Balderton Capital's 25 Year Anniversary: An Interview with Bernard Liautaud and Suranga Chandratillake

7 Oct 2025 · 48 min · 24 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Balderton Capital’s 25-year anniversary discussion on how the firm stays competitive in Europe, its equal-partner model, and why it expanded from early-stage into growth investing (including a “local capital” thesis).

Guests

Bernard Liautaud and Suranga Chandratillake, long-standing Balderton partners. Both are described as European founder-operators who built major European businesses and took them to the US; their experiences help them source “European founders with global ambitions.” Suranga also joined Balderton’s growth effort after running a multi-stage investment book at Goldman Sachs.

Key claims

Balderton’s longevity comes from backing category-leading entrepreneurs early (e.g., MySQL, Global Force, UX) and staying hands-on. The firm needs a balance of ex-operators and pure investors. Equal partnership improves founder access and internal culture, aiding long-term succession. Europe still lacks later-stage domestic capital, so Balderton built growth funds to fill the gap.

Notable examples

Revolut (seed/Series A; first institutional investor; “product obsession” and fast iteration), Spotify (missed early), plus portfolio mentions like Contentful, Depop, Talon(s), GoCardless, Wave, Clio, and Darktrace.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Balderton's Success Over 25 Years

0:45 to 2:19

Discussion on the key factors contributing to Balderton's sustained success.

“So these companies that became, you know, amazing, amazing leaders at the very, very beginning of the ecosystem.”

The Role of Founders in VC

2:19 to 4:13

Exploration of how the founders' experiences benefit their ability to source new entrepreneurs.

“fit that archetype of European founders with global ambitions.”

Balancing Investment and Company Building

4:13 to 6:07

Examining the balance between investment acumen and operational experience in venture capital.

“building their businesses, then it's not going to work.”

Equal Partnership Model at Balderton

6:07 to 8:07

Discussion on how Balderton's equal partnership model has influenced its success and relationships.

“And it's been a foundational principle of benchmark.”

Changes in Partner Roles at Balderton

8:07 to 10:04

Insight into how the roles of partners have evolved over the years at Balderton.

“about it's not about positioning yourself from a career point of view or anything like that yeah It becomes a lot more of a team sport.”

Adapting to a Competitive VC Environment

10:04 to 12:43

Exploration of how Balderton has adapted its strategies to stay competitive in the changing VC landscape.

“At least for me, that's like if the core changed, I'm not sure I'd do it.”

The Transition to Growth Funds

12:43 to 14:00

Discussion on the decision to raise growth funds and the implications for Balderton's investment strategy.

“I think you've raised two growth funds now.”

Transitioning to Growth Investing

14:00 to 16:53

Learn about the strategic shift from early-stage to growth investment and its market implications.

“compelling for an entrepreneur to know that your partner in the early stage can follow you all the way.”

The Optimal Size for Early Stage Funds

16:53 to 18:15

Understand the dynamics of early-stage fund sizes and their impact on performance.

“Even though we work as a combined team, we've now injected more people who understand that later stage as well.”

Defining Fund Returners

18:15 to 20:03

Explore the criteria for successful fund returners and the evolving landscape of company valuations.

“So you're not looking to get any bigger?”
Show all 24 chapters

Case Study: Revolut's Success

20:03 to 21:54

Examine the investment journey with Revolut and the lessons learned from its rapid rise.

“So if we have our early stage funds and we have 30 shots, then we need to have one, one company every 30 that become an$18 billion business.”

Lessons from Revolut for Other Founders

21:54 to 23:59

Discover key principles from Revolut's approach that could benefit other startups.

“So, yes, that fund is once in a lifetime fund because of that one company, for sure.”

The Importance of Market Timing and Location

23:59 to 26:00

Learn about the strategic decisions regarding market expansion for tech startups.

“that would be the best gift they could give to the ecosystem, I think.”

Finding and Winning Investment Deals

26:00 to 28:00

Understand the strategies for sourcing and securing investment opportunities in venture capital.

“But, and as you said, I think it's going to be a once in a generation fund.”

The Importance of Engagement in Venture Capital

28:00 to 29:20

Learn why active engagement in the startup ecosystem is crucial for venture capital success.

“I think it's easy when you're successful as a firm to sort of sit back on your laurels a little bit and, you know, expect that great founders will come to you.”

Winning Investments: Strategies and Realities

29:20 to 30:25

Discover how to win investments and the nature of competition in early-stage ventures.

“And so that doesn't go away and you can't stop doing that.”

Spotify: A Missed Opportunity

30:25 to 31:07

Insights on why not investing in Spotify was a key mistake for the firm.

“Well, the one that Spotify has to be the one that we have to mention.”

Evolution of the European Startup Ecosystem

31:07 to 33:45

Explore the transformation of the entrepreneurial landscape in Europe over 25 years.

“And that's why we also feel like, OK, if we missed it early, maybe we can get it a bit later.”

Public Markets and European Companies

33:45 to 36:14

Examine the challenges and strategies regarding public markets for European startups.

“about the lack of capital markets, the lack of an exit opportunity at the IPO for companies here in Europe.”

The Impact of US Investment on European Giants

36:14 to 39:48

Understand how US investment affects European companies and the broader ecosystem.

“One of your portfolio founders, Barney, was talking over the weekend about how, you know, Europe is now building these amazing tech giants, but we're losing them to the US.”

Are We in an AI Bubble?

39:48 to 42:00

Delve into the current AI landscape and whether it signifies a bubble or a lasting change.

