In short
Podcast Summary: Masters in Business - Opportunities for Digital Transformation Capital with David Roux
Podcast Overview Host: Barry Ritholtz Guest: David Roux, co-founder and executive chairman of BayPine Theme: Discussing the digital transformation landscape, AI, and investment opportunities in core economy businesses.
Key Topics Discussed
Introduction to David Roux
- Background:
- Bachelor's from Harvard, master's in philosophy from Cambridge, MBA from Harvard Business School.
- Co-founder of Silver Lake Partners, served as chairman and co-CEO, and held leadership roles at Oracle and other tech companies.
BayPine's Focus
- Investment Strategy:
- BayPine specializes in "digital transformation capital," targeting companies in traditional industries.
- Unlike typical private equity firms, BayPine takes stakes in companies and actively works to enhance their efficiency and profitability through technology.
Historical Context of Tech Investments
- Silver Lake's Formation:
- Recognized the untapped potential of tech-focused private equity during the internet boom of the late 90s.
- Critiques of the prevailing theory that tech businesses had volatile cash flows, making them unsuitable for private equity.
Insights on the Tech Environment
- Market Dynamics:
- Not all tech companies are overpriced; opportunity exists beneath the surface in companies trading at lower revenue multiples.
- Current tech giants (like NVIDIA) face competition and disruption, indicating the need for investors to critically evaluate technological advancements and their implications.
Digital Transformation in Practice
- Case Studies:
- Mavis Tire Express Services: Implemented technology to improve customer experience, enhance inventory management, and optimize labor utilization leading to significant profitability growth.
- Pollywood: Increased online sales and optimized manufacturing processes to improve efficiency and customer satisfaction.
The Role of AI
- Future of AI in Business:
- AI is expected to yield dramatic productivity gains, improving workforce effectiveness across various sectors.
- The implementation of AI tools (e.g., Microsoft’s Copilot) demonstrates potential to enhance productivity significantly.
Social Impact and Foundations
- Rue Family Foundation:
- Focuses on social entrepreneurship, education, conservation, and biomedical research, alongside supporting veterans.
Key Takeaways
- Execution vs. Awareness:
- While the opportunity for digital transformation is clear, the execution is complex and requires expertise.
- Investment in Technology:
- Understanding technology and its integration into existing business processes is crucial for success in private equity.
- Evolving Market Dynamics:
- Awareness of market trends, particularly concerning AI and digital solutions, can lead to strategic advantages.
Conclusion David Roux's insights into the intersection of technology and private equity offer a compelling narrative about the future of investing in traditional sectors. By combining financial acumen with technological expertise, BayPine aims not only to drive profits but also to facilitate significant operational improvements for its portfolio companies.
Final Thoughts This conversation encapsulates the evolving landscape of private equity, illustrating the necessity for a nuanced understanding of technology’s role in transforming traditional industries.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00I'm Hannah Fry, and as we rely more and more on artificial intelligence in every facet of our lives and businesses, I'm on a mission to find out how we can build the internet the internet that AI needs. Learn more later in the podcast.
0:42We think we know. Wherever you get your podcasts. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts, radio, news. This is Masters in Business with Barry Ritholtz on Bloomberg Radio. This week on the podcast, another extra special guest. David Rue is chairman of Bay Pine, a fascinating private equity firm. They are not interested in simply flipping companies or buying firms and then quickly selling them. What they do, much more involved than a consulting firm, they are experts at digital transformation across a wide variety of sectors in the investing world. And they essentially take companies as varied as tire manufacturers and industrial producers and retailers and find intelligent ways to use technology to make these companies more efficient, more productive, more profitable.
1:55and they're not again they're not just consultants they come in they take a stake in a company sometimes it's a minority stake sometimes it's a larger stake and they help affect this massive change with great results they're one of the few companies that specialize in this their track record has been very impressive and the approach they bring to transforming old industry companies is absolutely fascinating. Previous to Bay Pine, David was one of the co-founders of Silver Lake Investors, a legendary firm from the 90s and 2000s. With no further ado, my conversation with Bay Pine's David Rue. Thank you.
2:45Pleasure to be here. It's a pleasure to have you. I've been looking forward to this conversation for quite a while. Well, let's start out with your background. Bachelor's from Harvard, master's in philosophy from Cambridge, and then an MBA from Harvard Business School. What was the career plan? You know, I originally wanted to be an architect. Really? I've always wanted to pretend to be an architect. That's an area I'm fascinated in. Why did you not go into that space? You know, I grew up, you know, building go-karts and tree houses and the like. But I think when I got to school, I found that I could make models, build software, maybe create organizations, and that it was as much fun as building a building.
3:40There's a different sense of creating a company versus creating a certain type of space inhabited by people. No doubt about that. So let's talk about some of those companies that you built. You begin at a few tech startups. You found Daytex, which eventually gets acquired by Lotus. What was the startup process like? This was mid-1980s. Is that about right? Yeah, early 80s. You know, in business school, I realized this is the kind of early PC boom. And I realized from my academic work, you know, there were word processors, there were spreadsheets, but there was not very good database technology for PCs.
4:28They didn't have what the mini computers had and the mainframes had. So I saw an opportunity to create some software and also to be able to marry that up with data for people to use on their PCs. And that was the idea behind Daytext. So Daytext gets acquired by Lotus. Who eventually acquires Lotus? Lotus is eventually acquired by IBM. By coincidence, that was a relationship I managed, so I had a very good kind of ringside seat and all that. They were very interested in the company's suite of primarily communications technologies, CC Mail, Lotus Notes, because the sort of networking boom had already started up, and they saw a world where all of these PCs would be interconnected.
