In short
Podcast Notes: Modern Wisdom Episode #870 - Cenk Uygur - How The Left Continues To Eat Itself
Episode Overview In this episode, Chris Williamson discusses with Cenk Uygur, founder of The Young Turks, the current state and challenges facing the political Left in the aftermath of the recent US election. They delve into topics such as the credibility of political figures, the populist vs. establishment divide, and the implications of "wokeism" on electoral outcomes.
Key Themes
- Credibility in Media
- Cenk critiques the credibility of mainstream media figures, contrasting them with Joe Rogan.
- Questions Joy Behar's dismissal of Joe Rogan's credibility based on absurd claims regarding dragons.
- Points out the disconnect between establishment media and the reality faced by average Americans.
- The Left’s Self-Destruction
- Cenk discusses the Left's internal conflicts and how they are "eating themselves."
- Establishment figures often reject populist voices, leading to alienation from the base.
- He emphasizes the importance of understanding the "populist vs. establishment spectrum" in politics.
- Populist vs. Establishment Politics
- Cenk identifies himself as a "populist left" and argues that the establishment is out of touch with the needs of the majority.
- He believes that a true populist candidate could revitalize the Democratic Party, similar to how Trump reshaped the Republican Party.
- Cenk asserts that the establishment is concerned primarily with serving donors and preserving their status.
- The Role of Wokeism
- The discussion touches on the impact of "wokeism" on elections and public perception.
- Cenk argues that extreme left positions, such as certain aspects of identity politics, can alienate voters who are concerned about more pressing economic issues.
- He observes that the Democratic Party's failure to address economic concerns pushes voters toward populist candidates like Trump.
- Intolerance of Dissent
- Cenk highlights the Left's intolerance for dissenting opinions, which stifles productive discussions and leads to a lack of progress.
- He compares this to the right, which has historically had its own issues with criticism but is beginning to allow more debate.
- Media and Elections
- The role of media in shaping public opinion and electoral outcomes is a recurring theme.
- Cenk argues that online media is now more powerful than mainstream media, allowing new voices to emerge.
- He predicts that the future of elections will hinge on media effectiveness rather than traditional campaigning.
- Populism and Policy
- Cenk proposes a "populist plank" that includes basic economic rights like paid family leave and anti-corruption measures.
- He suggests that any politician who delivers on these populist policies, regardless of party affiliation, should receive support from constituents.
Key Takeaways
- Establishment vs. Populism: The divide between establishment Democrats and populist movements needs to be addressed for the Left to regain relevance.
- Economic Concerns: Voters are more interested in economic reform than extreme cultural issues, which can detract from their core message.
- Criticism is Necessary: Open dialogue and constructive criticism within the party are essential for growth and change.
- Media Influence: The rise of alternative media platforms is reshaping political discourse and could lead to significant changes in future elections.
Conclusion Cenk Uygur's insights provide a critical lens on the current political landscape for the Left. By advocating for a return to populist values and an emphasis on economic issues, Cenk believes the Democratic Party can reconnect with its base and regain electoral strength. The episode emphasizes the need for constructive dialogue, both within the party and across political divides, to foster real change.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Who is more credible the cast of the view or a dragon? These days apparently a dragon. So as you know, Joy Bayhara said that, oh, you can't trust Joe Rogan, he believes in dragons. Oh, well, Joy Bayhara, I believe that Joe Biden was young and dynamic, that he had no cognitive difficulties at all, and that he was the best possible candidate for the Democrats. I can't find anything less credible than that. Why are these people so out of touch? Is it purposeful or is it ignorance? Oh, it's definitely ignorance. And so, Chris, this is really interesting because I am bilingual. I speak both populist and establishment.
0:47And that's because I worked at MSNBC as a host. I worked at current TV. I went to the you know some of the same schools that these folks went to and so I I mainly come from their worlds But I'm a natural born populist and so they've rejected me 2000 times over before I even got to the right wing right and so and but I know how they think and they're in their own Bubble everybody's in their own bubble and so in their bubble They're right about everything and they're objective right and they truly believe that right and so anyone who disagrees with them they think is not objective and is to be dismissed and derided and insulted, etc.
1:30And so they have no idea how cool this they are and they're not coming out of from bad intent, which a lot of people won't believe, right? But they actually, they genuinely believe they have the best of intent. And if you just listen to the establishment one more time, boy, then they'll really deliver. Right? And if you cheer for them louder, they'll really deliver it. and I swear to God, they genuinely believe it. Are they well read? Because it seems to me, in order to be able to have that level of self belief, you need to really know what you're talking about. And I'm yet to see much evidence that that's the case.
2:05No, that's the other amazing part. They're actually really well educated, really well read. But since the bubbles are so strong and thick, they still, it's like asking a fish how's the water? And the fish says, what water, right? So what they don't understand, This is the crux of what they don't understand is that the establishment is built to preserve the status of the top 10 % and then most importantly the top 1 % and then the top 0 .1%. And since it's built on that and almost all the people in the establishment are at a minimum in the top 10 % at least in terms of socioeconomic status and they grew up, most of them, not all of them, but most of them grew up in that context.
2:49When Joe Biden provides about 5 to 10 % or Barack Obama provides 5 to 10 % change, they think, oh my God, this is amazing. My life was already great, and these saints have given me 5 % extra positive change in their minds, right? Or 10 % positive change. How could anyone complain? You guys are nuts. What I'm trying to get them to see is no brothers and sisters, But for the rest of the country, 60 % of Americans live paycheck, 5 % change, and go and get it done. They need 50 to 100 % change, and you're not getting it, because you just don't talk to folks like that, and you're not in that context.
3:29And when I say that, they think I'm the biggest radical ever. And by the way, now of course, the new theory is, that's it, I've done the pivot, and I'm a right -winger, and I've abandoned all my policies, and et cetera, et cetera. No, I've been saying the same thing for 20 straight years. Oh, you're not taking a hard turn to the right? No, not at all. So, and here's another thing. I talked about this on Lex's show and I talked about it in my book, Justice Coming. And whenever we can have an actual conversation, I want people to get this through their heads. I just wrote a piece right before the election for Newsweek about it.
4:08There's two political spectrums. There's the left right spectrum, but there's the one that nobody talks about. The populist versus establishment spectrum. So I am populist left. So you will see me have left wing positions on many, many issues, the great majority of issues. But I also have a populist position. So that's what discombobulates them. They're like, no, if you're on the left, you have to be pro -establishment. I'm like, no, that doesn't make any sense at all. The left historically was not pro -establishment. you guys turned them that into pro -establishment through all the corporate donations, et cetera, et cetera.
