In short
Podcast Episode Notes: Motley Fool Money - Mailbag: incl. Should I buy equal-weighted ETFs? (June 23, 2024)
Episode Overview In this mailbag episode of Motley Fool Money, hosts Scott Phillips and Andrew Page address listener questions on various investment topics, including strategies for investing for children, equal-weighted ETFs, and considerations for international investments. The conversation is infused with humor and insights on the complexities of finance and investing.
---
Key Topics Discussed
- Listener Engagement
- Podcast Ranking Inquiry
- A listener named Simon expresses surprise that the podcast isn't in the top 50 finance podcasts in Australia, prompting a humorous discussion about the rankings and the hosts’ affiliate relationships.
- Investing for Children
- Starting Investments for Kids
- A listener named Luke asks about investing for his 8-month-old child. The hosts discuss:
- Tax Implications: Under 16s face high tax rates on unearned income. Options include:
- Setting up an account in the child's name with the parent as trustee.
- Using the child's tax file number.
- Educational Approaches: Encouraging children to learn about investing through involvement in the investment process and periodic reminders of their account’s growth.
- Gearing and Leverage
- Discussion on Gearing
- An anonymous listener asks about using geared index funds to potentially enhance returns while retaining some cash for bonds. Key points include:
- Risks of Gearing: Gearing can amplify both gains and losses, with previous performance not guaranteeing future results.
- Prudence: Use home equity for borrowing instead of margin loans due to lower interest rates and absence of margin calls.
- Investment Discipline: Emphasizing the importance of holding investments through market fluctuations to realize gains.
- Equal-Weighted ETFs vs. Market Cap-Weighted ETFs
- Performance Comparison
- The hosts discuss whether equal-weighted ETFs might outperform market cap-weighted indices, noting:
- Past performance can be misleading; future results are uncertain.
- Concentration issues in the ASX may warrant consideration of equal-weighted ETFs, but historical data is not sufficient to make definitive claims.
- International Investments
- Europe as an Investment Opportunity
- A listener questions the lack of emphasis on European companies like Novo Nordisk. The hosts reflect on:
- Market Dynamics: European companies may not be as prominent in global discussions as American companies, reflecting on cultural and historical contexts.
- Investment Complexity: The challenge of researching and investing in foreign markets, stressing the home advantage of investing domestically.
- Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
- Considerations for REIT Investments
- A listener named Michael contemplates adding REITs and small-cap indices to diversify his portfolio. Discussion points include:
- Diversification: REITs offer potential income but are subject to market risks, particularly in changing economic climates.
- Complexity vs. Simplicity: Encouragement to maintain a straightforward investment approach rather than complicating the portfolio unnecessarily.
- SMSFs vs. Industry Super Funds
- Tax Considerations in Different Fund Structures
- A listener raises questions about tax implications in investments managed through SMSFs versus industry funds:
- Tax Deferral Advantages: SMSFs allow for deferral of capital gains tax until asset disposal, potentially benefiting investors in the long term.
- Implementation Costs: The hosts caution against overlooking management fees and investment performance when evaluating different fund structures.
---
Key Takeaways
- Engagement with Listeners: The hosts appreciate listener feedback and questions, fostering a community around financial education.
- Investing for Children: Teaching kids about investing early can instill valuable lessons about financial responsibility.
- Gearing Risks: Leverage can enhance returns but also increases risk; careful consideration and understanding are essential.
- Market Dynamics: Understanding the performance and potential of different investment vehicles requires analysis beyond historical data.
- Simplicity in Investing: A straightforward investment strategy often leads to better long-term outcomes than overcomplicating with numerous ETFs or funds.
- Tax Implications: Understanding tax consequences is crucial when choosing between different investment structures.
---
Conclusion The episode showcases the hosts' expertise in demystifying complex financial queries while engaging listeners in a relatable manner. They emphasize the importance of understanding various investment strategies, their risks, and the relevance of simplicity in building a robust investment portfolio.
For more insights, subscribe to the newsletter at [fool.com.au/LiSTNR](https://fool.com.au/LiSTNR).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:10Welcome to Motley Fool Money, our very special mailbag edition. It is Sunday morning. Andrew Page has been out treading the boards, pounding the pavement, swimming through the waves, flying his ultralight from New Zealand. I mean, the man knows no boundaries. Andrew Page from strawman.com. Good morning. Hashtag life goals. You know, you've got to cram every minute full of adventure. You've got to do what you can. We talked about Die With Zero. Is the ultralight flight from New Zealand on your bucket list? It seems like a very good chance of dying at some point with that as a pastime. I don't know.
0:45There is a chance. There is a chance. We'll have to see how it goes. Mate, Straw Man, I believe, is Australia's premier online investment club. Is that still the truth? Correct. It's still the case. Yep. Just checking. I haven't asked for a while. If you had something number two, it bodes me to ask on behalf of our listeners to make sure you are still the premier online investment club in the country. I am Scott Phillips, of course, from the Motley Phil. And we are doing a mailbag episode, mate. I'm going to start with this one from Simon. He just says, hey there, Scott and Ram. ShareSite recently listed their top 50 podcasts and you are not on it?
1:19What? You even mentioned them now again. Are they kidding? Get into them. You deserve to be there. I'm picking up the phone. I did not know that, Simon. Thank you. Because we're actually an affiliate partner. Right? And I know the guys pretty well. So 50? I mean, okay. Not number one. Okay. Not in the top 10. Not in the top. There are 50 finance podcasts in Australia. Like, okay. I'm ticked off now. Mate, where is the quid in quid pro quo if they're not doing the right thing? If you're an affiliate partner is all I'm saying. I am having very stern words with someone. Heads will roll. Either that or they are dead to us and they will never be mentioned in this podcast again because we are both petty and crave it.
2:02No, we don't. Do not use share site. Cancel your subscription. And definitely don't use the affiliate link that Andrew has on his website. Or if you want to, you can. Who am I to tell you what to do? Money talks and podcast walk. What can I say? That's it. I thought it was good. Thank you, Simon. Yeah, look, we will definitely have a chat. Hey, we mentioned the other day, Matt sent us the, I posted that on the socials. I think you retweeted it, the Statler on Waldorf picture, which was brilliant. Excellent. I just thought, I don't know if I mentioned this, but I want to mention the rest of this.