“And I think we're starting to see a lot of it.”

The Dynamics of AI Investment

42:00 to 44:16

Explore the shifting landscape of AI investment and market predictions.

“is what may cause wobbles in this boom that we're seeing.”

Balderton's Investment Strategy and Flexibility

44:16 to 45:26

Learn how Balderton adapts its investment strategies to market changes.

“hundreds of millions of revenue now, it can be achieved in less than a couple of years.”

Balderton's Future and Entrepreneur Support

45:26 to 47:49

Discuss the future goals of Balderton and its commitment to entrepreneurs.

“I want to talk about, you've done 25 years, the future of Balderton.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Bernard Liautaud:Hello, welcome. I'm here from Balderton offices with Bernard and Suranga, two of Balderton's most long-standing partners to talk about and celebrate 25 years of Balderton. Thank you both so much for joining me.

0:12Suranga Chandratillake:Thank you.

0:12Bernard Liautaud:Thank you, Seb. First question I want to ask, how has Balderton managed to survive for 25 years and thrive in the ecosystem?

0:19Suranga Chandratillake:I think it's all due to the quality of the entrepreneurs whom we have had the chance to work with. Because at the end of the day, the success of Ballatin is the success of the portfolio companies. We've had the chance to focus from the very early days on entrepreneurs with great ambitions and who want to build category leaders. So even in the first fund, we had companies like MySQL, we had companies like Global Force or Ux. So these companies that became, you know, amazing, amazing leaders at the very, very beginning of the ecosystem. And then I think we had the chance to be there at the right time when the ecosystem started to grow and produce a lot more great companies.

1:10Bernard Liautaud:And from the outside looking in, it looks like what Baltham has always done amazingly is choose European founders or entrepreneurs who are global, who have huge global ambitions, huge global outlooks. Has that been the intention from day one? Yeah, absolutely. I mean, so day one was before Bernard and I were at the firm, obviously. But, you know, the history of Baltherton is that it was founded by Benchmark, obviously a US firm. And they wanted to build a European sort of copy of what they were doing here in London. And, you know, they'd always backed global founders in Silicon Valley. And they said, there's just no reason why we can't expect similar, you know, global ambition, amazing talent that just happens to be in Europe.

1:55Bernard Liautaud:that have just you know happened to grow up in spain or italy or the uk or germany and so that's always been in the dna that's always been the way we've looked at things and yeah and as you know there are it turns out as ben i'll say you know a number of those out there and we've been fortunate to be able to work with a bunch of them and how has both of your experiences and careers helped you to find those people you're both exit founders you both built great european businesses and i think you both took your businesses to the u.s so you you both fit that archetype of European founders with global ambitions.

2:28Bernard Liautaud:Has that helped you to kind of find and source other people like that?

2:32Suranga Chandratillake:Yeah, absolutely. I mean, I think our experience has been appealing to these founders. So they're really good founders. They have the choice, right? They can pick whomever they want as their partners. And so these founders have found us in a way. And I think the fact that we've done what they were trying to do, I think has been a great plus for us and for Bulletin to find these people.

2:59Bernard Liautaud:And do you think that's a big value add as a VC to be company builders yourselves? Yeah. So my take is that you, so I think, so first of all, investing is a very different job to starting or running a company. There's no guarantee that being good at one means you're good at the other. And in fact, I think there are many people who are good at one and not the other. But there are people who are good at both. And I think what we think is that if you look at particularly investing within the context of venture capital, it's a really interesting mix. On the one hand, it's very much like other investment professions in the sense that it's about understanding markets and seeing an opportunity and measuring that and scaling that and so on.

3:39Bernard Liautaud:But it's also this very, very human investment business because we back companies when they're very early. There's a lot of growing pain involved in going from, you know, two people and an idea up to 100 people, up to 1000s of people. And as investors, although we're minority investors, we're pretty large investors. And so we're very involved in that very, very hands on. So you have to have this really interesting combination of thinking like an investor, understanding the sort of financial side of what we do. But at the same time, being someone who understands that you can have all the great spreadsheets in the world, if you're not able to sort of get in there and help out with the company and be there for the founders as they're building their businesses, then it's not going to work.

4:19Bernard Liautaud:And so as a firm, we've always tried to create a bit of that balance, right? So we have people in the firm like Bernard and I, who have very strong operational backgrounds, we've been founders ourselves. But also we have people who are amazing financial investors. And I think having this mix and creating a culture where these different perspectives can come to light, that's sort of what's worked really well for the Yeah, that's super interesting. There's a lot of noise at the moment about whether Europe needs more ex-founder VCs and that we have a much more risk averse culture compared to the US and the US has made the VCs have a lot more operational experience.

4:54Bernard Liautaud:And I guess what you're saying is that you need that balance of both ex-operators and people who are just great at investing. Looking across the European ecosystem, do you think we've got that balance right? Or do you think we need more ex-operators in the ecosystem?

5:08Suranga Chandratillake:I think we need more operators. I think if we compare US versus Europe, I think it's still that unbalance still exists. So we need more. But again, we're keen to have a diversity of people and to have the investors, to have the operators and to confront these views when you make an investment. If you think about what we do, we don't just mentor and coach entrepreneurs. That's one part. But we also have to source and we have to win and we have to pick. We have to make the decision. And so when we are in front of an entrepreneur figuring out, okay, we want to back that company or not the other one, it's confronting views that have different perspectives, I think is really important.

