Mailbag: incl. Spending a (hypothetical) $500m lotto win! January 14, 2024

13 Jan 2024 · 1 h 27 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: Motley Fool Money - Mailbag Edition (January 14, 2024)

Episode Overview In this special Sunday mailbag edition of the Motley Fool Money podcast, hosts Scott Phillips and Andrew Page answer a variety of listener questions about investing, financial decision-making, and hypothetical scenarios. The conversation ranges from practical investment strategies for individuals to philosophical discussions about wealth and happiness.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Investment Strategies and Learning
  2. Question from Jake:
  3. Context: Jake has been investing since he was 22 but struggles with evaluating company numbers.
  4. Discussion Points:
  5. Importance of developing a fundamental understanding of financial metrics.
  6. The hosts recommend Jake learn basic accounting principles and metrics, emphasizing that it’s a lifelong learning process.
  7. Suggested resources: YouTube videos, finance podcasts, and specific books on investing (e.g., *Good to Great* by Jim Collins, books by Peter Lynch and Warren Buffett).
  8. Acknowledgment that qualitative assessments can also be valid, but learning the numbers gives an edge in investing.
  1. Investing for Children
  2. Question from Nick:
  3. Context: Nick wants to help his children (ages 10 and 13) invest but faces legal restrictions.
  4. Discussion Points:
  5. Explanation of how to set up investment accounts for minors (using a parent as a trustee).
  6. Recommendations for platforms like Sharesies and Perler that are user-friendly for young investors.
  7. Emphasis on the educational experience of investing for children rather than sheer profit.
  1. Recognizing Personal Bias in Investing
  2. Anonymous Questioner’s Dilemma:
  3. Context: They bought shares in Zip during a market peak and are now struggling with whether to sell based on their original investment thesis despite significant losses.
  4. Discussion Points:
  5. Importance of maintaining objectivity and recognizing emotional biases.
  6. Suggested strategies: Documenting investment theses, setting clear criteria for exiting positions, and being aware of intrinsic biases.
  7. The conversation touched on the difficulty of separating personal emotions from financial decisions and the need for self-awareness.
  1. Hypothetical Scenario: Winning $500 Million
  2. Question from Adam:
  3. Context: What would the hosts do if they won a $500 million lottery?
  4. Discussion Points:
  5. Scott’s Take: He would focus on giving back, funding charitable causes, and advocating for financial literacy and systemic reforms.
  6. Andrew’s Take: He would enjoy a comfortable lifestyle, buy some luxury items, but also focus on philanthropic efforts, such as reforesting land or supporting social causes.
  7. Emphasis on the fleeting nature of happiness derived from wealth and the importance of maintaining relationships and contributing to society.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Investing Requires Continuous Learning: Even experienced investors should strive to educate themselves about fundamental financial concepts and market dynamics.
  • Financial Education for Kids is Vital: Encouraging a hands-on approach to investing can foster financial literacy from an early age.
  • Recognizing Bias is Crucial for Success: Self-awareness in investment decisions is key to avoiding emotionally driven choices that can lead to poor outcomes.
  • Philanthropy Brings Fulfillment: Generosity and community support can bring more lasting happiness than material wealth alone.
  • Flexibility and Freedom Matter: True wealth is as much about having the freedom to make choices as it is about financial resources.

---

Conclusion This episode of Motley Fool Money combines practical advice with philosophical insights, encouraging listeners to think critically about their investments and the broader impacts of wealth on their lives and society. The hosts' engaging banter and honest reflections make the complex world of finance accessible and relatable to everyday investors.

For more insights, subscribe to the free newsletter at [fool.com.au/LiSTNR](https://fool.com.au/LiSTNR).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:09Welcome to Motley Fool Money, our very special Sunday mailbag edition. Nope. New Year. Same intro because it's special. Because it's Sunday. Because it's the mailbag and because I'm here with Andrew Ram Page Esquire, if you don't mind. Mr. Page, good morning. Good morning. I'm thinking we had a sir or something to that. Oh, okay. Lord Andrew of Page? Lord. That's the one. That's the one. Lord Andrew of Page. That could definitely work. That's why we brainstorm these things. Yes. We're covering all the big issues, mate. That's it for the podcast. We've peaked. It's early, but we're done. Mate, I am curious.

0:54Does your 45-hour Sunday morning ritual continue through January or do you give yourself a break? What does peak athlete do in the middle of January? Well, you know that those of us that take this thing very seriously, we never let up. So, yeah, straight through. Oh, okay. Straight through. No peaking and tapering? just peak performance the whole time. No, that's for the week. The strong never stops. Tate brings for the week. Tate brings for the week. Exactly. I love it, mate. That is brilliant. Hey, should we get into some questions? I'm keen to get into some questions because you did put the call out before Christmas.

1:32I did. And we got so many questions which is awesome. Love it. Which is great. It would probably help if we got through more than three questions an episode. My favorite thing is a couple of weeks ago you said, maybe we should do it quickly. I said, mate, that's what we try and do every week yes the strategy isn't the problem it's the execution that's the issue yeah yeah that was very much a thought bubble and i as soon as i said it i realized

1:58it's important to know one's own limitations and then set standards accordingly exactly exactly all right let's kick off the question from jake then and see how we go see if we can if the if the if par is three let's try and at least beat that shall we okay i'm confident maybe we'll get four or five in all right jake says hello scott what is straw man phillips and andrew it's an online investment club page do you like what i did there i just never bother asking because jake started for us i am after some general feedbacks as jake around restructuring a portfolio thanks to scott's relatable and down-to-earth approach and advice i've been investing increasing amounts in shares since the age of 22 ish nice work and was lucky enough to inherit some additional shares from my grandfather a few years ago.

2:41I'm now 40. He says, hopefully that is just young enough to still warrant a little hate from you, Scott. Yes, Jake. Yes, it is. I do hate you. Not as much as I hate the 20 year olds, but enough. I hate you enough. And I want to sell some of the holdings, he says, in larger banks and companies to free up some cash to reinvest in companies with perhaps more room for growth. I like that. Over the years, reading and listening to Scott and now Ram on the pot machine, I've developed a decent understanding around the psychological and temperamental nature of investing, as well as some confidence towards investing in the share market.

3:15However, I haven't put much effort towards learning how to crunch the numbers to evaluate a company for myself, and I'm still fairly limited in my understanding of this process. I've tried briefly, but I find I end up with lots of questions that lead to more questions. I know that feeling. I follow the Motley Fool who says, and I get recommendations there, and I'm aware of options such as ETFs. My question is this. If you both woke up one day and had lost your capacity to evaluate companies but still wanted to invest, what approach would you take to continue investing in smart ideas? Or do you think I have to bite the bullet and develop more knowledge around understanding the numbers to evaluate companies for myself?

3:56If so, how would you suggest I start this process? He said, I enjoy the podcast. and funnily enough for a financial podcast i even get a few laugh out loud moments each episode many thanks jake jake i'm going to assume you've been laughing with us rather than at us but i'm not going to ask you which uh which of those is true because some questions are best not asked never ask a question unless you know the answer is the old political uh political inquiry approach i'm going to take that as the very same approach and assume that uh you're laughing with us uh Really good. Some really great points from Jake.

4:30By the way, starting at 22-ish and then adding increasing amounts every year. Jake, you will be completely fine, mate, as long as you keep diversified and stay sensible. Yeah. I mean, you know, Jake's question is a good one, mate. He's saying, look, I kind of get companies, but I kind of don't get numbers. And what do I do? Is there a strategy for me? Or do I have to make some different decisions around, you know, basically biting the bullet and learning more in the process? I mean, I think the hard answer is that, yeah, you kind of need to learn some numbers, some accounting. I mean, it's confronting and intimidating, but it's not as hard as I think people like to make out.

5:16It's pretty boring. It's pretty dry. it can be pretty esoteric at times too but I think like any subject domain the big the big ideas aren't complicated right and I don't think they're beyond anyone of of you know average intelligence even below average intelligence frankly given given the investing class that that is out there and the professional investing class I should clarify so yeah so yeah I I I I think you do yourself a disservice if you start off by thinking, I just don't want to learn. I understand that it is intimidating and that you're not there yet. But rather than say, is there a path forward where I just never have to look at this stuff?

6:07I'll come back to that. I don't think so. I would encourage you more to just to don't feel as though you have to be an expert on day one or even after a week of intense study or a month or six months. So it is – all of this stuff is a lifelong journey. I've been doing it for decades. I still learn stuff all the time and I still cringe at some of the stuff I used to think very firmly about. Yeah, I know. I know. Mate, that is so true, by the way. Not even that long ago, right? Like something's like, oh, I never, ever, ever will listen to any of these podcasts retrospectively.

6:45Yeah, but you'll get there, right? And I just feel why handicap yourself? Now, if for whatever reason, just like I just know that it is a hard pass for me to even go down that path. Yeah. Can you do it qualitatively alone? Probably if you take a very wide lens and you apply some general heuristics and understand that, you know, The bad ones will probably reweight themselves to something that's negligible and the good ones will do okay. But I just feel as though – so I'm hesitant to say, no, it's impossible. Of course, it's probably not. But I do feel as though you're fighting with one arm tied behind your back.

