#622 - David Geary - Why Science Says Men & Women Will Never Be The Same

1 May 2023 · 1 h 25 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Summary: Modern Wisdom #622 - David Geary - Why Science Says Men & Women Will Never Be The Same

Introduction

In this episode of the Modern Wisdom podcast, Chris Williamson interviews David Geary, a cognitive developmental and evolutionary psychology professor at The University of Missouri. The discussion revolves around the inherent differences between men and women from physical, psychological, behavioral, and cognitive perspectives.

Key Themes and Concepts

Biological Differences

  • Brain Patterns: Brain patterns can predict the sex of a 10-year-old child with 93% accuracy, indicating significant differences between male and female brains.
  • Sex Differences in Abilities:
  • Women generally excel in verbal skills and reading, while men tend to have advantages in spatial reasoning and mechanical skills.
  • These differences are rooted in evolutionary biology and may be influenced by prenatal hormonal exposure.

Gender Equality Paradox

  • STEM Participation: Contrary to popular belief, as societies become more gender-equal, the representation of women in STEM fields has decreased. This suggests that inherent interests and abilities play a significant role in career choices.
  • Social Learning vs. Biological Predisposition: While social roles theory suggests that societal expectations shape gender behavior, Geary argues that biological predispositions significantly influence interests and competencies.

Transgender Issues

  • Increasing Rates of Transgender Identity: Geary discusses the rapid rise in transgender identification among youth, particularly among adolescent girls, suggesting that social media and peer influence may be contributing factors.
  • Detransition Rates: There are concerns that many individuals who transition may later regret their decisions, indicating the complex interplay of societal pressures and individual identity.

Educational Disparities

  • Disparities in Higher Education: Women now outnumber men in college completion rates, raising questions about the implications for future gender dynamics in the workplace and relationships.
  • Social Dynamics: The discussion highlights how educational and employment trends affect social structures, including marriage and family formation.

Evolutionary Perspectives

  • Adaptive Behaviors: Differences in play patterns and social interactions are analyzed through an evolutionary lens, suggesting that men and women developed distinct social strategies to enhance survival.
  • Sexual Selection: Geary explains how male and female physical and psychological characteristics evolved to meet different reproductive and social challenges.

Discussion Highlights

  • Interest in STEM: Geary's research indicates that women tend to pursue fields aligned with their strengths, often gravitating towards areas that emphasize reading and communication rather than mathematics and engineering.
  • Social Contagion: The concept of social contagion is explored, where adolescents, particularly girls, may adopt identities or beliefs based on peer influence and social media trends.
  • Challenges Facing Boys and Men: The podcast also touches upon the challenges facing boys and men in education and societal engagement, suggesting a potential crisis in male participation in various sectors.

Conclusion

David Geary provides a nuanced perspective on the inherent differences between men and women, framing the discussion within the context of evolutionary psychology and societal changes. This episode offers listeners insights into the complexities of gender differences, the implications for education and employment, and the ongoing debates surrounding gender identity.

Additional Resources

For more on David Geary's work, you can check out

  • [David Geary's writings](https://quillette.com/author/david-c-geary/)
  • [Chris Williamson's free reading list](https://chriswillx.com/books/)
  • Support Chris on [Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/modernwisdom)

Social Media Links

  • [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/chriswillx)
  • [Twitter](https://www.twitter.com/chriswillx)
  • [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/modernwisdompodcast)
  • [Contact](https://chriswillx.com/contact/)

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00you can take a brain pattern of a 10 -year -old and predict whether that brain belongs to a boy or a girl about 93 % of the time, almost as good as you can by looking at an adult face of a male and a female. So huge difference. Why do you think the discussion about sex differences between men and women has become so hotly contested recently? Yeah, great, great question. I think it's always been and hotly contested to some extent, it just kind of flares up and then down just depending on conditions. I think one of the main drivers is there are many individuals who don't want to believe that there's biological bases to anything.

0:51And if there's a biological basis to anything, it's going to show up in sex differences. And there are gender activists who don't want to believe that there are differences between men and women that have a biological basis to them. And therefore, they don't want to consider that those potential differences contribute to socially important outcomes like the percentage of males in computer science or engineering or teaching or whatever it might be. You did a bunch of research, looking at STEM and seeing what it was that contributed to women's lower participation in STEM subjects. Right, so we've looked at a variety of sex differences and a number of things.

1:48In one 2018 study, we looked at the proportion of women, college students, who were getting degrees in inorganic sciences. So computer science, engineering, physics, and so forth. And we plotted that against things like gender equality, which is, would be a high gender equal country, would be one that they tend to be generally pretty wealthy, liberal. There's high levels of female participation in the labor force, is women in polarmament or Congress or whatever. It might be a lot of women in higher ed and so forth. So the standard argument has been for the last of four or five decades is that as countries approach that type of wealth and liberal openness that basic psychological, cognitive, and other sex differences will begin to disappear.

2:58So we looked at that generally. We looked across countries and we found the exact opposite of that. That as countries became more gender equal, there was proportionately fewer women going into these inorganic sciences. They were going into other areas presumably. So the gap in these particular STEM fields actually increased as societies became more open to women participating in a variety of kind of cultural endeavors. Have you got any idea whether this is due to interest sorribilities? Right. Probably a couple of different things. Interest for sure. There are sex differences and interest in science generally.

3:47And there are sex differences and particularly interest in mechanical types of things. How inorganic things work. work. In terms of abilities, the probably one of the primary movers is intra -individual strength. So what are you best at reading or math or reading or science or whatever it might be? And throughout the world, girls are generally, their best subject is generally reading, meaning that their comparative advantage isn't fields that are more reading heavy than math or science heavy, even if their overall levels of math and science are high, or even higher than boys, if their strength is reading, they're still more likely to go into other fields than STEM related.

4:49That's very interesting that it's not necessarily, you could have, let's say that women were better than men in maths on average, but that women were even more better at reading. They're going to be predisposed to do the thing that they are best at. We all take pride in the things that we feel were very competent at, and if we have this biological predisposition that is a sexed difference. Why would it be surprising that we would go away and flourish in those areas? Well, yeah, it is not actually surprising at all, in our mind, because it's just a rational choice. You're going to go into areas in which you're going to have a comparative advantage where you're going to do relatively better than you would in other areas.

5:41So if you're a poor reader and you're reasonably good at math and science, you're probably going to go into a tech field. If you're really good at reading and much better at reading than tech related sorts of things, you're probably going to humanities or something similar. Why is it the case? Why would it be the case that females are better at reading and that males seem to be better at maths. Give me the ancestral justification for why men should be better at counting things and women should be better at reading things, given that both of those have only been around for a few thousand years.

