In short
Moonshots Podcast Episode Summary
Episode Title
Tech CEO on the Future of Travel & Technology w/ Adam Goldstein | EP #82 Host: Peter Diamandis Guest: Adam Goldstein, CEO of Archer Aviation Release Date: Not specified Podcast Description: Tracking the future of technology and how it impacts humanity.
---
Episode Overview
In this episode, Peter Diamandis interviews Adam Goldstein, the founder and CEO of Archer, a company focused on revolutionizing urban transportation through electric air taxis. Goldstein elaborates on the evolution of transportation technology, discusses the challenges and opportunities in the aerospace industry, and shares insights on the future of urban commute.
---
Key Topics and Discussions
Introduction to Archer Aviation
- Archer's Mission: Transform urban travel by providing electric air taxi services to shorten commute times from 60-90 minutes to just 10-20 minutes.
- The Midnight Aircraft: A piloted, electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft designed to carry four passengers with a range of up to 100 miles and speeds of up to 150 mph.
Future of Transportation
- Electric Air Taxis: Referred to as "electric air taxis," Goldstein argues that this terminology captures the essence of the innovation better than "flying cars" or "eVTOLs."
- Cost Structure: Initial pricing anticipated to be similar to Uber Black, with the goal of reducing costs over time to below the price of car ownership.
Technological Innovations
- Battery Technology: Improvements in battery density and technology have made eVTOLs feasible, allowing longer flight times and improved safety.
- Design and Safety: The Midnight's design incorporates redundancy with 12 electric engines, eliminating single points of failure, enhancing safety compared to traditional helicopters.
Urban Transportation & Infrastructure
- Scalability of Air Transport: The ability to leverage vertical space for transportation, contrasting with the limitations of 2D ground infrastructure.
- Regulatory Environment: The discussion highlights the necessity for collaborative efforts with regulators (FAA) to ensure safe and efficient operations of eVTOLs.
Future Challenges and Opportunities
- Autonomy in Air Travel: Goldstein discusses the eventual shift towards fully autonomous air taxis and the gradual move from piloted to automated operations.
- Global Markets: The potential for rapid growth in international markets like India and Africa, where traditional infrastructure is lacking, presents significant opportunities for eVTOLs.
Manufacturing and Scalability
- Manufacturing Strategy: Archer’s partnership with Stellantis to leverage their expertise in automotive manufacturing to produce the Midnight eVTOL at scale.
- Market Potential: The total addressable market for urban air mobility is estimated to be as large as $9 trillion, akin to the current automotive market.
Road to Commercial Operations
- Timeline for Launch: Archer aims to begin commercial operations by 2025, with plans to launch regardless of FAA certification timelines through alternative uses (e.g., humanitarian aid).
- Capital and Funding: Goldstein shares insights into the capital-intensive nature of the aerospace industry and the importance of raising funds effectively to support growth.
---
Key Takeaways
- Archer is set to redefine urban transportation with electric air taxis, focusing on safety, efficiency, and user experience.
- Regulatory collaboration and technological advancements in battery and propulsion systems are critical to the success of eVTOLs.
- The potential for eVTOLs to transform transportation in emerging markets highlights the need for innovative solutions to existing infrastructure challenges.
- Successful scaling and manufacturing partnerships will be crucial in achieving Archer’s ambitious production goals.
---
Conclusion This episode provides a glimpse into the future of urban mobility through the lens of innovative technologies led by Archer Aviation. With a strong focus on design, safety, and market potential, Adam Goldstein discusses the transformative power of electric air taxis and the collaborative efforts required to overcome industry challenges.
---
Follow Peter Diamandis:
- [Twitter](https://x.com/PeterDiamandis)
- [Instagram](#)
- [YouTube](#)
Learn More About Archer:
- [Archer Website](https://archer.com/)
- [Follow Adam Goldstein on X](https://x.com/adamgoldstein13)
Support the Podcast:
- Use code PETER25 for 25% off your first month's supply of Seed's DS-01® Daily Synbiotic: [seed.com/moonshots](https://seed.com/moonshots)
---
This summary captures the essence of the podcast episode while providing detailed insights into the discussions and key concepts, ensuring clarity for readers interested in the future of transportation technology.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00I'm NFL Lineback at Tijayawatt and this is my personal best. YPB by Abercrombie is the active wearer I'm always wearing. That's why I reached out to co -design their latest drop. I work with designers to create high -performance active wear that holds up to my toughest workouts. Shop YPB by Abercrombie in -store online and in the app. Because your personal best is greater than anything.
0:31When did making plans get this complicated? It's time to streamline with WhatsApp. The secure messaging app that brings the whole group together, use polls to settle dinner plans, send event invites and pin messages so no one forgets mom's 60th and never miss a meme or milestone. All protected with end -to -end encryption. It's time for WhatsApp. Message privately with everyone. Learn more at WhatsApp .com. Everybody, I'm here with Adam Goldstein, co -founder, CEO of Arture Aviation, and I am excited to talk about flying vehicles, my favorite subject. I have to start with a question, Adam, which is, what do you call these things?
1:12Because flying cars sort of like feels like a euphemism, and calling them EV tolls just doesn't roll off the tongue. Any recommendations? Yeah, that is the kind of an adult question for the industry, but electric air taxis seems to be the cleanest way electric private electric air taxis. I like that and eventually they'll become just called transportation, I think Hopefully a real pleasure my friend to have you and talk about This moonshot which has been around for a while one of my favorite examples is one of the quotes that Peter Tiel said is like, you know, we were promised flying cars, and all we got were 140 characters.
1:57Well, guess what? We've got flying cars now. And congratulations. You know, I look at all of the electric air taxis out there. Our chair's done an extraordinary job in terms of creating a viable business. And I know how hard the aviation business is having played in that in the space business and the consumer business. And you've got, you've had a lot of battles, but you've conquered so much. So congrats. Thanks Peter. I appreciate it. It's definitely the road has not been easy. I can say that. So, you know, we're entering a time where this idea of flying cars is something that is real. You know, a number of companies, including Archer of Gone Public, you have raised and invested a significant amount of money and have actually made something that is extraordinary.
2:54I want to start with like, first of all, if you can describe Archer and your beautiful midnight vehicle, what is Archer? What is midnight capable of doing? How should folks think about it? Yeah, so these are electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft. So think like an electric or helicopter with wings. They take off at land vertically and then fly forward on a wing like an airplane. And we're going to market using these vehicles really to replace trips that you would typically take on the ground in a car. That might take you 60, 90, 120 minutes to travel 20, 30, 40, 50 miles. Replace those with trips in the air.
3:33That can take you five to 10 minutes. And so if you look at a typical use case of going from a city center to an airport, like I'm in Hatten to a JFK or an LAX to Santa Monica. Those are like brutal trips that we've all sat through that are actually not that far that we can actually do very, very quickly in a vehicle like this. I think about this, I think of like packets which humans like being able to hop in for the lowest price and speed. Are these vehicles, is the price premile going to be competitive? How expensive is this going to be in the final result? Well, I think the really the go to market price point will be somewhat similar to an Uber, like an Uber Black, but over time, and when I say over time, I'm not talking 50 years, I'm talking five years, seven years, you know, these vehicles will be lower than car ownership.
4:24So I mean, the 2D infrastructure in around cities doesn't scale. It's very hard to build new roads. It's very challenging. But infrastructure in the sky obviously is basically very little. You don't need anything. You can scale it infinitely. And so there's an opportunity to just build a lot more vehicles and to serve a lot of people and ultimately drive their costs way, way down. But if you just look at helicopters, they're extremely complex vehicles. Very complex gearboxes and tricky vehicles to maintain and keep up in the air. They'll have 200 or 300 single points of failure. First, with these vehicles, these air taxis that we can build, they'll have zero single points of failure.
