In short
Podcast Notes: Prof G Markets - Episode: Your Bills Are About to Go Up — The Fed Can’t Stop It
Overview In this episode, Ed Elson hosts a discussion with Michael Gapen (Chief US Economist at Morgan Stanley) and Robert Armstrong (Financial Commentator for the Financial Times) about the implications of the Federal Reserve's recent interest rate decisions and inflation predictions amid geopolitical tensions, particularly the war in Iran.
Key Topics Discussed
Federal Reserve's Interest Rate Decision
- Current Rates: The Federal Reserve has decided to keep interest rates steady, a widely anticipated move.
- Economic Context: This decision comes against a backdrop of rising inflation, with recent data indicating significant increases in the producer price index (PPI) and core inflation rates.
- Uncertainty: Fed Chair Jerome Powell emphasized uncertainty regarding the economic implications of the Iran conflict on inflation and unemployment.
Inflation Outlook
- Current Statistics:
- PPI rose 3.4% year-over-year, the highest gain in a year.
- Core PPI (excludes food and energy) rose by 3.9%.
- Gas prices have surged, reflecting the impact of geopolitical events.
- Future Projections: Experts predict inflation will likely rise due to ongoing conflicts, particularly in the oil sector.
Impacts of the Iran War
- Oil Prices: Since the onset of conflict, oil prices have risen by 40%, with potential for further increases depending on the war's duration.
- Consumer Impact: An increase in gas prices affects household budgets, with oil being a significant factor influencing overall inflation, particularly impacting food prices due to transportation costs.
Economic Definitions and Predictions
- Stagflation:
- Defined as a situation with high inflation and high unemployment.
- Experts discussed the possibility of "micro stagflation," where inflation remains high while economic growth slows.
- Consumer Behavior: Economic indicators show divergence between macroeconomic data (which appears strong) and consumer sentiment, with many households feeling the pinch due to rising costs.
Economic Ratings
- Rob Armstrong's Take: Rated the economy as "pretty good" despite challenges, emphasizing low unemployment and real wage growth.
- Michael Gapen's Rating: Gave the economy a "B+" for overall performance but noted disparities affecting consumer experiences, particularly among low-income households.
Key Takeaways
- Geopolitical Uncertainty: The current economic outlook is heavily influenced by geopolitical events, particularly in the Middle East, which makes predictions difficult.
- Household Impact: Rising energy prices are squeezing household budgets, leading to potential reductions in consumer spending.
- Macro vs. Micro Perspectives: While macroeconomic indicators may present a positive view, the reality for many households highlights growing financial strain.
- Future Projections: The Federal Reserve's ability to manage inflation is complicated by external shocks, and longer-term inflation expectations remain uncertain.
Conclusion The episode provided insights into the delicate balance the Federal Reserve must maintain amidst rising inflation and geopolitical volatility. The discussion underscored the importance of understanding how broader economic policies impact everyday Americans, particularly as inflation continues to pose challenges in the wake of international conflicts.
For more insights, you can follow the Prof G Markets on social media and subscribe to their newsletter.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOMarket Reactions to the Fed's Decision
2:02 to 3:16
Analyzing the Federal Reserve's interest rate decision and market responses.
“Let's check in on yesterday's market vitals.”
Inflation Concerns and Economic Outlook
3:16 to 3:56
Discussing recent inflation data and its implications for the economy.
“Since the US struck Iran on February 28th, the price of oil is up 40 % and gas prices have risen more than 30%.”
Expert Panel on Inflation Outlook
3:56 to 6:39
Insights from economists on the inflation outlook for 2026 and rate decisions.
“Was there anything else we found out, anything that is perhaps unusual, interesting, or maybe changes the situation in any way?”
Impact of Oil Prices on Inflation
6:39 to 10:40
Examining how rising oil prices affect inflation and consumer bills.
“So the plot for 2026 kind of compressed.”