5:56Bernard Liautaud:One of the unusual things about Bolton, which is inherited from its benchmark days, is the equal partnership. And now that Bolton has been around for 25 years, I wanted to ask, how has that founding principle stood the test of time?

6:08Suranga Chandratillake:I think it worked really well. And it's been a foundational principle of benchmark. And it was as well for us. It brought that principle to us. And I think it works really, really well because then, first of all, there's not one who dominates the other. Everybody has the same view. We also, or not the same view, but the same weight in their views. And we know that the success of Bulletin is success of the collective group. So when we approach an entrepreneur, they know that it's the entire partnership that makes that commitment. and therefore if at some point in the life of the company they need my expertise or they need Saranga's expertise or Rana's expertise, they have access to all of this always.

7:04Bernard Liautaud:And have you seen that model spread at all across the ecosystem? Yeah, I think there are a number of more modern firms that have the same strategy, at least to start with. I think it often erodes over time. But like Bernal says, I think we've always felt that it has huge benefits both for the entrepreneurs we work with, but also for the firm internally. So for the entrepreneurs, it's absolutely this idea that everybody is equally vested in your success. Even if they disagreed with investing in you in the first place, which you may never know, once we have invested, we all care because we're all tied to it.

7:38Bernard Liautaud:And you can therefore access whoever you want, whenever you want them. And some of our founders have done a brilliant job of kind of using different people at different times. and internally it creates a culture where everyone's voice is heard everyone's voice is equal um you know the backgrounds that you have bring relevance to your voice but they're not never that's never allowed to sort of drown out the other voices and i think that creates just the right level of antagonism and tension in some of the conversations that means that we challenge what we're thinking all the time um and it also means that you know people don't have to worry about it's not about positioning yourself from a career point of view or anything like that yeah It becomes a lot more of a team sport.

8:15Bernard Liautaud:It's a team sport, yeah.

8:16Suranga Chandratillake:But also, I think the thing that is really important is that we believe it's a key component in order to have a sustainable firm. It's true. If you have one or two people who dominate the partnership, have more economics and more decision power, then the succession is very, very difficult. Whereas here, we have been able to stay for 25 years and we will be able to have a firm again in 25 years because the succession is much smoother. And it is because of equal partnership.

8:51Bernard Liautaud:Because of the structure. Interesting. And how has the role of partners at Balderton changed? When it was Benchmark Europe 25 years ago, I think there were a small number of just partners. now you've got these amazing offices you have uh principals associates entrepreneurs and residents you have you know finance marketing teams like how is the role of a partner at Baldish and Change when it was a very small just a partnership to a much bigger organization than it is today yeah so I would say it hasn't changed a huge amount uh interestingly enough um I think we um you know our sort of success has means that we can bring a lot more to the table and and and And so in particular, we've been able to invest in operational teams, platform teams that bring things like legal, financial, HR, talent, marketing, etc., expertise to the companies.

9:40Bernard Liautaud:And they can use all of that. That's fantastic. Yes, we have offices like these, which allow us to be a lot more of a host within the ecosystem and a networker and so on. But the core business still comes back to being out there on the street, finding really interesting companies, thinking about them, spending time with them, and then as a team making decisions about which ones we're going to invest in, then hopefully getting the opportunity to do that if we can convince the founder to feel the same way, and then working with them as they build their companies, providing more finance along the way, and then ultimately figuring out what the outcome ends up being.

10:14Bernard Liautaud:So like the core is still the same. At least for me, that's like if the core changed, I'm not sure I'd do it. You know, like it's part of the magic of this job is that you, you know, one day you meet, you know, two founders with a team of sort of three or four people. I was sort of remembering recently because a 10 year anniversary of meeting Nick and Vlad at Revolut for the first time. I think it was like a team of less than five people at that point, you know, with an idea, a PowerPoint and not much more. and then you look 10 years later at what it is you know the Revolut is this huge international behemoth that continues to grow at an incredible pace with thousands of people building amazing product and we get to you know we have a front row seat of all of that and that's that's an amazing privilege and that hasn't really changed.

10:58Bernard Liautaud:Yeah and has the way Baldurton operates or the way that you do your job as VCs has that had to change at all to reflect I guess the growing VC ecosystem across Europe. I think 25 years ago, there was Boulder, Turn, Index, Excel. We're probably the only three big VCs across Europe, whereas now there's a lot more cropping up. Have you had to change to remain competitive and to keep winning?

11:21Suranga Chandratillake:Yes. I think you mentioned that we're a different firm now than when we started 25 years ago. We're a bigger firm. And it's because entrepreneurs are expecting more from their VC. So we're we've evolved and in some areas we've taken the leadership in bringing more services to help the enterprise much more than we were doing before. So I think, yeah, it's becoming a much more competitive world, for sure. There are probably a dozen of companies who compete from time to time and more U.S. firms, other European companies and so on. But in the end, we've managed to stay at a high level in Europe because we have grown.

12:11Suranga Chandratillake:So we have felt at some point that we needed to be more of a platform. So not just like a single firm in one stage with just a small group of partners, individuals. But now we have, as you said, we have a full platform for value creation. We do early stage and we do growth so we can actually follow the firms or the companies from the seed all the way to IPO. And that evolution has been critical to keep us on top.

12:42Bernard Liautaud:And I wanted to ask about the growth funds. I think you've raised two growth funds now. And for a long time, Bulletin wasn't really focused on growth. At what point did you decide that you needed to raise the growth fund? And why did you make that decision?

