A stubborn lunatic’s guide to making great art

13 Sep 2024 · 56 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: A Stubborn Lunatic’s Guide to Making Great Art

Podcast Title

Search Engine Hosted by: PJ Vogt Edited by: Sruthi Pinnamaneni Description: Exploring the world one question at a time.

Episode Title

A Stubborn Lunatic’s Guide to Making Great Art Description: This episode reflects on the 25th anniversary of *The Sopranos* and discusses how the groundbreaking show was created against the odds with insights from director Alex Gibney of the documentary *Wise Guy*.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. The State of Arts and Media
  2. Funding Concerns: PJ expresses his worries about how art is funded and the sustainability of creative endeavors in an environment that seems increasingly hostile to unique artistic expressions.
  3. Creative Landscape: The episode highlights the various stages of the documentary and podcasting industries, emphasizing a perceived decline in quality and risk-taking.
  1. Alex Gibney's Career and Philosophy
  2. Love for Documentaries: Gibney recounts his journey in the documentary world, initially feeling out of place and underappreciated within the industry.
  3. Defiance Against Corporate Limitations: He discusses how he has consistently strived to create meaningful content despite commercial pressures and the limitations imposed by network executives.
  1. The Creation of *The Sopranos*
  2. David Chase’s Vision: The episode delves into how David Chase, the creator of *The Sopranos*, faced numerous rejections while pitching his idea, which was seen as too risky for the traditional network model.
  3. HBO's Risk-Taking: HBO's unique business model, which prioritizes subscriber satisfaction over mass appeal, allowed Chase to create a show that was personal, complex, and often controversial.
  1. The Artistic Freedom in Television
  2. Character Complexities: The show’s characters are discussed as both charming and brutal, reflecting the intricacies of human nature while challenging societal norms.
  3. Creative Tensions: The writers of *The Sopranos* emphasized the freedom to explore sensitive and unlikable themes, a practice that may not be as viable in today’s politically correct climate.
  1. Current and Future Challenges
  2. Pandemic Impact: The conversation touches on how the COVID-19 pandemic has drastically shifted the landscape for independent films and documentaries, particularly in terms of theatrical releases.
  3. Celebrity Documentaries: Gibney critiques the rise of documentaries that cater to celebrities, often sacrificing editorial control in favor of commercial viability.
  1. Hope for the Future
  2. Distribution Models: Both PJ and Gibney express hope for new models that can facilitate personal and important storytelling despite the current climate.
  3. Creative Resilience: The episode ends on a hopeful note about the resilience of artists and creators who continue to seek ways to make their work despite industry challenges.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Stubbornness in Art: The importance of a “pathological stubbornness” in persisting as a creator amid declining opportunities.
  • Art under Constraints: Creative constraints can lead to innovative solutions; true art often emerges from struggle.
  • Changing Tides: Recognizing and adapting to changes in distribution models and audience expectations is vital for artists.

Closing Thoughts The episode serves as a reflection on the intersection of art, commerce, and creativity, emphasizing the need for artists to remain true to their vision while navigating the complexities of modern media and audience expectations. Alex Gibney's experiences stand as a testament to the importance of persistence and innovation in the face of adversity.

---

Listen to the full episode on [Search Engine](https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This episode is brought to you in part by Joe's Jeans. You know how we're all constantly trying to find that balance? Comfort and style, function and fashion, the clothes that actually keep up with us? Joe's jeans look like classic denim, rugged and timeless. But the feel is completely different. They're supple, lightweight, and with four-way stretch, they move the way you do. It's the kind of denim you forget you're wearing, but other people notice in the best way. Whether it's a casual day working from home, running around the city, or grabbing dinner at night, these jeans just fit the rhythm of everyday life.

0:32And because they're crafted with premium materials and thoughtful details, they don't just work for today, they're made to last. You've got options too. The Asher in Doheny and the Brixton in Nod, two styles you'll keep reaching for when you want to strike that balance of comfort and style. Go to joesjeans.com and use code ENGINE at checkout to take 20 % off your first purchase. That's joesjeans.com, code ENGINE for 20 % off.