4:44So that's why people are confused. Yeah, what that pivot toward defending the people who have the most money, defending the people that have the most power, defending the people who are the most educated seems to be turning the entire bar stool upside down compared with what traditionally were the values of the left, right? Working class on class, on class lines, not based on really that much else. Is it salvageable? Is it possible to try and bring this back around? Yeah, 100%. So look, first of all, Bernie almost won in 2016 and 2020. I mean, he lost by, you know, the skin of his teeth, and that's only after the entire establishment, coalesced and ganged up on him, and not just the politicians rallying around Joe Biden in 2020, but all of mainstream media, most importantly MSNBC.
5:36They all said, all Bernie's are not C. He's gonna execute people in Central Park, etc., etc. Who else do they call a Nazi? Oh right, Donald Trump. Anytime anybody's announced their, it's out there. Now I am massive proud of Donald Trump and I think that what he did in 2020 was unacceptable and on American. So we can go back if you want and discuss and debate that. But he is trying to be a populist in his own way. I think it's a little fake. We can again debate and discuss that. But at least he's going in that direction. And Bernie is clearly a populist. And that is why the establishment hates both of them.
6:12But remember, they barely beat Bernie two times. So it won't be Bernie again. He's too old. But next time around, if we have an actual populist in the Democratic primary, we can recapture the party in the way that Trump has captured the Republican party. And if we don't, we're doomed. That establishment can't win elections. They're too fake, they're too phony, they serve the donor class too much, they're too elite, and nobody's interested in that bullshit. You asked Elon Musk to put you in charge of cutting the pentagon, how'd that go? It's official. I'm now running the entire pentagon. Because that's how it works.
6:51No. Look, I thought it weren't great. and but the left doesn't think it went great. So let me explain. So Elon says I want to cut two trillion from the budget. In reality, there isn't two trillion to cut. All discretionary spending is only 1 .7 trillion. But there is one place where you could have massive savings. And that's the Pentagon. And that's because they never pass an audit. This is their seventh straight audit that they failed. And they say that they generally can't account for half the money, which is over $400 billion. So I said, on X, hey Elon, put me in charge of the Pentagon. I'll cut $400 billion overnight.
7:32And hey, all of a sudden you're 20 % of the way home to your goal, right? And he said, give me suggestions. So let's pause there. No Democratic leader has ever asked me for suggestions, even though I run the largest left -wing media network in the country. They've never asked why populous. What would a populous know he doesn't even support the donors terrible we're never gonna ask him right so Elon asked already that's progress that's already better than I was what I was getting from the other side and so then the left goes no don't say that okay but what do you want me to do lie do you want me to tell you that Kamala Harris and Joe Biden called me every other day like oh we're really interested in what our base wants, they had it all interested in what their base wants.
8:20They pretty much hate what their base wants. So that's great. And then I gave my suggestion, which was, hey, listen, if you want to cut in a real way, you'd have to of course do it line by line. So if you bring me in and we both went to Wharton, we both run businesses. His are of course much larger. But hey, I run a top 10 media network in the country. So both of us know how we can go line by line and cut things that are actually wasteful inefficient. And by the way, some of it is just corruption, just massive pork barrel spending. Okay. But for now, I can give you a suggestion of stop having the generals work for defense contractors.
9:00Because the minute they retire, they go work for the military industrial complex. And since they're going to get millions of dollars from those guys, what do they do before they retire? They give those same companies billions of dollars, sometimes hundreds of billions of dollars in contracts. That's an obvious massive conflict of interest that any business person would understand anyone with common sense would understand. And so then Don Jr. jumped in and he said that's a good idea and we're already discussing it. Great. Okay. So you've got Elon certifying and you've got the son of Trump stepping in as well.
9:37That's right. And then, and then Donald Trump's union came back in and said, again, hey, this is just common sense. And we should be going in that direction. So now if the left wants to complain, if, now it's if they do it because they haven't done it yet, if Elon and Trump and et cetera, cut the Pentagon or and or do a great rule about conflict of interest for the general. So the left has wanted for the last 20, 30, 40, 50 years. If they complain, oh, they did the thing we wanted. I got it, then I can't help you. Right? Yeah, this can't take the win. I can't help. Does this sense a lot of the time that purity is more important than victory?
10:21Oh, 100%. And unfortunately, that's one of the defining hallmarks of the modern left that I'm rebelling against. And so, look, I know so both signs, again, misunderstand each other. And again, I'm bilingual. I use severe Republican. I'm a progressive populist. I've been in both camps. I understand both camps and I speak both their languages. But they do not speak each other's language. So the left thinks, oh, it's all a trick, right? And there's good valid reasons for thinking that, okay? But they think, oh, everyone on the right is a fraud, and that is not true. And they think, okay, if the minute you agree with them, They're not going to actually do that thing.
11:04Instead, they're going to use it to cut Medicare, Medicaid, all these other programs that we care about. And they're never going to actually do the thing that they set. Now, maybe that's true. And if that's true, well, okay, then I'll call them out on it, problem solved, right? It's not like I'm going to go, oh, okay, they promised it. So I will let them cut all the programs that I care about and I will not say anything. No, man, if anyone hasn't learned yet, I am uncontrollable. Okay, so you're not going to control me from the left or the right, the Democratic party or the Republican party. So if they do stuff I don't agree with, I'm going to not only call it up, probably going to yell at them, right?
11:43But if they say yes and then they do it, I am going, unlike everyone on the left, I'm going to take the fucking win, right? I don't think that part is complicated at all. You've been talking a lot about something that I've been fascinated around the last few yours, which is the intolerance of descent from within the left, the hypersensitivity around that. How frustrating is that to try and navigate? Yeah, but okay, so that is super frustrating. And there's an extra layer of it for me, but I also want to talk about the right a little bit too, in a second. So on the left, there's the thesis that if you agree with the right, even 1%, they will abuse it.
12:28So never agree with that. Okay, yeah, but that's going to lead to very unproductive conversations, right? And then there's also the thesis of if you're not at the most extreme maximalist position, your your strategies wrong, we should always defend the craziest shit our side has ever come up with in human history. I don't agree. I think that's a terrible strategy. And that's how we wound up in defund the police. That's how we found out the and wound up with transgender, undocumented immigrants getting free surgery, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Like, I told them that is 98 % of Americans are not going to be in favor of that.
13:07You are just flat out wrong. Like and so if you tell someone on the left they're wrong, they get so hurt by that. They just, they cannot stomach that. And one thing I'll give the right credit for is there's way more debate, right? I think in the old days, as in like first Trump term, there was no debate. Trump, daddy Trump says it, everyone does it, period, period. And the right wing also has its massive intolerance, right? Intolerance for anyone on the left's opinion, generally speaking, although now we're building some bridges, but also intolerance for, I don't like that lifestyle. So that lifestyle is bad.
