The AI Headlines You Should Be Most Suspicious Of

28 Jun 2026 · 29 min · 11 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

How to spot AI hype (“AI washing”) and judge whether AI-driven transformations are real, including what boards and investors should look for beyond headlines.

Guest

Julie Averill, former global CIO and executive VP at Lululemon (helped scale revenue from ~$2B to $10B+), first CIO at REI, tech leadership at Nordstrom; now advises boards/CEOs on AI capability and organizational readiness; author of Chief Impact Officer.

Key claims

AI tech is easier than the human infrastructure (truth-telling teams, decision rights, psychological safety). Companies “perform” transformation for board approval rather than sustaining it. Only a small fraction see efficiency gains (she cites ~3%). Boards should ask for business metrics, not vague “AI strategy” forecasts.

Notable examples

Allbirds’ “Newbird AI” rebrand; Snap framing layoffs as AI efficiency; ADP stat that 22% feel AI won’t threaten jobs.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Understanding Sustainable Value Creation

0:39 to 2:06

Julie explains what sustainable value creation looks like during transformations.

“Hello, everyone, and welcome back to Motley Fool Conversations.”

The Role of Human Intelligence in Transformation

2:06 to 4:05

Discussion on why human intelligence is crucial for company performance.

“companies they own, what does real sustainable value creation look like on a balance sheet during that level of growth, during those types of transformations?”

Performing vs. Sustaining Transformation

4:05 to 6:05

Julie discusses the difference between performing transformation and sustaining it.

“Yeah, I want to dig into that concept a bit more.”

Cultural Infrastructure Around Technology

6:05 to 8:18

Exploration of the importance of internal culture for successful tech implementation.

“And what is the, you know, the downside?”

Evaluating Investments in Tech Projects

8:50 to 11:50

Julie shares insights on distinguishing impactful investments from speculative tech.

“And you've personally managed massive corporate tech budgets.”

AI Washing and Its Implications

11:50 to 13:45

Discussion on AI washing and its risks for investors.

“of AI washing earlier, and I want to talk about that a bit more.”

Corporate Boards and AI Strategy

13:45 to 14:00

Julie critiques how corporate boards approach AI strategy questioning.

AI Strategy and Boardroom Dynamics

14:00 to 19:34

Exploration of the misconceptions corporate boards have about AI strategies and their implications.

“I would love to hear more of your thoughts on that.”

Urgent Warning on SEC Changes

19:34 to 19:51

Discussion about the SEC's plans on quarterly reporting and its impact on investors.

“The United States Securities and Exchange Commission plans to eliminate quarterly reporting.”

The Impact of Activist Investors on Legacy Brands

20:28 to 24:47

Analysis of how activist investors are pushing for AI changes in traditional companies.

“I also wonder, how should long-term investors view activist tech investors who, you know, build positions in some of these legacy brands?”
Show all 11 chapters

Leadership Insights for Investors

24:47 to 27:20

Key factors for investors to evaluate effective leadership and organizational alignment.

“What are you seeing right now in corporate AI transformations that genuinely excites you?”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01There's a lot of change going on and a lot of motion, and I don't think anybody has it figured out. So any company that looks like they have it all figured out, I'd be suspicious of.

0:17That was Julie Averill, former global CIO of Lululemon and author of the new book, Chief Impact Officer. I'm Motley Fool analyst Rachel Warren. Julie joined me to talk about spotting AI hype before it costs you money, why the companies talking loudest about AI may actually be the ones to avoid, and how to tell whether a transformation is real or just a really good story. We hope you enjoy. Hello, everyone, and welcome back to Motley Fool Conversations. I'm Motley Fool analyst Rachel Warren, and today our guest is Julie Averill, a powerhouse technology executive, author, and board director who has spent nearly three decades leading some of modern retail's biggest digital transformations.

