In short
A leveraged AI-focused hedge fund, Situational Awareness, suffers a rapid margin/liquidity crisis after AI-related positions and shorts reverse; banks call leverage and the firm negotiates a fast sale to Citadel. The hosts also discuss hyperscaler earnings divergence (ROIC expectations), then “Would you rather” stock picks (Tesla vs GM; Eli Lilly vs Novo; JPM vs SoFi; Costco vs Target), plus a Tesla/SpaceX/China-business rumor and “stocks on radar.”
Guests
Lou Whiteman (Motley Fool host; discusses leverage risks, ROIC, and valuation/optionality) and Jason Moser (Motley Fool host; emphasizes market dynamics, long-term investing, and specific stock comparisons).
Key claims
4x leverage math can wipe equity quickly (e.g., 25% stock drop). “Crowded trades” can snowball without conspiracy. Citadel may have prevented disorderly liquidation. Hyperscalers diverge based on credibility of ROIC paths amid AI capex; Meta faces weaker return narrative.
Notable examples
Situational Awareness positions/shorts (Micron, SK Hynix, CoreWeed; software shorts), Citadel rapid sale, Anthropic $5B stake, Microsoft/Amazon/Apple/Meta/Alphabet capex and ROIC debate, Tesla China business sale rumor, L3Harris backlog $42B, Keysight software/services ~36% of revenue.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Rise and Fall of Situational Awareness Hedge Fund
0:46 to 2:28
Discussion on the situational awareness hedge fund and its leverage strategy.
“His hedge fund, same name, situational awareness, focused on AI bets.”
Understanding Margin and Risk
2:29 to 4:31
Exploring the dangers of using margin in investing and its mathematical implications.
“I want to start with the margin piece of this because I think this is important for investors to understand.”
Market Dynamics and Competition
4:32 to 8:06
How market dynamics and competitive pressures affect stock trading and investor behavior.
“And I mean, I think this is just an interesting story.”
Investor Psychology During Market Crises
8:07 to 11:35
The importance of maintaining composure and focus during market downturns.
“Let's put Leo out of business or something like that.”
Investor Psychology During Market Crises
11:56 to 12:38
The importance of maintaining composure and focus during market downturns.
“You're listening to Motley Fool, Hidden Gems, Investing.”
Investor Psychology During Market Crises
12:43 to 12:55
The importance of maintaining composure and focus during market downturns.
“All investments involve risk, including the potential loss of principal.”
Earnings Divergence Among Hyperscalers
12:56 to 14:01
Analyzing earnings reports from major tech companies and their varying market reactions.
“We had a huge week of earnings from a lot of the biggest companies in the world, the big tech companies, the hyperscalers, as they are known.”
Analyzing Market Responses to CapEx
14:01 to 19:21
Discussing the market's reaction to capital expenditures of major companies and their credibility in AI investments.
“I think some to some extent, especially for some of these.”
Comparative Stock Analysis: Tesla vs. GM
20:32 to 28:00
Lou and Jason compare Tesla and GM, discussing valuations and market performance.
“It's a little game called Would You Rather.”
Banks and Membership Models
28:00 to 30:00
The hosts discuss the performance of banks and the importance of monetizing memberships.
“1.54 customers for products for customers.”
Show all 15 chapters
Costco vs. Target Analysis
30:00 to 31:30
A comparison of Costco's and Target's business models and market performance.
“Fast forward today, we've seen clearly they've been able to raise prices just incrementally here and there while maintaining those 90 plus percent renewals.”
Tesla's Potential Business Moves
31:30 to 32:53
Discussion on Tesla's rumored sale of its China business and implications for a merger with SpaceX.
“So I don't like investing in retail, but if I do, I want to see what are you special at?”
Tesla's Potential Business Moves
32:58 to 33:10
Discussion on Tesla's rumored sale of its China business and implications for a merger with SpaceX.
“Vanguard investors own shares of Vanguard index funds and those funds own shares of the companies they invest in.”
Tesla and SpaceX Merger Speculation
33:10 to 37:06
Further exploration of the potential merger between Tesla and SpaceX and its implications.
“As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against.”
Stocks on the Radar
37:06 to 40:28
Hosts share their stock picks and insights on upcoming companies to watch.
“We'd like to end the show with stocks on a radar.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01Travis Hoium:No margin calls for the next hour. Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing starts now.
0:09Travis Hoium:Welcome to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. I'm Travis Hoium joined today by Lou Whiteman and Jason Moser. Guys, we've got to start with the news of the week. Lou, that is situational awareness getting a margin call. The hot investor of 2026 is now out of the equity markets. What in the world happened.