6:22Right. Yeah. So both reading and mathematics are evolutionarily novel abilities. And so you can't say that well, you know, women evolved to be good readers and many evolved to do math that just doesn't make sense. And you know, probably if anything, the good mathematicians and recent evolutionary history probably have had below average reproductive success, you know, just while guests are. But in terms of reading, if you look at brain imaging studies and cognitive studies and so forth, it is an adaptation of the language system and other systems like theory of mind, you'll understanding characters and so forth understand plots.

7:07And women have advantages in certain language areas and they have advantages in theory of mind and so forth. So the underlying basis upon which reading skills are developed, there's a sex difference and some favoring girls and women. When it comes to math, there's no math gene per se. I mean, there is a kind of inherent sense of quantity and so forth, but it's not a very sophisticated skill. And if we look at overall mean differences in math, they're pretty small. Where we see the differences are in areas that involve spatial abilities. So, certain areas of geometry solving word problems actually has a spatial component to it because you can sketch out their relations in a complex word problem that helps you kind of solve, set up and solve that problem.

8:06And that is driving this ex -difference in math levels to a large extent when we see those differences. There are also more men than women at the high end of math performance. That was at one point a very big gap. It's closed since the 90s. There's maybe three to one men than women at the high end, but it's kind of been relatively flat. I would imagine, it seems to me that the discussion around we need to get more women into STEM. We need to get more men into heel has very much dampened down as the stark difference in college admission and then like completion rate between women and men with two women for every one man completing a four year US college degree ish on average.

9:05Seven times more men dropped out of college during COVID than women. It's huge. I notice that the discussion around pushing women further into higher education, appears to have kind of fallen by the wayside. We haven't had that be quite so vociferous as it was, and that seems to have been, I would have said in the last sort of three to four years that I've really noticed it. Yeah, yeah. The, you know, if we go back, that there's a long literature on kids liking of school, you know, going back more than a hundred years. And girls have always kind of liked school more than boys. Sitting there, listening to adults and, you know, being conscientious doing your...

9:50You mean that's more... It's easier for girls to adapt to that kind of environment than it is, especially for young guys. They just are not really... It's not really their thing. And as higher ed opened, you know, there were clearly restrictions on in discouragement of women going into college, going back 60 years or so. As those restrictions abated, we had more women flowing into higher ed than men. And now we have about a 60 -40 ratio of completion in the U .S. and a lot of Western countries. Yeah. So bringing attention to that highlights the disadvantage that boys and men now have in educational outcomes.

10:44And that might be why, you know, here is much about it because the gender activists don't want people to think about it. But it's a problem. It's a problem on multiple levels. One is it's distorting the operational sex ratio for young adults, more educated women than men, leads to more competition among women for a smaller base of educated and ambitious. Do you know what I've deemed that? I need you to come up with a meme to describe that. So I've deemed it the tall girl problem. Tall girl problem, yeah. Yep. And it's associated with the delays and marriage, increased divorce rates, more adjectification, more sexy selfies, more casual sex, more unprotected sex.

11:41Right, back to the hippie and disco days, types of things for young educated adults. Which is whatever. I used to blame it on the Bee Gees, but apparently it's a little more complicated than that. You've got the sex ratio thing or the tall girl thing. Tall girl problem it is. Yeah, the other problem is that the US and a number of other highly developed countries are losing the industrial base that would provide pretty good paying jobs for working class guys that really got them integrated into the workforce, integrated into the broader culture, so forth. And now a lot of those jobs are disappearing and you have a lot of guys that are probably pretty good at spatial mechanical types of things, but they're not pursuing school.

12:41And a lot of them are pulling back. is a huge number, living at home still, not really engaged socially, not engaged economically. And it's a potential tinderbox for society if things really collapse economically. You are touching on all of my favorite catastrophes and crises here, David. So first one, Richard Reeves' book of Boys and Men. Were you familiar with that? Did you get to read that last I don't think I've read that. You would, it's very short. Super short read, only about 150, 200 pages, I think. Fantastic. So it's, he is a policy -wank guy from Washington, D .C. who is looking at structural issues that boys and men are facing, education, employment, and then in the home.

13:32You would love that. So first off, put that on your list. Secondly, Nicholas Eberstadt, men without work. Are you familiar with him? No, no. I'm like, yeah. Yeah, sorry, I've read the basic economic papers, but not the popular press books. Got you. Yeah, so his, he was on the show a couple of weeks ago and he said, there's this cohort of prime working aged 22 to 55 year old men, seven million of which are unemployed and not seeking work. On average, they spent 2 ,000 hours per year watching screens. 50 % of that time is on prescription drugs whilst smoking weed and two -thirds of that cohort live in a household which claims at least one disability benefit.

14:18Right. Right. Absolutely wild. Huge, huge problem. That is a huge problem. I mean, partially due to the changes, you know, increases in world trade and changes and as I said, the manufacturing base. I also wonder if a lot of the cultural, social rhetoric about things like toxic masculinity and so forth and promoting girls in education, which is fine. But it's often seen by activists as a zero sum sort of game. You don't want to acknowledge any issues that boys have because that might take away from what girls are, the extras that girls are getting. And it's creating a real problem. I couldn't agree more.

15:05One thing that you touched on before was the potential tinderbox. And let's roll all of these together. Given the fact that we have the highest rates of sexlessness amongst young men that we've ever seen, around about 30 % of men haven't had sex in the last year, aged 18 to 30, around about 50 % of men say that they're not looking for short -term or long -term relationships. We have this massive cohort, around about seven million men just in the US, 22 to 55, that are not looking for work and also not employed, also not in education, employment or training. And yet we haven't seen the in -kind increase of killings and anti -social behavior, spray painting cars, setting stuff on fire, pushing over granny, etc.

15:53What do you attribute the fact that young male syndrome has all the raw materials to occur and yet we haven't seen it. What do you think is going on there? Right. Yeah. Well, typically, as you said, I mean, have these disaffected, disengaged men, you get higher rates of crime and violence and a variety of other social ills. I think you hit on it. I mean, they have something to keep them occupied. They've got internet porn or whatever they're watching on the screens and they're getting some flow of income either from disability payments or extended unemployment or they're living with their parents or something like that.

16:34So they are kind of marginally satisfied probably with things. But what happens if the US and these countries go into a massive recession and these benefits and other sorts of things have to be cut? And, you know, it's basically they're being paid off to be quiet and just deal with their situation. Oh, that's a very interesting way to frame it. There is some existential malaise, just this ambient sense that you're not needed, structurally, socioculturally, archetypally in terms of the role that you play in the wider world. And the, how would you say, rich social safety net financially that a lot of men are offered, doesn't allow them to buy a palace, but it gives them enough money to keep the porn subscription and the internet taking over, which means that social media can continue to sedate, video games, etc, etc.

17:44Yeah, I think where I've arrived at is a sedation hypothesis that you've got porn video games, social media that are kind of nerfing the desire for status seeking for goal orientation and for reproduction and giving them a titrated dose this is enough means that they don't need to go and do it. Therefore the lack of it doesn't hurt quite so much. It's not enough to be satisfied but it's enough to not go and burn everything down.