13:51Hey, brothers and sisters, did you mean free? freedom or do you not mean freedom? If you mean freedom, let anybody do their any fucking lifestyle they like. What is it of your business? Right? So but again, I think these are times are different. I think Trump 2 .0 and I might be naive and I might be too hopeful and I grant that to my friends on the left. But I sense an actual right -wing populist movement that might even push back against Trump. So and I think the first place that pushbacks probably going to come is Israel. But we'll see. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I'm a sucker. And maybe you guys will all just say, Daddy, I don't want to mean you Chris.
14:26I mean, right wing populist. We'll just go, no, Daddy, Trump, Daddy, Trump, whatever Daddy Trump says we want, right? We'll see. We'll find out. Do you think that you're closer to right wing populist or left wing establishment people.
14:44It depends on how you define it, right? Because if I say right wing populist, people will then say, well, right wing populist, some right wing populist believe X, Y and Z. And those X, Y and Z positions are awful. And I would never agree to them, right? But if I say left wing establishment, they believe a whole bunch of people that I don't agree with, right? So and what I want everybody to understand, both on the left and the right is, maybe we are individual human beings and we are not born with an ideology that fits pre -existing buckets. So there's this bucket of left wing ideology and a bucket of right wing ideology.
15:30And those are all on different issues, foreign policy, domestic policy, spending, social issues, et cetera. And they say, no, this was set 100 years ago, 200 years ago, 20 years ago, you have to agree with every position on the left or every position on the right. Why? My number one question to Americans is why? Why do I have to agree to a preset ideology? Why don't I say, hey, you know what, I like that on the left, I like that on the right, I like that in the middle. And that's because I'm a human being, I'm an individual, I'm an American. And so stop listening to your leaders telling you what you have to believe.
16:05And especially for right -wing populists that think and often do, but think that they cherish freedom. If you do, brothers and sisters, you have to prove it, not just by cherishing your own freedom, but by cherishing other people's freedoms too. It's interesting to think about the way that the incentives align. You know, I had Anna on the show a couple of weeks ago, really interesting conversation for her too. And I asked her the question, can you see the incentives and the dynamics that cause people to go from left to right? Because I don't see very many people going from right to left. And I think that it's because of this sort of puritanical purity nature that there wouldn't, you wouldn't be accepted with open arms.
16:47And it does seem like until the left is prepared to let go of this incredibly high bar, the maximum, some maximizing number that you said. It can't be 98%, can't be 99%, must be 100 % agreement with absolutely everything that the party line is saying that you have to agree with. Whereas the right's like, nah, you're most of the way there, come on over. So yeah, I mean, it just seems so obvious to me about why you get this slide to the right. I mean, even you talking to Donald Trump, Jr., talking to Elon Musk, like that doesn't happen in reverse. It doesn't happen the other way round. Oh, well, that's definitely true.
17:25I mean, because as you were saying, I was laughing inside at the idea of Kamala Harris saying to Charlie Kirk, oh, that's an interesting idea. What other suggestions do you have, Charlie? Come on. Yeah. That's never ever ever going to happen. I mean, that's never, she never going to say that to me. Let alone Charlie Kirk, right? Let alone anyone on the right. And so, and that's because again, that's not the left right thing. That's the popular establishment thing. Because the people in the establishment think that the people that are populists are dirt and they think that they're not Turn out in the elites.
18:02Why would I listen to them right so like they find that I'm watching you uneducated masses Yeah, and they find the idea of taking a device from us Just laughable, you know, you just laughed out loud at the at Darian Transigence and they would laugh at the idea What would we learn from Charlie Kirk or James? Oh, I need laugh and laugh and laugh. And that's why sometimes getting into a conversation with somebody who's an establishment Democrat and they're talking down at me like almost every time. I've barely ever had a conversation with anyone who's an establishment Democrat where they weren't doing this, looking down their nose at me the entire time, right?
18:47Like who the fuck do you think? It's a highly, it's a highly unlikable party, it's a highly unlikable group to be around. Yeah, so look, from their perspective, they would say, well, how about you guys? You guys keep attacking Muslims and transgender people and gay people and black people, etc. From their point of view, and I know a lot of the right wing would disagree, right? But as someone who is as close to neutral as it gets in terms of at least the populist then, no, the right wing does attack those people. And maybe not to the degree that the view says and maybe not in the same way that the view says But are there attacks are there actual bills pass etc?
19:24Yes, definitely, okay? So both sides have reasons to distrust each other But but what I'm saying about the establishment Democrats is that they don't just distrust the right They distrust populists that are on their side too Because they're elitist by nature and and by the way that also is true of Republicans and But why give the populist right credit is because they let a rebellion and a successful rebellion against establishment Republicans. So if I tell Democrat Mitch McConnell is a piece of shit who took a billion dollars from corporate donors and does anything at corporate donor, ask him to do, they'll say, of course that's true, yeah, Mitch McConnell is the worst.
20:05If I say Nancy Pelosi did the same thing, they're like, how dare you, she's an angel when And she took the same billion dollars, she did it for our well -being. I'm like, did she? Did she? Because I could show you all of our staffers that worked at Health, Nishirah's companies and drug companies. And then all of a sudden, we can't negotiate drug prices. And I can go on and on and on, right? But on the other hand, so now when I be in the whole past, when I talk to Republicans, they would say the same thing like, oh, how dare you, Mitch McConnell is the beloved Mitch McConnell who has given us everything we want, including the giant corporate tax cuts we want it.
20:42Well, now when I talk to right -wing populist, they're like, yeah, fuck me, Chicago. Oh my god. All right. There you go. We're making ground. Yeah. That's right. You don't have to agree with me on the policy, but we, the bare minimum that we all have to get on the same team on is. And by the way, the rights not completely on this team yet, okay? Which is that the donors controllers control everything. The politicians serve their donors. That's why they do talking points. They're empty shells. They're almost all crooks. And whatever donor money is given to them, they serve that money 100%. Does that mean if the donors are so important?
21:26And I've heard this, I'd Dean Phillips on the show at the start of the year and he was, I was digging deep into just how much time is spent fundraising and having to schmooze at cocktail hours and so on and so forth. It's like way more time than you spend actually legislating or doing your fucking job. Is there something different now about Elon being a large contributor financially, strategically, et cetera, operationally, but being out front, being owning it, being like, hey, I'm here. I'm on stage. Does that add an amount of transparency, legitimacy, scrutiny to him that gives you a sense of confidence?
22:10Not yet. No. Who fits in the pudding? Yeah. Okay. And so proofs always in the pudding. And so look, you understand the structure of what I'm saying here. The right. Of course I do. Yeah. So let me let me address it in a couple of ways. So first of all, those Trump served the donors. Sorry guys, but definitely, yes. So Sheldon Adelson gave him $100 million in 2016 and then another 100 million in 2020 and campaign contributions through the PACS. And then Miriam Adelson, his wife, he's now passed away, gave him $137 million in this cycle. So that's over $330 million that the Adelson's, let's be honest, bribe Donald Trump.