5:22How did you end up at Oracle? I had met Larry Ellison during my Lotus days. I'd done another company, which we sold to Symantec. Larry had contacted me and said, look, we've got a tiger by the tail. The business is growing like crazy. I think there might be some M &A opportunities. We really don't have a corporate development function. Would you be interested to come here and build one? That's how it happened. Oracle, especially in the 80s and 90s, became famous as a serial acquirer of all sorts of pieces, spin-outs, roll-ups. How long did you stay at Oracle? I was there all through the 90s until 1999.
6:03It was really a terrific experience, extremely rapid growth. I ran the venture fund, did all the investing off the balance sheet. I also started and managed the M &A program. So, yeah, it was fantastic. Yeah, I can imagine. Oracle in the 90s, you were out in California, I'm going to assume, right? Silicon Valley. Right, right in the heart of things. Ground zero. And I got to think Oracle and Ellison, like I cut my teeth on them in the 90s. He seemed to have been everywhere. Oracle was consistently ranked best company to work, top 10 fasting growing companies. Like Oracle, I think people who just came into the market in the past 10, 20 years don't know what a powerhouse Oracle was and still is.
6:49Yeah, it has a remarkable history. You know, class of 86, meaning that's the same year as Microsoft, Sun, Apple. And so they've been at it and doing a great job for a while. You know, Larry's often thought of as a very aggressive and astute business mind, but I don't think he gets enough credit for his technical chops. If you look back, think about it, he has been fearless about betting the company on major new architecture. So he made the original bet around relational databases when everyone else was doing something else. He then made a major bet on Unix when it was a kind of obscure, you know, scientific operating system.
7:43He then made a huge bet around enterprise applications, big bet around client server. And then maybe the most courageous bet was in the mid-90s when Netscape had gotten the first browsers out, the internet boom had started. A great story came in one morning after a weekend And we all sat down at our little executive committee call, and he says, look, I've been thinking. I think this internet thing is more important than most people understand. I would like to change 100 % of what we're doing in development. I want to stop all of the client server work, and I want to replatform everything that we're doing on a web architecture.
8:303 ,000 engineers, dozens, hundreds of products affecting, you know, thousands upon thousands of customers. And he very casually said, I'd like to do this by the end of the day. Sounds like that's a multi-year project. Was he talking about a plan or was he talking about - No, no, no. He was talking about, I want - I want this done. He turned to the director of engineering and said, I want this done by the end of the day. Just port it over to the internet. We're just going to stop. We're not going to write another line of client server code. It's done. This is going to be the new architecture. This is the future of computing.
9:01This is what our customers are going to want in two and three and five years time. So we need to start building it now for it to be ready then. It was really the thing, I mean, just an incredibly gutsy bet, but a very good sense of his technical prowess and the confidence he had about the kind of what's coming next part. Huh. Sounds like Oracle was quite an experience. At the end of the 1990s, you co-found Silver Lake in 1999. What led to that? You were at Oracle. You were like a 15-year veteran at Oracle. Is that about right? No, not quite, but I'd been there a while, and it was a fantastic experience.
9:48I had a great job, really good relationship with Larry, the rest of the team. I was in my late 30s. I'd kind of come to realize that it was always going to be Larry's business, rightly so, and that I was looking around, and I saw what I thought of as I've come to call it an OIPS, which is acronym OIPS for an opportunity in plain sight. And I couldn't understand the following. I couldn't understand why investors were pouring money into venture firms, pouring money into growth equity, and not doing anything to invest in technology using a private equity format. It didn't make sense to me that it would be a good small company, it would be a good medium-sized company, and then all of a sudden it would not be an appropriate place for fiduciary capital.
10:35That didn't make sense. And I thought, gosh, that must be a huge opportunity. We were right in the middle of the internet boom. So tech was front and center of the news. And yet there was none of the traditional firms were there. In fact, they were actively avoiding it. It was sort of not considered an appropriate place to invest that kind of capital. Why was that? Was it that people were just so distracted by the new hotness, by the dot-coms and the internet? No, no, I don't think so. Or were the public markets there for larger companies if they needed capital? No, no, I don't think that. Here's what I think, because this is what they told us.
11:20I mean, I asked that exact question. The theory was this. You couldn't go write checks for hundreds of millions of dollars if you couldn't underwrite the technical innovation at the heart of these business models. If you didn't understand how the semiconductor worked, if you didn't understand how the software was built, one. Two, there was a theory that these businesses had volatile cash flows and therefore couldn't be leveraged, which was the whole point of leveraged buyouts. And finally, that they were companies run by children, young folks. I was in the business, and when I heard all that, I said, you know, those guys in New York and the skyscrapers and the guy in London and those people in Munich and Tokyo, I don't think they really know what's going on here.
12:08These are actually really good businesses. The cash flows are unbelievable. Customer franchises are very, very durable. There's incredible organic growth here. This is a really big and attractive opportunity. I think someone's going to make a great return by building a business here. And you don't need to underwrite the entire underlying technology. You're really just talking about that transition to whatever makes those companies that much more attractive. Is that a fair assessment? When you're doing what Silver Lake does and what it was built to do, you are making a fundamental bet technology.
12:52It's like when people buy technology or enter into an agreement with a company like an Oracle or a Microsoft, you're not buying what they're selling you today. You're buying the promise that they will continue delivering. It's like buying a lot on a river. Now, you're not buying the water in front of your house. You're buying the promise that the water will continue to flow. And so you do need to have a point of view about how well positioned these companies are for the future. You co-found Silver Lake with, this is some lineup, Glenn Hutchins, Jim Davidson, Roger McNamee. Tell us about your Silver Lake co-founders.
