In short
The episode focuses on SpaceX’s S-1 filing ahead of an IPO, arguing investors will be buying an AI-led company more than a pure rocket business.
Guests
Lou Whiteman (investor perspective; compares near-term SpaceX vs Tesla), Jon Quast (highlights S-1 numbers and AI/space mix), plus recurring host Travis Hoium and producer Dan Boyd (later stock picks).
Key claims
SpaceX TAM totals $28.5T, with 80% enterprise AI; 76% of Q1 CapEx to AI; AI TAM dwarfs rockets.
Notable examples
Starlink subscribers doubled to 10.3M; ARPU fell to $66/month; Starlink operating income $1.2B last quarter and $4.4B last year. AI business uncertainty: Grok GPU utilization was poor, leading to renting capacity; Colossus data center reportedly low utilization, then leased to Anthropic (~$1.2B/month revenue). Guests also discuss NVIDIA earnings (strong growth, stock down), retail (Target/Walmart traffic up), and SaaS “apocalypse” moderation.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOAnalyzing SpaceX's S1 Filing
0:46 to 4:13
Discussion on the financial details highlighted in SpaceX's S1 filing.
“I don't want to be too bombastic in stating it that way, but look, it has a total addressable market that it's putting out there of 28.5 trillion.”
SpaceX's AI Focus
4:14 to 7:49
Exploration of SpaceX's emphasis on AI and its implications for investors.
“ARPU or average revenue per user did drop to$66 per month.”
Starlink's Growth Metrics
7:50 to 11:24
Examining the performance and profitability of SpaceX's Starlink service.
“I don't think I'd buy it because even that, I think it's their question marks here, period.”
NVIDIA Earnings Overview
12:34 to 14:03
Discussion on NVIDIA's recent earnings report and market reactions.
“Earnings season is essentially over, but NVIDIA is always a little bit late to the party.”
NVIDIA's Remarkable Growth Figures
14:03 to 15:17
Learn about NVIDIA's astonishing quarterly revenue growth and its impact.
“Went from 73 % year-over-year growth last quarter, as incredible as that is, 73%, to 85 % growth this quarter.”
Retail Sector Insights: Target and Walmart
15:17 to 16:39
Explore recent retail performance, focusing on Target and Walmart's sales growth.
“I do want to touch on retail because this was interesting.”
Consumer Behavior in a Challenging Economy
16:39 to 19:32
Understand consumer behavior and retail dynamics in the current economic climate.
“happen after the Strait of Hormuz, you know, in the Iran conflict.”
Investing Perspectives: SpaceX vs. Tesla
20:13 to 24:49
Join a discussion on the investment potential of SpaceX compared to Tesla.
“Welcome back to Motley Fool, Hidden Gems Investing.”
Evaluating Target and Walmart's Future
24:49 to 27:18
Analyze the potential future performance of Target and Walmart stocks.
“They want to be vertically integrated in semiconductors, in AI.”
AI Chip Market: NVIDIA vs. AMD
27:18 to 28:00
Discuss the competition in the AI chip market between NVIDIA and AMD.
“their frequency, which is food and beverage and beauty are two of the things that they called out in the conference call.”
Show all 13 chapters
AI and Stock Market Dynamics
28:00 to 30:13
Explore the implications of AI on stock valuations and market leaders.
“I think they've kind of positioned themselves as the insurance policy for the industry.”
Analyzing the SaaSpocalypse
31:00 to 35:06
Discuss the state of the software market amidst the SaaSpocalypse narrative.
“obviously been thinking about is the SaaSpocalypse.”
Stock Radar: Hidden Gems
35:06 to 39:20
Discover potential hidden gem stocks including Onto Innovation and IBM.
“A year ago, they reported 2.9 % growth, and now it's 5.5 % growth.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01Travis Hoium:The SpaceX IPO is almost here. Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing starts now.
0:09Travis Hoium:Welcome to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. I'm Travis Hoium joined today by Lou Whiteman and Jon Quast. Guys, the big news of the week is that SpaceX's S1 is out. If you're not familiar with an S1, this is the document that gives all the financial information, the total addressable market, maybe something we'll talk about with SpaceX. Basically, all the financials, all the things that we've been speculating on for years are now public. And this is kind of the last big thing before the company actually goes public. So, John, I want to start with you. And I'm just going to start this wide open.
0:42Travis Hoium:This is a multi-hundred page document. What stuck out to you? Well, the big thing that stuck out to me, ignoring everything else, is that I think that we thought that this was going to be a rocket company that had a little bit of AI on the side, but really the S1 is pointing to, this is an AI-first company that dabbles in rockets. I don't want to be too bombastic in stating it that way, but look, it has a total addressable market that it's putting out there of 28.5 trillion. We can talk about that all day long, but 80 % of that TAM is for enterprise AI. That is extraordinary, but it's putting its money where its mouth is here.
