In short
Sophie Pender argues Britain should abolish private schools, saying they preserve class segregation and “positional advantage” through concentrated wealth, resources, and elite networks, not just better teaching. She challenges the idea that social mobility is mainly about exceptional individuals escaping their background, and instead claims the system itself should change.
Guest background
Sophie Pender is founder and CEO of the 93% Club, named for the majority of Britons who attended state school. She grew up on London council estates, faced family trauma (including an alcoholic, drug-using father who died when she was 12), studied English at Bristol, trained and worked as a corporate lawyer for about five years, then left law to run the 93% Club full-time.
Key claims
Private school alumni are far more likely to land top jobs (citing a Sutton Trust 2025 report: five times). Private schools “code” success via accent/cultural norms and alumni connections; state schools lose potential “brain drain” when talent is extracted.
Notable examples
Accent bias stories (e.g., a Hull accent student changing speech due to fear); her corporate interview where she was asked to “pronounce” her words; Brampton Manor as a high-performing state school; Eton’s “quad to quad” architecture mirroring elite institutions.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOReflections on Radical and Social Mobility
0:40 to 2:15
Amol reflects on his journey with the podcast and introduces the topic of social mobility.
“This is actually my final episode of Radical.”
Introducing Sophie Pender and the 93% Club
2:15 to 4:21
Discussion on Sophie's background and her initiative to support state-educated students.
“It's Sophie Pender, the founder and chief executive of the 93 % Club.”
Setting the Stage for Discussion
4:21 to 4:50
Amol introduces key questions about social mobility and the education system.
“That raises some very uncomfortable questions.”
Sophie Pender's Emotions and Background
4:50 to 6:50
Sophie expresses her nerves and discusses her background and upbringing.
“and just to say if you subscribe to Radical on BBC Sounds, you will get a notification each time it drops.”
Sophie Pender's Family Story and Early Life
6:50 to 14:00
Sophie shares her family history, including her parents and their challenges.
“I feel like I'm almost overstimulated with the use of the word social mobility.”
Reflection on Father's Letter and Accountability
14:00 to 16:05
Sophie reflects on a poignant letter from her father about accountability and circumstances.
Transitioning from School to University
16:05 to 17:42
Discussion on Sophie's transition to university and her initial views on class activism.
“It's so funny, because I know one of your other guests, Joe Seddon, said that English literature is one of the degrees that we should say that has to have a health warning on it.”
Wealth and Class Perceptions
17:42 to 20:38
Sophie discusses the stigma around talking about money in different class backgrounds.
Experiences as a Corporate Lawyer
20:38 to 21:54
Sophie shares her experiences working as a corporate lawyer and the benefits of money.
“whereas people who don't have money, who think all day, every day about money because they need to get to the end of the week, are willing to do it.”
Barriers in the Legal Profession
21:54 to 22:51
Discussion on the socioeconomic barriers within the legal profession and its culture.
“And people just don't, it's like, it's just so nice not to have to worry about it.”
Show all 21 chapters
The Formation of the 93% Club
22:51 to 24:58
Sophie explains her motivation behind starting the 93% Club and its initial goals.
“How did you feel confronting those barriers?”
Accent Bias and Social Mobility
24:58 to 28:00
Sophie discusses the impact of accent bias on social mobility and her own experiences.
“And I think I've mentioned this podcast before.”
The 93% Club and its Mission
28:00 to 36:51
Explore the mission of the 93% Club in advocating for state school equality.
Podcast Promotion
36:51 to 37:11
Learn how to stay updated with episodes of Radical and engage with the podcast.
“I hope you're enjoying this conversation with the incredible Sophie Pender.”
Debate on Private Schools and Class
37:11 to 42:05
An in-depth discussion on the implications of private schools on class and society.
“On that point, though, because they love this point of we're helping the taxpayer, I think there is definitely also something that is neglected in this argument.”
The Impact of Class Segregation in Education
42:05 to 45:55
Explore how class segregation in education affects societal dynamics and political outcomes.
“I've talked to her about this very point and she says, stop banging on about the 7 % of kids that go to private schools.”
Arguments for Improving State Schools
45:55 to 49:26
Discuss the arguments for focusing on enhancing state schools instead of solely criticizing private schools.
“Which, again, I'm not a conspiracy theorist.”
Social Capital and Its Role in Education
49:26 to 56:07
Learn about the importance of social capital and networking for educational and career success.
“I mean, that is a, you know, that's a hypothesis.”
The Importance of Social Capital in Education
56:07 to 1:01:42
Learn how social networks impact the value of education for working-class students.
“It's not just about what sort of life are we living in if our one goal in life.”
Navigating Class Identity and Personal Journey
1:01:42 to 1:04:26
Explore the complexities of class identity and personal transformation.
“I mean is there anything you can do Well, I think it's interesting that we say geography is destiny because I think education is destiny.”
Mainstreaming Radical Ideas on Social Mobility
1:04:26 to 1:06:31
Understand the challenges of discussing social mobility and private education.
“Like I, it makes me feel like we're all in this kind of like Truman show situation.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Amol Rajan:This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK. How has America shaped the world? I'm Asma Khalid, host of the Global Story podcast from the BBC. As the United States marks its 250-year anniversary, we've been exploring the surprising and often hidden ways the US has shaped the modern world. And today on the show, we answer your questions about this moment and what to expect in the years to come. From the BBC, it's the United States at 2.50. Listen to the global story on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts.
0:39Amol Rajan:Before we start this week's episode, a little personal note from me. This is actually my final episode of Radical. Well, my final conversation on Radical. We'll still have the Q &A episode on Monday. And next week, we're going to have a best of Radical so far. Radical is going to continue. I'm going to continue elsewhere. I'm not retiring. You'll still be able to find me in all the usual places. But this is my final conversation on Radical. It has been just the most enormous privilege to have all of these conversations with such smart and influential and thoughtful and powerful and just interesting guests.
1:16Amol Rajan:And also to get your thoughts, your questions, your insight each week. I'm so honestly, I'm just so humbled at the amazing response that we've had from you to this podcast. not just the sheer numbers listening, but the depth of your engagement. Thank you so much for all the time that you've given to Radical. And if I may say thank you to all of the brilliant people on the other side of the glass who I've worked with, who've produced this show in such a fantastic way. There are going to be more episodes of Radical coming soon, but I wanted to finish the last of my conversations with a really special guest.
1:45Amol Rajan:You're going to hear about her in just a moment. And we're going to talk about an issue which I think you know by now is a huge passion of mine. I think it lies behind so many others when we think about modern Britain, and that is this slightly slippery concept of social mobility. Who gets the chance to get on and why? That's going to be our subject on this, my last normal episode of Radical.
2:15Amol Rajan:hello it is amol here welcome to radical these conversations about the deep local national and global trends changing our world and offering you and our guests a safe space to submit some radical ideas for the future this week we're ending my run of conversations on radical with an absolute cracker. It's Sophie Pender, the founder and chief executive of the 93 % Club. The 93 % Club takes its name from the overwhelming majority of people in Britain who went to state school. In spite of that majority, Sophie argues that most of our powerful institutions still feel calibrated to a much smaller, privately educated world, and that the benefits of private schools for those who went to them go far beyond who gets the best teaching.
3:03Amol Rajan:As the old saying goes, it's not what you know, it's who you know. And Sophie decided while she was at Bristol University that if you can't beat them, you join them. What began as a student society, really a little network on Facebook for her mates, is now a huge and growing nationwide network of state-educated students and professionals offering support, mentoring and connections. She's trying to flip the script. She's trying to rewrite it, using networking to help that 93 % of the country increase their representation in the UK's top professions. She's taking pretty radical steps to try and accelerate social mobility, but she thinks we've often defined social mobility too narrowly as an exceptional individual escaping their background and making it into elite systems and networks and professions.