18:14It's fascinating. I mean this is a problem that I'm basically be obsessed by at the moment. One other thing to just kind of round out what we spoke about at the beginning, is that the gender equality paradox? Is that what we're referring to, the fact that as you get increasing egalitarianism, you have more of a sex difference in terms of what people go into? Right. Yeah, so that we call it the gender equality paradox in STEM in this particular article. But you also see larger sex differences in a variety of other things such as personality, spatial abilities, a variety of things that, you know, as people get wealthier and there are more options, social and economic options available to them, they're better able to express their own individual preferences.

19:08And we've argued that as you're better able to express your own individual preferences, any inherent sex differences or any inherent individual differences will be better expressed in those contexts than in contexts that have for a variety of reasons, more restricted opportunities. So as the real world constrains your choices less by being more free, more open, more degrees of freedom, more opulent, etc. That allows you to fully follow whatever it is that you care about the most. Therefore, these sex differences we seem to see increase. Right. Yeah. What is the response from sex difference denial groups about why the gender equality paradox exists then?

20:05Well, yeah, when we, he's written so and I did this, you know, this 2018 study, you know, we walked through, got through all the data and we thought it was pretty interesting, but not, you know, we didn't think it was going to be as big of a deal, at least I didn't think it was going to be as big of a deal as it turned out to be, mostly because it wasn't that's surprising. And it wasn't that surprising because other people had found like increases in personality differences and so forth across cultures. But the response to it was pretty negative. We got a lot of emails. The editors of the journal apparently got a lot of emails including you know attacks on us and pressure for them to retract the article, so forth.

20:59they didn't do that. There was a commentary on it that did get published. I think just because the editor got tired of getting so many commentaries, he finally said, well, we're already published one when we're not been doing any others. That showed that the gender equality paradox didn't, well, one, they complained about how we defined proportion of males and females in STEM fields, which was just kind of a stupid thing. But then they took actually a study that he's Bernoy put together called the Biggie, which was an alternative measure of well -being, sex differences and well -being, rather than the gender equality measure that most people look at.

21:54We looked at things like opportunities to complete education, overall healthy lifespan, life satisfaction, things that are equally valid for men and women and boys and girls, rather than something like the proportion of women and parliament, which has a gender activist, and it's very female biased. So when we use the female biased measure, which is what the activist is pushed for in is a better measure of gender equality, we get the paradox. When we look at our measure, which we developed to make it sex neutral, just because the gender equality stuff is biased, they don't find that, which is what we would expect.

22:40But anyway, the authors of that made a big deal of that, they did a hit piece on Heasbird and I and Buzzfeed. Oh, very reputable response there. Yeah, I had never read Buzzfeed. I never even considered it. You'll be parked in between four outfits to wear on your next hot girl walk and 10 dog memes so good that we can't stop laughing. I'm glad that they really positioned you appropriately there. Right. Right, well, they they put in there a lot of at -homin and a lot of Comments that the editor and reviewers of their comment to the journal said you got to take out because this isn't support They put it in there, but anyway now there's this Buzzfeed thing and there's this commentary on our original article So when people bring up the gender equality paradox and stem You they can now say well, this has been debunked see this Buzzfeed

23:40Fuck off, dude. Fuck off. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. But, so that's how it's dealt with. You know, you get something into the general media in a commentary somewhere or some counter argument somewhere. And then when somebody brings it up, you don't have to discuss the points. You can just say, well, that's already off the tape. It's gone. It's been, you know, the... as Vied et al 2018. Yep. Yeah. Phenomenal. OK, one final thing to sort of round this out, you've used participation in STEM. That seems to be a very obvious sex difference that occurs as you get more egalitarianism in a society. Are there any other equally strong or even stronger evidence for the gender equality paradox?

24:31Well, one interesting thing is the sex difference in height gets bigger. Which sounds weird. Yeah, yeah. And that has nothing to do with gender equality actually. It has to do with the overall health of the population, the wealth of the population, medical. Yeah. Oh, so you're saying in a less prosperous, less egalitarian society, or less prosperous society, egalitarian societies tend to need to be prosperous in order to be able to allow people to choose what they want. Prosper societies have better medical interventions, food, water, sanitation, etc. Which doesn't nerf the height increases that men's natural genetic disposition would have caused them to get?

25:23Am I right here? That's correct. The physical sex differences get bigger because the overall health of the population gets better. And so not only are the psychological sex differences expressed better, the physical sex differences are actually larger. That's a very robust effect. And I'm looking now at whether that particular fact is correlated with changes in sex differences in certain cognitive abilities, suggesting that as physical health gets better, the brain obviously is going to mature better and fully developed with full potential, then some cognitive sex differences should actually increase along with the sex differences in height.

26:14It's hard to study that a little bit because there's really good data on height across across the last century and a lot of countries, and some places across multiple centuries. But the psychological cognitive tests are more recent, so there isn't as good at data, but there's hints of that. The spatial advantages of men and spatial abilities seems to be increasing along with their increases in height. And it often is positively correlated with the overall health of the population. So healthier populations with bigger sex differences in height usually have bigger sex differences in spatial abilities.

27:01The same seems to be true with women's advantages in certain verbal memory tasks and episodic membering personal experiences and so forth, they're better at those. And as indicators of overall physical health get better, the sex difference there seems to increase as well. So that ties it into, if we tie it into height changes, we can better link it to actual, an actual biological mechanism. David, you're absolutely blame on my mind here. This is so interesting. So in the same way as a prosperous society allows men and women to better choose the life path that they have, it may also biologically, nutritionally, medically, etc.

27:55create a foundation that allows men and women to be more of what they are with regards to their cognition, their capacity, their behavior, which is upstream from a society that allows them to choose what they want to do more. So it predisposes them to a particular type, which would be women. I imagine, you know, if you were able to do the best studies in the world, you might even find that women's social networks become more intricate. They become more nuanced and most subtle in particular ways. This is one of the most interesting things that I've learned. This is really, really, really cool. Yeah, there are some interesting behavioral studies looking at in developing nations, looking at things like nutritional health, nutritional supplements for kids who are at risk for stunting, you know, kind of low physical growth poor, poor physical growth.

28:58And so you can look at behavioral competitiveness, physical activity levels, which generally favored boys over girls. And you can look at, you know, how does supplements, you know, how does improving their health change the sex differences and rough and tumble play competitiveness and so forth. And the biggest gains are for boys who are receiving these supplements. and the biggest losers are the boys who don't get them. So, some of the sex differences in, you know, just physical activity levels and competitiveness are smaller or disappear in malnourished, you know, poor health kids, but when you improve their health, these sex differences pop up.

