In short
Podcast Notes: REWORK - Revisiting the Good Old Days
Podcast Overview
- Title: REWORK
- Description: A podcast by 37signals about better ways to work and run a business, featuring co-founders Jason Fried and David Heinemeier Hansson alongside host Kimberly Rhodes.
Episode Details
- Episode Title: Revisiting the Good Old Days
- Episode Description: Discussion on changing perspectives, particularly around the number of products a company should focus on. Jason Fried reflects on their current stance compared to their previously stated views.
Key Takeaways
- Change in Perspective:
- Emphasis on the evolution from focusing on a single product (Basecamp) to developing multiple products (like HEY).
- Acknowledgment of the seasonal nature of business strategies—expansion and contraction as necessary phases.
- Team Dynamics for Expansion:
- The importance of team structure allowing small, dedicated teams (2-person teams) to work on various projects simultaneously.
- Enhancement in efficiency due to specialized teams for infrastructure and product development.
- Recognizing Limits:
- Discussion on how to identify when a company is stretched too thin, typically when big ideas cannot be pursued due to lack of resources.
- The balance between expansion and contraction to avoid burnout.
- Value of Writing Ideas Down:
- Importance of documenting ideas for immediate projects rather than for a backlog.
- Distinction between ideas and issues; maintaining separate collections for clarity.
- Launching New Products:
- Advice on when to consider launching new products, emphasizing the need to nurture existing ones before moving to new ventures.
- Warning against the tendency to jump between projects without proper development.
Detailed Discussion Points
- Change in Product Strategy
- Transition from a singular focus on Basecamp to exploring other products as the company has grown.
- Expanded product offerings are seen as a natural evolution rather than a mistake.
- Team Structure and Efficiency
- Current team size (~60 people) allows for multiple simultaneous projects.
- The structure facilitates dedicated focus while maintaining overall company efficiency.
- Identifying Overreach
- Indicators of being stretched too thin include inability to pursue significant ideas.
- Team size is critical; losing key personnel can shift project capabilities dramatically.
- Documentation and Idea Management
- Ideas are documented for current projects, without creating a permanent backlog.
- Ideas can evolve and be revisited, but they are not prioritized over new concepts that may arise.
- Guidance for New Ventures
- Focus on nurturing the first product before jumping into new projects.
- Importance of understanding market demands and ensuring that products are refined and supported adequately.
Closing Thoughts
- Future plans include working on a new book that encompasses broader philosophical discussions about business rather than a how-to guide.
- Emphasis on thoughtful decision-making and adaptability in business strategies.
Links and Resources
- [Record a video question for the podcast](https://sendspark.com/request/The-REWORK-Podcast/hsj7miu9gesm8gq6jm8pr6z9izly0fc2)
- [Books by 37signals](https://37signals.com/books)
- [Sign up for a 30-day free trial at Basecamp.com](https://basecamp.com/pricing)
- [HEY World | HEY](https://www.hey.com/world/)
- [The REWORK podcast](https://www.rework.fm/)
- [The Rework Podcast on YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/@37signals/podcasts)
- [The 37signals Dev Blog](https://dev.37signals.com/)
- [37signals on YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/c/basecamp/featured)
- [@37signals on X](https://twitter.com/37signals)
Conclusion The episode highlights the importance of adaptability in business strategies, the balance between expansion and contraction, and the value of nurturing existing products while exploring new ideas. It serves as a reminder that the approach to product management must evolve alongside the company and its capabilities.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Welcome to Rework, a podcast by 37signals about the better way to work and run your business. I'm Kimberly Rhodes from the 37 Signals team, joined by Jason Creed, co-founder and CEO. This week, I want to dive into one of the chapters of It Doesn't Have to be Crazy at Work. This was written back in 2018. Things sometimes change. So I want to go back to, Jason, one of the chapters which has changed significantly. I'm going to read just a little passage from it, and then I want to get your thoughts on where you stand now. Yep. So it is a chapter called The Good Old Days. And you write, just a few years ago, we made a number of different products.
0:35Today, we make just one, Basecamp. We gave up everything else and the potential of millions more in revenue so we could focus in rather than pan wide. And then you and David also write, rather than continue to invent new products, take on more responsibilities and grow more obligations, we continually aim to pare down and lighten the load, even when times are great. Okay, obviously, this is not recent. We're not just Basecamp. Yeah. We have Hay. And now we're creating all of these other products. So kind of talk me through that, how that perspective changed back from 2018 when you guys were at that to now.
