Furious Jack Smith Strikes Back at Trump Corrupt Scheme

0:00This episode is brought to you by Claude by Anthropic. Claude is the AI for minds that don't stop at good enough. It's the collaborator that actually understands your entire workflow and thinks with you. Whether you're debugging code at midnight or strategizing your next business move, Claude extends your thinking to tackle the problems that matter and finds connections you might have missed. For problems worth solving, get started at claude.ai slash Spotify. In business, the best days are when priorities stay on track. For midsize and large companies, that means managing multiple exposures, from property and liability to cyber and more.

0:41The Hartford helps companies plan for risk with insurance and proactive risk solutions. So focus can stay where it belongs. Prepare for risk. Protect success. Smart risk management from the Hartford. Contact your agent or visit thehartford.com slash risk mitigation. Amazon Health AI presents Painful Thoughts. I, um, I can't stop scratching my downtown. Yeah, but I'm not itching to go downtown and tell a receptionist I'm here to talk about my downtown. Some things you'd rather type than say out loud. There's no question too embarrassing for Amazon Health AI. Chat your symptoms and get virtual care 24-7.

1:26Healthcare just got less painful. Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. Now, I was looking for fun ways to tell you that Mint's offer of unlimited premium wireless for$15 a month is back. So I thought it would be fun if we made$15 bills. But it turns out that's very illegal. So there goes my big idea for the commercial. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of$45 for three months,$90 for six months, or$180 for 12-month plan required. $15 per month equivalent. Taxes and fees extra. Initial plan term only. Greater than 50 gigabytes may slow when network is busy. See terms.

2:00Michael Popok:Imaginary and unfounded. You could use those adjectives against a lot of the Trump administration. But in particular, Jack Smith is using that vocabulary along with his lawyers to shove back against a ethics violation investigation being conducted by the Office of Special Counsel under Donald Trump because they're claiming that the investigations of crimes committed by Donald Trump, the prosecutions of those crimes, the resulting indictment was all done for political purposes. It was all done so that the voters wouldn't vote for Donald Trump. It was interfering with the elections. It was political campaigning.

2:37Michael Popok:It was political campaigning. It was a prosecutor doing his job and following the facts where they lead and following the law where it leads and bringing Donald Trump to justice and wanting the American people to at least know if they were voting thumbs up or thumbs down for a felon or not. Now, Donald Trump already got convicted of 34 felony counts, But it was something that people should know when they go into the ballot box about Donald Trump. And they also knew that they had to hurry up and get these cases ready and up and running, not because of interference, but so that he would get tried before he became president, if he became president again.

3:18Michael Popok:And Jack Smith wasn't alone in the prosecutions. He had two federal judges, one named Eileen Cannon in Florida and the other one named Tanya Chutkin in D.C. So let's get down to this imaginary story that's been perpetrated and perpetuated by Senator Tom Cotton, who's a Trumper, who made a whistleblower report to the Office of Special Counsel, being led right now by another Trumper, Jameson Greer. and the response that Jack Smith has fired back through his lawyers, Lanny Brewer. We do it right here on the Midas Touch Network and on Legal AF. Hatch Act, let's start with a teachable moment. What is it?

4:03Michael Popok:First of all, it's not a crime to violate the Hatch Act. It doesn't put you in jail. It's a fine, a monetary fine at best. And it says that if you're working for the taxpayer and you're being paid, It's generally federal employees, although it sometimes can apply to state employees, government employees. But while they're working and while they're making money on the taxpayer dime, they're not to do political campaigning, political activities. And Trump knows this act well because like 30 people in his administration the last time around were found guilty of it, including, as I said, Jared Kushner, his son-in-law, and Kellyanne Conway and others.

4:45Michael Popok:because they were all promoting Donald Trump's re-election campaign in 2020 that didn't work instead of doing their jobs. And so there's a 63-page Office of Special Counsel report from back then about the Trump administration. So it almost makes you gag with the irony that Trump is using the Hatch Act to go after Jack Smith. It just shows you how weak Trump is and how weak any cases against Jack Smith. That's all you got against him. So what is the Office of Special Counsel? My second teachable moment. It's not what you think. A special counsel or independent counsel is appointed by the attorney general in a criminal context to prosecute a case separate and apart from the Department of Justice, usually because there's a conflict of interest or something like that.