1:2876 % of first quarter capital expenditures going to AI. In other words, what it is spending in AI is more expensive than putting rockets into space. This is a very big surprise to me.
1:42Travis Hoium:Yeah, Lou, I want to put these numbers out there because they are fascinating. Space is, and this is their total addressable market that they have published in the S1. Space,$370 billion. Connectivity, so that's Starlink and Starlink Mobile, broadband and mobile,$1.6 trillion. And AI,$26.5 trillion. This is from the company that is now renting its GPUs because its utilization for its own Grok products was so poor that that's what they needed to do. And yeah, John's right. They're spending, in the past three months alone, CapEx was$7.7 billion for AI CapEx. Just fascinating how different this company is, even then the name SpaceX.
2:29Yeah.
2:30Lou Whiteman:I'm reminded of what Willie Sutton said about why he robbed banks in a way, because like when you're doing an IPO, you have to sell your company. Now it really shouldn't be, well, actually it really should be a reflection of what you want to do, what you want to accomplish. But in practicality, it tends to be, this is why you should buy it right now. And AI is where the money is, as Willie Sutton said. We'll see where they go. You're right, though. The thing that strikes me is that Grok is, shall we say, a very incomplete product. I mean, the thing that really stuck out to me of staying on the AI is that even without the R &D expense, and of course, R &D expense is a huge expense for these hyperscalers, But even without R &D, Grok didn't make enough revenue in the first quarter to cover.
3:20Lou Whiteman:It's just general expenses and the cost of doing business. So backing it out. I mean, it is a less than a billion dollar quarter of revenue in a time when Anthropic and Google and others are catching on. I look, here's the thing. And we can talk about lots of different parts of this. I think Starlink is fascinating. But just like back in 2010 with the Tesla IPO, I don't think that anyone is going to be interested in this for what it is today. And I don't think that this S1 should be taken. I mean, take it seriously, not literally, I guess. To use an expression used about politics.
4:01Travis Hoium:Let's stick on that Starlink piece because, John, I thought these numbers were fascinating. This is from the connectivity section. the number of Starlink subscribers more than doubled in the past year to 10.3 million. So that's a very significant number. ARPU or average revenue per user did drop to$66 per month. I have seen that they, at least some people were reporting they were raising prices over even just in the past month. But this is the segment that is also profitable segment income from operations,$1.2 billion in the last three months and$4.4 billion in the past year. So that actually seems like a pretty good business, John.
4:40Yeah, I really wish that it was being spun out into its own publicly traded company because it would be something I'd be very interested in owning. You look at the growth rate, I mean, you look at the subscriber rate and then the drop in average revenue per user, yeah, but that combination still leaves it with 30%, greater than 30 % revenue growth year over year, that's a really good growth rate. And the operating margin on this is pretty good as well. There are some economies here with vertical integration, but an operating margin that is quite attractive. And so this would be an attractive business on a standalone basis.
5:16Now you lump it in in the bigger company, I think that there's some question marks there. And if it was a standalone business, it would probably be going public at a exorbitant valuation as well. But Starlink is the star of the show.
5:28Lou Whiteman:Yeah, I agree 100%. It's the sort of show. I actually think it works better inside a big company because I think some of what they're getting at cost, you wouldn't want to pay the market rate for.
5:39Travis Hoium:You're saying for the launches?
5:41Lou Whiteman:Yeah, for the launch and maintenance. Like, you know, the total addressable market is just, you know, all the numbers are fun. You know, the total one's basically U.S. GDP. But that, I think it's$1.6 trillion in Starlink is what they said, right? Yep. Guys, just, and I mean, this is current day, not future, but global telecom connectivity revenue in 2025. So that's mobile, that's fixed broadband, that's fixed voice. That is what everybody spent on all of those things last year was 1.3 trillion.
6:12Travis Hoium:So they are going to capture all of that and then some, and by the way, those businesses are not really great businesses, have not been good businesses to investors anyways.
6:21Lou Whiteman:They're fine. They're cashflow businesses when they work. Um, the, the, the unit economics, I think need to be watched. Cause like you said, revenue per user was down. That's we duh, because they lowered prices and they are in the earliest days. So they do want to capture market share. So it's not a problem, but look, relative to signing long-term leases for cell towers, this is a very CapEx heavy form of communication. These satellites have, some of them are going to have, um, you know, lives of a few years. And why is that? Space is hard. Space is brutal. And to some extent, I'm oversimplifying, but you need so many of these.
