Trump’s D.C. police takeover was planned and the Putin meeting stakes

0:02Has anybody else gone down like a Sean Dunn rabbit hole or is it just me? He's the guy allegedly that threw the hoagie. Oh yeah. You think it was planned? I don't know. So here's my problem. And it's like a personal problem. We hear about all these like seminal moments in American history, like the shot heard around the world and don't shoot until you see the whites of their eyes. Like our moment is like, you know, hoagie throw on 14th and you. And I just, I kind of want to do over.

0:44From the newsroom of The Washington Post, this is Post Report's weekly politics roundtable. I'm Colby Ickowitz. It's Friday, August 15th. I'm joined this week by White House reporter Cleve Woodson. Cleve, hey. Hi there. And we're also here with the Post's White House bureau chief, Matt Visor. Hey, Matt. Hey, Colby. So happy to have you both.

1:08So today we're going to go deeper inside President Donald Trump's federal takeover of the D.C. police. We have some new reporting showing that Trump was thinking about doing this before he took office for a second term. And we'll get into what the takeover has actually looked like here in D.C. And finally, we'll touch briefly on Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin that's scheduled for later today. So as we covered in an episode earlier this week, Trump took control of the D.C. Police Department on Monday. Under the Home Rule Act, it's a law setting out how the District of Columbia is governed.

1:41The president can do that for up to 30 days. And he also deployed the National Guard, like the actual military, to help patrol the streets here, which he says is necessary to lower crime. So, Cleve, Matt, we all live in and around D.C. We work in downtown D.C. What has this takeover actually looked like on the ground? What have we seen? I mean, like on my commute and I ride my bike in and I've noticed a lot more police officers in Georgetown. Yesterday I was in an Uber and there were just like the downtown was a little eerily quiet to the point that Uber driver said, like, this is weird. It's so quiet.

2:18And part of that is just the police presence all around. I have not been down to the mall where our colleagues have seen sort of National Guard presence. But, you know, there's clearly a much more visible presence of police officers. But it's interesting because D.C. is kind of a place that's used to sort of seeing these kind of buildups. We have the inauguration every four years, Fourth of July. There's barricades all over the place. So it's hard to figure out how much to attribute to Trump's latest decision because you're sort of used to seeing law enforcement and, you know, kind of barricades around the city.

2:56And like, how much is the sleepiness August, right? The town kind of shuts down. Everyone's gone anyway. So like, are people staying home because there's more police or are they just at the beach? I haven't seen any roving bands of anybody. I've seen maybe more police officers at Metro stations. I also ride a bike into work. That's not the only one with cabs. But, you know, like I one of the things that I found interesting is it seemed at least initially that police were using the sort of added federal resources to actually go to crime hotspots. there was some reporting by some of our colleagues.

3:29There is a chance that this thing actually is able to like staunch some crime, at least in the short term, if they are actually going to the places where crime is happening and trying to, you know, be a part of a larger, more holistic policing strategy, as opposed to just putting tanks at the National Mall. It doesn't feel like that, though. Like the other night, they put up a checkpoint at 14th and W For people that don't live in D.C., that's a really popular corridor with a very fancy bakery and a very expensive, like, doggy daycare and, like, a high-end outdoor apparel store. Like, it's got a real mix of, like, gentrification and lower-income people as well.

4:11But they were, like, stopping cars and checking ideas and asking about the general immigration status of people that were driving up 14th Street. Like, I'm not really sure how that stops crime. Well, I think we're sort of seeing this evolve a little bit over the course of the week. First is sort of just the visible presence. And next is sort of what are they going to do? And I think you're seeing that with the checkpoints where it's a little bit confusing about what the overall aim is. We're seeing reports of as of yesterday about immigration enforcement and that some of these police officers and the Trump administration wants to use this to enforce immigration laws.

4:48So I think it also gets at the broader aim of what Trump's trying to do. I was with him at the Kennedy Center earlier in the week where in addition to naming Kiss and George Strait and the Kennedy Center honors, he went on sort of an extended riff about what he's trying to do. Fighting crime is a good thing. We have to explain. We're going to fight crime. That's a good thing. Already they're saying he's a dictator. The place is going to hell and we've got to stop it. So instead of saying he's a dictator, they should say we're going to join him and make Washington safe. And some of that is crime, but there's also a lot of beautification, changing the infrastructure.

5:27He was talking about traffic medians, cleaning up the streets, removing graffiti. It's almost like a mayor. You know, the president wants to be the mayor of D.C. You know, he's sort of talking about this in a much broader way than just the crime. And so you're seeing the tent encampments and things like that as he sort of widens the scope, I think, of potentially what he's trying to do. I mean, we know that Trump often talks about D.C. as being dirty and dangerous. And we touched on this last week, but there was this attempted carjacking and a pretty bloody assault of a former Department of Government Efficiency staffer, Edward Corstein, who goes by the nickname Big Balls.

6:09Trump was talking about that a lot in the lead up to this takeover of D.C., and it really seemed like maybe that was the impetus for him doing this. But Matt, you had great reporting this week that this was actually something Trump was considering like long before he even got reelected. What did you learn? Yeah, I mean, this dates back in like many things to his first term where he had expressed desires of taking over D.C. but was thwarted and convinced otherwise by the people around him. Now a lot of those people are not around him. And so our reporting showed that they had almost a playbook kind of ready to implement with several different options for him from taking over the entire government of D.C.

6:51to federalizing the police force to the National Guard. And so he was ready to do it. And I think a lot of people around him were sort of waiting for the right moment. And, you know, there were a couple instances of sort of high-profile crime, but the big balls, you know, attempted carjacking eight days before he announced that he was doing this. That eight-day period is where they really sort of ramped up and prepared for what we saw Monday, which was the president surrounded by most of his top cabinet officials who had been laying the groundwork for this unprecedented display of force on the streets of D.C.

7:33I think there's kind of an evolving image of President Trump. I mean, in his first term, I think a lot of folks thought of him and maybe still think of him as mercurial, impetuous. You know, he sees this thing on Fox News and he tweets about it and then this becomes policy and all of that stuff. And I think what we're seeing with this reporting and with other reporting about executive orders and how they're waiting on a particular moment or the particular timing is a much more strategic Trump in his second term, who has a list, a litany of things that they want to do, that they want to accomplish, but also an acknowledgement that there is the right time and that there's patience required to wait for the right time to implement these things, whether it's executive orders, whether it's a takeover of D.C.

8:19But I just think there's just sort of this evolving viewpoint that we're kind of our insight into like the way that Trump works, which is not just mercurial, you know, a gigantic presidential id, but as strategic as any politician. I agree completely with Cleve. And it's interesting to see people react to that because our reporting showed that D.C. officials were caught completely off guard in some sense. They were not prepared. They didn't get much of a heads up. They didn't know Trump was going to do this. But on the other hand, Trump has been talking about this for a long time. And so there was this idea, I think, among city officials that maybe he won't do it.

8:59You know, maybe he's not going to live up to what he has been talking about, which you've seen in other respects on the tariff issue with Trump, where he'll propose something, he'll kind of back off it, and then he'll kind of go towards some middle ground. I think it's also worth pointing out that D.C. is uniquely positioned because of its home rule aspect, because the federal government has oversight over it. It makes it easier for D.C. to be the incubator for Trump's attempt to take over city policing. I mean, Cleve, you wrote about this this week, right? You wrote about his longstanding fixation on crime and how he's always talking about how, you know, cities are a mess.

9:37And, you know, he was worried about crime in New York when he was living in New York back in the 80s. Talked about crime a lot during the campaign. Like, it feels like these week's actions kind of fit with his both longstanding beliefs and his politics. I think one thing that's also really important, like with the folks that I've talked to over the last week and the people that I've talked with over the last four or five years in covering Trump and Biden is, you know, there's also just a racial element to this, like just just under the surface of it. You know, if you look at that press conference on Monday, it is a mostly white administration telling, you know, members of a majority minority city, a black led city that, you know, basically you can't handle the basic aspect of keeping people safe in your city.

10:26And the reason I think that's important is because throughout Trump's assent, he has sort of leaned into these arguments that are based on race, that are based on grievance, that are based on that are based on otherism in order to sort of fuel his political rise. And I think that for some residents of D.C. and some of the experts that I've talked to, this feels like a sort of dog whistle way of getting into that. That sort of explains why D.C., you know, Chocolate City becomes sort of the Petri dish for this and could be a launching off point for other places. Is it for photographs and headlines?

11:01There's a perhaps the photo that stands out in my mind are like three green military Humvees in front of the Washington Monument. Like, when was the last time somebody was, like, carjacked, you know, at the Washington Monument or whatever? And so there is a question, like, a fundamental question about whether this is just about the images or the optics. I guess the other side of that coin, too, is that increasing a law enforcement effort in a city that kind of doesn't want it increases the chance that those conflicts, like the hoagie throw, you know, hurt around the world or whatever, will happen.

11:39And I wonder if that's sort of giving Trump the image that he wants, the photos of videos I've seen. MAGA World went crazy. That's interesting. And I think one of Trump's tricks is to poke at somebody and hope for an overreaction by them. And he's done that with great effect oftentimes, you know, with Democrats or with his political opponents. Here, we haven't yet sort of seen that. And I think the D.C. mayor's reaction, Muriel Bowser, has been interesting to watch in that respect of like trying to kind of walk a fine line to not sort of fully react in a negative way, at least in the initial part of this.

12:21Yeah, hold that thought, because I want to talk more about that relationship between Trump and Mayor Bowser. We're going to take a quick break. And when we come back, we'll discuss that. And we'll also discuss how this push, you know, illustrates Trump's pushing the boundaries of his presidential power. We'll be right back.

12:51Okay, so Matt, I've been super struck by this relationship between the D.C. mayor, Mural Bowser, and President Trump, and how she has struck this conciliatory tone with the president since the start of this term. I mean, right at the beginning, she had painted over a mural, a Black Lives Matter mural that was put on 16th Street in front of the White House during the 2020 racial injustice protests. So like, what is their relationship? It's interesting. I mean, she's the one that initially had it painted in the first place during the racial unrest in 2020. So, you know, the relationship then was not good at all.

13:30You know, they were antagonizing one another. I think she deliberately came into this term trying to be much more conciliatory toward Trump. And Trump has done this thing with her like he does with a lot of people of complimenting. She's doing a good job. You know, I like her. Even as he criticizes the city. Yeah, the city's terrible, but the mayor's great. And so I think that relationship could change as we're seeing toward the end of the week. Now we're starting to see a little bit more of the tension come to the forefront. But at least her initial reaction on Monday was really mild compared with what Trump was trying to do to her city.

14:11Yeah, there just seems to be a recognition on her part that Trump is the guy for the next four years, that because of the unique status of D.C., that he wields tremendous power over what happens in the district, as we've seen over the past week. And there seems to be just a recognition on Bowser's part that while she is the spokesperson for this city and that she's of the opposite party and on opposite sides of a lot of issues with Trump, that you have to contend with somebody who wields tremendous power over your city. Yeah. I mean, we did see some signs of tension yesterday, though, right, because we saw the U.S.

14:46Attorney General Pam Bondi. She ordered the mayor and the D.C. police chief to recognize Terry Cole, the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, as the district's emergency police commissioner. And that seemed to really undermine this idea that local officials would maintain some authority over police during this period. Bowser has called the order unlawful, suggested they're not going to comply. So what could happen next in this standoff? It's interesting because on Monday, it was totally unclear who ultimately is in charge of the D.C. police force. And the city officials kept sort of suggesting, well, we're working together, we're collaborating.

15:22And only later in the week does it become like crystal clear as Pam Bondi makes clear that my guy is in charge and that's created this tension. But where it goes next is hard to predict. Trump also is talking about extending this well beyond 30 days. He wants some congressional legislation, which given Republican control of both chambers is within the realm of possibility. So who knows? I mean, but it seems like this is not going to be over in 30 days as we initially may have thought. It seems like a much bigger thing. You know, we've been talking about Trump's fixation with crime, especially crime in cities.

16:04And I just want to bring up that there was a big shooting at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta last Friday that The Post has been covering. So far, Trump hasn't mentioned it at all. It just seems odd that Trump fixates on this 19-year-old getting beat up in D.C., but doesn't mention that a federal building was sprayed with bullets and that a police officer was actually killed. So why do you think he hasn't talked about that at all? It's interesting to follow sort of what he talks about and what he doesn't. And this is one in which I think his political instincts oftentimes are to support his base.

16:43And in this case, it seems like the shooter was motivated by vaccines and COVID vaccines, which aligns with his base. But a police officer was shot, which doesn't necessarily align with his base and his efforts to defend the police, especially in a week where he's sending police officers onto the streets of D.C. So I think it's a more complicated political scenario for Trump. So he's just completely avoided it. So what we've heard from Democrats and other critics of Trump this week is that this move that he's made to militarize D.C., it feels straight out of an authoritarian playbook that dictators send the military into the streets to show that they and only they are in control.

17:26I mean, is that a fair characterization of what he's doing here in D.C.? This factors into what I would say, like the end of every interview that I do over the last couple of weeks. It's maybe not the subject matter, but I kind of when I'm talking to academics or historians or whatever, I'm like, you know, is this the red line? You know, have we crossed into it? You know, whether it be, you know, deporting people without a court case or taking money from colleges and universities that disagree with him. It's unclear, right? There is no like international arbiter of totalitarianism. You know, like there's not some person that decides.

18:04And so it can be very, very dicey because a lot of readers will email me and say, you should call this an authoritarian thing. And my somewhat saucy response is often like, who gets to decide that? You know, I think what a lot of people would agree is that there are authoritarian or totalitarian aspects to it. Or, you know, they can see shades of history in Nazi Germany or communist Russia or whatever. But like, I don't know if there's ever going to be a point, at least, you know, in the next week or so where we can all say, yep, yep, that's it. That's authoritarianism right there. Yeah. I don't know that it's crossed that line quite yet.

18:43I mean, it could head there. You know, he's doing things that are within his power. They're unprecedented. Previous presidents haven't used their power to do this kind of thing, but he's not yet in an unlawful territory. I think D.C. officials are now trying to challenge that. And so I think that gets into more authoritarianism if you're using your power in ways that you're not allowed to, that the law restricts you from. And I don't know that we're quite at that point just yet. Sure. I mean, I think there is this sense that like these aren't long term solutions to crime and homelessness. Right.

19:23This is a bandaid fix to to crime in the city and all the kind of systemic social service programs that actually work are not what he's suggesting. Yeah, I think that if you are like I before I was a political reporter, I was a police reporter. You can make a joke about the intersection of that if you want. And there's no need. But, you know, there are a lot of proponents that say that the way to attack crime is is to attack society's ills and to give more people an opportunity and all of that stuff. And that what is happening in this month, in the past week, is that you're putting a whole bunch of police officers on the street who are just going to have a chilling effect on crime because there are a whole bunch of police officers on the street.

20:11But it's not a long-term solution. It doesn't provide long-term opportunities. It doesn't get at the root causes of crime. And so we'll just go right back to normal. But because Trump may be able to lower crime in the short term, he gets to say, my way works. Right. And the city was terrible before and it's beautiful now, right, is what we'll hear him say. We have no idea where those homeless people are. I know. But, yeah. I wanted to mention another piece of exclusive reporting from The Post this week, which came from one of our military reporters, Alex Horton. And it was about how the Trump administration wants to create, like, a special federal National Guard task force.

20:48This idea would be that the force would be standing by at all times to respond quickly in U.S. cities to civil unrest, like what we saw happen in Los Angeles when there were protests against immigration raids. How does that plan fit in with what we're talking about here? I mean, I think it's an indication that he wants to broaden this to other cities. You know, he talks about Chicago a lot. He talks about New York a lot. But, you know, usually blue states, you know, cities, you know, he seems to oftentimes ignore the, you know, the cities and red states that also have issues with crime. But, you know, I think it's an indication of him wanting to deploy them, you know, in a greater way, use the federal resources in a greater way to address crime.

21:38which it's interesting to me also to think about FEMA, you know, another federal effort to address issues of, you know, natural disasters is something he wants to like get rid of. In some ways he's talking about federalizing an effort on crime as he's at least earlier in his term has talked about unfederalizing, you know, our response to natural disasters. Yeah. So we're going to put aside this story for now. But, you know, our reporters, as you mentioned, are all over this story. And you can catch up on all of it with a seven day pass to the Post for just$7. So find out more at WashingtonPost.com slash WeekPass.

22:22Before we go, we should probably note that there's a big meeting happening today. We're all talking Friday morning. This afternoon, President Trump is taking this really high-stakes meeting in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin about the ongoing war in Ukraine. Matt, what do we know about the stakes of this meeting and what could come of it? I mean, it's a meeting that Trump has, you know, almost craved for a long time. You know, a one-on-one meeting with Vladimir Putin. And, you know, throughout the week, Trump's rhetoric has changed a little bit. It's been at some points, this is a huge meeting.

22:59At other points, he's sort of like, it's a touch base. We're going to see if, you know, it's an initial meeting. But there are a lot of issues at play. And Putin is such a canny figure on the international stage. So it sort of validates Putin in a way, in a way that a lot of certainly Joe Biden and, you know, tried to ostracize him. So but there's a lot at stake for Ukraine. And Trump earlier this week suggested that this is the first of potentially several meetings. But, yeah, the stakes are high. I wonder, to Matt's point about being a canny politician or canny global figure, if Putin notches a win even before he steps off the plane.

23:47Putin has been a global pariah. Isn't he charged with war crimes in connection with Ukraine? Yeah, there's been calls for his arrest. One reason we have to host it in the United States is because there are certain other countries. Well, he would be arrested the moment he steps off the plane. And now he is ostensibly meeting with the leader of the free world. He's back, you know, just at least in the sense of having a dialogue, of having conversations and all of that stuff. And I just I there's always this this back and forth with Trump about, you know, who's kind of winning in that contest of wills and all of that stuff.

24:26And it seems like Putin, once he steps off of the plane, is already on the foot because he's he's suddenly back into the conversation. Well, that's all we have time for today. But listeners can keep up with the latest on that meeting by visiting Washington Post dot com. We'll be covering it closely. Thank you, Matt Cleve. It was a great conversation. Thank you. Thanks for having us.

25:24I want to make a special shout out now to Maggie Penman, our longtime executive producer here at Post Reports. Maggie is a ray of sunshine wherever she goes, and so she will be taking on a new role at The Post after this week, writing for our Optimist section, which it could not be a more perfect fit. It's a bittersweet day for us because, Maggie, we are so happy for you. It's so sad to see you go. Oh, and one more note. I'm actually going to be on vacation next week, but Cleve is going to be sitting in my seat hosting the roundtable. So good luck to you next week, Cleve. Can't wait to listen.

25:59Yeah, I will try to do you justice. Perfect. All right, everyone. Have a great weekend.