Second-Round Effects of Inflation
10:40 to 14:00
Understanding the potential second-round effects of rising oil prices on the economy.
“That's why the Fed policymaker wants to look through this stuff.”
Understanding Second-Round Effects on Inflation
14:00 to 15:00
Learn how oil prices influence food costs and inflation dynamics.
“It does that very quickly, usually within about two weeks.”
Long-Term Inflation Expectations and Economic Resilience
15:00 to 17:00
Explore how repeated economic shocks affect inflation expectations and stability.
“And as Rob said, the answer then is you kind of need more time to see what's happening.”
Forecasting Inflation Amid Geopolitical Tensions
17:00 to 19:00
Discuss the challenges of predicting economic outcomes amid geopolitical uncertainties.
“Well, you're putting me on the spot on this one.”
Comparing Current Inflation to Post-COVID Trends
21:06 to 22:40
Analyze the current inflation scenario in comparison to previous economic downturns.
“Stop waiting around for the perfect candidate.”
The Different Nature of Current Economic Challenges
22:40 to 24:18
Discuss how today's economic issues differ from past crises, especially the 1970s oil shock.
“Is that the right thing to think about or is this just completely different?”
Show all 15 chapters
Understanding Stagflation: Definition and Current Risks
24:18 to 26:19
Get insights into stagflation, its implications, and current economic indicators.
“Only things I can, I think that's exactly, Michael's got it exactly right as far as I can see.”
The Potential for a Mini Stagflation Scenario
26:19 to 28:00
Evaluate the possibilities of a mini stagflation scenario and its impact on consumer behavior.
“really getting it from both sides, but you can get a micro stagflation, which is, you know, the, the fed being stuck.”
Fed's Economic Forecast and Its Implications
28:00 to 28:55
Explore the Fed's revised growth forecast and its impact on the economy.
“So, I mean, you actually saw the Fed revise higher its growth forecast for 2026 today.”
Assessing the Current State of the Economy
28:55 to 30:19
Discussion on Americans' perceptions of the economy, especially before midterms.
“And now that we have this, maybe oil crisis is unfair of a word, but something close to it.”
Evaluating Economic Performance
30:19 to 31:55
Experts rate the economy and discuss contrasting macro and consumer data.
“If this is a bad economy, may all the world have bad economies.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Robert Armstrong:Powerful doesn't just happen, you have to make it happen. So the moment Total Wireless offers a free Samsung S25 FE with Galaxy AI, when you switch to the Total 5G or 5G Plus Unlimited 3-Month plan, you take the network as powerful as you, with unlimited 5G data that won't slow you down. Now that's a Total Power move. Visit your neighborhood Total Wireless store. Device taxes and fees may apply. Requires new activation on a Total 5G Unlimited 3-Month plan or higher. External port in and ID verification. Available only in Total Wireless stores. Limit to four devices per account. This episode is brought to you by State Farm.
0:33Listening to this podcast, smart move. Being financially savvy, smart move. Another smart move, having State Farm help you create a competitive price when you choose to bundle home and auto. Bundling, just another way to save with a personal price plan. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there. Prices are based on rating plans that vary by state. Coverage options are selected by the customer. Availability, amount of discounts and savings, and eligibility vary by state. This is your fix. I am your host, Stassi Schroeder. Welcome to Tell Me Lies, the official podcast. What's the most unhinged thing of season three?
1:11Steven, because he's so evil. I do think he is misunderstood. You see everyone face consequences. It's intoxicating. The writers just know how to trick you. There's always a twist in this show. Tell Me Lies, the official podcast, January 6th, and stream the new season of Tell Me Lies, January 13th on Hulu and Hulu on Disney+. Today's number,$80 billion. That's how many dollars Meta spent on its metaverse platform Horizon Worlds before the company decided yesterday to shut it down. A spokesperson said they did what was best for the firm and also apologized to their dozens of users. Money market's mad.
1:52If money is evil, then that building is hell. The show goes on!