29:47That's fascinating. Yeah, yeah. Consistent with, you know, there's a biological foundation to this that is rooted in, you know, fit physical health, including, you know, brain development. When it comes to sex differences in cognition, what are the most well -established differences in men's and women's brains? Let's get into the nuts and bolts of what's actually going on here. Sure. So let's, you know, traditionally psychologists have been studying sex differences in cognition for a century or so. And they focused on verbal abilities, generally math and spatial. Let's take math off the table because it's evolutionarily novel.

30:29It's not that interesting. And verbal is a big field. You can go anywhere from how quickly you can name animals that start with a letter A versus analogical reasoning. Girls have advantages in one on boys on another. So it's not clear. So putting it, I've argued that we really need to think about these cognitive sex differences from a broader evolutionary perspective and think about, okay, what is it that is universal across people no matter where they live? Math isn't because you get it in school or you don't get it at all. And so things that are one thing that is universal that women and girls have advantages on or something that I call at least an aspect of folk psychology.

31:19These are skills that allow you to interact with individuals on a one -on -one basis and more importantly develop and maintain one -on -one relationships. This would be, you know, BFF sorts of relationships. You think about all the skills involved in that and that would be, you know, language is obviously a good part of it, but also reading facial expressions, you know, making inferences about how they're feeling or thinking based on facial expressions, reading body posture, types of things, vocal intonation, theory of mind, which is your skill it is actually figuring out what's going on with the individual.

32:04And if we look at each of those individual skills, girls and women have small to moderate advantages in them. But in the real world, they're working in concert. They're not just bits and pieces. They're they're working all together. And if we look at the entire constellation of skills, as they're working together in an interaction or interpreting an interaction, girls and women have fairly large advantages, probably about 85 % of them are better than the average guy, or maybe 90 % or so. So it's a fairly substantial advantage. There are other areas involved in dealing with people or groups or whatever where we see more subtle differences, but it's the one -on -one kind of emotional intelligence.

32:54I think some people might call it that. I think that's what people mean by that. I call it kind of an individual level folk psychology. Girls, women do really well at that. But boys and men do particularly good on what I call folk physics. This is not an academic physics, but it is kind of the foundation for aspects of an academic physics. It involves things like dealing with the physical world, navigating from one place to another, tracking the trajectory of things as they're moving through space. Understanding how objects might be manipulated and used as tools, a mechanical reasoning type of thing.

33:45And so boys and men have small to large advantages in all of those areas. Wow, okay. What social learning theory? social learning theory. Well, there is a social learning theory where we learn to, you know, what do you do in this context? You go to a dinner with folks, you know, your first formal dinner, you've never worn a tie before and you have no idea how to do things. You know, you watch other people and you figure out, you kind of imitate what people who seem to know what they're doing or doing. And so that's a social learning type of thing. And that's a universal as well. I mean, we learn a lot from other people.

Read the full transcript

34:31There's no doubt about that. But I think you might be mean social roles theory. Yes. Yes. Yeah. So social roles is the argument that boys and girls and men and women learn to behave in sex -specific ways. Girls are more communal or nurturing, and guys are more agentic, focused on getting things done, being more dominant and so forth. because they receive either explicit or implicit information from the social environment that they are that basically tells them, oh you're a girl, you're a boy, and this is what girls and boys do, and therefore you adhere to these roles. And the argument then is that that's how all these were basically blank like slate, mentally, psychologically, and then we kind of develop these roles based from learning from others of the same sex.

35:42And that is the argument underlying things like encouraging girls to do this, getting role models, you know, girls and STEM role models, which is fine. I mean, whatever. The problem is it's well overstated. Boys don't like playing with toy cars and blocks and so forth because their parents have implicitly given them those toys for Christmas or they've seen the advertisements, boys playing with these things on television. They like playing with these things because if you're playing with a car, it has a a specific type of motion to it. It's a non -biological motion that captures the attention of what's called the dorsal visual stream that feeds into these folk physics centers that I mentioned previously.

36:42So there is an early bias in what boys and girls look at. Boys look at physical motion and stuff and they're attracted to those types of things. Girls look at faces and the details of objects. more. And that's, I mean, there is some place for social roles, but it's the extent of its influence is really overstated, in my opinion. A lot of people, when they talk about sex differences, particularly whether that be in children or as soon as people grow up to be adults, will come up against somebody who either, in terms of well -meaning or this is just the way that they see the world will use social roles theory as well look of course boys are stronger than girls they're the ones that are encouraged to do rough and tumble play of course boys are more interested in things than people because they've seen it on TV of course boys are expecting to be more dominant because these are the subtle cues that their parents and the media and everybody else is given to them for the people who sit down at Thanksgiving, perhaps with that one brother or sister or cousin who makes a whole process across as an argument.

37:56What are the strongest rebuttals that can dispel this particular myth? Yeah, so there was, well, one, these differences are universal. I mean, it's not just, you you know, US upper middle class families at C .I .I .E. I mean, you see it all over the place. But one important piece of data, well, there are a number of them. I'll tell you one and I'll tell you more if you want. There was a study done a few decades ago that was a fairly large -scale study looking at, you know, a couple hundred parents and how they were socializing their kids. So there were, some of them were traditional parents, you know, they'd buy the girls barbies or dolls or whatever and the boys, you know, car trucks.

38:49And other parents were more, I don't know if they'd be progressive, I mean, they'd be called progressive today back then. They were hippies or whatever they were. They were non -traditional. So they raised their kids say, okay, you know, girls can play with blocks and with toy cars and boys can play with dolls and all of that's fine. It doesn't make any difference. And then the researchers brought the kids into the lab setting and said, okay, is it okay for girls to play with trucks and boys to play with dolls those that were Raised and non -traditional family said yeah, sure. It's fine. No problem.

39:29So their beliefs about what's okay and or what's typical or not typical or whatever Mured to some extent with their parents said But then when you cut them loose and watch how they actually play they still play in sex -typical ways. So their beliefs about kind of what boys and girls should do and there actually was one thing but their actual behavior was sex -typical. There was no difference between how boys from traditional and untraditional families played and same for girls. Meaning that the kids are calling the shots here. They're creating their own environments based on what they find interesting and what they want to do.

40:15Does this show up in primates as well? Juvenile primates? Yeah, rough and tumble play is pretty common in species where males are bigger and more aggressive than females. And those are typically species if we're looking at primates where there's a lot of male, male fighting and competition in adulthood. it. Clearly see that in humans, if we look at human history, it's clearly a lot of physical competition, a lot of violence and so forth. The sex differences in physical size go back at least four million years in our ancestors. It's a long, long evolutionary history of that. Obviously males and females are bigger than females in modern humans.

41:01And we see the sex difference in rough and tumble plight. I mean, it just fits very, very nicely with this evolutionary pattern and this pattern of male on male aggression. I remember hearing a while ago that if you give a juvenile female chimp, perhaps, a sort of a soft toy that resembles a baby that they treat it in a different way to the males, Is that right? Have I made this up or was that correct? That's correct. It was with verborate monkeys and I think it's been replicated maybe with macaques or so. Right. If you give toys, sex typical toys, the human sex typical, a doll and a truck, big like dump truck that they can play with, you do see preferences.

