#812 - Mike Baker - Emergency Episode: Former CIA Agent On Trump Assassination Attempt

17 Jul 2024 · 1 h 12 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Modern Wisdom Podcast Episode #812 Summary

Episode Overview Title: #812 - Mike Baker - Emergency Episode: Former CIA Agent On Trump Assassination Attempt Description: In this emergency episode, host Chris Williamson speaks with former CIA officer and security expert Mike Baker about a recent assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump. The discussion is raw and unfiltered, focusing on security failures and the implications for political discourse.

---

Key Themes and Discussions

Intelligence vs. Logistical Failures

  • Baker emphasizes that the incident should be viewed as a logistical failure rather than an intelligence failure.
  • The Secret Service's standard security protocols were not followed, highlighting major security breakdowns during the event.
  • Importance of a thorough investigation to determine the exact failures that led to the incident.

Security Protocols and Responsibilities

  • The Secret Service has primacy in establishing security perimeters around high-profile individuals.
  • Local law enforcement was involved but was not adequately equipped to handle security risks effectively.
  • Baker suggests that there was a series of compounding failures rather than a singular error.

Political Discourse and Rhetoric

  • The episode discusses how political rhetoric may incite violence and create dangerous situations.
  • Baker cites the example of inflammatory language from both sides of the political spectrum, comparing it to the rhetoric surrounding Adolf Hitler.
  • There's a concern that such rhetoric could lead irrational individuals to take drastic actions, as illustrated by the assassination attempt.

Investigative Transparency

  • Baker believes that the investigation into the incident should be transparent due to the public nature of the event and the availability of footage.
  • He predicts that there will be an internal review within the Secret Service and possibly some external investigations.

Future Threats and Security Measures

  • The threat of political violence remains, particularly leading up to the upcoming elections.
  • Baker stresses the need for heightened security measures and a more robust security package for candidates, especially those with high profiles like Trump.

Political Ramifications

  • The assassination attempt has changed the political landscape, potentially giving Trump a "victim card" that could shift perceptions of him.
  • Baker contemplates whether Biden's presidency could be affected by the incident, possibly leading to more sympathy for Trump and a reevaluation of Biden's effectiveness as a leader.

Election Dynamics

  • The conversation touches on how the political climate will evolve leading up to the elections and how candidates will adjust their discourse.
  • Baker warns that a return to divisive rhetoric is likely, despite any temporary pauses following the incident.

Media and Public Perception

  • Baker discusses how social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) played a critical role in disseminating information during the event, contrasting it with traditional media narratives.
  • The discussion also highlights the importance of public perception and how images and narratives can quickly influence opinions.

---

Key Takeaways

  • A significant breakdown in security protocols led to the assassination attempt on Trump.
  • Both political rhetoric and security measures are crucial to the safety of public figures.
  • The incident may shift public perception of Trump, impacting the upcoming election dynamics.
  • Investigative transparency is key to restoring public trust in government agencies.

---

Conclusion The episode provides a deep dive into the implications of the assassination attempt, examining how security failures, political rhetoric, and media narratives converge to shape public perception and political landscapes. Baker's insights as a former CIA officer lend a distinct perspective on national security and the complexities surrounding political violence.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00how big of an intelligence failure was this? Well, you have to think of it more as a logistical failure, as opposed to an intelligence failure. This was a breakdown in what should be very standard security protocols. And look, the Secret Service does that very well, but clearly, and you always have to... I'd caveat this with one thing. You have to always wait for an investigation to finish. There, currently in the middle of their own investigation as to what the hell happened. And obviously as soon as this happens, everybody on social media is an executive protection expert. So everybody's talking about exactly how this happened.

0:43Well, well, I think it's important not to get out over your skis, but in a situation like this, clearly, it would be insane to say that there weren't failures, there weren't breakdowns here. And even people with no experience can look at this and say, I'm sorry, how did you not have somebody up on top of a roof that had line of sight to the stage to the rally event? And so typically, look, when something like this happens, and I've done countless, you know, advanced plannings and security assessments and risk and threat assessments, and typically when something happens like this, it's not one thing.

1:24right? It's a it's a it's a series of of mistakes or missteps that compound and then you end up with this this goat rope that never should have happened. So they're doing an investigation. Congress, of course, it's called for an investigation. I wouldn't expect anything to come from that because Washington DC is where all investigations go to die. And but the the bureaus is involved of Secret Service obviously doing their own hot wash, and they sit underneath the Department of Homeland Security. You know, so if DHS does a review, fine, but there's so much video footage of this, right? And it happened in real time with so many people watching and there's so many different angles that I think in this case, unlike sometimes, sometimes you get investigations of an event And you don't get much transparency, right?

2:23Because internally they're trying to figure out, okay, how do we improve this? Well, you don't want to necessarily talk about all that activities because you're informing people who might have nefarious intent. But here, it was clear for everyone to see that there were a significant number of issues and problems. Who's responsibility? Who does the buck ultimately stop with? Well, we're talking about this. Homeland security, secret service, local law enforcement, Well, I think what you're going to find likely is, first of all, in terms of who has primacy on the ground, it's a secret service, right?

2:58So they established a security perimeter. And then, according to at least early reports and what secret service is saying is, then they designated local law enforcement as having control outside that designated security zone, which included the building where the shooter took up position. But that's, you know, ultimately it's the Secret Services responsibility. So they should have obviously said, okay, so what are you doing in relation to those buildings that have a line of sight? And if local law enforcement said, wow, we've got a couple of armed officers that are patrolling the ground. And, you know, interacting with the attendees, that would be like, then you'd say, okay, well, how about you give me a state trooper or one of your local officers up on that rooftop and that went over there.

3:47Any building, right? That's got a line of sight. And you post somebody up there and just cover it down. That secret service is ultimate responsibility, even if theoretically okay on paper, this area over here is under the control local authorities. So there is a procedural problem, there's a command and control problem, there's a communications problem during the course of this rally. I think you'll also find there was some command and control issues in terms of the ability for the sniper or the counter sniper team on site and they had a couple of them up there to act, right? And there was probably, I don't know this, I'm speculating, right?

4:31But I'm speculating based on experience from past events that, you know, there may have been a lag time in getting the, you know, the go -no -go figured out terms of taking a shot on the target. There may have been problems at the top of Secret Service in terms of what did they allow for as a security package for former President Trump? When you say that, you mean the number and quality of the people that were on the ground? Yeah. You've got to kind of got a standard, you know, former President's security package because they get coverage for life after they finish their time. and you could easily argue that perhaps the package for Trump, given that he's now the presumptive nominee for the November election, that clearly he draws a lot of heat.

5:27Should have been beefed up. Should have been beefed up. And look, also, look, it was under the Trump administration when we tagged Soleimani. And the Iranians and their various proxies are still very upset about that. And we know that they've been looking at various opportunities to try to target individuals they feel responsible. So there were a variety of reasons why you could look and go, yeah, the package for a former president Trump needs to be more robust than say what we would normally allocate. And so that may be, I don't know, I'm not saying it is. I'm just saying that may be an issue where now you've got more of a procedural problem with management, right?

