In short
The episode covers the Texas vs. California redistricting fight ahead of the 2026 midterms. Topic: Texas Republicans passed House Bill 4 to create five new GOP-leaning congressional districts, after Democrats fled to break quorum; Texas GOP leaders delayed the process, and Gov. Greg Abbott threatened lawsuits/arrests.
Key claims
the new Texas map is a partisan gerrymander that cracks/packs communities of color; litigation could overturn maps under the Voting Rights Act; California Democrats are “punching back” with a temporary ballot measure to redraw lines only for 2026/2028/2030, reverting to an independent commission afterward.
Notable examples
Texas Democrats reported DPS surveillance and confinement tactics; California’s plan requires voter constitutional changes and would trigger only if GOP states proceed.
Guest
Maeve Reston, a Washington Post politics reporter.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOTexas Redistricting Controversy
0:05 to 1:53
Discussion on the controversial election map passed in Texas and its implications.
“And McCrispy strips dipped in Caesar sauce?”
Origins of the Redistricting Fight
2:18 to 4:23
Explanation of how the redistricting fight began in Texas and its partisan implications.
“Maeve, thank you so much for joining us.”
Democratic Response and Gerrymandering
4:23 to 6:00
Discussion of the Democratic response to the GOP's redistricting efforts and the concept of gerrymandering.
“Maeve, just quickly, you said that Democrats were saying that this map was gerrymandered.”
Surveillance of Texas Democrats
6:00 to 7:40
Insight into the experience of Texas Democrats returning to the legislature under surveillance.
“And of course, they had been threatened in lots of different ways by the GOP officials in Texas.”
Political Dilemmas and Challenges
7:40 to 11:15
Discussion on the political complexities and pressures faced by Texas Democrats during the redistricting fight.
“So I have my freedom paper and I am able to go wherever I need to.”
Legal Implications of Redistricting
11:15 to 12:40
Exploration of potential legal challenges surrounding the new election maps in Texas.
“That is more intense than I was expecting being confined to a bathroom.”
Impact of Redistricting on Midterms
12:40 to 14:00
Analysis of how the redistricting maps could affect party dynamics in the upcoming midterm elections.
“challenges to the maps in Texas, as well as California and other states.”
Impact of Redistricting on House Control
14:00 to 14:56
Understanding how redistricting can affect political power in the House.
“that Democrats had the upper hand and could flip enough seats to take control of the House.”
California's Redistricting Efforts
15:55 to 18:00
Examining California's legislative response to redistricting challenges.
“That's one of the states that's starting to clear some of the hurdles that they need to get through to do their own redistricting, but doing so in favor of the Democrats.”
Comparative State Responses to Redistricting
18:00 to 22:42
Analyzing differences between California and Texas in redistricting strategies.
“Governor Newsom has argued that these maps will completely neuter and neutralize what is happening in Texas.”
Show all 12 chapters
Long-Term Implications of Redistricting
22:42 to 26:30
Discussing the potential consequences of ongoing redistricting battles.
“This kind of like tit for tat we're seeing between Republican and Democrat controlled states.”
Long-Term Implications of Redistricting
28:03 to 28:31
Discussing the potential consequences of ongoing redistricting battles.
“passenger princess, I love playing on spinquest.com.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Ava Wallace:Hi, this is Paige from Giggly Squad, and today's episode is brought to you by McDonald's. Honestly, Caesar sauce and a Diet Coke at McDonald's might be the perfect girl dinner. And McCrispy strips dipped in Caesar sauce? No notes. Right now, at participating McDonald's, the$2.99 Caesar snack wrap is making me rethink my entire go-to order. Caesar sauce is at participating McDonald's for a limited time, so go try it before it's gone. Prices and participation may vary. Have all members voted.
0:34Maeve Reston:Have all members voted. On Wednesday night, Republicans in the Texas Statehouse passed a controversial new election map. 88 ayes and 52 nays. House Bill 4 has finally passed. That vote gets Texas one step closer to creating five new congressional districts that lean heavily red. It was not a straightforward process. You might have heard a few weeks back about the Texas Democrats who left the state. They were trying to stop a vote from even happening. These Texas legislators ain't fleeing. These Texas legislators are fighting. They are fighting corruption. They are fighting racism. And they are fighting rigging.