2:00Welcome to Prof G Markets. I'm Ed Elson. It is March 19th. Let's check in on yesterday's market vitals. The major indices fell as the Federal Reserve announced its interest rate decision. More on that in a moment. Treasury yields climbed. Meanwhile, Brent crude prices jumped after an airstrike on Iran hit one of the world's biggest gas fields. Okay, what else is happening? The Federal Reserve has decided to hold rates steady. That outcome was widely expected. Kalshi put the odds of a hold at 99%. In its statement, the Fed noted that the economic implications of war with Iran were, quote, uncertain.
2:42Meanwhile, recent inflation data has been discouraging. The producer price index rose 3.4 % year over year. That was its biggest annual gain in a year. and core PPI, which excludes food and energy, came in at 3.9%. Personal consumption expenditures told a similar story last week. Core inflation rose 0.4 % in January alone and 3.1 % year over year. And remember, these reports only offer a rear view mirror. What is ahead is looking even worse, at least for now. Since the US struck Iran on February 28th, the price of oil is up 40 % and gas prices have risen more than 30%. As price increases are also hitting other industries, such as agriculture, where the cost of fertilizer has risen 25%.
3:32So the bottom line is, our bills are probably going to go up even more. Here to discuss the inflation outlook for 2026, we're joined by another panel of experts today. We have Michael Gapin, Chief US Economist at Morgan Stanley, and also Robert Armstrong, financial commentator for the Financial Times and author of the Unhedged newsletter. Michael, Robert, thank you both very much for joining us. Michael, I'm going to start with you. We got the Fed decision. Rates remain where they are. Everyone expected that. Was there anything else we found out, anything that is perhaps unusual, interesting, or maybe changes the situation in any way?
4:15I wouldn't say that there was anything unusual because the standard playbook for the Federal Reserve in a situation of getting an oil price shock is to be predisposed to want to look through any increase in headline inflation. So I think what I heard a lot of, though, and you noted it, the repetition of uncertainty, uncertainty, uncertainty. Writing down a forecast at this point in time, very difficult. Powell said, take our forecast with a grain of salt. And he said, this is one of those moments where probably not submitting a forecast would have been easier than submitting one. And so I think, yes, the Fed is saying, OK, headline inflation will be rising.
4:59But that's only part of the story. This is another supply shock that puts upward pressure on both inflation and the unemployment rate. So that leaves our goals in tension. so to know what to do we probably need to see some more data and so i i think he gave what a a balanced view of the outlook could be higher inflation could be weaker labor markets and and then interjected a little uncertainty and caution and i think that's the appropriate response so i wouldn't say a lot new um but just the re-emphasis on uncertainty uh you know it tells you again it's The Fed would like to see progress on inflation, but now there's kind of another hurdle that it has to overcome this year.
5:44What about looking forward in terms of rate cuts, Robert? What did we learn, if anything, about what we're going to see in 2026 from the Fed?
5:56Robert Armstrong:I mean, if you look at the notorious dot plot, and I do want to take on board Michael's comment that this is the chair Powell and the Fed was obviously not very pleased at having to have give to give projections this time around, given that we've rolled the iron dice and there's so much war uncertainty. But if you do look at that dot plot, which shows the projections for appropriate rate policy this year, there was kind of a bit of compression. Now, nobody is looking for rates to be increased again this year. But the tail of people who think there should be several cuts pushed up as well. So the plot for 2026 kind of compressed.
6:44Robert Armstrong:And partly that's an expression of uncertainty. And partly it's saying we are stuck here with these, what Powell describes as modestly restrictive rates. And we're stuck between the two ends of our mandate. And what are we going to do? We're going to sit and wait until something happens. And I don't know what else in their position. I don't know that there's anything smarter to do than that. Well, I think for consumers and for observers, I mean, my intro there basically said it, which is inflation appears to be set to rise. And that's what we're all worried about. And so I guess the question was something that I was expecting was for them to say, yeah, this is something we're quite worried about, too.
