In short
Podcast Episode Summary: Modern Wisdom Episode #654 - J. Michael Bailey: Activists Tried To Get This Study Banned
Episode Overview In this episode of the Modern Wisdom podcast, host Chris Williamson speaks with J. Michael Bailey, a psychology professor at Northwestern University and a researcher known for his work on sexual orientation and human sexuality. The discussion centers around Bailey's controversial study on rapid onset gender dysphoria, which faced significant backlash and was retracted by the journal due to pressure from activists.
Key Themes & Concepts
Retraction of the Study
- Background: Bailey's study focused on rapid onset gender dysphoria (ROGD), particularly among adolescent girls who suddenly identify as transgender.
- Retraction Explanation: The study was retracted not due to scientific misconduct but because it angered transgender activists who pressured the publisher, Springer Nature. Bailey argues this was politically motivated.
- Public Response: The retraction has paradoxically increased the article’s visibility, leading to almost 100,000 downloads and extensive media coverage.
Concepts Explored
- Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD):
- Defined as a sudden identification of transgender status, primarily in adolescent girls without prior signs of gender dysphoria.
- Associated with social and mental health issues, with many affected youth demanding medical treatments.
- Findings:
- In a survey of 1,655 parents with children believed to have ROGD, significant mental health issues preceded the identification of gender dysphoria.
- A substantial number of youth reported worsening mental health post-transition, suggesting pressure by gender specialists for social transition.
Analysis of Gender Identity Theories
- Cultural Acceptance vs. Social Contagion:
- One theory suggests that greater societal acceptance has allowed more individuals to express their gender identity.
- The alternative theory posits social contagion, particularly among socially vulnerable adolescents, leading to a higher prevalence of ROGD.
Sexual Orientation and Gender Dysphoria
- Malleability of Sexual Orientation: Discussion on how sexual orientation may be more fluid and malleable in females than in males.
- Bisexuality:
- Bailey discusses the existence of male bisexuality, challenging previous assumptions and acknowledging a subset of bisexual men who respond to both male and female stimuli.
- Paraphilias: The conversation highlights various sexual orientations and paraphilias, including autogonophilia (sexual attraction to the idea of being a woman) and gynandromorphophilia (attraction to transgender individuals).
Societal Implications
- Victim Status: The merging of transgender identity with victim status in society is discussed, suggesting it creates perverse incentives that could harm individuals.
- Cultural Influence: Bailey speculates that men's sexual orientations are less susceptible to societal pressures compared to women, who might adapt based on cultural shifts.
Key Takeaways
- Bailey argues that the scientific inquiry into gender dysphoria is crucial for understanding and addressing the complexities of gender identity.
- The retraction of his study is viewed as an attempt to suppress dissenting viewpoints in academia, which he believes undermines scientific progress.
- Future research aims to provide more comprehensive data on the long-term effects of gender transition in adolescents.
Conclusion This episode dives deep into the complexities surrounding gender identity research, societal expectations, and the implications of sexual orientation, offering listeners valuable insights into a highly topical and contentious area of study. Bailey’s work continues to challenge prevailing narratives in the field, advocating for more open and rigorous scientific discussions.
---
Additional Resources
- For more information, listeners can search for Bailey's work on Google Scholar or contact him via his university email.
- For further reading, explore the book "The Man Who Would Be Queen" by J. Michael Bailey for insights into gender identity and sexual orientation.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00What happened with your recent article? So the short answer is that our recent article has been retracted by the publisher of the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior where it was published Retraction is something I've never had an article retracted before and it's something that I've associated with terrible things like fraud, plagiarism, grievous mistakes. None of that is true about our article. Frankly, and honestly, our article was retracted because of the ideas and the evidence it presented that angered transgender activists and their allies who pressured the publisher who either agreed with them based on politics or chickened out or were worried about business concerns.
1:10I can't read their mind obviously. But I will say that the retraction was a sham. I would also say that the retraction has backfired entirely from their perspective. Our article has gotten far more attention than it ever would have. The publisher, Springer Nature Group, keeps metrics on this. Our article has been downloaded it almost 100 ,000 times, which is, you know, that's not perhaps a big deal for mainstream media, but for an academic article that is extreme. We have received more news coverage. We're about 40, ranked 40 out of 400 ,000 articles of about the same age in terms of media coverage.
2:10Here we are talking, you know, I'm on a big podcast with you and there have been articles and so on. So I'm not hurting. I just want people to download and read our article and don't pay attention to the retraction notice. It's meaningless. If people want to get a hold of the now forbidden article, where should they go? Same place they ever did. Our article was published open access. That means we actually had funding from society for evidence -based gendered medicine, and Sega to publish the article for free reading. Most academic articles have a paywall that non -academics can't get through easily.
3:12There's no paywall. The retraction simply means, for practical purposes, that Springer stamped the words retracted article on every single page of the article, which doesn't affect your ability to read it. And frankly, I wear those words as a badge of honor now. That makes it kind of sexy. It feels like it's a top secret seal. So what's the someone that's listening that wants to go and search? What should they search for on the internet in order to get What I search in order to go to the site to keep track on our current metrics, you know, I'm really waiting for when we get a hundred thousand dollar view.
4:04I'm sorry 100 ,000 views. D .S. D .I .A .Z. Bailey, B .A .I .L .E .Y. R .O .G .D. for Rapid Onset Gender Disphoria, which is what it's about. And then you'll have links to choose from, choose the one that says, Springer, and that'll take you right to the site. You can read the article right there. Okay, so we've flirted with it so far. What was in your forbidden study, which was so reprehensible that caused it to be retracted and stamped with a wax seal? I'll tell you in a moment, but I just want to give a bit of background. This article was published by me and a co -author Susanna Diaz. That is not her real name.