1:17Maeve Reston:You may have also heard about Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, threatening those Democratic lawmakers with lawsuits and arrests.
1:26Ava Wallace:These Democrats, because they broke quorum, have tied the hands of the state to be able to address the needs of our fellow Texans. Our fellow Texans are angry at these Democrats for not showing up and doing their job.
1:39Maeve Reston:But those Democratic lawmakers came back. The vote happened. And now two things are true. In 2026, when Americans turn out to vote in midterm elections, it'll be that much easier for Republicans to hold on to their majority in the House. Or it won't be. Because Democrats are trying to do the same thing in the states where they're in control.
2:03Maeve Reston:From the newsroom of The Washington Post, this is Post Reports. I'm Ava Wallace in for Elahe Izadi. It's Thursday, August 21st. Today, I talk to Post politics reporter Maeve Reston about the race to redistrict. Maeve explains how we got here in Texas and how states like California are punching back.
2:26Maeve Reston:Maeve, thank you so much for joining us. So catch us up. How did this redistricting fight in Texas actually begin?
2:34Ava Wallace:So it started with President Trump saying that he wanted Texas to find more seats.
2:41Maeve Reston:And I won Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know. And we are entitled to five more seats. I don't know.
2:50Ava Wallace:This was in an interview with CNBC. The 2026 election, which is the midterms, is not looking particularly great for him. First of all, just because of historical patterns, often the opposition party is able to net a lot more seats at this time in a presidency. But also because, you know, there is a lot of concern about the economy and there also is some concern about the immigration tactics that President Trump has been using. And so he really felt it was necessary to lean on the Texas governor, Greg Abbott, and Texas GOP lawmakers to say, look, you've got an opportunity to redraw the maps, even though it's mid-cycle.
3:37Ava Wallace:And this normally happens after the census that's done every 10 years. And that's how it all got started.
3:44Maeve Reston:Okay, this might be a super basic question, but what's wrong with this new map and why do Democrats hate it so much?
3:51Ava Wallace:Well, basically, you know, the maps were drawn by Texas GOP lawmakers to yield five more seats in Congress for the GOP. And so they have drawn, you know, members into completely new districts that add a lot more Republicans. They have split up communities of color. as one Texas lawmaker was saying these maps are cracking and packing the districts to stack them against Democrats. And it's just effectively what we call a partisan gerrymander. But what ended up happening is that Texas Republicans were delayed in trying to pass these maps for two weeks by Democrats who fled the state to prevent the GOP from having enough members present to conduct legislative business.
4:45Maeve Reston:Maeve, just quickly, you said that Democrats were saying that this map was gerrymandered. What is the difference between gerrymandering and standard redistricting?
4:54Ava Wallace:Yeah, so gerrymandering means essentially that you are manipulating the boundaries of an electoral constituency to favor one party or class. So, you know, that could be that you're manipulating the lines that break up a city with common interests or you are doing other things that split communities of interest and that you're doing all of that essentially to serve partisan interests.
5:24Maeve Reston:And redistricting is just like the neutral, we're just redrawing the lines here. Yes. Thank you for explaining that. Okay, so back to the map. Maeve, you said that Texas Democrats fled the state to keep the legislature from achieving a quorum, from having enough members present to conduct business. Democrats are pretty outnumbered in the Texas legislature, so them coming back would certainly mean that the map would get voted through. So why did they come back at all?
5:50Ava Wallace:Basically, Texas legislators couldn't stay away forever from home. The Democrats knew they were not going to ultimately win this one. And of course, they had been threatened in lots of different ways by the GOP officials in Texas. The other factor here was that California Democrats had unveiled their plan to counteract the Texas map by redrawing their own lines. Those new maps in California would essentially wipe out the gains that the Texas GOP was trying to make with their maps. Democrats in California are aiming to give their party as many as five additional seats under these new maps. And so that essentially allowed Texas Democrats to go back knowing that California was going to very swiftly take that action.
6:44Ava Wallace:So they came back. I see.
6:47Maeve Reston:I definitely want to come back and unpack all of the kind of counter moves by California. But first, I'm wondering, what was the experience of these Texas Democrats when they did return to the state? I know our colleague Molly Hennessy Fisk talked with State Representative Suleiman Lulani. Yeah.