7:05Lou Whiteman:You are doing low earth orbit, kind of cheap, disposable satellites. That's the business model here. You're not building a satellite capable of looping around Pluto or something. So there is going to be a constant, constant cost. If you bring the unit economics down, that makes it a real difficult thing, especially look, Amazon's doing this, ASTS is doing this, there are legacy providers who do this, and all, by the way, the nature of physics, it is always going to be second best if you do have a cell tower, so it is going to be, for most things, for most large markets, a complementary, not a replacement product.
7:46Lou Whiteman:I love Starlink, and I love the potential here, but I'll be honest, if it was a standalone, I don't think I'd buy it because even that, I think it's their question marks here, period.
7:59Travis Hoium:John, I want to touch on the AI piece because that is, according to SpaceX, the biggest total addressable market for them. And this is something that is going to capture investors' attention as SpaceX goes public. But it's really, there's a lot of questions about what the business model is even going to be here. We've seen over the past just few weeks that Colossus won, which was this was the big data center that they built in Memphis, that Jensen Wong just was, oh, my gosh, only Elon Musk can build a data center this fast. Then it turns out it's very, very low utilization because people just aren't using Grok.
8:33Travis Hoium:So they decide to lease out this data center to Anthropic. Now, that turns into positive revenue, potentially positive free cash flow. the reports are it's about$1.2 billion worth of revenue per month. That's going to be starting to come in this month. And I think it ramps up next month. But is that the business? Is this just another NeoCloud? Or is this, are you buying Grok? I'm a little bit confused about what the AI business is actually going to be. Yeah. I mean, well, you look at it, you project forward, this Anthropic deal is just brand new here. You project forward$15 billion in annual revenue from that, you look at what the AI component of SpaceX generated last year in 2025, we're basically at an$18 billion AI business here at a run rate of$18 billion.
9:23You look at what SpaceX, the space part of it did last year, did about just less than$16 billion in annual revenue. So right now, if you look at a run rate perspective, about 55 % AI, 45 % space, that's really interesting, especially when you're looking at where's management's vision focused, where's it spending its money. I mean, and what are investors signing up for when they buy this IPO? I think they, again, to go back, I think that they want space, but we need to recognize that it is getting AI. uh look grok aside i think it is a good idea if you have unused capacity and you have somebody willing to pay you 1.25 billion a month sell it yeah yeah travis you're confused because seemingly
10:11Lou Whiteman:they're confused if you read the uh document um i mean they say almost 23 trillion of that opportunities enterprise applications to me that seems like layering on the hyperscaler models at actually helping companies do things with it, which is probably the best business to be in, but it is separate from the hyperscale and business. At the same time, in another part, they say their biggest single AI opportunity is data centers in space, which wouldn't be included in the enterprise market. So I think it is a, we'll see here, I'll take the under on data centers in space. Bottom line here though, here's the thing.
10:46Lou Whiteman:I'm kind of talking it down left and right. I'll bet a dollar that the IPO is a big success. And so, you know, it is, let's just see how this turns out. We're all fascinated by this. We're all looking for clues in the prospectus. There's a lot of interesting things there, but this is going to be a long-term story and a lot of people are excited about it. End of story.
11:08Travis Hoium:We definitely got a lot more information about what SpaceX is doing. I don't know that we got all of our questions answered about where SpaceX is going. So more to be determined, but they are likely to go public next month. We will definitely be following that here on the show. When we come back, we're going to talk about NVIDIA and retail earnings. You're listening to Motley Fool, Hidden Gems Investing. There are moments in life that reveal who we are and who we're meant to become. For those born to lead, such moments call for a vehicle of equal distinction. Dynamic by design and uncompromising in execution, the Range Rover Sport was engineered for those rare individuals who demand the world and possess the conviction to claim it.
11:48Travis Hoium:The Range Rover Sport commands attention wherever it goes as every detail has been engineered for impact. This is the most advanced Range Rover Sport yet, filled with innovations to keep you connected, including an elegant 13.1-inch touchscreen that lets you seamlessly navigate and control vehicle systems. You'll enjoy interior refinements like sculpted 22-way heated seating with a massage function, ensuring comfort for every journey. With nearly unlimited ways to personalize, from unique colors and finishes to wheel options, you can make it truly yours. It offers a powerful drive with peerless refinement, combining ultimate luxury and unbridled agility.
12:27Travis Hoium:Exclusive offers available now. Explore further at RangeRover.com. Welcome back to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. Earnings season is essentially over, but NVIDIA is always a little bit late to the party. They reported earnings this week. Lou, really good results. It's hard to see a company that's growing this quickly not impress the market, but the stock was down 2 % after they reported earnings. What did you think?