3:52Amol Rajan:She wants us to be much more ambitious, and ambition is a big theme of what we're about to discuss, And she wants us to question why anyone should have to move to leave their community and tone down their identity and their accent, their personality to be successful. She says, why not change this system, the institutions instead? So Sophie wants to challenge the two tier education system that separates children so early to build a country where talent doesn't need the right postcode or connections to thrive. That raises some very uncomfortable questions. Can a country with private schools ever be truly meritocratic?
4:28Amol Rajan:Should social mobility mean joining the establishment or changing it? And can Britain create a fairer system without asking people to give up the advantages that they have inherited? Before we begin, just a quick reminder. On Monday, Sophie's answering your Radical Questions, the bonus episodes which you have driven so brilliantly. Thank you for all of the questions that you have submitted to us. We appreciate it so much, as do our guests. and just to say if you subscribe to Radical on BBC Sounds, you will get a notification each time it drops. Now, on to this week's episode of Radical with Sophie Pender.
5:05Amol Rajan:Okay, let's do it. Sophie Pender, what's going on? How are you? I'm all right. So I'm feeling nervous. I'm feeling nervous. Why are you feeling nervous? Well, I felt like we could co-host this show. Sure. Not the show, this episode. Straight in with a job application, literally in the first sentence. Yeah, it's on its way out, guys. Is that one of the things you've learned from the 93 % Club, how to apply for jobs before people have even got ready to work out what they think? Okay, so that's a future. Okay, so in future when we're co-hosting a podcast, this will all sound very different. Why are you nervous?
5:33I think that the topic that we're talking about inspires a lot of emotion in people, positive and negative. So I feel the weight of the responsibility to do it justice. And also, you're one of the people early on that radicalized me in inverted commas.
5:51Amol Rajan:I radicalized you? Yeah, so when you did your How to Crack the Class Ceiling program, I was actually in the background of episode two of that. So I was a junior lawyer when you were going to talk to people in the city about class. And I'd listened in on those conversations and I thought, hmm. And I've since left my legal career, obviously. To go full-time to the 93 % Club. So How to Crack the Class Ceiling was a two-part documentary. which was about social mobility in this country which is a subject you're interested in and I'm interested in and this podcast is interested in and you might even say is an arena that requires some pretty radical ideas I'm nervous for a couple of reasons one because I don't think I've ever had a guest on this show that I feel like I've known more about in advance and been interested to see whether or not reality matches expectations as I'm sure it will but also because this is my last conversation on Radical and we've done over 50 episodes and we've had some of the smartest people in the world, you know, incredible people and we've chosen to end with Sophie Pender and you now dedicate your life to one of the great passions of my life and of this podcast, which is, well, what is it?
7:04Amol Rajan:Is it social mobility? Is it poverty? Is it inequality? Is it opportunity in Britain? What do you call it? Do you know what? I feel like I'm almost overstimulated with the use of the word social mobility. there are some days that I wake up and I think if I never hear the word social mobility again it it will it might make me the happiest day of my life because I feel like it's almost it's almost lost its meaning in a way it's a slippery concept and also no one goes into the pub and goes hey um hey Tom Tom how do you feel about social mobility yeah and I almost wonder if it's also become like a form like you know I grew up in a very working class background and we'll talk about that but I was you know I was like oh I'm a product of social mobility and I come from a Socio-economic background.
7:46And I do wonder sometimes, and this is just the cynic in me over the years, is have we used this language now to almost remove conversations around class and make it almost more difficult to realise that we still have a class problem in this country? Because class is uncouth and it's not good to talk about class. But we can talk about social mobility.
8:05Amol Rajan:Just tell us a bit about the origins of Sophie Pender. So I think I'll start with my parents. so my mum who's called Sarah one of 14 oh I didn't sorry I'm going to start I'm going to start I can rein it in Catholic she's one of 14 wasn't your dad one of my dad's one of 11 my mum's one of 13 incredible so I mean when you were growing up did you think that was normal well I had it was abnormal in my regard because of my dad's 11 and my mum's 13 both were the only people that came to the UK so we had a massive family in India. So I had a massive, I've still, yeah, I've got over 40 cousins, but they're in India.
8:47Amol Rajan:So we were kind of the weird, the sort of UK exception, but so it wasn't as normal. It would be normal in a different way for you. Yeah. I mean, I thought it was normal. So my mum was the youngest of 14, so I've got a massive family. My dad, do you know what? I think he was the youngest of five, but I think the fact that I can't even properly tell you that probably tells you about the relationship there um he his family came over from Ireland and my dad had a very troubled upbringing um he was homeless by age 15 there's a lot of violence in his family and Irish heritage is super interesting because you see a lot of intergenerational trauma so um there's a lot of alcoholism in my family my dad became an alcoholic um and he was a drug addict uh my mom obviously well he became an alcoholic slightly later in in life when my parents split up but when they were together and I was born he was very much he would take drugs but he would also deal drugs I was born in Graham Park council estate which is one of the biggest council estates in North London where in North London is this very roughly it's in Mill Hill right so it's funny right you see you hear mill hill and you think oh yeah night there's a posh area with a nice gales um you know great yeah exactly so gray and park council estate is where i was born um you know we had a giant german shepherd because my dad was the drug dealer on the estate and so you you weren't really and i was really young at this age right so i was i think it was i grew up there probably zero to four before we moved to the next council estate so your parents were together when you were born yeah how old were you when they split up i was about six when they split up and did they split up partly owing to your your dad's alcoholism and drug involvement no well i mean i'm sure that played a part well i did it play a part of it i don't know it was affairs so um my dad had an affair with a 17 year old right so yeah really like and and you kind of when you're your parents do try to keep these facts from you but they are also ultimately human too and so you do witness a lot especially when you're an only child and you're kind of watching your parents war with each other um so they split up when I was six and then there was a period where my dad sort of you know transferred from alcohol sorry drug addiction to alcoholism so he would use speed and you know drugs that when you weren't taking but when you were taking them you were like lovely and charismatic and you know he was like the life and soul of the party but the minute it wasn't available it was you know that he was very violent um and so you know was mostly violent against my mum but there were definitely times where you know I remember on my seventh birthday um going to ring the the doorbell it was I remember I was in a little blue dress and I had a badge it was on my seventh birthday and he wasn't there he wasn't in his flat and my mum was like where is he and he was round his mate's house who was also on drugs and um he came out the house and he tried to pull me out the car and he you know he was like I'm going to take her to Ireland you're never going to see her again so you know at six years old I'm being like pulled from pillar to post from in these two different worlds with my mum who is you know ultimately human and she's she's fallen in love with someone who is ultimately incredibly flawed and my dad who is I think objectively on paper probably people would say a pretty bad bloke but if I'm being empathetic about that you know if you look at his childhood he was incredibly traumatized and so it's intergenerational and yeah um he died when you were also pretty young right when i was 12 so there was there was a period where after that incident happened and he tried to take me my mom got restraining order so he wasn't allowed to come anywhere near me or my mom um so there was a period where i didn't see my dad for a number of years um and then um I got a phone we we'd started to reconnect and I saw my auntie in a shopping mall which was really weird I was in Harrow and she was just she was just there walking in front of me my dad's sister and she gave me my dad's number and I think I was I was 11 and so I just started secondary school and you kind of feel like an adult right and I was like I kind of don't need to go through my mum anymore in this situation um and maybe I also grew up really fast because of what happened to me and I remember we were we were texting backwards and forwards but we never really properly rekindled the relationship and then I got a call from well my mum got a call from my auntie saying Richard which was his name he yeah he's in hospital and he's not going to make it and basically he had the details of it were unclear but his liver had basically totally packed in and the toxins had gone through his entire body and he was in a vegetated state so the last time I saw my dad he died very slowly um over about two weeks but his liver had packed in and the reason why I say it was unclear that how you know how the circumstances of his death is that and this actually coincided with me going to psychotherapy was that about 10 years later and I didn't realize this existed I was at university and I got these possessions from my dad my dad didn't have a lot you know I remember asking for his shoes um to remember him by because he was all the same trainers and he didn't have any possessions so actually he needed to be buried in the shoes because he didn't have any other shoes and so I didn't realize these things existed and it was photographs but it was also a letter and my dad had left a 20-page letter um where he at the start um well he spoke about his life and his upbringing and the fact that he had been subjected to violence as a child and the fact that he never really got encouraged in education and all of these different things but really broke my heart I think is and I received this when I was yeah about 20 and what really broke my heart about it was in the front page of the letter he wrote something along the lines of it's taken me this many years in my life to realize that you can't put the blame on everyone else for the circumstances that you find yourself in and i think it's a common thing in alcoholics anonymous that they get you to take accountability they also sprinkle a little bit of religion in there as well but they get you to take accountability for your actions and so i was reading this letter where on the one hand he's saying i take accountability this is all my fault and then i'm reading this letter where he hasn't sort of chance yeah of course and I realized at that I realized at that point I was like and I think this is why I feel so icky about social mobility now which is who am I to tell you know if social mobility is great right if you happen to be the exception and you break through the car ceiling if you're not that person who am I to tell you that it's your fault when I'm reading this letter and I've got my dad who died thinking that the circumstance of his life were his fault and at the same time I'm reading a letter which basically says that he never stood a chance and I think at that point it was a real turning point for me where I was like I need to the way that I'm viewing the world right now is not it.