7:04Ava Wallace:So he and most of the other Democrats have been under constant surveillance by the Texas Department of Public Safety officers that have been tracking them since their return, ostensibly making sure that they did not flee the state again. and Leilani told Molly that, you know, this is a pure form of bullying. And he also, you know, said basically that this is not freedom.
7:34Maeve Reston:So, Doctor, how does it work now? You're, where are we going and where is your DPS officer? So I have my freedom paper and I am able to go wherever I need to. But, you know, I have this DPS who is following me. So I'm actually not free to do things. It's kind of intimidating. that they want to follow us. And it's also a waste of state resources that these DPS officers who have actual job to find criminals and do other things. Yeah, I saw these incredible videos that Molly took while driving around with him, just talking about the symbolism of the surveillance, what it all means. So this is him behind you in the gray truck.
8:16Maeve Reston:I believe so.
8:20Maeve Reston:So do you have to drive differently knowing he's back there? No, I'm just behaving my own, trying to behave my normal self because I don't think I've done anything wrong. And that's what we're doing. This actually is more for the people, for the public, for you to know that what they're showing the might is if we can do this to your elected officials, we can come do it to you. So you just follow what we tell you otherwise, your safety, your security, your life, your freedom at the stake.
8:52Ava Wallace:And then another state representative, Nicole Collier, she declined to remain in custody of DPS officers and instead chose to sleep on the House floor for two nights. And it was really interesting. I was on a Democratic National Committee call with other reporters this week where Collier had joined that call. It also included California Governor Gavin Newsom and New Jersey Senator Cory Booker, who is also a Democrat. And in the middle of an answer that the Democratic National Committee chairman, Ken Martin, was giving to a reporter, Collier interrupted and said,
9:34Ava Wallace:She had told us earlier in the call that she was being confined to a bathroom to join this call with the Democratic National Committee. And we could hear someone in the background. and she said, Well, you told me I was only allowed to be here in the bathroom. No, hang on. Bye, everybody. I've got to go. It was unclear exactly who was giving her that information and what piece of the law they were talking about. I mean, often there are rules in every state legislature about what kinds of political things you can do in a place like the state capitol. But of course, she was not leaving the capitol at that moment.
10:17Ava Wallace:And so she was told that she could make this call from the bathroom. But then apparently they decided that that was not appropriate. She very hurriedly rushed off the call. Senator Booker then spoke about how outrageous it was to experience that moment in real time. And he said,
10:35Maeve Reston:Hey, that is outrageous. First of all, let me tell you something. Representative Collier in the bathroom has more dignity than Donald Trump in the Oval Office. There you go. That is outrageous. What they're trying to do right there is silence an American leader, silence a black woman. And that is outrageous. And I hope everybody took note of that. The fact that she can't even let her voice be heard is freaking outrageous. And this is what we're fighting for here. This is ultimately what this is about. What we just witnessed, them trying to shut her down and say it's illegal for her to be in the bathroom and on this call.
11:14Maeve Reston:Wow. That is more intense than I was expecting being confined to a bathroom. That's quite a lot. OK, I want to return to the map. What happens now that the Texas House has passed it? Is there more? Are we waiting for litigation? Is there any other kind of hoops that they have to jump through or what now?
11:33Ava Wallace:There will definitely be litigation and it's unclear how that will go. Lawmakers in California are actually watching that very closely because, as we will talk about in a moment, their new maps will not go forward unless the Texas GOP-leading maps end up prevailing not only, you know, in the legislature and being adopted, but also in the courts. So we're going to have to see how that process plays out. But if the courts, for example, were to find that these maps do not comply with the Voting Rights Act, then they could be tossed out. And, you know, Texas potentially could have to start from scratch.
12:15Ava Wallace:And I don't know what all the legislative timelines are, but there are certain rules about getting maps in place, you know, a certain amount of time before the 2026 elections. So we'd have to see how that all plays out.
12:29Maeve Reston:What is it about these maps that could be out of compliance with the Voting Rights Act? Or like, what could the legal challenges look like to these maps and to maps in other states?
12:39Ava Wallace:So we could see all kinds of legal challenges to the maps in Texas, as well as California and other states. That has happened over and over again, because a lot of times what the courts are looking at, in particular, the Supreme Court has looked at, is, you know, whether maps comply with the Voting Rights Act of 1965. And what the Voting Rights Act protects is that the drawing of the congressional districts has to protect communities of color and that you can't, it's called, crack or pack the maps in order to limit the influence of those communities. And that is what we will see play out in the courts.
13:32Ava Wallace:There could be other kinds of challenges, you know, on transparency or, you know, giving the voters enough time to digest and learn about these maps that were being put into law. So it could be a maze of court battles over the next year or so.
13:49Maeve Reston:Pending litigation then, I guess, how do these maps theoretically change kind of the party calculus for the midterms.
13:56Ava Wallace:Well, so until this whole redistricting fight erupted, it seemed likely that Democrats had the upper hand and could flip enough seats to take control of the House. A Democratic House majority could impede the president's agenda, and it would give Democrats the ability to launch investigations into his administration. So a lot would change very fast. And of course, that is why President Trump is trying to guard against that possibility with every tool that he has.
14:29Maeve Reston:OK, so all that said, this Republican plan to make it harder for Democrats to flip the House might not actually work, right? Because, Maeve, you mentioned earlier that Democratic lawmakers in states, including California, are responding with their own redrawn district maps. We're going to get into what those efforts look like right after the break.
14:56Ava Wallace:Hi, this is Paige from Giggly Squad, and today's episode is brought to you by McDonald's. Honestly, Caesar sauce and a Diet Coke at McDonald's might be the perfect girl dinner. And McCrispy strips dipped in Caesar sauce, no notes. Right now at participating McDonald's, the$2.99 Caesar snack wrap is making me rethink my entire go-to order. Caesar sauce is at participating McDonald's for a limited time, so go try it before it's gone. Prices and participation may vary. Hey guys, Lady Luck here. Are you going on any road trips this summer? I know I'm going to be going on a bunch of road trips. And being that I'm going to be Passenger Princess, I love playing on SpinQuest.com.
15:38Ava Wallace:SpinQuest has all of my favorite slot games, live blackjack, live craps. Head on over to SpendQuest right now and get yourself a$30 coin pack for just$10.
15:49Maeve Reston:SpendQuest is a free-to-play social casino. Void where prohibited.
15:52Ava Wallace:Visit SpendQuest.com for more details.
Read the full transcript
15:57Maeve Reston:Maeve, you're in California. That's one of the states that's starting to clear some of the hurdles that they need to get through to do their own redistricting, but doing so in favor of the Democrats. So what does that look like in California? And how is it kind of different from how it might be in Texas?
16:15Ava Wallace:So in California, Democrats have a super majority. And so in full control of the legislature, on Tuesday, they began clearing these procedural hurdles to move forward with the redistricting plan. And it's a bit complicated. But the proposal would ask the voters to amend the state constitution and set aside these current maps, which were drawn by an independent redistricting committee if another state like Texas or Florida changes its map to favor the GOP in the 2026 elections. And the Independent Redistricting Committee, I just should note, was something that was very popular in California and was approved by voters actually in two earlier ballot measures in 2008 and 2010.
17:09Ava Wallace:So what the Democrats are arguing is that this new map that leans toward their party would only be in effect for 2026, 2028 and 2030. And after that point, the independent redistricting panel would go back to their normal work of drawing lines, which will be done after the 2030 census. And so those maps would be used beginning in 2031. So the Democrats are saying this is temporary. We love the Independent Redistricting Commission too, but we have to make this change because of what they framed as Trump's power grab here. It's not good enough to just hold hands, have a candlelight vigil and talk about the way the world should be.
17:56Maeve Reston:We have got to recognize the cards that have been dealt and we have got to meet fire with fire.
18:02Ava Wallace:Governor Newsom has argued that these maps will completely neuter and neutralize what is happening in Texas. And he also has really emphasized this trigger in the ballot measure, saying that these new maps will only go into place if, you know, these other states like Texas and Florida have approved their maps and those maps are going forward.
18:28Maeve Reston:This does not go forward, I want to remind everybody, unless one of these other states move forward.
18:33Ava Wallace:There's still an exit ramp, not just Texas, but Missouri, as I mentioned, or Florida, Indiana, and these other states that are considering doing the unprecedented, rigging their elections with midterm redistricting. You know, it became clear in legislative hearings this week that, for example, if the courts were to throw out the Texas maps, then California could revert to its old maps. So that's how they're making the argument with Governor Newsom repeating this phrase that there's still an exit ramp.
19:04Maeve Reston:Maeve, why is there such a difference in the way these states are able to kind of go about redrawing these lines? If I have you right, so California can do something essentially that's reactionary and it's temporary. But all Governor Abbott needed in Texas was to call an emergency session. Why is there such a difference in the way those states or maybe those two parties kind of approach something like redistricting?
19:29Ava Wallace:So it really shows the power of the voters here in California who put this independent redistricting commission into place through ballot measures because they wanted a fairer process. They got behind the idea that there should be competition in these congressional districts. And that has been sort of a bedrock principle for the Democratic Party. So it's just become this really interesting debate where Democrats now kind of flip to the position that they previously have had, but have said, you know, these are different times. This is a different presidency. If Trump wasn't using these tactics, we wouldn't have to resort to these measures.
20:12Maeve Reston:So given that, you know, it is being posed as such a dire measure, how do people in California feel about what's happening now?
20:20Ava Wallace:Well, so internal polling that I have heard about, a lot of different groups, as well as Governor Newsom's team, were doing polling on this ahead of time to see where the voters would end up. And it appears that over 50 percent, they believe, will be behind this ballot measure. They think they can inch that number up higher once they really explain what's at stake here, because, of course, you know, Democrats have overwhelming numbers in California. But, you know, people from Republican districts really don't like it. And at the legislative committee hearings this week in Sacramento, there was a long line of people from more Republican areas of the state like Fresno and Bakersfield, Riverside, California, who lined up to say that there has been no transparency in this process, that this is not what the voters want.
21:12Ava Wallace:They also don't want more than$200 million of taxpayer money to be spent on this special election. Wow. And say that there's a lot, you know, better things that that money could be used for, especially at a time when California is having to make cuts to other essential services.
21:31Maeve Reston:Of course, elections cost money. Yeah, something we haven't mentioned yet. But we have reported that Republicans in other states are considering changing their kind of district lines as well in places like Florida and Indiana and Missouri, Ohio. Are there any other Democratic-led states that are thinking about kind of doing the same thing that California is and just going kind of tit for tat?
21:49Ava Wallace:Other states certainly are talking about this. Illinois, for example, is one of the states that's looking at whether they could squeeze more Democratic seats out of their maps, which are already very gerrymandered. And, you know, almost all of the seats in Illinois are Democratic-controlled. But they were looking at whether they could potentially get one more seat out of their maps. New York is also looking at that as well. But they have some more constitutional and other hurdles. It has to be a multi-step process. So, you know, it's likely that New York would not be able to get anything done before the 2026 midterm elections.
22:32Ava Wallace:And there are some other Democratic states looking at this, but nobody is as far along or as committed to this as California thus far.
22:41Maeve Reston:Maeve, is this a fair fight? This kind of like tit for tat we're seeing between Republican and Democrat controlled states. it feels like what you're saying is that Republican-led states can move much faster than Democrat-led states.
22:55Ava Wallace:Yes, Republicans are considering changing district boundaries in states like Florida, Indiana, Missouri, and Ohio, even though some GOP lawmakers in those states have had reservations and there are also maybe some legal hurdles in those states. But a lot of these Republican states just have made it easier to create Republican leaning maps and don't have as many safeguards against that. So that's why Democrats in places like California have been arguing that this is not a fair fight and that they have essentially tied their own hands in their states with some of these measures to ensure that the maps are nonpartisan.
23:39Maeve Reston:Just simply saying we're not going to take advantage of this, right? It's a philosophical thing they're talking about that they've tied their own hands with.
23:46Ava Wallace:Yeah. And you have people like the former attorney general, Eric Holder, who spearheaded a whole huge group to try to work toward independent redistricting and make this this process less political. And even he is now, you know, saying that the Democrats have been too hamstrung and that these are different times that call for different measures.
24:07Maeve Reston:Maeve, if we're just kind of going back and forth with this, where different, you know, a Republican-led state redraws the lines, a Democratic-led state redraws the lines, and it gets to the point, hypothetically, I guess, where even if you want to vote against redistricting and vote against gerrymandering, that your vote doesn't really matter because of how the lines have been drawn. Like, I feel like I'm having an existential crisis over this, but what happens in the long term when we start going down this road?
24:33Ava Wallace:Well, I think that will be up to the voters of America to decide whether this is the kind of back and forth that they want, because a lot of people have described this as kind of a race to the bottom, including some of the people who have been involved with the Independent Redistricting Commission here in California, including former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican who championed it. And, you know, he has argued that two wrongs don't make a right and even went to the gym a morning a little while back with like a custom made T-shirt that said gerrymandering is evil. And so there's a lot of different voices in this debate.
25:15Ava Wallace:And we're going to see that thought out over the next, I think it's 11 weeks here in California. It is going to be a hugely expensive campaign over this ballot measure with both sides talking about raising more than$100 million to try to win this. You know, the former Republican leader, Kevin McCarthy, in Congress, who's now in the private sector, has said he'll be very involved in fundraising for the no side, fighting against the ballot measure. Governor Newsom, who has one of the best lists in politics, is going to be raising a ton of money on the yes side. And you've got groups from all over the country, partisan groups, that are going to get involved in this.
25:57Ava Wallace:And both sides are trying to frame this as a fight that has national consequences because it will potentially decide who controls Congress in 2026.
26:09Maeve Reston:It's going to be a long 11 weeks.
26:11Ava Wallace:It really is.
26:14Maeve Reston:I'm sending you stamina, wishing stamina for you. Maeve, thank you so much for joining us, as you said, amidst a very, very busy year and a very busy couple of weeks here for you in California.
26:24Ava Wallace:My pleasure.
26:28Maeve Reston:Maeve Reston covers politics for The Post.
26:35Maeve Reston:That's it for Post Reports. Thanks for listening. There's a way now to dig in on the news that matters most to you and build a community around staying in the know. This is a way to level up your group chats. A premium subscription to The Washington Post now comes with three extra logins. You can give them to friends and family and dive in on stories together, chat about them, and get immediate access to The Post's exclusive stories. Check out the link in our show notes for details. You can also go to WashingtonPost.com slash subscribe. Again, that's WashingtonPost.com slash subscribe. Today's show was produced by Rennie Svarnovsky.
27:11Maeve Reston:It was edited by Rina Flores and mixed by Sam Baer. Thank you also to Thomas Liu, Molly Hennessy Fisk, and Noah Bierman. I'm Ava Wallace. We'll be back tomorrow with more stories from The Washington Post.
27:44Ava Wallace:perfect girl dinner and mccrispy strips dipped in caesar sauce no notes right now at participating mcdonald's the 2.99 caesar snack wrap is making me rethink my entire go-to order caesar sauce is at participating mcdonald's for a limited time so go try it before it's gone prices and participation may vary hey guys lady luck here are you going on any road trips this summer i know i'm going to be passenger princess, I love playing on spinquest.com. Spinquest has all of my favorite slot games, live blackjack, live craps. Head on over to Spinquest right now and get yourself a$30 coin pack for just$10.
28:28Maeve Reston:Spinquest is a free-to-play social casino. Void where prohibited. Visit spinquest.com for more details.
From the publisher
With a vote of 88 ayes and 52 nays, the Texas House passed a controversial new election map on Wednesday night. If approved in the state Senate, the redrawn lines would create five new congressional districts that lean heavily red.
The Texas House vote comes a few weeks after Texas Democratic lawmakers fled the state in an attempt to stall the GOP effort. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) threatened the lawmakers with lawsuits and arrests.
So, they returned with a plan.
Guest host Ava Wallace talks with politics reporter Maeve Reston about how Texas Republicans were able to gain this advantage – and how blue states are responding with redistricting plans of their own.
Today’s show was produced by Rennie Svirnovskiy. It was edited by Reena Flores and mixed by Sam Bair. Thanks to Thomas Lu, Molly Hennessy-Fiske, and Noah Bierman.
Subscribe to The Washington Post here.