1:25Welcome to Search Engine. I'm PJ Vogt. No question too big, no question too small, no question too repetitively echoing in my head seven times a day. Okay. I've been telling stories professionally for 16 years. I complain about work like anybody else, but the more honest part of me always knows that really I'm getting away with something. Being paid to make art you love is as close to a scam as you can run without being in legal danger. It feels impossible that this is all true. And the thing is, some years, it wasn't true. When I first started in audio, podcasting didn't really exist. It was radio.

2:05And there would have been no business model to support a show like the one you're listening to. I've been here long enough that I've watched the business model arrive. I worked for a few years where there was tons of money in podcasting. And I'm here in the era after, where a low tide ebbs again. The state of things comes up on the show sometimes because one of the biggest questions that actually preoccupies me day to day is how are we going to get people to pay for this shit? Free art, pay what you want, it's a funny thing to build a life on. It preoccupies me. And I know it preoccupies me because lately when I see something good, a movie, a book, a live event, I don't think so much about the creative choices enabling it.

2:46I think, how is this getting funded? Even what does the lifestyle of the person who made this look like, that it permits them to make art? Do they have kids? Where do they live? This documentary came out this week called Wise Guy, which is about The Sopranos, my favorite TV show, maybe my favorite piece of narrative art. And watching it, it felt like the documentary was asking the same question that has been haunting me. How do you make something personal and important when the entire system is conspiring to keep that stuff off the air? The documentary, appropriately, is by the director Alex Gibney, who has spent his career defiantly making non-commercial films.

3:26He made Going Clear, critiquing one of the more lawsuit-happy groups in America, Scientologists. He won an Oscar for his bleak but fascinating documentary about American torture, Taxi to the Dark Side. He also works in the same office as me. So sometimes we see each other at the coffee machine. I still don't know how to work. I wanted to ask Alex Gibney how to work that coffee machine. Just kidding. I wanted to ask him how he's figured it out, how to make a career doing risky, creative work that other people pay for. And also about what he learned from interviewing Sopranos creator David Chase, one of the people who most successfully made something personal and strange while still connecting with a massive audience.

4:09Alex, welcome to Search Engine. Hey, thanks, BJ. Good to be here. So this is my theory for the structure of our episode. The Sopranos was a show about observing decline. The pilot of The Sopranos opens with this monologue from Tony Soprano about how America is in decline, how he was born too late and he missed the good old days. You are documenting how the story of The Sopranos being made is a story of a different kind of decline, like a TV show from this blip of a moment where television shows that were that good could get on the air. Your project is a documentary. The documentary business, many people have observed, is in its own state of decline.

4:44And then I wanted to interview you about all this on a podcast, podcasting. In decline. Very much in decline. And then my plan is at the end of this interview, we'll probably both die. Suicide. Yes. The Japanese have a term for that, shinju. It's a mutual suicide, right? That sounds like a love play. That's what we're going to teach listeners today is how to do shinju. Does it sound good? Do you agree generally with our premise yet? I do. I do. Okay, so my first question is just like, the way Tony Soprano feels about America, to what degree do you feel that way about documentary film in America?

5:21Well, at the moment, I kind of feel the way Tony does. I think the golden age of documentary, which was proclaimed maybe even as recently as like four years ago, now feels like it's got a lot of rust on it. I wanted to rewind a little bit before the rust, before the recent golden era. I asked Alex to tell me the story of how he first fell in love with documentary film, one of show business's less profitable avenues. Alex's story begins decades ago, the first era of his career, which he spent in the creative wilderness. He grew up in New England and moved to California in the late 1970s to go to film school at UCLA.

6:00So I made documentaries in film school, and one of the ones I made in film school actually got on TV, which was back then, you know, hugely successful. But then I went through a long period where I was underemployed, even after I'd had kids. And if I was going in to look for a job, my wife would always say, honey, listen, if they ask you what you do, don't say you make documentaries. Because then you'll never get hired for whatever it is you want to do because you couldn't get hired to make documentaries. Oh, they would see it as like, why would we hire you even for like a commercial or something like that?