0:57She formerly served as the global CIO and executive vice president at Lululemon, where she speared a cultural and technological overhaul that helped scale the company's revenue from$2 billion to over$10 billion. And before rewriting the playbook at Lululemon, Julie pioneered major digital and omni-channel initiatives as the first ever CIO at REI and in tech leadership at Nordstrom. Today, she advises boards, CEOs, and founders at the intersection of AI capability and organizational readiness, the place where most transformations stall. She speaks globally on leadership in the age of AI and helps organizations build what technology can't deliver.

1:34Teams that tell the truth, leaders who can turn pilots into real change, and cultures that sustain transformation instead of performing it. Julie has just released her highly anticipated new book, Chief Impact Officer. Real transformation comes from human, not just artificial intelligence. Julie, welcome to the show. Thank you so much, Rachel, and thanks for that kind introduction. You know, as noted, you spent years leading technology transformations at Nordstrom, REI, of course, famously helped scale Lululemon's revenue to over$10 billion. You know, for individual investors managing their own portfolios, looking at the public companies they own, what does real sustainable value creation look like on a balance sheet during that level of growth, during those types of transformations?

2:20I think it's when you're building both the foundation and the growth, when you can enable both. And there are tough choices you have to make along the way. But the important thing is to look not just where you're going tomorrow, but also in the future. So for it to be sustainable, you sometimes have to make the tough choices and invest in things that maybe you're going to serve you a couple of years from now. And you have to make choices to maybe not turn on that revenue facing feature today because you know that you need to create a future. And another thing that really stood out to me, I mean, just from the title, real transformation comes from human, not just artificial intelligence.

3:00Why is human intelligence a more reliable indicator of a company's performance than just artificial intelligence? What is the interplay between between those two that you see right now and moving forward? I see companies today making a lot of headlines around AI, right? It is powerful. It is new. And it has tremendous possibility to lead our companies in many different places. But it is still about the people. The technology is getting easier and easier. And so we're focusing more on the technology than we are on the people. My experience is that if transformation doesn't start with what's the business problem you're trying to solve and you're focused more on the technology, you're going to end up buying really expensive technology and not moving your business forward.

3:51And so that's my focus there is like, what are we trying to solve? And the people who understand the business and are driving that business need to be part of defining that future and helping bring it into reality. Yeah, I want to dig into that concept a bit more. I mean, through your advisory practice, you work with company leaders and boards often coming in where tech transitions stall. And something you've spoken about is this idea of companies performing transformation rather than sustaining it. I wonder if you could maybe tell our audience a bit more about what is performing transformation look like?

4:29What are the signs that a retail investor can look for, whether it pertains to AI or otherwise? Yeah, I think look beyond the headlines. So, for example, right, we have seen this concept of AI washing, right, where companies are proclaiming I'm laying off thousands of people in order to or because of AI. And then you look a little deeper and it's not because they've actually found the efficiencies to be able to lay these people off, but it's because they overhired maybe during the pandemic and now need to right size their team so that they can take that money, invest in other things. So performing is declaring, right?

5:11Like what's my AI strategy? And the board comes up and they bless it. and underneath it you don't have the individual leaders that are saying your supply chain leaders saying here's how ai is going to help me get the right products to the right place when when the customer is there to get it uh and it's just you know efficiencies out of supply chain so yeah performance is performance is companies that are going for headlines um you know looking to be ai forward without actually doing the work of understanding what AI is supposed to do in their organization. And we're seeing that a ton today. Well, and something as well that you write about is technology itself is really the hard part.

5:55The hard part is really building the human infrastructure around it. You know, trust, decision rights, truth-telling teams. Maybe talk us through that a bit more. And what is the, you know, the downside? What are the losses that we see if a company lacks that internal culture? Yeah. I bring up a couple examples in my book of where truth-telling is important. One is when we return to office from COVID, right? And I was part of this, right? We wanted to bring people back into the office three days a week, and we just sold the upside of it, right? It's going to be amazing to have everybody back in the office together.

