#1029 - Malcolm Gladwell - How to Convince the World of Bulls**t & Evil

6 Dec 2025 · 1 h 15 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Modern Wisdom Podcast Episode #1029: Malcolm Gladwell - How to Convince the World of Bulls**t & Evil

Episode Summary In this episode of the *Modern Wisdom* podcast, Chris Williamson interviews journalist and author Malcolm Gladwell. They discuss profound societal patterns and psychological insights, exploring the mechanisms behind contagious diseases, ideas, and behaviors. Gladwell introduces the concept of “memetic epidemics” and delves into the intersection between cultural phenomena and public perceptions, particularly in the context of the American death penalty and the evolving landscape of societal norms.

Key Concepts

Memetic Epidemics

  • Definition: Epidemics of ideas that spread through similar pathways as contagious diseases.
  • Implication: Understanding these pathways can help prevent future outbreaks of harmful societal ideas.

Historical Context of the Death Penalty in America

  • Discussion on the evolution of execution methods in the U.S. (from public hangings to lethal injection).
  • Critique of the American approach: The focus is on making executions more palatable to the public rather than addressing the morality of capital punishment.
  • The role of anesthesiologists and the gruesome reality behind lethal injections, revealing they may cause significant suffering.

Super-spreader Dynamics

  • Super-spreaders are individuals who disproportionately influence the spread of ideas or behaviors within a community.
  • Gladwell draws parallels between the spread of infectious diseases and social ideas, highlighting that a small percentage of the population often drives the majority of change.

Tipping Point Theory

  • The concept of the tipping point as a threshold where a minor change can lead to a significant impact in societal behaviors and ideas.
  • Gladwell reflects on how the original ideas from his book *The Tipping Point* have become commonplace, leading him to explore deeper implications in his new work.

Comparison of Drug and Idea Epidemics

  • Gladwell examines the differences and similarities between the spread of drug addictions (like the opioid crisis) and social ideas.
  • The opioid crisis serves as a case study for how marketing strategies can target specific vulnerable groups.

Influence of Storytelling

  • Storytelling is emphasized as a more effective means of persuasion compared to raw data and facts.
  • Good stories engage emotions and operate on the principle of surprising the audience, making them more impactful and memorable.

Discussion Points

  • Death Penalty History: Gladwell shares insights from his series on the history of the death penalty, highlighting the absurdity of execution methods in America.
  • Trans Athletes in Sports: The discussion touches on the complexities and controversies surrounding trans athletes' participation in sports, emphasizing the need to focus on more pressing societal issues.
  • Parental Influence and Genetics: The episode also explores the idea of parental influence on children and how genetics and environment interact in shaping behaviors and traits.

Key Takeaways

  • Understanding the mechanisms behind the spread of ideas can provide insights into societal behaviors and potentially prevent harmful trends.
  • The American death penalty system illustrates a unique societal dynamic where the morality of execution is often overshadowed by public perception.
  • Storytelling remains a powerful tool in shaping opinions and beliefs, often more effective than statistical evidence alone.
  • The discussion of trans athletes highlights the need for sensitive and informed discourse surrounding new social categories.

Extra Resources

  • Malcolm Gladwell's *Revisionist History* podcast, particularly the series on the Alabama murders.
  • His latest book: *Revenge of the Tipping Point*.

Sponsors

  • Discounts on products and services mentioned in the podcast can be found [here](https://chriswillx.com/deals).

Conclusion Malcolm Gladwell's insights in this episode offer a deep dive into the complexities of human behavior, societal patterns, and the interplay between ideas and actions. The conversation challenges listeners to reflect on the moral implications of societal norms and the significant influence of storytelling in shaping public opinion.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Talk to me about the history of the death penalty, fettered past that I didn't realize existed. Oh, my goodness. In what country? In America? Yes. Well, this is a subject we dig into in this new series we've done on revisionist history, the Alabama murders. And, you know, the history of the death penalty in the United States is not a—in other countries, the battle is essentially about whether you should have it or not. and in america the battle is really uh we'd like the states to have the right to do it but they have to do it humanely it's this absurd position where the at issue is not the morality of the state taking someone's life the issue is that the state should take someone's life in a manner that seems consistent with the values of america so there is this you know the used to be the case way back when we hung you publicly.

1:03Then we moved on from that. And there was the firing squad, which was considered to be more humane. Then they moved on from the firing squad and they went to the electric chair. And then from the electric chair they went to lethal injection. And then from lethal injection they have now gone on uh to uh uh to um nitrogen gas to asphyxiating you in nitrogen gas i didn't know about that i didn't know about the most recent the iphone 17 pro max that came out this is the latest wrinkle right so they've been and at each stage the intention was formally the intention was to make the death more humane and um certain for the person being executed but in fact the intention was to make the process of execution more acceptable to the public.

1:58So they're looking for the way that the form of executing somebody that is the easiest to watch. So you can imagine how hanging would be quite a spectacle, you know, a disturbance, but you wouldn't take your child to a hanging.

2:20the execution by firing squad might be a little less dramatic. But certainly the big jump was the electric chair was gruesome. I mean, somebody's brains were literally being fried in front of your eyes and their eyes were popping out and things. So it really was, that was up until the 1970s. And the move to a lethal injection was the idea was that we can put people down the way we put down horses and that's really quite calm and it seems appears at least to be kind of calm and humane and stunned by medical people and it's all very kind of um so that's that's the kind of like it's a very curious peculiarly american approach to this subject and what is the what's the current status of that in the U.S.

3:13Well, a guy, we get into this in the podcast, a very brilliant Canadian like me, a guy named Joel Zivett, who's an anesthesiologist and intensive care specialist with a kind of side interest in the death penalty. People have been using lethal injection for 40 years, since the late 70s. It's become the standard for if you wanted to kill somebody and you're a state government in the U.S., you inject them with three drugs. The first is a sedative. The second calms you down. The second is a paralytic, which just kind of like keeps you in one place. And the third is potassium chloride, which stops your heart.

3:58And the idea was that you got calmed down, you were buckled in, and the paralytic just kept you still. and then we stopped your heart with potassium chloride. And what Joel Zivett discovers is that's not how you die

4:18in lethal injection. You die because the first thing you get, which is typically some kind of barbiturate, the sedative, so alters the pH, the acidity of your blood, that essentially your lungs are on fire and burn up. And you can't cry out in pain because you've been given a paralytic. And so you spend a few minutes in exquisite agony as you're... Imagine pouring acid. Imagine forcing someone to drink a cup of acid. That's essentially what we're doing. and then I give you another drug which makes it impossible for you to be heard as you silently scream. That's lethal injection. And so ever since he showed the world that, there's been this idea that, oh, maybe we should move to asphyxiating people with nitrogen.

5:18Sounds humane, comparatively. It is. Honestly, when I was doing this, our podcast is all about this murder that took place in Alabama. And all of these issues come up in the course of, as the state tries to figure out what to do with the killers. And it is the most, not only are the details of these things just so bizarrely macabre. I don't know, how do you pronounce that word? I never know. Macabre. Macabre. Do you say macabre? Yeah, yeah, yeah. The details are so absurdly that way. But then what's additional is that there is simply no interest in any of these details on the part of, we're talking about a case that happened in Alabama.