5:03I don't know her real name. She is the mother of a gender dysphoric child whom she believes has rapid onset gender dysphoria, which is rapid onset gender dysphoria is something we need to talk about. I assume that your audience doesn't necessarily know what it is. It's very important. And it is the reason why the trans activists came after us. The evidence that gender dysphoria is the explanation of the surge in cases of gender dysphoria that has happened over the past decade and especially the past five years. The idea is this, a subset of gender -displorant cases. And now it's my far the greatest percentage.
6:02Our adolescent girls who never showed any signs of gender dysphoria in childhood. They were not tomboys, they were not masculine. They did however have issues. A lot of them had some mental health problems, they had some social problems, and so on. In adolescence, they tended to hang out with a crowd that was unconventional and progressive and ideological and they got the idea based on ideology that all of their problems are due to underlying transgender that they never knew of before. They suddenly or rapidly announced or they decided that they were transgender and they announced to their parents.
7:06And many of these girls, it's mainly girls about three quarters. There may be some boys too, but we should talk about them separately. A lot of them are demanding very serious treatments, including medical treatments. They want testosterone, which has very serious effects on the body, and some of them want surgery like the amputation of their breasts. Some of them are getting this. Our evidence in our article is entirely consistent with that. We surveyed 1655 parents of youth whom the parents believed had the syndrome. Three quarters of the youth were girls. The parents said that indeed youth had pre -existing mental health issues and that the mental health issues actually preceded any indication of gender issues by four years.
8:30That's a long time.
8:34The youth who were most likely to socially transition, now social transition means changing their pronouns, changing their style of dress, changing what they call themselves, boy or girl. The youth most likely socially transition were the ones with the most problems. That was also true for medical transition, which was thankfully rare. Only about 7 % had sought, or had obtained medical treatment, whereas about 60 % had taken many steps to social transition. Parents said after they socially transitioned, they got worse. and the best what does what does worse mean they became less happy they became less close to their parents they decompensated and the best predictor of transition was that the family had received a referral to a gender specialist.
9:56And if parents visited a gender specialist, they usually felt that the gender specialist pressured them to transition their child. So there were some Some other interesting findings too, but those were the ones that got people upset. I think those are probably the most important findings because they are consistent with the idea of Rapidonset gender dysphoria. Rapidonset gender dysphoria was first proposed by Lisa Lippman who published the first paper in 2018. She also received tremendous pushback. her the journal where she published her article did not retract it but they did make her make changes to original article and she suffered personal consequences Brown University where she was cut off their ties with her she you know, she lost contracts with Brown University.
11:04Activists cannot stand the idea of rapid onset gender dysphoria. And I understand why, because it is threatening to their belief system, they strongly believe that gender dysphoria is always real and that the best way to proceed is to transition as quickly as possible and furthermore that youth are always right when they say that they are gender dysphoric, that their trans just believe them. All of these are contradicted by the idea of rapid onset gender dysphoria and our study was strongly consistent with the existence of rapid onset gender dysphoria. I will admit that ours is only the second major study of this phenomenon and there's plenty of work to do and I don't think that we've got this nailed shut so that everybody is obligated to see this world as we do.
12:24But it's an important study and instead of trying to silence our research it would then better if the skeptical had done their own studies to try to clarify what they thought was going on, but of course they didn't want to do that. See if I'm right with my conception of the sort of two current explanations for what's going on with regards to the increase that we've seen over the last 10 years or so. One theory posits that the world's degree of acceptance of trans people at large has changed. It's called the left -handedness argument online sometimes, which is that during the middle ages, if you were left -handed, you were often accused of being a witch or a wizard or something, and it would cause you to be ostracized or sometimes killed or punished socially in some form or another, which meant that I think maybe only 3 % of people were left -handed during the middle ages.
13:32But then when left -handedness is no longer seen as wicked and it's socially accepted, I think the true number of left -handed people is closer to maybe 12 %, let's say. So you see an increase in the number of people who Identify is left handed, I suppose they can be their true set their true left handed selves because there is no longer social stigma attached to it there is a camp that argues that the Rapid increase that we have seen in the number of people identifying as transgender over the last decade to two decades or so has been due to this releasing of the glass ceiling and judgment by the group at large.
14:10The alternative theory, which is being put forward, is one of social contagion. That explains why females in particular, the F to M transition, are particularly susceptible to this. Females are more socially aware, socially malleable and influenced. It's part of their sort of intersectional competition and status measuring apparatus that they have a a greater susceptibility to trends around them because they are It's important for them to remain part of the tribe in that regard which would explain a part of the explanation for why girls seem to be more impacted by this ever increasing number. It's almost like a mimetic sort of feedback loop that's occurring How far away am I and what have I missed in terms of that conception of the landscape?
15:02You put it beautifully better than I did. So you should have got me on the paper. I could have been cancelled as well. Yes. Yes. You're considered yourself a co -author on future research. Well, actually, I can take it. I get enough stick on the internet as it is already. Okay, so what is First question, is it impossible for these two worlds to exist together? Is there a blending of rapid onset gender dysphoria with the activist's theory about this? Is there a way that those two worlds could coexist? Certainly. And I suspect they do. It's a question of which is for dominating. Obviously, we'd become much more tolerant of the transgender fairly recently.
15:57I wrote a book in 2003 and people back then thought that transsexuals were really weird, interesting but weird and people were uncomfortable around them. Now I think if anything, their thought to be cool and I'm glad that tolerance has increased for the transgender but I also think that it's important to realize that there may be trade -offs. I don't think we need to be intolerant but I do think that we need to be aware that attitudes affect what people choose to do. Being transgender is partly a decision that a person makes. Take a very, for example, a very masculine female. Well, she might decide, well, you know, I'm just a masculine teenage girl.