12:55Suranga Chandratillake:We started actually in 2018. So it's been quite a while now. And we thought there are great champions being created in Europe now, more and more than we had in the past. So the ecosystem is growing. And naturally, there are going to be companies that we're going to miss or either because we didn't meet them then or we didn't think that they had quite the ingredients that we wanted. and we thought it would be great to be able to still support these companies at a slightly later stage and and even if we invest in a series b or series c there's still enormous value to be created and we could still help these companies tremendously so we thought hey we we want to play along the the full uh set of stages of a company as opposed to just just very early and and by the way by doing this, it will make even the early stage fund more competitive because it's more compelling for an entrepreneur to know that your partner in the early stage can follow you all the way.

14:08Suranga Chandratillake:And also the fact that we had an early stage fund we felt would be a competitive advantage for the growth fund. So there were a lot of great reasons to do so. And we started by doing secondaries to begin with in 2018 and then transferred that into a full growth fund.

14:25Bernard Liautaud:And how has it been? Because the growth investing is very different to the early stage. How was that kind of transition from being an early stage focused fund to being kind of like a full stack? So one thing I'll first of all add to the earlier question of like why start a growth fund. I think the other reason, the other piece in all this was we realized there's a hole in the market. I mean, many of our companies, companies we do have a lot of invested in an early stage, if they were successful, would go on to raise growth funds, rounds, but those rounds would get invested in generally from abroad.

14:57Bernard Liautaud:So, you know, lots of US investors, some Asian investors, et cetera. You know, there have been some brilliant long-term growth funds in Europe, but a relatively small pool of them with generally, for all the right reasons, focuses on certain kinds of businesses or whatever. And we said, well, hang on, this is crazy. Like, you know, why should a company that's always been based in Europe, that continues to be based here have to go abroad necessarily for financing. You know, it's great that they can attract that capital, but why not also have it locally? And I think we thought there was a real opportunity for that.

15:26Bernard Liautaud:And I think that still exists, actually. I mean, even today, when you look at the numbers, the ecosystem, particularly in the last 10 years, has exploded in terms of capital availability. But the majority of the kind of local or domestic capital within Europe still is skewed towards the early stages. So seed, series A, maybe series B. Once you get to growth and particularly late growth stages, actually most of the capital comes from elsewhere. And so there's still more opportunity in my mind in that world. But then, yeah, going back to your question about what it's like to be a growth investor, in some ways, it's again, very similar.

15:59Bernard Liautaud:In the end, it's about finding amazing founders who are building businesses in very, very large markets. But then there is also a level of rigor and analysis that comes with investing later, just because there is more data. And so one of the things we did was, as Bernard mentioned, We tested the water in this whole area with an initial liquidity fund, which we built and ran out of our existing team. But then when we decided we were really going to go for it with growth, we said, no, we need to build a special team that really understands this market, has a track record already in this market. And we were really, really, you know, we were really lucky to be able to convince Rana Yared, our partner Rana, to join.

16:38Bernard Liautaud:I mean, she'd been a partner at Goldman Sachs for a number of years, had run a very, very successful multi-stage investment book there for the firm. She'd spent a lot of time in Europe as well as the US and so was a perfect fit for us. And she and she's built a team around herself as well of growth focused investors. Even though we work as a combined team, we've now injected more people who understand that later stage as well. And when you look at the early stage, you know, when I was looking, I think you've raised 12 funds in total,$5 billion. You know, the range of the size of the early stage, I think the smallest was maybe 300 million.

17:14Bernard Liautaud:I think the largest was over 600 million. Do you think there's an optimal size for an early stage fund? We're both smiling because it's a constant debate.

17:26Suranga Chandratillake:Yeah, one would argue that the smaller fund, the easier it is to generate great performance. The reality is that we live in a world now where in order to be competitive, you need to be able to put enough money at work early. So a seed can be$10 million or a Series A can be$20,$25. So the stakes and the scale of early-stage investment has changed. And so we have evolved the fund so that we can do maybe around 25 to 30 transactions in a fund over a three-year period. And based on that, we feel that 600 million is the right size for the fund.

18:15Bernard Liautaud:So you're not looking to get any bigger? You think 600 million is a good size for an early-stage fund?

18:19Suranga Chandratillake:Yes. We don't want to raise more than that. I think it's a good size, but getting a lot bigger, I think, would create a lot of hardship on the performance.

18:33Bernard Liautaud:And on the 600 million, you think that the economics still work in terms of being able to ideally 3x in 10 years? And if so, people talk about a fund returner. When you've got a fund of 600 million, are you looking for one fund returner? And if so, is that like a 10 billion outcome? And how different is that to 15, 20 years ago when you were looking for a fund returner?

18:54Suranga Chandratillake:You have to have companies that are a lot bigger. Yeah. A lot bigger because, well, first of all, it all depends what you mean by a fund returner. If it's 1x, then it's 600 million from a company. But if you want to do in one company, you want to do 3x. So that one company will need to bring the firm 1.8 billion. Yeah. Let's assume that we have 10 % of that company when we exit. It means that this company needs to be$18 billion in valuation. There are not that many companies. But however, we know because we have studied how many companies in a period of three years, so our investment cycle, end up becoming$10 billion plus valuation companies 10, 12 years later.

19:46Suranga Chandratillake:And that number has constantly grown. You know, 20 years ago, there was none. Then there was maybe a couple. And now we think that today, if we think of the next three years, there'll probably be maybe 10, 12 companies that 10 years from now will have that scale. So if we have our early stage funds and we have 30 shots, then we need to have one, one company every 30 that become an$18 billion business.

