to work.”

The Urgency of Action Against Iran

12:20 to 14:05

Insights into why immediate action against Iran is critical to prevent overwhelming threats to Israel.

“This is what originally prompted the war that we kind of saw last year.”

Iran's Nuclear Threat and Global Security

14:05 to 21:58

Learn about Iran's missile capabilities and the existential threat they pose to the US and Israel.

“So there was a timeline in the sense of a sense of urgency that within a couple of years, Iran was going to get itself to the point where it would be able to overwhelm any Israeli anti-aerial defenses.”

Impact of Strait of Hormuz on Oil Prices

21:58 to 26:35

Understand how Iran's actions in the Strait of Hormuz could drastically affect global oil prices and the economy.

“If we have a multi-week, multi-month campaign going on, remember, Trump has already talked about four to five weeks is the sort of the planning that he has.”

Market Reactions and Economic Predictions

26:35 to 28:00

Explore the potential market impacts and economic predictions amidst geopolitical tensions.

“type of shock that could cause recessions around the world and basically every time you get a major recession of this sort usually get bear markets in the equity markets which are declines of 20 % or more.”

Understanding the Risks of Oil Disruption

28:00 to 28:34

Learn about the potential economic impacts of closing the Strait of Hormuz.

“So those are the risks that we're dealing with now.”
Show all 29 chapters

Market Reactions to Prolonged Conflict

28:34 to 29:11

Explore how the market might respond to extended conflicts in the region.

“And we appreciate your continued help in helping us understand, you know, such a terrible conflict for obvious reasons and such a protracted one for reasons that you have laid out pretty clearly.”

Historical Bear Markets and Oil Shocks

29:11 to 30:26

Understand the correlation between oil shocks and bear markets in history.

“in for, we have seen a number of black swan or exogenous events in the past couple of years that the market has pretty much taken in stride.”

Comparing Oil Disruptions: Then and Now

30:26 to 31:46

Examine the differences between past and potential future oil disruptions.

“And it has usually almost always also led to a major business cycle recession.”

Current Oil Price Predictions and Factors

31:46 to 32:46

Learn about current predictions for oil prices amid geopolitical tensions.

“During the Arab oil embargo, roughly that disruption was roughly about four percent.”

Market Anticipations of Oil Disruptions

32:46 to 33:27

Discuss how market sentiment affects current oil prices amidst uncertainty.

“that we're going to have oil prices certainly well over$100.”

Recession Scenarios Linked to Oil Prices

33:27 to 34:30

Explore the scenarios that might lead to a recession based on oil prices.

“Again, it might be if the oil shock only lasts a month, it'll be enough to hit the economy, but not enough to cause, let's say, a two-quarter long recession potentially or not a major one.”

Impacts of Recession on Private Credit Markets

34:30 to 35:34

Understand the interplay between recession threats and credit markets.

“And again, in terms of the magnitude, we're talking about fairly severe recession if what we're talking about is, say, oil prices that are$150,$200, somewhere along those lines.”

The Strategic Objectives of Conflict

35:34 to 36:26

Analyze the implications of strategic military objectives on market stability.

“and extreme illiquidity because there's a lot of redemptions happening in funds that handle private credit.”

Market Predictions for Precious Metals and More

36:26 to 37:28

Assess how various sectors will react to ongoing geopolitical tensions.

“It's going to take at least that four to six weeks that Trump and Hexeth are talking about, and it could take a lot longer.”

Gold's Role in Economic Crisis Anticipation

37:28 to 39:32

Discover how gold prices reflect the anticipated risks of economic crises.

“Gold has been pricing in the risk of a crisis like this for quite a long time.”

Assessing the Value of Gold Amid Crisis

39:32 to 41:20

Evaluate the current investment value of gold in light of potential crises.

“And what gold is sort of forecasting right now is some sort of long-term inflationary event.”

Personal Insights on Gold Investment Strategy

41:20 to 42:00

Gain insights into investment strategies regarding gold amidst uncertainty.

“Sure, we can get another run in gold, maybe 6 ,000 or a little above.”

Current Market Conditions for Gold and Oil

42:00 to 43:19

Exploring the unusual behavior of gold prices amidst rising crude oil prices.

“for example, with crude oil prices earlier today up about 8%.”

Strategic Positioning in Oil Investments

43:20 to 45:59

Discussion on positioning within the oil market and the implications of potential U.S. oil policies.

“and WTI crude, West Texas Intermediate, is about$75 right now.”

Evaluating Energy Sector Valuation

46:00 to 51:40

Analyzing the undervaluation of the energy sector compared to other market sectors.

“market was pretty much at historically high levels of valuation, at historic levels of valuation, at levels of valuation that were above the 90th percentile, many at the 98th or 99th percentile.”

Risks in Bonds and Interest Rates

51:41 to 56:00

Examining the factors influencing U.S. Treasury bonds and risks associated with corporate bonds.

“In terms of other sectors in the market, I think it's time to start taking a look at some of the defensive sectors.”

Understanding Inflation and TIPS

56:00 to 1:01:10

Learn about inflation forecasts and the benefits of TIPS as an investment.

“inflation as a result of this situation.”

Market Risks and Defensive Strategies

1:01:10 to 1:05:02

Explore the cyclical risks in investing and the importance of a defensive stance in uncertain markets.

“So perfect for you to share that with listeners.”

The Potential for Economic Crises

1:05:02 to 1:07:46

Discuss the complacency in the market and the potential for future economic crises.

“And I'd say that that's the last thing that I kind of want to leave you with, Rena, which is that this issue of complacency.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:10James Kostohryz:James Kostohryz is very happy to have you back on Investing Experts. Welcome back to the show. Thank you for having me, Rena. It's great to have you back. For those that missed your appearances, it was a year ago just about, and prior to that, we've had you on a few times. For a refresher, you run an investing group on Seeking Alpha called Successful Portfolio Strategy. You have a lot of investing experience. For those that forgot, you've been on before talking about the Iran-Israel-America war, which is specifically why we have you again on today, but also just to get your take on the markets as you see them.

0:50James Kostohryz:Would appreciate a reintroduction, and thanks for coming back on. Sure. Well, thanks for having me again, Reena. To talk about my background and specifically how that background might be useful at this particular time, I've been a global portfolio strategist now for over 20 years. I also happen to have a pretty strong background in the oil and gas industry. In fact, the oil and gas industry was one of the first sectors that I covered as a sell side and then as a buy side analyst when I worked in the industry institutionally before I went out on my own to do independent work as a global portfolio strategist.