7:29And it sounds like what we heard was we don't really want to say anything about it. we're going to acknowledge the elephant in the room, which is that Iran is happening, and that that's going to have an effect on oil prices, it's going to have an effect on gas prices. In fact, we're already seeing it. But even when you look at, you know, what the members of the FOMC predicted, 12 of them said, yeah, we're going to get at least a cut in 2026, which I guess to me, I'm kind of like, well, aren't prices set to rise quite dramatically. Michael, what do you make of the possibility that we could have quite rampant inflation now that the Iran war is kind of well underway?
8:11So you're right that there is already clear evidence that prices will go higher. We're seeing it in gasoline prices that are up 50 cents to a dollar per gallon nationwide. And oil and its byproducts, our inputs into things like fertilizer and diesel fuel and airline prices. So you will see it. And yes, we are already seeing it. The question from the point of view of the policymaker or the Fed is, well, how long will oil stay elevated? If there is a, let's call it fairly quick, you can be subjective about your definition of that. If there's some fairly quick resolution to this, and oil is back down to its$60 to$70 range where it was going into this, say, in May, it's hard to argue that the broad outlook for the United States has changed a lot.
9:06But it could be that oil prices stay elevated much longer than that, or even move higher from here. And so, yes, you could get a prolonged inflation shock, but the higher oil prices go, it also means demand is weaker and labor markets are likely to be weaker. So I think the Fed did acknowledge today and Powell acknowledged today and their forecast acknowledged inflation will be higher. But the uncertainty part of this as well, it depends on how long this geopolitical uncertainty in the Middle East lasts. And the Fed's no better at predicting that than I think anybody else. So I think that's the dilemma they're in.
9:44It seems like the future of our economy right now of inflation right now is basically entirely dependent on how long do we stay in Iran and how long until this situation is pretty much resolved. And I guess that's on the president. I mean, it's not clear to me how any of us have any sway over how this is resolved. But I mean, that's what we're talking about here, right? This all reverse engineers to like how long we lost in Iran.
10:19Robert Armstrong:I think the real problem for the policymaker, as Michael suggested, is that rate increases are a terrible tool for dealing with high energy prices. Right. Like if you're going to control high energy prices, you're going to have to do so much damage to demand with higher rates that you're going to wish you didn't do it in the first place. Right. That's why the Fed policymaker wants to look through this stuff. I would note, however, that in this meeting today, the long-running inflation dramas did come up. Namely, are we going to see the half a percentage point of inflation that we think is coming from good tariffs on goods?
11:03Robert Armstrong:Is that going to go away, as we all think? Chair Powell sure hopes so, and so did the rest of us. And it was interesting, when he was asked, the first question he was asked was, do we look through oil price inflation? And his answer was, the first thing I'm looking for is for tariff inflation to go away. And once we get that dealt with, I'll be able to worry about oil. And the second long running drama that got mentioned that I thought was interesting is he was talking, the chair was talking goods, inflation, goods, inflation, tariffs, tariffs, but he was pushed by one of the journalists who said, well, aren't services inflation when you take out housing aren't those kind of sticky at three percent now for quite a long time and he was kind of like yeah that's pretty frustrating too we wish that wasn't true so like there are it's not all it's not all it's a lot oil is is the headline now and it's a big story yeah but you know the way i look at it inflation's kind of at three right and it's going sideways yeah right and that was true before we started this maybe you know you could say it's 2.8 or 3.1 or whatever, a PPI report, whatever, but it's somewhere in there.
12:16Robert Armstrong:It's a point above, it's a point above where it should be and it's going sideways. And we don't really know why. I mean, Michael may know why. Well, Michael, I mean, when we look at the inflation that we already were dealing with, which was, you know, maybe moderating, but still pretty sticky and certainly nowhere near the 2 % target, add on top of it, what's happening to oil. What are your inflation expectations going forward. And for those who maybe haven't thought about the connection between oil prices and everything else, how could those prices trickle down through the rest of the economy?