16:11So young Sophie responds to
16:13Amol Rajan:this extraordinary turmoil, death of your dad, going to a pretty tough school by getting three A stars, by being the first person in your family to go to university, by getting into Bristol to do law, is it? I did English, actually. Did English? Oh, my God, shocking degrees. Do you know what? It's so funny, because I know one of your other guests, Joe Seddon, said that English literature is one of the degrees that we should say that has to have a health warning on it. I'm pretty confident that I came out of university earning a lot more than Joe Seddon did. Ooh! A little bit of interradical rival.
16:49Amol Rajan:There's one for you, Joe. Joe, feel free to be in touch. Do you know Joe because of his work in social media? Yeah, of course. Okay, so Joe, Joe... I did text him when I heard that saying... Do you write a reply from Joe Seddon? Joe Seddon, legend, former guest, founder of a tech platform called Zero Gravity. He's the one who came on this podcast and said geography is destiny. So you go to Bristol, and Bristol is a university which at the time has, what, 60 % state-educated and 40 % privately-educated people. And young Sophie is in this new city and there's a lot of posh people around. And a lot of indie people as well.
17:21Amol Rajan:And a lot of indie people, yeah, kind of like cool, kind of hippie types. So you get to uni and you're like, okay, I think I should sort of try and do something to kind of get together the other people who, like me, are in the 93 % of the population that actually went to a state school. Not for the first couple of years. Like, I was not born like a class warrior. I did not, you know, when you're... You're a convert. Yeah, convert class. I'm very proud class warrior um I was not when you grow up working class I I always believed that activism was the preserve of the privileged because you can afford to be gluing yourself to something if you know that you're gonna be bailed out right if I said boo to a goose I'm losing my job like what safety net do I have to fall back on and I know that some of the greatest activists of our time haven't actually come from privilege but when you think about activists in the modern age like you know i don't have the data on it but anecdotally a lot of the people that i met at bristol who are activists were also incredibly rich so i started uni knowing that i wanted to become a corporate lawyer by the way not human rights or anything a corporate lawyer because you wanted to be rich yeah yeah i was like well i know that well when my dad died he didn't even leave me his shoes and i know that i've got no inheritance because my mum lives in a council house i'm not going to get any any of that good wealth transfer so you said yes so instinctively there do you think some people who grow up poor feel ashamed about saying that they want to get rich i think people like british people in general like make it shameful to talk about money one of my first experiences at uni was being shamed by someone for talking about money or asking them how much money they had which wasn't a thing because like my mates when we were growing up we would always spot each other we all have part-time jobs and at different points we would get paid so like one of my mates was paid spotting so that means you let you lend a bit of money right spotting is not a spotting is like talent spotting like a model yeah spotting is like let me a fiver because i'm a bit short this week yeah so we yeah so sorry we would lend each other money until the other person got paid and you say can you spot me this um and it was for silly things like going to the cinema or nando's uh nando's opened up on our high street best day of my life and so we would always ask each other how much the other person had in our bank account and it would kind of be like a bit of a joke because the answer would probably be like two quid or a fiver and i remember in my first week of uni in freshers we were all sat around and we were all like asking questions like what did you do with your summer obviously the question of what school did you go to came up constantly we were going around the circle and this girl who was super posh um I didn't hold that against her just you know it's just a oh yeah she's a bit posh she was talking about us this girl was 18 and she was talking about the safari she'd gone on and I was like and she basically had said that her parents give her an allowance and she had used that allowance for the safari.
20:05And I was like, wow, that's amazing. How much allowance do your parents give you? And oh my God, it was like I'd shot her. You could hear a pin drop and she was like, has no one ever taught you any manners? Has no one ever taught you that you don't talk about money? That's very uncouth.
20:23Amol Rajan:It is such a thing, the difference in the readiness and preparedness of people from different class backgrounds to talk about money. And I guess part of it, I don't know, why would there be as a cultural idea, why would it be that people who've got money, so you don't talk about money because it's uncouth, whereas people who don't have money, who think all day, every day about money because they need to get to the end of the week, are willing to do it. For sure. And I do wonder, again, I feel like I was not a conspiracy theorist, by the way. Like I said, grew up working class, kind of believed all this sort of the system's out to get us.
20:58It's kind of like we're kind of all bought into capitalism. It's unfair. That's life. and that's kind of like where I was at. But I do think doing this work full time now that it's a tactic of wealthy people to make us all feel ashamed about talking about money because if we all openly spoken about it, we'd realise how much they've actually got. So I don't know when you just sort of take a beat.
21:20Amol Rajan:And it opened up the question about whether or not they're worth it. Yeah, like is that fair? I don't know. But you were open about you wanted to be a corporate lawyer and indeed you were a corporate lawyer for five years. How did you find that? Money was great. Money was really good. I mean, I'm a workaholic. So, I mean, when you're having to juggle as many things as I'm juggling, age 16, I think it alters your, like, neuron path so that you have to constantly be busy. When you've not had money and then you have some money. By the way, this is not, you weren't buying yachts. You just had, like, a decent wage for a mid-20s something.
21:53Amol Rajan:It's fantastic. And do you know the best, the single best thing about money is not having to worry about not having money. Yes. It's amazing. And people just don't, it's like, it's just so nice not to have to worry about it. So you're a corporate lawyer in a swanky office. Well, I wasn't in a swanky office, actually. I got given the office that had no windows. Okay, so you had a rubbish office. Not everyone did have no windows, though. But for the first time, and law, one of the things we got into with the documentaries, which you very kindly mentioned, is that law as a profession skews richer.
22:24Amol Rajan:If you look at the proportion of judges, for instance, at the very top, who are from private school backgrounds, it skews much more posh for lots of reasons to do with history, the fact that the legal profession has got this kind of Hogwarts kind of architecture, very beautiful architecture, which is quite forbidding. There's a vernacular. There's how you address people. There's a jargon. There's how you actually dress yourself. Law puts up a lot of barriers to people from poor backgrounds. How did you feel confronting those barriers? Well, it's interesting that you say about the Hogwarts-y stuff because one of my, when I was a junior lawyer and I had a trainee, he went to Eton and he obviously knew the stuff that I would do.
23:04So we'd have interesting conversations about it. And I asked him just quite bluntly, I was like, you know, I obviously have all these theories about what goes on behind closed doors. What are your thoughts on it? And he said at Eton, they tell us from quad to quad to quad. So at Eton, they have a quad and a quad is that little patch of grass.