5:04And because they're electric and the power trains are using electric engines and lithium -ion batteries, they won't need to undergo the same type of maintenance. It's just similar. I have a Tesla. I've owned it for many years. I've never made it once. And so you have a dynamic that you can build a lot of these vehicles, drive the cost down even further that ultimately will allow this to be accessible to everyone on Earth. Yeah, the old adage friends don't let friends fly helicopters, right? Because they're so they're so dangerous, but Let's describe the midnight vehicle. First of all, it's gorgeous.
5:39It's probably the most beautiful of the electric air taxis out there. Can you describe it's range number of people, it's support structure, speeds, that sort of the stats that people would be interested in? Yeah, so it's a piloted vehicle and it can carry up to four passengers. It's designed to go up to 100 miles, but the typical use case will probably be, you know, 20 to 40 miles. And the vehicles fly 150 miles per hour. So first of all, when you fly in a straight line instead of like weaving throughout where the roads take you, you can reduce the total amount of distance that you travel. You can also fly 150 miles, you know, consistently the entire flight, so it can get you there much faster.
6:26And because you can take off and land vertically, you don't have to drive out to an airport. you can get to your endpoints very, very quickly. So it's a vehicle that was actually designed with a lot of the same mentality and the way that we design cars. And so when you look at the way aircraft are designed, they're almost always not very attractive. Even if you look at today's planes, the Boeing's and the Airbus's, the planes all look the same. They don't have to. But we took an approach with the vehicle where we said, we're going to take a much more emotional view to designing the vehicle rather than a pure mathematical view.
7:02Because this is a vehicle that we want people to want to touch. They want to get in, they want to fly. They want to be passionate about. And so that came with some performance hits. And so a lot of the engineers that work at Archer were upset about that. But I do think design is actually a really important part of introducing a product like this. And ultimately introducing a product that can really revolutionize and ultimately become a mass market form of transportation. Yeah, bad ass is the description that comes to mind when I look at the midnight. And if you're listening to Google and check out an image of it, it's gorgeous.
7:42Talk about one second subject that I'm super passionate about, which is convergence of these exponential technologies. This wasn't possible a decade ago. What are the technologies that came together to make this possible? So if you think back to, you know, I guess when I was a kid in the 90s, you know, batteries were still used, both of my batteries were, you know, around. And batteries have just become more and more energy dense. And, you know, back then it was, you know, a miracle to keep things powered up for any substantial period of time. You know, the thought of, you know, powering up a car and driving any reasonable range in the 90s or even in 2000 was pretty unthinkable.
8:25If you flash forward to today, we all almost take it for granted, still that, you know, Kitesla, you know, a car with lithium -ion batteries can drive you, you know, 300, 400 miles on a charge. And that's pretty incredible and it's very, very effective and good for everyday use. Today, when we think out, you know, 10 years from now, 20 years from now, it's just even hard for people to understand and what batteries will be able to do going forward. So based on technology today, these planes can fly up to 100 miles. And so you can take a 6 ,500 pound maximum takeoff weight plane like the Midnight Vehicle, fly it quite far and use it every day, recharge, repeat that trip over and over and over again, all day long.
9:14So battery technology is one breakthrough. So battery tech has been probably the biggest one. And the reason why that one is so interesting of all of them is just because it hasn't, it's not like it's stopped. It's just getting better. So the product literally gets better every year. So we can just use the newest cell that comes out to our agnostic to which one to just constantly improve the performance to increase the, you know, the ride quality, the luxuries inside these vehicles. So even the midnight plane today, which thank you Peter, I do agree looks very, very cool. It will get cooler because there's a lot more flexibility.
9:47ability once you can keep adding more energy into these vehicles. So that's been a really big breakthrough. I think another one that's been really big has been all about light weighting these vehicles. And so, you know, it's a composite structures have been a big deal, so they're not aluminum or metal structures or composites that are all lightweight. The reason why that is so important is energy density is only so good. and it's still not nearly as efficient as Kerosene. And so we need to lightweight these vehicles as much as possible to preserve enough of the maximum takeoff weight percentage for payload, for people, for stuff.
10:30And so that's been a really big critical part of what we're doing. But the aviation industry has not advanced substantially across all the different parts of the supply chain. And so there's so much more to do. It's just unthinkable. And it's really because there hasn't been demand for innovation product that is used. We think about like a Boeing and Airbus that make 500 planes a year, making more than 1 ,000 planes a year is kind of unthinkable. But this is an industry where actually we think you can be making millions of planes per year, which will totally change the aerospace supply chain. Yeah, I would just to wrap up the list.
11:04I would imagine that direct electric repulsion, DEP propulsion, has been one of the drivers, obviously electronics and compute. I would love to believe that automation and air traffic control was part of the equation, but we can, let's talk about the FAA in a minute, but your point about the aviation industry being stagnant is insane, right? we take off in December 17th of 1903 and then we cross the Atlantic and then we go supersonic and then we go to large bodied aircraft and there really has been very little innovation in the aviation industry. It's like we stagnated. Yeah. And basically the planes have gotten more efficient.
11:54You know, they're more fuel efficient. They are safer. So we've increased there, But these are all like, you know, marginal and the grand scheme of things of like what you can't do. There's no reason you couldn't build a new, you know, blended wing plane that looks more like a triangle that totally reconfigures the interior, the way people operate. It doesn't have to be a tube with a wing. There's lots of other configurations that could work. And I actually think that, you know, the EVTAL electric air taxi companies have a chance to totally just change aviation beyond the original products themselves.
12:33Because to build a new airplane, it's quite expensive. I think Boeing will spend $20, $40 billion on a new plane. And by the way, it's not even really necessarily a new plane. A lot of them are upgrades. So like the 737 Max is still a 737. It's a, I don't know, how old 50, 60 -year -old fifth generation type of plane. It's not a clean sheet aircraft. So there's so much to do here, but that will require these companies to get like archer to get substantially bigger to have substantially more capital to be able to invest to go do this with all the very very possible. I mean the FAA does an amazing job of keeping us safe.
13:09The track record is extraordinary. Think about it. But I remember when I was certifying my zero -GIR plan for doing parabolic flights, which was a relatively minor modification to avionics and the hydraulic system, it was brutal just to get the mods approved. And the adage was from the FAA is not happy until you're not happy. Yeah. It's a lot of work. And I mean, we take for granted the fact that we're just like cattle getting on and off of airplanes and everything is Operated as safely as it does which is extraordinary Yeah, and maybe all you know I'll leap my own words on this one, but potentially this time it's different and the reason why it could be different this time with this industry is that Geopolitics have played a pretty significant role here So the US has done over the long term a great job of maintaining a leadership position in aviation and that's been important not only just to the economy and be called to move people around but also from a defense perspective.
14:19And so even if you just look at the regulators today, if you want to go certify a new plane there's four big regulators you can go to. You can go to the FAA. You can go to Europe's version which is called YASA. You can go to Transport Canada. You can go to A &AC in Brazil. There's not that many options to go to do there. Most of the world books to the FAA to do this. Yasa is kind of viewed as almost like the second biggest regulator. There's around 500 people that work at Yasa, versus the FAA will have something like 45 ,000 people that work there. It is the dominant global regulator. But the US has done a poor job when it came to air dominance in drones.
14:56In China, with DJI has done a very good job and has a very significant market share, majority market share and has left the US behind. And so there's been a real kind of drive from the White House all the way down by Partisan that the US does need to maintain the solicorship position. And if there is a Tesla -like moment in the sky, that needs to happen here in America. And so there's a big push to make sure that the regulators are working very collaboratively with the companies, obviously safety first, but collaboratively to make sure it's not a roadblock to actually get this industry to market.