1:30And as a global portfolio strategist, I'm very focused on how developments in the global economy will impact the performance of different asset classes and sectors and specific stocks and other securities. And so within that context, every so often we have some sort of geopolitical event or crisis or problem that arises that has a very big impact or very potentially large impact on the global economy and global markets. and starting well over a year ago, really a couple of years ago, I started talking about the very strong possibility that we were headed for a major regional and even global war that would be focused in the Middle East on the conflict between Israel and Iran and the United States and Iran.

2:30And this is something that I've been kind of highlighting this risk for quite a while. And this risk has been sort of moving and escalating in various stages. Of course, in the middle of last year, we finally got a manifestation of this risk that I had been talking about. But it ended up being only a 12-day war that had some impact on the markets, but in the end, it wasn't a huge impact because the war only lasted for 12 days and didn't really spread. It was really just a conflict between Israel and Iran. And then the United States got involved at the last moment with a very targeted bombing strike and almost symbolic retaliation.

3:14But I knew that the conflict wasn't done, despite the fact that a lot of people seem to think that the risk was gone after the bombing last year. And so, you know, now we have this war that has started a few days ago. So starting several weeks back, I started advising and warning my members of Successful Portfolio Strategy, as well as my clients, that it was becoming increasingly likely that we were going to get a war and that this war would be a much greater scope and magnitude than the one that we had in the middle of last year, the so-called 12-day war. So I think it'll be useful for us to focus a lot of our conversation today, Rina, on what we can expect going forward.

4:00Obviously, the markets have already had some reaction to the start of this war, but I think that we can expect a lot more of this going forward. I think that the market is still greatly underappreciating, greatly underestimating the risks that this poses to markets. I think that we've been spoiled for a very long time as market participants in the sense that pretty much every major global event that comes around seems to get resolved in a pretty quick period of time. That was certainly the case with the confrontations between Iran and Israel last year in April and then later in June and July. And so I think a lot of people just assume that this is going to go away pretty quickly.

4:41But I'm personally of the view that this isn't going to go away quickly, that this is going to be probably going to be a prolonged affair, and it's actually going to have some pretty significant effects on the markets. And so I guess a good way to maybe start this would be for me to explain why it is that I think that this is going to be a rather drawn-out affair and why it might be quite significant. And in order to understand that, we need to understand the kind of strategic picture here and why it is that this war is even happening in the first place and why it is specifically that the United States is involved right now as deeply as it is.

5:25And so we're going to have to take a couple steps back and kind of look at things from a strategic long-term perspective. Because that strategic long-term perspective is actually going to be the thing that's going to enable us to kind of foretell or predict or forecast how quickly this conflict may actually be over. As I said, I think most people expect this to be over soon, but I think when we understand the deeper and the broad strategies that the participants here have in mind, we see the prospect that this could actually last a lot longer than what a lot of market participants seem to think.

6:04So one of the most important things that we have to understand here is the Israeli perspective with respect to the threat that Iran poses to Israel. So the leadership in Israel, the majority of the leadership and certainly the leadership that now is governing the country, believes that Iran poses an existential threat to the existence of the state of Israel. This word existential is kind of thrown around a lot. You know, in everyday uses, we use the word existential, but I actually mean it in the actual sense of existential, that Iran could actually destroy the state of Israel or could actually make it impossible for people to live in Israel.

6:51And this has been a concern in Israel for quite a while, but it really, really came into much clearer focus a couple of years ago when we started getting the massive missile barrages coming out of Lebanon and into northern Israel. And with the thousands of launches of these low-tech projectiles, they actually had to clear out a pretty significant portion of the country. It made it essentially uninhabitable. This really, I think, started to open the eyes of a lot of people in Israel and elsewhere around the world, which is something that the enemies of Israel had been saying for a very long time, that what they wanted to do was to make Israel such a hell to live in that the citizens of Israel would essentially flee the country.

7:41And with what happened in northern Israel, we got a very clear indication of how that could happen. Basically, the strategy was to encircle Israel, all around the country, with its enemies, various extremist jihadist groups, arm them with missiles of increasing sophistication, and have them lob those missiles into population centers in Israel on a constant basis, and also potentially, you know, do some raids and even ground attacks like we got in the October 6th incident. excuse me, October 7th, that's right. When we got the situation that we had with the missiles being lobbed into northern Israel back in 2024 and after that, a lot of people in Israel and strategists realized that this strategy that had been articulated by and was actually public knowledge by various jihadist leaders could actually work.

8:46And one of the main concerns is that the speed with which Iran was able to produce missiles. And the increasing sophistication of these missiles was something that would mean that within maybe a couple of years' time, these various terrorist groups surrounding Israel would be able to reach every single corner of the country. And it would literally be impossible for Israel to defend against this type of onslaught, particularly these like low tech projectiles that had like a lower trajectory, because it's one thing for the Iron Dome to work. When you have projectiles coming all the way from Iran, you have a long time to actually sort of prepare for their arrival.

9:35And they also come at a certain height. But when you have projectiles coming basically from your neighbor next door, you don't have any time to prepare for it. And also just the trajectory of it makes it such that it's very, very difficult to defend against and can essentially overwhelm the defenses. And as you know, and a lot of your listeners probably know, some of these missiles that are used can cost hundreds of dollars, maybe just a few thousand dollars, the most sophisticated ones, maybe 10 to$30 ,000. But each one of the projectiles that's used to actually intercept these costs over a million dollars each.

10:13So the economics of it is pretty overwhelming. So that was a key insight that Israeli strategic thinkers kind of came to terms with, which was that the actual existence of the state of Israel was being brought into question through this strategy. And the only way to actually address it was to go after the so-called head of the snake, which was Iran. Iran was the country that was producing all these munitions and distributing it to its proxies in the region. It was financing the whole thing. It was also the ideological backing for it. They provided a whole ideological infrastructure. And so this was something that was truly a threat to the existence of the state of Israel.

11:00And of course, a second part of this issue had to do with the nuclear issue. And these things are actually connected. Because from the Iranian standpoint, they would be able to, with impunity, continue to finance and arm their proxies in the region with impunity if they actually had a nuclear weapon that they could use to deter Israel from ever attacking Iran. And that's why the urgency of preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, it wasn't just that Iran might actually use a nuclear weapon against Israel. That, of course, was always considered a serious possibility. But it was simply that it would limit the—but the other issue is that Iran having a nuclear weapon would limit Israel's ability to stop Iran from arming and financing these proxy groups surrounding Israel and the nation surrounding it.

12:04And that's actually ultimately potentially more important because Israel could actually be wiped out, not just from a nuclear weapon, but from all of these like smaller, lower-tech missiles that were coming from all directions or would be coming from all directions by the proxy groups. So this is what really injected a real sense of strategic urgency on the part of the Israelis to both attack the proxies in their proximity, and particularly Hezbollah, but also go after the head of the snake, which is Iran. This is what originally prompted the war that we kind of saw last year. But what happened is that when the United States got involved and it attacked the nuclear facilities, it really didn't solve the underlying problem.

