Stopping Poor Financial Decisions with Former FDIC Chair Sheila Bair

15 May 2026 · 1 h 5 min · 34 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Episode topic: Former FDIC chair Sheila Bair discusses what drives poor financial decisions, lessons from the 2008 financial crisis, and why financial education and consumer protection matter—especially for young people. She also critiques deregulation, “too-big-to-fail” expectations, and today’s private credit and student-debt incentives.

Guest background

Sheila Bair is a former FDIC chair who helped steer the FDIC through the financial crisis. She has also worked in government and finance and writes books for adults and young readers, including How Not to Lose a Million Dollars and children’s/teen finance series.

Key claims

Bailouts were too generous and accountability was too weak (including bonuses in 2009). Deregulation cycles repeat crises; risk-based capital rules can be gamed via securitization/overcollateralization. Private credit is often an investor-protection problem (valuation opacity, conflicts, liquidity), not necessarily “systemic,” but it shouldn’t be pushed into retail/401(k)s. Student debt worsened due to misaligned incentives that let colleges profit while borrowers carried the risk; reforms simplified repayment and added accountability.

Notable examples

Bonuses after 2009 bailouts; Intel/“take a stake” bailout idea; SVB/Signature failures and uninsured-depositor bailouts; private credit funded by banks through securitization structures; student loan negative amortization and $10/month minimum; credit card debt story (~$6,000 interest).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Early Career Insights

3:21 to 4:52

Sheila Bair shares her background and career path in law and finance.

“So I want to start with a little bit of background from you.”

Philosophy and Finance Connection

4:52 to 7:27

Exploring how Sheila's philosophy education influenced her career in finance.

“What's the through line connecting each of these worlds, government, regulation, academia, and finance?”

Writing for Different Audiences

7:27 to 8:57

Sheila discusses her approach to writing finance books for various age groups.

“And that can be very confusing and intimidating, and I think sometimes weaponized, frankly, by people who are trying to sell a product or service.”

Reflections on the Financial Crisis

8:57 to 11:22

Sheila Bair reflects on decisions made during the financial crisis and their implications.

“It's kind of riff on the tulip bubble that occurred in Hollywood hundreds of years ago.”

Cycles of Deregulation in Finance

11:22 to 14:06

Discussion on the impact of deregulation on financial crises over the years.

“Let me shock listeners by saying I think President Trump got something right almost accidentally by taking a piece of a company like Intel.”

Cycles of Financial Crises and Deregulation

14:06 to 16:40

Explore the recurring nature of financial crises and the effects of deregulation.

“So we had Graham, Leach, Bliley, which certainly was a major factor that led to the GFC.”

Recent Bank Failures and Regulatory Responses

16:40 to 19:28

Discuss the implications of recent bank failures and the regulatory actions taken.

“The world has really gotten kind of interesting in terms of we still seem to be dealing with the echoes of the financial crisis.”

The Rise of Private Credit and Its Risks

21:18 to 24:44

Examine the growth of private credit and the regulatory challenges it presents.

“She's the former chair of the FDIC, which she helped steer through the financial crisis.”

Concerns About Private Equity in 401ks

24:44 to 28:00

Discuss the implications of allowing private equity in retirement accounts.

“Here's what the banks say, and I don't necessarily believe this, but it's not completely unconscionable.”

Concerns Over Retail Exposure to Alternative Investments

28:00 to 29:00

Discussion on the risks of retail investors being exposed to alternative assets.

“And actually, I don't know how it's been performing.”
Show all 34 chapters

The Challenge of Regulating Large Financial Institutions

29:00 to 30:00

Exploration of the difficulties in regulating banks that are too big to fail.

“And to put some numbers on what you referenced about the performance, the median alternative funds doesn't do all that great.”

Ineffective Accountability for Large Banks

30:00 to 30:50

Discussion on accountability measures for large banks and the likelihood of bailouts.

“I mean, I worked hard in Dodd-Frank to come up with, you know, to instill more better authorities to put these large institutions into a resolution-type process where you would impose that accountability.”

Concerns Around Deregulation and Financial Stability

30:50 to 32:00

Analysis of the implications of deregulation in the banking sector and potential risks.

“I think they're going to bail out again.”

The Student Debt Crisis: Current State and Solutions

32:00 to 32:50

Insight into the student debt crisis and potential solutions for improvement.

“Let's talk about a financial crisis that really has gotten a lot of short shrift given everything else we just discussed, which is the student debt crisis.”

Improvements in the Student Loan Repayment System

32:50 to 34:20

Details on changes to the student loan repayment process and their implications.

“Well, and I think the headline numbers are in this K-shaped economy.”

The Need for Accountability from Colleges

34:20 to 35:30

Discussion on why colleges should be held accountable for student loan defaults.

“If you got a loan from taxpayers, even if you're struggling, you can pay$10 a month.”

Shifting Perceptions on College Education

35:30 to 36:40

Exploration of changing attitudes towards college as a necessity for success.

“I mean, it's not a ton of money, but it's still six hundred dollars a year.”

Concerns Over Graduate School Debt

36:40 to 37:50

Discussion on the challenges of debt incurred from graduate programs and their outcomes.

“Inflation, you know, with tuition, you know, many multiples.”

Increasing Awareness Around College Value

37:50 to 39:10

Insights on how prospective students are becoming more informed about college value.

“So do you have any hope that students are in a better shape financially going forward?”

The Future of Higher Education Institutions

39:10 to 40:30

Predictions on the future landscape of colleges and universities in the U.S.

“I think it's a wonderful experience, but it's not for everybody and you don't have to do it.”

Writing for Young Adults: Financial Literacy in Education

40:30 to 41:50

Discussion on the importance of financial education for teenagers and young adults.

“And so I think we'll still have them, but I think there'll be a lot of consolidation there.”

Impact of Social Media on Financial Advice for Youth

41:50 to 42:00

Analysis of how social media influences young people's financial decisions and knowledge.

“And I'm pleased with the way the book came out.”

Navigating Generational Financial Advice

42:00 to 45:05

Discusses how different generations receive financial advice and the implications for financial literacy.

“Gen Z and what's the new generation after them?”

Sponsorship and Financial Insights

45:05 to 45:53

Introduction of sponsorship content along with a brief on upcoming discussions.

“You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.”

The Dangers of the 'Degen Economy'

46:01 to 49:51

Explores the implications of speculative trading and gambling among youth.

“My extra special guest this week is Sheila Baer.”

Establishing Financial Education in Youth

49:51 to 52:53

Discusses the importance of financial education and initiatives to teach kids about money.

“You established the Financial Education Division within the Treasury Department.”

Understanding Modern Money Management

52:53 to 56:00

Addresses the challenges of teaching kids the value of money in a cashless society.

“Congress mandated that money has to be invested in broad-based index funds, which is good.”

Understanding Impulse Spending

56:00 to 57:08

Learn about the impact of impulse control on spending habits and budgeting strategies.

“Um, and I, you know, so I think it feeds a lot of overspending.”

Car Buying Insights

57:08 to 59:10

Explore the challenges and strategies involved in buying a car today.

“my little hack is I'll buy one of the die-cast models and put it on my shelf.”

Mentorship and Public Service

59:10 to 1:00:40

Hear from Sheila Bair about the mentors that shaped her career in finance and government.

“He really taught me what public service meant, and he was always focused on the public interest.”

Reflections on Historical Literature

1:00:40 to 1:02:58

Discuss the significance of historical literature and its impact on understanding past events.

“I'm reading Anthony Horowitz's new book, A Deadly Episode.”

Streaming Preferences and Recommendations

1:02:58 to 1:04:24

Discover Sheila's favorite streaming content and her approach to media consumption.