41:54is the females like the dolls more than the males do. The males are also more likely to approach their novel types of things, and so the risk -taking is higher there. Now, there's no toy trucks in MacCack evolutionary history, but again, it could be attractive because of the type of motion in the Dorsal Ventual Stream associated with navigation and just kind of focusing on large scale space. I'm fascinated by the fact that the type of toys, it's not just the fact that that figuratively represents a kind of role perhaps. I would imagine that if you were to look at the sex differences in the trucker community, that it's going to be heavily skewed to one man.

42:47But there's also something innate about that movement back and forth and given the fact that we, you know, go back far enough and we do have a common ancestor there has to be the sex difference which at least was maybe there before we split off and we're seeing this play out with Macax or whatever else it might be. What would you say to the people that say we are more similar than we are different, you know, if you look at the overlap between the dispositions that boys and girls have that men and women have. You know, you've mentioned there one particular example, which seems pretty stark, which is the average female is better than 85 % of men when it comes to, I think it was reading faces or perhaps it was verbal ability.

43:32What would you say to people that say we're more similar than we are different? These sex differences are basically small and it doesn't really matter and David, you're just making a mountain out of a molehill. Yep, yep, yep. I heard that and that's a very popular belief in the field and one that is debated. So if we look at sex differences in certain verbal skills, they're fairly small. So you can say, well, we're more similar than different. Maybe 60 % of women are better than the average guy, not big. But my point was, and other people's point, is if you put the whole package together, The brain is an integrated system that pulls together abilities that you use in tandem.

44:19When you pull together these networks of abilities, that would include making eye contact, theory of mind, sort of things, vocal intonation, and so forth, that's when you get very big differences. That's more of a real life sort of thing. So, if we look at individual personality types of things, like how sociable, how much you like just, you know, festive chatter and talking to people in kind of the warmth component being nurturing, you know, it's a modest sex difference, favoring girls and women in this case. But if we put together the whole pattern of personality, we have much, much larger differences, would not, in this case, not much overlap.

45:04Because this is not just like rolling a six once, it's the equivalent of rolling five sixes in a row, and that suite of traits when bound together trends much more toward women. I had, I had Joyce Banninson on the show at the start of the year and she gave me a really interesting example. I would love to know if you've looked at any of this. She spent forever studying kindergarten kids playing and the games that they play. And she mentioned that if you look at the sorts of games that boys and girls play. These are three, four years old, I think maybe up to five years old. You know, it hasn't been a massive amount of time for socialization to occur, especially in kindergarten.

45:45This may be if you're the eldest child or an only child, the first time that you've actually got to spend any significant period of time with other kids. And she said, if you look at the language they're using, if you look together over shed warfare against cowboys or aliens or something else. And if you look at what girls are doing, they are keeping something alive. It's a rabbit, it's a doll. And the language as well that's used is again very different, sex differently. What have you, have you integrated any of this, this sort of social game playing into your work too? Yeah, yeah, yeah, first, Of course, Joyce's work is great.

46:30I really keep up on it and like reading it. Yeah, that's called social dramatic play. Social dramatic play. Social dramatic play. So kids, when they hit that age, begin to develop a richer imagination. So they can now imagine themselves in different role -taking sorts of different characters in these roles, and then they can now better integrate their roles with the roles of their playmates. So they're basically practicing social interactions in different contexts, being the hero, being parent, or whatever it might be. So it's an important component of development. And the interesting thing there is that the fantasies that boys and girls as Joyce stated develop on their own differ quite dramatically.

47:36And in fact, the vocabularies of boys and girls begin to differ in the second year of life in terms of what they talk about. How so? What did they talk about? You know, so, you know, a stereotypical thing. So, you know, unsurprisingly to me. So 18 -month -old girls are more likely to focus on clothing and boys on objects. in terms of just kind of free, free discussion sorts of things. But the boys integrating themselves into a, they typically integrate themselves into larger groups. Joyce probably talked about this as well. And these groups, as you said, are in some type of conflict with something, you know, Indians or dragons or whatever it might be, and they're coordinating and integrating their behavior together.

48:30That is, in my opinion, a component of rough and tumble play. I mean, there's individual rough and tumble play, but there's also coordinating your activity so that you are more functional as a group. And if we look at between group conflict and traditional contacts, and we look at it historically, it is coordinated activities of males, fighting the coordinated activities of other groups of males. That's male -male competition. It just goes beyond one -on -one. It goes to a group level type of thing. And these early play differences that Joyce talked about, we've wrote about 20 years ago, saying that this is preparation for this.

49:16The boys are creating these groups because these are the groups they're going to grow up with and later in some cases fight with or cooperatively hunt with. It makes complete sense to anybody with a semi -functioning brain as to, ancestrally, why boys, males would have this predisposition for practicing warfare and why girls would be interested in people, they would be playing doctor or drama or veterinary or whatever. family. How does this manifest or what is happening that's causing this to manifest? We can understand why, right? We can understand the ultimate reason for why this is happening.

49:57But what is it that's inside of a male that causes him to think let's pretend that we're fighting cowboys? Yeah, they know they aren't necessarily thinking anything. They're engaging in things that they find fun. So if we look at disorders or just individual variation in either prenatal exposure to testosterone or postnatal spikes, the first six months of life there is a big spike in testosterone. So there's a second dose there in addition to prenatal dose and girls have some fluctuating exposure to to estrogens during that six month period as well, although it's more variable than with guys. But in any case, these hormonal influences are at least partly contributing to these sex differences in play.

50:56So girls who have more had more Androgens early in life, you know, prenatally engage in play behaviors that are closer to boys than girls. also they're kind of in between those. So it's a mix of activity. So there's clearly a hormonal component to it. And I think the way that works is in terms of what captures your attention. You know, biological motion is probably going to capture the intention of a baby or something. We'll capture the attention of girls more than boys. Whereas the physical motion is going to capture the attention of boys more than girls. All you have to do is have a small attentional bias and built -in reward systems that will keep you focused on that and keep you engaged in related activities and then it can kind of build from there.

51:52So the mechanism is heavily driven by Androgen exposure to testosterone primarily and that's one of the key differences. Is there anything else going on here is a protein folding in the brain, are there particular areas of the brain that are larger, smaller atrophides, hypertrophides in one form or another? Yeah, I mean, probably there are sex differences in certain very basic areas of the brain associated with aggressive sexual and that type of behavior. And there are some really interesting sex differences in overall patterns of brain organization. So if you look at gray matter and white matter, if you look at one small part, maybe there's no difference or maybe there's a difference.

52:41And if there is a difference, it's probably not going to be huge on average. But if you look at the whole pattern of the brain, you get quite substantial differences. So you can take a brain pattern of a 10 -year -old and predict whether that brain belongs to a boy or a girl about 93 % of the time. Almost as good as you can by looking at an adult face of a male and a female. So you huge difference. And that's FMRI? That would be MRI, just structural differences. What people really need to look at is the coordinated activity of brain areas. So certain brain areas that are linked together are going to fire together spontaneously.