12:52First of all, any attack on a nuclear facility, if you don't get regime change, it just means that the regime is going to rebuild that nuclear capability. And secondly, as I mentioned earlier, an equally important threat from Israel's point of view was the production of hundreds and thousands and tens of thousands of different types of missiles in Iran and being distributed to its proxies and also just being distributed throughout Iran for any potential war with Israel. And as we've been able to see already, the destructive capacity of Iran's ballistic missile arsenal is tremendous. I mean, it is causing tremendous damage in Israel.

13:42So even though the Iron Dome in Israel, even though their aerial defenses are almost miraculous, the fact is that a lot of these missiles are getting through and with increasing technology, particularly the hypersonic missiles, there's not really any defense against that. And also, at some point, it just becomes overwhelming. If you allow Iran to build thousands more missiles over the course of a couple of years, at some point, it actually overwhelms any defenses that you can create against it. So there was a timeline in the sense of a sense of urgency that within a couple of years, Iran was going to get itself to the point where it would be able to overwhelm any Israeli anti-aerial defenses.

14:25And so if you're going to have a conflict and a war with Iran, you needed to have it now while you still had the strategic upper hand. And so it's also been a priority for the leadership in Israel to convince the United States precisely of this and to get them to understand how much of an existential threat this was to Israel, but also in a sense to, persuade the Americans that ultimately this posed a major threat to the United States as well. And that's what we also need to discuss a little bit about here, which is that Iran already has missiles that are capable of reaching anywhere in Europe.

15:03They're just a very short step away from having intercontinental ballistic missiles that could reach the United States. And of course, we know that they're only a very short time away from being able to produce a nuclear weapon. They have nuclear material that can be converted to bomb-grade material basically within a couple of weeks, enough for about 11 bombs. Now, they don't actually have, or our intelligence services think that they don't actually have the capacity to turn that into a nuclear weapon yet because they still need the type of triggers and weaponization to actually be able to convert this refined uranium into a working bomb, and they need to do tests and so forth.

15:44But the reality is that if you leave them there, they will eventually acquire that nuclear weapon. That's pretty much 100 % guaranteed. And we know that they have the capacity to deliver that nuclear weapon because their ballistic missile program is already highly advanced. So this is not just a problem for Israel, it also becomes a problem for the United States, because if Iran has the capability of developing ballistic missiles that can reach the United States, and particularly hypersonics, the United States is more undefended than Israel is, in fact, because there is no aerial anti-missile defenses in place the way you have in Israel at this particular time.

16:27And as we know, from Iran's point of view, America is the great Satan, and death to America for the leadership in Iran is a very real thing. Their actual objective is the death of America, just as it is the death of Israel. So even for the United States, this does actually become existential. And I think a lot of strategic thinkers in Washington, in national security circles, finally came to the conclusion that allowing this regime to continue meant that inevitably they would develop intercontinental ballistic missiles that would be able to reach the United States. And also it would be inevitable, just a matter of time, that they would also acquire a nuclear warhead that they could arm those intercontinental ballistic missiles with.

17:21Strategic thinkers in the United States decided that this posed an existential threat for the United States, and therefore it needed to be addressed now rather than later after Iran actually became a nuclear power and had this ICBM capacity. So in this sense, the strategic thinking of American policymakers and Israeli policymakers converged. And this is why they decided to attack now before Iran has nuclear weapons, before they have the intercontinental ballistic missiles. It just makes sense from a long-term strategic standpoint to have this battle now rather than later. And so this brings up the other issue is, okay, what are their objectives?

18:02What are their objectives and what's the end game here? You know what the end game is based on what the initial analysis that I tried to outline. The end game is that they need to absolutely make sure that Iran has completely lost its capabilities of producing a nuclear weapon. That means that they need to either destroy or capture all of their refined uranium that they already have there. the 11 bombs worth of it. They need to destroy all of their facilities and technology that's used to produce and refine this uranium. And they also need to completely wipe out their ballistic missile capability.

18:45Because again, just that ballistic missile capability alone is enough to threaten the existence of Israel and also to pose a serious threat to the United States. And it's already posing a threat to Europe because these missiles can reach all the way into Europe, even as far as England. The end game is that the United States and Israel need to wipe out their capacity to produce missiles. They need to completely wipe out their nuclear program. In theory, there's three ways you could do that. The first way is that the Iranians can negotiate that away. They could actually agree to have people go in and dismantle their nuclear program in a verified way.

19:23and they could agree to have people come in and dismantle their missile-making capabilities in a verifiable way. But that's not going to happen. I mean, there's no leader in Iran that would ever allow that level of humiliation. And so that really leaves only two other alternatives on the table. One is that you simply destroy these capabilities physically through military intervention. And most likely that would actually require troops on the ground to get that all done. You may want to ask me later on in this program whether boots on the ground might actually be needed. I do think they will be in order to achieve these objectives.

20:00The other possibility is that you get regime change. And the new regime actually says, you know what, we're going to give up our ballistic missile capability. We're going to give up our nuclear program in exchange for supporting the new regime, you know, getting rid of the sanctions, giving us economic and political aid and support so we can get the nation going again. Of these three possibilities, the most attractive and really the only safe and secure alternative is the regime change. Because, again, even if you destroy, physically destroy all of Iran's capabilities now, as long as this regime is in power, they will always try to rebuild.

20:42They will always rebuild and it'll just be a matter of time before they rebuild their ballistic missile capability, before they rebuild their nuclear capability. There is no way for it to get rid of this existential threat without regime change. So they are very, very much focused on trying to get that done, even though the United States would rather play this down because the whole idea of regime change is unpopular in the United States. But the strategy makers in Washington know that the only way to get rid of this existential risk is through regime change. And from the Israeli point of view, they know that for sure.

21:15They are 100 % convinced that the only way they're going to be safe in the long run is to facilitate regime change in Iran. And so I think that the Israelis are 100 % committed to the extent that they possibly can be to use this opportunity to get regime change because it might be the last opportunity of the sort that they'll ever get as a nation state to get rid of this regime that is ideologically committed to their destruction. Just to kind of wrap this up here from a strategic point of view, these strategic objectives of the United States and Israel cannot be met within a short period of time.