1:13Well, like they say, like what, to everything there is a season, basically. I think that when we first launched the company, there's a grand expansion. You know, we made four products in four years and a few more after that. And then we realized we had too many things going on at once and we don't want to grow our staff. So we said, we can't do all those things at once. So we kind of contracted, contracted for a while. And then we're like, you know, we have this itch to make something else. It originally started by making a new version of Highrise, which is our CRM tool that eventually turned into Hay, our new email thing.
1:44We didn't set out to make a new email thing. We just kind of found ourselves there. And then we actually kind of looked in the mirror and essentially like, this is kind of fun. We actually like making new things. This is actually what we do. and maybe we've been suppressing ourselves or repressing ourselves essentially by not doing this. But it was good. It was good to compress for a while and contract. And then we expanded again. So now we're in this expansion mode again, right? And the expansion mode, it was, hey, we're now building this thing called Fizzy. We're doing Basecamp 5. We built Campfire and Writebook under the Once label.
2:16We may make some other things. We'll see. But we're back in this expansion thing. And so I think all things are true. There's times when contraction's good. There's times when expansion's good. I think you need to follow your own feelings on this. When we felt like we had too much going on, it felt good to not do as much stuff. And then at some point you get an itch and you realize you like to make things and you make more things. So I can feel both things at once too. Like in some ways, I feel like we might be doing too many things at once again, but I actually still prefer that feeling. I still prefer making new things.
2:48I have new ideas. I want to see these things out in the world. And so we'll see how that all pans out. We might be four years from now, we might contract it. I have no idea what's going to happen, right? Yeah. We don't think that far ahead. It's also like, you know what? We have this rare opportunity to have a chance to make new things, to have a cash cow like Basecamp allow us to support us in a way where we can make new things. We should take advantage of that obligation in a sense to explore. Yeah. And that's what we've done. Okay. So you mentioned Basecamp, Cash Cow. I feel like we also have the benefit of the type of people who can be working on multiple things, like the infrastructure to be working on multiple things, the size of team to be working on multiple things.
3:30Tell me a little bit about that and our ability to be able to expand in this way. We built a company where we can have small two-person teams basically working on things. So one programmer, one designer. And so we have about 60 people in the company. They're not all designers and all programmers, but we have a good five or six product teams, basically, that are able to kind of work simultaneously. So we're able to do more things at once now across more products at once. We can also decide to put a product on hold for a little bit, redirect some energy somewhere else to make something new and then redistribute again.
4:01So we have that ability. Plus we have teams dedicated to infrastructure now. Before it used to be like people making the products were also doing a lot of the infrastructure work. It's a long time ago, but that's the way it was. And that was just very hard because there's infrastructure required and that when they're working on that, they can't work on products. We can now do multiple things at once simultaneously, different departments, different groups. And we've just become very, very, very efficient with building products. Rails is part of that. ShapeUp is part of that. The talented people we have here is part of that.
4:29The way we run things here is part of that. And we've just figured out a way to make a lot of things simultaneously with a relatively small company. There's a lot of companies that their mobile team is bigger than our whole company, right? So we're just very efficient in that way. Plus we produce a lot of open source, tons of open source stuff as well at the same time, infrastructure stuff that we extract out of our own development from our own products and put that stuff out there. And David's doing a whole new Linux distribution, right? With help from lots of other people. And open source has been very helpful in that way.
4:59And that like, we can get a lot of stuff over the over the finish line, and then a bunch of people can come in and contribute to that after the fact. Yeah. So that's another part of the strategy in a sense. And mostly it's just we like it. It just feels right. It feels good to make new things. People are energized by making new things. It's also exhausting sometimes. Even within these expansion seasons, there should be a little bit of contraction from time to time. So you catch your breath. We don't push people too hard over long periods of time. So they burn out, but it's going to take on some challenges and kind of establish a new PR in a sense every once in a while.
5:28And how can you tell when you're getting stretched too thin when like there's too much going on? Everyone would probably have a different answer here. I'm asking for yours. Because some people, yeah, some people might feel stretched too thin as it is. And I might feel like we're not stretched too thin. There's other times. I think mostly it's when there's bigger ideas that we can't seem to get to that we know we need to do, but we just don't have the time, people, resources, energy, attention to do it. I think, for example, we couldn't launch another product right now. Like we're launching Fizzy.
6:00We originally were doing two things at once, Fizzy plus another product. Right. And then we lost somebody. And that was another example of like, well, now we're down one. And now we certainly cannot do this two things at once. So sometimes it's just a physical reality of not having enough people, or you had enough, and then someone left and that changed the equation. Because our teams are so small. If you have 18 people working on something and you're down to 17, it doesn't matter. If you have three people working on something and you're down to two or two down to one, huge difference. That stuff's pretty obvious.
6:30But I can imagine there's some people in the company think we're doing too much right now. And they might be right also, but it's also still fun. And again, we're not doing it in a way where we're making people work 80-hour weeks and weekends. It's none of that. So I think we can handle what we're doing. Okay. This is a little off subject, but because that viewpoint was shared and it doesn't have to be crazy at work, tell me about rewrites. Are you rewriting this book or writing a new book? I feel like there's things in there that are dated. Yeah. I think there are things that are of the time versus dated in that they're old.
7:04I think they were the right decision at the time. Sure. And a book represents that alone. I can't write a book for the future. Write a book for then. Yeah. And by the way, eight years from now, that book might be current again because we might be back to that. So who knows? But we are working on a new book. It's not like a rewrite. It's just a different kind of book. It's more about the general philosophy of making it up as you go. which is probably not going to be short essay based like our previous books, but a little bit more of a more like a philosophy book, much longer chapters around a handful of topics, and then probably backfilled with a bunch of FAQ style answers to questions that people would have after reading the first half of the book.
7:45That's kind of the new format we're playing with right now. And in that, it's not the same kind of thing. There's some shared themes because there's just some shared points of view across that are all tied to the same thread back from when we started the business in 99. But it's a little bit more about decision making and approaches to things at a much higher perspective than specifics. I think like our previous books would be things like, here's what you should do. This book is really about here's what we've done. Here's how we think about things. It's not telling you what to do at all. This is not a book to tell you what to do.
8:19This is a book to read and understand how another company thinks about things. And that might spark some ideas in you, might help you see something you hadn't seen before in yourself, might give you a perspective you hadn't considered before, but it's not like a how-to book. Not that other ones were that how-to, but there are more how-to, I would say. Well, and I also said this is dated, but to be fair, I was able to find that chapter because it felt like such an outlier compared to everything else that is like, this is still what we believe as a company. This is still the philosophy that we have.
8:49That one, yeah, was an outlier. Yeah. There's 10 % that may not be as accurate today as it was when it was written just because times have changed and things are different. But the majority of that book stands, as does Rework, written in 2010. So all those ideas, I would stand by all of them with the exception of either maybe there's a few essays where I'm like, I don't agree with myself anymore on that. So what? That's not a big deal. The bulk of that is still exactly what we think. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So let me go back to this renewed energy and new products. Is there a way that you are cataloging ideas that you have that we don't have time to build yet?
9:28I feel like you guys always have new ideas. Are you writing those down on a list? Are you just thinking they're going to float back up? How are you managing all of these ideas that you guys want to do at some future date? Yeah, no, there's no list. I mean, And there's idea for what we're working on right now, like fizzy, there's feature ideas that we might write down because we've thought about them and want to document them. But it's not so we remember them later. It's so we can pitch them now. And if we decide not to do them now, then that's that. Maybe we'll do them again later. But just because we wrote them up doesn't mean we're going to do them.
10:02We write things for now, not write things for later. They just happen to be later also because they're written down. But it's not to refer to down the road. As far as bigger product ideas, I have one other product idea at the moment, and I wrote up a pitch internally to a few people, and that's sitting somewhere on the sidelines right now because we don't have time to do it. We're not doing it right now. If we decided to build up that product, we'd probably do it next year at some point, but we've made no decisions whatsoever on that. and it's not been developed beyond just the initial, hey, we have a need for this.
10:34I have a theory here about this. Here's how I think this thing could work and why I think it'd be good. And it was one write up like 800 words, 600 words, something like that. And that's it, right? I think there's maybe one sketch or two sketches in there. Sketch is like a three second, like here's the box and here's the things, whatever. And that's it, you know? So whenever we write something down, that's a little bit different because that's like, I just want to get this idea down in my head and write it down and just have it. Yeah. But there's not like 15 of those. There's one which we might do next year.
11:01Otherwise, the things we write down are all about things we would like to do now if we can. And if we can't, they don't get preferential treatment just because we wrote them down before. New ideas bubble up whenever they bubble up and they are as valid as anything that we already wrote down or put down. But there's not like a long backlog or list of things we have to pull from ever. Like in Fizzy, for example, we'll go at Fizzy, we have a collection called Fizzy Ideas. The fizzy ideas, though, are for like, can we do this now? Like we're building it now. These are some ideas we want to like log and write down and discuss, but it's not a backlog to pull from.
11:33Right. These are just things that we could choose if we chose to choose them. Well, and what's interesting about that is there's a fizzy ideas collection and there's also a fizzy issues collection. I found myself the other day writing up a card on fizzy issues and I was like, this isn't really an issue. This is more of an idea. So it is kind of deciding between like what actually needs to be fixed versus just like something that would be nice. That's right. Yes. Like I'm actually looking at the Fizzy Ideas collection right now. And these are mostly ideas, but there also are some things that are issues.