15:32And that's what we've seen. We saw that with Billy Nolan when he was the FAA administrator, and of course he stepped down and joined Archer, but then the next administrator that went in actually came from an EVTall company. So Mike Whitaker, the new FAA administrator, came from Hyundai's EVTall company called Supernal. So obviously there's some kind of interesting things to at least note of what's happening there. So we have seen a lot of it, you know, the regulators actually being on board, which I think is really great. And I think these vehicles, you know, another reason why they are on board with these vehicles is they already have certified vehicles that are substantially less safe than what BBtalls can be, which are hell.
16:13Oh my gosh. Yeah, it's crazy in comparison. Can you talk about the safety because I think one of the things that's beautiful about the design of midnight night is the safety factors. Can you speak about what you built in? Yeah, so one of the points I didn't get to in the list of like the advancements in that you had mentioned is really around the electric engines. And so if you look at a helicopter and you know, if you almost drew a circle around the rotor, that is what they call like the disc area. You need a certain amount of disc area to lift spin, you know, spin a rotor at a certain speed in order to generate enough lift to, you know, to lift these vehicles was off the ground.
16:53But when electric motors became an option, all of a sudden you had a new type of motor that could be scaled down and still very efficient. And that was a game -changer for the EV -toll entry and a huge disunlock which allowed the industry to really move forward. So if you look at the midnight aircraft, it has 12 electric engines which have each one of the 12 have a set of propellers tied to them. And so that means instead of having one single point of failure, like where the rotor is, and then all the parts that go that lead into that rotor with helicopters, it can be as many as 200 to 300 single points of failure, we have none.
17:32Zero single points of failure, it's a fully redundant aircraft. So if we lost a motor or a propeller for any reason, a fluke accident or bird strike or whatever the case is, it's no problem at all to the vehicle. It can balance and trim, as they say, so they can make it stay stable and fly in complete submission. That is a huge, huge advantage. And so electric engines really helped do that. But we also were able to break apart the battery packs. So there's not just one fuel source. So if we had something happen to one of the battery packs, we have six different battery packs that each power two diagonally opposed to motors.
18:06So if we lost a battery pack, we would only lose two engines. And again, still have 10 and can still fly and complete the exact same mission. So it is just such a higher level of safety than what helicopters are able to provide because of the redundancy. And that's a huge part of the ability to scale the industry. Do you need the pilot in the vehicle or is that to make people feel comfortable and get through FAA regulation? Do you imagine a time when we're going to see these electric air taxis which are fully autonomous? And if so, what kind of time frame would you imagine? You don't need a pilot from a technical perspective, from a practical one when theory meets practice, you do need a pilot.
18:49So I think for a couple reasons. One is in order to start a new industry like this, it's going to be critical to make people not only just understand that these are safe but really feel safe. And I think pilots are a big part of that journey. And so the pilots can be there to reassure you to, you know, it's kind of like when you, you look over at the person on the plane to see if they're nervous to see if you should be nervous. The people there I think can really help. That being said, there are already a lot of features built into the vehicles from the very beginning. That will reduce pilot workload and prevent the pilot from crashing the plane.
19:27So things like envelope protection. So the pilot can't roll the plane over. They can't stall the plane. So there features that have been built in that will help really again allow these vehicles to scale from a safety perspective. But if we really do want to scale beyond 10 ,000, 20 ,000, 50 ,000, 100 ,000 vehicles, there is a point where we certainly will need to go autonomous because there simply aren't enough pilots out there to do this. The way you get there though is optionally piloted. So you can build the vehicles with the auto land features that can take over if anything happens to the pilots and then ultimately gets people comfortable and then you start removing the pilots.
20:06You can do that by having pilots on the ground and then finally just no pilots at all just completely out of the blue. Yeah, I can imagine especially with the progression of AI and seeing autonomous vehicles it's going to become, I mean there is an argument to be made that at some point it's safer without the pilot in the vehicle. And I've heard those conversations were commercial jet airliners where human induced error is a significant percentage of the problems out there. But I'll put that aside for a separate conversation on the FAA. I want one. So initially, our chair is an aviation, you're a transport service.
20:50Do you like in yourself to a more of an Uber where I've got my app? And I need to get from Santa Monica to Dodger Stadium. And I just tell it where I'm starting, where I'm ending. and it gives me a slot. Is that what sounds like? Yeah, I think that's the right approach from a go -to -market perspective. There will be a, you know, I think a solution that is available to the masses. There may be, I'm sure, VIP type of services. You can imagine, you know, corporates, you know, could have their own, you know, type of, you know, VIP service or, you know, certain different groups that make sense for hospital systems, that kind of thing.
21:31especially in the beginning though, I think it's going to be critical that Archer as the OEM really manages a lot of the data to make sure we fully understand the safety of these vehicles, maintenance of these vehicles, and we protect that very, very critically. And so I don't see us selling individual vehicles on a significant basis because of that. And I think it will, there's other ways to accomplish the same goals. So if you want one, Peter, it'll be interesting for you in LA, but what happens when you leave LA? Like you can go to New York. And so there are other variations of that that you can get an access to the vehicles in a similar type of service.
22:15If you think about what net jets did, that's an example of a premium version of air travel. That's more convenient, that's a bit more private, but you don't physically have to own the plane yourself because you don't use it all the time. So like how often would you use it? Even if you used it just once a day or twice a day, it's still the plane would just be sitting there, unused, and because they're expensive, I think there are other ways to actually reuse them to again keep keeping the cost at a price point where it can become more everyday use instead of just novelty. So I wanna walk through a little bit how the last time I really dove into the operations of this, I was at the Uber Elevate Conference back years ago when Uber was thinking about autonomous air taxis.
23:06And the idea was there were going to be electric verteports that would sort of be regional. And I just saw an announcement that you and a dear friend who works for you and a you'll put out that you've, you've aimed to deal with Atlantic aviation. Congratulations on that. That's huge. Yeah, thanks. Yeah, so for those who don't know, Atlantic aviation is a fixed base operator. I fly my airplane out of Santa Monica out of the Atlantic, FBO there, and they're all over North America. And so the idea is you'd have charging stations there. And so I would, when I go to my Archer app and I say I want to fly from A to B.
23:49It would say go to this location and get on and it's charged there. So walk through some of that logistics, give paint a vision of what it's gonna look like when it's operational. So you're at your house in Santa Monica. You open up your rubra app, which will be integrated. And you wanna go from Santa Monica to, Let's say, you know, the crypto center to go watch a Lakers game. You can kind of book the entire service that way. The first leg of the service will be, the Uber comes and picks you up. Takes you from your house to a vertical port, to place where you start your journey, you take off in land.
24:32The good news about vertical ports is they require very little infrastructure. All we really need is charging. And so, you know, in obviously a safety area. And so the vehicles will charge using similar type of technologies that you see with EVs. So 2C, just like a Tesla Supercharger charge app. How long would you imagine a charge takes for it? And it depends how exhausted the batteries are, but what's the typical charge time? So the typical trip that we would fly, so say like a 25 mile trip if we were going from LAX to northern part, somewhere in L .A., maybe somewhere in Malibu. A trip like that will only use a small percentage of the battery.
25:15The plan is to really just top off at each of the legs. You're really only charging during the loading and unloading of passengers. You're not ever really just sitting down, not using the planes because they're just sitting there charging. When you do take full trips, using a bigger chunk of the battery, you will have to charge for longer and you can charge the batteries up in 30 to 40 minutes all the way up from start to finish. Again, very quick charge. And that just will get better over time. So like our joke is like this is the worst product we'll ever build. And so because it just keeps getting better because the core underlying technology is just keep getting better.