5:58the state government of Alabama is just completely indifferent to all these. They don't even like, they don't even seem to care what happens to somebody that they're executing. They're just kind of, and that was the kind of one of the many revelations in doing this little miniseries we did called the Alabama murders was the kind of, it's almost as if the, for the state of Alabama and other states, the cruelty is the point. That telling them that what they thought was humane, it actually isn't, doesn't diminish their motivation and enthusiasm. It seems to increase it. We're going to have this come up with the young person that shot Charlie Kirk.

6:42It sounds like I think the day that the head chief of police did a press conference, one of the first things that he said was, we will be seeking the death penalty. Yes, Utah is a state. Now, Utah has used where Charlie Kirk was killed, has in some cases gone back to the firing squad. Oh, wow. Okay. We could pull that out again. Nostalgia. Brilliant. Yeah, a little - Play the old stuff. Play the old songs again. It is very like the band from the 70s playing its hits. Now, I don't know. In some states, it's considered, this is again very American, you get to choose your method. I don't know whether that's the case in Utah.

7:29What would you choose?

7:32Firing squad. I'd go firing squad too. It's a pretty heroic way to... The one that I would really want is guillotine. Oh, that's epic. Yeah. Yeah. And then have your head placed somewhere magnificent for the rest of time. Well, you know, the thing about guillotine was, you know, Guillotine at the time was considered this great progressive innovation. It was intended to be a vast improvement over tying people to the wheels of wagons and running them over. It was like, look, we're a civilized society. We should be able to kill people quickly and cleanly. The guy who gave the guillotine his name, whatever his name was, Jacques Guillotine, that was his whole thing is that we're a civilized country we're Frenchmen of the 18th century, we can't be playing these games so like I would drop the head off with a big blade yeah there's something to be said for I mean it's an the very fact we're having this conversation is is absurd right?

8:50Like, why are states killing people? Like, it just seems like this just, the idea that we're entertaining this conversation in 2025 is slightly incredible. It's a sign of just how strange America, I mean, you're new to America. Does this not strike you as just being bizarre? Not particularly. I think that the desire for retribution has existed throughout every sort of human's thought processes, whether they're modern or from five decades ago or forever ago. You know, capital punishment, is that sort of the title for this kind of a thing? Right, yeah. Mutiny, you know, pirates on pirate ships, stuff like that.

9:35There is this sense of, there is a particular line that if you cross it, the threshold is you pay the ultimate price, which is that you no longer get to live. I understand. My point is, I understand the psychological compulsion from humans. It doesn't surprise me. Do we think what I have thought that in the modern world, we would have transcended that in the same way as we transcended shitting in the street and open warfare that you just do on your neighbor because you don't like him or something? yeah in in some ways but i think the the compulsion the desire to do it makes makes makes total sense to me and you get this lock-in from the past uh there is i would imagine an argument sort of a twofold argument uh one being uh this person did something so heinous that they do not deserve to live anymore uh and secondly uh this is a deterrent to other people who would consider doing this in future um one oddly enough one is the second one is very sort of utilitarian um and the first one is actually kind of like karmic and astral and uh i i think i don't know What do you make of that post-mortem on the sort of modern world of it?

10:57Well, I guess I'm more puzzled by, you're speaking in terms of this being an understandable human response to an act of brutality. But I'm more puzzled by the fact that if it is an understandable human response, why is it confined in the developed world to the United States? why is it not understandable in England, Germany, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, you know, on and on and on. Greece, Italy, they don't have an understandable human response. Canada, Bermuda, Jamaica. How long ago did France, France must have used the guillotine relatively recently. Until I think the 80s.

11:38So it's been a good, it's been a good 40 years. Yeah. They were one of the last holdouts. But I mean, look, when you have come up with the entire genre yourself, you've got to keep playing the old songs. You know, you've got to keep using the guillotine until the 80s. It goes to this thing that I'm sort of obsessed with, which is that I do not believe that either Americans or non-Americans fully appreciate just how weird America is. I think that Americans think, oh, the rest of the world is kind of like us, only just a little less so. and non-Americans, if they don't know America well, just assume, oh, it's like, you know, it's like, it's like England, but it's bigger.

12:18Actually, it's not like England. It's better. Like Canadians are, I'm a Canadian. Actually, I'm an Englishman, but I'm an adoptive Canadian. Canadians may, we make this mistake all the time because we, we really, you know, we watch the same sports. We watch a lot of the same television. It looks, if you drive from Detroit across the border or buffalo across the border to toronto it all looks the same if you didn't know there was a border there you would think you would still and yet the differences between canada and the united states are just phenomenal like so it's that that that's all something that's always puzzled me that um that this country that i'm i am you know i'm an immigrant to is just, I don't understand why it's so singular.

13:05Yeah. It is 50 countries combined together under a single government, single currency, single language. I think you get some weird externalities when you just combine that many people with. Yeah. What's the line from the Paul Simon song? A loose accumulation of millionaires and billionaires. I wasn't familiar with that. That's from Days of Miracle and Wonder. Yeah, yeah. It's not, I mean, where you are living in Texas is not the same country as where I live in New York State. No, that's correct. Speaking of trajectories over time, do you think that The Tipping Point aged with difficulty? Like lots changed in the information landscape from then until now.

13:51I'm particularly interested in sort of what you didn't or couldn't foresee, what happened that you couldn't have predicted in that way, which obviously led to the revenge of. yeah we're talking about two books written 25 years apart my first book The Tipping Point my last book Revenge The Tipping Point when I wrote the first book the internet is really just in its infancy

14:20and all of social media doesn't exist and the Cold War has just ended and were absurdly optimistic about the future of the world. And I'm 30 some odd years old. And, you know, my life is ahead of me. And then 25 years later, when I write the sequel, I don't know whether the dynamics that I'm describing in the original tipping point are that, you know, the simple idea, the spread of ideas can usefully be understood as similar to the spread of disease, that the same contagious principles that govern epidemics of disease govern epidemics of ideas. That idea was a novel idea in the year 2000. Today, it's a commonplace idea.

15:17So in essence, it's not that the ideas of the book became dated. It's that they became commonplace. right now we everything's viral now we talk about that we and whenever we use that when we say something on on you know twitter has become viral we are using the language of epidemics of disease we have we have adopted that metaphor as our own um so the task so when i was sat down to write the kind of sequel to my first book it wasn't that i was saying okay i got it wrong and this is what i missed i mean i i just a little bit of that in the book it was more like okay the task is different now. We've all accepted this metaphor.

15:55Let's dig a little deeper and try and understand what it means. This episode is brought to you by Gymshark. You want to look and feel good when you're in the gym. Gymshark makes the best men's and girls gym wear on the planet. Let's face it, the more that you like your gym kit, the more likely you are to train. Their hybrid training shorts for men are the best men's shorts on the planet. Their crest hoodie and light grey mall is what I fly in every single time I'm on a plane. The Geo Seamless t-shirt is a staple in the gym for me. Basically everything they make. It's unbelievably well fitted, high quality, it's cheap.