12:55How could it show up on the bills of regular households across America? It was interesting today because obviously this is a meeting where the Fed released its updated projections. And we looked at them and we said, oh, that's interesting. Their forecasts now look a lot like ours. So I think, as Rob mentioned, it will be an outlook then where headline inflation is close to 3 % by the end of this year. And the Fed thinks core inflation, so if you exclude food and energy prices, could be somewhere around 2.7%. So some diminishment in core goods inflation, but not a whole lot. So the trajectory is there from the Fed's perspective.
13:40It's moving in the right direction still in their forecast, but it's a quite gentle downslope. So this is, you know, view that the oil price shock is another hurdle that the Fed will have to overcome in order to ease rates. And on the second part of your question, yes, oil moves directly from oil prices to gasoline prices in the U.S. It does that very quickly, usually within about two weeks. And so we see that. So what they will be worried about is what we call second-round effects, right? Because oil and energy is an input into the production process more broadly. For example, roughly 40 % of the cost of food when you go into the grocery store is related to transportation costs.
14:27Right. So you can get second-round effects on inflation. Now, history says you're not likely to because the higher oil prices go and the more you and I have to spend on gas, the less we have to spend somewhere else. So there's usually some demand destruction that prevents that second-round effect, but there's no guarantee. As Powell said, we're about five years of inflation running above 2%, and at least short-run inflation expectations have moved higher. So there's no guarantee we won't see second-round pass-through effects, but history says they should be limited. And as Rob said, the answer then is you kind of need more time to see what's happening.
15:09Robert Armstrong:I guess the other point I'd make there, Ed, is that there is this kind of question out there is like, how many times can you kind of punch the economy in the face before it becomes permanently grouchy about the future? and where you have things like, you know, longer term inflation expectations go up because you get these shocks, whether it's, you know, COVID and then it's tariffs and then it's this war. And it's like, you know, you're taking all these hits. And at some point you start to think maybe I'm in a kind of nasty inflationary world and my longer term expectations for inflation start to trickle up.
15:51Robert Armstrong:I should note that is not happening now. I was looking at five-year, five-year forward inflation break-evens this morning, which is like a kind of tricky mathematical way of getting an estimate of what inflation is going to be in the five years starting in five years, right? So you like subtract various bonds from one another. They haven't moved at all, right? No change since the start of the war. So the inflation the market anticipates is all in the short term. And that's a good sign so far. What I think would scare me to death and would certainly scare Chair Powell and the rest of his committee to death is if you see someone anchoring at the longer end of the curve, higher term, premium, whatever, that would be bad.
16:32Robert Armstrong:But so far, it's been amazingly stable out there, right? Like, you know, as he emphasized today, we're not seeing any sign of that, but that would be the bad thing to look for. It's so interesting because, I mean, what we're trying to do here is we're trying to predict the future. We're trying to predict the future of prices. And as we said, kind of at the top of the program, like that all relates to what happens in Iran, at least for now. That's what the whole question is all about, which means that these analysts and these investors have to try to put on their sort of military strategist hats and try to predict what on earth is going to happen in the Middle East, which seems to me to be a very difficult thing to do and certainly a very difficult thing for investors to do because we're not military experts.
17:17So I guess my question to you, Michael, over at Morgan Stanley, where that is the job as the economist of the firm and as the guy whose job it is to figure out what's going to happen, like, how do you think about these issues when they're so specific to geopolitics and to literally military strategy? Well, you're putting me on the spot on this one. I would say maybe a trite answer. I mean, you do your best, but you recognize that the error bands, as we would say as an economist lingo, the error bands around your forecasts are a lot wider. So let me give you an example. Right now, if you look at options on oil, they're what we call bimodal.