Read the full transcript

20:14Bernard Liautaud:Yeah, of course. And, you know, of course, you mentioned Revolut, Europe's largest privately held company, recently founded 75 billion. That was, I think, looked at Fund 5, it came out, which was like a 300 billion dollar fund. Can you share anything about the metrics of that fund? Because from, you know, I've done some numbers myself. It looks like to me it's got to be one of the best performing funds that is, you know, a European fund invested in Europe. is there anything that you can share about that fund? I don't think we can share any numbers unfortunately because of the sort of because of the agreements we have with our LPs and everything else but no it's obviously a fantastic fund it's obviously a fantastic fund and you know in many ways it's a great example of you know like the way the venture capital model works when it works interestingly that that fund has a number of other really fantastic businesses in it but But the power law means that you do find these companies that are just so phenomenally successful that on their own, they can return a fund many times.

21:21Suranga Chandratillake:I think the important point is we invested in Revolut at Seed and Series A. So we were the first institutional investor in that company. And it was 12 years ago. You can imagine 12 years ago, we invested in a company that had five people. It was an enormous valuation. So the returns that we can get on such a company are extraordinary. But thanks to the extraordinary genius of Nick and Vlad and the entire team. So we've been great beneficiary of that. So, yes, that fund is once in a lifetime fund because of that one company, for sure.

22:01Bernard Liautaud:And is there anything that you've learned from both investing in that company, but also following their journey that you're then applying either into other investments or you're giving to other founders as they hope to replicate that success? I think, look, I think every company is very different and successful companies are, you know, wildly different and sort of famously different. And this has always been the way if you if you spend time in Silicon Valley, as Bernard and I have, you know, famously, the culture at, I don't know, Meta is totally different to the culture of Google and totally different to the culture at Microsoft, for example.

22:38Bernard Liautaud:And yet they are all incredibly successful companies. So I think it's important not to sort of completely copycat things. But I think, you know, some of the things that have worked brilliantly for Revolut are, you know, an obsessive focus on their product. The product is the core of everything they do. And they think about that all the time. Another key thing that they have is this kind of like urgency around the cadence at which they operate. So when they have ideas, they're just not, you know, they're relentless about wanting and, you know, wanting to get those ideas into reality as quickly as possible.

23:12Bernard Liautaud:And it's in order to then learn from that very, very quickly. And, you know, many of their ideas end up not being good ideas, but they learn about that really quickly and then can absorb the learnings and move on. Whereas I think there are a lot of companies where they can have this grand unified theory and spend three, four years building towards it. If it doesn't work, then you're really stuck. Right. So there's things like that that I think are critical. but most importantly for me I think the the most important lesson to learn from Revolut I would say is it shows that you can build global defining generation defining companies right here in Europe you know that's what Nick and Vlad have done they built it right here in London they've got teams everywhere now of course but this is their base and and if they can do it others can too and I hope that you know if that can create the inspiration to another thousand entrepreneurs that would be the best gift they could give to the ecosystem, I think.

24:02Bernard Liautaud:And I think what's unusual about Revolut is that now they're focusing heavily on US expansion in the way that other companies are told to expand to the US very, very early. I think both of you in your entrepreneurial journeys both experienced that where you sort of build in Europe, but you sell to the US. And of course, Revolut's a different business. But is that advice that you give to your portfolio founders? Is it sort of like build in Europe, but scale to the US as soon as you possibly can? No, I think that really depends on the company, honestly. So, you know, I think that's very much traditionally the model for sort of a B2B software business.

24:38Bernard Liautaud:The reason for that is because, you know, the software market in the US is huge, both state and private, you know, people that a lot of software is just bought in America. American corporations and the American government are just very big buyers of software. So if you are building a security company or some kind of knowledge management company or a talent software company or a finance software company, then yes, you're probably going to have the US pretty early in your journey. But actually, when you think about particularly some of these regulated businesses, things like financial services, so a fintech like Revolut, then actually Europe is a huge market and maybe a better place to start.

25:14Bernard Liautaud:So it really depends on the business. so we and again you know like we work with our founders right so of course we provide you know we provide kind of experience from what we've seen elsewhere but ultimately most of them have a pretty you know meaningful view on on kind of where they want to go and how quickly they want to go somewhere and so we generally are supporting that rather than trying to sort of change their minds and go somewhere else. That makes sense and going back to the funds quickly so I think Revolut was fund five. I wanted to ask two questions. How instrumental has that company and that fund been or how much easier has it made raising future funds when you have that track record?

25:57Suranga Chandratillake:You know, it's obviously, it puts a halo effect on Walden.

26:05Suranga Chandratillake:But, and as you said, I think it's going to be a once in a generation fund. But what LPs are looking for is consistency as well, is the ability to have amazing funds, but also to find performance in future funds. Because for someone who is deciding to invest now in fund nine or the future fund, fund 10 and growth, our success in the past is just an indicator that we are able to find these great companies. But we have to perform in Fund 9 and 10 and 11 like we perform in Fund 5. And that is based on building a way of investing that is very attractive to entrepreneurs. It's the platform that we build.

26:57Suranga Chandratillake:It's in order to win deals, you have to hustle. So you have to be really in the ecosystem. You have to be leaning forward. And that culture is what I think defines Bolton. And so Revolut is just a constant reminder that if we are in it, it's because we hustled, we were there at the very beginning and we made the bet. And we need to have that same spirit for the next 20 years.