6:32We'll be able to rebuild our culture, to build connections, to be the company that we used to be when we saw each other face-to-face, the water cooler conversations, et cetera. And I believe that, but without acknowledging to people that we were disrupting the lives that they had come to build and saying, we're asking you to give up the opportunity to pick up your kid at daycare, like you've been doing in order to take care of your parents. Um, then, then you're only telling half the truth and people are smart. And so when we go out today as leaders and we say, AI is going to transform our company and we're going to augment, not replace your skills, people are still silently wondering what's in it for me.

7:17I just read a report today out from ADP and it said that 22 % of people globally feel like AI is not going to replace, threaten their job. So that means that four out of five people are sitting there wondering if AI is going to replace their job. So if you're asking people to go on a journey with you on AI and they feel threatened that it's going to replace their job and you haven't acknowledged it and spoken the truth about whether that is true or not and how you're going to bring them on the journey, are they going to advocate? Are they going to speak up when something is wrong with the model?

7:58Are they going to quietly go silent and potentially sabotage the effort. So this notion of psychological safety that allows people to speak the truth is, in my mind, really fundamental for accomplishing any major company transformation.

8:18Trading at Schwab is now powered by Ameritrade, unlocking the power of Thinkorswim, the award-winning trading platforms loaded with features that let you dive deeper into the market. Visualize your trades in a new light on Thinkorswim Desktop with robust charting and analysis tools, all while you uncover new opportunities with up-to-the-minute market news and insights. Thinkorswim is available on desktop, web, and mobile to meet you where you are. It's built by the trading obsessed to help you trade brilliantly. Learn more at schwab.com slash trading. And you've personally managed massive corporate tech budgets.

8:54And I think one of the things that would be interesting to think through is when an investor, we're looking at companies, you know, capital expenditures. How can we distinguish between really high impact structural investments from those that are really just burning cash on speculative tech projects? Yeah, it's tough for investors. I mean, inside company, you can pay attention to the ROI on the individual initiatives, which is what I always do, right? When you begin a new project, let's claim what we think the ROI is going to be, how we're going to measure it. And probably harder for an investor because you don't make those things public if we're talking about public companies.

9:34But if we're talking about private companies, certainly you can ask to see that. Also, I look at pace of change. I look at the mindset of the technology organization. Is this a company that is, you know, especially retail? There's a lot of legacy technology in retail, and it's advanced to the point where the top retailers are really top technology experts. But there's still a lot of, in a lot of retailers, there's a lot of legacy stacks out there that have people maintaining, still investing a lot of money in legacy solutions that aren't really creating innovation platforms for the retailers to be able to scale and grow.

10:20It's an interesting thing to consider. You have such an expansive background in retail, and obviously I know you advise a lot of companies in and outside of this space. Where are you seeing some of the greatest efficiency drivers from AI right now and from your vantage point? where we're seeing them is where there are repeatable processes so you know customer service is one example that came out first because you have you know you have things that you can document and when you know when a customer asks for their order status there's a specific thing that you can do to give them that information where it is more difficult is those things where especially in retail where our processes aren't documented.

11:05So how to go to market, right? A lot of people in the decision-making process of that. And so even though, you know, it may take years to take a product to market and it's very, very enticing to try to shrink that down. You can't just bring in AI and shrink it down because it's the process of making decisions that needs to change to expedite it. So all the people that are in the room, can you agree on who makes the decision? And can you document how that decision is being made? If so, that's a good candidate for AI. If not, then no, not yet. Well, you mentioned briefly the concept of AI washing earlier, and I want to talk about that a bit more.

11:55You've highlighted how heavily the market rewards. It's the mere mention of AI sometimes. We've seen this in a lot of different companies, some of which we'll get to in a bit. But how do you officially define AI washing for, say, an individual investor who's wanting to protect their portfolio from some of these overhyped businesses? Yeah, I mean, I think if it's a company that is looking to use the word AI as something to imply value without having actually done the work, I think the companies that are really getting AI leverage are not the ones necessarily out there talking about it, but they're slowly transforming and doing the hard work.