12:54Lou Whiteman:Yeah, the market yawned, right? And again, I sort of think, and I've thought this for a while because we saw this last quarter too, to some extent, that the market is both impressed by this and also kind of maybe doesn't think it can go on forever. And so it's like, you know, like, great, we're here, but how much can you really grow? Look, though, they say they're growing, which kind of leads me to do theory B, which I'm going to steal this from our colleague, Tim Byers, who I think was spot on here. The market is no longer capable of being impressed by AI numbers. We are numb to these numbers.
13:29Lou Whiteman:And arguably that's okay for NVIDIA because there's a real there, there, long-term they can continue to deliver. But as an investor, if you accept this sort of that the market that nothing impresses, that Jensen Wan could get up there and just scream, are you entertained? And just this is like yawning, bored crowd. What does that mean for investors in, say, more fragile AI stocks that are also overvalued? Can they sustain that? I think my takeaway is NVIDIA is fine, but be careful out there if you're an investor in a high land. Yeah, I mean, look, this is the largest publicly traded company in the world.
14:08Went from 73 % year-over-year growth last quarter, as incredible as that is, 73%, to 85 % growth this quarter. And projecting forward, expecting 97 % growth in the upcoming quarter. We are talking about the largest company accelerating the revenue growth rate. I think that NVIDIA needs to come back out on stage and take another bow because I don't know if we've ever seen numbers like this. Just for perspective, it increased its quarterly revenue by$38 billion year over year. That's just the increase, not what it generated. You take a company like John Deere, been around for 200 years almost at this point.
14:48That's about how much it makes in a year. That's how much NVIDIA increased its revenue from last year. So just incredible numbers.
14:56Travis Hoium:The numbers are wild. And they also announced an$80 billion buyback program, which crazy enough would be about 2 % of shares outstanding. So the numbers are getting just insanely... How about the dividend?
15:08Lou Whiteman:Yeah. 25 ,000... What was it?
15:10Travis Hoium:25X increase.
15:12Lou Whiteman:Or 25X, yeah, increase, yeah. To 25 cents. Yeah.
15:17Travis Hoium:I do want to touch on retail because this was interesting. The other thing is we're starting to get retail numbers. So they're about a month lag from most typical earnings reports. So we heard from Target and Walmart this week, kind of canaries in the coal mine, if you will. And the numbers I thought were shockingly good, John. Target said that revenue was up 6.7%, 4.7 % increase in same-store sales. Target specifically has really struggled with that recently. So it seems like things are turning around. Management is a little bit cautious that this is sustainable. So I guess that's understandable.
15:51Travis Hoium:They're new kind of in their roles. So don't want to set that bar too high. But then Walmart also said that their same store sales were up 4.1%. So is the consumer actually a lot better off than we thought? Well, more important than the number itself, I always like to look at the traffic. This is feet in the door. And for Target, it was over a 4 % jump in store traffic. That is real growth there. It's not just an increase in prices. And similarly, Walmart saw that 3 % jump in traffic as well. So these are retail giants that are getting increased activity. And that's a good thing. That is actually a really good economic indicator.
16:34So that may be surprising given the economic environment that we're in.
16:38Travis Hoium:Yeah, Lou, the other thing to point out is that this quarter, part of this quarter did happen after the Strait of Hormuz, you know, in the Iran conflict. began. So the impact of oil prices doesn't seem like it has dampened consumer enthusiasm, at least yet. But, you know, there's there's some things like inflation, higher gas prices kind of coming down the pipeline. But we're not seeing bad numbers, despite the fact that consumer confidence is not great right now. Right. I mean, I don't think you're right that
17:10Lou Whiteman:the conflict had started, but gas prices in particular are a slow drip. So I don't think we should read too much into kind of the impact of that based on numbers that kind of, you know, from March. The whole thing, like, look, I don't know, I don't know how much to read into it. Because for both Walmart and Target, it feels like regression to the meat in opposite directions. For Target, this is a good first step. But as they say, you know, a journey of a million miles begins with one step. They have a long journey ahead of them just to get back to break even. good. They've started that journey.
17:43Lou Whiteman:They've done good things in this quarter. You'd still rather have been a Walmart holder for the last five years, and we'll see on that. With Walmart, the most fascinating thing, we have given them so much credit, and deservedly so, for kind of stealing Target's lunch and moving upstream into the higher net worth consumer. It feels like that's biting them a little bit because there's actually signs that instead of Walmart being the beneficiary of trading down that maybe they're feeling a little bit, but either in product mix or just people going elsewhere. I think, I think Walmart survives that.
Read the full transcript
18:20Travis Hoium:Meaning they've moved too high up on that consumer scale? Higher. Higher.