6:07And then you've got the whole other issue of just general discourse. If you demonize somebody on either side and call them Hitler, fascist, you know, intent on destroying democracy, a threat to the nation as President Biden's referred to him even the day before the shooting, you're probably, you know, inciting some irrational person who, who may not be able to process all that as hyperbole. And this keeps you literally. This is a point that Tulsi Gabbard made where she said that how can you expect someone to not try and stop Hitler if you keep calling them Hitler? Would you not go back in time and try and kill Hitler?

6:51And if literally Hitler, there was a magazine that had him looking like the few, a number of magazines that have had him basically in the same poster style that Adolf Hitler did in the past, you know, how many more analogies do you need to draw? And it's one of these things where until the repercussions and the consequences of doing that become kinetic, everyone thinks that it's just a lot. Well, Trump's bombastic, he's gregarious, he says crazy things. We need to push back with the same sort of technology that he uses, which is words and imagery. And then someone takes it up a notch. Yeah, look, I mean, it's clear and people always say, ah, it's what about it isn't, but it's clear.

7:30It's a problem on both sides, right? on the edges of both sides, there's all this rhetoric and hyperbole. So there's no doubt about that. But you're right. Look, if the New Republic, and that was one of the magazines that had the sort of this propaganda poster of Trump as Hitler, they're throwing these things out there. And I think rational people look at that and go, okay, well, man, that's over the top. It's rhetoric type, probably I get it. You guys are using this as a campaign strategy, but there are a lot of people out there who I'm going to process it that way and disappear down these rabbit holes.

8:03So there's a lot of layers here. So when you say who's responsible, it depends on what altitude level of magnification you want to look at it from. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Where does the dominoe begin? One of the things that I did read was that there was a lot of homeland security contractors on site as opposed to secret service agents that there was a more heavy reliance on local law enforcement than you would have done typically. I'm going to guess that this is the package that security detail package, as you mentioned, just being more diluted than it should be. You have some talent and some of the talent, I guess, is questionable based on the video footage.

8:43But then you also have this sort of the outer regions, which are maybe not even more as competent. And more of that was done by contractors and more of that was done by local law enforcement than typical. Yeah, look, the election season, any election season, right? But particularly now when everything's so heated and both sides have been loving hand grenades to each other for quite some time, it's a difficult time for secret service, right? They're stretched, you know, thin because there's so much to do. And they're resources are working constantly. So yes, they draw on, but they typically draw on, even when it's not in election season, they draw on local authorities.

9:21And there was a significant presence at the rally of Butler County police. And there's going to be some other issues about there was an encounter between one of those police officers who attempted to go up and interact with the shooter and then didn't when the shooter pointed a gun at him. And then the firing started shortly thereafter. But look, there's a real breakdown there, right? because you've got a moment where obviously this guy has enough time to go to the building, try to get up to the top of the building to interact, where are the comms with the you know, counter sniper team saying, I'm going up on the top of the building to interact with somebody who apparently has a weapon because lots of people on the ground saw him and alerted the authorities.

10:09So there's there's again, as I mentioned, it's never just one thing. It's a series of problems usually that contribute to a security breakdown. Yeah. It's interesting. I get what you mean about during an election cycle, there's more people, more places, more checks need to be done. But it's not like you don't know this. Right. You know reliably it's going to happen in four years time and four years after that and four years after that. So all of this could have been prepared for in advance, whether it's training, whether it's recruitment, whether it's whatever you need in terms of staffing. I remember reading not so long ago as well after Trump's indictment, conviction, whatever it is, that there'd been some suggestion to completely rescind the security detail from him, or at the very least to dial it back as some kind of recompense that he needed to pay for now being a felon.

11:00Exactly. Yeah, that was a move in Congress by, I think it was Congressman Jeffrey's maybe. I don't want to get caught with the wrong name, but One or a handful had, I think, kind of floated the idea that, well, probably somebody who's been convicted shouldn't have secret service protection. It's an Asinine idea. I mean, it was a completely Asinine idea because he's still a former president and he's still the presumptive nominee, but they were trying to score some political points, right? And that's been part of the problem. you're getting a lot of dysfunctional and irrational behavior because an element within the Democrat Party has this, I don't even have to describe the hatred for Trump.

11:51But then again, on the right side, on the extreme right, if obviously you've got this same rhetoric that goes and demonizes the Democrats and Biden and all this, it's not a good place for the nation to be obviously given what can happen and what we saw happen on Saturday. It's at least at the moment a little bit asymmetric that only one side has control over how much protection an ex -president gets. And it seems to me like the amount of protection should be proportionate to the potential threat. And regardless of whether you like or don't like Trump, he's a pretty big target. I mean, you don't need to do much to Biden to cause him to fall over, but Trump's a much larger target.

12:39I'm gonna let that one go. But, you know, you're not wrong. And that's why you do risk and threat assessments on a constant basis, right? Because the risks, the threats, they change. They can increase, they can decrease, and you're always doing that. Whether you're talking about executive protection for a political candidate, whether you're talking about, you know, what sort of level of protection you provide to a facility or it doesn't matter. So, you're absolutely right and they should have been looking at this. Now, they did say that they, there has been some comment that the Secret Service did heavy up the security package to some degree back in June, I believe, for Trump.

13:21But it's only now that they've approved Secret Service Protection for Robert F. Kennedy, right? And, you know, that's an indication that really what the Democrats wanted was they just wanted him to go away. They did, but they almost didn't want to acknowledge the Kennedy was a candidate out there. Oh, dude. So I've been to, I went to dinner with an RFK at a friend's house, maybe about a year ago, then I went to a rally thing of his in Austin about six months ago, and then I went to another meetup with him about two months ago. And each one of those, he's made it very, very plain. I have no security detail.

14:00I have no extra special care from the government, despite the fact that I come from the most assassinated family in American political history. Yeah, it was insane. It has been, but I do think it was essentially for a very political reason, which was we don't want to acknowledge that he's a candidate. We just wanted to go away. Can you, I mean, giving him the detail is almost like a stamp of approval in some way. This is a legitimate. Yeah. It's kind of that formalizing of his candidacy in a way, right? That's a lot of people process at that. They see the secret service detail and they imagine, okay, he's a presidential candidate, right?

14:37And they were so afraid of him taking oxygen out of the room. But now as a result of what happened on Saturday, they've reviewed, I assume they're going to increase the package for President Trump. They've approved a package for a Robert F. Kennedy. And they've been looking at, I'm in Milwaukee where they have the Republican National Convention. They immediately got on the ground here and started reviewing security, go figure. I mean, that should have been done. Look, this is not, there's a methodology here, right? And you can have little bits and pieces that change based on what the event is, but the standard practice, the standard protocols really don't change that much.

15:19And so more than anything, there was a command and control and a communications breakdown between secret service and local authorities that I believe an investigation is going to prove contributed mightily to what happened on Saturday. What will the process from here internally be to investigate? I imagine it's just going to be a fucking nightmare to try and work out who's culpable, what happened, how's this going to occur? Whilst also doing the investigation, which requires resources from the very thing that you're trying to now beef up, given the failure that just occurred during a time when you need them more than ever, but also that time is trying to be split working out what the fuck happened.

