In short
Podcast Summary: Motley Fool Money - How We Invest (June 27, 2025)
Overview In this episode of Motley Fool Money, hosts Scott Phillips and Andrew Page discuss their fundamental approaches to investing, exploring personal philosophies and strategies that guide their decisions. The conversation is characterized by a mix of insights, humor, and candid discussions about the complex world of investing.
Key Themes and Concepts
- Acknowledgment of Uncertainty
- Humility in Knowledge: Both hosts emphasize the importance of recognizing that no one has all the answers in investing. They stress being humble and adaptable, acknowledging that market conditions can change rapidly.
- Personal Evolution as Investors
- Learning and Growth: Andrew discusses how he has evolved as an investor over the years, underscoring the necessity of continuously learning and improving. Both hosts agree that being a better investor requires constant adaptation and awareness of changing conditions.
- Circle of Competence
- Understanding Limits: The concept, popularized by Warren Buffett, suggests that investors should operate within their knowledge sphere. Andrew and Scott emphasize the need to recognize the boundaries of their expertise and not invest in industries or companies they do not fully understand.
- Quality of Businesses
- Investing for the Long Term: Andrew focuses on investing in companies for the long haul, prioritizing quality businesses that can endure market fluctuations. He argues that the best advantage for individual investors is their ability to think long-term compared to institutional investors who are often driven by short-term performance metrics.
- Valuation and Margin of Safety
- Investment Philosophy: Both hosts highlight the importance of establishing a valuation for a business before investing. They advocate for buying shares at a price below intrinsic value, incorporating a margin of safety to protect against unforeseen events.
- Cyclical vs. Structural Problems
- Market Dynamics: Scott distinguishes between cyclical issues (temporary market downturns) and structural problems (fundamental flaws in a business). He advises investors to seek opportunities in cyclical downturns but be wary of structural issues that might indicate deeper problems.
- Investor Psychology
- Emotional Resilience: Both Scott and Andrew underline the importance of maintaining a level head during market volatility. They discuss strategies for avoiding emotional decision-making, which can lead to poor investment choices.
- Long-Term Value Creation
- Returns vs. Price: The hosts stress that in the long run, a company's share price will reflect its ability to generate value. They encourage focusing on long-term growth potential rather than short-term price movements.
Key Takeaways
- Continuous Learning: Investors must commit to lifelong learning and adapting their strategies.
- Know Your Limits: Stay within your circle of competence and avoid investments in areas where you lack understanding.
- Focus on Quality: Invest in quality companies with solid fundamentals and long-term growth potential.
- Beware of Emotional Decisions: Maintain a calm perspective during market fluctuations to avoid hasty decisions.
- Understand Market Dynamics: Differentiate between cyclical and structural problems to identify sound investment opportunities.
- Valuation Matters: Always establish a fair value for investments and incorporate a margin of safety.
Conclusion The episode serves as a comprehensive guide to the hosts' investment philosophies, offering valuable insights for both novice and experienced investors. Their discussions encourage a thoughtful, disciplined approach to investing, emphasizing the importance of knowledge, patience, and adaptability in navigating the financial markets.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:07Welcome to Motley Fool Money, the podcast that really isn't that sure about anything. Well, I'm not anyway. I'm Scott Phillips from The Motley Fool. He is a little more certain. He knows a few more things. He is, of course, the man who built a multi-trillion dollar business on a single idea that if you create Australia's premier online investment club, if you called it strawman.com, despite the Wizard of Odd references, you can become the richest man in the country. Mr. Page, Mr. Andrew Page, Esquire, if we don't mind. How are you? The richest man in the country. A little hyperbolic, but I'll take it.
0:41It'd be nice to have a non-mining related mogul, right? It would. Oh, MCB and Scott Farquhar are doing their best. That's true. That's very true. Who else have we got? Twiggy and Gina. Everything else is rocks, mate. Or property. Or property. Houses and holes. That's what we do. That's what we do. Between the Lowys in commercial property and the Triggyboff in residential property. What have you done for me lately, I suppose, is the question. That's fair. Well, until you are atop the rich list, mate, you are spending some time with us on this podcast, which I appreciate even more because this is a pre-recorded podcast.
1:16Now, you always remind me that every podcast is pre-recorded. And despite that, I still can't get it through my head. So I'm off on holidays. Right now, as you're listening to this, I think, where am I? I don't know. Probably somewhere approaching Darwin with any luck. Good Lord willing, the creaks don't rise. We're spending five weeks. I'm driving for a week solid to get to Darwin. We're spending three weeks on holiday and then driving for a week home. such as the size of Australia, as we all know. So yes, I'm probably almost the beginning of the holiday part as opposed to just the driving slog of the part.
1:48I won't ask now. I'll ask some point in the past, but in our future because we're in that twilight zone of pre-records where we don't really know what day it is or what we've already said or haven't said. I will ask for reading recommendations. If you have any, I'd love to hear them from you in a different forum. Maybe we're overdue for an investment book podcast. I don't know. Anyway, so basically we're doing this well in advance. Uh, and we kind of, one thing we've done before, I'm pretty sure we've done it before, maybe more once is we'll talk about how we invest. And I did, uh, you know, you, you, you'll give three thoughts, I'll give my thoughts, so yeah, we go.
2:21But the reason I started by saying, I'm not sure anything is as much as we kind of think that we know that we know that we know, we're also, I'm going to say on your behalf, I'm going to take a bit of, take a bit of hubris, uh, for, for both of us and say, we're both humble enough to know that we don't know at all. and we also expect that things have changed, will change, do change. But we are going to try and just share with our listeners. We had a listener who asked us ages ago, hey, can you guys do a podcast where you kind of, a couple of episodes where everyone can kind of catch up? You know, so I'm motley for money 101 of some description.
2:53And we don't do enough research or preparation to do that, unfortunately, but there is some value in some of these, you know, pre-recorded episodes. Just kind of take a step back from the daily news. We won't talk about interest rates, at least not in the current tense, which will please Andrew in no end. I won't ask me about the RBA, but just to kind of just step back a bit and go, hey, what are some of the bigger things? What's kind of going on? What do we want to share with our listeners that isn't time sensitive? And we kind of thought as a starting point, we're investors by trade. The Straw Man is an online investment club, as Andrew tells us every now and again.
3:26And the Motley Fool provides investment advice. So, you know, we should have a clue, an idea of how we personally invest. So, mate, I'm going to throw you straight under the bus up front and just simply say, how do you invest? Yeah, it's a really good question. It's something that has definitely evolved and will continue to evolve. And I don't shy away from that. I actually really lean into it. I think there's a real risk in this game of getting a little bit stale. And also the world is way too complex to think you've got it all figured out, right? Like it just is. And I've said to you before, I'm a different and I'd like to think better investor than I was 10 years ago and five years ago.
4:08And I'd like to think I'll be better still. As with anything in life, the more you do it, the more experience you have, you should get better at it. And do you have that thought of, yeah, I've got it all figured out. I never need to do anything differently. It's just the height of hubris. It is the height of hubris. And they're just new things in the world that didn't exist. We really do invest and live at a very interesting juncture in history where the rapidity of technological advancement, geopolitical change, I mean, it's changing really rapidly. So you've got to be pretty agile. Let me hasten to add here, I am not talking about wholesale changes.