22:52Okay, so legal bribe and yes the Democrats definitely do it as well both sides claiming only the other side does it is insanity Not remotely true. So what did Donald Trump do for the Adelson's he moved our embassy because Sheldon asked him to the one One of the upsides of Trump is that he can't help himself He just says whatever is at the top of his mind and that gives us a sense of authenticity But the downside is he does confession after confession and so he's like, okay, yeah, Sheldon gave me a lot of money And so I moved the embassy. No, you're not supposed to give away foreign policy to a donor.
23:22Sorry. And then she he gave Miriam Adelson the presidential medal of freedom For what brother? Come on for what that's like our highest honor and you're giving it to a donor's wife So now the what's important is not the passport right now So he appointed four people that are team Miriam Marco Rubio state at least the faniquet as you unimbassador or Mike Huckabee as Ambassador to Israel, Mike Wallace as National Security Advisor. All four of those are Neocards. They're war hawks and they want more war, not less war. That is not what the base voted for. That is team Israel versus team America. I'm keeping it real.
24:02And by the way, I say the same exact things about Kamala Harris and Joe Biden. They totally sold us out, because A -PAT gave over $11 million to Joe Biden throughout his career. It's his number one donor. They've given different groups of given over 10 million now, five million from A -PAC, six million from J -Street to Kamala Harris. That's why they were willing to lose Michigan and the entire election rather than defy their donors. So now proof's going to be in the pudding. So that's one of his donors. I can give you many other examples. Now when you turn to Elon to your question, well, so on the one hand he's more transparent about it.
24:40That's good. That's true. right? The Koch brothers hid in the shadows and the right would argue and I think this true some truth to it that George Soros was in the shadows, right? And a lot of times the right will say, oh yeah, would you ban George Soros' money from politics? And I'm like, yeah, of course I would. I'm like, I, I would you ban union money from politics? Of course I would. I would ban all money from politics. That's the point. I don't want to cheat. And so that's the difference between a genuine populist and a partisan, right? So now Elon has a lot of interests, right? Let's keep it real.
25:15He and one of the people and when he's doing efficiency in the government, if he gets rid of every regulator who regulates his businesses, that's super fishy, right? So is he going to do that or is he not going to do that? And you know, there's an even Trump, He said it in one of the rallies because he can't help himself. He said I used to be against electric vehicles But Eli gave me a very strong endorsement. So now I'm pro electric Brother, you're not supposed to say it out loud So I'm hoping against hope that right wing populace actually hold them to account and my side thinks I'm a sucker for that And that right wing populism is not genuine.
25:59It's all fraudulent. They're all gonna do whatever Trump and Elon says So we'll find out and their actions will tell us who was right and who was wrong. I've heard you talk about just sort of leaning back into the criticisms that occur internally. And I do think that you're right. The rights not particularly good at taking criticism in the past, but recently it seems to be at least prepared to have the argument. But I've heard you highlight something I've noticed too, which is the democratic leadership finding it offensive, if you ask them hard questions, this sort of, what are you doing? Like are we not on the same side?
Read the full transcript
26:40Which obviously doesn't allow you to sharpen your sword particularly well, because you can actually do it constructively in a way that's aiming to improve and move toward things speaking the same language with the same goals, the same outcomes, et cetera. But yeah, the fact that it's not taken well, internal criticism and difficult questions aren't taken well. Yeah, there's two elements to that. So one is they believe that the role of the media is to do marketing for them. So anyone who doesn't do marketing for corporate politicians overall, but now it's mainly become corporate Democrats. They find that to be deeply offensive.
27:20And unfortunately, they've trained a lot of Democratic voters to find an offensive. So when I criticize the Biden administration. I get pushback from actual Democratic voters saying no, Jank, Jank, you're supposed to do only say only positive things about them. Don't say anything critical because that'll hurt our chance of beating Trump. They've trained their own voters to believe in propaganda as a concept. And I love Democratic voters. And so I'm not, I want to snap them out of it. I want to say, Hey, guys, you guys are generally kindhearted folks. who want to look out for other people. But you cannot have this ideology of no criticism.
28:04Because if you do no criticism of your leaders, you will have very shitty leaders. Okay, they will get power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. And it'll make your side weaker and weaker and weaker. And so for 10 straight years, I've been arguing for stronger primaries, actually way longer than that. But it's, I say the last 10 years because they had the ideology of, no, we will anoint a leader and democratic leadership is geniuses playing four dimensional chess and I swear to God they would literally say that to me. They're playing four dimensional chess. Your little mind can't understand it, Jack.
28:39Okay. So we picked the one who's the most pro corporate and who's, you know, pleasure, the donor is the most. And that is the anointed leader who has the best chance of winning. And then they send every robot on MSM. You see a bass chance of winning, bass chance of winning, and then, okay, but Bernie's like he went from 1 % to 48 % in a miraculous run with no media coverage. That was unbelievable, right? So how about that? That looks successful. No, he has no chance at winning. He has not our corporate run. All about has no chance at winning, right? And he got Democratic voters who are good people to believe that bullshit, right?
29:15So I'm trying to snap them out of it. And one of those things that I point to is they're like, no, we should have no primaries. We should just have an anointing in a cheerleading and you're ruining the cheerleading. Okay, had that work out for us because in 2016 the DNC did everything they could including illegally funneling money to Hillary Clinton's campaign through the state parties To make sure that it was Hillary Clinton and not Bernie Sanders, right? And they did as smaller primaries they possibly could And then on the Republican side there was a free for all you remember the old I don't know if they still do it in WWE but They were everybody's in the ring and then they the Royal Rumble.
29:53What's that? Is it a Royal Rumble or Battle Royale? Yeah, yeah, yeah, both of those. And with the starter calling the Royal Rumble, you got to throw everybody out of the ring, right? And it's one against all. And that's what 2016 was. And Trump came out of it. And I keep asking them like super simple question, can you remind me who won in 2016? Oh right, Donald Trump won in 2016. to Republicans won in 2016 after they had a super tough and I would argue vicious private. In 2020, there's no primary on the Republican side, but there is a significant primary with 27 Democrats on the Democratic side, Democrats win.
30:32So in this case, again, they canceled the primary, they say the guy with dementia is the anointed one and don't tell anyone that his brain is melting. I'm like, guys, he shakes hands with invisible people. We already know his brain is melting. There isn't enough propaganda in the world to get people to believe that Joe Biden is mentally healthy. And they're like, no, there is. And then he goes out and he's like, oh, my uncle was eaten by a cannibal. I'm like, I mean, if you can't recognize that this brother is in bad, bad shape. You're trying to deny reality. and it is such a dumb strategy. Forget that it's wrong and it's immoral to lie like that, et cetera.
