Big Take Asia: The US Pledged to Contain China’s Tech Ambitions. It’s Not Working.

1 Nov 2024 · 15 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Summary: Big Take Asia - The US Pledged to Contain China’s Tech Ambitions. It’s Not Working.

Overview In this episode of the Big Take Asia, hosts K. Oanh Ha and correspondent Rebecca Choong Wilkins discuss the ongoing technological rivalry between the United States and China. The conversation centers around China's progress in key industries and the effectiveness of U.S. measures aimed at curbing China's technological ambitions.

Key Points Discussed

  • The Made in China 2025 Plan:
  • Announced in 2015, this plan aimed at achieving technology self-sufficiency and establishing China as a global leader in crucial sectors, including aerospace, biomedicine, and renewable energy.
  • Nearly a decade later, Bloomberg's research indicates China has achieved a global leadership position in five of the identified key technologies and is rapidly catching up in seven others.
  • U.S. Measures to Contain China:
  • The U.S. has implemented tariffs, export controls, and financial sanctions to limit China's technological advancements.
  • Despite these efforts, China's success in certain sectors (like solar panels and electric vehicles) shows that trade and innovation continue despite U.S. sanctions.
  • Challenges for the U.S.:
  • The U.S. has garnered support from allies to restrict China's access to advanced technologies, particularly semiconductors.
  • However, the U.S. has struggled to contain China in many other technology sectors.
  • Technological Focus Areas:
  • China's focus includes emerging technologies such as electric vehicles, drones, solar energy, and advanced manufacturing.
  • The Chinese government can marshal resources effectively to support prioritized industries, giving it a competitive edge.
  • Political Context:
  • The episode highlights the upcoming U.S. presidential election and how candidates Trump and Harris align on the need to curb China's rise.
  • Trump proposes a more aggressive stance with potential high tariffs, while Harris aligns more closely with the Biden administration's policies focusing on jobs and industrial policy.
  • Future Directions:
  • A shift in U.S. strategy might be necessary. Suggestions include a focus on collaboration and talent acquisition from China, instead of solely punitive measures.
  • The discussion emphasizes that while containment has been the strategy, a more cooperative approach might yield better results in maintaining U.S. competitiveness.

Key Takeaways

  • China's Progress: Despite U.S. efforts, China has made significant strides in high-tech industries, indicating that tariffs and sanctions are not entirely effective.
  • U.S. Strategy Reevaluation: There is a growing need for the U.S. to reassess its approach towards China, potentially moving from a containment strategy to one that emphasizes innovation and collaboration.
  • Political Implications: The upcoming U.S. elections may influence future policies towards China, but both major candidates recognize the need for a strong stance against China's technological advancements.

Conclusion This episode of Big Take Asia delves into the complexities of U.S.-China relations regarding technology and innovation. It reveals that while the U.S. has implemented various strategies to curb China's tech ambitions, the effectiveness of these measures is debatable, and a reevaluation of strategies may be necessary to maintain global competitiveness.

> For further insights, listeners are encouraged to check out the full episode on their preferred podcast platforms and follow the upcoming discussions on Odd Lots.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Your best bottling plant employs 3 ,300 people. How do you get 3 ,300 people working at peak efficiency? Your best store has reduced waste, water, and energy usage. How do you make every store like your best store? Your best property has every guest raving. How do you make every property like your best property? The answer is Ecolab. Better performance, better outcomes, better impact. Ecolab. Now every location is your best location. The Chase Inc. Business Premier card is a pay-in-full card with flexibility made for business owners who make things happen. Earn a total of 2.5 % cash back on every purchase of$5 ,000 or more.

0:41Plus, earn unlimited 2 % cash back on every other purchase, giving you unlimited earned potential to invest cash back into your business. Inc. Business Premier is part of a suite of credit cards from Chase for Business, designed to meet your needs every step along the way. Learn more at chase.com forward slash business card. Chase for Business. Make more of what's yours. Accounts subject to credit approval. Restrictions and limitations apply. Cards are issued by JPMorgan Chase Bank and a member FDIC. Hey, OddLots listeners. This episode you're about to hear is from another podcast here at Bloomberg, the Big Take Asia podcast.