16:03Yeah. Well, yeah, and you raise a really good point. And that's where our congressional investigation can really kind of muck up the works, get in the way because, you know, they get out there and they start sucking up oxygen that really needs to be spent, you know, doing operations. But look, it's important right after this go, Rob, you know, internally a secret service was doing a hot wash. What's this mean? Stop using these woods. What do you mean? Well, they're basically just doing an after -action review of, you know, what happened immediately in the aftermath of this thing. but there's a lot of moving parts as you pointed out.

16:41Look at it, there's DHS personnel, there's the local law enforcement. It's not a good sign that's so soon after this event, there's already some finger pointing going on, saying, well, that was their zone, not ours, Butler County saying, well, that's, you know, it doesn't matter, Secret Service has primacy, so they should, you know, be telling us what to do in a sense. So that's not necessarily a good indication, But I think this thing has got to play out in public in part because government agencies, whether it's a secret service or the Bureau or the CIA, whatever, they've lost a lot of credibility, which is kind of a painful thing to admit.

17:27But they've lost a lot of credibility over the recent past. And so, you know, one of those things, one of those ways I think you build back some level of trust is to be more transparent. And again, they don't have anything to lose because everybody was wanting it zero. Yeah, they're starting... Well, I meant because everybody was watching, they can afford to be more transparent, but okay, I take your point. So, you know, going into the rest of this, you know, do you think these sorts of threats are over or are there more serious risks to come as we get toward the presidential election? Well, the threat's not over for sure.

18:06You know, that never goes away, right? You never get this down to zero. It's not how the game is played. So they have to approach every event, whether it's the RNC happening outside or whether it's any other campaign rally, the DNC, which will be taking place in Chicago, they've got to approach every event in the same fashion, right? And yes, there'll be more under the spotlight, you know, from the public and from, you know, their own agencies and the various people involved. But that's a good thing, right? It kind of refocuses the mind. You know, I'm not saying that the event, I'm not saying it was a good thing.

18:46I'm just saying that it's going to, one of the end results will be, everyone's gonna be a little bit more on their game because they're gonna be reminded in a very terrible way. What's at stake? You can argue they shouldn't have to be reminded, but you know, you do these events and you do these events and the thing about executive protection is, it can be a grind. mentally it can be a real grind. Well, you're standing outside a door, you know, secret service details, there's a lot of hurry up and wait, you know, it can be kind of mind numbing it away, right? There's, you know, then you got a movement, okay fine, now I got to go do another advance, and I'm doing the advance, and there's a lot of routine, a lot of, you know, wrote, which, you know, can be a bit, again, it can be a bit mind numbing.

19:37which inevitably causes people to pay less attention, which then allows small errors to kick up. Yeah, I was speaking to Tim Kennedy. I got him to break down the body language of the counter sniper from the secret service that was on the roof. And he's, you know, looking, he's coming up off his glass, he's going back down, then he flinches and then he goes back down again. And, you know, he, Tim's assessment was, he thought that was a person who'd never been in a firefight before. that that was someone who potentially hadn't seen combat action. But another thing to consider is that this isn't training.

20:12You haven't just rocked up, cat full of caffeine, you know, on the range with your body, that's your spotter. And I know when I'm going to need to shoot, you've been there for how many hours? Sad up there doing this thing, you know, that sort of endurance, and as it continues to go on. But again, it seems to me that all of that can be fixed just by more volume and higher quality personnel. If you've got someone that's doing the night shift, don't make them do the day shift. You can have sufficient resources that you don't need to drain everyone like that. Yeah, I think that's absolutely right.

20:45You've got to have sufficient staffing and again, talking about how much of a grind it can be. It's not the sort of business where you can just work through people until they're exhausted. You've got people have to be at an optimum level all the time. And so that requires you to be able to work through a number of shifts of rotations. And so you have to have those resources. But look, and training, you've got to have constant training and that costs money and time. And so sometimes those things get kicked aside. I'm not saying they did. I'm just saying that sometimes in the world of government, certain things can be pushed decide and in favor of other things that aren't really as operationally beneficial.

21:33So likely, do you think it is that the heads of Homeland Security or the Secret Service are going to end up getting fired or disciplined for this? Well, I don't think DHS, my orchestra, I don't think isn't going anywhere. He seems to be coded in Teflon because you could argue he should have been fired for the the lack of management of the US Southern border for the past three years. But I don't think he's going anywhere. Kimberly Cheatle over at Secret Service. Well, she, you know, she's been there what, almost 30 years maybe. Longer, she was, you know, an agent and a supervising agent for 27 years, finished up, and then went to, I forget Pepsi, I think, where she was Global Security Director, and then she got called in.

22:23She had worked on Vice President Biden's Detail years and years ago. And so that who knows, maybe that was part of the connection, but she came back in to run this secret service. Is she going to be kicked out? I don't think so. Washington, DC is not typically a place where people get fired. Why is that just nepotism and people know people and people know things and you scratch my back? Yeah, I think, you know, people get reassigned and lower levels, if things go sideways, typically that shit rolls downhill. So you may get mid -level officers or agents that get reassigned or put on ice. Typically people don't hire levels.

23:09They're not expected to pay the price. I don't know why. But it's a little bit like, it's a little bit like this problem with the civil discourse and people talking about how we have to turn the temperature down. Well, that requires self -awareness and it requires the willingness to accept some responsibility for where we got to now, right? Because they were part of the problem. But I don't think politicians necessarily or political appointees tend to be loaded for bear with self -awareness or willingness to accept responsibility. What do you think happens to the political discourse moving forward from here?

23:45How do you think it changes or doesn't? I think given another, I don't know, 15 minutes and we're going to be right back. We're going to refer to the mean. I have no doubt that there will be a short period of time, including I think, including Trump's nominating speech at the RNC. I think, you know, that's going to be more dial back than people would imagine coming from Trump. He said he wrote a brand new one for it. Yeah. And I'm sure he did. Look, he's got, look, it's, I don't think you can go through that an experience like that and not have some moment of reflection. Right. Now, whether it lasts, whether he can change his stripes, I don't know whether the Democrats can change their stripes.

24:37Who knows? Look, they ran a campaign based on Trump as a fascist and he's gonna destroy democracy. And it was working for them, right? It was energizing at least their base. And I think they felt like that's the narrative they were gonna run with for the next few months. I don't think either side is really going to dial it back significantly for any period of time. So, yeah, still be a moment. But then I think everyone's gonna kind of revert back to the normal jump back in their trenches and, you know, we'll be right back to that. Biden said, or at least the Dems said, that they'd turned off their campaign ads for a little while, sort of a show of a market respect.

25:15I imagine that if you kept running those, there'd be some in there that are absolutely tone deaf for a guy that just got shot. But yeah, there is a big question. Can you say that Trump is Hitler one day and then the next day wish him well, given that he was just shows. Yeah, I know. I know. I know. I'm blowing with the wind. Thank God he was only crazed. Yeah, it's a, it's a, yeah, it's a really good question. But I think what they're counting on is the attention span of the Americans maybe. You know, everybody's so busy just trying to get by and feed their families and do their work and kind of whatever.