17:11I like playing baseball, you know, I'll just be a girl. Or she may say, well, gosh, you know, I could imagine being a boy plus, you know, I get a lot of cred if I am transsexual. and also really something we haven't mentioned yet, which is happening, which I think is negative, is the binding up of transgender identity and victim status. And I just think that that's a problem with our world right now that we're promoting victim status, not just among the transgender, But all kinds of phenomena and I just think it's very negative. It creates a perverse incentive for people to Pedestalize things which are actually negative in the long term.
18:11Yes, self -harm. You know, self -harm gives you a degree of prestige somehow in whatever upside down basketball world it is. There is now an incentive for people to do a thing which there should be a disincentive for them to do. So, there is social renown now for self -harm or for multiple personality disorder. I don't know whether you saw on TikTok last year there was a trend of people that would have their others, I can't remember what the word was, it's like the other versions of them would come out and I'm a this person and I'm a that person. which again, you know, I'm pretty sure who's the guy that created Eugenics, who was the dude that did it in the 1900s, Francis Galton.
18:59Francis Galton managed to make himself go insane by worshipping a doll as a deity, right? My point being that you can induce all manner of crazy psychological maladies if you believe them hard enough. So I don't want to wear it on Galton Because I don't know what you're just talking about and I do know a fair about Fair amount about Galton, but what the other thing that you said the key thing is absolutely true and really important and really fascinating that if people believe they can enact all kinds of things and when I say enact I don't mean they're pretending exactly They're acting as if They're acting in accordance with their beliefs.
19:51This is not the first go -around for multiple personality disorder. We had an epidemic in the early 1990s that was associated with an epidemic of recovered memories of sexual abuse. This was young women typically who went to therapy with a therapist who believed in this, who persuaded these women that their fathers typically had severely sexually abused them repeatedly over years despite these women never having any memory of this. And of course these memories, these recovered memories were false, they didn't happen. And a subset of these women also came to believe that they were more personality disorder.
20:45And I think that this, what's happening now with ROGD, rapid onset gender dysphoria is the same thing. And the women, the big difference is that the girls, this is happening to are getting it younger. 14, 15, 16 instead of 24, 25, 26. And they're getting it from their peers rather than a therapist. Otherwise, I suspect the same kinds of people are involved at both epidemics, both times. Why would it be the case that there are psychological risk factors like OCD autism spectrum disorder and a few others. Why would they be predictive of ROGD? Autism gets thrown around a lot as very common. I am not as impressed as many people are by the evidence for autism.
21:52For one, the diagnosis of autism has become so vague. I don't even know what it means anymore. It's become quite overdiagnosed. The youth in our study did have an excess of formal diagnoses, but they were very general anxiety and depression. Why would women with these emotional problems have this susceptibility. I'm not sure the 1990s epidemic these were somewhat older individuals and so they had more time to get accurate diagnoses and the number one associated diagnosis was borderline personality disorder which is associated with identity disturbance, not knowing exactly who you are, what you want to be, being manipulative, being prone to extreme emotions.
23:03Now, do I have an explanation why it's they who are most susceptible to these false ideas? I don't think I do. I don't think I do. I had a conversation with David Geary a couple of months ago and David fascinating guy absolutely fascinating phenomenal episode and one of the things that I learned when speaking to him he was the first person that introduced me to the concept of rapid onset gender dysphoria. the group that another ideology that would be associated with some of the people who seem to be suffering rapid onset gender dysphoria would be a denial of biological differences between men and women.
23:53The fascinating thing that's oddly sort of recursive and cyclical and almost ironic if it wasn't so odd, is that the very reason that we have a sex difference in the number of F to M transitions is precisely because of the biological difference between men and women. It is the biological difference between men and women that predisposes these very goals to the increased susceptibility of transition, and that's the same group that is denying it. So it's both the supply and the demand and the denial kind of all rolled up into one. Do you know what I mean? Yeah, they have a very strange set of beliefs that are mutually contradictory.
24:36For example, they believe in the idea of innate gender identity that may be hidden and so on. But if it's an innate gender identity, then and that men usually have one and women usually have another, that's got to be a biological difference. Yeah, I, I, I think that their science is not very coherent scientific. I don't think that's going to be a very useful way to persuade them. What are the given you've had this relative landmark study, you know, one of only two massive end size of whatever it was 1655 pairs? 1655 parents, okay. According on each parent reporting on a child of theirs. Yeah, yeah.
25:37What are the implications of this moving forward? What have you thought about sort of next steps and such? Well, my next step, I'm an academic, I'm a researcher, I'm not a clinician. I think that we need to get better and more detailed evidence. And I'm involved in what I think is going to be a really important study that is about to launch the Summers in collaboration with Lisa Libman, who is the person who first studied Rapidance at gender dysphoria, and Ken Zooker, who is one of the world's leading experts in gender dysphoria. All three of us have been canceled at least once, so we're the the lab, canceled collaboration, but we also are experts who are unafraid to stay in here.
26:45In this study, we're going to be recruiting both gender dysfork adolescents directly and their families. And we have a very extensive survey about mental health and gender feelings about gender history of gender steps taken toward transition and so on. We hope to enroll thousands and we're going to follow these people up over five years at least to see how they turn out and to see how that affects happiness. are the ones who transition going to eventually be happier than the ones who didn't. For example, that's a big question. Fascinating. Yeah, I suppose it's one of those things where being able to spin explanations without the scientific backing can be done at lightning speed, but being able to test the hypotheses with science is actually a pretty arduous task.