0:30Lou Whiteman:Yeah. So let's talk about this because this is fun. First of all, situational awareness, the AI focused hedge fund founded by, I hope I can send this right, Leopold Aschenbrenner, I think it is. Now, Leopold has a heck of a history already. I mean, it's almost like the Forrest Gump story here. All right, guys. He was at FTX with Sam Begman-Fried. He was at OpenAI and then he went off and he actually just wrote, I think it was a substack or something talking about situational awareness, basically that AI was going to eat the world, got a lot of buzz, and he turned it into a hedge fund. His hedge fund, same name, situational awareness, focused on AI bets.
1:07Lou Whiteman:And, you know, as the tide was rising, so too did his portfolio. The fund borrowed heavily to multiply its returns. We don't know exactly how much, but we know this because the fund's return were better than the underlying assets that it was buying in terms of their returns. So there's obviously leverage at its peak. It soared from a couple hundred million to 20 billion in assets, up 440 percent in the first half of the year. But guys, we've seen
1:32Travis Hoium:in the first half of the year. I want to highlight this. The first half of the year, which ended exactly one month ago today.
1:38Lou Whiteman:Yeah, yeah, yeah. But we have all seen this movie enough times to know what happened here. You know, the AI infrastructure trade has taken it on the chin of late. Some of the situational positions, you know, these companies, Micron, SK Hynix, CoreWeed, they were down big and short positions that they also took on betting against software. Like they were basically in on the AI is going to eat all software. So short software companies to the ground. Those started turning against it too. The banks that provide leverage called, said hi to avoid liquidation. The firm negotiated a rapid fire sale to Citadel.
2:15Lou Whiteman:Don't cry for Leopold though. He retained the private assets include, and this is the last scene of the movie here, including a$5 billion stake in Anthropic. He still has that. But yeah, a heck of a week. Lots to learn here. This is actually, I think there's a lot of, I don't know if JMO and I are going to be building similar portfolios, but I still think there's a lot we can learn here.
2:36Travis Hoium:I want to start with the margin piece of this because I think this is important for investors to understand. This is why we talk about not using margin. but I want to explain a little bit of the math behind it before we get to the Citadel buyout because I think that is also really interesting that they've become the villain in a lot of circles, but they actually may have saved the day. But Jason, the math on this, just on a basic sense, I think that we, the reporting is that he was about 4x levered. So$20 billion fund, let's just use that simple math, owns$80 billion worth of stocks. If those stocks go down 25%, you have nothing left.
3:16Travis Hoium:All you have is your debt. Your equity is now zero. That's how you get in trouble really, really quickly because you're leveraged on the upside when things are going well. Like Lou said, you can have a 400 % six-month run. By the way, I think that 430-something percent number was after fees. So the real return was probably well over 500%. But this is this is where a, you know, a big move. But these companies aren't going bankrupt, can can get you in a lot of trouble. Sure. Yeah. And I mean, that's I think so. I personally I don't invest, you know, on margin. I don't use debt to invest. It's just it's just not my style.
3:57It's not what I do. And I think part of that is at the end of the day, you don't really control what's going on. Right. You don't ultimately call the shots at some point. If you have any sort of thing that shifts in the market for whatever reason, I mean, you're you're completely out of control. Right. Somebody else is going to call you like like Lucetta bank calls us. Hi, how are you? We'd like our money back, please. And you have there's nothing you can do. And so and so I think it's always worth remembering that, yeah, it can really amplify returns as things are going well. But when the tide turns, it can be catastrophic, to say the least.
4:36And I mean, I think this is just an interesting story. Just I this Ashen Brenner himself, like he was not a trader, not an investor, not a dumb guy, clearly very well educated and obviously had some interesting jobs along the way. It does kind of remind you of that Dunning-Kruger effect, though, right? I mean, you just sometimes maybe you think you're a little bit better at something than you really are. And I'm sure he was feeling great. I saw it on social media. I mean, apparently, you know, he was having a day. Yeah. And fast forward to today. And I mean, it's pretty much yesterday's news. But I mean, to lose point, too, don't cry for him.
5:19I mean, he's still doing just fine. At private stakes and companies like Anthropic. I mean, he's going to walk away from this doing just fine. but it's certainly made for a lot of headlines this week for sure.
5:30Travis Hoium:Yeah, and the fund does still exist. I think he sent a letter to investors overnight and actually said they're still up 80 % for the year. So that Anthropics stake is doing a lot of work there. Lou, I want to talk about a couple of the mechanics here because this is one of the things I think a lot of people have gotten confused about or think there's market manipulation going on. I'm going to try to walk through this and see if you agree with sort of the number of events that happened here. So a bunch of these positions, which people, they have to file 13F. So we know some of these public positions that he held, at least as of the end of the second quarter.
6:06Travis Hoium:Actually, those aren't even out yet. No, no, it's first quarter. We would only know through the end of the first quarter. But it's relatively well known, at least some of the positions, and that he has a leveraged portfolio. So these stocks start to go down. What then ends up happening, and I'm saying that this is not new because Jim Cramer wrote about this in Confessions of a Wall Street Addict, which I think was published in the late 90s. Other hedge funds start to smell blood in the water. They start to go, oh, somebody's in trouble. And guess what? When your stocks are going down and you have, let's say that$80 billion number is the number, you can't just go to the market and say, you know what?
