War With Iran: Why Oil Didn’t Spike As Expected

3 Mar 2026 · 34 min · 15 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Notes: Prof G Markets - War With Iran: Why Oil Didn’t Spike As Expected

Episode Overview Date: March 3 Hosts: Ed Elson, Scott Galloway

Guests

  • Matt Smith, Oil Analyst at Kpler
  • Alex Health, Author of The Sources newsletter and Co-host of the Access Podcast

Main Topics

  • Impact of the war with Iran on oil and energy markets
  • OpenAI's latest funding round and corporate dynamics in AI
  • Investor implications of ongoing geopolitical tensions

---

Key Discussions

  1. The War with Iran and Oil Market Reactions
  2. Background:
  3. U.S. and Israel launched strikes against Iran, resulting in the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khomeini.
  4. Iran retaliated with strikes across the region, affecting U.S. bases.
  5. President stated military operations could last several weeks.
  • Market Response:
  • Initial panic saw major indices open in the red before recovering by midday.
  • Brent crude oil prices spiked by 7%, but not as dramatically as anticipated (expected 15-20%).
  • Diesel prices rose by 15% due to impacts on Saudi refinery.
  • Insights from Matt Smith:
  • The market is less reactive than expected due to:
  • Rumors of the Strait of Hormuz closure, impacting crude supply flow.
  • A belief that the military operation might lead to a faster resolution in the region.
  • Stability in the oil supply could return post-conflict, reducing strain on prices.
  1. Broader Impacts of Iranian Conflict
  2. Fertilizer supply is also at risk, with significant exports originating from the Middle East.
  3. Potential for increased volatility in oil prices, impacting consumers directly at the pump.
  4. The relationship between political stability in the region and market stability for oil investors.
  1. OpenAI's Record Fundraising Round
  2. OpenAI raised $110 billion, boosting its valuation to $730 billion, more than double its closest rival, Anthropic.
  3. Major investments from Amazon, NVIDIA, and SoftBank were highlighted.
  4. The oversubscription of the fundraising round indicates high investor demand and FOMO (fear of missing out).
  • Strategic Alliances:
  • The partnership with Amazon reflects a shift from a previously anticipated alliance with Apple.
  • The complexities of relationships amid overlapping investments in AI firms, where companies are intertwined financially.
  1. Anthropic vs. Pentagon Dynamics
  2. Trump blacklisted Anthropic after disagreements regarding the use of AI in surveillance and weaponry.
  3. OpenAI quickly secured a partnership with the Pentagon, highlighting competitive dynamics in the AI space.
  4. The fallout could significantly impact Anthropic's market position and public perception.
  • Public Sentiment:
  • Consumer reactions to the turmoil, with a shift toward Claude (Anthropic's chatbot) reflecting a potential backlash against OpenAI’s political ties.
  • The dynamics of trust and ethical considerations in AI use are becoming increasingly relevant.

Key Takeaways

  • Oil Market Insights:
  • Immediate reactions to geopolitical events can be tempered by expectations of future stability.
  • Investors are seeking safety amidst rising global tensions, prioritizing stable assets.
  • AI Market Dynamics:
  • The race between AI companies is not just technological but also deeply intertwined with political narratives and corporate ethics.
  • The ability to maintain consumer trust and ethical boundaries will be crucial for companies like Anthropic and OpenAI.
  • Geopolitical Influence on Markets:
  • Wars and military actions can create short-term panic and volatility but may lead to long-term market adjustments.
  • Investors need to be aware of broader market signals and consumer sentiment amid geopolitical conflicts.

---

Conclusion The episode underscores the complexities of navigating financial markets in the context of geopolitical events and the evolving landscape of the AI industry. As tensions rise, both oil investors and technology companies must adapt their strategies to ensure stability and growth amidst uncertainty.

For further updates, follow Prof G Markets on social media and subscribe to the newsletter for insights into market movements and implications.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Market Overview Amid War

1:07 to 2:10

Understanding market reactions following US-Israel strikes on Iran.

“As AI reshapes professional services, law firms and in-house teams are rethinking how complex work gets done.”

Discussion with Matt Smith

2:10 to 3:21

Insights from oil analyst Matt Smith on the market impacts of conflict.

“Let's check in on yesterday's market vitals.”

Oil Prices and Market Dynamics

3:21 to 4:50

Exploring why oil prices didn't spike as expected during the conflict.