6:34Right, because you're interested in documentaries and documentaries of spinach and nobody cares about them. Why did you like them? I liked them because, I mean, when I was going to college, you'd see them at film societies alongside the feature films. So to me, they were movies like, you know, Gimme Shelter documentary, great documentary, really entertaining. And then Fred Wiseman, I always liked his films, and Barbara Koppel, Harlan County, USA, Woodstock. I mean, they're documentaries, right? So, I thought they were great. But there came a period, and particularly the period of cable TV, was a period where channels were like, you were supposed to be able to recognize them as you went up and down the dial with your clicker before there were too many channels to use a clicker.

7:21Yeah. So that if you went by A &E, it's like, oh, that's A &E because you can automatically tell like in three seconds what the channel is. And so documentaries just became either something that was dull that was on PBS, even though they weren't always dull on PBS, or that was just a cable channel documentary, which meant it was just more fodder. They were all stamped with a kind of corporate seal. There was no personality to them. Like the documentaries that I liked, like the ones I just talked about, even the cinema verite ones where you don't hear or narrate or anything, you know, the cinema verite filmmakers thought themselves as visual poets.

8:04Yeah. So, there was a mark of personality to them. That's what was intriguing and engaging. They were engaging with real life, but it wasn't some stentorian narrator telling you the way the world was. So you're showing up at a moment where you are feeling a little bit Tony Soprano-esque in that you're missing a slightly bygone era and you have a vision for what you want to make, but where the landscape that you first arrived to was not a landscape that was conducive to it. That's right. There was a lot of years in the wilderness I spent doing other stuff, whether it was doing some journalism or I cut exploitation trailers for a while, you know, all sorts of stuff.

8:46Did you feel like a person who'd like fallen in love with the wrong thing? Yeah. I had. And my wife was particularly convinced I had fallen in love with the wrong thing. What about the post office, the regular hours? You know, it was like, because I was always, I had a zillion projects. Yeah. Right? But the projects never went anywhere. Alex's time in the creative wilderness, his post office era, lasted for years. The 1980s bled into the 1990s. In the late 90s, he has this moment that really helps him understand the art form and the industry he's pledged himself to. That helps him understand why it is he's been so stuck.

9:28That was the period when I was scuffling up in Canada trying to make something. I was trying to make it for the Disney Channel. and then the Disney Channel had a change of heart about what it was going to do because Michael Eisner, you know, was caught trying to make a slave ride. Wait, what happened? Okay, so the Disney Channel was going to change to become an Americana channel. Okay. And as part of that, the first show, this is going to be my big break, was going to be a doc series that I invented called The 50s based on a book by David Halberstam called The 50s. And it was cool. It was like toe-tapping music, but it was serious stuff, but told in a very entertaining way.

10:10Somewhere along the line, Michael Eisner, as part of this Americana project, decided that he was going to build an Americana museum, sort of like Disney World. Yeah. But he ran into two problems. One was he was going to build it by a Civil War battlefield. Okay. And two is discovered that one of the highlights of the park was going to be a slave ride. Like an amusement park ride. To show you what it would have been like to have been a slave, yeah. That's an error in judgment. Whoops.

10:45A quick tangent, but I think it's worth it. This is a quote from Disney's Bob Weiss, the park's creative director at the time. Quote, The park will deal with the highs and lows. We want to make you feel what it was like to be a slave, and what it was like to escape through the Underground Railroad. That quote inspired more public outrage. Disney CEO Michael Eisner jumped in to defend the Amazement Park ride, saying, quote, People were not mistaken. Disney did back off, describing not just the ride, but the entire park, and ultimately the Americana TV channel. Executives, like the ones who made this series of decisions, are the people who control the money that determines what someone like Alex Gibney is allowed to make.