18:26Lou Whiteman:You know, and, and so now like, like things like, like times when they used to be the clear beneficiary, it's just a little more wishy-washy and you know, that's who they are. That's fine. I think it's still in that positive, but it's funny. Like, it's a reminder that we can't let our conventional wisdom on these companies really rule us. Well, and I think that it's so tempting to say, look, the consumer is stressed. And so it is trading down to a lower priced retailer. But that explanation doesn't totally cut the mustard because you look at the restaurant results here recently. Cava. Look, I'm not saying it's the most expensive place, but I don't think that we go there when we're trying to save money.
19:01We saw a 7 percent increase in guest traffic there, 10 percent same store sales growth recently. that's incredible meanwhile Wendy's same store sales in the USA down nearly eight percent so
19:13Travis Hoium:not everything makes sense yeah trying to draw a through through line and make perfect sense is has been impossible and I think we've been trying to do it on this show it just it just isn't there but I was shocked that both of these companies reported really really good numbers so hopefully that's a good sign for the economy when we come back I'm gonna have John and Lou pick some stocks for us. You're listening to Mighty Full Hidden Gems Investing.
20:03Travis Hoium:scrambling for the closest outlet and built-in intelligence that makes updates around your schedule not in the middle of it. They don't build tech for tech's sake. They build it for you. Find technology built for the way you work at dell.com slash dellpcs. Built for you.
20:23Travis Hoium:Welcome back to Motley Fool, Hidden Gems Investing. In this section, we like to have a little bit of fun with investing. And I want to get an idea of which stocks Lou and John like right now. So I'm going to give you guys two stocks. I know if you pick between the two, do something like an either or. Let's start with a topic that we started with here, SpaceX coming public. Lou, would you rather buy SpaceX's IPO? Are we going to be at a$2 trillion valuation? Sounds like something like that. Or would you rather own shares of Tesla?
20:55Lou Whiteman:I mean, obviously the answer is it doesn't matter because they're going to be one company in a year, so you're going to hold either in a year. But look, at least in the near term, I'd actually take SpaceX. And although my answer is probably neither, but here's the thing. I do believe there is at least a portion of the investing community that is more interested in investing in Elon's brain and Elon's potential to build cool stuff in the future than they really are interested in investing in Grok or an electric vehicle maker. So I do think that naturally, if you have two securities in which you can do that, they're going to compete with each other, right?
21:35Lou Whiteman:One of them is a brand new flashy story with a total addressable market that basically equals US GDP. The other is, I think, still an attractive story and with areas where they're trying to grow, but there's a lot of water under the bridge there. So I do think there's a real risk, at least in the near term, people will trade out Tesla to buy SpaceX to get the fresher, newer version of invest in Elon's brain. So in the near term anyway, I think I'd rather be sitting in SpaceX right now. It's so interesting. Morgan Housel, the author, Morgan Housel, he talks about how two very smart, logical investors can disagree over something here.
22:14So I'm going to disagree with Lou, but Morgan Housel points out that oftentimes a disagreement is just over time horizon. And so when I make an investment, I'm thinking five years. If I am buying a stock today for the next five years, I'm picking Tesla. But I agree with Lou's point here that maybe over the nearer term, SpaceX is the one to own. But when it comes to Tesla, and kind of the reasoning goes back to what Lou was just saying, investing in Elon's brain. And, you know, for whatever criticism there might be, he does have this just incredible tenacity to stick with something. And I know that we disagree on that.
22:52But when you look at what he has been able to roll out in the electrical vehicle market, I've seen a lot of other players come into this market and give up before they reach the finish line. It has he has really built this into an incredible business. And I really think that he is going to see the optimist program, the robots. I may have my doubts about that. At the same time, I do think that there is going to be a marketable opportunity there. And I do believe he's going to stick with that and create something pretty impressive. So if I'm thinking five years out, I am thinking Tesla here. I have questions about SpaceX, even though I do love the space economy.
23:29Travis Hoium:One of the things that's interesting with these two companies is it seems like the story is going in the same direction, meaning AI and particularly the CapEx related to AI is happening at both of them. You know, I think Tesla said in the most recent quarter that their AI investment is going to explode to, off the top of my head, I think it was$25 billion this year. So they're not going to be the biggest investor in AI. But then you see the SpaceX numbers and you're seeing the exact same thing. So is it almost like you're buying the same future, even though one of them is starting with space and satellites and the other one's starting with electric cars?
24:03I absolutely think that is true, Travis. I think that these are going to be very similar in direction. and even similar in focus, you look at one of the big, we didn't talk about this, one of the big expenses coming up for SpaceX, like it or not, is the TerraFab project that Elon Musk wants to create.