16:27You get 30 days of free returns, global shipping, and a 10 % discount site-wide. If you go to the link in the description below or head to gym.sh slash modernwisdom, use the code modernwisdom10 at checkout. That's gym.sh slash modernwisdom and modernwisdom10 a checkout do you feel like a cassandra in that context being able to virality and contagion well not really i mean i feel there's something kind of very self-regarding about calling oneself a cassandra look i love i love the question i love the question because everyone's um desire this compulsion the temptation to see yourself as the prescient clairvoyant that could have I would have said it before.

17:10I think it speaks to you that you're like, ah, fuck, you know, like I just kind of said the thing. Because I got the, listen, academics we're talking about. I got this idea from, sociologists were using this metaphor in this way. It wasn't like I somehow saw it. I just kind of stumbled on this idea and said, I love this idea. I think it's cool. It's all about who popularizes it, not who came up with it. So, okay, I'm interested in how your view of influencers evolved since the tipping point. Obviously, you're saying dynamics that you noticed back then are now very commonplace in terms of how people describe stuff now.

17:43So that's something that's the same. What's changed? What's differed? What's evolved? So one of the ideas that I spent a lot of time with in the original Tipping Moit and in the sequel is just the observation that social influence is asymmetrical. And this is true of epidemics of disease, many kinds of epidemics of disease, which is that if you look at COVID, every person infected with COVID does not carry an equal risk of infecting someone else. The job of infecting is done by about 5 % of the population. That 5 % might be 100 or even 1 ,000-fold more likely to pass on their infection to someone else than the rest of us.

18:28That's an asymmetry. Yeah, I didn't know that. Yeah, it's a massive asymmetry. That is very similar to the way ideas spread. if a hundred of us think that Taylor Swift is a great singer, we are not equally responsible for spreading that news to the rest of the listening, music-loving public. There's going to be four or five of us who do all the work, right? Who have, by virtue of their social position or the kind of trust that people have in them or how socially connected they are, they can tell the world that this unknown artist named Taylor Swift is great. But if somebody is, if my mom listens to Taylor Swift in her nursing home, she's not that and loves her.

19:15It's not a consequential fact in the history of the trajectory of Taylor Swift, right? With all due respect to my mom. She's not like, does not have her finger on the pulse of popular culture. But you can all, you can imagine that there are people who are, massively social connected and have bona fides, there are people who, when we want to know what to listen to, we listen to them. And if that person likes Taylor Swift, it really matters. That process, asymmetry, which I was really fascinated with in the original tipping point, and it's the great commonality between diseases and spreads of ideas, I think that's gotten more marked in the...

19:53I think everything's asymmetrical now. If you'd asked me 25 years ago, I would say that select kinds of contagious ideas have this pattern, but many other things are kind of like spread randomly or spread equally through the population. I think everything's asymmetrical now. I don't think you can find a phenomenon that isn't marked by the fact that 5 % of the infected population is doing 90 % of the work. Why? Because I think I mean here's an analogy which is before there's air travel, international air travel. So we're in the 19th century. And if you had a contagious disease it would spread to another country only if somebody got on a passenger ship, crossed the ocean, and were still infectious at the time they got off the ship, right?

20:56So things did move around the world, but they moved relatively slowly around the world. That's where quarantine came from, right? Quarantia. Yeah. Exactly. And it was possible to kind of nip these things in the bud. Now, then there's the age of jet travel, and all of a sudden, I could catch a cold in New York and spread it to my dinner partner in London that night, right? So what's happened is that a technological intervention has sped up and enhanced the asymmetrical process. So that small group of people who travel a lot become hugely important in spreading disease, right? Because they have access now to way more.

21:45So I travel a lot. I would be one of those. I probably travel more than 99 % of the human population. If I'm very infectious with a cold and I get on a six-hour flight to Los Angeles, I am patient zero. I'm doing the work of 100 people. so that when you think about the digital age it's doing that for ideas there's just so many more contacts between people now and access to ideas and the and the um the kind of uh uh the social power that the connective power of certain kinds of individuals is just so enhanced right the The interconnectedness allows the super spreaders to be just way more effective and powerful.

22:39And not only that, there's an additional thing, which I should get into in my book when I talk about the opioid crisis. But technology also allows people who want to spread things to better identify who the super spreader is. That's crucial, right? As opposed to being, you know, 25 years ago you say, I think that most ideas are spread by a very small group of influential people. I have a vague idea who they are, but I don't know for sure. Now I feel like we sort of, we don't know for sure, but our certainty about who the super spreader is, is much greater. And that means that the super spreader's power is enhanced even further, right?

23:24That's an interesting, the transparency or obviousness and awareness of everybody of the influence of the person and of the, you know, the common knowledge idea. It's kind of like the emperor's new clothes. It's not enough to know the emperor has no clothes on. You need to know that everybody else knows as well. and if that person is the most influential but does everybody else know that they're the most influential well if you have this big number next to their instagram account or their youtube subscribers or or you know their newsletter list or whatever the oh other people here's an objective statement of how many other people think this person is a person of note and um Yeah, it's this odd.

24:18People accumulate reach, the opportunity to be connected to more people. That reach gives them a degree of authority, independent of their authority, right? They may have some authority already, some sort of trust, prestige, dominance type thing. and then everybody's awareness of the fact that other people are aware of their authority like supercharges this even more so yeah i can see how these things sort of square on each other cube and yeah the the original observation though is this idea of the transparency of asymmetry so not only so we know things are asymmetrical but now we know where the asymmetry lies has affected nearly every field that you can imagine let me give you two random examples the big one is in fighting crime because of our ability now to precisely track and model outbreaks of criminal behavior we now know you go to a criminologist and they look at a map of austin texas or london england or new york city they can tell you exactly the 15 or 20 city blocks where 50 % of the crime in those cities takes place on a regular basis.

25:35They can tell you down to the stretch of sidewalk where a criminal act is most likely to occur, and we can put police there and we can effectively shut down that criminal act. That is, crime is a highly contagious asymmetrical activity where a small group of people commit a huge um majority of the crimes and they committed they commit those crimes in predictable places at predictable times according to predictable patterns and if you know all those things you can completely tell you're you're policing you're law enforcement um i was talking to a guy yesterday who uh is working in, he runs the anti-mosquito spraying program in a county in Florida.

26:27And they used to spray huge amounts of pesticide over the entire county with planes. Now they use drones and LIDAR. And now what you do is you figure out exactly where the swarms of mosquitoes are, and you only, you send the drone to that exact spot, and you just spray the spot, right? It's like hilarious. It's like the Ukraine war going on with pesticides and mosquitoes in a random part of Florida. But that's the same thing. Mosquitoes are massively asymmetrical. It's like all of the damage is being done by a group in a very specific spot. And now that we know where the spot is, you can fight the epidemic at its source.