18:05There's kind of a mass of expectation saying oil's probably going to come back down to around$70 a barrel, and then there's a second mass at around$150. and this gets back to i think to your earlier point about a lot of the outlook then depends on how long we sit where we are right the longer the straight is closed you might see a shift to 150 if there's a resolution you can go back to 70 so the answer tends to be you need to write multiple scenarios of how the world could evolve and then place kind of subjective probabilities on those. So the usefulness of one modal, most likely baseline outlook diminished in this environment.
18:49And you have to be a little flexible and say, it could be this, it could be that. Let's sketch out how both of those scenarios work. So that's about the best you can do. Yes, which is, of course, unsatisfying for all of us, but that's what we have to deal with. It's where we are. This is the life we have chosen, as they said in the Godfather. Stay tuned for more of this panel after the break. And for even more markets insights, you can subscribe to my weekly newsletter, Simply Put, at simplyput.profgmedia.com.
19:31Support for the show comes from SoFi. To stay ahead in this economy, your number one priority should be staying on top of your finances. With inflation and market shifts, you can't afford to be passive. You need to be proactive about where every dollar is going. And part of that is having a bank that actually works for you. Enter SoFi. SoFi Plus is a premium membership, a smart way to get more for your money. SoFi Plus is packed with benefits and unlock a thousand or more in annual value with qualifying activities. Values including a competitive APY on savings, an investment match for your IRA, and access to one-on-one sessions with SoFi Wealth Financial Planners.
20:04You can get started for$10 a month. And if you join SoFi Plus between now and April 15th, you'll have a chance to win over$75 ,000 in cash. SoFi is also giving 20 individuals$1 ,000 in cash prizes and 50 winners free SoFi Plus memberships for a year. Head to SoFi.com slash Scott G to enter. Terms and conditions apply. To learn more about SoFi Plus, head to SoFi.com slash SoFi hyphen plus.
20:33We all have that dream trip we've been wishing we could go on. But too often, life, or usually price, gets in the way. That's why Priceline is here to help you turn your dream trip into reality. With up to 60 % off hotels and up to 50 % off flights, you can book everything you need for your next adventure. Don't just dream about that next trip. Book it with Priceline. Download the Priceline app or visit Priceline.com and book your next trip today. Go to your happy price. Priceline. This episode is brought to you by Indeed. Stop waiting around for the perfect candidate. Instead, use Indeed Sponsored Jobs to find the right people with the right skills fast.
21:14It's a simple way to make sure your listing is the first candidate C. According to Indeed data, Sponsored Jobs have four times more applicants than non-sponsored jobs. So go build your dream team today with Indeed. Get a$75 sponsored job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast. Terms and conditions apply.
21:35We're back with our panel. When you think back, Michael, to our previous round of runaway inflation, when you think back to like post-COVID 2021 going into 2022 and the impact that that inflation had, At least that's what's in my mind right now. I mean, we're looking at a situation where we don't know what the inflation picture is going to be, but it's very uncertain. And it seems that a runaway situation is on the table because of what we're seeing, not just in America, but also in Europe, which is getting absolutely hammered, at least prices over there. In Asia, it all reminds me of that post-COVID era where everyone's inflation was going out of control.
22:17And then suddenly everyone had to figure out how to deal with it. Most decided, OK, we're just going to raise rates. We're going to tighten as much as we can. And then we did see a very significant drawdown, more than 20 percent decline in the S &P. And it was largely a function of this inflation problem that was stemming from supply chain issues because of COVID. I'm just reminded of what happened there when I look at what's happening right now. Is that the right thing to think about or is this just completely different? I'm going to push back on that and say I do think it is different. um the covet story was certainly obviously as everyone knows it was a global pandemic and supply chains globally were were constrained so you given the integration of the global economy um and the share that goods are in the average person's consumption basket it's over 10 percent up as high as maybe 20 percent now gasoline for example is is about two to three percent so the magnitudes of the shock here are are very different so i think the ultimate effect on inflation will be different and just from a historical perspective if someone were saying oh michael but what about the 70s that was more like a 400 increase in oil right so that you know that's kind of like oil going from 60 to 250, right?