4:49The big North Star stuff, I think, is pretty resolute. I can't imagine the really big picture stuff sort of changing. And I think that the real, the core truths of investing will be the same now as they were 100 years ago, will be the same in 100 years time, right? So that's a lot of a, it's a long preamble. But I do think that you want to, you want to forever be a student. You know, you are always on that journey of self-improvement. And you need to walk this fine line of having an open enough mind, a curious enough mindset to kind of recognize your, you know, weaknesses, trying to address them, trying to continue to learn, but still have the courage of your convictions to go, no, I'm right.
5:38And I'm going to actually put money on this to bet that I'm right. Right. Yes. Yes. Which is, which is, and I always like the phrase, you know, strong opinions loosely held in life and in general, but definitely for investing. So yes, I've got strong opinions on what I like, but whether this is true or not, I don't know, because the easiest person to fool is yourself. But I'd like to think that no matter what investment it is or how high conviction I am, that presented with new facts or a reinterpretation of the facts, a different reasoning of the facts, that I could pretty rapidly change my mind.
6:18that is I think is is quite obvious and yet also very very very difficult you know one of the surest ways to to come unstuck in this game is is through pig-headedness you know no no no I'm right now it's down I'm going to average down it's not a loss until I sell etc etc etc and you average yourself all the way down to zero you know just just because your ego couldn't take the hit or just because you couldn't acknowledge to yourself that, okay, I got it wrong, which is also something, it's a long preamble, which is also something you've got to make peace with at the beginning. Often quote this, but Peter Lynch says, if you're good in this game, you're right six times out of 10.
7:02And that is absolutely true. So you're going to be wrong. I think once you make peace with that fact, when it inevitably comes up, you go, oh, that was one of the ones that didn't turn out too well. Actually, just before coming on online with you here today, I noticed that Jerry Sackis at Playside Studios has just resigned after the share prices plummeted. And I thought I actually had a small position in them. I thought they were an interesting company. I thought they had upside. The thesis is so completely busted at this point. Right. Which is fine, right? The natural inclination is to go, no, no, no, no.
7:35Now it's even cheaper. And wow, the market's overreacting. And, you know, you've got to be greedy when others are fearful. And you trot out all of these sort of truisms, but really they're just there to preserve your ego, you know? And it's like, ah, okay, I got it wrong. Dust yourself off and back to it. And also, did I get it wrong because there was just the always, you know, the future is always unknowable. Something came out of left field. You just had to, in good faith, you know, change your stance on things. or was there something that you could have known? Now, because they're two very different reasons to be wrong.
8:17One, I was wrong because, oh, it turns out behind the scenes, the CFO was cooking the books, right? Like, well, you can't see that from the outside. So you can give yourself a little bit of, you know, you can forgive yourself a little bit for that. That's just one of those things. And that will happen again and again and again and again. It's like, whoa, not only did I not see that coming, the market didn't see it coming, And there was nothing in the public arena that would have given you hints as to that was happening. And then there are the mistakes. It's like, how did I miss that? Like, that was there for all to see.
8:48In fact, there were people out there saying that this is a risk, this is a risk. And, you know, so, yeah, as I say, a long preamble. Look, let me start at the beginning. I won't go through the whole process. We'll go back and forth. But I guess the first thing for me is just the acknowledgement of my circle of competence, which is something that Buffett talks about a lot. It's not the size of that circle. It's knowing where the boundaries are, as Uncle Warren likes to say. And it's so important, too. So sometimes companies will come up and they sound great. They sound super interesting. But it's an instant no for me.
9:26not because I'm I I have a a strong opinion on on the the company not doing well it's just I just can't handicap that I I don't know maybe maybe this is the new thing maybe they go and conquer the world but I I at least at this point can't can't make that judgment I can't handicap that in any way so so I think that is really really really important can I add to that mate just quickly um i love that you said that the other thing i think people miss a lot is not only have to be competent at it but you have to believe you're able to tell when the market is wrong so you have to you don't have to know better than everybody there is a lot of people believe that somehow to be an investor you'll be the best investor you have to win that investing you'll be number one right you don't have to be you don't have to be even close to to not you don't be in the top quartile frankly yeah um to do really well and the top half is average and you You know, you don't have to be, but the thing about circle of competence and just listening to you talk about it then is when you put that into place, can I understand Woolworths?
10:29Yes. Okay. But can I understand it well enough to know when I know something that someone else doesn't know? So that's where, I love the phrase circle of competence, but I almost feel like it's not quite enough. And I think a lot of people make this mistake because they're experts in their field. So I know engineering, I know retail, I know manufacturing, I know gold mining, whatever it is, you can know the thing and so you've got that competence right and and that's good and you kind of almost can't you need the competence as very at the very least but it's still that extra little bit of i need to know willies well enough to know the business and to have an informed view on its valuation yes and i'm looking and by the way everyone does that so what i'll throw on top your circle comments variant perception which is we're going to come up with a better phrase for it it's it's technically correct but it's also a bit a little bit highfalutin um just that idea of like I need to be able to find when the market is wrong about that thing, not just know that thing.
11:24And I'll have to take an unpopular view, which I'm sure we'll get to in a minute, but I just want to kind of throw that on top of the circle of competence because to my mind it does add that extra little bit of something, which is knowing it is mandatory effectively in our view, but it's not enough. And I just want to add that to it. Keep going. I love that. I love that. You've got me thinking too, because it's more than the first level thinking in type interpretation because so often you'll say, oh, yeah, I understand. It's a retailer. What's there to get? And then you think, yeah, but usually there's usually one or two insights that really make it kind of click.
12:00So, for example, you said before, maybe I am the world's best, I don't know, I'm making this up on the spot. I'm the world's best coder. And I have a very, very, very strong opinion that Python is the best coding language and that all of the best software is written on that. And I also know that the best backend infrastructure is on AWS, et cetera, et cetera. I'm very quickly getting out of my circle. But, and I've seen this happen before where they'll go, people who really understand something, go, well, this technology is not that great. And yet the company behind it continues to just knock it out of the park.
12:37And what you're missing there is it's just like, yeah but no one really cares about that back-end stuff does it does it does it fulfill the need i mean you can get into a lot of fun discussions with with apple fanboys right exactly that is just saying and i'm not having a go i've honestly i've got so much respect for apple apple is probably one of the best companies the planet has ever seen right let me just put that out there their products are awesome i get it right i get it you don't know you know um but you know i i think a balanced objective view of the technology would say, is it better than, I don't know, Samsung, I'll pick the most obvious competitor.
13:13It's like, yeah, probably. You know, is it twice as good? I don't know. I don't know. But if your analysis is purely on the technical specifications, you kind of miss the broader picture. At the recent Berkshire meeting, Buffett called Apple a consumer company with a tech wrapper. Totally. And that's the insight I'm talking about here. So it's sort of like there's the first level thought of like, oh, Apple, it's a technology company. They make electronic products, electronic hardware. It's like, no, they don't. Well, I mean, yeah, they do, but that's not what they do. They're really a brand more than anything else.
13:52They're really a consumer products company that happens to be very reliant on technology. And obviously that's what it's all about. But people buy Apple because it looks really cool, because of the image that's associated with it. Totally. It's all brand. It's all brand. You want to be seen to have, whether it's the latest handbag or whatever that thing is. There is something that goes beyond the component parts of what it is. So I guess what I'm trying to say here is it's kind of a variant perception, to your point, but more just like a more fundamental perception of not getting hung up on what it is specifically that's sort of behind this.