27:08You don't have to spray everything. That's a great metaphor for how the world has changed in the last 25 years. yeah that i mean that's a new way to talk about super spreader right super efficient spreader perhaps yes uh you mentioned uh oxycontin there um opioids why is the oxycontin sackler family such a good through-line case study literally morally pharmaceutically like what is it that they all bring together in one example. Well, you have to understand that OxyContin, the most infamous drug of the last 100 years, the drug that kicked off this opioid crisis in the United States that at its peak was claiming, whatever, 120 ,000 lives a year.

27:58I mean, unbelievable carnage. There's nothing particularly special about OxyContin. It's just a reworking of drugs that have been around for years and years and years. They made it a little more powerful, and they made it slow release, but it wasn't that it was some dramatic breakthrough. So in other words, OxyContin is not the product of some kind of innovative genius. What it is is the product of a marketing innovation. What Purdue, the maker of OxyContin, realized in the 1990s and early aughts as this epidemic had started, is that if you look at how an addictive painkiller is prescribed by doctors across the United States, there is a massive asymmetry.

28:45Most doctors don't prescribe it at all because they are doctors. They are aware of how dangerous opioids are, and they dramatically limit their patients' access to them. A very, very, very small group of doctors in a very, very specific parts of the country don't give a shit. And what Purdue was able to do using the kinds of databases that we have now, that we didn't have 20 years ago, that track the prescribing habits of every doctor in America, is precisely identify and target the tiny fraction of doctors who didn't give a shit. That's how we got the opioid crisis. It is exactly what we're talking about.

29:32It's finding the swarm of mosquitoes. It's looking at the block in New York City where all the crime is. They found those doctors and they said, we're going to ignore every... We're talking about 2 ,000 doctors out of the hundreds of thousands of doctors who could potentially have prescribed OxyContin. They find that group of 2 ,000 and they put all of their resources in trying to convince those 2 ,000 people to prescribe as much OxyContin as is humanly possible. That is the entire, that's all you need to know about the opioid crisis, right? It's just a ruthless application of this kind of asymmetry that we've been talking about.

30:13Everyone else up to that point was under the illusion that if I want to sell lots of a given drug, I got to reach everybody, right? I need as many, I need as many customers as possible, doctor customers as possible. And Purdue's like, no, you don't. Well, you're nuts. you need to focus on 2 % of the population in order to make this thing take off. And that's how we get to 120 ,000 deaths a year. Is there a way that an epidemic of drugs differs from an epidemic of ideas or even, I guess, an epidemic of viruses? Do ideas spread in the same way or is there something else going on? Well, you know, I mean, I'm hesitant.

Read the full transcript

30:56One should always be hesitant about making sweeping statements. Especially when the word epidemic is being used, yes. I think that the, I would say that the commonalities are greater than we imagine. Obviously, you don't die in the same numbers from a noxious idea that you do from a dangerously addictive opioid. So there's that. and ideas. There are some weird differences, which is when I was doing my book and I was talking to all these people who started the opioid crisis, the thing that they couldn't understand was why it lasted so long. It should have, normally when you look at an epidemic of disease or that's killing lots of people is they burn out really quickly.

31:44The crack epidemic in the 90s doesn't actually last that long. The HIV, HIV, well, we really get a really powerful medical intervention early on, but HIV doesn't, in the Western world, does not hang around for decades. It gets tamed pretty quickly. The flu comes every fall, and it's gone by the spring, right? You know what? People, large numbers of people are coming out. But opioids linger. That was what was so weird. It goes on for 25 years. It's still going on. It's finally starting to fall, but it's at a high level. because it moves from opioids to heroin and then heroin to prescription drugs to heroin and then heroin to fentanyl and then fentanyl to mixtures of all three and just keeps going.

32:31And all these people who study this for a living, they're observing this and are keep waiting for it to burn out, right? Like there's a well-known generational mechanism where if your dad or mom is addicted, this happened with crack, crack the kids of people whose parents were addicted to crack did not touch crack you saw what happened and you were like i want no part of it right um it's interesting with the the uh genetic predisposition that would be carried through as well so what you have to assume there is the environmental like inverse role model effect is so powerful that it's got escape velocity to get over you having the raw building block genetics of an addict.

33:20Yeah. Yeah, that's impressive. Really. I mean, you see a lesser version of this with, I mean, alcoholism clearly runs in families, but I think that might be because, to use the same kind of model that you're talking about, that people can be functioning alcoholics for their entire lives. And so the kind of lesson that the child is receiving is a little bit more mixed. With crack, you literally saw your parents disintegrate in front of your eyes. It's a really, really powerful, concentrated lesson that this is something you stay away from. If the natural path of alcoholism was that one of your parents starts drinking when you're 12 and they're dead by 16, then I would imagine that the alcoholism would not run in families in the same way.

34:12Yeah, that's fascinating. Are you still using that old face shaver from three Christmases ago to shave your nether region? If so, that isn't self-care. It's a hate crime. Good news, Manscaped just put their best gear into one kit, the Performance Package 5.0 Ultra. Inside, you find the Lawn Mower 5.0 Ultra. And for those tough-to-reach areas, there's the Weed Whacker 2.0 for your nose and ear hair. And once you're done trimming, Manscaped has the aftercare handle too. You get their Crop Soother After Lotion, Crop Preserving Anti-Chafing Deodorant. They even throw a magic mat shaving mat in to make cleanup effortless and two free bonus gifts.

34:46So if you're giving someone in your life a gift this Black Friday, this Christmas, whatever, this is what to get them. It's a hint that they might be a bit too hairy and it's a lovely gift. Plus, you can get 15 % off and free shipping by going to the link in the description below or heading to manscaped.com slash modernwisdom and modernwisdom15 at checkout. That's manscaped.com slash modernwisdom and Modern Wisdom 15 at checkout. There's this idea called the region beta paradox, things that are not bad enough to be bad, but not good enough to be good. Living in a house that's in an all right location and the rent's not too expensive, but there's mold and your landlord's a dick or being in a relationship with somebody and they're not abusive, but you're really not that in love.

35:26And maybe they're cheating on you actually and you're not too sure. All of these people would be worse if their situations, all these people would be better off if their situations were worse. Worse, oh, that's fascinating. it would kick them out the bottom um and uh i i talked about this a few years ago and um as the internet does clipped it and did a thing and somebody asked me at this live show i did in australia last year set up and he says you know you have done live events and sometimes questions are a little more verbose uh they're a little bit rambling uh and this one was real sharp and short and he says i think i'm in region beta should i purposefully make my life worse so i get out of it and I was like kind of a radical solution it's a high risk strategy but I don't know it might work and we came up with a slightly different solution but I thought that was really funny well the version of that is the difference between the cold war and you know Russia and Ukraine we never the cold war never becomes a hot war because the consequences of conflict between the Soviet Union and the United States are existential russia and ukraine just are just like slowly over time randomly destroying each other and you know they can both of them are carrying on right so it's like it's they're in they're in what's the phrase region beater region beta yeah beta you guys would call it region region region beta paradox um they're in that conflict is in region beta 100 yeah yeah yeah it really is um I suppose one solution here would be if you're an alcoholic, you could start trying crack.