21:51They can only be met through a long term, multi-week, probably monthly, multi-month campaign. What does this mean? If we have a multi-week, multi-month campaign going on, remember, Trump has already talked about four to five weeks is the sort of the planning that he has. That's your best case scenario. You know, Pete Hegseth has talked about four to six weeks. Both of them have said that the United States isn't going to stop until its objectives are met. And I just outlined what those objectives are. So this could very clearly go on longer than the four to six weeks that they've planned for. Four to six weeks, I think, is a very optimistic scenario.

22:31And so this could go on a lot longer. Now, what's going to happen in the meantime? Well, in the meantime, Iran has the capacity to keep the Strait of Hormuz shut. They've already announced that they're shutting it down. They've already shown that they can sink ships and, you know, put ships on fire that disobey their orders to not pass through the strait. Traffic through the strait is basically at a standstill. There's some ships that are still getting through, but no big oil tankers. And from a strategic standpoint, that's all the Iranians care about is keeping the big oil tankers from coming through there.

23:05if they can keep these big oil tankers from being able to make it through the Strait of Hormuz, they know oil prices will soon be up well over$100, probably up over$200. The other thing that the Iranians are doing, in addition to blocking the Strait of Hormuz, is that they're attacking their Gulf neighbors who are large oil exporters. the Iranians have publicly declared in the past that if they the sovereignty of their nation is under threat and or if they are not able to export their own oil that not a single drop of oil will be able to get out of the Middle East region they will not allow a single drop of oil to come out of the Middle East if they're not able to sell their oil or if their sovereignty is actually under threat and that's exactly what the situation is right now and they have actually said publicly that they're not going to allow a drop of oil to get out of the Middle East.

24:03Now, they can do that partly through trying to block the Strait of Hormuz. But the other alternative that they have that they haven't quite resorted to yet, but that's what we can be looking forward to in the next couple of weeks as a real risk, is that they actually start intensely attacking production, oil processing, oil transport, and oil export infrastructure in the region. Now, they've already had some attacks. They've attacked a major oil shipping port in Bahrain. They attacked a very major oil processing facility in Saudi Arabia. But this is just a taste. I mean, they've done very, very little attacking to the oil infrastructure yet.

24:48But here's the risk. The Iranians, since they have attacked other facilities in these Gulf nations, At some point, these Gulf nations are going to be kind of forced to respond militarily. Now, up until now, they've been showing restraint because they're afraid of getting into a war with Iran, where Iran actually starts shooting their most powerful missiles at their oil infrastructure and essentially destroys their economies. But clearly, these countries can't just sit back and let Iran bomb away at them with impunity. And already the Saudis are looking like they're preparing for some sort of a military response.

25:31And so the next big step, I think, as far as a new shock is going to be that if nations in the Gulf, such as Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia, you know, most importantly, actually start getting involved militarily and start attacking Iran, the Iranians are going to feel completely justified in bombing their oil export infrastructure. And when that happens, or if that happens, we can definitely expect to start seeing oil prices, you know,$200, maybe even$300. So the combination of blocking Hormuz and also going after oil export production processing infrastructure in countries around the Gulf are the biggest risks right now to the global economy because it can get over prices well above$100 well even over$200 that's the type of shock that could cause recessions around the world and basically every time you get a major recession of this sort usually get bear markets in the equity markets which are declines of 20 % or more.

26:48I'd point out that the equity market right now is not too far off of its highs, really, even though today we're having a fairly significant down day. But we're still within roughly 5 % percentage points of the all-time high. That means that the market is discounting relatively little risk of a major disruption of this sort. If it was at least discounting the risk of a major disruption, we'd be down at least to correction levels, which would be a decline of 10 to 20 percent. But we're not even that yet because I think the market is very complacent here. So I think in the next few days, as the market absorbs the prospect that this conflict is going to drag on, that the Strait of Hormuz is closed off and that there's a serious threat to oil export infrastructure in the Middle East, we're probably going to get down at least into correction territory, which is down 10 to 20 percent in the S &P.

27:39And if we actually start to see these risks materialize, where Iran starts going after the oil export infrastructure and they're able to show and prove that they can effectively keep the Strait of Hormuz closed. And by the way, I do believe that they can keep it closed. I've explained this in various articles of mine. I've explained why they can do this, despite the fact that a lot of people have their doubts and are skeptical about this. But if the Iranians are able to prove they can keep the Strait closed and show effectiveness in attacking oil import or export infrastructure, We're looking at oil prices way over$100, probably over$200, major shock to the global economy and recession.

28:21So those are the risks that we're dealing with now. All these things doesn't mean it's going to happen. These are just risks that we need to sort of really be aware of right now in which the market clearly isn't taking as seriously as it needs to.

28:33James Kostohryz:I appreciate that. That's a lot to lay out. And we appreciate your continued help in helping us understand, you know, such a terrible conflict for obvious reasons and such a protracted one for reasons that you have laid out pretty clearly. You know, we are an investing podcast. We're not a policy podcast. Leaving aside the awful humanitarian consequences of this, what would you say in terms of this lasting weeks, months? what would you say, because to your point of what the market does price in and how long it prices it in for, we have seen a number of black swan or exogenous events in the past couple of years that the market has pretty much taken in stride.

29:28James Kostohryz:What would you say about the coming weeks as the market starts to understand, or if it does start to understand and see that this is going to last longer than people may think? What does that do to, you know, what does it do to gold? What does it do to oil? What does it do to investors' appetite for risk? The obvious places that, you know, investors look in times like this, and perhaps the unobvious places that you may be looking at. Okay. Those are great questions. So, I mean, I think that the first thing I would start out with is just saying, looking at the risk to the broader market. I've done a pretty extensive study, and I've published parts of the study in various of my articles that I've written on Seeking Alpha, that whenever you get a major oil shock, a major and sustained oil shock, this has always led to bear market declines of 20 % or more in the U.S.

Read the full transcript

30:25equity market. And it has usually almost always also led to a major business cycle recession. I don't see any reason why that would be different this time. In other words, if we get an oil shock and if the oil shock is prolonged, I think that we can expect both a decline of more than 20 % or more in the S &P 500 and we can probably expect to get some sort of a recession in the United States, the severity of which will simply depend on the magnitude of the oil shock, the duration of that oil shock. In terms of magnitude, I wrote an article a couple of years ago explaining that if we got an oil shock that was of the magnitude that we had during 1973, during the Arab oil embargo, that would be equivalent to something like a$300 oil price today.

31:22Now, what's interesting is, and I pointed it out in this article, is that the actual disruption in the flow of oil from the Middle East that we got during the 73 crisis was actually of a significantly lower magnitude than the disruption that we're potentially dealing with here if the Strait of Hormuz is closed. And certainly if we start getting oil production and facilities disrupted in the Middle East, we're talking about this conflict is putting into play about 20 percent of global oil supply. During the Arab oil embargo, roughly that disruption was roughly about four percent. At its peak, it was about six percent.