23:43Okay. Then I'm, then I'm with you. It's much bigger problem. Um, it'll downstream into other things that your literal stagflation scenario. But I don't think, um, the oil shock we're seeing now is reminiscent of that. And last point, I'll turn it back to you or Rob for comments. We were at about$120 a barrel in, in 2022 when, when Russia invaded Ukraine. So we're, we've been in this territory for a while and it didn't entirely derail the U.S. economy. So yes, a push price is higher. I agree with that. But, you know, I think we're better at dealing with this than a global pandemic. Rob, what do you make of that?
24:21Robert Armstrong:Only things I can, I think that's exactly, Michael's got it exactly right as far as I can see. Only things I would add is, you know, back post-COVID, tight job market. Now we've got kind of a squishy one. And I wish it wasn't squishy, but that'll help on the inflation front. In theory, it should. And also back then, you know, we had the government putting dollars into people's pockets. Now we have the gas pump taking dollars out of people's pockets. Again, that should be a bit deflationary. So, but I think Michael has the picture, right? I mean, by the way,$200 oil is not a scenario we should completely dismiss.
24:57Robert Armstrong:I think it's over in one of the tales, but, uh, the, you know, again, we all become emergency experts on things. But, you know, in the last week, I've become more of an emergency expert on the kind of oil inventories. The longer the Strait of Hormuz stays closed, it's not like there's a linear increase in the price of oil. You know, global inventories start to get down, the well starts to dry, and you have a geometric increase in prices. So I'm not saying we're going to get$200 oil. I'm just saying I'm not laughing at the very suggestion. Right. Yeah,$200 a barrel is something that I think needs to be at least in people's models.
25:39You need to entertain the possibilities. And then the other word that I keep on hearing is stagflation, which is a word that comes up every now and then, but it's a very scary word. And it's now kind of a little bit more in vogue. uh rob is stagflation one what is stagflation and two is stagflation something that is genuinely or potentially on the horizon here uh well powell was asked about stagflation today and he said
26:11Robert Armstrong:stagflation is something that happens in the 1970s where you have a massive increase in an employment you have 10 unemployment and you have inflation at 10 or something and it's like you're really getting it from both sides, but you can get a micro stagflation, which is, you know, the, the fed being stuck. Inflation is too high for you to really stimulate, but, uh, the economy is slowing down. So you want to stimulate and what can you do? And, you know, to a certain degree by that more modest or small definition, definition of stagflation, it's already happening now you get the the economy is pulling in both directions and you know that can get worse and what's miserable about it is that it's not clear what the policy response is what do you do about it you know so uh we knock on wood you know yeah let's not do an experiment in that you know let's not i don't know if michael is i'm old enough to just barely remember the 70s stagflation and in particular its effect on the price of candy bars and the general mood around my house and uh it was bad it was really bad yeah michael what what do you think about that comparison i mean are we close or are we getting close to a stagflationary scenario here or is that far off i mean not as rob says not the literal definition of stagflation, which is falling output or negative GDP growth, rising unemployment and rising inflation.
27:48But this is, if you kind of think just about persistent inflation and sluggish growth, then yes, you could certainly be on the verge of that. What's helping the economy a lot right now, of course, is AI-related business spending and some productivity gains. So, I mean, you actually saw the Fed revise higher its growth forecast for 2026 today. I suspect it would have been even higher had oil prices not risen. But, I mean, I think it's obvious for the listener how a mini stagflation scenario would play out. If something like you mentioned,$150 or$200 a barrel, became a reality, then you're talking$5,$6 gasoline, right?