25:53So we've just gotten to the vertiport. Let's call it the Atlantic Aviation Terminal at Santa Monica Airport, the vehicles unloaded and I'm getting on, you're topping it off. We are, this is fully a, is this a part 121 operation, a part 135 operation in FAA, Pearlens? Yeah, they're part 135. And so these are, you know, you should be able to go from your car walking out of Newbert into the air in 90 seconds. I know that's possible. I know that's possible because I've done that many times on helicopters. I've done it in New York City. And so places with complicated air spaces, with vehicles that are in tightly constrained areas.
26:39So 90 seconds, you walk in in the air and you're on your journey. So let's talk about the profile. You're climbing straight up. You're climbing at an angle. these vehicles are vertical takeoff and horizontal flight, but can you describe a little bit what that profile might look like? Yeah, a lot of depends on where you are at, but we want to get into forward flight as soon as possible because it's the least intensive on the batteries. So pure hover is just draining the battery at a rapid rate. So think about in your Tesla, you slam on the pedal, but not for very long because it ends up goes to your 60 in two or three seconds.
27:20So it's very quick. So then you take your foot off of it. But if you were to hold it down, you're draining the battery much faster. So the hover is us putting our foot on the pedal. And so that is what's draining the battery. So we do want to move into forward flight as fast as possible just to again preserve the charge that's in there. So typically you'll start moving forward pretty quickly, but you'll do it at a rate that's very comfortable. You can, again, the videos that will show of the vehicles will always be boring because we never show what the planes can really do because we don't want people to imagine themselves in the plane while it's banking at a very hard angle or it's accelerating at a very rapid pace.
Read the full transcript
28:00We always show a kind of smooth boring flight. So it'll climb up to around 2 ,000 feet in a forward motion. And then the same thing descend again, very gently until I get to go back down. Now, if there's complicated airspace and there's things that you need to fly around, you may ascend or descend for a much longer period of time. So for example, in New York City, if you fly from, if you take a blade from the Blade West Side 34 Street to the Hamptons, right when you get to the Hamptons, you have to ascend to a very high level to just reduce noise. Because these vehicles are much quieter, they won't have that same problem, but there are other situations like that where you might have to climb at certain areas just to get around certain airspace.
28:48And if your folks are not familiar with the EVTOL and getting electric vertical takeoff and landing space, there's a number of different approaches and some of them have wings like midnight and some of them are just multi -copters. They're just drones. And the wing enables a massive efficiency of energy and also much higher speed, I assume. Yeah, it's funny. I remember Peter, I saw you at the maker unveil that we did in 2021. And at Hawthorn Airport, yeah, right next to SpaceX. Yeah, and Aaron Paul was there, you know, the actor from Westworld. and the episodes that were coming out, during that same year, he was flying around in an EVTALT.
29:35They were all wingless vehicles. And so, we talked about that and he said, oh, why do you have a wing? The ones in the show, if you've seen, they don't have wings. The wing actually provides lift and reduces energy usage, which allows the vehicles to just perform better. It also adds a safety feature. Yes. Because these vehicles don't auto rotate, So you can't like with a helicopter, you can kind of keep using the air on the way down to rotate You know the rotor to you know for to slow you down so you don't just go down that too fast for eight But these vehicles have a wing and so they can actually glide on the way.
30:12Yeah, so the engines if the engines go out if you know if you get And I am never mind If the engines go out you could just you can glide to a landing on airport So if you think about the levels of certification that like, let's say like an A380 has, like one of the biggest, you know, planes out there, you know, you're certifying an extraordinarily high level of safety, where, you know, you're looking at one and a billion, you know, chances, one and a billion flight hours of something catastrophic happening. And the reason you can certify at levels at high are because of the redundancy. Because inevitably, parks will fail.
30:49That's why you need redundancy. And so the wing is the ultimate redundancy. So again, six battery packs, 12 engines. None of the battery packs are connected. None of the engines are connected. So for all of them to fail, like one after the next, after the next, after the next, after the next, it's so unlikely. That's how you get to those safety standards that are similar to the big commercial airliners that we know today. And ultimately, you still have the wing. Yeah. Okay, so we have just taken off, we're in our flight profile, we get to our location. Now, one of the things that's interesting is where you can land and take off.
31:28Because, you know, and I'm just curious, in the beginning, I imagine you're going to be operating out of traditional aviation hubs, but you tell me, I don't know, Atlantic aviation being one of them, But I can imagine, like for example, you know, I have friends of mine living to Panga. And when I fly my, I have an SR -22, when I fly out of Santa Monica Airport, I'm over to Panga in, you know, in five minutes, you know, max. If on the wrong day trying to drive there can take me a good over an hour. So can you imagine that there will eventually be sort of land, small landing ports in and it convene locations for regional communities at your service.
32:12Yeah, absolutely, I think there will be.
32:18There's several different ways to think about where you can start and where you can stop. One version of this is just simply point to point services where there's routes where people are already taking every single day. So again, Manhattan to one of the three airports. There's something like 30 million trips per year just going from Manhattan to one of three airports. So you could effectively have a gondola in the sky that just runs those routes from the you know the the vertiports to the airports going all day every day non -stop you know like every two minutes it's taken off and going right yeah or I just think like it's like a ski lift right they just never stop they just keep going it doesn't matter which one you get on it's like greenlight or red light if you can do it so that is a a or a version of it which I think will happen other versions will be where they can actually fly you know you know the routes that aren't necessarily exactly planned that way.
33:07And so that starts to get into political conversation where in California, that's much harder to do than it is in Texas. So I've flown on helicopter in Texas and you can land wherever you wanna land. First of California, it's very specific where you need to land. And so there's different rules for different places and then also depending on the congestion. So New York City will be obviously extremely tight on what you can do regardless of the politics It's just because it's so congested. The air space is actually quite crowded. But it's also still because it's quite crowded, they're used to having many vehicles operating all the time.
33:43So at any given point in time in New York City, you can see helicopters flying, big commercial airlines flying, tour operator flying, all types of aircraft in there at all times in New York City. So that's why it's also a good place to start because they're already used to it. And there's already a lot of established rules on how to do it. I find that impressive that you're starting in one of the most difficult air traffic control congested areas versus starting in the middle of the Midwest, where it's prairies and cattle. So let's talk about when are you going to get operational? Where are you in certification testing operations?
34:19You've also announced some great contracts with players. Can you speak to you sort of with the rober or the rotors hitting the air? I sort of speak. Yeah, so New York City is really interesting for several reasons to start. One is it's just the global stage. And if you think about people from all around the world that come there, I want the CEO of Charles De Gaulle to call me and say, hey Adam, I just took one of your planes from JFK to Manhattan. That was incredible. You have to bring this to Charles De Gaulle. You have to. This is unbelievable. So New York City has that draw. Versus in Kansas, that'll be harder to get to.
34:56It will obviously be easier to operate in Kansas because the airspace will be so much less crowded. The second thing is I lived in New York City for 20 years. So I love New York City. I feel like I'm more of a New Yorker than anything else. And so for me, it's like kind of a homecoming to be able to do that. So that's another reason why. I also think the other thing that people don't talk about as much and maybe it's not cool to talk about it is this is an extraordinarily capital intensive business. The thing that has allowed it to happen, really, it's the technology, it's the kind of political nature of where we are with the regulators, meaning they want this to happen too, which is very positive.
35:36But then it's the capital. So even if the other two things happened, until the capital markets opened up to a point where we could actually do this, you couldn't actually get it going. And so thankfully, for whatever reason, the capital markets opened, I guess you could probably we thank Tesla for having a very successful hardware business. It enabled companies like Archer, which were very small, nascent companies to raise substantial amounts of capital. So, we raised almost a billion dollars of capital in our IPO. And by the way, we had 45 people working at Archer at that point. And so, it was a very low amount of people to go out and do this because you need a lot of money up front to start this.