23:24Amol Rajan:It's a place with four sides, yeah? Yeah, four sides. If anyone confused what a quad is. Yeah, yeah, that's it. And then you go to the quads of Oxbridge, because Oxbridge has quads. Yeah. And then you go to the quads of the Barrister's Chambers, because Barrister's Chambers also have quads. And there's some really, you could do some really interesting analysis on the architecture of private schools in this country, and how they mimic our top institutions, and how people feel in those rooms. What was the ambition of the 93 % Club when you started it, and what's the ambition now? the ambition when i started was just to make some mates to be honest like it was a facebook group but i was i was kind of tired of being called a chav um like my accent now like the way that i present and that my accent now is very different to when i was at university and if you meet my friends and my family i sound totally different to them and part of that actually is when i started at the law actually when i did my training contract interview for one of the firms the interviewer wouldn't start the interview with me because i wouldn't pronounce my t's so i think and i kind of but i think i was like do you want some water or even like maybe it's even like water and he was i mean water and he was like should we try that again and he actually took a beat should we try that again yeah he took a beat and wanted me to properly pronounce my words before he continued.
24:46Amol Rajan:Okay, I've got to be a bit careful here. But one of the central points of that two-part documentary, How to Crack the Class Ceiling, and this will get us into accent. I do want to find out what the ambition of the 93 % Club is now. But one of the central things was about accent bias. And I think I've mentioned this podcast before. The response to the documentary convinced me that accent paranoia is a much bigger part of being British than accent pride. So when How to Crack the Class Ceiling came out, It featured a young man called Chris. I use his name, though his name's actually changed since then, because he featured in the documentary.
25:18Amol Rajan:And he's got a very strong Hull accent. Obviously, he went to university, I think, in York, and went back to Hull, which is not that far away. And his family felt he betrayed them by changing his accent because he sounded so much posher. Didn't sound that posh to me, and I come from South London. And he basically was so paranoid and crippled by his accent that he just didn't have the confidence at university. So hilariously, when I met him at the start of that documentary, he'd been watching YouTube videos about how to say watermelon. And he couldn't say the turt in water. And the response to that documentary, I swear down, I got 100, maybe 1 ,000 messages from people pouring their heart out, saying I got to be chief constable.
25:58Amol Rajan:So I got to work at Avon and Somerset Police, but I grew up in Dudley in the black country. I didn't make it chief constable because of my accent. And all these people would just say, my accent held me back, my accent held me back. You say you've now changed it for reasons we'll get into. But you, did you consciously change it when you got into the law firm? Because you were like, if I'm going to get on, I need to code switch it. I think it just gets beaten out of you. Just do. Honestly, it gets beaten out of you. Just having a bit of osmosis, yeah. Yeah. To be honest, that's my experience on Radio 4.
26:25Amol Rajan:Yeah. Yeah. And I think you look back at, you know, there's like old videos of myself when I was in school and you sound different. I went back to go see my old sixth form teacher, Miss McFerrin, big up. And she was like, yeah, you sound different. different and it was other things as well like because you're from from an irish background i also spoke really fast so i had to slow down so we're the same person so i have to slow down i have to try so hard i write on a piece of paper slow the f down every time also your brain also probably your brain's going oh so i'm excited there's an annoying politician being stupid in front of me and i'm like i don't want to have to slow down because you're being annoying um but also i used to come from a place called tooting from south london i am from and i grew up in tooting i'm pretty sure now when i'm on radio for and i don't do it consciously because i try to avoid the conscious thing which is a conscious something but i end up saying i come from two ting why did you decide to leave corporate law to go full-time with the 93 club what's the ambition of the 93 club now ambition the 93 club is to effectively make private schools redundant big ambition yeah i know the lobby are going to come come for me i think private schools are the biggest conspiracy in this country and i say that because i've been involved in so many conversations on social mobility my ears are bleeding from talking about social mobility and yet we do not talk about them enough and if you look at the history of potential reform of private schools in this country you will see time and time again people going oh that doesn't that doesn't look very unfair that doesn't look very fair going to reform it being squashed by effectively the elites again to reiterate i think i'm quite a pragmatic like kind of center center left person this is the one issue where i go we all collectively losing our minds on this can you not see what i see can you not and that's what bothers me i go to conferences about how do we make education fairer and no one talks about private schools no it's it's like honestly I thought I was going in insane and actually so part of the reason why I ended up going full-time 93 % club was I think that I'm sick to death of mentoring programs and schemes and all of these like these different things that we like come up with to make ourselves busy and no systemic change is actually happening how is the 93 % club in a practical way going to achieve your mission of making private schools redundant what are you doing what do you do at the club so 93 % club is a membership organization and obviously earlier I said the mission is to try and make private schools redundant but implicit in that is that in order to make them redundant we need to make sure that state schoolers have the same social networks as what private schools do right because if you look at state schools and private schools you actually get incredible educational outcomes in a lot of state schools like there are some state schools out there think about places like Brampton Manor in East London I think absolutely smashing it what private schools do really well is what uh your the in the book they describe as positional advantage so they have obscene resources and so many of those resources are invested in making sure that private schoolers not only have 50 different olympic size swimming pools and football pitches but actually they have incredible networks in the city that they can tap up and the idea of the old boys network and the old girls network is actually a really long established feature of private schools so we're building effectively it's a bit it's literally like i'm literally copying the private schools it's really not people think you need to reinvent the wheel and i thought to myself well they're doing it really well why don't i just copy them and the way it works is that a student of mine say for example they want to get into the bbc or they want to get into i don't know one of the other broadcasters they can go on the platform look at our membership directory and just directly message them it's really simple it's an alumni network so what's the problem that you're trying to solve and before you answer that a 2025 report from the sutton trust which is a charity that does a lot on inequality and poverty and social mobility with that wherever that is so the private school alumni are five times more likely to get a top job than state school leavers i want to also just quickly mentioned in this context that an amazing academic at LSE who featured in my documentary is called Professor Sam Friedman, not to be confused with another Sam Friedman who works in and around government.
30:56Amol Rajan:Nightmare. Talked about, yeah, nightmare for them. Talked about how basically he's done a lot of work on this. He's written a fantastic book called The Class Ceiling. Talks an awful lot about how it's not just about getting in, it's about getting on. So if you look at elite professions, when state schoolers do manage to get in, sometimes because of attempts to open up recruitment, they still might struggle they might get in the lower levels but they might struggle to get on what is the problem that the 93 club is trying to address so this is the key thing is why i talk about private schools rather than social mobility don't get me wrong i have had so we're we're a charity so we have had funders in the past reject us with no real uh reason behind other than saying oh we don't think this is a big enough issue but then they will fund similar organizations we've even had feedback that if we spoke less about state and private schools which felt a bit on the nose and spoke more about social mobility they'd feel more comfortable so being explicit about your desire to abolish private schools has come at a cost to you yeah absolutely i mean the amount of abuse i get talking about the subject as well is absolutely insane what kind of abuse do you get i had to go to the police so i get if i mean you know there's there's always trolling but i have people from the private school lobby obsessively watching my social media and talking about it amongst themselves and then I got two very threatening emails not from the private school lobby I should say but from people who were against the stuff that so I've not made life easy for myself I've gone from six-figure salary in corporate law firm thinking I'm going to be I'm going to be partner I'm going to be kushed I'm going to you know get myself on the housing ladder to doing this full time because I genuinely believe that this is one of the biggest social ills that we allow in this country.
32:44Amol Rajan:What is that social ill? So just to set the scene on the private and state school problem and a lot of this you can see in the books that you mentioned so the thing about private schools is that the private school lobby which is the ISC, Independent Schools Council, will spend a lot of time convincing you that private schools are full of children who are from parents who just really love their children and work really hard and sacrifice a lot to send their kids there. But actually, when you look at the income distribution, when you get to the top 30 % of earners, you see a huge hockey stick. So essentially, you've got the first thing to understand is that the makeup of private schools is predominantly the wealthiest people in society who are sending their kids there.