26:00and they're all staring at TikTok anyway. So I think they honestly think, yeah, sure, we can get away with this incredible pivot from he's going to terminate the constitution and take away all your rights. And he's the biggest threat to the nation. And then turn around and go, well, I taught the Donald and I told him I was going to. And then, yeah. All right. But I think they feel like, you know, they can get away with it because they done it. So. Oh, yeah, yeah. Selective amnesia of the entire populace. So I'm glad that you brought up TikTok, your favorite topic of discussion. I, this is the first time that I've observed, actually I didn't even do this with January 6th, because with January 6th, they actually watched mostly Fox News CNN coverage.

26:49I was watching things be streamed live. But on Saturday, this happened just as I was going for dinner here in Montana. and I, for the first time realized just how important X Twitter is as a social media, it was a genuine utility for everybody that wanted to know what was going on. And I wasn't, I'm not going to Facebook to find out this information. I'm not going to TikTok to find out this information. I'm not going to Instagram to find out this information. I'm not going to the mainstream media to find out this information, like mostly peaceful but fiery assassination attempt from CNN or whatever that headline was.

27:30Yeah, there were some headlines. There were some headlines that he was pulled from the rally because he fell down and secret service interrupts Trump rally. Yeah, yeah. Or there was, there was a New York Times article just today that said, you know, that referred to the assassination attempt as that somebody shot at the president during a rally. And you think, okay, so, So I agree with you know, I think X has kind of proven its usefulness in this agreed event over the weekend. Yeah, I was I spent probably what time monitoring what was happening there. Then I think pretty much anything else. Although I was I was perfect.

28:11I was perfecting a new TikTok dance. So I had to. That wasn't easy. But it's gonna be a hit. I tell you what else I didn't see much of. I didn't see much sort of crazy misinformation, wild accusations. I haven't seen much that people have really needed to row back. Now, is that the benefit of the platform or is that simply just because of what users were talking about? You can't promote a tweet which lies about something that somebody doesn't actually post. You can only actually promulgate whatever messages people say. But, yeah, I was This really impressed. I was looking at X and going, holy fuck, like we need this thing.

Read the full transcript

28:57And I've not had that sense really before. It's just like, oh, if you've got truth social on one side and you've got X kind of more toward the middle and then you've got threads on the other side, it's just another one of these. But it made me think differently, I think. Yeah. I think it takes a little while for the crazy to come out, right? So I have seen some conspiracy theories. at, you know, this was an inside job, you know, and, you know, and then, of course, all the, all the, you know, the sort of the armchair executive protection specialists, you know, talking about exactly, you know, how, what went wrong, five minutes after the event, right?

29:32Are they okay? Well, at least less the dust settle a little bit before, let's talk to the blizzard up off the stage kind of. Yeah. Might be, might be good, but no, they did, look, the, the The imagery was amazing. The like him or hate him, right? And there's a lot of people on both sides of that for Trump, but you have to think, good God, right? I mean, the fact that he stood up, had to wear with all the kind of like face to crowd, you know, give him that indication that he was fine and he was, you know, I mean, that's those instincts, right? You can't teach that, right? That's kind of in there somewhere.

30:12and so I think that was amazing. Right, again, people who hate him are gonna say it was terrible. He shouldn't have shook his fist. I did hear CNN was upset with him because he shook his fist at the crowd and said, fight and they were like, well, that seems inappropriate. He's stoking, he's stoking a wartime rhetoric. We just got shot. He just got shot. They're upset because he's like shaking his fist and he's, they're like, well, that's not appropriate. Inappropriate to get aggressive when you've just been shot. Yeah. Yeah, I do, I said this to Tim. Look, I have, I sort of respect Trump in the, I find him an interesting orator and his sort of staying power has been, has been impressive.

30:55But I've never before said that I admired him. You know, I don't know whether it's because he's kind of like a WWE character, which he actually also happened to be briefly for a little while. He's super gregarious and he's out there and he's all of these things. And he's like older and he is from a different culture and all of these things lots and lots and lots of things right and I saw that video and then I saw that imagery and I was like that is fucking Badass that is a You there is no amount of media training or Sort of top down dictatorial rhetoric building and image sort of promoting that you can do to make being shot, then standing up and putting your fist in the air and going fight, fight, fight.

31:44That is him, that's his character. That is his character. We saw everything stripped back. Who is the guy? If you wanna know who someone is, shoot them in the air. Right? Well, let's say, okay, now, for those of you watching at home,

32:01let's step back on that guidance. but okay kids. No, but I take your point and also the striking thing is just the contrast right between that and what we had been talking about on nonstop, right on Friday and Thursday and Wednesday before that which was. People in theness, fragility. People in the mental now going through this election and obviously, you know, the Republicans will use that imagery, you know, but I think they have the rest of time. But they do have to be careful. I mean, Jesse, you don't want to, you know, because look, we, you know, there was a fatality there. You know, people maybe, maybe more.

32:52Yeah, maybe more. And so I think they're going to want to, so I'm hoping what this does is I hope it dials down the discourse. I hope it keeps things for a little bit of time. Again, I'm cynical, but you know, civil. And I hope it makes the Trump campaign more reflective, right? About their strategy and their tone and the way that they approach things. What does that mean, be most specific for me? Well, I think, look, everybody talks about, everybody talks about how you gotta win the moderates, right? You gotta win the independence. You know, if you're gonna win it all in November. And I think if what we got was the Trump of old, right, he's not winning those people, right?

33:40Because they already left him in 2020. That's why he didn't win, right? Because they were like, I'm tired of the chaos. I'm tired of the noise. I'm tired of it. You know, all of this. And so I think that if this makes him more or the campaign more reflective and they say, you know, what, you know, let's, let's, let's continue to dial it back. Democrats are going to do whatever they're going to do if they get back to throwing hand grenades. Okay, fine, let them. But let's be the, let's be the contrast. Right. I think that's the way that you get and then just focus on policies. Just talk about policies.

34:15Nothing else. Well, you already had a little bit more of a pivot to a slightly more statesman like version of Trump during the debate. And then after the debate, you know, there was no posting about Biden, there was no silly tweet of what equivalent there was there was none of that. Silence was his greatest weapon for the first time ever. Absolutely. Absolutely. When your enemy is imploding, don't talk it in a way. To get in the way, yeah, precisely. Talk to me about what you think this does to Trump's image among the American populace. How do you think that this incident changes it if at all?

34:51Well, I don't know that it, look, I think it will make a difference with some who are undecided. Not necessarily, I'm not talking necessarily about, you know, independence and moderates who are focused on politics, but I think those people who, you know, maybe don't spend a lot of time thinking about politics, but we're still kind of undecided. Maybe unregistered. Yeah, maybe unregistered. I wasn't sure if I was going to vote at all. Yeah. I think that that, and part of that will be that contrast between this guy standing up that's really shot and what they saw during that debate if they happen to see clips or they watch some of the debate.

35:26I think that contrast will influence a certain group. I think if he can, I don't know if statesmen's the right word, but I think if he can be more moderate than and speak to the issues and just stay there, then I think that can influence those moderates and independence perhaps that that are a little more focused on politics and did abandoned or abandoned the campaign the last time around. So I think it can have an impact. Look, the Democrats, you know, they must be amazed right now, right? Because all that conversation about Biden, that's nowhere to be found, right? That's done. At least for now, people are not talking about Biden.