27:27Bernard Liautaud:Yeah. So I guess like never, never stay complacent or never get complacent. And when I look at the portfolio from the early days, from Contentful, Depop, Talons, GoCardless, through to the Revoluts, and even more recently, Wave, Clio, you've won in the earliest stages some really amazing deals. How is Baldurton or how are the partners able to kind of get access and fight their case and win those deals, which I imagine were not always easy to win? So I think there's two things, finding them and winning them. So finding them is about just being honest about what the job really is. I think it's easy when you're successful as a firm to sort of sit back on your laurels a little bit and, you know, expect that great founders will come to you.

28:09Bernard Liautaud:You know, maybe build a huge team of people who can help source for you. And, you know, you can sit back in your nice office and sort of have emails sent to you. And the reality is that doesn't work in venture. It's just not that kind of business. Maybe you can do that in the public markets because every trade is a click away. But in our world, actually, you kind of have to be, as I mentioned earlier, on the street. You have to have coffee with random angels and founders out there because that's where they are when they start. And it's not clear at all. So that's the first thing. You've got to stay very engaged into the ecosystem itself and between us as a partnership.

28:42Bernard Liautaud:I mean, of course, we have an amazing team of associates and principals who help us with this. But we are all constantly out there, you know, just meeting people and understanding what's happening and getting a sense of, you know, who's building what and why they're building it and so on. So that's the finding it. And you just have to keep doing that. You can't stop doing that. You know, our partner, Daniel, who actually led the investment into Revolut, for example, was just spent the last two Sundays in a row in Berlin. You know, he lives in the UK, but he flew there two Sundays in a row to spend the whole day there because he's pursuing an entrepreneur that he really, really wants to invest in.

29:14Bernard Liautaud:The first Sunday was all about discover the company, wanted to really understand it and meet the whole team. The second Sunday was having convinced himself he's out there winning the investment. And so that doesn't go away and you can't stop doing that. The second piece of it is, like you say, winning those investments once you've found them. And that really is all about our ability to sort of a bit like Bernard and I have done today, explain to founders how we're going to be there for them for the journey and how it's much more than just a check. Interestingly, some of the best investments we've made have not been that competitive when we made those investments.

29:50Bernard Liautaud:When you invest as early as we do, you know, it's the reality is some of the best companies or the things that end up being the biggest companies can be quite contrarian at the time. And they may not be. You listed a whole bunch of them there. Some of those were very competitive and we had to fight to win. Some of those no one else was going to invest anyway. And so, you know, that's the that's the dream, I guess, but it doesn't always happen. And are there any companies where, I mean, I'm sure there are, but I guess what are the biggest companies where you either didn't win and they end up being huge or you had the opportunity to invest, but you didn't and it was a mistake?

30:25Bernard Liautaud:Well, the one that Spotify has to be the one that we have to mention. Like, you know, so I think the firm looked at Spotify maybe twice in the very early stages. And, you know, we blew it. I mean, that's an amazing company. You know, Europe's first or sorry, second hundred billion dollar tech company after SAP. And I think still has a way to go. You know, incredible founder who's still there and still very engaged. And it's I mean, I mean, as a European, I'm really proud of that company. Right. I mean, it defines that sector, that industry completely. All the big tech companies around it just copy it.

31:02Bernard Liautaud:And we should have invested in that one.

31:05Suranga Chandratillake:And we made a number of mistakes. we have a big anti-portfolio like every firm if you take it all the great European champions who have built enormous amounts of value the reality is that we saw most of these companies and so the ones that we have not invested in they were all mistaken it didn't mean that we necessarily would have won if we had put the bid in and some of them we have lost against a competitor So, yeah, I think we know it's part of the game in venture that you're going to make a number of bets. You're going to miss a number. And that's why we also feel like, OK, if we missed it early, maybe we can get it a bit later.

31:54Suranga Chandratillake:But we're very humble vis-a-vis this and our ability to pick the best companies.

32:02Bernard Liautaud:Got it. And, yeah, you've been in the ecosystem now. Borders has been in the ecosystem for 25 years. Before you both became VCs, you were both builders rooted in Europe. Both as your experience as VCs and as kind of builders and entrepreneurs, what have you seen change across the European ecosystem?

32:21Suranga Chandratillake:I mean, to me, it's being an entrepreneur is now something that lots and lots of young people want to be. It's viewed as a fantastic way to change the world, as a fantastic way to create wealth, not just individual wealth, but economic wealth for Europe. It's recognized not only by these entrepreneurs, but by many other stakeholders, the governments, all the ecosystem around. So we have now a full ecosystem with all the ingredients and the participants to create these amazing companies. So when Soranga started this company or when I started Business Object, in 1990, there were very, very few. We were the first ever European company to go public on NASDAQ in 1994.

33:14Suranga Chandratillake:This today is an ambition of many, many, hundreds of entrepreneurs here. So it's a bigger system. It's more competitive. But I think there's a recognition that the engine of growth of Europe is technology. And technology has been created in startups. so we have the chance to be at the heart of it.

33:36Bernard Liautaud:I want to touch on the public markets. You mentioned taking business objects public in the US and you took Blinks public as well. How are you thinking about the public markets? There's a lot of conversations or noise about the lack of capital markets, the lack of an exit opportunity at the IPO for companies here in Europe. Is that something that you take a view on with your portfolio of companies? Are you saying to them, look, the capital markets are not opening up in the UK and Europe, but they are in the US. need to be thinking about that opportunity? Or I guess, is that a role that you play?

34:07Bernard Liautaud:And how are you thinking about it across the ecosystem more broadly?