36:19So, New York City is really important for lots of reasons. If you think about the next phase in scaling out manufacturing, capital is going to be just as important. And so, we need the people that control some of the largest pools of capital to see these vehicles, to feel these vehicles and ride them. And because I've done it, the first time you experience like a helicopter in Urban Armability Trip and you get to do an amazing day, all of a sudden the world changes for you. So the trips that you know we offer investors all the time are come to California We will make you drive from SFO down to our office in San Jose.
36:57It'll take you 45 minutes an hour. It'll suck You'll then come see the headquarters. You'll see the factory next door We'll then go to San Jose, which is five minute drive from from our headquarters, which is next to Levi Stadium We'll fly you on our helicopter down to flight test Which is down in silliness like right outside of Monterey It'll be a 15 minute flight. It'll replace the 90 minute drive. You'll come see some planes fly. We'll then fly to Napa. We'll go have lunch. We'll then fly at SFO and you'll leave. And that is an incredible day that people can experience using a helicopter that will all of a sudden understand what the future is about to be like because you could not do anything like that without an air vehicle because it's just too much time on the ground.
37:40And by the way, you feel good and refreshed. You haven't spent that much time in a vehicle. it's moving actually really fast and you got to do lots of different cool things. Once you experience that, it's just you see the future. It's like the first time I put on an Oculus headset, I was like, oh my God, I understand virtual reality now. That was just mind -blowing to me. Same thing. First time you experience urban mobility, you are like game changer, I understand what's about to happen. Yeah, it's interesting. My experience of that was massively, I mean, I've done that in New York, you know, just basically getting from two and from JFK and Manhattan.
38:17But the place that really lit me on fire was Brazil in Sao Paulo. I don't know if you've ever spent any time down there, but everybody's got a helicopter to avoid the incredible traffic down below. And it's like, their helicopter's flying everywhere. So I imagine that's going to be a huge market for you. Yeah, absolutely. And just one more point on that, too, Peter. We talk a lot about these commuting solutions. But the routes we don't talk about, I think are actually the really interesting one, which are all the future things that these vehicles can do. So I believe someone who knows, maybe it's Archer, maybe it's May, will build an amazing project 15 miles outside of LA in the middle of the desert.
39:06You can only get to it by plane and you can fly there in five minutes, but it feels like you're at the Amon Gary Which is like a gorgeous hotel in the middle of Utah. It's like kind of known as the nicest hotel in America and it can be something you do to go to work. It could be something you do to go, you know, stay at overnight. It could be something you do just to get away. There are experiences that people will start to build using these vehicles that are totally different non -commuter routes that I think are going to just be a totally new way of living.
40:28you
40:58you
41:06I love that. It's building the cities of the future, right? I mean, it used to be that you'd go move to New York or Detroit or Chicago or LA because that's where the education was, what entertainment was, that's where the jobs were. And given autonomous cars, EV tall, and things like Starlink, there's going to be brand new modes of living. And that is beautiful. Talk about when you're going to see your first commercial flight and first commercial services and who are your customers right now. So there are there are two ways to get to market. The first way is the way that we've been talking about, which is through the FAA, through traditional routes going from Manhattan to JFK, those routes.
41:54The plan is to get certified and start operations in 2025. That's We remain on track for that target. Right around the corner. Yeah, the other version of that though, is we will make alternative plans to launch regardless of the timing of the regulator. So we already started by when we announced last year, some of the contracts that we did with the Department of Defense, where we will start delivering aircraft and that will be used in non -kinetic use cases, so not war machines, but for all different types of scenarios. So there's a handful of aircraft we can start making those deliveries on. But then we'll also look for alternative routes, the way the drone industry did it.
42:35So we've been looking at the drone industry, which I think is really fascinating. Zip line is a good example. They want to have a great business model of living blood. So we will talk to world leaders and start to find places where we can start to become an operating company, whether it's humanitarian, delivering doctors or supplies or food to areas that are hard to get to. I had a conversation with a CEO of one of the large mining companies and he told me that they bring supplies, doctors, food, medicine to a community, an average community in Australia. And he was asking if he could buy, you know, the planes from us could say he uses the fleet of helicopters today to do it.
43:27And he wants to increase the size of his fleet, but it's so expensive to operate and maintain helicopters. And so those are great places to go, where you're not flying over crowded urban centers. But you are doing something great for humanity with a project that will be on the one yard line, you know, with the regulator kind of waiting for the final sign -offs. that I think we will be able to find ways to operate kind of before certification. And that's like almost like a hedge to, the regulator is hard to, we don't call the shots they do. And so whenever they let us start operating, it's gonna be obviously a great day, but we also will start operating in 2025, no matter what.
44:06Amazing. People when they see these EV tall vehicles, they think of the military osprey, which is an awful track record of safety and it couldn't be more night and day just to compare contrast one second because I can imagine the military replacing those vehicles with this next generation. Yeah, so they're actually just two totally different categories of vehicles. So the Osprey is a huge vehicle with a very high ability to carry payload and travel far distances. So that vehicle is extraordinarily complex. One of the guys that ran program at, you know, for when they were building the Osprey, Kent was over at Archer running program.
44:56And he said the cross shaft, the part that, you know, goes between the two rotors, he said, was heavier, more expensive, and more complex than our entire vehicle, just with the one part of the cross shaft. And so that one part had to make sure, you know, the fuel could go back and forth to the two, you know, rotors in case one of them went out. So that is extraordinarily complex vehicle. This is a very, very simple vehicle. And the simplicity behind these vehicles are actually, and the similarity of these vehicles to cars are actually why the automakers are so heavily involved. So Archer has a big partnership with Stalantis.
45:34It's the third largest automaker out there, Jeep Ram, Mazurati Pugeot. And we have, they're an incredible partner for us helping us manufacture, they provide capital, they provide engineering guidance. They've been a great partner and there's other automakers out there too that have been involved in the industry. So I would actually equate these vehicles closer to cars than those complex vehicles like Ospreys. So they're kind of on different spectrums. The other thing too is they have giant Ospreys, they have giant rotors and the bigger the rotor, the harder it is, the rotor dynamics get extremely challenging.
46:04We have much smaller propellers, which are just much easier to use. It's not by the air traffic control here. So you're flying, do you imagine that in volume operation? I mean, let me ask you a different question first. Five or 10 years from now, how many are being produced per year? What's the volume potential for something like this? So it's funny. One of the guys at Estlantis said, look, Adam, I was bragging. I was like, oh, the facility that we're making in, you know, in Georgia, in the first phase He can produce up to 650 planes and then the second phase 2 ,300 planes per year. I was like, it's unbelievable.
46:42And he's like, yeah, you know, 2 ,000 planes is cool. It was like, but you know what's really cool? It's like a million planes per year. It was like the social networking moment when Justin Timberlake says to, you know, the Mark Zuckerberg character. He's like, you know what's cool? A billion dollars. That's what I felt like. I was like, oh, I felt really stupid. 2 ,300 planes seems really, you know, not like a lot. And so that's how the automakers think it's scale. So there are step changes that need to happen. And then there are adoption kind of curves that need to happen. But that's why the international market are so interesting.
47:16Because there are places like India that have an extraordinarily challenge ahead of them in terms of scaling infrastructure. So the US, by the way, for people don't realize this, India, an amazing nation of very intelligent, and scientific engineering, English speaking, and one of their major holdbacks is their transportation ecosystem. Yeah, in the US, we have 950 cars per 1 ,000 people. India, there's 200 cars, sorry, 20 cars per 1 ,000, 20 cars per 1 ,000 people. And the same equivalent of the JFK, at Manhattan, takes you three hours there. I've done it in Delhi, in Bangalore, in Hosoar. It is extreme, the traffic's brutal.