36:03They're not talking about his feebleness, his mental acuity, is he still fit to serve? And so I think the White House, if anything, is taking a breath and going, I think, I'm not sure that. So I think that I get what you mean. It's a good day for bad news or it's a good day to be seen. I suppose. But the problem is that this recent shooting assassination attempt is framed against the foundation that we already had. Everyone still already has that in the back of their mind. We know the fragility that we've seen of the existing president, the fact that he doesn't have that sort of gusto and that get up that we want to show from a leader up against China, up against Russia, et cetera.

36:46And then you have this, even if you're not looking at it anymore, it's like just being in a cold bath and getting into a hot one, you're like, holy fuck, this is different. So I do think that that's going to be there. I also agree, I think the more mature and stand -offish that the Republicans can be when it comes to messaging around this, I think that's going to benefit them more. for the first time ever. This is one of my George who I'm traveling with at the moment told me this yesterday. For the first time ever, Trump has a victim card. He's never had a victim card before. Trump has, he has a fucking victim card.

37:24Yeah. Well, although I would argue that the base, right? His loyal, loyal supporters view him as the supreme victim, just being victimized by law fair and the Biden administration. And so I think that group always looks at them in that regard. right? You know, look what they're doing to them again. And now he's being shot in the, in the, in the fucking air. Well, so another interesting thing is how much damage does this incident do to the left moral high ground around not being the violent ones? Yeah, I don't think they care. I think they just, they'll just, I've never seen any awareness on their part that, that could be an issue, right?

38:07It's sort of like that mostly peacefully and Tifa riots and, you know, burnings and violence. I think that they just brushed that aside. And so I don't know that they're worried about that idea. They all jumped on the notion, they were really wordsmithing, but they jumped on the notion in their statements about the assassination attempt that the shooter was a registered Republican. And by the way, why do all these guys look the same. I don't understand. They were lost. You know, and I didn't say that. My oldest boy said that. He said, what the hell is it with people like you know, what are the, what is the commonality?

38:49You know, his point was maybe they need to do a study of all these people and find out what was that thing that was super racist and done in the 90s. Was it frenology or physiognomy or whatever it was? Talk like that. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. like face shape as being indicative. What do we know about the shooter? You know, what, 20 years old from the area, Bethel Park in Pennsylvania, you know, I've only heard a few comments from people who claim that they knew them in high school and those are typical comments, quiet, loaner, lead. Only, you know, is dad purchased legally, legally, Apparently, the long gun that was used on Saturday by his kid some six months ago.

39:38And so there's not a lot of information out there. It's interesting. The bureaus got his, obviously they got his electronic devices. They took us phone down to Quantico. And once again, they're struggling, according to reports. I don't know whether that's the case or not, but they say they're struggling to unlock it. I'm following a 20 year old Lona from Nicole Green, whatever it is. Yeah, so I think it's, it's, you know, we'll get more detail, but that's one of those areas, right? Well, you have to be, I always hate to see people speculating about motives because that's one of the things in terms of an investigation regardless of what type of shooting event it is that you really need to let the facts, you know, come to light before you start talking and earnest about, oh, you know, what the motivation of the shooter was, Soba, Zaman, there's definitely, I think, another discussion to be had around what is the training of local law enforcement?

40:34You know, we've had it before. I was watching this documentary about, there's a name for them. What's the name for police officers that don't enter firefights even though they should do? It's like, it's not coward or whatever. It's like there's a specific name for it, you know, like a false valor or whatever. There's like an equivalent sort of name for it. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, well just failing at duty and you know I saw in this same documentary I was talking about that a lot of the police officers were saying that they spend more time in diversity meetings than they do with their firearm in the hand.

41:08Yeah, and that is true. When you look at the consistency of training, that's why that, you know, one of the things that could drive you crazy during that, that sort of the height of the defund the police was really, you're just fucking stupid because if you want a better police force, a more responsive police force, a more responsible police force, you want to actually give them more funds for training. That's where it all starts, right? So part of the problem is, again, going back to something we talked about earlier, is that a lot of times when you hit budget cuts, training's one of the first things to go.

41:38And that can't be the case when you're talking about law enforcement. Especially not if you're gonna be a guy who goes to a bladder and sees a dude with a long gun and... Yeah. And that again, I'm fascinated by the comms portion of this and the line of communication because there's a period of time there, right? Whether you attend these, alert the local authorities, local authorities, decide someone, you know, Bob's gotta go over there and investigate, well, at the same time, all that communication should have been shared with the counter sniper teams and command and control from the secret servants, right?

42:09They should have been making decisions in real time. So if that person was going up a ladder on that building, they should have had him in their sites at that point, right? Now, maybe they didn't have line of sight on the shooter. Maybe he was out of range, not out of range, but out of sight. And then he pops up and points his weapon at the, but that's the time to shoot him. As soon as it, you know, so there's little steps here. But again, you know, is it fair for me without the investigation being done to make all these, you know, statements? I don't know. I'm just speaking from, you know, from past experience on other events, but, you know, they got to let the investigation play out, it's just, it's such a, the event had such magnitude and such impact that it's natural.

42:51I get why people rush to make judgment or statements or talk about things. It makes sense. Do you think that this stops Biden from stepping down because Trump now has a martyr vote? Well, I think, yeah, that's a, yeah, that's a really interesting point, but I think it goes back to what I was saying when I was trying to refer to the fact that the noise around Biden's situation has died down to no noise, right? So I think it does buy him significant time. And I think him coming out and saying, you know, look, we need to be civil. We need to think about how we talk about each other. He's trying to be presidential.

43:34He's trying to show obviously, like with every event that he's had since the debate, that he's up to the job. But I think it's making it more difficult, right, for the Democrats to continue to beat the drum. There were probably prior to Saturday, there were probably more Democrats in Congress or in the Senate who were going to step out, you know, and say, we think he needs to go, right? That was a building drum beat. I think that it's more difficult now for them to do that because of the events of Saturday and because it felt like, okay, well maybe, you know, maybe we just got to stick with you.

44:12Dude, think about the last three weeks of fucking news. Yeah. Well, think about the, I mean, really think about this past year, right? Everything's been going on. I mean, obviously, you know, Ukraine, Huck and Gaza, right? You know, the discourse around the election, this event on Saturday. I mean, good God. You know, all we need is a pandemic. Sorry. Sorry. That's terrible, but you know, not that we won't want one. We're going to get another pandemic by the way. It'll happen. It'll continue to happen. Talk to me about JD Vans. Yeah. Interesting. I guess not an unexpected choice. They've been banging on for a while saying it was either going to be Vance or Bergen or Rubio.

45:06And look, JD Vance is close to his, to Trump's son. They're very good friends. He's, he's an interesting cat, right? Has almost no, anything about him, explain to me who he is. Yeah, he's got almost no political experience. He wrote that book, Hillbilly Elegy, which was a very interesting book. I mean, a very interesting book. And they made a movie out of it, I think. but he's a political newcomer. He's been a very staunch supporter of Trump. He's at Ohio.

