In short
The Newcomer Podcast: Episode Summary
Podcast Title The Newcomer Podcast
Episode Title Katie Benner on Meritocracy, Race, and American Education Reform
Episode Description This episode features New York Times correspondent Katie Benner discussing her new book, *Miracle Children: Race, Education, and a True Story of False Promises*. The conversation dives into the implications of a school reform experiment in Louisiana that claimed a 100% college acceptance rate and the institutional failures surrounding it. The episode explores themes of race, meritocracy, and how well-intentioned systems can harm those they are designed to help.
---
Key Points
Introduction
- Eric Newcomer, Tom Dotan, and Madeline Renbarger welcome Katie Benner to discuss her book.
- The episode reflects on their history together in tech journalism and how it connects to the themes of Benner's book.
Overview of *Miracle Children*
- The book details the story of *TM Landry*, a charter school in Louisiana that claimed a 100% college acceptance rate for its students.
- The investigation revealed that many students exaggerated their hardships to gain admission into elite universities, exposing flaws in the system.
Themes Discussed
- Meritocracy and Race
- The conversation touches on how meritocracy is portrayed in education and its historical implications.
- The inequities in the educational system, particularly for Black students, are highlighted.
- Incentives and Outcomes
- The pressure to present a façade of success led to harmful practices within the school.
- The discussion emphasizes how systems can prioritize results over reality.
- Institutional Failures
- Benner discusses how well-intentioned educational reforms can often leave marginalized students behind.
- The authors argue for understanding the historical context of education and race in America.
- Historical Context
- The conversation reflects on the evolution of elite education in America and the role it plays in power dynamics.
- The historical exclusion of minority groups from elite institutions is compared to current admissions practices.
The Conversation on Meritocracy
- The podcast examines how the concept of meritocracy has shifted over time, especially in relation to Ivy League admissions.
- Benner discusses the implications of viewing meritocracy through different lenses and how it can perpetuate systemic inequalities.
The Role of Social Media and Contemporary Society
- The discussion extends to how social media amplifies societal issues and creates a broader discourse around topics like race and meritocracy.
- The impact of technology on education and social perceptions is explored.
Reflections on the Future
- The episode concludes with reflections on the potential for change within educational systems and how societal attitudes may evolve.
- The potential for backlash against progressive changes in education is acknowledged.
---
Key Takeaways
- *Miracle Children* not only critiques a specific institution but serves as a lens to explore broader issues within American education reform.
- The conversation highlights the need for an honest evaluation of how race and meritocracy interact within educational frameworks.
- It emphasizes the importance of understanding history to inform current and future educational policies.
---
Conclusion In this engaging episode, Katie Benner sheds light on the complexities of race and education in America, offering insights that challenge listeners to think critically about meritocracy and institutional accountability. The episode serves as both a reflection on past practices and a call to action for more equitable educational systems.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VORevisiting the Past with Katie
0:24 to 3:02
Discussing memories and background leading to the book's creation.
“This is what we did during the pandemic.”
The Story Behind Miracle Children
3:02 to 4:14
Exploring the intriguing story of TM Landry school and its practices.
“And I think so we started off with the from the scoop at The New York Times to all the things in the world that intervene.”
The Bigger Picture of Education Reform
4:14 to 6:40
Analyzing the implications of education practices on race and opportunity.
“And its shtick was that it got black students into the most elite universities in the country, most of the Ivy Leagues, and it had this 100 % college acceptance rate.”
Meritocracy and Higher Education
6:40 to 8:08
Investigating the role of meritocracy in Ivy League admissions and its historical context.
“kind of game the system emotionally or otherwise to get their students into school, like what was the bigger story you're trying to tell here?”
Contorted Standards of Admissions
8:08 to 14:01
Discussing the evolution of admissions processes and their implications for diversity.
“These are schools that were founded, you know, in Harvard's case before America was founded.”
The Evolution of Meritocracy in Education
14:01 to 16:49
Explores how meritocracy has evolved over time and its implications for diversity in education.
“going to take in just a bajillion Jewish students is basically the fear.”
Societal Resentments and Elitism
16:50 to 20:13
Discusses societal reactions to changes in elitism and meritocracy, including the emergence of resentment and its consequences.
“So the idea of meritocracy is a useful tool that you can bend to almost any ideology.”
Affirmative Action: Successes and Challenges
20:14 to 24:42
Analyzes the effectiveness of affirmative action over time and its impact on racial equality.
“We've seen labor uprisings, obviously, that speak to exactly to that.”
The Flaws in Meritocratic Systems
24:43 to 28:04
Critiques the meritocratic system, highlighting its inherent inequalities and the contrasting experiences of individuals within it.
“And then you're like, wow, there's a lot of racial resentment that we're fostering with this.”
The Role of Elite Networks
28:04 to 30:49
Exploration of how elite schools like Harvard create self-reinforcing social networks.
“I mean, if you like a newcomer, right, like just look at like nobody working for a newcomer right now, I think, went to an Ivy League school.”
Show all 24 chapters
Perceptions of Success Among Students
30:50 to 32:57
Discussion on how the perception of success varies among students from different backgrounds.
“place that's the funny thing maybe not about that oh yeah sorry there are chips there are chips but That's not even what I ever cared about because you know what?”
The Changing Definition of Failure
32:58 to 35:38
Examining how societal views on success and failure impact students' lives and choices.
“That is a money-making opportunity that Mike really, really takes advantage of.”
The Economic Consequences of Education
35:39 to 38:18
Analysis of how the economic landscape dictates the necessity of college education for middle-class stability.
“And he ended up at home in Louisiana with his daughter.”
Admissions Anxiety and Elite Schools
38:19 to 40:58
Discussion on the increasing pressure and anxiety around college admissions in today's context.
“Like this is one of the reasons why the middle class has shrunk so much.”
Credentialism and Social Capital
40:59 to 42:00
Exploration of how credentials affect social standing and the paradox of needing them for security.
“I did every extracurricular you could do in Macon, Georgia.”
Credentialism and Meritocracy
42:00 to 43:30
Discusses the role of credentials in achieving success and the implications of meritocracy.
“But I think the, I'm always saying to my wife, like, you want to be elite.”
Political Dynamics of Elite Institutions
43:30 to 45:58
Explores the impact of political changes on elite institutions and meritocracy in America.
“It's like they're still related to rich people, but they didn't have the exact legacy that would have allowed them to get into this school.”
Historical Context of Racial Progress
45:58 to 47:59
Examines historical gains for racial equality and how they can be quickly reversed.
“So I think that the degree to which we're seeing ideas in the academy flow or not flow has certainly, the Trump administration has a big impact.”
The Role of Social Media in Modern Discourse
47:59 to 49:53
Analyzes how social media has changed the way social issues are discussed and perceived.
“And then you have this sort of like golden couple decades.”
Changing Attitudes Towards Race and Equality
49:53 to 56:01
Discusses the current state of racial attitudes in America and the complexities involved.
“that has been rebranded as wokeism has been here before.”
The Impact of Social Media on Awareness
56:01 to 58:26
Discussing how social media brings visibility to injustices and tragedies.
“Many of them died before they saw their work really change the world.”
The Role of Silicon Valley in Education
58:27 to 1:00:22
Exploring the relationship between Silicon Valley and higher education's evolving role.
“Can we maybe like close this in talking about Silicon Valley again a bit?”
The Transformation of Tech's Reputation
1:00:23 to 1:04:03
Examining how the perception of the tech industry has shifted over different administrations.
“You know, he was famously one of the co-founders of Stanford's more conservative publication.”
Cultural References and Their Implications
1:04:04 to 1:07:43
Analyzing the influence of popular culture on education and authority figures.
“I'm not encouraging our listeners to have that view and I'm not going to embrace that view.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Today on the podcast, we're joined by an old friend, New York Times correspondent Katie Benner. We look back on our old days covering tech together at The Information, our old podcast Dead Cat, and dive into our new book, Miracle Children, Race, Education, and a True Story of False Promises, an on-the-ground account of how race and politics shape who America's schools are actually built to serve. That conversation is coming up right now. This is the Newcomer Podcast.
0:32I'm very excited for today's episode. It's a reunion, not even of sorts. It's a literal reunion. It's Deadcat. This is what we did during the pandemic. Before literally everybody had a podcast, we were like, oh, we should have a podcast. It's our friend Katie Benner. We were all working at the information at one point. and in introing her book I want to start off with this memory that I just struck me today thinking about this was I actually remember it was like 10 p.m 11 p.m on the west coast and I remember getting a message from Katie and I was like man it is really late where you are in DC and you were like I have a story that's coming out in like a couple of hours and I can't sleep and it's like I want to be awake when it goes live and I was like oh man what's the story and it turned out that story was this piece, this investigation about this charter school in Louisiana that kicked off a whole thing that ended up becoming this book that has just finally come out, whatever, four years later from when you wrote the article.
1:39Is that right? More because we took two years. We had to hit pause for two years because of the pandemic and January 6th and then all the reporting that happened after that. Yeah. So when did the article come out? So the article actually came out at the end of 2018, I believe. And then we signed on to write the book in 2019 and had just started. And we were writing follow-ups about an FBI investigation into this school, which I'll tell you more about in a minute. And then the pandemic happens and Erica, my writing partner, was covering education. So she had to then cover every single school in the country as they were closing down.
2:18I mean, she was hit with a wave of work that was so insane. And I thought, well, there's no way she can really dig into more follow up stories and dig into the reporting for this book. You know, so and we're all so I thought there's probably research I can do. And then the Justice Department began to fall apart pretty quickly in that fall leading up to January 6th and all of the insanity after. So then I was also sidelined. So from 2020 through basically the 2022, you know, we really picked up again in the summer of 22. So it's taken us about three years to write the book. So we're talking about miracle children, race, education and a true story of false promises.
3:09And I think so we started off with the from the scoop at The New York Times to all the things in the world that intervene. But I think what's interesting reading the book, honestly, I mean, the world is sort of served the thesis of the book in, you know, in dark ways. Or it's like obviously if you have this sort of like super, super relevant topic, which is, you know, the great lengths that people will go to to get into elite education. Now our society is being reshaped from the other end of sort of the, I don't know, uncharitably the white supremacist effort to reclaim the elite education for homegrown Americans as we're seeing.
3:57Anyway, so there are lots of big themes in this book, which is what I'm enjoying. But why don't you just tell sort of the core story and then that sort of allows us to get into the big topics of the book. Sure, absolutely. So there was a small private school in Louisiana called TM Landry. And its shtick was that it got black students into the most elite universities in the country, most of the Ivy Leagues, and it had this 100 % college acceptance rate. As we all know, any private school that says it has 100 % college acceptance rate and they can get students into elite colleges. There are plenty of them in this world.
4:36Horace Mann, Crossroads in L.A., you know, a bajillion of them in Washington, D.C. These are really sought after high schools. This one seemed to be uniquely serving kids who are black in Louisiana. It's the feeder school for, yeah, underprivileged people in Louisiana. Exactly. but to the Ivy Leagues. And so what ended up, and they, there were these viral videos of students who, when they got in the celebrations that they would have with their peers, they were so, so filled with joy. They were extraordinary. Anyway, we got a tip that in fact, the school was, was, was lying and that the students themselves had been trading in racial stereotypes of hardship to get in that they, you know, while they were, most of them were from working class families, very few of them were impoverished.
5:24They hadn't grown up with drug-addicted parents. They hadn't experienced homelessness and things like that. But these were the kinds of stories that were going into their applications to try to convince predominantly white admissions offices to let them into these spaces. And that the school itself, that the founders of the school were really, really emotionally, verbally, and in some cases physically violent toward the students to kind of keep them in line. Like criminally, right? They'd been charged at one point. Well, they've been investigated and one of the founders, Mike Landry, was charged.
6:01And then ultimately, he pled guilty to lesser charges. So, I mean, there was something going on there. And my colleague, Erica Green, and I, who was covering education at the time, I was covering the Justice Department, we decided that even though it was a small school, the ideas behind it were so big that we wanted to really better understand how this had happened. And so we wrote a story about it for the New York Times, which severely impaired the school itself, even though it didn't shut it down. And then we ended up turning it into a book. And the larger story that you're trying to tell here beyond just this school and like the ways it treated its students or like the ways that they kind of game the system emotionally or otherwise to get their students into school, like what was the bigger story you're trying to tell here?
6:51Well, there were a few, you know, one was this historic kind of sweeping history of segregated education and the role that race plays in education and the role education plays in opportunity. So, you know, we go way back in history, but when the founding fathers say education is what makes you a citizen, they really meant it, especially in a democracy. In order to vote, to understand your rights, to fight for your rights, to use the court system, education is so essential. And it's really the difference between having power and not having power in America. No matter what era you're in, what year you're in, it really doesn't matter.
7:27That has remained true for the hundreds of years America's existed. And for all his faults, Mike Landry, the guy who founds the school, makes the point, you know, he makes a lot of compelling points, I guess, because that's how he won everybody over. But he's sort of like, oh, they, you know, the elites are willing to let, you know, minority children in through sports, but they're not really interested in letting them in through this sort of like the permanent resource, which is, you know, learning to sort of think and getting in through your academics. Exactly, which has historic analogs, right?
7:58Like, there was a reason why not just black students, but many other minorities in this country, places like Harvard, places like Yale spent so much of their history. These are schools that were founded, you know, in Harvard's case before America was founded. And they spent basically up until 1960 fighting very, very hard to keep out black students, to keep out Jewish students, to keep out Native American students and Asian students, because they had an understanding that they were a gateway to power. And they also had, you know, eugenics, for example, was really the heart and soul of the academic and intellectual underpinnings of eugenics grew out of Harvard and Harvard medical school.
8:40So these were institutions that until very recently had a beyond conservative bias towards who should have power. And it was not any of the groups I just mentioned. They talk about like accepting, I forget it was Harvard or Princeton where you're like, for alumni standards, like as long as we think you'll pass, like we'll let you in, you know. We can get through the schoolwork at all, you know, you can hang out with the other like real meritocrats, you know, that we're starting to let in here. And there were so many things that were startling to understand about not just, you know, like I said, one of the themes is a sweep of segregation, education and why it exists.
9:13Another one is kind of the role that Ivy League universities have played in terms of gatekeeping power. And so many of the mechanisms we think of as race-blind admissions, holistic admissions, all the things that came after affirmative action and admissions were actually created at the turn of the 20th century to keep power in the very, very cloistered communities of America's elite. So, yes, this was a time, it's like the turn of the century before World War I. You have lots of Jewish immigrants coming into the country. They believe in education and they want to get ahead. Columbia University is accepting more of them than others because somebody immigrated to New York City.
9:58And you have schools like Yale and Harvard really freaking out. They're like, this is what we don't want. We don't want to be overrun by Jewish students. This will ruin society. So instead of relying on test scores, which, you know, you had a lot of Jewish students really acing these tests, they created a holistic look at a student. So what if you're good at what if you're good at athletics? What if you're just a really good citizen? What if you bring other qualities where you would just get along well with the other boys? What if there were all these things that they could do so that you could take this Jewish student with perfect test scores and not accept him?
10:38So you could take a student who had gone to Choate or Phillips Exeter who had gotten straight C's and say, but he will add to this community in ways that are ineffable but important. It's really a story of how people contort themselves to systems. So you have that holistic process. And so then Landry is like, oh, people love this idea of grit. What if we can really make grit something people can understand in terms of, you know, the African-American experience and the type of grit that you expect this sort of minority student out of Louisiana to have? And that's where it's like, oh, we will we will sell you the grit the same way, you know, your prep school, you know, kid is trying to show it.
11:19The grit you want to. I don't think he was he's a really complicated figure because some of the things that he does, you know, when he's accused of hitting children, when he's arrested, these things are I. I truly believe you children should not be in that way. However, as one of the students said, Mike is really hard to dismiss out of hand because he diagnoses correctly so many things about society. He has such a spidey sense for what people's like desires are underneath what they're saying. So when he encounters Ivy League admissions officials, he's like, OK, these are people who ran extremely socially conservative institutions and in just a matter of 50 years have tried to undo hundreds of years of this like cloistered ultra elite system.
12:08These are the tools they have. Right. It's a holistic process. These are the things they seem to want. it was not hard for him to figure out ways to give them those things and the students that he had applied to their schools yeah i want to take a step back to talk about uh meritocracy or meritocrats because this is like a tech show right and that's like still one of the you know like major currencies in the valley is like this belief in the meritocracy and how that is like the only real way for people of of skill and and intelligence and capability to like rise up in the world here. What's like, as you were investigating or researching for this book, like, can you talk to me about like the history of meritocracy and the role that it played with the Ivies and like creating a, I have my opinions on it, but I'm curious, like what you kind of realized as you were looking into like the role of meritocracy and the Ivies, because it's like a 20th century phenomenon, right?
13:05Yeah, this is all the 20th century. This is all pretty recent history. There's an extraordinary New Yorker article from the early 60s, 1960s, where the writer, forgetting the woman's name, she shadows the Yale admissions department. And these are people who, when they're speaking to her, they are not saying things that they think are controversial or things that should be hidden or things you only say behind closed doors. So they're talking about meritocracy and they don't believe in meritocracy as a concept in the way we would today. You know, this idea that you take the people with the best grades.
13:40The quote from the head of admissions is, if we only took people who did well on test scores, we wouldn't, we would lose all these presidents, future presidents. We would lose future heads of industry. We can't just take people because they do well on their tests. We have to take people because they have a certain kind of background. Like this idea of meritocracy was considered somewhat insane because they were like, if we take people who, who get in on merit, we're going going to take in just a bajillion Jewish students is basically the fear. And keep in mind, this is also when Yale, they measured every, it was all men, of course, you know, all these schools were all male.
14:15They measured every quote, they called them boys, every boy their freshman year gets measured. And it was the year after they started becoming, you know, it was in the years after they started becoming more meritocratic, i.e. admitting students who weren't necessarily, as they called it um but pale male in yale that the student body as the average height started to go down and the the head of admissions really bemoans this in the interview and just is so sad that the students are getting shorter because they're not big tall kind of waspy white guys because they're letting in the jews they're letting into like you know the the the mal not malnourished it's clear they're well fed yeah the jews are bringing down the height it's like all these wasps are being particular facts i feel like our like our biographies need to be flagged all these uh very different katie's also very to a jew so we can as are you this is like a highly jewish and jewish inflected podcast it's interesting um i'm like i guess i went to harvard in the the brief meritocratic window.
15:21I'm just, I'd say all this only to explain that meritocracy has gone through a lot of iterations. No, no, no. I can dig it. Well, what do you, I mean, to get to a core question of the day, it feels like people are mourning sort of the noblesse oblige, you know, it's sort of like people in some ways, I mean, the Trump people, obviously it's all sort of incoherent. It's like the Ivy League people don't represent them, but they sort of want to they miss sort of the white elites. Like, I don't know. What do you make of the elements in our society that sort of want to bring that back, even though they don't seem to know, I guess, like which white elites they're really like talking about?
16:00There are a lot of people who now like fall under the umbrella of whiteness. So we're seeing that fight play out on the far right. It's like, are Jewish people white? You know, there are some people who say yes. Some people say no. You know, does this include Catholics? Like, you know, the idea of whiteness is really contested right now. But you're right. There is this belief that if we only go back to this past where we could better predict who would run things and whose ideas would win and we had a less contested world, things would be better. And so, yes, we rejected meritocracy when it created more diversity.
16:36When we got more diversity, then we embraced meritocracy again because we figured it would end diversity. So it's like we hated meritocracy when we thought it would end elitism. And then we embraced meritocracy when we wanted to end diversity. So the idea of meritocracy is a useful tool that you can bend to almost any ideology. Right. And it's like very woven into, you know, you cover D.C. like the culture there is very much like influenced by meritocracy. And you have presidents like Clinton and Obama who were not of the manner born, but are kind of prime examples of meritocratic achievement.
17:16And they sort of get plucked from there. You know, Obama goes to Columbia and Harvard Law School and feels very of those institutions. I mean, you know, he's an outsider when he comes in. But by the time I'm, you know, going in those, it feels like he's like typifies sort of what the Ivy League is, which is, you know, I don't know. right and it ends up upholding the system too right i mean part of the theory behind meritocracy is that you can pluck these people from their you know economic obscurity and then train them to be able to support the system that otherwise keeps their brothers and sisters and family down but they can kind of like be existing within this system and and propagate it or prop it up is that your true belief give us a non-arch version what is your actual view oh i 100 believe that Yeah.
18:07Do you not think that's the case? That that's like a huge component of meritocracy is to sort of take certain people that takes the best out of their community. I mean, I think it reduces revolution. It reduces radicalism. Like people that otherwise would be angry about their lot in life. A release valve. Yeah, yeah. It's like it's steam control. You know, it's like you have this rest of population of an underclass, racial or economic. And if you just pick enough of them out of it and put them in these institutions that have for hundreds of years been like keeping the system in its current place, it kind of keeps things a little bit more stable.
18:43I don't think that's a very controversial way of thinking about things. No, I was going to say there's a lot of scholars out there, including Imani Perry. She was at Princeton, but now I think she is at Harvard, too, who talked about this in terms of American exceptionalism and then racial exceptionalism, that there is a release valve element. You need some people to succeed. you know in the world where no one succeeds then you get you then we even diagnose part of our problem as like the bourgeoisie you know you need they need to be able to strive and hit sort of their class ambitions but in some ways the trump thing is like by letting in you know non new people into the striver class you're denying the existing striver class or meritocratic class or however or euphemistically calling this, like you're denying them spots.
19:39And so it creates resentment from the Stephen Millers of the world that it's like, I should have been treated as, you know, I'm a genius instead of like laughed at, you know, I'm not capturing it totally. But yeah, I get that you need to deliver like elites in a society, their elite function. And if you don't, they get really resentful and they say, I should be an elite. And like this society isn't doing it. And therefore I'm going to like try and destroy this society. But that's just like, that just seems like human nature. It doesn't seem like that cynical. It's like if people feel like they're not living up to their expectations, they're going to get mad and cause you all sorts of trouble.
20:12Like any functioning society needs to solve the problem of like delivering people to what they think they can, you know, you know, their their natural capacity at the same time while finding new people to bring in into that. I don't know. We've seen labor uprisings, obviously, that speak to exactly to that. But we've seen, you know, you saw the general strike happen on college campuses across the country in after Kent State, not only protesting the Vietnam War, but being like, you know, like we deserve there's if enough people feel they deserve better, they will rise up. Also, I just wanted to say, Tom, I think that it's so interesting you bring up Clinton and Obama.
20:52I mean, there's there is a historic argument to be made that they are outliers in terms of the academic acuity of our presidents. And I say, like, we have the founding fathers and we always remember them, but the people we don't remember are the presidents that kind of fall between, you know, Chester Arthur and probably like Calvin Coolidge. You have this sort of depressing string of 10 presidents who are not covering themselves in glory, who are letting massive scandals happen underneath their noses, who are supportive of massive scandals, who are rolling back the Reconstruction era, who are reinstating white supremacy laws, who love Jim Crow, who are embracing the KKK.
21:35Like, and they weren't like stellar students. And then even in our modern era, you know, George W. Bush, God love him. His dad was a good student, right? We all know he was a middling student. And so when you think about that New Yorker article where the head of admissions in the 60s is saying, well, if we were only to let good students in, we would be missing out on future presidents. It's almost like he's talking about George W. Bush. It's like he's gone to the future. that George W. What's your ideal? I mean, yeah. What was the ideal system here? Well, I mean, the ideal, this is one of the other things.
22:10And I think that this is a way to think about systems because when we think about institutions and systems, they're just people. And so we're really just managing desires and it's always competing desires. So like when we have a system of Jim Crow and you have segregated schools and it's very easy to keep black people out of school, which means it's very easy to keep black people with opportunity. Everybody understands how that system works. And for those people who want to educate black children, they find ways, right? They'll either set up special schools for them, but they're working within a system.
22:43The system changes after 1954. You have desegregation, you have busing, and these fights that last for 20 years. Well, in those cases, if you want to keep black children out of educational opportunity, you have to be more creative. You have to create new systems. Okay, that era passes. And then you have a more egalitarian world in some ways. And the Reagan era comes and kind of like undercuts all the funding for these systems. You see what I'm saying? It's like, it's not so much as what's the ideal system. I think it's more like saying, what is the outcome that we want? What do we think is the outcome we want?
23:20Some people will say, especially today in 2026, there are people who will say, we think that white people should be on top and we want our systems writ large to advance that agenda that would include education. Some people would disagree with that and everybody is kind of always going to be reorganizing or creating systems that are getting to whatever ideal it is they want. And so I will tell you that if my preference, my belief is that it is better to have a world where people, no matter what they look like. Right, exactly. It's pro-meritocracy. I'm just saying, Tom seems anti-meritocracy, right?
24:01Katie, you're pro-meritocracy is an aspiration. I get that these things are wielded, that race outcomes and white supremacy loom large behind the scenes. Whatever system you create, believe me when I say, will be undermined by people who don't want that. And so the most important thing is for people to understand the goals they want for society and to be nimble enough to understand when a system is no longer really working. There are actually pretty decent arguments to be made that affirmative action kind of stopped. If what your goal with affirmative action was in the 60s and 70s was to create better outcomes writ large for black Americans, I think there's an argument to be made that those outcomes stagnate in the 90s.
24:44I didn't believe that until Trump era. And then you're like, wow, there's a lot of racial resentment that we're fostering with this. And so it's like, well, you know, would it have been when you read the argument for why affirmative action struck down? I do not agree with those arguments. I will say, though, that if you're looking at the effectiveness of affirmative action, there is a plateau where suddenly black, black America as a whole doesn't continue to make gains where it does somewhat plateau. And so you say to yourself, OK, maybe affirmative action in terms of what we want as a bigger goal has run its course to some degree.
25:23What are some other things we can do that's not how the left really was thinking after, you know, 40, 50 years of having all these big federal level wins? And so now I think people are thinking about this. But like I said, no matter what system you create in order to advance racial equality, trust me when I say there will be powerful systems created to tear it apart. So you have to always be willing to work towards something new. I think that the meritocracy, especially like in the collegiate level, and I don't claim I have nearly enough knowledge as someone who went to an Ivy League school or someone who spent years studying how it works, but it seems like it exists to propagate itself.
26:04And it's how can we keep the system of Ivy League educated students running America? And there are just various ways in which you can kind of rejigger the system in order to make sure it has the right admixture of races and education and wealth to be able to keep it going. Whether that's the best way to run America, that no matter what, we know that the Ivy Leagues need to be running things. So I can make sure that they're successful. Doesn't seem like it's always going to benefit a large number of people. And so you have like these situations like Obama and Clinton, who I'll be very generous about them and say they nominally care about poor people and thinking about how they grew up and how they can enact.
26:41I'm being incredibly generous about it. And then you have someone like J.D. Vance, who is also an example of the meritocracy, right? Super relative, poor, like hardship, gets accepted by Yale and basically turns his back on that entire world that he came from and exists as a member of the system. And that's the meritocracy working very effectively in some respects. And I don't, a system that can produce a J.D. Vance and an Obama seems inherently flawed to me. If it's about actually, I guess they were successful. Schools don't, schools are not designed to make everybody alike. That's the thing.
27:23I mean, I understand that the right and sometimes the left accuses education of like brainwashing people and making them all the same. ultimately like we are all individuals with different subjectivity and so yeah of course like yeah the student body at any school to me defines itself far more than the academic the faculty and administrators are able to actually control those students so it's like the assembling of the students to me is the main thing that they are able to do and then the students mix it up i I mean, I agree with you, Tom, that there's like banks and financial firms that like do very, you know, want to recruit sort of Ivy League students and sort of maintaining class.
Read the full transcript
28:03But in some ways, I think they're seen as like the holdover of, yeah, the sort of presidents going to Harvard and Yale and everything era. I mean, if you like a newcomer, right, like just look at like nobody working for a newcomer right now, I think, went to an Ivy League school. I like recruited somebody. the guy who started it yeah just the guy who started it but it's yeah and i have a network from it you know but like it's people i know you know what i mean it's just like i i think harvard excels at being like a network of people who all stay in the mix like want to do stuff it's like i'd network with people from my high school if they were in the mix like they're not you know what i mean it's just sort of like the thing about going to harvard is just like there's so many people who are just like hustling they're trying to be at the top of their career like and then it's a self-reinforcing network because the best way to hire somebody is to sort of have the real dope from somebody you know it's like you want somebody to say like oh like is this person like a good worker what's their deal like if you know what they're about so them being in your network is is super valuable to vetting like it's not a conspiracy it's like how human beings work you know you know i have this theory my anna dalvi theory of the elite like the elites are like the easiest to fool.
29:17Like they're the easiest people in the world to fool because all you have to do is walk in with somebody who's already a member and then you're accepted. And trust me when I say that's not how it works in like the blue collar part of the country where I grew up. You can walk in to a party with somebody, but they're still going to want to ask you a lot of questions for who you are, why you should be there, why they shouldn't kick you out, why they should trust you. Like there's a lot. Whereas it's like if you walk in on the arm of the right person and it's the you know anadolphe you you're just accepted with almost with so with with far fewer questions in some ways it's the breakdown of the elite or it's like that the elite isn't isn't so rooted and that it's like any one rich person could make you fantastically wealthy they're like whatever i'll gamble a little bit you know be positive some here and so like because harvard Yale, MIT, Stanford are such powerful signifiers.
30:11People are like, well, if you have that signifier that they've ascribed so much meaning to it, that if you are a con artist, it takes a real long time to figure it out. Right. Right. But it's so interwoven into institutions beyond just... Okay. You work at the New York Times. That is a newsroom that is full of Ivy Leaguers. right yeah definitely it is just that newsroom is overflowing with ivy leaguers it's crazy it's totally crazy kitty kitty you're on the board of bowden i but but you know that that's what's so interesting and like back to your book like calm's the only one he's got the real like not top uc chip on his shoulder here you know i have no chip though like we're all in the same place that's the funny thing maybe not about that oh yeah sorry there are chips there are chips but That's not even what I ever cared about because you know what?
31:02Because I'm white. There are so many others. Yeah. Because I'm white and I was upper middle class and I knew things and I'm Jewish. I knew things were going to be fine. They were going to be fine. And handsome. He always leaves that off the list. I feel like. Yeah. This is a funny thing about Tom because everybody talks about how handsome he is. And I'm like, well, it's funny. He carries himself as somebody who is not, which I think is like very disarming and interesting people but also exceedingly weird at some point like it's one thing for it to be a charming tick but it's another thing when it just feels like dysmorphia like face yeah yeah exactly where we get into it now this conversation has taken a horrible turn we're working on tom's uh dating profile right now this is um i i can't endorse the the progression of this conversation um uh So Katie, the students that you were writing about here, they, I'm assuming, saw this elite system.
32:02And it was why the promise of TM Landry was so incredible to them. Because if you're on the outside, everything looks like an amazing opportunity. And if this school was just getting these students into LSU, which is a decent enough school, it would have seemed like a failure to a lot of them. The interesting thing, and I think that this is like a moment where you have to think about like, what does life look like through a white middle class lens? So for the earliest students of TM Landry, Mike was getting them into places like University of Louisiana, some HBCUs. And these were schools that, can I tell you, these kids were thrilled to go to.
32:42Right. But it's interesting the reception he gets when he gets a student into an Ivy League school, the amount of interest he gets from outside of his community, the amount of interest he gets from parents who, unlike early students, actually know more about college and know more about the ways that elite colleges open doors. That is a money-making opportunity that Mike really, really takes advantage of. And so that's, you see the growth of TM Landry as he understands that top tier universities convey something that is really important that for some of the families he has to teach them about. Like there are some families who do not believe that going to any college is a failure.
33:25And there are some families that don't believe that you failed if you don't go to college. You know what I mean? He almost has to like indoctrinate them into this worldview that unless you've gone to an elite school and have a certain kind of job, your life is not very worthwhile, which It's just such a specific worldview. It is not the worldview of the majority of Americans, by the way. But it is one we're familiar with because we work in the media. We covered technology. We covered Wall Street. We cover elite people. I think a core problem with society is just my grandmother thought – idealized the local judge in York County, Pennsylvania.
34:02You know, it's like that was like if I think about who she was building up to me is sort of like the great man that I should aspire to be. It was like sort of a community figure, someone, you know, wise and respectful, like locally. And I think over time, as I grew up, there was just much more like, oh, you know, and I'm competitive, so maybe I'm not representative. But there is just sort of a national like that you need to aspire on sort of a national level that the it's not that these schools are that you can't get in. Right. It's stories of how you could get in. And so there is a sort of dark side to this.
34:37Like anybody can go to the top in that like it creates such an intense focus on on the very top that it undermines being the best in sort of your community, which, again, becomes a subtle argument for not having these schools be meritocratic, not letting people in from all and just sort of saying, oh, well, it's just the elite self-perpetuating. the best you can do is like, you know, win your local community race. That's not the world I'm advocating for, but it is sort of a consequence of, you know, that evolution. It's interesting. Eric and I did an interview with a very fancy, very posh. Erica Green, you're a co-author, sorry.
35:16I'm Erica. She's Erica. It's very, very fancy, posh, very brilliant British podcast person. And when we were talking at the outcomes of some of the students, I mentioned that there was one student who was very, very happy that while he had not ultimately gone to Wall Street, he didn't take a Wall Street internship. And he ended up at home in Louisiana with his daughter. And he started a power washing business with his brother and was very, I mean, all of them, he's probably in many ways, he has a great sense of self and he's doing financially well. The man said, wow, so you're really advocating that failure is okay.
35:59And I found it fascinating that in his world, being at home, owning a power washing business, the brother you love, taking care of the daughter you love, and having a life that you really enjoy is a failure. I thought, so that's how far, like I said, when we think of what success is or what people need to do to have a good life, it's like so there's a terrible story because i'm like wow that is a huge huge chasm that that was his reflex and it also follows i think oh thomas pickety would say it follows an economic um gap that we have seen perpetuated by you know a loss of ways to have a middle class life without a college degree right like this is where people are going to me and be like nobody wants to work in a shoelace factory in america i'm not advocating for that i'm just saying that we see this scramble for college we mentioned this in the book we can't get into it too much but like this number of colleges that exist in 2026 is basically the number of colleges that existed in like 1920 okay 2020 1920 it's basically the same number of schools the number who want to go to college in 1920 versus 2020 very very different because the new schools are provided by like community colleges but like also probably like the death of like the like the the rural america like the farm life but people probably if you wanted to be able to afford a car and a house payment you didn't have to go to college for most of the history of this country and then starting in the 90s, you did.
37:49Because all of the jobs that allow you to have a house, a child, and a car go away. So now it's like you either, there's only one avenue to house, child, car, job, and it is through the same number of doors that have existed forever. Or you get caught up in this maw of like part-time jobs, working in the service industry, financial insecurity, maybe you don't have health care, et cetera. How binary is that? Like there's no middle ground. And so when you, and so we've started to also think of not having a college educated life as failure in part because the economic consequences have become so dire, but it's, but we can't educate, we can't put more people through the college system.
38:34Like this is one of the reasons why the middle class has shrunk so much. And so like colleges become do or die hunger games. Do you want to be in the middle class or do you want to be in like the, oh my God, wow. That's really right. And which is why I get so frustrated when you see this argument about, you know, the amount of debt that students have to take in order to go to college now being this like onerous thing that's going to, you know, burden them for the rest of their life, which is true. I mean, like this is incredibly difficult financially for most of these people. It was a long time, 20 years.
39:05But like people, that's like lucky. Like there are people that will probably take longer than that now. And, you know, you're gainfully employed, you know, working among Ivy leaguers. So like you made it, but, um, like, you know, the, the, the, the, the knock is like, you're taking on a whole bunch of debt to get like some degree in like a bullshit liberal arts, you know, degree, like, you know, where Harry Potter studies and, and you have nothing left, uh, you know, to offer after all of that. And it's like, yeah, but what alternative do these people have? If you're going to say going to college is a waste of your time and you're going to be stuck in debt for the next decades of your life, you've not provided an alternative of any sort of like respectable middle-class life that they can have and so what do you want these people to do and it to me it seems like it also perpetuates the obsession with college which is something that the elites you know i mean that continues i mean you look at someone like bill ackman who seems like his entire political theory is based around the fact that he's really pissed off that his daughter went to i don't know which ivy league and like became super woke and and there's like a huge amount of bitterness from people about like the social impact of like what colleges do.
40:12Like just like the more time that gets spent people thinking about college, the more importance it gains and the more like significance it has in our political life. Yeah. And when you say these people, that includes like me and Eric very much. Like when I applied to college, I grew up in a blue collar home with very little money. I was a good student. I don't know. I got good grades, but at the same time, the competition to get into college in 1994 and 1995 was night and day versus trying to get into college in 2025. The number of people applying for spots at Bowdoin is now exponentially more our acceptance.
40:502008 was again, we were getting. It was starting to really heat up when Eric was applying, which is what, this is also Eric's way of saying he's much smarter than I am. I'm not smarter. I did every extracurricular you could do in Macon, Georgia. I was the head of the Obama campaign for high school students in Megan, Georgia. Yeah, I can go. It's becoming a much harder go. You know, the idea of an elite school having a double digit acceptance rate, which happened all the time in the 90s. Very, very good schools had double digit acceptance rates. Part of the reason is because, especially through, you know, it was waning in the 80s and 90s.
41:26But there had been a world where you didn't have to go to college to have a middle class life. If I were trying to get into college today, growing up in the same exact circumstances I grew up in, wow. I can't even imagine how much anxiety I would feel looking around like a rusted out industrial town saying to myself. The real next elite. I was reading my three-month-old, your book, prepping for this interview, getting her education going. I was about to say so that she can be prepared for an even more rigorous college admissions process. Right, exactly. But I think the, I'm always saying to my wife, like, you want to be elite.
42:05So she doesn't even, I want her to be, you know, a musician. You know, it's like you, you know, it's like you, you raised Gracie Abrams or whatever. That'll look good on her preschool application, which you should probably be filling out soon. What? No. They said that'll look good on her preschool application. My hope is that she's successful enough that you're escaping some of the credentialism rat race. Like, isn't that the point of being truly successful that you're like, we have the credentials. Like, what does she need credentials for? The credentials matter so much more to people who don't have them.
42:32So you have this like weird world where for folks like the kids in this book and for people over the country, they're like, I just need that credential and that will give me security. And then there's a swath of people who are like, I already have them, but still want it for other reasons, right? That aren't survival, but they have a lot of social capital on there. And then that's when you get Varsity Blues. Right. Everyone using what it is they have, what they have. Varsity Blue is paying people to get them on fake teams to get recruited. There are people in my life that I wonder if they were Varsity Blue.
43:06I mean, I know when people are really upset about affirmative action and I'm like, okay, fine. But there is a way in which other forms of admissions processes, looking at you, legacy admissions, sometimes athletics, really, really does save spots for students who might not have hit that meritocratic bar. Right. They fell in between the gap, right? It's like they're still related to rich people, but they didn't have the exact legacy that would have allowed them to get into this school. And so they don't have the grit story to tell, but they also don't have the legacy thing. And so they're weirdly in the middle and suddenly they apply to USC as a kicker or something like that.
43:49forward like okay so the golf team if jd vance becomes president and like succeeds i mean the funny thing about the conservatives is like they don't know how they talk about building building building but they don't know how to build any institutions right it's like university of university of austin university of austin yeah exactly like who yeah let's see but um so it's like are they able to reform the elite institutions in america and then if a democrat wins like do we just go back to Obama era sort of aspirational meritocracy or how do you see this playing out depending on you know a few thousand American voters and how they how they swing and therefore how we set the cultural and political power of you know the next 10 years and I want to add on to Eric's question like how does like the war that the Trump administration has waged on institutions, you know, elite institutions during his term?
44:48Like, how has that affected all of this as well? I think the first question is really interesting, because the impact it's had, I understand there were free speech on campus issues before Trump became president in 2016, even that there were people who are very worried about a groupthink around progressive ideas. And, you know, I was just reading Jill Lepore's book, she's a professor at Harvard, and she was like, you would be lying if you said that there wasn't a lot of social critique around people who did not hold specific sets of liberal ideas and the crimson you know i like follow the crimson over the years and there was definitely a period where i was like terrifyingly like boring and sort of you know woke and like but you just felt like i just felt like an out of touch alum like i guess like oh the times change and i uh but then but none of the kids listen up your coverage gets much better And it feels like, oh, this is the virum place sort of I remember.
45:40So there was that period. The Trump administration has brought to bear over how you're allowed to think in higher ed is that they will put you in jail. Right. Instead of just letting the woke period play out, which it would have burned off on its own. It was burning off on its own. But now it's like we will arrest you and we might prosecute you. And we're going to use the Title VI process, Title IX, Title III, all the titles to bring investigations to bear, reflustrating investigations, and we'll cut off your federal funding if you stray from a certain set of ideals. So I think that the degree to which we're seeing ideas in the academy flow or not flow has certainly, the Trump administration has a big impact.
46:24And the reason why that's important is because a lot of the ideas that come out of the academy, me, even the ones that we think of as the most absurd in their moment, right, whether that is liberalism, whether that is postmodernism, whether that is certain kinds of gender, you know, gender study in their moment in the 50s, 70s, 80s might seem absurd. They become really important underpinnings for how we think as a society, whether we want them to or not. They always do flow. It's like, Tom, in The Devil Wears Prada. I knew you were going there. I knew you were going there. Yep. That ugly ass sweater that you're wearing was like a decision that was made by Vogue.
47:03Okay, thank you. I was like, which color was it? We do not want this for our universities because it is such a compass for where we're going to go. And we have seen historically that you can roll back progressive ideas much faster than people expected. And again, the Reconstruction period, which is understudied, I think, in American history, you have huge gains made for black people after slavery is abolished and after the Civil War. You have many, many black people elected to federal office, to Congress. You have black people. The establishment of the public school system came during Reconstruction.
47:42The establishment of public schools, especially all over the South. You have a push for more equal education. You have a push for desegregation. You have colleges like Oberlin, you know, accepting black students. They're one of the earliest. They're all sorts of things that are flourishing in the wake of the Civil War, right? Which is in like the late 1860s. And then you have this sort of like golden couple decades. And then you have the rise of Jim Crow, the Ku Klux Klan, militarized white supremacy, and a very, very repressive Supreme Court. coinciding with an extremely socially conservative academy that believes strongly in things like eugenics.
48:27So, you know, these things can move pretty quickly. So that's a long-winded way of saying, depending on who wins the next election, can we see even, forget the next election, just in the next three years, can we see the way we think of rights for immigrants, black people, gay people, women, insider, outsider, who is us when we think of who is an And that doesn't even include the fact that I think and people used to think that America should be the global meritocratic elite, not the American meritocratic elite. And they were denying, perhaps most importantly, like all the every talented person all over the globe to come to America.
49:08And, you know, great things here. And what was that, forward U.S. or whatever? Like Mark Zuckerberg once had a pro-immigration nonprofit. dedicated right well we'll see how the midterms go it could come back or at least the next election but but a point behind your point is just that they even if they haven't built institutions you know we're not getting the next intersectionality or there's lots of ideas that the academy could have had that they're probably afraid to have and that could have lasting well i also like wonder what like what social how social media fits into all of this too because like all of these ideas the the the terminology like the kookiness of the way people discuss social issues on college campuses, it's existed for decades, right?
49:50I mean, like Katie, you went to school in like the mid to late nineties, like all this political correctness that has been rebranded as wokeism has been here before. None of it's very new, but social media has allowed it to kind of break containment where you have random people in, you know, maybe never went to college in whatever parts of the country getting extremely angry about, you know, trans rights or heteronormativity or, I mean, pick whatever terminology that like they're pissed off about because Tucker Carlson told them to be mad about it. Like, I think the fact that it can kind of exist in this very accessible information system, it's kind of allowed the debates that happen on college campuses to become things that people get super fucking mad about, you know, because they're taken so out of context, right?
50:34So like a fierce debate over the way that commerce and feminism work in, you know, a book like Pamela or like, you know, Tom Jones, you know, the rise of 18th century novels, as people are debating fiercely some postmodern ideals about Marxism and feminism, they make sense in the context of those academic environments, right? They make sense in the context of that specific classroom where you're are basically just trying almost to train your mind to be agile around difficult concepts and to see a different worldview in a narrow setting with a narrow set of goals yes does it sound absolutely absurd outside of that context yes and did it have a way to migrate outside of that context before social media no it most certainly did not i went to school in Maine and trust me when i say the conversations that i had in random lecture halls and leave not only did they not i mean obviously the things we're talking about super important but like i do i do wonder like how much smartphones do or do not destroy our brains the shift to like video some of the like stuff around how technology technology is changing how people think might end up being the larger force like obviously there's this sort of i don't know the social force ebb and flow of you know how much racism is accepted who are the elites but like if everybody stops reading like that's gonna be it's gonna be a dark force yeah i mean think about someone like charlie kirk like his whole shtick was going on to college campuses and basically exposing old people to the kinds of things that like young people are talking about on college campus and it made them so mad like there's there's so much salience to like these kinds of conversations and like that is the core of definitely the conservative or like reactionary movement is like, how can we make people really mad about the things that people were talking about in college?
52:31And Charlie Kirk, who's kind of like a young, you know, social media savvy, but also, you know, he's conservative and it's, you know, traditional family values. He's a perfect, you know, perfect, like a vessel for, for all of that. It is amazing to me how much, you know, during the pandemic, there was sort of like the Peter Thiel's of the world saying the thing you can't say, it's probably true and it's like people like us were like what could that be besides racism right like the thing and now we have like elon musk being like apartheid was you know terrible for society and you're coming after the whites right i mean literally yeah there was another big one where somebody retweeted like you know just a list of like rhodesia obviously i'm not i'm not necessarily a scholar in all the societies that were once white ruled and then were no longer but None of us are colonialism experts.
53:23You have to know them. But not even dog whistle. But literally today, like Homeland Security and the Department of Labor are tweeting this sort of like, you know, clearly echoing sort of Nazism. Like what is the homeland for the United States? Like I don't understand what a heritage American is. It's totally incoherent. I don't know. That's a rant. But Katie, take from whatever you can from that. Like where is this headed? Like besides that people feel really emboldened, I guess, at least to be honest with what they must have been feeling before. And I was naive enough to think like surely racism, if not solved, like I understood that people were like, you know, we would fight about like the pipeline problem and say, well, there just aren't enough talented candidates.
54:07Like we can't get anybody like the fight. I took the fight to be sincerely on those terms rather than, no, we just like are sort of we are pretty much racist or, you know, we. Yeah, I don't know. Like what? I guess people harbored much darker views than I realized growing up. Yeah, I mean, I think it's interesting to kind of see the id of the country kind of take over. Because again, whether you're talking about the institutions, whether you're talking about systems, it is just people. And so we've had a long time where there was a consensus view, whether people liked it or not, but consensus view based on the law, based on legal changes, that there was going to be some sort of racial equality.
54:55once that is dismantled especially once the legal underpinnings for that are dismantled voting rights act civil rights act that we will see a big fast change and we're already seeing it so i think you're making a very correct observation um about the world we're entering even though that sounds very depressing i will say again these systems are just people our society is just people and people have different opinions, but everybody, it's a mass of people, but only really truly of that mass, a small percentage really want to change things. So we are watching a small percentage of people make big changes.
55:36There's going to be a small percentage of people as there always has been who are willing to push back against that, right? So we had, you know, slavery, you had abolitionists, you had people create the under, I don't even know how the Underground Railroad could be created today because people can't keep secrets and they want to put everything on the internet. But like, you know, you had a small number of people proportionally who were like, we need to make a serious change. And they fought for it and fought for and fought for it. Many of them died before they saw their work really change the world.
56:05But it did change the world. Right. And then we saw it again in the Abolishim Jim Crow. We've seen it as people have fought for the rights of Native Americans. We have seen it in, you know, like all sorts of venues where there's been this huge regression. So it's impossible for me to believe that in this vast country, everybody is going to roll over and say, I guess we just do immigrants anymore. And one thing that does make me optimistic, you know, this Renee Good murder, you know, is obviously terrible and, you know, looms very large in my heart and mind. And I mean, I do think in another world, there would be many, many more of those people before it became so visible.
56:49But in a world of video and social media, at once I feel like we're more miserable. We're made miserable because we're forced to face reality of terrible situations. But I think one thing that gives me hope is that at least that it takes one. I mean, and obviously there are other people who've been killed by ice, but, you know, it doesn't take as many of these horrific things for them to reach mass visibility in the way that, you know, obviously during segregation, as you talk about Miracle Children, like, you know, you need a free time. writers and you need all this concerted effort to really build, like, make these things visible.
57:24Whereas right now, I guess everybody's a social media influencer. So there's almost like an effort, anything horrible is being surfaced to our society. And I think that honestly, it makes for depressing living, but I do wonder if it will protect us more than it hurts us. I mean, if somebody had told me pre-social media that Gaza would become a cause that young people all over the world in the United States would care about, you know, the Palestinian rights movement has been around robustly since the 70s. And on college campuses specifically, like it was a product very much of undergrads mostly kind of like.
58:09Absolutely. UCLA. Like University of San Francisco, Berkeley. And yet what mainstreamed it was probably to Eric's point, watching videos of children burning to death, starving people, people being shot at as they try to get food. Like those are very, very searing images. Yeah. Can we maybe like close this in talking about Silicon Valley again a bit? Because you spent how many years were you covering tech when you were in San Francisco? It was like five, four years? Five, I think. five maybe no and then you got like that you got the fuck out of dodge you were like done with san francisco you're like i'm out i'm gone um my formative tech you know the early days kate katie and i worked across from each other at the information then she went to bloomberg view i was at bloomberg tom joined us at the information um so we all covered tech together you'd been at fortune writing about business generally before that was it it wasn't as pure tech right before No, it was more Wall Street.
59:11Right. Yeah, it was like finance, I thought. Yeah. Then you covered Apple for The New York Times and you covered the Justice Department. So now that you know that, listener, you can go back and, oh, the legal dismantling point was very – The New York Times Justice Department reporter was worried about this. But anyway, what do you think about where Silicon Valley sits in the kind of college conversation? And Eric mentioned Peter Thiel earlier. Obviously, the thing that made him famous for a bit was encouraging people to drop out of college. And at a surface level is this anti-college mentality here that the time that you spend in a university reduces your creativity and your ability to create the kind of startups that would actually disrupt the world.
59:54I've made my point clear, and I think you guys probably agree, that the elite institutions run most of Silicon Valley. There is not truly a huge amount of disruption in that system around here. But, yeah, I mean, looking at someone who's been in D.C., which is the ultimate, you know, lanyard elite, you know, part of the country. Like, what do you what do you sort of see looking at this industry now and like the way it's dealing with college and all of these issues? It's interesting. You know, I've always wondered when Peter Till said that, how much of the reason he said that was because he hated the direction that higher ed had taken in terms of social issues.
1:00:29You know, he was famously one of the co-founders of Stanford's more conservative publication. He felt like the college was prey to wokeism before that term was popular. And so, yes, when he was telling people not to bother with college, it was certainly because he was like, you have a lot of energy and creativity and you can work for 20 hours a day when you're 19. But also there was something about college that I think he had always been uncomfortable with. And now that there's this bigger crackdown happening, I do wonder if he would still see college as not valuable or if he would change his mind on that.
1:01:08He's still doing the Teal Fellows. I don't know. I don't think he's about to become pro-college. Fair. Fair. But would he be more likely to hire a student who'd gone to Yale now maybe? I don't know. Like if that kid hadn't been talking about trans rights. I don't know. Tech has changed so much in terms of how DC sees it. Under the Obama administration, it was seen as this force for good. After the 2016 election, it was seen as a force for good. They all went and worked. All the Obama people went and worked. It's like flax for tech companies. Yes. But what's interesting now is that there's almost like a very unvarnished view of the technology industry under this administration, which is a very transactional administration.
1:01:50Now the tech industry is seen as a source of funds, capital, for the administration. So for the industry, and we've seen which executives - Pay for the East Wing expansion. It's no longer like, are you good or are you evil? It's, do you financially help this group of people? Right. Literally what Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook just appointed a new president who is the wife of a Republican. Dina Powell. She's like a total creature of DC. Yeah. Yes, she is. She was like, was it Dick Army? I forgot which congressman. She was like one of his admins. I mean, she's been there forever. The conservatives would say what?
1:02:33You know, Sheryl Sandberg, you know, very cozy with the Democrats. You know, it's like it's one thing for the other, you know. And one of the differences, though, is that while the Democrats or Republicans before them may have sought the power, money and influence of an industry, they tried not to talk about it so openly. You know, they did it the old school way. I actually don't know if this is better or worse. I won't say that. It's definitely worse because it's just like, you know, it accelerates it. You know, I'm at Iglesias head signings somebody sent me, which is just like I haven't actually pulled up.
1:03:08This seems to me like a pretty profound difference from contemporary society. These days, I feel like the general vibe, even perhaps especially in elite circles, is that the worst thing you can be is a sucker. You don't want to break the law or directly steal from or physically injure other people. But you are seen as holding some kind of obligation to yourself and your family to exploit every angle available. Not just because you want to gratify yourself, but because everyone is doing it. And I do as a member of the elite. I think that is one of the most corrosive things happening right now. I think most elites still scoff at the classless lawbreaking of the Trump people.
1:03:44But I do think there's this pressure of like, man, get yours. Like, because it's sort of like, it's like, I don't know, crypto ad part of it. You know, just who's winning, you know, in Silicon Valley. Like, it's, yeah, it's a crazy, don't want to be a sucker. And I think that's going to be a corrosive force to the elites. And I think as somebody with a microphone, you know, I want to hold against that. I'm not encouraging our listeners to have that view and I'm not going to embrace that view. And, you know, I think there is the moral capacity to resist the view, but it's definitely one that looms large.
1:04:17And I literally I think I said on one of our team calls that I feel like the nihilism of 2025 made life so hard as a reporter. You know, it's like if your job is to call balls and strikes and view some meaning some of the time, it's like if everyone's nihilistic, like that's a it's a dark world to write no pine. But I do think honestly, in some ways, the Trump administration becoming so horrifying is a return to morality. because you're like, oh, no, I believe in things. This is terrible. And then once you're activating sort of that moral alarm bell, I think it's easier to be like, oh, I'm operating on other things than just winning some game.
1:04:59So I don't know. My hope is the horribleness of 2026 awakens people to some degree. It doesn't allow for this sort of slippage into just, you don't want to be a sucker. You need to get yours and graft everything. Which I guess sort of brings you back to your book. right? I mean, that's the ultimate graft, right? It's someone who recognized the system as it was, exploited it to benefit obviously himself, but he was maybe arguing the people that went to his school obviously was abusive in the way he did it. But it's sort of like a proto-Trumpian or Trump era mentality of like, there is a real problem in the way the system works, but I could get mine by engineering something.
1:05:38I mean, his hero is Denzel Washington in training day. I will do anything you want me to do.
1:05:49I haven't gotten to that far. I'm, you know, not that far. But that's I'm excited to get to that line. That's I'm fascinating. In what way he like gives us what's he expound on that? He says there are people, the people he heroizes and, you know, he loves the art of war. He loves the art of war. I feel like the people who love the art of war didn't read the art of war. The actual art of war is, you know, he, he, he talks to the students and says, you're warriors in a war against black people and we're going to fight and win. You know, he could see how his messages were somehow compelling to people who did feel like it was unfair, but then he'd be like, you know, he loves Denzel Washington training day.
1:06:34Like he loves, um, uh, the principal in New Jersey. Um, why am I blanking on his name? Oh, the stand and deliver guy. yeah stand uh you know who who joe clark who no joe clark who would walk around with a baseball bat you know like not stand and deliver not the inspiration these are played by lean on me lean on me oh sorry yeah okay yeah so it's like he he he heroizes like the principal who walked around the halls of his high school with a baseball bat um kicking students out you know so like he has a very specific vision of power you know what i love about these people is they never fucking finish the story it's just like denzel washington yeah denzel washington's character dies in training alfonso harris is dead and you know what happened to um joe clark he ended up getting pushed out and he became a prison guard at a juvenile detention center where he was investigated for torturing students it's like you know who my personal hero is by the way icarus because that guy flew really high that guy was so good at flying high and i'm just like that's me i want to fly high too don't tell me what happens but he's cool katie great to have you on the show i missed the dead cat days this was a lot of fun and the new york times needs to cut everybody loose you know it's the world of influencers now but that means let them do what they want not fire people right that's yeah read read yeah not gonna let them keep their jobs and all freelancers it's all just yeah miracle children race education and a true story of false promises by katie benner who we've been talking to and her co-author erica green also the new york times wonderful book important to read especially important now as we've all all morals uh who are the elites how colleges work are up for debate i guess.
1:08:29So understand your history. And I think, you know, obviously, this is about once, you know, school, but I think the book is clearly about the broader story of how American elite education has changed over the decades. Thank you. Thank you. Thanks. Thank you for tuning into this week's episode of the podcast. If you're new here, please like it, subscribe. It really helps out the channel. Listen in for new episodes every week, wherever you get your podcasts.
From the publisher
Today on the podcast, we’re joined by an old friend, New York Times correspondent Katie Benner.We look back on our days covering tech together at The Information and our old podcast Dead Cat, before diving into her new book, Miracle Children: Race, Education, and a True Story of False Promises.
The book examines a school reform experiment that claimed a 100 percent college acceptance rate, and what happened when the pressure to prove success overtook reality. Benner’s reporting traces how race, politics, and institutional incentives shaped decisions that ultimately left students paying the price.
We talk about how incentives shape outcomes, why well intentioned systems often fail the people they are meant to serve, and what this story reveals about meritocracy, power, and institutional decision making in America. This conversation is not about ideology. It is about how systems behave when results matter more than reality.