13:33Well, look, they're each enormously talented and capable in their own right. You know, we all lived near each other, knew each other professionally beforehand. We talked extensively about this opportunity and agreed that it was the next big thing. And I think that, you know, looking back on it, I've been very fortunate at Silver Lake and prior companies when I started something to do it with a group of people. And that it's always been great to have folks from different backgrounds, different styles, different professional experience. You know, it's very complimentary. And, you know, it's not for everybody, but for me, it's the way I like to do business.
14:15They weren't at Oracle prior. No. How did the four of you come together? How do we all know each other? Yeah. Glenn and I have been college classmates, tennis partners, fly fishing buddies. He was previously at Blackstone. Jim Davidson and I are both big sports fans and shared season tickets for the Sharks and the Warriors. So we would spend a lot of time together. He was running the H &Q investment bank. And then Roger was my next door neighbor and very good friends with Jim. So, you know, it was a group of people already kind of knew each other, had some personal relationships to build on and, you know, came with a different set of experiences.
15:00What was Silver Lake like in 2000 as the dot coms all imploded? Well, you know, it was an interesting thing. I would jokingly tell people that we bought high, sold low and made a ton of money. And, you know, it was a very challenging economic environment. The NASDAQ during that period fell 80 percent. Right. Over 80 percent. from the front end of the fund to the back. The fund itself, in a very fundamental way, was set up as a counterpoint to the mania around the internet. And what we would tell people pointedly, we say, look, you're completely right to be excited about the technology sector. It's underinvested.
15:43It's underappreciated for its scale. It's underappreciated for its growth. It's underappreciated for the strategic value that it plays in the economy. But you're investing in the wrong companies at the wrong price. And I had a little chart that I would show them. Say here's approximately 1 ,000 public tech companies at that time. These 10 % are what's driving the entire valuation. They're trading at 10 to 30 plus times revenue. Not earnings, revenue. Not earnings, revenue. And I said, I can just tell you that is the wrong price. Not necessarily bad companies, but those are the wrong prices. I said, but look at these other 90%.
16:29If you take the rest of the publicly traded technology companies, they're traded one times revenue, which is the same as the S &P of the day. Pretty reasonable, more or less. Very reasonable. And they grow twice as fast. So you have an opportunity to buy growth at half price. You've got the situation. There's sort of the fundamental insight at the heart of the Silver Lake value proposition is that technology, the entire tech sector was on sale, even at a time when people thought it was super expensive because 10 % of the market was super expensive, but most of it was not. How much of what's been going on in the 2020s has been a focus on that same top 10 % of tech companies as being overly concentrated and wildly expensive?
17:25Do you think the same situation is starting to show up in the modern era? Well, there are some parallels and also some important differences. The parallels are that there is a concentration of interest. The difference is those companies are now huge businesses with gigantic levels of profitability, unprecedented levels of profitability, and growth rates that have never been achieved before by companies at that scale. So that's the part that's really different, right? A lot of the things in internet time was highly speculative. The other thing that's different is that today the companies with the most spectacular valuation levels are private.
18:22People aren't wrong to say they are a winner. The sort of the bet, of course, is are they the only winner, right? And so you have to believe that there won't be successful competition. I would only point out that 40 % of their sales go to four big vendors, each of whom has their own chip development program. And so I'm not saying they're going to build a better chip, but they're definitely going to build a cheaper chip. And so there'll be some dampening for sure from that. And I'm around long enough to remember when it looked like Intel was impregnable, that they had a position in the ecosystem that nobody could touch.
19:12And now it feels like they're an also-ran. Well, this goes back to the point that you raised earlier, which is if you're going to do tech investing, you need to have an opinion about the tech. it's not just that you can look at a series of financials and say oh they had a good quarter last quarter they had good year-over-year numbers i like the three-year trend and say fine you have to separately underwrite the quality of the underlying architecture what's going on in the industry and believe that they're going to be able to keep going and so like If you go to NVIDIA, let's talk about that. You can look at the financials and say, this is fantastic.
19:56They're doubling and trebling, and these are incredible numbers and growth and blah, blah, blah. The way they've gotten their improvements has been to go beyond what has been possible in any other chip manufacturer. The other chip manufacturers have gotten their productivity improvements around the physical geometry by making the chip smaller and smaller. More and more transistors. More and more transistors. More's law. The classic Moore's law. Down to ever smaller. Ever smaller. Right. Right. These guys have stolen a march on the rest of the industry with their GPU chips by doing other things.
20:36They've gotten probably two or two and a half times, which is a lot of improvement. but they're talking about improvements of things that are kind of 8, 10, 12, 16 times productivity improvement. So they're doing it other ways. They're doing it with algorithms. They're doing it with other approaches. And so you have to form an opinion as an investor about what is the likelihood they can keep doing that because it's been the key driver. And keep doing that for the next three to five years, not just the next quarter. Bingo. As our use of AI expands, how do we make sure it doesn't end up breaking the internet?
21:18I'm Hannah Fry, host of The Exponential Era, a series that explores the real-world impact of future network technology. And I sat down with two experts to discover how we can support the massive connectivity needs of AI. Find out what I learned at bloomberg.com forward slash Nokia. As markets move and headlines break, what matters most is context. A Bloomberg subscription gives you unmatched reporting, sharp analysis, and powerful tools that help you connect the dots. Visit Bloomberg.com slash podcast offer to learn more. So let's talk a little bit about Silver Lake and how that eventually leads to Bay Pine, it feels like, and I don't know if my memory is correct, Silver Lake was one of the first buyout shops built around making technology investments or investments in technology companies.