“oil analyst at energy consulting firm Kepler.”

Impact on Energy Commodities

4:50 to 6:08

Analyzing the ripple effects of the conflict on various energy commodities.

“So while everyone has been watching that crude price, you've actually seen diesel prices up 15 % because you saw the Rastanoura refinery in Saudi Arabia get hit.”

Future of Oil Post-Conflict

6:08 to 7:20

Speculating on future oil flows and market stability following military actions.

“Regardless if that's true or not, the threat of them hitting a tanker with a missile or a drone strike has stopped that flow of crude and products and every other tanker going through there.”

Geopolitical Implications for Oil

7:20 to 8:35

Discussing how geopolitical actions affect oil prices and investor sentiment.

“Why does hitting Iran hard necessarily mean for the analysts that oil will be good and that oil will make its way out of the region?”

Analysis of Investor Sentiment

8:35 to 13:16

Understanding energy investors' perspectives on the ongoing conflict.

“But maybe it's that, or maybe it's just the fact that we just didn't get a bunch of tankers on fire around the Stradio Hormuz today.”

Conclusion of Discussion

13:16 to 13:26

Wrapping up insights from Matt Smith on the current oil market landscape.

OpenAI's Record Fundraising Round

16:23 to 17:28

Analyze the implications of OpenAI's $110 billion fundraising round.

“OpenAI just closed the largest private fundraising round in history.”

Anthropic and Pentagon Dynamics

17:28 to 20:30

Explore the fallout between Anthropic and the Pentagon, and its implications.

“We're speaking with Alex Heath, author of the Sources newsletter and co-host of the Access podcast.”
Show all 15 chapters

AI Companies' Political Clout

20:30 to 22:57

Discuss the influence of politics on AI companies and their strategies.

“Anthropic has been blacklisted as a supply chain risk.”

Consumer Reactions to AI Choices

22:57 to 26:00

Investigate consumer attitudes towards OpenAI and Anthropic in light of recent events.

“And this could end up to be catastrophic for Anthropic.”

The Future of AI and Values

26:00 to 28:01

Consider how the values of AI companies shape their future and public perception.

“And that's, Anthropic's right as a private company, and they should exercise that right, and people should want to support that if they feel aligned with that.”

Discussion on AI in Warfare

28:01 to 29:53

Explore the implications of AI's integration into warfare and its societal impacts.

“I mean, we talked about Cloud being at the top of the App Store.”

Impact of War with Iran on Markets

30:07 to 33:44

Analyzing how the war with Iran affects oil prices and market volatility.

“Trump said they will continue, and it appears, although the language has been confusing, that we are at war with Iran.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Matt Smith:Support for the show comes from Public.com. You've got your core holdings, some high conviction picks, maybe even a few strategic options at play. So why not switch the investment platform built for those who take it seriously? Go to Public.com slash ProfG and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's Public.com slash ProfG. Paid for by public investing. All investing involves the risk of loss, including loss of principal, brokered services for U.S.-listed registered securities. Options and bonds and a self-directed account are offered by Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA, and SIPC.

0:33Matt Smith:Complete disclosures available at public.com slash disclosures.

0:40Alex Health:As AI reshapes professional services, law firms and in-house teams are rethinking how complex work gets done. Harvey AI is an AI platform built specifically for legal practice, helping teams analyze documents, draft with precision, and collaborate securely across matters. Today, more than half of the Amlaw 100 use Harvey. Learn more at Harvey.ai.

1:07Alex Health:As AI reshapes professional services, law firms and in-house teams are rethinking how complex work gets done. Harvey.ai is an AI platform built specifically for legal practice, helping teams analyze documents, draft with precision, and collaborate securely across matters. Today, more than half of the AMLA 100 use Harvey. Learn more at Harvey.ai. Today's number? Six. That's how many Olympic medals Eileen Gu has won, making her the most decorated free skier of all time. The 22-year-old achieved this while also balancing full-time studies at Stanford, as well as a successful modeling career. Today's other number is 99.

1:52Alex Health:That is the percentage of parents who wish their kid was Eileen Gu. Money market matters. If money is evil, then that building is hell.

2:02Ed Elson:The show goes on! The folks are never watched the show, show!

