How to be antifragile in an uncertain world. June 14, 2024

14 Jun 2024 · 1 h 13 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: Motley Fool Money - Episode on Antifragility and Economic Trends (June 14, 2024)

Episode Overview In this episode of Motley Fool Money, hosts Scott Phillips and Andrew Page delve into various economic topics, including the strength of the US economy, interest rate forecasts from Australian banks, strategies for becoming antifragile in an unpredictable world, and a discussion on upcoming IPOs such as Guzman y Gomez, Virgin, and Canva.

---

Key Discussions

  1. Economic Landscape and Interest Rates
  2. US Economy Strength:
  3. The hosts note the resilience of the US economy, suggesting that it is too robust for immediate interest rate cuts.
  4. Recent inflation data indicates a slight improvement, yet the Federal Reserve is only anticipating one rate cut instead of two.
  • Australian Banking Forecasts:
  • ANZ has adjusted its interest rate cut forecast from November to next year, reflecting ongoing economic uncertainties.
  • The discussion explores the implications of these decisions, particularly under new leadership at the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA).
  1. Scams and Fraud Awareness
  2. Personal Experiences:
  3. Scott shares his concerns about scammers impersonating him online, leveraging his likeness in fraudulent activities.
  4. The discussion highlights the importance of public awareness regarding investment scams and the responsibility of social media platforms to combat these issues.
  • Advice to Listeners:
  • Emphasizes the principle that if an investment opportunity seems too good to be true, it likely is.
  • Encouragement to report scams and look out for friends and family who might be more vulnerable.
  1. Antifragility in Uncertain Times
  2. Concept Explanation:
  3. Antifragility refers to systems that gain from disorder and uncertainty. The hosts urge listeners to build personal and financial resilience through prudent investing and risk management.
  • Personal Finance Strategies:
  • Create diverse income streams and maintain a strong financial foundation to withstand economic downturns.
  • Emphasis on investing in quality companies and being mindful of debt.
  1. Upcoming IPOs and Investment Opportunities
  2. IPO Landscape:
  3. Discussion of upcoming IPOs from Guzman y Gomez, Virgin, and Canva, noting that the markets are currently experiencing a bull run.
  4. Scott and Andrew caution against jumping into IPOs driven by fear of missing out (FOMO). They stress the importance of due diligence and understanding the company's fundamentals before investing.
  • Skepticism Towards IPOs:
  • Both hosts express skepticism toward investing in IPOs, citing the risks associated with buying into companies that have been dressed up for sale and the potential for volatility in post-IPO trading.
  1. Investment Philosophy
  2. Long-Term Perspective:
  3. The hosts emphasize the importance of taking a long-term view in investing, suggesting that there will always be opportunities beyond the latest IPO hype.
  4. They share personal anecdotes about successful long-term investments, reinforcing that patience and strategy are key to financial success.

Conclusion The episode wraps up with Scott and Andrew reminding listeners to stay informed, vigilant against scams, and always look for sound investment opportunities. They encourage viewers to build financial resilience and not succumb to the fear of missing out on the latest market trends.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Interest Rates: Current economic indicators point to a strong US economy, impacting interest rates in Australia.
  • Scams: Awareness of financial scams is crucial; always verify investment opportunities.
  • Antifragility: Build resilience in personal finance through diverse investments and prudent debt management.
  • IPO Caution: Avoid impulsive investments in IPOs, focus on due diligence and long-term potential.
  • Investment Strategy: Successful investing involves patience, discipline, and a long-term perspective.

---

For regular updates and insights, listeners are encouraged to subscribe to the Motley Fool newsletter at [fool.com.au/LiSTNR](https://fool.com.au/LiSTNR).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:07Welcome to Motley Fool Money, the podcast that, well, don't say it too loudly, might join the IPO season later this year. I'm Scott Phillips from The Motley Fool. He is Andrew Page, the founder, the managing director, and because I haven't said it for a while, the chief cook and bottle washer at strawman.com, Australia's premier online investment club. Mr. Page, how are you? I'm very good. How are you? I'm very, very well. Thank you, sir. Feeling up, vibed, interested, as Richie Vannoy might say on the 12th man. I keep threatening, mate. We are starting this recording about an hour after we started chatting, which is about par for us.

0:44We're talking about everything, all sorts of good stuff. I feel almost guilty about that because people are missing out but this podcast is going to be long enough so trust me you don't want a two hour version of what we talk about you really don't you really don't you really don't we are in the middle of a pre-recording what's a full court press because we I'm going away for a few weeks in July so we actually chatted yesterday and we did a couple of podcasts which you will hear in the next couple of weeks and we're doing more today but I always enjoy chatting with you mate and this one is a a regular Friday episode So we are going to talk about what's going on around the place.

1:18And while they start there, again, a little bit behind the curtain, I think last week we had about six topics and we got through three. So let's see how we go. Did I mention the scammers last week? Because of this pre-recording that we're doing, I'm just up is down, left is right. I've got no sense of time anymore. Even if I did, I'm going to go one more time, mate, if you'll indulge me and if I listen to indulge me. If I didn't, then I'm glad I'm doing it. It's all about me. Have you seen the ads with me in them? yet on the social no no so i i i have joined the ranks of david kosh and andrew forrest and dick smith uh my voice not my voice actually my name and my videos are being used and overdubbed to try and scam people out of money which is kind of stupidly funny because i'm just this two-bit bloke you know isn't very important but it's actually really really really really awful i was gonna say another word but it's just i'll use awful because people are gonna get scammed to lose money after clicking on a video of me or you know me in inverted commas uh talking talking rubbish so you know whenever you say this because you you have um a lot of twitter impersonators and there is yes and you you mention it and then there's like my male ego goes no one's copying me what am i chopped liver over here like what the hell so you know what it is i think it's a combination they're using some tv appearances with a channel 9 logo at the bottom and i think i think it's just like that idea of hey this important person on an important tv network again neither of those is true necessarily but you know it's the inference um so here's so i just want to listen to know and to be aware of this and no one's going to tell their family and friends but if you do happen to hear it talked about please let people know if you see it online can you also please report the ads i know it's a crappy thing to ask people to do because you get nothing for it is it crypto no uh no no so this one because that's the tell for anyone listening if they see a that's not true i don't know how good the deep fake is like no one is buying that right so i've been so my my accounts have been copied as you say mate and then you used to you know they so someone copies my account calls it scott phillips puts a slightly different handle on it and then reaches out with a dm and says hey i've got a bitcoin deal for you click here and send me your bitcoin i'll send you some back or something that's obviously scam as you say the new one mate is actually these and here's the crappy thing about it i won't say the other what i was going to say so they're copying up mostly on facebook sometimes and instagram they are sponsored ads social media is taking money from scammers think about how crap that is right so okay so there's a video of me and it's me talking about it's the thing about interest rate decision i think from memory and they've got me talking but they've overdubbed me in this bad british accent which is thankfully until i gets better i said look at some point it'll be you have to send me a link I haven't got one.

4:03I've never seen it in the wild. I've never, ever, ever seen it in the wild. I assume you can block the accounts that say it, right? So like, well, let's not show Scott. But people send to me all the time, which I really appreciate. Thank you, anyone who does that. So it's not Bitcoin. It's offering a guaranteed 60 % return. Hey, so I know. Right? So look, and this is the thing. No one who actually, this is the problem. No one who knows us or knows me will fall for that. But some poor schmuck will come up and see this ad and go, he's on Channel 9. He must know what he's talking about. I guess I'll click on the link and see what happens.

4:34The other thing is they're inviting people to join a private WhatsApp group. That's the technology they're using, right? So the social media networks, not only are they not cracking down on this stuff, they're actually taking money from sponsored posts by people using my name, face, and a dubbed video to try and screw people out of money, which I just hate with a passion. Look, it's personal because it's about me. I always hate it. I've hated it for a long time. But when it's kind of about you and they're using you, it's like that's really, really sucky. So anyway, mate. Sorry, don't make it all about me.