31:14If you want to win, you don't want your candidates brain falling out of his ear. Like this is not complicated. And that's why I had such blowups with Alan Lickman. Because even after the debate, they took the professor with the keys. He came on the young curve, he's like, no, Biden's the right guy. I'm like, he said he wanted to destroy Medicare by accident. it. Do we think that that's the right guy?" And he's like, no, the keys to side always go with incumbent, always go with the establishment guy. Joe Biden. I'm like, okay, look, if you guys are going to be lunatics, I'm not on board for that, right?
31:47And so that I challenged Biden in the primary, we had a petition 14 months ago to get him the hell out of the race. So that kind of, you must share lead, you must do marketing, you must do propaganda. Dispise it. And that is why we're oil and water. Like the establishment Democrats probably hate me more than they hate any Republican. If you said to them, you're forced to go to lunch with Jank or Trump. I think every one of them picks Trump. They're like, oh, fuck Jank. No, no, no, no. I don't want any piece of that guy. I was listening to the rest of his politics. They did a number of post -mortems, I guess, after the election trying to break down what was going on.
32:28Now, have this guy on? I can't remember who it was, but he worked with Trump during his first administration. And he was telling this story, you know, sort of one of these classic ones about Trump's fragility around knowing things, or not knowing things, this sort of egotism that seems to be pretty endemic, although at least the snappier parts of it are nerfed publicly. And I can't remember what it was. There was something about the Middle East. He needed to know this thing about the Middle East. And one person tried to teach him something really important that would help to future proof them against the situation that was coming down the line and Trump is like nobody knows more about the Middle East than me I already that that's that I've read the book and I know all the rest of it But he really needed to learn he really needed this to be given to him so this dude that used to work there went in and took a different tack because he seems like quite a canny shrewd sort of dude and He said have you ever seen this movie brings up a movie Trump's like a best movie that's ever been made maybe the best movie that's ever been made And he said, well, interestingly, there's a back story to that that I'd love to tell you about.
33:32And he teaches Trump through this sort of odd acrobatic dance that he has to do to sort of get himself to the stage where this information is to be accepted. This is, you know, if there are character flaws in Trump that people really, really do not like and that are sort of out front, this is one of those big ones. this sort of fragility about knowing things, the brittleness around this sort of stuff. And it's wild to me that the very thing that most people on the left would point their finger at around Trump and the nostrils of the ego say, you know, all of the accusations that typically get thrown at him are precisely the thing that they have decided to embody.
34:17as if you ask me an offensive or difficult question, that's dissent, that's treason, this is mutiny, you can't do it. I'm like, you are aware you're taking for your own playbook, the exact thing you see is the biggest weakness from the other side. There's this weird ironic tragedy around that. Yeah, God, that's such a great point. And I hadn't thought of it that way. So it's absolutely true about Trump. And it's kind of hilarious. he's often accidentally very funny. So, you know, like the clean coal one is an example, but there's like dozens of these. He says, oh, you know, clean coal is when they take out the coal and they wash it.
34:57I'm like, no, it's not. Okay. But that's not the important part that he got that wrong. The important part is, if I was going to give that speech, I would think, do they take out the coal and wash it? That seems unlikely. Let me ask someone, right? But Trump never thinks, let me ask someone, right? Hey, if you put this in fact that inside the body, ask that off air. Don't ask it on air, right? Learn like, and he comes out and he's like, no one knew healthcare was this complicated. No brother, we all knew healthcare was super complicated. You didn't know it because you didn't study it. And I'm like, I get mad at the Democrats for all the things that they do wrong.
35:36I'm surprised that the right wing doesn't get mad at Trump for all the things he does wrong Like he never does any homework. He's never done a piece of homework in his life And that's probably because his daddy got him through school anyway, but you're right that the Democrats now have that same kind of Imperious attitude Whereas yeah, maybe they read books and they went to Ivy League schools and they did all that full stuff but But if you say to them, hey, I have a suggestion for you. They're gut reaction is fuck off Can't wait. Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Wait, okay. But you said Trump was terrible for not taking any suggestions.
36:10Why won't you take any suggestions? Because they find the idea of taking a suggestion from someone who doesn't have status as an inathema as something deeply troubling that they would never even consider this gatekeeping based on background, position, social class, social group, whatever, is a very British thing. It really feels like it's sort of inhabited the posh versus proletariat discussions that happen. They're just endemic to UK culture. I've never, I've never once heard an American person use the word posh. In the UK, it is used every single day by every single kid in school because class permeates Everything everyone is aware of it front and center and it's so odd to see Americans who you know we Criticize the left for not uplifting the working class for not sufficiently focusing on the working class Also the fact that Americans kind of almost deny that it exists They get all squirreling it's recently been put into race or it's been put into sexual orientation or into the the the airy that you live in or whatever.
37:23And yet, this just sounds like a lot like class gatekeeping, but just coming out in different ways. So there's a really good reason for that. You're absolutely right about the observation. And the reason is because established human Republicans and established Democrats for my whole lifetime have been trying to make sure that we don't talk about class. They want you to talk about race and sex and gender and both sides do identity politics, and if you're a right -winger and you think, no, we don't, you're nuts, and I'll prove it to you in a second. Okay? But what they want us to do is they want to divide us on culture war, bullshit, so that we don't realize all what we have in common is that we're the 90%.
38:08If the 90 % realized that we're united on those grounds, the top 10 % that are all rigging the rules to their benefit would be fucked and they know that. So they're like, okay, here's some red meat on trans issues. Now, masses go fight each other, right? So the reason why I tell the right, look, you guys are full of shit too. You do nothing but identity politics on your own right. So here's an example. Nancy Mace comes out after the election. Does it look at me, daddy, move with the trans bathroom with bathrooms and go, no trans people on the women's bathroom. That's that's the big issue in Congress.
38:46I mean, we're got 36 trillion dollars in debt. You know, we're a mess. We're not funding. We don't have paid family leave. Every other nation on earth has paid family leave. That's still every time that I fucking hear that stat. It blows my mind. I mean, again, that's because we live under corporate rule. And we've had these corporate Republicans and corporate Democrats getting us to fight one another for decade after decade and doing mass propaganda through mainstream media. Hey guys, don't focus on the fact that you're slowly getting crushed by corporate rule that trash compactor scene in Star Wars.
39:26We're all getting squeezed and squeezed. So that's why Americans don't even know that the rest of the world gives moms 12 weeks off after they have a baby because they are human beings and they understand that of course moms need three was at least to bond with their baby that is a very right wing position that is a very left wing position that is a very human position and that is why 84 % of Americans agree and these bullshitters in Washington tell us oh there's no way we can pass it and so what I say this about Biden the same way that I would say it about George W. Bush or Donald Trump don't tell me that you can't pass a bill that has 84 % popularity and then tell me that you're good politician because those two things are not possible.