11:31That's just the reality we live in. In this case, though, Alex's project wasn't actually killed. It was just moved over to a different channel. All of this is a long way of saying that when it came time for the premiere, the 50s, my co-creator, Tracy Dolby, and I went down, and at some point during the big party, which was at the Hard Rock Cafe, they said, and now we'd like to introduce the people who are responsible for this series. And I had, you know, bled this series for like three years, you know, moved to Canada in order to be able to do it. And so Tracy and I are puffing ourselves up, and then they proceeded to introduce the advertisers.

12:11Like, the execs at A &E didn't really even understand why we were there. Like, why would you bother to show up? You're just widgets, you know. That's crazy. The people who are really important are the advertisers. That's like the paper towel company. Yeah. Yeah. So what did you understand in that moment? Well, I understood that TV isn't about a conversation between a creator and a viewer. You're about renting viewers to advertisers. Right. And that the creators aren't really creators at all. You're just providing the catnip that, you know, is just tasty enough. It's good enough to lure you in so that you'll stay for half an hour and please the advertisers.

12:51And the last thing they want is any kind of personality or originality. You thought that the ads were what was interrupting your program, and what you understood in that moment is that you were the stuff in between. Correct. Alex learned the reason why it was so hard to make the complicated stories he wanted to make. His real job, as his bosses understood it, wasn't to find audiences who wanted to be challenged. It was to make inoffensive, mass-market content to put in between commercials. Alex Gibney was not happy to learn that in some people's eyes, he was really there to sell paper towels. For the record, this podcast is ad-supported.

13:30I actually feel mostly okay about it. When we're working on a story, the person whose happiness I think about is the listeners, not the advertisers. I've never had to worry about not covering a topic because it was going to upset, like, an internet-based mattress company. I do think the thing everyone's trying to figure out is how do I make the thing I want to make and find all the weirdos out there who might enjoy it? And for 20 years, the audience that would enjoy and pay for Alex's work, they existed, but he couldn't prove it. His big break would come in the early 2000s, when he'd just turned 50 years old.

14:08What happened was that a few stylish, voicey documentaries broke out as hits. Super Size Me, Bowling for Columbine, films like those, plus the rise of reality TV, meant that executives warmed to the idea that viewers might find unscripted stories interesting. For Alex, who'd spent decades subsisting mainly on hope, this moment was a nice surprise. It felt awesome. And not only did they write bigger and better checks for it, but, you know, sometimes you could take a swing and make it for a little bit of money and sell it for a lot. And there was a tremendous amount of excitement because it was about how do you do something weird and original?

14:48Yeah. That was seen as a market benefit. What were the kinds of things that you made in that moment that you feel like they were surprised to be allowed to make? Enron. Enron. Who makes a film about accounting?

15:07In 2005, Alex directed a film called Enron, The Smartest Guys in the Room. It was a documentary about accounting, but not just accounting. It's the story of the Enron scandal. where executives at a power company used fraudulent accounting to make it seem like they were making tons of money while hiding their mounting debt. Along the way, they wantonly committed memorable crimes. Some of those crimes actually caught on tape aired in the documentary. Hey, this is David up at Enron. Uh-huh. There's not much demand for power at all. If we shut it down, could you bring it back up in three or four hours?

15:42Oh, yeah. Why don't you just go ahead and shut her down then, if that's okay? In this scene, Alex uses audio that he got of Enron employees intentionally creating a power outage in California, just to juice demand. He wants you guys to get a little creative. Okay. And come up with a reason to go down. Like a forced outage type thing. Right. It's a stunning picture of a company with the power to just manipulate strangers' lives at will. It plays like a Hollywood movie. For Alex, this is the exact kind of film that for years, he could not have dreamed of getting a chance to make. Did you feel like, I can't believe I'm getting away with this?