27:47So you were always going to be playing catch up behind whatever the wake is that's left in terms of people's bro signs That's exactly right We sometimes have been frustrated ourselves the scientific process is Slow in part for bureaucratic reasons. We have to be very careful to get ethics approval for this which by the way was the reason the ostensible reason, not the true reason, the ostensible reason why my latest article was retracted. What's the story there? What was the reason that they gave you? The reason was this. Susanne Diaz is not an academic. She just went ahead and put up a survey.
28:39She's allowed to do that. She's allowed to publish such a survey. I am an academic. I have constraints. Any research that I do, I have to get approved by something called an institutional review board IRB for ethics. Now the data were already collected. It's too late to go through IRB. I checked with my IRB and they said, well, she didn't have to. And you seem to be okay being a co -author on this. But Susanna have not done this very legalistic thing that was a conventional informed consent, which is basically, this is exactly what you're going to be doing, do you consent? That is what Springer said was lacking.
29:44That's why they retracted the article. Here's why that's ridiculous. She made it very clear to parents what the actually completing the survey. The last line of the survey said, we're going to publish this online when we get enough data and that's something that Springer also said. You didn't tell them that their data were going to be published. Well, of course they want this published. They believe these parents are sick of of ROGD being shoved to the side, being silenced. That's part of the reason why they wanted to participate in the first place. So that's the reason they gave. I don't believe it for a second, but you know in our new research that we will be launching soon, we went through all the IRB procedure.
30:51We are so covered that there's not going to be any chance of any problem like that. Moving on to some of the other work that you've done. What is the typical sexual orientation of F2M and M2F people who identify as trans?
31:12Well, I want to start with what was typical 20 years ago and before, which was pretty well established. Back then most F2Ms, that is natal females who wanted to come men. First of all, they were adults before they were able to achieve that. There was no transitioning of children or even adolescents. Almost all of the female the males were female attracted or in the vernacular of sexology, homosexual female, male, transsexuals, though about 10 % were attracted to men. For male the female, these are natal female, I'm sorry, natal males who want to become women, there were two types. The first type was the type perhaps we are most familiar with, the kind that comes to mind immediately.
32:37It would be a male who was feminine from early childhood, little boy who wanted to be a girl who became an adolescent who was basically a girl and then when he could get surgery he did in adulthood. That type was male attracted and sexology called that a homosexual male to female transsexual.
33:08Jazz Jennings, I don't know if you know who Jazz Jennings is, she's a reality TV show. I have consider her that type though I'm less sure now for various reasons but the other type is at least as common but it is quite unfamiliar because nobody talks about it and it is autogonophilic male to female transsexualism. Otagonophilia is a sexual orientation, I guess, whereby a man is sexually aroused by the idea of being a woman.
33:57Most of these natal males are attracted to other people in the world and they're attracted to women. But they are also attracted to and sometimes much more attracted to a woman that they create inside themselves. It starts typically in adolescence where they will put on their mothers panties and bra, look at themselves in the mirror and master fatigistic cross -dressing. Many of them will have fantasies about having breasts in a vulva and some of them will actually do what they need to to get those.
34:48Otagonifilia is very controversial because trans activists have tried to to sweep it under the rug. They're embarrassed by it. I'm not. I don't judge these people. Also many autogonophilic transgender persons experience the theory as a narcissistic injury because it really means a lot to them to think of themselves as like women. But I'm saying in the theory says, not my theory, it's something that I endorse, but I didn't come up with it. The theory says, they're not like women. then there are men with this weird sexuality. And that hurts their feelings. So I published a book in 2003 called The Man Who Would Be Queen and only about a third of the book was about adult transsexualism, including Audigua Nafilia, and the trans activists back then, a few of them got so mad at what I wrote that they tried to run my life.
36:18Briefly, I thought they might.
36:23But, you know, they did back then what is happening to our paper now, they caused a strison effect. So more and more people have heard of otagonifilia, including
36:46persons with otagonifilia. And I want to stress that many of the many otagonifilic males are great people. In my experience if they are open and honest, they're admirable. I have many autogunifilic followers on Twitter. I have some autogunifilic friends and and so on. And these people are angry at the activists who have tried to censor any discussion about agonophilia. It has prevented us from knowing things like the best way that agonophilic individuals should live their lives. Should they transition? Should they not transition? We don't know. The study studies haven't been done because people haven't even felt free to ask the questions.
Read the full transcript
37:58Is there a natal female equivalent? Have you ever come across anyone that is the opposite of auto -gain affiliate. This is controversial and that should be the preface for every single sentence that you say. This is controversial I would say scientifically. I don't think anybody is politically upset about this at least yet. Give it time. So the word for that would be auto -andro -filia and I I know transgender persons who insist that there really is auto -androphilia. There's a guy who named Phil Ile Phil Ile, Ile, why I think he's about to publish a book called AutoHeader Sexuality. Very smart guy, but he believes that auto -endrophilia occurs commonly among transgender females.
39:19I am less convinced. You know, I'm being a hard -ass scientist. You know, maybe, but I kind of doubt it because male and female sexuality are of different. Otagonifilia is something that requires a male type sexuality, which is very focused and fixed and strong. Otagonifilia occurs sporadically, a male finds out on his own and becomes even though he's never heard of it before, it dominates his early sex life. And I'm really kind of skeptical that that happens in natal females, but we'll see. Does that, if someone, and if it's common that somebody that's never heard of it before, kind of stumbles upon this thing, this particular interest, this orientation, Does that suggest that there is a biological disposition precursor?
40:30I would bet more money than I have that we will find that eventually. I think Otagana Fili is strongly biological. Now, can I prove that? No. But what is going to make a 14 year old boy decide to put on his mother's panties and go into the bathroom and look at himself and become aroused and so on. Nobody teaches him that. You know, there's a lot of interest now, especially among general critical types about something called Sissy Hypno porn, which is it's a type of pornography consumed by Otogonophilic males and they're saying that this porn is creating Otogonophilic. Well, I don't believe it.