40:10If you can't pass that bill, that means you suck as a politician. And the reality is, it's not that they suck. It's that they don't want to pass the bill because corporations would lose a whole seven and a half cents over that. And remember, I run a company. I know how much they're bullshitting you, right? It's not that big a deal for companies that give paid family leave at all, especially issue for trillion dollar companies, they're doing it out of unbelievable cruelty. And so they bought all of our politicians and they get them to go, oh, it's pay travel leave is impossible. Higher wages is impossible.
40:47Universal healthcare is impossible. Everything is impossible. Anything that helps you is always impossible. And anything that helps the rich, all of a sudden, oh, yeah, giant corporate tax cuts. Here you go. All of a sudden, that's the easiest thing in the world. So how much do you think the equivalent middle management bureaucrat, government officials, are shitting themselves about having Elon Musk and Vivek breathing down their neck if this thing comes off? Well, a lot, and they should be. So look, I'm, so if they're talking about actual efficiency and they actually want to cut pork barrel spending, like I said on X, like I said on every show and I'll say here, I'm here for it, okay?
41:30Put me in, coach. Let me out of them. Because these sons of bitches have been wasting our money this entire time. I give one more example from the Pentagon in 2015, they buried a report. Why? What did the reports say that they had wasted $125 billion? Billion. How do you lose and waste $125 billion? You do it by saying, don't ever cut the Pentagon. on your end age or security we're all going to die unless you let me steal this 125 billion dollars bullshit they've been robbing us blind at the Pentagon my entire life now they're not the only department that does it and if you find other is this a waste abuse great i'm happy to take it out but what i'm worried about is they're not worried about the abuse or maybe they are but on top of that they also have another agenda which is oh lean a cons a pain in my ass regulating my businesses.
42:25Oh, she doesn't want me to have monopolies. Yeah, she doesn't want you to have monopolies because monopolies are against capitalism. They destroy capitalism. So JD Vance said he was in favor of Lina Khan. Let's find out. Let's find out because Elon Musk is against them, against her. And so is all of Kamala Harris' top donors, Mark Cuban, et cetera. They were all against Lina Khan. That means she's actually trying to protect the average American. Okay, so if you cut Lee and a con that isn't saving anyone money it's costing a lot of people money, right? I give that as an example, but we go on and on but what's gonna happen is they're gonna cut until they get to a point Where the American people are gonna go nah, we don't like that right so I think where the rubber hits the road will probably be Department of Education and if they go to cut the entire Department of Education As they've threatened to do multiple times I think the American people are going to go, no, no, no, we asked you to close the border.
43:21We asked you to end inflation. We asked you to care about the average guy. We didn't ask you to destroy education and replace it with private education, which you're all going to get rich off of. Right? So let's see how that goes. Yeah. Now that the dust settled, you know, we're a few weeks hence from the election, what's your sort of post -mortem being able to tie everything together? Now the fog of war is fucked off. Do you think this was more a right victory or a left gloss? Was your head fallen on this? Yeah, I think it's actually super clear. People voted for change. They almost always vote for change because the neoliberal system, they sometimes they call it neoliberal.
44:03Sometimes I call it corporate rule. It's basically the same thing. Corporations have gained so much power, which by the way, in my book, Justice Coming, I explain the founding fathers, the American Revolution. not just against the British Empire, but against the British East India company. Right? So the Boston Tea Party was not against the British government. It was against that corporation. They went through their tea overboard because they were tired of their bullshit. Right? And so the founding fathers kept warning us, be careful with corporations because they will accumulate so much money and so much power.
44:38They will use it to choke off democracy and they were exactly right. Right? So that's what's happened all across the world. So people like, I don't get it. Brazil's going left and right, then left. And Argentina's going extreme left, extreme right. I don't understand what's happening. I can clear it up for you. They're voting against the incumbents. They're voting against establishment. They're voting against corporate rule. So, and they're doing it all across the world. So in this case, Kamala Harris was actually, people have already forgotten on this, there was a brief window when she was up in the polling by about seven points.
45:16Now the polling turned out to be wrong by about three or four points. It wasn't off by 30 or 40. It was off by three or four. So in that window, she actually could have won the election if they had held the election that day. So why was she popular back then and then she lost all of her popularity? Yeah. Well, because she came out with populist positions in the beginning, she said, I'm going to end price gouging by these sons of bitch corporations. I'm going to go after what they're doing on housing and I'm going to lower the prices of housing. I'm going to pick Tim Walls and I know a lot of the right wing now have problems with Tim Walls but Tim Walls was a populist in Minnesota that past paid family leave etc etc so she started out in a great direction strategically and she Biden was down eight.
46:00She's up seven. Holy shit she gained 15 points nationally which is so hard and then her moron corrupt brother in low Tony West, who was a corporate lawyer for Uber, was like, no, I've got a great idea. Let's go kiss corporate ass. So he convinced her to put out a letter saying that 90 corporate CEOs were on her side. And he convinced her to put Mark Cuban all over cable news. I got no beef with Mark Cuban. I have agreements and disagreements with him. That's fine, right? But strategically it was a massive mistake to put Cuban on cable news going, no, she loves big business. No, she loves corporations.
46:36No, don't worry, she's not gonna do any of that price as you can stuff. She's gonna let the corporations keep fucking you, right? And then her lead evaporated. The whole end, oh, she loves Liz Cheney and Dick Cheney. Are you guys idiots? Dick Cheney's last poll was at 13%. Who the hell do you think you're gonna win with Dick Cheney? If they just can't get it through their heads. So as soon as she turned around, Anna and I and the young turist started saying, terrible strategy were word were doomed and that's exactly what happened. How big of a deal do you think the woke stuff has been? Because everybody's heard 30 % of the Trump campaign budget went on this one ad, the most effective political ad in modern history, talking about they, them and for you and us, which on the surface probably makes it feel like well that was a linchpin issue or the linchpin issue.
47:31How much do you believe that? Yeah, so at Young Turks we have a total open mind. So I have people to the left of me, I have people that are more established from them. And so we had this huge debate after the election. I was on the side of it made a difference. We had two other hosts that were more leftist than I am who said, no, the ad didn't make a difference. Okay, I'm going to have the same debate with my nephew, Hassan Piker, on Thanksgiving, we do a thing called Janksgiving on his stream. And he's more of a leftist than I am, so we fight for an hour or two, and then we go eat Thanksgiving together, okay?
48:12So we're going to have that same fight. And the essence of that fight is they think, no, go maximalist position and say that, you know, every other president should be African -American trans disabled person and we'll win all the elections. And I'm like, nah, it's not going to work. It's not going to work. And I had this huge fight with Hassan earlier about crime. And he's like, no, it's imaginary. He's like, okay, if you'd like to get your clock cleaned, tell the voters that they're imagining being in danger when they're actually in danger, okay? You're going to get annihilated. And what happened?