2:08Alex Health:Welcome to Prof G Markets. I'm Ed Elson. It is March 3rd. Let's check in on yesterday's market vitals. The major indices rode out a volatile session after the US-Israel strikes on Iran. More on that in a moment. Still, the indices ended the day in the green. Meanwhile, the yield on 10-year treasuries surged the most since April. Oil spiked, the dollar rose, and gold climbed above$5 ,300.

2:35Alex Health:Okay, what else is happening? The United States is at war with Iran. The US and Israel struck the country on Saturday, killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khomeini. Iran responded with retaliatory strikes across the region, including attacks on U.S. military bases. The president said the military operation will last around four to five weeks, but could continue for, quote, as long as it takes. Markets opened in the red on Monday, but by midday, the major indices had recovered. Meanwhile, Brent crude, the global price gauge for oil, jumped 7 % to just over$77 per barrel. Oil prices were already up 17 % this year, in anticipation of a possible attack.

3:17Alex Health:Joining us to discuss what this war means for us, what it means for markets, we're speaking with Matt Smith, oil analyst at energy consulting firm Kepler. Matt, welcome to the show. Let's get right into it. Obviously, quite rattling news for all of us for many reasons. When you look at what's happened in the markets here. What is jumping out to you? What are the markets telling us about what is unfolding in Iran right now?

3:48Ed Elson:Yeah, sure. So there's been sort of some undulations, I would say, across the various different commodities. So, you know, everyone has been focused on crude and breathing a bit of a sigh of relief, to be honest, because there was the expectation we could open up 15, 20 percent and we only opened up 12 percent. As you just mentioned, We closed up about seven, something like that. So not the worst case scenario. And the reason there's such a concern about crude is because you have that reflected straight through into prices at the pump. So in the US, even though it's very much insulated from the supply shocks, you still get affected because crude is a global benchmark.

4:28Ed Elson:And that's the input price to refine for that gasoline. But some other things that we saw across the energy complex was with natural gas. So we've seen a difference this time around to the 12-day war of last year where Iran just retaliated against Israel. This time it's sending missiles, drone strikes to many different countries and attacking energy infrastructure. So while everyone has been watching that crude price, you've actually seen diesel prices up 15 % because you saw the Rastanoura refinery in Saudi Arabia get hit. And then with natural gas prices in Europe, they're actually up nearly as much as 50 % today because we saw Qatar, an LNG terminal struck there as well.

5:17Ed Elson:And so there's ripple impacts across all of these various different energy commodities. And actually beyond that as well, in terms of fertilizer, a third of fertilizer in the world exported on seaborne basis comes out of the Middle East. So lots of ramifications here.

5:32Alex Health:Why is it that oil didn't rise as much as everyone thought it would? I mean, I remember a week ago, perhaps a few days ago, the consensus was, if this happens, oil is going to absolutely rip. It went up, but it didn't go up nearly as much as people seem to think. Why is that?

5:53Ed Elson:It's interesting, actually, because we've kind of got the worst case scenario in terms of the Strait of Hormuz here. So there's a rumor hitting right now that Iran has closed the Strait of Hormuz. Regardless if that's true or not, the threat of them hitting a tanker with a missile or a drone strike has stopped that flow of crude and products and every other tanker going through there. And so we are kind of hitting that worst case scenario here now. And so you would perhaps expect prices to rally more. Maybe it's just because with President Trump, he's saying that these strikes are going to be persistent.

6:31Ed Elson:We've just had Marco Rubio talking about how these strikes on Iran are going to get even worse. And so there's going to be this absolute pummeling of Iran in the near term here. And so perhaps people are thinking this is going to be a short-term event and we're going to get over this in a few days.

6:47Alex Health:That is interesting that because we're going to be, it is presumed that we will be harsher perhaps on Iran, hit them harder than most analysts thought, that that will mean that there will be more oil flow, essentially. that oil will continue to move freely through the Strait of Hormuz, which I'm sure we're going to be hearing a lot of the next few weeks and months. Why is that exactly? And I know that I'm now asking you to basically play military analyst, but it's interesting, as an energy analyst, you kind of have to. Why does hitting Iran hard necessarily mean for the analysts that oil will be good and that oil will make its way out of the region?

7:35Yeah, sure.

7:36Ed Elson:And so whether it's that the US is going after a regime change, which there's some doubt whether that's the case, or whether it's just simply they're trying to obliterate any nuclear ambitions in Iran there, or whether it's just attacking the military side of things, wiping them out there. Once you get past that, then there is the situation where the uncertainty is lifted and the likes of Iranian barrels could even flow stronger. So it's really important to bear in mind what happened last year in terms of that 12-day war. As soon as those nuclear sites were hit, you had President Trump come out on the presser and he was like, OK, now that this has happened, we've got what we wanted.