22:19Is that a fair description? Several other deals had been done, but they were occasional and they weren't the central focus for anyone. Tell us some of your memorable investments at Silver Lake? Well, I think some of the investments that the firm is best known for out of the box first was Seagate, which was a hard disk drive manufacturer. It was, at the time, the number one producer of disk drives. They had the best technology, great management team, very complex, but finely crafted, extended supply chain through Asia, and Wall Street hated them. It was hardware in the age of the internet. So the other thing that traded really, really hot back then was any new telecom business.
23:07Optical this, telecom that. One of the insights that we had as a group, and it stemmed from the fact that we were not finance people, but industry people with operating backgrounds, is we understood that the entire tech industry is an ecosystem. Right. It operates like your body, right? All the parts sort of need to fit together and they operate interdependently. And so everybody at that time was talking about the information superhighway and they were buying the highway, right? They're buying the telecom companies and they were buying all these new applications that you could do on the internet.
23:45But people forgot that you couldn't have an information superhighway without parking lots. In other words, the electron, the bit, had to start somewhere and it needed to end somewhere. So if you believed that broadband was going to explode, then you must also believe that storage is going to explode. And so we were able to look at that kind of systemic arbitrage around the architecture and say, you know, the comms piece is overpriced. I don't think we should pay 10 and 15 times for a pipe when we can pay six times EBITDA, EBITDA earnings, for the number one storage company in the world. Now, there was a bunch of complications around things they owned and, you know, it was a public company, so it was a leveraged buyout and all the rest of that.
24:40But that was really the fundamental insight. So it sounds like a lot of the public market investors had a fundamental misunderstanding about the entire tech sector, the ecosystem, as you described it. What other things did people just not get, not understand, overlook obvious investments in plain sight? Yeah. Well, I think in that case, it was a hangover from the very real war of attrition that for the prior 20 years had preceded that moment in time where the industry went from 120 disk drive companies to six or seven. You had an idea who the winners were going to be. Well, and so the question was, is there going to be more blood in the water, or have we arrived at an industry structure where everybody is going to do okay, and the number one player is probably going to do better than most?
25:45That was one. The second issue is, could anyone figure out a way to, at the time Seagate owned some shares and other software companies, and it wasn't clear to the market how they could sell those in a tax-efficient way, and that's one of the things that with structuring we were able to figure out. I'll give you another one where we bought a VAGO, Hewlett Packard's semiconductor division. In this tie frame, the early 2000s, it was very much the fashion to be out of semis. Semis were out of fashion, right? The world was infatuated with the other end of the stack, not the, you know, I didn't want to hear it.
26:29People didn't want to hear about semis. They didn't want to hear about sub-assemblies. They didn't want to hear about components. They didn't want to hear about computers. They wanted to hear about all the sexy, high margin, no cost of goods, no capital equipment, software, services, internet applications sounded wonderful, this is the age of pets.com, that thing. And so it wasn't wrong to say that software was good, but it didn't automatically follow that hardware is bad. And so people had this idea, almost like a dialectic, which is that you couldn't believe in something that you like, Like the other must be bad.
27:07And so semis were completely out of fashion. Siemens spun theirs off. HP spun theirs off. IBM either closed or spun theirs off. You know, just all these people who had very significant capabilities and fabs that today would be worth fortunes, leave aside the intellectual property and the skill sets and the trained labor force, you know, all went off the back of the truck. So we bought this from HP, hired a great manager, CEO named Hock Tan, and built this up into a kind of highly specialized, in other words, we didn't buy it with the idea that we're going to go compete with Intel and try to dislodge them from the PC market, but rather with the idea that everything was going to have a processor.
28:02cars, kids' toys, your kitchen appliances, and that somebody was going to have to make all those processors. And so there was an exploding rest of market opportunity that Intel wasn't focused on that people like Avago could be. Today, I think automobiles are the second biggest consumer of semiconductors. I don't know if that's still true. That was true a few years ago. I think that's right. In fact, the stat I often quote for people is that the semiconductor content in a car is more valuable than all of the metal, than all the steel and all the aluminum. And maybe more importantly, it is increasingly the case that what the semiconductors enable, the navigation, the…
28:54ABS, lane departure warning. All the features that really give the car kind of its identity are increasingly denominated by the digital capabilities. What about the rest of the world outside of PCs and automobiles? It was incredibly far looking to say in the early 2000s, by the way, there are going to be chips in everything, not just dishwashers and refrigerators, but toys and electric bikes and you name it, it's going to need a chip. That was a decade ahead of its time. You would have been very amused when we raised our first fund. you may remember the Furby doll. Sure, of course. Which was a Christmas - A hot product.
29:43You couldn't get it when you - Very hot kids product, little furry thing. The eyes batted and - And it had in it a digital signal processing chip that would allow it to make little cuddly noises and wiggle its legs. And I used to bring it with me to all of our fundraising meetings. I wouldn't say a word about it. I would simply take it out of my briefcase and I would put it on the desk between myself and the prospective investor. I wouldn't say a word about it. You know, I'd launch into my talk about semiconductors and hardware and the evolution of the sector and so forth. And finally, sometimes it would be five minutes, sometimes 10, but it was never more than 30 minutes.
30:22Right. The investor would say, David, what is that doll? Why do you have that doll there? I go, oh, I'm so sorry, I forgot to mention it. That's a Furby doll. And I brought that for you because I wanted to illustrate in a simple way how the march of technology is going to go. I said, that Furby doll has more processing power than the lunar lander. I knew you were going to go that way. And I said, we're looking at a world where all of music is going to be digital, all of film is going to be digital, television is going to be digital, the way you do your phone is going to be digital? I said, so all of these analog things, as they become more digital, need this technology.