53:28And that kind of helps build that network and keep it kind of well functioning. So if you look at those spontaneous brain activity studies, and there aren't that many with really young kids yet. But there's least one during the prenatal period where you can put mom in a scanner and get brain activity indices of the fetus. And we see sex differences there in brain activity patterns at about six months prenatally. And there was a recent study looking at, I think it was two and three month olds also showing differences in spontaneous brain activity patterns, but exactly how those are related to some of these sex difference we were talking about, we don't fully know that yet.

54:22If it was 93 % at 10 years old, what is it at six? Like three months prior to birth and six months after birth? Yeah, they didn't do that. That was a somewhat different technology and approach and they didn't do those particular analyses. Probably it's going to be smaller because probably the differences get bigger with age, but they didn't look at it yet. I think nine or ten is the youngest that I've seen. Look at that. There's a number of these studies with adults and it gets up to 95 % or so. Do you know how accurate they could be at predicting the sex of the embryo though? Oh, yeah, they didn't do those analyses.

55:07Okay, I understand. Okay, fine, fine. Evidently what the researchers are amongst another number of things trying to achieve here is say, well at age nine and ten, you have had, you know, social social roles theory comes back in again. perhaps you have been socialized into a mode of thinking, which has caused structural changes in the brain, these structural changes then basically beg the question by being the detector thing that is supposed to be detected. And people say that's what a male brain looks like because we have never seen a male brain which hasn't been socialized as a male brain. Despite the fact that there are a wide variety of families that raise children in traditional and non -traditional progressive and non -progressive ways, unless someone is going to say somehow that the brain of the embryo three months prior to being born has somehow been socialized, the sex differences that we see.

55:58And, you know, I'm being like overly explicit here to just really try and hammer the point home that there are structural changes that manifest into real world significant differences, is not only in disposition, not only in tendency, interest, capacity. It's a whole suite of things that occur. And David Bus, mutual friend of ours, was recently on Rogan. And I knew I had it, it was absolutely Adam. And the Rogan was going to bring up sex differences. Sure enough, as was predicted, that ended up happening. the most interesting thing that I've learned about sex differences in the last year is differences in throwing accuracy amongst children.

56:49Can you please red pill everybody that's listening on the differences in throwing accuracy among children? Sure. So, yeah. So, you find differences in throwing accuracy, throwing distance and velocity. So, even in preschoolers, boys are throwing more. They can throw farther and with higher velocity, higher speed and so higher kinetic energy than girls can. It emerges very early, as I said, the preschool years and becomes extremely large by 19 early adulthood or so where there's very little overlap between men and women. Maybe a little bit, but not much. It is a very big difference. It is correlated with differences, you know, the shoulders are built differently.

57:48The forearm are longer in men, relatively relative to overall size in women, that that difference is evident prenatally. It is associated with the sex difference in this dorsal stream sort of thing, the ability to track moving objects, you know, to hit something. that's you have to have the cognitive system in brain and cognitive system in place in order to hit something accurately And if somebody's throwing something at you you want to be able to track it coming in so you can dodge it Oh, yeah, didn't you looked at a study to do with how effective males and females are at dodging projectiles coming at them What can you tell us that study?

58:32Yeah, so Some people have argued that or in fact the initial argument and and maybe it's still the argument that The male advantage in throwing distance, accurate speed and all of that sort of thing is due to shared childcare and male hunting. And of course, there is a big sex difference in hunting engagement in traditional context. No question about that. But in addition to that, men are better at dodging things. So in this particular study, you couldn't do it anymore, but the researchers, if I remember correctly, got one of these tennis ball shooting machines

59:19and decided to shoot them at undergraduates to see what would happen. I'm sure the professors had a fantastic time when they were aiming at the annoying child in the front row that keeps on distracting them during their lectures. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, unfortunately we can't do that anymore. But I'm sure it was at fairly low speed and you know, so nobody would get hurt and so relatively easy task. And so they just looked at the number of balls that could be blocked. And men blocked most of them. In fact, there was a ceiling effect in women who were not as successful at that. And that's obviously a defensive mechanism.

59:59If other males are using projectile weapons, the ability to track and dodge that is an important component of the male -male competition. That's my argument. Which came probably before hunting. What is the suite of traits that we're talking about here when it comes to throwing accuracy, throwing velocity, dodging, seeing things moving through the air, etc? Yeah, so yeah, so so we have the throwing component to it. It has you know the behavioral component actually throwing something and hitting it accurately. It has physical components to it, you know the upper body upper body strength is big sex difference.

1:00:40They're the architecture of the shoulder and arms. There are, there's brain areas associated with motion detection and integrating motion detection with physical movements as in blocking something or throwing something. And so there's brain and cognitive systems involved there. That you see physical systems, the behavioral component, the brain and cognitive component, and guys are better on all of those components or at least most of them. integrated together, you get quite a large sex difference. So this, learning that, and it was specifically the accuracy thing that really drove it home to me, is for me now one of the more compelling justifications for us thinking about transgender athletes in sport a lot more carefully, because everybody has heard to death someone talking about how a biological male shouldn't be able to step into the ring with a biological female after a Euro -Eastrogen and testosterone suppression and then punch their face into the ground.

1:01:52It's self -evident and a lot of the arguments that I've seen stem exclusively from, well, we can reduce power by X amount, by putting them on this particular type of hormone blocker, testosterone and Androgens aren't all that drive power. Then someone comes back and says, well look at bone density, look at muscle mass, look at all of the time that you've gone through puberty, blah, blah, blah. That's done. Like it's interesting. I guess it was interesting, but it's no longer interesting to me. What is much more interesting to me are the fundamental capability differences, especially when it comes to things like accuracy.

1:02:27Because if, let's say, for instance, that you were to have a biological male that is going into the, what is it, the baseball, NBA, NBA, what's the baseball league called? Is there a whim as lead? Yeah, there must be. I've got to imagine so. But the same as the WMBA, right? OK, so let's say that Male goes into the WMBA. They're not taller. They're not bigger. They're built the same on average as the average female basketball player. Because I would imagine that female basketball players probably pretty tall, taller than me, taller than you. But what we're saying is that there is a fundamental capacity, capability, difference that biological males have with just the way that they see throwing and spatial rotation generally.

1:03:15Not just to do with the physicality of the architecture of the shoulder, changes in forearm length, etc. But the way that their brains are able to see the world of throwing overall. This also explains to a degree why the WNBA may be significantly less popular than the men's division, not because women are smaller and something else and something else, but they have a predisposition that is, oh, you could say that male's capacity is overclocked and it is supercharged comparatively with women. So this to me is the most, or one of the most compelling reasons because it gets beyond this sort of messy conversation about power and it gets more into fairness and it's why it's so compelling.

