Apple’s Headset Strategy & Tesla’s EV Sales Windfall

3 Oct 2025 · 42 min · 13 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Apple’s reported pullback on its Vision Pro/AR strategy and a shift toward lighter AR glasses; Tesla’s Q3 2025 delivery surge and what happens after the $7,500 EV tax credit ends; plus earnings-season and market “Over/Under” predictions.

Guests

Lou Whiteman (long-time VR/tech hardware skepticism; argues Apple is spreading focus and chasing form factors without a proven market); Emily Flippen (EV-sector bullish long term; bearish on heavy VR glasses adoption; watches for conservative guidance and margin trends); Dan Boyd (stocks segment).

Key claims

Apple is “backtracking” from lightweight spatial computing; glasses are likely a “money-losing proposition” until a killer use case exists. Tesla’s 497,099 deliveries (+7.4% YoY) were boosted by a tax-credit deadline sprint; expect a softer Q4. EV demand is not dead; hybrids and pricing/profitability matter more than credits.

Notable examples

Meta sold ~1M smart glasses in 2024; Meta/Ray-Ban glasses as the benchmark. Dutch Bros guidance conservatism; Delta and Mercado Libre stock picks.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Apple's Shift in AR Technology

0:45 to 3:30

Discussion on Apple's strategy with AR glasses and comparison with Meta.

“And the big topic I thought for this week was Apple, at least reportedly, kind of pulling back on their lighter Vision Pro headset.”

Concerns Over Apple's Position

3:30 to 6:20

Analyzing Apple's approach to the headset market and its impact.

“And like Lou said, they're kind of walking and chewing gum at the same time.”

Electric Vehicle Market Update

6:20 to 9:31

Overview of Tesla's delivery numbers and the future of EVs.

“that could be a whole new product category.”

Tesla's Future and Market Dynamics

10:07 to 14:00

Exploring Tesla's position and challenges in the EV market.

“That was a 7.4 % increase from a year ago.”

The EV Market and Competition

14:00 to 19:30

Explore the current dynamics of the EV market and the competition among major players.

“And that, I think, is going to be the answer to the question of how quickly and how strongly we see EVs take off from here, not a$7 ,000 tax credit.”

Earnings Season Insights

19:30 to 26:45

Discussion on expectations and strategies for the upcoming earnings season.

“a bunch of predictions for the rest of the year.”

Mortgage Rates and Economic Outlook

26:45 to 28:01

Analysis of mortgage rates and their potential impact on the economy.

“I do tend to be a pessimist and I like to be pleasantly surprised.”

Fed's Rate Cut Predictions

28:01 to 28:28

Discussion on inflation and Fed's potential rate cuts in the coming year.

“It has not moderated to the extent that the Fed wants it to moderate.”

NVIDIA's Market Position

28:28 to 30:16

Debate on whether NVIDIA will maintain its market leadership by 2030.

“But I'm betting on one rate cut in the next year.”

S&P 500 Predictions

30:16 to 32:18

Analysis of S&P 500's valuation and predictions for the next year.

“Unfortunately, if you look historically speaking, companies that are the largest in the world, when you zoom out in a five to 10 year period, don't tend to maintain that positioning.”
Show all 13 chapters

S&P 500 Predictions

32:50 to 34:18

Analysis of S&P 500's valuation and predictions for the next year.

“When we come back, we will get to stocks on our radar.”

Spotify CEO Transition

34:31 to 37:08

Discussion on Spotify's leadership change and its implications.

“Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only.”

Stocks on Our Radar

37:08 to 40:38

Investors share their stock picks and insights on the market.

“Average tenure of CEOs is falling, so you need to have a lot of talent there.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:04Travis Hoium:Are smart glasses the future of technology hardware? Motley Fool Money starts now.

0:25Travis Hoium:Everybody needs money. That's why they call it money. The best things in life are free, but you can give them to the birds and bees.

0:36Lou Whiteman:From Fool Global Headquarters, this is Motley Fool Money.

0:40Travis Hoium:Welcome to Motley Fool Money. I'm Travis Hoyam, joined by Lou Whiteman and Emily Flippen. We're going to jump right in today. And the big topic I thought for this week was Apple, at least reportedly, kind of pulling back on their lighter Vision Pro headset. They're going to be moving in the same direction, it looks like, as Meta has with their Ray-Ban glasses, kind of this AR technology. Emily, what are your thoughts on sort of this whole space and where Meta and Apple fits into it? I'm incredibly disappointed by Apple here. I mean, look, Apple invested a lot of time and resources into convincing all of us that the future was in these lightweight, daily wearable glasses that were the visionary of spatial computing.

1:24And then a year later, are just backtracks. And it's not clear to me if this is like a desperate pull for them to say, oh no, me too, when they see the innovation that Meta is doing and literally the metaverse, or if this is just throwing stuff at the wall to see what sticks. But in my opinion, I just am so incredibly bearish on pivoting towards heavy duty VR glasses when it seems like we have years and years of evidence coming out of Meta that consumers just do not want this.

1:53Travis Hoium:just it seems like a space where they're throwing stuff at the wall and we don't know exactly what's going to stick. But at least we know that kind of these lightweight things are going to stick a little bit. So that seems like a little bit of the move in the right direction, Lou. But it's still it seems like this is a money losing proposition for the foreseeable future.

2:12Lou Whiteman:We should say that this is one report and we don't know what's going on, really. Apple has, $65 billion in cash. I feel like they can do both. But look, the cynical take here is I can't figure out the spin is Meta was right or Apple is really that desperate, right? Because in a way, this seems like it's validation of everything Meta is doing. In a way, it's Apple, are they really just they need a something? I kind of agree with Emily. I see more potential in the Vision Pro is also more of a chances outright flop. I just, I don't get the obsession with glasses right now. And, and I'm, I'm kind of worried to see everyone pushing in that direction.

2:53Travis Hoium:One of the things that was interesting when the Vision Pro came out is look, I've, I've been in the VR space for almost a decade now. And what was unique about it is it was almost like an AR pair of glasses while actually being VR. I mean, it was the pass through was better than we've ever had in any other device. So it seemed like they were even at that time moving towards this sort of AI future, but the technology wasn't quite there yet. They hadn't kind of miniaturized things enough to get to even where, uh, where meta and Ray-Ban are with their current glasses. So, you know, maybe we were headed this direction all along.

3:30Travis Hoium:And like Lou said, they're kind of walking and chewing gum at the same time. So they're probably doing both of these things, but they're maybe now saying, Hey, look, the, the vision pro has kind of been a flop and people are at least a little excited about these sunglasses or these glasses from meta, you know, Emily, is that maybe the right way to think about it? They're, they're, they're seeing what's going to work and what's not. And they're seeing meta success there. Hey, I've always been a follower. They're never usually the first company to release a device. So maybe that's the right strategy.

3:59Yeah. That's a really generous interpretation. I think Travis, I think this is an issue. I mean, really, I think it's an issue of bloat. And I say that as somebody who is a fan of Apple. I mean, ultimately, Apple is still a hardware business when push comes to shove. So they have to be on the bleeding edge of whatever the new exciting hardware accessory is, even if that ends up getting commoditized, because otherwise they could lose their position as one of the largest companies in the world. So I understand the desperate need to be there. If Meta's onto something, Apple needs to be right there too.

4:27But here's the problem when you have so many extra billions of dollars in cash flow is that it really does allow you to lack discipline with where you choose to invest your CapEx. And I wish there was more focus coming out of the Apple management team. And again, to your point, we don't exactly know how many resources are being put behind this larger version of these AR, VR glasses. But I really do think that it's disappointing to see them spread out their attention when the Vision Pro hasn't lived up to its potential yet. And there is potential there. They might be a little early, but if they invested more time and resources into convincing consumers about why this would be an addition to their everyday life, then that could actually be on to something great.

5:04And my concern is that when you do two things poorly, you do nothing well. And I wish they would just focus on doing one thing well.

5:10Lou Whiteman:Here's a question, and I don't know if this ends up being bullish or bearish, but the Apple value proposition from the start was always, it just works, right? And in a way, that was tech for the normals, for the normies. And I'm a normie, so I appreciate that. And I am yet to be convinced that the normies want these glasses, that there really is the market that they think there is. I mean, to me, I don't see it doing anything right now that you can't do on your phone. So it's an accessory to the phone, not a replacement. The watch is too. The watch is done pretty well, but the watch is half the price of these.

5:47Lou Whiteman:So, I mean, do we want

5:48Travis Hoium:a watch is also nowhere near the market share that the right right right right it is a niche

5:53Lou Whiteman:product and do we want an accessory that costs as much as the phone i i doubt it so the glass half full is apple really sees a chance to do what they did with the iphone relative to the palm pre and all those and that they really have come up with something that is that next step glass half empty is is that this is going to just be like the watch and be just another product out there that that can't move the needle. When in theory, if they get the vision pro right over time, that could be a whole new product category. I, and you know, this is again, like, what do we, are we swinging for hits or swinging for home runs?

6:32Lou Whiteman:Cause this feels like going for a base hit and not, and kind of giving up on the home run swing.

6:38Travis Hoium:Do you think the combination, I'll start with you, Lou. Do you think the combination of artificial intelligence and kind of these improved, these different form factors. Usually the technology revolutions, the disruption that happens, it comes with a new form factor. So the mainframe, the PC, the smartphone brought about all kinds of new winners, new business models. We've been talking about new form factors in AI for quite a while. The pendant didn't seem to stick. It seems like glasses kind of has a chance, but then you run into this strange, I don't know if it's an uncanny valley where I can see some real value in, look, I can see in our recording, I can see your names.

7:22Travis Hoium:And sometimes I'd look down there when I'm, when I'm reading the outro, right? Just to, I don't know why I just do it. I'm meeting new parents with my, you know, as my kids go to school, I know I've met you before. I know you said your name, but I can't, I can't remember if it just popped up on my glasses, that'd be great. On the flip side of that, if we're constantly recording everything all the time, that seems like a pretty dystopian vision of the future. So it seems like we do need that killer app and we're just not there yet. And nobody's quite figured that out. Is that a fair critique of sort of this next generation?

7:58Travis Hoium:It's almost like we're in the Apple Newton phase of the industry. We're 10 years too early.

8:03Lou Whiteman:Let me give you a more subtle critique because I'm not going to go dystopian, although I see that. I see the fear. But look, we talk about what a distraction the phone is when you're driving, when you're walking down the street, whatever. Maybe, yes, if it just popped up Emily's name, if I couldn't think of it, that would be a help. But 90 % of the things, be it directions, watching Netflix, for gosh sakes, while you're driving or something, all of these things that seem to be obvious use cases, that just doesn't seem like a good idea for me. So again, it does feel like that, yes, it's a neat accessory onto the phone.

8:40Lou Whiteman:But largely, the reason this is the next big thing is, I think, because no one has any better ideas, not because it is a great idea. Yeah, that's an interesting way to put it. I'll just quickly tap off by saying, yeah, I wish Apple was okay with being second in some cases. And I think when you look at the success of the smartphone, Apple wasn't the first company to come out with a smartphone, but they waited for the proof in the pudding there with BlackBerry before they entered the market and destroyed it. And the same is true for smartwatches, right? They waited for Garmin and others to come out Fitbit to show the demand for watches and then said, OK, let's take this market that already exists and let's crush it.

9:12The market doesn't exist right now for these glasses. And I think that's part of the problem that Apple is running up against.

9:17Travis Hoium:When we come back, we're going to get to Tesla's phenomenal delivery numbers for the third quarter of 2025 and see what the future looks like, because this may be a peak for a while. You're listening to Motley Fool Money.

9:31Lou Whiteman:Trading as Schwab is now powered by Ameritrade, bringing you an expanding library of education with even more ways to sharpen your trading skills. Access new online courses, insightful webcasts, articles, engaging videos, and more, all curated just for traders. Plus, guided learning paths with content designed to fit your unique interests. No sifting to find exactly what you need, so you can spend your time learning to trade brilliantly. Learn more at schwab.com slash trading.

10:06Travis Hoium:One of the other big pieces of news for the week was Tesla had a phenomenal quarter. Deliveries were 497 ,099 vehicles. That was a 7.4 % increase from a year ago. The problem is the$7 ,500 tax credit ended at the end of the third quarter. So Emily, is this going to be kind of as good as it gets for Tesla, at least for the foreseeable future? I think it's a fair statement. I do think two things can be true at once, which is that this was a great delivery month they put up, but it was also this deadline sprint that you mentioned for people to place orders before the tax credit expired. If I had to estimate, I would imagine that we're probably looking at a softer fourth quarter here, despite how strong the third quarter was in terms of deliveries.

10:55But at the same time, I'm still really bullish on the entire EV sector, especially in the United States, but across the world. And I think the rumors of its death, so to speak, have been greatly exaggerated. There's a lot of people out there, a lot of investors who think that without government incentives, demand for electric vehicles just won't be there. And it's an interesting argument, and it's one that I think we're going to get some more evidence towards or against as we see these tax credits expire. But big picture, we've seen higher interest rates, and that softens demand for more expensive cars.

11:23EVs are still, on average, more expensive than more traditional vehicles. And you still need to have the installation and charging options. And a lot of people choose to finance those if they have them installed on their house. And of course, with higher interest rates, less people being willing to finance at higher rates. So there's a lot of factors that are going against EV adoption right now that are unlikely to persist over the long term. And so that's the sort of thing where I'm like, OK, it's great to see a strong quarter from Tesla. I am not expecting that to persist for Tesla or any other EV maker.

11:51I think Ford's CEO was just commenting earlier this week that he expects EV market share to drop by half for the foreseeable future. I mean, crazy numbers. But when I zoom out 10 years, I'm very not worried about electric vehicles here.

12:03Lou Whiteman:Here's the interesting thing to me. These are the times, autos are very cyclical. And these are the times when historically the big giants of the industry, Detroit through most of the industry, they've used their balance sheet to muscle out competitors. When pricing becomes a problem, when affordability becomes a problem, and Ford today still has that great captive auto finance unit, GM is rebuilding theirs, where they really can offer you a deal you can't refuse. And someone else who's smaller, in this case, a Rivian, back in the day, it was others, just can't afford to. On paper, Tesla is better positioned to do that than even the Detroit companies.

12:44Lou Whiteman:They have a great balance sheet. However, Tesla, unlike all these companies, also has a huge long list of things other than consumer finance they want to put their money to. So, I kind of feel like, to some extent, Tesla's near-term destiny is kind of in their own hands. If they want to minimize the blow of the tax credit, I think they have the wherewithal to do that. I don't know if, for long-term investors, that would be the best use of their capital, though. But I do think it's an interesting moment. In terms of the big picture for EVs, for me, right now, it makes sense that hybrids are where it's at, because I think hybrids offer you a better deal.

13:24Lou Whiteman:And I'm biased because I have a hybrid. So, maybe I'm saying that. To me, the future of EVs is not tied to tax credits. It's not tied to what Elon Musk thinks when he wakes up in the morning. You tell me how and when that Model 2 hits the streets, and you tell me if that Model 2 really is a$25 ,000 car. And I will tell you what I think the near-term future for Tesla EVs are. Similarly, all of these companies, Ford has a pickup truck. That's a very similar value proposition. Tell me whether or not those actually can be made at profit in any time soon. And that, I think, is going to be the answer to the question of how quickly and how strongly we see EVs take off from here, not a$7 ,000 tax credit.

14:09Well, why are we so focused on Tesla and Ford when we actually already have evidence that is the case? BYD out of China has been making profitable, low-cost electric vehicles that are getting worldwide adoption. We don't see them a lot here in the United States because of our own tariff regime and lack of importing there. But I do think that we have evidence that this battery company, originally a battery company, now a big car company can do it. There's no reason to believe that others can't eventually get there as well. But that evidence exists. It's just a matter of, to your point, Lou, how quickly.

14:39Travis Hoium:Absolutely. Speaking of companies that are growing in EVs, I think this one's fascinating is General Motors. Do you know how much their EV growth was year over year in the third quarter? 105 % to 144 ,668 vehicles. The Equinox EV, which is their entry level,$35 ,100. I believe that's less than you can get a Tesla for today. It does seem like the dynamics have shifted quite a bit. What will be fascinating, they're still focusing on big trucks and SUVs. That's where the money is made. Even though Tesla used to be high margin, their margins are now lower than the traditional automakers today. And it's partly because they're not making these expensive trucks and SUVs, which are selling like crazy today.

15:27Travis Hoium:So, you know, this is going to be fascinating because it does seem like one thing that's going to be consistent is the market will probably not be growing as much as it would have had that$7 ,500 tax credit remained. And therefore, it's going to be more competitive because there is more supply coming into the market.

15:43Lou Whiteman:The one caveat there, I would say, on just looking at GM numbers is I think the dealer model provides more incentive to try and move metal before the tax credit disappears. Because as soon as it's on location, that's the dealer's problem, not the automaker's problem. And the dealers don't have that balance sheet to put the work. So they wanted to move that metal. But we'll see. If it holds up, that's great for GM.

16:07Travis Hoium:I want to get your thoughts on, we have the end of the third quarter, just happened this week on Tuesday. That means the earnings season is going to be coming very soon. Emily, what are you looking at for this earnings season as it starts next week and the week after? I'm actually looking for companies that are very obviously sandbagging with guidance. And I say that I think we all kind of expect for guidance this quarter to come in weaker. It was that case last quarter. We are living in a really uncertain environment now. So it makes sense that not only are companies expecting their profit margins to be squeezed, especially with weak consumer spending.

16:40They don't know what's going to happen with inflation or tariffs, whatever the overhang may be. But I always love it when a company's management team is always a bit more pessimistic than I am. And sometimes that can be a red flag, but sometimes that can also be a buying opportunity. For instance, I think about Dutch Bros, who, when you look back at their business at this point last year, kept guiding for low to mid single-digit same-store sales growth. So much weaker than what they were putting up because management was just that uncertain about the cannibalization that would be happening with their business or consumer spending.

17:09But quarter after quarter, they just kept hitting it out of the park. They only recently raised guidance. But that mismatch, in my opinion, between a really conservative management team and a really strong business where I can see their path to outperformance even more than maybe management can, can be appealing. Because if you see shares fall really dramatically based off of weak guidance that you think is a hurdle that can be easily passed, it can be a buying opportunity.

17:33Lou Whiteman:It's so funny you say that because I was thinking the other day, I was like, I'm more excited about the opportunity to go shopping this earnings season than normal. I do think that we're ripe for it, I think. All the conditions are there. As far as what I'm looking for, I'll go big picture. I'm focused on margins just across the board. I'm really curious how much the macro is eating into margins. We know there's tariffs out there. We know that the consumer is struggling. To get a feel for how much that companies are eating it, I think I'm more interested in looking at margin change over time than I am even like revenue growth or earnings growth.

Read the full transcript

18:13Lou Whiteman:I want to know not what happened in the last three months. I want to know what to expect the next three, six months to come. And I think that that is at least a little bit of a window into what's going on out there.

18:24Travis Hoium:Lou, do you think tariffs is going to be a bigger topic of discussion or less than it was over the last two quarters? And I'll say maybe the second quarter, because first quarter was a lot of like, we have no idea what's going on. Second quarter, companies have kind of gotten their heads around it. third quarter, now we're really in it. Are we going to hear a lot about it, or is it going to just be in the background?

18:45Lou Whiteman:I think we're going to hear a ton about it, but I think it's going to be in the guidance side, because we're in the holiday quarter now. I think that that's going to be front of mind. Travis, I've used this with you before, the boiling frog analogy, that tariffs are not a light switch. It's just over time, suddenly, whoa, what happened? The holiday season seems like, If I was a CEO, that would be front of mind for me at the holiday season. And so I think you'll be hearing about it a lot in the guidance.

19:11Travis Hoium:It is going to be fascinating to see what companies can, who has pricing power, who doesn't, who has to, like you said, eat those tariffs and who's able to pass them on to customers and where they're impacting. A lot to learn over the next few weeks. When we come back, I'm going to have Emily and Lou take an over or under position on a bunch of predictions for the rest of the year. You're listening to Motley Fool Money.

19:40Lou Whiteman:As a podcaster, my voice is heard by thousands. And now with Vanguard Investor Choice, I can be heard by the companies that I invest in too. Vanguard Investor Choice makes it easy to set your proxy voting preference for your Vanguard index funds. In just a few clicks, you can make your voice heard on important shareholder topics like executive pay and direct our elections. Visit vanguard.com slash investor choice to learn more. Vanguard investors own shares of Vanguard index funds and those funds own shares of the companies they invest in. Available for Vanguard index funds that participate in investor choice.

20:14Lou Whiteman:Vanguard Marketing Corporation Distributor.

20:21Travis Hoium:Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. Today we're going to play a little game called Over Under. I'm going to give a prediction about something that's going to happen in the economy or the market. And Emily and Lou are going to guess whether they think there's going to be an over or under. So let's start with the topic that we discussed earlier, Meta's glasses. They sold about a million pairs of these smart glasses in 2024. That's a pretty big number. My question is, are they going to sell over or under 5 million units in 2028? Emily, I'm going to have you first, go first, over or under$5 million?

20:59Yeah. I feel like this will come as no surprise for anybody who listened to the first half of the show, but I have to go under here. I just don't see the use cases for it on Metis side. When you look at Metis Financials, this business spent more on CapEx in the last 12 months than the business generated in operating cash flow in all of 2022. They are just throwing money at the wall. It's amazing to me how much money they're investing into various things, but nothing is sticking with consumers. And ultimately, you can't force a consumer to come out and buy a new product if they don't see a use case for it.

21:32So it's amazing to me that they even sold a million units in 2024. That is peak hype, in my opinion. And unless something really sticks here for Meta, I expect that number to actually fall over the course of the next few years.

21:45Lou Whiteman:Wow. Okay. I am going to use Emily's words and come to the conclusion that over. Because yes, Zuck needs this. And Zuck is more than willing to spend money. And Zuck is still sort of hurting about metaverse.

21:59Travis Hoium:You may just give them away.

22:00Lou Whiteman:I mean, I wasn't going to go quite that far, but since you got there, I don't think that profitability, I mean, I'm glad we're talking volume. We're talking units, not profitability or success here.

22:13Travis Hoium:But yeah, I don't think we're under the delusion that these are going to be profitable in the next three years.

22:17Lou Whiteman:My guess is he's going to move these darn things come higher high water.

22:21Travis Hoium:This will be interesting because I do think the adoption of the VR space really hit a wall. But glasses are different. Glasses are a little bit more passive. They're not quite lower cost, which is, I think, interesting. You know,$800 for these new display glasses. But there's definitely a market for it. The other thing to think about, too, is if you bought one in 2024, when are you going to want to update that? if there's not a lot of new features, that could be a headwind too. So we'll be fascinated to see how successful or unsuccessful Meta is moving into more of the glasses space. Let's go to the overall economy.

22:58Travis Hoium:And I want to get your thoughts on mortgage rates. And the reason that I think this is important is housing is a huge driver of the economy. A huge portion of our money is spent on rents, on mortgages, provides tons of jobs. And higher mortgage rates, at least than we've had over the past decade, has been a real headwind. Fed funds rate is coming down. The rate that the Fed controls is coming down. The problem is the longer term rates that drive mortgage rates and the borrowing rates for companies is not coming down kind of at the same rate. So right now we have a mortgage rate average of about 6.3%.

23:38Travis Hoium:A year from now, do you think those mortgage rates are going to be over or under 6 %? So down just slightly from where we are today. Lou, I'll have you go first.

23:47Lou Whiteman:Yeah, we're getting a real-time lesson in the limits to the Fed's power, aren't we? There's just so much going on other than the Fed that's driving these long-term rates. I am going under, and I'm not sure it's a good thing. I am all over the place of what's going to happen in the economy in the next year. But I am increasingly worried, I think. And I think that there's going to need to be more and more aggressiveness. And I think housing is a natural place for both politics and policy to get involved here. So I don't want to go too much under there, but I have a feeling we'll be eventually pushed downward one way or the other.

24:27It might be a hot take here, but we're sitting at about 6 % right now. And I think the general expectation is that the housing market can't handle these high rates for very much longer, and that the Fed is going to continue to cut rates, which eventually, hopefully, even though there is obviously a disconnect here between what the Fed is doing and what lenders are doing, that will eventually come down. But I have to say over. I think mortgage rates are going to be over 6 % one year from now. And the reason is, is because I don't actually think we're going to get as many rate cuts as the market is expecting.

24:58And I think that tepidness is going to pull over into the market for mortgages. And the reason I say that is because a lot of the inflation data, despite the fact that it has cooled off and it's come down, although obviously not to the Fed's target rates, I expect that will probably heat up as a lot more of these price increases from tariffs are passed along to consumers in the back half of this year. A lot of that evidence has shown that companies so far have eaten the price of these tariffs. And that is eventually, that dam is eventually going to break. And in my opinion, that's unfortunately going to impact interest rates.

25:32Travis Hoium:I do think it is interesting that we have not really seen, we've been talking about this on these shows for months. We have not really seen the impact of tariffs yet. You know, the, the inventory cycle for a lot of these companies is not a month or two. So if tariffs went in place, April 2nd. It's not like you're going to see that in stores. Even in June, they were planning in April for now, for the holidays. And so this is when we're going to see those price increases. I mean, I have kids. We're buying stuff for them all the time. And you're seeing those prices go up. I'm interested to see if that impacts consumers.

26:12Travis Hoium:So Emily, is your point just that the market is going to say, you know what? Sure, these rates are going to come down short-term, but long-term, they're going to have to go back up to fight inflation? Yeah, I think it's going to be a combination between a weaker labor market and inflation here that is going to put the Fed in a bit of an odd position. And ultimately, I think whenever you see broader economic concerns in combination with the dynamics that we're seeing in terms of the housing market today, I would just be surprised if rates fall that dramatically within one year. I hope I am wrong.

26:45I do tend to be a pessimist and I like to be pleasantly surprised. So I hope a year from now, we're sitting here in October, 2026, talking about our nice four to 5 % mortgages. But that feels like a pipe dream to me these days.

26:56Lou Whiteman:You know, it's fascinating, Emily's I'm kind of pessimistic too, but I think in the near term, it's easier to play games with it. And in the longterm, it eventually comes back to bite you. So I'm kind of focused on the one year too, but who knows? That's what makes market, right?

27:10Travis Hoium:All right, let's quickly do an over-under on the number of Fed rate cuts in the next 12 months. Emily, it sounds like you're going under three. That's where I'm going to set the bar. But is that officially your call? Yeah, it is. In fact, I'll tell you what, in the next 12 months, I will even go further. I think we have maybe one rate cut. So the market is pricing in two this year. Yes. You don't think that's going to happen in 12 months? I don't. I've talked about this on Motley Fool Money in the past, I believe. I think I expected one rate cut in September, which we got. And despite the fact that all of the blind polling here from the Federal Reserve does indicate that even the people on the panel themselves expect a number of rate cuts over the remainder of the year, we don't have, obviously, with the government shutdown, our most recent jobs data.

27:58And inflation has not moderated. I can't emphasize this enough. It has not moderated to the extent that the Fed wants it to moderate. It's still well above their target rate. We've actually seen it accelerate on a month-over-month basis. And there's a fair bit of evidence that despite the fact that tariffs have not had the impact that I think a lot of economists and investors fear to this point, which is wonderful, that that shoe is, in my opinion, likely to drop towards the back half of the year. Again, I really hope I'm wrong here. I really hope mortgage rates come down. I really hope we have three rate cuts.

28:28But I'm betting on one rate cut in the next year.

28:31Lou Whiteman:Yeah, I really hope I'm wrong-ger. Because for the record, I agree with, if you want me, I play pundit. I agree with everything Emily said. I was reluctant to even cut the first time. I'm scared about that. And I don't want rate cuts. I'm worried about inflation. But again, I think politics plays into this. And especially as the year goes on with the Fed, I think market dynamics is providing pressure. Officially, I would push to three. I think we are at three. But if anything, if you force me not to push, I'm going to take the over. That scares me a bit. But I do think that the pressure on the Fed to cut rates is only going to accelerate as Powell steps away and does other changes and as just kind of assist the situation.

29:18Lou Whiteman:I'm afraid we are going to deteriorate some from here.

29:22Travis Hoium:Lou, I did allow you to push on that one, but this one, we're going to make things a little bit more difficult. NVIDIA is the most valuable company in the world, $4.6 trillion market cap, Microsoft for 3.9, Apple 3.8 trillion. My question for you, is NVIDIA going to be over or under the 1.5? So basically, are they going to be first or are they going to be lower than first most valuable company on January 1st, 2030. So you have a little over four years between now and then, are they going to maintain this ranking?

30:00Lou Whiteman:Any good gambler has to take the field on that. And I'm going to take the field and say under, however, NVIDIA is a pretty good choice to, um, to be there. It's a great company. They have staying power, but now, if you're going to give me every company or NVIDIA and have it play out four years, I'll take everybody else. Yeah. Unfortunately, if you look historically speaking, companies that are the largest in the world, when you zoom out in a five to 10 year period, don't tend to maintain that positioning. So I have to agree with Lou here that I think it's probably going to take the under. That being said, if anybody can do it, it's Nvidia.

30:37And so this would be, and you hate as an investor to say, you know, this time is different, but this could be the exception to the rule.

30:45Travis Hoium:We'll end on this one. I want to get your S &P 500 picks over the next 12 months. Over or under 7 ,000. And as we're recording, we're at about 6 ,750. So I'm giving a little bit of a gain, 5 % gain or so. Do you think a year from now, we are over or under 7 ,000 on the S &P 500, Emily? So this is an interesting question because I think everyone and their dog will tell you right now that the S &P 500 is overvalued. The market is overvalued. We have all of these headwinds. Consumers are feeling hurt. I mean, the government, as we are talking, is literally shut down and the stock market is up. The market doesn't care.

31:27Exactly. There is this real disconnect that's happening between the American consumer, the American economy, and I guess general vibes of the American people here versus what we're seeing in the market. So I fear that the irrationality to some extent can maintain over the course of the next year because it hasn't made a lot of sense to this point. That being said, I can't get behind why that would be. So I have to take the under. I think it's less than five. In fact, I think the stock market's probably down from where we are today, a year from now. Again, I hope I'm wrong and pessimists sound smart.

32:04Optimists tend to make more money. So I'm staying fully invested regardless of what my short-term prediction is for the markets. But it's hard for me to rationalize how the market could go up from here, given the factors and the headwinds that we're seeing in the broader economy.

32:17Lou Whiteman:It's hard to disagree with that. And I've been all doom and gloom when we're talking about the Fed and stuff. But here's the deal. I do think that it's quote unquote priced in. I think one of the weird things is Liberation Day was such a shock that we kind of just normalized that or, We kind of became immune to that real quick. I am more confident that we aren't going massively in one direction or the other. I think it's going to just be a grind, but I'm going to take the over. I think that we can just grind along almost regardless of what's going on on Main Street for a while.

32:50Travis Hoium:When we come back, we will get to stocks on our radar. You are listening to Motley Fool Money. Friend, when you go, hope you cure your disease.

33:03Lou Whiteman:Pick up the pieces and dust off the jeans And I'll hit the highway

33:12Travis Hoium:You know it helps with the grief

33:17Lou Whiteman:You go your way and take part of me And I hope you're wrong about destiny on how we are bound by rage and tragedy.

33:37Travis Hoium:Our shackles are strong and the road is steep. But when you were gone, brother, it's all...

33:48Lou Whiteman:Support for the show comes from Fundrise. For the past 70 years, there's been a room in finance most people couldn't enter, a room where you could have invested in some of the biggest names in tech, companies like Airbnb and Uber before their multi-billion dollar IPOs. I'm talking about venture capital. Fundrise recently took a sledgehammer to those closed doors by launching a venture capital product that's available to anyone. Their mission is to give everyone the chance to invest in the best tech and AI companies before they go public. You can visit fundrise.com slash fool to check out Fundrise's venture portfolio and get in early today.

34:24Lou Whiteman:All investments involve risk, including the potential loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This is a paid advertisement.

34:54Travis Hoium:and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. One of the interesting news items for the week is Spotify founder and CEO Daniel Eck is stepping down. He is going to be replaced by co-CEOs, Gustav Saderstrom and Alex Nordstrom. Emily, this has been a phenomenal run for Spotify and for Eck over the past three years. I think they've kind of solidified their business model. But going with the CEO, the co-CEO strategy seems to be a trend too. So what did you take away from this announcement?

35:31I was really disappointed by this announcement because as you mentioned, Travis, while it looks good for Spotify over the last couple of years, it wasn't always the case. And when Spotify first went public, part of my conviction behind the business was the way that Dan Eck talked about the company being very focused on the long term. And investors can forget that there is a period for Spotify there, a very long period, where investors were very pessimistic, believing that Spotify would never be able to get its gross margin above 30 % because of the limits and the caps on the way that the licensing agreements for music operated.

36:02And Dan Eck had a really impressive long-term vision for what the Spotify platform could be. And he really did execute well on that, raised prices when it was appropriate, while expanding into things like audiobooks and podcasting, of which so many people, even internally in Spotify, were very skeptical about his investments there. and Eck kind of led that initiative. So it's disappointing to see him leave, even though he will stay on his executive chair. I don't love co-CEOs in general, but I will say if anybody can pull it off, it's possibly this pair. Nordstrom and Soddersam have already acted kind of together as co-presidents of Spotify.

36:36They seem to have different expertise, one more product, one more operational. So hopefully they'll find a way to marry in that sense, but the devil's always in the details. And it's scary when you have a founder CEO leaving the helm of a great company.

36:49Lou Whiteman:Everything in my gut makes me want to hate the co-CEO structure. You need one person in charge. I think I need to get over that, though. We've seen it in a lot of companies. I do think, look, the CEO title has always been vague. It means different things in different companies. It's too much for one human being to do all the work of a big company. Average tenure of CEOs is falling, so you need to have a lot of talent there. I think if you look at this case, and I think there's a good chance it works, I think the idea of just we're almost just recategorizing what we call people. And when inevitably nobody was multitasking everything and everybody had different roles anyway, I think what's evolving more is just how we describe these things, not how companies work.

37:34Lou Whiteman:You need the right people. You need well-defined roles. You need maybe a founder as executive chairman to play referee if needed. I think it can work, and I need to be less scared of it. So hopefully for the best year.

37:47Travis Hoium:It has been interesting to see Netflix has done a similar thing where they have different expertise. And so it does seem like kind of a two-headed dragon at the top. And these companies are so big now that maybe that makes sense because it's a huge job to fill. Let's get to the stocks that are on our radar. We're going to bring in Dan Boyd from behind the glass. Lou, I'm going to have you go first. What's on your radar this week?

38:07Lou Whiteman:Dan, I'm looking at Delta Airlines, ticker D-A-L. They kick off transport earnings next week, Thursday, I think. Should set the tone not just for airlines, but could provide insight into the consumer, into big macro and all that. Baseline expectations is that corporate travel is holding up better than tourists, international is steady, and premium products are in demand. If that proves true, that is really, really good news for investors, not just in Delta, but in United too, which I think Delta and United are probably the best stocks in this sector. very curious to hear what they have to say and what we can read into the entire sector from them.

38:42Travis Hoium:Dan, what do you think about getting into airline stocks? Now, Lou, you are a Georgia guy. So how much of this is blind homerism?

38:52Lou Whiteman:I haven't lived in Georgia that long.

38:55Travis Hoium:So none? You're saying none is blind homerism?

38:57Lou Whiteman:No, no, no. I don't believe it. I don't believe that for a second. Look, Dan, as someone who flies Delta regularly, I have all the reason in the world to hate them. Trust me. Fair enough.

39:07Travis Hoium:All right. Emily, what's on your watch list? Hopefully a stock that generates a little less hate than Delta Airlines. I'm looking at Mercado Libre. The ticker is M-E-L-I. Mercado Libre shares are down about 15 % this week because this e-commerce behemoth that operates in South America looks like it's getting a bit of renewed competition from Amazon. Amazon announcing that in their attempt to expand their presence in Brazil, they'd be waiving additional fees for sellers and fulfillment by Amazon throughout the country over the holiday season. And in my opinion, this is a great buying opportunity, Dan.

39:41You have to listen to me here because MercadoLibre has been there, done that. C-Limited with the Shopee app, tried to move into Brazil and Latin America, South America a couple of years ago, and got absolutely trounced by MercadoLibre. MercadoLibre has by far the biggest lead in the space. I couldn't be less concerned for the lead they have here. And with shares off around 15%, I mean, what's a better time to be buying.

40:02Travis Hoium:Dan, Emily is going with a long-term winner compared to the troubling industry in the airlines. What do you think about Mercado Libre? I mean, she said, you have to listen to me, Travis. So I guess I have to listen to Emily now. Let this be a lesson to ask for what you want in life. So what's going on your watch list? Is it officially Mercado Libre? It's definitely going to be Mercado Libre. I think the price point might be a little too good to ignore these guys. For Lou Whiteman, Emily Flippen, our production leader, Dan Boyd, and the entire Motley Fool team, I'm Travis Hoyam. Thanks for listening to Motley Fool Money.

40:37Travis Hoium:We'll see you here tomorrow.

From the publisher

We discuss what Apple and Meta Platforms see as the future of tech hardware and whether or not Tesla’s latest delivery boon is a peak for the company. Later in the show, we play over/under before covering the stocks on our radar.

Travis Hoium, Lou Whiteman, and Emily Flippen discuss:

- Apple’s headset strategy

- Tesla’s delivery numbers

- Earnings trends to watch

- Over/Under

Companies discussed: Apple (AAPL), Alphabet (GOOG), NVIDIA (NVDA) MercadoLibre (MELI), Delta (DAL).

Host: Travis Hoium

Guests: Lou Whiteman, Emily Flippen

Engineer: Dan Boyd

Disclosure: Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, “TMF”) do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement.

We’re committed to transparency: All personal opinions in advertisements from Fools are their own. The product advertised in this episode was loaned to TMF and was returned after a test period or the product advertised in this episode was purchased by TMF. Advertiser has paid for the sponsorship of this episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠megaphone.fm/adchoices
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing

All 453 episodes
Apple’s Headset Strategy & Tesla’s EV Sales WindfallMotley Fool Hidden Gems Investing · 42 min
Listen in VO