16:16Kind of, because when I made it, even in the first five minutes of that film, there's a lot going on. There's a recreation of a suicide. There's a strange Tom Waits song called What's He Building in There? It was an odd and idiosyncratic film in many ways. Now, it was about something that was famous. Yeah. You know, the collapse of Enron. But I kept asking people, kind of like David Chase kept asking himself. His cinematographer told me, he's like, is anybody going to watch this shit? And that's what I kept wondering, like, is it going to get into Sundance? Like, is anybody going to watch this?

16:51You had the feeling of Am I Too Far Out on a Ledge, even if it was creatively fulfilling. Right. And so that's 2005. Enron, it did hit a cultural nerve. It did. It was like what I called a taxi driver film. Like, you'd be riding in a taxi, and the taxi driver would be saying, hey, man, have you seen that Enron movie? Enron was nominated for an Oscar. And in the aftermath, Alex's career entered this new phase where people with money now trusted him. And of course, he cashed that capital in to make an even more seemingly uncommercial film. This one was called Taxi to the Dark Side. It's a documentary about an Afghan taxi driver who was beaten to death by American interrogators.

17:31Alex says he made the movie in part to broadcast this observation about human nature that he'd noticed. He learned that the American interrogators had kept torturing their prisoner even after they knew that there was no intelligence to gain from him. So there was something terrifying at the heart of it that said something very deep and disturbing about human nature. And also, it was told as a story about a poor innocent who got caught in a machine, you know, of cruelty. I feel like one of the network executives because it's like you're talking about the actual heart and meaning of these stories, and I'm like, what were the economic conditions like over and over again?

18:09Well, I think there was always this thinking, which was ironic in this case, like if you made something really well, you might win awards. Right. Now, awards are sometimes economically viable, and sometimes they're good for business long term. Yeah. And that's why interesting movies still get made sometimes, because people are looking for awards. Oh, this might win an award. And in fact, that one did. It won an Oscar. A big award. Yeah.

18:38I'm a little embarrassed to admit this, but before this conversation, I never really got the point of awards for art. The idea that you pay money to submit your work to be judged by your peers has always smelled a little bit to me like a vanity scam. But for somebody like Alex, awards have been vital. A movie about torture might never make a ton of box office cash, but it can win an Oscar, which can be its own motivation for a funder to put their money in. The thing sweeping his career forward now wasn't just a greater cultural appreciation for artsy, power-interrogating documentaries. It was that the business model kept changing in ways that favored creators like Alex.

19:19DVDs arrived, allowing filmmakers to charge consumers more for home movies than they had with VHS tapes. And then, DVDs were replaced by internet streaming companies. In the battle to be the next Netflix, streamers spent heavily on new work, including splashy documentaries, which were a relatively cheap way to signal you were a premium channel. Plus, in the streaming era, a film didn't need to be such a big hit because the companies were better at algorithmically targeting little sub-communities that were likely to enjoy a specific film. They had a philosophy, which was communities of interest.

19:55And so long as you could keep those people subscribing to your service, that was good, right? And they would be super happy. Now, other people might come over to it, but if people weren't that interested, maybe they wouldn't come to it. So it was just a way of getting some people hugely excited about a film, as opposed to trying to get everybody willing to buy that soggy croissant. Right, because a soggy croissant is always going to be like, I think David Foster Wallace wrote that we're unique in our highbrow tastes, but we tend to be common in our lowbrow tastes. Like everybody's curious about a murder.

20:31Everybody's curious on some level about a celebrity, or most people are. But if you can target small, passionate audiences, you can target them in more specific ways. Like you can make things that are more idiosyncratic or personal or inventive or whatever. Right, and you're also not afraid when it comes to certain subjects to offend people. So what's the point at which the streaming age starts to feel, I don't want to say bad, that's like such a simple way to put it, but what is the part where, or the moment where the limitations of the new model start to reveal themselves to you as a filmmaker?

21:03I think, you know, I really do think it starts with a pandemic. Really? That recently? Yeah. I think there may have been warning signs about it before, but the pandemic really does it because the pandemic takes away theatrical. And theatrical, even in the small indie world, you know, people would go out to those films, they would pop up. I mean, as a viewer and someone who is completely unsophisticated in my understanding of the film industry, I don't see that much stuff in theaters, but I do use stuff being in theaters as a sign that I should pay attention to it. Right, right. Yeah. And the way you say it is exactly the way it worked in economic terms.