24:23Travis Hoium:Tesla will also be involved, yes. Exactly. And that's the point, is that that's a joint collaborative effort, and Intel is also in the mix there. ASML CEO just going on record recently saying, hey, I've been talking to Elon Musk directly. He is very serious. And so the ASML machines are necessary for everything that he wants to make in the TerraFab and already having those discussions. So yeah, that's going to be a big capital outlay. They want to be vertically integrated in semiconductors, in AI. So definitely something to watch. It's definitely going to be interesting to see how investors are pulled when there's two Elon Musk companies.
25:00Travis Hoium:And if we do get to the point where they merge into one, as Lou said. Let's talk about the other companies that we talked about a little bit, Target and Walmart. And I just want to give a couple of numbers, John, before I have you pick between the two. Target currently trades for a trailing price to earnings multiple of 17. Walmart has a trailing price to earnings multiple of 42. So very different valuations. But if you have to own one of these stocks, Lou said it, Walmart has been the better performer over the past five years. But if you had to buy one of these stocks now, which one is it? It would be Target.
25:34And it has been Target for a while now. You know, I do believe that this is a company that is potentially able to run the same playbook that Walmart ran. Walmart was able to create more revenue and higher margin revenue thanks to the advent of its digital businesses and its rise and things such as its marketplace, its digital advertising, other things. even its membership program. Target is trying to run the same playbook. It's been slow to do it. It was slow to get started. But I think we're seeing some of that guest traffic coming back. We are looking at historically lower profit margins for Target right now.
26:14And it's trading at that cheap valuation at the lower profitability. What happens when those margins start to improve? All of a sudden we could see a big jump in earnings and the stock would look quite cheap today by those standards.
26:27Lou Whiteman:Yeah, I'll be honest. I'm not fully convinced the target can execute from here, but look, there was a non-zero chance that this was going the way of JCPenney's or Sears. And I know it wasn't likely, but we've seen this in retail too many times. You do not have the right to exist. I think this quarter, if nothing else, has done a lot of work just kind of eliminating that possibility. With Walmart, it's an incredible company. I still think it probably is the better ultra long-term investment, but I'm not going to pay 45 times earnings for a company with decelerating sales in the same store sales and in a tough economy.
27:06Lou Whiteman:I think my answer is neither, but I would, I would invest in Target.
27:11Travis Hoium:It's going to be interesting to see what they're going to be able to copy from Walmart. The other thing to highlight with, from John's point is Target is leaning more into what they call their frequency, which is food and beverage and beauty are two of the things that they called out in the conference call. You know, they have not been driven by grocery the way that Walmart has over the past decade or two. They're trying to follow those footsteps. They're not there yet. And there's a lot of work with the physical infrastructure, you know, changing stores, you go into a Walmart, you know, it's almost a grocery store with a Walmart attached.
27:46Travis Hoium:Target is not quite at the same point. So it'd be interesting to see if they are able to copy that. All right, let's talk about the world of AI chips. Lou, NVIDIA reported this week, AMD's stock is on fire. If you have to buy one of them right now, which one is it?
28:02Lou Whiteman:I'm going with the winner. I'm going with NVIDIA. I like what AMD has done. I think they've kind of positioned themselves as the insurance policy for the industry. But look, for all we talk about NVIDIA, look, we got what, a 26 times multiple versus an almost 60 times multiple or so. On a forward basis, we're at 22 right now. Yeah, you get the undisputed leader. And mind you, even after, if this does turn out to be a bubble, a company that has multiple times been through a bubble and come out the other side and found ways to grow value again, I'm still going with the big dog here. I'll take the other side of that.
28:42I'm going with AMD. This is actually one of the most recent additions to my own stock portfolio. and the reason being is agentic AI. You have the AI agents coming in and that is more CPU intensive than GPU intensive. And so NVIDIA has been able to benefit from just this massive increase in GPU demand. In fact, CEO Jensen Wong saying, we think that our Vera Rubin system is going to be supply constrained through its entire life cycle. That's such an incredible statement to make. But with AI agents, and you talk, speaking of Wong, he says, we're going to have all of our employees running 100 AI agents.
29:21Whether or not that actually is true, you're talking about an incredible increase in CPU needs. For some people, that means an investment in Intel, but for me, that's an investment in AMD. I really think that it's going to be a beneficiary here and I think you're going to see those margins rise pretty fast and that PE multiple that you cited, I think it's going to look a lot cheaper very quickly.
29:44Travis Hoium:Yeah, their forward price earnings multiple, just for comparison, is 26. So there's a lot of growth in margins that are priced into the stock, but not quite as expensive as it may seem on the surface if you're looking at trailing numbers. CPUs, by the way, also something that NVIDIA is talking a lot about, now that they are also in the CPU game. Which is a fair point, a fair point and a fair risk. When we come back, we are going to talk about the parent cancellation of the SaaSpocalypse. What do John and Lou think? You're listening to Motley Fool, Hidden Gems Investing. In a world full of noise, long-term thinking stands out.