41:30I feel like these guys have this interest in they're finding the porn. I don't think anything plausibly is going to raise this idea in somebody that doesn't already have the interest. The other word that I learned when looking at some of your work is Guy Nandromor Fulfilia. One of the longest words I think I've ever said in my life. What's Guy Nandromor Fulfilia? Guy Nandromor Fulfilia. So I'm going to say a word that I think is fine, but some people are touchy about it. Guy Nander Morpheelia is sexual attraction to she -mails. What I mean by a she -mail is an adult male trans woman who has both breast and a penis still.
42:32I can see it in my mind. Yep. Well, it's not hard to find it online. That is a kind of pornography I have come across. And it actually is quite a common form of pornography. And even I think just plain old normal straight men get into that sometimes. But they're different than the kind of men who need that and prefer it. And for example, I had a girlfriend at one time whose ex -husband had that preference. and in order for them to have sex, they needed to bring a picture of a Gmail on the computer screen so he could look at it and become a rouse. That became a problem for her. I can imagine that that would create complications, yes.
43:41Yeah, but that's, you know, some other just plain old,
43:50I just I think don't have the hang up about the penis being there too. This is what you know back in the 90s you know on Alan Partridge which is a famous British comedy show. One of his friends that turns out was going to Thailand and he comes back and all he wants to hear about is the lady boys. He's all he wants to hear about is lady boys. Tell me about the lady boys. He keeps on saying. Yeah. That's right. The lady boys. That's that's what they are. Yeah, they still tour as ladyboys of Bangkok in the UK I don't know if that's the same in the US, but I mean the posters everywhere for ladyboys of Bangkok To my knowledge they don't come here, but You know there are Gmail Escorts that you can find online I knew In writing my book, the 2003 book called The Man Who Would Be Queen, I actually at that time knew some transsexual prostitutes, some of whom had worked as she -male prostitutes and then they got surgery and continue to work as female prostitutes.
45:14Opening opening up to as many markets as possible. Yeah, yeah. Well, the one that I'm thinking of preferred the the men who liked women to the men who liked females. I think she thought that the ones who like she males, I don't know, that they treated her differently as a very interesting. So this is an obvious follow -up, which is, is this a new category of sexual orientation? Are these people closer to gay? People, are they closer to straight people? Great question. And so I can answer the second part that question. They are very close to straight people. They're not at all gay. Guys who get into she -mails.
46:07So if we bring these guys in the lab and we show them pornography featuring just women and the kind that we use in this situation is two women having sex with each other. female female porn and male male male porn. Those are the kind best kind of stimuli because if somebody gets aroused there's no ambiguity about who they're getting aroused by. Guys who are into she -mails get aroused to the females but not the males. But they get slightly more aroused to videos of two females getting it on. And that's a little different than typical straight men who get more aroused by two females and two females.
47:02But neither or gay men, gay men or morphophiles, nor regular straight men get aroused to men getting it on. Right. Next, next obvious follow up question to that is, I've heard you say that heterosexual women are genetically indifferent. What does that mean? I would say not just genetically indifferent there, I think that their conscious feelings are indifferent in the laboratory to erotica. So if we bring women into the lab and we show them in the same kinds of stimuli. Two men having sex, two women having sex. Straight women, showing indifferent pattern of genital arousal. They get equally aroused to both by both, and they get, and they say, they get equally aroused by both.
48:07Now, they don't get that aroused psychologically. psychologically. They don't straight women do not get as aroused to watching either kinds of erotic stimuli that I just mentioned as either straight men do or gay men do. But it is interesting that they seem to show this flat pattern. Lesbians in contrast do show both a genital preference and a subjective preference for female stimuli. Is there a vestigial arousal among lesbians for men?
48:55lesbians do get more roused by male stimuli than they do to nature scenes. But what about do they get more aroused to gay men than gay men do to lesbians?
49:13These questions are hard to answer. These are the studies that we need, Michael. These are the hard Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Not charging questions that we need. Well, they're hard to answer because the kinds of apparatus that you must use to measure genital arousal in men differs from that that you must use to measure them women. And the best evidence that we have, we've taken it out of the genitals into the brain. we've done FMRI scanning of people looking at erotic stimuli. And it pretty much shows the same patterns as the genital stuff does. And your excellent question, I think I'm going to have to hold off answering because I don't remember.
50:16That's fine. So we kind of, I remember I had a conversation with Christina Duranty and she taught me about a study where they brought women into a lab and they sat them down opposite two different guys. One guy was really nerdy and one guy was kind of a bad boy leather jacket and sort of like coft hair and stuff like that. And they analyzed the verbal responses and the physical responses that women had to each of these different men. Now they had a Oscar -winning film writer, some award -winning film writer, write the script that the gentleman actor was using. So it's like, you know, if you were going to cut it, the cool guys, like, if you come with me, I'll show you the best night of your life and it's going to be really cool.
51:10But I don't really cares, so it kind of, it doesn't really matter so much, but very, very high status, prestige prestige prestige. Whereas on the other hand, the other guy was something else. Now the interesting thing is, it was the same guy. The same guy was playing both roles. They just styled him differently in his mannerisms, had been adjusted. One of the most interesting takeaways was there was a number of lesbian female attracted women who were in the study. And when they looked at their behavior with the lower status man, it seemed relatively straightforward. When they looked at their behavior with the highest status man, even though they had a self -report of not being attracted to him and their verbal behavior wasn't particularly forthcoming, their non -verbal behavior was much more flirtatious.