5:02The thing that I find odd about it too is that, like, there are a lot of problems in the world that are just hard to fix. Like, you know, there's just – these ones don't seem that – I'm not a programmer. Yep. But particularly in the case of, like, the fake accounts, it's like, which one is older? The less old one is the fake one. Like, something like that, right? Like, or – and I'm sure that is, like, a thousand more sophisticated. Same name, same image, same posts. repost it up someone else's account that's been around for 13 years oh maybe that might be a problem let's flag that one you know and weird thing is too because when it has happened and i've because i've seen some fake ones from you and i go i'll just report it and then it's like go here now feel in the form now it's like oh yeah it's too hard it's too hard i all i'm trying to say is hey twitter slash x this is fake right you didn't go okay thanks we'll look at it yeah yeah but it's like no we need you to jump through these hoops and do this like i'm not gonna do I'm sorry, mate.

6:01I'm just not going to do it too hard, right? And it's just like, they just don't. I think the only reasonable conclusion is they don't care. No, they don't. They're getting some money. Not only do they not care, they're getting paid by the scammers. They are literally, can you imagine if Channel 9 or Triple M or The Daily Telegraph was distributing this stuff? Yeah. How long do we take to get shut? They'd lose their media license in seven days. Yeah. If you were knowingly running, or not even knowingly, I want to be a little bit careful. If you were taking no precautions whatsoever to stop your media outlet being used to scam people, it would be a national scandal.

6:39ACMA would be all over them, the communication media authority. It's almost like Channel 7 paying an accused rapist, you know, for paying their rent. And it's unbelievable that that could happen. Anyway, back to the topic. So, yes, please be careful of scammers. Yeah, I said, the thing is, no one listening will fall for it because they know us and they know me and some other poor schmucks are going to get done. It just really grinds my gears and it just sucks because it's me. And it's like at some point someone's going to, I'm getting an email at some point from someone saying, I clicked on your video and I lost my money.

7:10Where is it, Philips? Yeah. And that's the thing that sucks. I would say, I would just say in general too, more broadly, whenever there is any ad in finance and they're everywhere, if it's too good to be true, it's too good to be true. Yeah, exactly. So let's say you and I come up with some incredible trading scheme and we're making 60 % per annum. Hell, we're making 15 % per annum reliably. Exactly. Right? Exactly, yeah. Now, we've got a couple of options here. We could sell that or we could just use it. Yep. Right? If I've got the formula to turn lead into gold, I'm not selling the formula. I'm just going to start making a bunch of gold.

7:47Like, it's that obvious. And unfortunately, I guess when you are desperate, you know, perhaps that you are more susceptible to that. So I don't, the interesting thing is, is a lot of the fraud gets underreported and it gets underreported because people are embarrassed. Yeah, that's right. And that's, and you can understand it, right? Oh yeah, absolutely. If it has happened to you, don't, don't, don't feel too bad. Like it's, you're in, you're in plenty of good company. These, these things are, you want there, you just want certain things to be true, right? But just remember that the long term, the best performing asset class throughout history tends to be equities.

8:26That tends to just nudge around 10 % per annum. So anything that's doing better than that, you know, it's just kind of like that's where you've automatically got to. I'm not saying that it's automatically a scam. There are, I'm sure, opportunities out there that are doing better than that or have the potential to do better than that. But your spidey sense should tingle. And you hope that it will. So, you know, look, I just want to put that on the record, mate, for people who are unfortunately getting close to getting stuffed by that because it's just awful and it sucks. Hey, let's move on. Interesting things this week, mate, in interest rate land.

9:00A couple of things. Well, interest rate inflation land, really. U.S. inflation was out and was better than expected. That's a win. However, the U.S. Fed said, well, that's true, but we don't think it's going to come down fast enough. And so we're now only expecting one rate cut. this year rather than previously two. So that's kind of a big deal. Last week, we had the European Central Bank and the Bank of England both cut their rates. Not Bank of England, sorry. European Central Bank and the Bank of Canada. Let me be very clear. Both cut their rates. And we had the ANZ come out, the first of the big four banks, to push their rate cut forecast out from November to next year.

9:42Now, I will, in my head, already have you saying, hey, you've been wrong four times. I was just getting ready to say that. Sorry, it's dearly a thunder. I've also saved us 15 minutes of the rant. So that's, you know, there's some time saving. You're welcome, listeners. But just interesting dynamics. And again, the so what probably doesn't matter all that much. And we don't, this is the other thing, by the way, we don't yet know what Michelle Bullock is going to do relative to what the others had done in the past. She may or may not take the same view. I've said before, the economic orthodoxy, and I'm actually, again, I know you disagree on the premise of the question, which is central banks don't need to set rates and i get that um but the economic orthodoxy is inflation is worse than a temporary recession i think you agree with that um even if it's not the rba should should make it happen or not happen um but there's no guarantee michelle will actually take that view in in a circumstance where the economy does falter we know gdp is only growing up 0.1 of a percent i saw some bloke in the fin yesterday saying he already thinks we're in the first quarter of a recession because the june quarter it's almost finished but if it is negative then all tensions on the september quarter in theory if if michelle bullock kind of keeps to the orthodoxy she will keep rates high to fix inflation even if it does risk a recession now maybe she'll blink maybe she won't there's also the uh rate setting board that the rba is supposedly going to put in place the treasurer hasn't legislated yet so if you kind of forecast out or a forecast if you cast your mind out six or twelve months we don't know what bullock's going to do personally uh or and on the board she's not the only person to make the decisions but also a brand new board could have a different view so there's kind of i wish there's more uncertainty than normal it's always on there's always uncertainty right but it's just interesting that there are that yeah patterns of behavior you could you know if you looked at phil low and said okay well lowe's been doing it for seven years and he's probably going to keep doing what he's always done that's a reasonable assertion right new governor possibly new rate setting board um and again moving moving goalposts in terms of what inflation is doing ANZ reckons, yep, it's probably February next year.

11:42The other three so far, the three of the big four, are saying it's still November. Interesting just kind of the dynamics at play here. Yeah, I mean, what I find super interesting is how subjective it is. I mean, the way you frame the question highlights that really well. Like, this person could do this, that person could do that. Yes, yes. It's not like, I reckon if you got two different engineers, different backgrounds, different political leanings, whatever, and you said build a bridge. Yeah, right. They'd both build a bridge that worked, right? Because there are just certain laws of physics that must be adhered to to carry a given load, right?

12:17Like there is a, the universe enforces a certain objectivity. You know, one of them's not going to go, well, I'm going to build it out of balsa wood because it's better for the planet or whatever, right? It's just not going to happen. But when it comes to setting the price of money, to some extent, and to a lot of extent, the quantity of money, it's kind of like, I kind of feel that this is the way to go. But you can't tell what two different people will think and reasonable people can reasonably disagree. I guess that's where I always get tied in knots. And so you're right. And that is why forecasting is such a mugs game on this kind of front because it's not – you can be right in your analysis and your summation of the situation.

13:02and according to your given economic sort of framework, what needs to happen doesn't mean it will. Yes, that's right. In fact, the opposite could happen. That's right. So, yeah, it's diabolically tricky. And that's why I know it's such a controversial statement, but, you know, get rid of central money. Yeah, get rid of it, man. I mean, it's just like we've all figured out over the decades that centrally planned economies don't really work that well. But let's centrally plan the most fundamental component of the economy. That's cool. that's totally cool anyway i won't i won't go down that that rabbit hole again um i guess i yeah what what is it to sort of say there it's i think what i find interesting it's not just the interest rate setting but the fiscal setting as well yes what's and that's we got to keep mentioning that mate because it just gets ignored i mean i'm i'm trying to whenever i do media stuff i try to make sure i make the point that we focus on the rba and with with reason they are changing the price of money, whether you think they should or not, we know it has implications.

14:03It's just not the only game in town. And it's actually probably a less important one. So the US, I mentioned the US because, well, it's the biggest economy, but also I just read the fact, the stat yesterday. But with the exception of COVID, their federal spending as a component of GDP is as high as it was in World War II. Wow. Right? So it's emergency levels or what you might consider emergency levels of spending without there being an emergency. Rates. I know we think rates are. Spending is a percentage of GDP or just is there a context? Yes, a percentage of GDP. Okay, cool. So that sort of normalizes it for a whole bunch of things.