32:09But, you know, basically a four to six percent disruption. And it didn't even last two months. The world is different, and there are some things today that are different than they were then in terms of there are strategic petroleum reserves that didn't exist during 1973 and do exist now. There's some other things that make a difference. But there's no doubt, I think, in the minds of serious oil analysts that if we get a disruption that lasts for more than a month, and a serious disruption of the oil flows coming out of the Strait of Hormuz and coming out of the various facilities in the Middle East, that we're going to have oil prices certainly well over$100.

32:50And if this disruption were to last, let's say, for more than two or three months, we would start seeing prices up in the$200 range. Now, of course, prices can get ahead. Prices sort of anticipate. So right now, if you think about it, the market, what it's saying is that, well, we don't expect these disruptions to last very long. That's why oil prices are, you know, only a little above$70 right now. But if the marginal participant in the market starts to become convinced that this is going to become a two-month disruption, then that'll get priced in. And as I said, a two-month disruption would probably be worth$200 oil price.

33:32so that's sort of quantifying for you a little bit the timing in other words if this conflict drags on or it looks like it's going to be dragging on for over a month without any end in sight we should expect probably oil prices of over$100 if the markets start pricing in a conflict that's going to last for more than two months then we start talking about the possibility of$200 oil I think that So anything in terms of oil prices where we start going well over$100, we're talking about a recession being triggered in the United States and globally. Again, it might be if the oil shock only lasts a month, it'll be enough to hit the economy, but not enough to cause, let's say, a two-quarter long recession potentially or not a major one.

34:29But if we start getting a disruption that starts lasting two, three, four months, then we really are talking about the type of economic disruption that could cause a recession that lasts for two quarters or more, you know, more than six months. And again, in terms of the magnitude, we're talking about fairly severe recession if what we're talking about is, say, oil prices that are$150,$200, somewhere along those lines. Now, to kind of compound matters, something that's really not in the headlines very much, but I bet it's something that you already probably talked about in your podcast with some of your guests, is that there is right now in the United States a little bit of a worrisome problem with private credit markets.

35:16and a recession would be hitting those markets at exactly the wrong time. So we have a very toxic combination here of a prospect that the U.S. could be falling into a recession when private credit markets happen to be very vulnerable right now with rising default rates and extreme illiquidity because there's a lot of redemptions happening in funds that handle private credit. And all of these are the type of ingredients that kind of make for a financial panic and crash and a sort of major economic shock. So, again, I'm not predicting that that'll happen because in order for that to happen, we need to actually get an oil shock that gets oil prices well over$100 and it needs to last for a significant period.

36:00And I'm not in a position right now where I can actually predict the length of this conflict. All I can say is that the chances of such a prolonged conflict are a lot larger than what the market is currently allowing for. And again, this is because the objectives, the strategic objectives that the Israelis and the Americans have set are such that those objectives cannot be accomplished in a short period of time. It's going to take at least that four to six weeks that Trump and Hexeth are talking about, and it could take a lot longer. and if it does take a lot longer and if the Iranians are able to continue, you know, as long as they have the capability, as long as they have some missiles that they can shoot out at ships that are in the Strait of Hormuz and that they can shoot at oil facilities in the Gulf, that's going to get those oil prices into that kind of crisis range that I'm pointing out that would trigger a recession and that could potentially trigger a much more serious problem if we get kind of a prolonged procession in the midst of this private credit crisis that seems to be brewing right now.

37:10James Kostohryz:And if you added precious metals to that prognostication, if you added perhaps bonds or currencies or global equities or energy, what would you say about those sectors and sections of the market? Okay, great question. So let's start with gold. Gold has been pricing in the risk of a crisis like this for quite a long time. I think that it was one of the only markets that seemed to be anticipating the possibility of a very serious crisis associated with this conflict. Because essentially, during the Torbay War, oil prices got up to about You know, they got up briefly above that, but basically we're at sort of$3 ,500 and they've kind of run up in anticipation of that.

38:06But what's interesting is that even after that conflict subsided, and it seemed to kind of go into the background as far as news and everybody forgot about it, oil prices continued to rise, despite the fact that we had falling inflation in the United States and no real sort of major inflationary threat. I think that a lot of that run-up in the price of gold can be attributed to players in the market that were anticipating the possibility of a major shock to global markets that would happen as a result of an oil shock due to war in the Middle East and so forth. So I think that the gold market, interestingly, was already pricing in quite a lot of risk.

38:53One of the things that I've talked about in my articles is that if you look at the price of gold right now in real terms, in terms of its purchasing power, but what I mean by that is how much stuff can you buy with an ounce of gold? Like how much oil can you buy with an ounce of gold? How much of the CPI basket can you buy with an ounce of gold? How many hamburgers can you buy? How much can you buy in terms of wages with an ounce of gold? and those real terms in purchasing power, gold right now, is higher than it has been at any time in the last 400 years. And it's about as high as it's been in recorded history going back several thousand years.

39:33So this gives you an indication of the fact that gold is pricing in some sort of major long-term inflationary scenario, because otherwise it wouldn't be here, Gold prices in, the gold price incorporates a kind of a forecast of long-term inflation. And what gold is sort of forecasting right now is some sort of long-term inflationary event. And that event, in essence, would be triggered by this Iran war just the way that the inflation in 1973 in the 70s was triggered by the 73 crisis. And then the inflationary crisis that we got in the early 80s was actually triggered by the crisis in Iran that started in 1979.

40:17So those were two times when gold really shot up. And gold is shooting up now, essentially in anticipation of this crisis. But I think that what I find problematic about gold here is that it's already priced in a heck of a lot. And I am not necessarily of the view that this crisis, despite the fact that I've been more bearish than most people, and I've been pointing out this risk that we'd have this crisis, and I am fully aware that if we have an oil shock, we're going to get an inflation shock as well. We're going to get some high inflation. But I don't think that this is the end of the dollar and I don't think it's the end of the international, you know, currency, you know, fiat currency regimes around the world.

41:04I don't believe in these kind of more doomsday scenarios that are in some senses being priced into the gold price. So I think there's already so much doom and gloom already priced into gold here that I don't necessarily really like it as an asset class. do I think that gold can make another run here if the crisis intensifies? Sure, we can get another run in gold, maybe 6 ,000 or a little above. But I already see some signs that gold is overbought and vulnerable to a decline. And actually, today is a great example of that, because despite the fact that the S &P is down fairly substantially today, Right now, as we speak, it's down about 1.20%.