31:06And if you understand how the technology works, you will, not because you're kind of a big brain genius, but because you've played the game before and you understand what all the pieces do, you'll be in a really good position to identify those opportunities going forward. I'll give you another great example. The part that, and the little wrinkle that I think gave us a lot of credibility, and by the way, gives us credibility now, is to say, let's own the right technology, put it in the right companies, and the key part is, at the right price. It is bringing an investment sensibility and financial discipline to the work that we do, right we're not like technology zealots and i want to just own it to own it right it's not a prize it's not a trophy it's uh you know would this be useful and would somebody else be interested i'll give you another example ebay came out of the blocks super hot they bought paypal and then they bought this thing called skype and skype was the first software-based peer-to-peer video conferencing capability.
Read the full transcript
32:18So long before Zoom, 20, 30 million people on at the same time, which was an amazing technical feat. Wasn't exactly clear what it had to do with auctions, even less clear what it had to do with PayPal, but eBay bought Skype. And it kind of noodled along in the Skype portfolio in the early 2000s for a year, two years. No one paid any attention to it at all. We said, my gosh, look, they've had three CEOs in two years. They're spread out all over the place. They haven't upgraded the product in two years. Maybe they'd be willing to sell it. Contact them once, contact them twice. Eventually, they said, yeah, we'd be willing to talk to you about that because we had a point of view about this is a really exciting market, but no one's paying any attention.
33:08So if we could carve that out, we went to eBay and said, keep as much of this as you want. We'll buy the rest of it at a full valuation, which we did. And it was a business that had nice growth despite really being a feral child, right? And we said, look, get paid twice. We'll pay you once what it's worth, and we're going to make this way more valuable than you possibly could because we can focus on it and make a bunch of changes. And it was sort of a troubled, was a complicated asset where there was so much staying in the litigation. They hadn't upgraded it for a long time. Apple had just announced that they were going to be offering a video service.
33:51It became FaceTime. So there was, you know, Microsoft said they wanted to be in the business. So there was a lot of competition. There was competition from very credible, large players. And if I recall correctly, around that time, all of the fat pipes and broad bandwidth that had come public in the late 90s, early 2000s were coming back up around pennies on the dollar. I recall Global Crossing and Metromedia Fiber and all these companies. So the bandwidth was coming aligned at a cheap price that didn't exist that way in the 90s, which is very much right into the sweet spot of Skype. Yeah, and by the way, not so dissimilar from the AI processing crunch that we have today where people are pouring a huge amount of super expensive stuff, which you do need, but which will be available three years and five years and 10 years from now.
34:45Much cheaper. Really, really different pricing. You end up buying them, if I recall correctly, not much long after that, didn't Microsoft come along and scoop them up from you? Well, what happened is that we bought it, completely upgraded the software, changed out the entire management team, developed a series of partnerships, built a business side of it because it had been very much a kind of B2C phenomenon. Kind of really opened up a product line around B2B. And it ended up being very attractive for Microsoft, sold it to them. one of the foundation elements in what is Teams today and really helped them.
35:25I think it turned out to be a good deal for Silver Lake, but it also, I think, as all deals should be, a very good deal for the acquirers. Any other memorable Silver Lake deals? We're oftentimes, I think maybe two others that we are well known for, we were the largest investor in Alibaba before it went public. And that was a - explosive that was explosive but it was a scary investment it was a minority investment in a chinese e-commerce company you know located on the other side of the world who's also your co your co-investor is the people's republic of china right they own a ultimate regulator right for sure um owner slash regulator and you know masa son and soft bank are already large investors.
36:18But we liked the management team. We loved the story. And that turned out to be a very good, that was a very, very good investment. And then the last one, and really still very much in the news, was Dell. Big, well-known public company, eponymously named for its CEO who'd left, kind of like Charles Schultz, left, came back. first went private where Michael rolled essentially all of his ownership into it, made a very large personal bet. So it was a gutsy bet because it was at a time, again, this is a place where the conventional wisdom was the PC was going away. We were going to use our phones.
37:04We were going to use iPads. Somehow it was going to go away. We didn't think it was going to go away. And we thought that the market hadn't really appreciated how much work Michael had done building up a store of intellectual property around next generation computing, whether it's cyber, cloud computing. And, you know, maybe it's like maybe a basketball franchise that has a bunch of draft picks. You know what I'm saying? or kind of young talent, which we thought was going to be very valuable because we had a point of view about the importance of cloud. We had a point of view about the importance of cyber, and we thought that those assets were undervalued because the whole of the company was getting valued like it was a commodity PC vendor.
37:58So let's talk about what did you do post Silver Lake in the 2010s? I'm a starter and a builder. I like backing social entrepreneurs and feel particularly passionate about conservation, biomedical research, and education. We took our foundation resources and focused it first on a thing out in Seattle called the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Stood that up. Bill Gates, blessedly, is doing most of the support now. But that's now 500 researchers, and they focus on understanding in detail the global burden of disease so that we know how healthy or sick every country is and where to allocate our health care dollars.
38:48On the biomedical research side, became very active as the chairman of Jackson Laboratories, one of the largest independent institutes in the country, focused on kind of the genetic causes of rare diseases. We were able to double the size of that, quadruple that endowment. And then more recently in the education space, I had this view that we were not appreciating how big artificial intelligence was going to be. And that as a consequence, as a nation, we are under-invested in advanced computer science. In other words, we've got programs at all the best universities, but they're graduating hundreds of people, tens of thousands, or maybe even hundreds of thousands that we need.
39:36Yeah, because what's happened is that the academics are focused on building the new platform, the so-called large language models. Right. When, think about that like it's a nuclear power plant, complicated, high science. But it now works, and it'll work a little better, and they'll keep refining it and so forth, but it works. And that what we need next are application engineers. We need electricians. We need people to design appliances. We need to run wires. We need to change from steam to electricity. And we don't have those people. And so we already know what we need. By the way, it'll be 20 or 30 years of implementation ahead of us.