5:36Michael Popok:It comes from the power under the Constitution of an attorney general to point inferior officers and inferior attorneys that report to him. That's Jack Smith. That's Robert Mueller. That's Durham, John Durham. That's Ken Starr, if you want to go way back in time. That's the Watergate prosecutor, Jaworski. That's those people. Office of Special Counsel, they really should come up with a different name, is the whistleblower office in the executive branch where somebody complains, either a federal employee complains about something going wrong in their department, or somebody complains about a federal employee.

6:20Michael Popok:Until Trump, it was headed by very competent people. One of them is a friend of mine, somebody I knew well from law school days because his father was my law professor, Walter Dellinger, Hampton Dellinger. Hampton Dellinger famously got fired by Donald Trump as the head of the special counsel's office at the start of his 10-year term. They are supposed to be independent, unless they're controlled by Donald Trump. They're supposed to do investigations and whistleblower complaints, make recommendations. They can bring suits against these people and the like. Now, Donald Trump had one partisan hack who was so bad, just like a right-wing podcaster, friend with the white supremacist, white supremacist endorser, 9-11 denier, election denier, Nick Fuentes, guy named Paul Ingracia.

7:12Michael Popok:So bad, so unqualified that even Trump couldn't get him through a Senate confirmation. So the office is currently being headed by Jameson Greer. Can I share a little secret with you? I kicked my coffee habit and I swapped it out for mud water. And wow, what a difference. No more jitters, no afternoon crashes, just smooth, balanced energy that helps me focus and crush my day. Mudwater is this amazing blend of cacao, chai, turmeric and adaptogenic mushrooms like lion's mane and cordyceps that actually taste delicious and fuels my brain without the usual coffee chaos. I love making it. It's super easy.

7:49Michael Popok:Just scoop, stir and go. Sometimes I add a creamer or honey to make it my perfect cup. Plus, it's USDA certified organic, non-GMO, gluten-free, vegan, kosher and zero sugar. Clean ingredients you can feel good about. If you want to feel this kind of natural energy, head to mudwtr.com slash legal AF and grab your starter kit today. Right now, listeners get up to 43 % off your entire order, plus free shipping and a free rechargeable frother when you use code legal AF. That's mudwater.com slash legal AF with code legal AF. After you order, when they ask you how you found them, please let them know we sent you.

8:28Michael Popok:Again, that's mudwater.com slash legal AF and code legal AF. Get ready for clean, delicious energy all day long with mud water. Tom Cotton, a senator, made a, it wasn't even like a whistleblower complaint. It was like a social media post. I assume he sent a letter as well. And so they opened a file. How else is a federal prosecutor supposed to go after an elected official, even up to the president of the United States, if there's also a political calendar going on at the same time. I mean, every judge that was responsible for something involving Donald Trump, from Judge Mershon up in New York, the 34 felony count, Judge Chutkin, D.C., Judge Cannon, Miami, all of them.

9:16Michael Popok:Well, at least two out of the three. Chutkin and Mershon said out loud, we're not going to let the political calendar dictate due process, the right to a fair trial, and speedy trial. all required here. We're not going to allow that. And they didn't. And the only thing that they have to try to attack Jack Smith on is that he was trying to get the trial up and running so it wouldn't interfere with the election. He was actually doing the opposite of the Hatch Act. He was trying to avoid interference. So let me just read to you from some of the notes, some of the comments made and how we got here.

9:58Michael Popok:Well, Cotton said the race, the race to verdict and the race for trial obviously was a Hatch Act violation. It should be investigated. That's basically what he said. Here's what Lanny Brewer, the lawyer for Jack Smith, had a say in response and what he's just filed. So there's no basis for an accusation that Mr. Smith violated the Hatch Act. The allegations are wholly without merit. Quote, Mr. Smith was fiercely committed to making prosecutorial decisions based solely on the evidence. He steadfastly followed applicable Department of Justice guidelines. I mean, you know, there's the DOJ manual, the principles of federal prosecution.