2:31This is just a comment from Matt, but it's just funny. He said, hi, Scott. Love the ranting in a recent episode. an incredible tapestry of balanced ranting where it felt like no one was safe government labor liberal economists business unions boards ndis investors property moguls supermarkets politicians savers borrowers australia usa esg fossil fuel companies super funds and even barbara streisand all delivered in good nature with the hope of prompting these important conversations for the national agenda and then he said as i think i said last time it really felt like a Statler and Waldorf moment.
3:05So I attempted a quick AI face swap. Thank you, Matt. I just love the list. Matt, can I tell you, mate, again, I love the people listen. If you have enough time and interest to actually write that list, you're paying way too much attention to what Ram and I are saying. I love it. I'm kind of quietly proud of that, just quietly. You seem very angry, though. Sometimes you get that wake-up call. It's like, wow, am I really? Is there anything that I'm positive on? Yeah, I just love it. It was a lovely list. Thank you, Matt. And again, if you haven't seen it yet, do jump on the socials. It was probably a couple of weeks ago now, maybe a month ago.
3:38I posted that photo. It's a very, very, very unflattering photo, but it's very funny. So if you're of a certain vintage where The Muppet Show makes sense to you, and if you're not, again, you have my usual disdain and hatred because I don't like young people because they have more years left than I do. But it is a pretty funny image. It's remarkably unflattering. Hey, Luke does have actually a question, mate, which is nice. So let's go with that. Luke just says, Hey team, I have an eight month old baby and I'm going to start investing for him and regularly top it up. I'm thinking of using a chess sponsored account through the ComSec or SelfWealth, I think.
4:12But the information on their websites is a little vague when it comes to tax. I know you've answered this before, but I couldn't find the podcast. Fair enough. We've probably got a few new listeners anyway. Can you please help me out? Fool on and keep up the podcast. I listen to them each week when running. For some reason, I find it motivational. personal luke uh my best guess is trying to just somehow trick himself into outrunning us i've got to get away from those guys i've just got to keep going that was going to be my theory too i know the fastest after i get home i can turn this thing off maybe that's maybe that's it i'm not sure which way luke's going with that um luke tax is really stupidly hard for kids um i've talked about this before speaking of ranting uh unfortunately some of your fellow australians and my fellow australians screwed it for the rest of us uh by using kids as tax shelters for their own investing and so the government kind of went well if you do that we're going to take it away so basically mate there is a massive issue if you earn more than i don't know the number it's 500 bucks odd a year um in income as an under 16 of unearned income in other words you didn't work for it the tax rate's like is it 60 or something around it's stupidly high um so it's really really hard um so be that bear that in mind luke um you can either use it to put your own name and cop the tax yourself when you transfer the shares you do it in the little one's name and you know Hopefully at some point between now and 16 years, more than 500 bucks a year in interest, you may just have to cough up the difference, which again, those are both two really, really crappy options, but that's where you've got.
5:35In terms of setup, mate, my accountant has told me, and this is not tax advice, set up the account in his name with you as the trustee. So Luke as trustee for the child, have a bank account in the child's name and use the child's tax file number. That's what I've been told to do. Again, I can't give tax advice. So please go get advice if you want to, don't rely on what I say. but that's just the kind of the very quick cook's tour through tax and investing for kids. Ram, do you have anything you want to throw on top of that? They're just labels, man. You can't label me or what I do. I would just say do it yourself, right?
6:08And then at some future point, transfer it across. The kid is not going to say, Daddy, what's the fiduciary responsibility you have? It's not going to happen. All they need to know is - With one difference though, right? When you transfer it, you have a tax bill. That is true, right? That's the only answer to doing it in your own name and then transferring it later. Yeah. I would just sort of say, son, we've put in some money aside for you. Yeah. You know, when you're X age, you'll get it. That's all they need to know. And actually, that's just the beginning, right? The more important lesson is what we've actually done with that money and why have we done it that way and why is that interesting?
6:51And then just to periodically remind them, like not every day but i don't know once or twice a year just just so they can have that observed lesson of yes exactly you know and they'll ignore it and they won't be interested in it despite what you do um because kids are kids and and but but that that background noise will will percolate through at some subconscious level at some point it's like wow you know as as they do come of age they'll think mom and dad did this for me and look at that it's worth x dollars today and they put this much in like holy moly that's really i need to do this i need to keep doing this that's yeah that's i mean you know the tax the designation i get it i'm not i shouldn't be so dismissive of it but that's it's all by the by um yeah uh the far more important point is that they see and observe what's actually going on.
7:48And that is an incredibly potent lesson. And even if you do it, it sounds like I'm shilling, but even if you do it through a play money paper trading account on Strawman, it's still - Hypothetically. You know, it's a free account. I get nothing for it, right? I guess I can boast a higher user count, but that's about it. But just, or not even me, I do it, I don't know, I do it on a spreadsheet, do it whatever way you want to do it. And that is, yeah. the technicalities just what I would say is the technicalities are just going to soul destroying, soul sapping bureaucratic nightmares that are just going to make any kid think that's really difficult and painful and I don't want anything to do with it.
8:35Fair, fair. I will add one mate just as an additional thought. So I've done I've gone two ways. So we're putting some money aside for my young bloke as I've said many times before but I also have a small account that he puts his own money into um it's like 170 bucks there or something at the moment like it's really tiny yeah um but he does that himself and so there's never going to be any tax implications on that one because it's so small well i mean if you start saving well you will but he's already amazon's up like 77 cents if we bought or something again i own amazon shares so to see uh for full disclosure but um you know so the only thing i would say ram to your point is just involving the kids with that from a young age let them see it happening in real time and building that as a kind of a life thing that we slash you do over time can also be useful it's one thing about saying hey you're 18 here's here's x grand i've saved it for you you're welcome but the other thing of during those formative years involving them in some way shape or form in the process of selecting stocks or seeing compounding happen in action yeah um i know that you know my young kids got wow you mean we got the money yeah mate and guess what you did absolutely nothing for it right went up while you were at school and sleeping and so i was like oh that's amazing some of those life lessons i think are worth exposing them to in whatever form you feel comfortable during during that period can i be a little bit nitpicky here i don't know it's only if you throw some pessimism in right you can count on that um i i i've thought about this more and more lately you're so right in everything you say but i i the only stop there the only pushback i'll have and it's unintended and it's not beside the point but it's this because i've had friends and family to say this to me over the years you didn't do anything for it and it sticks in my craw because i i did a lot of stuff stuck in it mate okay well it's very it's a very chock full craw um is that it's not just the work and the research and the decision and this and and and the the the choice, the deliberate choice to not consume now.
10:33I mean, I could take that money I've invested with and go on a holiday or buy a nicer car or any number of things. And I didn't do it, right? I'm not after a medal, by the way. I'm not, you know. No, yeah, I understand. It's a fair point. And the real work, what I really did for, and what anyone who has done for it, is that they have rolled with the punches. They've resisted the urge to sell when there's a profit. it they've resisted the urge to panic when there's a loss and that is a that is a brutal journey that only those that have been on it can can fully appreciate and so when some muppet 10 years later goes oh you did nothing for i'm not putting words in your opinion it happened i'm sure you've had it before or you didn't do anything it's like do you have any idea what i've had to endure and the sleepless nights are like i earned i earned this money right i earned this money really through a through a lot of emotional turmoil and frankly, a lot of research and work.
11:29So no, I earned it. That's very, very fair. I think the benefit I'm trying to illustrate is the passive income idea. Yes. You can go and wash the car for 10 bucks or you can earn 10 bucks if you just put that money away and let it compound away. And all of a sudden that'll grow by itself. You're right. It's not doing nothing. It's just the, frankly, for me, because I'm lazy. I'm like, if my money can work for me while I'm asleep rather than me having to be actually working, I'll take that option. I guess I'm not trying to encourage his laziness, but I am trying to encourage that idea of it's kind of grinding away in the background.
12:01Yes, you have to have earned it, saved it, not spent it, not taken it out. So those things are absolutely true. It's just the very, very 11-year-old lesson of, you know how much you hate having to wash the car to earn 10 bucks? Well, you just earned 70 bucks over here where the number is. By doing, again, nothing in inverted commas. That's the lesson, but I take your point. Yes, yes. I mean, it is a pedantic point, but I'll put it out there to people when you have that. And also just to forewarn this forearm, because again, I think too many people in our position say, investing is really easy.
12:34Spend less than what you earn, put it in here, and one day you'll wake up and you'll compound a lot of money. It's like, yeah, I should totally. It doesn't set you up for the reality of the journey, which is a hard journey. Yeah, that's right. Hey, mate, I've got a question from someone who asks to be kept anonymous. And as the great part of this one is I put anonymous, please, at the very, very top of the email. As you all know, that's the best way to do it. Hi, Scott and Andrew. As always, please accept my gratitude for keeping the pod machine running. We would do nothing less anonymous. And churning out pearls of wisdom every weekend to power my walks and household chores.
13:09I recently attended the ASX Investor Day. I must say an incredible experience, and I came back with fundamental learnings of multiple concepts and ideas I am keen to explore. So I have three questions. By the way, halfway through the comment says, last question, a stretch goal if you both make it this far. So we'll see how we go. Question one, gearing. Now we did talk about this a little bit. I think it was last week, the week before, mate. But given the challenges of margin loans and borrowing money, I recently discovered a geared index fund. They usually have 40 to 50 % internal gearing, while the management ratio seems cheap at under 0.4%.
13:46A simple example was given that if you hold 50 grand, you can invest only 20 grand in a geared broad index fund and leave the rest for international bonds, etc., and get the same exposure while multiplying your returns and franking. While leverage I understand both ways, risk is limited to only capital you put in. What am I missing? Why aren't most people using it? For a long horizon, 7 to 10 years, can a geared strategy complement your index funds or is it much more suited to a short-term tactical approach and why i want to throw this question in is because the obviously what what this question had been told the asx invested or i assume is that you've got your 50 grand you can only put 25 in shares instead of 50 and then do something else with the rest of the money like international bonds etc so that was an interesting kind of uh wrinkle or different to what we know we talk about, which is pure magnification, leverage.
14:40This case is like, well, you could kind of have your cake and eat it too, have your leverage and put money elsewhere. Your thoughts? Yeah. If it sounds so good to be true, it usually is. That is absolutely life advice to live by. And I just did this very, this isn't a perfect comparison, but I looked at the GEAR ETF, G-E-A-R, and I compared that to the ASX 200. And guess what? The ASX 200 has done 18 % over five years and Gear has done 8%. Blimey down, yeah. How? How? I mean, square that circle. It's like, well, you multiply the losses on the way down as well. So it's sort of, and there are costs associated with it.
15:24So the fees are just, they might be reasonable, but they're still higher than otherwise. I just think it's too clever by half. I've mentioned many times on the podcast before, I'm actually not against using a modest amount of leverage. I just don't – well, I haven't done deep research into it, probably because of the ideological objection to some of these products. But maybe there's a product out there that's pretty reasonable. But they're trying to sell you something. And I guarantee the person at the ASX Investor Day works for Morningstar or somewhere. You know, like I'm going out on a limb here, but I would very strongly suggest that is the case.
16:04I've said before, the best way to do it is if you're in this position is to use your home equity because there's no margin call on that. And the interest is much cheaper than what you would get. You know, I'm even against, I've got a margin loan. I don't usually have much borrowed against. I use it like a credit card more than anything else. Yeah. Make sure I have capital when I need it and I pay it off really quickly. But that is an option as well. Just know thyself going into it because you've really got to be on top of it. And the rates of interest that you pay are criminal, frankly. Extraordinary.
16:37They're personal level interest rates, yeah. They really are. I used to work in a margin lending department years ago. And I can tell you a vast majority of clients didn't do well. I can imagine. They did not do well. The trading desk did rather well. so bizarre you know but how about that isn't that weird give people something they can use to yeah their own self-destruction and it's good for you yeah yeah so i mean look i'm not trying to be too pessimistic and rain on the the general premise is a reasonable one a reasonable we do it with property and no one blinks in fact people go 90 on property and on a negative cash flow basis and No one blinks at all.
17:16So, you know, there is that as well. But modest amount, prudently done, quality shares. You know, I've got no problem with that. If you're looking at these - Managed well is the only thing I'm going to add to the end. Oh, sorry. Don't panic, don't sell, all that kind of stuff. 100%. And by the way, we all say that. As a smart strategy, it's the ability, and you've just mentioned it before with kids, it's the ability to sort of see that through, the do nothing bit. That's the hardest thing. I mean, saving the money is harder, right? But other than that, the do nothing bit is the hardest part of all.
17:47Blaise Pascal, the hardest man's greatest challenge is sitting in a room and doing nothing. It's so true, particularly with investing, especially when you've got every expert, quote unquote, under the sun telling you you need to do this and do that. And, you know, and buy and hold is dead and all of this other rubbish. I was mentioning to a friend the other day, this great study, I've got to dig it up again. I think it was CD Waterhouse or Schwab or one of the US brokerages did a study of all their customers. And the best performing accounts were from deceased accounts because they just didn't do anything.
18:21Left the hell alone. They just bought some stuff. They died. The family forgot about it. And lo and behold, 10 years later, they'd all done incredibly well. There's a lesson. There's a lesson in all of that. It's the same lesson that the average mutual fund in the US loses to the index. the average mutual fund investor loses to the average mutual fund. How is that possible? It's because they change too often. They kind of jump around, try and do this, try and do that. And it's all that kind of stuff. Well, the Pascal quote, mate, just because it's cool and I know you want me to share it. All of humanity's problems stems from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone.
18:53That's better. Much more than that point. Have I pronounced the first name correct? Because I've only ever read it. Blaise Pascal, I believe. My name here, actually. Yeah. I believe so. It could be Blaise. Blaise. Probably Blaise. Let's go Blaise. ourselves here. There'll be someone screaming at the pot machine right now going, you idiot. Someone. All of the people. The only thing anonymous I'm going to add to Andrew's response, mate, you know my views generally on margin, which is don't do it, ideally. But what I hate about the suggestion you were given is, hey, put all this money into shares, use leverage to do it.
19:24So instead of investing 50, invest 25, put the other 25 grand in bonds. It's like, oh. So you're paying to invest on one hand and the other hand you're putting the money in bonds. Look, bonds and international, which I like international, by the way. The idea of borrowing to then diversify is kind of bananas to me. So if you're going to leverage to improve, increase your exposure to an asset class overall, like shares, quality, long-term shares, as Ram says, again, I can see the benefit of that. I don't think I'll ever say, yes, you should take a marginal loan. But, you know, that's, yeah. Doing it to invest in bonds, I think is the world's worst outcome.
20:02So I wouldn't do it. I'm going to say just as a general comment I just think bonds are a really bad investment and that's like I guess so against tradition Historically yeah well I mean there are times when they do better than shares right and that's if you can time the market then let's have a different conversation because you can time everything I hate that argument I mean I know you're correct but I hate that argument because that is true of anything you know there is a period where investing in chicken farms is outperformed up you know Enron was a great investment for a while it doesn't make any good idea you could have invested in bonds just in a broad-based bond ETF.
20:33In fact, the ETF is bond, B-O-N-D, 10 years ago, and you've lost money in the safest investment. And that's not inflation adjusted. So you've probably lost 35, if you're lucky, percent on that, on the safest investment known to man. Like, apparently. And you feel good because you've at least diversified and you've been safe and your financial plan said it's a good idea. Oh my goodness. And you've probably saved yourself some volatility on the way through. So, you know, you kind of feel like it's done its job. and yet you've only got two thirds of the money you started with. And there's some all kinds of, I mean, we could go way down the rabbit hole here and sort of mark to market accounting and held to maturity assets and all of this kind of stuff.
21:11But there is a lot of bondholders who are bleeding badly, whether that has been recognized in the accounts or not yet, because interest rates have gone up, which means the bond prices have gone down. So yeah, maybe if they hold their 30-year bond to maturity, they'll be made whole in nominal terms. But in the meantime, if they have to sell right now, they're a massive loss in the world's largest economic powerhouses, IOUs. If I'm going to lend money to anyone, I'm not lending it to the US government. Let me tell you right now. I will say too. And I want to just illustrate my point, Ram's point.
21:49In hindsight, there is always going to be a good time to abort bonds and a bad time to abort bonds. And some people will be saying right now, well, you just buy them X and you sell them Y. and there are some times when they outperform, those things are all true, right? But my point about timing the market is if you knew that, well, as Ramp said, you buy Enron, then you sell that, then you buy some.com thing in 98 and sell them in early 2000. I mean, in hindsight, I could craft a billion-dollar portfolio for 100 bucks over 40 years if I get to only buy the good stuff, right? If you can't time the market, and if you can, you're a unicorn because no one else can, then go for it.
22:21Otherwise, yeah, not worth it. Point to me, a famous investor that's made a fortune out of bonds. I mean, I can think of Howard Marks, who's a macro bond kind of investor. But that's all emerging market kind. And distress stuff as well. Very sophisticated stuff. Yes, exactly. And by the way, we say about property shares all the time. There are also people who made a lot of money out of property. Doesn't mean the average person has, but some people have. Some people made a lot of money out of bonds. Some people made a lot of money out of... Monkey NFTs. like people who bought yachts off the back of that insanity right right doesn't mean it's a good idea no equal weighted indexes or indices asks our questioner academic research seems to I bet you the I know who would have been selling this one sponsored by yeah academic research sponsored by seems to show equal weight has performed better than a weighted a market cap weighted index given the full concentration of banks and mines on the ASX where every 50 cents out of every dollar goes to a top one of the top 10 of these are people better off investing in equal weighted or continue with a market cap weighted index now we've talked about this one before uh i've been pretty clear on this one from my perspective i my problem is that we've talked before about how like how reasonable it is to take past performance and extrapolate it and that is kind of the general legal boilerplate but it's also true and there are times when it would have been you know we talked about this with the the other week with the S &P 500, right?
23:49You know, if you look at the S &P 500 15 years ago, there's no tech there, that's terrible. How can you possibly do any good? The answer was, well, the big companies became bigger and took over and then went to, and because they are growing faster, they get bigger and they power the index higher. I'm in two minds. I really, really am. I have, I think I've said before, I'm in a small odds ETF because I wanted to kind of avoid banks and miners. In the event, it's not been a particularly good idea for me. And I think it's kind of, we've talked about this before, if you're going to go passive, go passive.
24:15If you're not, pick stocks. um there is the fact that equal weight has done better in the past maybe it continues to or maybe it doesn't there is just nowhere near enough data to suggest in my opinion that we can take that and assume that the future is going to be the same as the past and i think you know you can say about any data or any time and frankly we always should there always should be an at risk on any piece of data including stock market returns over a century um you know could it be different in the future yes uh but the equal weight indices have only been around for a short amount of time uh during that time by the way there have been massive fundamental changes in the indexes or indices like the the rise of tech now maybe that happens again or maybe it doesn't and i just don't personally i think the returns of market weighted indices over a century give me enough confidence to say do i really want to mess with that so for me i'm saying no even though the data looks good.
25:10Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I was just, I, as you were speaking, I say, well, let's see the VanEck Australian equal weight ETF. MVW is the ticker there. And compare that to a general index ETF, Vanguard VAS. Yeah. It's well, the regular one has done better over the last year. The other one's done better over the last three and five years. Right. Exactly. So I get, I get the intention because. Yeah, correct. I likewise think that the Aussie market is way too concentrated in a handful of banks. And everyone knows my opinion on banks. Even ethics aside, just their performance have been woeful. I was going to say I would argue and then I'll change that to facts would demonstrate.
25:59And miners. So it makes a huge amount of sense to try and correct for that. But time will tell. We just can't know. Sometimes, in fact, not just sometimes, oftentimes, simple is better.
26:18I can't predict the future, but I think it's a reasonable guess to say that, look, if I just go your standard boring vanilla index ETF, I will guarantee you that I will look back in 10, 20 years and go, oh, there were better investments. obviously by definition, but almost by the same definition, I'll be better than, you know, half of the other investments. I'm just going to come straight down the middle more or less. Yeah. And it's probably going to be a really, I'm probably going to compound at a rate that's greater than the rate of inflation. I'm going to, I'm going to, I'm going to grow my wealth over time.
26:53You know, hindsight's going to be 2020. It's going to mess with your head. If I was investing with hindsight, I would have put all my money in Nvidia. Yeah, that's right. Right. Or I go back to 2010 and put it all in Bitcoin at one cent. It's just going to mess with your head. And so what of it is if you're really torn, and I get being torn, have a little each way, 50 % in the equal weight and 50 % in the regular one if you want. We're at this sort of point where we're all in the ballpark of sensible investing. And reasonable people can reasonably disagree over the finer details. But look, if someone said to me, I was at a barbecue and they sort of said, hey, I've got each month I just save a little bit of money and I tip it into an equal weight ETF.
27:44I'm not going to go, oh, my God, spit out my beer and go, you're an idiot. What are you doing? That's a good point. Okay, fine. Fine. No, I like it, man. That's a really good point. Motley Fool Money. For more, subscribe to the free newsletter at fool.com.au forward slash listener.
Read the full transcript
28:03Let's go to a question. We made it to the stretch question, anonymous. He asked about tactical exposure to European stars. The question is, I also learned about groundbreaking companies like Novo Nordisk, the Ozempic drug manufacturer, currently surpassing the total GDP of Denmark, apparently, Schneider Electric, et cetera. None are covered in the ASX 200 or the S &P 500. While I'm not looking for a tip for these, buy, hold, sell, I wanted to understand why these don't get talked about a lot and the overall opportunity costs of not having them in a portfolio. I'm assuming there was a European broker there sponsoring that one, international shares idea.
28:46No, we're being a little bit cynical. Well, I've been to enough of these events just to be a little bit cynical. Only a little. European companies, mate. A couple of the Motley Fool team actually invest in European businesses, I have to say. Not me. I don't have any investments outside the US and Australia. Are we missing a trick? I mean, you'll get in trouble being too general here. There are some incredible businesses in Europe. I've talked a million times I've generalized, mate. Go on. There's some great businesses in Africa, in Asia. I would say that on average, though, European businesses aren't nearly as good as US businesses.
29:27I think that's fair. It's a complicated statement to sort of justify. With enormous exceptions, as a general rule, I think that's right. Yeah. Yeah. And why? I don't know. But factually, it seems to be the case. I don't know what it is. Is it American dynamism? I don't know. I don't know what it is. But it's kind of true. And you've made the point before. It's just like once you start getting to this sort of pointy end, just find the company you really like and invest in it. But don't, why go the product that sort of bundles it all together and puts some superstar at the front to sort of say, see, you would have got this if you had done that.
30:03And it's just like, well, just find the really great European companies and invest in them. And if that's too hard, then I just, again, you can, it's no guarantee of the future, but it might be illustrative to just look at some of these products over a long period of time and compare that with our index, with the US index. and I haven't done it for a while but I suspect it's not going to be great. So, yeah. Yeah. It's hard. So I think, look, the reality is that there is only so much time and energy and effort and ability to understand and research. And you kind of start with, for me anyway, home markets are easy because we know the products, we know the companies, read about them, hear them, do all that sort of stuff, right?
30:49So it makes sense to start with your home market wherever you are. And then you kind of go, okay, well, what else can I do? And for me, it was like, well, international makes sense for diversification reasons and because there are some wonderful companies. So I'm like, okay, well, where am I going to have the best chance of finding those? Now, firstly, to ram to your point, the first thing is they are more likely to be US companies just because that's the way they've gone. I think you're right about dynamism and stuff, mate. I have a suspicion too. It's a combination of the fact that 20th century was the US century, right?
31:16The US empire, albeit not a traditional empire, just colonized the world. And so if you had a US-based company, Coca-Cola is a great, example not only because they call it coca colonization but because it's it's just that idea of coke is sold everywhere right maccas is everywhere now and so they're kind of the the why are american companies bigger and better in part accidents of time and history and circumstance in part probably because of some you know fundamentally american things but broadly speaking you start with the world's largest consumer market with a single in a single country single set of rules largely same language uh and you kind of go from there if you started english in America.
31:53You go to every other English-speaking country, then you go to most of the rest of the world, which speaks English as a second language because it has to. And so you've kind of just got this great run-up start. If I'm going to look at European companies, where do you start? There's not a single index either, by the way. So we say European as if it's a single group. It's not. Would it be a Novo Nordisk for us? Maybe. But I've got to think about, should I look at that? Maybe. Okay, where do I go? If I'm going to start with a, okay, I'm going to invest in Europe. so right where do where do you start which are the european companies how good are they where are they where are they held what's the price what's the exchange rate um can i understand the language do i understand the markets operating in it's just extra degrees of difficulty for me now i will say something like novo nordisk is a truly global company so i'm not suggesting it's not understandable but it's just like to go from maybe europe to finding novo nordisk or finding something else is really difficult again so should you do it yes if you want to i'm not i'm not you know if these companies listen on the u.s exchanges we might invest in them yeah so i'm not saying don't do it i'm not saying they're they have to be bad companies ram's not saying that either we're just saying kind of i don't invest in england either by the way and it's english and with you know a very very um similar culture and and legal system whatever because that's kind of what ours is based on why don't i and this is again the easiest choice well because there's probably some great companies there but i've only got so much time and i started here i went to the u.s and i'm kind of like if i think i get a reasonable return from those markets whatever time i take away from that to go and look somewhere else it's just it's just harder that i can that i can kind of manage to get right um there's there's a small sporting analogy you know are there are there more interesting sports i might enjoy more than the ones i like now yes am i gonna spend a whole time finding them and not watching the sports i already like and understand and have a favorite team in i mean i could and would it be a bad thing no i might i might discover some wonderful things the olympics is great every four years where we get to all be experts in synchronized swimming and um what's the uh rhythmic gymnastics and you know pole vault uh but you know do you watch it afterwards you kind of go back to what you know and i think that's partly just familiarity and that's there's benefit there right i'm not suggesting you couldn't find a hidden gem pole vaulter or something else but the the chance of better if you understand the game you understand the industry you understand the markets you've already got a lot of experience exposure to it just harder to get from from from about a zero to confidence in a time effective way that isn't taking time and effort away from stuff you probably get a better chance of getting right i would suggest yeah and i guess an observer could also make the comment it's like well why the asx yes exactly out of all the places in the world australia two percent of the global economy so europe no according to you guys for some reason but australia yes and not just yes but like for both of you a significant proportion of you know of your wealth why and and i 100 the answer to that is the to extend the sporting analogy is the home field advantage i mean i know the market i i often know the products with direct experience in it they operate on the same time um zone they they the the ceo speaks the same language uh you know we we they're regulated by our rules and institutions you just i would put myself against any, not, let's be careful here, not any, most investors in Europe who are investing in the ASX, right?
35:12Because they're going to, you're shaped by your own experiences and everything. I just understand the Australian culture. Why am I some like anthropologist expert? No, I just grew up here. I'm obviously going to know it better. And I'm certainly, you know, just like someone in France is going to understand the nuances of that culture, that system, that economy far better than me. So I like to play the home field advantage. And I like to go to places where there's not a lot of competition. And when I look at, just to show my favorite area of the market, you know, ASX small caps, there's not a lot of competition there, right?
35:47And is the best company in the world in that particular pool? Almost certainly not. But are there enough opportunities? For someone who's really happy to hold somewhere between 10 and 20 companies, can I find enough opportunities there? where I feel as though I can have a decent crack at outperforming the average? And I think yes. Now, will I lose a lot of sleep if it turned out that, oh man, if only I'd forgotten all of that, gone to Europe, invested in this Ozempic making. Like, well, that will, no matter what you do, that will always be the case. So try and just tilt the odds in your favor as much as you can.
36:21And one of the ways you can do that is, again, just playing on the home field. Yep, absolutely. I think that's 100 % true. yeah i think the the home field thing is really important look at um anz tried to expand into japan uh tesco from the u.s tried to expand to california dominoes is having its own troubles having its own troubles getting into europe and being successful netherlands and france and i don't know to what degree that is cultural or what degree they just simply market the too difficult to get into or they've taken off too much more than they can chew but these guys are spending tens of millions of dollars betting with some hopeful research and degree of reason to believe they can make it successful and are still not able necessarily to break in for whatever reason in other words they looked at a market they're getting it wrong now doesn't mean you know a netherlands-based pizza purveyor couldn't try and also fail or that someone at some other supermarket couldn't fail trying to get to california i'm just making the point that coming from overseas and saying i think i could i'd like some of that please um the cultural business realities are just different and and it's just worth being aware of that yep 100 percent mate some question from another anonymous question i know it wasn't actually it's from michael michael the majority of my portfolio says michael is long-term index funds in 100 equities with the aim for indefinite wealth creation and investment income generation that sentence should be probably the first line on most people's financial planning advice My Australian allocation, he says, is set at 40%, which is currently in a single ASX 300 index.
37:52I've been considering adding other ETFs to this Australian allocation in an effort to achieve potentially some diversification, or at least to shift the weighting away, I said I had a question before, from some of the biggest companies that make up the ASX 20. Because 40 % Australian allocation is concentrated holding compared to international equities, which have greater breadth across many countries, sectors, small cap and emerging. I'm considering adding smaller Australian allocations to either or both an Australian REIT index or the small cap index. Since both these indices contain holdings that are already in the ASX 300, the REITs of the 300 in the case of the former and the ASX 100 to 300 in the latter, I don't know if this is adding a benefit.
38:36I like the idea of introducing a total 10 % allocation to REITs across the portfolio in a similar way to super funds, as they appear to have had very good long-term growth, like traditional equities, deliver good dividend yields, and balance out the underlying holdings a bit more towards property. I like the idea of ASX small caps to redistribute the concentration of holdings in the ASX and to hopefully capture higher growth. I'm concerned this doesn't actually add diversification and it increases the management expense ratio. Plus, it amounts to me taking an active position in what is supposed to be passive long-term indexing.
39:11Your thoughts, Michael? It comes up a bit, doesn't it? And I get it where people say, I've only got this ETF, so I need to be more diversified. And I just push back a little bit and say, no, you're incredibly diversified. You might just have one item in your brokerage account, but it just happens that that item is an index ETF, which definitionally means that you've got 200 plus, maybe 500, depending on the index, companies that are in there. You're already diversified. By the way, it's only 40 % of your total investment portfolio. So 40 % of the whole is allocated across 300 companies, correct?
39:48Again, I'm being pedantic. So by all means, shift things around, but don't do it because diversification. You're diversified. You're incredibly diversified. Yep. Good question. And the other, I mean, yeah, you blur the line between passive and active and there's no i don't know where you set the slider and each one each person will set that slider what's appropriate to them and again i don't really if someone wants to have 10 different etfs because it sort of gives them the exposure that they feel is appropriate again reasonable people can reasonably disagree for various you know depending on their view of the world and where things are sort of going but it's not it's it's not an easy thing some things come up on on this show you just go that's a terrible idea don't do that or it's like yeah these we've got very smart listenership right we do i just i feel as though we just incredibly smart good looking funny all of the above right and it's kind of like i don't i mean i i more than happy you know have a beer and talk about the finer points but we just we're we're fine tuning at this point do i own any rates no i don't like them Surprise, surprise.
40:59So I'm not going to do that. We should say REIT is a real estate investment trust. For those, I didn't explain the acronym, which I should have done. Horribly, horribly lacking in doing that. But yeah, so that's unsurprisingly, Randor is not a fan of real estate. Well, it's not. And it's even like, that's a broad term. It's like saying, I don't like shares in this sense. Well, like there's within that group, you have these, you know, you have Berkshire Hathaway. And at the other end, you have Dodgy Brothers Biotech Company that's just, you know, milking shareholders. So, and in the same way, we've talked about before on the pod, there are some REITs out there purely exposed to commercial properties, which are having all kinds of tenancy problems.
41:35And, you know, it's just, I imagine there's going to be some pretty significant write downs and also refinancing issues as they roll onto higher rates of interest. You know, these are well flagged for those that sort of follow the space. And I don't know, I have my concerns. So, I wouldn't be doing that. But then what does the listener suggest? Maybe they're going into an industrial-based one that's more focused on, I don't know, data centers and warehouses that might actually have some really good tailwinds. So the devil's always in the detail with these things. So I guess it's a big word salad for me, other than just to sort of say there's nothing that's too wrong there.
42:16as long as it sort of conforms to your broader philosophy and outlook on the world, that's fine. Just wherever you can, err towards simpler as opposed to complex. And I think that's a pretty good rule of thumb if you can do that. If you're finding that it's just sort of like you're agonizing over 0.3 % allocations, you know, so like you're kind of overthinking it. And it's easy to do. And by the way, the pot calling the kettle black here. But yeah, err on the side of simplicity. Particularly if you're choosing a passive strategy. If you want to go pick stocks, very different story. If you're going to try to be half pregnant, it's a difficult place to be.
42:57I agree with you, mate. So we talked about already the small cap. I mentioned the response to the previous question, the small cap ETF. I own it. I would own it in smaller proportion if you wanted extra exposure to stuff outside. the 200 or 300 the benefit i think you've got michael is you've got the end of going to cut your personal advice but you've got 60 money outside australia anyway um which is the best part of diversification by the way just quickly too um it's not as diversified as it used to be if you look at the u.s market now the magnificent seven are an extraordinary large i think not unprecedented but kind of 20 25 year high in terms of concentration which i don't think is necessarily terrible but just be mindful of that it's why international diversification is really important for mine or one of the reasons so yes i by the way i don't like reits as a group either um to ram's point not because i just have a pathological dislike for property like he does but uh no because if you look at you look at property i like big box retail i like uh warehousing i own shares and goodman group for the record for full disclosure uh but i hate uh middling retail think about online commerce think about the risks to working from home to office REITs um i just reckon maybe maybe it's maybe it's massively great value right now because the market also doesn't like it um but you're kind of betting on this really big structural shifts reversing and they might maybe everyone goes back to the office maybe everyone buys stuff on in in person rather than online um so like which is we should not say look here's the thing right i'm making a value call about a sector and we're talking as bram said about a passive strategy i i see i have no desire to further diversify out of i own vanguard vgs which is the world or developed world except australia i own a vas which is the australian uh etf um and the nasdaq etf so they're kind of my my larger etf holdings i've got a little bit in just because i did at one point um yeah i i don't think you need to overthink it i think an allocation that you already have is fine.
45:01I think the change is also fine. Again, 10 % of 40 % or 10 % overall. I wouldn't actively try to do that, but that's up to you. Can I just make a point on REITs too? Please.
45:17Not in... I'm going to choose my words carefully here. They're very much required almost to use a reasonable degree of debt. Yeah. Because - Not the REITs themselves, but the companies I invested. Yes. Because the nominal returns aren't great. And that's not a problem, by the way. I mean, it should - I mean, again, you always go back to first principles. When someone says that, you know, property will increase by X per year, I think you've got to ask the five whys. Why? Why? Why? I mean, what's driving that? And I think, again, any observation of the long term here and other markets would suggest that on average, property tends to sort of grow in line with the economy, which kind of makes sense, right?
46:02Yeah. So, which is fine. It's like gold, right? That's probably, it's had a really great year, but generally speaking over the centuries, it just more or less kept up with inflation, right? Yeah, that's a good point. So if you're going to invest in that kind of stuff and you want outsized returns, the only way to engineer that is to take on debt. And that's why these tends to be like, Like, because of that, that brings their level up to what you might consider sort of normal-ish for equities, for businesses that create value, you know, which do more than just exist and house things. And again, I'm not trying to be too mean here.
46:41No, no, you're right. When there are big hiccups in debt markets, it's always the REITs that get wiped out. Always. The REIT return, if you buy at book value, is just the rental yield plus debt. Yep. Pretty much. Which is mathematically all the... I mean, you get some small redevelopment profits, but even then the redevelopment of funds have got to come out of either the rent or debt. So it's kind of... Oh, man. You're kind of double counting if you can't. And again, they're real profits, but they just know it's achieved... Well, the leverage, the better result is achieved with debt. So you are...
47:09And again, that's not bad. As Ram said before, Australians borrow 90 % of their property value all the time. Sure. Just be mindful that the impact of that debt can be... And we saw Centro go broke in the GFC. Oh, no, it didn't go broke. I should be careful with my words. They all had to re-capitalize. When I say all, like 90 % of them just pretty much wiped out most investors. Correct. You know, and again, plenty of people in expensive suits working in glass towers in the city would tell you that these are the low risk end of the spectrum. A lot of retirees had their money there because of the yield.
47:41It's just like the engineering that went behind all of that. Again, it's sort of good until it's not. And I'm just always a little bit nervous to expect that something like that would be delivering those kinds of rates of growth without a good degree of financial engineering, which is fine, all good and well until it's not. And for me, it just seems like it's just, I'm not saying they're hyper risky. That's the wrong impression I want to give. But they are certainly riskier than what conventional wisdom would lead you to believe. Yeah, I think that's all the way to put it. mate let's finish off with a question from james who then says please keep my identity anonymous sorry james you know what on the last james there's there's so many james's out there's a lot of james i'm okay with no one's gonna put it together on the last part of the cars it was a recent podcast actually you had a question from lucas around investing via industry funds where the tax liability is built into the unit price versus an smsf where capital gains tax implications can be delayed and are only felt on disposal.
48:46I think the point you missed is that in industry or retail fund, there is tax drag. It is as if every asset is being sold and repurchased every day to provide a net of tax unit value. The unit price, therefore, is reflecting payment of a 15 % tax on profits. With an SMSF, any capital gains liability merely accrues until the point of sale. Well, unless the government changed the rules, by the way. Therefore, the ability to defer sale until the point at which the investor is in pension phase and paying 0 % tax would allow them to sell an asset completely tax free. It's difficult to quantify the benefit, given the compounding, but do you not see this as a material benefit for an SMSF?
49:34Keep up the great work. Always enjoy the pod from our anonymous listener who happens to be called James. Again. again uh this is beyond me i good question right yeah i don't know i'm gonna throw that one straight to you i don't well again i'm not a tax expert either um i think what's i think what's important to think about is in a completely like for like scenario james i think you're absolutely right let's be really clear if the costs are the same if the management decisions are the same if the investing is the same if the x everything else is the same there is definitely tax benefit in delaying the recognition of capital gains tax.
50:12We know that, right? The compounding tax-free is a wonderful thing rather than having to keep putting the money back in. So I think that's absolutely true. I don't think there's any way to get around that in any reasonable sense. So I think that's true, right? On average, the Australian market goes up about 10 % a year. I'm going to use really, really rough numbers here. About 4.5 % of those dividends or 4%, about 5.5 % to six is capital growth. If that 6 % was taxed at 15%, you'd lose 0.9 of a percent. And like for like, yeah, that absolutely would matter. Now, the tax still accrues. So the last day tax is still higher than it would be on the last day of SMSF, but you've compounded as you say made it a higher rate.
50:51I think that's absolutely true. I think there's nothing, there's no getting around that reality. As far as I know, if your explanation of the tax circumstances are the same. So yeah, Yeah, I think so. Do I think it's material? So that's where the question becomes a problematic one, right? I mean, yes, by definition, I guess compounded long enough. You've also got to put in the annual audit and account fees and the setup costs just for a like-for-like. To me, it's where it's sort of like you've got$2 million in an SMSF. These are rounding errors, these costs. So yeah, probably. Yeah, correct. $300 grand in an SMSF.
51:28and it's like, whew, that's got to be factored in too. And the cost difference has probably been the tax benefit for a while. Now, eventually you get to a certain size. Here's the problem though, James. We already know the government has, I don't know, has it been legislated? I don't think it has. The change to the unrealized taxation of super that Jim Chalmers introduced takes that benefit away over$3 million worth of super. Now, again, if you've got that much money, it's a different question, different problem, but it's not zero. And so the kind of benefit of that goes away at that point and the zero tax only applies for super fund balances up to one point, or sorry member balance is up to 1.6 million 1.7 million now sorry it's been indexed 1.7 million these are big numbers and at that point you know as rams said the other day about borrowing and you know any money is good money any money you can save or keep for yourself is good rather than giving it to the ato or someone else so yeah like it's real money you've got one half million dollars not like the extra you know i don't know 10 grand 20 grand it's not nothing it's you know it's a new car so they're real they're very real stats um i don't want to i don't want to to get rid of this In a perfect world, if your fees were the same and you could defer capital gains tax, you should, if your returns are also the same.
52:34And I'm putting a lot of this. I don't mean to, James. I guess I'm just trying to make the point that, like I say all the time, theoretically, there are better and worse strategies. In practice, it comes down to how well the advice is taken or how well the investment strategy is implemented. If you bought, I suspect, an ASX 300 ETF on day one in both funds, and if the fund grew fast enough to offset the cost of the fees or to catch up, year one, the fees are higher in SMSF. By year 40, they're probably lower. Net-net, are you better off overall? Probably, yeah. So if I was going to do the same thing, sure.
53:09I promise most people to do with SMSF so they can do all these funny things. They can trade or they can buy property or they can do whatever else and that's not nothing again it's not zero but i would suspect the investment volatility or sorry the investment risk which i is a term i'm going to invent it's probably got a formal term in investment literature the investment risk of the asset allocation or the investment choices is probably bigger than the tax benefit and in both directions so if i got a tax benefit from being an smsf and i invested really really well i might beat the super fund by three or four if i uh get the pay more fees the balance doesn't grow i invest badly and i only get six percent rather than ten percent then i should have gone with an industry smsf and gone fishing so as always it's the devil is in the execution for me um so look theoretically are you right yes if you get the same results in the same format in the same you know the same fees and same whatever yes that's true where where everything etc as i was taught in economics all things being equal uh or everything else being equal that would be true uh and and again i'm not i'm not trying to i'm not trying to um i'm not trying to discount the point because it's absolutely a strong point i just want to guess make the point that in and of itself it's not enough it's not enough for everybody to therefore start an smsf because they want to save money on the capital gains tax accrual where where the rest of everything else the fees the investment returns the paperwork all that kind of stuff is also a reasonable part so uh yes all things being equal just make sure those all things are actually equal and not just assumed to be or you miss the forest for the trees.
54:39Yeah. Yeah. Good point. Mate, I reckon that probably wraps us up. I'm going to, well, here's a question. Could you please come back on Friday? You can't stop me at this point. At this point, I like it. The snowball is rolled so far down that hill. It's the weekly therapy session if anything else. So I will definitely be back. Well, in that case, mate, and dear listeners, we will see you on Friday. Enjoy the rest of your weekend. And until Friday or, as Ramblach said, whenever you listen to this podcast, Fool on. Cheers. The Motley Fool and people appearing in this program may have positions in the companies mentioned.
55:16General advice only. Please speak to your financial professional to understand how it may pertain to your situation. Subscribe to the free newsletter at fool.com.au forward slash listener. The Motley Fool operates under Financial Services License 400691.
From the publisher
– Why aren’t you in the top 50 pods?
– Remind me how to invest for kids?
– Gear into shares to leave money for bonds?
– Equal-weighted ETFs?
– Why not Europe?
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
