In short
Odd Lots Podcast Episode Notes
Episode Information
- Title: Jigar Shah on the Three Big Things Driving the Nuclear Energy Revival
- Air Date: September 24, 2023
- Hosts: Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway
- Guest: Jigar Shah, head of the Loan Programs Office at the Department of Energy
Episode Summary In this episode, the hosts discuss the revival of nuclear energy in the United States, particularly in light of the recent decision to restart the Three Mile Island nuclear reactor, which had been shuttered since 2019. They are joined by Jigar Shah, who outlines the key drivers behind this nuclear renaissance, including policy changes and shifts in economic conditions.
Key Themes and Discussions
- Historical Context and Current Events
- Three Mile Island: The plant became infamous for a disaster in 1979, leading to public fear and regulatory caution around nuclear energy.
- Reopening Decision: Constellation’s partnership with Microsoft to restart the reactor reflects a growing interest in nuclear energy as a clean alternative amid rising electricity demand.
- Drivers of Nuclear Energy Revival
- Economic and Policy Factors:
- Increased demand for electricity, particularly from data centers and electric vehicles, is revitalizing interest in nuclear.
- Significant government funding from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) is facilitating new projects and offering incentives.
- Technological Neutrality in Tax Credits: The IRA has introduced a technology-neutral tax credit, making nuclear more competitive against other forms of energy.
- Financial Dynamics
- Cost Structure: Restarting a nuclear plant is less costly compared to building a new one, making it financially viable with the right incentives.
- Market Response: Constellation’s stock saw a significant increase following the announcement, highlighting investor optimism about a nuclear revival.
- Contract Structures: Microsoft’s contract for differences model allows them to stabilize costs while promoting clean energy usage.
- Challenges and Opportunities
- Workforce Development: There is a shortage of trained workers for constructing and operating nuclear plants, which needs to be addressed to scale up nuclear projects.
- Regulatory Environment: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is evolving, now tasked with balancing safety and supporting new nuclear projects.
- Public Perception: Nuclear energy enjoys strong local support where plants are situated, which could help mitigate opposition to new developments.
- Future Prospects
- Building Momentum: Shah discusses the importance of consistent projects to maintain workforce skills and reduce costs.
- Geothermal and Other Technologies: While nuclear is gaining traction, other energy technologies like geothermal are also emerging, though they face unique financing challenges.
Key Takeaways
- The nuclear energy sector is experiencing a revival due to a combination of renewed demand for electricity, supportive government policies, and evolving market dynamics.
- Financial incentives from government programs are crucial for making nuclear projects economically viable.
- Overcoming workforce shortages and regulatory hurdles will be essential for the successful deployment of nuclear energy.
- The current energy landscape is characterized by a push towards cleaner energy sources, and nuclear is poised to play a critical role in this transition.
Conclusion The discussion highlights the shifting landscape of energy production in the U.S. and the pivotal role nuclear energy could play in addressing future demand while contributing to clean energy goals. Jigar Shah's insights provide a comprehensive overview of the challenges and opportunities facing the nuclear sector in light of recent developments.
For more insights and discussions, listeners are encouraged to follow the Odd Lots podcast and check out additional resources on the Bloomberg platform.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Your best bottling plant employs 3 ,300 people. How do you get 3 ,300 people working at peak efficiency? Your best store has reduced waste, water, and energy usage. How do you make every store like your best store? Your best property has every guest raving. How do you make every property like your best property? The answer is Ecolab. Better performance, better outcomes, better impact. Ecolab. Now every location is your best location. Being a small business owner isn't just a career. it's a calling. Chase for Business knows how much heart and effort go into building something of your own. Manage all your business finances, from banking to payments to credit cards, all in one place with their digital tools.
0:44Plus, access online resources designed to help your business thrive. Learn more at chase.com slash business. Chase for Business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. Member FDIC. Copyright 2025 JPMorgan Chase and Company. How many vendors does it take to meet all your organization's food needs? Just one. EasyCater, the workplace food platform that lets teams order from a huge variety of restaurants, over 100 ,000 nationwide, all through a single vendor. In addition to all that variety, Easy Cater also gives you full visibility of your organization's food spend with invoicing, centralized reporting, and seamless integration with expense management systems, all on one platform.
1:36Easy Cater, your business tool for food. To learn more, visit easycater.com slash podcast.
1:45Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News.
2:02Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. I'm Joe Weisenthal. And I'm Tracy Allaway. Tracy, how about that reopening of a Three Mile Island nuclear facility? You know what? I saw that headline kind of float by, and it seemed like a big deal. So I think Constellation signed a deal with Microsoft to reopen the Three Mile Island nuclear plant, which everyone remembers from the disaster that happened there in the 1970s. What I did see was Constellation's share price just exploded higher, like up 30 % in a day. Maybe I shouldn't say exploded in the context of Three Mile Island.
2:43It melted up. That's right. It melted up. You know, a couple of things about this. So one, I'm kind of not surprised because we all know that the big hyperscaler tech companies have all this demand for electricity. They have a desire to not use further fossil fuels and nuclear is an obvious theoretical solution to how to get more clean energy. You know, I will say one thing about this deal and it's very exciting and I don't want to diminish it in any way. But there's one aspect of it. I didn't realize that one of the reactors at Three Mile Island had only closed down in 2019. So I only know there was like something bad happened in the 1970s and the probably contributed to the U.S.'s general pulling back from nuclear.
3:26But I hadn't realized that actually, you know, there was still nuclear being produced at Three Mile Island up until 2019. Does it make it a little less exciting? But it's not like we're fully turning back the calendar to 1970s. Well, I think there's a nice narrative, full circle aspect to this, right? Which you just touched on. After the Three Mile incident, I mean, that really kicked off the death of nuclear in some respects in the US. Like, there was a lot of hesitancy and fear, really, about building new plants. And so, in some ways, we're restarting at least one of the reactors. It's a nice story arc, let's put it that way.
4:07So, okay, so this operation is going to get restarted. And you mentioned the death of nuclear and how we basically went forever without building new. There was that Georgia plant, I think it came online sometime last year, the Votal plant. But it does raise the question of like, how much was the fact that we more or less stopped building nuclear a function of the fact that we got scared of nuclear regulations, we became too cautious, et cetera. versus the fact that we just had, as multiple guests we now have pointed out, this sort of flatlining of load growth, this sort of flatlining of overall demand, which is something that's now changed in the last few years with the reacceleration of demand for data centers.
4:47And so how much is this a story of we got scared of nuclear and we overregulated it versus how much did the economics just not make sense when there was not growing demand for electricity? Yeah, I think that's a good point. I mean, there's another tailwind that's sort of behind the potential nuclear resurgence now, which is there's a lot of government funding floating around the IRA and programs like that. And so that's another thing that maybe is making maybe this time is different. There have been a lot of predictions about a nuclear renaissance over the years, but maybe maybe this is it. Let's learn why the stars have aligned the constellation, if you will, why the stars have aligned.
5:28for this seeming revival of nuclear in America with the restarting of the Three Mile Island reactor. We really do have the perfect guest. We've had him on the podcast multiple times, truly one of our favorites and a fan favorite. We're going to be speaking with Jigar Shah. He is the director of the Loan Program's office at the Department of Energy, a key player in all of the Inflation Reduction Act's efforts to stimulate clean energy growth in the U.S. with the Inflation Reduction Act. His office went from a lending authority of about$40 billion to over$200 billion, a big advocate of nuclear and other sources.
6:06Jigar, thank you so much for coming on Adlots, and great to have you in the studio. It's the first time we've talked to you here in studio. It's so great to be in the studio. Thanks for having me. Thank you so much. So I'm going to start off with this question, which is, okay, we went for a long time basically without building new nuclear power plants. It's starting to pick up again. How much is it because something has changed policy-wise with subsidies and tax credits, et cetera, versus demand is back, therefore the economics of nuclear makes sense? Or would you say it's not binary? Well, look, I think that when you think about what happened through a historical context in the 1970s, we had high inflation, right?
6:45And nuclear power was subject to high inflation. And so part of this is people were already worried about building new nuclear plants before the incident occurred because things were just getting more expensive, right? And when you think about the utility bankruptcies that occurred way back when, it was because they had cost overruns on nuclear power, right? And so I think that in general, it goes to when America stopped believing in itself and its ability to do big things in infrastructure. And I think this moment with load growth and with the president saying, we are going to build big things here, like has gotten people thinking again, hey, what would it take to actually figure this out this time around?
7:31This is actually exactly what I wanted to ask you about, because I was reading that the initial construction cost for Unit 1 of Three Mile was about$400 million. And I guess like today, the cost of building a nuclear plant would be like$5 billion,$10 billion. Obviously, the$400 million isn't adjusted for 1960s prices, but it does seem in general like it's more expensive to build nuclear plants, certainly since the 1960s. Where did that additional cost increase actually come from? So when you think about building things, like if you were to build multifamily housing and you would build one multifamily housing building versus building 12 throughout the city, you can imagine if you're using the same design, it would be cheaper.
8:21The workers would get better. The first one would cost more. The second would cost less. The third would be even less. You get faster. I mean, you see that when you go into like a new home construction place. The first home takes, it seems, a lot longer. And then suddenly like the homes start popping up every week, right? This is the same with nuclear power. We trained 13 ,000 people to build a Vogel nuclear plant in Georgia, right? And then we were done. And where did all those workers go? To other jobs. So now, if we wanted to build units five and six, we wanted to rebuild VC Summer in South Carolina, which is like 100 miles away, right?
8:58We'd have to go out and find another 13 ,000 workers, right? And so one of the things that we have to figure out how to do is to figure out how to build 10, right? And have those same workers that we trained, all those same EPC contractors, all of those same suppliers, not have to stop and start. But we continue to like to do these one-off things. This is why I recommend everyone should go read. your office puts out a series of reports called Pathways to Commercial Liftoff Reports about what it takes to really commercialize various types of energy, not just nuclear. And you always talk about the importance of the order book going forward so that people know that there's a second and a third project and a fourth project out there.
9:39So I want to get into that and also talk some more about the workplace development. But just on this project a little bit more, tell us what happened. How did the stars align such that Constellation thought it's worth taking on the operational risk to get this going again? Microsoft thinking that, yes, this is the best solution for their clean energy needs. And what is the role of supply and demand? And then the role of various tax credits and such within the IRA that made this all happen? Yeah, I mean, it's a juicy tale, right? When you think about the nuclear energy industry, there aren't really any entrepreneurs.
10:18Constellation is a company that bought up a lot of other people's nuclear plants. They are the best operator of nuclear plants in the world. And then they got spun out of Exelon into their own stock ticker. But I think we all have to acknowledge that if it wasn't for the Palisades nuclear plant in Michigan that we announced a conditional commitment for, and that we're closing the loan on here, there's no way that the rest of these projects happen. And Palisades is owned by Holtec, which is a genuine entrepreneur, Chris Singh, private company, one of the most successful entrepreneurs in the nuclear industry and in the whole world.
10:57And it's one of those weird things where he woke up one morning and said, well, I just got a contract to dismantle the Palisades nuclear plant. And we went to him and said, would you think about restarting it? And he said - Do you think about doing the complete opposite, perhaps? Yeah. And he said, well, sell me. And I was like, well, here are the incentives out of the Inflation Reduction Act. You can get the 48E and some of these other tax credits. Walk us through the specifics. What do you get in there? So when you restart a nuclear plant, the nuclear plant is viewed as new, additional capacity because it was shut down.
11:33And so as a result, this technology agnostic credit that was created by Senator Wyden, right? Because remember, we always had the solar tax credit and the wind tax credit and all these other things. So over time, the IRA moves us to a technology neutral tax credit so that everything that is clean gets this technology neutral tax credit. It's a pretty lucrative tax credit. It depends on the technology, but let's say$0.03 a kilowatt hour. And so now you're in this place where you actually have a bonus production credit. Now, you separately can choose to get an investment tax credit, right? But it happens to be that the production tax credit is more lucrative for these restarts of nuclear plants.
12:16But if you decide to do the investment tax credit, then you get the 30 % tax credit. Then there's bonus tax credit. So if it's part of an energy community, you get an extra 10%, right? If you have a lot of domestic content, you get another 10%, right? So you could imagine that some of the folks who are building brand new nuclear plants might go that direction. But as a result of these incentives, nuclear power is now very cost effective. Then the question becomes, who actually wants to buy this power? Because wholesale market prices have been low. And so then the question becomes, who wants to buy it?
12:48And it happened to be that two different utility groups in Michigan competed over wanting to buy all the output out of the Palisades Restart. And so he picked one of the groups to buy that power. And then that led to the project becoming financeable. And so once that succeeded, then Constellation was like, hell, maybe we could do this. So when you say with the tax credits and those other changes, it suddenly becomes cost effective or it becomes financeable. Walk us through the actual math. Like what is changing here? Is it the discount rate or the future projection of revenue? Like what is it exactly that changes in the equation?
13:32So for a restart, you generally choose the production tax credit, not the investment tax credit. And that's because the cost of restarting a reactor is a lot lower than the cost of building a brand new reactor, right? So you make more money by getting that extra$0.03 a kilowatt hour for the next 20 years. So the math there is you put up – it depends on where the final cost runs out, but let's call it$1 to$2 billion to do the restart. And then you get this$0.03 a kilowatt hour multiplied by the number of kilowatt hours that that plant creates. And remember, a nuclear power plant runs, on average in the United States, 92 % of the time.
14:12So that's a lot of kilowatt hours that comes out of that plant. Whereas with a solar farm, you might get 25 % of the time production, right, with a tracking system. And so the math means that you could get almost all of your money back on the$1 to$2 billion from the tax credits, right? And then you've got the sale of the power, right, that you're signing a long-term contract for. And that's where you make your return, right? Which is why I think Constellation's stock price jumped so much because they have so many existing sites where a lot of those nuclear sites have one reactor. And they were made for four reactors or five reactors, but we never built the rest.
14:58And so while this one was the easiest way to get in, right, because it was a restart, There's all these other sites where you could build new reactors. And now that Microsoft has come in and said, we want to buy all that output because we are taking seriously the commitments we made to 24 by 7 clean power by 2030, then you now have the makings of an equation. And I don't know if you heard, but like Meta came out right after that and said, we are also all in on nuclear power and meeting this 24 by 7 requirement. So we have a lot of physical capacity or just space capacity right now to add more reactors.
15:35And so that's sort of the exciting aspect. Walk us through a little bit more of the math with the Three Mile Island deal specifically. So for Constellation, it's going to cost them$1.6 billion, I think is what I've seen reported, to get this reactor back up and running. And then Microsoft makes some sort of commitment where they're going to be a buyer over, I don't know, X many years. Talk to us a little bit more about this particular deal. Yeah. So I don't know what the final cost of the Constellation restart will be just because I think they still need to do more engineering work to figure out exactly what needs to be fixed.
16:10But there's some estimates floating around. The way that Microsoft and others sign these contracts is they don't actually buy the power. Yeah. What they do is this thing called a contract for differences. Okay. And so power generally gets sold into the open market, right? Into the local grid. Into the PGM, right? And Microsoft says, depending on what happens with this power, we will make you whole on the payment. So if we said that we're going to pay$0.09 a kilowatt hour and you end up getting$0.07 a kilowatt hour, we'll pay that$0.02 difference. And that includes not just the kilowatt hour price, but also includes the capacity payment.
16:46So you may have heard that the PJM had a very large increase in the price that the capacity payment cleared. And the capacity payment is essential because it convinces the coal plants or the natural gas plants or others who are sort of at the end of life to make investments to last a little longer because they got paid a capacity payment to stay open. So the pieces that come here are both the capacity payment and the energy payment. And Microsoft is saying that we get all the attributes, so we get to call our usage green. But separately, if for whatever reason, the wholesale market value for what the nuclear power plant is creating is less than the strike price that we agreed to, then we will make you whole.
18:04www.ecolab.com Better performance, better outcomes, better impact. Ecolab. Now every location is your best location. For enterprise organizations, managing all your food needs is a tall order. But with EasyCater, you get a single workplace food vendor with the tools and resources to make it easy. Giving teams across your organization an easy way to order from a huge variety of restaurants, all on one platform. All while consolidating your corporate food spend so you can control costs, streamline billing and payment, and simplify reporting. EasyCater, your business tool for food. To learn more, visit easycater.com slash podcast.
18:46Every business starts with an idea. How can you go from daydreamer to industry leader? Amazon Business accelerates your journey. With smart business buying, get everything you need to grow in one familiar place, from office supplies to IT essentials and maintenance tools. Amazon Business takes the buying experience you know and love from Amazon, plus tools that help you save costs and make insights-based decisions. Ready to bring your visions to life? Learn how at amazonbusiness.com. So you mentioned the idea that there are some nuclear sites out there already that have spare capacity that could either be restarted or with new reactors or units built.
19:26So I guess I have two questions based on that. But one, if you have space in your nuclear facility, is that space specifically designed for one type of reactor already? Like, are you wedded to a particular model that you have to follow? And then secondly, what's the actual process to build a new reactor? reactor? Like, I can't imagine you open up the nuclear reactor catalog and, you know, you go like, oh, I'll take this one. How does it work? Well, so just to start with your last question first, it used to be that you did have a nuclear power catalog. Oh, and that's the problem, right? That's why we have 90, you know, plus reactors, and only four of them are exactly the same.
20:09And so it used to be that you used to be able to customize your model. And that led to a lot inefficiencies. And so I hope and pray that this time around when people build new nuclear, they build the exact same cookie cutter thing every single time and we get our cost down. But to answer your question, so the Department of Energy commissioned a study to look at all of the 54 sites that we have with nuclear plants. Some of them have one reactor, some of them have two, a couple have three, and then only one, the Vogel nuclear plant has four. And we can build any type of reactor on those empty sites because really it's just land that's behind a security perimeter, right?
20:44And that's what you care about is a security perimeter. And so we have about 65 ,000 megawatts of capacity at the existing nuclear sites, which is massive. If we use small modular reactors, right, which are the ones that are sort of in that$3 to$6 billion range. And if we use AP1000s, which is what we built at Vogel, then you could build almost 95 ,000 megawatts at those same sites, but those are more like$10 to$14 billion each, right? And so you have to decide whether you want to spend that much money. Are you limited at all, or does space maybe become a factor in the sense that the hyperscalers want to be co-located close to the plants?
21:27So they're not going to be within the security perimeter. They'd be outside of the security perimeter. And most of these nuclear plants are in fairly rural location. These are somewheres. I grew up near a nuclear plant. But they're going to be, let's say, five to seven miles away. And so you don't need to use a transmission infrastructure and tax it. You can create your own line directly from the nuclear plant to the data center. And so that saves a lot of costs because now you don't have to pay for the transmission. And so that's why a lot of this co-location makes a lot of sense. It also disrupts the grid the least.
22:01And then the other thing that is so great about this co-location idea is that the people who live around a nuclear power plant love nuclear power plants. The public perception of nuclear is at 90 plus percent around a nuclear power plant. And so, you know, instead of going to a brand new spot where you might have mixed reviews, it's easier publicly to use existing sites. It's good to know. Here's a random question. I've been one of those things that wanted to ask someone, I probably could have just tweeted it years ago. Sometimes I see these things as like, oh, there's like a three-year wait to like plug some new production of any sort of energy into the grid.
22:39And I'm always like, is this just like someone like who has to like go out and plug a line into the wall or something? What's that all about? And like why does it have to be that long? It really is an extraordinary thing, right? I think that, you know, most people view electricity like water, right? So you just put a bigger pump in, you put in more pipe, it gets to your house, you got hot water, that's great. It's not like that at all. There is this complex physics equation that you have to solve for. Because the grid has to be in perfect balance all the time, right? Well, so there's the perfect balance between supply and demand.
23:13But then there's also figuring out what the constraints are of each individual segment on the transmission line. So if you're using power in New York City and you're creating a lot of extra power out of the nuclear plants in Illinois, then that power has to go via Indiana and Ohio and then through Pennsylvania to New York City. And they may or may not be able to carry that much. And so they have to do these studies. I see. So every time you try to add something to the grid, they have to do a study and they have to figure out whether that capacity is there, how often it's there, whether it would continue to be balanced or whether it'd be imbalanced.
23:52And so the big fight there is that, so in Texas, what they do is they just look at the safety part of it, but they don't look at the capacity part of it. They just say, you like connect at your own risk. And if we're clogged, we're just going to tell you to shut down. And that's on you, right? So that's why they're approving people super fast. Whereas with the PJM and others, they're saying not only are we going to do a safety study, we're also going to do a capacity study, and we're not going to let you connect until this other generator shuts down and frees up capacity for your generator. And so that then makes the wait time much longer.
24:30Since you mentioned safety just then, I get the impression that the other thing that's been holding nuclear back is, I guess, licensing barriers and regulation and things like that. Has anything changed on that front recently? I saw there was a bill over the summer called, I think, the Advance Act or something like that, that I think made some progress. But is that starting to evolve too? Yeah. So, I mean, there's definitely been a lot of people giving their unsolicited advice to the NRC saying, we want to beat you up because we don't think you're moving fast enough. But when you think about it, it's only the Vogel units three and four that they've had to process, right?
25:11And ultimately, what the people who built Vogel did was said, we are going to tell you exactly how we're going to build it. And then you hold us accountable to building it that exact way. And then you license it at the end, right? And so that's what the NRC did. The alternative pathway is they can go in and say, we're just going to build this thing. like you're going to like pre-approve that the fact that the license for the reactor is pretty safe and it's fine but you're just going to like approve the as-built drawings at the end right now like when you do that well then it's a lot easier to get away with things being one inch off here and there which is fine but like if you give them as-built and say we're going to choose a licensing path where you hold us responsible to no changes well then when they come in and inspect it and it's one inch off, they're like, you got to redo that and do it to exactly the specs you told us.
26:05So now all of the different reactor companies are deciding to go with this new pathway because it would be a lot cheaper. But then you have to wait till the end for them to say that something you did wasn't like a safety concern. And so it could cause you a lot more cost, which is why people generally don't do that, right? And so my thing with the NRC is that They have a job to do, not unlike the Fed's dual mandate, right? Like the NRC now has a dual mandate, right? So with the Advance Act, it used to be that they just were safety-minded. Now they're safety-minded and they have to support the building of new nuclear, right?
Read the full transcript
26:43And so the way this kind of stuff works is you've got to flood the zone, right? So if you actually build 10 reactors, it'll be amazing how efficient the NRC will become. But if you have all these people working there and you only do one reactor, Well, then a lot of people are like, well, we have a lot of time on our hands and we're going to like study your application a lot more. Right. And so the efficiency comes from people using the NRC more and actually like pushing a lot more reactors through. Joe, I can't wait for the Phillips curve of nuclear incidents versus capacity build out. Whenever the day that that is a debate, you can be sure that we are going to cover it.
27:21We talked a little bit in the beginning about the market's reaction to Constellation. So the market likes the deal. And as you mentioned, the market likes the sort of possibility that this is opened up of maybe the Constellation isn't just going to be in the business of running nuclear, but actually building new nuclear. You know, talk to us a little bit more about the prospect. And it gets also back to your point about how for this to actually work, it can't just be one offs. There has to be a series. It's like that 13000 people that built Fogel. Then they go on to the next project and they go on to the next project.
27:53where are we on the sort of, I don't know, second derivative question of whether we have the sort of momentum in the industry to actually learn from the previous project and redeploy talented work and all these things that we need to get the cost curve bent down? So I think the first piece is why, right? Yeah. And I think the why part of this is, as you suggested, there are three aspects to load growth, right? One is data centers. And frankly, AI is not really a big part of it. It's mostly just clouds, an expansion of cloud, but then there's some AI sprinkled in. That's at least 25 ,000 megawatts of new load by the end of the decade, right?
28:33Then you've got all this success we've had with the president's agenda around onshoring and reshoring. And so there's a bunch of 500 kilowatt and two megawatt and four megawatt manufacturing facilities that are popping up everywhere, 800 new manufacturing facilities that have been announced, right? And that are under construction or expanding. And then the third piece is you have this electrify everything movement where a lot of people are buying electric vehicles and they're doing heat bumps and they're doing all these things. And so you've got all three of these. And then the question becomes, how do you want to meet the load growth?
29:05And for a lot of the electric utility companies, remember, they haven't had load growth in 30 years, right? For sure for 20 years and then very slow load growth in the 90s. And so they're now saying, can we do this with the tools that we have in front of us? And it looks like it's going to be really hard for them to do it with the tools that they are used to using. And so they're saying, we're going to need to figure out this nuclear thing, but also we're going to have to figure out how to use geothermal, expanded hydro, et cetera. And so then the question becomes, how does one wrap their brain around doing this, right?
29:43Because the electric utility companies are filled with people who run them, who generally were running a dividend yield stock, right? Like these are shareholders who are like, we want no volatility and we just want our dividends, right? And now you see like JP Morgan's infrastructure fund and others that are taking some of these utilities private and saying, we think you're a growth stock and we don't think that we could actually do this in the public market. So we're gonna take you private and give you all the tools you need to become a growth stock, right? And so there's some of those dynamics going on.
30:14And you've got a lot of governors who are yelling at the utilities saying, I spent so much time attracting all these manufacturers to our territory, and now you're giving them a three or four year timeline to interconnect? What the heck, right? Like, we want to create family sustaining jobs for all these people who want just to have a high school education and not go to college, right? And so the pressure on the electric utility companies is getting real. And so now you're in this situation where the question becomes, okay, if we're going to do this, how do we do it? And so we have been facilitating those conversations with the nuclear liftoff report, with lots of conversations around what new tools might you want for risk mitigation from the federal government?
31:01How do you want to do this stuff? And Constellation, for instance, has said, we're amazing at running utility-scale nuclear plants, but we don't know how to build nuclear plants. So we don't want to build them. We want other people to use our sites and we want them to build them and then we'll operate it, right? Because we're really good at operations, right? And so you're starting to see a bifurcation of the market where there's some people who are doing development work and developing these sites and figuring out how to negotiate with the hyperscale data center companies, et cetera. And then there are other people who are trying to figure out how do I construct these things and how do I build the workforce, et cetera, to do 10 or 12 of these things.
31:38And then you've got others like Constellation who are saying, we have an interesting financial model, right? Because they have to do subsequent license renewals of their plants that are reaching 60 years old to extend the life to 80 years, right? And so a lot of folks are saying, well, you know, that's also a risky bet. That's probably going to be$10 billion of CapEx to do that. well, if I had offtake agreements from the hyperscale data center companies, that would be a safer way for me to make that bet, right? Because they're really risk averse. I mean, even like I would say up to like two weeks before this announcement around the restarting of the Crane Clean Energy Center, a lot of folks were like, I don't know how the stock market is going to react to this, right?
32:21Yeah, it's pretty striking. Right. So they were really nervous, right? And now when they've got the validation, I think it gives them even more of an incentive to figure this out. To make more announcements. But also the electric utilities, right? It gives the electric utilities an incentive to say, like, why are we being so risk-averse? Like, our shareholders will probably reward us for becoming a growth stock.
33:00For enterprise organizations, managing all your food needs is a tall order. But with EasyCater, you get a single workplace food vendor with the tools and resources to make it easy. Giving teams across your organization an easy way to order from a huge variety of restaurants, all on one platform. All while consolidating your corporate food spend so you can control costs, streamline billing and payment, and simplify reporting. EasyCater, your business tool for food. To learn more, visit easycater.com slash podcast. How can you grow your business from idea to industry leader? Bring your vision to life with smart business buying tools and technology from Amazon Business.
33:41From fast, free shipping to in-depth buying insights and automated purchase approvals, they deliver everything you need to achieve your goals. It's not easy to stand out from the crowd. Simplify how you stock up to get ahead. Go to AmazonBusiness.com for support. In business, a well-chosen gift does more than say thank you. It acknowledges effort, strengthens relationships, and shows someone they're genuinely seen and appreciated. That's why so many marketing and brand leaders turn to 4imprint, because the right gift creates a lasting impression and reflects your brand in a way people remember.
34:16With thousands of customizable products like premium apparel, branded drinkware, smart tech, bags, and carefully selected office items. 4imprint helps your brand deliver recognition with meaning and professionalism. You can personalize every detail, from your logo and message to the way the gift is presented. And with 4imprint's expert support, dependable service, and with thousands without a setup fee, it's easy to create thoughtful experiences that align with your budget and your brand standards. Every order is backed by 4imprint's 360-degree guarantee, so you can be 4imprint certain. It arrives on time, exactly as intended and handled with care.
34:52Explore gifting with purpose and certainty at 4imprint.com. 4imprint, for certain. You explained it very well just then, but in light of a lot of utilities starting to look like growth stocks, AI-adjacent growth stocks rather than like boring old dividend plays, are there new sources of financing that are potentially interested in the sector? Have you seen the actual mix of funding, either the investors or the structure, start to change? Well, I mean, the reason why we're in the middle of this is because the Loan Programs Office has this expanded authority, and we are in the middle of all these conversations because everybody wants to figure out whether they can use the money out of the Energy Infrastructure Reinvestment Program that we were given out of the Inflation Reduction Act or our traditional Innovative Clean Energy Program, where we've got probably$150 billion.
35:46between the two of those programs of loan authority. And then you saw the big announcement from all the big banks this week saying that they are now pro-nuclear. I don't exactly know what that means. Yeah, I was gonna ask you. So by the way, just for those curious, we're recording this September 24th, but yeah, keep going with that. And so, you know, I think in general, those big banks like to do balance sheet related investments. And so in some ways, I think they're signaling to the electric utility companies where, you know, a lot of these big banks own the debt for a lot of these companies that say, hey, we're going to be pro you guys doing nuclear power.
36:21So I think that's good. I don't quite know exactly what they're going to do differently. But it used to be that a lot of the utility companies thought that their stock would be downgraded if they announced a new nuclear plant. So at the very least, I think everyone's sending a signal that we're not going to downgrade you. We actually want you to do this stuff. We want you to promote economic growth in the United States for America. And we're actually going to like, you know, give you tailwinds. And so I think that message is being sent. Since we're talking about funding sources, if we step away from nuclear for a second, I think it was last week I saw this report about there's this geothermal company called Fervo.
36:59There's always a lot of excitement about and I think they've raised some VC money, etc. Anyway, the report asserted that the problem for them, and I guess maybe you can explain it better, but I think geothermal is you stick a pipe in the ground and there's heat in the earth and it comes up and then the heat comes out and that's energy. The VCs are maybe excited, but then project financing is a challenge. Whether it's the lending to actually like, okay, here's the funding that is going to be for this site specific. I don't know much about this. We've never done a geothermal episode. From where you sit, is that a real constraint either on geothermal specifically or other forms of energy, which is that, yeah, maybe some investors like the idea of equity in some of these companies, but like the project financing component of whatever we're talking about is still not a mature market.
37:44Yeah. So geothermal is a very interesting technology. You know, as you may know, traditional geothermal is you basically have to find a liquid that like sits under the earth, like sort of near a hot pocket. And then you basically like tap into it and then you let the liquid go up and down. And then, you know, and that's sort of how you do geothermal. This new enhanced geothermal allows you to create your own pockets. And so you use modern hydraulic fracturing technologies, you drill a mile down or wherever it is, wherever you think that heat pocket is, and then you fracture the rock there and you put pipe in there and then you basically allow the working fluid to go down there, it gets super hot and it comes back up and now can turn a turbine, right?
38:23And so as a result, you can do it anywhere. You can do it in New York State, you can do it in North Carolina, you can do it in Nevada, you can really do it anywhere. Now, it's only really cost-effective today in six states in the West. But once we get really good at that, then it should propagate across the United States because it's super cost-effective. Again, though, the first units are going to cost more, right? And so Fervo got a clean transition tariff signed with Nevada Energy. So Nevada Energy is buying their power. And then Google is buying it from Nevada Energy so that Nevada Energy isn't taking this premium power and spreading it across all of their repairs.
39:01But Google will buy it, right? And then they made another announcement recently that they had done more drilling tests and everything went far faster, far cheaper than they thought it would. And so they're getting closer to the oil and gas speed rates than the geothermal speed rates, right? And Halliburton and SLB have said, wow, this stuff is ridiculously easy. We are happy to do all this drilling because this is child's play compared to what we do regularly for the oil and gas sector. Now, to answer your question, the problem is what the solar and wind industry are used to doing is getting money directly from large pension funds and pushing all the risk off to the contractors who do the work.
39:43And the contractors say, don't worry, we'll take cost over on risk, we'll do everything else because this stuff is crazy easy. And so now low-cost infrastructure funds can invest in it, right? When you go into geothermal, Halliburton SLB say, we don't take any risk. You pay us as a drilling company, and sometimes we hit gold, and every once in a while we don't hit gold, but we're not guaranteeing you gold. You pay us for the drilling. You give us the subsurface data. We'll do exactly what you tell us to do. And it works. It doesn't work, right? So a lot of this low cost. So when money is saying, that seems strange, you're saying I could have a cost overrun.
40:19Because you don't fail, per se, in enhanced geothermal. It might just be you have to build another hot pocket. Like instead of five, you build six or seven, right? And so that costs a little bit more. I don't want to take that risk. I think someone else should take that risk. And after you've certified with, you know, inspector that you've done everything correctly, then we'll buy the project because we don't want to take that risk. Right. And so they're going through this pathway where they need to find money from people who actually like taking that risk. And so that's why it was important to see that Fervo raised money from Devon Energy, which is clearly an expert at managing this kind of risk for fracking.
40:55And so they are not afraid of this risk at all. Right. But their cost of capital is clearly higher. than super low cost solar and wind money, but they're willing to go faster because they are very comfortable with these risks. And so this whole thought process and how we're thinking this through is something that I had to do when I started SunEdison back in 2003 and got all the big financial firms who thought solar was too risky to come in to the market. And so now we have to promote this exact kind of thinking across geothermal, long duration energy storage, storage, nuclear, hydro, like all these technologies that we've been researching for 20 or 30 years and like it's ready for prime time.
41:36People are like, wait a second, that looks a little different than what I did yesterday, right? Yeah, it feels like the proof of concept is there. For instance, I really like geothermal just on a sort of individual housing basis. And it would work for my property in Connecticut. But the constraint for putting in geothermal in an old house in Connecticut is that you would have to tear everything up and put in the ductwork to actually make it work. So on that note, are there other restraining factors on a lot of this new technology? I mean, that's kind of what we've been discussing. But setting aside the financing, we have proof of concept for a lot of these.
42:14What's holding back the growth? Are there physical realities perhaps or shortages, for instance, of HVAC workers, going back to the housing analogy, that maybe are restraining growth? Well, we definitely have a huge problem with trained craftsmen, right? And so I think that we're probably between 500 ,000 and a million people short, depending on your assumptions for how fast folks are gonna retire from the craft. And so it's an extraordinary thing, right? I mean, you could start at 16 years old, become a union craftsman, be making six figures by the time you're 30, and have a family-sustaining job.
42:52So I think there's a lot of people who thought for a long time that their kids going into the trades was probably not what they wanted to brag about at cocktail parties. But it's great to see that in the last year, I've seen people start to brag about their kids going and becoming an electrician or a plumber. And so some of that stigma is going away, which is great because a lot of people need to go into the trades. And frankly, a lot of people don't want to take on the college debt, etc. I think the other constraints, though, are really around the grid, which we talked about before, which is that no matter how much stuff we do to build new HVDC, high-voltage DC lines, or grid-enhancing technologies, reconducting existing lines to put new materials in there that can carry twice as much power, we're still going to be grid-constrained.
43:37So then the question becomes, how efficiently are we using the grid? Geothermal and nuclear operate at like between 75 % and 92 % of the time. And so it's pumping electrons into the grid at that rate. Solar, if you add two hours, four hours of battery storage, might get from 25 % to maybe 35%, right? But so you're inefficiently using the grid. So now you might have to put a lot more storage on the front end of the transmission line to use the grid more efficiently and then put more storage in the back end of the line, which we call electric vehicles, to use that more efficiently, right? And so we can get so much more out of the grid that we've already paid for, but we have to be intentional about the mix.
44:18So we love solar and wind, and we should build as much of that as we can, but we also need a lot of this clean firm power generation to match it as we retire so many coal plants, not because of environmental regulations, but largely because they're at the end of life. I mean, Many of these coal plants are requiring billions of dollars of additional investment to stay open. And people don't want to put that money into them. And so I think there's a lot of constraints around us basically deciding what we're going to get good at, right? And like, where are we going to start the flywheel? I would suggest to you the flywheel has to get started across all these technologies.
44:56The IRA and the bill legislation have been the single largest investment in starting this flywheel in the world. And so we're super excited about it. But the other piece of it, I remember, is that everybody else in the world wants our solutions. So if we do it here, I mean, Poland, Eastern Europe, all these other places want to use American nuclear designs. They want to use American technology. They don't want to be tied to Russia or China. And so part of this also is recognizing that the world is looking to us to show this leadership. The president has passed all these laws. And now we need the private sector to be a little less worried about whether their stock price is going to go up and down by showing leadership and recognize the last five people that were nervous about it, their stock price went up.
45:38It's like it's time to believe. Jigar Shah, thank you so much for coming back on Odd Lots. Kind of perfect timing, all of this news to announce. And per your point, so far, the stock market seems to be helping your efforts. So thank you so much. Oh, thanks for having me.
46:07Tracy, I always really like talking to Jigar. You know, this sort of reminded me, it's not even related to this conversation. I have one of my friends who is more, I would say, on the right side of the ideological spectrum. And he's always, he's like, I think he mentioned to me once, he's like, I don't really care about climate and all that stuff, renewable energy. But when I hear Jigar talk, like, yeah, I'm totally on board. It's always great talking to him. He's very compelling. Yes. I mean, I do think one of the things that has perhaps changed a lot of the equation is also the experience of the pandemic, which did not necessarily cause shortages in energy per se, but certainly kicked off a general awareness of wider infrastructure and the idea that you can get choke points in certain vital things for the economy.
46:53So I think that is like kind of always hovering in the background. And from that perspective, even if you don't like clean energy for some reason, you probably like cheap energy. And so hearing about potential expansion in capacity should be a good thing. I really like how much this story is kind of a stock market story. And I think it's one of the things that makes it particularly exciting for us at this podcast, where it's like truly at the intersection of capital markets plus clean energy. Yeah, like engineering, real world things. So, for example, I liked his explanation of like why it's not trivial to just add massive amounts of power because all of the balancing that has to go on throughout the entire expanse of the grid from Illinois to New York and everything.
47:35But then also this role like it really does make a difference. Like if the stock market rewards your deal, then you want to do more of them and all your competitors will want to do more of them. And so sort of like this signal from the signaling effect. I was about to say exactly that. So you can scratch your head and be like, why are the banks putting out a statement saying they like nuclear energy now? But like the value is the signaling effect. Right. And it is kind of crazy. So, again, we're recording this on September 24th. But just in the past few days, there have been like five or six positive like nuclear related things that have happened.
48:13Kind of crazy. Totally. And to Jigar's point about like it's sort of a tragedy if you build the Vogel plant in Georgia. And then you have all these people trained on how to construct a nuclear reactor. And then at the end of the line, and then everyone goes to get a job at some other field, we're not going to have cheaper, more abundant energy unless what we've learned from one project quickly gets deployed to the next project, which is why all those liftoff reports from the DOE, like Jigar's talked about this on past episodes, the order book is just absolutely key. I'm thinking about the nuclear reactor catalog now.
48:48Maybe it'll come back, but it'll only be like two pages long and it'll be like the Model T where you can have the nuclear reactor in gray or gray. Yeah. All right. Yes. I'm looking forward to that catalog arriving in my inbox on Christmas time. Shall we leave it there? Let's leave it there. This has been another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway. And I'm Joe Weisenthal. You can follow me at The Stalwart. Follow Jigar Shah. He's at Jigar Shah DC. Follow our producers, Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Armin, Dashiell Bennett at Dashbot, and Kel Brooks at Kel Brooks.
49:25Thank you to our producer, Moses Andam. For more OddLots content, go to Bloomberg.com slash OddLots. We have transcripts, a blog, and a newsletter. And you can chat about all of these topics. Lots of interest in there in our Discord 24-7 with fellow listeners, Discord.gg slash OddLots. And if you enjoy OddLots, if you like it, when we talk to Jigar Shah about a potential revival in America's nuclear power, then please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad-free. All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there.
50:05Thanks for listening.
50:14Thank you.
50:43single workplace food vendor with the tools and resources to make it easy. Giving teams across your organization an easy way to order from a huge variety of restaurants, all on one platform, all while consolidating your corporate food spend so you can control costs, streamline billing and payment, and simplify reporting. Easy Cater, your business tool for food. To learn more, visit easycater.com slash podcast. Wednesdays on BET, an all new episode of 106 in Sports from executive producers LeBron James and Maverick Carter, Ashley Nicole Moss and Cam Newton. Break down top moments in sports, culture, and entertainment.
51:21Check out 106 in sports on BET and next day on BET Plus. This podcast is brought to you by FedEx, the new power move. Hey, you know those people in your office who are always pulling old school corporate power moves? Like the guy who weaponizes eye contact. He's confident, he's engaged, He's often creepy. It's an old-school power move. But this alpha dog laser gaze won't keep your supply chain moving across borders. The real power move? Having a smart platform that keeps up with the changing trade landscape. That's why smart businesses partner with FedEx and use the power of digital intelligence to navigate around supply chain issues before they happen.
52:06Set your sights on something that will actually improve your business. FedEx. The New Power Move
From the publisher
Earlier this month, we got the surprising headline that the shuttered nuclear reactor at Three Mile Island will be restarted. Of course, Three Mile Island was the site of a famous disaster in 1979 — one of the incidents that contributed to the US pulling back on the construction of new nuclear plants. This particular reactor was shuttered in 2019, when the economics of it no longer made sense. So why the restart? And why is there generally more interest and excitement about nuclear than there has been in years? On this episode of the podcast, we speak with Jigar Shah, the head of the Loan Programs Office at the Department of Energy. We talk about the big drivers both in terms of policy and economic conditions that have created this renaissance.
Read More:
Microsoft AI Needs So Much Power It's Tapping Site of US Nuclear Meltdown
Microsoft to Pay Hefty Price for Three Mile Island Clean Power
Only Bloomberg.com subscribers can get the Odd Lots newsletter in their inbox each week, plus unlimited access to the site and app. Subscribe at bloomberg.com/subscriptions/oddlots
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