45:43And, you know, of the candidates, I don't know that if what you were saying was I want to, I want to pick a candidate who can really help me win over, you know, groups that I'm, I, I need to win. I don't know that JD Vance is that person because he's already got his base, right? And so I think JD Vance kind of shares the same supporters. Rubio could have shown up for it up. Obviously, with a Hispanic vote as well, it would help. He's a much more seasoned politician. Bergam is a good friend of Trump. He's got very good political instincts, business instincts. Nicky Haley was hanging out there. And I gotta tell you, if you wanted to moderate, so you wanted the independent voters, you could argue from Nicky Haley could have been a terrific choice, except they got, you know, there were so sideways with each other during the primary.

46:44What do you think, do you think there's any chance that Trump changed his VP pick post Saturday? No, that's interesting.

46:56No, probably not. I think the wheels are in motion too much. Yeah, I think the factor that would have changed his decision possibly would have been if Biden had stepped out. And it pulled himself out that that may have recalibrated the thinking perhaps over the VP pick. But I don't think Saturday, I think at that point, he just he went with Vance and didn't change his mind. I was in a group chat with a bunch of different people here. One of them saying, Teal hired him at his VC fund, MythRoll, also endorsed his Senate campaign with the biggest individual donation ever for a Senate campaign of $15 million.

47:39Very happy with Vans, super smart, competent veteran, rust belt, blue collar orientation, also, and sad that this is the case. He provides assassination insurance. Yeah, well, look, I mean Trump had been saying that, right? He said, you know, his decision over who to pick would be, you know, if something bad happens, are they ready to step in? But okay, to be fair, you know, every presidential nominee says that. I want my VP picked to be ready on day one. And look, I like, I like Vance in the sense that he's, he's unique, Right? He's not a he's not a 110 year politician, right? And that's not a bad thing at all.

48:19And I like the fact that he's a veteran. That's a very good thing. So I'm just saying it's an interesting choice in the sense that I don't know that it expands the voting block necessarily for the campaign because it's drawing from the same kind of block as opposed to maybe one of the other picks, but then again, you know, you want somebody that you can, you know, be simpatical with and Vance has been a staunch support. Nicky Haley might have just been a fucking nightmare from behind the scenes from day one. Well, I think it would have been a very interesting dive. Yeah. Yeah, I think that's the case and maybe Rubio, you know, was a bit of the same way, you know, maybe there was some concern over past, you know, you know, punches they thrown at each other.

49:09So who knows? At the end of the day, does it, does it matter all that much? I don't know that a VP pick matters all that much. Look, if Biden stays in, you know, I think the key has got to be saying, look, you're not running against Biden, you're running against, you know, President Harris, because I don't think anybody in their right mind believes that Biden makes it through four years if he wins. So a vote for Biden is a vote for Kamala Harris and you're willing to say that Kamala Harris could be the leader of the free world. And I can't even say that with a straight face. I mean, that's more terrifying than the president getting shot.

49:48Oh, the presidential candidate being shot in the ear. I've seen this map, the election map of when Reagan got shot afterward and you've got red, red, red, red, red, red, red, red, and then this one blue dot that remained up at the top. How likely, or how unlikely is that to be the case given the sort of never die, never trump, etc. kind of even after all of this. You've basically got the ultimate one to punch. Like jab in the face, Biden's completely incompetent punch. The other guy is totally competent and can literally get shot and stand up 15 seconds later. But that's just, surely there's no way that we can see a huge red sweep in the same way because people are just so passionate about hating Trump.

50:37Yeah. Yeah. It's a different situation. It's apples and oranges when you're talking about what happened with Reagan, I think. And so, there's no way he's going to run the table or get anywhere to close. It's going to be a close race still. And I think that, you know, the jury's still out. maybe when the noise dies down, right? And the election really heats up again, and the rhetoric comes back kind of the way it was, that the Democrats start re -evaluating again Biden's suitability. And so that could be the next big event in terms of the election season that we're in the middle of. Fucking hell.

51:18OK, so one other thing that I really wanted to ask you, one of your expertise international relations. First off, have any other world leaders of interest said anything that's interesting? And secondly, how do you think other countries, the China's, the Russia's, the Iran's of the world? How do you think they interpret the ease with which a 20 year old bullied kid with bad hair was able to shoot the president's ear off? Yeah. Well, I think that jihadists are looking at and going, what? That's it, that's all we have to do is climb up on a damn shed. Yeah, so I think that they're looking at it from a security breakdown and thinking, oh my God, maybe we've been overthinking this, right?

52:02They've been too much credit. Yeah. And so the Chinese regime has always Xi Jinping and the foreign ministry, they, you know, they were very muted in their response after the assassination attempt and, You know, they wished him well, but they tend to try to be seen as not waiting in because they don't want anybody stepping in their business. European leaders said exactly what you would imagine. You know, everybody was condemning the political violence. There were really many... I'm trying to think Slovakia, Robert Fiko, you know, he made a couple of interesting comments because he had been, you know, they tried to assassinate him not that long ago, shot him I think four times.

52:50So he alluded to the idea that, you know, the rhetoric from the opposition party, you know, probably played a role. But there was pretty much just what you would expect, you know, condemnation of political violence from world leaders, you know, UK, Kirstaarmer, the new prime minister, he came in and weighed in very quickly. And so that makes sense. It's, you wouldn't expect anything different. I think Russian, I'm trying to remember what they, they didn't really say much. I think Peskov, the spokesperson for the Kremlin made an off -handed comment, but basically it was not that interesting. Is it not that interesting?

53:33Another advertisement of America's in fighting operational operational poor management, the fact that one party that's kind of in charge of the protection detail for the other party isn't capable of stopping this. It's more sort of America falling flat on its face on the world stage. Only recently after the guy that's in charge couldn't string a sentence together. Yeah, it was interesting. I mean, speaking of that, you know, the the White House during the NATO summit, which was just, you know, concluded last week, like John Kirby was asked and he said, look, nobody in NATO questions Biden's abilities.

54:13We don't have to justify Biden to anybody. They all firmly believe, well, what else is the NATO leader is going to say? But it was interesting that even at that point when it was clear that there were some issues, the White House was still trying to portray Biden as being on top of his game and sharp as a tack and all the other, like, again, we're all getting older, right? You know, you, me, everybody, we're all getting older. We all age differently, right? It's not age, it's mental locuity. And we've all got elderly parents. We've all got elderly grandparents. We all know what it looks like. So I think the problem the White House has, even during this moment when that talk has died down, is that people understand that process, right?

54:59And they know what it looks like because they've seen it. or they've had to deal with it directly. So I don't know ultimately that they're gonna be able to hold the line and keep him in there.

55:12But frankly, Kamala Harris and John Kirby and Karin Jean Pierre and everybody in his little circle and his family, they've kind of been lying to the American public for quite some time now and trying to cover up what's been happening. Despite the fact that we've been seeing bits and pieces of it, but that's why he hasn't been out there, right? What was it called? What was it called when you when you take videos out of context? What was that? There was a name or a cheap fake cheap. It was a fake. Yeah, that's what they were referring to it It was a cheap fake every time that there was a reference to it or that we were just and the media for the most part We're willing to cover up as well.