8:19Ed Elson:Now, China, start buying that Iranian oil again. And so it went straight to getting those oil prices down. And so it's like, once these ambitions and goals are achieved, then the potential flow of prices afterwards is perhaps a much more likely proposition. But maybe it's that, or maybe it's just the fact that we just didn't get a bunch of tankers on fire around the Stradio Hormuz today.

8:43Alex Health:Is there an outcome that energy investors and energy analysts, those who work with oil and gas, is there an outcome that most want? I mean, when an oil firm, a consulting firm, or even an oil investment firm sees what's happening in Iran. I mean, obviously, this is a political issue. Some people support what's happening. Some people don't support what's happening. But say you're an investor in this stuff. What do you think when America strikes Iran?

9:15Ed Elson:Yeah. And I think it's a stability thing, right? So OPEC as a whole, this group of oil producers they want stability of price i think oil investors want stability in terms of the geopolitical backdrop right and so i think if it if iran is addressed here in the same way as we've had venezuela addressed it's one more hot potato that the market doesn't have to think about or deal with and so that taken out of it gives way less uncertainty and so that's a positive thing for investment so i think that's perhaps the best way to look at it yeah certainty understanding

9:49Alex Health:what the path forward is. And it sounds like what the analysts seem to say, or what maybe the price is telling us, is that people believe that Trump is going to conclude this. Yes. Or at least that this will be far less uncertain now than it was, I suppose, a year ago.

10:06Ed Elson:Yeah, no, no, absolutely, absolutely. And that's the thing here as well, right? You've got this really interesting situation with sanctioned barrels in the global market here, where you've got, you know, Russia is pushing out three and a half million barrels a day. that is a massive discount that isn't open to all of the world you've got india that is buying that you've got china that is buying that so you've essentially got a two-tier market here it's the same thing for iranian crude where all of that crude is basically going to china because nobody else will buy it and it's the same thing with venezuela or it was until there was the incursion there now that venezuelan crude is not at a steep discount and only going to china it's now going to the broader market at a at a more fair market price so you're essentially going to be doing the same thing in theory with iranian crude if that situation the situation gets resolved there sanctions are eased those barrels that were only previously going to china at a big discount could be making its way into the market at a market price which would bring all prices down essentially so that's that's maybe the path we see from here and then you've only got ukraine russia to deal with.

11:13Alex Health:Right. Just final question before we let you go. Are there any blind spots that you think that energy investors perhaps are displaying here, something that they're missing? And what I'm getting at with this question is, it seems that there is a sense, not necessarily of certainty among the investment community, but maybe less uncertainty than we thought. I mean, And prices have gone up, but not as much as we thought, which reflects that maybe they're feeling a little less anxious about this situation than perhaps one would have predicted. Is there anything that maybe they are missing? I, as an observer, am looking at what's happening in Iran.

11:53Alex Health:I feel anxious. I feel concerned. Is there perhaps too much certainty or not enough uncertainty?

12:02Ed Elson:I think we just don't know how this is going to play out, right? because it could play out just over the next couple of days, as we talked about, with an absolute pummeling of Iran, or it could be the one to four weeks, as Trump has talked about. But I think the one concern from an oil investor perspective is that if this issue gets cleared away, then you essentially have one less uncertainty in the market. And the broader fundamentals for the oil market have been fairly soft. We've had this kind of excess in the market in terms of supply so you could really have this geopolitical premium unwound in prices here we could really uh head considerably lower from where we are so that's positive for prices at the pump it's positive for consumers not necessarily positive for oil in oil investors and it's just the flip side of this is that if this does continue on for the for for weeks and potentially into a month or two you have the mid-east gulf here where even we're seeing now is the tankers are building up there they're loading crude they're loading products but they're sat there and they can't get out eventually that gets bottlenecked up right and you have to see these mid-east gulf producers starting to shut in production because they simply can't export the stuff and so that that's a

13:15Alex Health:consideration to think about too lots of interesting stuff here matt smith oil analyst at energy consulting firm Kepler. Matt, thank you. We really appreciate your time.

13:26Ed Elson:Thank you.