51:58So they were playing with the hair more, they were kind of leaning in, they were pounding a little bit more and what that kind of suggested to me, which I think kind of leads into some of your work, is that even for women who are not attracted to men, for a very long time, men have been the gatekeepers to so much with regards to survivability, reproduction, protection, resources, etc. That it feels like even exclusively female attracted women, just keep this skill set in the locker room somewhere, where if they need to deploy it because the Chieftains come over and she's just finished up with her girlfriend that nobody knows about secretly in a cave somewhere, that she can still kind of turn it on.
52:47And I thought that that was really interesting. That is really interesting. I wasn't familiar with that. Also, I think that Lesby and the women who are identify as lesbians are not as exclusively female attracted as gay men are male attracted even if they might deny that lesbians are more likely than gay men to become non -lesbians. Relapse. They'd go back. Yeah, there's a researcher named Lisa Diamond who has studied something she calls female fluidity which refers to women's greater propensity to, I don't know, become romantically interested in somebody regardless of their natal sex. And not all women do this and there are some, you know, let's say gold star lesbians who would never go for a man, but I think there are more lesbians who have the capacity for sexual attraction to men.
54:06Okay, so in your opinion, then, is male sexual, men's sexual orientation is more fixed and And it's absolutely is more malleable. Absolutely. And that's part of the reason why men, but not women, not many women, have parapherias, which are these weird sexual interests. Utterganophilia is a parapheria, but some others are, for example, pedophilia, sexual traction of children. What's the amputee one? What's that one? That is called acrotomophilia. Yeah, right. Yes, which we've been studying. There's an zoophilia attraction to animals. Lipophilia, which is attraction to morbidly obese people and the guys who are into them tend to be just normal weight guys.
55:04And we just we have a paper that is about to be published. It's accepted. and I'm working on the proofs now, which I think is, he modestly says, I think it's very interesting, but we studied guys into amputees, guys into animals, and guys into the really huge fat people. And for each of these three kinds of parafilius, a lot of these guys also have the Inversion they are actually aroused by the idea of becoming Yes, I think fat person and animal which you know And and I think we have about 10 Guys into amputees who've actually managed somehow to get amputations Wow. So I first learned this from Dr.
56:05James Cantor and spoke to him about it and he described it in this really lovely way, which was a lot of the sexual, let's just call it, a lot of the paraphernalies that people have and the odd fetishes that people are turned on by is reflected both outwardly and inwardly. So there are people who are attracted to amputees, there are people who see themselves as amputees. They have their limbs, they have all of their but they feel like they should not. They feel like they shouldn't have that. He also, I don't know whether you believe that, this is true, said that there are people who are attracted to children and there are people who see themselves as children.
56:43There are men often who want to be dressed up as babies. We did the first study of this. Kevin, my PhD student, Kevin Sue, and I did a first study of auto -peteraphilia. And that's right. And the most ethical form of pedophilia. Yeah, and when a really interesting finding of that study was that men some of these men are attracted to boys some are attracted to girls well the the guys who are attracted to girls are sexually aroused by the idea of being a little girl Not a little boy, which is interesting So you have, that is a great way to prove that the relationship outwardly and inwardly is the same because otherwise you wouldn't have this relationship between the two.
57:40That's so interesting. Why is everyone not a sex researcher? Why is everyone not doing paraphernalia sex research? I feel the same way. So interesting. Oh, okay. So in your opinion, does bisexuality truly exist in men? Like how accurate do you think the stereotype is that bisexual women are really straight and that bisexual men are really gay?
58:06In I think it was 2005 we published a paper that failed to find evidence that male bisexuality truly existed where by that I mean that men in the laboratory would show arousal to both men and to women. That did not make us popular. We were, you know, got us into the news but not liked. We have kept studying this by me and my then -Gradwood student now, he's a professor in England, Geryl, Friger, and we've gotten several hundred subjects in the lab. And two years ago, we published in Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences a paper in which we showed beyond the shadow of a doubt that male bisexuality truly exists.
59:24There is a subset of bisexual men who clearly produce a rousal to male stimuli and to female stimuli. Most of them are somewhat more roused by one sex than by the other. they're not exactly predominantly gay or predominantly straight bisexual. Yeah, but they're they're a bit bisexual. Yes, so I now believe for sure in male bisexuality. At the same time, if you talk to gay men, ask just ask them this question. Did you ever say you were bisexual? About half a gay man will say, yeah, then you say, well, were you really bisexual and they say, no? So it really does happen that some men misrepresent being bisexual, but it also seems to happen that some men are bisexual as I would understand that.
1:00:30And this is a small cohort and also it's difficult to stress test whether this is the thin end of the wedge en route to becoming a fully fledged member of the gay community or whether you're actually going to just stop it, they'll let it be. Yeah, that's interesting. What about environmental influences on sexual orientation? So we have at the moment in Korea a very sort of sex negative culture, which you'll probably be familiar with where there is the four B's movement, women who are recanting, I can't remember what the four different B's stand for it's in Korean, but it's men and patriarchy and family and work or kids or something like that.
1:01:15And it is downstream of a whatever less than one birth rate and it's everything's career's just a mess. But that seems like whether it be outright celibacy slash abstinence or turning to lesbianism, I don't know whether that's true. That is a sexual orientation response to an ecological or environmental cue. right? Something has happened that has changed maybe the sex ratio, maybe the make value of the potential available partners that are around downstream from that. We have declining birth rates across the West too. We have an increase in cohort of high performing women and an increase in cohort of underperforming men.
1:02:06Hypogamously that means that maybe women are going to be struggling to find men that are of the make value that they would desire even though we're in a society which has been the most sort of sex positive, ostensibly than it's ever been, I think that there is a bit of a sex recession going on, there's a great article in the Atlantic about this. So with all of this folded together, how malleable is sexual orientation in response to the local environment and could you foresee a future given where we're at sexually and with the mating crisis at the moment that this could continue in the future?