47:59And it's only going to get worse as they continue to industrialize. So they need technology to leapfrog 2D transportation. And so that's why there's been such an interest. And we've partnered with Rahul Bhattia from Indigo, which is the largest airline in India. It's like 60 % plus percent market share. And he's very close with a Prime Minister Modi who wants to find transportation solutions. So when you start to look outside the US in the international markets, there is a real potential to leapfrog politics, where in the US, if you want to talk about putting a million vehicles into the air, you can imagine the challenges of scaling things here, beyond just the traditional challenges, the political challenges are tough.
48:44Internationally, there are places that need this, it's almost like they have to have this. I also imagine this for Africa, right? Africa went from landline to Lefinae to mobile and revolutionized the nation where you know, to Lefinae and Africa is better than some parts of the United States. But I can imagine, there's such a little road infrastructure in the Africans of continent that this could be transformational. If you get the volumes up and the cost down and you just said it's just, you know, the electrons become free after a while and then it's the cost of infrastructure. Yeah, absolutely.
49:21So, so when you're, so let's talk about, you know, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions of vehicles flying as, you know, packets which humans point to point is, is the air traffic control system able to handle that? Does it, does it go fully automated? What do you, you know, what's the conversations with the FAA like? Where, what's your hope? because I mean, listen, as a pilot, it's as much as I respect the hard work the FAA does, and air traffic control does, it's insane right now that they read me over an open, crackly radio, and I have to write down, you know, the details of my IFR flight plan, and then I have to read it back, and that's just crazy.
50:11Yeah, I think there's a lot of parts of the sort of old infrastructure that need to get redone. The good news is we can launch using the existing infrastructure. There will be a kind of period of time where there's both helicopters and EV stalls and then ultimately switch out. I think for all of these, you know, electric airplanes and so that transition period will take some time. There's still 50 ,000 helicopters out there So we still have to, you know, that'll still take us many years to build and replace those vehicles. But ultimately, we'll have to, I think, completely change the system here.
50:45The good news is NASA has been working on this for over a decade. So there's a lot of work that's been put into this, but it is a monumental task for sure. A lot of it will also depend on, you know, it's funny when you look at the movies, right? And I was thinking, you know, back to like the fifth element where Bruce as well as is driving an air taxi, right? It's actually an air taxi. They're driving online in a line, that can erode. It's actually, you can manage that. You're effectively just managing, making sure you don't bump the vehicle in front of you. So I can see that routes that get planned, heavy use routes that get planned, where they become actually very dense, that they start to operate like that, because it's easier to get volume that way, because all you're really doing is spacing these vehicles.
51:30And then with the autonomy features, you can put, you know, it's actually much easier to do that. And again, because it's different than, you know, terrestrial vehicles where there's the long tail is just so great. You know, there can be any number of scenarios that can happen that are almost impossible to train for. In the air, you can see from all directions and there's nothing really like coming at you. The sky is basically empty. And it's impenetly scales effectively. So it allows just a lot more room to put a lot more more more vehicles in the air. So it's going to be hard, but I think it's actually, you know, something that's been worked on for quite some time and is very doable.
52:08And there is a lot of room and AI will be our friend and the sensors and the technology to enable autonomy there. Is here now and it's a matter of when do we get the regulatory structures. I want to turn the conversation to the origins of Archer because folks listening who are aspire to building moon shots. You know, because, listen, as Peter Tiel said, the world was expecting flying cars and got 140 characters. And it's, I mean, the idea of flying car to use that term has always been the definition of the future, right? There's the Jetsons and it's like, when do we have flying cars? Well, they're here.
52:52And they, you know, I remember earliest days of these conversations when people were talking about maybe now we can have these vertical take -off and landing vehicles. And over like over the span of like a year or two, a dozen companies really materialized. I do believe archer is in my mind top of the stack in terms of how far you've come and what you've built. Congrats on that. But can you take me back to when this entered your mind as a, yeah, I'm going to go build or go build a company to do that because it's kind of a crazy desire. And then actually I want to talk about how do you start? Yeah, so my story isn't I guess I don't know if there is a typical founder story, but you know I actually started when I graduated college and I went to work it was 2001 so I got hired in 2000 to get a job which was basically the end of the dot -com boom and I actually went and I became an investment banker and I actually didn't know what an investment banker was I did it for Merrill Lynch And the only reason I did it was because, you know, one of my friends, family members had said, that's not really a job for you Adam.
54:17That's more of a job for some of the Ivy League kids. And I was like, pfff, Ivy League kids, no way. I'm a state school kid. I will get any job. And I literally dedicated myself to the next, you know, really 18 months to getting that job. I end up getting that job. My second day of work was 9 -11. And so I worked really, I worked in the World Financial Center, which was effectively one block away from the World Trade Center, and I lived about four blocks north of the Trade Center. So I'm walking to work in this new city in New York, which I'd spent basically no time in, and literally the plane flies over my head into the building.
54:54I watched it all happen, and then of course the second one. It was just this completely shook me. And I left banking after six months, because effectively there was nothing to do, because the world basically stopped. And I went to work for a hedge fund. But hedge funds in back in 2002 were not what they are today. That was the Wild West of investing. And I ended up working for a guy that was just an absolute genius. And he had said to me, I'm going to show you how to find value in the world. In his big thesis was, Fall of the Research, wherever it takes you, public private, it doesn't matter. And so we did all types of crazy stuff together, looking at public companies, private companies.
55:39I remember where we actually invested in Bovespa, the Brazilian stock exchange. It was a private company and we had went and figured out a way to buy seats on a foreign countries stock exchange, which was very hard to do through other entities, which ultimately demutualized and then going public and was very successful. All these things were basically impossible, impossible things to do. It was like, you can't go buy seats on a stock exchange of a foreign country. They won't let you do that as an American. It was always started with the note. He was like, I'll show you how to get things done and find value.
56:14So against him, it's very different than going to work today and just buying a stock and shorting another stock. It was kind of the wild west back then. We also invested in Bitcoin very early off the white paper, the early early days. It was just a wild period of time, but all that was training. I studied what makes companies good and what makes companies bad, what makes industries good, what makes industries bad. As I was following that research, I started looking at tech companies, I started investing in tech companies, and then I started building tech companies. And so I started messing around on the internet and what I quickly discovered was the same thing that you know as You always find which is it's not reserved for the few It's actually an open system that anyone can go and compete in and start building stuff And it was just so fun and so I built a bunch of different things failed pretty much every single time But ultimately figured figured some stuff out each time that you know, I would start I would start an idea or project It always was very sound in nature, but getting an idea is nothing.
57:21Getting somebody to use your product is really hard. Getting a lot of people to use your product is extraordinarily hard. Getting people to pay for your product is unbelievably hard, and a lot of people to pay for your product is absolutely extraordinary. And so the whole crossing the chasm concept was always very interesting to me. And so my last company that I had started was a company called Veteri. It was a software -based business in the recruiting space. I did it with a partner. And it was a really, really fun company where we had a great time, a great culture. It wasn't really in the space that we wanted to be in, but it was a really great experience.
58:00It taught us all that raising capital and building teams, recruiting and scaling products, and all that good stuff, which all of this was training for Archer, which led me to that. But the one thing at at veterinary that I just hated was the grind of sales and so like the month to month you start over You know each time and so as you know I thought about you know a next company one of the things that was really important was the tech was so good That I wouldn't have to sell it it could actually sell itself and so when you start thinking like that like your product has to be really amazing And you start to think about product in your life that are like that.