14:46Because dollar terms, you need to contextualize it and benchmark it, et cetera. so it's with the exception of COVID it's it's it's sort of like it's never been this high with the exception of World War II and some other period as well right but again emergency periods it's sort of like and I guess people would argue that you know when the free world is at risk you maybe it's an okay time to spend beyond your means where's the emergency where's the I mean we're going that way too right and sort of and and the the other point is with interest rates is we're all talking about we're all using terms adjectives like high i'm like well it's high compared to where it was a few years ago yeah but over the great span of history it's actually not that high it's probably around normal do you know what i mean and and sort of like so we're in a situation where we're talking rate cuts we're talking accelerated spending and support we'll talk about this later as well but queensland government's giving extra support for first homeowner first homeowners all of this kind of stuff every time i drop the kids off to school i have the radio on and rave traumatize my kids you know it's always some spending on this and on that and you know and it's sort of like so are we trying to fight inflation are we not trying to fight inflation here and it it's sort of i don't know where i'm going with all of this other than to say we can we can navel gaze at the next the rest of 2024 but the bigger picture for me is we're just so on an unsustainable path.

16:18And I know that these cans can be kicked very far down the road. So it might be something that I just don't have to deal with until I'm 68. And who cares by then or something, you know, but, but, but there is, the thing that worries me is that there's no appetite to accept reality for what it is. Yeah. There's no long-term plan. I don't think you, you don't turn the Titanic on a dime. Right. So, but there's no, there's not even a conversation about maybe we need to write the ship and even Don't have a long five-year. Hey, let's have a five-year plan to sort of at least start to turn the wheel a little bit here.

16:52So it's a problem, right? And the other stat I heard this morning actually in the car was that 17 % of kids are below the poverty line in Australia. 17%, right? And why? Because of housing. Because people can't afford the rent. I mean, it all comes back to that in so many ways. And, you know, you can't turn on the news without hearing about the cost of living crisis, et cetera, et cetera. And so, yes, obviously monetary policy and interest rates are a big part of the discussion. But on the other hand, we're just pumping money in, freshly created money, money that poofed out of thin air. And it's just like, this is really counterproductive, guys.

17:30And I know we're repeating ourselves, but I just shrug my shoulders. You use the word we very liberally there, Ram, is all I'm saying? I don't know what else there is to say. You know, you sort of, you get to these things and it's sort of like - No, no, that's true. That's true. I don't know where to go with it. So I will. I have a couple of thoughts. And I think what we need to be mindful of is, in my opinion, is two things, right? First is the amount of money that's going into the system. And am I right in saying Australia is actually not increasing money supply at the moment? I think we've rolled over that, haven't we?

18:05I'll Google it, but we've come back from a very high peak. If you want to talk about this, get into the weeds a little bit here. If you want to talk about M2 money, which is sort of like all the currency, the central bank reserves, plus at call deposits from banks. So what you would, what I think most of us would consider money. So when you think how much money does Scott Phillips have, I look at his bank account. Yeah, exactly. And that's that kind of, so I'm not going to include things that are locked up in longer term instruments and the rest of it. Although you get to M3 and there's other abstractions of money.

18:35Such a deep rabbit hole, by the way. But yes, on M2, yes, I believe we've eased back. I'll look it up while you talk. So that's a win. um so here's the and here so i i want to you mentioned about four different concepts and i kind of stop at each point and go ah no you're wrong i just kind of wanted to so i'll try and break it up we start talking about the government spending as a percentage of gdp i am absolutely categorically not a big government or a small government guy i'm a responsible size of government based on what we want to do and the things the government could do better than private enterprise guy which doesn't fit on a business card or a bumper sticker which is what makes it very very how to radicalize people to the center because just kind of it depends or uh pragmatic answers you know only please it's not a particularly big um constituency should be uh but we all get radicalized by our our favorite you know dry drugs start again being dragged to the left or the right i um so percentage i don't i don't this will annoy a whole lot of people i don't care about government spending as a percentage of gdp truly don't care like you mentioned it's highest as world war ii that's important but i'll get back to that second if it's 50 or 2 i genuinely don't care right what is government spending about government spending is about two things it's about the safety net and it's about providing services and goods that are not better provided by private enterprise i had someone try and tell me on twitter i love this and if you're listening i apologize for making fun of you but i'm being kind a little bit um i had someone try and tell me that rather than government's uh rather than government's building roads uh dominoes and fedex and other companies use the road should pay to to make the roads like okay so that how would how they'll get together and do that if that was a central organization maybe could get together and get money from each of them and do that that'd be useful they'd probably have that wouldn't they and maybe we could call that government or something and i was again i was looking a little bit facetious obviously but um you know we have roads and we have hospitals and we have defense forces and we have schools and we have stuff that i think as a group other than the very extreme fringe on the left and the right, I think it's a reasonable mix of things that government could do because we probably don't want only private companies building roads or only private companies building hospitals or whatever else it is now.

20:46There is a role for toll roads potentially or private health potentially. But the idea of kind of a centralized authority, i.e. government, collecting money and making those things happen, kind of makes sense to me. I think it's an important thing. We have a safety net. And I think as a wealthy, caring society, we can choose to, and again, some people will disagree. And I don't know how you live with yourself if you do disagree. But look after people who can't look after themselves. I think that's a pretty reasonable thing to do as a society to say, you know what? I've been very, very, very, very, very, very lucky in my life in a million different ways.

21:17Other people haven't had that luck or have just made bad choices or whatever else it is. I reckon it's pretty reasonable for me to say, you know what? It's okay for me to share a little bit of my luck with some of the people who have had a bit less. That seems very reasonable to me. And whether that's, again, health or whether it's welfare or pensions or something else that kind of makes sense to me and then as a society if we say well you know what we think governments do these things well or better than private enterprise other things private enterprise do better than government you just tot it up and say okay well how much does that cost well that's that's literally how it never happened for first principles that's how you would literally decide how much tax was payable and then you work out who pays the tax and that's a whole different other conversation but if that's 20 or 25 or 30 percent of GDP I personally really don't care I care about waste a lot I care about uh governments doing things they shouldn't do I care about bureaucracies being too big but I also care about things not being done by governments that should be and people as you said if one in five kids or one in six kids is below the poverty line that is an absolute I don't I can't even think of the words without swearing um absolute travesty it's a it's a you know it's a stain on our country our generation our society to get to that point one in six kids doesn't have enough money to to have a life that we would consider a life that's not poverty it's just it is it is it blows my head up um so that that's so that's that's my that's my kind of percentage gdp don't care what i do care about is when the percentage gdp goes up and the tax doesn't go up and so you make this wider debt which is exactly what's happening with stage three tax cuts and yes i'll rant about them one more time maybe even one more after this i'm not sure before they actually come in effect on the 1st of july i know i've lost the argument um so be it but i'm not gonna doesn't make up doesn't make me wrong in my own little special part of the world where i think i'm right about everything um the state so your tax cuts are being funded with debt it's just so you know we're saying hey let's spend more and let's collect less because that's a smart way to run a country it's just it just blows my head up again it's just it's just stupidity and it is craven selfishness from our politicians governments and oppositions who aren't prepared to say this does not work we need to fix this problem what used to be they used to agree on that not that long ago howard and rudd 07 it was probably the last time we had a serious bipartisan view that we actually should live within our means and since then both parties and a pox on both their houses have not only stopped talking about they've legislated increasing deficits the lmp did it last term labor have done it this term they have no desire or willingness to actually fix the country's finances so that we are on a our financial footing and that is just unforgivable we are literally you know we are lumping our kids with more and more and more debt because we can't be bothered actually making responsible decisions and running the place properly and it's just it's just it's awful so i guess that sorry matt it's a bit of a long ranting rambling answer to or response to your point which is you know we're spending way too much and and so last point to that which is the last one you made which and by the way doing that is stimulatory because we are spending net even more than we were this time last year which which by definition puts more supply or demand in the economy which by definition at a given level of supply any increase in demand pushes up prices it is just madness it is you kind of look back and go but but these these people are the ones in charge they're supposed to be making good decisions looking after the country and if that was your job you wouldn't do it like this and yet they are and it's just is it is it any wonder people are so disengaged right cynical yes yes and you know it's it's so true to be right yep and it particularly if if you're outside of the top five percent or whatever yes yes those people that live in a bubble and you know things are great and everyone just needs to work harder and it's all on there you know that they that's the kind of view that i'm generalizing but that a lot have i like to do it um put it this way i mean these these conversations can get very technical um but if if throwing money at things solved problems there wouldn't be problems right yeah exactly it doesn't work it's never we don't always throw with the right things that might be the other part of the problem Well, let me clarify that a little bit, Matt.

25:36Creating money and then throwing it at the problem doesn't do anything. I mean, you've got to keep going down and down and down until you hit bedrock here. And as I like to say, this is just all an accounting system. It's just units or shells or beads or whatever unit you want to use just helps us keep track of things, right? Money has no use except to keep track of work that I have done. I have to store my value so that I can solve the double coincidence of wants problems because barter just doesn't work. And I can't remember who owes me what in a civilization of 8 billion people. So we kind of had this incredible invention called money that keeps track of everything.

26:14Now, as soon as we start creating it and we give a certain small subset of people the power to do that and then to direct that money, it literally steals off everyone else in the same way that diluting shareholders does when insiders create shares for themselves. It's exactly the same thing. So back to the original point, I couldn't find M2. On trading economics, I found M3. So it's just one layer up. It just includes a broader form of money. So I think things locked up in term deposits and other things, but same kind of thing. So as of March of 2024, there was$3 trillion of Australian dollars in existence.

26:49And again, you'd think that, well, money's money. Well, there's different types of money, even as we sort of define it in our current context. In 2011, it was 1.3. In 96, it was 300 billion. So the chart that I'm looking at is hard to do in an audio form is bottom left, top right with the slightest of dips. And by the way, you see little dips along the way. Now, again, let's take a broad view And let's look at, this is like a Jordan Peterson almost kind of framing here. It's like, no, no, no. Just because of the meme where it's like, well, it starts with the ancient Greeks. But if you look at the Greek empire, look at the Roman empire, look at the Byzantine empire, you look at the British empire, you look at any empire that has risen and fallen, it always ends in the same way.

27:47They start clipping the coins. They start inflating the money. And they get into these debt spirals. It is one of those observations that is 100 % in terms of look at the kind of any empire. It's always there is a monetary phenomenon behind it. It is. I'll put that out there and encourage people to dig into that themselves because you'll realize that that is the case. Now, whether that is causal or coincident, I don't know. We can have a debate on that. But, you know, I just get, again, at a very broad context, you get very late stage empire vibes. You know, the US was just an incredible civilization, the likes of which the world has never seen.

28:26And just look at the state of the place now. And a lot of the West is sort of being dragged along with it. So what do we have? We have widening wealth inequality. We have unsustainable spending. We have debt that can never be paid back. Right. It's not like, oh, our kids will have to pay it. They won't pay it back. Can we just say, can we say will never rather than can never? Because it absolutely can be. It just requires decisions to be made by people to do it. So it's – sorry, I don't mean to interrupt. No, you're not wrong. I know you're doing it. But of course, it absolutely can be. We all know it can be.

29:00Yeah. We also believe it probably won't be because politicians are too gutless to do anything about it. And frankly, the rest of the electorate is too selfish to actually hold them to account. Yeah, you just put it off, right? Until you can't, right? And what usually happens there is that, again, remembering that this is all just an abstract concept with money and debt, right? It's just monkeys deciding that I owe you something and you'll pay me back. Yeah, with a bit extra. Yep, sure, I promise I will. That's it. That's the entire assets of the bank. It's just promises from other people. And again, that's not a conspiracy.

29:32It just is. It's just a statement of fact. So at some point, someone's got to carry the can because if the debt doesn't get paid back, someone's left without. And usually what happens, people, the real wealth, as I said in a recent one of the prerecorded, the real wealth is the stuff. That's the wealth. It's the house I live in. It's the factory that I own. It's the farmland that I can produce stuff with. That's the real world. The rest is just an accounting system. And what will happen is that a whole bunch of people will get wiped out. And it'll be the owners of capital that usually, even though there might be monetary losses and accounting losses and the rest of it, they will still retain the real wealth in the economy.

30:16And it's the bottom half of society that just really gets done over. every time every single time without fail and it might be we might be talking about things that finally come to a head in 2050 i don't know but it's it's it's going that way and it just it makes me despair so one of the things i think people naturally sort of say is like okay that's super depressing um short of like starting some massive political movement and changing the the the thinking and direction trajectory of an entire nation which is very hard to do unless you want to be Gandhi and like do something like that. What do you do to sort of protect yourself?

30:53I kind of think you just be very careful of the counterparties that you're getting involved in here. Think about very carefully about the assets that you own, the debt that you have against that, the serviceability of that, the income streams that you have. And it's sort of, you just want to make yourself as anti-fragile as possible in this world. I would argue very very strongly because um unless you unless you are sort of very well connected uh politically there's a there's a there's a very good chance that something terrible will happen to you and then you'll be left carrying the can and it's i don't know is that too bearish or too doomerish yeah how does it how does it resolve how does it how does that resolve i'm a Genuine question.

31:37How do we, with all of this debt that just gets mounted up, the global debt to GDP. So let's take everyone in the world. We're all on one planet, one team, one dream. It's 330 % debt to GDP. So in other words, if you took every single bit of production produced on planet Earth and you didn't consume a single thing, it would still take over three years to pay back all of the debt. Right? Now, how do you fix that? someone's someone's someone's got to take the medicine is it going to be you is it going to be me you know who it is it's the person that that has no power the person with the big stick they don't take the medicine that that is the brutal harsh reality of it and and yeah most of us don't don't carry the biggest stick so so bring me out bring me out of my um tinfoil hat uh conspiracy here and help me see reason i will i will politely say that sometimes i'll add jordan peterson you can you can start from you can you can see what you look for potentially right so every if every empire has ended with a monetary phenomenon i'm sure that's true i would suspect there are empires that didn't end or circumstances where that the you know the the false positives the false negatives and all that kind of stuff right so is it is it true that every empire finished that way yes is it causal probably not is it correlated maybe uh are there other examples that disprove it maybe um or or conversely let me know because i haven't come across any or conversely the issues may have been present 400 years before the end of the empire and eventually you know the the graph the graph looks big now uh it's possible we look back at the graph in 45 years time ago oh man look how much worse it got and still we haven't got to that point i'm very i'm very certain that that is the case actually yeah yeah yeah so i think you know And I think - This is not imminent stuff, by the way.

33:25Right, right. And I think, so it was, well, that's, and that's kind of, I guess that's kind of my point. I think you're, you know what's great about, and I've got to be careful, I'm not doing the same thing, right? By finding a solution and looking for a problem to attach it to. But I think your point, the great thing about it is you don't have to change much. It's a bit like investing in inflation versus investing when there's no inflation. If you do the same things, the right things each time, you're going to get good results no matter what the circumstances are. You know, if you're always investing in businesses with pricing power, for example, If there's no inflation, you're going to make money.

33:54If there's inflation, you're going to make money. And so to your point about what do you do, I think that's – it's a nice reminder, I think, for people to – what I love about those circumstances, inflation generally, or maybe debt or maybe whatever kind of tinfoil takes us to, it's very, very, very, very, very unlikely that good investing changes. And that's just one of the beauties of what we consider good investing, right? And so that's – if you are buying – if you're diversified, because you should be anyway. You know, the bigger risk actually, mate, is not, well, let me be careful how I express this.

34:30I would suggest that the bigger risk for individual portfolios is actually not the bad times, but the good times. In the sense that the good times blind you. You know, you didn't have to worry about pricing power for 20 years because there was no inflation. Oh, they sow the seeds of destruction every time. And so that's kind of my point is if, you know, if there's any benefit to whacking the tin of oil had on occasion or maybe just listen to Andrew while he has it on. You kind of go, actually, yeah, maybe it doesn't happen. But if it did, I'd like to be prepared for that. And whatever the potential bogeyman is, I mean, short of, you know, the world's going to be a nuclear disaster or, you know, we're all going to get it.

35:03Like, whatever, yeah. But the realistic kind of, maybe it's too much debt. Maybe it's high inflation for a long period of time. Maybe it's high unemployment. Maybe it's like, well, save hard, invest well, diversify, own quality company. When I say diversify, I don't buy two of everything. you're not Noah, diversifying into a range of quality businesses in different areas with different risks and different whatevers. That's how you kind of, that's how you kind of make that work. And so I think, you know, what do you do? It's the beauty of it is you don't have to predict the outcome because you don't have, and by the way, Andrew's saying here's one range of outcomes.

35:36I agree with all of that. Yeah. There's one range of outcomes. Maybe Andrew's 100 % right or maybe he's 100 % wrong and it's some other risk that we don't foresee or the literal, the black swan, something no one's talking about that gets us. How do you prepare for those things? Well, you can't prepare. Well, you can prepare for an individual risk. But given you don't know which of the risks is going to come to fruition, when, how bad it's going to be, you kind of say, okay, well, how do I make it to your point? I'll get back to your point, which is how do I make my portfolio, my life anti-fragile?

Read the full transcript

36:06And that's why I come back to regret minimization. You and I disagree on debt. We've got some mailbag questions coming up in the next couple of weeks about that. For me, it's like, well, actually - Not a mile. I don't think we're a mile apart, are we? No, no. Well, you're going to leverage back up again on the house. I'm like, you know what? I want to be literally on my entire aim. Yes. To a degree. Sorry. Yes, I shouldn't. To take more debt on to invest in shares. I'm like, you know, at some point in your financial life, it's worth taking a bit of extra risk to try and build up an SDG. At some point, you then, in theory, I would suggest to throttle back a bit, like, you know what?

36:40I've got enough now. You mentioned again, we're kind of pre-announcing the future episodes. And one of the ones coming up, I think I mentioned the Warren Buffett quo, or you mentioned it. We kind of talked about the gambling, what you have and need, what you don't have and don't need. That is literally my personal financial motto, which is when I'm at a point where I can say, actually, I don't take those risks anymore. Is there upside? Yes. Is the upside worth the risk of the downside? Hell to the no. I'm going to be more careful. So being anti-fragile for me, I think you're absolutely right, mate.

37:08This is precisely what people should be doing, regardless of whether your scenario plays out or it doesn't, some other scenario plays out or a third scenario no one can imagine plays out. If you're prepared properly as an investor, you're okay. Yeah, look, I mean, this is, I always despair when you read the, every second day, is it on news.com or something like that? The 30-year-old with the 40 property empire and look how they did it and you can do it too. And it's like, yeah, but it's all debt, right? The moment that they lose a tenant or they lose an income and they can't service that, The bank is a fair weather friend, right?

37:45They will go, pay us the money. Where's the money? It's like the Chopper movie. No money here. There is no money. Great scene, by the way. Great scene. And I did not do it justice at all. No one does Eric Banner justice. Oh, it's just so weird. He's being Chopper. Yeah, go. But when there is no money, they'll sell you a house. Yeah. And it folds very quickly. What we were talking about the other day was the idea of being bulletproof. The person who has paid off their house or a very significant portion of their house is bulletproof. Yeah. There's nothing you can do. You might think, oh, I own my house.

38:27It's like, do you? Do you really own your house? Like if you've got the 90 % leverage on it. Yeah, exactly. You know, you might legally own the owner, but it is held as collateral. Oh, you don't. The title sits at the back safe. There's a reason for that. You know, and it's just – so you've just got to be careful here. And we have got a culture here, particularly in this country, but also in Canada and UK and in many parts of the West, where it's just sort of like the lesson of the last few decades has been gear to the eyeballs, put it in assets, mainly property, and profit. And it works really well.

39:10It works incredibly well when asset prices are going up, but we have dulled our awareness of downside risks. And when things do unwind, they tend to unwind very quickly, sort of up the stairs and down the elevator shaft kind of stuff. So again, there is subtlety here. There's nuance here. And in our discussion, I'm saying, yeah, there's nothing wrong with appropriate debt. Absolutely not. but leveraging yourself to the eyeballs on assets that are not even generating a positive cash flow i mean it is the height of madness and you sort of you shake your fist at the sky and everyone goes yeah but look at that guy he's got five ferraris and you're living in a crappy rental like who's who's laughing you it's like well correct correct yeah it's kind of good until it isn't and and so i i guess with the so what from all of this kind of um skullduggery that's sort of happening at the macro scene is you can't control for the madness that is happening but you can do your best to to make yourself um uh any fragile and be prepared for whatever comes i i sort of say and as i say that i think that's really good advice for people who have early enough on on the um who were early enough on on that arc there are plenty of people today to like like birth rates are declining and like of course they are of course they are it's like you and your partner at 20 cannot afford to raise a kid where one's going to like be out of work for a while so it's like you know and so these these people like two people graduate as doctors and investment bankers they're still waiting 10 years to get their foot in the door for some dog box in the sky out in the middle of nowhere right and and then they will be up to the eyeballs in sort of in in debt so i just sort of feel as though there'll be people listening to this going okay okay, that's great, but how do I make myself anti-fregister?

41:03I'm barely making my rent. And I am not living a great lifestyle here. I am sacrificing. I am trying my best to save. And at this pace, it'll be 10 years before I have a 10 % deposit. And it's just like I actually don't know what you do in that situation. There is no answer in that situation. And usually the answer will be framed as a political one. Well, the government, quote, unquote, should do something. but the government is just going to conjure up money and throw it at people in a very unfair unsophisticated kind of way and probably just exacerbate the problem uh you know and then and then we have the situation where it's like well we can't give the job seekers more money because then that's going to be bad for inflation and around and around and around we go and we get wider rich gets richer the poor get poorer and we end up where pakistan was not that rich get richer The poor get the picture.

41:54It's absolutely true. I mean, again, I just, history, those that don't study history are doomed to repeat it, you know? And it's sort of like, if I was in the top 1%, I think those that are there should take a more sympathetic view for very selfish reasons. Yeah, yeah. Well, they should do it for actually, for moral reasons, but if you're not going to do that, at least do it for selfish reasons. Yeah, forget everyone else, because there will come a time where it's just like you and your mates are living in a compound, right? Where there's just a whole bunch. You don't go out in the streets at night.

42:29And this is, again, it's really difficult to sort of say this from an Australian context, but it's like the majority of people in the world live in that reality. I've been to Port Moresby, I did Kokoda six years ago, and that's exactly the Port Moresby story. Of course it is. Exactly what it is. It's a story in Brazil. It's a story in Argentina. It's a story in Lebanon. It's a story in Egypt. It's the story in, you name it. Like it's, it's, it is real. It's the story in, in middle America in a lot of like in the Midwest, it is, it is something that again, I know, I know how this sounds, right?

43:01I know how it sounds. And for those that are in a reasonable, comfortable situation, it's just, you know, ha ha ha. But it's more the trajectory. And I am really taking a broad lens here. And my point being is like, this isn't going to happen tomorrow. The zombies aren't coming for you, but you know, 2034, 2044, I don't know. I've got kids. They'll be adults at some point. I don't want them living in that situation. My kids will be fine because, you know, I've been really fortunate in life and I'm saving up a lot of money and I've got some good assets and I'm going to pass it on. So they're great.

43:33They're fine, you know. But they're the exception. Or they will be increasingly in the exception and they will be increasingly despised and rightly so by those that don't have. Because it's like, where's this is not fair? And when, you know, look at the French Revolution. Look at any number of revolutions. It always comes back to the guillotines coming out at some point, right? So, again, if you're in that, do you want to be the top 1 % in Zimbabwe or would you rather be middle class in Norway? I know what I would choose, right? Australia, frankly. Yeah, Australia, right? But we're going, what did they say?

44:09The other thing, the food bank line in Melbourne was like around three blocks and the longer it's ever been. Bigger than the 90s. Again, you have to go back to the 90s to have a real recession. Food Bank, I'm pretty sure it's a seven-figure, like millions of people using Food Bank. It's astonishing. People living in cars. And you speak to any of the charities, right? And they're just like, we're – and again, we're not in – like definitionally, using the big macro picture, we're not in recession. Correct. But for a lot of people, you can put a label on it or not. It's like they're doing it bloody tough.

44:42And they're also doing it in a situation where it's not a question of working harder or getting a second job or doing is just like, because the wall is so high and so slippery. It's just like I challenge anyone to sort of climb out of that. Barring the one in a million genius that invents a quantum, you know, or something that just happens to be that, which is just unrealistic to think that most people are going to be able to do that. Again, it's just I feel as though the trajectory is unsustainable. We need to have a long-term plan and discussion of how we do this. It's probably going to require someone somewhere to take some medicine.

45:18And I think most people should agree that it's those that are extraordinarily fortunate that probably bear the brunt more than most. Because the way I frame it is I think after the fact, you're still the richest. Yeah, totally. After the fact, you've still got everything and any desire fulfilled in life, right? after the fact you've still got an incentive to work hard like that's that's the stupidest argument you have against oh if you do that no one will no one will work because there'll be no one i'm not saying we go to communism of course but we it's just it's just a basic fact we can debate who has to carry who has to take the medicine but someone has to take the medicine because if we live in this la la land of no no it's all good and it's all going to be great and we never have to change anything it's like well the iceberg's on the horizon we're we're plowing towards it at a rate of knots and we don't have to turn right now but we want to start thinking about turning at some point is my only point and even if we even if we miss it it still makes sense to turn because you know you you don't want to go you don't want to sail that close to it that maybe you'll be okay you know i say about regulation all the time attacks if you don't know where the line is you're too close to it it's the same same for the economy it's like maybe it'll be okay but maybe it won't and that's not the trade-off you want to make with the national economy right there are some there are some decisions you can make to say actually let's make sure we'll be okay and work backwards from there and that's the same as climate change right exactly the same kind of thing in this without getting into the debate again these aren't necessarily imminent kind of threats but you know we're on a path here and we should probably adjust a little bit you know at the very least it's like you would run the country the way you'd live your own life you know there was no one who sensibly say i'm going to take the decisions we're taking as a country as an individual you just wouldn't do it and somehow we the worst the worst part about government is actually not the government itself it's the concept of government is them and not us and when you say well they should do this thing you you manage to psychologically distance yourself from that right the government over there are taking too much in tax money or the government should make this decision the government should solve this problem the government should once you do that to your point you kind of make australia becomes this thing over there and you somehow feel like you're disconnected from well i'm not the government so i'm okay so well dude this island is is our you know like the government it might it might be the organized like the organizing layer of our society but we're all on the same island dude literally as well as metaphorically um blaming the government the government should do something the government should do something oh crap now i'm in trouble the government should have done something it's like well this i don't i don't mean we're us or they're them in the sense of any other politicians or just like structurally if the government has debt and you don't, you still got debt dude your island is indebted, it is metaphorically, and to invoke the climate change thing, the water is metaphorically rising the government should, I'll be okay no you don't get to make that distinction dude, this is not how this works, we're all in it together better or worse

48:29Let's go to IPO season, mate. Interesting to keep an eye and ear out for what's happening in markets. And by the way, we're recording this on Wednesday, Thursday, the 13th of June. Overnight, the Wall Street, S &P and the Nasdaq both hit all-time highs during trading. Didn't close at all-time highs, but hit all-time highs during the trading day. Markets here aren't that far away either. it is the most hated bull market but it's probably the most ignored bull market for a very long time largely by the way because people haven't got the money to spend or invest which is why we're not getting the retail headlines i suspect but while prices are high while investment appetites are elevated uh we know guzman and gomez or guzman e gomez i'm not sure how it's pronounced um is going to ipo we think that it's likely virgin will ipo and reading the papers the last couple of days there's a lot of speculation that canva the australian so-called unicorn company um may well also ipo the kind of corporate communications are ramping up lots more presentations the story being told a lot around the place including by cliff obrecht the uh the co-founder um it was doing addressing a conference this week uh there was a lot of talk this sort of thing's happening mate and i i guess it's worthy of thinking about ipos in general as well as these ipos in particular because speaking of human psychology greed is ever present and the general view among a lot of people spurred on by the occasional really great day one sort of stag prophet they call it um if i could get it in the ground getting on the ground floor it's such a such a uh it's it's it's just it's a bloody um what do they call it um hyperbolic um no which is the other like yes i just want i I want to do that.

50:18Yeah, I want to do that. I want to do that. It grabs people's attention so incredibly dramatically. And so the idea of getting in on day one or the ground floor, or even on the IPO of some of these companies is going to stir up the animal spirits in due course, almost certainly, because if they don't, these companies aren't going to IPO. They rely on it to try and generate this hype, to try and get the best price they can for their clients. A reminder, by the way, when someone lists a company, an IPO, they want to get the best price. They're not offering you a good deal. So just be mindful of that.

50:46but um so i will i will sound a general caution i have never invested in ipo i think i'd be very very very very unlikely to ever invest in an ipo um i've had some shares that have gone public when companies demutualized telstra and nib i own both those companies still but i had sold i sold them both actually no i didn't held telstra forever i did sell and i bought some again subsequently um um but you know the i just want people to be careful it's so easy to get caught up in the greed the kind of what if what if they make money and i'm not on the train at the time i better i better buy something i want the sag profit as well um there is a there is a lot to be said for the benefits of companies being listed on stock exchanges otherwise we couldn't invest in them and they couldn't raise money and so i'm not against the idea of companies coming to market just be really careful the entire ipo process is designed literally designed to stoke excitement, to stoke greed, to want you to want these shares.

51:42Why? Because it's an auction. They want lots and lots and lots of people interested, so they can sell it for the highest possible price. And if you're the buyer in that scenario, what do you reckon this is about the price you're likely to be paying? Now, some IPOs start high, go even higher. Some start high and never, ever hit those prices again. And plenty are middling in the middle. So I just want to kind of mention to our listeners, not to kind of see this as this game to be played in one. It is really really i said i don't think i've ever bought an ipo i can't imagine ever buying ipo i guess in the right circumstances if i got a good price i thought the business was wonderful i wouldn't rule it out because why rule out you know why why absolutely rule out something that may possibly work in my favor at some point the chances of it though are really really really really small not only that but a company that goes public has been in private hands by definition so you haven't had the chance to look at it as a public company before all you're seeing is a couple of years worth of financial data and a company's been literally dressed up for sale some bold projections right and it's not even necessarily the best it'll ever be but they're not leaving any money on the table right they are literally they know what the shape of the pain needs to look like by the time they get to listing so they're going to run the business so they can maximize that one page and get you to pay the most money and again maybe it's great maybe the business is fine maybe the future is beautiful but just remember what's going on in the background these really really smart people have run this business probably bought into it run this business and are trying to get the best price they can on the way out, trying to find someone to sell to.

53:10It usually says, too, often in the prospectus, like very often in the prospectus, there's a section that'll say, why are you listening? Yeah. And the most common quoted answer is, so the insiders can sell down. Yes. Now, that's not an evil thing. Correct. They've spent 20 years slogging their guts out. They've got 99 % of their wealth there and they want to exit in some shape or form. Yep. You know, there's also, oh, well, we need capital for growth and we need this and the rest of it. But it's overtly stated that they want out. So they don't want, they probably retain a very significant number of shares, but they don't want all of them.

53:48They need you to buy them. And they're not going to say, it's actually not looking that good. Do you want to buy my shares? It's just not going to happen, right? It's almost a rule of mind. I just don't. I'm like you. I don't think I've ever bought into an IBO and I don't ever feel as a way. almost for all of the reasons you've said on that alone, regardless of how good it looks. It's hard to imagine a seller offering me a good enough price at IPO for me to be interested. And good on them. They're entirely at the best price they can. But there used to be the old line back in the Kerry Packer days for the young people, you're too young and I'm not going to explain it to you because you're too young, you don't matter.

54:21No, I'm kidding. Kerry Packer was the richest man in the country at one point. And the old line was you didn't want to be on the other side of a trade from Kerry Packer. Because if you were buying from Kerry or Selina Kerry, he was getting a better deal than you were. The same is almost always true of private equity. Do you really want to be on the other side of a trade? You know, it's the old Warren Buffett line. You are the exit liquidity. Right, exactly. That's what you are. If you're playing poker, you don't know who the patsy is, you're the patsy. It's like, if you're buying off private equity, there's a pretty good chance they're getting a better deal than you are.

54:50Again, not always. Not always. Not always. But often enough where, I mean, there are some, these things are heuristics for a reason they're rules for a reason exactly yes i also stereotypes because it just it's often not always but often true and and you know that i yeah so guzmany gomez um is is going to i think the ipo valuation is a enterprise value to pro proforma proforma proforma ebitda charlie munger calls ebitda bs earnings by the way because it's it's an acronym that stands for earnings before well let's not count the interest cost let's not count tax let's not count depreciation or amortization of any of our assets but after that that's what our profit is there's a there's a use for it but it is a very It is a very favored metric because it is more malleable in a lot of ways.

55:53And a lot of these costs are very real, very significant, very real sort of cost. But anyway, using that more generous version of profit, it's 32 times. Yeah. Now, how do you get to that? Well, it's got 185 stores in Australia. And I said, well, we're going to have 1 ,000 in the next two decades. Oh, and our margins are going to improve. and we're going to go sell Mexican food to the Mexicans. Okay? Now, I shouldn't throw so much shade here. I actually think it's – I love the franchise, right? I love the food too. Burritos are fantastic. They've done a great job, yeah. And they have done a great job and they deserve all of their success.

56:30And I'm not saying they will never do that. And that valuation may make sense. If they do do that, it's actually probably cheap, right? But it's aspirational. It's not fact. and you're kind of paying up for the fact that they will do that. So they might actually get to a stage where, you know, over the next couple of decades they get to 800 stores. A phenomenal success by any measure. And maybe the margins hold steady, right? But it's not what's been baked in or assumed in an effort to sort of sell this. So I could try, I could say, well, hey, Scott, buy straw man off me. It's$10 million. dollars you know well that doesn't make sense relative to the money that you make it's like oh but next year i'm going to launch in the u.s and i'm going to do this and i'm going to go oh okay oh so you're telling me that in in 10 years time your earnings are going to be a billion yeah oh this is a bargain like well yes if and as you like to say if is the biggest little word in the english language so it's it's just something to i always feel as though it's never too late Like if you miss out on the float, it's now listed on the market.

57:37You can buy any trading day of the week. Correct. And more often than not. And by the way, once you've seen it trade for a while, here's the problem, mate. People think, but what if I wait? What if it goes up in the meantime? And is that, honestly, we are, we're not, I've said so many times, I've got to refine this line, but effectively, successful investing is the ability to control your evolutionary urges. That's all it is, right? Because we start with, but what if I miss out? and that fear of missing out, literally FOMO, is far worse psychologically, not financially, terrible financially, worse psychologically than actually waiting and seeing and that is why, that's exactly what they're preying on.

58:14Like that's the point, right? So when you jump in, because well, what if I miss out? What if you don't? What if the price goes down? And we don't, we can't hold those two thoughts in equal measure in our heads. The FOMO just crowds out everything else and that's why this is, It's why it works, why marketing works, frankly. But that's the challenge, right? One of the things I try to console myself with, because, I mean, I fight against these urges. I think everyone, unless you're a complete robot, you know, like all of us face these challenges. But you've got to remind yourself that regardless of where we are in the economic cycle, regardless of what the market is doing or whether it's up or down, every single day there is an opportunity.

58:53Yes. Every single day. Now, I don't know what the best opportunity, You don't know, but they're out there. And you've got to remember that they're out there. And that for every day that goes past, you miss a bunch of opportunities. And that's okay. Make your peace with that. You know, when people go fishing, that hook is dangling past some of the biggest fish that just don't bite, right? You just miss out. But that's not the point. And I feel as though this idea to get now, I must get in now, or I'm going to miss out. And if I don't do it, I'll never have another chance again. There's always opportunity.

59:23There is always at the top of the market, at the bottom of the market. You know, okay, there's different degrees of opportunity. That's absolutely true. But there is always opportunity. And if Guzmini Gomez goes to the moon from the float and this is the best price that you'll ever have the chance to get into, okay, that'll suck. But guess what? You also missed out on NVIDIA. You also missed out on Google. You also missed out on, you know. Even you could have otherwise bought, correct. Make your peace with it. Make your peace with it. But know that tomorrow there will be another opportunity and it's out there.

59:54And that's the fun of direct investing. Go find it, right? Get in there and find it before anyone else does. And even when you're successful and you do find it, it's not like the market the next day is going to go, oh, we realize the error of our ways. It will take time for that particular fruit to ripen. But, yeah, the FOMO is what gets me with these things. And if we, when we're doing this podcast in several years' time, and we've had a few annual reports, we've had some time to sort of assess things, I might be the biggest advocate. It could be the biggest holding in my portfolio at that point in time.

1:00:34And it might even be so at a point where I'm buying in at higher than the current price. But I might be buying in at a time and at a price where I can at least have greater conviction. and for me that's worth a lot rather than the potential of maybe or what if, you know, because, you know, I don't know. Hope is not an investment strategy as I like to say. Yeah, it's a great line. This is the other thing, by the way. I really, really, I love the business. I love the food and I'm hoping, I would like to be a shareholder. I'd absolutely like to be a shareholder. Does anyone have to rush out and be a shareholder now?

1:01:10No. If it goes up from$22 to$40, will I be disappointed? Probably, yeah. but I'm not gonna if it falls to 15 I'll be equally I'll be happy hey let me ask you this what's gonna happen go on when did you buy your Berkshire shares I bought them I bought the first I think you know oh geez oh six or five I think so 35 40 years after it started yeah correct that's right so at a price where it had already gone up 10 20x yes Do you know what I mean? Like, it's just like, would have you liked to have gone back into a time machine when you were 18 and put all your money in it then? Yeah, but let me ask you this.

1:01:53How's your investment gone? Very nicely. Yeah, right? Like it doesn't, you know. Exactly right. The best time to plant an oak tree is 50 years ago. The second best time is today, right? And there's such wisdom in that kind of stuff. So I think we flogged that horse to death, but hopefully the point is well made. we have um speaking of expensive though i i won't be buying guzman gobe's on price although i love the business uh speaking of expensive i'm not i think it's actually probably the cheapest of the three in all likelihood i say cheapest in inverted commas because virgin will probably list a lower pe but it's a far worse business and canva is probably going to astronomical number despite the fact it's probably gonna have a four billion dollar valuation um And again, it's kind of gone.

1:02:38Sorry, man. I was just going to say, I wouldn't go near Canva. I'll tell you why in a minute, but go ahead. No, go on. Do it now. Was it you and I were having a conversation, someone, what businesses are most at risk of disruption from AI? Yeah. Graphic design, yeah. Graphic design, man. Even on, if you go to, everyone listening to this has WhatsApp. I'm pretty confident, 90%. So WhatsApp now has an AI bot integrated into it. You can talk to it. Say, draw me a picture of whatever. Oh, wow. And it'll draw your picture. Oh, yeah, it's cool. I mean, it's not great, but it just came out. But it's like, Canvas dead in my view.

1:03:18And I think they see the writing on the wall. This is pure navel-gazing speculation. Maybe they integrate it and they do it better than anyone. I was going to say, I would suspect, if you're the big dog, you have every chance, like Microsoft's done, taking a stake in ChatGPT or OpenAI that does ChatGPT. Right. I wouldn't want to say Canva is obviously necessarily dead, but you're right that they're going to have to ride this wave well because they're going to ride the wave to the beach and they're going to get dumped. So when - And that's a very big risk to put in front of a$4 billion valuation.

1:03:48Exactly. So when Canva came along, and I think the founder was amazing. They started off, they saw a problem. All the great businesses start with seeing a problem. Yeah, yeah. And they imagine a world that could be better. Gosh, it's really hard to make a yearbook for our high school. Like it's really, really difficult. That's how Canva started. Yes, yes. She's amazing. And hats off. Like I just think I'm so in awe of those kind of people that do it and actually make the dream a reality. And now Canva as a product is fantastic. If you want to like, you know, create a deck, a poster, anything, a scrapbook anything like that it's just it's really really cool but we are very fast moving into a world where it's like hey chat gpt do this for me and it's going to do a really good job now maybe canvas survives in that kind of world maybe they're the best at doing it but i can't imagine the margins are as good or the differences are as vast exactly and i don't know if the growth that they experienced in the early days of going from this little thing in perth to you know nasdaq listed well what you know a massive uh multinational company i just yeah i feel as though i think it's a bold it's a bold bit speaking of burritos though much harder to disrupt like chat gbt ain't making a burrito anytime soon right well until we got replicators uh star trek sure true up until that point i think and that's kind of it mate i think you know the branding is hard and morningstar uh by the way so just for fun Morningstar released, I think you asked me yesterday, it was reported on yesterday or today, their first coverage of this saying they reckon it's worth$15 a share.

1:05:31Now, the shares are going to be, the capital's going to be raised at$22. So you're already looking at, in theory, a 50 % premium to what, now Morningstar could be dead wrong, right? It could be a$50 stock. So let's not pretend. So yeah, but the key point here is that that's the risk of the business is whether they can build and sustain a brand. And, you know, that's, as you say, easier to do with a physical. A, it's a physical product. You're putting it in your mouth. And that requires, firstly, a lot of trust. But secondly, taste is one of those things that's very hard to replicate. Do you care which AI-driven graphic design software you use?

1:06:11Of course you don't. You might be more comfortable with one than the other. But here's the thing. Once you can tell it to do, you need no skills. Who cares, right? And maybe you do try another burrito. Maybe the other burrito is better. Maybe they lose market share. Maybe Goodsman is dead in five years. Time for all I know. By the way, Taco Bell tried to come to Australia and pretty much died in the attempt. Yeah, because it was terrible. Oh, I love my Mexican food. Right, right. No, no one in Mexico is going to look at that. So, Guzman, you know, and they're doing a good job. I love the business.

1:06:40I hope it's cheap enough to buy. I want to buy some shares. Buying what you know, I've had more than my share of Guzman Burritos in my life and I probably am not finished yet. It's really good. Like, I think it's got a great chance of being a successful business, but it does matter what you pay. There is almost no business that you can pay any price for and expect to do well, including Berkshire. If Berkshire was a trillion dollars a share in 2006 when I bought mine, I'd be underwater today. Massively. You know, it absolutely, it must matter. It must matter. But I think, Virgin, of the three, mate, I would buy Guzman before Canva and Canva before Virgin.

1:07:14How would you rank that? Yeah, that's the easiest question you've ever asked me. Yep, 100%. I mean, I wouldn't be happy with particularly any of the holdings, but if you held a gun to my head, I was like, I guess I'm going to go to Burrito. You must do it. Yeah, correct, correct. It's not hard, is it? No. So yeah, be careful of IPOs. Don't get caught up with FOMO. Just cool your jets. Buy the stuff when it makes sense to buy. It's a bit like dividend reinvestment, or not dividend, capital raisings. When I can send you something in the mail, say, hey, can I have$10 ,000, please? You kind of go, oh, maybe I should consider that.

1:07:44Yet there's another 1 ,700 investment opportunities today who aren't sending you a letter in the mail, and which might be better investment ideas. And the same with IPOs, just because everyone's talking about it, you kind of feel, again, this is human psychology. It's stupid. We feel compelled to find, to make a decision, to come to a conclusion, to say, oh, it's a thing. Should I buy it or not? Our brains would explode. If you had someone who sent you a letter every day from the 1 ,800 companies in the ASX that said, we're going to buy some of our shares today, you'd go mad. But it's that, what is it?

1:08:16Recency bias, maybe, or availability bias. It's like, it's in front of you. It's like, I feel like I have to make it. No, you don't. Yeah. And there's an anchoring bias there too, because virtually every single capital raise, 99.99999 % of cases, you get a discount to the most recent trading price or the 30-day average price. Clever. Isn't it clever? So it's like the market's just being the market and buyers and sellers are trying to figure out, and sometimes it's up, sometimes it's down. And in the space of a year, it will fluctuate to an insane degree. But, oh, we need some more money. It's like, well, it's$30 now.

1:08:48We'll give it to you for$28. that's a six seven percent discount oh i'm gonna buy it why do you think they're gonna be use that capital in a sensible way do you think it makes sense relative to the future trajectory of the business no it's cheap no it's but it's cheaper than what i can buy on market you know it's just like it's insanity and it's just like why do they do it because it works it works it works so well right and by the way if we're rational you should be annoyed the company's offering other people shares cheaper than you could have bought them on the market for yesterday i mean the company can use the money well don't get me wrong there's times when it's absolutely worth them doing it because they can have a 30 share price sell them for 28 and create 32 worth of value so of course they should do it right of course they should do it yep but but rather than being oh my goodness this is great i should buy one it should actually be you're doing what you're selling them for what yeah i think they're worth this you're selling for less than that what what's wrong with you people and that's the key one right the number of times i've heard people ostensibly otherwise sensible investors go yeah but i'm just gonna to buy it then i'm going to sell it and it's easy money like like if there's easy like we started the podcast by talking there's no such thing as easy money right and and the fact that everyone else is probably thinking that as well and the fact that there will be a dilutionary impact that that mean that there'll be a pro forma reduction in share price all else being equal just by virtue of the fact that there are more shares that are out there tends to make it a pretty precarious strategy and one that only and just doesn't just doesn't work that well most of the time yeah so it's just like it's the height of it's the height of hubris to kind of think that i can do it no one else has thought of this yes but i've thought of it like and yet by the way that's what every company does i mean the the height of hubris is the hubris that takes apple from steve jobs's garage to to global domination right nvidia some blokes gone what if you had a processing chip that was just for graphics and someone's gone really mate intel would have already thought of that by now what the hell's wrong with you go back to work you know and yet the nvidia is a $3 trillion company.

1:10:42Again, you're not wrong, mate. It's the exception that proves the rule rather than the reverse, right? It's also, by the way, why some of these companies are so dominant and so worthwhile and do so incredibly well. Because if you do strike gold, and by the way, don't invest in people looking for gold. If you find gold, and they're going to let me move out of mining particularly. If you find metaphorical gold and you can keep mining it at a good price and people will pay you a lot of money for it and you've got a low cost, that's exactly what successful businesses are. They are the end result of this.

1:11:09And then you get to look at them on the ASX and go, so you're going to show me all that information about them? And I can then use my judgment to see whether I want to own it? That's a pretty cool system. We should do more of that. It's like, well, it's kind of the share market. That's the beauty of it. Doesn't mean there's not some rubbish there as well, by the way. Yeah. No, well said. Well said. Be careful out there. Be careful out there. Hill Street Blues. Going full circle, by the way, for those, again, young people who don't understand old people stuff, you can turn off now. Do you ever watch Hill Street Blues, mate, when you were a kid?

1:11:38I did, yeah. There you go. so I did my scam so we go back to the beginning my scam kind of you know alter ego I wrote an email just to our members and wrote it put on the website said hey look there's scams out there just please be careful and I did finish it with exactly that with the scientist line of let's be careful out there so you're taking us beautifully full circle with both the podcast and the email and maybe we should call this one done only though if you'll come back on Sunday can we do that deal it's guaranteed I definitely will be here I am very glad to hear it Until Sunday, enjoy your weekend, and we will see you then.

1:12:13Fool on. See you then. The Motley Fool and people appearing in this program may have positions in the companies mentioned. General advice only. Please speak to your financial professional to understand how it may pertain to your situation. Subscribe to the free newsletter at fool.com.au forward slash listener. The Motley Fool operates under Financial Services License 400691.

From the publisher

– The US economy is too strong for rate cuts...

– ... And ANZ pushes out it's Australian forecasts

– How to be antifragile in an uncertain world

– We consider IPOs, including GYG, Virgin and Canva

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Motley Fool Money

All 403 episodes
How to be antifragile in an uncertain world. June 14, 2024Motley Fool Money · 1 h 13 min
Listen in VO