“So Hiroshima gets it because somebody went there on a honeymoon.”

Advice for Aspiring Professionals

1:04:24 to 1:06:39

Gain insights on job market navigation and the importance of company culture.

“I get podcasts or I like to read transcripts of podcasts because I can read a lot faster.”

Lessons from Personal Finance

1:06:39 to 1:08:10

Understand key concepts in banking and investing that can influence financial strategies.

“Sometimes things you weren't even thinking about come up and they turn out to be really, really good job choices.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This message is brought to you by Apple Card. Spring always feels like a reset. Clearing things out. Simplifying what you don't need. Apple Card is built with that same idea in mind. No annual fee. No late fees. And no foreign transaction fees. No fees. Period. Get started and apply in the Wallet app on your iPhone today. Subject to credit approval. Variable APRs for Apple Card range from 17.49 % to 27.74 % based on credit worthiness. Rates as of January 1, 2026. Existing customers can view their variable APR on the Wallet app or at card.apple.com. Apple Card is issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Salt Lake City Branch.

0:36Terms and more at applecard.com. If you follow markets, you know the value of long-term thinking. You plan, you diversify, you prepare for volatility. But in life, even the best strategies can't prevent every bad day. A fire, a loss, a disruption that demands immediate attention. When that happens, what matters isn't just what you planned, it's who shows up. That's where Cincinnati Insurance comes in. For more than 75 years, they've helped individuals and businesses navigate life's toughest moments with care, expertise, and personal attention. Together with independent agents, Cincinnati Insurance focuses on relationships, not transactions.

1:16Their approach is grounded in experience, follow-through, and trust built over time. Bad days happen, and when they do, you deserve an insurance partner who understands risk, respects what you've built, and is ready to help you move forward. The Cincinnati Insurance Companies. Let them make your bad day better. Find an independent agent at CINFIN.com. So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises. So let's talk about results. At IBM, we work with our employees to integrate technology right into the systems they need. Now, a global workforce of 300 ,000 can use AI to fill their HR questions, resolving 94 % of common questions.

1:58Not noise. Proof of how we can help companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business. IBM. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News. This is Masters in Business with Barry Ritholtz on Bloomberg Radio. This week on the podcast, another extra, extra special guest, Sheila Bair, former FDIC chairperson, author. What a fascinating career. She was right in the thick of it through the financial crisis, butting heads with Tim Geithner and working with Hank Paulson. And she really has done more than just about anyone in the country to help shore up the financial system, the banking system, and to drive us all towards a better degree of financial education through her work, not only at the FDIC, but at Treasury and through all the books she's written for children and young adults about finance.

3:11I thought this was fascinating. And I think you will also, with no further ado, my conversation with Sheila Bair. Thank you for having me. So I want to start with a little bit of background from you. You get a bachelor's in philosophy from the University of Kansas and then go to law school at the same school, University of Kansas, where you got a JD. Yeah. What was the career plan? Did you want to be a lawyer or what were you thinking? Well, I'm a native Kansan. Grew up in southeast Kansas, traditional Kansas Republican family. We were all Jayhawks. Dad went to medical school at KU. Mom went to nursing school.

3:52My sister was a physical therapist. I didn't choose a medical profession, but did choose KU. So it's a good school. It was an affordable school. And I really didn't know what I wanted to do. I was interested in philosophy. I took a lot of courses in English and economics, too, but majored in philosophy. and realized pretty much as soon as I graduated, I wasn't going to get a very good job with that degree. Well, you could always teach philosophy. I could do that, but I would have to get a PhD and probably go to school longer than I wanted to do that. So I decided to go to law school, which was a, you know, philosophy is a good major if you're going to go into law school because both disciplines are about logical thinking, analysis, you know, good writing skills.

4:35And so actually the philosophy major was good preparation for law school. Yes, say the very least. So your career spans from government and academia and finance really at the highest levels across all three. What's the through line connecting each of these worlds, government, regulation, academia, and finance? Yeah. Well, I have been. And I've had a I've done a lot of different things in my career. And I young people, I tell them, don't try to pre-program your career. Don't be narrow minded about opportunities. And a lot of people stay in the same job for 30, 40, 50 years. I respect that. That's fine.

5:15That was never for me. I'm always looking for new things. But I guess my my first entree to the big leagues released adjacent to the big leagues was when I worked for Bob Dole as his counsel, first on the Senate Judiciary Committee, where I actually I staffed him on the Voting Rights Act compromise to Title II of the Voting Rights Act, which is pretty much just eviscerated by the Supreme Court, which was which was very, you know, that was my first big project for him. So that that's that hurts. But anyway, so I then I went with to the leaders when became majority leader, I went to the majority leader's office with them and handled a broader range of issues.

5:51But that's really, and then I was on his 88 presidential campaign, actually, which obviously started in 1987. Those campaigns start a good year before the primaries begin. And that's where I started off as a civil rights lawyer and did civil rights issues and other things for him. But we had the 1987 market crash. And during the time I was working for his presidential campaign became a big issue. I had to take a crash course in stock markets, and that's when I was first exposed to finance and found that I was really interested in it. Really interesting. I want to focus on some of your writing because you've written for very different age groups, demographics.

6:33Right. So Bull by the Horns, obviously, for adults about the GFC. But the Money Tales book series is aimed at kids. Right. And then the new book is really aimed at teenagers, people starting out. How different is it communicating somewhat complex ideas to each? Is it the same? Is it just making it understandable? Or is it a different approach for each group? It's a bit of a different approach. I think the fact that I didn't really start in finance, that I segued into it working for the Stock Exchange, then later many other senior level jobs. I had to start from scratch when I was learning it, and I had to learn it fast.

7:17But I think my own experience helped me really break down and understand how to approach understanding finance. And one of the big issues is the terminology, the jargon that we use in the financial industry. And that can be very confusing and intimidating, and I think sometimes weaponized, frankly, by people who are trying to sell a product or service. So, but yeah, I mean, I think my early need to really start from scratch and learn it helped me later break down and explain things. And then I think also my philosophy major, the logical thinking, you know, breaking things down into their component parts, understanding the causal connections, kind of laying it out, the analysis out for people in an understandable way is something that I've always tried hard to do and have refined over the years.

8:04But yeah, Bull by the Horns was definitely, it was written for a general population, but it talks a lot about securitization and topics that might make some people's eyes glaze over. But for industry professionals, I think it was of interest. But my children's books, and actually I wrote another book for teens called Bullies of Wall Street, which was a book about the financial crisis for teenagers. And then I have, golly, since 2006, I've been on, you know, as a sideline writing picture books for children. And those are really fun because those are fictionalized stories. I use rhyming verse. They're just fun.

8:42You can be creative because they're really about basic concepts, you know, compounding interest, risk, capital formation. Those are things that really you can't explain at a very basic level for kids. Ponzi schemes is one of them. Asset bubbles is one. I wrote what is called Daisy Bubble. It's kind of riff on the tulip bubble that occurred in Hollywood hundreds of years ago. And I was concerned that kids were not going to get this. And that's one of my more popular books, especially with the boys. There's a character named Sly Seale that's manipulating the daisy market. And, you know, I make that very transparent in the book and they enjoy that.

9:19That's very funny. My favorite part of Bull by the Horns is just the really vivid detail you go into with the clashes with Tim Guy Fender and Hank Paulson. If you could go back in time and magically change any decision that was made during the GFC, what was the wrong decision and how would you fix it? you mean during the crisis or in the lead up to the crisis um either or what what do you think what do you think the big issue it's never one thing but if if so let's since i mentioned guys and paulson what of their decisions do you think was most problematic that you would have liked to reverse yeah well i think there should have been more accountability uh i i do think there should be more accountability i think meaning bankers wall street yes yes we should have at least provided more financial penalties even if we're going to send people to jail.

10:20I think the bailouts could have been less generous. I am still outraged that we let them pay bonuses at the end of 2009. So I think that was, you know, after giving them all his capital. And then once they, you know, got the benefit of all these other programs and, you know, we stabilized themselves to enable them to pay that capital back so they could pay bonuses at the end of 2009 when the rest of the country was reeling in a recession. No, I think we could have been a lot tougher. So, but you know, these things are all compromises. And actually it was more with Tim Geithner than Hank Paulson.

10:52Hank and I could usually come to a common ground and we did on issues where we started with different viewpoints. But yeah, I mean, I think there is a perception of some that they were kind of, the Wall Street was the center of the universe and the heartthrob of the economy and we needed to take gender loving care with it and all of that. And we need to do something. I'm not suggesting we shouldn't have provided some stabilization measures, but we didn't have to. I think we really went overboard. And I do regret that. And I think people are still mad about it. I think a lot of the polarization that we have today stems from the perception on Main Street that not only did we bail these guys out, but we bailed them out very generously.

11:30I couldn't agree more. Let me shock listeners by saying I think President Trump got something right almost accidentally by taking a piece of a company like Intel. Well, my big complaint during the bailouts were, hey, if you're going to give these publicly traded companies a bailout and not send them to bankruptcy court, well, great. Take 40 percent of the company and promise to sell it back to the public markets within a decade. And it would have cut the cost of bailouts substantially and would have hurt existing shareholders and management who helped create the whole disaster. That's exactly right.

12:17Yeah, no, I think that was – we did a little bit of that, but not enough because I think there was just a visceral reaction against being too tough. um so when the alternative is that those that handsome building downtown with the tall columns and the judge who basically says uh okay you're now in receivership like when you look at the next the next best alternative is you're toast okay we'll give up 40 percent at a substantial discount and stay at live to fight another day i couldn't agree more we were they were looking Their baseline was how these companies operated before they got into trouble.

12:56And my baseline was bankruptcy was the alternative. We did, but it was uneven, too. So we put Fannie and Freddie into conservatorship. And maybe they should have been put in bankruptcy, too. But the statute provided for conservatorship, where they still language. So they got punished pretty well. We were still getting – well, now they're allowed to keep their capital to build a capital base. But the government's made quite a bit of money since then from that. AIG, poor AIG, you know, they were effectively put in conservatorship by the Fed and finally emerged from that. But, you know, there was an unevenness, too, with the way some of those entities were treated versus, for instance, a Citigroup, which, you know, what else can we do to help you, Citigroup?

13:39It was pretty embarrassing. For the third time, fourth time? Yeah, three times, yeah. They're like every generation. They're back with their hat in hand. And they will be again. You need a few billion, right. I'm rooting for, but, you know, historically, you know that he's going to be back. So I'm kind of fascinated by over the course of your career, you have spanned three distinct cycles of deregulation. Right. So we had Graham, Leach, Bliley, which certainly was a major factor that led to the GFC. Yes, it was. We have the entire Dodd-Frank deregulation of the past decade and then everything that's – like all the carve-outs and then most recently reducing the amount of net cap in reserve that banks have to hold.

14:37Yeah, that's ongoing. So why do we keep having these crises? Is it structural? Is it the American political system? It seems like we're constantly repeating these cycles over and over. Yeah. Well, we are. And deregulation was a big part of the crisis. Nobody wants to say that or just lack of regulation. The Fed and Bernanke and Greenspan have both said this. The Fed had the authority to write lending standards, mortgage lending standards for the entire industry. The problem is most of these mortgages are being originated by non-banks. The banks are funding it, right? But they're providing the conduit funding to get them into scarizations.

15:11But the Fed had the power to stop that and just flat out refuse. Oh, we don't want to constrain credit. If I hear that once, I think those are, you know, Warren Buffett once said the most dangerous words in finance or everybody else is doing it. I think it's we're going to expand access to credit. I swear to God, because it is used as an excuse for so many terrible, terrible lending decisions. Didn't Greenspan say, we don't want to stifle innovation in the finance markets? Those are the interest words, too. I don't want to stifle innovation either. But it's just used as an excuse. Oh, you know, like we've got to reduce capital to get more lending out there.

15:45I would argue there's too much lending out there already. We're seeing all the cockroaches scurrying out now. So, yeah. So, it was in derivatives. As you said, Graham-Leach-Blyley broke down. It created these too-big-to-fail institutions. It all got bailed out. But also derivatives, their basic decision was that nobody needs to regulate derivatives markets. The theory was, well, the big banks were dealers, the derivatives dealers. They're regulated by the bank regulators, so we don't need market regulation. And that did not turn out so well. Because the thing about the mortgage crisis was there were hundreds of billions of mortgages going bad.

16:19But there were trillions and trillions of financial engineering on top of how those mortgages would perform. And that's really what got us at the end of the day. Yeah, there were a lot of mortgages that never should have been made, but the system could have absorbed those underlying losses. It was the derivatives on top of that that really brought things down suddenly. So let's talk a little bit about finance. The world has really gotten kind of interesting in terms of we still seem to be dealing with the echoes of the financial crisis. It's amazing. It's almost 20 years ago. And yet things like when SVB, Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank failed in 2003, people started to get concerned about systemic risk, even though these are kind of too minor.

17:14Those are not systemic. Right. Systemically important financial institutions. And yet, in order to cover uninsured depositors, regulators— Who are the richest people, among the richest people in the country. Gee, I wonder if that's just a total coincidence or if some upset people made some phone calls. Yeah, I was appalled. Because if your local credit union goes out and you're— Yeah, you're taking a loss if you're an uninsured depositor in a community bank. Yeah, you bet. But if you're a Silicon Valley VC and you're connected, you get – Stablecoin issuer, yeah. That was so funny. The Biden administration was doing everything they could to kill crypto on one hand, and then they bail out one of the biggest – the biggest stablecoin issuers who had a couple – two and a half billion or so of uninsured deposits.

18:06Really irresponsible on their part to put that much of their reserves in uninsured deposits, but they were bailed out. I couldn't believe it. I wrote a very strong piece in the Financial Times after it happened. And, you know, it was just this new jerk bailout, bailout, bailout, especially if they're rich, powerful people. I don't I was just I was appalled. I'm still appalled. I was it was it was 200 billion. It was not systemic. It had good assets. If they had they should have tried to find a buyer quickly. Like Washington Mutual. Yeah. So but there is I think nobody said this, but my suspicion is there is this Biden administration religious adversity to bank mergers and acquisitions.

18:45We can't make banks bigger. So instead of quickly trying to market and sell it, they didn't do that. But even if they hadn't, if they just put it into a bridge bank, they had good assets. They probably could have paid 85, 90 cents on the dollar to the energy. Did someone else come along and buy all the assets anyway? Well, yeah. So the merger happened regardless. But it cost the FDAC, it was$17,$18 billion, the deposit insurance fund. It was outrageous. I'm still aghast that that even happened. And, you know, that annoys me with my Democrat friends who pretend that the Republicans are ones that are pro-industry and pro-bailout, and then they do something like that.

19:27So go figure. Coming up, we continue our conversation with Sheila Baer, former chairperson of the FDIC, discussing regulation and deregulation in the modern financial system. I'm Barry Ritholtz. You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

20:11and no foreign transaction fees. No fees, period. Every credit card should be this easy. Get started in the Wallet app today. Subject to credit approval, variable APRs for Apple Card range from 17.49 % to 27.74 % based on credit worthiness. Rates as of January 1, 2026. Existing customers can view their variable APR in the Wallet app or at card.apple.com. Apple Card is issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Salt Lake City branch. Terms and more at applecard.com. On June 10th, Bloomberg Invest is back in Hong Kong. We look at the role Hong Kong plays between China and the world as major powers compete and markets realign.

20:46As global investors rethink risk, we'll explore the forces driving Asian demand and the future of private capital. Catch exclusive interviews with top newsmakers, plus a live recording of Bloomberg's Odd Lots podcast. Visit bloomberglive.com forward slash invest Hong Kong to learn more. Supporting sponsor Deutsche Bank.

21:10I'm Barry Ritholtz. You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My extra special guest today is Sheila Bair. She's the former chair of the FDIC, which she helped steer through the financial crisis. Her latest book, How Not to Lose a Million Dollars, aimed at teenagers and helping them really understand the basics of finance. So let's talk about something else that's a potential issue. Private credit has exploded in the past decade. It's now over$2 trillion. And while we have all of these private non-bank credit funds, they're all being funded by regulated banks. Is this just regulatory arbitrage?

21:55Well, it is, but not in the way that I think the bank's soundbites make it sound. So their soundbite is that the capital regulations are too onerous, much tougher than they are for these private funds, which is nonsense. The private funds are much less levered than banks. Banks are, you know, on a non-risk-weighted basis, you know, these big banks are operating with 6%, 8 % capital funding, equity funding. So it's not like they have tougher capital requirements. The problem is these risk-based rules, and this is exactly what was going on in subprime too. The risk-based rules, through the magic of securitization structures and quote-unquote over collateralization, you can lend to a private fund, and the private fund will give you collateral.

22:42They'll give you their loans, and they'll say they'll be valued 150 % of what your loan is, right? So that you're way over collateralized. And if you do it that way, the capital rules will give you a very favorable capital treatment. So you can use a lot of leverage, increasing your return on equity by lending to the fund. If you make the loan directly to the highly levered business who the fund is lending to, you've got a very, very high capital charge. And so the argument is, well, you're directly exposed to this highly levered business. So you need to have it tougher than if you just lend to the fund.

23:18The problem is that you're basically allowing banks to lend and fund indirectly highly risky mortgages that they would not do or not be permitted to do, frankly, if they were doing it directly. And that's exactly what was going on with subprime. These horrible, unaffordable mortgages peddled so a lot of people didn't understand what they were getting. The banks were funding that through their credit lines and their warehouse funding to provide the money to the originators, packaging them up with securitization and selling them. And again, the capital required for that was much, much less than actually making a mortgage yourself and holding it.

23:58So it really is the same basic flaw in how the risk-based capital rules work. I would just say you can't fund a loan directly or indirectly that doesn't meet prudent underwriting standards. Because what happens is the banks, from a societal standpoint, the banks are funding a lot of really risky loans that, if they go bad, can have broader adverse ramifications for the economy. But they don't look at it that way. And in point of fact, there are pending capital rules now that will make it even more favorable for these banks to be lending to these intermediary funds as opposed to lending directly.

24:36So that's what's driving this, not because banks have much tougher capital rules than private funds. That is not true. It's just that they can use more leverage to lend to the fund directly than to lend to the business itself. Here's what the banks say, and I don't necessarily believe this, but it's not completely unconscionable. They say when we were securitizing loans during the financial crisis, lending standards had been completely abdicated in all of these no income check, no job check, just sign and pray. And then, oh, it will all come out in the collateralization and the syndication. We'll spread the risk around.

25:21Right. This is, hey, these are lending money to firms that have been in operation for 10, 20 years and names like Apollo and Carlisle and Blackstone who are trying to get a return on investment. And this sounds a little familiar. You know, they would never put their reputations or their names at risk by doing anything too stupid. And besides, the default rates have been really low and it's highly spread out across sectors and geographies. Is that a fair argument? It is a fair argument. And I'm not saying private credit is a legitimate asset class. And I don't think it's systemic, primarily because you don't have all this financial engineering sitting on top of it.

26:05I do think they've been making some really risky loans. There are a lot of conflicts of interest involved since a lot of the private credit funds are affiliated with the private equity funds. They're lending to the private equity portfolio companies. And this is a particular problem. Actually, I think this is an investor protection issue more than systemic issue. I really do. And for sophisticated investors, I think private credit is absolutely a legitimate asset class. You know, got to understand it's not regulated. You don't really know what the loans are worth, right? So there's a big problem with getting a proper valuation on the assets.

26:40Not a lot of transparency for retail or even high net worth individuals. There's a liquidity issue, right? The business model doesn't really work unless most of the capital is locked in. And frankly, there's a lot of research questioning whether it really provides better returns. The S &P 500 has been kicking it for several years now. So there are a lot of questions. But for sophisticated investors, you know, go forth and do it. And I don't think it's systemic. And I do worry about these life insurance companies and the annuitants because, again, you've got a private equity-owned life insurance affiliate.

27:17You've got the private credit affiliate. You've got the life insurance affiliate lending into the private credit affiliate. You're using these third-party credit raters to make sure, you know, it's all at arm's length. Very incestuous. Yeah, and the BIS did a study about a year ago on this, and others have taken a look at these valuations, and they're finding significant evidence of inflated values. So I do think we need to protect at the retail level. We need to – there need to be some – not expanding access to this. So you're not a fan of private equity or private debt in 401ks? No, I am not.

Read the full transcript

27:53As a matter of fact, I am not. You know what? If you want to – you want to buy a stock in KKR, go for it. You might check how it's been performing. And actually, I don't know how it's been performing. But I'm just saying, if you really want exposure, there are publicly traded ways. BDCs now, there are publicly traded BDCs. There are public ways to do it. There are some funds, 40-act funds, that do invest a small percentage in alternatives, too. So there are ways now. But yeah, opening it up directly for retail, especially 401ks, to start loading up on this asset class, I think is really problematic.

28:29And I do worry that the plan sponsors, the fund sponsors, the 401k sponsors are going to be getting the hard sell about putting this stuff into people's 401ks. And again, I don't think retail – I know I don't. I don't want exposure to it. I've read enough to make me really worried about it. So I think really sophisticated big institutions, which have traditionally been their investor base, they want to do it fine. But no, it's not right for retail and it shouldn't be going into 401ks. And I'm, yeah, I'm very worried about that. And to put some numbers on what you referenced about the performance, the median alternative funds doesn't do all that great.

29:12It's not that diversified and it doesn't outperform the S &P 500. Hey, if you're lucky enough to get into a top decile fund, you're going to kill it, but it's going to take a couple hundred million dollars. Yes, exactly. To have access to that. Yeah, the retail people are not going to be getting the creme de la creme on this. No, that's – and that's a huge issue. They're going to stuff the riskier stuff into the 401ks. It makes a lot of sense. So we've talked about everything but too big to fail, which was a big part of the lead-up to the financial crisis and how the Fed, the FDIC, everybody dealt with it afterwards.

29:52As an example, JPMorgan Chase now has over$4 trillion, with a T, in assets. Can a bank that size be effectively regulated? Is too big to fail the norm now? Oh, I think so. It absolutely is. I mean, I worked hard in Dodd-Frank to come up with, you know, to instill more better authorities to put these large institutions into a resolution-type process where you would impose that accountability. You could fire the top management, the boards, make the shareholders and bondholders, unsecured creditors, absorb the losses, all the stuff we didn't do during the crisis. You mean normal bankruptcy rules.

30:32Yeah, exactly. It was similar to the FDIC process, which is basically a bankruptcy process. And Title II and Dodd-Frank provides for both the Title II mechanism, which is FDIC run in a bankruptcy process, a Title I process. So the tools are there, but I don't think there's any – I hate to say this, but I don't think there's any chance they'd ever use it. I really don't. I think they're going to bail out again. They already do. They'll set up special lending facilities or ratchet interest rates down. You know, private equity. So actually, I worry more about private equity than private credit because private equity funds are heavily exposed to software companies, which we don't know how that's going to shake out.

31:14But there's quite a bit of concentration there. So, you know, so but if that sector gets into trouble, you know, the Fed will lend to the banks who can then lend to the funds. I mean, that's that's just the way I think it works now. And I think a lot of the push for ever more deregulation, lower capital rules is based on the assumption of the big bank lobbyist that they're never going to go down. There's another kerfuffle, another problem. The Fed's just going to open up the spigot again. So, you know, why should they have to operate with all this capital when they can lower their capital and get much higher returns in equity?

31:47And I do think that's the unspoken rationale because it doesn't make any sense otherwise. Because we've got a lot of uncertainties in the banking system right now to be lowering capital. Makes no sense unless you're just banking on a bailout if things get dicey. Let's talk about a financial crisis that really has gotten a lot of short shrift given everything else we just discussed, which is the student debt crisis. We've seen just an explosion of student loans. It was briefly and defaults. It was briefly put on pause during the pandemic and right afterwards. I just saw a survey earlier today that said 83 % of young people say this is a bad economy, when by most historical measures, it's a booming economy.

32:42So how did we get here? Why is it so difficult to fix? What is a potential policy solution to the student debt crisis? Yeah. Well, and I think the headline numbers are in this K-shaped economy. I think the headline numbers can be can be misleading because you've got to look at how all that wealth is being distributed. But I think for student debt, I will give credit to the Trump administration in Congress, the BBB, the big, beautiful bill. I hate that name, but it had some really important reforms to the student loan system. So they've dramatically simplified the repayment options. There's now a standard plan and one income based repayment plan.

33:20And they have imposed some accountability on colleges, which desperately needed to be done. And so it's easier to kick colleges now with high default rates out of the loan system. They have gotten rid of negative amortizations. One of the frustrating things about student loan borrowers was that because in previous administrations, the repayment plans that were based on a percentage of your income were set so low that people were even – some of them were paying zero. Because you had to earn a certain amount of money before a loan payment obligation even kicked in. But what happened was, for bookkeeping purposes or whatever, they would negatively amortize the loan.

34:01So all your unpaid interest was going into your debt principal, and it was getting bigger and bigger. Just recapitalized forever. Even if you were making some payment, you got frustrated because your debt was getting bigger and bigger. That's all gone away with now. Negative amortization has been abolished. Everybody has to pay at least$10 a month. I don't think that's unreasonable. If you got a loan from taxpayers, even if you're struggling, you can pay$10 a month. And then there's – and then – so if that payment is so low, if your income-driven payment is so low that you're not covering your interest, the government will pay$50 a month to lower your principal.

34:40So as long as you're making at least$10 a month, your principal will go down each month. And I think this will be simpler and will provide better incentives to make loan payments, keep up the loan payments, because you'll actually be able to see the principal going down. So I give credit. And in full disclosure, my son, who's a fellow at the AEI, was also heavily involved in this. So he's a chip off the old block that we think alike when it comes to student. Yeah, simplification, more accountability. And those are the things that this bill accomplished. So I'm hoping that this gets straightened up.

35:14And people are having to pay now. But the transition to going from not paying for years, you know, and Trump did that, too. We had this three or four year long moratorium. People are going to have to pay now. It's going to hurt. They haven't made room in their budget for these loan payments. Well, ten dollars a month isn't it's not huge. No. Right. And if the government is kicking in 50. Yeah. I mean, it's not a ton of money, but it's still six hundred dollars a year. Have we done enough to resolve the student debt crisis or what else can we do to move this along? Yeah. Well, I do think there needs to be more accountability for colleges to assume some of the losses.

35:52The schools themselves. Yes, the colleges themselves. Because this was the classic misaligned economic incentives. So with the best of intentions, the Congress said, OK, from now on, all the student loans are going to be made. Pretty much all of them are going to be made by the government because we're worried the banks are not treating borrowers as well as they should. So we're going to be doing this. And then the colleges themselves will basically originate the loan. So you apply to a college, and the college financial aid office will come up with a financial aid package. And they will calculate how much you need to borrow to go to their school.

36:26Well, now, what are their incentives? They're going to get the money. You're buying for a tuition, room, and board. So they're going to get the money. They're not on the hook if the student can't repay the loan. So what do you think is going to happen? And what happened exactly is you could have predicted it. Inflation, you know, with tuition, you know, many multiples. Nine percent a year for 40 years, 50 years. For whatever, yeah. So tuition, as any parent knows or student knows, has skyrocketed, become very unaffordable without borrowing. But, you know, there was all this easy money. And the undergraduate is a problem with the graduate schools.

37:04You know, a lot of young people then sold a bill of goods to get a master's or a Ph.D. because they're unlike undergraduate loans. There is some caps on your federal loans, but no effective caps. That's been changed now, too. There are some caps. Thank goodness. On your graduate and professional schools, you know, so somebody like me, oh, I'm going to go get a Ph.D. in philosophy so I can teach. Right. So I pay$300 ,000 to get my Ph.D. in philosophy and get a job maybe paying 60 ,000 a year at some small college. Well, that makes sense. But I think that's happened to a lot of people. And I don't think, you know, I don't absolve the borrower either.

37:41They should have known better. But the schools let this happen. These graduate professional schools can be real moneymakers. They are the graduate schools in particular, real moneymakers for colleges. And the degrees are frequently do not enhance the earnings potential of the student. So do you have any hope that students are in a better shape financially going forward? Or is this still very problematic and need more help? I think things are getting better, and a lot of it is something else that the first Trump administration did, which Biden continues and the current Trump administration continues, is to publish postgraduate outcomes.

38:15So you can go on College Scoreboard now and put in a college and a degree that you may be thinking about it, and you can see what the graduates are actually making. And you can find out the graduation rate. You can find out the retention rate. You can find out all sorts of information that will tell you, is that college graduating students and are they getting good jobs after they leave? And so I think more and more parents and student advisors, high school, college advisors are using those tools. There are more calculators, too, that are based on to help you figure out how much you can borrow based on what your postgraduate income will likely be in that field at that college.

38:53So there is more awareness. And then I think a lot of, you know, ironically, this is coming back to bite a lot of the colleges now because I think it got so expensive. People are starting to take a second look. Well, do I really need to go to college? You know, for so long, there was all this social pressure to go to college. I was a college president. I've taught a university. I think it's a wonderful experience, but it's not for everybody and you don't have to do it. And there's no stigma if you don't do it. You know, you might want to go directly into the workforce, learn on the job. You might want to go to a trade school.

39:22There are community colleges. You've got to be careful there, too, but many of them provide really good education that's less expensive and a shorter duration. So I think students and their parents are also thinking more broadly that they don't have to go to college. There may be other options available. Last question about college and education. We have thousands and thousands of universities and colleges. Do we have too many? Yeah, probably. I mean, are we going to lose 10 or 20 percent of the college base over the next decade? We probably will. And I think the part of it that's really, really struggling are the private liberal arts schools.

40:05And they became too pricey. And I think that's sad because I used to be the president of one of those colleges. And I think they do offer very special educational experience. It's a very, you know, it's more high touch. It's more, you know, for some, you know, going to college when you're 17, 18 years old can be pretty traumatic. You've never been away from home, you know. And so some students, that small, intimate college environment was a good option, but they're really struggling now. And so I think we'll still have them, but I think there'll be a lot of consolidation there. And then it's the weaker schools.

40:36You know, if they're not proving their worth, they're going to close probably. Really, really fascinating. So you went from writing a crisis memoir for adults to totally the opposite direction, basic financial literacy for children. What made you decide to aim in between young adults and teenagers? Well, actually, it was my editor who, you know, everybody, when I first started running the picture books, everybody said, oh, this is too, you know, elementary school children are too young for this. And they're not. They absolutely, and the books have sold well, and they totally get it. But my publisher, everybody said, you need to write a book for teenagers.

41:16And my publisher thought that was a good idea as well. And so I thought about it, and I thought, yeah, because, you know, there's more and more financial education being required in high schools. And I want, I'm concerned that as schools start offering these courses, that there's, you know, good quality, accurate content. There's a lot of people out there providing financial, you know, a lot of people on social media, a lot of curricula, you know, sponsored by industry groups. And so I thought, well, you know, I'm going to I'm going to throw my hat in here to try to provide some basic financial advice to teenagers as they're entering adulthood.

41:49So that's that was the I will have to say my my publisher's initiative. But I think it was a good idea. And I'm pleased with the way the book came out. So I'm glad you brought up social media. Gen Z and what's the new generation after them? Generation Alpha? Someone said Generation Jones is another one. I can't keep up with it. But they all seem to get a lot of financial advice from Instagram and YouTube and TikTok rather than, let's say, more professional experience folks. Right. How did that impact how you thought about reaching this age group and how did it shape the tone of your book? Yeah.

42:33So it was I did want to get some accurate information out there because there's a big theme of this book is, you know, I say in the introduction, building wealth is not hard. You need to establish a regular saving investing habit. You need to avoid debt. That's really what you need to do. and uh and uh but there's so much advice it's just the opposite and especially on social media pushes debt you know well why bother with a nice safe index fund you can go borrow some money and buy a rental property and make way you know way more returns no no no no so but there's crazy stuff like that or borrowing to invest in crypto or mem stocks or you know gambling you know and their kids are getting confused about the difference between gambling and investing They're very different things.

43:18So I wanted to provide some correctives to that. And then just basically also address and flag common financial behaviors that cost people money, like carrying a credit card balance. That I'm very open in my first chapter about my – I totally got in trouble with credit card debt. I was just graduated from law school. I was a civil rights lawyer then, didn't know anything about finance, didn't care, thought it was beneath me. I needed to buy some clothes for work. I needed to get an apartment and furnish my apartment. And so I was getting all these solicitations from various credit card issuers who had found out that I was now working for a living somehow.

43:57So, yeah, I got in trouble with credit card debt, and I made that minimum payment. I thought, wow, this is great. I can borrow this money and use this tiny little payment every month. And I ended up, I think it was about$6 ,000 in interest when all of a sudden. Oh, my God. That's a lot. Well, yeah, which if it invests in the S &P 500, it would be worth around$240 ,000,$250 ,000 now. So there you go. But I think just avoiding things like that, the average family pays$1 ,600 a year in credit card interest. If that was just put into an S &P 500 index fund, boy, over 30 or 40 years, you're talking real money.

44:29So I wanted to emphasize that is the simplicity of how to build wealth. Compounding opportunity costs are big themes. I think those are so fundamental to understanding how to manage money. But basically, I just want to help kids avoid mistakes. I don't want them to have financial problems when they grow up. I want them to get off on the right foot, which I did not, and a lot of people don't. Coming up, we continue our conversation with Sheila Bair, discussing her latest book, How Not to Lose a Million Dollars, A Young Person's Guide to Avoiding the Tricks and Traps of Our Financial System. I'm Barry Ritholtz.

45:07You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

45:35As global investors rethink risk, we'll explore the forces driving Asian demand and the future of private capital. Catch exclusive interviews with top newsmakers, plus a live recording of Bloomberg's Odd Lots podcast. Visit BloombergLive.com forward slash InvestHongKong to learn more. Supporting sponsor, Deutsche Bank.

45:59I'm Barry Ritholtz. You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My extra special guest this week is Sheila Baer. She is the former chair of the FDIC. Her latest book is out, How Not to Lose a Million Dollars, A Young Person's Guide to Avoiding the Tricks and Traps of Our Financial System. So you mentioned a couple of really interesting things that taken together, Howard Lindzen runs a venture fund, and he calls it the degenerate economy. Gambling, speculation, end of day options, mean stocks, crypto coins. And all of these have been through apps and other methods. Yes. So the phones have been adopted by teenagers en masse.

46:48What do you make of the degen economy and what does it mean to the future health of these young adults? Well, it's very dangerous. It's particularly a problem with young boys. And, oh, by the way, they shouldn't be doing this if they're under 18. But a lot of them are, as we know. They're targeted. And they don't understand the worth of money. The apps just make it so easy. They don't make the connection between the financial losses they're experiencing. It's a game for them. And the industry advertises. they do gamify it. So, and even, you know, stock trading, some of these online brokers, the big ones, they gamify it.

47:25And it's not a game. It's serious. Money's serious. And I think one of the things from early on, if parents give their children allowances, but tie that to work, I think it's really important for kids to understand early on the connection between work and money. It's not just free easy, you know, because too many kids don't make that connection on their parents or genus with the credit cards or whatever. And, and they use their credit card numbers to do all these gaming apps. And, and I just don't think the reality of what these kids are doing actually sinks in until they're really in over their head.

48:00And I think it's purposeful. I think, you know, kids don't understand the difference between gambling and investing. Well, there's a big difference in it. You're investing, you're supporting capital formation and the real economy, helping businesses who make real goods and real services, raise money and operate or supporting the secondary market that enables all that and what are you supporting with gambling or crypto i mean some crypto to the extent it represents the technology i think crypto technology is is very valuable but these these these uh you know these different currencies and tokens they have nothing behind them you can call them coins okay i call them coins because that's nothing behind them i'm amazed that bitcoin has held up i think it's just you know it's kind of the granddaddy of them all.

48:42So if you're going to invest, most people do a Bitcoin because they've heard about it and the rest of it is crap. Bitcoin may be too, but it has lasted. I will give it that. But yeah, I mean, what are they supporting? And they're losing money. You know, there was a study done of gambling apps that showed that the people that use gambling apps, only 5 % take out more money than they put in. And it's addictive. And these gambling platforms, even if you start winning well wow oh you're doing great here's a little money why don't you keep going you know they want you to keep going until you start losing money because the odds are you will always lose money and bloomberg came out with some great research recently on prediction markets 75 of the profits i believe are going to one percent of the users less than one percent it's crazy it's so so the whole game is rigged with even active trading of stocks very few people can do that and make make money consistently yeah and you're going to be going against people who do it for a living You can have a lot more access to data and expertise and algorithms and all the things, all the tools you will not have when you try to actively trade stocks.

49:46So this is kind of fascinating. I bet most people don't know how much of a passion project this has been for you so long. Did I read this correctly? You established the Financial Education Division within the Treasury Department. I did. Early 2000s? In 2001, yeah. Yeah. Yeah, I did. I established the Office of Financial Education, and it's grown now. It's in the treasurer's office now, and I think they held a group. It's called FLEC, and it's basically a council of all the different financial education components of the various different regulatory agencies. And it's a good group. Yeah, I did start it.

50:23That's one of the things that got me interested. Actually, my first book was pre-crisis, Rock, Rock, and the Savings Shock. It actually came out in 2006 because based on that experience, it inspired me to start writing kids books because I became aware that there really weren't any resources for elementary age schools. So how not to lose a million dollars covers basics like savings accounts, student loans, debt avoidance, and retirement planning. It kind of raises a question, why aren't we teaching our kids financial fundamentals at the grade school level? Why is this not just part of civics? Yeah, yeah.

51:00Well, it can and should be. I mean, I think there's a big movement now to have a standalone high school personal finance class, which I think is good. But it really, it needs to be more than that. It needs to be every year. It needs to be introduced. And, you know, math curricula is an obvious place because I think it makes, it will make math more interesting to kids if you do use money examples, right? So you want to learn about ratios and percentages? Let's talk about compounding and how much your money grows at 4 % interest a year or whatever. So it does need to be introduced every year. And again, that's one of the reasons my books are – I mean, they're supplements to curricula.

51:36I don't write educational curricula, but there certainly could be assigned readings to go with those classroom efforts. And I think that's important. And the kids get it. They're interested in it. They absolutely get it. They're not too young. One of my favorite parts of the BBB was the newborn accounts. Oh, the Trump accounts, yeah. The baby bonds, which Cory Booker started talking about. I'm drawing a blank on the name of the venture capitalist who suggested something like this years ago. But it's only$1 ,000 to every newborn in an investment account. Yeah. Is this a good start? Is this going to help kids learn about money?

52:15Yeah, it absolutely is. It's I think, you know, it's only for there's a three year period where children are born within a three year period. We'll get the thousand dollars, but it can be matched by employers. A lot of employers. We're hearing already Dell and JP Morgan and a bunch of big employers announced they'll do a thousand dollar match. And the assumption is this will be renewed after three years. I hope so. I hope it is. I'm kind of a fiscal conservative when it comes to our deficits, but I think this is a good way to spend the money because it goes directly. You know where it's going.

52:48You know it's helping. And it's a wonderful way to learn about the power of compounding. Congress mandated that money has to be invested in broad-based index funds, which is good. And, you know, we'd be seeing crypto and memsocks or whatever. So that's good. But you can see over time how it will grow. And I hope, you know, when they're 18, they can take it out. But I hope they leave it there. And it just converts into a regular IRA at that point. But it's great. It's a wonderful financial educational tool as well as some additional financial security for low-income families and their children.

53:19So let's talk about another aspect of money that's so different today than it was when we were kids. money is effectively invisible credit cards apps buy now pay later subscriptions all that there have been studies that have shown that if you give people a pile of cash to spend or a credit card loaded with the same amount they spend more with the credit card than with actually paying you know greenbacks which says a lot about the psychology of you know modern spending. It does. So how do you, how do we recognize that? And how do we teach kids the value of a dollar? It's, it's, it's really a challenge when you just tap the card and it's magic.

54:07It's not real money. It's funny money. Yeah. Well, that's what I think it's important to attach an allowance to jobs. I think helping kids make the connection between having to work and earning money is really, really important because the parents are too generous. They'd let them use their credit card. So that's, they start getting that easy usage. And if they're using their parents' credit card, they're not having to, it's not causing them any pain to spend money. So I think the parents can control a lot of this, but the kids need to understand the connection between earning money and spending money.

54:37And if they make that connection, they will be more judicious and careful with their money because they realize how dear it is because it took, that$10 took an hour of their life raking leaves or whatever, you know. So I think it's important to make that connection. And financial education, understanding, you know, I have a chapter on, I spend a lot of time on credit cards because I think it is an early trap for a lot of families and a lot of kids because it's just so easy. And BMPL is the same thing. BMPL, I don't like it. Buy now, pay later. Buy now, pay later. The whole idea is to facilitate impulse buying.

55:12Let's face it, you know, you're using BMPL when it's really beyond your budget to buy. You weren't thinking about buy it you don't really have the money now to buy it but you really want it and that's what bmpl does and they're you know bmpl users a very high percentage of them uh you know first of all it's not interest fee because it ends up going on your credit card because you can't pay it off so you're just carrying the balance on your credit card or it's coming out of your checking account and you overdraft and you get an overdraft fee so it's not really they say it's interest rate for a lot of users it's not really i guess i'm in a financial when we were kids it was called layaway and you didn't get the good or item until you paid it off.

55:49And you very much understood, I got to shovel more, more sidewalks or more lawns if I want that bike or whatever it happened to be. It was, this is the opposite lesson. It is. It totally is. Um, and I, you know, so I think it feeds a lot of overspending. I think impulse, I, you know, kids are making decisions more impulsively. I mean, they don't have the same impulse control adults have. And I think, you know, people know that. Retailers know that. Commercial entities know that. So they try to encourage them to make snap decisions to buy something. And it's just so important. I have a rule, wait a week.

56:30In my chapter on budgeting about buying things, just wait a week. You know, there's some things you have to buy. Your needs, like your rent or whatever. but if it's your wants first of all don't buy any want that's not within your budget even if you do wait a week you know just don't buy it on impulse wait a week come back to it do you really want to or not when I go into grade schools and do readings I my common question is raise your hand if you've ever bought something you wish you hadn't bought every hand every hand goes up every hand goes up it's amazing yeah already you know at seven years old they've got buyer's remorse it's usually junkie toys what I speaking of junkie toys when there's a car I fixate on, my little hack is I'll buy one of the die-cast models and put it on my shelf.

57:14So for 60 bucks, I like, all right, I feel like, all right, I have a little experience in this car. And after a few weeks, it's like, all right, I have the toy, I'm good. I don't need to spend$100 ,000 on another stupid thing for the garage. Well, that's right. There's a chapter on buying a car too. I just bought a car, actually, a used car. I didn't want to, maybe it'd appreciate it so fast. It's going to be a second car. But this, I couldn't believe it. I mean, I knew this. I've had experience in the past. It'd been a while since I bought a car. He was trying to upsell me with everything. And now they're trying to sell me, give me all these service contracts that would increase the price of the car by about 25%.

57:52It's just unbelievable. Kids want to buy cars. They want their own car. See, I don't think that's true anymore. Maybe not. A lot of kids aren't getting licenses. They can Uber wherever on Monday. In urban areas, I think that's true. Right? And it's, there seem, although there is a renaissance of kids buying, let's call them 20-year-old analog as opposed to digital cars with stick shifts. Really? Like there's a whole generation of new car enthusiasts coming up that I think a stick shift today is an anti-theft device. You know, you bring it to a valet, they look at you, you know, go to a restaurant.

58:36They're like, would you mind pulling it in over there? Yeah. Okay. That's funny. But it's really true. And it's good because, you know, cars are expensive. The average monthly payment is like 700 a month, you know, for a young boy. It's a thousand dollars a month is not uncommon on a lease. Yeah. Kids don't understand why, hey, no down payment. Well, yeah, but no, no residual at the end. You hand it back. That's right. It's just the cost. Exactly right. Yeah. So, yeah, it's really expensive for in person to buy a car if they can avoid that. So I only have you for a few more minutes. So let me jump to my favorite questions I ask all my guests, starting with, tell us about your mentors who helped shape this career you've enjoyed through academia, finance, and government.

59:23Yeah. Well, Bob Dole obviously stands out. He really taught me what public service meant, and he was always focused on the public interest. He was a populist in the good sense. He was from a small rural town in Kansas. He was horribly injured during World War II, laid up for years. The townspeople rallied, supported him, got him back to health, helped him become who he became. So he really focused on the public, and I learned that. And I think later in my career at the FDIC, we kept that focus on the public, the people who were using the banks, not the banks. Who are we helping? We're helping the people who use banks.

1:00:00So I'm proud of that. And I learned a lot from him. You know, later I got to know Paul Volcker. I learned a lot from him. Paul, Paul. Yeah, that's right. Elizabeth Dole was someone I never really had a chance to work with her, but I knew her through Senator Bob and have maintained contact with her over the years. another woman who inspired me, not a mentor, but Sandra Day O 'Connor, the first woman Supreme Court justice. When I was on the Judiciary Committee, I got to handle her confirmation. And she was just a lovely person. So a lot of people I've met over the years, but Dole really stands out as my prime supporter and mentor in my career.

1:00:41Let's talk about books. What are you reading now? What are some of your favorites? Yeah. So I love murder mysteries. I'm reading Anthony Horowitz's new book, A Deadly Episode. I don't know if you know Anthony Horowitz. He's a British mystery writer. I know the name. My wife is a fan of those, so she burns through those. Yeah, he's quite prolific. He was actually chosen by the Ian Fleming estate to continue writing. Oh, no kidding. He's written, too. They're really good. Yeah. I actually like them better than Ian Fleming. Now owned by Amazon, the movie franchise. That's right. So, so that, and then I'm reading John Hersey's Hiroshima.

1:01:17My family and I are going to Japan at the end of the month and I wanted to take them. Yeah. Yeah. And I, the kids kind of balked. I said, we're going to go to Hiroshima because I think that's an important part of history. You need to, we need to see this and understand it. And I read Hiroshima when I was young, you know, probably, you know, high school, I think when it came out. and uh and it had such an impact on me and so i'm reading again and it still has an impact on me and especially everything going on in the world now on other countries even japan talking about wanting to have a nuclear capability because things just don't seem very unsettled on that square right now so that's those are my two i usually have two books going one non-fiction one fiction so so i'm going to recommend a book to you okay it's really kind of fascinating an american who's a professor somewhere in the UK, Brian Kloss with two A's.

1:02:05And the book is called Fluke. And the book starts with this story of a young couple honeymooning in Kyoto. Later in life, the husband becomes the head of the War Department. And when we have to figure out where to drop the A-bomb, he absolutely vetoes Kyoto. And Hiroshima is what gets – because this couple went there for a honeymoon. Oh, that's brilliant. That country – that city is spared. And then it wasn't supposed to be Nagasaki. It was – I don't remember what city it was. But there was cloud cover and they couldn't – back then you were doing visual reads. Right. You couldn't see. So they went to the secondary target.

1:02:54Yeah. And so think about, talk about flukes, how random things are. So Hiroshima gets it because somebody went there on a honeymoon. Just crazy. Well, and now you look back and why did any city get it? Couldn't you drop it over the ocean or something? You want to make a point. I mean, really, I don't, it's hard for me to understand now. I know. And that's just, you know, we're not there at the time. There was a lot of. The psychology during world time. Yeah. So different. And the Japanese had been, everybody had been horrible, but the Japanese had done some brutal things well for centuries yeah well okay all right speak to speak to China and Korea they are not I'm a big fan of Japan yeah but but they were quite a ruthless empire for a long time yeah so there was a lot of um so I understand that and I think well maybe the horror of it when you know and the and I think that's why John Hersey's book was so important because it really underscored the horror of it but maybe because people then understood how horrible it was it made it even less likely anybody would ever use it again.

1:03:55I'm going to rationalize it that way, but it is hard. You know, you look back and, oh my gosh, did we really have to do that to people? Because it was not just the people who probably were killed immediately were the lucky ones, the radiation sickness after the horrors. I think I got to sign that same book in high school. Everybody read it, yeah. And plowed through it and it was just powerful. It was, yeah. No, it's very well written. It was, yeah. Let's shift to, are you streaming anything these days? You listen to any podcasts or watching anything? Yeah, I don't stream or podcast that much. I get podcasts or I like to read transcripts of podcasts because I can read a lot faster.

1:04:30You read it much faster. Yeah. How about Netflix or HBO? Yeah, I can. You know, again, I'm, you know, one note on this. BBC, I'm there, you know. I love the murder mystery. Bird Box, yeah. All the Agatha Christie's I've seen. David Suchet, Prarose are by far the best. Foil's War was great. also Anthony Horowitz. He did the... They made it into a series or a movie? Which one? The Foils of War. The Foils of War, actually, that was a TV series. It wasn't a book. That was one of the few things, but it's really good. I like the Morse, you know. Have you ever watched Morse? Inspector Morse? No, that's not famous.

1:05:10That sounds vaguely familiar. It used to be on PBS at one point. Yeah, yeah, it's old, but there were three, Morse and then Endeavor, which was about Morse when he was younger, and then Lewis, who is Morse's sidekick. So BBC did a really good job there. So yeah, these are old stuff. I recycle them. But yeah, I love BBC and I love British, I love Redbox, excuse me. I love them. Our final two questions. What sort of advice would you give to a recent college grad interested in a career in banking or finance or government service? Yeah, well, I would say be open-minded because I think the job market is, we don't know, AI is kind of, having a negative impact on entry-level white-collar jobs.

1:05:52So you need to be thoughtful about that and how to navigate that. So I think you need to be open-minded, but preferably if you have options, pick a company that has a good culture. Ask them how they think about their customers. If they're an investment firm and they talk about them like Muppets, you probably don't want to work there, but if they talk about them as – I remember Muppets way back when, yeah. Just to mention an example. So I think it's important, any business actually, whether it's finance or any real economy business, how they think about their customers and treat their customers.

1:06:28Because I do think long-term success is based on having a mutually beneficial relationship with your customers. So I would, you know, just the work ethic. And again, keep an open mind. Sometimes things you weren't even thinking about come up and they turn out to be really, really good job choices. And our final question, what is it that you know about the world of banking regulations, government service, financial industry today? It might have been useful to know way back when, when you were first getting started. Yeah, I thought about that. Markets, right? Not personal finance, but markets. Clearly credit card debt.

1:07:06Go whichever way you want. Yeah. Well, compounding was something I did not understand in credit card rates. That comes up surprisingly frequently. Yeah, yeah. Because it's not intuitive. Yeah, no, it's not. And the daily compounding is, you know, it backs up pretty quickly. I think for markets, financial markets and investing in particular, I've actually done pretty well over time. My grandmother gave me$1 ,000 when she was getting later in life, near her death. And she didn't have much, but she wanted to give my sister and I something. So she gave me$1 ,000 and told me to put it in an IRA. That was back when IRAs had just gotten started.

1:07:42And with my dad's top, I put it in the contra fund. It's worth a lot of money now. So I've made some lucky – I've stuck mainly – I've picked a few stocks, but I've picked mainly diversified index funds of various sorts. And I wish I'd understand better about being brave during the dips, though. You know, I think – usually I buy and hold, so I don't sell when the market's going down, which is the worst thing you can do. But I think I would have been a little more courageous buying in the dips, you know. Buying more into weakness. Yeah. Well, Sheila, thank you for being so generous with your time.

1:08:13As always, a delight. We have been speaking with Sheila Bair, former chair of the FDIC, author of the new book, How Not to Lose a Million Dollars. If you enjoy this conversation, well, check out any of the 600 we've done over the past 12 years. You can find those at iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, Bloomberg, wherever you find your favorite podcasts. I would be remiss if I didn't thank the crack staff that helps put these conversations together each week. Alexis Noriega is my video producer. Sean Russo is my researcher. Anna Luke is my podcast producer. I'm Barry Brit Holtz. You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

1:09:03The Bloomberg Sustainable Business Summit returns to Singapore on July 22nd. Our fifth annual Asia Pacific Summit will explore how business and finance leaders are shaping the next phase of globalization by strengthening resilience, advancing climate adaptation and driving a multi-speed energy transition across Asia's diverse markets. Join us for solutions-driven discussions, interactive workshops, and networking opportunities. Learn more at bloomberglive.com slash SBS dash Singapore.

From the publisher

Barry sits down with Former FDIC Chair Shelia Bair. They discuss the release of her latest book "How Not To Lose A Million Dollars" and the importance of financial literacy across age groups. Bair also discusses her concerns about crypto and the rise of Buy Now, Pay Later.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Masters in Business

All 235 episodes
Stopping Poor Financial Decisions with Former FDIC Chair Sheila BairMasters in Business · 1 h 5 min
Listen in VO