1:15And in this episode, you are going to hear about China's efforts to dominate industries of the future. Specifically, it is looking at China's 10 years old made in China plan. to see how the country is actually faring when it comes to advancing key technologies. This episode of Big Take Asia will give you a preview of the next episode of Odd Lots arriving on Thursday when we'll speak with co-authors of a new Bloomberg report. We're going to be speaking with Bloomberg's Asia government and politics correspondent, Rebecca Chun-Wilkins, as well as Bloomberg economic analyst, Gerard DePippo. They will help us unpack the China 2025 plan and what their research has uncovered.

1:56In the meantime, enjoy this episode of The Big Take Asia. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts, radio, news. The U.S. presidential election is a week away, and the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris could not be tighter. The two candidates are going head to head on everything from the economy to immigration. But one area they agree on is the need to curb China's rise. We've got hundreds of billions of dollars just from China alone, and I hadn't even started yet. But tariffs are two things, if you look at it. Number one is for protection of the companies that we have here. A policy about China should be in making sure the United States of America wins the competition for the 21st century, which means focusing on the details of what that requires, focusing on relationships with our allies, focusing on investing in American-based technology.

2:58So how is the U.S. doing versus China? Which superpower is leading the race for dominance of the 21st century? Rebecca Chung-Wilkins, Bloomberg's Asia government and politics correspondent, says a good way to try to answer this question is by looking at the key emerging technologies that China identified as its priority back in 2015 when it announced its Made in China 2025 plan. And when you look at that plan now, nearly a decade later, new research by Bloomberg Economics and Bloomberg Intelligence shows that Made in China 2025 has largely been a success. So of the 13 key technologies tracked by Bloomberg researchers, China has achieved a global leadership position in five of them and is catching up fast in seven others.

3:58Welcome to the Big Tech Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm Wan Ha. Every week we take you inside some of the world's biggest and most powerful economies and the markets, tycoons and businesses that drive this ever-shifting region. Today on the show, how did China get ahead in key technological advances despite U.S. efforts to prevent that from happening? And would a Harris or Trump administration change that?

4:31Rebecca says back in 2015, when the Made in China plan was announced by the Chinese Communist Party, it was all about helping the country achieve two big goals. One is this self-sufficiency, not wanting to be reliant on other countries and is preparing for any kind of scenario where, for example, China might be cut off from, say, its energy supply or whatever it might be. And China more broadly does have a sort of preoccupation or prevailing concern with preserving its own security. So standing on its own two feet. And the second is becoming increasingly competitive and, in fact, a global leader in some of these key strategic areas.

5:12So there's both a sort of inward and an outward element to the Made in China plan. The plan highlighted 10 priority sectors for the nation to focus on, including aerospace equipment, energy-saving cars, biomedicine, and high-end machine tools and robots. And now, almost 10 years later, according to the analysis by Bloomberg, China has, in fact, become a global leader in many of these key areas. So those sectors include solar panels, unmanned aero vehicles, those are drones, Graphene, which is a coating material that's used in tons and tons of sectors. High-speed rail and electric vehicles. Now, does China have any natural advantages that makes it possible that it's been able to take leading positions in these sectors?

5:59Or is this simply by design and the will of Beijing? Well, it's worth saying that even in 2015, China, as we determine, was already a global leader in three of these sectors. in graphene, in solar panels, and in unmanned area vehicles. So they had a sort of somewhat of a head start in any case. But the other important element here to remember, I think, is that when Beijing does signal out an area for support, when it signals out a key policy priority, it really is able to throw the full weight of its economy, essentially, behind that. So, for example, if it decides that electric vehicles are a priority, say, It can ask banks to lend it credit cheaply.

6:41It can get local governments to lease it land cheaply or perhaps even at no or low cost. It can also get large state-owned enterprises to use the sort of full force of its resources, its talents and direct it towards those industries. So, you know, Beijing has an incredibly sort of powerful basis here, an incredibly powerful set of resources to direct towards these industries when it has selected these priorities. But there is one key area where China hasn't caught up to the U.S., and that's in advanced semiconductors. That's in part because of some key things the U.S. has done to keep its rival from catching up.

7:23There's sort of three big tools for economic statecraft that we've seen. One of them is tariffs imposing these high costs for imports coming into the U.S., sometimes prohibitively high. The second are export controls, essentially trying to prevent the transfer of U.S. technology, goods, services overseas to other parts of the world. And the final part of that are financial sanctions. The big area where we can say that some of the U.S. export controls and so on have been more effective is in sort of high advanced semiconductors. And it's important to remember in this context, it's just a handful of companies involved in this kind of really advanced semiconductor tech manufacturing.

8:04And it's fair to say the Biden administration, they have been successful in building consensus among allies, among other countries trying to contain China's access to semiconductors. And so we saw Dutch companies, Japanese companies essentially falling in line in preventing China from accessing the actual products needed to manufacture these types of chips. And in light of that, of the U.S. having allies to support its approach to trade on China and its approach to contain China, what has China done to make sure it has access to the technologies it needs? China essentially has been stockpiling like mad.

8:45That's the sort of fundamental basis of this. They're stockpiling a record amount of semiconductor equipment. And that includes these high-end NVIDIA chips. It's preparing essentially for a number of further curbs. It's looking further out, thinking if we see these kind of moves accelerate, if they're expanded, where will we be? And how do we try and future-proof against that? But it's not just semiconductors where the U.S. is trying to use export controls to slow China down. After the break, a look at the other tools the U.S. is using. And will a new administration keep them going?

9:42How do you make every property like your best property? The answer is Ecolab. Better performance, better outcomes, better impact. Ecolab. Now every location is your best location. How many vendors does it take to meet all your organization's food needs? Just one. EasyCater, the workplace food platform that lets teams order from a huge variety of restaurants, over 100 ,000 nationwide, all through a single vendor. In addition to all that variety, EasyCater also gives you full visibility of your organization's food spend with invoicing, centralized reporting, and seamless integration with expense management systems, all on one platform.

10:25EasyCater, your business tool for food. To learn more, visit easycater.com slash podcast.

10:37The U.S. has leaned on its allies to limit China's access to advanced technologies like semiconductors. Meanwhile, the U.S. is also concerned about its ability to be a leader in other sectors as well. Some of these areas were outlined back in 2022 by National Security advisor Jake Sullivan. Computing related technologies, biotech, cleantech are true force multipliers through the tech ecosystem and leadership in each of these areas is a national security imperative. We're investing in the industries of the future and strengthening the resilience and security of our supply chains. Sullivan calls these technologies a national security imperative.

11:21Bloomberg's Rebecca Chung-Wilkins says that's an important thing to take note of Because over time, she's seen a change in the way the U.S. talks about the need to restrain China. Yeah, I think in the early days of the trade war, a lot of the focus was on the sort of wrongdoing, as they alleged, of Chinese companies. But over time, that has really morphed into this whole discussion over national security and increasingly this focus on China's preparedness for a war. And in fact, we've almost seen the true, real concerns at the heart of some of these economic policies over sort of military might, essentially.

12:01It's this question of deterrence, whether or not Beijing and Washington will essentially adopt this idea that the costs of this trade conflict and trade war and the costs of this increasing competition are worth it or not. It comes sort of, I suppose, to this fundamental question of to what extent both sides feel that their own national security is fundamentally at risk. On the campaign trail, Trump and Harris have advocated different approaches toward China, even as both agree on the need to thwart its rise. I asked Rebecca what Trump currently has in mind here. Well, we just, in a way, have just seen an amplification, perhaps unsurprisingly, of some of his previous policies.

12:51He's mentioned this possibility of 60 % tariffs across all Chinese imports into the US. That would be crazy high. That would be crazy high and it would really hurt the Chinese economy. One bank, for example, estimates that it could essentially halve Chinese GDP growth. So it would really be a significant hit to China, but also a significant hit to the US if that then results in a higher cost of goods. Bloomberg's editor-in-chief, John Mickleswate, pressed Trump on that point in an interview earlier this month. You're talking about 60 % trade on that, 60 % tariffs on that. You're talking, as you said, 100, 200 percent on things you don't really like.

13:30You're also talking about 10, 20 percent tariffs on the rest of the world. That is going to have a serious effect on the overall economy. And yes, you're going to find some people who would gain from individual tariffs. The overall effect could be massive. I agree. I agree. It's going to have a massive effect. Positive effect. It's going to be a positive, not a negative. Let me just. No, no, let me. The other thing to remember with Trump is that he has taken a more protectionist stance writ large. He's not just concerned about Chinese imports, but he's concerned about imports from everyone, including, for example, the European Union.

14:05What do we know about Harris's approach if she wins? Well, Harris's approach, we expect to be more consistent with the Biden administrations. I will say she, too, has focused on this idea of jobs and sort of American industrial policy, trying essentially to build up some of those manufacturing bases again. She's been critical of Trump's proposed tariffs, but she has been quite firm on some of the national security risks that the U.S. faces. So, Rebecca, is either approach really doing a great job in containing China's tech development? Well, if we look at the success of the Biden administration and we look just going back to the beginning at some of those made in China targets, for example, we can see that actually they aren't successful or they haven't been successful in certain key areas.

14:55If we exclude semiconductors, actually trade has found a way to get through. Sanctions haven't been hugely successful. So that's one question for Harris, that this need to perhaps recalibrate the approach. Despite the U.S. efforts to slow down China, the world outside the U.S. is increasingly driving Chinese EVs, surfing on Chinese smartphones and powering their homes with Chinese solar panels. And Rebecca says there might be better approaches for the U.S. to maintain its competitiveness. One approach to thinking about what would be more effective than sanctions is this idea that Adam Posen from the Peterson Institute has mentioned, which is suction, not sanctions.

15:41Essentially, that the U.S. should be making use and taking up talent, resources, innovation coming from China and partnering with it in order to advance its own industries and its own key sectors. So basically taking away all the talent so that the U.S. makes use of it. Taking the best of what China has developed and then building on that to develop and innovate at a faster pace.

16:12This is the Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm Wan Ha. If you'd like to hear more about Bloomberg's research on the Made in China plan, check out the conversation on Odd Lots with my colleagues Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway. The other thing that happened that I think was actually a bigger deal from the Chinese perspective was when the U.S. added Huawei to the Commerce Department's entity list in early 2019. because what that signal was that the United States was effectively trying to kill what was arguably China's best global technology company. The U.S. would say we're not trying to kill it, but the restrictions are pretty draconian.

16:49And there's very much that vibe. And check out our last episode where you can hear more about one critical market that China's focusing on, EVs, and how one Chinese carmaker, BYD, is dominating the electric auto market globally. That's on our Big Take Asia feed. This episode was produced by Young Young, Jessica Beck, and Naomi Ng. It was mixed by Alex Sugiera and fact-checked by Eddie Duan. It was edited by Caitlin Kenney and Daniel Tenkate. Naomi Shaven is our senior producer. Elizabeth Ponso is our senior editor. Nicole Beamsterbower is our executive producer. And Sage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts.

17:27Please follow and review The Big Tick Asia wherever you listen to podcasts. It really helps new listeners find the show. See you next time.

17:42How many vendors does it take to meet all your organization's food needs? Just one. EasyCater, the workplace food platform that lets teams order from a huge variety of restaurants, over 100 ,000 nationwide, all through a single vendor. In addition to all that variety, EasyCater also gives you full visibility of your organization's food spend with invoicing, centralized reporting, and seamless integration with expense management systems, all on one platform. EasyCater, your business tool for food. To learn more, visit easycater.com slash podcast. How can you grow your business from idea to industry leader?

18:22Bring your vision to life with smart business buying tools and technology from Amazon Business. From fast, free shipping to in-depth buying insights and automated purchase approvals, they deliver everything you need to achieve your goals. It's not easy to stand out from the crowd. Simplify how you stock up to get ahead. Go to amazonbusiness.com for support.

From the publisher

China is making steady progress in its quest to dominate key industries of the future, despite years of US tariffs, export controls and sanctions. 

Check out this special episode of Bloomberg's Big Take Asia podcast, as hosts K. Oanh Ha talks to Bloomberg News correspondent Rebecca Choong Wilkins about how the US is struggling to curb Beijing’s technological advances, and whether the upcoming presidential election could change the dynamic.

Then come back on Thursday, as Rebecca joins the next episode of Odd Lots -- along with Bloomberg economic analyst Gerard DiPippo -- to take a further look at the ongoing tech rivalry between the US and China.

Read more:
The Big Take: Efforts to Contain Xi’s Push for Tech Supremacy Are Faltering

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Odd Lots

All 683 episodes
Big Take Asia: The US Pledged to Contain China’s Tech Ambitions. It’s Not Working.Odd Lots · 15 min
Listen in VO