Risk, and the opportunity for gains. October 20, 2023

20 Oct 2023 · 1 h 4 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: Motley Fool Money - Episode: Risk, and the Opportunity for Gains Date: October 20, 2023

Episode Overview In this episode, hosts Scott Phillips and Andrew Page discuss various topics related to the current financial landscape, including geopolitical issues, investment strategies in small-cap versus large-cap stocks, and notable corporate developments involving BHP and Whitehaven.

Key Topics Discussed

Geopolitical Considerations

  • Market Response to Israel and Palestine Conflict:
  • The market appears relatively unaffected by the current conflict, with oil prices stable and shares not significantly dropping.
  • Discussion on historical volatility in markets due to geopolitical events versus current apathy.

Investment Strategies

  • Importance of Long-Term Focus:
  • The hosts emphasize the importance of investing in high-quality companies with strong prospects rather than reacting to short-term market movements.
  • Andrew speaks to the strategy of identifying small-cap companies that offer potential at better value compared to larger firms.
  • Small-Cap vs. Large-Cap Investments:
  • Andrew often focuses on small-cap investments, citing that they can be overlooked and might offer better value, while Scott leans towards mid to large-cap stocks.
  • The discussion highlights the merits of looking at company fundamentals rather than just their market cap size.

Company Highlights

  • BHP's Coal Asset Sale to Whitehaven:
  • BHP is selling its coal mines for $6.4 billion to Whitehaven, which has seen a significant rebound in its share price following the announcement.
  • Discussion on whether BHP is sacrificing value for ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) concerns and the implications for shareholders.
  • The hosts ponder whether both companies can benefit from this transaction or if BHP has undervalued its assets due to pressure for a cleaner corporate image.

Stock Analysis

  • CSL and ResMed Update:
  • Overview of potential opportunities with CSL and ResMed stocks due to recent price drops.
  • Discussion on how market sentiment can affect pricing, especially regarding emerging health technologies like Ozempic, which may pose competition for both companies’ products.
  • Emphasis on understanding both the upside and downside potential of these stocks for prospective investors.

Closing Thoughts

  • The hosts encourage investors to focus on individual company merits and long-term growth opportunities rather than being swayed by market emotions or trends.
  • They underline the importance of conducting thorough research and maintaining a diversified portfolio.

Key Takeaways

  • Market Reaction: The market’s indifference to geopolitical events may represent a broader trend of resilience or a misalignment of risk assessment.
  • Investment Approach: Focus on acquiring high-quality businesses at reasonable prices is paramount; both small and large caps can present opportunities depending on the context.
  • Corporate Strategy: Companies like BHP are navigating pressures to divest from "dirty" assets while potentially sacrificing shareholder value; the implications of such decisions should be carefully evaluated.
  • Stock Volatility: Price fluctuations in stocks like CSL and ResMed may present buying opportunities, but investors should remain cautious and consider the underlying business fundamentals.

Conclusion This episode of Motley Fool Money provides insightful commentary on current financial events, emphasizing the need for a disciplined, long-term investment approach while remaining aware of market dynamics and individual company performance. The hosts encourage continued research and critical thinking in investment decisions.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:07Welcome to Motley Fool Money, the podcast that is not getting 6.4 billion dollars for our coal assets i'm scott phillips from the motley fool he is andrew page the man the myth the legend i know i say that all the time i just really like it how are you buddy yeah pretty good always always love the g up i feel a bit better after that as you as you well about myself as you well should i should say by the way uh for those who don't know because we haven't talked about for a while we are former colleagues uh you worked for the motley fool for a while you then left us uh in a half no not really to go and start burnt every bridge that was there that's right through grenades over the shoulders you walked your way bridge willer style you left us to start a business which is flourishing called strawman.com which is remarkable I have never actually thought to ask you what strawman.com does flourishing is a nice nice touch I like that thank you we're an online private investment club or a private online investment club some combination of those words you should talk to the founder and really nail that i think it's important you should get that yeah just at some point the first you know 10 or 15 years of the company's life you probably should just have a have a an answer to that question maybe you should ask me every week and then i'll get more practice that's not a bad idea i mean i'd probably be a bit boring for our listeners but yeah i'd help i can help you out if you want nah nah how's your week been oh it's been you know there's a lot happening in the world so it's sort of you know i you know i think it's one of those weeks where you feel as though it's best just not to look at Twitter or the news too much.

1:41But gosh, yeah. Other than that, yeah, not too bad. Mate, I'm going to start there, actually. And I haven't actually given you warning on this one. We did talk about it off air. But I do want to ask you about the Middle East, Israel, Palestine, Gaza, Hamas thing. Let me solve it for you. Yeah, if you wouldn't mind, that'd be lovely. Joe Biden's listening. I'm playing on the way over to Israel. Take some notes, Joe. I just wanted to, I wanted your thoughts. And again, we don't have to care about what the market does because our opportunity is to take advantage of the market when it's wrong rather than necessarily need to care or know or whatever about what it's doing when it's right.

2:19We don't have to justify or explain it necessarily. But there are circumstances where we see these geopolitical events just absolutely wreak havoc through markets. And then there are times when the market kind of seems to collectively shrug. We kind of talked about it a little bit last week, but it's continued on. And again, I will say about this goes to where anything could have happened, hopefully nothing bad. But asset prices could move all over the joint, insurance could move, whatever. But at least as we record this on Thursday morning, the 19th of October, we're now a week and a half into the conflict.

2:52The human toll is horrible. I said this last week, I will say it again, because it bears repeating. We're not taking it lightly. when we are a finance podcast, we'll talk about that. It's nowhere near as important as the human cost. But the oil price is down still. The markets are okay. I mean, Wednesday night, US was tough. So maybe our market will open up down tomorrow, today, so I should say. But broadly speaking, the market shrugged its shoulders. And in some other parallel universe, shares are down 10 % right now and oil prices over 100 bucks a barrel. Do you have a thought? Do you have an observation?

3:30Do you have a sense of what is going on in the markets and why this time is, I'll say this time is different, the four most dangerous words in investing. Why so far has it been different to some other occasions when these sort of things would have caused massive conniptions? No idea. No idea. I mean - It's weird though, right? It is weird. I mean, we touched on this last week as well it's it's always easier to rationalize after the fact so i'm sure i can come up with some narrative that goes yeah that makes sense but i mean before the fact i you know no idea and and then how it goes from here so it's it it is it is what it is and this is this is why i think it's such just a i get get to the punchline quickly here is why it's so silly to try and position around this kind of stuff.

4:20It's, you know, how do you end? Even if you've got a very good read on what's happening right now, I still don't know what's going to happen tomorrow in a very fluid, fast-moving situation. So it's the only thing, and again, as you say, it feels so crass to even talk about this given what's happening. But we've talked about this actually in a more general sense. as well, which is, I'm just going to do what I always do. I'm just going to try and find really good quality companies. And I've got a very high degree of conviction will be around 5, 10, 15, 20 years, and that will be earning more than they are today.

5:02And I want to try and acquire them at a good price. Now, I don't know when the market's going to offer me that price. And when it does offer me that price, I don't know if that means that's the exact point that's going to turn and go to the moon. But that's all I'm going to do. And I'm just going to keep doing it. And I'm pretty confident that as long as I continue to do so, over time, I'll be rewarded. I mean, the horrible humanitarian disasters that are unfolding in multiple places, in fact, around the world, I don't think that really says much about, use the great classic example of, you know, what Woolies and Coles are going to be doing, you know.

5:38Actually, we'll have some kind of impact because oil prices feed into production costs and there's general inflation and there's food price in the room, but you know, they're going to be around. So CSL, Cochlear, so it's a bunch of other big, you know, established companies. And so it's sort of, it's about focusing on what you, what you have a reasonable degree, what you can reasonably expect to be true. In other words, I don't know what next quarter's earnings are going to be at for any of these companies, but again, A, if they're around and B, they're in general prospering over the longterm and C, they're available at a decent price.

6:15That's all I care about. I think that's a really good way to put it, man. You're right. You're right. That's why we don't, you know, the ructions around the world are important for a whole lot of reasons. And we talk about it because despite the fact that human toll is far, far more important, assets still trade. And our listeners, you know, there are simply impacts on asset prices this time around. Not many, actually, as it turns out, at least not yet. But we do need to have that conversation let me let me take a tangent from that mate because i you you invest in smaller companies generally speaking than i do uh i tend to work in the mid to large you're definitely the small cap land given what you just said why do you this is not a direct it's a devil's advocate question not a direct a direct uh challenge or criticism why do you not take that to the extreme why don't you invest in the best companies that are out there the biggest the most proven the most, you know, the quality of the ones are going to be there in five or 10 years.

7:08It's easier to do that with a large cap business, a Woolworths or a CSL or something else, rather than a smaller business that maybe hasn't got the track record or the balance sheet strength or the brand recognition or the breadth of customer base. In your own investment thinking, as you kind of try and square that circle for yourself, if I'd have taken what you just said and said, well, most people would say that means I'm in ASX20 land, I'm in blue chip land. I know you tweeted about the ASX 20 during the week. So I'm giving you a bit of a throw with the dicks here. But why, you know, why not take that to its logical extreme and say, I'm just going to find the very best, highest quality businesses I can with massive balance sheets and great brands and invest in those where you get a second, third and fourth chance because nothing is fatal.

7:55Why go to the smaller end of the market and roll the dice there? Such a great question. So there's a US-based investor I've got a lot of respect for. He's not as, you know, we love to talk about Buffett and Lynch and Marx and sort of the big names, but his name's John Huber. He runs Sabre Capital. And he made, he had his investment newsletter out a little while ago and he was making the point that he's, he is generally that investor, very high quality, deep moated, large companies at good prices, very much from the Buffett sort of school of thought. And he made a comment to his investors, which is we're going small cap.

8:34And some of the, some of the, I'm paraphrasing here, but, but some of the, some of the, um, investors push back. It's like, Whoa, that's, that's not your style. And he said, no, no, no, no. My style is always to get good companies at good prices. It just so happens that when we look around at the landscape, the better value is in the small cap arena at this point in time. And I think that's true too. So while you're, You're right. My portfolio is very much small cap. I've sort of focused there. You know, if I could buy Cochlear at$100, I'd sell everything right now, you know, and back the track up.

9:10If I could get Telstra at$0.50, you know, even then. You know, it's like there is – it is not – my style is very much on what is the best opportunity risk-adjusted at current prices. I tend to find on average over time it happens to be more often in small cap because they are overlooked. They are under-researched. You often get the biggest disconnects with value because it's sort of me and a few idiots on hot copper who I'm competing against. So it's sort of like I'd rather that than the smartest, you know, PhD educated financial wizards, you know, with massive resources and supercomputers who I'm competing against at the big end of town.

9:56I just I think there's some really incredible companies at the big end of town. I just I don't I don't think the value is there. Maybe that's changing a little bit. Actually, I mentioned CSL and ResMed. Put that in there. That's that's interesting. What's happened with the Zempik and this miracle weight loss drug has really taken a knife to these businesses. So things could change. The other point I would make on it, just to reference the tweet that you mentioned, when you look at the ASX20, it is a story of mediocrity. Like, what did I, I'm going to forget my own tweet now, but it was something like 6.9 % a year, I think you said.

10:326.9 % with dividends invested, excluding tax. Don't forget, you pay, if you reinvest dividends, you've got to pay tax on the way through, but ignore all of that. So I just use the ASX20 index or total return and you look at it and it's just like, huh, 6.9%. You dig underneath the hood. We've spoken before at three of the four major banks have just all lost money as much as 20 % over 10 years on a capital basis. AMP, my favorite whipping boy, you know, like absolute dog's breakfast. Woodside. There's a whole bunch of stuff in there. It's kind of like, tell me again how these are high quality companies.

11:10And it's easy to sort of point to the share price, But the reason is, is that that share price, there's sort of short term fluctuations. But when you stand back and you look at the per share earnings growth of these businesses, because in fact, there's actually not much growth there at all. In fact, in many circumstances, an absolute decimation of earnings. So it's kind of like my, the point of my tweet was, I think too often we say big is better, big is safer. And it's like, well, it's patently not true. And I think too often when people go small cap, they go, they equate small cap with pre-revenue, highly speculative cash burning companies.

11:50Now, that's probably a majority of the case, but that just, there are small cap companies that are just gushing free cash flow with fortress balance sheets. you know that they're the exception to the rule but they're out there and and so which is why i wouldn't be and i'm not an investor in small cap etfs because i just get all the crap that that comes along with that so it's you gotta be careful with some of these labels i don't know that was a waffling answer but hopefully sort of threaded the needle a little bit now it's a good answer I think it's well worth talking about because it puts style or approach to the fore, which is exactly the point, rather than size in and of itself.

12:35And where the opportunities are is the place that it is worth going investing. I think that's a really, really, really thorough point. I just want to draw it out because I think people would have been listening to you saying quality, you know, here in five or 10 years, great businesses. And people are like, that doesn't sound like Andrew's small cap investing. But I think that is the point where you've made the point many, many times. Just applying a size filter arbitrarily is probably one of the least useful things you can do as a proxy for quality. There are some great companies in the ASX 20.

13:02There are some great companies outside it. Finding great companies is the point rather than arbitrarily saying big or small or medium or somewhere in between. You said it much better, mate. And not to lure us into a very deep rabbit hole. I think there's a lot of mischaracterization with property, right? It's like, Andrew hates property. I don't hate, who would hate property? Property is what a wonderful asset. I just, you know, I don't want to leave a five to one in something that's got a negative real yield. That's all, you know, give me a good property at a good price. I'll back up the trail, dump all of my stocks tomorrow, right?

13:34Like it's the same with the proverbial emu farm, you know, at a price and one that's generating good cash flows. It's these rules and heuristics that get applied and spoken about can be very counterproductive. And the reality is, is that when you're looking at something where there is broad agreement on the market of quality or something like that, well, they're just, the opportunity is not there. If everyone recognizes how fantastic a company is, there's no, at best, you might be able to buy it at fair value. You're certainly not going to get it at a bargain. And if you're buying it at fair value, well, by definition, I'm going to get the market average, which is like, well, I'm just going to buy the ETF and guarantee that.

14:17You know, so it's sort of like I need, if I'm going to be a stock picker, I need something that is below a reasonable appraisal of fair value. I mean, what else am I, what am I doing here if I'm not trying to do that, right? When there's a far, you know, perhaps far more worthwhile pursuits in life when I can buy an index fund, as I say, guarantee the average and not have to spend all this hard work and stress trying to beat the market average, right? absolutely it's one of the things i've said i've said before about tech i'll say it again because i think it's it bears repeating uh people buy tech stocks because their growth stocks and growth stocks they think are going to do better than the market and whatever else there's nothing inherently so we talk about size sector is the same if if amazon was appropriately priced from day one amazon doesn't beat the market no and that and yeah there is uncertainty there which is where the opportunity can come in some of these growth companies because you can sees something market misses and that that's okay the market wasn't convinced amazon would be the behemoth it is today um i own shares as everyone knows let's do that uh but uh you know there's nothing magical at any sector it's only a question of has the market appropriately priced the future that's literally it and to whatever extent technology has been that and maybe maybe will always be that for all i know right but there's just a reminder that if you if you focus on the wrong label big small tech uh i don't know industrials mining uh retail whatever there's nothing magical about any of those things and the only way any company beats the market is if it does better than the market itself investors a group think it's going to happen and that's been tech for a while because frankly people caught on late and that's been great if you're an early tech investor you've done really well right by finding these businesses you saw something in them you said great this is fantastic i'm going to make a lot of money here because the market hasn't seen it yet that's perfectly fine but a in a different universe it could have always been appropriately priced or b at some point whenever to your point mate when the crowd realizes this yeah that's when tech is down what a third over the last couple of years maybe not quite that anymore yeah probably about that yeah but part of part of that is for exactly that reason everyone went oh tech we love it we're going to bid it up why is it underperformed yes in some small cases because the companies themselves are disappointed but it's more the fact that investors got too excited about the price and And this is where, again, you've made that point beautifully, Matt, about you're buying a company for a price that is a discount to its future.

16:43That's all we're trying to do. When things get overvalued, you don't have the opportunity. And tech has been that for a while now. Will it come back? I assume so, yeah. But it's just worth – trends can continue forever. They can also end. And if the mispricing, way back to Buffett's mentor, Ben Graham, who bought businesses because they were trading for less than the value of their assets, right? Which sounds bananas to us right now. Why do people do that anymore? Because those companies don't exist because people have arbitraged that away. Companies don't sell at that price anymore because someone's going to grab them before they do.

17:15And so that idea for investing, Ben Graham doesn't become an idiot all of a sudden. The circumstances of the strategy you followed stopped. Buffett himself started buying Graham-type stocks. then went more phil fisher went more growth growth everybody who joined at the hip as munger said and we've repeated many many times but that that idea of buffett's own style change why partly because he thought he's found a better way partly because the fishing the pond dried up there was no more opportunity in that space for that particular label i.e discount to net tangible assets or book value and certainly with that amount of capital right exactly so those things you know it's it's the approach that matters let me give you a very quick example on that i have to point because it's only because they had some results out this week and it's a well i say little companies not that little actually it's what is it it's a 174 million dollar market cap so that's small cap right i always i always have to catch myself because imagine if i met you at the pub and you said oh i've got a hundred i've got a business valued at 174 million whoa that is that's small it's not a local fish and chip shop that is a big business it's just on the asx it's like no it's tiny you know it's like well okay is it anyway it's um it's called drop suite right and shares for full disclosure okay but here's a business right that has just knocked it out of the part year after year their recurring revenue has just uh it has increased their actual revenue has increased they've as they've been scaling they've tipped into profitability and cash flow positivity um and they're scaling extremely effectively well blah blah anyway i like i like the business right and they're not a recommendation to buy for god's sake please if you're buying stuff because some idiot on a podcast mentioned it it's all on you so i'm just mentioning that but i i i i mention it as an example here because if you which which is what most people will do they'll go okay they'll look at it and go wait a sec in july it was 37 cents and now it's 25 cents it's falling it's bad like is it right or was things a bit silly at 37 cents why did it get to 37 cents the afr wrote a big love letter to it you know big puff piece yeah and like oh this is great oh okay and then it was again under the under you have these companies are not scrutinizing there's not there's 2 000 stocks out there and everyone's talking about csl and woolies and cba you know it's like there are a lot of companies like this out there but this is what happens people will see it the race and they'll pile in because It was a glowing article on an AFR article, and they'd had some good results, by the way.

19:49And then it fell down at like 37 cents to 25 cents on a percentage basis as he delays. A third, give or take? Yeah, well, your mask is much better. Exactly a third. He's dropped a third in value in a few months. And it's just like, this is a good thing for anyone who is rational and farsighted. And this is the point here, is that there is the, thing that you are buying and then there is the price that you are buying it for and they are two very very different things and and yet here's a company that's very much clearly classed as as tech we know what tech has done but even despite that sort of recent movement if you go back to the start of 2019 it was three cents a share do you know what i mean like stand back look at the people are looking at the trees and they're not looking at the forest here yeah and and i think too often And this is why so many people get very mediocre returns because they're only focused on the wiggly thing on the chart.

20:49They've got no sense of perspective when it comes to timeframes here. Anyone who's run a business knows it takes, even the successful ones, they're the overnight success that are 10 years in the making. You don't see the team slaving away, you know, eating two-minute noodles, living in their mom's basement while they build the business. You just, oh, look at this guy. And now he's got a Ferrari. is like, no, none of this happens by accident. And I think if you, I don't know, I'm on a rant here, but I feel as though, again, I shouldn't complain and I'm not complaining because if you can sort of take some of this stuff to heart, there are nuggets of gold just lying around that are out there.

21:28They're rare. They're not obvious, but they're there. And they're there even in these troubled times, in these difficult times. And even in, as you say, the reason I bring it up is because in this landscape of tech and everyone hates tech and tech sold down, it's like, well no in the last few years this one's 10x in price and you know it's it's just it's just these again these labels can be very very unhelpful and each opportunity has its own merits or otherwise and that's that's why we often call ourselves bottom-up investors you know these these top-down labels all the economy's going into a recession or bond yields are spiking or all this macro stuff which is fascinating by the way um it it it distracts you from i think these individual opportunities and whether you want to call a company like drop street tech or small cap or whatever bucket you want to put it into is really just not going to give you is not going to help you in in any way as opposed to here is a business that has certain characteristics and is available at a certain price totally and by the way whatever label you give it not all companies with that labor will perform the same way so it's actually it's worse than useless because you say oh tech well drop sweet is 10x over that time there'll be other tech companies that have halved gone broke over that time so how has tech performed well it depends which tech you owned um the other thing about one last one on small caps very quickly is today's big companies were yesterday's small companies so people people tend to look at the success stories of i mean csl was a i think i want to say it was a two dollar stock now it's a 300 stock i mean maybe it wasn't quite the chip i don't really remember but the idea that as a government um right exactly operation yeah commonwealth serum laboratories back in the day um woolworths was a definitely a two dollar 15 i think a share when it was listed um now you know my point broadly is that you look at the big companies say see the big companies i'm really willing to buy more big companies and that can absolutely be the case bhp has been big for a very long time but there are some of the biggest companies today were small companies and it doesn't mean you buy every small company either I'm not making the case for either necessarily.

23:30I said, I tend to operate kind of the mid cap-ish kind of part of the world. Andrew is at the small end. I think I own maybe one company in the ASX 20 and we've talked about Telstra before. But just the broad idea of don't buy big because they're now big. That's, you know, it kind of misses the point. You know, you pay a lot of money for a very large, fully established tree. You can pay five bucks for a seedling and somewhere in between there is the right price, the right opportunity. Maybe the seedling dies, maybe it doesn't. And so, you know, there's reasons why you don't want to buy every cheap thing or every small thing.

24:00But don't look at the big company and say, look how successful Woolies is. I'm going to buy more of those. Add the one that won't even mature. That kind of misses that growth story. Can you indulge me for a couple more minutes? I've got to give you another. So I only, and I spoke about this recently also, but I have to write a bit of a love letter here. It's a company called, I think it might actually be one that you follow as well. It's called Jumbo Interactive. Yes, I own shares in Jumbo. Me too. um okay so totally biased uh and the fact that you and i both own it means it's it's going to zero so fair run run fairly worn but i mentioned it because we spoke to the ceo and the founder mike the verka during the week at straw man um mike started the company in 1995 as as an isp as internet service provider and software developer he's a he's a coder himself right it listed in 99 is jumbomail.com do you remember that i did not is that i didn't i should know the history i didn't know the history that's fast no well i looked it up in in in prep for the interview i was like huh i didn't know that jumbomail.com now you say that i have a yeah now you said i have a slight recollection but maybe i'm maybe i'm making it up because i want to sound smarter than i am but yeah go on well so uh for those that weren't around at the time um anything with dot com at the end of it just went to the moon and then and then crashed all the way back down walmart spun off walmart.com way back in the day that's how important this was walmart thought there was more value in spinning off their walmart.com business so it was for a very short period of time a separate listed business i actually went to the domain and it's for sale for 30 000 us dollars so if you want to own jumbo mail.com does jumbo and director still own it uh i assume so that's funny i don't actually i didn't look on the balance sheet somewhere go it'd probably be there somewhere um but what was what was fascinating about this is that here is a business that in the last 20 years they so you go i just because it's a round number go back 20 years well so what happened was we had the rise of the internet as we we now all know was a thing and we had some changes to the legislation which meant that internet lotteries became a thing now it's just sort of like yeah einstein of course it well it wasn't you know back in the old days youngins you had to go to a news agent and you had to buy it there and well now obviously you can you can buy it online so anyway another theme that i'm huge on structural shifts structural shifts are where value is really created and so for 20 years ago they went from less than 3 million in sales they most recently did almost 120 million you do the mass on that it's a compound annual growth rate of 20 % per year, right?

26:37Over that very long stretch of time. And even if you go over the last five years, even if you look on a per share basis, as you should, the sales per share has grown at 20 % per annum over that period as well, right? It's like, interesting. Okay. Not just that, it's profitable, right? It pays a dividend. It pays 80 % of its more, 80 % plus of its profits out to dividends. Doesn't need them. And it can still grow at that rate. And before you say, oh, yes, but it's all profits and profit is vanity, revenue is vanity, profit is sanity. The net margins, let me repeat this, the net after tax margins are 30%.

27:18That is remarkably good. Look on the app, do a scan. Tell me how many companies you find in Australia with a net margin of 30 % and a return on equity of over 30 % too, and consistently so anyway so uh it just tells you it's a very capital light business and it tells you it's a business with an incredible moat but unmoted companies don't trade it at 30 percent that's true but here's my point and just just i said it was going to be a love letter and you had to indulge me this is this is tech i said to mike you know what's what's what's the core ability and strength of business like well we're i'm a developer we're a development company most of the people who work at the company are coders and developers that's what we do and it's like Okay, well, how are you growing?

28:02Oh, we're taking our tech and we're launching it in other jurisdictions. Okay, what about sports betting? What about online casinos? Why would we do that? We've got no edge in that. That's stupid. It's like, oh my gosh, I just love it. Love it so much, right? And yet this ticks all of the boxes that you would tick in terms of those broader statements that we made. And that's why I remembered to talk about it, was it has just gone from strength to strength to strength to strength. And do you remember a few years ago, mate, so 80 % of the revenue comes from reselling lottery tickets from now called the Lottery Corporation.

28:36That's right. TLC was Tabcorp. It was my little Tabcorp, yeah. And then it's had a few restructuring. That's a whole business study right there, right? It really is. Like the structure and restructure of these gaming companies. um but do you remember a little while ago that this was these shares were incredibly good value because of this huge counterparty risk it's like oh tabcorp's just going to screw them over and then they signed a 10-year deal and even then people yeah but what happens after 10 years they're going to be they're going to be done because then then the counterparty is just going to demand a much better margin so when they re-signed that deal their their costs went up their margins went down on that business.

29:17Yet the business has continued to power ahead and has, I would argue, pretty good growth opportunities. And again, it's very easy to sort of look short term, very easy to sort of look at the characteristics that it sort of presents and bucket this with other sort of things here. And again, I guess I'm mentioning it because it ties together so many of the themes we're talking about. Quote unquote small cap, quote unquote tech, quote quote growth you know and and yet it's sort of it defies a lot of the generalizations that you can make about all of those buckets and i just wanted to give it a plug nice i will i want to add one thing mate uh which is just in the interest of fairness the counterparty risk you mentioned is still really big so if anyone's heard you talk about that and likes the business and i like it too i own it so you know we're absolutely both biased there is a there is a very real chance and no one knows how big it is that so you might remember remember vita group or vita group i do um so they sell up they right they were a retail company that basically had the contract for telstra shops a lot of i think it was all of them but most of them uh and then telstra just literally one day said yeah we're gonna do it ourselves thanks guys it's been fun yep and that was disappeared that was it right and so there was a there was a chance that not only does does the lottery corporation uh ask or demand of jumbo uh better returns for lottery corp in other words lower margins for jumbo it actually might at some point say yeah this online lottery thing it's actually really big now and we don't want to share it anymore we're gonna do it all ourselves and jumbo's business will go will disappear overnight for that part of their business yeah so so it's worth it's worth just making that point that uh and again i own the shares i i don't think it's a significantly large chance but it's a very real chance and the consequences would be i'll say catastrophic for the share price they're not catastrophic for the business not existential but you know this is it's a very very different looking jumbo at at a much lower valuation moving forward because that profit it's making now from from reselling the lottery corporations tickets would literally just go away tomorrow so i just wanted it's an excellent point i'm so glad you raised it i mean it is seven years away but that'll go by quicker than you than you think and also too the market will start to discount that or not discount the shares increase the risk of that until that deal is signed so that's the other thing is you can't wait for seven years and say, at that point, I'm going to sell if it doesn't get re-signed because the shares will crash that day.

31:39But even, you know, trying to predict market movements is really hard, right? But let's go out five years. The market starts to think, oh, okay, now if I'm pricing this thing, you know, it just kind of cash flows. The further out it is, the less value it creates or infers. If we're two and a half, 18 months out from the contract being re-signed, it had no news yet we don't know what's going to happen now and who knows what's going to happen the market will start to think okay that's now a you know it's it's a near-term risk and if the market is so convinced that shares may well fall and maybe stay low uh for a for a period of time before that expiry because it might expire and until or unless there's a new contract signed so uh you can't just wait seven years either it'll be some point before that people start to think but what if and that'll weigh on the share price that's that's gonna be life of earning jumbo right Now, by the way, you might say, well, then I won't buy them.

32:32The shares could double or triple between now and then, and they might fall 15 % or 20 % as a result, right? So we're not saying buy them. We're not saying don't buy them. I'm not saying because there's a possible downside at some point. We've all seen Amazon shares are off 2 % overnight, right? 2.3 % I think they were, which sucks if you bought them yesterday. If you bought them 10 years ago, you kind of never really notice it. So, and again, Jumbo's not Amazon either. But just be mindful of those moving parts if you are considering an investment, as Ram says, don't buy it just because we talked about it.

33:00But hopefully we want to kind of, we're not trying to be balanced because we both own the shares, so we like them. We're not trying to say it's an even bet here. It's a 50-50 outcome, but we do want to present the whole story. I just, oh gosh, we are so far off our agenda, but let me riff on this. I want to underscore a couple of points you made there. And I love it because, Munger talks a lot about this, which is that you've got to understand the bear cases, the bear case better than the bears, right? And I love that when we're talking about a company that we both own, that your first place you go to is to talk about what can go wrong.

33:34And I know you're doing that just for the sake of balance, but I also know as an investor, you do that. And it's something that I think is we are so, we want to believe, right, on a good story. And I think it's always a sign of a very capable investor when you tell us what stock you like. Oh, I really like this because of that. And you go, what can go wrong? If they go, I don't know, nothing. What do you mean? I just told you everything. This is perfect. That is like run a mile, right? Exactly. The true investor goes, well, actually, here's all the things that could go wrong. And why I might be comfortable with that.

34:13Obviously, you need to have that comfort. Otherwise, why would you invest? But you certainly need to be aware of it And you need to take it very seriously, which I think is super important. The other point I'll make, and I think I made this a few weeks ago, is the idea that without some of those uncertainties, you don't get the bargain. So you kind of need something that is there that is a little bit hairy, as I called it in a recent article. You know, you need some hairs on the business because the business that is just perfect is priced for perfection and by definition doesn't have it. So, it's this really weird thing where you kind of want this really great business, but you want a couple of things that aren't so great about it or at least are perceived by the market.

34:59Things that worry the market. So, great. Yeah. Because that is such a wonderful setup because it's sort of like, you know, it's like a Zempic and ResMed and CSL. You know, I was like, you know, for whatever reason, sleep apnea and kidney disease is cured, apparently, according to the share market. And like, huh? But, you know, shut up. Don't complain, right? Like, oh, yeah. Yeah, that's totally a thing. You should, everyone is holding shares. You should sell because that's totally a thing. And then I'll buy them off you because you're idiots. And that is, I guess, it's two ideas you've got to hold in your brain simultaneously that I like this and that this isn't, even though there's this aspect that isn't so great and might have some negative consequences because at least that way I get the bargain.

35:47And finally, finally, sorry. The final point is I would make is that that's not to say you should be careful with some of these flippant statements. I don't know. Maybe kidney disease is solved. Or if it's not solved through a Zempic and GLP-1 compounds, it's going to be solved next year through some AGI breakthrough or something. I don't know. But that is why that margin of safety concept is so important as well. So you're just sort of like, I think I would do that. In fact, I do with Jumbo and any of the stocks. I was like, well, I feel as though I've got a positive view on it for good reasons.

Read the full transcript

36:19But I certainly want to make sure there's some slack in my expectations such that if it doesn't execute to plan, that I have not priced that as a necessity. In other words, I've allowed for the inevitable, what does Munger call it? The vicissitudes of business, where things will likely not pan out exactly as the way you expect, but that's okay because I've got a bit of a margin of safety in the price. Motley Fool Money. For more, subscribe to the free newsletter at fool.com.au forward slash listener.

36:58Let's talk about CSL and ResMed, mate, because you've done a nice job of covering what's going on there. I just want to unpick a little bit further because I think there's a real opportunity with both these companies right now. I don't own either of them. For full disclosure, they are recommendations I've made before and they're both current recommendations. There's a couple of free stocks. Not that I'm saying anyone should listen to it, buy them based on how I talk about it now, but they are companies we've recommended to our members. And when you do recommend them, there's this huge risk section as well so which is always worth pointing out right yeah so resmed has fallen by one third since the third of august so in what's that two and a half months lost a third csl shares are down by 23 since the 13th of june so four months and so i want to make just random couple of thoughts but they're kind of they're connected so ausempic uh you've mentioned as we talked about it mate for those who aren't following the story there's a new wonder drug apparently taken by hollywood celebrities and is all over tiktok so make of that what you will and if you are think i'm being skeptical of my comment you're absolutely right um which is was a drug as always i think it was for diabetes from memory something else anyway uh apparently taking it helps you lose weight right so so that's that's apparently so hollywood celebrities taking it losing weight it actually suppresses a whole range of impulse control is that right yeah so it's more Like it's just you're less, as I understand it, you're less likely to fall to temptation.

38:27So it's actually good for like, you know, other addictions as well. Yeah, right. So if I have a bottle of wine and I throw a Zipik down my neck, I won't do anything stupid while I'm drunk? Yeah, well, I guess so. But it also, there's, you know, it does make me think, there'll be doctors out there screaming at the podcast machine right now for a good reason probably. but you know i don't know if i want to take something which is like deadens any like there's something about being human where i don't i don't mind being a little bit flawed and and subject to the odd the odd sort of impulse our wives might disagree um so anyway this this is this new one now when i say wonder drug you know it's really really really really really early in this thing and as you said mate and it's always worth keeping this is why investing is hard right because you got to keep both ideas in your mind.

39:15Firstly, odds are based on every other weight loss drug ever, this one may not be the panacea. This might not be the cure-all. On the other hand, someone might have said that about Lipitor, the cholesterol breakthrough drug that genuinely became a massive blockbuster drug for, I think it was Pfizer. Almost everyone was on Lipitor at some point for cholesterol, right? So you kind of keep those two ideas in your head at the same time. There's a really wide range of outcomes for this thing. Now, then you say, all right, take resmed resmed is down a third in the last couple of months uh the for a third of resmed's business to effectively dry out now it's not necessarily a third of sales because there's margins in between but you know work with me here um it would have to as empty would have to a work b be prescribed widely c be affordable d be taken actually in the uh in the regime that's that's intended to be.

40:11E, I think we're up to E, people would have to lose a lot of weight and enough weight that the obstructive sleep apnea that tends to be, and sleep apnea is by the way, when you kind of, you stop breathing during the night, that goes away because you lose enough weight. So we're up to E already, right? Those ifs that have to be stacked together. And then you say the market has shot first and asked questions later by lopping a third off the share price on the off chance that maybe possibly those things happen. And if you're framing a market for that if you would just and this is you mentioned small caps format and risks and the fact that some things do go wrong with jumbo and you have to have some things that could go wrong and resume might be one of those resume may never again trade at the price it was two months ago it's really unlikely but it's possible for that to all come to pass uh statistically probabilistically that's not a likely outcome so if that's true and you get offered resume at a third off now the pass price might have been too high so again we don't want to anchor to that as you mentioned mentioned before ram um you know what would have to go wrong for resmed or right with ozempic or one of these other drugs would be remarkable now it's possible right it's really possible maybe we are on the verge of like with chat gpt and ai maybe we're on the verge of an amazing set of medical breakthroughs where these therapeutic treatment companies so think about resmeds with its sleep apnea devices basically the cpap machines think about csl with a whole lot of you know um drugs and treatments and vaccines maybe maybe it'd be great on the behalf of humanity wouldn't it be great if all the therapeutic companies were out of business because their their solutions their treatments weren't needed of course it would is it really really likely i don't know i would suspect in fact i will go on a limb and say i think it's unlikely because it would it would require a a right angle turn for medical science and again is it possible yeah do i hope it's happening yeah will happen one day i don't know maybe there's one wonder pill that solves everything for everybody that'd be great um but you know that that idea of let's lop a third off the price of of resmed csl by the way even even even less impacted this kidney disease that may or may not be helped with is an epic is a tiny portion of csl's business and yet the share's down 23 so i'm not not the only reason they're down but it is what it is so i think when you see the market react to that now let's let's go back to ram's point about probabilities if i bought a basket of companies i'm going to make some numbers if i bought 10 companies that had these sort of circumstances i am very sure i would do very nicely not every company because some of them may end up being a jumbo may lose its contract or resume might put out a business buy or whatever else but the chance that it happens to all of the companies that suffer these one-off big falls because the market freaks out let's go back to buffer makers we're supposed to be fearful and others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful investors are fearful of a zempic right now they are scared about resmed's future and csl's future if i'm going to try and build a portfolio over time i want those sort of opportunities because sometimes they're going to be right by the way buffer made a fortune buying american express shares when they got done by a scandal um where it was a basically fraud um someone to put something in a tank that wasn't supposed to be there and they claimed it was a salad oil but i can't remember the story um in detail yeah it was called the salad oil scandal anyway amex bounced back because of course it did you know these things are never also never these things are rarely significant permanent value destruction issues so i like to sell at the current price like resume at the current price again don't buy them just as i said so go and do your work um and be diversified i'm not saying just buy these two companies as we always say so you know caveat caveat but um these are these are businesses that the market seems to have forgotten were some of the biggest and best companies in the last couple of decades and has it really stopped all of a sudden is the music really stopped is the is the show really over maybe but probably not very likely one last thing mate very quickly csl was uh attacked or given some grief by shareholders at their recent agm because the share price was down and the csl boss said what the csl boss should have said which is yeah what do you want what do you want me to do about it right i'm not i'm not i'm not here to cheerlead the share price i'm here to run the run the business and i just thought again i don't own shares but that's exactly what you want a ceo to say is like dude i don't know i don't i don't set the price i just run the company it'd be different if they were attacking the business and him because of material and fundamental degradation in business quality and outlook that's different that you are in control of that but i'm like yeah you know and i'm not i'm not sticking up for the guy yeah yeah but i think any time as i as you know we do a lot of ceo interviews with straw man i i never ask them well if i do ask about the share price it's like what do you think the market misunderstands about it but it's not like why is it down or why is it up and what are you doing to fix it yeah i'll flip i'll go the other way i'll invert it any ceo who seems unnaturally focused on the share price i'm actually that's a red flag for me it's like You don't understand that you don't control it, right?

45:20Like just you do you and the market will do the market. And all you need is the whole voting versus weighing machine kind of analogy. It's like if you do a good job, the market will recognize it eventually. And that's all you need to do. If your whole strategy is just to jawbone the share price up, that never, ever, ever, without exception, over any material timeframe works out well. and if you've got a CEO who's constantly talking about the share price run a mile I would say it's a heuristic you know maybe not always true but I think you'd probably agree with that statement 100 % a million percent I don't want anyone and you know some people say well sometimes they focus on the share price they want to get up because they want to raise some capital or something else now that's possible but also by the way if that's your strategy if your strategy is geez the CEO better do a good sell job of pumping the share price because that's how that's how we're going to raise money.

46:12You better realize that is an enormous risk with red flashing lights. It doesn't mean it can't be done. It can be done. But just be really careful about, you know, is it important for shareholders that they get the best possible price? Of course it is. If the strategy is, let me go out there and shill the company as hard as I can and see if I can get a couple more cents on the share price so I can raise some capital a little more cheaply. You are taking on a very large risk with very unknown outcomes and just be very, very careful. It's not dodgy. It's just like that's, you know. They're focused on the wrong thing.

46:46And it's extraordinarily revealing that that is what they're focused on. They fundamentally misunderstand their role and influence, I would argue. I agree. Can we go to - Oh, can I? Sorry. So you can't mention CSL and ResMed. I've got to throw very quickly two scenes in here. And I'm going to do a little bit of a victory lap because you can look dumb for a long time. I'm a master at looking dumb. So I want to make a point here because, again, we can talk about and we can dismiss sort of short-term movements. I just did it with Drop Street before, you know, down 30 % in a few months and like how it's just the market doing its thing.

47:25Well, it becomes a harder thing to do. I just said the weighing machine versus the voting machine. It's a harder thing to do over longer timeframes. Now, CSL actually was$137 at the start of 2020. And now it's 236. Yeah. So that's actually a good three and a half years. Yeah, that's right. Like, okay, what's going on there? And I wrote about this on Strongman recently is that this to me is a really wonderful example of a great business but not a great price. What happened at the start of 2020? Was CSL a bad business? No, it was a great business. It's still a great business. It'll be a great business in five years' time.

48:09I've got every confidence in that. In fact, even though COVID came along and had a bit of an impact for them in terms of blood collections and there was some logistics, the nuance and the minutiae of sort of like those that follow the company will notice there were a few issues. But between like the most recent financial year at that point in time, they were doing about six bucks per share. and then but 2020 2021 and 2022 the per share earnings grew grew well actually yeah so so what what's gone on here well i'll tell you what's gone on is that at the start of 2020 you were buying csl at a p of 43 right and and and and at the time i think you and i had discussed it at the time was just like well what's wrong with this picture nothing from a business quality perspective and it's not as though too many people i think were quick to go yeah but it's very high quality i was like well yeah it is but even the best quality business isn't worth an infinite amount and we had three things that have changed in in the intervening three and a half years we had we had the narrative of lower for longer and interest rates change radically so so actually since then we've seen u.s 10-year yields go from one percent to 4.6 percent you know Like that's a big change.

49:30We had very strong growth expectations, but there was just like, well, it grew very well. It just didn't grow as strong as everyone had expected. And this is the point that we made before. It's sort of like when the share price was breaking through$300 back then and everyone was pointing about the high quality and how interest rates are going to stay longer. And, you know, that everyone can buy a share price that's rallying because you feel good about it. And FOMO kicks in and all these other kinds of things. I think the prudent investor was like, well, I love the company, but God damn, you know, 43, Jesus.

50:04You know, and I think what's different now is that when you look at, I should probably actually look at it before I pine on it, but you've now got a PE of 32, just looking at ComSec, which uses a blended number of historical and forecast. Yeah. I agree with you, mate. I think things are getting really interesting here. My hesitation, just to push back a little bit, would be I think some of the commentary I've seen around CSL is the thinking goes like this. A Zempic is overblown. It's now a bargain. And I think that's true. You actually said this in passing when you were talking, was that if you felt the price before was good.

50:47I posit that I think the price in a world of higher for longer now, not lower for longer, but higher for longer interest rates. A great company. I think it'll continue to grow probably around the 10 % mark on earnings per share for the foreseeable future. It's incredible for a company that's worth like, what,$115 billion? But 32 isn't cheap. You know what I mean? And I would say that what CSL and ResMed are interesting now because they are the classic Buffett great companies at fair prices. Now, he said, it's better to have a great company at a fair price than a fair company at a great price. And I think there's a lot of wisdom in that.

51:28But I guess what I'm trying to say is I feel as though these are interesting opportunities, not in reference to where the share price was before the shenanigans started. I just think it's because they're high quality and they're probably at around a fair price. I don't think they're at a bargain price, even though the share price can make you feel that that's the case. And that's couched. like it's just couched in it's probably an interest rate and a lens there which is doing macro and you know talking out of two sides of my mouth here but i just i just wanted to put that out there it's just like we we all love to anchor and i think too even the even the so-called experts are anchoring on past prices making the assumption that before this started things were were good value and now they're great value and i guess i would say they were probably a little bit overpriced and now they're more fairly priced.

52:15I think that's right. I think a price fall is not good and a price increase is not bad either necessarily, right? It's just a question of based on the current price and the future earnings, is this company attractive? Moving, speaking of two sides of our mouths, I think I certainly pay attention to big share price movements because it tells you the market's thinking something different than it used to. and that can be a chance to go and look for opportunities where the market may you know if if it was a good price before it's a great price now yeah and so you know if you see a big share price for us oh wow okay well i better check that simply if you see share price rise normally people say what's it gone up already i've missed the boat maybe but maybe the market's also telling you something's actually going on that is worth paying attention to like the future is really bright or delivered a really great profit or for whatever reason the market is choosing to re value this business.

53:11And again, don't buy or sell just because the share price has moved. It's a worthwhile, with 2 ,000 companies, you've got to find a way to start finding some opportunities. And one of them is just to say, hey, the big movers, something might be going on, it's worth a look. Yeah. Gosh, we could talk about that all day. We really could. We almost have. I want to go from small cap to large cap, mate, for the last 10 minutes or so of our chat. Two really big bits of news. And I think they're worthwhile talking about for a couple of different reasons. Let's start with BHP and Whitehaven. BHP is selling its coal mines in Queensland to Whitehaven for$6.4 billion, if you don't mind.

53:48Now, often if you see someone spending$6.4 billion, the purchaser is not always assumed to be getting a good deal. In this case, Whitehaven coal shares jumped, I think it was 11.8 % on the news. Now, I think this is fascinating for a couple of reasons, mate. And I want to say we don't know anything internally that hasn't already been discussed by the market. But I wanted to posit a couple of thoughts because I think it's very fair to say that if you can buy an asset and your share price jumps 12%, the market is assuming, or at least imputing, that you are getting a bargain. Because if you can give over$6.4 billion, including, by the way, a lot of borrowing, so there's interest costs that come with that, and yet your shares are worth 12 % more than they were the day before, that tells me the market's like, oh my God, you guys got to steal.

54:42If you're paying$6.4 billion for$6.4 billion worth of value, the share price shouldn't move because you've swapped the debt for an asset. And think about balance sheet accounting, right? Assets got by 6.4, liabilities got by 6.4. Okay, everything's the same as it was before. If you can justify, and by the way, when a lot of companies make acquisitions, the acquirer's share price falls because the market goes, oh my God, you did what? this is this is this is risky and it's scary and you're overpaid this seems the exact reverse now i want to also then let's get into the single point uh reference the fact that bhp not long ago sold it's well they call it a demerger they sold their oil assets to woodside uh woodside i think bhp shells there's a theme there right well that's what i wanted to draw out here because Because if you see them selling two asset classes that are, I'll say, dirty assets in a lot of people's minds, I don't necessarily want to impute that view from myself.

55:40I have views, but let's keep it about the market for now. So you see something going on. And then BHP selling this Whiteham shares go up in theory because Whiteham shares feel like they're getting a great deal. Now, it's possible, I guess, for both parties to have a great deal, but it's not very likely. It strikes me, mate, that BHP is so desperate to remake its corporate image that it may well have given Whitehaven a free kick to a pretty significant extent in doing this deal because they just want to get rid of those coal assets. And they're prepared to say, well, let's just make it go away.

56:14If you're a not a forced seller, if you're a motivated seller, that's the sort of seller you want to buy from if you're a buyer, isn't it? Oh, hell yeah. I mean I haven't done the work so I don't know you weren't putting in a bid? no I wasn't putting in a bid straw man to acquire BHP's coal assets that'd be a hell of a story it was either that or a two bedroom townhouse in Marrickville so I thought you know let's not go there slightly cheaper yeah clearly I mean trade happens because both parties agree right no one's no one's got a gun to their head here right so bhp has gone yes and and says whitehavens and they're both happy with it um so where i would and i've got to be careful here because again i don't i don't know the nuance of the details of the quality of the assets and the potential cash flows that can be generated from them but if and it's a big if bhp has sold this purely for ESG virtue signaling reasons and have been prepared to take a big haircut on the true value of that, I think the board and management need to be taken to task over that.

57:28Unless the Shell's actually wanted it though. This is the other part where this gets really messy because the board and management are there to serve the Shell. If the Shell's like, guys, you've got to get out of this shit because we don't, excuse my language, we don't want this weighing on the share price. We think we're going to have a better time of things if we don't have any of those assets that people don't like. Yeah, but I also think it's always a bad sign when you have a board and management that listen to investors. Be careful with that because I think the investors have a choice. They can pull out their smartphone at any point in time and hit sell.

57:59Gone, right? So I feel as though management and board, what they need to do is just be consistent in their message. Here's the assets we own. Here's the strategy. Here's the opportunity we're chasing. Here's the strategy that we're going to go and do that. Just be clear and consistent on that. Change your mind when circumstances dictate, but do it with reason, rationality, and always with the North Star of any corporate entity in the capitalist system that we operate under, which is we're here to maximize value for you. Now, if you don't like the way that we're going to maximize value, then that's fine.

58:32That's your choice. And even if you say, well, okay, listen, We feel as though we can do a lot to maximize shareholder value and be a force for good in the world if you want to frame it in that way. Then that's great as well. But don't sell yourself short in an ideological push to do that too quickly. You can divest or at a time that is more opportune. tune, you can let those assets run down and you can get out of things by just being more focused in how you reinvest cash flows within the company. It's like, just stop reinvesting in that. Eventually it'll go away, right? Or Whitehaven Coal. You want to be the smarter person in the transaction is what I'm saying.

59:21And they might come up and say, oh, we'll take it. We're desperate for it. We've got a lot of free money. It's just that stage of the cycle. Hey, we'll take it off your hands. Like, great. This is brilliant. It furthers our agenda and we're getting a great deal for shareholders. So it's not that, and look, I've got very strong views on all of this kind of stuff too. I think it is, to a large extent, it'll be with us for a while, these fossil industries, but it is a sunset industry at the same time, I would posit. And it's not a terrible idea that you, I wouldn't be reinvesting in it, put it that way.

59:53But I do think even with that view i wouldn't be in a race to sell this off at at a at a price that that does me a great disservice if again come back to my original point if that's indeed what's happened and what heaven gold shells might be sadly mistaken right paying share price jumping by 11 might be hubris and that might be entirely wrong i just i i agree i i totally agree with you actually i've i've ranted long and hard about ethical investing before but i do think

1:00:23it's hard if this if white haven is really getting such a great deal if that's true then i don't know what value i can quickly put white haven share price uh so oh the market cap if the business is now worth 6.3 billion dollars effectively doubles white haven's business and so what the what the shareholders are saying is this purchase adds 600 odd million dollars to the white haven market cap now that which presumably doubles their earnings all else being equal i guess right well with a whole lot of stuff going on but yes they're taking out some debt to do it and all that kind of stuff but that that's that's kind of the that's kind of the question is if it's worth so much more to white haven how's it not worth that much more less to bhp now bhp is a much bigger business so proportionally in share price you know per share and even on a market cap basis uh bsh 232 billion dollars so it's not a material transaction for bhp in the same way but it does feel like there is a a very specific thing going on here and i do i share your share your sentiment um probably a little less stridently in the sense that i think there's you know we say don't listen to shells on the other hand we say well shells we would say don't worry about the share price for example you know we we have used as shareholders i i i just think i think it's interesting that bhp is getting out of this stuff i do think i've used before the uh the example of one of my favorite comedy skits ever which is the front fell off by clark and door uh where where john clark said no it's been towed outside the environment you know it must be in an environment no no it's outside the environment it's not in the environment anymore uh which is this ship that was leaking oil there is something along to that with bhp right so bhp is now somehow cleaner in quotes uh white have which is already a coal company it's like well it's got nothing to lose if you hate me already well you might as well hate me and i'll buy these bhp coal acids and who cares uh you know what what's been achieved nothing that we've shuffled deck chairs on the titanic uh there's one new cleaner deck chair over here the other one's still as dirty as it ever was but the same amount of coal's being produced in fact white haven's predicting there'll be more coal produced next year from these mines than in the last sorry the next three years than in the the last three years uh and so you kind of this is one of those you mentioned virtue signaling before mate i can't quite get away from that idea because nothing's been achieved environmentally not a single thing has happened in fact if anything bhp seems more concerned about its corporate reputation than white haven is so what have you done you've sold an asset from someone who yes they sold coal maybe you can't make it ever good but bhp kind of cared about how it was perceived what happens like yep we're coal and we're dirty and we don't give a stuff so who do you want to own those coal mines you know it's it's it's just i thought it was a really interesting kind of time to be thinking about that it is interesting too mate the pressure being put on boards i think that's that's my last thought is just the fact that bhp felt like they had to do this or should do this probably tells you a lot about what's going on there as well oh yeah yeah oh gosh there's so much to say there but i know we're running out of time but yeah i just think it's all good and well to do that kind of stuff as long as you're consistent and clear and you don't shoot yourself your foot in the in shoot yourself in the foot in the process nicely put Mate, speaking of more things to say, will you come back on Sunday?

1:03:33You know I will. I will look forward to our conversation. In the meantime, until Sunday, Fool on. Cheers. The Motley Fool and people appearing in this program may have positions in the companies mentioned. General advice only. Please speak to your financial professional to understand how it may pertain to your situation. Subscribe to the free newsletter at fool.com.au forward slash listener. The Motley Fool operates under Financial Services Licence 400691.

From the publisher

– Why doesn’t the market care about Israel and Palestine?

– Why buy small caps?

– Two companies Ram owns

– Whitehaven to buy BHP's coal assets

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Motley Fool Money

All 403 episodes
Risk, and the opportunity for gains. October 20, 2023Motley Fool Money · 1 h 4 min
Listen in VO