30:19Travis Hoium:On the Capital Ideas podcast, Capital Group leaders explore the decisions that matter most in investing, leadership, and life. It's a rare look inside a firm that's been helping people pursue their financial goals for more than 90 years. Listen to the Capital Ideas podcast from Capital Group, published by Capital Client Group, Inc. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows The Motley Fool's editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers.
30:52Travis Hoium:Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertisement disclosure, please check out our show notes. One of the things that we have talked about a lot on this show and the market has obviously been thinking about is the SaaSpocalypse. A lot of software stocks are down significantly in 2026. But John, as we get through the first quarter earnings season, and we got a couple of reports this week, it doesn't seem like things are nearly as bad as projected a couple of months ago. So what should we be thinking about software right now? Is this an undervalued sector we should be looking for opportunities?
31:29I think that some parts of this sector are undervalued, but definitely not all of them. I don't think that we saw any financial results this week that changed the big picture. And so I want to start with that for just a moment. Why should anyone listen to me? I'm just a dude. But if you're going to listen to somebody, how about we choose somebody who's smart and close to the situation? And I'm thinking Cloudflare CEO, Matthew Prince. Prince says that there are three areas of work. There are builders, there's sellers, and there are measurers. And when it comes to software that helps you build a product or software that helps you sell a product.
32:08Both of those things are fine. But when it comes to things that help you measure work results, that is where AI is disrupting. And so he actually gave two examples of this. First, it talks about finance. So think internal auditing. Think, you know, where's the money going? Are people spending the money correctly? That's one area. And then another area is marketing. Always measuring, you know, Are we hitting our campaign goals? Is it working just right? AI tooling can make that kind of instantaneous, more precise. And that is the areas of the software market that I really think the disruption is coming for AI.
32:44So the companies that are doing that, I'm actually worried if I'm Salesforce or into it here. This is a customer retention management software. This is financial software. I think that these areas are being significantly disrupted by AI.
33:00Travis Hoium:And is that because they're so established in a legacy workflow, you know, where, okay, this is how I do my taxes. And then if things are going to completely change, and I'm just gonna, I don't know, put all my tax papers on my desk and just take a picture, and then AI figures it out, it's probably not going to be Intuit who wins that market. And you could say the same thing with Salesforce, where, you know, entire businesses are built on Salesforce. But if we change everything, why are we going to stick with Salesforce? Is that kind of right? Yeah, that's kind of how I'm thinking about it. To be fair with Intuit, I'm not really thinking TurboTax as much as I'm thinking QuickBooks.
33:34But yeah, this is definitely something these domains are areas that I'm worried about.
33:39Lou Whiteman:So here's what I'd say is that I don't think it's going to be a zero sum all or nothing. But with the examples you just gave, Travis, maybe AI doesn't destroy these businesses, but what does it do to their pricing power? I've joked about this before, but if I was the purchasing manager at a big company, whether I intended to or not, when I got my renewal from all of these SaaS vendors, I'd say, that's great. I'm just going to talk to OpenAI, and then I'll be back with you in a week and see what that – see if I don't get in the next few days. I'm like, you know what? We found a way to make it work where we're not going to up your bill by 3 % this year.
34:15Lou Whiteman:So I don't think it is, I think what's lost in the SaaS apocalypse talk is the all or it's an all or nothing, zero sum game. I think the truth is probably somewhere in the middle that maybe these businesses aren't destroyed, but their attractiveness of an as a long term investment because of their ability to generate margins, growth, increasing profitability, profitability. That's where they're vulnerable. So I think it's just hard. The other thing is I'd really like to see it instead of just trade stocks down 70 % on the assumption. And so far, we haven't really seen it. But I do think that the answer is probably somewhere in this strange, fuzzy middle where, yeah, the best times are over, but there are ways to adapt.
35:05Travis Hoium:Yeah, John, to talk about some of the specific results we got this week, Workday, their revenue actually accelerated from 12.6 % growth a year ago to 13.5 % in this most recent quarter. Zoom also accelerating. A year ago, they reported 2.9 % growth, and now it's 5.5 % growth. Not quite as impressive, but Zoom, you know, arguably one of those huge values. So it seems like the numbers aren't that bad from the companies that you would think would be affected by this SaaSpocalypse disruption. Yeah, I don't know if I want to call Zoom's most recent quarter a return to glory. I don't know if I want to own a software stock that is trading or that is growing revenue at 5%.