1:02:43This is another one of those times when it's important to distinguish male and female sexuality. And this is what I'm going to say is speculative because this hasn't been established and there's a lot of disagreement. But my gut sense is that men's sexuality is not going to be responsive to cultural pressure much. I say much because there are parts of the world where men will have sex with other men, other males. Let's not call them men. If the males are presenting as very feminine and perhaps transgender. So for example, in Samoa, there's a natal males who are considered a third sex called the Fafafina.
1:03:51You got the lady boys in Thailand and so on. It's pretty common for just plain old straight men to have sex with these natal males. Now, I don't think that makes them gay. They're not having sex with men. They're seeing these people as female like. But I don't think there's anything, any kind of cultural change. even if I could build society from the ground up, that would make straight men want to have sex with each other. I think women are likely different and more responsive to cultural factors. And perhaps also things like bad experiences with men, there's a, you know, this belief that when route to lesbianism is being mistreated by men, we don't know that's true, but I find it plausible.
1:05:01But I don't think that women mistreating men is going to make them go gay. No, that's fascinating. One thing that I've been considering a lot is you've been talking about the thin line between what being gay means physically and what it means in terms of appearance. There's an interesting question. Is a very voluptuous big boob, big lips, long hair, Thailand, lady boy type presenting person more female than a very shaven head, sort of more androgenous body type, but vagina owning woman. And there's a really interesting question going on here, but you know that you highlighted there in some over its refer to as a third gender.
1:06:04You know, there's a lot of accusations from the left of genital fetishism, which you might have heard of, which is that you're actually being, you're addicted to the genitals as opposed to the presentation, but there is an interesting question given that our sexuality is so easily fooled. We are such rampant sexual beings that a six inch by four inch screen that has a small depiction of sex happening on it is enough to fool our brain to think there's some sex happening here. No, there isn't. There was some sex happening there a long time ago and now you can see around the side of it. You know that it's not here.
1:06:51You know that you're not getting any of this. That illusion is responsible for the internet. Correct. So my point being that you already can see, as soon as you accept the fact that porn is an effective stimuli, you accept the fact that it is not exclusively about the action, it's about the presentation, right? Is it just a difference of degree, not a difference of kind, all the way down to the more female presenting regardless of whether it's an XX or XY chromosome person? It really starts to blur the line between what is and is not classed as a same sex or an opposite sex attracted sexual orientation?
1:07:41Yeah. I think that all we have for the most part are senses and, you know, men, especially, but humans in general are very visual species. And you're absolutely right that some trans women, even those who still have a penis, can look white. They look like really attractive women, although often you can kind of see the remnants of their maleness and their bone structure or something like that. But yeah, and I think that in those cases, men who don't feel attracted to them or say they don't. That's more likely to be mental, you know, some kind of aversion, an idea. Like that person is a man, not a woman.
1:08:45So despite the fact that they look like a really attracted woman, I can't go there. Yeah, it's so fascinating. So I've seen this, you know, I've seen this argument happen on dating shows or on a right -wing commentary channels and stuff like that around no, because that would be gay. I'm like, is it more gay to have sex with what looks like a nine out of ten woman body shape, size, voice, presentation, actions, everything with a penis, then it is to have the exact opposite. All of the presentation factors of a man could be on testosterone, could be all of the rest of it, but has a vagina that it's a really, really fascinating question.
1:09:35You know, this sort of, it falls in line with the number of other arguments, this sort of more biological essentialism side of things, especially the people that would say, unless you can change your chromosomes and even not then, if you're a natal male, I'm calling you a man, if you're a natal female, I'm calling you a woman for the rest of time. So, it's a suite of beliefs, I suppose, all of which are interplay with each other and would also cascade down from there. But yet, it's a really, really fascinating consideration around what it means. And this is when you get into the deeper and deeper into the layers of paraffelia and and the nuances of sexual orientation, it all kind of starts to break apart.
1:10:15It's like the quantum level of sex research, I suppose. Yes, yes, we are going on the outskirts here. What about people's gay dars? Do you think that most of us have an accurate gay dare? Yeah, this is again something we've studied quite a bit and yeah, people have a much better than chance GADAR No, it's not perfect But they are much better at than chance at discerning whether a man is GADR straight and they rely So gay men, you know, just their outward appearance in the West currently is not necessarily very feminine, although I think gay men might present themselves more attractively than straight men.
1:11:18But it's more things like movement, you know. And speech, speech patterns are... Yeah, you found there's like a gay accent. There's a gay accent, yes. What is the gay accent?
1:11:37So we know it when we hear it, and actors can often effect the gay accent, even if they're straight. There's interestingly, there's a lesbian accent too. I think gay accent may tend to be more expressive, and gay men articulate more clearly than straight men and lesbians have the opposite. They're less expressive and they don't articulate as clearly. Do you think is that in any way gay men modeling female speech patterns? Are there any parallels there? Yeah, you ask great questions and you know, so nobody knows and I think there are two at least two good hypotheses there. One is that unconsciously growing up gay men, you know, some of them they had somewhat feminine gender identity and they did model.
1:12:45The other is that there's something about gay men's brain, which is somewhat feminized and produces the speech better. Nobody knows. Well, when it comes to the ability to present clearly my speech coach that I use for the podcast is gay, classically trained in theater, classically trained in improv, for not just an outrageous communicator, and probably the best communicator that I've had on the show is Douglas Murray, who is also a human miles in my speech culture, like two peas in a pod that have never met. But just phenomenal, like out of this world precision, with his ability to remain cool and depression, to be able to communicate in a very precise way, to be able to use inflection and drama and whimsy, and to then be able to pull it back without being fragile, just phenomenal.