48:51Prop 36 was a referendum basically on crime in California. In California with massively democratic voters, it passed was 70%. That is democratic voters going, yes, there was crime. Yes, we were pissed about it and cut the shit out. Okay, move those misdemeanors back the felonies. We're not interested in domestic assault being lightly treated. We're not interested in having our toothpaste locked up but it's CVS, right? This shit is real, okay? So now, but it connects though. It connects with our earlier conversation because the end of that trans ad was, okay, so that position is so extreme and they don't get it, they think it's not extreme.
49:35No, asking me to pay for your surgery when you're not a citizen yet and you're a detainee. Brothers and sisters, I got 1 ,000 priorities and maybe we disagree on whether I would pay for that surgery if I had all the money in the world, right? But we don't have all the money in the world. We don't even have paid family leave. What are we doing giving surgery to prisoners or detainees in that case? Anyways, at the end of the ad, it says, Kamala Harris is for they them and Trump is for us. See, that connects it back to populism. So Kamala Harris seems to be generically for they them, whether it's an extreme position on trans rights rights.
50:18And by the way, I want to be clear, I'm 100 % for trans rights, constitutional rights. I am not for, I have a right to play in the WNBA. No, you don't. That's not a constitutional right. Okay. But if you try to take away their actual rights, I'm going to fight you to the end on it. Okay. But, but that idea of there for other people, Democrats, whether these extreme transpositions, whether it's sometimes criminals, it's such bad framing Democrats, what are you doing? Okay? Or it's corporate goons. There for them and not for you. And the reason why it resonated so much is because that establishment Democrats have proven over and over again.
50:58They are for them, not trans people, not black people, not immigrants, but for corporate donors. So they will never, ever listen to the people. That's why that commercial resonated so much. Yeah, it plays into a wide narrative. This sort of skepticism or this suspicion that people have I kind of feel like that might be the case. And then it legitimates any claim that then follows along that same set of train tracks. Yeah, that's exactly right. And so those two things collided in a way that was toxic and ultimately proved fatal for the democratic chances. And by the way, again on the young Turks, what did we say?
51:35We said, don't go that extreme left. We were right. And don't go corporate and we were right. And so we did that at the risk of losing some of our audience and we did, we lost some of our paying subscribers, it hurt us financially, but it matters if you're being honest or not. It matters if you're authentic or not. And so, what I'm hoping for is at the end of the election, that there's three wings of the Democratic Party, the corporate wing, the establishment wing, that's one, they're the dominant ones, unfortunately, that's Biden, Harris, Hillary Clinton, etc. There's the extreme left wing that I didn't, and Terry and left, et cetera, where you guys, what right wing would call woke politics.
52:15And so, but there's a third wing. That's our wing, the populist left wing, right? The Bernie Sanders 2016 take care of the average American wing. So honestly, that wing was the only one that was correct. The other two wings were totally discredited in this election. Now will we be able to convince Democratic primary voters of that in 2028? That's the big question. I just had an idea. So that three pronged layout that you've had, I wonder how much of the Democratic Party, if that's true, let's just assume that that framing's accurate. I wonder how much of the Democratic Party actually likes both the right and the left obsessing over the identity politics woke stuff because it creates a specter that people can throw stones at that isn't the corporate at side that isn't the establishment side.
53:06It allows them to hide behind the much sexier, much more headline grabbing little nefarious underlink that occurs for the dams. 100 % and guys, what you don't know is that a lot of those culture wars are started by the Republican donor machine. So what they do is they go, okay, let's try to dig up something that the American people will hate that's on the left. So on the trans issue, for example, they started with, okay, if you remember in the first Trump administration, he thought about banning them from the military. And that turned out to be unpopular, because people were like, well, they're risking their lives for the country, that seems nice, that seems good.
53:47No, don't do that, right? So then they moved to the bathroom issue. And then eventually people were like, what are we gonna do? Check people's generals in bathrooms to see which bathroom they should go in. That didn't prove to be popular. So then they move to okay trans women in sports. Oh boom, they got it right. So why are they doing that? Why are they going through all those things? Because they're trying to find a way to have a wedge between us. That's why they're called wedge issues right. So they're trying to find a thing that is unpopular on the left so they could use that against the left.
54:21Why? Because of the same reason that the establishment Democrats do identity politics because they don't want to talk about the economic issues, because on the economic issues, we're all united against them. So they have to divide us, and so I would ask my right -wing brothers and sisters to stop falling for the trick, okay? And by the way... The nut picking occurs on both sides, right? The opportunity for you to find something on the left, which is a ridiculous, margaritale green, whatever she's got up to this week, or even earlier on today, like you can nut pick the nut picking, You can almost use this is the recursive reactive cycle of story occurs someone reacts to it the reaction occurs to the reaction the meta reaction about what everybody's saying happens.
55:06It's so predictable. And in fact, we predicted it. So on the young Turks, we love doing predictions and so for example, like I said about 14 15 months ago, I said Biden has approximately is 0 % chance of winning this election. and right before he dropped up, his staff said, we believe he had a zero percent chance of winning this election. Okay, so now on this ground, I'm not telling you all this stuff about I might disagree with the extreme left now as a Monday morning quarterback and after the election, we started saying it two years ago. We started saying, hey guys, this is wrong direction and we got under huge fights over it.
55:49And so, and what I was trying to explain to them is, Guys, the other side is digging to find something unpopular on our side. They will eventually find it if you dig long enough. And so when they do find it, can you please not help them by falling right into that trap? And their resounding answer to us was no, fuck off. So, so when they got to trans sports, they like that portion on the left, fell right into the trap. They ran into the trap. They're like, yes, no, there's no difference between trans women and biological women. I'm like, guys, a trans woman entered a weightlifting contest. She's in her 40s, okay?
56:35And notice I'm saying she, I respect all of her choices. I respect all of her rights, but she enters that contest and wins by 200 pounds, even though she's in her 40s. There's a biological difference. Of course there is. And they're like, no, no, no, no, no, we're gonna fall into the trap. And I'm like, okay. So you think I'm like, look, give LeBron every hormone on planet earth, put him in the WNBA. He scores 200 points in that. They're like, no, he would be an average player. Okay, look, I can't, so they wouldn't listen. And I'm asking right wing populist now. Can you guys please listen? Every time they do a cultural war issue, they're trying to distract you.
57:20It's a fucking squirrel, okay? Focus on things that matter in your life. Does your daughter have healthcare when she needs it? Are your wages higher or lower? Like here, $15 minimum wage. The right wing was trained through propaganda from corporate Republicans. You should hate them in a minimum wage. You should hate the minimum wage. And the propaganda is, oh, if you have higher wages, it'll drive up inflation. No dick, inflation is already here. Higher wages at least allows me to keep up with inflation. So the one you're saying we should move up the price of cars and bananas and houses. The only thing we shouldn't move up is your wages.