Read the full transcript
28:31So that will slow things down. I don't have the ability to buy everything I need to buy if I have to pay that much for gasoline. So it dampens growth in real income. It dampens purchasing power. The consumer is 70 % of the economy. So if they pull back and save on a precautionary basis, then growth will slow pretty quickly. I think one thing, just as we start to wrap up here, one thing that a lot of people, a lot of Americans are just trying to figure out is like, is the economy doing well or is it doing poorly, especially with the midterms coming up? I mean, this is the big question. And now that we have this, maybe oil crisis is unfair of a word, but something close to it.
29:19It seems though, as though the vibe is that the economy is not doing well, the economy is bad. These are obviously kind ridiculous, reductive terms. But it is important, especially when we get into the world of politics, which we are just brushing up against right now. So as we end here, I would like to just get your guys' ratings on the economy on March 18th. I'll start with you, Rob. How would you rate the economy if you had to categorize it as good or bad, as reductively as you can? Okay.
29:55Robert Armstrong:Reduction is my business, as we say in journalism. Before the shock of this war, GDP growth was probably at or above potential growth for the economy. Consumption was growing in real terms. Wages were growing in real terms. Unemployment is below 5%. If this is a bad economy, may all the world have bad economies. You know, uh, you know, uh, the, the, the only black mark is I wish the job market was a bit dynamic. You know, it was a bit more dynamic than it is now. We have a low unemployment rate, but nobody's hiring anyone. Right. And I don't like that, but like on the big stats, unemployment consumption, output growth, this is a pretty good economy.
30:49Robert Armstrong:Pretty good. Okay, Michael. So I would agree. I'll be reductive in a grading sense. I'd give it a B plus right now. Yes. And a B plus on the macro data, because as Rob mentioned, GDP looks pretty good. The unemployment rate's low. Inflation's running three. That's not a disaster. Could be better, but it's not where we were in COVID, for example. But the beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And the vast majority of households in the U.S., roughly two out of three, if not 70%, 75%. They consume primarily out of labor market income. Goods are a larger share of their consumption bundle. Gas tends to be a larger share of their consumption bundle.
31:32So parts of the U.S. household are stretched. And as Rob mentioned, the labor market is not dynamic. Employment growth is slow. So income and employment prospects are weak for some households. So this is why I think you get a disparity between what the consumer survey says, which is mixed, and what the macro data says, which is, what are you worried about? Right. Okay. Michael Gapin, Chief U.S. Economist at Morgan Stanley, Robert Armstrong, Financial Economist for the Financial Times. Michael, Robert, appreciate you both. Thank you so much. Fun to be here. Thank you. Okay. That's it for today.
32:11We appreciate you joining us for another Prof G Markets panel. If you have a guest you think we should speak to on this topic or any other, please drop us a line in the comments or email our producer, Claire, at markets at profgmedia.com. We hope to hear from you. This episode was produced by Claire Miller and Alison Weiss, edited by Joel Patterson and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our video editor is Brad Williams. Our research team is Dan Chalon, Isabella Kinsel, Kristen O'Donohue, and Mia Silverio. And our social producer is Jake McPherson. Thank you for listening to Prof G Markets from Prof G Media.
32:46If you like what you heard, give us a follow. I'm Ed Elson and tune in tomorrow for a conversation with Ed Yardeni.
33:13They're designed to keep you going without slowing you down. So put that fork down. Try the new wraps today in app or at order.sweetgreen.com. Available at participating locations only.
From the publisher
Description:
Ed Elson speaks with Michael Gapen and Robert Armstrong about the Federal Reserve’s interest rate decision and what to expect from inflation for the rest of the year. They discuss how households will be impacted by the war in Iran, whether stagflation is on the table, and give the health of the economy a grade.
Michael Gapen is the Chief US Economist at Morgan Stanley. Robert Armstrong is a financial commentator for the Financial Times and author of the Unhedged Newsletter.
Check out our latest Prof G Markets newsletter
Follow Prof G Markets on Instagram
Follow Ed on Instagram, X and Substack
Follow Scott on Instagram
Send us your questions or comments by emailing Markets@profgmedia.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