35:45I mean, that's just not enough to do it for me. With Workday, I want to be fair. I think it was a perfectly fine quarter. But, you know, I'm going to tap the brakes. Management kind of bumping its chest a little bit saying, hey, this is our moment. AI is great. If you look at the guidance for the rest of the year, it could potentially hit its slowest growth rate as a publicly traded company. So I don't know if AI is the catalyst that Workday is making it out to be. But for now, it is doing fine.
36:13Travis Hoium:We like to end the show with the stocks that are on our radar. John, what are you looking at this week? Yeah, this week I am looking at one that is definitely off the radar. And this is Onto Innovation, ticker symbol O-N-T-O. This is one that's already up a ton. I wish I brought it earlier. it's up about 60 % this year, trades at over 100 times earnings. This might be the most expensive stock I've ever brought to the show, but I do think it can outgrow its lofty valuation. So what does Onto Innovation do? It makes equipment that inspects semiconductor products for defects. So as these products get smaller and smaller, we're talking about atoms at this point, the need for checking for defects gets higher and higher.
36:54It does become greater. Onto has been able to acquire other businesses, and it's really kind of developed good technology for this. We're talking 2D measuring. We're talking 3D measuring. So really great equipment as manufacturing for semiconductors is increasingly brought into the US. All of the major players are talking about this. We're talking Micron, Intel, even SpaceX. We're talking about the TerraFab. These are coming into the US. I think that that provides a growing market for Onto Innovations measuring products. Revenue is near records, growing low double digits. Operating margin close to 20%.
37:32Balance sheet is debt-free. I think it's a business poised for the long term.
37:36Travis Hoium:Dan, what do you think about Onto Innovation? This is a truly strange business, y 'all, because it started in 1940. It's been public since 1999. Does not even have a Wikipedia page. So I don't know much. True hidden gem. Yeah, really. I'm not a huge fan of the big PE ratio, but I'm curious. Lou, what do you got? Maybe another hidden gem on the radar this week, Lou?
38:02Lou Whiteman:Again, no, I think this one probably has a Wikipedia page. I didn't check. But Dan, I am looking at IBM. I think, you know, the ticker is IBM. Shares of Big Blue were up 11 % on Thursday after the U.S. Commerce Department announced a$1 billion grant to fund their quantum computing effort. I'm just going to gloss over the discussion about government picking winners, et cetera, et cetera. Look, we're not going to solve anything there. It's always happened. And I also am not going to try to make the case that quantum is really investable right now. IBM thinks it's a multi-billion dollar opportunity, but in 2040.
38:36Lou Whiteman:So I'm not going to try and say it's anytime sooner. To me, though, the investment is a reminder that IBM, which has been left for dead numerous times since the mainframe era, just keeps chugging along. And yeah, they are likely to still be in business doing things in 2040. Let's be honest, the jury's still out on some of these SaaS stocks or even AI stocks and whether or not that's true for them too. And the company's mix of consulting and tech, it seems to be doing a pretty good job winning AI business these days too, based on the results. Stock, even after Thursday's rally, is basically flat over the last year, priced at 22 times earnings.
39:12Lou Whiteman:Not outrageous for a tech company. Probably not a 10x here. But Dan, if you want tech ballast in your portfolio, I think you can do a lot worse than this one. IBM, big blue for the win.
39:22Travis Hoium:Dan, have you been to IBM's Wikipedia page? Yes, I have. It does exist. I can confirm. Also, Lou was being funny before the show and he was, you know, introing his radar stocks and was like, Dan, do you need the ticker? And so that was really funny, Lou. You're a hilarious guy. Dan, which one is going on your watch list? Like I said, I'm curious about Anto. So Anto it is. Congratulations to John. For Lew Wyman, John Quast, and our production leader, Dan Boyd, I'm Travis Hoyme. Thanks for listening. We'll see you here next time.
From the publisher
We learned how much money SpaceX is (or isn’t) making from rocket launches and AI in anticipation of the company’s upcoming IPO. Plus, we discuss positive retail earnings, NVIDIA’s results, and software making a comeback.
Travis Hoium, Lou Whiteman, and Jon Quast discuss:
- SpaceX S-1
- NVIDIA earnings
- Target and Walmart’s results
- Software’s comeback
Companies discussed: Tesla (TSLA), Target (TGT), Walmart (WMT), NVIDIA (NVDA), Onto Innovation (ONTO), IBM (IBM), Cloudflare (NET), Workday (WDAY).
Host: Travis Hoium
Guests: Lou Whiteman, Jon Quast
Engineer: Dan Boyd
Disclosure: Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, “TMF”) do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement.
We’re committed to transparency: All personal opinions in advertisements from Fools are their own. The product advertised in this episode was loaned to TMF and was returned after a test period or the product advertised in this episode was purchased by TMF. Advertiser has paid for the sponsorship of this episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