40:20So these will be great jobs for a lot of people. So we've built the first school. We spent a few years getting that organized, opened it in 20. We're now, I guess, four years in. We've got 1 ,000 students, 200 corporate partners, and started or accelerated 94 companies, 400 jobs. You know, really exciting. You're doing this for a couple of years. You're standing up. I'm happy as a clam. Right. I'm making things. I'm helping people. Right. You're running the Rue Family Foundation, the Rue Institute. You're basically... I was not looking to start a new business, much less an investment firm. Right.
41:06What happened is that my very good friend, Anjan Mukherjee, we were talking about the future of private equity. During that conversation, we were saying, you know, this next generation of private equity needs to do something different if we want to continue producing the supranormal levels of profit that we've seen from the asset class. Because there's more competition, prices are higher, credit's more difficult, you can't count on multiple expansion. So you're going to have to make the business you buy better during the pendency of your ownership. There's only so much procurement improvements available.
41:45You can only upgrade management so far. My observation was this, which is that I said, you know, this tech thing, it's only 10 % of the economy. When you take all of GDP, when you take all of semis, all of computing, all of networking, all of software, all of social media, it's 10 % of GDP. I said, what's going on right now is the other 90 % of the economy is being digitized. Huge opportunity. Now, big difference is that now the nature of technology is that it's the only capital good that really kind of decreases in price and makes itself smaller, right? So you think about what's the difference between now and 20 years ago?
42:27Now, the technology is much smaller. It's much more ubiquitous. It's much less expensive. And it's much easier to use. All of those things mean it's going to go everywhere. So we're talking about this and we're getting ourselves lathered up about the fact that all of these analog companies, industrial firms, consumer firms, healthcare firms, services companies, they all need to adopt more technology, but none of them know how. Opportunity in plain sight. It's dead obvious that they're going to do this, right? You think about the companies that you know in those kind of sectors that are doing well are almost always those that have adopted the technology earlier.
43:12You know, J.P. Morgan and Finance or Walmart and Retail. You know, those companies that get there early get a big leg up on their analog competitors. We said we could do, we could build an investment firm that not only could write a check, but could be your technology partner in helping you architect a business model future that would allow you to grow your company faster, perform better, you know, produce more profits, you know, and drive value. So let me push back against one thing you said just a little bit. Please. This opportunity in plain sight, if it was really in such plain sight, everybody would be doing it.
43:58But instead, it takes a couple of guys with a lot of technology experience, a lot of operational experience, and financial experience to make this real. I partially agree. Okay. All right. And here's the partial part. The partial part is that I think the opportunity is easy to see. Ah, the execution. I think the execution is hard. Is the challenge. So the way I oftentimes say it is that it's easy to describe. It's just really hard to do. And it's hard to do because you need to understand the technology itself. You need to know the vendors. You need to be able to set priorities. You need to have a realistic sense of time.
44:42And you need to know how to weave this new technology into the processes that already exist. It's not like these companies have no tech. Every one, any company of any scale has an ERP system. They have a bunch of databases. There's compliance issues. There's, you know, cyber. There's all kinds of things so that you have to integrate into what's already there. So when I think of private equity, at least from the 90s, 2000s, even the 2010s, I think of them as a form of financial engineering to unlock value. What you're really describing is digital transformative capital, to steal a phrase from your website.
45:28So this insight is, hey, we don't need to just do financial engineering. if we could get these companies to adapt the latest, greatest tech in a way that's useful and productive, we can really unlock a lot of value. Is that what led to Bay Pine getting launched and you kind of coming out of retirement to try it again? Yes. I mean, that was sort of Anjan calling for the lefty from the bullpen. Right. Right. Let's get the lefty. Yeah. So it started innocently enough where it was really a conversation between two friends with a lot of mutual respect, you know, respect, where we had a similar, you know, 15, 20 year runs in private equity.
46:14So we were very current, highly topical understanding of what was going on, and we realized that we could take and put in one place, really, it's like a binary weapon, right? Where a Mukherjee quality, world-class private equity firm with fabulous diligence, great structuring, really thoughtful modeling, great financial engineering. We don't want to throw that away. Right. Those are all valuable lessons. but combine it with the operating prowess, tech insight, and extended personal network of relationships that would allow us to do things for and on behalf of our portfolio companies that simply wouldn't be possible, practical, or maybe even imagined by our competitors.
47:16It sounds like your competitors are the consulting firms who come in and kind of seagull an event. They come in, they eat everything, they grapple everything, they fly away, as opposed to you guys not only coming in with technology expertise, operational expertise, but capital, writing a check. That's a very different relationship than paying a consultant. Yeah. You know, it's interesting. The consultants actually play a very important role, and I wouldn't want to diminish it, around awareness building. And when we go in to talk to a management team, they almost always have had a consulting encounter.
48:07Right. Right? And they'll have a stack of PowerPoint slides, which they'll kind of run to their office to show us, that says, the consultant told me there are 16 things that I can do with technology. But I don't know which one I should do. Right. I don't know what I should do first. I don't know who should do it for me. I don't know how much it should cost. They're not going to implement it. I don't know how long it will take. I don't know how it integrates with what I've already got. And I particularly don't know what to do if anything goes wrong. And so it goes back to the implementation part.
48:43And so what we like to see is a management team that has self-awareness and enthusiasm but are not themselves technically fluent. where we can bring that to the party in a way that can be catalytic for the management team to give them confidence because they have a willingness to act. They're just not sure what to do, and they don't want to do something harmful. And so having somebody who's done it before, been there, is super useful. So let's talk about some of your portfolio companies and how they're engaging in digital transformation. We were talking about AI earlier. How are you guys looking at AI to facilitate taking some existing companies and making them more productive?