7:26So take the effort. Take the effort to – maybe you just sort of say, hey, this month I'm just going to get – I'm going to try and watch some YouTube videos on the profit and loss statement. you know um this next month i might do some stuff on metrics the pe's that press the books etc etc and gosh there's so much good stuff out there for free whether it's blogs or podcasts or youtube or so even if you're not not a reader um there's some really i mean youtube and social media is full of rubbish but there's actually some really really really good stuff there as well and and you'll find it with with a bit of bit of searching around and you know slowly but surely you'll get there and and and you will now have a and because most people can't be bothered you'll now have a bit of an edge and an edge is is exactly the kind of thing that you should have in investing because if you what's the saying if you look around the table and you can't work out who the patsy is it's it's you um yeah don't don't be the patsy i love that mate i think um again as always you've pretty much nailed it i jake i think so a couple of things um mate if you've been doing it for a while and you're kind of still not at that point so know yourself is a really important part right a really important thing i think um if to invest you had to be a musician or an artist i would have to give up and buy utfs uh there are some skills i have uh very into leanneeson i have particular skills as leon neeson might say though i won't try to do the accent um and uh and i will use those particular skills to help me invest but uh if those particular skills were different skills then i would struggle right and i think so i guess i'm i guess i'm andrew's 100 right um with an initial caveat from me which is if you know that you know that you know uh that it's you know either you're not going to do it or you don't want to do it or you're not going to be good at it because it's just people are wired differently right um if i do my wife's job she'd do my job we'd both go hungry um and that's you know not not not because she's she's a bloody phd right She's a very smart lady.

9:28And could she apply herself and do the process probably? But you've kind of, you know, Buffett talks about winning the Avarian Lottery, waking up or being born, sorry, wired a certain way with certain skills that happened to help make him a fortune, which 50 years earlier or 100 years later might have, you know, may not have. That's a kind of a reality of the world that we're in. So, mate, I'm with Ram. I think you should absolutely go on. If you had the interest and inclination and you think you're half good at it, the aptitude, right? The general ability to kind of get this stuff, then go to the work.

10:00It's absolutely worthwhile. You may find it fascinating, interesting, whatever. If you find yourself with a like a, I mean, I could, but I really, really don't want to. That's okay too. I would say as much as I support Ram's exhortation to go and do these things, if it's kind of one of those, I know this isn't going to work, then wasting your time, energy, effort, and probably doing it badly for a while and getting discouraged and giving up anyway, there are some things you shouldn't start so i think if you're in any way wired interested you know have the aptitude then give it a red hot go if it's never going to be for you then that's okay i think the qualitative stuff to ram's point i would suspect if here's the problem right the the truly qualitative we say qualitative we don't kind of just mean looking at from the outside going oh pretty logo it does some cool things a lot more customers coming in that's worth buying true qualitative would be you know how attractive is the business how stickier its customers how likely is it to keep winning against its competitors does it have enough growth left they're kind of numbers based qualitative assessments anyway right it's not like it's not purely aesthetic and i know you're not saying that jake by the way but you know it's it's harder to do than you'd imagine if you don't have that underpinning of the business model stuff which isn't numbers necessarily but it is numerical concepts you don't need to do the maths of it but you kind of have to get the idea of capital light businesses for example or recurring revenue businesses or competitive advantages or all those kind of things trapdoor moats one of ram's favorites you kind of got and they they are they are expressions of of mathematics at some level so long answer i won't drag it out anymore um mate if you give it a go if you're even slightly interested give it a red hot go for a while and see if it starts to work and see if it starts to really grab your attention i will i'll put one i'll answer it slightly um i'll go one step back from you mate in terms of what he could learn I would grab half a dozen books and read those books and see if you start to understand the concepts because the math is easier when you have some concepts to apply it to.

11:55I learned about a concept that I was doing, it was a course called Finance for Non-Financial Managers. So I was working for Heinz at the time. I was 20 something, not very many, 24, I guess 25, something like that. I went to this course, the company sent me on this course because I was an analyst. And so kind of, I wasn't completely ignorant of numbers, but I wasn't a financial manager, i.e. I wasn't an accountant or a financial controller. I did this course and the lecturer was brilliant. And the course kind of helped me think through things like the ability of gross profit to pay for your fixed costs.

12:30And once those fixed costs were paid for, it all falls straight to the bottom line. Now that's really obvious stuff to me now, 20 something more than that years later, closer to 30 years later than I'd like to admit. you know it's it's so it's you know it's it's not hard but that that what helped me there was the math it was literally buckets he had a picture up there was like here's we're filling this bucket and the buckets fixed cost and once the bucket's full then you have all this money drips over the top of the bucket and goes to this and like oh wow and the scales literally fell from my eyes that was kind of along with reading the motley fool not as a plug but i literally you know i discovered the motley fool in a newspaper of all things uh way back in 98 gosh and um i know right and add those things together and you start to get it you start to get a picture so grab some books um good to great by jim collins is the first one i'd go for read both of both of peter lynch's books one up on wall street and beating the street oh yeah rewind this and hear it again have a listen um read the essays of warren buffett uh i if you start there and you go okay i get all that i like all that it all starts to make sense then it's telling you something i it's going to help fill in some people learn from stories right some of us are lucky enough to learn from the numbers only most of us learn from stories those i think four books i'll give four books those four books are where i would just literally read all four and then and then reassess your question reassess our answer and then see how you go from there nice let's go to question from nick who says hi scott and then he bracket says and ram but as i'm a property guy probably best to leave him out with a with a laughing emoji um i'm just wondering why leave him out if you're both property guys but i think maybe he's uh he's paint uh i don't know why he's excluding you anyway we all love our echo chambers is you know we're all guilty of that well nick says he's a property guy i would have thought he'd want you front and center anyway um i i'm kidding i'm kidding i really love the show i haven't missed once is hearing you on the property couch podcast thanks mate and now i feel confident that simply adding the vanguard asx 300 ETF is a straightforward and relatively safe way of filling out our portfolio without needing to spend all my spare time tracking the fortunes of individual companies.

14:42That's a perfectly great way to do it. A few weeks or months ago, you mentioned your kid has a sharesies account, where you were helping him learn about investing and he bought businesses he was interested in. That's absolutely true. Everything I've seen, you need to be 18 plus before buying shares, says nick my kids are 13 and 10 thanks to us talking about our investment portfolio and them reading barefoot kids great book they want to start investing he says we're only talking about a few hundred dollars it's all about the experience process and habit so my questions how do you actually go about helping kids buy shares it seems to get very complex because the assumption seems to be you're trying to do a tax dodge why can an under 18 buy as many depreciating assets as they want but can't buy anything their future self will thank them for that's a very good question thanks guys really appreciate any ideas and suggestions you have and that's from nick nick it's it's a great question mate it's not that they're expecting you you to be doing tax dodges it's the fact they know that under the old rules lots and lots and lots of people were dodging tax using exactly this approach and it is one of those things where you know the old don't hear it very often uh you know uh that that kind of sarcastic line this is why we can't have nice things that's exactly why, right?

15:57The system is there. Plenty of people exploited the system and the government said, well, sorry for you people who are doing it properly. You can't have it because they screwed it for you. And that's kind of the truth, right? You either let people, you know, if I had three kids, each of them with a$20 ,000 tax-free threshold, I could employ them. I could put my shares in their name. I mean,$60 ,000 worth of dividend income, right? Before I paid a cent in tax on my investments. Imagine having five kids. So Nick, I absolutely hear you. You're absolutely right the government has no choice realistically i mean there probably are better solutions you could have a think about what they might be but i don't have a really good one um mate yes so we have the shares is a an online stockbroker they're based in new zealand they're not chess sponsored so i wouldn't put large amounts of money there compared to what i can get from chess i have done work and do work with shares for the record so full disclosure there um i do a little video for them on a monday morning so that's just what i do um so you know we kind of um i just want everyone to know that there's a relationship there i'm not saying you should use shares or shouldn't use them but you should know that that's there.

16:53I did it for my young bloke for a couple of reasons. One, super easy to use. The app is really straightforward, really obvious. Even the company logos come up and for a kid, it's just super, super, super easy to use. By the way, it's not just for kids, it's for adults as well but it's just an easy one to do. Brokerage is really, really cheap because they're not chess sponsored but to your point, mate, he's also talking about hundreds of dollars. I invest some money for him separately. He doesn't know about that unless he hears the podcast but frankly, he's not going to. He doesn't carry them on TV.

17:20He's not going to listen to the podcast. um so yes uh but the shares his account we set up as a second account specifically to build that interest to really get him involved to give him a chance to actually make some of those decisions um in terms of how kids buy shares under 18 you're right about the appreciating assets mate it's a funny one isn't it you can i mean a kid could buy a car frankly uh he couldn't drive it could buy one um and there'd be no restrictions but buying shares i don't think it's the nature of contracts the um if you're having a contract with someone you have to sign paperwork and you don't you can't legally sign a contract around 18.

17:51The way to do it is you set up the account in your name with the child as the, so use you as the trustee for the child. So it'd be John Smith as trustee for Jenny Smith, if Jenny Smith was a 10 or 13 year old. That's how it would work. You use their tax file number and you have a bank account in their name. They can have their own bank accounts, by the way. They just can't have brokerage accounts. So you have a bank account in their name for the cash. If you want to put some cash in there regularly and buy from that account. Or in the case of shares, you just transfer money directly to the shares.