13:28Alex Health:After the break, OpenAI's record funding round and Anthropic gets into a fight with Trump. And for even more Markets Insights, you can subscribe to my weekly newsletter, simply put, at edwardelson.substack.com.

13:49Matt Smith:Support for the show comes from LinkedIn. It's a shame when the best B2B marketing gets wasted on the wrong audience. Like, imagine running an ad for cataract surgery on Saturday morning cartoons, or running a promo for this show on a video about Roblox or something. No offense to our Gen Alpha listeners, but that would be a waste of anyone's ad budget. So, when you want to reach the right professionals, you can use LinkedIn ads. LinkedIn has grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals and 130 million decision makers according to their data. That's where it stands apart from other ad buys.

14:21Matt Smith:You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company role, seniority skills, company revenue. Also, you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience. That's why LinkedIn ads boast one of the highest B2B return on ad spend of all online ad networks. Seriously, all of them. Spend$250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get a free$250 credit for the next one. Just go to LinkedIn.com slash Scott. That's LinkedIn.com slash Scott. Terms and conditions apply.

14:51Alex Health:Support for this show comes from Harvey AI. Law is a craft, forged through repetition, sharpened by judgment, perfected in the details most people never see. Practice Made Perfect is Harvey's belief in relentless refinement, and turning complexity into clarity, pressure into precision, and experience into advantage. Legal work isn't just about knowing the law. It's about applying it carefully, consistently, and under real stakes. Harvey is an AI platform built specifically for legal practice, helping teams analyze large volumes of documents, draft with precision, and collaborate securely across complex matters.

15:29Alex Health:It doesn't replace expertise, it strengthens it, making teams faster, more exacting, and more certain. Today, more than half of the AMLA 100 use Harvey as part of their workflow. Learn more at Harvey.ai.

15:50Alex Health:This episode is brought to you by Nespresso. Introducing Virtuo Up, the latest in a long line of innovation from Nespresso.

15:58Matt Smith:It's innovation you can touch, sense, and taste in every single cup. With a three-second start, easy open lever, and dedicated brew over ice button,

16:07Alex Health:it's even easier to enjoy your coffee your way. Sip for yourself. Shop Virtuo Up exclusively at nespresso.com.

16:20Alex Health:We're back with ProfG Markets. OpenAI just closed the largest private fundraising round in history. The company said on Friday that it raised$110 billion. That is more than double its record-breaking raise from a year ago. The round boosts OpenAI to a$730 billion pre-money valuation, nearly double the valuation of its closest rival, Anthropic. Its backers include Amazon, who put in$50 billion, and NVIDIA and SoftBank, who each contributed$30 billion. Meanwhile, the ongoing Anthropic-Pentagon dispute came to a head on Friday. Trump blacklisted the company and directed every federal agency to immediately stop using Anthropic's products.

17:03Alex Health:That order came after Anthropic refused to loosen its AI guardrails for surveillance and lethal strikes. Within 24 hours, OpenAI swooped in and signed its own deal with the Pentagon. Users then called for a boycott of OpenAI, which sent Claude, Anthropics chatbot, to number one on the US App Store. Tons of drama, tons of developments here in the AI race, here to unpack all of it. We're speaking with Alex Heath, author of the Sources newsletter and co-host of the Access podcast. Alex, good to see you. I'm going to jump right into it. First, let's just start with what I think is the more boring news, which is OpenAI raising$110 billion.

17:43Alex Health:A month ago, that would have been incredible. But now that Trump is fighting with Anthropic, it sort of disappears into the background. Initial reactions to OpenAI's fundraising round.

17:55Matt Smith:We knew this round was happening for a while. They've been putting it together. The thing that jumped out to me was that it was, I think, about$10 billion oversubscribed, right? I think they were shooting for 100, and it sounds like there's going to be billions more still contributed by sovereigns and other large firms in the coming weeks and months. The Amazon partnership is a big one. My read of that is that OpenAI knows that it has essentially lost the Apple partnership to Google, which, as we know, just did that recent Gemini deal. OpenAI, for how well ChatGPT is doing, they still need more distribution.

Read the full transcript

18:32Matt Smith:They need hardware touchpoints, voice assistant touchpoints. Amazon provides a lot of that in addition to the AWS and training and benefits that they have. So this seems to be like a reshuffling of the strategic alliances, I guess, between the Mag7 and OpenAI, where if you would have thought maybe two years ago, OpenAI is going to be getting closer to Apple. I think their hardware work with Johnny Ive and just how that initial Siri partnership went has shown that maybe those two are not meant to be together long term. And so I think this is OpenAI deciding that Amazon is the new horse it's going to attach itself to.