41:50It was down almost 3 % earlier today. Gold is actually down. In other words, you would expect with this type of risk scenario that gold would be rising today. for example, with crude oil prices earlier today up about 8%. Right now they're up only about 5.5%. But you'd expect gold to be rising on a day like this, and it wasn't. Gold is down by 3.86%, almost 4%. It was down 5 % earlier today. And silver is down by over 6%. What this tells me is that when you have gold falling on a day where it should be rising, that's really bad news for gold investors. I've been out of gold for a while now because I think that it's pricing in too much doom and gloom.

42:36So my personal perspective on gold is that even though I believe that there's a lot more risk to be priced in yet into financial markets, I think the crisis is probably going to be worse or people are going to start fearing it's going to be worse than they have until now. I don't actually think that gold is necessarily a good place to be investing right now. You mentioned some other asset classes, of course, oil. Oil, the commodity, is the place where I have the largest positioning right now. Because as I said, I do think that there's a significant threat that we could start seeing oil prices well over$100, maybe even as high as$200.

43:18Brent right now, Brent crude is at$82. and WTI crude, West Texas Intermediate, is about$75 right now. That means, as I mentioned before, that if we start pricing in a crisis that is as long as the one that Donald Trump is hoping for, which is only four to six weeks, we could easily start seeing oil prices in the$100 range fairly soon. And we've been positioned, ever since oil was down in the$50 range, We've been buying crude oil ETNs in our portfolio on successful portfolio strategy. We just recently made a very important adjustment in our portfolios where we moved to an ETN that holds Brent rather than WTI.

44:02USO, which is the U.S. Oil Fund, is sort of the main instrument that a lot of investors use to get crude oil exposure. we're a little bit concerned that Trump is going to implement some sort of price control measures in the United States and potentially a reintroduction of something that's called the export ban the oil export ban which is something that I can describe to you in more detail if you'd like but basically what it is is that it says that the United States is not and it is not allowed to export oil anywhere in the world. And so it keeps all that oil in the United States, and it basically isolates the United States from global oil prices.

44:43And as long as the United States has enough oil to meet its own demand, then the United States can actually keep its own oil prices down. Even if oil prices in Europe might be above$200, they could actually stay well below$100 in the United States. So in order to avoid that specific type of risk, I've gotten out of the exposure to WTI, which is an American benchmark. It moved into the Brent benchmark. And that brings us to the other issue, which is exposure to the energy sector, particularly oil and gas producers.

45:17James Kostohryz:I just want to interrupt you, James. Is that the ETF for the Brent? Is that BNO? Yes, that's correct. Yep. In addition to making this adjustment to moving to BNO from USO, We actually previously owned SCO, which is a two-time leveraged play on WTI, but we got out of it the other day precisely because we're a little bit concerned. In fact, we just got out of it yesterday because we were concerned about the possibility that measures could be introduced that would sort of dampen WTI relative to Brent. So that's why we made the switch there. Now, the oil and gas sector for quite a while now has been the most undervalued sector in the U.S.

46:03market. Every single sector in the U.S. market was pretty much at historically high levels of valuation, at historic levels of valuation, at levels of valuation that were above the 90th percentile, many at the 98th or 99th percentile. Now, energy was exactly the opposite. Basically, energy has never been cheaper on a relative basis than it has been in the last few months. It's been cheaper in absolute terms, but in relative terms, it's never been as cheap as it's been. And even now with this run up that we've had in the energy sector, you know, oil and gas producing equities, it's still trading at levels that on a relative basis are, you know, very near all time lows.

46:51We do see that there's some good fundamental value there, particularly if you think that oil prices are going to stay high for a prolonged period. But here's where I think people need to really have some caution and we're kind of positioning in this way in our portfolios, which is that we're more exposed to the commodity right now than we are to the producers. Because at some point, the value of an oil and gas producing company has very little to do with, let's say, the near-term oil price. It has a lot more to do with the longer term oil prices, because if you think how a discounted cash flow valuation works, the price of oil during this next year, if it goes up, sure, it's going to be great for the profits, but that's only one year of profits.

47:37Most of the value in a company is in its second, third, fourth, fifth, you know, through 20th year of cash flows. And so unless you're projecting oil prices to be above$100 after two, three, four, five years, these oil producing equities really shouldn't go up too much. In other words, if we start getting a real crazy rally, which we don't have anything crazy yet, but the way these things work, usually we get into some sort of a crazy rally because as soon as people start seeing$100 oil prices, they're going to be saying, oh my gosh, we need to buy oil producers. And they start buying that stuff hand over fist, essentially projecting$100 oil prices into the long-term future.

48:24But that's not the case. So, for example, if you have oil producing equity and you start getting earnings estimates, forward earnings estimates based on$100 oil, they might be trading at a P of, you know, seven or eight times, even five times earnings. People say, my gosh, that's cheap. That's crazy. Let's buy that. The problem is that if oil prices come back to$70 within a year or two or three or four, then the earnings, the PE that looks like a 7 PE when oil is at$100 and you're looking 12 months ahead, the PE looking, let's say, three years out might be 25. And so that's where people need to be careful.

49:09And, you know, we're going to be very careful about ourselves in terms of how we're going to be managing our exposure. The only thing that we're doing to manage our exposure in the energy space has to do with the location. uh we want to be a little bit uh away from certainly want to be away from companies that own a lot of uh or a lot of their production or a significant amount of their production is in the middle east particularly in the war-torn areas so so we're staying away from stocks they have a lot of properties and exposure in the middle east but we also want to lean away a little bit from the u.s because we're afraid again of this oil export ban that trump could reintroduce which is something that the United States had as part of its law for many, many years and was only basically repealed a few years ago, Trump could probably bring this back with an executive order and it could also be approved by Congress again.

50:01And that would severely limit the profitability of U.S. and North American producers like Canadian producers as well. So I would rather, to the extent that I can find and look for oil producers outside the United States that are leveraged to the price of oil in Europe, in Latin America, in Asia, in Australia, in Africa. These are some of the things that we're looking at. And of course, these are going to be lesser known E &P companies. I have an advantage there because I've been basically an energy investor for well over 20 years. Most American investors are familiar with the U.S. oil majors. And even if they're E &P investors, they're focused on the E &P companies that operate in the United States and to some extent Canada.

50:56But there are some interesting stocks. And I won't really get into like names too much here because I don't think we're going to have time for that. But in Latin America, in Africa, Asia, Australia and so forth. And so we're actually kind of right now rotating some of our positioning out of our exposure, which was, you know, quite large, I would say very large in U.S. producers, kind of moving our production exposure into some of these other areas, which are more undervalued anyway. But I do want to emphasize is that in either case, we're actually more bullish on the commodity right now than we are on the producers.