12:08And if you go to issues, it's definitely more issues. It's nice to have these things separate. But of course, it's nice to look at both. Yeah. Because logging something at this can be subjective. Like if something doesn't work the way I want to, is that an issue with it or is it an idea for it? Right. Yeah. And it doesn't really matter. You put wherever you feel like it matters and we'll find it anyway. But the fundamental thing I want to get across is that just because you wrote something down does not give it any preference over a future idea that you might have. Yeah. Okay. Okay. And my last question for people who are listening who maybe are software developers or just have their one thing that they're working on thinking about a second, what are some things that you would consider or have them consider?
12:48Like if they have the capacity, are there some guidelines that you might give them to think about when it's too early versus like, yeah, dive into a new product? It seems like a lot to have more than one product when you're very small. Yes, it really is a lot. And the reason why I think people get into that so quickly, and we did this too, is because when you're new at something, like building is really fun. Maintaining? Maintaining stuff is not as fun. Right. Once you built it, like you're building it as fun. You don't have to listen to anybody. You build whatever you want. Yeah. You put it out there in the world.
13:22Now you have to listen to a bunch of people, right? And that can be frustrating. It can be exhilarating. It can be all the things. but now you have a responsibility to others. And I would take that responsibility seriously. And this is kind of my point is if you just jump right into building another thing, that first thing you made, you're no longer probably going to have a lot of time to improve it and make it better. And so like the bet you're making is that that wasn't good enough. I got to make another bet. I got to keep making bets. I think initially you should probably focus on the thing that you made for a while, for a few years, hopefully, unless it like clearly doesn't work at all.
13:56And you got to, I don't know, I can't tell you when that is, but there's a point where like, this is not actually going to pan out. You might need to work on something else, but littering the market with 1.0 products that you just move on to the next one, move on to the next one, move on to the next one, move on to the next one. At some point, it's going to make people think like, I don't know if I should be using this, anything this person makes because they don't pay attention to it after it's been released. Yeah. It's a good point. So I think you got to give things enough time. You got to keep reinvesting in them and developing them.
14:24And there is something very special about something that's been around for a long time and been nurtured and cared for and improved over a long period of time, something like Basecamp, for example, and that you're able to really, really, really, really hone and polish some experiences that are really meaningful for people who use the product. And you would never get to that if you just kind of jumped on to the next thing. So another way to think about this, if you're going to build a business out of this, you best probably not jump around too much initially, unless what you're doing is just not going to pan out at all.
14:55And then you should probably think about why did this first idea not pan out at all? Is this next one going to pan? Like, what did I get wrong here? Maybe. I don't know. I mean, here's the other thing. Like I could argue the other side, which is like make a bunch of shit. There's people who do this. Peter Levels is a famous, what people call him, hacker. Anyway, not in a negative sense, in a very positive sense. I think he's made close to a hundred products. Oh gosh. Yeah. One guy, very fast, not very polished. His products aren't super polished. They're just like great, simple products that do one thing really well, for example, or a couple of things really well.
15:26And then like four of them, I don't even know what the number is. Maybe a dozen, maybe three kind of hit. And so his point is like, throw a bunch of stuff out there, make a bunch of small bets. And then you can do that too. It just depends on what you're kind of building and what you want to build. So there's just different ways to look at all this, but I think you got to be careful not to just leave a bunch of unfinished work all over the place. Yeah. That can be very, very messy and hard to get back into and hard to improve. I like the question because I can give a bunch of different answers.
15:53And whenever I can give a bunch of different answers, the answer really is always, it depends on you. It depends what you built. It depends who you are. It depends what you're selling. And don't listen to anybody tell you how to do this. Well, that is a perfect place for us to end. Rework is a production of 37 Signals. You can find show notes and transcripts on our website at 37signals.com slash podcast. Full video episodes are on YouTube. And if you have a question for Jason or David about a better way to work and run your business, leave us a video question at 37signals.com slash podcast question.
From the publisher
Time has a way of reshaping what we believe, and sometimes, what we’ve published. In this week’s episode, CEO and co-founder Jason Fried chats with Kimberly Rhodes to explore one particular chapter of REWORK that no longer rings true. Jason reflects on their current stance on having multiple products vs. just one, what company's should consider before they expand, and why knowing your limits still matters.
Key Takeaways
- 00:10 – The change in perspective on multiple products
- 03:15 – The team needed for the company’s expansion
- 05:28 – Recognizing when you’ve taken on too much
- 09:16 – The real value of writing ideas down
- 12:35 – Advice on launching new products while maintaining previous ones
Links and Resources