19:11Alex Health:Which also seems interesting because Amazon is a very large investor and shareholder in Anthropoc too. Everyone's invested in everyone at this point.

19:19Matt Smith:Right. There's no distinction. They're capital incinerators. And both last week. And they're just like, yeah, I mean, they just want money. They just need money. And there's finite pools of it left for these size of rounds.

19:34Alex Health:It's also interesting that you say it was$10 billion oversubscribed, suggesting that maybe the price should be even higher than what it is. That seems to stand out as well, no?

19:47Matt Smith:I guess. There's just so much FOMO. And I think because OpenAI is not public and, you know, optimistically may be public by the end of this year. I think there's just tremendous investor appetite to get into the name before it's opened up to retail. I mean, had this round been instead an IPO, you know, maybe OpenAI would have raised more. Maybe it would have a two trillion market cap right now. We're kind of in peak bubble froth mania. So in the same way that people in San Francisco talk about escaping the permanent underclass, maybe that's how investors are thinking about getting into open AI right now and get in while you can, right?

20:25Matt Smith:That's how I feel.

20:26Alex Health:Let's talk about Anthropic and the Pentagon. Trump has called Anthropic a quote, radical left AI company. Anthropic has been blacklisted as a supply chain risk. Federal contracts have been cut. He's saying that the government won't do any business with anyone who does any business with Anthropic, which that part seems really crazy. We talked about this a few weeks ago. It's amazing how it has developed. What does this say about the AI race right now?

20:58Matt Smith:I think it shows how powerful these companies are. It was surprising to me, actually. I mean, I knew about Anthropic's government work, but that they were the most fully integrated model in the government behind classified walls up until this point. I wasn't quite fully aware of until this whole blow up. And it's interesting that that has been the case given that Anthropic has historically been the, I guess you could say more doomer of the other AI labs, right? The one that is always talking about the potential pitfalls and safety risks happened to be the AI lab that It was the most closely integrated with the U.S.

21:36Matt Smith:government before this. It's interesting. It's interesting that OpenAI swooped in and got a deal that is effectively what Anthropic said that it wanted. And to me, that suggests, you know, based on what we know about this administration, egos can run hot and heavy, especially looking at some of the players involved specifically in this. You've got Emil Michael, the very strong-armed head of growth and business for Uber back in the day, for Travis Kalanick. One could argue the Sam Altman before Sam Altman in terms of the amount of capital he raised for Uber at the time, which then was record-setting.

22:17Matt Smith:Who understands tech and goes back with all these players as an Elon loyalist. And then Pete Hedgespeth and all the other players involved. I mean, it really, I think it just speaks to the ego. You know, I don't really know if there's much more. I don't know if like, you know, you see some of the reports about, you know, they were arguing about like theoretical missile strikes and Dario saying, Amadei, the CEO of Anthropics saying, oh, you'd have to call us first if you wanted to use Claude to like defend against a missile strike. And that just suggests a level of bravado and chest pumping in these negotiations that I imagine, given all the personalities involved, did not work out well.

22:57Matt Smith:And this could end up to be catastrophic for Anthropic. My gut says it won't be. There's too much money at stake. There's too many investors in Anthropic who have ties to the White House. I'm sure that, yeah, Anthropic loses this$200 million contract. That's not really a factor for them financially. but certainly shows that open eye can be shrewd as Sam Altman has been known to be and swoop in here and get closer as Anthropic pulls apart from the government.

23:27Alex Health:Yeah, it's striking how relevant the politics are becoming in these tech stories and these AI stories. And you mentioned the bravado there, which I think is probably true, but then I think there's another reading of it, which is, you know, maybe Dario Amadei and Anthropic, they just have values. And their values are, we're not going to be used in mass surveillance on Americans. We're not going to be used for autonomous weapons. That's our line. And then they get pushed by the government, and then he just holds the line, which I agree takes a level of confidence and maybe bravado, but also I kind of respect it as, okay, you're just sticking to your values.