33:28And there's no real influence of working class kids there. So you've got a real concentration of one group of people. They then, on top of that, get obscene levels of resources, which make it almost impossible to fail. So not only do you get already affluent kids getting additional benefits that state school kids don't get, you also get, to be blunt, children who are being overqualified beyond their intrinsic ability. It's impossible to fail. And so much of the data that you came up with in your documentary showed that if you're a working class student with a first you are less likely to end up in a top job than a middle class student with a tutu which indicates that something's going wrong there right that there's a there's a there's a private schools are doing something else
34:11Amol Rajan:beyond education and credentialism which is allowing people to climb up the pole exactly and actually a lot of the research shows that yes while some private schools do have better education facilities private you don't actually need an education degree to be a to be a private school teacher and that's not to say that you know an education degree automatically makes you better but you can't kid me because a lot of my best friends through going to university and law school came from private schools and they said to me actually a lot of our teachers were you know they weren't very good so there's something else that's going on there beyond just the pure education and so then you've got a situation where you've got a bunch of really wealthy kids you've then got obscene resources so even if you take the most affluent state school in the country right and actually there's not a huge amount of discrepancies between state school spending you take the most affluent state school in the country and the poorest private school on average you're still going to see a spending discrepancy ratio of three to one so for every one pound spent on a state schooler three pounds is spent on a private schooler so then you've got that situation but that three pounds isn't from the government necessarily is it it's not but the point is the parents of those people yeah so the way that private schools make their money predominantly is through the parents and they've got some endowments as well because some of them charities but actually that's a little bit of a red herring because it's not but it's a taxpayer money it's not the case that private school kids get three times as much as state school kids no but the point is the resources right so it's not yeah but the capital going there exactly but the taxpayer also does subsidize private schools even after the vat change even after the vat change because some of them are charities so they do so some of the business reliefs were removed but actually um you know if someone makes it i think rishi sunak made like a hundred grand donation to his school you know you can get gift aid on that the taxpayer is ultimately paying for that so you've got a resource gap there which is huge right so that compounds that privilege and then you've got a very sophisticated alumni network and a brand that fully follows these students around which basically says if you come from these schools there's an automatic obligation to help one another and that's very different to state schools because when you go of given the impression that you have succeeded in spite of your school and you don't really give it a huge amount of credit I became very resentful of my school and my family and so I didn't really want to help them didn't really want anything to do with them and I wasn't going back and helping the next generation so that leads to a brain drain right so social mobility takes exceptional individuals out of their communities and you're left with a situation where you've got this brain drain in working class communities
36:51Amol Rajan:I hope you're enjoying this conversation with the incredible Sophie Pender. If you are, please subscribe to this podcast on BBC Sounds and turn your push notifications on. That way you'll never miss an episode of Radical, including the bonus Q &A where I put your questions to her about class, privilege, networking and education. Thank you so much. And now back to Sophie Pender.
37:17Amol Rajan:so the independent schools council which you mentioned the isc um not in the room uh and not here they're always in the room they're in this room uh they tend to be the room more broadly they're not here to defend themselves and i'm going to channel some of the arguments that i imagine they would put to you and perhaps already um have uh given you the privilege of engaging with the first is um just being realistic about this country's resources and the way we arrange spending in this society that we have if you took that seven percent and put them in the state sector there would be an additional cost which is huge you're questioning that and they would say as the parents often say the parents of people who send their kids to private schools would say they're paying twice they pay through general taxation for their for the sophie penders and and others to go state school and they pay to send their kids to the best um uh schools in the country and therefore there's less pressure on the state system isn't that less pressure on the state system a very valuable saving well i think you know if we were just logical about this i think there's less pressure on the state system we wouldn't be on this in the situation if that seven percent really were relieving the state system i don't think we'd be in the situation we're in is the first point but i think they calculated they save the the uh the state system about i think four billion but actually when you think about the education budget that would lead to an increase of about 4 % in the education budget if we had to absorb the 7%, which actually, when you break it down, is about less than a penny in the pound for the taxpayer.
38:46Amol Rajan:Second argument the IOC might put you. On that point, though, because they love this point of we're helping the taxpayer, I think there is definitely also something that is neglected in this argument. One, we know that these families come from the wealthiest earners in the country. And as someone who was a corporate lawyer and has spent a lot of time with very wealthy people, there is a very strong relationship between wealthy families who can spend as much they can on these private school fees and having very smart lawyers and accountants that structure their affairs in such a way to pay minimal tax and I have never met a private school parent who sent their children to private school because they were so worried about relieving the state sector my other rebuttal to that would be we are in a situation where this country's growth is stagnating and we are time and time again talking about we've got a neat crisis what a million people out a million great obsession it's yeah you've done how many documentaries about class i'm constantly talking about class there's so many programs popping up we've been trying to deal with this issue for years state schools have been squeezed with their spending well the iic if they're here forgive me for channeling them again i might continue to do would say that the neats crisis is not connected to the fact that we've got private schools in this country.
40:00Amol Rajan:We've got a million, I mean, it's extraordinary. Trust me, I'm obsessed with this. A million young people the age of 16 to 24 out of work not in education, employment, training. That's not to do with private schools. That's to do with other things. But they would also say, you, Sophie Pender, must acknowledge that all policies, all radical changes come with trade-offs. There will be trade-offs if you abolish private schools tomorrow. By the way, is your plan to abolish private schools in one fell swoop? Is that what you'd like? Why not? Okay. It's radical, no? Okay, it's radical. it is radical but I don't think it'd be realistic in one fell swoop right but you'd need to I would be pro a policy where we say okay from this point we're no longer accepting new children and we phase them out phase them out okay all policies are trade-offs what are the losers from yours lower grades why do we assume it's a levelling down to go to state school right and if people assume it's a levelling down to go to state school then why is that okay for the rest of us true but I mean I just don't understand that other than other than other than having to find the money to be able to put all these people who are in the 7 % of schools into the state sector, what are the other costs from your, what are the other price, what's the other price you're willing to pay other than taking a lot of political heat and getting a lot of threats?
41:09Amol Rajan:Do you accept that some people, some people in the short term might get lower grades? But why are they going to get lower grades? We're assuming that people who are working class and in state schools get lower grades. Like I said, there are many, I mean I got three stars. They're automatically, and also So let's be clear. I think the other thing that I didn't mention about why in particular, do you know what? There's a huge argument to say that private schools are unfair and people pretend it's not a zero sum game. But for every advantage a private schooler gets, that's someone that you've spoken to before who's missing out on that opportunity.
Read the full transcript
41:44Right. And we like to, you know, people who say things are unfair, we like to go, no, it's not a zero sum game. please let us in the room we're not going to push you out but unfortunately there's a limited number of jobs and if if they get all the jobs then where are the working class kids who don't have uh people to lean on but aside from the unfairness argument because we're in a capitalist society we've kind of all bought into it right that we kind of somewhat believe that capitalism could be a force for good maybe let's assume that i'm i don't care about the unfairness the thing that really concerns me about our education system is the fact that it segregates us along class lines and I think it's creating a really unhealthy dynamic in this country that goes beyond what job you're going to get and whether or not you're going to be productive and what grades you're going to get all the way to something like populism so when we look at the political situation in this country I had I have existed in two worlds right I've existed in this kind of at Bristol middle class lefty la la la you know life's not fair let's like really champion and then I've also existed in probably like working class communities who are probably a little bit more right-wing actually and so when I hear people on one side of the spectrum say I can't believe that people are electing these people I go well I can I can believe this is happening and it's really stark and we are segregating kids from age four into into different groups rich kids and poor kids and we're not allowing them to mix let me put to you another argument which would come from
43:16Amol Rajan:people outside of the um isc katherine birbalsing uh known to some as britain's strict teacher and she's a very controversial character she's well she was a former guest on this podcast and when she was sat in that very chair um and she's achieved i mean anyone just the facts would show she's achieved absolutely astonishing results at the Kaila Community School. I've talked to her about this very point and she says, stop banging on about the 7 % of kids that go to private schools. Sophie, for those listening on the podcast, Sophie Pender's eyes and eyebrows just went northwards at an alarming rate.
43:49Amol Rajan:She would say, Catherine Bilbo-Sing would say, and I'm not misrepresenting her here because I've heard it from her a few times, stop banging on about the 7 % that go to private schools. Just focus on the 93%, as it were, that go to state schools and do everything in your power to make state schools better, like she is doing. Classic. Just make state schools better. Well, we've been saying that for how many years now? Why are you dismissing that argument? Because we've been saying it for so many years. Well, why not do it? Well, do you know why we're not doing it? Because of private schools? Well, not because of, well, because the private schools exist.
44:18But if you think about it, right, if you think about the, again, we've established that the parents of the kids in private schools are from the professional managerial class, right? What do those guys have? They have education, they have social capital, they have cultural capital, they have very pointy elbows and they have high expectations I don't think that's a bad thing I think part of the reasons why private schools are also so successful is they have these like incredibly invested parents who know exactly how to push on a system if it's not working you go to my school high percentage of kids on free school meals like my mom bless her god love her she's a she's smart in her own way but you know I remember being 15 and writing her CV for her.
44:57If my education is failing me, who's she going to lobby? A lot of the parents, if you say, oh, are you going to lobby? They wouldn't even know what the word lobby means. And so I do think that there is an element of when you can opt out of a system, when you allow people with influence and education and wealth and power to opt out of a system, how can you expect them to care about it? And that's not to say they're bad people, but let me give you an analogy the NHS right I'm not going to get into the complications of the NHS but a lot of wealthy people in this country will use the NHS but they will also have private health care and actually a lot of people in this country even my stepdad who was a McDonald's lorry driver who's got private health care through his workplace but when Covid happened we were all out on the streets banging our pots and pans for the NHS no matter what your social background was because we think it's a good thing for this country i've not got the data to prove it but i do have a hypothesis which is that if i fall over tomorrow and i break my ankle even if i've got private health care i still have to go to a and e i still have to use the public health service so i have skin in the game with our state schools when they were crumbling because it had a rack in the thing or you know you've got kids
46:11Amol Rajan:going to school was that reinforced concrete yeah yeah and you know you've got i mean state schools like mine have been struggling for so many years and it's been a constant cause of conversation and yet you wonder why nothing's being done politically and again if you look all of the different reforms throughout time and people considered thinking about reforming the education system or doing something for state schoolers you see an incredibly powerful lobby of people trying to prevent that from happening I mean look what's happened to Bridget Phillipson for doing VAT on private schools there was a stat and it was I think Sam Freeman found it which was that in the year that VAT on private schools was proposed, there were over 300 articles, I think 330 articles about VAT on private schools for a proportion of the population, which is 7%.
46:55Which, again, I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I don't sit there watching YouTube videos about chemtrails and things like that. But, you know, something's going on there. And so I think that the reason why state schools won't just get better is because we don't have...
47:09Amol Rajan:State schools are getting better. They are. They are. There's been a revolution, particularly by the way in London, the way there's something called the London effect, there has been a dramatic increase in the standards, both if you look at PISA tables and literacy and numeracy, but just in terms of grades, Britain's state schools, I think most because of who I think of as the most important people in any society, which is teachers, are just doing astonishing things and have gotten better. Couldn't you accelerate that trend? Why does getting rid of private schools, why is that a necessary part of what's otherwise a successful journey?
47:43because we're still seeing discrepancies in who gets to the top but it's also again to come back to my original point there's the unfairness element of who gets the jobs and actually in that how to break the cast ceiling documentary you met with the writers of industry and I honestly I've actually met one of the writers and they're nice guys I don't really know them but you know they seem like nice people but there was a bit where like you guys were chatting and they were sort of joking about the fact that when they got their first jobs they just spoke to the they didn't ask him a single question they asked him one question he got wrong but they actually just spoke about the schools they went to i mean that's totally unfair but beyond that i do think we're missing a trick right and i think what people listening to this who might send their kids to private school need to understand that i do not judge their decision to do so right like we all
48:24Amol Rajan:make we're not against parents who have aspirations for the best for their kids but all parents have aspirations for their kids right and it's not about choice because you know can you afford 50 grand a year or 40 34 grand a year it's not really a choice is it because you know even if my mum wanted to send me to one she couldn't have done that um but i think the really key thing and the the trick that we're missing is that we are really underestimating. There's a macro effect of if parents who were privileged and had amazing education had to use the state system, I do think we would see stats.
48:52Some standards are improving in state schools, but for schools where it's failing, you would see them rise, right?
48:57Amol Rajan:You would see it. This is the argument that if you, yeah, it's worth just spelling this out. If you got rid of private schools and all of that capital, that human capital of people with connections and links to posh legal firms and banking, And if all that human capital and aspiration of sharp elbow flooded the state sector, the state sector would become more not just middle class, but would have a kind of that culture of higher expectations and pedagogic achievement. Yeah. And don't you think maybe education might feature a bit more heavily on the political agenda? People might be a bit more worried about it.
49:26I mean, that is a, you know, that's a hypothesis. But the other thing that I think we miss a trick on is we talk about productivity in this country and the fact that we're not unlocking the potential of lots of people. But we know that one of the biggest things that you can do to unlock potential is social capital. Networks are everything in this country. There's other things that are a factor, of course, but networks are so, so important. If you get a school and again, it's not just about state and private schools, but I'm talking about, you know, schools where you have a real socio-economic mix of rich kids and poor kids growing up alongside each other that has a really positive impact on working-class children one because they could make I mean children are innocent right they don't look at people and go you're poor or you're or you're rich you know you can have the child of like a you know a lorry driver or maybe even like me like a child of an alcoholic or a drug addict rather than going around the house of someone else whose parents are also in that situation you can't help them maybe they happen to go around the house of someone whose parents are lawyers and actually they can go, oh, I was thinking about becoming a lawyer.
50:27And they go, well, let me help you. And actually there's a macro effect of policy. There's also that amazing micro effect, which is that when you mix income communities, you have an amazing effect on it. It really raises all standards for people.
50:41Amol Rajan:Well, the evidence of that, just to support your argument for a second rather than channeling the ISC, is... They're going to hire you. The argument for what you're saying is actually just what happens at a lot of universities. Yeah. Because at university, people who went to such and such school mixed with people who went to such and such school and actually there's just an increase in mutual understanding so as i sit here before you i can tell you that um several of my closest friends are etonians they are brothers to me i love them with the most profound uh affinity and affection and i to go through my life alongside them is one of the greatest privileges that i'll ever experience um some of them hated school um some of them as happens didn't come from massively rich families some got scholarships whatever it might be a lot of my closest friends are genuinely as the cliche goes uh privately educated the fact that they have gotten to know me and i've gotten to know them has been mutually beneficial yes you know we've both won from that increase of understanding and your argument is that if you got rid of private schools then that sort of mixing that socially advantageous mutually advantageous mixing that happens at university could just happen at age 11 instead 100 and that for me is is the key argument for it is i i really worry about this country and i think with what you see with AI like AI is going to totally transform the way that we get jobs and it's already happening because previously you could submit an application and if you're from a working class background if you had a great application you know assuming that they're on board with hiring working class people you could probably comfortably get an interview what we are seeing now in the 93 % club is that employers are being totally flooded with applications that look the exact same so you can't see the wood from the trees and so people are actually turning back to really archaic ways of hiring which is referrals because they know not what you know who you know right you know because if you're receiving two applications that look the exact same because everyone's using ai at the moment you're probably quite time poor and you think actually do you just know someone who can who i can who can fill this role so not only are we seeing this kind of AI purge of graduate level roles we're also seeing the way that hiring is happening totally go back to archaic means and networks which will obviously benefit one type of people what's your advice to young people you mentor huge number of young people what's your advice to them about how to navigate the AI I mean in mega terms by the way the the evidence so far is kind of complicated there are actually if you look at America where a lot of this evidence comes from actually there isn't yet except for some particular cases there isn't yet evidence of the white collar job erosion that people have warned about including on this podcast but it could well come and it stands to reason that the repeatable cognitive tasks that are often entry-level white collar jobs might be the ones that ai replaces and people like reed hoffman the co-founder of linkedin who was sat in that very chair or dario amadei the boss of anthropic who was on this podcast, their warning is that AI could do for white collar jobs what globalization did for blue collar jobs a generation ago.
53:38Amol Rajan:And so you need to master AI before it masters you. What's your advice to young people about AI? Some of whom will be listening to this now. I think I honestly think that building your social capital and realizing that that is going to be super key for you is essential. So putting yourself out there as much as possible. I think the AI I've obviously listened to your podcasts I think the AI conversation is really interesting and I think that being in the social mobility space we're very knee-jerky people go well this is the solution or this is the solution and we've kind of seen that with apprenticeships so over the last couple years people have swung the other way and said right we need to we need to go and send all the working class kids into apprenticeships and I actually was just in the United States and the purpose of that tour was to look at workforce readiness and there was a real common theme which was blue collar jobs and getting working class kids into blue collar jobs and my slight concern which comes back to the state and private school problem is that whilst I am totally on board with apprenticeship as a route and the idea that you are not lesser than for doing vocational no and I think we've had a real big problem in this country of valuing people with trades far lower than people with you know knowledge skills my concern is that until we solve the social mixing issue i am really concerned about telling working class kids not to go to university and not to do academic things exactly this is this by the way this puts you absolutely um consistent in a way with um katherine beer will singh which is the danger is that if you elevate vocational training or vocational education too much then what you end up with is schools for the rich and skills for the poor and so there's an argument that even if you believe in maximizing vocational um and uh technical opportunities for all children um and even if uh it's the case that one aspect of the ai revolution is a kind of revenge of the blue collar where people we want crafts and building things and working with your hands um even if that's the case because ai is going to do the the job of of the head if you like um and we're going to do heart and hand you still want to make sure that people have a basic level of academic competence to the age of 14 or 16.
55:51Amol Rajan:You want to make sure that Billy doesn't do woodwork at the age of 12 because Billy's from a poor background and you close that world off to him. I do think we have a danger of not recognising the wraparound of what university can give you. It's not just about credentials. It's not just about what sort of life are we living in if our one goal in life. And I think to be clear, you know, when you're working class, that does have to be a return on investment because you don't have something to fall back on. But actually, because I believe social capital is so essential, sometimes that return on investment comes through the networks that you make at university.
56:25So actually, had I not gone to university, for example, and I started an apprenticeship, yes, maybe my earning potential would be increased during that time where I'm not studying. But maybe I didn't meet someone who knows someone who knows someone. So that is so essential, right? We need to be really clear to students, especially working class students, that one, you know, you're not there just to be on the productivity machine. It's good. It is also good to learn. But two, if you really want to increase your earnings potential, you want to build your networks because that is where things are going.
56:57Amol Rajan:On geography, Joe Seddon on this podcast said that in Britain, geography is destiny. Emma Greed, who is a hugely successful entrepreneur and businesswoman from a very working class East London background. She grew up in Playa Stowe. Talked about how if you want to make it, you've got to move, bloody, in this country. You've got to go to where the action is. Matt Clifford, AI supremo, investor, entrepreneur, hugely successful, grew up in Bradford. I'd like to invite you to be honest about what you'd say to people growing up in Bradford and Huddersfield and Rochdale and Rotherham and Camelford in Cornwall and Western Supermare and lots of other, and Hull, parts of it, lots of other places in this country which I've been to, which are poor, where I mention all those specific places because I've met lots and lots of working class kids in those places, and what you would say to them about whether or not if they want to have a six-figure salary and if they want to have a quality of life which is comfortable, whether or not they need to move.
57:57I think this is...
57:58Amol Rajan:Not whether it's a good thing or not, but would you do your advice for them? Yeah, whether they need to move... To the big city. I think Andy Burnham's, as Prime Minister, is going to be super interesting for this. so we're seeing this idea of manchesterism and obviously there's lots of debates of whether manchester itself needs the the support that other areas don't i think the blunt answer is probably you do need to move to the city to get on to the point of again where my thinking has gone the guests that you mention i think will probably share a very similar philosophy which is the idea of i mean they're all very bought into capitalism you know self-actualization go out and make as much money as possible which is totally fine and I think that interestingly I definitely was in that camp as well and over the last couple of years it's really dawned on me the sense of social responsibility and I think what uh what middle class is and I say private schools because of the alumni network and the brand and what they're what they're really good at is loyalty and they are so loyal to each other and they have whole platforms where people are there to help one another and there's this real sense of if you call we'll answer and i think that with working class communities social mobility has created this really weird psyche where we're all kind of just scrambling to get out of our situation and some of us make it out and then we don't go back we don't support the next generation so so do you worry that if if you're just being because just being really honest here if the advice to the individual from those places i mentioned and sorry about the other places i didn't mention and sorry to the places i did mention in fact but if the advice them as individuals is if you do want x then you and you have that self-actualizing approach to life and you want the six-figure salary you need to move do you worry about brain drain where those places lose some of their brightest some of their best and end up feeling even more disconnected from power absolutely and i also worry about the individual so i remember when i was a lawyer i was we've closed a deal which i think they made so much money on and we were taken out to a dinner by heston which is like i don't know what michelin star also i didn't know michelin was the michelin man like you know the car yeah anyway i thought it was like this is heston blumenthal yeah yeah so went out for dinner and then a couple days later i was in clacton so I spent a lot of my childhood growing up in Clacton, which we know is actually the most deprived area.
1:00:22So all of my summers, I have family in Clacton.
1:00:25Amol Rajan:Clacton is in Essex. It's next to Jaywick, which I'm going to say is the poorest borough or part of the country and has been at the bottom of the Indices of Multiple Deprivation, which is released every year. Indeed. So, yeah, so, I mean, like Jaywick and St. Oseth, those two places, they have caravan parks. And we used to go there and that's where our holidays were. and I have family there who still live there. So I had this moment of being sat at this restaurant and then going to Clacton and thinking, who am I? Like, what is going on here? So it's not just about, I think there's a brain drain issue, but it does catch up to the individual in the end.
1:01:02There is a reckoning of your identity at some point.
1:01:05Amol Rajan:Because you feel like a traitor. You feel like a class. Didn't know who I was. Had no idea who I was. Didn't know if I was middle class, didn't know if I was working class. Honestly, I couldn't tell you what way the wind was blowing. have you worked out the answer to that question now no not really I think probably like multifaceted because it's a cultural thing as well right you know you've got some friends I didn't grow up watching the news and then suddenly you go to university and everyone's asking you what your opinion is on things and you don't know because you're sat in front of the TV with a tray on your lap watching Love Island which was my experience what can you do about places that are poor and getting poorer and further and further disconnected from London I mean is there anything you can do Well, I think it's interesting that we say geography is destiny because I think education is destiny.