12:32So I'm a little more suspicious of the companies that claim the big headlines. Sometimes it's signifying investments, which is a good signal. But I would ask the so that question, right? You're doing this so that what can happen? Do they understand that? Do they believe in the future of the company that's being defined by these AI ambitions. Like I said, AI, incredibly powerful, but yet to unlock the value, there's different work that needs to be done than just proclaiming it. Well, and I wonder as well, in your experience, how long does a legitimate AI or tech infrastructure implementation actually take to flow down and show up as true margin expansion or earnings growth, for example?

13:17Because that's really where we see the proof as investors, right? Yeah, I mean, I can be fast. I can be really, really fast. If you can carve out, you know, carve out a piece of the business and you get alignment. It's like I said, the technology is easy, right? And you can make it go live. But the larger transformations that require people across multiple functions that really changes how people work, those take a long time. And mostly because organizations are slow to move. you know there's a lot of talk around how ai is actually changing the org charts because instead of being modeled you know on a department hierarchy instead you have to think about how decisions are made it's fundamentally different and those are the things that take time in an organization i saw in a recent piece you wrote that one question boards need to stop asking their CEOs is what is your AI strategy and that they should instead be focusing on business metrics.

14:18I would love to hear more of your thoughts on that. I mean, why are so many corporate boards maybe asking the wrong questions? Well, I think it's very natural for boards to want to know what their companies are doing in terms of AI. And I heard one CEO get asked that, what's your AI strategy and how can you forecast the impact that AI is going to have on your business. And his reply was 20 % over five years, like no data behind that. No, no anything, but just, yeah, we should be able to get 20 % over five years. I mean, it's a reasonable guess, but what it does when that happens is that now the focus is on efficiencies.

15:01And the reality is that many companies have had gains in, you know, tremendous gains in with AI for their business, but it's not yet coming through in terms of efficiency. Something like 3 % of companies are actually seeing the efficiencies play out. Now, will efficiencies come? Probably, but that's not what to go after to start with. So when a board comes and says, show me your AI strategy, what happens is the CIO goes back to his or her leadership team and says, we need an AI strategy, appoints one person, right? And that person goes, they collect all of the ideas that are out there and it becomes again performative because then that goes to the board they see a list of all these things they're happy because all this a activity is happening but we don't really know if any of those are really moving the neo maybe the answer is we need one maybe that's the right answer we have one thing going in ai but here's how it's going to transform the most important problem the business has today maybe it's 200 but do you know what all those 200 are doing.

16:07So I think it brings a focus on the wrong thing. I think boards should continue to focus on the questions that are important to them, like where are we going in the next three, five years? And then the follow-up question is how is AI going to help us get there? In a few different industries, we've seen some really interesting case studies of late of companies sort of rebranding to AI businesses, but maybe masking some concerning underlying business realities. And in one example is Allbirds, right? You know, they rebranded to Newbird AI. I think the stock jumped some crazy amount, like 700 % on the announcement.

16:43Despite they had closed U.S. stores, they've watched their revenue plummet double digits over the last few years. Maybe talk through that example, but also what does that tell you about the danger of narrative-driven investing? Yeah. So Allbirds, what did they do? They converted their properties to data centers or something. I don't remember what it was, but I mean, they have a plan behind it, but what it signaled to the market was, oh my gosh, these guys are progressive. They're modern. They're going somewhere. They're thinking differently. And it was short-lived, right? It was a short-lived blip.

17:18But again, this is the notion of AI washing where the market sees something that's exciting. Everybody's all in. drives the stock up and then the reality hits. So I think that there's, I believe the market is rational in the long term and this sort of thing will work its way out. I look at those companies that are really creating value over the long term. Those are the ones that I would invest in. Yeah, I mean, they transitioned to a GPU as a service business. They sold their assets to the American exchange group. So certainly a pivot. You know, another interesting example, a different company in business.

18:05You know, we had Snap. They framed a pretty significant layoff as an AI efficiency story, which sort of temporarily pushed the stock up. But again, this is a business that's seen years of structural losses, a lot of fierce competition within their respective space in tech. I'd like to hear your thoughts about when we're seeing company leaders maybe using AI as a shield to mask these decisions around restructuring or otherwise. What does that tell you? I think it tells you that that's a business that's in trouble. Right. The real headline is not one that they want to say. So they're using AI as a cover.

18:43And the real headline, like you said, might be that we're struggling with our business and we're pivoting because our current runway is not leading us to a sustainable future. So AI is an excuse or a cover for what they actually don't want to say. And then the thing that I also worry about is once you've done that and you're telling your whole organization that AI just cut 20 % of our jobs. And the organization knows what the truth is. And again, going back to modeling truth in your organization, you've just lost trust with the 80 % that remain. And those are the people that you need with you more than ever.

19:33Do you have individual stocks, a 401k or retirement accounts? Urgent warning. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission plans to eliminate quarterly reporting. This would blindfold investors from the information needed to make smart financial decisions. It would be good for corporate insiders and bad for you. Go to BetterTakeAction.org to speak out before it's too late. It only takes two minutes. Join us now. BetterTakeAction.org. Hey, it's Parker Posey. How did I get here? I love improvisation when it comes to acting, but when it comes to a real life plan, I stick to a script. Cue the music.

20:09Invest in your story with DIA, the only ETF that tracks the Dow. From State Street, getting there starts here. Before investing, consider the fund's investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. Visit statestreet.com slash IM for perspectives containing this and other information. Read it carefully. DIA is subject to risk similar to those of stocks. All ETFs are subject to risk, including possible loss of principal. Alps Distributors, Inc. Distributor. I also wonder, how should long-term investors view activist tech investors who, you know, build positions in some of these legacy brands?

20:38They'll often demand immediate AI adoption or other key changes. How does that impact, obviously, the growth story, but also long-term shareholder value? Yeah, I think it's the question of, do I continue to believe in the business model of this company that I invested in? Or are they trying to force a change, a pivot, because they just fundamentally believe that the business is no longer sustainable? So I think it's different for each one. But if a company is saying fundamentally, we're not going to, you know, we're not going to go down the AI path, that's concerning. But if there is a legacy business, especially, you know, I'm worried about a lot of the SaaS businesses today that do need to pivot.

21:28They need to pivot in their pricing model. They need to pivot and recognize that there's a lot of companies that are coming up right now with their eye on the big SaaS providers because the technology is so much easier. So I don't blame the investors for trying to push that angle. But I think fundamentally, do you believe in the business model of the company that you invested in or not? And just going back more broadly to this concept of AI transformation and the lessons that you talk about in your book, what do you think are a few things that investors might be missing right now as we are surveying various industries that are going through these different transformations?

22:10Nobody has it figured out yet. Right. Nobody has it figured out. I was just looking at a stat this morning. 87 % of CEOs believe that psychological safety is important, yet only 13 % important for AI transformation, yet only 13 % believe their organization has it. So there's a lot of change going on and a lot of motion. And I don't think anybody has it figured out. So any company that looks like they have it all figured out, I'd be suspicious of. I'd look for learning companies, companies who are talking about what's going right, what's not going right, what they're learning, how they see the future changing for them would be how I would look at an indicator of a company that is going in the right direction.

23:04Are they able to talk about something that they don't yet fully understand? Another thing that I took away from your book, you know, you explained that real high performance and trust only tend to emerge when leaders stop hiding behind corporate masks. And, you know, as long-term investors, what are some of the ways we can differentiate between transitory tech advantages that can be copied versus those that are actual permanent structural modes. I think you have to look at the P &L. Do you see changes that actually flow through to the bottom line or is it just, you know, fancy lipstick? Yeah, absolutely.

23:42I think another thing as well, I want to talk a little bit more about your book as we get to the latter part of our conversation here today. You know, as investors, we are obviously focused on building portfolios capable of compounding wealth securely through the years. What do you think are some forward looking lessons from your book, Chief Impact Officer, that can be used to, you know, filter out market noise and really separate some of the sustainable winners from the overhyped businesses? I think it is about companies that are grounded, that are honest, that are telling the truth about what's happening today and what's happening in the future.

24:25Companies that are focused on culture of a company, more interested in what's going on inside the organization than the headlines that they're producing externally. in companies that have something unique for the market that, you know, that you can uniquely identify and understand because it, you know, it solves a need that they uniquely have permission to solve in the market. What are you seeing right now in corporate AI transformations that genuinely excites you? And this could also be, you know, projects that carry on, of course, into the next five to ten years? What most excites you right now as you look at this space?

25:10I think speed of decision making. There is incredible changes happening by companies who are leaning into remodeling how they're making decisions and speeding things up. AI has already made this world so much faster, as we all know, in our personal lives. But the same thing is happening in corporations when they are figuring out how to take that new information that maybe was only available to them once a month previously, and now it's available on a real-time basis. So how can they change how they make decisions and go faster and through that speed, use it to be able to innovate and create and unlock the creative potential of an organization?

25:58And one final question, something we focus on a lot here at The Motley Fool is we're looking at companies that we want to invest in and add to our portfolios, of course, is leadership. And of course, something that you've written about a lot and we've talked about a lot today is this idea of leadership, accountability, and the hallmarks of good leadership. What are a few things that we as investors should be paying attention to, to really separate those visionary leaders from those that may not be able to lead the companies that we own into the success that we want. I think if you have time with your individual CEOs and can understand what are their values, how do their values translate to the organization, are they consistent with what they say with what you see inside the organization?

26:44Like we've talked about earlier, people know They can smell something that just is a little fishy. And so is that leader true to what they say externally as well as what people internally say? You know, the opportunity ahead, right? Is the organization behind them? and really believing that what they're saying on a market tour is the same that they would say inside the organization, same thing that people on the front lines would say is really where they're going. Well, thank you so much for your time today, Julie. It's been wonderful to speak with you. And for those who are listening or watching, check out her book, Chief Impact Officer, Real Transformation Comes from Human, Not Just Artificial Intelligence.

27:33Appreciate your time today, Julie. Thank you so much, Rachel. It's been great. As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. For The Motley Fool Hidden Gems investing team, I'm Rachel Warren.

Read the full transcript

28:04Thanks for listening. We'll see you next time.

From the publisher

The companies dominating AI headlines right now may not be the ones actually winning. In fact, according to Julie Averill, the loudest signals are often the ones most worth questioning. As former global CIO of Lululemon — where she helped oversee one of retail's most successful tech transformations — Julie has spent decades separating real change from corporate theater. Motley Fool analyst Rachel Warren sits down with Julie, now author of Chief Impact Officer, to unpack what AI washing actually looks like from the inside, why 87% of CEOs say psychological safety matters but only 13% believe their company has it, and what that gap means for the stocks in your portfolio.

Host: Rachel Warren

Guest: Julie Averill

Producers: Bart Shannon, Lauren Budabin

Disclosure: Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, “TMF”) do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement.

We’re committed to transparency: All personal opinions in advertisements from Fools are their own. The product advertised in this episode was loaned to TMF and was returned after a test period or the product advertised in this episode was purchased by TMF. Advertiser has paid for the sponsorship of this episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing

All 453 episodes
The AI Headlines You Should Be Most Suspicious OfMotley Fool Hidden Gems Investing · 29 min
Listen in VO