51:36We're bullish on the producers, but the commodity, let's say, has more upside. So that's kind of how we're looking at that particular sector. In terms of other sectors in the market, I think it's time to start taking a look at some of the defensive sectors. One of the things that happened in the market, the market had this huge rotation from growth to value. But by moving from growth to value, it's become more cyclical. In other words, a lot of the value names are essentially cyclicals. And cyclicals get hit really, really hard if you get a recession. So I think that we could see if we start, if the market starts anticipating the possibility of a recession, a lot of these stocks that have gone up by a heck of a lot in the last few months in this rotation from tech into more value-oriented sectors, we could get a huge reversal of that move and get a lot of these more cyclically oriented sectors having some major downside within the market.

52:34And of course, I think that the tech sector is not going to be immune to this. But I think on a relative basis, this outperformance that we've seen from cyclicals and value might just be over. And again, it'll be over if this conflict becomes prolonged and actually starts causing people to price in a recession. We don't need to have a recession. We just need the marginal investor to start pricing in a high risk of a recession. As long as the marginal investor starts pricing in a high risk of a recession, we're going to have big declines. And again, probably more than 20 percent in the market overall and probably underperformance of cyclically oriented sectors that have recently really shot up and could actually crash back down as a result of increased cyclical risk.

53:22James Kostohryz:James, as you mentioned, we are getting into a lengthy conversation already, and I know that it could be much lengthier and still be very valuable. But I guess as we close out this conversation, and you're welcome back anytime, what else would you share with investors these days? Is it worthy to get into bonds and the Fed and perhaps an interest rate conversation? Where do you think would be of most valuable for investors? So let's talk about U.S. Treasury bonds for a moment. There's two key variables in the pricing of long-term Treasury securities. The first is anticipated inflation. And the second is the real rate of return.

54:05In other words, this is the return above and beyond whatever the anticipated inflation is. This is the real inflation-adjusted return. Those are the two components that basically make up the return that you get on a U.S. Treasury bond. And if you buy a corporate bond, you have an additional element there, which is sort of a risk premium that you get for investing in a company that has a risk of default that's higher than you have on a U.S. Treasury security, generally referred to as spread. it. Now, in terms of corporate securities, I think that we can safely assume that if we start pricing in a recession, we're going to get spreads.

54:47Corporate bond spreads are going to widen significantly. They've recently been near record lows and for quite a while. So the combination of increased credit risk combined with worsening liquidity conditions means that those spreads are probably going to wipe. So corporate bonds is probably not a place where you're going to want to be and certainly wouldn't be something that would be defensive. Now, if we're talking about treasury bonds, you have less risk when you have low duration. So in other words, short-term treasuries and T-bills, they have, let's say, relatively less risk because they don't price in a lot of longer-term inflation.

55:30And they also don't necessarily, they have a real rate of interest, but that real rate of interest has very low duration on it. So it doesn't have a big impact on the price. Where you get a big impact on the price is when you have long-term treasuries that say 10, 10 year, seven to 10 to up to 30 year treasury securities. That's where you can get big declines. For example, if the market starts pricing in a significant long-term inflation as a result of this situation. In other words, if people start pricing in a scenario like we got in the early 70s after the Arab oil embargo, or if they start pricing in an inflation crisis like we got in the early 80s after the 79 fiasco in Iran, we could start getting long-term inflation forecasts, which right now are only a little above 2%.

56:23In other words, the long-term treasury bonds are only forecasting inflation of a little over 2 % over the next 30 years, over the next 10 to 30 years. But if people start anticipating higher levels of long-term inflation, let's say like three, four, five, or even greater percent, that would actually crash the long-term treasury bond market and the long-term bond market more generally. So again, that's not going to be a safe haven in this scenario where we have rising potential inflationary risks being priced in. An asset that I've really come to understand deeply and I've invested in it in my service and I talk about it and I have some expertise in it is TIPS.

57:13TIPS is Treasury Inflation Protected Securities. and what this is is that it's a type of U.S. Treasury bond that guarantees you a real rate of return plus whatever inflation there happens to be during the term of the bond. So for example, even if inflation goes from 2 % and change the way it is now and it goes all the way up to 10%, the U.S. Treasury guarantees you that it's going to return that 10 % inflation plus whatever the real rate of return on the bond is. So clearly that's a much safer investment if you happen to be the type of person that's worried about long-term inflation. And for example, you're like me and think that gold is already too high and don't want to continue to get too exposed to gold.

58:04With tips, you get long-term inflation protection without the risks that you have with gold. It's the most direct play on, let's say, long-term inflation if that's what you're worried about. Now, tips do have a risk and they have duration risk. There's long-term tips that have duration risks tied to what's called the real interest rate. This is a little more complicated and I don't want to get into it here because, again, we're going to get a little too technical and probably go over. But the real rate of interest that you have on tips, even if it moves a little bit, the price of tips will move a heck of a lot in relation to that real rate of interest that's priced into the tips market.

58:49So it is a risky asset, particularly if you buy long-term tips. And here's the thing to think about. If you think that in the long-term, U.S. inflation isn't going to get out of control, and therefore the U.S. isn't going to need really much higher real interest rates, as opposed to nominal interest rates, that real interest rates will continue to be roughly what they've been. But you think that there's a chance of a big growth scare or even a recession in the United States, during a recession, real interest rates always come down, almost pretty much always come down. And they're actually right now relatively like high-ish levels historically, close to 2%.

59:30During a recession, they generally go down to 1 % or less, maybe half a percent. So you have some upside, significant upside potential in tips in terms of price appreciation, we're talking about price appreciation of 10, 20, 30 percent if we get a decline in real interest rates, not nominal interest rates, mind you. In other words, the nominal interest rate, for example, the yield on U.S. Treasuries might go from where it is right now from 4 to 5 percent or higher if more inflation starts getting priced in. But simultaneously, you could actually get a situation where the real interest rates comes down because of anticipated recession.

1:00:15and that would actually cause the price of tips to go higher. So investing in tips is something that you need to understand what they are. It's more complicated than investing in treasury bonds, but we do that in our service and we've used it to good effect. And we do now have a pretty significant position in long-term tips in our portfolio. Not a huge position, but a fairly significant position in our portfolio in long-term too. So that's an asset to also look at as a potential sort of asset class for people that are concerned with the situation and thinking about how to kind of position their portfolios.

1:00:56I don't know if there's any other asset classes that maybe you'd like me to cover, Rina, for your listeners.