10:35Michael Popok:You wouldn't know that watching Pam Bondi or Alina Habba or, you know, any of the Judge Pirro or any of these other people that are operating in the Department of Justice without any rule book at all, any ethics at all. But Jack Smith did. And the letter continues. And he did not let the pending election influence his investigative or prosecutorial decision making. the investigation mr smith's attorneys wrote is premised on a partisan complaint from cotton that suggests the ordinary operation of the criminal justice system should be disrupted by the whims of a political contest but the notion that justice should yield to politics is antithetical to the rule of law moreover the suggestion that the hatch act can be violated by taking routine procedural steps to prosecute a case involving a candidate for public office is unprecedented and risk interfering with the enforcement of our federal or criminal laws.

11:34Michael Popok:His actions were always consistent with the decisions of a prosecutor who has devoted his entire career to following the facts of the law without fear or favor and without regard for the political consequences, not because of them. It's just ironic. Look at what we're dealing with. Trump guts the office of special counsel. He fires the only competent person around Hampton Dellinger, who's independent and serving a 10 year term. He tries to put in a right wing podcaster who supports white supremacists and every MAGA conspiracy theory out there in Paul and Gracia, so bad that he can't even get confirmed.

12:12Michael Popok:So they yank his nomination. They take a Tom Cotton manufactured choreographed complaint about Jack Smith and turn it into a federal case. Talk about a mountain and a molehill. And Jack Smith's fighting back. And lawyers are supporting him to do that. And lawyers are rallying around him. And even though major law firms have all bent the knee to Donald Trump, there are thousands of other law firms, including brand new ones out there, that have just been born to protect people who are being victimized and targeted by the Trump administration. And we do the same thing here. You're on Midas Touch and Legal AF.

12:51Michael Popok:on Michael Popok. Take a minute, hit the free subscribe button. We've got a brand new Legal AF sub stack. I think everybody will enjoy. I do two live reports every day, one in the morning, one in the evening to kind of catch you up in real time at the minute. You know, it's a little different than these videos and these hot takes that we do on Midas touching on Legal AF. I can really kind of rip it right off the printer, get it right off the reporting and bring everybody together in a two or 3 ,000 person huddle and talk about these issues, hear from your comments and respond. Legal AF Substack.

13:23Michael Popok:Think about becoming a member. You'll get access to all the videos and then a paid member to really support what we're doing there. So until my next report, I'm Michael Popak. Can't get your fill of Legal AF? Me neither. That's why we formed the Legal AF Substack. Every time we mention something in a hot take, whether it's a court filing or a oral argument, come over to the Substack. You'll find the court filing and the oral argument there, including a daily roundup that I do call, wait for it, Morning AF. What else? All the other contributors from Legal AF are there as well. We got some new reporting.

13:56Michael Popok:We got interviews. We got ad-free versions of the podcast and hot takes. Wear Legal AF on Substack. Come over now to free subscribe. The right window treatments change everything. Your sleep, your privacy, the way every room looks and feels. At Blinds.com, we've spent 30 years making it surprisingly simple to get exactly what your home needs. We've covered over 25 million windows and have 50 ,000 five-star reviews to prove we deliver. Whether you DIY it or want a pro to handle everything from measure to install, we have you covered. Real design professionals. Free samples. Zero pressure. Right now, get up to 45 % off site-wide, plus get a free professional measure at Blinds.com.

14:38Rules and restrictions apply. Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. Well, now, I was looking for fun ways to tell you that Mint's offer of unlimited premium wireless for$15 a month is back. So I thought it would be fun if we made$15 bills. But it turns out that's very illegal. So there goes my big idea for the commercial. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of$45 for three months,$90 for six months, or$180 for 12-month plan required. $15 per month equivalent. Taxes and fees extra. Initial plan term only. Greater than 50 gigabytes may slow when network is busy.

15:09See terms. I'll be honest. shopping for clothes is not my favorite thing. I just want to look good without overthinking it. Stitch Fix makes it easy. You take a quick style quiz, your size, your vibe, your budget, and a real human stylist sends a box with clothes that actually fit your life. Try it on at home, keep what works, send back the rest. Shipping's free, no subscription required. Get$20 off at stitchfix.com slash Spotify. That's stitchfix.com slash Spotify.