14:37I like to always start with the idea of, this is where I say things, this is one of those things that never will change. Whether someone was selling a stone-tipped axe in 8 ,000 BC or they're selling a quantum computer chip in the 2030s or so, So the business, the only business that works is the business that solves a problem or satisfies a need or a want for a consumer. And consumers, like all of us, we're just irrational, doesn't need to make sense. But it's got to scratch an itch for you. What's the itch? How many different ways can I scratch it? Why am I going to scratch it with your particular product?
15:23and it goes well beyond, again, just the specs and the price. There's a lot to that kind of stuff. So I feel as though I need to have a good handle on that issue there. What's the problem that you're solving? I'll throw it back to you. I like that a lot, Matt. I'm going to add to you, actually. So we're recording this just after the federal election and I'm not going to get into the politics of it. Don't worry. but I had a conversation with people about why the election might have gone the way it went and there was talk about the policies of the different parties and one of the responses was think like a VC it's all about the marketing and the distribution and just to your point about Apple and you know is it about the now it's everything right but having the best policies like having the best product is not enough to your exact point The other thing, by the way, Buffett's thing about Apple is, he talks about this tangent really quickly.
16:21It's being the most valuable real estate. The screen, the nine-inch screen, where they are, how big screens are, is the most valuable real estate in the world. Yes, yes. Per square inch. Yep. And so that combination of great brand, people love it. They're going to use it all day, every day. It's in their pockets. I can own the company that puts those in their pockets. That's, again, technically great, sure. but it was it was those two that combination of things far more than the tech itself that mattered mate for me um i love that you started with circle of competence actually because i was going to start with um i was gonna start with company attributes or the way i think about investing but you're right going back to who am i i think is really really important so i will i will start by saying how i invest and this is obvious and i hope it's repetitive to everyone who's listened before because if it's not i'm doing a really bad job um how do i invest I invest in companies.
17:11I invest for the long term. Now, that sounds obvious. And I'm glad it sounds obvious to people who are listening. Like, yeah, of course, how else should you do it? As you kind of made the point in the intro, that's not how everyone does it, right? And so when I say invest in companies, I want to be really clear. I've said this before, but this is a bit of a summary, a bit of a wrap, a bit of a, you know, whatever. Hopefully, I'm pulling together different threads. I invest in companies, as do you. And everyone says, what else do you invest in? The difference here is thinking about the business as a business as a business.
17:41Thinking about the idea of the, well, it's the retailer, not just W-O-W, the ASX stock code. Thinking about how it does what it does. And there's two things. Would you be happy holding it if the share market closed for 10 years is the way to look at it, right? Yeah. And so, again, I mean, I expect the price to, I don't know, well, I don't have a view on the price, but for a buyer company, I expect the price to go up. but the value to increase more importantly we'll get back to value in a second so but it's the business not the stock code and that matters for a whole lot of things matters because you don't want to get caught in trying to look at weekly lines on a on a on a chart uh you don't want to worry about the 90 day momentum or the 180 day candlestick butterfly iron condor um stochastic chart thingy dover um because it's about the company right it's about the business the other reason that it's about the business, this is something that doesn't get said often enough, is the business is not the balance sheet.
18:38The business is not the P &L. Now, it is those things, but it's not only those things. And why I say that is because, and you've kind of alluded to this, it's about the future, not the past. As we say, if you buy a company today, the past is irrelevant because all you get are the returns from today. From today as a company, from today's share price, that's what matters to what your returns are going to be. There's no point saying, I bought the shares, they went nowhere, but it was a great company for the previous 30 years before that. Thanks, Chief, but you haven't helped me, you haven't made any money.
19:07So again, when I'm talking about the business here, I'm saying, yes, I mean, again, I don't for a second want to devalue the importance of the balance sheet and the penile. I tell you a lot about the business, a lot of it, and it's the fundamental starting point, but it's where to from here. And it kind of goes back to a little bit of the circle of confidence stuff you talked about, mate, which is where is the value creation? What does the future look like? I've used the example of Coca-Cola Amatil a dozen times. I bought shares because it was a fantastic business and it was and it remained at Fenton.
19:34It was bought by the European bottler. But it was just super dominant. It was super saturated. It was in every fridge and every service station, supermarket, corner store, fast food joint in the country. So where was the growth? And so it's all those things together. It's the business and the company. It's not the stock code, it's the company. It's not even the company, it's the business. And again, that sounds like the same thing but it's really not the business. It's the stuff they do. It's not Woolworths Group Limited. It is the checkout chick, the bloke at the fruit and veg thing, the lady at Big W, the bloke at the cheese counter, whatever they're doing.
20:09It's those things that are the business. It's what does it do, not just what is the corporate entity. So there's that. And the long-term thing that you kind of alluded to with the 10-year thing, I suspect, I have a very firm conviction but nothing is absolute, that it's been said by others more eloquent than me, the best advantage we have as individual investors is time. Yes. Because we're in a market where the vast, vast, vast bulk of people who are trading on a daily basis, well, there's day traders who are doing ultra short rubbish. There are the fund managers who are almost as short because they've got three and six and 12 month numbers.
20:43And I've given them a hard time before, partly because they deserve it, partly because they don't deserve it, but they're in an industry where their investors will walk if their one year returns are crap. So they've got to play that game, whether they're trying to play that game or both, maybe they don't realize they have to, or they don't realize they, whatever it is, they are playing that game. And they're playing that game, you know, we don't have to play that game. And so if you think then again about the business and you think about the ability to understand what a business's future looks like, I have a much stronger sense of what Woolies will be in five years' time rather than what's going to sell tomorrow or next week or next quarter.
21:18Same store sales growth 3.2 % over the quarter on quarter or is it 3.3 %? And who cares? And the other thing on that is that the share price will then move based on sentiment, not on results. Ben Graham's famous quote, in the long run, the market is a weighing machine. In the short term, it's a voting machine. In other words, in the short term, you ask people how they feel. In the long term, you're saying how much they... Do you like gold? Yes, a lot now. Okay. Long-term weighing machine, how much gold do you actually have? Let's actually measure that. Let's measure what you actually own. So that's important.
21:49I just wanted to play that out. So over the long term, and by the way, why does the long term matter? Because if you write about the business that I just talked about, then the business roughly right if it grows meaningfully in some direction and you're roughly right about that the best chance you have of being rewarded for that is over the long term because price will follow value over the long term more often than not far more often than not again no guarantees there's nothing absolutely investing either by the way it's another little nugget to take away but price will follow value almost certainly for most companies over the long term you've got to give enough time for that to play out I'll go further every single time every And the challenge I'll put out is find for me a company whose earnings per share have grown at a consistent attractive rate for a long period of time.
22:35And the share price hasn't broadly tracked that. But you will not find an example. You might even find an example of five years where something was just like so stupidly valued. Actually, Microsoft in 2000 is a great example of this. 15 years. We know that that's gone on to be one of the biggest companies in the world. It's a fantastic business. It gushes cash flow like you wouldn't believe. a balance sheet like a fortress. But yeah, it did nothing for a long time from a shareholder perspective, but you overpaid. But my point remains, in the long run, it still was a great investment, you know, because it just, it is a, there is a financial gravity where the things can get really disjointed, really out of whack, but they always come back to it.
23:17And so you can't, you're left as an investor going, well, you've got to, you've got to have a guess here, buddy. you've got to have a guess about the future. Do you want to guess what a group of irrational, emotional, skittish, hairless apes are going to think in the year 2032? Or is it easier to try and figure out what this company might be earning more or less roughly at that point in time? They're both hard. They're both hard. One is a lot harder than the other, you know? What did Newton say? I can calculate the motion of the stars, but I can't predict the madness of man. I've butchered that, but it's something which is very true, right?
23:58And it's very much at the heart of what we're talking about. So, yes. Sorry, I interrupted you there, but I love your point. Did you have any more to say? No, over to you. The other thing I wanted to mention quickly, just on my first point there, I thought of it afterwards, was I think Maccas is a great example, right? of the idea of, and I say this with the utmost love, the burgers are crap. They're awful. They're just awful, right? I do hear the burgers are better at Hungry Jack's, but I couldn't. They're all bad. And I'm not someone who has Maccas on a pretty reasonable basis. I know I'm not getting a gourmet experience here, right?
24:34But it's a really good example of, you know, you've got to think about what it, because the easy thing to say there is Maccas are selling burgers. It's like, nope, they're not. They're selling convenience. Yes. They're selling convenience. It's like, no, you're just playing semantics. Like, no, I'm not. I'm very much not playing semantics. That is what they sell. And they know this more than anything else. And consistency, by the way. Yep, absolutely. Absolutely. And so - I'll go with a burger at any Macca's, anywhere, quickly, easily, knowing what I'm going to get. I'm going to buy it at Burke or Broom or, you know.
25:07Always the same. It's always the same. Always quick. Super quick, convenient, consistent. That is what you're selling. And this is something that you would be surprised how many boards and management teams you'd meet, I don't think, could really put their finger on what the company does in that vein. They'll say, oh, well, we manufacture widgets for this. But it's like, no, you don't. Not really. I mean, yes, technically. And technically true, as they say, is the best kind of true. But it is deeper than that. So I'm just, I'm trying to, I, I, I, particularly as I've gotten older and I've done this longer and longer, I'm really trying to get to that, to that core truth of what it is you, you are doing.
25:51I like that. Yes. What else can we say? So the other thing I want is you said before, you've got to know thyself, right? Look, to channel Forrest Gump here, I am, I am not a smart man. But you know what love is, Andrew. I'm not a smart man, but I know what value is. And I'm just not. Forest page.
Read the full transcript
26:18And fortunately, you have the luxury of choice. I really don't need, me personally, I think I don't need anything more than 20 stocks in a portfolio. I'm more than happy with 10, frankly. And there's 2 ,200 and something on the ASX. So I can afford to be really fussy. But the very first filter I kind of really have is like, can I get to that answer to the question I just posed before? What do you really do? And if I can't do that, and I can't, I'm going to say at least 70%, probably higher. It's just like too hard pile. I think they've stopped having me on Ausbiz because I'm pretty much convinced that it's because they just want to, bloody hell, mate, just tell me, buy, hold, or sell.
27:02And I'm like, well, it depends. I don't really understand this. I need to understand that better. And it's a really frustrating answer, right? But it's kind of the best answer, I would say, right? Because I can either, I can have this false hubris or I can be honest. And as I said at the beginning, like the easiest person to fool is yourself, right? Because you want to be spot. And we feel as though, you know, it's like when you're at the Olympics and you're on the balance beam, right? There are extra points for degree of difficulty. In investing, it's not, right? You can invest in the dumbest, simplest business, or you can invest in the most complicated business, and you might get a 10 % average return out of both of them.
27:45Which was the better one? It was clearly the one that was easier. is that there is no added bonus. There is no added return because you decided that you were going to invest in this really weird boutique financial services company that's doing, I don't know, something with stable coins and they've got this relationship. And it's very hard, right? And particularly if you're not familiar with that industry, it's sort of like, I just don't get what you do. So I've really got to understand that basic, basic, basic thing. And life's too short. Life's too short to really think, well, I don't understand it, but I'm going to spend the next six weeks doing a massive deep dive into it to try and understand.
28:27If you want to do that, you can. I think there's something satisfying in learning about anything kind of new. But keep it simple. Keep it simple. And if you're really not getting a good sense of something, chuck it in the bin and move on. There is always something else around the corner.
28:48forward slash listener.
28:52The next thing I'm going to talk about is quality.
28:57I obsess over quality businesses where I can find. Now, you don't always get everything. The other thing about investing, you don't always get everything in your checklist. Like, just do that up front, actually. Perfect is the enemy of the good. Right, and someone's going to say quality. Someone's going to say, well, that's not as high quality as this for that reason, or that's not this. So I will say I obsess over quality, and then I will say, well, some of the companies I own aren't necessarily quality the way that everything's got hairs on it right so but but i think for me it's if here's the other thing we talked about long term before right and you have to if you're going to be a long-term investor if you're going to hold companies for the long term inherent in that in that intention is to have businesses that can and are likely to perform for an extended period of time because you know if you're if you're if you're a value investor and good luck to you, I'm neither because I'm either a value or a growth investor.
29:47If you're a value investor, you're looking for $0.80, right? The problem is when you get $0.80, even if you win, it goes to$0.93,$0.95, so it's like, well, okay, I've done what else I'm going to do. I'll sell now and look for something else. Now, that's a nice return still, but it means you have to keep finding more and more and more things every time, every time you look good, find something else, find something else, sell that, sell that, sell that, buy something else, sell that, sell that, sell that. You just pulled a rabbit out of the hat, right? Now do it again. Now do it again. well, right?
30:11So I'm not saying you can't do it. I'm just saying that for me, that's hard. Particularly, frankly, it's not our market. There's not that many companies that regularly can be undervalued by enough. Now, when I say that, and this is where I'm going to still say I have the elements of value in my investing because I'm not going to buy things that are overvalued. I was going to say, there is no other rational... Anyone who says they're not a value investor, I think you're an idiot, really. You can be focused on income. You can be focused on growth you can be focused on all these other kind of things but fundamentally at the end of the day you want something that's offered to you at a lower price than what it is is truly worth like obviously right otherwise i mean i suppose you can still go okay with that but it is really just a greater fool theory like this is regardless of the quality this thing is not good value but i think it will be even less good value in the future and that's a that is a game of chicken you don't want to play.
31:05I think that's a lot of way to put it. So I, so, what's important for me in that sense is you get the value. So rather than having to find something new all the time, rather than saying, I'll buy something for 80 cents and sell it against your buck. I'm going to say, I'm going to buy something that's worth a dollar that's currently 80 cents. But in a year's time, I reckon the business will be worth$1.10. And you have that hopefully worth$1.25. You have that hopefully worth$1.50. Again, I'm not going to do it even. Now, why is it worth more? Because the business grows, it is larger, it's more profitable.
31:37And for as long as that remains true, you hopefully get to hold that business if you get it right for years. Now, if you want to hold it for years, if you're looking for that business, the longer you want to have it work for you, the better quality of the business has got to be. If it's a one-trick pony, it does the trick, it's like, well, that's over then. So you mentioned Apple before, I mentioned Coke. They're great examples. I love brands. It's another bit of a tangent on quality. But, you know, Apple has got a very, very long runway. It won't go as fast as it used to because it's not exactly saturated, but pretty saturated.
32:06Coke's very saturated. So it's not enough. You need growth potential. But if you've got a company, how old's Coke? 140 years old probably, give or take. It's probably got something going for it, right? And so rather than trying to find a Scots Cola that's an 80-cent dollar, I want something that, again, has that growth potential. But if you look for quality up front, it gives it the potential to continue to do well. Now, what is quality? It's lots and lots of things, right? It's competitive advantage. I'm going to give you a laundry list until we collect some of these. Competitive advantage, right?
32:35Why is it better? Why will it keep being better? Growth runway. If it's already saturated, I like Coca-Cola or Amatil, you're going to have struggles, right? So it can't be just the biggest businesses of the world. It's got to have good management, preferably founder owners. We've talked about these things before. Why? Because they care more. They're less likely to screw things up. They're less likely to get blindsided. They're less likely to do things that aren't in shareholders' best interests. And again, if you're holding for the long term, if you're choosing to ride with someone, You want to check the credentials of the driver.
33:01So that's really, really important. And I mentioned balance sheet wasn't the be-all and end-all, but it's bloody important. And so not having – you've talked a lot. I've incorporated this in my own conversations and thinking. Not so much how big will it be in five years, but are we sure it's going to get there in the first place? Are there any – will it survive? And so the balance sheet gives it that potential. Now, companies take on lots and lots of debt can get lucky and survive. Companies with no debt, with a massive balance sheet, are going to survive. Worst case, you do slightly less well than you hope to do.
33:29So you can't, I've said it in different contexts recently, leverage is the only way a smart man can go broke, as Warren Buffett has said, which is a smart person, but you know, the quote is the quote. Companies are the same. I mean, you have to suck for a very, very, very long time. If you've got a balance sheet with truckloads of cash, you have to lose money for years and years and years and years and years. And then you might still have some cash left over. And so, you know, it doesn't need to be, again, not all these things are going to be in the same place and size, But quality for me is just so, so, so important.
34:02It sounds obvious if you're that. Someone who thinks that already, then great. I just, I'm not interested in buying. I'm going to throw another Buffett quote. I apologize in advance. There'll be a few. Yeah, but one of Buffett's most famous ones is, it's far better to buy a wonderful business at a fair price than a fair business at a wonderful price. And why? For all the reasons I've just talked about, that's the potential opportunity. Yeah, so true. Yeah. Yes, I love that. Yeah. Yeah. So I would define quality. You're right. Gosh, we could do a whole episode on just what is quality. I think when it comes down to it, when you want to - Yes.
34:40The evidence for quality is ultimately reflected in the financials. As you say, they're backward looking. They are limited. They're not perfect. But you don't ever get a situation of a business that's really high quality, but just never delivers any good financials, right? And the financials that matter, I would say, what is the level, what is the return? Well, there's different flavors of this, but let's just go with the more common one. There's a good high return on equity. In other words, you have a business that earns a million dollars a year. I have a business that earns a million dollars a year.
35:17It's just that I put a million dollars of equity in and you put in 10 bucks. Your business is vastly superior to mine. You put in a little bit and you got back a lot. I put in a lot and I got the same back again. I say it's just one of that is far more efficient. So you want a business that has the capacity to really get a good return on the money that you put into it. Not what you bought the shares. When you bought the shares on the market, you just paid some other person for it, right? I mean, the money that was put into the business when it started or money that they raised from shareholders along the way?
35:52What's the return on the equity, on the net assets value? And ideally, not only that, you want a company that once it has made a good return, has the capacity to reinvest those returns at similarly high rates of return. Because when you have those two things, you have a compounding machine. So it's different if like, even if you you say, well, I only put$10 of equity and I made a million dollars, but you were a one trick pony. You released a killer app, it went viral, you made a squillion dollars and then everyone just got sick of it. Like Pokemon Go, right? It was the thing and now no one knows.
36:31Well, got to be careful. It's probably still very popular, but it's not so much in the zeitgeist anymore. Now, if you can do that again, it's like, well, just made a million dollars off my$10 investment. I guess I'll retain it within the business and I'll get whatever the percentage return on 10 to a million is. Like I'll do that again and again and again. We're going to have to play a drinking game here with Buffett. Except not very secret. But that's the secret sauce, right, of Berkshire. Yeah, it's not even a secret. But it's that conglomerate of just like we make a lot of – we generate a lot of cash flow and then we direct that cash flow to the areas of the business that has the best chance of getting a good return on those retained earnings.
37:16It's why Berkshire doesn't pay a dividend, right? It's because, well, we think we can get a better return just by keeping it within the business. So that for me, I want to have that potential. And where the historicals are helpful is that they don't guarantee anything, but it certainly does give you peace of mind. It shows you that it's possible. A company that has a consistently high return on equity and any return on incremental equity is the other version of this that they retain. The return they get on that is also likewise attractive. Yes, doesn't guarantee anything, but shows you that they've been doing something very right up till now.
37:54It is harder for earlier stage companies because they might have only just commercialized, right? Like the figures can look really awful. In fact, some of the companies I'm holding, they're not even making earnings at this point. They've got sales, but there's no earnings. And there are companies that have got earnings, but the margins are razor thin on the net margins. And the return on equity is just awful. Again, you're looking at a flow over one period of time. But I would argue I think the capacity is there for those earnings to really start being spun off. And then as they are, they'll be able to be reinvested into the business at similarly high rates of return.
38:29If you don't have those things or the potential for those two things, you don't have quality. To your point, you're right. The financials do show what has been delivered, but what can be delivered when you've got no profit. I mentioned Kogan for us, we were drinking games. But, you know, I'm not going to – and this is what I'm saying. Is it as high quality as Woolworths or JB Hoffman? No. But the potential is there. So that's the trade-off of a growth runway versus quality. And there is always going to be a trade-off to some degree or other. now I think the quality is being demonstrated in certain ways picking up I'm not chilling for it by the way and by the way I might have been I probably haven't I might have sold them by the time I had this podcast by the time of recording I still own the chairs not that I'm looking at yourself but just you know it is what it is um that that's kind of the that's kind of the the reality I like the so it's what things does it have that are I will say statistically likely because we are in a probabilities game I'll talk about that in a second too to to give us that sort of return to give us that sort of growth to really deliver that sort of um a market beating returns what we're looking for right so that that's those things are agglomerated to some degree more or less in some categories and say you know not any company owns as a founder ceo but i love them um not every company has a fortnox balance sheet but i love that i will i will make trade-offs where we're appropriate if the business seems to be demonstrating its ability and the one Another phrase I use too regularly is more things to look for customers more often.
40:02In other words, the customers are buying more things than they used to. There's more of them and they do it more frequently. It's a holy trinity. You don't always get there. But that's kind of what you're looking for, right? So that's the, to my mind anyway, that's what you're looking for when you look for those qualities. Am I seeing it demonstrated? Is it likely to keep being demonstrated? I love your point about returns on equity, mate, because I think that's something that investors, I'll say miss it's a little chicken and egg because again it's that relative to the price relative to the future all those kinds of things and by the way unless they're paying out good dividends the ROEs for most people will drop slowly over time as they grow because they can't they're keeping more cash they know what to do with not everyone and if you can use it then you're doing really well but that's kind of what you're looking for right you're looking for value creation and that's you know Charlie Munger said our job is to turn a dollar in more than a dollar of value.
40:56And it's typically going to say that away, that's the only job. But that's what return on equity measures is, I've got a dollar. How much value do I create with that dollar? And I think it's really, really important. It's a sign of quality of a business. It is worth the... Return on equity is the money retained by the company, but you're not normally buying for the equity price either. So there is that, as we talk about valuation, right? So if you're paying book value, which is just effectively the same as the equity value, then that's the return you're going to get if you're paying 15 times 25 times 40 times equity then you're going to get a much much lower return so be careful about not you but be careful about using ROE too liberally it's great to see high ROEs but if the market already knows it you're already paying a high price and so it's it's always valuation it's always price but as I said as we said before the buffer quote find a wonderful business and a high ROE is it's really a bit well so I will throw a bit of a the only thing to be careful with ROE is the level of debt being used and so you can I was going to say there's no bad business with high ROE that's absolutely untrue you can turn a low ROE business into a high ROE business by borrowing an absolute crap load of money right please yes do can I just go back just drill into that a bit so the other because I said before there's various flavors of this you can use return on assets or return on capital you know but they're all they're all measuring it's not a matter of saying you made money Well, good for you.
42:23You made money relative to what? And so return on capital, return on assets is actually rather helpful in this regard. So when you do look at return on equity, look at those other ones as well. For a company that has very low return on capital, can have a very high return on equity in the same way that you can make a property investment very, very, very attractive. Now, property, I know this is going to be a shock to Australians out there, but doesn't normally grow at 7 % compound forever. But your personal return can be made to, like if you've got a million dollars, I've got a million dollars, we both buy a property, we get 7 % say, right?
43:06Well, one way for me to do better is I'll just borrow 90%. I'll put$100 ,000 down, it goes up 7%. Well, that's$70 ,000 return on a million dollar property. But my contribution was only$100 ,000. So it was actually a 70 % return. Like all of a sudden, our return on assets was the same. The return on equity was miles different. So yes, it's such a good point that you make.
43:34For me, I think it's – I wrote about this recently actually, is that capital is potential energy. So you mentioned the balance sheet before. The balance sheet is so important. These are the assets that the company has to work with. These are the things that generate the earnings. And it doesn't have to be, you know, it's easier to conceptualize when you think of factories and farms and these sort of more traditional kind of things. But assets can be intellectual property. You know, they can be brand. They can be other things that are less tangible, less real, but very real still.
44:14That can be deceptive. Let me give you an example. I used this recently. I'm going to go up and I'm going to drop a 100 ton excavator in your front yard and say, right, I need you to do some landscaping. I come back at the end of the day, you just destroyed that land. Like it's just chopped up. It's useless. You know what I mean? Like you've probably broken the machine as well. So there's probably going to be extra impairment costs on all of that. I give that to a seasoned operator. They're going to move a mountain like that. Like it is. never going to be revealed by looking at the balance sheet.
44:49It's like, well, Scott's got a 10-ton excavator. Andrew's got a 10-ton excavator. Okay, they're the same kind of company. No, no, no, no, no. Who's behind the wheel? Makes all of the difference, all of the difference in the world. So you want good assets, absolutely, because assets are the foundations for growth. You want a good return on assets because that's what's going to point you towards high quality. But you want a good custodian and manager of those assets as well. Now, this is a bit harder to sort of determine, but I think what you want to look for here is that someone who is very judicious with where they make capital expenditure decisions.
45:29In other words, if they are buying more assets, whether they're acquiring another business or they're just buying new plant equipment and machinery, they're doing so in a way that It coordinates all of the assets in this elegant ballet, this synchronous, you know, fluid movement of all the various parts of human capital, of financial capital, of machinery. And it is an elegant thing that just comes out and spits out a bunch of cash flow at the other end. good operators tend to in my my view tend to make lots of little experiments burying stuff and killing it super quickly if it's not working and doubling down on the things that that kind of do so you will see you you will see a little bit of a movement within the balance sheet too not these big wholesale changes like well we're all about coca-cola amyotill is a great example we're all about fizzy drink.
46:26Actually, now we're also about tinned pineapples. Like what? You know, it's different, right? Like they went into, they went into different areas. I don't know. Hindsight is kind of easier here, but, but what you're, what you're wanting is a, a business that has, I guess, agility, um, one that has optionality, you know, it's, do I have a warehouse full of equipment and machinery and parts that can only do this one thing? All I can do is make fax machines. That's it. I can do it really well, but that's the one thing I can do. And if fax machines ever go out of vogue, I'm screwed because I just can't pivot that to anything else whatsoever.
47:02Now, again, this is very, I think probably if I've done a decent job there, that's pretty obvious. It's much less obvious in trying to sort of identify this. So what are you trying to look for here? Again, things like high inconsistent return on equity and return on retained earnings, all those kinds of things are very good. If you see a business that has fairly regular asset write downs, that's a red flag. That is very clearly a sign of a management team and a board who just don't know what they're buying, right? Because it gets added to the balance sheet of what you paid for it. And it gets written down because the bean counters go, there's no way it's worth that much.
47:37I know you paid that much for it. It's just not worth that much. And it's not worth that much because it's not generating the kind of cash flows that it kind of should. So we're going to write it down. Now, even the best businesses in the world will suffer from that because you can't predict the future and you've got to throw stuff at the wall, see what sticks. But as I say, good operators will do it judiciously, tentatively, small little experiments, ramping up as is needed, killing and pivoting as is needed as well. So have a look at not just a balance sheet, but how a balance sheet sort of changes over time with that kind of idea in mind, because the asset base, the asset mix, how that fluctuates and changes and evolves over time is actually quite revealing in terms of what the stewards of the business are doing with their very, very limited resources, whether they're a trillion dollar company or a corner shop.
48:28They have limited resources. And how are they best using that to maximize the flows? Everyone focuses on the flows, the earnings, the profits, the earnings per share, as they should, because that's bottom line that's kind of what you that's the goal but but you you're gonna miss you what you want to you want to know will that continue and if to know whether that will continue you need to look at how the sausage was made not just at the sauce it's a lovely sausage very plump and juicy but how it's good that's what i want to think how to want to take does that make sense i think probably a little over the place there yes i think i think that's right i'm trying i'm trying to take me i try to take it to effectively what i'm then i'm then looking for is i talk about the the the growth potential and it's it's that combination right of the past history the current circumstances and what the future might look like and i think that's where i so what where i wanted to go to is that variant perception again i want to talk a little bit about contrariness um i'm not a contrarian at all i'm an optimist i'm an eternal optimist as our listeners well know but but slash and um i think optimism is smart now i would say that because that's hubris and that's my view and i wouldn't say i'm not that's stupid but i'm not optimist um optimism wins uh in life it wins in investing wins in business and the the what i what i in terms of how i invest i'm never happier as i said before than being the only optimist or a pessimist um because it's that time it's covid it's the trump tariffs it's the whatever everyone's like oh this is terrible the world's gonna end it's like i could but the last 158 times you've said that didn't and we've always gone on i've said that i've got to again i said before i'm gonna fix this line i've still gotta fix the line um but The market has never yet failed to regain than surpass a previous high.
50:22Now, unless that stops, every time we're below that previous high, I'm not going to say it's free money because it sounds a bit over the top, but I need to be careful. The most of us have a financial service license, I want to be very careful about what I say here. But just because, you know, maybe Fran De Pot, I'm talking about investing being free money. But as a rule, if everyone's really disappointed about a thing, particularly a thing that's been proven in the past to have been really good, back to the quality stuff, back to the return on equity, you talked about you know when everyone's like oh the chairs are terrible oh yeah i mean right now it feels that way but again go to that long-term perspective you know we talk about recommendation ideas at work and everything someone will say to me and they know they shouldn't um oh i'm not sure the tariffs might be bad in the next six months or so and i honestly my response is very politely very kindly i really really don't care in fact i like that you think that because other people think that as well i'm probably getting a good deal and again i'm not contrarian for the sake of it i'm not taking the opposite view of everybody all the time i'm not i'm not a pessimist where everyone else is optimistic i'm not i'm not looking to disagree with people i'm not i'm not argumentative as a matter of course but where i see that opportunity to be contrary to be optimistic take that approach say hey you know what things actually might be okay um but you can't see through it um david garden the motley full co-founder we referenced him a couple of times but um he talked to years ago i might have been i can't remember when i want to say gfc times it It feels like it was more recently than that.
51:46Anyway, he talked about dark clouds he could see through. And that's exactly the story. So when you get a chance to buy these things that people are ignoring, forgetting about, putting aside, not worrying about, all that kind of stuff, that for me is a great opportunity. So if you can – what is it in a nutshell? It's basically saying I have a long-term perspective. I finished where I started, which is if we go back to that, what's really going on, what is long-term? long term is saying there will be bumps but i expect this business to be positive to do well over the long term not in the absence of those bumps but despite the bumps that come along the way and that if you can have that view gives you a chance to not freak out when other people are selling if you own the shop oh the stock but also it lets you buy what other people are are selling there's some there's some retail businesses that were trading for like high single digit very low double digit pe's during some of those covet years and by the way some went broke so you've got to get the right ones but it was like well do I really think this this large household name quality retailer with you know long histories good balance sheets great brand recognition are they really do sales never really never pick up again the profits never really never recover because right now they're down um so yeah I again I don't I don't call it being contrary because I'm not and it's not about optimism all the time well I'm always optimistic but it's not about buying any price because I'm optimistic.
53:09It's just that idea of looking around and going, hey, they're all really upset and disappointed and depressed. That feels like an opportunity to me.
53:21Yeah. For me, the key question when those things happen. In fact, there's a part of me that really wants bad things to happen to good businesses. Because the great business that everyone knows is great and the sky is blue and there's not a single storm cloud in the sky, it's just not a great investment. I mean, maybe over 15 years you'll do reasonably well, but it's not a great investment. It's not really going to set the world on fire. So I want something that's got problems, but I always describe it as I want a cyclical problem, not a structural problem. In other words, I want a problem that is just a consequence of, ah, their economy's not doing great right now, or, you know, ah, there was some supply chain snafus and it screwed them up for this quarter.
54:12And, you know, it results in something quote unquote bad. Earnings fell, you know, sales were depressed and like no one's cheering that. But it's like, is it because we just realized that every single product we've sold over the last 10 years is chock full of carcinogens and asbestos and we are absolutely, we've got a legal thing in front of us that we're never going to come out from and we've got to completely retool the whole thing. And like, or, or is it just sort of like, well, there was this like, you know, big economic sort of thing, whatever it was. Insert your favorite thing here because there's always something on the economy that people are fretting about.
54:52That's kind of like not great, but doesn't speak to the quality of the business. Good businesses will go through tough times, sometimes of their own making, very often have nothing to do with them whatsoever. And that is such a perfect setup. That is such a brilliant setup. It's just like, yeah, earnings are down. We miss guidance, all of that kind of stuff. But it says nothing about the long-term earning capacity of business. That is just such a beautiful, beautiful, beautiful setup. When you have signs of something that is structural, no price can be cheap enough. And dear listener, let me tell you, I have learned this the hard way.
55:25Because you try to do the, oh, I'm going to be greedy when others are fearful. And oh, look, everyone's freaking out. And they're probably freaking out more than is necessary. but there's just something that's just revealed about the business that this is like through and through, there's just, it's just a poison within this business, whether it's a cultural problem, whether it's just, you know, the result of years and years of underinvestment, whether, you know, there's, I could list something as long as your arm here. And this is hard. These, these things are hard to spot. What is, what is helpful in this situation, but extremely rare is a candid forthright management team that will help you understand what's going on as opposed to, look, it's everyone else's fault except ours.
56:11And don't worry, it's always going to be brilliant. You know, that is what you want to hear. And that's what most people will say. And it's very comforting. But I think, again, you will get those occasional managers who will just say, yeah, we dropped the ball here or this happened and it's not great. So we were expecting these sales to come through in this half. It's going to be pushed to the next half because, you know, it turns out that all the shipping containers, you know, just weren't stuck in a port because of some tariff thing that Trump was doing. It's like, oh, that sucks, but people still like your product.
56:44You're still solving a very real problem and you're doing it in a way that's far superior to everyone else who's in the space. And now you're much cheaper than you were yesterday. It's like, that's a pretty good thing. Yeah. I don't think. Yeah, that's really important. Structural versus cyclical. You're going to do the cyclical. Just know what you're buying. Know how it's going to react. Know how you're going to react when it does react that way. But also to think about what the – so I talked a lot about quality and long-term all that kind of stuff. If you're going to buy a cyclical business, you're either going to ride the ups and the downs, and that's fine, but know that the share price will be super volatile, or you are potentially playing a slightly different game.
57:26And I will say there is a place for that if you want to do that. but you've got to know what that cycle is and so if you're gonna if you're gonna um what's a good i mean oil is always an easy example it's just all over the joint right now if you're gonna buy if you're gonna buy an oil drill up because you expect 20 years time it's gonna make a fortune that's that's completely cool um but just know over that time the share price will probably rise in full 50 percent many many many many times just because that's what tends to happen now you can try and time and buy low and sell high and then buy low again and some people do and that's not an unreasonable approach if you want to um but if you're not going to just just know if you're buying sickle stuff know it's going to be like that right it just is um we've recommended elders to our members for example it's a rural services company and they are commodity prices and crop yields like it is just all over the place and so you either say well i'm going to buy low and sell high or you're going to say you know what it's going to be it's going to be all over the place and i'm going to some years are going to be absolutely rubbish we're going to lose 40 percent some years share price wise i think it's going to make more than that and over time i expect the The total will be better than where we are now.
58:27You're just going to have to strap in for that ride. That's all. So just be mindful that you're dead right, mate, on the cyclical versus structural. I think that's absolutely right. The other thing is that Buffett, the salad oil scandal at American Express, hardly known in Australia these days, but basically it was found that Amex had, I can't remember the exact details of it now. There was an investment that had some, yeah, so basically there was oil tanks supposed to be full of a shim, was it oil? Fascinating. As in crude oil. Anyway, it ended up being filled with something that wasn't supposed to be there.
58:53And so it was just fraud. and the company got smashed and Buffett bought shares at that point because like, well, the Amex franchise is way too big and too powerful. It will continue to do really, really well despite this. It's not going to be existential risk because it's not going broke but the market hates it because there's one thing going on. He's looking out 20 years and going, Amex is going to make a fortune in the next 20 years despite this and if people are ignoring that, this is the other benefit of the short-term panic is whatever's happening now is a puffed-eenth of the total full life of this company, right imagine coke call in 1912 someone says oh people start drinking coke this year because of something you know it's now obviously in hindsight we can do more easily we can with with a very cloudy crystal ball but that's kind of the idea and i think that's that's my um just just adjoined it to you to your to your point is just that know that that's going to happen and just be prepared for that as well on the buy side but also don't sell in panic if those things happen because they will and they do and that's just life and it goes back to things we've said to add it's quality it's value it's all those if you've done the work if you own the right business then that's kind of what you're looking for isn't it it's one of the things yeah i thought it might yeah gosh this hour is going really fast um i feel as though we're only still at the beginning here so one of the things i'll just reiterate a couple of points we've made before in the past but i think it's important here is just to diarize your thinking um you write it out why are you buying this company What is it you like about it?
1:00:22What do you expect? Are you? It's so valuable. That's why you did it. Yeah, totally. We've got that functionality. But look, it's just very much designed that way. It's like, that's why you did it, right? Like it's just think about it in advance. And where I'm getting it here in particular is with the risks. So whenever I buy anything, I'm trying to go, well, this might go wrong. This might go wrong. This might go wrong. So when it happens, I've already thought about it. And within that list of things that can go wrong, there'll be the sort of more existential, more damaging, more structural stuff.
1:00:53And then there'll be this like, like if I was buying a retailer, I guess I would put it in risks, but I wouldn't see it as a risk just as a characteristic of the company. It's like, yeah, it's probably going to do really well when people are confident, they've got lots of money in their pocket, and it's probably not going to do too well when everyone's really scared. And that's just normal. That's just normal. And I'll fold that into my second point, which I'm leading up to, which is, and this is the last thing, the last thing you do. And I know there's other things to sort of say, but the last thing that you do is look at the share price.
1:01:25It's the first thing that everyone else does. Like, you know, why? What does that number or even the history of that number on a chart tell me if I can't put it in context? Like it's a completely meaningless number. I don't know what to do with it. Is it good? Is it bad? Unfortunately, people go, well, it's good because it went bottom left, top right. So it's good. And monkey brains are really good at extrapolation. So let's just extrapolate that. So therefore it will always be good. And it's just like, it's really, really, really, really bad ideas. So what I'm trying to then do is just basically say, yeah, yeah.
1:02:04Okay, I like the business. Now I'll look at the price. In fact, no, no, I've skipped a second. What would I pay for it? What do I think it's worth? Forget the price. Forget the price. Like, what do I think it's your – what would I – if this was just – I'm a gazillionaire. I've got all the money in the world. I'm going to go and make an offer to the chairman and just say, listen, I want to buy your business outright. What is the number that I would put out there that is realistic? You know, obviously, a dollar would be great, but they probably won't sell it to me for that. So what's the price that – At what point do I stop getting enough value for the business that I'm pursuing?
1:02:39I would love to buy it for a dollar, but I'll pay – to your point, let's do our total business – I'll pay$48 million for that business. Yes. Up to that. If I get it for less, I'll take it, but I wouldn't pay more than that because at that point I'm not getting enough of a return to justify either the cost of my capital or more importantly, the opportunity cost, one of your favourite words, phrases, of giving up the opportunity to invest in something else instead. Yep.
1:03:04Absolutely. And within that too, I am very much acknowledging during that process that I can't see the future. So three most important words and investing is margin of safety. So I don't want to be a hyper-specific. I think this company is going to earn$1.32.3 in earnings per share next year. And then after that, it's going to be$1.46.9. And no, no, but roughly speaking, what does it look like? And then let's discount it. My hand on heart, my best guess, but let's try and get 10 % under that, 20 % under that, because it accounts for the almost inevitable reality of me being wrong in some way, shape or form.
1:03:50It means that if you are wrong, it's like, well, I wasn't buying something where everything had to land perfectly for me to get the return that I desired. In fact, if it does as I originally expected, I'll get an even better return because of the margin of safety. If it does better than I expected, the return will be even better. It's okay to be wrong when you've been too conservative, right? Like that's happy to be proven wrong. Thank you, Mr. Market, for showing me the error of my ways. I was hoping for a 10 % return. I got a 20 % return compounded over 10 years. Like, thank you. I am happy to be wrong.
1:04:25I don't want to be wrong in the sense where I was expecting all of this stuff to happen and it fell short. And it's just like, well, you can get a scenario here with a million examples we could go through as people go, this is a great business. They're going to be much more profitable in the future and be right in that analysis and still lose money. Not because they didn't earn more money, but just not as much money as everyone else was expecting and was priced for by the market. And again, we could do a whole episode on valuation, but that's that last point. And then can I get it? And very often, once you've gone through this whole process, you go, listen, I think it's probably something I'd be prepared to pay around here.
1:05:03Oh gosh, it's 50 % above that. So just chuck it on a watch list, set an alert, Get on with your life. One day it'll go ding. And you go, ooh. Yep. Ooh. Yep. It's the price I said I would pay for it. No, man, let's have a look. Let's see if anything's changed. If nothing's changed, like, go for it. Do it, right? But you'll do two things that you'll do, right? The same with auctions. You talk about what would I pay up to. Every single mug. And I say this having just done this about a year ago. We're not spending more than this. This is the price that we're going to offer. We're not going above it.
1:05:35And, of course, you go over it, right?
1:05:40it happens with shares too, right? Because you want it because it's going up. If I don't, FOMO is going to kick in. And same on the downside as well. You'll do all these other kinds of things. So again, the value of having it written down and the value of having a consistent process and sticking to that process. A commentator, two things I've said before, excuse me, sorry. Two things I've said before, which are related, which is I buy to hold, not buy and hold. I will sell if my thesis is broken in valuation. We're not going to do valuation now, but effectively, if I'm a thesis broken, I get offered a stupidly good price or I've got a better place for my money.
1:06:15So I'm buying to hold. I'm not buying and holding regardless, but I'm also not buying for the short term. I'm not buying to flip. The second one is one of my favorite lines. I know you like this one is I try to be slow to buy and even slower to sell. And that is if I've done all the work on the way up, if I've created the value, if I've found the value, if I've understood the quality, if I think it's all positive, it kind of goes back to the point we were making about not selling too quickly in terms of panicking but even evaluation i gotta say i'm i'm probably too lax but i find it being too likes being better than being too strict on it which is if it's if i've done a little if i like the business if it's a great business if it's done its job and it's a little bit expensive i'm probably gonna stick with it because it'll probably surprise me you know not always and not ever and some are gonna disappoint but that's that's the broad approach so buy to hold and be slow slow to buy in other words do the work don't jump at the jump down the gun do the work first and make sure you really really want to buy it has really justified its place in your portfolio.
1:07:08Once it's done that, give it plenty of rope in my view.
1:07:15I know. We will. We'll have to do a follow-up episode to this, right? I do unfortunately have to take my daughter to an appointment so we've kind of scheduled things and my internet dropped out just a little bit behind the curtains here. It's in the beginning. We're well over the hour. For some reason, notion we set, but... Hey, thanks for suffering through this first of our pre-recorded episodes. When will I learn? I have to say that. You're going to correct me every time. We appreciate you listening to us. We will be back. You'll come back on Sunday, won't you? All right. Until then, have a great weekend and fool on.
1:07:55Hell yeah. The Motley Fool and people appearing in this program may have positions in the companies mentioned. General advice only. Please speak to your financial professional to understand how it may pertain to your situation. Subscribe to the free newsletter at fool.com.au forward slash listener. The Motley Fool operates under Financial Services Licence 400691.
From the publisher
Scott and Andrew break down some of the fundamental approaches they take to investing.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