6:44Travis Hoium:I'm going to take my bets off the table because if you start selling in bulk, it's going to just exacerbate the problem even worse. So you have people betting against you, going short against you. Your valuations start going down. That's what you're talking about. Eventually, the banks, the brokerage calls and goes, hey, you know that$60 billion that you owe us? You got to come up with that money. We got to figure something out. And that seems like that's what started to happen as early as last weekend. I think so.
7:12Lou Whiteman:And look, you know, yeah, a lot of people like to bag it, but this is a competitive industry. And look, even if you didn't have the 13F, Leopold's doing a lot of interviews. He's talking about a couple of trends. We're all smart in this room. We probably could have guessed some of the stocks that he was in. And look, if your favorite football team finds out that the cornerback for the other team has a bad knee. Yeah. And they start throwing to that side. Is that cheating or is that just smart or somewhere in between? Right. So if I don't think Citadel or any of these big investment companies, they weren't even saying let's target situational awareness.
7:48Lou Whiteman:They were looking at the market and saying this is a very what they call crowded trade. There's a lot of people using leverage. I bet that there or it was a reasonable thing to say, like, if there's pressure here, it could it could snowball. And this is where we want exposure. So I don't think it's even like a vast conspiracy. Let's put Leo out of business or something like that. It's just this is how market dynamics work. A trade gets crowded and people say a market is always two people with different opinions coming at a fair price. The crowded or more crowded one side of a trade gets, the more appealing the other side looks.
8:27Lou Whiteman:That's what a high valuation is. So, yeah, you can see Citadel as a villain here because they probably saw this coming and they probably have, well, now slowly or orderly liquidate a lot of this and get their money back quick. Or you can see them as a hero because one of the things and I don't want to make them a hero. But one of the things I think as individual investors, we always talk about do not panic in a downturn because there's a lot going on. But if Citadel or someone hadn't have stepped in, the other option here was to liquidate, to sell$80 billion worth of positions.
9:00Travis Hoium:And now you're talking about, yes, some of these stocks are down 50, 60%, but they could go down another 50, 60, 70 % really quickly.
9:07Lou Whiteman:Really quick. And frankly, it should be temporary. It's just an influx of supply and it puts supply and demand. Always the real takeaway here from this story, all the way back to long-term capital management and before that is, is the reason we say do your best not to panic in a downturn is because there is a lot going on that isn't tied to long-term price appreciation and fundamentals. So if you're focused on price action and not fundamentals, you can really get bit. I mean, there's some times where you just need to sell, but so often in these panics, there's more to it going on than And everybody hates this stock and it's going to zero.
9:48Lou Whiteman:And that's why literally sitting on your hands tends to be the best thing you can do in a panic, even though every fiber of your being says, get out, run. Jason, I'm going to give you the last word. What did we learn this week? I like the idea of sitting on your hands. I think that Lou said it perfectly. I mean, their emotions are difficult to control in investing, but it is a crucial, crucial part of being able to invest successfully over the long haul. And when you see headlines breaking out like this, you see markets reacting with volatility. It's easy to say I've got to do something. But for the most part, in most cases, the best action is just inaction.
10:33Just keep investing every time you get paid, put that money in your index fund. If you own individual stocks and you know why you own them, then feel good about that. But oftentimes the best action is an action.
10:47Travis Hoium:Yeah, I think this is where I keep going back to a lot of these long term foolish principles that they work over years and over decades. And that is the most reliable way to not only compound wealth, but also to even beat the market long term. And the investors that we're talking about here, whether you're talking about Citadel or whether you're talking about situational awareness, are playing a completely different game. And that's another thing to keep in mind is that you as an individual investor are not doing the same things that they're doing. Citadel is making markets. This was a great opportunity to make a market and maybe make several billion dollars along the way.
11:26Travis Hoium:But it doesn't necessarily mean that these businesses are broken or anything like that. So focus on that long term. Anonymity is a good thing. Like, you know, I don't want to be the guy on social media making headlines and people talking about my fund and what a genius I am. I'm OK just kind of flying under the radar, just kind of doing my thing. Anonymity is a good thing. Maybe maybe next week, Lou, we should talk about what a genius Jason is on the show. Please don't. Let's not do that. Let's not do that. When we come back, we are going to talk about hyperscaler earnings. You're listening to Motley Fool, Hidden Gems, Investing.
11:58Lou Whiteman:Support for the show comes from Fundrise. For the past 70 years, there's been a room in finance most people couldn't enter. A room where you could have invested in some of the biggest names in tech, companies like Airbnb and Uber before their multi-billion dollar IPOs. I'm talking about venture capital. But unless you had millions of dollars and the right connections, the door to the venture capital room was closed. You were stuck waiting in line with everyone else. But recently, Fundrise took a sledgehammer to that door when they launched their venture capital product and made it available to anyone with a minimum investment of just$10.
