In short
Discussion of the “War on Iran,” focusing on alleged US/Israeli motives, legality, preparedness, and likely political/economic fallout; plus UK media/politics reactions (Keir Starmer, pro-Trump coverage) and a brief detour into UK by-election dynamics (Gorton and Denton) and energy-price debates.
Guests
The episode is a roundtable with multiple commentators (named only partially in transcript). “Andy” and “Adam” and “Ian” and “Gary” are referenced; one guest is described as having been a political editor of The Sun (Harry Cole). No other guest names or credentials are clearly stated.
Key claims
No one knows the full rationale for the strikes; Rubio’s “Israel would strike Iran” explanation was contradicted. The war lacks international-law basis and congressional authorization. Trump and Netanyahu face little restraint; public opinion is unprepared and war is unpopular due to civilian casualties and economic disruption. AI targeting may contribute to errors (e.g., a primary school strike). UK right-wing press is increasingly “MAGA” due to US-facing digital incentives.
Notable examples
Israel’s remote-controlled sniper rifle plot against an Iranian nuclear scientist; Netanyahu’s “DVD rack” of Iranian nuclear secrets; claims of Iran’s leadership continuity (Moshtaba Khamenei). Oil price spike and gas-supply arguments (North Sea drilling won’t fix global trading). UK headlines urging support for strikes; YouGov poll: 13% pro-Trump, 67% against. Gorton and Denton by-election framed as “Green as alternative to Reform.”
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOUnderstanding the Iran Conflict
1:30 to 3:56
Exploration of the complexities behind the US-Iran tensions.
“Well, we've got quite a lot of answers, haven't we?”
Leadership Changes in Iran
3:56 to 6:20
Discussion on the implications of Iran's new leadership.
“Is it just too cynical to say that Trump just sort of fancied doing it and there was no one around him to stop him?”
Consequences of US Actions
6:20 to 8:12
Evaluating the outcomes of US military actions in the Middle East.
“You know, the most we're getting is Keir Starmer saying, well, you can't use our bases.”
Trump's Approach to War
8:12 to 11:16
Analysis of Trump's foreign policy and its effects on the Middle East.
“And he did, I think, three paragraphs on Iran.”
Public Perception and War
11:16 to 14:01
Examining how public opinion shapes the narrative around war.
“For the classicists listening, I don't think he's got Venus insufficiency.”
Trump's Stance on Middle East Wars
14:01 to 15:00
Discusses Trump's previous rhetoric against forever wars and its implications.
“When he had a go at Jeb Bush, for those of you who have long memories, about Iraq, saying, you know, you got us into this stupid war that cost American lives and American billions.”
The MAGA Base Reaction
15:01 to 16:20
Explores how the MAGA base may react to Trump's decisions and the implications for voters.
“The thinnest silver lining imaginable on an otherwise enormous cloud.”
Shifting Opinions on US-Israel Relations
16:21 to 18:46
Analyzes changing opinions within the American right regarding Israel and its impacts.
“Those people are not diehard committed MAGA heads.”
Gavin Newsom's Controversial Comments
18:47 to 19:51
Examines Gavin Newsom's remarks on Israel and their political ramifications.
“Now in American politics this used to be the kind of thing that had people kind of reaching for the gin and they're clutching their pearls, that this was completely unthinkable, unsayable thing to say.”
British Media and US Influence
19:52 to 22:10
Discusses how British media is aligning with American political narratives.
“But then suddenly, yeah, no, straight screeching reverse ferret into more wars in the Middle East does seem quite a turnaround.”
Show all 22 chapters
Public Opinion on UK Foreign Policy
22:11 to 25:38
Reviews public opinion in the UK regarding foreign policy and Keir Starmer's stance.
“Would you like to guess what percentage of people in Britain, according to a recent YouGov poll, describe themselves as being pro-Trump?”
The Shift in Media Strategy
25:39 to 28:00
Explores how British newspapers are adapting their strategies for an American audience.
“over the last five years or so has been to set up outposts.”
American Perspectives on War in the Middle East
28:00 to 29:08
Explore how different political factions view the potential for another war in the Middle East.
“and he's now got an American-facing online show.”
Game of Historical Quotes
29:08 to 30:26
Participate in a game contrasting quotes from 2003 and 2026 about military actions.
“that this is a terrible thing that people want to focus on slavery and the bad things that empire did.”
Analyzing British Media's Response
30:26 to 32:31
Examine how British media reports on the current war's impact on energy prices.
“Far from making us look noble, it makes us look fatuous, shifty and unreliable.”
The Reality of UK's Gas Supply
32:31 to 34:38
Discover the truth about the UK's gas supplies and the North Sea drilling debate.
“Can anyone guess the prescription that's gone out far and wide about how we counteract this?”
Global Shifts in Energy Supply
34:38 to 37:36
Learn about the changing dynamics of global energy supply and renewable alternatives.
“Anyone who says to you, we should drill the North Sea, it is equivalent to your heroin dealer has raised prices a great deal should you start growing your own poppies.”
Reflections on Political By-Elections
39:41 to 42:04
Analyze the significance of recent political by-elections and their implications.
“about the Gordon and Denton by-election on the front.”
Political Landscape and Tactical Voting
42:04 to 45:01
Explore the dynamics of tactical voting and party competition in upcoming elections.
“there's another party out there with just a very, very different set of political priorities that they might also go to.”
The Role of Social Issues in Voting Trends
45:01 to 47:56
Discuss how social issues influence voting patterns and party strategies.
“Perfect for which estate agent you've ever met.”
The Impact of Campaign Messages
47:56 to 50:37
Analyze the effectiveness of campaign messages in appealing to diverse voter groups.
“farage had a couple of years ago right which is how do you staff all the positions how do you make it more than just you.”
Reflections on Political Campaigns and Media
50:37 to 52:52
Reflect on the implications of political campaigns and media representation of issues.
“In the same way that I think that reform quite often play white grievance politics.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01John Deere is putting in work and putting up highlights. Oh man, look at those passes. Tillage, planting, harvesting. Three years in and these pre-owned machines are still at the top of their game. We're talking reliability, performance, and long-term potential. And get this, these veteran machines can pick up the latest precision tech with ease. You know it and fans ready to add John Deere certified pre-owned equipment and more options to their lineup can shop at machinefinder.com. Booyah! Shop the Sherwin-Williams Fall Sale and get 35 % off paints and stains September 15th through the 21st, with prices starting at$29.86.
0:39Whether you're refreshing your interior or exterior, we've got the colors to bring your vision to life. And with delivery, getting everything to your door is easier than ever. Shop online to have it delivered or visit your neighborhood Sherwin-Williams store. Click the banner to learn more. Retail sales only. Some exclusions apply. See store for details. Delivery available on qualifying orders. Page 94, the Private Eye podcast.