55:50I can't do it. I can't place it. Did you read? I think it was Ben Usher. He wrote an article called common knowledge I didn't read that no. I'll send it to you. I'll send it to you afterwards So basically the break down, it's phenomenal. It's so good. And it basically says that it's not enough for you to know a thing. You need to know that other people know that thing too. So for instance, it's not enough for you to know that it's the Ampriz New Clothes. Right? You can pick your favorite fairy tale of choice. And the problem being that until you have reliable insight that other people will agree with your position, nobody is prepared to take the position.

56:33So it's not enough for you to know that you know, you need to know that everybody else also knows. And what we saw on the debate night was common knowledge be distributed to the masses. There was nowhere else for anybody to hide. Therefore, when you come out as someone who previously has said Biden's sharp is attack or you know, we pick New York Times fucking like Washington and post whoever it is. And then you pivot and say something else, well, it's a completely costless position to hold because everybody else knows it. Like it's the same with the free speech position. You know, free speech doesn't matter for people who agree with you or who you agree with.

57:10Free speech only matters for the people who you disagree with because it's a costly position in order to be able to hold that and it's the same with this common knowledge thing. And it's so interesting to me because for those of us that exists terminally online in the heterodoxosphere of substachistan. We have all known this. For forever, this is something, this is, to me, talking like doing jokes about Biden's mental degradation was hacky. It was so obvious that it felt low ball to say. And then you watch the debate and you go, oh, this couple in the world who don't have access to my common knowledge.

57:50Now I'm sure that there's shit tons of stuff that I don't know about, but that was one of the things that I did. So much so that I take it for granted. It's an accepted fact, and it's so much of an accepted fact that it would be hacky and low -ball to make a joke about it. And oh, the world thinks that this is fucking revolutionary, and it really broke my brain. For a while when I realized, oh, my understanding and the way that I see certain parts of the world and the way that maybe the rest of the part, a big chunk of the populist does is Yeah. Is fucking miles apart. I'm no fucking clairvoyant political divinity guy, but fuck me, I knew that.

58:23And to be a revelation was just like, oh wow, this really does show how echo bubbles and still the power of legacy media to be able to filter what actually gets down to this sort of ocean floor of most people. Why? Why would it be? And the ability to repeat a message, right? If you're, you know, if you just keep saying the same thing over the attack shop as attack shop as attack and then it works. And then we find out that they've been basically complicit in hiding this and that's why. And then of course, people come out and plundits come out and people who had just been on their shows, talking about how great he is saying, well, we've kind of seen this for a while.

59:05I can't believe that they've hit it from us. It's kind of like again, what we talked about earlier, calling Trump Hitler and then the It's that it's that immediate turn around that to me is shocking, but but people just move on, right? And they know that, right? They know they can do this. There's almost no shame because they just like, okay, I'm going to pivot and completely reverse my position. And I'll be fine in a day or two. It's shocking. But anyway, in the interim, just rounding out the conversation on security, does Tim Kennedy or Eric Prince need to be called in? Do you go private security to bolster Trump security detail or maybe maybe other people's security details?

59:51No, no, I think look, I was out and we had a large operation on Iraq, early days of Iraq, right? I'm talking about 03, 04, 05, 06. I mean, and we had a large private security operation out there and that's a war zone. It's a little bit different, but when we're talking about augmenting secret service with private security, I don't think so. I think, look, David, the challenge is that you face when you try to augment secret service with private guys in Iraq. You're just layering on potential communications and command and control issues. I just think And it's also, I think, look, the Secret Service, their staff with some great people, right?

1:00:44We always have to be careful about, there's this tendency to say, they're all screwed, dismantle it, you know, that's, it was a cryback. You gotta get rid of the bureau, get rid of the agency and do all these things. And I'm thinking really, that's your take on this. I'm not just fixing problems. And so the Secret Service augmented by, local and state law enforcement, they can do the job. They've been doing the job. Part of this is, they've got to be transparent again. They've got to come out and say these are the steps that occurred. Some of them won't surprise us because we all watched. But they've got to be very clear about what those steps are.

1:01:29They've got to be very clear about how they intend to not have it happen again. Right, and that's going to require some people taking responsibility. And that's where I think that can be a problem because you have to make people at the top take responsibility and maybe suffer some consequences as opposed to just saying, you know, the officer on the ground who failed to communicate in real time, what he was about to do by going up on that building, you know, that's the guy who's you we can all blame. Yeah, I have had it in my head since Saturday. I wonder whether there is a level of negligence you reach where it almost becomes complicity.

1:02:04Well, I think it's complicity. It can be what's the word I'm looking for complacency, maybe at times. The reason I brought up the private security thing is I saw that trailer saying 30 % of secret service staff are going to be female by 2030. I spoke to Tim and Tim explained to me that the mile time for guys versus goals to run is different. The weight load that you need to be able to lift is different. The height, all of the rest of the stuff. You saw a woman who was, she came up to Trump's nipple, maybe, you know, got this big guy, got this big dude and this little woman. That's where he decided to go as far as the height measurement was the nipple.

1:02:49That's precisely where she got to. I know what you mean. And then you know, they would get a yet at age and kind of fumble fucking with their weapon trying to re -hul in a holster it was the same one who used Trump to hit behind Trump like this like sort of in that kind of like for the fucking the guy woman in the kitchen from Tom and Jerry like yeah. That's a great cultural pull right there. Yeah, you haven't thought about that for a while. You haven't thought about Tom and Jerry. Look, I think there's no room for DEI in the world of operations of security, right? You just simply choose the, it shouldn't be the way it is in everything, not just those sectors, but you choose the most qualified, capable people.

1:03:34And if they can't cut it, then you move them out, and you bring in somebody who's more capable and qualified. And you're right, you can't, there's a problem when you, when you, because I think the Secret Service will say that, look, we didn't lower the standards, right? That's not, that's not what we did, right? But you hear that all the time. Problem is that that belies the reality right? Al -Nirok is a good example right? For a while there was only one we bring former you know spec ops guys out right? Well that's a that's a small pool right? There's not a lot it's not a lot of former guys there with that qualification.

1:04:08So then you started seeing you know everybody squatting and everybody coming out there and claiming that they were a spec ops former you know this and that and and so So you've got a limited pool of capable people, I believe, right, that you can choose from for certain jobs. And you just have to take those people and say, fuck the EI, that's not what's important in this business, right? And again, I don't want to rush to judgment, right? I don't know the qualifications these people. We have to kind of look and see, you know, let's be measured, that sort of thing. But I take your point and I don't disagree with it at all.

1:04:47Well, the problem being the reason that I mentioned Eric or Tim or some other private contractor is that Tim brought it up to me. He said, the people that you see that are on Trump's detail, even though they may not have performed like the A -Team, they weren't hired yesterday. You don't get hired and then get put on a presidential candidate's detail. You have been in the agency for a while. You've been hired and trained long ago. You've been around for a long time. So in order to say, well, we're going to rectify it, we're going to train better, we're going to hire better We're going to change the DEI initiative.