21:36In other words, theatrical distribution, particularly for independent films, was almost always a loss leader. Yeah. It usually didn't pay for itself in theaters, but it was a signal that it was good. it. And also, the film festival world, all of that, and then people would show up and bid. But then, you know, so the pandemic happened, suddenly theaters flatline. Nobody's going to theaters during a pandemic. And also, there starts to be a huge consolidation in the streaming industry or streaming cable industry, because now streamers and cable casters are starting to be won. And now they have more power, they just make the cheapest thing.

22:16They can make a product that's a little bit worse, but where they claw back a little bit more money, et cetera. Yeah. That's right. And so then what does it look like for you? Like when you're trying to make something that is— Well, then it becomes harder because, you know, you go to people and you say, I went to one streamer with a film I had called Citizen K, you know, which is kind of a look at Putin's Russia through this oligarch named Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who then, when things turned in 2003, spent 10 years in the Gulag. And I went to one streamer, and the streamer said, you know, this is a good film, but we don't want to offend Russia.

22:55Really? Yeah, we don't want to offend Russia. Oh, okay. Wow. Okay, note taken. You know, because you can see the commercial considerations, particularly in a global economy, begin to take over. What Alex is saying is that in the previous, more competitive era, some upstart streamer may have been willing to take on the risk of offending Russia. But now, in this less competitive moment, with fewer people funding work like his, the system's overall risk tolerance goes down. Another side effect of a system that wants less risky movies is that a lot of the biggest documentaries in the past couple years have just been adoring profiles of celebrities, who frequently get a lot of creative input and sometimes even final cut.

23:43And I think in a way it's kind of obvious why that is. If you want a big audience, you make a list of the top 20 celebrities, and you think if we do a Taylor Swift documentary, we're going to get a big audience because her audience is big. So you're just borrowing Taylor Swift's audience. The difference is that for a network or a channel or even a streamer early on, that they would have editorial control. That would be a good thing. That showed a dedication to certain journalistic and editorial principles, right? To never give the subject control. Not anymore. Gone. Poof. And I think that to some extent, you think to yourself, well, okay.

24:27Like, I've made commercials before. Like, when I make a commercial for a client, I don't expect to have editorial control. Because it's a commercial. Yeah. But that's the problem. It's like there's this netherworld at the moment where the celebrity and the channel wants the viewer to believe that it's a documentary. Yeah. When it's, in fact, a commercial. So when, to talk about this recent project, when HBO comes to you and says, we want you to make a film about David Chase, and that's about The Sopranos, which is one of their properties, were you worried that what they wanted was? Yes, I was.

25:07And look, HBO has been pretty fearless over the years in terms of their willingness to do tough stuff. But it just felt to me like, I love the show, but do I want to do like a special on The Sopranos? It didn't feel that interesting to me. But then when I sat down with David and met him, he was a fascinating character. But also I realized, whoa, he went through back then what I and many others are going through right now. The battle. The battle. Meaning, how do you get something personal and important on when everything about the system is conspiring to keep it off?

Read the full transcript

25:54How do you make something personal and important when everything about the system is conspiring to keep it off? After a short break, the story of a person who did that maybe the most successfully of anyone, a guy with a tortured relationship with his mother who wanted the whole world to find that drama interesting.

26:23Thank you.

26:52One for sales, another for inventory, a separate one for accounting. Before you know it, you're drowning in software instead of growing your business. That's where Odoo comes in. Odoo is the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one, fully integrated platform that handles everything. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, HR, and more. No more app overload, no more juggling logins, just one seamless system that makes work easier. And the best part? Odoo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. It's built to grow with your business, whether you're just starting out or already scaling up.

27:27Plus, it's easy to use, customizable, and designed to streamline every process. So you can focus on what really matters, running your business. Thousands of business have already made the switch. Why not you? Try Odoo for free at odoo.com. That's O-D-O-O dot com.