1:03:59and I've never really heard anyone do a full treatise on this area of transgender athletes in sport. Let's say that there was a sport where you had to do lying detection or you had to manipulate different social groups or you had to be able to detect facial cues or something. If you were to have female to male transitioners in that sport, they're going to absolutely dominate the league, even if they have taken testosterone for ages and they're walking around with the sociosexuality through the roof and the sex rides really high or whatever. I just found this, it's really fascinating. I think this is really, really interesting stuff.

1:04:36Yeah, yeah. Yeah, some of the spatial differences and the perceptual differences that I mentioned are more strongly related to prenatal, you know, an early postnatal hormonal exposure than actual circulating testosterone. So you can, the men's circulating testosterone isn't really highly correlate with their spatial abilities, but the earlier exposure seems to be what's important there. So yeah, you can decrease muscle mass a little bit by reducing testosterone, but there's other things you're not going to change that people have, as you said, people have talked about. How big are the differences between navigating from one place to another?

1:05:17Yeah, good question. They are, I would say, they are most of them are kind of contrived situations. They're moderate to large. I would say men are better, you know, just kind of dead reckoning sort of thing. You start from some place and you wander around in the woods and then you try to figure you're on how to get your way back without explicitly just backtracking the exact same way you were, get the quickest route back, and better and that. I don't remember the exact effect size, but it would be noticeable difference. Map reading is different as well. Interest in maps is different. We could see quite obviously why it would be the case that men need better spatial rotation.

1:06:08they need better navigation over a broad ranging kind of distance because if you're going out and on average men Ancestrally hunted more than women therefore Will the beast goes from right to left. I have spear will the beast plus spear plus throwing plus trajectory Plus how the fuck do I drag this back home hashtag where is home as well also what about female sex differences that give them capacities that men struggle with and and also why would these be there? What is the evolutionary justification for why they would have them? Yeah, so the sex difference is in the folk psychology or emotional intelligence that I talked about earlier.

1:06:53Women have advantages in. Probably related to a couple of things. One of them is women are and girls want to develop a social support network that for social emotional support and social and other types of problem solving, men form networks as well, but they're usually cast oriented or competition oriented networks. So if you hang out with all your friends watching, you know, the WNBA or the Super Bowl or something, maybe the Super Bowl will be better, watching the Super Bowl and you were this last time rooting for the Chiefs, all of you, and they win. You're all kind of bonded together, even if you didn't talk about anything during that time, you drank beer and did whatever you're going to do.

1:07:44That's kind of a shared activity that kind of helps link male groups together. You can have lots of guys there. You can't, you know, it doesn't have to be limited to two people. Girls and women form relationships more based on the dyadic interactions and the social and emotional support talking through issues, talking about what's important to them and so forth. And the dynamics of this are very different between males and females. I covered in my book on sex differences. But one component of it is that to develop and maintain these BFF relationships, you have to be very sensitive to the emotional state of your girlfriend, your best friend, you have to read things and so forth.

1:08:44She may not want to really bother you by talking about problems you know, problems with her boyfriend or mom or whatever that might be, but you can pick up that something is not quite right. And you know a lot more about her than guys do about their friends. You say, oh, you haven't trouble with your mom again. Is it such and such a sort of thing? So that's the theory of mind sort of thing. You're picking up subtle, nonverbal cues, picking up on it. That's exactly what the girlfriend wanted you to do. and that engages you in the talk that hopefully will help to resolve that type of issue. So that, most of the intelligence is really important for these relationships.

1:09:28It's also important for dealing with and metting out something called relational aggression. So the movie Mean Girls, maybe you've seen that. So, you know, kind of kind of bitchy. Girl, you know, subtle put downs, gossip and spreading lies. It's basically designed to disrupt the social networks of competitors. Undermind their same -sex friendships and make them unattractive to boyfriends. Would be boyfriends. And it is most effective if it's done in a way that is plausibly deniable. That is you do it very subtly. You know, I'm really worried about so -and -so because I think she's seeing three guys who are drinking a lot of that sort of thing.

1:10:26And so because it's more, you know, when guys are mad at each other, they'll make eye contact and they'll push or yell. I mean, you have to figure it out. I mean, it's usually obvious if they're really upset. But you have to have these subtle social skills to pick up on that relational aggression so that you can counter it. And so I think the combination of relational and also have these subtle skills to use it to manipulate other people. I think the combination of the social support friendships and the female female competitions, relational aggression is really the basis for the female advantage in these skills.

1:11:12It seems to me that the heavier brow ridge that men have, the bigger jaw, the bigger hands, these are our weapons, right? This is how men would have done that. Inter -sexual competition, it would have been inter -group warfare as well with different tribes, etc etc. The ability to understand and manipulate social dynamics, language ability, reading facial expressions, that is female weaponry in regard. Now it's also defensive, offensive, affiliative, you know, co -eulitional, all of that. But I just, I love thinking about conceptualizing things in this way that But because women on average weren't getting into physical altercations, because they are more fragile sometimes could be with child if they die the danger of the child being on their own is significantly higher.

1:12:09Therefore make sure that you don't, how would you say, explicitly, obviously accuser to really do something that could cause you to be on the wrong end of a very sharp stick from either the husband of the woman that you just pissed off or the woman herself. So you need to be able to manipulate social groups. You need to be much more subtle and you need to dance your way through this. You need to use colloitional tactics. You need to so seeds of discord venting as an example of this. And because of that, you have to have a predisposition. You have to have these capacities to be able to make yourself capable.

1:12:48Whereas Because for men, everything's out in the open. You got a problem? Let's sort the problem out. We don't need to have that quite so much. Yeah, men engage in relational aggression too, and they play politics, and some of them are very good at it. But the politics is to organize large -scale groups for collective action sort of thing, rather than manipulating the social dynamics within a smaller kind of social network. But yeah, you're right. Yeah, you have to be very good at that To navigate all of these complex social relationships in a way that doesn't provoke retaliation Yes, when it comes to the current trends that we're seeing this increase in transgender especially youths What's your assessment of the situation?

1:13:43Why do you think it is that we've had such a rapid increase in the happening? Right. Yeah, so I wrote that quote article that you mentioned on that. And if we look at it historically, well, so let's step back. Let's look at brain patterns that I mentioned before where you know, you take a 10 -year -old, you can predict 93 % of the time whether it's a boy or a girl. If you take an adult, you can predict 95 % of the time whether it's a man or a woman. So the brain patterns for guys are kind of bunched up in this area, but there are some individuals that kind of go out on the curve. So there are guys that have female typical marine patterns, not a lot of them, but they're there.