1:01:01James Kostohryz:If you think it's worthy to spend a minute or two on any other asset classes. Happy for you to share that. And perfect segue to remind listeners that, again, you run an investing group on Seeking Alpha called Successful Portfolio Strategy. So perfect for you to share that with listeners. Sure. Well, let's talk a little bit about another asset that has been very popular lately, which is silver. Silver is down by almost 6 % today. Again, this is something to be very concerned about if you're an investor in silver. On a day like this where you get risk rising and potential inflation risk rising, you would want to see gold and silver rising.

1:01:45They're falling. That's a horrible technical signal. But more generally, silver investors need to worry about the fact that this crisis poses a severe cyclical risk to the global economy. And silver is more of an industrial metal than it is a precious metal that's used for purposes of investment. If we get a recession globally that brings down growth, it's going to significantly impact the demand for the industrial uses of silver. Because again, silver is more of an industrial metal. And I would also point out that these private credit risks that we talked about earlier in the program, this plays into the CapEx boom that's kind of fueling industrial demand for silver and other metals.

1:02:34So I think that silver is a particularly risky metal right now. And I would be wary of it. We don't own any of it. And we haven't owned it. And I certainly wouldn't be dipping my toes into it right now. A very bullish long-term bond copper. But again, in the short term, we just sold some of our positions that we had very recently. we sold significant positions that we had in copper miners in my service because I'm afraid of the cyclical impact of this crisis. In other words, when global growth goes down, demand for copper goes down. And when demand for copper goes down, prices of copper comes down, obviously the profitability of the copper miners.

1:03:17There's been a lot of bullishness around copper and some of the copper miners in recent, I'd say months, even years due to the projected increased demand in copper that's going to be required for a lot of the circuitry and other industrial uses that are arising as a result of the AI CapEx boom. I'm very much a believer in this long term, but I think short term, the run up in copper and especially the run up in copper equities has been pretty speculative. And these stocks may get hit pretty hard if the market starts pricing in, let's say, a significant risk of recession. So those are some assets that I would be looking at closely and somewhat warily.

1:04:04In general, I think that people should be thinking defense right now rather than offense. Generally, that also means people should probably have higher cash exposures and also investments in, you know, say short-term bonds. In other words, You don't necessarily have to own cash per se. You can always have it in money market funds that invest in short-term securities, or you can invest in self-in short-term bonds, which have relatively little risk. So those are some of the things that I'd be, but as a general, let's say, I don't want to call it advice, but as a general philosophical stance right now, I think that with this S &P still within 5 % of its all-time highs, there's a heck of a lot of risk out there.

1:04:51And I think that it really behooves people to be a lot more defensive right now than they've been in a long time. Because we're facing the possibility of the type of crisis that we haven't had in a long time. And I'd say that that's the last thing that I kind of want to leave you with, Rena, which is that this issue of complacency. The biggest bear markets, the biggest declines in markets happen when people are the most complacent. And I haven't seen people this complacent in my entire career. I have never seen so much risk being blown off by the market because people think that, hey, this particular crisis that people are worrying about isn't going to happen just like the other ones haven't happened in the last 30 years.

1:05:37But hey, you know what? There have been some other big crises that really did materialize in the past. The 73 crisis, crisis in the early 80s. Um, obviously the, uh, the, the, the crisis that we got, uh, in the global financial crisis in 2007 through 2009, we had the bursting of the tech bubble. I mean, these things are real. They only happen once every maybe decade or two, but people have sort of forgotten that actual bad, bad things can't really can't happen to the economy and to their portfolios. And when I say bad things, we're talking about declines of 20 % or more, sometimes as much as 40%.

1:06:20And we have so much complacency built in. We have, in fact, an entire generation of investors that have never actually lived through a crisis. I would say, I don't know what the percentage is, but some very large percentage of market participants today, probably more than half, have never really lived through a long-term sort of wealth-destroying crisis in the market. And I would really caution young people that never lived through one into thinking that, you know, crises can never happen. And I would also caution, of course, anybody that's not young to say, you know, you've been made used to things kind of going away in the last few years.

1:07:07Real crises have happened in the past. They will happen in the future. And while there's no guarantee that we're going to get a major crisis from the current war in the Middle East, it certainly has the potential to generate a major crisis. And that was, of course, the focus, the earlier part of our conversation today. This crisis could get oil prices well above$100, even above the$200 range. And if that happens, we're going to get a business cycle recession. we're going to get declines of over 20 % in equities, and it could potentially get a lot worse if all of this exacerbates the developing crisis that we have in private credit markets.

1:07:45James Kostohryz:Thank you, James. Really appreciate this conversation. Thanks for being so generous with your time and your thoughts. Again, James Castori's on Seeking Alpha. You run Successful Portfolio Strategy. Is that the best place for listeners to get in touch with you? Absolutely. Yeah, that's the best place for people to get in touch with me. Subscribe to Successful Portfolio Strategy. I mean, it's really a bargain. It's really one of the cheapest services that you're going to find. And I really think that my strength is in portfolio strategy and looking at things from a strategic perspective. We also do, we've had a great track record in terms of stock picking, you know, individual stocks like stock to, you know, are off the radar people that, you know, especially internationally stuff that people haven't even heard of.

1:08:37And so I think that the type of situation that we're, that's happening in the world right now is really right up my alley. And I do expect, you know, that my performance during this period is going to be pretty exceptional. It already has been. I mean, we're up big time this year where most people are either flat or down for the year. We are up in a big way this year as a result of having anticipated this crisis. And since I anticipate that this crisis is probably going to go further than people think, I think that there's still a lot more upside to be gained from the type of positions that we have in our portfolio.

1:09:13James Kostohryz:You also have a 14-day free trial for successful portfolio strategies. So really nothing to lose there. James, thanks again. Really appreciate the conversation. You're welcome back anytime. Just a reminder, anything you hear on this podcast should not be considered investment advice. This is for entertainment purposes only, and you should seek advice from a licensed professional before investing. If you enjoyed the episode, leave a rating or review on your favorite podcasting app, and we'll see you soon with a new episode.

1:09:44one

From the publisher
Global portfolio strategist James Kostohryz explains why the US and Israel are at war with Iran and why it may last longer than we think (0:35) Oil shocks can lead to business cycle recessions (29:00) Gold pricing in risk (37:20) US treasury bonds (53:40) Silver and copper (1:01:20)

Show Notes:
Will War Trigger A Bear Market And Spike In Oil?
Fiscal Headwinds And Unrealistic S&P EPS Growth With James Kostohryz
Strait Of Hormuz: Main Focus Of Investors In Iran-Israel Conflict

Episode transcripts

For full access to analyst ratings, stock quant scores and dividend grades, subscribe to Seeking Alpha Premium at seekingalpha.com/subscriptions

More from Investing Experts

All 99 episodes
War, $200 oil, and the market’s reckoningInvesting Experts · 1 h 10 min
Listen in VO