18:18kind of holding account and they then make the you make the trades from that from that amount so you kind of you kind of put the fund the account in advance uh rather than with some brokers where you make the trade and then they take the money out a couple of days later so it really simple really easy i don't care if you don't use shares you do you share these um i used it for young long book it's just easy and it was obvious and it was there there's others um the other thing i like about shares is by the way i also really like perler perler's one i use my with his other the money that i invest for him um the great thing about both of those is they're super kid friendly they're also not hyper trading accounts they're not trying to get you to day trade take margin buy foreign exchange trade cfds whatever else they're just like hey you know and i don't know circumstances will change i always i always fear uh giving too many reps to people or companies because you kind of go well three three years something might change entirely different right now uh in in late 2023 when we're recording this i know it's going to air later than that um they're just they genuine they're long-term investors they're investing for the right things.

19:16Their ethos is really great. I love what they're doing, the way they're doing it. So Sharesies and Pearl are both really, really, really, really great for kids, for anybody, again, for adults who want to get straight and narrow, fantastic. But for kids, great start. Pearl is great. You can buy Sharesies, I think, Shares Sponsor for six bucks a trade, I think. Sharesies is a percentage fee. So either is completely fine, as others out there as well, obviously. But yeah, you give them a go. Yes, you set your account, your name as trustee for your child or children and their individual tax file numbers.

19:45So you can show the ATO that it's their money, it's for their benefit. And again, if there's a bank account linked to it, again, the bank account in their name with their tax file number against it. You basically want to show the ATO everything is all about them. And when they turn 18, then you simply transfer those assets to them, to their legal name from that trustee account. And I'm no tax expert. I can't promise you to get tax advice as always, if you're not sure. But to the best of my knowledge and for what I've been advised, that's the best way to demonstrate to the tax office that you're on the straight and narrow.

20:15Yes. Sorry, Ram, that was a bit of a monologue from me, mate. Your thoughts? No, it's good. So it means I don't get hit with a capital gains tax on the transfer. Correct. Yeah. Okay. Cool. Yeah. Now, I will say, just really quickly, mate, there's still a cap on the amount of interest they can earn, so dividends they can earn before they get absolutely smashed on tax. You can't get around that. I think it used to be$416 a year account, what it is now. You just can't get around that with shares. You can do it in your name, but then you've got to pay capital gains tax when it gets transferred. That might be worth your while.

20:50You can do it in your name and they can just decide when they want the money. You can sell it for them. It can effectively be their account under your name. There's not much in the way of other options. You can use insurance, investment bonds and other things, which is a whole different field. But if you want shares, I like this particularly, as I said, for my young bloke. He's got Microsoft and Amazon and Tesla and Woolies, I think, and ARB and maybe something else. It was just basically so that he could buy a business he likes and see them go up. And he asked me the other day, hey, which one I've made most money on?

21:20I said, oh, it was Microsoft, up 44 % or something. I was like, oh, wow. And I said, mate, you've made this much money, you're doing nothing. Some of those messages, and of course the fact he owns parts of businesses, other lessons I think is a 10-year-old. But for kids that are 13, 10, as yours are, Nick, they're the sort of lessons I'd want to be teaching. Sorry, Ram Kipka. No, no, that's great. My kids are the same age, more or less. I thought about it a number of times, but we're just always put off by the red tape and the hassle. So I don't do it for my kids. It probably sounds really negligent.

21:54But I don't think they care about legal structures and taxation arrangements. Yeah, that's right. I go out on a limb there. I don't think they give a stuff. or they yeah so you look this is going to be a shameless plug but um i think all that matters is that they get the experience and they get the lessons right so go to strongman create a free account in their name or you know we just get an email ask you for an email address and set a password and a username and there's a paper you can you can paper trade the mark i hate that term paper trade paper invest paper invest in the market and and they will have a portfolio they They can see a little chart of how they performed, a little pie chart of what their portfolio looks like.

22:37And then in the background, you can just make that hole at some point if you want, you know, all proportionally so, because we give you$100 ,000 worth of play money. You might not want to give them a 10-year-old$100 ,000. But I mean, look, I'm sure there's other ones out there as well. Find it that, and that way it's kind of like they get the experience and then they get the lessons and they will see, oh, wow, I did this at 13 and now I'm 18. and wow, it's really grown a lot. And there is a lesson to be learned there and then they can start doing it properly or you can just do a transfer at that kind of point just to make it easier.

23:12Yeah, I think that gets around it, but it is frustrating that it's not easier. Yeah. Super annoying. Yeah. Super annoying. And yeah, I mean, I wish there was a better solution. That's just not, unfortunately, that's just kind of sucks. Mate, let's go to another question from someone who is choosing to be anonymous. Hi, Scott and Andrew. I'm hoping to get your thoughts on how to recognize your own red flags when investing. Several years ago, in a fit of FOMO, fear of missing out, I bought ZipShares at the height of the buy now, pay later bubble. I then watched the share price drop 95 % and bought further small amounts on the way down.

23:55For full disclosure, mostly out of desperation to reduce my average cost base. stupid i know and since then i have ignored it when i first bought shares that is all i'll say i know you could have reduced your amp cost base massively the last 20 years and still lost a fortune when i first bought shares i knew it would be high risk but i did some research and i chose zip as i thought their ability to let you pay off larger loans in more installments i.e five thousand dollars would be attractive to people who are financially responsible but maybe needed to pay off a new couch or TV over time, especially with the rising cost of living.

24:31I also liked that the company was voluntarily compliant with Australian financial regulations. I was happy then to buy and hold for the long term and see what happened over five or 10 years. Recently, says our anonymous questioner, I took another look at Zip because I was thinking of selling my shares. But although I am more than 50 % down, I feel my original investment thesis is still there. And Zip has reduced costs, reduced their timeline to be cash flow positive, and simplified their expansion plans to focus on the US market. So here's the question. How do I know if I'm really being objective versus being affected by my own biases?

25:09I've tried to ignore the share price, look purely at the investment thesis, but am I ignoring macroeconomic conditions too much? Or are my biased to be proven right and make money back? Warren Buffett said, be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful, but I'm not Warren Buffett and I can't tell whether I'm being reasonable or an idiot. I love the honesty. If your thoughts on Zip, I'd appreciate it, but mostly I'd like to know how you guys have learned to recognize your own biases. And do you have any tips to know when you need to get out of or push on with a risky investment?

25:41How do you recognize your own behavioral investing? Red flags. Thanks very much for your time. I've been a regular listener for some years now and always enjoy a new episode on the podcast machine and that's from a anonymous uh so mr or mrs a anonymous uh has has sent in that question really really good one mate um what what do you do you have any of your own biases or personal red flags you can think of mate and how do you how do you deal with them how do you overcome them Gosh, how long have we got? Yeah, a ton of them. Ton of them. You know, it's such, it's a really difficult one because I think we are just exceptionally talented at fooling ourselves.

26:27So I'm aware of them. And there is even a little voice in my head at times when I'm being guilty of suffering from one of them. But I can still rationalize my way out of that quandary pretty easily yep you know yeah no i know that this would normally be considered anchoring and that but in this instance i have re-evaluated and i think so so you know and and and then but i but i will look myself in the mirror and say hand on heart no i think i'm being objective um but there is that little nagging sensation am i though am i yeah i don't know and so i i i think all you can do is be aware of it and ask yourself the question and try and be honest.

27:10But I don't know if you can ever know for sure. The usual tactic I tend to use is to write my investment thesis down before I buy it, which we've often talked about. This is how I understand the business. This is what I think the business will do. This is what I think is a good price. This is what I think could go wrong and this is what it would look like if it did go wrong and this is how i would react if that was to turn out to be true you know so what what could happen and if it did happen what how would i react i'm kind of like setting that in stone it doesn't guarantee anything but it does it does help mitigate it because when you sort of go back and read what i thought a year ago in light of a 50 decline or increase you know i can say well i did say that at the time now can i what new information or data is out there that can allow me to rationally reframe what I thought.

28:04And maybe you can, but, but it's just, it's just a bit harder to do when you've sort of prescribed the possible outcomes and the, and the reactions to that. And you're never going to be able to cover every eventuality, but, but it does help, I think. So that's the best I've got. It's just really, really unsatisfying answer. And I don't think you can ever get rid of it, right? Like I imagine that Buffett himself, even as an octogenarian and, you know, many, many decades of successful investing, I'm sure suffers from some biases, right? Yeah, yeah. You know, much less than most people, I'm sure, but still, they're still there.

28:45And, you know, it's like denying your own human nature. It's kind of not possible to do. So that's a really disappointing answer. I wish I could sort of say, well, here are the three things that I suffer from and I do this. And that means I don't suffer from them. That was fixed. Yeah. But I'm just being honest. I don't think so. Other than, I mean, here's the other thing, right? And this has plagued me for a long time. Is it probably best described as imposter syndrome. I was like, what the hell do I know? You know, I'm like, you're lying in bed, staring at the ceiling late at night, just thinking, oh, my God, I'm a complete fraud.

29:20What am I? I don't know. Do I really know? Who might do this? Yeah. Gosh. Oh, my God. The world's crashing. You know what I mean? I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. And you can, you can be so cautious as to be paralyzed with, with you. We've talked about this previously where investing is this weird endeavor where you want to have enough arrogance to think that the market is wrong and you're right. And yet the humility to recognize that the market is probably more right than wrong. And, and you know, like that is, that is a very hard circle to square. uh like what do you what do you want to be you're the person who is clearly right and the market doesn't know what it's talking about or is or is it the other end where the market is always right and i've got no chance of doing better than it's very difficult to do um so yeah i'd be keen to hear how you deal with it mate because that's the best i've got it's really tough isn't it i mean badly is the answer right but again as you said um i yeah recognize your own humanity i think is step one um it's also i i've really you know our listeners know this i've i've immersed myself in behavioral psychology and behavioral finance um and i think i think it's that i think i think it's that i think the other thing i try and do is even within my stock picking go back to the i've tried to base my investing approach in things that i've seen work in the past and try and do those things often enough and correctly enough that over time i'll do okay which is both a really vague incredibly vague answer but also as bad as true and honest as i can be and so if i think about the way i've invested over time uh i have and yours is again we value the same things but go about it very differently which is fascinating um you know i'm i'm much more likely to buy businesses i know well right as a as a salve for getting things wrong i could i could look at business i don't know quite so well and hope i'm right and make some assumptions or i can say i don't know too hard pile so the first thing i'd say is a big too hard pile if i don't know i don't know i leave it alone uh not that i necessarily know i'll get the other ones right but i'm really really quick to say i don't know so with zip i didn't buy it in my art pay either and you know it went from four dollars to 150 or something so you know choose your examples carefully if i bought both i would have made a squillion dollars um so you know that there is that um i think so i think i think it's i think it's largely that i think it's buy what you know um and know what you're buying i think for me it is trying to implement for myself as those things that tend to work so i tend to buy businesses with high competitive advantage where i can find them now the problem i've got answering your question anonymous is that you're talking about zip being a risky investment i don't make those ones so and honestly i don't mean to sound holier than thou but part of how i avoid the psychological bias is not doing that um and plenty of people do and maybe they do find out of it i didn't buy afterlay or zip or a million other things because i looked at it and went i don't know seems pretty risky maybe the upside is big maybe it's not maybe it goes well maybe it doesn't i don't know that's i'm just not going to do it so i kind of put my own barricades around my investing style to try and keep me in the on the straight and narrow try and keep me in the uh you know the mainstream you know fastish flowing waters without without running the risk of going up against the rocks you know um i give up some potential upside but and and at the same time in doing so hopefully protect myself against some downside risk not all risk share price risk business risk plenty there i've bought some absolute stinkers before so i'm not again i'm not saying a perfect nor say i've got this right and obviously i've solved for it but i kind of try and do the the right things right more often than not and tempering i'm also lucky temperamentally i'm not a risk taker and i don't need excitement from the the market to really feel like i've you know i've done anything so it's kind of like you know my portfolio is full of i got soap hats and berkshire right it's like if there are two more boring business on the on the markets i don't know what they are um you know um now i let's talk about kogan for fun i haven't done that for a while drink when you think about exactly right it's been a very long time between drinks um when you think about kogan the you know that that was riskier than most and i looked at that and like you've done with zip i said i think this company's going to continue growing i think people are using it in increasing numbers i think that continues at pace and and if and when i'm right then i will generate me really meaningful returns from that outcome um but it didn't it didn't require me to take too many guesses about what might happen i might still be wrong about my assumptions uh but i've been roughly roughly right i'll tell my biggest my biggest i also i also try and turn my biases to my own advantage right so uh last one for me um i owned kogan when it was 20 something dollars it's now about five right now i bought some cheaper and some more expensive than the current price so uh i'm not necessarily losing i haven't lost the environment 20 but i could have sold at 20 i didn't and i didn't because i said good businesses over time will go well uh i will let it play out i'll let this investment thesis play it i won't try and get too clever on valuation i'll let it play out uh i've made mistakes in the past i've said many times about dominoes selling at 13 bucks i thought i was smart because i've gone from 8 to 13 and therefore i was a genius then I went to 140 and back to 50.

34:50Now, you know, you can do the maths on how much money I left on the table on that one. So yeah, I think harnessing the truisms of investing history is probably my, and then investing accordingly is my best way of almost kind of putting biases in my favour almost, you know, the things that are more likely than not to happen. Do more of those rather than trying to guess which one might be the next X, Y, or Z. Last quick thought for me, which is not about the biases but about maybe yours anonymous um you're talking about zipping you talk about some of the things you liked about it and what i what i sense is a an ethical interest maybe maybe you thought it was better business because of those things um but the idea of larger amounts of money so you know it would target people who weren't doing it tough and trying to get through the next payday but people who want to pay off a lounge over 12 months or you said look at least they voluntarily followed the financial code those are morally really important things and i'm not saying you should do the wrong thing by buying them or not i do wonder whether speaking of biases whether you kind of went well you know if if life was fair zip should win because it's doing the right things um or maybe just said i'd do my bath because i wasn't doing those things in either case though i would just i would just encourage our listeners not to not to not to assume that uh just because they it feels nicer the results are necessarily better be careful about giving higher weighting to those things that make you feel good but don't necessarily help the company do better not not because you shouldn't not because you shouldn't use that filter for yourself but don't don't overweight the company's ability because it's it feels nice if that makes sense so separate out your ethical decision of yes no from well it deserves to do well because it's doing the right thing it may uh but that that that deservedness doesn't doesn't yeah unfortunately karma isn't real that deservedness won't necessarily deliver a better result for the company yeah it's a tough yeah i mean in regards to zip i mean

Read the full transcript

36:46i've i think you really hit the nail on the head before with with understanding um this circle of competence and what is yeah what is um outside of that and for me most things are outside of it because i'm not that bright and when i i've i have looked and dabbled with payment companies before and usually hasn't worked out well and you realize that there's a whole i mean the kind of things that are important are usually the things that are not mentioned in the pitch decks and and the rest of it that's right you know so look at look at look at afterpay afterpay was the pioneer they invented this category i was like wow that's really cool uh everyone's gonna start doing it this way which is really just reinventing lay-by frankly um this is all they did um but then that wasn't the strength of the business.

37:38It wasn't the tech. I mean, tech's not, well, you've got to be careful here. Tech can be very hard, but like, you know, conceptually it's not, you know, I'm sure a half decent development team could rebuild the infrastructure of Zip and Afterpay without that much effort. Their strength was in being a first mover and having the brand recognition and then ultimately in building the network effect up. So people used Afterpay because it was accepted in more places. Merchants chose to partner with Afterpay because more people came in with Afterpay on their phone saying they want to pay for Afterpay.

38:08It's this virtual circle. You really just can't get to a point where it's just like, am I really going to have 18 different apps, BNPL apps on my phone? Like, it's just too hard. You generally have one. And now all the banks are offering it as well. It has become a commoditized product. And so you've got someone like Zip who definitely, I just had a quick look at their presentation. Like, yeah, they're very much pivoting towards break even. They're not there yet. They're seeing a bit of customer growth and the rest of it. Okay, cool. But there's still a very long road ahead, I would say. And in a hyper, hyper competitive market against people and enterprises that are very well resourced and very large and maybe have that more dominant network effect and, you know, marketing channels and all the rest of it.

38:55So it's all of the things that you said, yep, I'll take them as true. But there's all those other sides of things as well. So does that mean I think that they're going to go badly? No, it doesn't. It means I don't know. And that very fact means that I don't know, so I'm not going to do it. I wish them well. Good luck. I can't handicap it. Every now and again, you come across a business, you're like, I think I really get this. And then you dig into it and you're like, I really get it. And then I swing hard. I'd like, I swing really hard when I have a high conviction idea because they are rare. And when you find something that you have a lot of firm conviction in, it is something that, you know, when you get that fat pitch to use Buffett's term, you really want them to take a big swing at it.

39:41You know, like, because they're rare. They're rare. Yeah. And I'd also double down on your comment too about risk. I look at my portfolio and I reckon if I showed this to 99 % of financial planners and brokers, they go, whoa, that's super risky. Because they're small cap, often pre-profit kind of companies. Talk about behavioral flaws. Maybe this is one. Maybe this is one. But for my sins, I look at a lot of them, not all of them, but certainly majority of them go, no, that's not that risky. I think they're really well managed. I think they've got a really great product. I think there's really durable, sustainable sales momentum in this.

40:24I think if they're not profitable, they will very soon be. And the economics of the business and the sort of the way it's structured will mean that profit will come and will come significantly so. And it's probably a few years out, but no one's thinking that far ahead. And I'll just twiddle my thumbs for a few years and look like an idiot. And then one day, you know, be that overnight success that was like five years in the making. And that generally is the story of my big wins, right, is looking dumb for a long time and then sort of just being on the ground level when everything takes off. And it's not because I can't know when that is going to happen.

40:57But if you see the things that are in place there and, you know, you can make a case for it. But I'd say it's not that these are all guaranteed, far from it. But I think collectively it's actually, no, I'm not requiring a breakthrough in quantum computing or, you know, a revolutionary drug breakthrough or something. You know, these aren't the speculations that are being made. It's sort of like, do they have a reasonable presence in their chosen niche? Are people who use their products continuing to use it and use more of it? Are they finding more and more clients? And are they scaling the business effectively?

41:39And do they have the balance sheet to sort of see them through to that end? It's like we sort of check a lot of those boxes. It doesn't seem as risky as what it might. As to the first level thinker, he goes, oh, it's small cap, ergo it's risky. Oh, look at the beta relative to the index. Or look at this, or look at liquidity, or any of these other stupid academic kind of descriptors of risk, which I don't think any right-thinking person would necessarily equate with risk. I mean, yeah, it might lead to enhanced volatility, but that's not risk. um so so i i just i'd make that comment there as well and and again while we're while we're doing it and this is as i want buffett says that risk comes from not knowing what you're doing and i think that is the best description of risk that i have i have heard as opposed to what some of the more traditional descriptors would would sort of suggest so yeah i think that's right mate i think that's right i it's one of those things a bit like uh we talked about charlie's quotes not long ago where kind of Charlie says, you don't deserve to be an investor or you don't deserve to get the returns.

42:41I think Warren's right about risk is not knowing what you're doing. But it's also not knowing, you don't know what you're doing or it's a, you know, knowing what you're doing but being wrong. I think it's a, a couple of years a little bit too, you know, the old rule number one, don't lose money stuff. I think they're a little bit too trite, sometimes a little bit too short. I don't disagree with you, but you can you can lose money even if you know what you're doing because sometimes circumstances go against you now again he would say in overall sense i mean like the rule number one don't lose money is i'm not saying don't lose money in an individual trade or that you can't lose money even if you know what you're doing um he you know he lost money on the justin boots he bought a boot company that went broke um you know did he know what he's doing yes was he wrong probably yes was unlucky maybe yes um so you know i think generally speaking that's true and you're right i actually agree with you um these academic definitions of risk are completely useless but that bias thing you know hubris is one of those as well and i just would say to our listeners be careful that you don't assume you know what you're doing um you know the older i get the more i learn the more i realize i don't know uh there's there's some there's some hubris that you should be careful of and humility you should try and adopt in that in that context as well a couple quotes you just reminded me of one is like when i was 13 i couldn't believe how little my dad knew and when i was 20 25 i couldn't believe how much he'd learned in in the last dozen years which is always great such a great line so great the other one which you reminded me of just then was I think it's Twain but it's probably incorrectly attributed but it's the idea of it ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble it's what you know for sure that just ain't so just ain't so that is such and it's beautifully written too some of those quotes they make sense because they make sense others just come off beautifully that one is just a lovely I'm pretty sure it's Twain too yeah if it's not it's JP Morgan although that joke's getting old whilst we had that but yes you know it's just beautiful beautiful quotes and well that's it you know the things you know for sure that are saints so there is uh you know the more certain you are i you know the more certain someone is about something less inclined i've i've learned to become less inclined to pay them attention yeah um there is something about there is something about conviction which is important but conviction and certainty different things yeah you know and i think if you got someone who's just so certain once you become certain something you stop listening to alternative views uh you know that strong strong opinions loosely held as a phrase we have for a while um but it's yeah it's such an important concept right by all means find the courage of your convictions but don't be so convicted don't be so certain that you stop listening um because that's when things will come and get you and that's that's ugly oh hey yeah i would go 100 in one one position if if that kind of certainty was possible right yeah right exactly and i'm pretty certain of some of my investments i feel as though i am and i feel i defend them but they're not 100 of waiting though right yeah exactly and that's always what worries me when i say i'm pretty certain about it's like oh i probably shouldn't be you know that here's the other thing right in terms of in terms of certainty um you probably should only ever be about 75 percent of anything yeah not not because not because you're stupid or because it's just because life happens maybe you're wrong maybe you're unlucky maybe it goes badly maybe there are circumstances you don't even consider maybe there are risks you do consider that actually do come to pass despite the fact they're really really really unlikely um etc etc etc right um you know transurban toll road business sydney airport airport business man what could what could wreck those businesses come on there they're toll road business everyone needs to use them you know surely planes won't stop flying and cars won't stop driving down toll roads and then you know covid19 hold my beer you know it's so it's it's it's those things you just got to be really really careful of and i think i don't know i think if you're more than 75 certain about anything not you personally obviously anyone on um once you get past that level of certainty i i find it even like i recommend stocks for a living to our members right i really do and even those i'm like which ones are you which ones do you feel really certain about and i i've got to have the humility to say kind of none you know like all of them to some degree and as a group i feel really good about them but individually you know can i tell you five years out which one's going to do best no um and i honestly think you know if i tried to i'd be doing everyone a massive disservice because you know it would it would require me to take a view to say all right you know get some hubris get some hubris ready get your arrogance out uh let's let's put stuff on the table come on show me the color of your money and that macho thing that blokes do so badly so well and so badly do the new macho thing so well it ends out so badly is you know that just that that idea of well you got to take a position you got to know what's wrong with you don't you have conviction don't you know what's going on you know What am I paying you money for, Phillips?

47:17But to be fair, no one says that to me, which is lovely. But that sense, as people, but as blokes as well, you start to go, well, yeah, I mean, yeah, what's wrong with you? Why don't I know? When the brokers advertise their day trading platforms, it's all, take a position, show you. You're a smart guy. You can tell them what to do. You know what's going on. Make money from that certainty. Make money from your ego. What they should be saying is, you're so arrogant, I'm going to make a fortune of you because I'm going to convince you that you know what you're going on. and you're going to lap it up because you want to believe it's true.

47:46And that's how we get to this sort of place. Well, what was it with long-term capital management that blew them up? It was what the mathematicians call a six sigma event. Correct. In other words. Six standard deviations. Yeah. It was, nothing is impossible as a good probabilist, you know, probability theorist, gosh, can't talk today, would tell you. but it was sort of like it had the same odds of throwing a tennis ball at a brick wall and it flying through because all the atoms just were in the right arrangement you know so yeah theoretically possible so very very unlike it might happen once every eight billion years kind of thing and it happened exactly yeah that's exactly what it is man and by the way this is this is by the folly of technical analysis and chart reading and stuff they'd say well it hasn't happened before so therefore it can't happen it wasn't it wasn't even that it it wasn't even that But, you know, they hadn't started first principles and said that, you know, the things that would need to happen for this to happen was part of it.

48:43But they also went, well, it hasn't happened before. And so, you know, what are the odds? And it's that, you know, again, the hubris, that idea of, you know, we modeled it and it didn't come out. So, therefore, we assumed it was fine. It's like, well, you know. Oh. Exactly. Oh, the GFC. The GFC. I mean, again, watch the big short. It's just like, well, we've got a lot of crappy mortgages in these products and these mortgage-backed securities. but for it to go like we a lot of them can go bad i mean the only way this is going to go bad is if the whole system goes bad but i mean you know how likely is that is like well that happened and it happened within you know in the space of a few years um so yeah even worse and this is this is exactly what you just said but i'm saying a different way even worse is they went well hang on these are all crappy mortgages but if you add them all together the rule of large numbers says well hang on these are all crappy individually but if you add them all together and you're getting paid a decent amount that makes these c-grade mortgages a plus all of a sudden because we it's not just one mortgage it's lots of mortgages and it's only part of them so add all this together and mathematically you convince yourself that well we're diversified right because we've got we've got a thousand mortgages in there not just one and it's only part of them and yeah as you say about what could possibly go wrong the the they forgot to realize that correlation was a thing and so when one went wrong as you say system wise uh that was exactly the problem uh what so you know should have been a c-grade product at the best anyway they convinced it was a grade product And even then, C-grade product was still not worth C-grade because the correlation of that was awful.

50:07Or if you want to quote Charlie Munger, which is always a good idea, he says, if you mix raisins with turds, you still have turds, right? And it feels apt to the example just given. God bless you, Charlie. Motley Fool Money. For more, subscribe to the free newsletter at fool.com.au forward slash listener.

50:31here's adam who says hi guys hope you enjoy your much deserved break over the holidays thank you mate and thanks for the pre-recorded podcast says yes i know they're all pre-recorded by definition that's true i will enjoy them while on holidays in noosa now i feel slightly guilty adam because uh your holiday back's probably over the time this goes to where we have a lot of questions but hopefully you enjoyed noosa and hopefully you will also enjoy uh hearing your question to answer when you get back two questions he says i have one serious and one for a bit of fun i enjoy listening to a few money podcasts over the past few years yours is my favorite he says in brackets thank you mate and they all say to invest in low-cost index etfs and go fishing in november this year it was pointed out that the asx 200 has gone sideways for the past 15 years so you're relying on dividends at about four percent which gets taxed commentators say this is due to a large dividend payouts by companies and not reinvesting their profits as this won't change in future neither will the asx and you should look for etfs that only invest in companies that reinvest profits e.g berkshire what are your thoughts and do these etfs exist for aussie companies so there you go the market's gone nowhere in 15 years only dividends and anyway the dividends get taxed so what you should do according to some commentators apparently is only buy an etf that has non-dividend paying companies?

51:54No. Markets at a record high. So this was penned in November. We had a, we're recording this before the end of the year. The market rallied very hard towards the end of it. And again, I don't want to count chickens before they hatch, but the market's likely eight or nine percent. And even if it didn't, I don't think that changes anything, right? Because there's such short timeframes, it's all kind of meaningless. So yeah, I reject the premise of the question, sir. The next thing I would say is this idea of dividends, paying out dividends precludes growth is just really bad thinking. As always, it depends.

52:42If I can retain – Warren and Charlie have never paid a dividend and their shareholders have been just fine. right and they and and and because they have they have reinvested that and like i guess this is to your point like sort of like allow them to sort of get growth but the interesting thing here is is that they haven't necessarily reinvested the proceeds of those profits in the companies that generated those products profits that is the big advantage of a conglomerate kind of sort of structure uh and then on the other hand you've got the tobacco companies uh altria and the rest which have had no growth, in fact, degrowth, and yet whose shareholders have done incredibly well because they've paid out a load of dividends, right?

53:27So in other words, give me a rule of thumb and I'll find you 10 exceptions to it, right? That's right. And so I just, I don't like these. I don't like them. It depends. Is there reinvestment, sensible reinvestment potential? Sure, keep it. If there is not, pay it out. But I can't tell you because I haven't done the work. I don't think anyone's done an exhaustive analysis of it. But the amount of capital and shareholder wealth that has been destroyed by companies not paying out a dividend because the CEO thought that, well, we've been so successful in our little corner of the world. Let's go to the US and do the same there.

54:02Well, why don't we go into China? There's a lot of people in China. If we can capture 1 % of the market there, we'll be laughing. And yet virtually no Australian company has had success. any company that's had success through exposure to China has been by selling stuff directly from here to there. Yeah, that's right. I.e. rocks or wine or something like that. But no one, no Australian company, certainly no listed Australian company has gone into China and gone, wow, what a great move that was. In fact, it was, oh my gosh, we just had it handed to us and we blew up all of that kind of money. So were they right by not paying out a dividend?

54:39So I think too often commentators like to say things that sound good, but don't always work out in practice. So I would ignore that. And I would look at things on a case-by-case basis. Dividends are tax, therefore don't go for them. I don't know. Like, I think if, again, I'm not a big dividend investor because I'm not at that age yet. But if I was, you know, mid-60s or so and I'd spent my life building up a capital base and wanted to sort of have that work for me, I would have no problem with having some dividends even if I had to pay tax on it. And given that we've got this wonderful franking system where 30 % tax has already been paid on it, it's like, sign me up, dude.

55:22This is fantastic, right? And even if there is some tax at the end of it, it's like, again, gosh, Australians are silly like this. There is no better problem than a tax problem. and anyone who wants to winch to me because they paid a load of tax in a given year, I just want to slap in the face. It's like the only way you can do that is because you made a squillion dollars, right? Like that is the only way that you pay a lot of tax. So if you want to be clever and lose money on purpose and then go, ha, ha, ha, Mr. Taxman, I didn't pay you any money. I mean, you need your head read, right? Like give me a million dollar tax bill next year and I'll be happy.

55:56I mean, the only way that happens is because I probably made about$2 million, right? So that's a good year. That's a pretty good year. And not that I'm saying I'm desperate to, you know, what Kerry Packer says, like, you guys don't do, you spend all the tax proceeds in a really dumb way so you don't deserve any more. But, so I'm not happy about paying it, but I have to pay it. And the only reason I will pay it is if I've had a, you know, a profitable kind of year. So I think tax is always something to be mindful of, but it is too often the horse behind the cart kind of situation. Yeah. What do you think?

56:35Yes. I want to start with one of the statements that I think is incredibly misleading, Adam. Accurate, 100 % accurate, and 101 % misleading. The market has gone nowhere in 15 years. Absolutely 100 % true. If you take the highs of, in fact, 16 years, If you take the highs of 2007 and then compare the current level of markets, say, see, investing is a terrible idea. The market's gone nowhere in 16 years. That's absolutely true. If you had invested your entire life savings in one fell swoop at the very top of the market in 2007, you would have made dividends at 4-ish percent, and the share price had gone nowhere.

57:16That's still not true. Sorry, I've got to interrupt. That's still not true. It was 6 ,700, the all odds, at the height of the market. And now it's 7 ,700. Now, I'm not saying it's a spectacular return, but that's without dividends. 12 % in 16 years. Yep. Yep. Well, that's my point, right? So dividend, you got the dividend return. Okay, let's say shares didn't go exactly nowhere. They went up, what's that? Half a percent a year, 1 % a year, something like that. Terrible return. Why would you bother investing in shares? Stupid idea. Share investors are dumb. 100%, sure, sure, sure. The facts are the facts are the facts.

57:48when someone tells you that what you should do i'm going to be really really direct here because i'd like to do this what you should do is ignore that person and never ever ever ever listen to them ever again because there are there are as the saying goes people who know the price of everything and the value of nothing that person is you know the problem telling the truth is you then get to say it's like you can't go broke taking a profit true 100 true literally by definition 100 true uh so so therefore follow my advice no no it's like we're saying so uh the sky is blue therefore buy my etf you know the fact it's true doesn't follow that therefore it recommends a certain course of action now almost every day for the well effectively the entire history before 2007 the share market was lower and most days since then between that high and when we got back to that high whatever it was andrew you're right so we're up of that now but over that period of time, it's been lower.

58:48The thing is, if you're an investor, unless you invest your entire life savings on that day, and if you did, you still made some money. If you invested for the few years before and or the few years after, you put money to work in the market that has done really, really well for you. And if you were five years before that and five years after that, you've done really, really, really, really well. If you're investing during the GFC, you've done spectacularly well. If you invested during the COVID crash, you've done really well. If you miss both those periods and still dollar cost averaged outside that, you have done extraordinarily well.

59:20So someone who says you should take only one point in 2007 and ignore every single other day since then when you could have invested, just ignore those days. And just look at this one data point. So you see it's gone nowhere. That is just absolute bollocks. It is a complete misunderstanding. Now, I'm not bagging you, Adam. You hear that and you say, well, sounds real, sounds fair. i'm bagging anyone who stands up and holds himself out to be an expert and says therefore this tells you anything at all about investing it is complete bollocks it is complete codswallop it will mislead you those people are frankly idiots okay let me be really really blunt because it is either they don't know in which case stop listening to them or they do know in which case stop listening to them it is it is just it is a bit charlie here it's it's it's blanket numeracy it is honestly straight out in numeracy if you can look at that and decide that because that's true and it is true therefore you shouldn't invest it is honestly mate i i can't think of anyone who less who less deserves to give financial advice than someone who says that and says therefore this is what that means yeah so i want to put that on the record really clearly uh put my name on it i'll sign the i'll sign the document um anyone who stands behind that and tells you that as a result you should do X, Y, or Z is an idiot.

1:00:40Can I get the counterfactual before you go on? Imagine if you and I said, well, okay, we're taking the other side of that bet. And then we're like, okay, we'll make your case. And I go, well, okay. Did you know if you put all of your money into the market on March of 2009, you would have made 15 % compound per annum. And therefore the share market is the best investment in the world. Or more recent example, you put all your money in the market in March of 2020. And that's what I'm like. So what am I doing? I'm cherry picking the data. I'm taking the lows of the market and I'm using that to say that the share market is the most brilliant investment ever.

1:01:22And I think anyone look at that and go, well, that's unfair. You can't pick the best time to invest and then base your case on that. And the answer is yes, yes, that is correct. And so to your point, it's just sort of like, ask anyone even if it's not a daily dca it was just like i don't know i just put money into the market on the first of january every year and i've done that for any meaningful period of time you've done very well you know could have you should have you done better had you been someone who could foresee the exact turning point of every ebb and flow in the market well yeah okay but that's like saying if i only picked these numbers last week i would have won powerball like it's it's it's a nonsense it's such a nonsense so i just wanted i just wanted to add the other side of that as well which we won't we will never be guilty of making that that's why you invest in market because you know if you just back up the truck after every crash look how smart you are you know yeah but honestly it is blatant stupidity and i you know i will say by the way um i'm not bagging well i'm bagging those people i'm bagging that view they are just outright wrong and i've got to say to you if they don't realize that's wrong then they need to really relearn maths frankly statistics they need to they need to understand cause and effect a whole lot better and they need to understand you know the idea of investing much better than that if that's all they can bring to the table they're entitled to that view but they're dead wrong and yeah it is i'm happy to teach them the error of their ways if they if they want to talk about it um but the i i just talked about certainty and hubris right um i will hang my hat on this one if this makes me hubristic so be it if this makes me you know whatever it is just it is just outright certain i've never you know what mate i've never had the spare time i've had it i've probably watched tv i haven't made the time to sit down and do the whole yeah but if i invested a thousand dollars every month since or a hundred dollars every month since or every day since here's what i would have had or if i invested for 20 years 10 years either side of that here's what would have happened or whatever that whatever else i should do because those are the real numbers uh you know and even the vanguard chart doesn't do as good a job as it could of that stuff right because it's ten thousand dollars at a point in time at some point we'll roll forward that that period it's you know that's that's the reality but um yeah just anyway let's move on because i don't want to i don't want to spend too much time on it but i couldn't i can't be stronger there are fewer things in investing that i know to be true other than people who say that are missing the point entirely well i i could be a little bit stronger and i will um generally speaking um the person who says this is someone who is advocating a very active approach which is otherwise you have to trade because yeah yeah buy and hold anyone who buy and hold is an idiot it right like that's done yes you can't look at this you've got to be active oh it just so happens that i have the tools and the newsletter and that that's going to assist you with that you know i said because with me and my trading system and my little bit of software you would have avoided this and you would have known exactly when to buy and sell and so then so then the next obvious question is it's like if i said to you mate i've cracked the formula the alchemist couldn't do it but i've done it i've got a formula here that will turn lead into gold yeah do you want to buy the formula off me now wouldn't you just use the formula like what why i've always never had a satisfying answer to it because they're just grifters and there is no answer but i think you've got every right to ask in good faith not have to be rude about it don't have to be offensive about it but it's like well good sir and i say sir deliberately because they're always dudes good sir you have this technique that makes guarantees millions in the market uh why aren't you on an island or a yacht somewhere right now like you know yeah why are you here busting your hump trying to flog this to me yeah when you've got that capacity oh i've i've made so you see it on youtube i've made so much money now it's time for me to give back and to teach others like well you could go work for the Red Cross or you could donate some money.

1:05:15Or do it for free. Do it for free. Don't sell your training software. Give it away for free. No, it's full of, it is absolute BS. And I think if we haven't laid that on thick enough yet, then I don't know how else we can do it. True, true. Hey, I will say one thing, by the way, because the enterprising intelligent listener is now saying, hang on, aren't you bastards doing exactly the same thing? At least at the Motley Fool, we do that. And I think, I'll say, absolutely. And they'll say, well, what is the difference then? And I'll say, the difference is that we have a get rich slowly strategy. Yes, I see.

1:05:43That takes decades. I'm not telling you a get-rich-quick stream, I'm telling you a trading strategy. Why am I not hockey-beat-to-myself? Because I reckon I can probably get the market return, hopefully plus a couple of percent a year doing this. That is not going to put me on the Bahamas anytime soon. And me helping you do that is not going to stop me being able to do it anyway because me and you together, even if every listener followed, well, maybe every 20-something thousand, if enough people followed it, maybe it would change prices. But the reality is most of my portfolio are the same companies I recommend to our members, and I don't lose out by sharing that, so there's no reason not to.

1:06:16And I get paid to do it. So that's, you know, I just want to make the point, mate, because you're 100 % right, but the cynical or skeptical listening are saying, hang on, you bastard are doing exactly what you're accusing them of doing. No, no, I am offering to try to help. I may not be right, by the way. No guarantees, no fancy software, no promises. I'm trying to help our members get a little bit richer than they might have otherwise been by picking good stocks and staying the course and learning the right temperament to invest and i might help them get rich slowly yeah you know and so that's and that's that's why we are people say to me all the time why don't you just do it yourself because i don't have enough capital yeah i'm not i'm not well i am i am doing it i am doing it myself well that's yes that's also true yes yes that's why i'm not doing well it's why i'm not competing to myself because there's no there's no downside of me sharing it and i don't have enough capital to to uh not have to work unfortunately i'd love to but that's not where i find myself and i think this is worth just for anyone who was saying ah i got you guys that's honestly the easy easy answer yeah no try hard unfortunately i have to work for my money that's right mates uh we're running out of time well not really there's no there's no time limit but we are getting close to time i do want to get to the second question but also i want to finish answering adams first i i did a bit of a rant and that cost us some time um the so the a6 on firebase rubbish ignore it whatever um the the commentators of what you should therefore do.

1:07:36I couldn't think of a worse idea. The only thing you should do is say, which strategy maximizes my returns? Warren Buffett's actually no slouch. I'm happy for him to keep the money and reinvest it for me because you know what? I reckon he's probably going to do a pretty bloody good job. And that works for me. So Warren, don't pay me a dividend, not because I'm trying to avoid tax, not because of any other clever investment strategy, because I own shares in a company where the person in charge is going to do a really, really, really good job of making it work. Now, I also own shares in Telstra.

1:08:03It's not an active buy recommendation of my stock picking service. It is a current recommendation of our income service. It pays a nice dividend. I'm really happy with that because Telstra's growth isn't that much chop. It doesn't get that much opportunity to grow. Now, if it held its dividend and tried to reinvest it, it probably ended up getting subpar returns. So pay that out. In any case, our only thing is to maximize our total after-tax return. in whatever form that return comes that return comes berkshire's been buying back stock it could have been paying a dividend um whichever warren thinks is a better option of that i'm happy to back him i'm happy for him to to make that decision uh i i just again i don't know what the commentators are saying i don't know why they're saying it's it's not very useful um i would be ignoring it entirely and just going going from that so that that's my that's my general thought on on that one um here's his second question mate uh just for fun let's say you win the 500 million dollar jackpot in the usa what do you do with this much cash it's a nice problem but what would you do while you ponder that says adam i will sip my cocktail by the pool thanks for your great advice over the year just because the earth has moved around the sun one more time merry full-on christmas that's from adam uh 500 million dollar jackpot mate uh what's on the shopping list i would i would i would use it as a deposit on a one-bedroom unit in the because it's about what i'd need so you're a miserable bastard i really am i really am i've got i've got my favorite my topics and i just i will use every possibility to circle back towards them um there is that there is that you know i've actually i've thought about that a lot because hope springs eternal.

1:09:55But you know what's interesting is that there have been so many, so many studies in this. And generally speaking, people, the level of happiness doesn't change. Like obviously that night you find out you're euphoric, you have a pretty good first year, but you get used to it really quickly. Yes. And generally speaking, all your relationships fall apart because the brother that you gave a million to is peeved at you because you gave 1.2 to your sister. Or you didn't give him more and you kept 499 for yourself. Yeah, how come you've only given me that? And then your mates, every time you go out, your mates expect you to pay.

1:10:29And it's not that you can't, but it's more the principal. Relationships just fall apart. And the thing that are most important to human happiness, it's that hierarchy of needs. What's his name? Maslow. Maslow, yeah. So once you've sort of got shelter, and once you've got the basics ticked off, I don't have to worry about being cold and hungry and healthy and stuff anymore. The most important thing for humans by far is social connections, you know? And that's why solitary - Is that bubble below arguing about property for you, mate? Where does being gnarly about the property market sit on the hierarchy for you?

1:11:01Is it above or below shelter? It's like, I'll take the ability to do that over shelter, I think. That's how important it is to me. Honey, I'm outside in a cardboard box, but I'm going to rant, I'm going to rant, I'm going to rant. So, so I, I think I really, I think we all live in the future and we all go, if only this, then I will be happy. If I get that, I'll be happy. If I get a girlfriend, I'll be happy. If I get married, I'll be happy. If I get a million dollars, I'll be happy. And it's just like, not that those things don't bring you happiness, but you've kind of, you, you very quickly take it for granted.

1:11:35so you have certain um i was giving grief to a certain um iron ore billionaire uh wa based person the other day who i just have a lot of contempt for and uh she's a she's a miserable gosh she's miserable nice okay well just let's let's get us out of trouble can we and she's as rich as anything right and i i look at a person like that and just think imagine the good that you could do in the world and still still have the perfect life right and uh so what would i do it's kind of it feels like i'm like i'm um trying to like virtue signal or something here but i think yeah i would live in a very nice house and i would have a lot of nice toys don't get me wrong i'm not i'm not going to be a monk but i i would i would i don't know i'd love to go through a hospital and just give a couple million dollars out you know like or or i don't know maybe just like put some And just do a Clive Palmer with political ads, except not be a bastard about it.

1:12:34Like maybe even advocate for some things that I felt were really important. And you know why? And I say that from a non-altruistic perspective, because again, the research tends to show you is that those things bring you a lot more happiness. Then, you know, it's like giving a gift brings you more joy than receiving a gift, generally speaking. You know, maybe not when you're nine, but when you're 49, that certainly tends to be true. My young bloke has not heard that remote. and i i know i know i know how all of that sounds but i genuinely i i think that to answer your question i i think i would i would i would love to just be that fairy godmother that just you know finds that single mom nurse that's just busting her guts out doing more important work and just saying here you go here's a house or something like that would bring me so much joy

1:13:25i um nice nice question nice problem um

1:13:33there's stuff i do with the money and the stuff i do with my time i have to say and i kind of think that combination is worth worth thinking about would you do anything different time wise i'd work a lot less yeah but would you would you do different work i guess would you yeah yeah how would you would you fill your days would you i mean yeah i mean it's hard you're already making a billion dollars a year with straw man so that's probably it's hard for you to think about only making 500 million but i hypothetically i so i i would i love my job right so i'm literally you know i think i would i think i would give myself permission to be more flexible with my work week um by which i mean if i wanted to go on holidays i would and and i'd i'd hopefully come to some accommodation with the boss so look i love what i'm doing and i want members to be looked after so i'll do it for nothing because you need to replace me and make sure someone's you know at at the controls if we need something if someone's got to do some work do some writing do some you know someone's got to be there to do it right it's not fair for me to say i'm off i'm you know i'm wealthier than rich than god i'm getting around the country around the world and screw you um but i think i want to stay at the full or at least you know working work with the full in some in some capacity so i guess i'd start there um i'd certainly i'd certainly you know because i get paid because i have a responsibility i wouldn't want to shirk that but i think if i could say look i'll do it for nothing i'll do it for a dollar a year um get someone else to come and kind of fill my my boots so that someone's doing the work and and i'll i'll absolutely give as much value as i can but i'll also be freer to take off on a wednesday go fishing or you know go away for a week to somewhere just because i want to so i think i'd time wise i think i'd do that and when i say that stuff it is those deathbed things right of more experiences with more people doing more things if the young boy wants to go on holidays to go and do that if i want to go you know those things kind of matter so i think that's where i'd start and that's not what you do with the money adam and i guess you probably know us well enough that it wasn't going to be a uh here's the toys we buy only um i think i'd give the vast bulk of it away mate in some way shape or form uh either as a i may decide i enjoyed directing that traffic or like warren buffett who's just said to the bill and melinda gates foundation you take the money i don't want to you know i'm not good at this you're good at this you do it i don't know what i'd do there um but i'd like to think i'd give a very large chunk i mean you look after family and friends all that stuff that's that's that's a you know take that's done with that sort of thing you know the family mortgages and all that kind of stuff don't forget your podcast co-host my friend that's all i'll say i will i will buy you that one bedroom uh flat in fairfield you're after mate thank you uh just you know it's only reasonable i'll have some change hopeful um yes you know i do that stuff i think um i think on top of work i i mean my passion is finance right and it's both investing in personal finance um to your point i absolutely think i do a lot of advocacy um paid or unpaid and certainly funding advocacy and funding projects um i think we should meaningfully reform the financial advice industry not just the people not just the rules but the laws that go with it the the fact that financial advice is complex exists because there are so many different you know think about the decision tree of financial advice there are so many different if this then that you know the choose your own adventure is it's a telephone book um okay so you have that many kids all right well you got that job okay uh your partner does that oh okay um you know except it just the whole thing is so ridiculously stupidly complex financial advisors aren't needed but they can be beneficial for way too many people not because i don't want people to get good advice but because you shouldn't need good advice 95 of us should be able to have templated financial advice which is if you're this age and have this much money follow this investment approach and that's the best you can do should be that should be the answer for 95 of us you know the fact that it's not oh you can transition to retirement at this stage you've got this much money you can give that lump sum into super and you can do that much you've got that many kids and you can set up this family trust to do that thing for those people and and and and you know it is an absolute dog's breakfast so that needs to be fixed i probably would devote a reasonable amount of time effort and money uh to improving personal financial literacy to improving the access to financial advice, to improving the laws around it, whether I'm successful or not, maybe it's a fool's errand, but I'd give it a red hot go.

1:17:42And with some reasonably clear efforts, I'd go on that path. Here's something really left field, mate. And this is probably, we all follow our flights of fancy. I would actually, I'm a green at heart, as you know, I'd probably buy up a whole lot of dodgy land and reforest it as a project. you know the idea of a you know being able to kind of take a large swathe of the land and say right all that you know that's going to that's going to be go towards some sort of conservation project i think is almost returning you know quasi national park um i might even give it to the government as a national park or it depends whether i trust them to do the right thing um yeah just that something like that would be it'd be kind of cool right to be able to sort of put that money to work and say this is being protected effectively in perpetuity appeals to me pretty pretty significantly so i think some some large-scale projects like that sort of stuff is probably what I'd do with it.

1:18:32Let's be a little bit fun for the end of the podcast. I'd buy about five or six different cars. I've got my eye on. I'm not going to need that many cars just because if I had that much money, I probably couldn't help myself. A big garage with five. And by the way, not a single sports car among them. I might have like an MX5 or something. A convertible is always fun to drive. But they'd just be honestly lifestyle cars, right? I'll take the convertible out today because the weather's nice. I'm partial to a four-wheel drive. You know, and our listeners know, having gone bush, I'd probably spend an extremely obscene amount of money on doing a four-wheel drive up.

1:19:04So I'd have every bell and whistle on the place, not because I do the hard track, just like a touring four-wheel drive, just for pure comfort and pure fun. I'd buy myself an old Kingswood station wagon. We had one as a family and I'd miss that car terribly. Maybe an old EH Holden as well. Just literally the fun kind of lifestyle cars just for the hell of it, just because I could. You wouldn't be tempted to lobby against tax, you know, lobby for tax reform for the ultra wealthy and advocate against indigenous rights and shake your fist at solar panels. That would be a really good use of your time for someone with hundreds of billions of dollars.

1:19:44And, you know, and then you could get into legal disputes with your children about how you're going to give them or not give them money. I mean, that seems like a really worthwhile cause, hypothetically, of course, not, you know. allegedly allegedly um no i would i would i would i would intend not to do any of those any of those things probably because you're you're not a mean-spirited person i think you know i just there'd be something about winning a large enough amount of money that you could make a really big difference partly but you know the benefit of winning it as much as a lot of people lose you'll be really careful i put a whole lot in trust and invest a whole lot of stuff when i say trust i'd invest a whole lot of stuff for an income stream right because I'm smart enough to know that that's the way to do it rather than spending down the capital.

1:20:27If I'm going to give a whole lot away, whatever's left, I'm going to invest so that I have a regular income stream I know that I can kind of rely on more or less. But I think the benefit of winning it rather than making it is, I think some degree, your ego's caught up in that, right? If you build the company, I'm not talking about just the mining heiress you might be referring to, but Mike Cannabrooks, lovely bloke, lives nearby by the way, which is kind of cool. But a lot of people, Murdoch, Packard, their ego's kind of tied up in their business, right? So it's all about the next, the next, the next, the next, and keeping that position and adding more and proving you can do it and all that kind of stuff.

1:21:01And that's not a criticism of them necessarily, but it kind of comes with the territory. I think part of it, to kind of your point of like, I didn't deserve this, but I got it. There's no ego in that. There's no, I deserve it. I made it. I earned it. I should keep growing it. It's kind of like, hey, windfall. What do you do with a windfall? I think it's different to what you do if you build a business because you just have that culture, that DNA, that experience where you kind of, And frankly, moving in those circles, I don't want to move in those circles, you know. Would I move from my house here?

1:21:28I'd probably go and buy some more property. Like I'd like a larger, a block just for hell of it because I love the bush and I love just being in nature and that sort of stuff. So I probably would, but not a place in Point Piper or a fancy mansion on a hill. Other than that, like what more do you need, right? Go and make a difference for some people. I think to your point, you look after your nearest and dearest and then put some effort into improving the place. I think that's probably what I'd do. Yeah. Yeah, you got to have some kind of passion project right you you i mean right the first thing you would like again while we're being real the first thing you would do is buy a whole bunch of toys and just have a great year yes exactly yeah that's what get it out of your system yes you know stay at every five-star hotel do do the whole whatever you know go up the caribbean do all of that stuff i mean you take a year or two to sort of like find yourself and then but as i say you're it's gonna get very hollow very quickly it doesn't I know that I deeply know that, but I still have trouble believing it, you know, because you kind of think, how is that possible?

1:22:29But I know it's true. Yes. And, yeah, I would really take my time to sort of, we've sort of been shooting from the hip here, but I'd really take my time to think about it. I would say this, though. That's true, too. We've said this before, too. This is a fun question, and we're well over time. But I honestly, I don't want to really reveal too much about my personal situation, but I'm happy enough to admit that I don't have millions of dollars. I reckon if I got to, let's think about this. Yeah. If I got to four or five mil, I'm done, I'm out. Yeah, totally. Because that's enough to buy me a comfortable house and with the residual have enough of a capital base to generate enough of an annual return to provide more than enough income for me to live the kind of life I want.

1:23:18So I don't - That's the thing we're super too, right? Yeah. Go, keep going. That's all I need. I mean, you know, if I ever get there, hold me to account. I don't know if I will or not anytime soon. But, yeah, I really do look at people who have much more than that and just keep going for – for me, real wealth, you touched on it really. Real wealth is getting up in the morning and saying, I'm going to do this today and just being able to. Like there are no commitments. No commitment. And maybe today I do want to do some work or maybe I want to do some charity or maybe I just want to like stuff my gob full of like chocolate eclairs and truffles and have an ivory back scratch.

1:24:01I don't know what it is, but every day that I get to choose what I do is a day of immense freedom. And I will take that over being a billionaire that has to work 60 hours each week and answer investor calls and be hauled in front of Congress. And I'll go like, just like, nah, not for me, not for me. I think, you know what, I think that, I mean, they love the game, right? That's why they do it. and i i don't regret that i want to do but to your point i said like i love what i'm doing as i said i don't live the motley for like i love this podcast i love working with our members i love being able to you know hopefully help some people i i i'm not i'm not you know asking for any praise here i get paid for what i'm doing don't get me wrong um but i i love doing what i'm doing you know some people have this sunday afternoon i remember other jobs sunday night like oh god i gotta go back to work and it doesn't mean you know some monday mornings and i think i'd like the same bed but i kind of go hey how lucky am i to do this job so i i don't think i do what i love um that's why i said i wouldn't i wouldn't want to leave my job i'd i'd love to keep doing what i'm doing i love the opportunity to to help our members to help our listeners to help our readers um it's why i joined the company so i i wouldn't want to not do that in fact i i'd miss deep desperately not being able to say here is my suggestion to help you in this particular area whatever it is here's a stock to buy here's a you know i think about investing here's an answer to a question on a mailbag podcast when we're an hour and 25 minutes in um you know that's i mean i i genuinely love this stuff i would i wouldn't know what to do if i if i wasn't doing i'd be on twitter ranting anyway right so um you know that i i'm very very very fortunate but as you say the day when it's like actually no today i've got something else i need to do or want to do and i have the luxury to do that that is that i do a job i love the only thing i the only i want to add to my life is if i didn't want to work one day i could go and do something else and that's not fair to the company it's not fair to our members and our boss my boss would probably say um scott that's not how this works at least now but if i get to the point where i work for a dollar a year then i say hey mate look here's the thing i want to be around make me make me chief investment officer emeritus um you know give someone else a daily job if they're gonna if they're gonna you know sign the checks and and do whatever um i'll happily i'll happily take some honorific title and and you know be as involved as i can be but uh with a bit more as you said that's that freedom of saying what i want to do today i i'm gonna take two weeks off i'll see you see you in a fortnight No, Scott, thanks.

1:26:13Appreciate it. You know, that is freedom. That is success, frankly. That's the goal. That is the goal. We done? We're done. Unless I win 500 million and then we are done. In which case, this is the last podcast I'll ever hear. I'm out of here. You'd come back and do next week, wouldn't you? I never liked any of you. Screw you all. I'm out. You'd come back. I know you. You couldn't help yourself. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I should hope so, too. Cool. Thank you for spending a bit of time with us in a very, very long podcast. Lots of fun questions. Great to be in your ears. And until we speak next week, Fool on.

1:26:48Cheers.

From the publisher

– How should I invest when I can’t evaluate the numbers?

– How can I invest for kids?

– How do you overcome your own biases?

– Should I avoid dividend-paying companies?

– How would you spend a $500m lotto win?

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Motley Fool Money

All 403 episodes
Mailbag: incl. Spending a (hypothetical) $500m lotto win! January 14, 2024Motley Fool Money · 1 h 27 min
Listen in VO