58:00Now fuck off. So you can tell me anything you want about trans bathrooms in either direction. But at the end of the day, fight for your wages, fight for your health, care for your family. Does that make sense? It does. I mean, ultimately the job of the political party, first job, the first job is to get into power. Because if you're not in power, you're not really doing shit. So do you think that there will be a reckoning on the left? Do you think there will be a reassessment of the things that have been focused on? Will it result in genuine change? Have any kind or you said that you like predictions?
58:37What's your prediction for this? Yeah, so and I'm also one of the few people in media that acknowledged it when I'm wrong, right? So I thought that 2020 online media was already strong enough to beat mainstream media, and that that's why Bernie Sanders would win against Biden. Because mainstream media is a propaganda anti -machine and they despise Bernie more than they despise Trump. They hate him with every fiber they're being because he's a true populist left person who's actually looking out for the average guy and nothing bothers the elites more than that. So, but I thought he was online media that was backing him and the uprising and so would be enough to overcome Biden.
59:20And it looked like for the first three primaries that Bernie won. He won all three. It looked like we were right. But it turns out no when they coalesced and Obama pulled them in and Clyburn pulled them in and said bootage his global char all you guys shut the fuck up and back Biden and hey morning Joe and CNN everybody shut up Except just everybody called Bernie the most successful Jewish -candidate in American history at Nazi and his followers Nazis Just go do that smear the shit out of them Let's go and when they did that and Obama gave and Clyburn gave that order And he didn't to be clear he didn't give the order to MSM you see a CNN that's more group thing, okay?
59:58And so but when that happened We lost because it turned out mainstream media was still bigger than online media, okay? So I was wrong about that Now in 2024 for the first time online media has been stronger than mainstream media and you see that because mainstream media all said in unison. Mos vote for a Kamala Harris, Trump is great danger. Trump is the worst hurt human alive. And look at this. I launched that I agree with them on about Trump. I think we can get into that another time. He's ego maniac. He should have never said terminate the Constitution, et cetera, et cetera. Okay. But don't tell me that Kamala Harris is perfectly fine.
1:00:41Wish you could barely speak, right? She speaks in talking points. She But those bullshitters for the first time in my life lost, right? Why? Because Rogan, Theo Vaughan, all those podcasts that Trump did got them more views than all the paid media that Kamala Harris got and all the mainstream media that she got. So that gives me some hope not because of Trump or Republicans, but because in 2020 primary that we might be able to win in the primary and have a truly populist left candidate, which would finally give Americans a real choice. Wouldn't that be amazing? Hey, do we go in that direction of that guy genuinely trying to help the American people?
1:01:24Or if you guys come up with a genuine populist, that person trying to genuinely help the American people, but in a different direction. Now let's let the American people decide. So I hope that our side's online media, including the young Turks, is strong enough to overwhelm MSNBC and Windows primaries because this is really important. People misunderstand politics. They think, and this is the mythology that television has been putting out there my whole life. Oh, two sides got together. Everyone in the country watched the debate. They analyze the policy issues, and then they decided which candidate they like better.
1:02:02No. One side got brainwashed by one's media, the other side got brainwashed by another set of media, and then some people broke free of that brainwashing, and they're floating out of non -line media right now, et cetera. So what decides elections is almost exclusively media. So the media wars are going to determine who wins the 20 -28 election as they have throughout. It's just that for the first time, our side as an online media, which is more populist, is now winning. Thank you, Gugha. Ladies and gentlemen, I appreciate the hack out of you. Thank you very much for today. What is coming up for you guys next?
1:02:40What can people expect? So one of the things that we're doing at TYT .com is we got a populist plank and I'm super curious to see if the right wing agrees with those positions and what I'm saying is let's do a voting block and so if your side is true and they deliver on these things, I'm not playing around with any of it. I don't care what the teams are called. I don't care if there's an R or a D on your helmet. You deliver paid family leave, anti -war, money out of politics, whatever those positions that I'm going to vote for you. And that's what signing that pledge means, okay? Whichever side delivers, I vote for them.
1:03:16And if you don't deliver, fuck off. Okay, so I'm not going to vote for you if you don't actually do the things that we want. You could tell me how terrible the other side is and you could both size fear manga. Oh my god, they'll let trans people in all the bathrooms. terms, ah, right? And the other side's like, oh my God, they're going to turn the country into, you know, the fourth right, right? You could say that all you want. But those six policies are all super popular with right and left. So you deliver on this, we deliver our votes. If you don't, again, in unison, we should shout out to them, fuck off.
1:03:54So, but I don't know if the right wing would like it or not like it. So go check it out on t -i -t dot com look at the thing if you like it sign the petition watch the show we do live shows six to eight p .m. everyday monday through friday and every right -winger that watches it goes holy shit they're honest i didn't expect that right and we criticize both sides and by the time we criticize trump they're like oh i get it they actually give a shit and they're not criticizing him just to be a dick to drum or just to be on the opposite side or just because their Democrats are on the left, they're doing it because they have genuine concerns.
1:04:31So come check out Young Turks on YouTube or on tyt .com anytime, sign the pledge if you like it, and at least here are case so you can make an informed decision about which side to go with. Appreciate you, Mike. Good to chat. Thank you, brother.
From the publisher
Cenk Uygur is a political commentator, former attorney and founder of The Young Turks,.
The dust has settled after the US election, so what is the post-mortem? As the founder of the biggest Left-leaning show in the world, why does Cenk have so many problems with the way the Left is constructed right now, and how can they improve?
Expect to learn if Joe Rogan is more credible than The View, if Elon will give Cenk the resources to run the Pentagon’s budget, whether it's possible for the left to start working collaboratively with Republicans, if the election was more of a right wing victory or a left wing loss, how big of a deal wokeism was in turning the tides of the election and much more…
Sponsors:
See discounts for all the products I use and recommend: https://chriswillx.com/deals
Get up to $50 off the RP Hypertrophy App at https://rpstrength.com/modernwisdom (use code MODERNWISDOM)
Get the Whoop 4.0 for free and a 12-month membership for just $199 at https://join.whoop.com/modernwisdom
Get a 20% discount & free shipping on The Chairman Pro at https://manscaped.com/modernwisdom (use code MODERNWISDOM20)
Extra Stuff:
Get my free reading list of 100 books to read before you die: https://chriswillx.com/books
Try my productivity energy drink Neutonic: https://neutonic.com/modernwisdom
Episodes You Might Enjoy:
#577 - David Goggins - This Is How To Master Your Life: https://tinyurl.com/43hv6y59
#712 - Dr Jordan Peterson - How To Destroy Your Negative Beliefs: https://tinyurl.com/2rtz7avf
#700 - Dr Andrew Huberman - The Secret Tools To Hack Your Brain: https://tinyurl.com/3ccn5vkp
-
Get In Touch:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chriswillx
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/chriswillx
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/modernwisdompodcast
Email: https://chriswillx.com/contact
-
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices




