AI Experts React: Elon’s Grok 4 Is Now #1 in AI — This Changes Everything w/ Emad Mostaque, Salim Ismail & Dave Blundin | EP #182

11 Jul 2025 · 1 h 5 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: Moonshots with Peter Diamandis

Episode Title

AI Experts React: Elon’s Grok 4 Is Now #1 in AI — This Changes Everything

Episode Description In this episode, Peter Diamandis discusses the revolutionary release of Grok 4, the latest AI large language model from Elon Musk's XAI. Joined by experts Emad Mostaque, Salim Ismail, and Dave Blundin, the group analyzes Grok 4's capabilities, benchmarks, and implications for the future of technology and humanity.

Key Guests

  • Emad Mostaque: Founder of Intelligent Internet
  • Salim Ismail: Founder of OpenExO
  • Dave Blundin: Founder of Link Ventures

---

Key Takeaways

  1. Grok 4's Performance and Benchmarks
  2. Grok 4 scored 100% on the AIME benchmark, an advanced math quiz.
  3. It exhibits post-graduate-level capabilities across various subjects, outperforming PhDs.
  4. Grok 4 demonstrates superhuman abilities in reasoning and academic questions, although it still lacks in planning.
  1. Current State of AI Models
  2. There is an accelerating competition among AI models such as Gemini 3 and GPT-5, with Grok 4 currently leading.
  3. The benchmarks indicate a qualitative leap, as Grok 4 outperformed previous models like Grok 3 and Gemini 2 in several assessments.
  1. Economic Implications of AI
  2. The conversation highlighted the beauty of capitalism, with companies like XAI taking risks to gain a competitive edge.
  3. The model's training and fine-tuning processes have evolved, now requiring equal resources for both phases to enhance quality and reasoning capabilities.
  1. Future of AI and Humanity
  2. Discussions included the potential for AI to discover new technologies and explore complex scientific phenomena, possibly leading to advancements in fields such as physics and chemistry.
  3. There is speculation that AI may pass the Turing Test and reach a form of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) without societal recognition.
  1. Applications in Various Industries
  2. Grok 4 presents significant applications across sectors such as education, healthcare, and entertainment.
  3. The panel discussed how Grok 4 could transform industries, particularly in automating research in biomedicine and enhancing productivity in coding and software development.
  1. Ethical and Regulatory Considerations
  2. As AI technologies advance, discussions about the ethical implications and regulatory frameworks become crucial, especially in healthcare where AI could augment or replace human professionals.
  1. Innovations in Gaming and Entertainment
  2. The potential of AI in creating personalized gaming experiences and interactive media was discussed, with predictions of AI-generated video games and films becoming a reality soon.
  1. Economic Factors and Cost of AI
  2. The cost of operating AI models is decreasing, making them more accessible.
  3. Predictions suggest a dramatic reduction in costs for AI operations, making powerful AI tools available to a broader audience.

---

Conclusion The episode underscores a transformative time in AI development, driven by the rapid advancements embodied by Grok 4. It raises significant questions about the future of technology, its economic impact, and the social responsibilities that come with such power. The panelists express optimism about the potential benefits while acknowledging the challenges and ethical considerations that lie ahead.

Further Resources

  • [Peter Diamandis on X](https://x.com/PeterDiamandis)
  • [Access Peter's Executive Course](https://qr.diamandis.com/futureproof)
  • [Learn more from Emad Mostaque](https://ii.inc/web)
  • [Explore Dave Blundin's fund](https://www.linkventures.com/xpv-fund)

---

*Recorded on July 10, 2025. Views expressed are personal and not financial, medical, or legal advice.*

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00How impressive is GROC4 for you? If you look at the AIME benchmark, which is an advanced math quiz, GROC4 scored 100 % on it. You're literally running out of benchmarks. It's got to be driving the Google nuts that Elon got this done in 28 months from a cold start. When he said he was going to put this huge cluster together, every AI expert in the world said you cannot get power laws and coherence at that scale, you just can't do it. Every AI expert was like, oh god, Danny did it. The amount of compute and resources, again, are going exponential. Now it's the real quality that differentiates the top models between each other.

0:39My big question is, where do we go from here?

0:45Now that's the moonshot, ladies and gentlemen. Everybody, welcome to moonshots. An episode of WTF just happened in tech this week. Special episode today following the release of GROC4. It is large language model release month, an extraordinary string of new models coming up. I'm here with my moonshot mates Dave Blunden, the head of Link XPV, Suleam Ismail, the CEO of OpenEXO, and a special guest to help us dissect all of this is Imad Moustache, the founder of Intelligent Internet. guys it was a pretty epic day yesterday good to see you all pleasure to have you yeah likewise yeah and this is our special Groc4 edition I'm I'm you're in London yes yeah fantastic and and Celine we're in the planet of you buddy New York okay Dave's in Boston I'm in Santa Monica all right Let's get going.

1:50So just to jump in, goal here is dissect what happened yesterday, blow by blow, what's GROC for all about, and just a shadow what's coming, we've got a few new model releases coming with Gemini 3, GPT 5, and probably a few others. So let's keep it off with this video. Like GROC4 is post -graduate like PhD level in everything better than PhDs would fail. So it's better that said I mean at least with respect to academic questions it it I want us to emphasize this point with respect to academic questions GROC4 is better than PhD level in every subject, no exceptions. Now, this doesn't mean that it's, you know, times it may lack common sense and it has not yet invented new technologies or discovered new physics, but that is just a matter of time.

2:51If it, I think it may discover new technologies as soon as later this year, and I would be shocked if it is not done so next year. All right, Dave, you want to take the first step? Yeah, yeah, awesome. This is actually a golden moment in time because it is an absolutely brilliant assistant that can do almost anything you want it to do. But like Elon said, it's not reasoning yet. So it's not coming up with the fundamental, this is what we should build and this is why. So that's still in the hands of the creator, the human operator. And so this moment in time is actually really, really golden. It feels just like an Iron Man movie where you've got Jarvis, Jarvis will build the suit for you.

3:34You have to decide how you're going to save the world. It's a really, really fun time to be using these brand new, like you said, there'll be three of these in the next month or so. This is the first round. He's dead, right. The PhD level solution, it's all measured in the benchmarks we'll get into in a minute. But it does virtually anything mind -blowing capabilities, but it doesn't decide what to do and why. EMI, I love your take on this. You've been plugged into this world intimately for a while. How impressive is GROC for you? I think it is very impressive. I think people would say said, I think it is reasoning, but it's not planning as yet.

4:19And there was a question as when we got to this run -of -flop level. I think that's the term. 10 to 28, I think, once, would we continue to see improvements? And part of that is the compute and part of that is the data as we'll get to later. And the answer is yes. And again, like Elon said, getting above graduate level in every sub postgraduate level in every subject, it can now execute and it can reason. It doesn't have planning yet. So I mean, isn't that AGI? Isn't that the sort of like kind of definition of AGI? But we passed through the touring test without noticing. Are we going to pass through AGI without noticing too?

5:01It's like this hedonic adaptation. You're like, of course, it's fine, you know? But already, again, if you want to get a job done, it will do the job for you of summarizing a book. Like it will do the job for you of like writing a summary of something or translating etc. And life is just the same so far because you haven't got that final step that Dave said. And there's a few extra bits that we need for full agentic above that. But we're nearly there because we have that final building block now with this next level of model. Yeah, where it's reliable. Diction, by the way, that it's it is reasoning.

5:37It has to be to solve these really hard PhD level problems, but it's not planning. That's a great way to phrase it. Run -of -Lop is 10 to the 27th, so that's the scale. That was the level the AI acts that they want to ban, by the way. So this would be the first bathroom. Yeah, that's a great point. I think one of the things that's happening is the absolute beauty of capitalism, where you've got big juggernaut companies fighting it out for supremacy and throwing taking massive risks, choosing design paths, taking huge gambles and really, really going forward. I think it's really magical to watch this happening.

6:16Yeah. I love this tweet from Sawyer Merritt. It says, XAI was founded in March of 2023, just 28 months later. It's now the number one model in the world verified by independent testing, incredible achievement. I mean, it is insanely fast compared to everything all sets being built. I remember when in May, two years ago, when Elon was first raising money, and I had a chance to sit in on a investor pitch in the first round for XAI, and he said, I'm going to have 100 ,000 GPUs H100s operating by the end of the summer, and everybody's like, no, no freaking way. And he did just that. and he's not slowed down.

7:01So here we see in this image, artificial analysis intelligence index, GROC -3 was placing, like, fifth or sixth, GROC -4 leaps to the front of the line. Are we gonna continue seeing this, Yimad? This just leapfrogging each other. Leapfrogging each other. Is there no end in sight? It's getting very difficult because if you look at the benchmarks they have there, If you look at the AIME benchmark, which is an advanced math quiz, GrantFour scored 100 % on it. You should get a bit of an answer. I mean, so you're literally running out of benchmarks in order to do that. And the amount of compute and resources, again, are going exponential, because you need to squeeze that out as well as have good data, as well as have good algorithms.

7:52So before you could just chuck everything into a pot, slush it around. Now it's the real quality that differentiates the top models between each other. And it's become more of an engineering and quality challenge than just a brute force challenge. In saying can I please say one for a second? Please. Okay, so I've got a problem. I would suggest that if I'm trying to answer that problem or get a solution to it, I could go to any of these and they're going to give me marginally roughly the same answer. So where to point where the the new step is I love it. I want to get into the details of GROC to figure out why it's so radically different from any of the others, right?

8:31And that's where I think the fun will come. Every week I study the 10 major tech meta trends that will transform industries over the decade ahead. I cover trends ranging from humanoid robots, AGI, quantum computing, transport, energy, longevity, and more. No fluff. Only the important stuff that matters, that impacts our lives and our careers. If you want me to share these with you, I write a newsletter twice a week, sending it out as a short two minute read via email. And if you want to discover the most important meta trends 10 years before anyone else, these reports are for you. Readers include founders and CEOs from the world's most disruptive companies and entrepreneurs building the world's most disruptive companies.

9:13It's not for you if you don't want to be informed of what's coming, why it matters, and how you can benefit from it. To subscribe for free, go to demandus .com slash meta trends. That's demandus .com slash meta trends. To gain access to trends 10 plus years before anyone else. Well, the funny thing is we're using, you know, we're basically going to Einstein, you know, and asking him to summarize a poem for us. I mean, it's like there's such massive level intelligence and the utilization for the general public is is diminimous. All right, let's look at what's next on this. So GROC outperforms the highest level test humanities last exam up until now we've seen see, 0 .3 was at 21%.

10:02And GROC4 was at 25 .4%, Gemini 2 .5 at 26 .9%, and then GROC4 and then GROC4 Heavy comes in at 44 .4%. We were talking about this a little bit earlier at EMOD. Can you speak to humanity's last exam for us? Yeah, this was come up by scale AI and kind of a few others to have an exam that even the most polyamathic people in the world would find difficult. So they estimated that like some of the smartest people in the world would score maybe 5 % on it, maximum 10 % and the top models at the time, which was probably like half a year ago, nine months ago, scored 8%. Now you have a qualitative leap above to that 44 % level.

10:49And I think it's interesting because as kind of Salim was referring to, like one of these models for, they're at this super genius level, It's like having a mega liberal arts program. And then the next step is going to be to have really useful people in the workforce on one stream and then the other stream will be to take the sub components of this and just push up to superhuman reasoning, discovering new things at a level that we can never have before. And I think this is one of the indications like, because again, I tried to read some of the questions, I didn't understand the questions. It was a past year.

11:24I literally just gave a presentation on this yesterday, So I have it right in front of me. Tell me. Humanity left exam, 2700 questions. When the slide says, for reference, humans can score 5%. That means the very best humans in any given domain can score 5 % within just the domain they understand. And I'll tell you why. Like here's an example question. Compute the reduced 12th dimensional spin boardism of the classifying space of the LI Group G2. And then it goes on from there. I mean, most people can't even understand one word of that. Exactly. There's another one. Take a five -dimensional gravitational theory compactified on a circle down to a fourth -dimensional vacuum.

12:08So, yeah, these are the hardest questions. That's why this exam is supposed to last for a long time. A 44 % score is just way outside the range of human ability because nobody has that broad knowledge that spans all these topics. So how far, how long before we had 100 % here too? You might have any bets? Two, yes, Max, I would say probably next year. So there was a conversation years ago about AI getting to a point where you can't understand the questions it's asking and answering. And we're not far from that. So I mean, we're unable to actually, at some point, we're unable to measure how rapidly it's advancing.

12:53That becomes a little bit frightening. It's got to be driving Google nuts that Elon got this done in 28 months from a cold start. Absolutely. Largely because Elon is phenomenal at large scale manufacturing, large scale organizational management and people working 4 or 5 a .m. sleeping in tents on the factory floor. That's his wheelhouse and that's Tesla that's SpaceX and and because all the intellectual property was more or less open sourced by the research community at Google and meta, he was able to pick up all that brilliant thinking and just plow it into implementation. Also small teams, right?

13:34It's not I mean, Google's a massive organization. Yeah, I think there's something else here though. Remember, We talked about this last time when Grop 3 came out, right? But when he said he was going to put this huge cluster together, every AI expert in the world said you cannot get power laws and coherence at that scale. You just can't do it. And he went right back to first principles, created new kind of connections between the chips and whatever and did it. And every AI expert was like, oh god, then he did it. And so this is the this is the incredible ability he has to go into a domain with a beginner's mind, go to first principles and just re -engineer that out of it to achieve massive performance.

14:16And I think this is an indication of that. My big question is, as you mentioned earlier, Dave, where do we go from here? Right? What does it mean to have a 50 % versus 44 % on this test? Yeah. Yeah. I think if I can just give it a little bit of context. In 2022, Amazon built us the 10th fastest public super computer in the world, 4 ,000 A100s. That was 2022. That was the 10th fastest in the world of any super computer that we were training on. There was an instance where literally hundreds of the chips melted because of the scaling. Now they've managed to, by 10 instant engineering problems, scale the hardware, but also the inside of the model, which I think is this really important thing.

15:03The reason it's above PhD level in each of these areas is that was a computation scale problem. And so what happens is that if you could scale a liberal arts person all the way up to post -grad in everything you would, and then you specialize down, and then you look at some of these things and Suleam's question there. Yeah, you've got the best. Just for reference, everybody, it's the XAI cluster now has 340 ,000 GPUs. Just for about $30 ,000 or more each. Yeah, you do the math. 10 billion. A lot. This is why we're seeing a billion dollars a day going into AI and why Jensen said there'll be a trillion dollars a year by 2030, and it's not slowing down.

15:48So here's another image from the little conversation Elon had yesterday. These are the benchmarks his team put up. I don't know if you want to hit on any of these E -Mide or Dave or Selim. Any of the favorites for you? Well, my favorite one is the AMAIME 25, 100%. You know, GPQA, these are all hard benchmarks. I think Elon would want to go to 110%. He likes 11 as the most. The actual ones. The only one I don't recognize is on the bottom right, you might be wondering what that is, the USA, I'm going to know who 25. I think it's the USA Mathematical Limpiad. Oh right. So it's about to happen. But again, these are novel hard benchmarks effectively, all of them.

16:37And they're being saturated because ultimately the AI can reason mathematics and science better than we can. Again, it can't plan just yet. It doesn't have the same memory capacity and the building blocks haven't been put together, but it's already superhuman narrow capability in many narrow areas. So it's inevitable, I think, what happens next? You know, we glossed over his quote there, Discover New Physics. Wouldn't surprise me if it's this year. Certainly no later than the end of next year. Alex Wisner -Gross has been having a field day with that all day. I bet. First of all, what does it mean to discover new physics?

17:16That's pretty interesting by itself. Well, Alex has been saying we're going to solve all of math and then physics comes next, chemistry and biology follow quickly. This is the most exciting thing for me. This is the most exciting thing of these models are will they literally unwrap the president of the universe before us, right here, right now, during our lives in the next five or 10 years? Well, there's a couple of specific applications that I think I've been watching. I want to see an AI break and solve the quandary of the wave particle duality of light that would be interesting and seeing what exactly is going on in this.

17:57The second one would be molecular manufacturing and how do we, new techniques for doing molecular manufacturing? Because we crack that. Then you crack all assembly and manufacturing of all kinds, right? And then the cost of anything becomes about a dollar a pound per weight of computer, a dollar a pound. And now you're in an amazing space. I mean, listen, again, going back to Ray Kurzweil's predictions, right, how he does it. I still, you know, he's mentored you. He's mentored me. But, you know, these predictions that we're going to have nanotech in the early 2030s. Where is it? Where is it? Well, this is probably its parents.

18:36Yeah. Well, the one that's really fun to think about, you know, the quantum teleportation Peter that you brought up at one of the right meetings. So how do you reconcile the fact that two entangled particles can be infinitely far apart, it's still communicating in real time with the fact that the speed of light can't be transcended. So Alex's speculation is if we can solve physics in the next year or two or three and it turns out that you can communicate using quantum teleportation, that we instantly discover all these other intelligences around the universe. Yeah, we've just been listening at the wrong frequency with the wrong codex.

19:17These are the key takeaways. I'm going to just read these out loud, and we can talk about them. They spent just as much on fine tuning, training the AI after initial phase, as they did on pre -training. So that's a big change. You mind you wanted to check that for us? Yeah, so it used to be that everything was basically take a snapshot of the internet and then you put it into this giant Super computer mixer and it figures out all the connections the latest spaces to guess the next word Then you had this very weird AI that came out that was a little bit crazy It's like a Dechevold graduate student for that is a coffee and then you had to tidy him up with the reinforcement learning That was the post training and that was one percent of the compute then with deep -seek it was 10 percent of the compute And now it's moved to equal because they figured out how to chain reasoning strips.

20:07And in fact, I think part of what they did, whether you've seen this with other labs, is they use their frontier model to make data for the next frontier model. So having large amounts of compute to create your own training data in a structured manner allows you to take that latent space, the landscape and make it smarter and smarter and smarter. just like your brain adapts as you learn more and more reasoning as you see more and more things. And so rather than having to have these massive scrapes of the internet or whatever, it's more and more structured data making up these models which are making them smarter reasons.

20:43So the 50 % additional compute dedicated to the fine tuning does that mean we have a more sane version of Grak. Yeah, well, fingers crossed. It doesn't necessarily mean that because you can still get all sorts of mode collapse within it in terms of if the late space goes, but probably because, again, you're training it just on a certain field of things as opposed to Reddit and other things. In terms of order, I'd say this is probably like a hundred million dollars each, so it probably adds up to one meta AI researcher. I knew you I knew you unit of measure the AI world. That's funny. So let's comment on the cost here.

21:31$3 per million tokens. $15 per million output tokens and can handle one context windows of 56 ,000 tokens. How does that measure up Dave in your mind? Well, that's pretty normal these days. It's a longer context. You know, a lot of the claimed context windows aren't real under the covers. The dimension of the neural net is much smaller than the claimed context window. So I suspect, you know, at this scale that this is the true dimension of the network, but I don't really know what I'll have to dig in over the next couple of days and find out. But, you know, what it means is, you know, you can feed in 100 books worth of information concurrently.

22:11It instantly digests all that knowledge and then gives you an intelligent answer based on all of that information in one pass. So it's just the next step in what's been going up sequentially from model to model to model. EMI, do you expect we're going to be constantly reducing the price per token? Is this a demonetizing curve for a wild to come? 100%. I mean, so the cost of this is about the same as the cost of Claude Force on it, which which is the second model of Anthropic or O3's cost, but it's better than both. It's about 0 .7 words per token to give you an idea. And so the cost of a million very good words that are smart is $20.

23:00But next year with Vera Rubin, the next generation chip they're going to whack in there, just by the hardware it'll be three times to four times cheaper. And they'll probably figure out some more stuff around that. So, equi intelligence, the cost probably drops by around five to ten times a year. So, it'll be a buck for a million amazing words. It's hard to believe the most powerful technology in the world is diminimism cost. It's crazy. I want to put a comparator though here. You know, we do, this is amazing. Like we could put hundreds of our books into the thing it would hold all of that in real time as Dave's had.

23:42But let's note that a single human cell has several billion operations going on in it at any point in time, right? So we're kind of several orders, multiple orders of magnitude from modeling one cell. And so we've got a long way to go try and model life or get to really big, big, big things. There's a coming wave of technological convergence as AI, robots, and other exponential tech transform every company and industry. And in its wake, no job or career will be left untouched. The people who are going to win in the coming era won't be the strongest. It wouldn't even be the smartest. It'll be the people who are fastest to spot trends and to adapt.

24:23A few weeks ago, I took everything I teach to executive teams about navigating disruption, spotting exponential trends, a decade out, and put them into a course designed for one purpose to future proof your life, your career and your company, against this coming surge of AI, humanoid and exponential tech. I'm giving the first lesson out for free. You can access this first lesson and more at dmandis .com slash future proof. That's dmandis .com slash future proof. The link is below. Let's talk about supergrock heavy. You know, I got a low V -Lonnes terminology, right? It's we've got Falcon Heavy and you know, we've got super grog heavy He loves his terms and I love them too actually it makes me like smiled when I saw that why heavy by the way Does there a name reason for that?

25:11It consists of having a cross to Elonverse. Yeah, I mean like you know Falcon Heavy was able to have you know Three boosters to launch a heavier payload orbit. So why not why not talk about heavier capacity? So I mean, in reality, right, Falcon Heavy had multiple boosters and this has multiple agents. So Superbrake. So next one will be heavier than the one they will have to have. Next one will be rock starship. There will be, there'll be, there'll be BFG. BFG has. So the price point here is that's a new high bar. That's going to scare a lot of people. I say the same thing I said last time, try it.

25:55Burn the 300 bucks for one month. You can turn off the subscription, but you gotta try it to know what you're missing or not missing. A lot of the use cases, the day -to -day use cases don't matter much. But if you're building something complicated, writing code or designing mechanical parts or whatever, you're gonna get addicted to it. What I'm really curious about is the margin at 300 bucks a month. are they actually chewing up all that money on compute for you or do they have significant margin at that price point? Because one thing I've been predicting for a long time is inevitably going to happen soon is the use cases where you need that extra intelligence.

26:32Like when you're building a software product and you're prompting it, you absolutely need that extra level of intelligence. It makes you dramatically more efficient in moving forward. And if you look at the cost of an engineer's software engineer's time, you can afford to go up another factor of 10 or even more in price point for this and still be glad that you paid it. And so I think the escalation of pricing is going to come soon. The kind of argument is that the competing models will then commoditize it, but I think people will pay a lot for marginally better improvement because the effective product you get out the other side, it really accelerates your time to development or the quality of design or whatever the solution to the math problem is right rather than wrong makes a big difference.

27:18My guess is they're losing money. That's what OpenAI said for their pro level. Whereas the level below they make money. So I think the way that I view this is a loss leader because if someone's paying 300 bucks you enter price seldom up. And then you do team things to get everyone doing it. Because basically right now what we have is a UI problem. The reason there is there. The way to hook it up and make it usable for as many people on your team isn't there. You know, this is what Andre Carpethy calls context engineering, you know? Like, what are the new UI's that will enable us to use this most efficiently and get our data in there?

27:56If you can crack that, then 300 bucks a month for a high level knowledge worker is nothing. You know? Just like, you used to pay a thousand, two thousand bucks a month for Bloomberg when I was a hedge fund manager, mostly for instant messaging, but you know, like again, It's just not quite there, but it's about to flip that. Yeah, a lawyer will cost you that much per hour, or even three times a per hour. Will this do the job of your legal document better? I can't wait. That's the one profession I would love to replace. You're lawyers. You mentioned enterprise level, you might let's go there right now.

Read the full transcript

28:36What else can go up to you? We're actually releasing this block if you want to try it right now to evaluate run the same benchmark as us. It's on API, has 256K contact links. So we already actually see some of the early adopters to try Gwak4 API. So our Palo Alto Neighbor Arc Institute, which is a leading biomedical research center, is already using seeing how can they automate their research flows with Gwak4. It turned out it performs is able to help the scientists to sniff through millions of experiments logs, and then just like pick the best hypothesis within a split of seconds. We see this as being used for their like the CRISPR research and also, you know, Grog4 independently evaluate scores as the best model to examine the chest x -ray, who would know.

29:29And on the financial sector, we also see, you know, the Grog4 would access all the tools, real time information is actually one of the most popular AI is out there. So, you know, our graph was also going to be available on the hyperscalers. So the XAI enterprise sector is only, you know, started two months ago and we're open for business. Open for business. So, Iman, you've been working on medical -related AI. It's, you know, the block here isn't the tech. It's going to be the regulations. It's going to be when will an AI be able to fully replace a radiologist or fully replace any profession in the medical world.

30:12How do you think about that? Well, I think it's the augmentation first, reduce errors, increase outcomes, and then eventually it's replacement because Google had the AI Medical Expert study which showed that it was Dr. Dr. Plus Google search, Dr. Plus AI, and then AI by itself. Yeah, just to self -driving cause. I just want to touch on that because it was a really important article that came out. If you again, the physician by themselves was getting something like 80 % of the cases correct, the centaur, the physician plus the AI was getting like 87%, the numbers are approximate, and then the AI without the human bias, without the human biasing the the AI by itself was outdoing all of them at like their early 90 % extraordinary.

31:03Oh, again, it's worse that it's better than any post -grad at the moment. But right now, I think it's about the empowering and the acceleration in terms of the integration and your way off the liability profile of replacement. I think you need replacement right now. What we need is less errors in some of the medicine, right? I think the doctor number by itself, Peter was 70 % because I remember Daniel Crafting, when you go to the doctor, you get the wrong diagnosis about 30 % of the time, right? That's a staggering number of errors, by the way. But it means that of four of us, one and a half got the wrong diagnosis the last time we went to the doctor.

31:40I mean, we need to figure out who that was. That's really ridiculous. And so you need an AI to take over that whole field. Well, especially human bias and get your human bias out of that is also even more as we can. The number of types of scans and sensors you can do is way, way outstripping any human ability to look at all the data that comes out of it. So a lot of it isn't trying to beat a doctor. It's trying to assimilate data that never could have gotten into the diagnosis before. It's a great point. That's a great point. Just. That was going to be more. That's going to our next next one. So available for an API.

32:17All right. We've covered these areas already. Let's move on. A quick aside, you probably heard me speaking about fountain life before. And you're probably wishing, Peter, would you please stop talking about fountain life? And the answer is no, I wouldn't, because genuinely we're living through a healthcare crisis. You may not know this, but 70 % of heart attacks have no preceding, no pain, no shortness and breath. And half of those people with a heart attack never wake up. You don't feel cancer until stage 3 or stage 4, until it's too late. But we have all the technology required to detect and prevent these diseases early at scale.

32:52That's why a group of us, including Tony Robbins, Bill Cap and Bob Hooray, founded Fountain Life, a one -stop center to help people understand what's going on inside their bodies before it's too late and to gain access to the therapeutics to give them decades of extra health span. Learn more about what's going on inside your body from Fountain Life. Go to FountainLife .com slash Peter. And tell him Peter sent you. Okay, back to the episode. All right, I love this. You know, Elon is a gamer. And so it's not unreasonable for him to be talking about using GROCK to make games as take a listen. Yeah, so the other thing we talked a lot about, you know, having GROCK to make games, video games.

33:33So Denny is actually a video game designer on X. So, you know, we mentioned, hey, who want to try out some GROCK for preview APIs to make games? And Denny answered a call. So this was actually just made first -person shooting game in the span of four hours. So some of the actually the unappreciated hardest problem of making video games is not necessarily encoding the core logic of the game, but actually go out, source all the assets, all the textures of files and you know to create a visual appealing game. I think one of the challenges is what we do with all of our time in the future and we may be playing a lot of video games.

34:18You know this could actually light up the entire metaverse world because building the metaverse world and building those environments was the big limiting factor and now you can do it at a very rich level. This could be really interesting to see what comes from this. When did you guys first here that Grock IV was going to come out last night. He said a few days ago, didn't he? He's been on a week ago. He was saying there was going to be this weekend and then it got pushed to yesterday. I feel like we had about 48 hours to know this plus or minus a day or two. If you look at the presentation, the raw presentation from last night and compared to Google I .O.

35:01So, Google I .O. was scripted and staged with multiple presenters and clearly planned way in advance. This last night was like, is it done yet, guys? Is it done? Does it work? Okay, it works. We're launching tonight. Let's go. Get on stage. Let's go. And I think that's the way it's going to be in the future because it seems like getting to market one day, two days sooner actually matters a lot in this horse race. So this is kind of the dynamic we should expect going forward. But by the way, that narrator, that's the AI voice of a geek who is living and breathing it. And that's where you wanted that.

35:37Yes, we do. Let's take a listen on Elon on video games and movie production. For example, for video games, you'd want to use Unreal Engine or Unity or one of the main graphics extensions and then generate the art, apply it to a 3D model and then create an executable that someone can run on a PC or console or a phone. We expect that to happen probably this year and if not this year certainly next year. So that's going to be wild. I would expect the first really good AI video game to be next year. And probably the first half hour of watchable TV this year. And probably the first watchable AI movie next year.

36:40Yeah, it's amazing what the fragmentation of those industries is going to be incredible. Because normally we think of a video game coming out in a release. All of your friends get the exact same release. It's a release that's maybe good for a year or more. And you're all on like FIFA 23 now or whatever, 25. But here, because it's only four hours to create the next iteration, then you can say, well, no, I want to customize version. Or I want to, there's going to be all this fragmentation. And the version of the movie that I saw isn't the same ending that the one that's the So now we're debating on how we're not even on the same page and how the movie ends because we saw a different A .I.

37:14generated version. And it's going to be great. It's going to be really, really cool because everything's going to have here. We're going to have a lot to do with our time. I mean, E -Mod, listen, you spent so much time as CEO of Stability in this market arena of entertainment and video production and such. When I asked you earlier whether Hollywood is going to be disrupted, you said, no. So can you explain that, please? So I think the thing that won't grow is people's attention. So if you look at Netflix, their biggest competitor is video games. Which is why they're going into video games. You only have so many hours in a day and you're a consumer.

37:53Video games sector right now I think is $450 billion. The movie sector is $70 billion. That's how fast it's grown. Education around the world is like 10 times larger. So it's 10 % of education in terms of size. So if you think about that, then for Hollywood studios, this is great because the cost of coming down. And it's been a dramatic shift to give you an idea of the first video models, stable video, I think was pretty much the first. We released that in 2023. And now with VO3 from Google and others, you're pretty much at Hollywood level close to it, but you need one more generation to get there.

38:28And the average Hollywood click length is 2 .5 seconds. It used to be 12 seconds, which is 2 .5. And we can generate eight. And soon we'll be able to generate more. So you're getting to this point where you can make that. But again, people like having common stories to talk about. Barbie, Oppenheimer, and things like that. So these marquee things, they can get the license of carry grant from back in the day and make him a star again. You know, you're going to see the role. What's the role? Don't you think that there's going to be so much supply? If I have a chance to watch a new episode of Classic Star Trek, but I'm the character playing Captain Kirk and you're playing Spock and my friends are taking the roles.

39:16I mean, I don't know why I would not be buying that entertainment from a source other than no outside of Hollywood. Well, you'll buy that too, but I think one of the things we've seen in the AI world, what's it about distribution distribution distribution? So you'll buy your interactive games and put yourself in the game, but you'll still have your marquee things and the cost of that will decrease dramatically and the distribution cost will decrease dramatically and the impact will increase. So again, for companies, this is all great. For the individuals working in the industry, this is terrible.

39:48And so I think this is the key thing. For the individual creators, this is great because you can finally tell the stories. So we'll see you register stories, but you've still got to distribute them. It's like one of the exams I'm excited to give is Taylor Swift, bless her heart. It's not the best music in the world, but she still calls it's earthquakes, you know? Yeah, no. So you're point that I think the video game industry bypassed all of their media combined. I think I read that. And it's on a much faster growth trajectory as well. But I think the video games are far more compelling with AI components.

40:24AI players, AI voices, voices that are talking directly to you. And so that interactive media is going to get even more accelerated by this trend. So whether you call it movies or video games or other, the media is going to change, right? It always does. So it may not fit exactly in those swim lanes, but it's clearly the interactive talk to me part is going to grow much, much faster than passive watching part. Yeah, I think it's the quality part and it's the feedback for you to find flow. So the movie industries going from like 50 billion to 60 billion in the last 10 years, average IMDB score 6 .3.

41:02Video game industries like doubled inside quadruple, there was 170 billion now it's like 500 billion. The average score has gone from 69 % on Metacritic to 74%. Games are good now. And you need to be good to compete. And again, I think what we can see from this technology is I as a creator can create the best things better because I can control every pixel. This is what Jensen has said. Every pixel will be generated. Exactly what's in your mind. Maybe you have to use a keyboard, it just comes straight from your mind. It can be on that screen, you can tell the stories you want. On the other side, you've got the fast food.

41:38So the general content farms get even better. So you've got your gourmet and you've got your fast food. And both of the quality of those will increase. All right. Every day I get the strangest compliment. Someone will stop me and say, Peter, you have such nice skin. Honestly, I never thought I'd hear that from anyone. And honestly, I can't take the full credit. All I do is use something called One Skin OS1 twice a day every day. The company is built by four brilliant PhD women who identified a peptide that effectively reverses the age of your skin. I love it. And again, I use this twice a day every day.

42:13You can go to 1skin .co and write Peter at checkout for a discount on the same product I use. That's 1skin .co and use the code Peter at checkout. All right, back to the episode. Of course, Grock for coding, let's take a quick listen. All right, so if you think about what applications out there that can really benefit from all those very intelligent, fast and smart models, then coding is actually one of them. Yeah, so the team is currently working very heavily on coding models. I think right now the main focus is we actually trained recently a specialized coding model which is going to be both fast and smart.

42:52And I believe we can share with that model with all of you in a few weeks. I still remember E -Mod when you were on stage with me like three years ago at the abundance summit and you said no more coders in five years. It was front page throughout India. I got hate mail about that. Oh my God, you scared the daylights out. And it's true. I mean, it's a big issue. It's a big issue. Why would you be able to talk to a computer about that? A computer can talk to a computer. Yeah. You know? Well, hold on. Let me get a good drill into that just for a second. Don't you think we'll end up with really good coders just creating 100 times more code?

43:35No, because what you'll have is really good context engineers directing to build things. Code is an intermediate step of language because the computers and the compilers couldn't handle the complexity of what we wanted to talk about. Now you can talk to the AI all day long about anything and it understands to a reasonable degree what you actually want. And once we get the feedback, it's really going as we've seen with cursor and other things like that. There's a reason it's got to $500 million in revenue in a year. There's a reason that Anthropics got to $4 billion, probably two -thirds of that is code.

44:10You know? Crazy. All right. Just pointing that we won't have this for a couple of weeks. We'll have to get back on the pod and check it out when it's out. Somebody told me you can get to it through cursor right now. I'm looking at cursor as we speak and I don't see it popping up as a cursor. Cursor is very much linked towards Anthropics, so it probably like the bottomize it. But GROC4 ready, heavy is a pretty good code, it writes clean code. And the coding model I think will be even better. But again, how much better are you going to get when you can output a 3D video game like that or just about anything?

44:43And I think this comes to think, are you, if you're trying to create content, the AI is good enough already for just about anything. If you're trying to create something creative, this is the final part that requires planning and coordination and multi -agent systems, and the UIUX isn't there yet for the feedback loops, et cetera. Yeah, now I can use all the horsepower they can give me, though, because when you're writing a little code module, it's all pretty much perfect already. But right now I can go to the best cloud model and say, build me a dashboard for this function, and just give it that prompt.

45:16And most of the time it comes back great, and even things of things that I wouldn't have thought of for that dashboard. And I can use another step up of capability in that area. So I'll use it up as quickly as it comes out. All the takins today. Okay, let's hear from Elon about his video model training. What's coming on input output? I would expect to be training of video model with over 100 ,000 GB 200s and to begin that training within the next three or four weeks. So we're confident it's going to be pretty spectacular in video generation and video understanding. So 100 ,000 GB 200 more than anybody's thrown at this.

46:03Emod, what is that? How does that as that hit you? So when we trained the state of the art first video model two years ago, two years ago, we used 700, 700, 100 H 100s. So like let's say they're three times slower. So they're equivalent to 200 of the chips that he's about to use because he's the integrated GB chips from Nvidia. The top level models right now. If you look at the loomers of the world, the bite dance models of the world, the VO3s, use two to 4 ,000. Wow. He's about to use a hundred thousand of those. And the thing about video is when you train a video model, it actually learns a representation of the world through computation.

46:53So once we made a video model, we extended it to a 3D model that can generate any 3D asset. It understands physics and more. So actually, video models are world models that can be used to do all sorts of things, like improve self -driving cars by creating whole worlds and other things like that as well. I think that's the reason why, given they've got 300 ,000 chips, they're putting 100 ,000 of these to the video model. Well, and they're planning a million GPUs by the end of this year. No. It's like no small dreams here. The mod when you pioneered this just a couple of years ago, like you said, the video model was trained completely separate from the large language model because it was just too much.

47:36You couldn't put everything into one mega model. Is he going to do a master retraining of this model with video data or is it a separate set of parameters in a separate model entirely? This will be a separate model. So we took the image model and then we created the video model from that and then we created the 3D model from that. Now they're doing from scratch training because the technology we developed for stable diffusion 3, the diffusion transformer matching it is able to do that all at once. And this is similar to what to V03 and others use and with optimizations you can just pop that all straight in.

48:08Now the arch that they use like the GROC model for the image is actually the same architecture as for the language and they may do the same thing. I'm not sure how they're going to train this model because again they're super smart but it's a different model entirely but they may all end up being the same model because if you want to model the understands physics and the wonders of the universe and what's the question to get to the answer 42? You probably want to train on everything that a human sees and more because it'll train on everything a million humans can see and understand and read and all sorts of stuff.

48:44I mean you know I'm excited about the idea of there's so many my favorite science fiction books that have never been made into movies or TV series right? I mean the ability to just say, hey, you know, like one of my favorite books is The Bob Over series by Dennis Taylor. And you know, I love it. It's a four book series. It's it's extraordinary. Make it into a movie for me. Make it into a 20 part TV series for me. Here's a hundred bucks. I'm sure actually if you took the best books that have ever been turned into movies already and use that as training data. So like this book turned into this killer movie, make the changes necessary to get from point of view.

49:29Okay, now here's a book that never got made into a movie from what you learned about those patterns, make the movie that's the most compelling. The thing is you won't even have to do that. Like just with the pace of chip improvements, as we go through the generations in two years, you will have live 4K TV. So you've already seen some people do like live low -resolution stuff, interactive stuff. When Jensen says every pixel we generate it, he literally means it. Like with the next generation chips and a bit of more improvement in the algorithms and optimization of the models, you can have live streaming 3D or video where every single pixel is generated on your screen within a few years.

50:13And so you can just say stop try this adjust this and that'll be the feedback loop. It'd be fun to take some old movies and make them way better. Take the old Kona and the barbarian movie and make it a really proper movie. I can use it. I like it. I like it. I like it. You know what hits me? We're sitting here having this conversation in four different cities around the world. We've taken so much for granted in this video channel. And like, you know, 10 years ago, what do we have? We had just barely at Skype. And now, it's crazy. So we humans adapt so rapidly to awesomeness. And we take it from normalize it very fast.

50:59It's like your second way, my right, right? Yeah. The first one's like, wow, when your second one was like, okay. Oh, for sure. So any any closing thoughts on I have a question. I have a question for E -Mod. You've been in the space for a while now we have GROC 4, right? One of the types of things that GROC 5 will be able to do. So GROC 5 will be a multi -agentic system but rather than having four boosters that will have 60 or 600 or 6000 depending on what you want. It will probably have a world model plug did and it'll have interconnectivity in this sun that Elon mentioned yesterday to every major type of system.

51:40So it knows how to use Maya. It knows how to use advanced physics in theulators. It will write its own lean code and optimize it for mathematics. And so it's just going to be like an incredibly versatile worker. And just like he's going to unleash millions of optimist robots, he's going to unleash billions if not trillions of these things, GPU demand, we're standing into the economy. and that's going to be a bit crazy. And I think the way that you'll interact with GROC -6, probably GROC -5, is you'll have a Zoom call with it, just like you have now. Mm -hmm. Hey folks, Slim here. Hope you're enjoying these podcasts, and this one in particular was amazing.

52:18If you want to hear more from me or get involved in our EXO ecosystem, on the 23rd of July, we're doing a once a month workshop, tickets are $100. We limit it to a few people to make sure it's intermittent and proper, and we go through the EXO model. What we do there is we basically show you how to take your organization and turn it into one of these Hyper -growth AI type companies and we've done this now for 10 years with thousands of companies Many of these use the model that we have called the exponential organizations model Peter and I co -authored the second edition a couple of years ago So it's a hundred bucks June July 23rd come along.

52:54It's the best hundred all you'll spend link is below see that Gemini 3 and and GPT -5, let's talk one second about what you expect there. Are these going to just leapfrog, Grog -4? Are they going to be diverting in different directions? You mod your thoughts. I think they'll probably all be the same plateau. Now it's really about the UI -UX and then how you wrap these into agent, so then multi -agent systems and then how you make it so just easy for anyone to use like this. So, you know, Google in the work that they've done with their AR glasses, you know, enabling you to have a conversation with your AI and being able to have it see what you see, that's a great step forward, you know, open AI with their voice mode has been fantastic.

53:47Are there any versions of, you know, user interface that we haven't seen yet? I mean, DCI will be one of them for sure. I mean, I personally think again, the interface is just the interface that you have with the remote worker. And all the technology is almost in place for that. Get on a call, hit a slack. Pretty much, and you just don't know. That's my AGI. My AGI is actually actually more like actually useful intelligence, right? Like this is, I think, what Selim would like. Just... I don't know, it's an AI or not. It just gets the job done and it doesn't sleep. And this final part of it as well is that the task length of these AI is gone to like seven hours now I think I've seen from various entities now they're getting that up to almost arbitrary length So you can set teams away and they have organizing AI's and others They get the job done they check in whenever they're unsure about something and then this is that next step up for all these technologies But I think the 10 to the 27 models will as you said all be pretty much similar because they're already above PhD and everything.

54:51Now it's about making them super useful and getting them out there. And the demand for that is in the billions of agents. The daily interest thing is Elon's got basically a limitless capital supply. Yeah. You know, it's every time he's gone to raise money, you know, I've asked, well, how much can I get in the next round? And it's like, well, we're oversubscribed already. Yeah, it's not the constraints. You can give you the money. It's going to be the GPUs. I have a question for you, Matt, about that actually, because if you say, OK, the GPD5 will be out soon a couple of weeks hopefully. It'll be on the same plane, probably leak frog, but in the same genre.

55:35And then Gemini 3 will come out, and it'll be somewhere similar, maybe a little better. But the chip supply, you know, Google has huge amounts of GPU and a massive cloud computing platform plus they make their own TPUs. Then, you know, we got a million chips going to Elon. We just talked about that. Sam at OpenAI has had a little bit of trouble with Microsoft recently. There's definitely some kind of falling out there. And the way OpenAI got ahead of everyone in the first places getting access to the compute from Microsoft. And so is he going to have a problem getting catching up to a million concurrent GPUs training a single massive model?

56:19I mean, I think Stargate is in that order of magnitude when you look at the kind of gigawatts and now Amazon's just an unspore anthropic using training them for something that's even bigger than Stargate with their latest kind of chip supply. Google's the leader in this, so they have three million odd. But the thing that I come back to is open AI basically slowed down when everyone was making Ghibli memes. And so if you think about order of compute of Ghibli memes compared to order of compute for useful work, like, it's that versus that. Google is okay because Google are actually landing millions of their own TPUs and they have the full stack and it has better interconnect for log context length.

57:00It's actually really good 7th generation hardware. Elon will get the supply because he's a beast. And I think again, open air, I have the capital, but they're moving more and more towards consumer, the Johnny I have acquisition and things like that. The dark horse here is probably again meta to be honest, because Zyker's going to drop a hundred billion dollars on this. He dropped 30 billion on the glasses on the Metaverse. He thinks AGI is coming and Meta is a $1 .7 trillion stock. He will easily drop $100 billion. He's got $70 billion of free cash right now to use and can pump it up. Well, I did an interview of Jan Lekun at MIT not super long ago and they had committed and already bought a million GPUs for internal use in Meta.

57:46So he had those on order already then I'm sure they're in house now. So he has the the compute in house. So basically all the top guys can get a million. The next step is 10 million. Well, there's only 20 million in the world. So this is where it runs into a bottle. They can't even keep a straight face. Can you? Well, but again, think about every pixel being generated and think about again, the economic activity of actually having a single useful teammate or account. I mean, we're talking about like accountants and lawyers and other things like that on the other side of the screen. We're Is Nvidia just going to just keep going, going, going?

58:24Is anybody going to displace their production at all? All of the top chip manufacturers are good enough to run these models. The only question is who has enough gating supply. The reason for the hopper thing was actually the packaging of the chips, the coos. So you have different supply channel constraints, just like robots. bots. In two years, robots will be good enough to do what? 90%, 95 % of human labor. The only reason the entire global economy on labor isn't going to flip over from $2 .1 robots is supply chains. So what we've got is a complete replacement of the capital stock of the economy from GPUs for virtual workers and robots.

59:07And it's just supply constraints. So Nvidia, number one, you don't go wrong, you don't get fired at getting Nvidia. But you'll get chips from wherever you can get them because those chips are all disappointed to you cheaper than your team members. I just asked to actually Gemini in the background here what it costs today's market rate to train a run of flop. So one of these models just a compute cost is 312 million. So like you said, Amade, it's like one signing bonus over the banana. So that's not the cost is not the issue. it's who has access to the compute. It was amazing to me in this entire conversation.

59:45We haven't said the word Apple once. Yeah, and Apple controls about a third of the manufacturing capacity at TSMC for their M3 line M2 line chips. So they could easily become a player in the the get a big data center up and running game. They'd have an incredible asset having that manufacturing toehold with TSMC. It's just incredible that they haven't done that. Well, I think this comes down to the thing. These models have economies of scope in that once you train a model that's good enough, do you really need another one? And then it becomes like electricity. It becomes a utility. So your genius models become utilities and then what matters is the model that runs on the M3 or whatever, you know, like liquid AI, just releasing edge models.

1:00:33Those things become even more important because the M3 has capacity. M4s have capacity. Yeah. Yeah, that's a really big deal, by the way. Liquid is, I didn't appreciate how big a deal it was until recently, but people are going to want to use this stuff immediately. I mean, it's so addictive. And the infertile compute is severely constrained. And liquid, you know, runs fine on the edge on these M3s. It runs really, really fast. It runs on the chips and the cars. And it's about, you know, they say about a hundred times more efficient than just trying to run a brute force transformer. So that could be a huge unlock for people having access to AI, you know, at least more access to keep up with the demand.

1:01:13Exactly. Because you'll have your gated stuff, and then they might increase prices because they have to because there'll be so much competition for chips, even as you get them cheaper. And then you just got this AI with you, but that AI will be smart enough to do your day to day. And so you'll have a whole curve of intelligence, just like sometimes you need to have steady workers and sometimes you need your geniuses. I forgot you were actually the first guy to see liquid when it was just a research. Yeah, I gave them all the compute to get going. Yeah, that's right. That was amazingly now that we're $2 billion valuation.

1:01:44So I think when you come back and join us next week, I think we have a schedule. I want to hear all about the intelligent internet. I'd love you to break things news on what you've been working on in secret for the last year or so. So I've seen pieces of it, it's awesome, but hopefully you'll spill the whole master plan for us. Dave, Celine, my moonshot mates, thank you guys. Grock for special edition. See you at Grock 5. Yeah, well, we're at Gemini 3 and like 3 meets. Yeah, we'll be back online soon. All right, see you all. Thank you for joining us on Grock 5. So bye, oh guys. If you could have had a 10 year head start on the dotcom boom back in the 2000s, would you have taken it?

1:02:31Every week I track the major tech metatrends. These are massive game changing shifts that will play out over the decade ahead. From humanoid robotics to AGI, quantum computing, energy breakthroughs and longevity, I cut through the noise and deliver only what matters to our lives and our careers. I send out a metatrend newsletter twice a week as a quick two minute read over email. It's entirely free. These insights are read by founders, CEOs, and investors behind some of the world's most disruptive companies. Why? Because acting early is everything. This is for you if you want to see the future before it arrives.

1:03:09And prop it from it. Sign up at demandus .com slash meditrens and be ahead of the next tech bubble. That's demandus .com slash meditrens.

From the publisher

Get access to metatrends 10+ years before anyone else - https://qr.diamandis.com/metatrends  

Salim Ismail is the founder of OpenExO

Dave Blundin is the founder of Link Ventures

Emad Mostaque is the founder of Intelligent Internet

–

Offers for my audience: 

Get the first lesson of my executive course for free at https://qr.diamandis.com/futureproof 

Test what’s going on inside your body at https://qr.diamandis.com/fountainlifepodcast  

Reverse the age of my skin using the same cream at https://qr.diamandis.com/oneskinpod    

–-

Learn more from Emad: https://ii.inc/web 

Learn about Dave’s fund: https://www.linkventures.com/xpv-fund 

Join Salim's Workshop to build your ExO https://openexo.com/10x-shift?video=PeterD062625

Connect with Peter:

X

Instagram

Listen to MOONSHOTS:

Apple

YouTube

–

*Recorded on July 10, 2025

*Views are my own thoughts; not Financial, Medical, or Legal Advice.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Moonshots with Peter Diamandis

All 268 episodes
AI Experts React: Elon’s Grok 4 Is Now #1 in AI — This Changes Everything w/ Emad Mostaque, Salim Ismail & Dave BlundinMoonshots with Peter Diamandis · 1 h 5 min
Listen in VO