1:30Well, we've got quite a lot of answers, haven't we? We've got a panoply of different answers. Various explanations were offered. Trump seemed to have been on phone calls with half of the US press corps over the previous weekend, and he gave a range of ideas. Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State, came out and said something which might have been accidentally have been true and was therefore he was immediately had to backtrack on, which was the idea that Israel were going to do strikes on Iran, which they knew Iran would respond to, and so therefore America was pre-empting that. But that's obviously a very controversial thing to say, that the world's greatest superpower is being dragged into a war by a nation of 8 million people.
2:05So he then had to pretend that wasn't what he'd said in one of those kind of great flat denials that the US administration really specialised in. Well, they go, no, we didn't. And then they play the clip and they go, oh, yeah, you did. OK. So, you know what, the answer is that nobody really knows. I mean, they did, last weekend they were talking about regime change, which they've got. So Ali Khamenei is now dead. his son at the time of recording is wounded but alive according to that. Not a big change then. Well I think it's a significant change because you now have a supreme leader who you murdered his father, his wife and his child.
2:42So he'll have more motivation for reform and reaching out to the West I would have thought. Another success, mission accomplished. Yeah right but also there's been all these things about how they want Iranian protesters to rise up and capitalise on the protests. The trouble is that it comes after several weeks of thousands upon thousands of them being slaughtered or imprisoned by the regime. The other thing that they've done is obviously the US defunded all of its overseas broadcast operations, including I believe one in Farsi because that was sort of woke madness that just allowed people just to sit on very big sinecures.
3:14And the new supreme leader is called Moshtaba which is the Farsi for chosen. So when they were having the meeting, I wonder who we're going to choose. But also in his CV, which obviously I've been reading recently to try and catch up, it said he had a very, very influential teacher that formed a lot of his views called his father. Right, OK. The signs have been there for a while that the immediate replacement, and as you say, we don't know how long this will last, is not going to be a leader of the opposition party. No, so we're not dealing with someone who we can trust because he's been through the British public school system and been deeply inculcated in our ways and values?
3:54No. Right, okay. It's continuity ayatollah is what I'm doing. Yeah, it hasn't even been to Sandhurst. But does that bother Trump? Because I mean, he did regime change in Venezuela, didn't he, which consisted of taking out one man and his wife, and then just letting the regime carry on as normal, but making sure that some of the oil reserves came the US's way instead. Yeah, although I'm really not sure how even that's working out, given the reluctance of the US oil companies to invest in a mad Trump scheme, given that they think, even if you think he's going to stay around beyond his term, he's still heading into his 80s.
4:23Is it just too cynical to say that Trump just sort of fancied doing it and there was no one around him to stop him? And the armada's in place. What are you going to do, send them home? Right, it would be embarrassing at that point to send them home. And I also think that, you know, Israel has been very clear about the fact that it feels that it wants to just use the opportunity of its current aggressive posture to take out as many regional enemies as possible. You know, I mean, you know, Israeli opposition to Iran's nuclear program is long running. I mean, they've done kind of incredible stuff.
4:52At one point, they set up a couple of years ago a remote controlled sniper rifle to take on the top of a mountain to take out an Iranian nuclear scientist. You know, do you remember that terrible, mad time when Benjamin Netanyahu posed with that wall of like rack of DVDs where they'd got all of the Iranian nuclear secrets? This has been, you know, a longstanding preoccupation of Israel. Previous US presidents have been more of the calm down lads view. Donald Trump is not. But this is also the nuclear capability which we were told by one Donald Trump had been totally obliterated last year. Yeah.
5:24When they did the strikes last year he said it was fake news to say that they were only compromised and not totally obliterated. So they got going on that again quickly didn't they? Given that they keep assassinating Iranian nuclear scientists it's a real testament to their grit that they've got it back up again within six months. And it is confusing for readers to say, oh, how's the war on Iran going? Oh, there's a lot happening in Lebanon. Most of the casualties, you know, 300 in a couple of days, seem to be by Israel on a country that isn't the named aggressor. I think Benjamin Netanyahu has calculated he will never have an American president who is so keen to do all the stuff that he's always wanted to do for a decade or more now.
6:08and so this is what I mean this is fundamentally a war about the fact that there is nothing to restrain Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu. And why is there nothing? Well there's no international law for a start so we have President Macron has sort of delicately tiptoed up to the edge of saying it's not really in accordance with international law actually there was no vote in Congress before this no congressional authorisation for this no one else in the alliance you know the NATO alliance is willing to kind of speak up to Donald Trump. You know, the most we're getting is Keir Starmer saying, well, you can't use our bases.
6:41Oh, no, actually, you can now. And China and Russia, which are allied with Iran, haven't really stepped in in any... I mean, I'm sure they're supplying it with intelligence or arms, but they haven't stepped up in any massive way to make a big deal out of this. So what is the restraint here on Trump and Netanyahu? And then some commentators say, well, that's good. There is no restraint. Indeed. The one thing that might be the restraint, as ever, is the US economy. So as we're talking now, there's overnight been a huge oil price spike. And that is the one thing that people in the White House who aren't called Donald Trump are very worried about.
7:17But this has been going on for a long time, right? So the midterms are in November. Traditionally, you'd expect a president's party to lose ground in the midterms, which will be the start of Trump's gentle fading out of public life, if this were to follow classic US presidential second terms. So his team are terribly worried that they can't get him to talk about affordability. You know, he mentions it in passing, but then gets super bored very quickly and is not doing the kind of things you would do if you're worried about it, like rolling back tariffs, like not spending billions of dollars of ordnance in the Middle East with no clear objective.
7:52After 9-11, there was a strong impulse that something must be done. I don't get the sense that that's the same here. No, the polling on it is really negative. And I'm not surprised about that because there was absolutely no preparation for it. So a couple of days before the strike, Trump did the State of the Union address, which was incredibly long and rambling. And he did, I think, three paragraphs on Iran. Now, classically, you might want to say we have this terrible enemy. And, you know, to get back to 2003, oh, we're really worried it'll unleash a chemical weapon on us. Or we're really worried it's got weapons of mass destruction.
8:26Or here's the threat that it poses to the world order. Or we can't allow this to go on because of this incredible threat. No, he just sort of said we can't let them have a nuclear weapon. And that was really as far as it went. So the American public opinion hasn't been prepared for this war. It was extraordinary. I was going back for reasons that become apparent a bit later in the podcast to a lot of coverage from 2003 and quite how long the build-up to that one was. You know, it was all about are they going to get a UN second resolution and are the weapons inspectors going to be allowed to come back?
8:51I mean, it was 18 months before they actually moved and kind of went in. Whereas this one just does seem to have done on a whim. Do you think he knew it was going to happen? or did Benjamin Netanyahu just phone him up and say it's tomorrow? I mean, they had been moving, as Andy said, they'd been moving all of the carrier groups into the Mediterranean. So over a period of weeks. The day before, the embassies were saying all the non-essential staff, please leave, which didn't seem to trickle through to the influencers. At that point, I would be like, oh, OK, fine, see you. Well, they're essential, though, that's the thing.
9:22Yeah, deeply essential posting activities that must be done. And in a way, they hadn't really stopped since last June when they bombed the nuclear facilities, right? That was a ceasefire in the sense of, and we'll come back any time we like, thank you. The international inspectors did say that they had found some material. I mean, so there was a small chance to say, actually, it's not totally random, but that was just buried. Yeah, I really like people have been doing that meme of kind of like, at least in 2003, you took the time to lie to us and can't even be bothered to do that. I mean, I think Trump's having a very bad time at the moment.
10:00He's had this big rash on his neck. He's been wearing a baseball cap, which for a man who's very vain is an interesting one. So for the fake situation room that he's made in Mar-a-Lago, he was sitting there with his baseball cap on. And then he went to a dignified transfer, which is when they receive home the bodies of American servicemen, traditionally like the most solemn occasion. And he was wearing a baseball cap for it. But it's a white cap. I'm pretty convinced that he's thought, this shows I'm one of the good guys. It's back to fairly basic symbolism. Western John Wayne territory, are we?
10:31I'm afraid we are. Gary Cooper. I mean, the Iranian guys, all their hats are black, Andy. Right. He is wearing a white hat. Well, I don't need any further convincing. That's the level of analysis you're going to get from me. Maybe he puts the black hat on when he orders a strike. Or maybe it's a bit like the new Pope. Maybe he's sending out kind of signals through the colours of a hat. But you think there's something wrong with his hair? I mean, I think it's about the fact that he's got some... You know, he's had this bruise on his hand that looks like someone's had an IV in it. He's had congested ankles.
11:07He's spoken a bit about the fact that that might be chronic venous insufficiency. I think he's struggling through a few health problems. Which is probably not surprising for a man of his age. Right, for a man of his age and prodigious Diet Coke and random food consumption. And he takes four aspirin a day. There's this kind of... Because he wants lovely thin blood. He doesn't want nasty thick blood. For the classicists listening, I don't think he's got Venus insufficiency. I think it's Mars. So the war is not legal. It's not popular. It's hugely screwing up the global economy. There are hundreds and hundreds of civilian casualties happening.
11:44I mean, we haven't yet completely answered the question of who launched the strike on the primary school, which killed about 170 girls. But it does look like it was an American strike. I mean, it could very well be. The Americans haven't denied it. They've just said Pete Hegsler said it. Trump's denied it. Well, yeah, but Trump denies everything. I mean, yeah, but at the Pentagon press briefing, the BBC, one of the few legacy outlets that was still kind of allowed in there because of Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of War's turnover of kind of the press corps to influencers. They said, you know, what's happening with that?
12:17And he said, there's an investigation going on. They said, that's what you said several days ago. Could you hurry this along? And no, they didn't get any further with it. I mean, there was a piece in the eye last week suggesting that the overuse of AI with targeting might explain some of these errors, rather than it being merely a malicious desire to blow up school children, which I don't think is what the Americans are doing. It is just a carelessness and an over-reliance on technology which does make mistakes. It's hard to see how the war is going to get any more popular as time goes by, if there are more casualties, you know, as certainly will be Iranian, and whether there are any more American ones.
13:00We're used to the idea that Trump makes quick lightning raids, Venezuela, the bombing of the nuclear sites that last June, and then declares victory. It seems as though Iran hasn't received a copy of that script on this occasion. That's the real fear when you talk to people who cover that region, is that is there a sense among the Iranian leadership that they don't have anything to lose by just continuing to send out drones? When one of the many justifications that's been given for it is that they want regime change, isn't there? I mean, there's not really much coming back from that, even if it's amongst a smorgasbord of other justifications.
13:35Yeah. They want you out. Yeah, but I think you're right about the popularity aspect of it. I mean, I suspect that will be what eventually prompts Trump to declare that he's definitely won. It's all over. Everything's amazing. and then move on to something else. But it is really peculiar because I sat there at a Trump rally and listened to him saying, I'm the only US president in 80 years who hasn't started any wars. I've ended some. Such a huge part of his appeal. He was, in the 2016 debates, very... When he had a go at Jeb Bush, for those of you who have long memories, about Iraq, saying, you know, you got us into this stupid war that cost American lives and American billions.
14:13What was the point of that? There is a previous version of Trump that... There was some blinking away, some neurons saying that this is a bad idea. It was an absolutely explicit part of his appeal to the American people, wasn't it? It was no more forever wars in the Middle East. And that's what I mean, we were talking about checks and balances on him. How much of a check and balance on him is the MAGA base and those voters? I suppose if he's not standing for another election, then personally, he's got nothing to lose from annoying those people. Well, he has kind of stuffed J.D. Vance quite heavily with this.
14:39So the vice president is, you know, known to be America first and isolation is very much of that tendency. He served in Iraq. And it's really made it quite hard for Vance to run as the vice presidential incumbent in 2028, having been so overwhelmingly kind of humiliated on one of his signature kind of policy positions. There we have it. The thinnest silver lining imaginable on an otherwise enormous cloud. I was about to say, he's really nuked J.D. Vance's prospects. And I thought that's not the happiest. Well, he'll be back in nine months, won't he? Just to pick up on Adam's point is only seven servicemen have died to date, only seven American servicemen.
15:22So obviously large numbers of other people have died. But aren't unpopular wars in America wars in which American servicemen die? I mean, so far, and I'm not being callous and you couldn't be more callous than Trump. Yeah, well, people die. It happens in wars. There we go. I mean, I thought quite a jaw dropping speech. but so far it's not losses that will make the war unpopular. The thing that is really toxic for him is the sense of the MAGA base going why don't you care about the same things that we care about? And it is now a very popular conspiracy theory that he did this as he does everything to get away from the Epstein files.
16:04And that is a fringe belief but it's still quite a lively one among some sections of the base. And then for swing voters, there were people who voted for Trump because inflation was really high and they were having difficulty buying stuff. And they didn't mind all the other mad stuff that he was doing. They just didn't like what Biden was doing. Those people are not diehard committed MAGA heads. They're people who want a functional US economy. And at the moment, he seems to be interested in everything but their gas prices, for example. And again, he's telling them, he's saying this is a small price to pay for not having a nuclear Iran.
16:41This is in one of his latest speeches. You're thinking, so you're admitting today that this war is going to cost the US taxpayer money? Yeah, if you are a recently minted crypto billionaire, probably lots of things look like a small price to pay, don't they? Yes. In terms of the MAGA base, what are their feelings about Israel? Because, I mean, traditionally, the Republican Party's thing has been very much Israel, right or wrong, we are behind them all the way. There's a sort of feeling with this one that if Israel kind of took America into this with them, it's a sort of continuation of with the attacks on Hezbollah in Beirut as well.
17:12It feels like a continuation of one of the eight wars that he's said he's already finished as well, doesn't it? I'm really interested in this because I think it's undercovered. So on the American right, there has been a lot of discourse since October the 7th about the fact that the left has been overtaken by basically sort of Hamas supporting cafe-awareing students. And this is a driving force of anti-Semitism in the US. Actually, there's a mirror image of that happening on the right. So one of the big stars among Gen Z staffers in Washington, they will admit to watching Nick Fuentes, who is a self-described Christian nationalist, a Holocaust denier, openly anti-Semitic, and somebody who, for that reason, is very critical of the US military alliance with Israel.
17:54And saying that he would now vote Democrat. I mean, he's a troll. He's an internet troll. But he does represent something, which is that there is a big part of the institutional class, the younger institutional class, that doesn't see the US-Israel alliance as being something that is completely unquestionable and sacrosanct. and that has huge implications in American politics for example because AIPAC which is the pro-Israeli funding organisation is really influential in lots of congressional races, lots of political races it funds candidates and it has a very specific set of demands about what it thinks those candidates should say if it's prepared to back them and you are already beginning to see candidates backing away slightly on both sides Turning money down Well so Gavin Newsom is a really interesting example he's obviously got his eyes on 2028 as a democratic contender, he's currently governor of California he said last week that and he phrased it as someone else saying it, but he said other people have described Israel as an apartheid state.
18:49Now in American politics this used to be the kind of thing that had people kind of reaching for the gin and they're clutching their pearls, that this was completely unthinkable, unsayable thing to say. But it's not anymore. And then the mirror image of that is on the right, you will have people like very influential commentators like Tucker Carlson who are incredibly critical of Israel and actually have built up quite a fan base in places like Qatar and Saudi Arabia because of their willingness to say that. Already we knew that popular opinion in America had moved away from Israel and now that is finding its outlet in some of the elite commentators and some of the kind of niche and underground commentators.
19:25So I think you're right. I think that this sequence of events will drive those people even further into the arms of why does Israel dictate the US foreign policy? That's why Marco Rubio came out and kind of cleaned up his statements, because that is a toxic thing to have said to quite a number of people in American political life. And again, it seems a bit of a U-turn from, you know, back in January, isn't it, when they went into Venezuela. But then the justification of that was this is all about the Don Roe doctrine, which is saying that the Western Hemisphere is, you know, part of the Americas are kind of what we're going to be focusing on now, which is make the Americas great again, I guess.
20:00But then suddenly, yeah, no, straight screeching reverse ferret into more wars in the Middle East does seem quite a turnaround. It makes no sense. And I think people have tried to drive themselves mad in the last week trying to make this make no sense. And I think if you just go, just imagine he's Caligula and he's made his horse a senator. Was that him or was that Tiberius? No, Caligula. It was Caligula. Consul, yeah. See, the one thing we can't get wrong on this podcast is classics, isn't it? I do. Words like me saying a Venus insufficiency, I should have said. he does need more love but he doesn't need more war but I didn't make it clear I'm going to do one deliberate error about either Roman history or the second world war in every podcast just to keep everyone on their toes thank you
20:46that sound could mean a lot of things and when something's going wrong at home the hardest part can be figuring out what the problem actually is at Thumbtack you can upload a voice message or a photo and our AI-powered search will help diagnose your project. Plus, the pros we know have over 14 million five-star reviews, so you can hire with confidence. Bumtech, we know homes. Hire the right pro today.
21:16Andy and Anna here from your new favourite podcast, No Such Thing as a Fish. Yes, we are two of the four hosts of the podcast that stuffs fascinating, amazing, weird, mad facts into your ears on a weekly basis. You got any good facts, Andy? Yes, how about this one? Anteaters have evolved on 12 separate occasions. Wow. Mysterious, wonderful. The world really wants them to exist. What about this one? When Ronald Reagan left office, he left a note on the White House lawn for the squirrels warning them to beware of George Bush's dogs. So there you go. If you like fascinating facts and much more besides, we are no such thing as a fish.
21:56We should come now to the most important question that the war on Iran has raised, which is, why, oh, why is Keir Starmer not invading immediately? I think that's the official British media stance, isn't it? Or most of us. Would you like to guess what percentage of people in Britain, according to a recent YouGov poll, describe themselves as being pro-Trump? What percentage of Britons are pro-Trump? Oh, well, it'll be triple figures. Which I mean, three. 3 % where was this poll conducted inside the Telegraph office rather different outcomes 1313 that's higher than I thought it was I thought it would be below 10 and 67 % against and then a lot of people as ever in a poll going who but you know and people really associate reform reform voters are more pro-Trump than everyone else conservative Labour, Green, FSMP whatever it might be and also people think of them as being more pro-Trump.
22:53Well, it's not entirely surprising, given that their leader rushed over to Mar-a-Lago last week, no sooner than the war had broken out, to try and have dinner with Trump, didn't he? And God stood up. Poor old Nigel, taking his GB News film crew with him and everything. And yeah. If he'd just booked it for a wedding, he'd have had a handshake. He'd have been allowed a peek behind the curtain. He's got no political strategy at all. But this has been a really big thing in the last week, Because lots of the traditional British press, which I mean mostly print media, Telegraph Times, so on, say running articles.
23:28I'm just going to quite a few headlines here. Starmer has made Britain irrelevant. Starmer must not equivocate on Iran. What's the point of having aircraft carriers if we aren't prepared to use them to do what is not made clear? But there is this drumbeat saying we must absolutely right or wrong support America in this and saying, well, Keir Starmer can't sit on the fence. What actually emerges is that lots of people want Keir Starmer to sit on the fence on this and think that's broadly the correct position. And lots of people are opposed. 49 % were opposed to the attack on Iran as opposed to 28 % in favour.
24:00It's reasonably clear public opinion in the UK, but that has not made it through to the papers. The Daily Mail in particular, I mean, did you see that headline last week? Starmer takes the great out of Britain. And I just thought, this is very odd for a newspaper that presumably still thinks of itself as patriotic to be kind of piling in with another international leader who's been insulting our Prime Minister and kind of taking his side on it. It just seemed a very bizarre position to be in. Desperate and deluded was their front page headline about Starmer. When, as you say, I think he's pretty much taking a position that most of the British public, or majority of them, would kind of think was quite a sensible one.
Read the full transcript
24:33And you said to me the Daily Mail was marvellous in invoking the spirit of the other great wartime leader, Sir Tony Blair, who the mail used to not think of as particularly marvellous. That was the most extraordinary thing. You had the mail on Sunday headlines saying, you know, Blair says we should have gone in at the first moment. You just remember saying, guys, do you remember? You don't like him. You really, really don't like him. And you've been saying for decades what a disaster leaving America and going into Iraq was. It's extraordinary. I mean, even more recently than that, do you remember when Obama was supposedly interfered in the Brexit vote and said we'd be at the back of the queue.
25:10Do you remember all of the op-eds from people saying, oh, how dare this American interfere in Ireland? You know, they managed to sort of find their backbones there and be a bit patriotic about it. But no, we seem to have gone over entirely into let's just be the 51st state now, according to certain newspapers. But you, Adam, you have a very convincing theory as to why. The key thing about what's happening with a lot of, particularly our right-wing press at the moment, is that internet advertising is a lot more lucrative in America than it is in Britain. which is why the strategy of most of our British newspapers over the last five years or so has been to set up outposts.
25:45A couple of them were ahead of it. The Mail Online was ahead of it. The Guardian was long ahead of it, setting up operations in America. But all of the others have kind of been piling resources into New York offices and America-facing websites ever since then. And I think that's sort of... Because these days, actual print papers are largely a sort of afterthought, and it's all digital first. That whole mindset, I think, of facing an American audience is starting to filter back entirely into the editorial line that they're taking even on the British-facing stuff. Yeah. So we've gone very MAGA, basically.
26:18British newspapers are now semi-American products. As soon as you point it out, it's quite hard not to notice it anymore. It's fascinating. The Telegraph itself is absolutely seeing itself as a... Well, we did a story in Street of Shame, the Telegraph have earned themselves a place in the White House press room, which they never had before. It was a little seat at the back, which they have to share with one of the online outlets. But they are in there. And they were one of those, I mean, the Telegraph were amongst many people last week who appeared to be able just to phone Donald Trump up on his personal mobile and just kind of have a chat to him and say, would you want to slag off our Prime Minister?
26:52Yes, I'd be very close. Will you print that? Yes, of course I will. It was even worse than that when the Sun phoned him up. They seemed to have fed him the line. So they said something like, do you think he's just doing this because he's worried about losing the Muslim vote, basically, right? Is he afraid of offending Muslims? and Trump went, yes, I do think that probably is why it is. And then, sure enough, that was the splash. You can't ask leading questions in a British courtroom, can you? But you can if you're speaking to the leader of the free world? Well, I did think, I thought that was a bit of a rum thing and I thought, no, no, no, you shouldn't be able to trick the US president that easily.
27:22That's a him problem, isn't it? Can I just put in a word for the journalist concerned who is very, very objective. It was Harry Cole and it was part of his podcast, which is titled Harry Cole Saves the West. so absolutely he's going into this objective Andy's furious this podcast isn't called Andy Saves the West you don't even try and save the West Andy isn't that what Liz Truss's book was called yeah well 10 years to save the West she didn't specify who would be doing it I suppose but I don't know if you remember Liz Truss didn't actually manage to do it no I was thinking how embarrassing to have taken the title of your product from Liz Truss but that's a very good example of the phenomenon you're talking about right which is that Harry was political editor of the Sun for a really long time and he's now got an American-facing online show.
28:05So his audience is the MAGA base, right? Whereas even people on the British right are just not in that reflexively pro-American place that the MAGA people are. Yeah, I mean, the Telegraph certainly used to be the paper of the kind of Buffton-Tuftons and the retired colonels and things who are mostly popping up now to say, oh, you're not terribly wise if you're going to another war in the Middle East. We haven't really got the resources for this. But just sort of being ignored in this kind of, like, no, no. And the Buffton's, and you know, a lot of sympathy for them, pointing out that the running down of the British Arms Forces can't entirely be laid at the feet of Keir Starmer, given we've had 14 years of the Conservative Party not funding them.
28:45The fact that there isn't a navy and that the army is, as the eyes repeatedly point out, you know, has had its outsourcing volunteer and recruiting divisions given to someone else, means that it's almost entirely ineffective. But there does seem to be this willful thing of not learning from history anymore. I mean, I wonder if this is part of the war on woke, because we've been told for years and years by a lot of these right-wing papers that this is a terrible thing that people want to focus on slavery and the bad things that empire did. And actually, empire was marvellous. But it now seems to have sort of been extended to, well, about 2003, doesn't it?
29:21We've decided to just rewrite that one as a complete... In fact, would you like to play a game of 2003 or 2026? Yes. Iraq or Iran? OK. I'm going to read you some quotes. Iraq or Iran. The sub-editor's nightmare. You have to guess. 2006 or 2003. This is brilliant. It's Iraq-U-I. That's the one. British spies are part of a deep cover operation to track down chemical weapons which could be used in attacks on neighbouring countries such as Israel and Dubai, the Mail on Sunday can reveal. The intelligence officers are working with American counterparts inside the country to locate sites which have been identified as potential hiding places for nerve agents.
30:022026. Yep, 2026. It was last Sunday. Yep, Glen Owen in the mail on Sunday. I love that. It sounded so... The chemical agents are like... Intelligence sources talking about chemical weapons and nerve agents. I'm wearing skinny jeans. I'm listening to the strokes. It's all coming back. Hans Blix is in the news again. Yep. Chemical Ali, he's back. Yep. Another one. This is an editorial. Britain remains a bridge between America and Europe even though its spans have been stretched to breaking point by the current crisis it should be a matter of pride that we who share so much in terms of democratic ideals with the great English speaking power across the Atlantic should have stood shoulder to shoulder with it Genuinely cannot tell, 2026 I say Nope, 2003 That's the Daily Telegraph on why we need to be right in there shoulder to shoulder with George W Bush Britain is left muttering about due process nitpicking over niceties proclaiming its loyalty to a legal order that others have abandoned.
30:54Far from making us look noble, it makes us look fatuous, shifty and unreliable. 2003. 2026. Dan Hanan, the man who is reliably wrong about everything, in the Sunday Telegraph last weekend. Right, one more. An abject lesson in making a laughingstock of Britain. The Prime Minister's slow and inept response placed Britons in harm's way. Other nations acted rapidly to evacuate their people. when it did act, its charter plane broke down and spent 10 hours on the runway. A good thing the Foreign Office wasn't in charge on D-Day. The Prime Minister was utterly misguided from the start. It raises the question, who on earth is advising him?
31:31That's got to be 2026. Surely the Dubai mention, surely. No, that one's 2011. And it's the Daily Mail talking about Libya. Oh. Do you want just one bonus question? Who said last week, when commenting on Donald Trump's justification, one of his justifications to the war, Trump said, if we didn't hit within two weeks, they would have had a nuclear weapon. Who said of that? He lies so often that he doesn't know the difference anymore. Is it Alistair Campbell? It's Chemical Ali Campbell! It is indeed, yes! The man of 45-minute WMD's dodgy dossier fame. So, yeah. Wow. We're not learning from history.
32:09We can't be bothered anymore. Can I bring us on to another element of the British coverage? because so much of the war has been about energy, what it's going to do to oil and gas prices. They've risen enormously over the last week, in particular oil, but gas is creeping up as well. So a large element of this discussion has been what Britain should do in response to this. Can anyone guess the prescription that's gone out far and wide about how we counteract this? Is it heat pumps? It's not, no. Oh, is it just drive less? It's drill, baby, drill. the reaction has been well let's drill the north sea which no one has thought to do over the last 50 years one example claire coutinho the conservative shadow energy secretary has been out there saying you know north sea north sea ed milliband is a dangerous fantasist we need to repeal the climate change act and get cracking to be fair she was saying that before the war with her own as well oh yeah and she was wrong then so don't you worry she's wrong then she's wrong now she's remained consistent which i do respect her for so i've been speaking to a few people about basically the reality of this so would it interest you to have a little bit of context about this whole discussion because it will happen a lot over the next few months your your heat pump time has come hasn't it really the solar panels how's your electric charging and your cross pavement charging solution working out for you top yeah yeah the price of the sunshine hitting my roof has not rocketed uh tenfold which is nice so i'm not going to be And because we haven't had any sunshine.
33:40No, I know. The way it's been discussed, in particular in the papers even today, is that we've got two days of gas supplies left in this country. This is a disaster. And it's absolutely not. This is how the industry works under normal circumstances. Most of our gas does not come from the Middle East. There's about 10 % at most. Most of it comes from Norway. A bit comes from the North Sea. Some comes from America. But we are not reliant for the actual supply of it on the Middle East. The problem is, of course, it's globally traded. The price will rocket, basically, because of these shortages. If this goes on for several months, there will be a concern about how we get that last 8 % or 10 % replaced, because Britain is really, really, really reliant on gas.
34:27We use it for heating a lot of our homes in a way that most other countries don't. That is potentially a problem there. But that's if this lasts several months, the actual supply of it. In terms of how the North Sea might change the prices, it's almost completely irrelevant. That's the thing. Anyone who says to you, we should drill the North Sea, it is equivalent to your heroin dealer has raised prices a great deal should you start growing your own poppies. The answer is to get off heroin. Is that because it would now cost a huge amount to extract what's still there? It's gone. Or there just isn't any?
35:05It is a really, really what they call a mature basin. So, you know, Claire Coutinho has been saying, oh, well, Norway has been finding a lot. The amounts they've been finding are sort of up practically in the Arctic Circle. What is left on the UK continental shelf, it's pretty well done. Do we not own the Arctic Circle? Afraid not. No, not anymore. Cannot invade it. Seriously, I mean, honestly, I mean, you know, if I was writing a leader in a popular paper now, I would say in another blow to Starmer we failed to invade the Arctic. Quick, well Donald Trump's looking in another direction. Let's take Greenland.
35:41So the weird thing is, Adam, you've been talking about short memories. We have been through something very, very similar four years ago. Russia invades Ukraine. Prices spiked enormously. Attempts were made then to increase the supply of gas and bring it down. Prices still went up 15-fold. So you cannot North Sea your way out of this. So what can we do? I mean, the government has a lot of opportunities to say this is a crisis. You know, you look at countries like Spain, which have hugely increased their renewable capacity. They haven't been affected by quite the same spike in prices. So the government can make a lot of sort of quick decisions to signal, you know, whether that's we need to electrify our home heating, we need to electrify our transport.
36:21These are things we can do with domestic supply. Countries mostly have this thing of, have you heard of the energy trilemma? It's such a great phrase. We're about to. I'm afraid you are. Good. There are three things you've got to choose between when you're getting your energy supply. You want it to be cheap. You want it to be secure. And ideally, you'd like it to be low carbon. But loads and loads of countries have said, look, we've got cheap and pretty secure fossil. So we're not so fussed about it being low carbon. In a world in which these things are no longer cheap or secure, and where China is waiting, saying, would you like some batteries and solar panels?
36:56That really changes the discussion. And what's going to happen, I think, globally is that lots of countries will scramble for extra supplies and many will get them. Countries which have a bit less money to spend won't. This is places like Pakistan, which don't have abundant natural resources. And when Russia invaded Ukraine and gas prices spiked enormously, Pakistan was absolutely left in the lurch. What that led to two years later is Pakistan importing an enormous number of solar panels. And in fact, this year they've cancelled lots of gas shipments because they said we just can't take on that much gas.
37:29We don't need it anymore because China was there waiting to provide supply. So this was all very different in the oil price shock nearly 50 years ago. There are now alternatives which a waiting superpower is hoping to supply. That's so interesting to me because, again, I think there's a difference between some of the legacy media treatment of it, which is that net zero is a ridiculous thing and super silly and whatever, and the reform belief it should be rolled back versus the view of lots of other people around the world that this is coming to an end. The era of fossil fuels is coming to an end.
38:00And not least among Saudi Arabia, the producer of an enormous amount of them, right, where you will hear the crown prince talk about how he's got to find something else for the country to do in a post-fossil fuel future. Another example, Cuba, which might be next on the invasion list. It's certainly been blockaded for, you know, America's just turned off the oil taps. Cuba's now importing a lot of Chinese solar panels in an attempt, I mean, they're really struggling, you know, planes are struggling to refuel in Cuba. They want to keep the lights on. The one downside is that lots of big renewable projects take a lot of upfront investment.
38:28And if inflation is very high and interest rates are very high, it's harder to fund them. But in the long run, oil suppliers don't want their stuff to be inaccessible to lots of people. They'd like the price kept at a reasonable level where they make a lot of money and people can afford to actually buy it. And they're not desperately casting around for alternatives. and I think old Sparky will be returning to this theme in the magazine.
38:57Andy and Anna here from your new favourite podcast, No Such Thing As A Fish. Yes, we are two of the four hosts of the podcast that stuffs fascinating, amazing, weird, mad facts into your ears on a weekly basis. You got any good facts, Andy? Yes, how about this one? Anteaters have evolved on 12 separate occasions. Wow. Mysterious. Wonderful. The world really wants them to exist. What about this one? When Ronald Reagan left office, he left a note on the White House lawn for the squirrels warning them to beware of George Bush's dogs. So there you go. If you like fascinating facts and much more besides, we are no such thing as a fish.
39:38Ian, I presume that when this issue went to press, you were thinking it would have something about the Gordon and Denton by-election on the front. I did I had a particularly fine joke about the plumber winning a by-election and I could put the joke the system is broken on there and I thought well that would do for the front by Monday it didn't feel like it was the biggest story in the world which is a great shame because it was really interesting not I think in ways that a lot of the press covered it this is extraordinary nothing like this has ever happened before which again it has quite frequently That is what happens in by-elections.
40:15And George Galloway must have been sitting there thinking, what do you mean? I've done exactly this at least twice. How dare anyone say this is a new tactic by the Greens. You know, I've set up new parties. I've gone for this vote. I've won. So there was a sort of feeling that the story had been somewhat missed, but we didn't really have time to go into it enough. So I think we could have a quick look now. Yeah, and this is really the short memory episode, isn't it? We've got a lot of short memories all over the place. So back to 2003, 2022, and now... To George Galloway. Week before last. Week before last, yeah, yeah.
40:53So I suppose the question that raises is, is Starmer screwed? This is a seat with a pretty big Labour majority that's just been completely overturned by the Greens with a very charismatic local candidate who, you know, was a very winning sort of plumber who kept doing a plastering course throughout the campaign because, you know, what if she didn't win the election? She was clearly very popular and liked, and the message was quite convincing. And she was up against Matt Goodwin, who clearly wasn't very popular and certainly not very well liked. We should say for non-news junkies who Matt Goodwin is as well.
41:22He's a man with an unfortunate surname when he then goes and loses elections and takes it very badly. He was both a reform candidate and, I think, probably at the time of recording, the UK's most popular political substacker. But that's only because Hannah Spencer MP doesn't have a substack, I presume. No, well, she was brilliant on social media. And I think that, you know, the Green Party generally under Zach Polanski has incredibly upped its game. And I think you're right, Ian. The reason I think people kind of panicked and freaked out about it, particularly on the right, was they sort of thought if there are angry voters who are rebelling against the system and the establishment, i.e.
41:53Labour, then the repository for those votes is reform. And then in turns, I actually know there's a left-wing version of that. And then people, if they are angry with Labour and still aren't willing to give the Conservatives a look, there's another party out there with just a very, very different set of political priorities that they might also go to. Because I remember sitting with you guys recording a podcast about a year ago and saying my feeling was that there are as many people out there who are as repulsed by Nigel Farage and reform and will do anything to keep them out as there are people who are going for the message that he's peddling out there.
42:24And I think this election has kind of proved that in a way. In a lot of cases, I'm not... Yes, the Greens are doing fantastically well. They're very appealing in terms of the social media stuff and all the stuff they're doing under Zak Rolansky. But I think a lot of people would... The dilemma for them in Gorton and Denton was finding which candidate was most likely to keep reform out. And I think that's probably going to be where the battleground is now in the next few coming by elections and in the next general election. It's going to be a case of reform versus whoever is most likely to keep reform out.
42:53Would you agree with that? There was a very telling instance. So Rob Ford, who's the professor of politics at University of Manchester, did a blog that ran through all the different options. And he said, you know, there's a path to victory for the Greens, but they need to be the alternative to reform. And sure enough, this got slapped all over their leaflets with like, if you don't want reform, vote Green, says... And he complained and said, well, that's actually not what I said. But it was a classic version of, you know, most of us who are politics nerds will know the concept of the Lib Dem bar chart, right?
43:18Which is just a mysterious thing. Lib Dems can win here and you find out that the axis has been massively manipulated. But that's exactly, you're right, Adam, is that it became a reform versus not reform fight. And the interesting thing is that lesson is that could be a very effective way of doing politics. The 2025 election was a Tories versus not the Tories. and voters were very good at tactical voting and sorting themselves. Are you in a seat where actually the Lib Dems are the best challengers to the Tories? You know, one of those maybe West of England seats. Is it, you know, is it going to be Labour the best place to get the Tories out or is it going to be reform?
43:51And something similar happened here. And if you look at all the polling on issues, reform voters are very distinct from everyone else. They don't have a lot of overlap on social issues with other people. They're in their own kind of blob. So there is a kind of left block that people can move through and people who were Labour voters in 2025 are not going to find it particularly hard to end up as green voters. Right. Whereas it's going to be harder for those reform to capture any extra people. they can cannibalise the conservative vote but some of the people who are now still voting conservative are unlikely they're more likely to be perhaps more likely to be socially liberal or don't believe in the triple lock or whatever it might be which makes it very hard for them to be eaten by reform so the thing that political scientists say that they think about reform is that they probably have a high floor but a low ceiling in the sense of actually when it comes to it the next section will be about whether or not Labour can kind of squeeze, how hard can they kind of squeeze them.
44:52Any estate agent will tell you having a high floor and a low ceiling is very bad if you're six foot three. Yeah, yeah. No, the estate agent would say it's a really new form of living and it'll cost you over a million. Perfect for which estate agent you've ever met. Sorry. Perfect for horizontal living. I think I should attribute this to Ben Ounsell, he's a professor at Oxford, and he talks about the fact there's basically a left block and a right block in British politics. And that's the way we've got to kind of see it. There are two pools that people are fishing in. And Labour is doing this awkward straddling, which is why so many of them were unhappy with Morgan McSweeney as Keir Starmer's chief of staff, because he felt they were spending too much time going after reform voters.
45:31So traditionally white working class baby boomers in those north of England constituencies in Wales at the expense of younger, more socially liberal, pro-European voters that they were losing anywhere else. And the feeling is that Labour has been quite complacent about, well there aren't enough of those people and they're quite geographically concentrated because it's studenty places we don't just want to win brighton and london is that what they're saying yeah or bristol or wherever it might be but actually we'll be we'll really get a sense in the local elections in may about the fact that if there are lots of people who want somewhere to defect from labour to is are they going to go to reform or are some of these people going to go to parties on lib dems um the greens in scotland the smp and the same thing with i think the welsh elections will be a very interesting reform versus anti-reform.
46:16I was interested in her victory speech in which she said working hard in this country used to mean something and I thought which party is that? I mean it could be more or less anyone and traditionally you'd expect that to be a Tory or a Labour person trying to attract a Tory. No it's the Green candidate who has a job, you know, a proper job. She does stuff. She does stuff that people like. That is that workers and shirkers argument from the 2015 election. Absolutely. And actually, when I say that, I can't remember whether that was Ed Miliband or David Cameron that was pushing that particular line.
46:54That was Osborne in particular. Oh, was it? Right. OK. Were the workers part of Alarm Clock Britain? Or was that the Just About Managing? No, Alarm Clock Britain is Nick Clegg. Sorry. And Just About Managing is Ed Miliband. Well, Ron actually didn't have to say it as long after the election. And quiet bat people is the thick of it, which is the one you must not get confused with. I think just about managing this is Theresa May. The squeezed middle is Ed Miliband, you're right. But they're all identifying the same thing, which is people who are economically insecure. And the interesting thing is that we've been used to thinking that as people who are in de-industrialised parts of perhaps northern England.
47:28Actually, now it applies to 30-something graduates paying back their loans at 9 % of their salary, unable to get on the housing ladder thinking you know what is the point like when do i get to settle down and have a family and all those things i've been told constitute a good life yeah um so you know and those are that's the pool that the greens have been incredibly good appealing to they've got that novelty value as well which is what nigel farage had that's what stood him so far was he was one of these people who didn't feel like a normal politician and felt like he was an outsider coming in but then zach polanski's then got exactly the same problem that nigel farage had a couple of years ago right which is how do you staff all the positions how do you make it more than just you.
48:05But I think he's learned a lot from what has worked for Nigel Farage, which is both having a pop at the mainstream media and saying they're all a hate to say against us always works really well for populist politicians. But at the same time, making yourself really available. Zach Palancey has gone out and done a lot of stuff. Think about the number of interviews he's done versus, say, Kemi Badenoch, right? He's just a lot more visible. He's out there. And yes, he might get into sticky situations when he goes on the rest is politics or whatever. But fundamentally, he's just there in people's faces in a very fractured media environment in a way that I think, you know, but neither Keir Starmer nor Kemi Badenot, nor even really Ed Davey for all his I was going to say waterboarding, I don't mean that do I?
48:43Paddleboarding. He's waterboarding at Thorpe Park. Waterboarding at Thorpe Park. The worst day out ever. Well, that could be an American base for the time this podcast goes out. Okay, so we come back to where Keir Starmer's crew is. Yes. Right. I mean, Helen, you've been telling me for ages, Nigel is going to be the next prime minister? I think that we should be very open to the possibility because there have been huge swings and this was a massive swing to the Greens with the reform in second and Labour in third and what was previously a really great seat and the key problem... A solidly Labour seat.
49:19Yeah, was that there was a large constituency of quite socially conservative Muslims. There was another bit of the seat that was white graduates essentially. Now those are two groups that have some things in common but actually electorally you'd imagine want different things. And for one party to be able to get 40 % of the vote out of that seat is quite impressive. And a big problem for Labour, because it doesn't say that there's one weird trick that they, you know, why don't you just be meaner to immigrants? Might win you back some of those people, but none of those people. Why don't we be more liberal on social issues?
49:49Well, that's going to turn off some of those people. Where do you go? You know, both of them united, by the way, one of the few things they're united on is Gaza, to take us right back to the start, right? Both the kind of, you know, white college graduates and socially conservative Muslim voters, both of them very worried about Britain's involvement in wars in the Middle East. So that was something that Zach Polanski pumped quite hard during that violation. But it can't all be about that, can I? When Matt Badloos came out immediately and said, actually, this is all down to the Muslim vote and down to family voting and corruption and everything.
50:19But, I mean, if you're going to get a load of socially conservative Muslims to vote for a woman candidate and an openly gay Jewish leader, that's a hell of an achievement, isn't it? Yeah, it just proves that they ran a very good campaign that spoke to people on the issues that they cared about. That said, there are bits of that campaign I didn't like. In the same way that I think that reform quite often play white grievance politics. I don't like the Green Party putting out adverts which is showing Keir Starman with Modi to say, look at him hanging out with a Jew. And then Netanyahu to say, look at him hanging out with a Jew.
50:52that to me is pressing a button that I don't really want people carving up Britain into different ethnicities and tailoring their message differently or on religious sectarian grounds I mean that's the Zach Goldsmith going for London mayor tactic isn't it? Absolutely. Yes. Was it a Hindu family saying he'll take your gold? Right exactly I find it a continuation of the fact that there are people who are madly obsessed with Sadiq Khan that he's trying to impose Sharia law on Britain and just say just because he's a Muslim I think that's all you need to know about him that kind of politics is really Show some respect Helen, that's the President of the USA you're talking about Really, really ugly wherever it comes from But they've correctly identified that talking about boring old green stuff is not especially interesting No one cares about the heat pump For listeners of the podcast there was a section in which Andy was talking about energy but we've cut it Oh no!
51:44Kemi Badenow's Conservatives got 1.9 % of the vote and that I think shows that she's done the work of reducing the vote to its core and you can build from that. And her reaction was to say that Keir Starmer is finished. I love that. That was brilliant. Mirrored by a lot of the press. I mean, you pointed this out, but... Yeah. Harp, starboard. They lost their deposit. All right, we should end this orgy of gloating. We haven't even done Dubai influencers. Imagine such a thing, Andy. Look at all the gloating that I've got pent up inside me. We get big, big views on YouTube from Dubai. Okay, I'll say nothing.
52:19Yeah, yeah. I've always loved the UAE and I believe that everything they do is great. Absolutely. I know who protects us. You have to say that when you move to Dubai, which Helen is doing. You've revealed where we're broadcasting from, where the bunker is. That is it for this episode of Page 94. Thank you so much for listening and for watching. If you would like to get a copy of Private Eye, it's available in your local newsagent. And if you'd like to get a subscription, it is available at private-eye.co.uk. the latest issue of the magazine has a terrific report from dr grim a human rights correspondent about what life has been like in iran under the ayatollahs and under the regime and it's got plenty more fantastic coverage fantastic jokes fantastic cartoons it's a fantastic magazine and the price has not spiked tenfold yet so rush out and get it right now thanks to ian helen and adam and thanks once again to matt hill of rethink audio for producing bye for now Andy and Anna here from your new favourite podcast No Such Thing As A Fish Yes, we are two of the four hosts of the podcast that stuffs fascinating, amazing, weird, mad facts into your ears on a weekly basis You got any good facts, Andy?
53:32Yes, how about this one? Anteaters have evolved on 12 separate occasions Wow Mysterious, wonderful The world really wants them to exist What about this one? When Ronald Reagan left office, he left a note on the White House lawn for the squirrels, warning them to beware of George Bush's dogs. So there you go. If you like fascinating facts and much more besides, we are No Such Thing As A Fish.