49:45Yeah. Well, first thing, we could spend a whole session on AI. But here's what I would say first. We believe it is actually, despite all the hype, and notwithstanding all the attention it's already received, bigger than most people think. Yeah, I'm with you on that. But - I'll give you a funny example. Please. So I'm in the midst of putting together a manuscript, and the publisher, they're not keen on doing an index. It takes a couple of months. You're paying a person all this time to look up every name, everything, every that. for a couple hundred bucks, there's an AI PDF indexer that will identify every proper name in 400 pages and create an index relative to...
50:35And I'm just imagining reproducing that sort of dumb mechanical work over and over and over again. And I know I'm just scratching the surface here. Very well. It's a great example. I think that right now, most people's experience of AI maybe is a chat bot, right? You know, chat GPT or, you know. Or go to any car company, you get that pop-up, and you know that's not a live person at two in the morning. What I always say is just imagine all the best AI, current ones today. And by the way, the ones that you're seeing today are the worst that you will ever see. Right, right. A little better every day.
51:21Worst you will ever see. They read, they write, they hear, they see. They can compose poetry, music in any genre, photorealistic images. they can create video all of this today right right this is all available uh today they also write computer code as well or better than most uh programmers they can do complex mathematics they can solve puzzles they can play games they can run factories they can drive cars It is really hard to overestimate what's possible. And we are standing really for the first time after decades of discussion about it on the brink of real white-collar dramatic, white-collar productivity gains, really dramatic.
52:27Best example that I would use for you to kind of give you a framework for it is that you're going to see a lot of AI show up as features in products that you already use. Like, you know, all your Apple products. Right. We'll have it soon. The first thing you get that's probably a product will be agents. You know, something that works with you like a partner, right? Like a writing partner that you would use, right? Sort of a, you know, think about it as a more advanced version of what you were just describing. Right. The best thing out there right now to illustrate that is a product called Copilot from Microsoft, which works with a software engineer.
53:07You have it running on your machine, and it's basically a programming buddy that will help you write code, suggest different options, help you debug, track, blah, blah, blah. And it typically improves productivity 25 % to 50 % out of the box. Amazing. And can be up to 100%. Right. Right? It all by itself has dampened the demand for computer programmers. Really? Because it's made the ones that we have so much better. You've doubled the effective productivity. Up to. But think about it as very dramatic, right? You know, if you had five, maybe you need four. If you, you know, it's just a really significant improvement, which makes it practical to imagine that you're going to be able to do this in law firms and accounting firms and consulting firms, where you take your average employee and make them as good as your best.
54:14So let's take an old economy company that's not traditionally tech-oriented. You guys own Mavis Tire Express Services. Yes. How does a consumer service business like that get digitally transformed? How do you monitor that? The CEO walks into our office and said, I know everything in the world about tires. I know where to buy them, how to store them, how to put them on, how to rotate them. I know how to balance them. I know how to align them. Nothing. I know everything about tires. I know anything about technology. But I have a very strong opinion that technology could help my business, and I just don't know where to start.
54:55I've got – he had talked to a bunch of consultants. He had lots and lots of ideas. And there are hundreds of these Mavis stores, right? Thousands. Thousands. There were a thousand Mavis stores when we first started chatting three years ago. So it's a good-sized business, very well-run, nice growth, profitable. Not a business that's broken, but a business where the management team had a felt need around the opportunity to make it better and really steal a march on their competitors. And so what we did is sit down with them and say, look, here are six different use cases that you might want to think about.
55:41Here's a way around digital marketing. Here's a better customer experience. Here's what you can do around inventory management. Here's labor productivity and capacity utilization planning. Here's dynamic pricing. And we went through an entire kind of brainstorming session around that, produced a whole plan. So usually when you do a new investment, you'll do an underwriting. And we do a normal financial underwriting like everyone else. What's different is we also do, in addition, a separate digital underwriting where we talk with the management team to create a technology roadmap for the enterprise that integrates with their business model.
56:30and extends it to create performance improvements. And what we did with them, sat down, we got better digital marketing so that the search engine's optimized for, if you're calling and writing in, I've got a flat tire and I'm in Poughkeepsie, then here's where you go. Improve the customer experience so you know when to bring your car in, limit wait times, accurate estimates of how long it is going to take, what it's going to cost, what your options are, dramatically improved kind of labor utilization in the shops, capacity utilization, got the pricing right so that we manage margins and customer expectations appropriately.
57:21All of that, we could get done in two days or two weeks, but some of those things has taken us two years to put up. The end result, though, is that the business is now more than twice as big, roughly twice as profitable. And that's not all due to the digital, but the digital is very fundamentally enabling of that growth. As you might imagine, if you're opening new stores, it's a lot easier to do if you do the same thing in every single store. Right. So let's talk about another portfolio company, Pollywood. Yeah. High-density polythene outdoor furniture. How can technology improve that? You know, it's an interesting business.
58:06It's a specialty manufacturing company that builds kind of very high quality. It feels like wood. Outdoor furniture. Very durable, colorful, but doesn't chip, doesn't fade. Doesn't need to be painted. Doesn't need to be painted. You don't have to take it in during the winter, any of those things. So that's sort of the fundamental value proposition of the thing. But here's the difference, which is that we said, look, you guys are manufacturing guys. People have built it, and they're really good because they use recycled plastic, So it's incredibly sustainable. You know, they drill the holes. They do the trimming.
58:48They just take the plastic waste, put it back in the top. So it's a zero waste, highly sustainable. Fantastic story. During COVID, they grew their online business a lot. They're not marketing people, right? So we're able to show them how to significantly improve yield on their online, the e-commerce side of the business. and we're able to do that, by the way, very quickly, almost instantly around that, able to see how to get to new adjacent market areas based on finding more people like the ones who are already buying. Once you identify a customer, you want to be able to identify more. Once you identify them electronically, then it's a lot easier to find that electronic signature and go look for it online rather than waiting for people to find, you.
59:42The other thing that we're doing there is that we have highly automated manufacturing. And so that we can take the manufacturing and instead of manufacturing 20 or 200 chairs, putting them in a warehouse, sending them to a distribution center or a store and hoping somebody buys them, we can instead take an order, build the chair, send it to them. So it's not just just in time, but it's real time that creates pull. So that dramatic improvements in efficiency, but it also makes it easier to do custom things, improves turnaround time. You get your furniture much faster. Those would be good examples.
1:00:25Really, really interesting. I only have you for a few more minutes. So before I get to my favorite questions, let me just ask you one last question. We talked about the Rue Family Foundation and Institute briefly. Tell us a little bit about what you focus on with the Rue Family Foundation. What we like to do is find social entrepreneurs, folks who are looking to make scale impact in education, particularly educational access, conservation, you know, kind of environmental things, biomedical research, and then a particular focus of mine is around helping support veterans and their families. Really, really good stuff.
1:01:14All right, so this will be our speed round. I have about four minutes, five minutes to get through five questions. Let's just do this quickly. what's keeping you entertained these days? What are you watching or listening to? Right now, my wife and I are watching The Lioness and The Diplomat. We're about halfway through The Diplomat, so no spoilers. Season two. Good. We loved The Crown, and I am waiting anxiously for season two of Wolf Hall, the Henry VIII and Thomas Cromwell story. In podcast land, my current favorite is Fall of Civilizations by Paul Cooper. Huh, interesting. Tell us about your mentors who helped to shape your career.
1:02:05You know, I've had a couple. I've been very fortunate. Early guy was a guy named Chuck Glover, a newspaper guy who ended up running Cox Enterprises, the media company. he funded my uh cox funded my first company he was a newspaper guy and the key lesson from him was look i had to put out a product every day and so just getting in the habit of putting one foot in front of the other making a little bit of progress every day and just keep going uh was really valuable. The other guy who was great for me was Dr. Frank King. And what I learned from Frank, he was the head of engineering at Lotus and had a similar job at IBM before that.
1:02:53What I learned from him was that the people were more important than the products. And that building your organization, primacy of people, and particularly always being, you know, always recruiting being kind of on the prowl all the time uh was super valuable let's talk about books what are some of your favorites and what are you reading currently i uh i'm a mark halpern fan i love paris in the present tense um i like don winslow city on fire is one of my favorite books It's first in a trilogy with City of Desire and City in Ruins. I like anything by Dennis Lehane, anything by Elizabeth Strout.
1:03:43And I'm currently just finished The Magician by Edmund Duvall, just reading The Hair with Amber Eyes, also by Edmund Duvall. Huh, interesting. Our final two questions. What sort of advice would you give a recent college grad interested in a career in either private equity or technology? You know, I always tell them the same thing. I always tell them to do something else first. And I say that because I'm a great believer in domain expertise. And so I usually counsel younger folks coming out of school to go learn an industry and or learn a craft, learn a skill. Be good at marketing, be good at sales.
1:04:30You know, be good at finance. Pick something where you're really good at it because it gives you a cachet and a standing that you don't otherwise have. And our final question, what do you know about the world of private equity investing today that might have been helpful back in 1999 when you were first standing up Silver Lake? I wish I knew how important it was to be first. Really? How interesting. I think as an operating person, I probably intuited it and understood it because I kind of saw it around me, the advantages that accrue to a category leader. You just don't need to be as good. Think about Elon Musk.
1:05:24His first electric car was a bundle of borrowed parts and components. it barely worked it was hugely expensive um literally a lotus salon with laptop batteries with laptop batteries in it wired together with you know with soldering wire cost of fortune incredibly uncomfortable to drive totally unreliable um gotta start somewhere but he was able to do that for years and years and years and learn and learn and develop you know an expertise and some skills. Same thing's true for, if you think about it, Jeff Bezos, right? Selling books that no one wanted. Right. Losing money hand over fist for a decade.
1:06:08But building infrastructure, building experience, learning lessons, you know, creating a team that became the basis for, you know, both of those things didn't work until they did. And boy, when they worked, they really worked great. They really worked. Thank you, David, for being so generous with your time. We have been speaking with David Rue. He is the executive chairman of Baypine, a private equity firm focused on digital transformation. If you enjoy this conversation, well, check out any of the 500 plus discussions we've had over the past 10 years. You can find those at iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, Bloomberg, wherever you find your favorite podcasts.
1:06:50And check out my new podcast, At The Money, short discussions with experts on specific topics involving your money, earning it, spending it, and most importantly, investing in it at The Money, wherever you find your favorite podcasts and in the Masters in Business feed. I would be remiss if I did not thank the crack team that helps put these conversations together each week. Anna Luke is my producer. Sean Russo is my researcher. Sage Bauman is the head of podcasts here at Bloomberg. I'm Barry Ritholtz. You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.
From the publisher
Barry Ritholtz speaks with David Roux, co-founder and executive chairman of BayPine, a private equity firm focused on digital transformation at core economy businesses. Previously he co-founded Silver Lake Partners and served as the chairman and co-CEO. David has also held leadership positions at Oracle, Central Point and Lotus Development. He currently serves on the boards of Bristol Seafoods and The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington. On this episode, Barry and David discuss the tech investing landscape, AI's future development, and sectors of opportunity for BayPine's "digital transformation capital."
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.