1:13:44And so yeah, I wonder, Andrew Doyle as well, Satur is from the UK that runs the Tatanya McGrath, a Twitter account. I wonder whether being gay is a competitive advantage in the world of online commentary, perhaps. But yeah, all of that stuff so interesting, and you're right, is all that you kind of... I don't think I've been around sufficient lesbians to be able to say that I could pick up on that. The only real things that I ever noticed with Lesbian to sort of the dress, I think that Lesbian seemed to dress significantly more differently to normal women than Gays do to the hair man. Yeah, the plaid shirts, the baggy jeans.
1:14:33Yeah, gay men dress somewhat differently, more stylishly, at least. It's just better usually. Yeah, that's right. That's right. Yeah, very funny. What was that paper that you did about male mate value being more malleable than female mate value? you. That's an old one.
1:15:02Yeah, the student who was the lead author on that was interested in the explaining the sex difference in the in depression. Women are more likely to get depressed than men are and she hypothesized that it could be because women's made value is more tied to their looks, which she said you can't do that much about whereas men, they're accomplishments which you can. And she got some evidence for that. I'm not sure that I, that's an old paper and I'm not sure I believe the theory, because, you know, So if women really can't do that much about their looks, what's the cosmetics industry doing? And it's not that easy for a man to go out and double his income.
1:16:05So anyway, but that's what the paper was about. Yeah, so I find I had a conversation with Ed Hagen as well recently and Ed did a study where they controlled for upper body strength when looking at differences in depression and anxiety and when you control for upper body strength the differences between men and women get smaller and smaller and smaller and then essentially go away. And the reason that I was interested in discussing my liability of mate value is that it's a common discussion that's had on the internet. And it's borne out of a contest between men and women about who's got it worse.
1:16:48It's like, well, it's easy for you because you just need to go and get a boob job, but I can't make myself any taller. And when I was there, it's easy for you because, you know, at 21, I reach my peak sexual market value and it's all downhill hill from there and you get to continue to accrue status and resources. And it's very much sort of two people talking different languages that the sexual brains, the sexual attraction mechanism that works for men, what they want from women and for women, what they want from men are not the same. It's not you can't play a balancing act here. There is no ability to work out the equity, there's no exchange rate between these two.
1:17:31Like how many boob jobs is three inches of height worth? Do you know what I mean? Like there is no way of us doing it. Oh well, you could wear high heels and put makeup on, but you can go out for five years and increase your earning potential by 40%. Like what does that even mean? When we're talking about this, I had a theory, which I thought maybe total horse shit, so I'm going to try and bring it back up again. I had a theory that male mate value to the individual is more malleable and to the group is less malleable and female individual mate value is less malleable and to the group it's more malleable.
1:18:13That you basically have as a man there are more degrees of freedom that you can move yourself on and there is a longer timeline that you can do it on, specifically because of the fact that, you know, a guy who's 35 is more attractive than a guy who's 25 to most women on average. And I don't know when that peaks probably in your mid to late 30s, perhaps. But even then, you know, Leonardo DiCaprio has been acquiring and disposing of under 25 year old girlfriends, regularly for like two decades now. So with sufficient status and resources, you can continue to cycle through that. But yeah, what do you, what's your mindset at now when it comes to malleability, especially with this facing this mating crisis and people having concerns around being able to be seen by the other sex?
1:19:05Well, I think that in the sense that I understand I think we're probably very malleable. The culture has changed tremendously in a fairly short time and it's gonna, guessing it will change tremendously still. I hope it changes back in certain ways because I'm not that happy with certain things now. But that's a different question than, do I know how to change it? And I do not. And that has to do with male female interactions as much as academic freedom, both of which, well the latter concerns me more now. Michael Bailey, ladies and gentlemen, Michael, I really, really appreciate your work, any opportunity to dig into people that are looking into sex is fascinating for me.
1:19:59I've immensely enjoyed talking to you. I hope that we get more chances either in person or back here, whatever. I have a question. I have a laundry list of things that we didn't get to talk about to do with sexual arousal patterns, virtuous pedophiles, the birth order effect of homosexuality so we can absolutely run this back. Let me know once your new paper is out. As a reminder for the people who want to check out your article and also follow you online and stuff like that, where should they go? Where would you want to direct them? I am a boring academic week. You can go to Google Scholar and search for J Michael papers as well or email me at my university address.
1:21:01It's J .M. Hyphen, Bailey, B .A .I .L .E .Y. at northwestern .edu. And I'll try to help you if you need it. Yeah, nothing fancy for me. Michael, I appreciate you. Thank you. Thank you.
From the publisher
J. Michael Bailey is a Northwestern University professor of psychology, researcher, and an author known for his work on sexual orientation and human sexuality.
Scientific research has had public scrutiny for a long time. But Michael's most recent study was placed under so much pressure from upset dissidents that the journal formally retracted it. Today we get to find out just why human sexuality is such a dangerous topic to look into.
Expect to learn what it's like to be in the middle of a global cancellation furore, what exactly the concept of gynandromorphophilia is, how malleable your sexual orientation actually is, whether lesbians are more likely to become straight again, if bisexuality actually exists, how accurate our gaydars and much more...
Sponsors:
Get 20% discount on Bubs Naturals at https://www.bubsnaturals.com/ (use code MODERNWISDOM)
Get 15% discount on Mud/Wtr at http://mudwtr.com/mw (use code MODERNWISDOM)
Get 15% discount on your first order from Collars&Co at https://collarsandco.com/ (use code: MW15)
Extra Stuff:
Get my free Reading List of 100 books to read before you die → https://chriswillx.com/books/
To support me on Patreon (thank you): https://www.patreon.com/modernwisdom
-
Get in touch.
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chriswillx
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/chriswillx
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/modernwisdompodcast
Email: https://chriswillx.com/contact/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices




