In short
Prof G Markets - Episode Summary: China’s AI Is 20x Cheaper — And Catching Up
Podcast Overview
- Title: Prof G Markets
- Hosts: Scott Galloway and Ed Elson
- Release Frequency: Monday through Friday
- Description: A show discussing significant news impacting capital markets, aimed at enhancing financial literacy and security.
Episode Details
- Title: China’s AI Is 20x Cheaper — And Catching Up
- Date: February 19, 2023
- Guests:
- Alice Han: Co-host of the China Decode podcast discussing Chinese AI developments.
- Robin Brooks: Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution discussing Sweden’s potential switch to the Euro.
---
Episode Content
Market Overview
- Market Movements:
- Major indices showed gains before a Federal Reserve meeting raised inflation concerns.
- Treasury yields increased as Bitcoin dropped to approximately $66,000.
Discussion Segment 1
Chinese AI Advancements
- Key Highlights:
- Chinese tech companies launched new AI models around Lunar New Year.
- Notable models include:
- Alibaba: RinBrain (robot understanding), Quen 3.5 (coding model).
- ByteDance: Seedance 2.0 (video generation), Dubow 2.0 (deep reasoning).
- Zipu: GLM-5 (designed for agentic intelligence).
- Alice Han's Insights:
- Chinese AI models are reportedly 10-20 times cheaper than U.S. counterparts, promoting broader accessibility.
- Chinese models are used differently; engineers can download and fine-tune them for specific needs, enhancing privacy and cost-effectiveness.
- U.S. models focus on high-level reasoning and precision, catering to enterprise needs.
Discussion Segment 2
Sweden’s Consideration of Euro Adoption
- Key Highlights:
- Sweden's Finance Minister is exploring the possibility of adopting the Euro.
- This consideration arises from geopolitical tensions and a desire for stronger ties with the EU.
- Robin Brooks' Insights:
- The decision is influenced by concerns over U.S. reliability as an ally and the safety offered by Euro adoption.
- Critics argue that the Euro does not provide real security benefits, referencing the experiences of Baltic states.
- Discussions revolve around the dollar's dominance and the implications of potential de-dollarization.
Discussion Segment 3
Pentagon and Anthropic
- Key Highlights:
- Anthropic, an AI company, faces scrutiny from the Pentagon due to its refusal to allow its technology for autonomous lethal weapons and domestic surveillance.
- This has led to Anthropic being labeled a supply chain risk, sparking concerns about government surveillance and AI's military applications.
- Main Arguments:
- The current trajectory suggests that AI may increasingly be integrated with government operations, potentially leading to enhanced surveillance capabilities.
- Public sentiment about AI is growing increasingly negative, with concerns about its implications on privacy and ethical usage.
---
Key Takeaways
- Chinese AI Growth: Chinese AI is progressing rapidly and becoming a formidable competitor to U.S. technologies, primarily due to cost advantages and diverse use cases.
- Sweden's Euro Inquiry: Sweden's potential shift to the Euro is driven more by geopolitical uncertainties rather than a strong economic rationale, reflecting a complex interplay of safety and symbolism.
- AI and Government Surveillance: The evolving relationship between AI companies and the government poses ethical dilemmas and risks of increased surveillance, which raises alarm among the public and could influence future political landscapes.
Conclusion This episode of Prof G Markets highlighted the shifting dynamics in the global AI landscape, the economic implications of Sweden's potential currency shift, and the controversial usage of AI technology in military and surveillance contexts. The discussions provide crucial insights into how these developments may shape future market trends and societal values.
---
*For further insights, follow Prof G Markets on social media and subscribe to the newsletter for weekly updates.*
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOMarket Highlights and Federal Reserve Insights
1:54 to 2:14
A summary of market performance and inflation concerns following the Fed's meeting.
“Let's check in on yesterday's market vitals.”
Chinese AI Models on the Rise
2:14 to 3:21
Discussion on recent advancements in AI from Chinese companies and their market impact.
“Meanwhile, Bitcoin fell to roughly$66 ,000.”
Interview with Alice Hahn on Chinese AI Innovations
3:21 to 3:57
Alice Hahn shares insights on the importance and implications of China's new AI models.
“Media's very own Alice Hahn, co-host of the China Decode podcast.”
Comparison of Chinese and American AI Models
3:57 to 6:15
A deep dive into the differences between Chinese and American AI models, focusing on cost and usage.
“What do they mean for consumers and investors?”
Benchmarking and Performance of AI Models
6:15 to 7:58
Exploring the relevance and implications of AI model benchmarking and performance metrics.
“So I don't think there's a direct comparison.”
The Future of Chinese AI in Global Markets
7:58 to 12:20
Discussion on the competitive landscape of AI in China and potential future developments.
“to come out and say that we're exceeding the benchmarks of other rivals and competitors.”
Sweden's Currency Dilemma
16:13 to 20:04
Explore Sweden's consideration of switching from krona to euro amidst geopolitical tensions.
“President Trump's chaotic trade policy has rattled Europe and some countries are weighing new methods to push back.”
Debate on Dollar Debasement
20:05 to 26:24
Understand the implications of dollar debasement and alternatives to the dollar.
“we stand with Europe, and that it wouldn't really have much impact or whatever impact it would have would maybe not even be good for Sweden.”
Anthropic vs. Pentagon
26:26 to 28:00
Examine the conflict between Anthropic and the Pentagon over AI use policies.
“Robin Brooks, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution.”
The Hypocrisy of AI Surveillance
28:00 to 29:37
Explore the contradictions in government surveillance policies versus promises.
“In fact, such a deal-breaker that they now view Anthropic as a potential risk to America.”
Show all 12 chapters
The Future of AI and Public Sentiment
29:37 to 31:29
Discuss the implications of public distrust in AI and potential political ramifications.
“They're down to work with the government, but they're not down to spy on Americans.”
The Trajectory Towards a Surveillance State
31:29 to 32:07
Analyze the likely fusion of AI with government operations leading to surveillance.
“Having said that, there are still many Americans that don't really know about AI, that perhaps don't really care about AI.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01Ed Elson:Oh, hey. Sorry, love to chat, but I'm busy shopping all the rollbacks and more at Walmart.
0:08Alice Han:Grab a what?
0:09Ed Elson:Cancel that. I gotta grab these big savings on the Walmart app online and in-store like right now.
0:15Robin Brooks:See who? Nope, unavail. The only thing I want to see are the prices just lowered on Tech Home and all my must-haves. Wait, you want to shop Walmart with me? Alrighty, I think I can fit you in.
0:31Alice Han:As AI reshapes professional services, law firms and in-house teams are rethinking how complex work gets done. Harvey AI is an AI platform built specifically for legal practice, helping teams analyze documents, draft with precision, and collaborate securely across matters. Today, more than half of the Amlaw 100 use Harvey. Learn more at Harvey.ai.
0:58Ed Elson:This episode is brought to you by Nespresso. Introducing Virtuo Up, the latest in a long line of innovation from Nespresso. It's innovation you can touch, sense, and taste in every single cup. With a three-second start, easy open lever, and dedicated brew over ice button, it's even easier to enjoy your coffee your way. Sip for yourself. Shop Virtuo Up exclusively at Nespresso.com.
1:24Robin Brooks:Today's number? 219. That's how many hours it takes on average for adults to go from friends to best friends. Today's other number is 1 ,000. That's how many hours I've spent with Scott Galloway. However, I still haven't made it out of the acquaintance zone. Money market's mad. If money is evil, then that building is hell.
1:47Alice Han:The show goes on! The folks in there are watching. Show! Show!
1:52Robin Brooks:Welcome to Prof G Markets. I'm Ed Elson. It is February 19th. Let's check in on yesterday's market vitals. The major indices paired gains after the Federal Reserve minutes were released. The official record of their last meeting revealed rising concerns over inflation. It also showed several officials may want to raise rates if inflation persists. That news sent treasury yields climbing. Meanwhile, Bitcoin fell to roughly$66 ,000. Okay, what else is happening? Anthropic and OpenAI have grabbed most of the headlines recently, but Chinese companies have been busy releasing very powerful AI models of their own.
2:33Robin Brooks:It seems that Lunar New Year, which began on Tuesday, has become China's unofficial launch season. Alibaba kicked things off with RinBrain, a model designed to help robots understand the physical world. They also unveiled Quen 3.5, a coding and agent-focused model that is up to five times faster than its predecessor. Meanwhile, ByteDance dropped Seedance 2.0, a video generation tool, as well as Dubow 2.0, its deep reasoning model. And then Zipu released GLM-5, which is engineered for agentic intelligence. The through line behind all of these announcements, all of these models are reportedly matching and even beating US competitors on multiple key benchmarks.
3:17Robin Brooks:Okay, here to break down this season of launches, we're speaking with Prof.G. Media's very own Alice Hahn, co-host of the China Decode podcast. Alice, good to see you.
3:27Ed Elson:Hi, Ed, and happy new year. Happy year of the fire horse.
3:30Robin Brooks:Happy year of the fire horse. That seems to be part of the story here, which is right as the Lunar New Year shows up, we see tons of new models coming out from these Chinese these companies, these new AI models, Sea Dance, DuBao, GLM-5. I mean, a lot of these names are kind of dominating the headlines, at least in China. What do you make of these new AI models that have come out of China? How important are they? What do they mean for consumers and investors?
4:03Ed Elson:Well, Ed, it's definitely true that Chinese AI has bolted from the stables, to borrow a horse metaphor. And as you rightly say, we've got a couple of models that have just come out uh jepore's glm uh we've also got quen the new quen 5 max model that's come out we've also got new ai video generation models that have taken hollywood i think by huge surprise and shock and consternation but generally when i look at the models and i've been using them in the last few days what's clear to me is that they have improved They are faster. They are more cost effective if you obviously compare them to the closed proprietary models offered by OpenAI as well as by Claude, for instance.
4:46Ed Elson:But really, my frustration with this debate is that it's apples to oranges. People are going to use the Chinese models differently. I think the fact that Brian Chesky, the Airbnb CEO, says outright a couple months ago that a lot of his engineers are using this for agentic chatbots because it's cheaper and faster. seems to suggest that the use cases for this are very different, the Chinese models that is, than the American closed models. Firstly, a lot of engineers and just everyday people are using and experimenting with the Chinese models. Quinn, for instance, they're downloading them locally, fine-tuning them and using them for their particular use cases, any kind of projects that they may be involved in.
5:25Ed Elson:It's got improved privacy because they're downloading it locally. It's cheaper, often 10 to 20 times cheaper than what's offered by OpenAI and Claude. So really, they're using this very differently from, say, potentially you and me, Ed. I use Claude a lot at the enterprise level because the reasoning is exceptionally good when it comes to the geopolitical analysis, the financial analysis that I'm involved in. So the way that I think about it is that the American models are really focusing on precision, on reasoning at the highest level as they really quest for AGI. The Chinese models are really figuring out how to create a market in which everyday people, engineers, corporates even, downloading them locally, experimenting, fine-tuning, and just capturing the benefits of cheaper, faster models.
6:15Ed Elson:So I don't think there's a direct comparison. I think that the market exists for both these models, so to speak, to coexist.
6:22Robin Brooks:One of the things that we're also seeing is just the benchmarking. I mean, I can't tell how seriously. I'm supposed to take these benchmarking leaderboards. It seems that things are constantly shifting. But when you look at the leaderboards, when you look at the stats on which is the best model, which is the best performing, the fastest, however you define best, I'm not sure how they define it. The Chinese models tend to be the best, or at least they tend to be at the top of the rankings. What do you make of that? Does that mean that the Chinese models are better? Does that mean they're going to overtake the American models?
7:02Robin Brooks:Or again, is this perhaps maybe apples to oranges and these benchmarks maybe don't make sense?
7:07Ed Elson:Well, I love that you asked that question, Ed. I think often that the benchmarks can be red herrings. There's a good hiding principle in computer science that is applied to this, which suggests that even although they may meet those benchmark goals and exceed the other models, there are certain unquantifiable goals and performance outcomes that they may still be inferior in certain respects to the Claude's and the open AIs of the world. So again, back to my previous point, I really think that if you care about privacy and cheapness and speed, maybe you go for Quinn, you go for Jaipur, you go for Kimmy.
7:42Ed Elson:But if you care about, you know, frontier, cutting edge reasoning, precision, then you are still going to favor the Claude's and the OpenAI's. So it's really different universes that they inhabit. And I think benchmarks can often be red herrings, even although there's incentive for these models to come out and say that we're exceeding the benchmarks of other rivals and competitors. But again, you know, the cost is something that is directly comparable. It's no surprise that the Chinese models are 10, 20 times cheaper. And I think that that, with cost deflation, inertia will continue to favor the Chinese.
8:21Robin Brooks:At what point will the cost really change and shift the way the market works here? I mean, consumers, I think they know about open AI. They're beginning to know about Anthropic and learning about Claude. So there's maybe some brand loyalty there. But I feel like at a certain point, if you're presented with an option that is 10 or 20 times cheaper, you go with that option. So I guess what I'm a little confused about is when is that going to happen? Is that not going to happen? Is that not a giant concern for a company like OpenAI or Anthropic or even Google with Gemini?
8:59Ed Elson:Yes. Yeah. But I do think when we look at technology diffusion and value creation, the way that the software economy really came out of the US and the US dominated that and the value created by software. It's really, I think, going to be the clods and the open AIs that benefit from the enterprise part of the value chain. The enterprise can pay for it and they tend to be stickier in terms of the subscription. So I think that we'll end up in a world in which maybe the majority of the value is captured by Anthropic, by OpenAI, but that doesn't mean that there won't be anything left on the table for Alibaba, for ByteDance, for Kimmy.
9:46Ed Elson:It's just a different market that they're inhabiting. And we haven't even talked about some of the other use cases. There's now Chinese AI chatbot toys. That is going to be a big market, I think. And certainly it marries well with Chinese manufacturing and hardware capabilities. You said toys? So they're toys. Yeah, they're these toys that are being sold that can speak directly to children. and teach them and interact with them. I don't know if you've ever read Neil Stevenson's Diamond Age, but it's this kind of AI primer that is part of the story. We're already living in that Diamond Age, so to speak, in the sci-fi realm.
10:21Ed Elson:That is one area. And then another area in which the, I would say, OpenAI and Anthropic have not been as competitive is in multi-language. If you look at the models coming out of China, it makes sense because they've been trained a lot on multi-language English, Chinese, and other language datasets, they tend to be better at other languages. And so if you're a global company where you care about a Chinese-Asian speaking market, that could also be quite an important distinction.
10:50Robin Brooks:One name we haven't mentioned, which was very popular about a year ago, seems to be less popular today, is DeepSeek. Where does DeepSeek sit in all of this?
11:00Ed Elson:Well, I think DeepSeek is still a leader. They still have a lot of the high-level AI talent, And that counts a lot when you think about the AI competition domestically and globally. I do know for a fact, although I'm not sure if I should say this, that DeepSeek is working a lot with local governments, with government bodies in China to integrate AI into local public governance. And I think this is coming at a time where, you know, Ed will be watching with bated breath in the next two weeks or so, because the 15th five-year plan is going to come out. And it's very, very clear now that AI plus is going to be a huge cornerstone of the policy for the next five years.
11:43Ed Elson:So AI in every realm, including in public governance and public service and utilities. So DeepSeek is still a player, but I think the latest models coming out of Alibaba, even Kimi, show us that in China, at least, the AI race is hyper-competitive. It's not just a duopoly, or even centered around three players, which is increasingly what's happening, it seems, in the U.S. There's many different players, and I think they can capture different parts of the market.
12:14Robin Brooks:All right. Alice Hahn, co-host of the China Decode podcast. Alice, thank you. Appreciate your time. Thanks so much, Ed. After the break, the euro may take on the dollar. And for even more markets insights, you can subscribe to my weekly newsletter, simply put, at edwardelson.substack.com.
12:48Alice Han:engineering department, who's already got too much on their plate, responds with, yeah, we'll get to it. Thousands of businesses from early stage startups to Fortune 500s are choosing to build their sites in Framer, where changes take minutes instead of days to solve this very problem. Framer's enterprise-grade no-code website builder used by teams at companies including Perplexity and Miro to move faster. With real-time collaboration, a robust CMS with everything you need for great SEO, and advanced analytics that include integrated A-B testing, your designers and marketers are empowered to build and maximize your dot-com from day one.
13:21Alice Han:So whether you want to launch a new site, test a few landing pages, or migrate your full dot-com, Framer has programs for startups, scale-ups, and large enterprises to make going from idea to live site as easy and as fast as possible. Learn how you can get more out of your dot-com from a Framer specialist or get started building for free today at framer.com slash markets for 30 % off a Framer Pro annual plan. That's Framer.com slash markets for 30 % off. Framer.com slash markets. Rules and restrictions may apply.
13:52Alice Han:Support for the show comes from Vanguard. The role of financial advisor is to do everything you can to set your clients up for success. There are plenty of ways you can go about it. Maybe a leveling up of your fixed income strategy, but bonds can be tricky. The market is huge, rates shift, and risks hide in plain sight. That's why having a partner with scale and expertise matters. Vanguard brings both. Vanguard bonds are institutional quality. Institutional quality isn't a tagline. It's a commitment to your clients. It means top-grade products across the board. The lineup includes over 80 bond funds.
14:22Alice Han:They're actively managed by a 200-person global squad of sector specialists, analysts, and traders. A lot of firms love to highlight their star portfolio managers, like it's all about that one brilliant mind making the magic happen. Vanguard's philosophy is a little different. They believe the best active strategy shouldn't be locked away with one person. They should be shared across the team. So if you're looking to give your clients consistent results year in and year out, go to see the record for yourself at Vanguard.com slash audio. That's Vanguard.com slash audio. All investing is subject to risk.
14:52Alice Han:Vanguard Marketing Corporation Distributor.
14:58Alice Han:Support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously on Public. you can build a multi-asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, and options, and now generated assets, which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index with AI. It all starts with your prompt from renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20 % a year over year. You can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one-of-a-kind index, and lets you backtest it against the S &P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks.
15:30Alice Han:Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com slash ProvG and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash ProvG. Paid for by Public Investing, Burford Services by Open to the Public Investing, Inc., Member FINRA, and SIPC, Advisory Services by Public Advisors, LLC, SEC, Registered Advisor. Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures available at public.com slash disclosures.
16:13Robin Brooks:We're back with Prof2Markets. President Trump's chaotic trade policy has rattled Europe and some countries are weighing new methods to push back. For Sweden, that means reconsidering its use of the krona as its currency and switching to the euro. The country's finance minister just backed a formal inquiry into euro adoption, which would strengthen the country's trade ties to the EU. A full embrace of the EU's common currency would also be a vote of confidence in the euro, just as the dollar's dominance has fallen into question. In the past year, the euro has climbed 13 percent. Meanwhile, the dollar has declined 9 percent.
16:49Robin Brooks:So for more on what this currency plan in Sweden means, we are speaking with Robin Brooks, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and also former chief FX strategist at Goldman Sachs. Robin, thank you for joining us on Property Markets. Yeah, my pleasure. Thanks for having me. So this decision, or we haven't reached a decision, but at least Sweden appears to be mulling over the prospect of ditching the krono, which they've had for years, and moving over to the euro. It appears that this kind of has to do with the relationship between the US and Europe, or at least global uncertainty. This seems to be somewhat a response to that.
17:32Robin Brooks:Take us through why this is happening. Why is Sweden considering this?
17:37Alice Han:So, as you know, a bunch of European countries got together back in the 90s, and they decided to form a common currency. The euro was formed and began in 1999. There were a bunch of countries that did not join the euro when it was created. The UK, where I'm guessing you have a little bit of a connection. And then Sweden, obviously, Denmark, Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary. So it's not, first of all, any kind of outlier status to not be in the euro. Countries at the time had referenda on whether joining the euro was a good idea. Sweden did one in 2003, and it was rejected by a margin of 56 % of the vote was against joining the euro.
Read the full transcript
18:40Alice Han:the margin in terms of popular opinion polls now has moved in the direction of joining the euro you're totally right about that that's mostly about geopolitics so a fear that um in particular russia's invasion of ukraine just makes the world less safe the u.s is less of a predictable ally And so it must be that some Swedes think joining the euro gives you that extra safety. I think that's, if that is what's going on, then I think that's poor reasoning because the euro is really just a system of currency pegs. it doesn't confer any kind of safety. You just have to ask the Baltic states, for example, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, do they feel any safer from Russian invasion because they're members of the Euro?
19:41Alice Han:No. Poland, the finance minister just said, you know, we think the Euro is a great idea, but we prefer to be on the outside than on the inside. So I think whether or not, from a geopolitical point of view, this is a smart decision, I think is totally up in the air.
20:00Robin Brooks:It sounds like dumping the Krona, taking the euro would mostly be a symbolic gesture to say, we stand with Europe, and that it wouldn't really have much impact or whatever impact it would have would maybe not even be good for Sweden. Is there an element of de-dollarization or debasement in this whole conversation. I mean, one of the big themes we've been exploring recently is the fact that increasingly people are wary of the dollar. They're concerned about debt levels in the US. They're turning to things like gold. And I just wonder if the euro as the next most popular currency, if there's an argument to be made that we should be transacting in euros.
20:46Robin Brooks:Maybe people in Sweden think that that's the reason why you switch over to the euro. Is taking on the dollar a part of this conversation at all, or is that also a red herring? First of all, I think you're asking exactly the right question.
21:00Alice Han:There's a survey of central bank reserve managers. So these are, you know, picture all the sovereign wealth funds in Asia, all the central banks that have piled up tons of dollars in other foreign exchange reserves. These guys manage trillions of dollars. And this survey is done by the IMF. It's once a quarter and it surveys what is your allocation of your reserves to dollars versus euros versus Swiss franc versus Swedish krona, etc. And the amazing thing is that with all the noise last year, you know, just think back to Liberation Day, the big drop in the dollar in April 2025. And then, you know, as we went through the year, the altercations that President Trump had with the Fed, the massive rise in gold prices that we saw after October in particular, the allocations that foreign reserve managers are making to the dollar have been totally stable.
22:08Alice Han:There has been no flight from the dollar. There's also been no flight into the euro. That's pretty remarkable when you think about all the noise that we've had. So I think the lesson that I draw from that is the hurdle for the dollar to lose reserve currency status, for there to be serious dollar debasement, it's pretty high. But again, for Sweden, this is a really big opportunity. Sweden traditionally has always been considered kind of a high beta currency. It's super volatile. You didn't really want to hold it because it banged around all over the place on news. most recently so over the course of the last six nine months the swedish krona has started trading like the swiss francs so like a safe haven currency so when global uncertainty goes up for example liberation day tariffs swedish krona actually does well so i would put the swedish krona in the same bucket as gold, silver, platinum, you name it.
23:25Alice Han:It is this safe asset. What exactly is going on with dollar debasement, I think, is a separate question. Incidentally, the dollar is up today because the FOMC minutes talked about hikes and that surprised the market. So I think there's clearly a flight to safety. What exactly people are fleeing from isn't quite clear yet.
23:51Robin Brooks:Yeah, it's interesting because, I mean, foreign exchange currencies, these are conversations that are typically in the purview of investors, Wall Street, think tanks, economists, etc. But the de-dollarization question has generated a lot of heat and a lot of people are interested in it. And I think because it communicates a possibility that this world order that we've all known and lived with for so many years, where the US is the dominant power, there is a hegemony of America, it's reflected in the strength of this currency, that that may be coming to an end. And I would add, you know, a lot of investors are making trades off of this macro possibility, which is why we're seeing what we're seeing with gold.
24:41Robin Brooks:But it sounds like you as a real currency expert, as the chief FX strategist, foremost chief FX strategist at Goldman, it sounds like your view is that maybe this is a little bit overdone. If you're actually looking at the global reserves of the dollar, that actually this is more kind of bulk than bite.
25:04Alice Han:Well, we know that in the United States, fiscal policy is kind of out of control. debt is on a trajectory that is not good at all. Deficits are out of control. The thing is, that's true for many other countries too. Everyone is in trouble on fiscal. And so in a relative sense, the United States is worrying, but relatively speaking, it doesn't look that bad. So when you look at, for example, or risk premium in the bond market on treasuries over other comparably measured government bonds in other countries, actually, the United States smells like roses. It sounds crazy. So I think where we are is that there's a debasement trade, for sure.
25:58Alice Han:It's just not clear whether that debasement trade is against the dollar or against all fiat currencies together.
26:05Robin Brooks:Yeah, I think the question I always return to is, sure, maybe it's bad. What's your alternative? Exactly. Is it the euro? Is it the yuan? Is it Bitcoin, which is also kind of bad as a form of currency? Is it actually gold? These are all very interesting questions. We are out of time, but thank you for joining us. Robin Brooks, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution. Thank you.
26:35Robin Brooks:So yesterday we discussed this feud that is unfolding between the AI company Anthropic and the Pentagon, or more specifically, the Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth. And before we end here, I'd like to unpack that story a little bit, because I think it tells you a lot about where we are in this AI moment. So just to refresh your memory, one of Anthropic's biggest customers is the Defense Department, which is paying hundreds of millions of dollars to use their AI tools. But as of this week, Secretary Hegseth has threatened to cut ties with Anthropic. He has even gone so far as to put them on the supply chain risk list, which is a label that is usually reserved for foreign adversaries.
27:20Robin Brooks:They're also threatening to cut ties with any company that does any business with Anthropic at all. In sum, Anthropic is now on the administration's shit list. They do not like them. The question is, why? Well, it all centers around two main disagreements. Number one, Anthropic has told the Pentagon that they do not want their technology to be used for autonomous lethal weapons, i.e. robots that kill people. And then number two, they also don't want their technology to be used for domestic mass surveillance, i.e. spying on American citizens. And according to the Defense Department, this is a deal breaker.
28:03Robin Brooks:In fact, such a deal-breaker that they now view Anthropic as a potential risk to America. So there's a lot that is concerning about this. The fact that we're now requiring that AI be used for things like drone strikes, also that we're requiring that AI be used to spy on Americans and surveil them. These facts are scary in and of themselves. But what is perhaps more striking is the hypocrisy here. the fact that this is coming from an administration that has long stated that this is exactly the kind of thing we need to avoid, the threat of government surveillance, of big tech surveillance. Trump himself said that one of the goals of the campaign was to, quote, monitor our intelligence agencies to ensure they are not spying on our citizens.
28:54Robin Brooks:Jim Jordan warned of the, quote, quote, collusion of big tech and big government. J.D. Vance, the vice president, cautioned about companies, quote, using artificial intelligence to surveil Americans. He said, I worry about invasions of privacy. So this is exactly the thing that MAGA was supposed to prevent, this collaboration between the government or the deep state and also with technology companies to surveil the American people. And now we find ourselves in this very ironic position where an AI company actually doesn't want to move in that direction. They don't want to surveil citizens. They're down to work with the government, but they're not down to spy on Americans.
29:40Robin Brooks:And for that, they are being punished. Now, we can dwell on the hypocrisy here. It is quite striking. but that might also be missing the point. I think the larger point is we now know where this is all headed. And that is despite the virtue signaling arguably from both sides about the need to rein in big tech, to reduce the surveilling powers of the largest corporations and of the government, I think it is pretty clear now that is not going to happen. AI will be used for weaponry. AI will be used for autonomous, lethal drones and operations. AI will be used to track Americans, to spy on Americans, to surveil Americans.
30:28Robin Brooks:This is simply where we're headed now. And I should also be pretty clear here, most other companies, aside from Anthropic, are on board for this. Companies like OpenAI, companies like XAI, Google, and of course, Palantir, they are all down. Now, the only thing that might get in the way here is the same thing that I wrote about in my newsletter this week, and that is the American people. As I've written, AI is becoming increasingly unpopular. Less than half of Americans say they like AI. Less than a third of Americans say they trust AI. And it could be that this is the straw that breaks the camel's back, that voters decide, actually, we don't like this direction.
31:16Robin Brooks:we don't want this technology, we don't like how it's being used, and therefore we're going to do something about it, we're going to vote you out. That could happen. And I think the political ramifications of AI is now something that investors need to take really seriously. We can't really ignore it. Having said that, there are still many Americans that don't really know about AI, that perhaps don't really care about AI. And so until this reaches a boiling point, I do think that the current trajectory is the most likely. That AI will become fused with government. It will enable a surveillance state.
31:54Robin Brooks:It will be used to track people, target people, and sometimes kill people. Everything that MAGA said that they were supposed to prevent, ultimately, that will transpire. That is where the trend is moving. And barring some extraordinary event, that is likely where it will end.
32:15Robin Brooks:Okay, that's it for today. This episode was produced by Claire Miller and Alison Weiss, edited by Joel Patterson, and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our research team is Dan Chalon, Isabella Kinsel, Chris Nodonoghue, and Mia Silverio. Thank you for listening to Prof. G Markets from Prof. G Media. If you liked what you heard, give us a follow. I'm Ed Elson, and tune in tomorrow for our conversation with Aswath Damodaran.
From the publisher
Ed Elson breaks down the latest AI launches from Chinese companies with Alice Han, co-host of the China Decode podcast. Then, he discusses why Sweden is considering switching to the Euro and what that means for the dollar with Robin Brooks, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution and former Chief FX Strategist at Goldman Sachs. Finally, Ed examines what the Pentagon’s war with Anthropic tells us about where we are in this AI moment.
Check out our latest Prof G Markets newsletter
Follow Prof G Markets on Instagram
Follow Ed on Instagram, X and Substack
Follow Scott on InstagramSend us your questions or comments by emailing Markets@profgmedia.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