24:06Alex Health:And then I think what is striking is that we're now seeing this play out in the consumer economy where people are saying we're done with chat gbt because chat gbt sold out to the administration and then people saying we're going to embrace claude now it becomes the number one downloaded app in the country and it seems as though the politics of this all is actually shaping and shifting the trajectories of the businesses themselves and what i can't quite figure out is did he make the right business decision by standing up to trump and if you look at the App Store and the rankings, the App Store would tell you, yes, he did.

24:45Alex Health:But maybe over the long run, if they're losing these contracts to the government, OpenAI is taking them and said, maybe it's not the right business decision. What do you think, from a business viewpoint, who won here?

24:56Matt Smith:I think it's too early to tell. I mean, on the consumer side, who knows how many people are paying for those ChatGPT subscriptions for the app they're downloading, but certainly seems to be a near-term win. You know, hearing you talk, I'm reminded of the Delete Uber campaign. I think it was in around 2017, there was a similar thing where it was like, oh, Uber is caving in and is morally bankrupt. And there was mass protests and delete campaigns. And guess what? Uber is a much, much larger company now than it was then. These moments in time, I think, tend to get a lot of attention and then they are looked back at as blips.

25:36Matt Smith:Whether that's the case here, we're in the middle of it, we can't say. I do think the reality is often more nuanced than what you're saying in terms of like, oh, he just held the line and he's more moral and therefore OpenAI is not. there's a lot of nuance here but if you read the way that the department of war has responded if you read how open ai has talked about their deal it seems to me like anthropic has in their view legitimate concerns that extend beyond how the law currently operates today and maybe that's the difference is that OpenAI was willing to operate in the constraints of how the law in the United States works today, and Anthropic was not.

26:25Matt Smith:And that's, Anthropic's right as a private company, and they should exercise that right, and people should want to support that if they feel aligned with that. But I think suggesting that it's anything more than that at this point feels premature. I don't know. That's just my read of the situation at this moment, but again, we're getting things in real time every minute here.

26:46Alex Health:What do you think? How will the public view this ultimately? Because, I mean, I agree there's probably some nuance, but I still think that he probably stuck with his values and they didn't like that because they told him do this and he said no and they got upset. But I agree. I'm sure there's some nuance and I don't think this means that chat GBT and open air are evil. That's not my assumption here. But it does seem that the public opinion will shape things quite significantly here. And it's interesting you bring up Delete Uber. It's possible that maybe the public forgets and they decide, actually, we don't care about this.

27:23Alex Health:And I could see that happening too. But how the public views this is quite essential if they want to be consumer apps, if they want to be consumer-facing companies, which they do both want to be. And so I guess my question for you would be, how will the crowd see this at this point?

27:42Matt Smith:Well, the headlines have been written, and Anthropik's done a really good job of coming out and stating how it feels this whole saga went down and what it stands for. And those are admirable virtues, right? Not surveilling Americans, not using AI for autonomous weapons. And I think they're winning on that front, right? I mean, we talked about Cloud being at the top of the App Store. They've shipped a feature where you can quickly import your ChatGPT memory into Cloud, which is really smart. I think they're going to push full hog on this, like some version of the Super Bowl ad. I've seen some jokes of replacing ads with autonomous weapons and that banner on the Super Bowl ad, right?

28:26Matt Smith:AI is coming to autonomous weapons, but not, not clawed or something. So I can imagine they'll lean into it and they should, right? They should take, take advantage of the moment. Um, what that does to their longterm, you know, relationships with other governments who see this and go, Hey, like, can we actually rely on you as a partner? Are you going to decide that, um, your interpretation of the law, um, is, is better than ours? Who knows? Um, it'll probably be a blip in time, but for now, you're right. I mean, people are looking for ways to advocate for what they feel are infringements of civil liberties in the United States and a government that they don't see eye to eye with.

29:04Matt Smith:You're seeing that with, you know, your partner Scott's, you know, delete and unsubscribe movement. Right. And so I kind of see that as in the same vein here where this is something people can latch on to to to express the beliefs they have. And that's American. And that's awesome. At the end of the day, it's good that this can happen. One of the most positive reads of this that I've seen is at the very least, what Amadeus has done is shine a light on how we should be thinking about AI used in these contexts. What happens when cloud code can be used inside the NSA and not just to help you get your taxes done faster?

29:45Matt Smith:And so I think that's a good thing that we're thinking about that and that Dario thrusts that into the spotlight, whether it's good for Anthropoc or not.