58:39They're not very many of those right maybe your iPhone, maybe your Apple computer, maybe your Tesla. There's not many that you can keep going down a list that if you replaced it with something else, you don't really care who cares. It's fine, whatever. It's one pair of jeans for another pair of jeans. It's fine. Right. Right. So, I started looking at much bigger and bigger projects with a really interesting tech. Now, when I looked at electrification of transportation, we had been following Elon for a long time, and as an entrepreneur, what year are you in now at this point? So, in really, at the better years, we're 2015, really to about 2018, that was like where it got became like successful.
59:23And ultimately sold it to a company called the Adeco Group, who lost so many incredible lessons there to so many interesting things that happened. But when you know sold the you know sold the company Started thinking about you know different ways to grow and scale and I remember reading you know the You know the book on Elon Musk and just being so inspired at the big projects that he did And the moon shots the moonshots out there. Yeah exactly and reading the Peter Thiel books You know zero to one and those kind of you know stories and a lot of lessons were really interesting where the bigger the projects that you build like the more inspiring it is, actually in a way that easier it is.
1:00:04And that's like a kind of an interesting thing to say, but it's actually very true. It's much easier to hire. It's much easier to raise a lot of capital for, you know, at veterinary, it was very hard. It was like, hey, come over, we're doing this really cool thing, building a talent marketplace. It's really hard to recruit that way, versus, hey, we're going to go change the future of transportation building flying cars. Like it's a much better pitch for people. But you You have to be credible to do that. Having sold thatery gave me credibility to do this. It wasn't like I was just a crack pot.
1:00:33It was like, oh, this is actually a person that's done real stuff. It's been serious as sold some stuff. The other thing that was just such a huge factor in being able to do this was the ability to raise capital. Through my 20 years in New York City, I had made a lot of great friends. I had made people money over the years from my finance days. and then I'd made people money over the years in my startup days. I built a good network, but a lot of my friends were running banks, running funds. And so it allowed the network that I had built allowed me to leverage my track record and go raise a substantial amount of capital.
1:01:10So again, we were 45 people raised a billion dollars a capital. That was pretty unprecedented. And maybe it was a moment in time that we just were lucky that we hit. But that was a kind of a critical piece. But when I looked at the business models, what was going on in the industry of these EV tall companies, nobody was building a vehicle that was based around a business model. It was very much R &D. And so there were autonomous only companies that you just knew the FAA was never going to let you take the market in the near term. There are companies, 3D printing. There were companies building planes without a wing, which meant your range and your payload capabilities were so limited you could not create a business.
1:01:50And so I kind of put back on my, you know, more practical head thinking about my old job of what I want to hear. And so we built a vehicle that was based around a business model. And that was shockingly very attractive to the engineering community. And so that pitch was, was quite interesting because people had been working on this for a long time. And so one of the guys that I met early was a guy named Tom Yunes who was the head of engineering at Zero, which is kind of the original EV talk company that Larry Page started. I remember Larry Page pulled me aside one time and he was on my board at X Prize and I said, so what are you working on that no one else knows about?
1:02:32He goes, I'm building flying cars. So he really paved the way for a lot of the industry. And you start a number of companies in this area. He and Sebastian Thruin. Yeah. And so when I talked to Tom and said, well, Tom, why don't we just go try to build a plane that could actually get to market instead of an R &D project. And he was like, I am 100 % on board. Let's go do it. And so Tom was on board. And then a really funny thing happened. This journalist wrote this article that said, hey, there's a company called ArtChirts, a new EV talk company that's hiring up engineers and paying them three times what they normally make, which was not true.
1:03:14But it was the best advertisement you could ever have, and everybody would talk to us all of a sudden. And so we ended up hiring the best team in the world, just such an incredible group of engineers, and went for it and built it. And so the concept of, you know, our saying was always find the most efficient path to market. We followed the Tesla model, which is build the Roadster, get it to market, and then Then we'll build the Model S. Don't try to build the Model S first. That went back to our strategy. A lot of the industry was vertically integrating. We tried to buy as much stuff off the shelf as possible.
1:03:48We ended up building the powertrain ourselves because you couldn't buy it, but everything else we would, vertically, we would buy from a tier one supplier. That lowered the risk to the regulators because they're very familiar with most of the parts that we use, which again was a great message back to the the capital allocators, which allowed us to raise such a substantial amount of capital, which allowed us to be where we are today. That's amazing. The old saying, no bucks, no buck or adjures, it really is true here. So it's interesting. I think about, because you didn't come from an aviation background.
1:04:26You didn't come from even a physical manufacturing, engineering, or automotive, or a rocket background. And do you think that held you back in any ways, or did that give you an advantage? Unconstrained. I think about my job as kind of like four core areas, vision, capital, people, and risk. And it's an augmented version of Mark Laurie, who is one of my good friends and investors. Well, both you and Mark will be speaking at a button in 360 this year. will be at the end of the summit. So, excited, excited for that. Yeah, he's great. Yeah, excited to be there. Yeah, he's awesome. He's a great visionary entrepreneur.
1:05:10And so I have a very clear vision of what we want. We need to do. For example, this year, the goal is extremely clear, which is to fly the piloted production aircraft. Like that is the single goal for this year. So by having very clear goals like that, it allows people to optimize around decisions, which allows you to get things done and move really, really fast. So that has been very effective. I'm very good on the capital side just because of my background. And I've been able to make people, I have a good track record of doing it, which has been helpful. And then I spend a lot of my time on the people side and really trying to make sure we hire the best people.
1:05:48And I really believe in the Steve Jobs adage where you hire the best people and they tell you what to do, not you telling them what to do. And so if you can truly hire the best people, you can do that. As long as they have a very clear vision of what to do, you can get these people to work together. And then I'll spend a lot of my time understanding where the risks lie and trying to make the big calls to make sure we go left to right to avoid the big pitfalls. I do think it was an advantage when I look at the competitors because I don't have the desire to chase the shiny objects in our space. There's so many shiny objects because you The design space for aviation has never been so wide open because electric motor scaled down.
1:06:30You can do so many cool things. So I don't have that same neck. And I also think, again, it's going to be critical in the industry, not only that we just execute, but that we can actually show we can build a real business. Because if you don't build a real business, you will not get the capital to actually be able to fulfill this dream because it is so capital intensive. As you said, aviation is hard, and if you can't find a way to make money. That I think is actually the hardest thing about hardware. Most of these hardware products, the question is not can you make it. Yes, you can make it. The question is can you build a business around it, which in other words, is are you in the right decade?
1:07:11That is the thing that you always have to figure out. Did you pick the wrong decade, unfortunately, where cool, you built an amazing toy, but But it's too expensive to actually generate economic returns. Therefore, the capital game does not last forever, and the cycles will hit you. Eventually, you'll hit a rough patch, and you will run out of money with these big, intensive hardware companies. For any moonshot entrepreneur's listening, that is gold. Because just because you can make it build it doesn't mean the business is going to succeed. seed. And so many people have gotten the timing wrong and done it too early, which is the same as just failing.
1:07:52Because the whole market needs to be ready for you. That includes people's perspectives, regulatory structures, capital markets, everything. I mean, Bill Gross from IdealLab, who also with us at A360, he gives some great talks about timing is one of the most critical thing is that Uber came into existence because the iPhone was there, because Google Maps was there, because people wanted to make money after the 2008 recession. It's really funny. People always ask me, always ask me this question. Adam, do you regret going public or do you, how does it feel? They always ask in a negative connotation.
1:08:29How does it feel to be public as a public company? And the answer is, it's amazing. Are you kidding We found a way to raise a billion dollars of capital with less than 50 people. It was the best thing we ever did. Unquestioned. It was great. And yes, it's definitely a luck played a huge portion of it. But we, as the Keele likes to say, increased our luck surface area by prepping for that. And so I was, had my ear to the ground, it was very close to the SPAC market. So a friend of mine who runs capital markets at Morgan Stanley, I would check in with all the time. I would say, how do I do this?
1:09:05Tell me what's going on. He would say, first of all, there's a big cash component you have to willing to risk. You have to go do a public company accounting on it, PCA will be on it. Second thing you have to do is get all your legal docs in order, which is very expensive. After you've now spent $6 million, now maybe if the market comes to you, you can do this. It's very expensive to just do the legal work to get ready for before you even figure out if you can do any of this stuff. You spend that we spent the money. And then tried to understand what was happening in the back market. In Nikola was actually the one that was out there that was doing really well at the time.
1:09:38And so a lot of the early companies paid attention and understood what the investors were interested in. And that's what I think I did a good job of following that. And Archer was the first company in the space to announce. We announced before Joe B. We went out and did it. And we picked a really great sponsor in Ken Molyce. And so they were been extremely helpful to the company. So Ken Moles is one of the most prolific investment bankers in the world. So when he goes out and he talks to some of his clients or some of the leaders of the world, he mentions Archer and he talks about it. He's almost like Ijoukos.
1:10:15I can't near my lead gen guy. And so that was a very effective and picking the right partner there. And then again, we hit it. And if you look at some of the competitors that went after us, the difference of three months was a difference of 100 % redemptions and no pipe and a huge pipe and 50 % redemptions. We had 48 % redemptions and we raised a monstrous pipe, a $500 million, $600 million, round just got us up to $900 million. So it was just, again, a lot of it was timing. We definitely increased our luck surface area and then I think we've been responsible with the money too and the whole thing has been on execution.
1:10:55We have to show results for what we're doing. And that's why, if you listen back to what I said before, which was we are launching in 2025 without FAA approval. It doesn't mean we're launching the US, but we will launch. We will find markets to go launch because business model to me matters. Yeah, and experience matters and demonstrated operations matters. And I guess the next big thing is gonna be going into mass manufacture. And maybe we can wrap on that subject. You're going to build plants to produce the midnight vehicle. Where are you thinking about? So we announced a big factory in Covington, Georgia, which is right outside of Atlanta.
1:11:36Great town. I mean, really great town. It's a cute little town with an awesome square. But also right next to Georgia Tech, you know, a good, you know, which is a great aviation school. Great aviation school. Governor Camp has been very supportive of bringing these green jobs jobs to a state. So we got a great incentive package to go there. But a lot of my strategy has actually been focused on looking at what like Apple did. And so the Apple Foxconn relationship is really interesting. Apple owned the design, they owned the manufacturing engineering process, and then they work with Foxconn on the operations manufacturing side, the mass scaling of that.
1:12:16And so our partnership with Stolantis, I think, is really unique, and it's blossomed into to a great relationship where we focused very heavily on the design for working on the manufacturing and engineering together. And then ultimately the goal is to hand it off to them to go print. So when you think about these companies, like Stoantis, they are absolute masters at logistics, sourcing raw materials, bringing them together, keeping these things super tight, managing the supply chain, and getting stuff out the door. They turn raw material into finished product in days. And so they're really incredible at doing that.
1:12:48So when we think about scale, I just didn't think it made sense to look at the traditional aviation companies because they don't build that scale. It's a very different mindset, but the auto is due and there's a lot of lessons learned there. And again, the partnership that we have with Stellantis and specifically the CEO Carlos Tavaris is a really positive one that I think we can both benefit from immensely and we can leverage the lessons in scaling that Stellantis has shown with their vehicles. I mean, they're building something like 500, 600 ,000 cars per month. And so there's just an incredible amount of things we can do.
1:13:27And we can also be protected, potentially, protective, I guess I should say, from squeezes and raw materials. And so when you think about different things getting cut off, you'd rather be one of the big guys than the little guys. And I think it is going to be important to protect against raw materials because especially on the anything that has to do with batteries is going to get tight here at some point. You know, a member having a conversation with Elon, he said, you know, when you look at the people try and protect their idea, and he said, the ratio of the value of the idea to the value of putting something into mass production is, you know, is erudio infinity.
1:14:06It's just, yeah, the idea is the easy part. It's actually turning it into a business and actually operating at scale. That's everything. Yeah. I really like Teed said, his IP is his speed. It's almost like he didn't care. I think he does care, but like you would say, we're not trying to just protect the IP from extritional way. Speed is the way that you protect it. I really agree with that. Also, again, if you look at the market, it's really interesting. the total addressable market tam for our industry is huge. Morgan Stanley put out a number and they said it could be as big as 9 trillion. It's like an auto size number.
1:14:44It's one of the biggest markets out there. But you have a certain point where you have to prove that too. And so before you get to market, you're in this typical like $1 to $3 billion market cap range. It's the same place where Tesla, Rivion, Lucid, all were. They all three were there. As soon as they hit to production, they all went to $30 billion. Again, go back and look at Tesla when they launched the Roadster. The stock goes to 30 billion market cap. Rivian and Lucid did the same. It's up to you to prove that the tam is real. Tesla has made it. Rivian and Lucid are still trying to figure out if they can be part of that story.
1:15:20Hitting production for us is really exciting, but we have to prove the market is as big as we're saying. Not only is the manufacturing hard, but actually building the business is going to be hard. And so I don't want to underestimate the, you know, the difficulty that is going to be too. And so we're very focused on that as well. And we built up a good team internally to go start building up the airline operations and all the partnerships that we've launched internationally. But that, the scaling of the operation side, especially our business is going to be quite challenging. Adam Goldstein, founder, CEO of Art Traveation Manufacturer of Midnight EV Tall.
1:15:59I can't, okay. in one. So, 2025's right around the corner. Listen, thank you, my friend. Thank you for the work that you, your team, Nikhil are doing and a pleasure looking forward to seeing you in March at the Abundance Summit and coming up to visit. I want to come and see the plant, come and see the view. Absolutely. Thank you for having me. I appreciate it and you're welcome anytime. Thanks, Bell. All righty. Thank you.
From the publisher
In this episode, Peter and Adam discuss the future of transportation, when we’ll have flying cars, and how vehicle technology will evolve in the coming years.
17:28 | Ready for the Driverless Sky?
30:17 | The Future of Urban Transportation
1:03:23 | Disrupting the Aerospace Industry
Adam Goldstein, founder and CEO of Archer since October 2018, previously led Vettery from 2012 to 2019 and served as Co-Managing Partner at Minetta Lane Capital Partners. His career includes roles as Portfolio Manager at Plural Investments and Senior Analyst at Cedar Hill Capital Partners. Goldstein, a board member of the Museum of American Finance, holds a B.S. in Business Administration from the University of Florida and an M.B.A. from NYU Stern School of Business.
Archer’s goal is to transform urban travel, replacing 60–90-minute commutes by car with estimated 10-20 minute electric air taxi flights that are safe, sustainable, low noise, and cost-competitive with ground transportation. Archer’s Midnight is a piloted, four-passenger aircraft designed to perform rapid back-to-back flights with minimal charge time between flights.
Learn more about Archer here: https://archer.com/
Follow Adam on X: @adamgoldstein13
____________
I only endorse products and services I personally use. To see what they are, please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors:
Use my code PETER25 for 25% off your first month's supply of Seed's DS-01® Daily Synbiotic: seed.com/moonshots
_____________
Get my new Longevity Practices 2024 book: https://bit.ly/48Hv1j6
I send weekly emails with the latest insights and trends on today’s and tomorrow’s exponential technologies. Stay ahead of the curve, and sign up now: Tech Blog
_____________
Connect With Peter:
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube
Moonshots
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices




