Is the Data Center Investing Trend in Trouble?

3 Sep 2026 · 25 min · 10 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Whether the data center investing boom is slowing, plus a stock check on Snowflake and a listener portfolio-construction question.

Guests

Matt Frankel and Lou Whiteman are Fool contributors who discuss tech/AI infrastructure investing and valuation risks.

Key claims

Snowflake’s latest surge is tied to accelerating growth (revenue growth 30%→34%→37% over three quarters), margin expansion (adjusted operating margin ~15% vs ~11% a year ago), and AI-driven demand (management says AI workloads drove about half the acceleration). Data center pushback is real: New York and Texas paused approvals; 70% of Americans oppose nearby data centers; 833 opposition groups blocked/delayed 2/3 of targeted projects. Power costs are a major bottleneck; hyperscalers may need to absorb bills.

Notable examples

Snowflake’s net revenue retention 126% and “Cocoa” coding agent; Berkshire Hathaway’s earlier Snowflake involvement; Meta/Alphabet data center property tax impacts in Louisiana; listener email about small-cap vs established AI infrastructure investing (60/40 style split discussed).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Snowflake's Recent Performance

0:45 to 3:40

Discussion on Snowflake's recent earnings and growth metrics.

“It is hitting 52-week highs, and it is approaching all-time highs.”

Factors Driving Snowflake's Growth

3:40 to 7:50

Exploration of factors, including AI, driving Snowflake's revenue growth.

“And Q3 guidance, and it implies even more acceleration going forward.”

Concerns About Snowflake

7:50 to 9:54

Discussion of potential concerns regarding Snowflake's valuation and market sustainability.

“So I think that's definitely that evaluation.”

Concerns About Snowflake

9:57 to 11:30

Discussion of potential concerns regarding Snowflake's valuation and market sustainability.

“All investments involve risk, including the potential loss of principal.”

The Data Center Investment Trend

11:47 to 14:00

Analysis of the current status and challenges facing data center investments.

“I see some nice palm trees, things like that.”

Power Dynamics in Data Center Development

14:00 to 14:50

Explore the evolving power dynamics between data centers and local governments.

“I think the power dynamics should work the other way.”

The Positive Aspects of Data Centers

14:50 to 16:10

Discuss the job creation and economic benefits associated with data centers.

“a lot of this just kind of the craziness.”

Challenges Facing Data Center Stocks

16:10 to 18:10

Analyze the current state and challenges of stocks associated with data centers.

“So, you know, that's a big jump up in property taxes.”

Listener Question on AI Infrastructure Investment

18:10 to 19:00

A listener shares concerns about investing in a small cap AI infrastructure company.

“You know, NVIDIA just projected$1.3 trillion of hyperscale or CapEx next year.”

Investment Strategies in Uncertain Times

19:57 to 24:50

Advice on portfolio management regarding risk tolerance and stock selection.

“Welcome back to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:03Matt Frankel:Is the data center investing trend in trouble? Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing starts now.

0:13Matt Frankel:Welcome to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. I'm your host Jon Quast and I'm joined today by Fool contributors Matt Frankel and Lou Whiteman. Today we're going to talk about the data center build out trend and I promise that we're not going to regurgitate past talking points. There's going to be some new stuff here. But first, we wanted to talk about Snowflake. Snowflake has been a very popular stock among investors since it went public a number of years ago. It is over a$100 billion company, and today it is up more than 20%. It is hitting 52-week highs, and it is approaching all-time highs. Matt, we're going to let you talk to us here about what is happening with Snowflake?

0:58Jon Quast:Yeah, this is one I have to think that Berkshire Hathaway sold too early. They beat expectations pretty handily. Revenue growth was expected at 35%. It ended up 37%. They beat on the bottom line for the fifth consecutive quarter, massive guidance raise, and they posted a net revenue retention rate of 126%, which means that its customers are spending more and more as time goes on. That's a pretty remarkable rate. So not much to dislike about this quarter.

1:30Lou Whiteman:Yeah, John, do we have to call Warren Buffett in and give him a lecture on day trading? Because yeah, what's going on here, Warren? Why'd you get out? This has been just a weird stock though, hasn't it? Even for tech stocks, it was a darling IPO in part because it was the, Berkshire got in before the IPO, right? So it was the tech company that Warren Buffett endorsed. It fell nothing. I mean, it fell and did nothing for about three years, and now it's great again. But then again, it's also barely back to its all-time highs from 2021. Just a really, really interesting company, but a heck of a quarter.

2:08Lou Whiteman:Not just a beaten raise, but a really aggressive raise. 36 % revenue growth forecasted in fiscal 27. That's from a pretty good base to begin with. Definitely, as Ron Gross would say, firing on all cylinders.

2:20Matt Frankel:Well, and yeah, both of you are referencing why it has had such a weird publicly traded company arc. Berkshire Hathaway, Warren Buffett, very much known for being tech averse and getting in on this company that a lot of people didn't understand prior to the IPO. And it was seen as a major stamp of approval here. Like if the tech averse investors are getting in on this, shouldn't I get in on this as well? massive run up prior to the IPO. And it is just kind of, I want to circle back to something that Lou just said here. It's kind of been a loser for many investors, depending on when you got in, this has been a loser stock.

3:00Matt Frankel:But you look at what it's done since going public, it routinely beats its revenue guidance. It routinely raises expectations. And so, but it hasn't been a good performing stock for many investors. So what is different this time? Because we've beaten and raised in the past. We're beating and raising now and it's being celebrated. But what is really different here, Matt?

3:22Jon Quast:Yeah. So the price jump wasn't just because they beat expectations. Like you said, Snowflake regularly beats expectations. Five consecutive quarters of better than expected bottom line. It's because of the acceleration, really. So over the past three quarters, their top line growth has gone from 30 % to 34 % to 37%, all ahead of expectations. And Q3 guidance, and it implies even more acceleration going forward. And not only that, but margins improved while the growth accelerated faster than expected, which is really impressive. A lot of companies have this kind of acceleration right now, but they're paying up for it.

3:59Jon Quast:Adjusted operating margin came in at a little over 15%. It was 11 % a year ago. So not only is the growth accelerating, but so is the profitability. So that's really why you're seeing the stock up more than 20 % today.

4:13Matt Frankel:Yeah, I wish I could jump in a DeLorean and invest just about two years ago because the stock has roughly quadrupled since its 2024 lows. And really, boys and girls, if you want to find a stock that can perform so well over a short time period, I mean, find a stock that is about to start accelerating revenue growth, one that's not doing it right now, but revenue growth is about to really pick up. That can often be something that is going to perform well. But Lou, let's talk about this acceleration a little bit. I mean, it's not just that it's accelerating. Why is all of a sudden the gas pedal hitting the floor for Snowflake?

4:49Lou Whiteman:Stop me if you heard this before, but AI, okay? And to be fair, you're right. There's been a lot of beaten raises where it didn't do much, but last quarter we saw a very similar beaten raise and I think even bigger jump versus the 20 % today. So we're slowly catching on here, but like AI models thrive on data. That is the just foundation for all of these. Snowflake's core purpose is to make data accessible, to organize data and to make data available to humans, but also AI. So this is sort of a marriage made in heaven, I think. They took a lot of flack a few years ago. And one of the reasons the stock went down was they switched from just a licensed model to a consumption model.

5:30Lou Whiteman:So you only pay for what you use. And at the time that drove revenue in the wrong direction, because instead of just paying a massive, huge flat fee, companies could kind of cherry pick and only use it when they had to. But all of a sudden, AI workloads are coming in there and consumption-based model is really, really helping them. Whether or not it's sustainable or temporary, we'll see, probably somewhere in the middle. But right now, paying for what you use in an environment where you desperately need to get data into your models is a very, very good model for Snowflake.

6:03Jon Quast:Yeah, I would call out that management specifically said that AI workloads drove roughly half of that growth acceleration we were talking about. So it is a major tailwind right now.

6:12Matt Frankel:And of course, Snowflake's Cocoa product, this is the coding agent. And basically, you are able to incorporate your own data to write code for your own applications. That could be really powerful in continuing that acceleration. But we don't want to be just cheerleaders here on the sideline. We do want to talk about some things that maybe investors should take note of. Not necessarily, you know, absolute the sky is falling, but some things to watch that could be concerns down the road. We'll let Matt go first here.

6:42Jon Quast:Yeah. So, I mean, there are a few things that I noticed. One that we talked about before we recorded, their RPO, which is essentially their backlog. It grew a little bit slower than revenue. but a lot of that seasonality snowflake pointed out that they're you know they're they're renewals and things like that tend to happen in the fourth quarter so i'm not paying too much attention to that valuation is obviously a concern um i i've learned the lesson many times as i know you have that valuation always matters a little bit um snowflake right now trades for about 20 times forward sales about 80 times free cash flow that's a lot even with that growth um and stock-based compensation.

7:20Jon Quast:There's a reason we're quoting things like adjusted EPS when we're talking about all this, because they are giving out a lot of stock to employees. Their stock-based compensation is almost 30 % of revenue. That's a lot. That's down to their credit from 39 % a year ago. But their stock was diluted by more than 4 % over the past year. And that's even with some buybacks intended to offset it. So that's one of my big concerns.

7:46Lou Whiteman:Yeah, I'm glad you said that because, you know, look, it's part of life. We're used to it, but I am so frustrated by all this, you know, the way it's done. So I think that's definitely that evaluation. The other thing I'd mention is, is they did warn of some gross margin depression up ahead. The guidance was down 100 basis points, but look, the guidance was still for 74%. So those are decent margins. I don't want to play chicken little. The bigger question, and this is sort of just the bigger picture question, we've heard about token maxing. We've heard about just like companies, we just kind of that we're in the AI exploring mode and we seem to be moving towards an AI efficiency mode.

8:25Lou Whiteman:So maybe there was a question on the call that is the customer just being irrational now or can this continue? And I think it's a decent question to ask. Is there a time that maybe the AI volumes get smarter instead of bigger and that consumption-based model kind of comes back down to earth? It's still a good business if so, but back to Matt's point of valuation, There's a lot of the status quo continuing and going higher from here baked into that valuation. So any little flinch could cause trouble.

8:54Matt Frankel:After the break, we're going to be diving into data centers. You're listening to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing.

9:14Lou Whiteman:else's leftovers. It's still a great meal, but it's hard not to imagine what the food tasted like when it was fresh out of the oven. Historically, only venture capital investors were served access to the best tech companies in the world that had not gone public yet. And that meant the rest of the world simply had to sit on their hands and wait for an IPO. Fundrise says they're completely upending that dynamic with its new venture capital product. With just a$10 minimum investment, Fundrise's mission is to give everyone the access required to invest in the best tech and AI companies before they go public.

9:46Lou Whiteman:There's nothing wrong with leftovers, but now, if you want, with Fundrise, you can take a seat at the table alongside the biggest names in tech investing. Visit fundrise.com slash fool to check out Fundrise's venture portfolio and start investing in minutes. All investments involve risk, including the potential loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This is a paid advertisement.

10:09Jon Quast:Propel fitness water with Gatorade electrolytes, zero sugar and vitamins. Propel hydrates better than water to help you get the most out of your workout and get back to your best self. What propels you? Propel with Gatorade electrolytes.

10:25Matt Frankel:Welcome back to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. So we want to talk about data centers here. In July, New York became the first state to put a moratorium on new data centers and specifically for 50 megawatts and bigger. Now, if you're on a certain side of the political aisle, the political spectrum, you might look at a state such as New York, putting a moratorium on it and saying, well, that's what you'd expect with New York. But Texas now coming out and also putting a pause button on approvals because they're concerned about power and there's pushback from communities. So here we have somebody on the red side of the spectrum and the blue side, and they're both hitting very big states, prominent states, and they're both hitting the pause button here on new data centers.

11:14Matt Frankel:Now, the president, of course, has stated his opinion that if you oppose AI progress, you're going to be backwards and poor. But we've been talking about this trend a lot because there's literally trillions of dollars pouring into the economy to build this out, that has resulted in many stock winners for us. And this data center boom, now there's pushbacks and questions about it. So we wanted to talk about that. What is going on and why is there pushback here, Matt?

11:40Jon Quast:Yeah, well, I'm not surprised about this statistic. 70 % of Americans don't want data centers built near their homes. Now, I wouldn't want to look out my window right now. I see some nice palm trees, things like that. I wouldn't want to see a giant data center there. So I'm not shocked at that statistic. I was shocked to find out that there are 833 separate organizations that are specifically created in the United States to be opposed to data center construction right now. Now, opposition groups, these 833 groups in the first half of the year, successfully blocked or delayed two out of every three data center projects they targeted.

12:16Jon Quast:That surprised me. And that's something that investors should pay attention to. Okay.

12:21Matt Frankel:So Matt, give us an example here of a legitimate concern when it comes to these data centers.

12:26Jon Quast:Yeah, so you mentioned this is not a political issue. Regardless of what side of the political spectrum you're on, nobody likes higher power bills. Electric bills in the United States have risen about 5 % on average over the past year, much higher in some areas, specifically the areas near data centers. And the massive power consumption by data centers is a big reason why. And they're expected to have a further 6 % impact over the next year. Even most industry advocates like Greg Abel, Berkshire Hathaway CEO, who Berkshire Hathaway Energy is a net beneficiary of this. You know, he went on TV yesterday and said that the hyperscalers should absorb the power bills that these are causing.

13:05Jon Quast:And that's that is a big roadblock and a legitimate concern.

13:09Lou Whiteman:Yeah, it's a weird moment now because I don't want to make light of the concerns. I think the concerns are serious and they need to be addressed. But I also think these moratoriums are temporary. There's just a massive, uneven power dynamic that what we're seeing right now between these big tech companies with their teams and teams of look and small towns jurisdictions where a lot of the town council may be part-time workers who have like day jobs. That's going on. That's what's causing this moratorium. And I do think it's probably temporary.

13:44Matt Frankel:So, I mean, yeah, basically you're going up against a trillion dollar company and you're just this little tiny municipality. And yeah, who pays for the power? And you might have a hard time negotiating that. But do you think, Lou, that we get past this pause? I mean, you've already alluded to it, but get things coming again?

14:02Lou Whiteman:Well, here's the thing. I think the power dynamics should work the other way. They are desperate to get these things moving. I mean, look at what Meta, what Alphabet, what all these companies are spending to just try to go as quickly as they can. It feels like the towns, the municipalities, the states, they have more leverage than they realize. So I do think this problem solves itself by saying, no, supply your own power or even contribute to our grid and bring power. The big thing now is, though, with these moratoriums, I think New York talked about it, Texas talked about it. Let's get these negotiated on the state level where it's kind of a more fight.

14:37Lou Whiteman:You have the state lawyers, the state. You can't play towns against each other. you can't. We're not going to say what Shelbyville offered us, but it's really, really good. So doesn't Springfield want to get a good? That's the dynamics that have led to a lot of this anger and a lot of this just kind of the craziness. At a state level organized where everything is a little more transparent and you have just professionals negotiating with professionals who do this for I think that that does end these moratoriums to get things going. And I do think the power autonomous might look a lot better for communities once we get.

15:13Matt Frankel:Yeah, the tide of public opinion has definitely turned against these things right now. But Matt, I mean, are there some positives that we should consider when it comes to the data centers?

15:21Jon Quast:Yeah, I mean, you mentioned the president's backwards and poor quote, which I mean, to unpack that more, he actually did mention some very, you know, legitimate positives. Job creation is one. Matt is building a massive data center in Louisiana right now. It has, at peak construction, it's estimated to bring 7 ,500 construction jobs, which are temporary, but this is going to be like an eight year project, as well as about a thousand permanent jobs to the area. So it does bring in jobs. It is a national security concern. He mentioned China is laughing at us because this will help them in the AI race.

15:52Jon Quast:He's not totally wrong. Maintaining a tech lead is a big part of national security. We have a whole national security portfolio at the Fool, and a lot of the stocks are focused on maintaining our tech lead. And I mean, property taxes are another thing. I mentioned that Meta data center. It is bringing in a roughly$30 million property tax bill to a parish in Louisiana whose tax receipts last year were$22 million total. So, you know, that's a big jump up in property taxes. So there are some legitimate positives for these. And I mean, he mentioned that these hyperscalers just need better PR to tell people why they should want this near them.

16:29Jon Quast:And there are some legitimate reasons. Yeah.

16:32Matt Frankel:So Lou here talking about, he believes that the pause, the moratorium when it comes to data centers is temporary. Let's assume that Lou is right here, that the data center trend gets back on track. What about the stocks? Because as you mentioned, there are many stocks in the Hidden Gems universe that are tied to this trend, and many of them are down right now. I look at Marvell down more than 30%. I look at Celestica down almost 40%. Sterling Infrastructure, one of the better performers among our stocks that we follow here, it's down more than 50 % from its high. So do these stocks get back on track?

17:09Lou Whiteman:It's complicated, okay? It's gonna solve some of the problems, but it might not solve all the problems for these stocks. Depending on the company though, there are serious capacity constraints at work here too. It doesn't matter what your order book looks like if you only have so many employees or you only have so much manufacturing capacity or there's only so much equipment available to be installed, even if you have more demand. I both believe database construction will recover. And I do think that there's going to be some improvements for some of these companies. But I also think that the majority of the gains, there's the blockbuster gains for these suppliers, for these picks and shovels, they may be behind us.

17:49Lou Whiteman:It's not a sort of gains now. It's about just kind of extending an elevated operating environment.

Read the full transcript

17:55Jon Quast:I'd push back on that a little bit. I mean, you mentioned manufacturing capacity, employee capacity as constraints. There are others too. You know, there's power capacity, which we've talked about. That's why electric bills are going up. There's, you know, chip shortages, which, you know, you need chips to fill these data centers. You need capital. You know, NVIDIA just projected$1.3 trillion of hyperscale or CapEx next year. That's got to come from somewhere and eventually the numbers get kind of too big and we're going to have some capital constraints. So we're seeing a lot of different constraints, I believe, placed into some of the stocks you mentioned.

18:27Jon Quast:And now we have to worry about getting past zoning boards as well as another constraint. So there are a lot of constraints in the industry. And I think, yes, the explosive gains, I don't think we're going to see, you know, Lumentum, for example, 10X again from here because of this. I think some of the big gains are behind us when it comes to some of these AI infrastructure companies. But I don't think that, you know, we've seen them hit their all-time highs yet, for example.

18:54Matt Frankel:Well, one of our listeners is down big on an AI infrastructure stock. And after the break, we're going to take a question from them from our mailbag. You're listening to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing.

19:10Jon Quast:Propel Fitness Water. With Gatorade electrolytes, zero sugar, and vitamins, Propel hydrates better than water to help you get the most out of your workout and get back to your best self. What propels you? Propel with Gatorade Electrolytes. When you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use Indeed Sponsored Jobs. It gives your job post the boost it needs to be seen and helps reach people with the right skills, certifications and more. Spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Listeners of this show will get a$75 sponsored job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast.

19:48Jon Quast:That's Indeed.com slash podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Need a hiring hero? This is a job for Indeed sponsored jobs.

19:57Matt Frankel:Welcome back to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. In a quick note, we want to make you part of the conversation so you can send in questions to podcast at fool.com for any of our contributors here. We would love to take it if it's foolish, if it's short enough to read on air. and if you keep in mind that we don't give personalized investing advice. And if you can check those boxes, then we'd love for you to email us at podcast at fool.com, podcast at fool.com. And today's question comes from a listener named Ben. And Ben says that they heavily invested in a small cap AI infrastructure company and are currently sitting on a substantial unrealized loss.

20:36Matt Frankel:In other words, bought the stock and it went down pretty big. Despite that, I strongly believe the thesis and would invest the same amount at today's price. My bold case is that it could potentially return 10 to 15X by 2030. Alternatively, there's a much larger, more established company in the same ecosystem that I view as a relatively safer 2 to 3X over the same timeframe. So how should investors think about weighting that kind of asymmetric upside against the greater certainty of the established company, especially when already sitting on a large loss. And guys, if I try to just think through this question, what's really being asked, this is almost more a question about portfolio construction.

21:19Matt Frankel:You have a riskier, higher upside, small cap company already sitting on the unrealized loss, a safer, less big upside from this other larger stock. And so how do we weigh that?

21:31Lou Whiteman:Yeah, so not to pick on Ben because his email doesn't imply that this is hitting him, but I think it is. The first thing I think of this is the sunk cost fallacy. And I think it's something we should all think about with these things. Sunk cost-off fallacy is our habit of staying committed to something because we've sunk resources into it, even if quitting is smarter. In this case, you know, we have invested all of this. We're down big. So it's harder to cut our losses. We should always make decisions based on our best judgment right now going forward. But when you're holding a large unrealized loss, there is a huge urge to, I just got to get back to even.

22:05Lou Whiteman:So I do think that plays into here kind of some, as you're looking at this, it's hard to say apples to apples today. But to that question, how should investors think about slow and steady versus high risk, high reward? It's a boring answer. I really do think it boils down to the individual, their risk tolerance, their goals, things like that. My answer for me is I'd probably do both. I'd probably say put 60 % of the funds in an established company and the rest into a more speculative. So I get sort of the steady returns plus potential upside. But I really do think it depends on the circumstances and the individual and kind of what allows you to sleep at night.

22:44Matt Frankel:And just for our listeners, I want to point out that Ben did not share the names of the two companies here. So Lou is not making a pick on either of those, just kind of generally saying, hey, this is how I would think about it if I was thinking through it like you are. But Matt, what do you have to add here?

22:59Jon Quast:Yeah. So on the sunk cost fallacy thing, Ben passed the test on the main question you have to ask yourself. So he asked himself if he would buy more at today's price, and he specifically said that that answer is yes, I would invest more at today's price. And that's kind of the big kind of thing that Lou was talking about. The unrealized loss that you have is irrelevant to any forward-looking investment decisions, whether that is to exit or to buy more. The market doesn't know or care what your cost basis is. That sounds silly to say, but many investors kind of subconsciously invest like it does.

23:30Jon Quast:So I mostly agree with Lou about what he said with the steady player versus the high risk candidate. I'd point out that, you know, he said, I see a two to three X return potential by 2030 for even the slow and steady one. that translates to 17 % to 29 % annualized returns through 2030. That would still almost certainly be a market beater. So slow and steady in this case doesn't mean boring. It means that you see it has potential to beat the market still. So don't be afraid to put the majority into what you consider the safer play. If you're directionally right on the trend and buy it at a reasonable valuation, the return potential from the safer of the two could still be pretty enormous.

24:11Matt Frankel:Yeah. And I mean, as you say, I mean, beating the market is hard to do. And if there's an option with a safe stock, I mean, that might not be a bad idea. So thanks to both of you for weighing in here. As always, people in the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against. So don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes.

24:46Matt Frankel:Thanks to our producer, Bart Shannon, Behind the Glass, and the rest of the Motley Fool team. For Matt, Lou, and myself, thank you so much for listening to our show today, and we will see you again next time.

From the publisher

Description: Snowflake stock is surging towards all-time highs after reporting its latest quarterly earnings, and on today’s show, Jon, Matt, and Lou break down what’s going right for the company in contrast to past years. They also point out some concerns to monitor for Snowflake. The crew then turns the conversation on the data center slowdown before ending the episode with a listener question regarding an asymmetric upside stock that’s down big since buying a position.Jon Quast, Matt Frankel, and Lou Whiteman discuss:-Snowflake’s hot quarter-Some things to watch with Snowflake for now-Increasing opposition to the data center buildout-Whether the current slowdown continues and what it means for top data center stocks-Mailbag: My stock is down. Should I buy more?Companies discussed: Snowflake (SNOW), Marvell (MRVL), Celestica (CLS), Sterling Infrastructure (STRL)

Host: Jon QuastGuests: Matt Frankel, Lou WhitemanEngineer: Bart Shannon

Disclosure: Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, “TMF”) do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement.

We’re committed to transparency: All personal opinions in advertisements from Fools are their own. The product advertised in this episode was loaned to TMF and was returned after a test period or the product advertised in this episode was purchased by TMF. Advertiser has paid for the sponsorship of this episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing

All 453 episodes
Is the Data Center Investing Trend in Trouble?Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing · 25 min
Listen in VO