37:04That might be a way, another radical one. Another thing I'm interested in, this parental contagion idea. I've been having a lot of conversations recently about embryo selection, IVF embryo selection, polygenic risk scores and stuff like that and the potential the potential sort of tiger mom implications pre-birth um that could roll back so i'm interested in uh this parental contagion idea that that you talked about

37:41well i'm a little bit of a skeptic on that kind of apologetic screening screening because the things that you're interested in are the ones that are impossible to screen for right so intelligence what is intelligence if if it's definable at all is probably the result of an unknowable interaction between so many thousands of genes that god knows how you select for it um and then the other thing is like we if you don't have a handle on the ways in which a genetic susceptibility interacts with environment, then you could select for something and it could all come to naught, right? Like when I think about what intelligence is or what the kind of determinants of success are, there's so much A, randomness, and B, so much of it is about motivation.

38:37And motivation is the least genetically determined of all the

38:46character traits. Conscientiousness is the, what's the big five? Conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness to experience. Agreeableness and extroversion. Agreeableness and extroversion. Conscientiousness is the least genetically determined of all those extroversions the most. Yeah. And that's because conscientiousness is powerfully environmentally determined. If you like your job and you like your boss and you like your coworkers, you work hard. If you hate them all, you won't. Whereas, you know, an extrovert in a room full of sour people is still an extrovert. They're still yucking it up. Like they're not, you're relatively impervious to that.

39:32And I've come to the opinion that when it comes to explaining performance, conscientiousness and motivation are way, way, way, way, way, way more important than we realize. And if that's the thing that's the least genetically determined, then what are we doing here? Yeah, I mean, I suppose the argument would be trying to gain 1%, so 0.1 % wherever we can, the same as playing classic music to your unborn baby while it's in the womb because it's going to help the brain complexity of the brain development. Or, you know, people are, the same reason that I use a temperature controlled mattress duvet that tracks my HRV and I try to not eat three hours before I get, you know what I mean?

40:15Like people are trying to - Are you on the HRV train? I am on the HRV train. Look at me. You think I'm on the HRV train? Yes. Whoop brothers. Whoop brothers indeed. Whoop baby. Yeah. Whoop, whoop. We could do a whole sad thing on whoop. I'm a whoop obsessive. Whoop. its chief function for me is, sorry, this is a digression. The sleep score, really what it is, is I think I had a shitty night. And then Whoop tells me I didn't. This happened last night. My daughter wakes me up at four o 'clock in the morning. Daddy, daddy, I wanna... And I can't get back to sleep. And I wake up dreading my Whoop score.

40:50Whoop said I had a great night of sleep. And I've been fine ever since. But what about the gaslighting in the other direction? That's what you need. But what happens when you think you had a great night's sleep, you wake up and... Almost never happens. It's only, for me, it only ever works. If I think I had a great night, I had a great night. Maybe Will, I could get the CEO of Whoop. Did he skew my numbers? Maybe he gave me - I could ask him whether or not he could give me like optimistic Whoop. I just want to be, I'm happy to be gaslit. I only want to be gaslit in one direction now. I always want to assume that I've got more sleep.

41:22What's your HIV average? Probably in the 50s, high 50s. It's not that great. Good for you. No, that's high. I mean, I'm lower, but I'm a good deal older. It drops with age. Easier, such as myself.

41:37Parental contagion. Parental contagion. So there's, I mean, I guess the, I'm so impressed by this unknown interaction between environment and genes that I'm hesitant to kind of go too far on. there was a great book written that i wrote about at the time 30 years ago it was written by called do parents matter by judith harris and um she basically summed up all of the evidence about uh what impact parental child raising has on the kid and the answer is the evidence says not a lot basically if your kid you're feeding your kid and they have a roof over their heads and you're not terrifying them every night, it doesn't matter what you do.

42:29And the book, of course, is enormously controversial. Now that I'm a parent, I totally agree with it. But I just think the whole relationship between parents and the outcomes of their children is so muddy and murky that I don't even know what to make of it in any context now. In fact, I have a game that I play with people which is when I say, you know, people all love to play the game of, well, in this way, I'm just like my mom or in this way, I'm just like my dad. And I say, no, no, no, no. Skip a generation. The only way to do that usefully is to, is to think about your four grandparents because there's too much noise with your parents.

43:10Who knows? You grew up with your mom and your dad. Like who knows, like who knows if you're even accurate. Shed environment, N of two. Yeah. But who knows? And you have such a tangled psychological relationship. Who knows if you're even accurately representing the way they are, the way you are, right? I could go on for half an hour about my father and where my father alive and listening to it. I'm quite sure there's a possibility he would listen to that and say, I am nothing like that, right? And that's just the reality of your parental relationship. Your version of your parent and your parents' version of themselves are going to be different.

43:46So how do we even start figuring out how your parent influences you? At least with your grandparents as a degree of remove. So I can say, my dad would tell a story about my mom's father who was this kind of quiet, thoughtful, bookish guy. But people would always ask him to give speeches at weddings. And my father once went to an event where my grandfather was speaking, saw him and said, oh no he went to an event where i was speaking saw me and said i saw you and i saw i thought it was daddy they all called him daddy i thought it was daddy now so there's an example of like it was clear the relationship between me and my grandfather is clear but like you would never have walked into my father and said oh i see that's malcolm you know like it's too much noise One of my friends, his answer to the question, if you could go for dinner with four people living or dead, who would it be?

44:49His answer to that is always his four great grandfathers. Says you would learn far more from sitting down with your own genetics than you would for sitting down with some genius. A hundred percent agree. How cool would that be? How cool would that be? And I didn't know my grandparents very well, so I would settle for my four grandparents. But yeah, the four. I didn't know mine either. Can I give you, I came up with this idea a couple of weeks ago. I'm going to give it to you. It's my show. I can do what I want. But it's called the parental attribution error. We love blaming our parents. It's practically a rite of passage in modern psychology, but there's a double standard buried in the trend.

45:22We attribute what's broken in us to our upbringing while claiming what's strong in us is ours alone. Call it the parental attribution error, like the fundamental attribution error, where we blame others' actions on their character, but excuse our own by pointing to circumstance. This is a skewed way of assigning credit and blame. We externalize the bad, internalize the good. We're quick to blame and slow to credit. You say that you're anxiously attached because no one held you when you needed it, but isn't your ability to be alone with your emotions and to endure discomfort quietly also forged in the same crucible.

45:54You blame your parents for pushing you too hard in school, convinced that it made you perfectionistic and neurotic, but when was the last time you acknowledged that same pressure gave you ambition, discipline, and drive? Do you point to a childhood where mistakes weren't tolerated as a reason that you fear failure? But what about your meticulousness and your standards and your refusal to phone it in? Basically, as far as I can see, people are more than happy to lay the blame for their shortcomings at the feet of their parents, but very rarely lay the credit for their victories there too. And I just, I thought that was an interesting asymmetry.

46:32Yeah. It's funny that is a beautiful allegory to the fundamental attribution error. I have my own version of that, which is what I call the asymmetrical parental attribution error. I love asymmetries. And that is that we indulge in that, but typically when we indulge in that, we only ever make reference to one of our parents at a time. so you don't say i got this bad from my mom and this bad from your my father what you do is you're in a moment or a stage where you say well you're just blaming dad and then yours pass and you flip and you just blame mom for for a while and then you flip it's at only only one time you can only hold one disparaging right okay that's brilliant it's like um i remember scott alexander had this idea, he called it thinking in superpositions, right?

47:25That you could have two worlds exist in your mind at the same time. But when you're talking about the parents, it's like you have to collapse the superposition down. Like the uncertainty principle isn't able to exist. Only one parent can exist in your mind at one time. Yeah. It's never the interaction between the bookish father and the outgoing mother. And I am somewhere in between. It's like when you're not wanting to be outgoing, it's like, well, dad did tell you. And when you can't chill out, It's like, well, mom did say. It's binary. Yeah. And there are many interesting things about this, particularly now that I'm a parent.

47:57One is that from a very early age, and this is an obvious dumb observation, but it's nonetheless one that I've been thinking about. There is a, hypothetically, you might think, that the child, particularly the young child, thinks of their parents as a unit. My parents don't want me to do this. my parents, but in fact, they never do. From the very beginning, they're distinguishing between the father and the mother or whatever. And we continue to do this later. I think this becomes even more pronounced as we get older. And in the beginning, it's understandable because you're correctly, as a toddler, understanding that your parents relate to you independently and using different strategies.

48:45But you are, to your point, you're completely missing the extent to which it is the interaction between your parents that also fundamentally shapes you. You're just blind to it. Like the consensus position of Joyce and Graham Gladwell was X. And X also had an effect on me, not just Joyce and Graham individually. Well, how many people, when they get together, are different people to who they are when they're apart. With some of my friends, there's a version of both of us that comes out, and maybe it's even more us, right? It feels closer to our sense of self than I am when I'm on my own or with other people that I maybe even know better, but there's something, or the reverse.

49:29Around some person, and around them, all I can do is be bitter or resentful or I think small-minded things or I see the world in scarcity mindset or whatever. Given the fact you you talk a lot in uh stories which i i think is why um it's very easy to read your writing when it comes to the medium of communicating

49:58infectious ideas noxious or benevolent i guess um talk to me about the landscape of how storytelling infects differently than facts and sort of how that plays together. Because I think in the modern world, people assume that you should be convinced by the facts, follow the facts, follow the science. But I'm not convinced that that's the way that the human brain works, especially when you're trying to change opinions, fuel empathy, even fuel hate as well. Yeah. Well, the story does a lot better job of eliciting emotion. And that's enormously important, obviously, in anchoring an idea and making and giving an idea leverage over somebody's thinking or feeling.

50:55The story embedded, this is a kind of more subtle point, but I, you know, A story to my mind is a narrative that defies or a narrative that betrays the audience's expectations. That's what a story is. The reason I will, why did I watch HBO's Task? I finished it on Sunday. I watched it every week for seven weeks. Why did I keep watching? Well, it was interesting. I needed to want a TV show to watch. But fundamentally, I didn't know how it was going to end. So I knew if you had asked me before the final episode, how do I think it's going to end, I would have given you six possibilities. It turns out almost all of them were wrong.

51:43So the story, what made it satisfying to watch that through to the end, was that it did not conform to my expectation. And I knew that. And that's why I was drawn to it. I knew that it was pointless to try and figure out how it was going to end. And all stories, good stories, good songs, all have that quality of betraying our expectation. And we know that going in and that's why we want it. There's something fundamentally human about wanting our expectations to be betrayed. That's why we laugh at jokes, right? There's so many things we do. Think about it. Why would somebody pay an enormous sum of money to sit in an arena and have just somebody, one person up on stage, just tell these abbreviated anecdotes about their life or the world?

52:31The answer is because it's just a constant rush of betrayed expectations, right? I always watch these little Instagram snippets of Nate Bragassi.

52:47Am I pronouncing his name right? Bragass? I've only ever seen it written down. Yeah. So who I think is very, very, very, very funny in a kind of, but his portrayals are so beautifully done and so subtle. And so, cause he's working with this incredibly narrow template of he's telling these super kind of prosaic and benign stories about family life. Right. So you, and so you, your expectation is nothing can be funny or happen here. Right. He's, he's taken so many things off the table there's going to be no you know dangerous edgy commentary there's no politics there's no sex there's no violence there's no swearing there's no nothing he's not going to rag on anybody he's not going to make fun of anybody so you're like so we've narrowed and that's why he's so inviting you're like okay this dude is trying to thread the needle here.

53:42He's going to do something. He's going to betray me after taking 90 % of the possible objects of betrayal off the table. Then he pulls it off and you're like, oh my God. You laugh way out of proportion to the quality of the joke. The joke itself is pretty mild, but the degree of difficulty is so great. That's what you're rewarding. You're like, you did it man like yeah yeah did not see that coming and you you decided you want to paint in one color right that's like and that's that is the so all of which is a long way of saying that a story is one of the few places where we are willing to change our mind right it's when we're talking about a betrayed expectation we're talking about you change your mind And fact, facts don't, people have no difficulty whatsoever dismissing facts.

54:37But the kind of subtle mind changing that comes with a story is much harder to dismiss. In other news, Shopify powers 10 % of all e-commerce companies in the United States. They are the driving force behind Gymshark, Skims, Aloe, and Nutonic, which is why I partnered with them. Because when it comes to converting browsers into buyers, they are best in class. Their checkout is 36 % better on average compared to other leading commerce platforms. And with ShopPay, you can boost conversions by up to 50%. They've got award-winning support there to help you every step of the way. Look, you are not going into business to learn how to code or build a website or do backend inventory management.

55:16Shopify takes care of all of that and allows you to focus on the job that you came here to do, which is designing and selling an awesome product. Upgrade your business and get the same checkout that I use with Newtonic on Shopify. Right now, you can sign up for a$1 per month trial period by going to the link in the description below or heading to shopify.com slash modern wisdom, all lowercase. That's shopify.com slash modern wisdom to upgrade your selling today. Dude, that's so great. That's such an interesting insight. I had this conversation with Alex O 'Connor, who is an upcoming agnostic commentator, I guess.

55:56We would have called him an atheist a few years ago, but I don't think that's kind of the interim anymore. And he's very pro-religion. He's fascinating. He goes into every conversation with a theologist or a believer desperately hoping to believe on the other side. He just has a very high bar for it and is educated in the counter-arguments. And he said this real interesting thing that what we are asking people to do in the modern world is to ignore the types of information and persuasion which is most easily understood and believed in story myth archetype narrative personification uh to dispense with that in place of stats figures numbers charts data sterile scientific rational materialistic materialistic and he goes is it any surprise that you can't sort of rip people across you can't bludgeon them over the head with just more bar charts um in the hopes that and and then shame them for not believing right the thing which is most believable to you is the thing which you're not supposed to believe and the thing which is least understandable and least salient to you is the thing that you're now supposed to put all of your faith in and again asymmetries it's asymmetry between the power of story and the power of statistics Shapiro's got that famous um facts don't care about your feelings like it could not be more backward it's like feelings really do not care about your facts at all especially if that feeling has come from a fable right or a story yeah yeah yeah but he's using it in a slightly that actually that's super interesting i thought that but he is using that in a slightly uh different context which is that what he's saying is that you are really upset right now over something is not does not mean that the the underlying thing is somehow um uh has been kind of uh existentially disabled yeah it's still your displeasure does not mean does not disqualify You haven't changed anything.

58:08It's still, you know. So, yeah, but I happen to think he's one of the better. He's not in my particular corner ideologically, but I wish most commentators were as rigorous in their thinking as he was. I saw you made headlines last month about trans athletes. I imagine that was thrilling for you. Do you see a tipping point dynamic going on there? I think it's already tipped. I mean, this is one of the most puzzling. Let me just say parenthetically that that was one of the strangest public controversies I've ever been a part of. I was describing, I was the moderator on a panel. I was describing my experience as a moderator.

58:59a moderated battle between a pro-trans participation and an anti-trans partition person. And I'm trying to elicit a fair argument. Four years passed, and I'm on a podcast out of Johannesburg with one of the participants. And I just think, I said, there was a moment in that discussion where I failed as a moderator. I didn't do a good job. There was a moment where I should have moderated. Moderating is difficult. Ever moderated in your life? Yeah. Particularly on that topic. So that's all I said. And then the whole thing went. And I was like, I didn't recognize any of... Usually when you're involved in a controversy, you recognize the controversy.

59:37I did not recognize the controversy. I was like, what are they talking about? You wouldn't have predicted this in advance? No. I was like, what are they talking about? Was a moderator... No one ever mentioned the word moderator. It sort of changes when you know that I was the moderator. Anyway. It's already tipped. this is one of the most ridiculous subjects in the following sense that most people myself included would give their 100 % approval support for the trans agenda the idea that we would be discriminating against a class of people over this particular characteristic is absurd and offensive, right?

1:00:25But I think that this last random thing that's thrown into the agenda that says, oh, and by the way, someone who is biologically male should be able to compete against biological females is deeply puzzling to a lot of people, right? They're like, what does that have to do with, it's weird. Like, what's it doing there? I don't think, and I think most people are in wholeheartedly in support of the agenda and just say that last item, which by the way, it only involves like a dozen people in the entire United States. It's so hypothetical. It's like, what would you say? Why are you adding that? You're just antagonizing.

1:01:04You're giving fuel to the right. By the way, during the election, what is the part of the trans agenda that the Republicans hammered again and again and again? Participation in sports. That's what it came down to. So you're giving your enemy a weapon to use against you. Over what? A dozen? A hypothetical case involving a small number of people? So that's why I find the whole thing puzzling. I don't understand why are we even talking about this? Can you name a signal trans athlete, trans woman competitive elite athlete who is currently being disadvantaged by this policy? Can you give me the name?

1:01:48A trans woman athlete who's being disadvantaged. Yeah, we're locked out of competition with biological women as a result of the policies in elite sports. I would imagine that Leah Thomas would be at some point. I feel like the Swimming Association was one of the first bodies to have implemented this. I have to imagine if they are going to continue to swim. Right now, they can't swim. So would that be a yes? So you have... I've got one. You've got one. I've got one. Yes. Can you give me another? No. Okay. I did my mom. So why are we having... Why are we having... So you are a highly informed participant in public controversies.

1:02:35And I have touched on this issue, which everyone assumes is this hot button. This is tearing our country apart. So I have gone to a highly educated source and I've said, give me names. And you come up with one who's not even irrelevant, who isn't even swimming anymore. Right? This is a definition of an absurdity. Why are we wasting our time on something that is wholly hypothetical? Why don't we discuss the actual issues that are of existential meaning and threat to the trans community? That's my point. interesting i think on the you know on the other side um the the right would say something like uh this is the tip of the spear this is sort of endemic of the the encroachment into uh locker rooms and bathrooms this is you know the college sport thing is like you it's only half a wall away from it being about school as well and it you know it all kind of especially with the interesting one about the locker rooms thing i do i've thought this for ages i think that the locker rooms thing and the sports thing are so tightly bound because in order to get onto the sports field, you have to go through the locker room.

1:03:40And there is this sort of just geographic map psychologically inside of people's heads where they play that role through. And you think, well, if the locker rooms, that has to be happening in sport too. I wasn't aware of how few incidents this is causing. But certainly a lot of headlines are happening. But even the locker room thing is a separate issue. So there is a separate social issue of how do you accommodate somebody who belongs to a relatively new social category? And we have a long history in America of struggling with that issue, right? It was the issue we struggled with with African-Americans in the 50s and 60s and Jim Crow?

1:04:25Do we let them into our, you know, in Birmingham in the 1960s, black people are not allowed to use the same changing rooms as white people in department stores, right? Same issue, right? Eventually, we figured out how to do that. And I think we can figure out how to do that with the trans community. That's not what we're talking about here. We're talking about a completely separate thing, which is in elite sports, should the incredibly small number of people who are trans women who can meaningfully compete at the elite level be allowed to compete in the female category? That's the narrow thing that was being discussed on the panel of which I was a moderator.

1:05:06But it's like, so anyway, it's an example of the internet occasionally is very dumb. What was the story about the Harvard women's rugby team? out there. I was interested in... Well, I was interested in this... There's a certain amount of Ivy League bashing that I've done over the course of my career that now that Ivy League bashing has become an agenda item in Washington, I'm a little more circumspect about my Ivy League bashing, but I was just intrigued in my book about the fact that this university in the United States that plays more varsity sports than any other is Harvard. Which people think, oh, it must be some sports factory in the South or something.

1:05:55No, no, no, no. Ivy League schools have the most athletes, have a greatest share of athletes on, recruited athletes on campus of any institution. My question is, well, why? That seems weird to me. Why would an elite academic institution go out of its way to have lots of athletes on campus and also give those athletes a tremendous break at admissions. So huge controversy in America about, oh, don't you dare give an admissions break to black people. That's wrong. That's a violation of it. The Supreme Court says outlaws it, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Meanwhile, the exact same institutions are giving an equal and in some cases larger break to people who are really good at rowing or fencing.

1:06:41That strikes me as weird. Does that not strike you as weird? It's very strange. And why is one controversial and the other one is not? I would guess that in a meritocratic system, people believe that something which is done based on merit is maybe more deserving somehow, more justified in some sort of a way. but what relationship is there between the merit here and the role of an academic institution? It's like saying, if you were a high school kid applying to Harvard, is it useful to put on your application that you're a really good cook? The answer is... Well, if cooking was something which was part of the competitive landscape for a varsity league college, perhaps that would be the case.

1:07:34I think when people look at sports, but I mean, college sports is an entire category. Yeah, but these sports are absurd. It's fencing. Say that to a fencer with this big, long - What is that? You'll come after me. I mean, I make the point about, I talk a lot about tennis, which I think is the most ludicrous example. Massive admissions breaks at elite schools for people who are tennis players. What is the definition of someone who's good enough to play division one tennis in America that they spend their entire lives on a tennis court? Why do you want at your school someone who's not even participating in the undergraduate experience, they're just practicing their backhand.

1:08:08What is so special about that solitary, utterly boring activity that merits them getting an admissions break that is equal or greater to the break that you give to somebody who is part of a historically disadvantaged minority? I was going to say, is there something more special about somebody who's black than somebody who can play tennis well? Someone who is a product of several centuries of racism in the United States absolutely has a moral claim on an admissions break that is an order of magnitude greater than someone who has spent their entire adolescence at a tennis academy in Florida hitting forehands.

1:08:53What if they also play tennis? Black tennis players are the rarest of them all, you know? Yeah, there's not a lot of them. that's you know well tennis being good at tennis is a linear function of how much money your parents have so you would expect that the wealthiest uh uh ethnicities in the united states would have the most tennis players interesting question on that um seth stevens davidowitz wrote a great book about uh was it who owns the nba who wins the nba something like that and uh he did data scientist used ai to help him write this book in 30 days it's brilliant and uh the most common name of NBA players, the top five.

1:09:34It's like Michael, John. They're very middle-class names. The reason is that even in the sport of basketball, one that people assume is going to sweep up these poor kids from the streets and deposit them into the NBA. Now, LeBron, born to a 16-year-old single mother,

1:09:59is remarkable for how much of an outlier he is. Because, I mean, if you are LeBron, you can beat the system, but not anyone else. I wonder how many LeBrons have been born after LeBron now. That's my question. Whether or not we're going to see a ton of LeBrons in the NBA in a couple of decades' time. Yeah, that makes perfect sense because the degree of preparation necessary now to make the NBA is just way higher than the minute you radically increase the amount of preparation necessary to excel in a given area, you skew it by income. Formula One. Like classic income. Yeah. Very classic example, which is one of the reasons why I'm a big track and field fan.

1:10:43One of the beautiful things about track and field is it is one of the last sports for which this is not true. You do not need to have wealthy parents to be a great runner. or you like watching poor people do sports that's what you're telling me i like to watch the i like to watch the poor's they they run faster no i like a sport where there is no distinction where income and class don't buy you a head start that's what i like i like a sport where name me another sport where the kenyan who grew up you know way off in the rift valley somewhere it can meaningfully compete against someone who has the full power of nike behind them and grew up in an upper middle class suburb of dallas that's there's no other give me another sport where that happens yeah yeah yeah not even cycling cycling football like football in europe if you don't come out of one of those football systems you you're not you're not playing i think it's any it's any problem that you have with team sports as soon as you get into team sports right it's got to be an individual sport for this i can't think of a team sport that would allow you rowing is not going to be but even even a massive number of individual sports have become class weighted like tennis is a perfect example golf massively class well yeah golf's in it golf's a particularly interesting one uh tennis kind of kind of makes sense at least to some degree in that you need to be playing against people like it is interesting with track and field that apart from like wrestling, which I don't think happens on the track or the field, it's just in the Olympics, there's no track or field that is against an opponent in quite, like there isn't an opposition in the same way.

1:12:24There's just competitors, right? Also doing the same thing to you independently of it. Like the two javelin guys are like throwing the javelin at each other as it's coming. And that means that if you grow up in an area that has more better javelin players that can spend more time throwing the javelin at you, that you become more successful. Yeah, that's fascinating. I hadn't considered that, the egalitarian nature of the Olympics. And also, the weird, running is really interesting. Distance running in particular is fascinating because, you know, it starts out, since you're English, the English dominate middle distance running for the longest time.

1:12:58And if it wasn't English, it was the English by proxy, the Australians and New Zealanders. Then the Africans in the kind of 80s take over. And all of a sudden, everyone starts saying, well, that's because they have a genetic advantage. That's because they're listing all these reasons. And then what happens in the last 10 years? All the Europeans are, now it's the English again, right? So it's like we realized we made this – it's this thing that we do, which always strikes me as kind of fascinating, which is that we toggle back and forth between our causal explanations for a phenomenon just depending on where we're situated.

1:13:37If we're winning, oh, it's like we have the culture. When we start losing, oh, it's got to be genes. Cultural attribution error. Yeah. And then we start winning again. And now if you talk to the English, it's like, you talk to some English track and field coach, they'll tell you, oh, it's the long English longest since running tradition. It's like, dude, you didn't say that 15 years ago when the Moroccans and the Kenyans were winning every race. You just started saying it because Josh Kirsten won the world championships. And now all of a sudden you've changed your mind. Malcolm Gladwell, ladies and gentlemen.

1:14:12Malcolm, I find you fascinating. I think we could continue to do this for a long time, but I need to get on a flight to go on tour to your state. That's right. I need to leave. Where should people go to keep up to date with all of the stuff that you've got that's going on? Listen, I think the latest podcast I did on my podcast Revisionist History, we have a series called The Alabama Murders. It is the best thing I've ever done. And I would wholeheartedly recommend that to people. And I have a new book out in paperback, Revenge of the Tipping Point. Sick. Malcolm, I appreciate you. Thank you. Thank you so much.

1:14:44This was really fun.

From the publisher

Malcolm Gladwell is a journalist, podcast host and an author.

Do contagious diseases, memetic epidemics, and drug epidemics spread through the same underlying pathways? The answer may explain why society keeps falling into the same contagious patterns, and how we might prevent future memetic epidemics before they happen.

Expect to learn what the history of the death penalty is in the United States, what the “Tipping Point” means and what happened when we reached it, how epidemics of ideas differ from epidemics of drugs, what makes someone a “super-spreader” of social change, the “tipping point” dynamic of trans athletes in sports, if we are responsible for the epidemics we start and much more…

Sponsors:

See discounts for all the products I use and recommend: https://chriswillx.com/deals

Get 10% discount on all Gymshark products at https://gym.sh/modernwisdom (use code MODERNWISDOM10)

Get a 15% discount & free shipping on Manscaped’s shavers at https://manscaped.com/modernwisdom (use code MODERNWISDOM15)

Sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period from Shopify at https://shopify.com/modernwisdom

Extra Stuff:

Get my free reading list of 100 books to read before you die: https://chriswillx.com/books

Try my productivity energy drink Neutonic: https://neutonic.com/modernwisdom

Episodes You Might Enjoy:

#577 - David Goggins - This Is How To Master Your Life: https://tinyurl.com/43hv6y59

#712 - Dr Jordan Peterson - How To Destroy Your Negative Beliefs: https://tinyurl.com/2rtz7avf

#700 - Dr Andrew Huberman - The Secret Tools To Hack Your Brain: https://tinyurl.com/3ccn5vkp

-

Get In Touch:

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chriswillx

Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/chriswillx

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/modernwisdompodcast

Email: https://chriswillx.com/contact

-
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Modern Wisdom

All 547 episodes
#1029 - Malcolm Gladwell - How to Convince the World of Bulls**t & EvilModern Wisdom · 1 h 15 min
Listen in VO