12:31Lou Whiteman:Fundrise says their mission is to give everyone the chance to invest in the best tech and AI companies before they go public. Visit fundrise.com slash fool to check out Fundrise's venture portfolio and start investing in minutes. All investments involve risk, including the potential loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This is a paid advertisement.
12:54Travis Hoium:Welcome back to Motley Fool and Jim's Investing. We had a huge week of earnings from a lot of the biggest companies in the world, the big tech companies, the hyperscalers, as they are known. And Lou, what has been absolutely crazy, if you look at a chart, I have a chart up right now of Microsoft, Meta, Google, Amazon, and Apple. And they go completely opposite directions. For the week, we have Microsoft up 19%. Amazon is up 14%. Most of that is today. Meanwhile, Apple down 9.4%. and meta down 9.6%. What did we learn? Why are these stocks diverging so much right now?
13:33Lou Whiteman:So I'm going to carve out Apple because they kind of chose not to play in a way here. So I think for them, there might be separate things. But I think with the hyperscalers, what's going on is right now, the market has one question for these companies and the answers varied. And what we saw was the stocks react based on the answer. The question is, when ROIC, when returns, all right? Now, to be clear, I don't think the market is is yet punishing spending. That was kind of I saw headlines about that, but I don't think we see that, you know, spending bad. I think some to some extent, especially for some of these.
14:10Lou Whiteman:Toning down spending might be appreciated, but I don't think that right now it's if you're if you're if you don't lower your capex, your stock is just sent to the toilet.
14:20Travis Hoium:That seemed to be the story last week with Alphabet, right? Yeah. Yeah, but they went negative free cash flow, but but they have recovered since then. So that was what I was keeping an eye on this week, too. Yeah.
14:30Lou Whiteman:Yeah. I mean, I don't think they're punishing CapEx. I think there needs to be a clear sign that these management teams have just a map to get to the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. And Meta, based on its current business and its history with the metaverse, I think they have the least credibility on that front. You know, they may get there, but if you look at their history, if you look at what they've said so far, they have not articulated why all of this will end up in a happy ending. Microsoft and Amazon, they've done a little better telling that story. And they also have, I think, the most diversified revenue streams, which that's the best story to tell that everything is going to end up OK.
15:08Lou Whiteman:I really think that that explains the divergence. I think it's just where are we going with all of this, guys? I think Lou's right on the meta part. I mean, that to me, like right now, the market is just the market. It's actually like excited to hear these companies raising CapEx guidance. They're going to get Microsoft. They're going to spend one hundred seventy five billion dollars a year. Alphabet's going to spend close to two hundred billion dollars in those numbers are going to increase next year. I mean, we've already seen Alphabet explicitly stated. I mean, their CapEx next year is going to be materially higher than it is this year in the market so far is going along with it.
15:46And I think when you look at companies like Microsoft and Alphabet and even Amazon, I mean, you're seeing at least some sort of path toward the returns based on the infrastructure investment in the utility that customers are getting from their AI investments. With Meta, you know, I kind of look at these investments in AI. It's two different ways to kind of view it. Is a company investing in AI, the infrastructure to provide all of these services and bells and whistles for us, the broader consumer? Or is it a company that is investing all this money in AI that really that that is just benefiting their business?
16:30I think with Meta right now, clearly that those investments are benefiting its business, right? Its core ad business, because that's really at the end of the day, all it really is still. Granted, they have three point six billion users, so I think they're in a pretty good spot. But you do wonder, at least in regard to the money that a company like Meta spending, where is that return going to be beyond just their core ad business? And I think with Amazon, with Alphabet, you know, I think we're with Microsoft, we're seeing that they're able to monetize this to a degree, which we just haven't seen with Meta yet.
17:07Travis Hoium:So is the idea there, Jason, that they have what you would think of as a platform, a cloud platform, so it can provide compute. Other companies can build on top of them. And that's if you look at Amazon or you look at Alphabet, a lot of that is actually coming from Anthropic, a lot of that demand. Whereas Meta is building compute and going, well, we'll figure out what to do with this later. And that's a unsatisfactory answer to the market. I would say that's unsatisfactory because it kind of rhymes with what's been going on with reality labs, right? To this point, and we've been hearing this for a lot of quarters now, is investments in Reality Labs.
17:44Eventually, it's going to pay off and the returns will be there. And it just quite honestly has not materialized to this point. And I think it's fair to assume going forward that you probably aren't going to see a return on that investment. I don't know if it's just we as consumers aren't there yet in regard to immersive technology. Maybe one day it will pay off. But to this point, it certainly has not. And I think those questions only grow a little bit louder when you start looking at all these investments they're making in AI. Hi.
18:16Travis Hoium:Lou, this seems like the questions seem to change every quarter about what the market is looking for. As you look at right now, we're starting to see phenomenal revenue growth. So I don't think there's any question that the revenue is coming in. More questions about what's the return on that invested capital, because if you're putting $200 billion in the ground, you better get some revenue out of it. When are we going to get real answers that are going to show up in the financial statements about if there is ROIC?
18:44Lou Whiteman:Better come soon. And I don't know. And in the market's defense, we're still early days. So if the market keeps asking different questions, maybe that's what it's coming. My biggest fear here, guys, is there isn't a lot of ROIC in the frontier models. And that's where all the spending is going, that most of the AI goodness will just come from lesser models. And that, I think, is the huge fear hanging out. But look, someone's going to make money off of this. And probably the companies with big cloud businesses that just can do that for whatever is going on. And I think that's probably the way I'd lean right now, just because you feel like there will be demand there, whatever, whatever the future holds.
19:20Travis Hoium:When we come back, we're going to ask Lou and Jason, which stocks they would rather buy. You're listening to Motley Fool, Hidden Gems Investing.
19:32Lou Whiteman:They say leadership isn't just about where you're going. It's about the conviction it takes to get there. For those who demand the world and possess the drive to claim it, there's a vehicle of equal distinction. Dynamic by design and engineered for pure impact, the Range Rover Sport rises to meet you the moment you take the lead. This is the most advanced Range Rover Sport yet, a master class in uncompromised performance and unbridled agility. Inside, the innovation is seamless. You'll find an elegant 13.1-inch touchscreen that puts total control of the vehicle's systems right at your fingertips, but it's the refinement that sets it apart.
Read the full transcript
20:08Lou Whiteman:Sculpted 22-way heated seating with built-in massage function ensures every journey is defined by peerless comfort. Whether it's through unique interior finishes or custom wheel options, the ways to personalize your Range Rover Sport are nearly unlimited. Command attention and experience ultimate luxury in motion. Exclusive offers are available now. Explore further at RangeRover.com.
20:31Travis Hoium:Welcome back to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. It's a little game called Would You Rather. I'm going to give Lou and Jason two stocks in the same industry that have very different valuations and see which one they would rather own. Lou, I'm going to start with you. Tesla and GM. Tesla, I'm going to give you a couple stats here, trades for 11 times sales and 160 times forward estimated earnings. General Motors trades for one time sales and six times estimated forward earnings. Which one of these stocks would you rather own?
21:01Lou Whiteman:So I'm looking at my Scantron and it's no fair. I don't see D. I don't see none of the above here. So that's the bah humbug. So if you're going to force me here, I have actually worked with the automakers before. I kind of know the insides of the business a bit. It's a brutal business. Even in the best of times, it is a slog. You have the most complex supply chains in the world. I am not going to buy an automaker, period. So I'm sorry, GM. I respect what you're trying to do with subscriptions and services and all that. But I just I'll believe it when I see it. Tesla, I can't get my I do have concerns about the valuation, but Tesla has a lot more optionality away from that core auto business.
21:39Lou Whiteman:I do believe, despite the valuation, that if they execute on their plan, there is a lot of ways to create value there outside of just the moving metal on the car lot. So I am going to lean into my valuation fears or and choose Tesla.
21:57Travis Hoium:Jason are you going all in on dancing humanoid robots well you know I I'm with Lou in that I don't own any automakers uh I kind of look at automakers and airlines and I'm like you know what I'm just not interested so I the Scantron reference wow holy cow I I wanted to hold on I'm old okay that's great I really enjoyed that you got your number two pencil you know I thought I thought it was interesting. If you look back, look at year to date, look over the last 12 months, look over the last three years and look over the last five years, GM has outperformed Tesla in every regard. This has been a better investment.
22:37And I was a little surprised to see that if I have to choose one, I like Lou's point there about the optionality in regard to Tesla. There is a little bit of a jockey play there. Musk just seems to kind of get what he wants. I don't know how he does it, but just he does it. And there's there's obviously this this potential for Tesla and SpaceX to to roll up together as well. At some point, I don't know. But I think generally speaking, the optionality is why I would say I go with Tesla in this case. And it's it's not to be a little GM at all, because, again, looking at the track record last five years in the companies perform very well and investors have done OK as well.
23:20But yeah, it doesn't have the same optionality that Tesla has.
23:25Travis Hoium:You know, we always think that everything is going to repeat with General Motors because Lou's right. They kind of keep making the same mistakes over and over again when you go through some sort of downturn. We would love to buy one of these big GM vehicles as we have a bigger family and a dog and all that kind of stuff. They never go on sale. So that's an indicator of their pricing power in the market right now. I don't know if that will hold, but at least through 2026, it looks like you're not going to get any sort of deal on a Tahoe or a Suburban. All right, let's go back to the pharmaceutical industry.
23:55Travis Hoium:Jason, I'm going to start with you. Eli Lilly, everything going right for Eli Lilly right now, but the market is pricing that in. Enterprise value to sales is 14. PE multiple is 40. Would you rather own that or Novo Nordisk? Enterprise value to sales is three and a half and the PE is 11. Yeah, another industry that I tend to shy away from because I just don't have I don't feel like I have any sort of expertise or full understanding as to, you know, how these businesses operate. I understand they can be very hit or miss. A lot depends on pipeline. A lot depends on approval. We've seen Lilly and Novo both performing, I think, well, Lilly more so than Novo, but really benefiting from these weight loss drugs, right, the GLP-1s.
24:43And it seems like Like Lilly with Boundjaro and Zetbound, that is just a one-two punch that's really working very well for business right now. So this is kind of your classic growth versus value. And I mean, the bet on Novo would be that, right, they are going to return to growth, that their pipeline will then, you know, help them sort of reignite that growth. I just I don't know that it will. I think for me, I'm going to kind of look towards the winner and kind of expect that winner to keep on winning. And so therefore, I think I would go with Lilly in this case.
25:21Lou Whiteman:Yeah, I'm going with Lilly. This is another tough industry. Like even blockbusters only mean so much because of patent laws. I mean, Pfizer might have changed the world with statins and Pfizer did not. The stock did not behave like Nvidia. So I think that that's worth keeping in mind. Lilly, to their credit, is taking advantage of the moment and buying everything in sight. They've done, what, two dozen deals today. And what's that doing? That's maybe if half of them or if a third of them become drugs, but they are using the cash from this blockbuster to augment, to improve, to build out the pipeline for the future.
25:57Lou Whiteman:I really like that strategy. So they're my choice there, even if they are the less of a value play.
26:03Travis Hoium:All right, let's look into financials. Lou, would you rather own a big bank? And I'm going to put JPMorgan Chase here. price to book multiple is two and a half if if i'm pulling my numbers correctly that's that's what i have and that's high for a bank so tell me what's next that's very high for a bank uh three-year growth rate is eight percent okay okay decent growth rate second stock sofi price to book is 1.9 cheaper on a price to book basis but the three-year growth rate is 27 which one would you
26:32Lou Whiteman:rather own i'd rather own jp morgan and i'll tell you you pick price to book i'll i'll go pe ratio And it's rare for a bank to be, you know, above 10 to 15. JP Morgan, I was looking at it, kind of looks pricey to me at 14x forward earnings. SoFi's double that. And I still think that there is just, SoFi is a great young bank. And yes, their growth rates are better because they are younger. So there's a denominator issue. But look, JMO, I know you used to do the financial show. You know this. I was shocked when I saw SoFi bragging that their average customer has 1.5 relationships. That's a community bank would laugh at that.
27:12Lou Whiteman:And I think the fact I think that the best growth days are behind it just as the denominator changes. And I think it is going to eventually be valued like a bank because that's what it is. So I think there's probably more equity upside for slow and steady JP Morgan right now. Yeah, I think that's right. I'm going with scale here. SoFi,$20 billion business, obviously done some good stuff. What it started out initially was a student loan business, wasn't it? Student loans and personal loans. Yeah, all the stuff that big banks don't want to do. Yeah. So, I mean, it's nice to see they've been able to expand and become more things for more people.
27:56I do agree with what you said, one and a half times. 1.54 customers for products for customers. Yeah, that doesn't seem that great.
28:07Lou Whiteman:That was their record high. That was their record high. That number should be bigger.
28:11Travis Hoium:That number should be bigger for sure. We talked about this on Wednesday. I do think it's funny how banks trick you into increasing that number.
28:19Lou Whiteman:But Travis, it's not a... So here's my honest explanation about it. And sorry, Jim, I'm hijacking it. But I think they have been so, so laser focused on it on. I don't want to say juicing or spiking because that sounds like there's no conspiracy here, but they've been going so hard on bringing in new members and not actually monetizing. You could say the bull case is is actually slow that slow your role on just kind of getting everybody through the door and actually monetizing. But be careful because Wells Fargo could tell you a story about how that can go wrong. Yeah. Well, I mean, I'm glad you brought up Wells Fargo because, like I said, I'm going with scale here with JPM.
28:57But it's not to say that something bad couldn't happen. Now, I think that JPMorgan has done very well under the leadership of Jamie Dimon. We also know that he's not going to be there forever. And he's kind of, I think, one foot out the door. Right. They're starting to talk about succession planning there. And so it will it will depend on future leadership, making sure they can keep keep things going in the right direction. But the bank is I mean, it's it's basically a one trillion dollar company today. Right. I mean, it is just it plays such a pivotal role in our broader economy. I like the dividend yield.
29:35I think the dividend should continue to grow. I like the fact that they continue to buy back shares. And I love the fact that they really focus on keeping that war chest balance sheet. right they really want to make sure that they keep the company in financially in good health and and so yeah i i think to me i would just feel a lot more comfortable owning that one
29:56Travis Hoium:as opposed to so far i am i'm just going to disagree with you guys on almost everything here today but that's what makes market all right let's go quickly with this one i wanted to touch on this quick costco versus target give you a couple of numbers here costco's price earnings multiple is 48 targets price earnings multiple is 19 fun fact here jason target stock is up 43 this year but which one is your other own from here well i like the membership model i think membership has its privileges and i remember early on in my first uh days here working at the fool you know a number of us were questioning kind of how much further cost code could go with this and what did they really have the ability to raise prices um in in regard to that to that membership fee because we know they're going to keep prices as low as they can in the store.
30:43Fast forward today, we've seen clearly they've been able to raise prices just incrementally here and there while maintaining those 90 plus percent renewals. And that to me has just been a phenomenal part of this business is just that that renewal rate. And every time I drive by Costco here by our house, I mean, it's like it's like an airport parking lot. I mean, the place is the most annoying parking lot in the city. It is so full always. And I'm just and we're not members of Costco, so I don't go there to shop. But I'm always just amazed to see how busy it is. And just just a very loyal customer base that keeps on coming back for more.
31:26And as long as they keep as long as they adhere to keeping prices low within the stores, I, jeez, I don't see any reason why the business can't continue to grow and succeed.
31:35Lou Whiteman:So I don't like investing in retail, but if I do, I want to see what are you special at? What's your reason? What is what is it that you do that it can't get elsewhere? I don't think I think Target's up off the mat here, but there is what we've seen with Kohl's. We've seen with JCPenney's. We've seen with Kmart. You just don't have a right to exist here. And with Target, I kind of wonder how hard it's going to be for them to have just a, I go to Target for blank, you know, versus other things. Kind of Costco by default here, as expensive as it is, I know why they exist and I know why people go there.
32:10Travis Hoium:When we come back, we're going to get to the stocks on our radar. You're listening to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing.
32:19Lou Whiteman:As a podcaster, my voice is heard by thousands of people. And now with Vanguard Investor Choice, I can be heard by the companies I invest in too. Vanguard Investor Choice makes it easy for eligible Vanguard fund investors to have a say in how their funds vote at company shareholder meetings. With just a few clicks, you can set your proxy voting preference and make your voice heard on topics like executive pay, board director elections, and more. Investor participation is the heartbeat of a healthy corporate governance ecosystem. You have a voice. Let it be heard. Visit vanguard.com slash investor choice to learn more.
32:58Lou Whiteman:Vanguard investors own shares of Vanguard index funds and those funds own shares of the companies they invest in. Available for Vanguard index funds that participate in investor choice. Vanguard Marketing Corporation Distributor.
33:12Travis Hoium:As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against. So don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows The Motley Fool's editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertisement disclosure, please check out our show notes. I did want to get to some news that came in overnight, Lou. That is that the Wall Street Journal is reporting that Tesla is weighing the sale of its China business to pave the way for a merger with SpaceX.
33:48Travis Hoium:What do we need to know about this? Right.
33:50Lou Whiteman:And the first thing we need to know is Elon says it's fake news. But if you read the story, it basically, it sounds like they've been thinking about this for a long time. And it makes sense.
34:00Travis Hoium:They would probably not be able to have that business and merge with SpaceX. Yeah.
34:05Lou Whiteman:Yeah. Think about it this way. Everything we accuse. I mean, right now we're facing that Mercedes Benz might not be able to sell cars in the U.S. because they have a investor that a Chinese investor that owns 10 percent. That's how the U.S. views this. So what are they going to say if there is a major, major Chinese presence to a defense contractor, which is in part what SpaceX is? They would have to do something here for a merger. So that is the natural implication. But this has been a criticism for a while because Elon owns both companies. So it's out there. I think it probably I am really curious how much Tesla cares about automobiles anymore.
34:44Lou Whiteman:We haven't seen any new, I mean, we've seen kind of refreshes, but we've kind of cut the model lineup in half without a lot of plans for more. This would be a real symbolic move of the future of this business isn't electric vehicles. I think you'd only see it in a merger, but I do think a merger is coming. So I guess this is just part of the process.
35:07Travis Hoium:Jason, it's wild that the plant that I think was supposed to be the growth driver for Tesla makes, I think it's over half of their vehicles, could potentially just be, they're not going to give it away, but there's probably not going to be, you know, a half trillion dollars of value taken out of that Chinese state. No, and it's it's I think Lou's right. You know, we're talking more and more about Tesla being something other than an auto company, which is just kind of weird to think about. But I mean, Musk has said, you know, time and time again that I mean, it's it's all about humanoid robots.
35:43Right. I mean, that's kind of it's AI and humanoid robots. And so I think even even Musk may say this is, you know, fake news or whatever. My suspicion is we will see this merger happen within the next couple of years. I think that he's going to want to make sure to try to get this done during this current administration, because I would imagine he wouldn't want to take the chance on a future administration that might not be so embracing to this to this type of a deal. So my bet is we see in the next couple of years, SpaceX and Tesla roll up into one.
36:18Travis Hoium:Lou, as you look at Tesla as a stock right now, does the fact that they are potentially getting out of China, it's been become a very, very competitive market there. Could that actually be a positive thing for them?
36:30Lou Whiteman:Remember that what they do in China is make vehicles for the world. So it's a lot more than just competing locally with China. I don't think this happens without the SpaceX merger. So I think it's kind of you take the two for one. If they independently of SpaceX just decide we don't want to we're dumping China, that would be a concern for the business. But I think I think there's only two paths here, either the status quo or the merger.
36:53Travis Hoium:Well, it'll be very interesting to see what happens, because there's obviously a lot going on with both SpaceX and Tesla, Musk running both companies. So, you know, if they are going to merge, something is probably going to happen, have to happen with this take. All right. We'd like to end the show with stocks on a radar. Bring in Dan Boyd with his thoughts. Jason, you're up first. What are you looking at this week? Yeah, Dan, I'm looking at Keysight Technologies. The ticker is K-E-Y-S. And, you know, this world is more tech driven than ever. And it takes a lot to bring this technology to market, Dan, from design and development to testing and deployment.
37:27It's an arduous process, requires near perfection. Keysight delivers a portfolio of hardware, software and services that enable its customers to do it all. And the company operates ultimately in two different segments. They have the communication solution side of the business, which is electronic design and test software, instrumentation systems and related services. They're in markets or commercial communications, aerospace, defense, government and markets. And then they also have the electronical industrial solution side of the business, which consists of also electronic design, testing and simulation software, computer and aided engineering solutions.
38:03Those end markets include automotive, energy, semiconductor, general electronics. they make their money by selling the hardware software and services to a global base of over 30 000 different customers i like the fact that software and services now represents approximately 36 of the business that's higher margin uh recurring revenue and uh so definitely business keep an eye on you dan quite the pitch but also i like the ticker just keys yeah good ticker this
38:32Travis Hoium:This is one of those companies that is both like boring and completely inscrutable. I'm looking at their Wikipedia page and I got to tell you, I don't understand any of this. It's boring, but it's crucial. And that's the key. That's the key, Dan. All right, Lou, what are you looking at this week?
38:51Lou Whiteman:So, Dan, I want to take a look at Defense Prime L3 Harris Technologies. This week, they released earnings. They beat expectations on both revenue and earnings. They also raised full year guidance, yet the stock traded down more than 10 percent after earnings. So what's going on? Well, early in the year, L3 Harris teamed with the Pentagon to spin off its missile business in an IPO that would come with billions in government funding to increase missile manufacturing. The market liked that deal because it would allow L3 Harris to keep some of the upside of that missile business while saving its capex for higher margin areas like space.
39:25Lou Whiteman:But yesterday, L3 Harris said the IPO is going to be delayed until 2027 because of choppy, frothy market conditions. I get why the market is disappointed, but I think the sell-off is an overreaction. L3 Harris finished the quarter with a backlog of$42 billion in future business. They are the go-to contractor for areas like Golden Dome, Missile Defense, a lot of this defense electronics at this higher margin. They also have a better international business than most of their peers. Because of this, L3 Harris normally trades at a premium to those other defense contractors. Today, you can get it at basically the same multiple as General Dynamics.
40:01Lou Whiteman:That looks like an opportunity to me, Dan.
40:04Travis Hoium:Dan, another critical company, but a ticker of LHX. That's not as good. Not working for me quite as bad. Yeah, based on tickers, you know, we got to go Keysight here. But I get why L3 Harris seems like a juicy investment these days. But I gotta I gotta imagine that Keysight is probably selling components to at least some of the supporters
From the publisher
The week was dominated by hedge fund Situational Awareness being forced to sell its equity holdings, leading to both a drop and a pop in AI-related stocks. What went wrong and what can we learn?
Plus, we discuss why hyperscalers are moving in opposite directions, why Tesla may leave China, and the stocks on our radar.
Travis Hoium, Lou Whiteman, and Jason Moser discuss:
- Situational Awareness
- Leverage Gone Wrong
- Hyperscaler Divergence
- Would You Rather?
- Tesla in China
- Stocks On Our Radar
Companies discussed: Tesla (TSLA), GM (GM), Eli Lilly (LLY), Novo Nordisk (NVO), JPMorgan (JPM) SoFi (SOFI), SpaceX (SPCX), Costco (COST), Target (TGT), L3Harris (LHX), Keysight (KEYS).
Host: Travis Hoium
Guests: Lou Whiteman, Jason Moser
Engineer: Dan Boyd
Disclosure: Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, “TMF”) do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement.
We’re committed to transparency: All personal opinions in advertisements from Fools are their own. The product advertised in this episode was loaned to TMF and was returned after a test period or the product advertised in this episode was purchased by TMF. Advertiser has paid for the sponsorship of this episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