34:10Suranga Chandratillake:Yeah, I mean, I think we have to take a pragmatic approach. The pragmatic approach is that we, for a company in our portfolio, will direct them towards the market that enables them to fulfill their ambition and value them at the right level. The stock market in Europe are not quite where they should be compared to the US. The US has developed over decades. But I think there is something that has now existed in the US for a very long time that still needs to be developed is that traditional investors know that they have to invest in technology. They have to invest in venture firms. They understand that it needs to be part of their portfolio.

34:58Suranga Chandratillake:So it's a given. It's not like if, it's more like how much. And so we have way more firms in the US, financial firms, that will put a number of or amount of their money into tech companies in the stock market or in tech companies in the private market. And then it's fueled this whole thing for a very long time. And obviously it paid handsomely because you look at the top market caps in the world, they're all tech companies. And it's not the case yet in Europe. So we have to get on and all the ecosystem needs to work. The one piece that to me is still a bit missing is the appetite of the large institutional European investors to put a larger part of their assets into technology, whether it's private or public, and do it in a long-term fashion.

35:55Suranga Chandratillake:So be a long-term investor who are going to be at the side of these great companies when they grow from, you know, 100 million of revenue all the way to several billion dollars of revenue. And once we have that, that will fuel the public markets in Europe.

36:14Bernard Liautaud:One of your portfolio founders, Barney, was talking over the weekend about how, you know, Europe is now building these amazing tech giants, but we're losing them to the US. And because, you know, that late stage or the institutional capital isn't there, a lot of the upside is being captured and a lot of European giants end up moving to the US and they get investment from the US and they become almost US companies. Do you think that that's damaging to the European ecosystem? So I think Bonnie and I have discussed this many times. And I think losing is a slightly emotive way of framing it. the reality is there are like many different ways in which a company impacts the ecosystem it grows up in and and you can lose some elements but still benefit a lot so you know from a jobs perspective even if a company goes public you know a good example in a portfolio company of ours dark trace they went public in the uk but even if they'd gone public on nasdaq the the team vast majority of the jobs and so on stayed in the UK and particularly on the R &D side, which now, you know, now that the company has exited even further to a private equity firm, it's created a situation where a number of the people who are in the R &D team are off, you know, building their own businesses.

37:26Bernard Liautaud:We've seen a number of sort of spin outs and so on. So, you know, you could argue that it's been lost because it's been acquired by a sort of primarily US private equity firm. But actually, I would argue that a lot of the value has still been captured and kept here. But it's true that, you know, in the long run, it will be great for Europe to be able to do everything from host a company in the ecosystem, let it grow there, have the right talent to be based there. And yet also, you know, raise all of its capital from there and in the end, maybe go public there and stay in. And some of our companies have done that, right?

37:59Bernard Liautaud:We've had multiple companies who have listed in European on European stock exchanges and had a great run as a result of it. we could do with more of it but I think you know we just need to keep working at that and I think this sort of vocabulary of like it's a binary thing of losing it or not is not actually necessarily very accurate.

38:18Suranga Chandratillake:I think the mentality is changing by the way and we're seeing more and more companies that have determined that they will keep the headquarters here because the talent is great because they can develop all the way from Europe. And that has been a change. I think what's happening also in the US with visas and the overall political situation is making Europeans want to be staying here and building strength from here, as well as the need of Europe to build sovereignty in many, many sectors. And in particular, it's AI infrastructure. All these are elements that will continue to drive the growth of European company from European soil.

39:04Bernard Liautaud:And so do you think it's just time? You think given enough time we will develop the ecosystem that we will be able to have our European companies list here? And I guess to your point, ultimately you don't think it matters too much. You think it's okay the way that it is and we capture most of the value here.

39:19Suranga Chandratillake:Yeah, I think the most important is that a lot of the core forces of the companies stay here because you build an ecosystem when the The people who leave these companies to create their own business do it here. And then you reinvest. So the value that you've created gets reinvested in the same place. That's how Silicon Valley got started and developed so much, is that it's constant reinjection and the system that feeds on itself. We need to have this here. And I think we're starting to see a lot of it. We did here the 10 years of Revolut just a couple of weeks ago, and we had 30 plus entrepreneurs who are Revolut alumni here.

40:08Suranga Chandratillake:And so this value is getting created and recreated over time now.

40:13Bernard Liautaud:Yeah, that's amazing. Yes, the flywheel, they call it, right? You meet these unicorn factories to churn out more and more founders. I also wanted to kind of ask one final question on the ecosystem as a whole. You've both been building, investing for decades now. Bulletin was born just off the back of the dot-com bubble crash. We saw the 2008 financial crisis. We saw sort of like the 2001 bubble. We're now in a sort of AI hype world. Are we in a bubble? I thought we were going to get through this without the bubble question, but I guess I was wrong. It's really hard to tell because no one knows in these situations.

40:51Bernard Liautaud:I think my view on this, so I studied computer science at university. I specialized in what you would now call AI in my final year. I worked for an iconic AI company when I first came out of college, and then my own company had AI at the heart of it. So I feel like I've been thinking about AI for a long time. And what I can say, like from a very technical perspective, almost, is that the potential for this latest generation of AI, particularly built on top of the transformer architecture, is tremendous. It's a tremendous opportunity. It allows you to solve a class of problems that computers couldn't really touch properly before.

41:33Bernard Liautaud:and suddenly they can. I think even now it's far too early to tell exactly which applications of solutions to those problems are going to be the most profitable ones and even harder to tell which business model is the right way to exploit them and where the value will land, like down some foundational layer, somewhere in between, or maybe just in the customer. And so it's really difficult to sort of answer some of those questions. And I think the uncertainty of those things is what may cause wobbles in this boom that we're seeing. Because there'll be times where people will say, oh, I thought the value was here in this system model, but it turns out that didn't work.

42:13Bernard Liautaud:That means the whole of AI doesn't work. And markets are markets. They will generally overreact in both directions in that sort of situation. But it doesn't worry me because I think, like I say, that fundamental underlying driver here is tremendous. I mean, it's a scale of change that is, in my opinion, bigger than the mobile shift. I think more akin to the cloud shift in that it's infrastructural and it will be fundamental to everything and how it's done. And it opens up, like I say, this whole new vista of what a machine can do that we didn't think it could do before. So yeah, long run, I think this will be fine.

42:49Bernard Liautaud:Of course, we'll have wobbles in between. But you think the upside will be big enough that I guess it's okay where we're at today? Yeah, I think the hardest bit today is predicting. where that upside is going to be and which companies will really matter in 10 years time, which is, by the way, the same as with the dot-com boom. Right. I mean, you know, during the dot-com 99, 2000, there were all these investments and some of those investments turned out to be the best investments. You know, some of those companies, Google, Amazon, et cetera, that were in that period, which, you know, you could have easily ignored in the dot-com crash and said they weren't interesting, actually have gone on to be, you know, multi-trillion dollar companies 20 years later.

43:29Bernard Liautaud:And I think there will absolutely be a whole bunch of those again in 20 years time, or I think possibly sooner in this case. But knowing which one, that's the game. But I guess that doesn't, it doesn't change your job at all, right? You still have to find, pick and win the winners, irrespective of the market dynamics. Yeah.

43:47Suranga Chandratillake:Yeah, I know. Absolutely. I think the, just the scale has changed almost by a factor of 10. Yeah. Yeah. I have to invest more money to begin with because of the competition. even if what you invest in is still an idea. You may have to pay a lot more, but the price at the end is a lot more as well. So the upside continues to be amazing, but the risk is bigger for sure. But what we see is that the speed at which a company can reach hundreds of millions of revenue now, it can be achieved in less than a couple of years. And therefore, the attainment of value is a lot faster.

44:32Bernard Liautaud:And do you have to react as a firm quickly? You know, prices are going up, browns are getting bigger. Are you adjusting your ticket sizes, the number of investments that you're making? Or are you trying to stay, I don't know, disciplined or consistent across the tickets that you write into certain valuations?

44:48Suranga Chandratillake:We have to adapt. We have to be really agile. we have a chance to have great investors who have given us their trust. And so we have, even in early stages, we discussed just 600 million is a lot of money that they haven't trusted us with. And so we can adapt to do more deals smaller or less deals bigger. And so we have a lot of agility and flexibility, but we want to participate into this incredible revolution. And for that, we have everything that we need in terms of the scale of financial resources.

45:26Bernard Liautaud:Amazing. We've only got a few minutes left. I want to talk about, you've done 25 years, the future of Balderton. One of the specific questions I wanted to ask was, you know, I mentioned Index, Excel. You know, we've seen Index become the European VC that have gone to the US and they've opened offices in New York and San Francisco. Would you ever see a US expansion in Baldur's future?

45:49Suranga Chandratillake:Well, this is something that we have debated a lot. We have chosen not to do so, to be truly a pure investor in an asset class, which we feel is growing extraordinarily well. I think it served us really well because when an entrepreneur talks to us, they know exactly who we are and they know the value that we can provide. They know that we're going to be close to them. We're in their corner with a really strong understanding of what it takes for an entrepreneur in Europe to succeed on a global basis. That's our specialty. And we have helped dozens of companies do this and go across the pond and becoming successful there.

46:44Suranga Chandratillake:So at this stage, we're very happy because that purity of our business model has enabled us to really take advantage of this incredible growth that we've seen in the European ecosystem. We'll see if we want to do things differently in the future. But for now, we're really focused.

47:04Bernard Liautaud:You're staying in Europe. Amazing. And final question, what does Balderton need to do to make sure that it is still one of the top firms in Europe in 25 years time?

47:13Suranga Chandratillake:We need to be good pickers. I think we need to also, first and foremost, I think be at the service of our founders. provide them with the things that they really want understand that we we can help them but they're the ones who deserve the credit and I think if we if we stay the most attractive place for an investor to find for an entrepreneur to find money then we'll be very successful because again entrepreneurs the best entrepreneurs in Europe have the choice they will pick us so So we need to be the most compelling investor for them at the end of the day.

48:02Bernard Liautaud:Amazing. Well, thank you both so much for your time. It's been a pleasure. And congratulations on an amazing 25 years.

48:08Suranga Chandratillake:Thanks so much.

From the publisher

Balderton Capital is one of Europe's oldest and most successful VC firms.

It's raised 12 funds and billions of dollars, and has invested in over 250 companies. 30 of which are unicorns.

I spoke to Managing Partner Bernard Liautaud and General Partner Suranga Chandratillake about the firm turning 25, its their biggest winners (Revolut), its biggest misses (Spotify) and where the firm is looking to invest next.

Both Partners are entrepreneurs and have built their own billion dollar companies so it made for a GREAT conversation.

More from Scaling Europe

All 251 episodes
Balderton Capital's 25 Year Anniversary: An Interview with Bernard Liautaud and Suranga ChandratillakeScaling Europe · 48 min
Listen in VO