29:53Alex Health:All right. Alex Heath, author of The Sources newsletter, co-host of The Access podcast. Alex, thank you. We really appreciate your time. Thanks, Ed.

30:07Alex Health:So the airstrikes have begun. Trump said they will continue, and it appears, although the language has been confusing, that we are at war with Iran. Now, there are plenty of implications that we could spend hours, even days, discussing. And the idea of asking how this will affect markets seems a little bit of a ridiculous question because there are some things, like war, that are just bigger than markets. Having said that, we will end here with a few thoughts, not just on what this will do to markets, but also what this will do to your life. What being at war with Iran actually means for our daily experience as Americans.

30:48Alex Health:Now, there is the fact that we will be reading about this pretty much every day, and that is significant. But there will also be some more material implications with this war as well. For example, gas prices. As we discussed, oil prices are currently rising, and it's possible they will rise even more. And that will affect prices at the pump for you. To be more specific, a$5 increase in the price of a barrel of oil translates to a roughly 10 cent increase in the cost per gallon of gas at the pump. So a$10 or$15 increase in the price of oil isn't that bad. That's kind of what we're seeing. But the question will be if it goes even higher than that.

31:28Alex Health:if oil hits, say,$100 a barrel, then that will have a real impact on the pump. It will have a real impact on the cost of living at home. Something else that will be impacted is the price of liquid natural gas, or LNG. This is the fuel we use for heating and electrical power and energy storage, etc. And also, a fifth of the world's liquid natural gas flows through the Strait of Hormuz. So that means that global LNG supply is now going to be significantly constrained. And while America does have its own liquid natural gas supply, we will likely be exporting more of that over to Europe, who will be in desperate need for LNG, thus reducing the supply and raising prices here at home.

32:14Alex Health:This is exactly what happened during the Russia-Ukraine invasion, and it's why your heating and electric bills started to go up back then. A similar scenario could easily play out today. And finally, for the investors who listen to the podcast, I think you can safely assume that because of this war, your stock portfolio is about to become even more volatile than it already was. There are currently around 60 military conflicts ongoing around the world right now. That is the highest level of global violence that we've seen since World War II. Geopolitical uncertainty is rising. AI uncertainty is also rising, as we've discussed, which means that investors now have more reasons to panic today than at any time in recent memory.

33:03Alex Health:And that means they are going to be making some very rash decisions. They might start panic selling. They also might start panic buying. Either way, it will translate to a highly erratic market, which will make all of us even more anxious than we already were. In other words, the days of metaverse projects and NFTs and speculative investments such as those are firmly over. Investors are now looking for one thing and one thing alone, and that is safety. Physical safety, technological safety, personal safety, financial safety, all kinds of safety. as the world becomes more and more dangerous, the demand for safety is only going to go up.

33:47Alex Health:And if we were safe last year, or even the year before that, well, now the consensus on Wall Street is pretty clear. We're not so safe anymore. Okay, that's it for today. This episode was produced by Claire Miller and Alison Weiss, edited by Joel Passan, and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our video editor is Brad Williams. Our research team is Dan Jelan, Isabella Kinsel, Chris O'Donohue, and Mia Silverio. And our social producer is Jake McPherson. Thank you for listening to Prof G Markets from Prof G Media. If you liked what you heard, give us a follow. I'm Ed Elson. I will see you tomorrow.

34:29Alex Health:As AI reshapes professional services, law firms and in-house teams are rethinking how complex work gets done. Harvey AI is an AI platform built specifically for legal practice, helping teams analyze documents, draft with precision, and collaborate securely across matters. Today, more than half of the Amlaw 100 use Harvey. Learn more at Harvey.ai.

From the publisher

Ed Elson breaks down how the war with Iran is impacting oil and energy with Matt Smith. Then he discusses OpenAI’s latest funding round and the escalating tension between Anthropic and the Pentagon with Alex Health. Finally, Ed explains how he thinks the Iran war will impact investors. 

Matt Smith is an oil analyst at Kpler. Alex Health is the author of The Sources newsletter and co-host of the Access podcast. 

Check out our latest Prof G Markets newsletter

Follow Prof G Markets on Instagram

Follow Ed on Instagram, X and Substack

Follow Scott on InstagramSend us your questions or comments by emailing Markets@profgmedia.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Prof G Markets

All 416 episodes
War With Iran: Why Oil Didn’t Spike As ExpectedProf G Markets · 34 min
Listen in VO