1:05:18We're going to do whatever it is that they say that they're going to do brilliant You know, the 2028 election may very well be more way more secure than this one But you know when you're thinking what's going to happen over the next however long our fk junior is just being given Seek it service detail that's going to take some of the resources away and How many people are going to have their time taken up going through fucking meeting after meeting after hearing after court case after investigation. As you said, sucking New Oxygen out of the room and taking the attention away from the thing that it needs to be focused on.

1:05:50So yeah, I, I, I don't know, man, I mean, America is not showering itself in glory and oddly the only person that is at the moment is Trump.

1:06:01That's a great way to put it. That's no, I, yeah, that's, that's gonna drive a lot of people crazy when they hear you say that. But it's fucking true, dude. I, I, people can go back and listen, and I don't think I've ever been complimentary about Trump. Not that I was particularly critical of him over Biden, but I'm like, he's just a f**king dude. He's a dude that's kind of a bit crazy. And I just think, tell me, tell me that you look at that photo and you don't think, yeah, like that's some late 80s flag fly in Americana, like legitimacy. Yeah. It's, it's, it's, it's probably exactly a yellow Wolverines, right?

1:06:39No, I, I, again, and it's that imagery that's so important, right? Because people make decisions quickly. People don't dig deep, you know, and they're going to see that and maybe they make up their mind and, and you know, what, again, you can't, what are you going to argue with that? You're going to look at that and then you're going to look at that president Biden from the debate and you're going to go, okay, who's more than obviously. Yeah. What's, tell you what's an awesome, awesome video that you can get a hold of. So Evan, the guy that took the photo, um, he is a Brazilian Jiu Jitsu guy looks an awful lot like a Navy SEAL.

1:07:11He looks like a young Jokka Willink, hard dude. And if you watch the video, there's a handout version of the stage. And those shots start firing. He doesn't stop in power. He starts strafing across the front of the stage to get those shots. There's two guys that get them. Really interesting video that you can find, which was shot on a pair of Rayban metaglasses. So I've got a pair of those two. So it's a pair of sunglasses. that you wear and they've got two little lenses on either side and they can shoot up to about a minute of video in very high quality and the color representations really good and This guy so Evans the guy that took the photo the photos that are going around everywhere There's another dude who presumably got very similarly good photos as that.

1:07:52Yeah, he's from the New York Times I think yeah Doug Mills maybe yeah, so he Yeah, it is Doug Mills he had the foresight when he's round the back. He's around the back of the stage and And the video begins, but you can't remotely start those glasses. So he's had his camera like this or whatever it is like this. And he's shoot, shoot, shoot, shoot, shoot. And he's taking his hand off, pressed the button, held it. You have to hold it if you want to take a video and then go back to that. And if you watch, I message Dean, the guy that led it this episode, you met him in Miami, my video guy. I was asking him, what is that dude?

1:08:26Doug? What's that dude doing? Because you actually see from his glasses, you can see both of his hands, right? So he's got his hands up like this and you're looking at this thing and he He's shooting a lot. This is during a fire fight. Yeah, these guys. It's so cool. I love seeing People who know their craft inside out doing something and what's coolest about this? Isn't the shot the shot that you get It's the seamlessness with which he does it so you see that he's shooting and he can't frame up properly So he takes his hand off the front of the camera flips the screen down so that he can get a better look and he's working on his, I think either exposure or focus, whatever Dean said.

1:09:05And then he's checking, he's checking the screen, he's going like this. And Dean was like, he's working about every one to one and a half seconds, he's looking at the composition of his shot during this. So he's shooting, shooting, shooting, shooting, shooting, shooting, shooting, looks, shooting, shooting, shooting, shooting, and the burst, burst, burst, burst, burst. I don't like that's one of the coolest parts of it. You know what else is amazing? if you watched right behind Trump, there's some lady, right? As soon as the shooting starts, literally, shooting starts, she puts up her phone. And she just, she just sit in the audience, right?

1:09:40She said, first or second, roll behind Trump. So you gotta watch the videos that are out there and you'll see, she's got a, I think she's got a white case on her phone and she's sitting there and wearing a white shirt, I think, and then literally, it starts off and she just puts her phone up. I'm like, God! So I don't know whether this is true. Tim is the only guy that's told me this. He said that the man who died, comp... Compatoying. Yeah, if they're quarry, compatoying. Yes. He apparently, this is what Tim said, threw himself on top of his family, and that he took the shot in his head. That's the basic...

1:10:22That's what they're saying. Yeah, that's what he's using his body, which is the Aurora Colorado shooting all over again, right? That someone goes in and boyfriends throw themselves on something girlfriends. Yeah, no, it's, you know, and I think, I think that's another reason why I look, you know, if no one else had been hurt, maybe they would treat a little bit differently, but you can't, you got to be very measured about how they talk about this. I'm from the Republican side, from the campaign side, and I think they, they're, their best thing to do is just let it go. Obviously, they'll probably reference it during the RNC speeches or whatever, but they got to let it go, just go, and then just, and then just let some of the imagery speak for itself, but move on and go to the issues.

1:10:57And it looks to callus to use it as a look at how awesome we are, where hardest, whilst a guy died, and one or two people still in intensive care. Exactly. Dude, I hate to say this, but I got a pop. That's all right. Dude, I appreciate you for doing this emergency episode. I needed to get you on. Mike Baker, ladies and gentlemen, MB company man. and be company man. Also the President's Daily Brief Podcast. Look at me marketing right now just before we finish up. But now he's talking about that. But the President's Daily Brief Podcast available on all podcasts, platforms, and we do a weekend TV show now called the Situation Report.

1:11:38Well you'll have a lot to talk about next weekend. I really appreciate you. Stay safe in the RNC. And Doug, here we have the Lemo Emu in its natural habitat, helping people customize their car insurance and save hundreds with Liberty Mutual. Fascinating. It's accompanied by his natural ally, Doug. Uh, Lemo, is that guy with the binoculars watching us? Cut the camera. They see us. Only pay for what you need at LibertyMutual .com. Liberty Liberty Liberty Liberty Liberty Liberty Liberty Savings very underwritten by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and affiliates excludes Massachusetts.

From the publisher

An emergency episode in the wake of this past weekend. No ads, no edits — just a raw, unfiltered conversation with former Central Intelligence Agency officer and security expert Mike Baker.
Sponsors:
See discounts for all the products I use and recommend: https://chriswillx.com/deals
Extra Stuff:
Get my free reading list of 100 books to read before you die: https://chriswillx.com/books
Try my productivity energy drink Neutonic: https://neutonic.com/modernwisdom
Episodes You Might Enjoy:
#577 - David Goggins - This Is How To Master Your Life: https://tinyurl.com/43hv6y59
#712 - Dr Jordan Peterson - How To Destroy Your Negative Beliefs: https://tinyurl.com/2rtz7avf
#700 - Dr Andrew Huberman - The Secret Tools To Hack Your Brain: https://tinyurl.com/3ccn5vkp
-
Get In Touch:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chriswillx
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/chriswillx
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/modernwisdompodcast
Email: https://chriswillx.com/contact
-
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Modern Wisdom

All 547 episodes
#812 - Mike Baker - Emergency Episode: Former CIA Agent On Trump Assassination AttemptModern Wisdom · 1 h 12 min
Listen in VO