1:14:31And there are girls who have women who have male typical marine patterns. So it's not, you know, kind of out of bounds to think, well, you know, maybe for for whatever reason, you didn't see the sex typical shift in brain development for whatever reason. So you're going to get, it would make sense that you have some guys who really like girl things, but they're kind of forced to be boys and to do boy things and they would develop gender dysphoria and the same thing for some girls. And so if we look at early trends sexual in individuals they had a pattern of sex atypical play so they the boys are playing and liked girl things and so forth expressed wanting to be a girl had this dysphoria depression and discomfort with being a boy or a girl if it's the the reverse of that.

1:15:38In those individuals, if they're carefully screened and so forth, would be fairly rare. But if they transition, most of them do okay. They're okay with it. So the D transition rates are 1 or 2%. So it's like, yeah, it worked for them. But now jump before to the last, you know, while it started maybe 20 years ago, especially last 10 years, or so the number of individuals who are claiming to be transgender has really spiked way beyond the numbers you would expect based on these brain patterns for example. And the demographics of these individuals have changed as well. typically it was disproportionately more men than women and they had a history of gender dysphoria.

1:16:31Now we're getting more women, especially adolescents than men. And most of them, as far as I know, don't, I mean, some of them do, but a lot of them don't have this history of gender dysphoria and sex atypical play patterns and other sorts of things that have historically been reliable markers of transgender issues and doing well with the transition if that's what they chose to do. So there's been this huge spike as you know and it's been argued that social media has driven a lot of it. And I think that's right. And I argued that adolescent girls in particular may be at risk for these negative social media influences because during that time, early adolescence, late adolescence, they're really trying to develop this social support network.

1:17:36They're really trying to develop this, you know, a couple of BFFs and feel included and integrated and socially supported and emotionally supported and so forth. That's a really important thing. Now guys go through a similar thing, but they want to be part of a bigger group that works together and so forth. But the girl networks, I think, are more susceptible to social contagion and going along with ideas that maybe are more important than the ones that are going to be a part of a bigger group that works together and so forth. aren't a good idea, just to fit in and to be part of the group and not to get excluded or rejected from the group, which is a bigger concern for girls than it is for boys.

1:18:16And so I think we have a recipe for, combine that with social media and all the media attention, general media attention to these issues. It's now become a political signal rather than a kind of a personal desire. It's like you support this because you support all progressive sorts of things or you're against it because you're against all progressive sorts of things it's really created an environment that I think is going to be Detrimental and is being detrimental to a lot of adolescent and young adults especially girls and This would explain why you have seen a sex difference in the number of after M as opposed to M to F transitions or desires for transition because it you would presume that there's a left -handedness argument that gets used.

1:19:13I'm not sure if you've heard this used before, where during the middle ages people that were left -handed were seen as more likely to be witches. So people hid to the fact that they were left -handed. I think it was around about 2 % of people a a few hundred years ago said that they were, whereas now it's around about 10 to, it's a teens percent, I think, of the population that are left handed. So the argument is, when you stop demonizing people for being their true self, being fully left handed or being a male that identifies the female or vice versa, that people open up, that would be the explanation for why you would see this rampant increase, the fact that we are more, as a society, more accepting of it, but that wouldn't explain why you have this massive increase in F to M as opposed to M to F.

1:20:03And this sex difference appears to be explained a way largely by the raw materials that we went through. Women's desire to fit in. They're a greater social cue ability to absorb that. It also explains why you don't have a completely random distribution of people across the United States, one person out of every 10 schools, one girl out of every 10 schools, one male out of every 30 schools, let's say across the US, it's five girls in one class that all sit at the same table together during lunch. That's right. Yeah, you see these clusters, or in one school district, I think 10 % of the kids, I don't remember what the male female breakdown was, claim to be transgender, non -binary or something, which makes no sense.

1:20:57The other issue that has changed is the regret and detransition rates are going up. From fairly rare, 1 to percent or so, depending on what you look at, the stopping of hormonal treatment can be one out of three or so. So the rates of people kind of changing their mind is going up suggesting that the transgender, the dysphoria, so forth wasn't really related to that. It was due to some other issue. What I find particularly fascinating and kind of morbidly ironic about this situation is that the biological sex differences that men and women have are providing the raw materials to cause increasing volumes of men and women to recant their own sex or at least their on gender identity.

1:21:53So it's almost like a supply and demand of what's going on is happening in a community of people that deny that there are any sex differences. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's a mess. So, right. So, yeah. So you're saying that the adolescent women's girls susceptibility to social contagion has a biological basis to it, which I think it does. In that biological basis, makes them more prone to claim that they're really a guy. It did lie that there are any sex differences. And deny it. They're there. Yeah, it is. It's amazing. People can spend stories for sure. David Geary, ladies and gentlemen, David, I've absolutely adored this.

1:22:47It's been booked on my schedule for about two or three months now, and I've been looking forward to it. It's delivered more than I could have hoped for. First off, what are you working on next? And then secondly, where should people go if they want to keep up to date with your work? Right, so related to sex differences, keep up. I published a third edition of my book, Mail, Female, came out in 2021, so it's pretty up -to -date and I'm pretty anal about documenting things because I know it's controversial and you got to kind of oversight things. On the sex differences thing, the thing I've been working on on and off is I have spare time, you know, I've other things to do, is this tracking sex differences and cognition and behavior as they are related to the sex differences in height.

1:23:43So suggesting, you know, as I mentioned, you know, populations get healthier, sex differences in height get bigger. If there are other biologically -based sex differences that are related to, you know, the health of the brain, for instance, then we should see other differences in spatial abilities, verbal abilities, memory abilities, and so forth emerging. So I work on that on, I've been working on it often on that for a long time. And it's hard to get kind of knockout evidence for it. But there's something there. I just, you know, the data isn't quite there. But I have a number of articles on sex -specific vulnerabilities based on evolutionary theory and basic biology that if anybody emails me, I'm happy to send.

1:24:36David, I really appreciate you. Thank you so much for the day. Great. Thank you. Thank you. I really enjoyed it.

From the publisher

David Geary is a cognitive developmental and evolutionary psychology professor at The University of Missouri and an author.
Men and women are different. This should not be a controversial statement, and yet it is. Thankfully David has spent a career assessing differences between men and women in every domain from physical to psychological and behavioural to cognitive.
Expect to learn the real reason why women are underrepresented in STEM, why achieving true gender equality in prosperous countries is impossible, the massive differences between men's and women's brains, why strength is not the most compelling argument against trans athletes in female sports, why there has been such a rapid increase in transgender youths and much more...
Extra Stuff:
Check out David's writing - https://quillette.com/author/david-c-geary/ 
Get my free Reading List of 100 books to read before you die → https://chriswillx.com/books/
To support me on Patreon (thank you): https://www.patreon.com/modernwisdom
-
Get in touch.
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chriswillx
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/chriswillx
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/modernwisdompodcast
Email: https://chriswillx.com/contact/ 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Modern Wisdom

All 546 episodes
#622 - David Geary - Why Science Says Men & Women Will Never Be The SameModern Wisdom · 1 h 25 min
Listen in VO