1:01:49And if someone like me with a dad who is a drug addict in and out of prison can get an education, like I am proof that a good education is transformative. And I really don't think it's a coincidence that affluent areas have better schools. and so I think we really sleep on the idea that if you look at you talk about geography and these cold spots then we don't go okay well what are the what's the provision of the school and the level of education there because you know if you had an educated group of people they can make decisions about whether or not they want to start their own business which could happen in Clacton they could go to the city if they want but they have choices and they have agency and I think education enables agency and I think we sleep on it quite a lot let me ask
1:02:39Amol Rajan:So you've asked me finally about yourself. I sort of felt in preparation for this interview, listening to some podcasts you've done, reading Oscar's Amazing Brief, that there's kind of two stories, really. There's kind of British society and what Sophie Pender's going to do about it. And then there's the journey that you've been on. And when you started out talking about your, frankly, astonishing childhood, it sort of feels like you're kind of in the slow process of finding out who you are. yeah yeah is that how's that work going I'm yeah I'm still figuring out who I am I think class and your class identity is so messy and complicated and I think um I will never really exist in either world because I'm never going to be of the world that a lot of my mates are from now which is privilege and there was a period of my life where I pretended that my dad was still alive or you know or he died of sort of, I guess, more lesser uncomfortable means.
1:03:41Amol Rajan:Well, because it was too painful to confront the truth of it. People just don't like it. I mean, we're bad at talking about death in this country anyway. If you say that you've lost someone, they're like, people go, oh, don't talk about that. But, you know, to say, oh, yeah, well, how did you, oh, your dad died, or how did he die? You know, he was a very... There's almost like a, there's a good way to die and a bad way to die. Well, I think the way your dad dies, That's not how most people would imagine their final moments. What do you still, what's the ambition now? I mean, you're kind of trying to work out what you're about.
1:04:12Amol Rajan:You've made this huge, brave, radical leap. You're totally committed to the 93 % club and all that it does. What do you want to achieve? I want to make this a mainstream issue. I really can't do another conversation about social mobility where we don't talk about private schools. I'm going crazy. I really am. Like I, it makes me feel like we're all in this kind of like Truman show situation. Like someone's playing a trick on me that people go, oh my God, you know, we've got an education crisis or a neat crisis. We've got all this. And then people go, oh yeah, but you know, don't worry about those lot.
1:04:42So I think, I think for me, there's like a, there's a real bit of work to be done in making this mainstream. And that's what I hope to do with the book when it comes out. If I do my job properly, there will be no one in this country who can listen to an argument from the ISC and go, yeah, but it's not checking out though, is it? so and then beyond that like i said i don't i honestly feel like my career i don't know how you feel like your career but i feel like i i blink and stuff happens and if you told me that i'd be sat here talking to you i'd been like yeah whatever so i honestly don't know and i think as you get older through your career you realize that so many things come up and it kind of takes you in a different direction and steers you in a different way so i don't know so far i've been a lawyer chief executive and founder i'm about to become an author and i'll take over this radical podcast as well.
1:05:30Oh my days! Is that what's happening? When you take up your job at the ISC, I'll be here, don't worry.
1:05:37Amol Rajan:Oh my, what a way in which to end. I'm going to go work for the Independent Schools Council and I was trying to work out what was going to happen with this podcast and now I've worked it out. So you're actually here auditioning to be the host of Radical. I am, I am. It's all going to be about social mobility as well. Yes, it was all a conspiracy all the way along. Well, I didn't know that that was the idea before you came in here and until that moment I've absolutely loved that conversation. Well, regardless of whether or not you are the next presenter of Radical, I just want to say thank you so much for being my final guest on Radical because in fact, in your last but one answer, you just still actually, what I hadn't quite realised until you so beautifully put it, is the kind of idea behind this podcast, which is to make Radical ideas a little bit less radical, to make them mainstream.
1:06:21Amol Rajan:And obviously, I couldn't possibly endorse any of your ideas or any of the other ideas from any of our guests. But by coming on this podcast, you made your ideas, I think perhaps a little bit less radical and more mainstream. So Sophie Pender, perhaps the next host of Radical. Thank you so much for your time. Thank you.
1:06:46Amol Rajan:Whoosh, what a final conversation for me to have here on Radical. Sophie Pender is formidable and I get the impression you're going to be hearing a lot more of and from her. It's actually the first time that we'd ever properly, properly met. I think certainly the first proper conversation that we had. And though I, you know, we do our research on this podcast, I didn't really have as full an idea as I now do about what she went through as a kid. It is just worth acknowledging how extraordinary it is that she went on to have a successful career in the law and be as successful professionally as she is now, given where she began.
1:07:24Amol Rajan:on the central idea that she's arguing for look we covered a lot of social mobility and class it's worth saying she herself acknowledges a lot of people are just awkward in this country when it comes to class we just don't like talking about it very much because it makes people feel a bit yucky or weird or kind of gauche or something and she likes talking about it and she's not afraid to talk about things that other people find awkward and that cause her problems and incur controversy and difficulty for her so she's definitely someone who's not taking the easy path she could have been a corporate lawyer on a very very juicy salary but she's decided to do hard and brave and radical things and on the abolition after a phasing out of private schools isn't it just interesting that she said in all the conversations she's like i can't have another conversation about social mobility without people talking about this elephant in the room without people talking about the thing that is just obviously front and center and it is just very interesting isn't it that here we are in the year 2026 with not a single one of the main parties, not even the Green Party under Zach Polanski, advocating the phasing out or abolition of private schools.
1:08:29Amol Rajan:That makes her idea something out of the mainstream, something pretty radical and something pretty brave, which she wants taken to the mainstream. She is open about the trade-offs. It might take, you know, it might mean a short-term hit in terms of a lot of political pain or even potentially some grades for some students suffering, but the long-term societal benefit for the greatest good, for the greatest number, would, in her view, be worth it. I think in lots of ways, and I'd like to say thank you to Rufus and Oscar and the entire team behind this podcast for making this my final conversation.
1:09:03Amol Rajan:That was kind of a good note on which I should end. I know we've got the best of podcast next week and the Q &A on Monday, but that was a good final conversation to have because you have in Sophie Pender someone who is from a generation that, you know, has felt at times like it's got the odds stacked against them. You've got a fantastically passionate advocate for social change and you've got someone who, whether you think she's persuasive and cogent or not, is certainly a fantastic speaker and pretty radical.
1:09:36Amol Rajan:That is it for this episode. There's more to come from Sophie and from me. Remember, your radical questions, Our Q &A episode is out on Monday. Subscribe to Radical on BBC Sounds so you don't miss it. But for now, thank you so much to Sophie and to you for your time. Thanks for listening. Goodbye.
1:10:11Amol Rajan:anniversary, we've been exploring the surprising and often hidden ways the U.S. has shaped the modern world. And today on the show, we answer your questions about this moment and what to expect in the years to come. From the BBC, it's the United States at 250. Listen to the global story on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts.
From the publisher
Sophie Pender grew up on council estates in North London, became the first in her family to go to university, trained as a corporate lawyer - then walked away from a six-figure salary to fight Britain’s class problem.
She’s the founder of ‘The 93% Club’, a network for state-educated students and professionals, named after the proportion of people in Britain who go to state schools. But Sophie argues that “social mobility” has become too polite a phrase for something much deeper: how much class, accent, money and private education shapes who gets power – and who doesn’t.
In Amol’s final Radical interview, Sophie explains why she’s made it her life’s mission to make private schools redundant, why networks matter as much as talent, and what it would take to build an old boys’ network for everyone else.
GET IN TOUCH:
* WhatsApp: 0330 123 9480
* Email: radical@bbc.co.uk
Episodes of Radical are released every Thursday and Monday.
Amol Rajan presents the Today programme on BBC Radio 4 and hosts University Challenge on BBC One. Before that, Amol was the BBC’s media editor and the editor of The Independent newspaper.
Series producer: Rufus Gray
Producers: Oscar Pearson, Julian Paszkiewicz
Digital producers: Leona Gasper, Joe Wilkinson
Technical producer: Jonny Hall
Senior news editor: Sam Bonham