27:46This episode of Search Engine is brought to you in part by Rosetta Stone. I'm always threatening to learn a new language. This month, I would like to learn German. I spent some time among Germans this summer, and I found them to be very friendly, and I wanted to be able to communicate in their language instead of mine. The easy way to learn German is Rosetta Stone. They've been the trusted leader in language learning for over 30 years, with 25 different languages to choose from. Spanish, French, German, Japanese, and more. What makes Rosetta Stone work is their immersive method. No clunky English translations, just a natural build from words to phrases to full sentences.

28:21So you can actually start thinking in the language. So don't wait. Unlock your language learning potential now. Search Engine listeners can grab Rosetta Stone's lifetime membership for 50 % off. That's unlimited access to 25 language courses for life. Visit rosettastone.com slash search engine to get started and claim your 50 % off today. Don't miss out. Go to rosettastone.com slash search engine and start learning today.

28:59Welcome back to the show. So, Alex Gibney, a talented and stubborn man who figured out how to make personal art in a system designed to snuff it out. His latest film is about David Chase, a talented and stubborn man who figured out how to make personal art in a system designed to snuff it out. Chase was a TV writer who had had a successful career commercially in the 80s and most of the 90s, but who now felt profoundly frustrated by the limitations of the form. What is the process by which The Sopranos goes from an idea in David Chase's head to a television show on HBO? Okay, so David was just getting tired of doing the TV thing.

29:43I mean, he had had a relatively successful career. He was a showrunner at Northern Exposure, which is a very successful show. And he had done some other ones in the past. But he had always wanted to make movies. That's really what he wanted to do. And this was like his last go-round. He had some money put away. He was just going to write spec scripts and see if he could get a movie made. So it was like the last roundup. So David Chase, frustrated, done with television, convinced that the era is just not one that will let him make work he finds interesting. He figures he probably needs to switch to movies.

30:20He has this one idea he wants to try. This is a clip from the documentary Wise Guy. The voice you'll hear belongs to David Chase. For years, everybody told me that I had to write something about my mother. She was so out there. and so funny. My wife, Denise, was the first one to say that. And then everybody was saying, you've got to write something about your mother. In the documentary, David Chase tells Gibney about how a colleague, Robin Green, also pushed him to try to build a story around his difficult mother. In her pitch, though, it was more autobiographical. Robin said, you should write the show about your mother and a TV producer.

31:00And I thought, who's going to watch that? But maybe if he was like a really badass guy, maybe that would work. Was the bad guy already a mobster? Yeah. I wanted to get De Niro and Anne Bancroft. At first, I thought of it as a feature. It was the story that actually was the first season. It was about a mobster that goes through a shrink after having panic attacks. And so he writes this script, and he decides to make the protagonist a mobster, Tony Soprano, who's got a problem with his mother. And in fact, his mother wants to kill him. And he writes the script, and it's really good. And everybody agrees it's really good, and he starts to take it around.

31:41But at the time, TV was dominated by the three, possibly four networks. And they were interested in kind of lowest common denominator programming and sort of routinized programming. So he would go from place to place, and they all turned him down. And Les Moonves, who was at, you know, a famous executive at CBS said, you know, this mobster stuff is really good, but, you know, are you wedded to the therapy? And Dave was like, yeah, I'm wedded to the therapy, I guess you'd have to say, since it was the central engine of the entire show, right? So everybody wanted him to do something that was the cliché, and he wanted to do something that was completely different.

32:26And it wasn't until the script landed at HBO where they said, whoa, this is new and original and different. That was it. It was different. And HBO was looking to be different. It's not TV. It's HBO. Right. HBO had existed as a cable network since the 1970s. But in the 1990s, the channel was trying to transform itself. At the time, most HBO subscribers were there to watch movies and boxing matches. But HBO, like Netflix would 20 years later, wanted to start making more of its own stuff to make a real name for itself. A traditional TV network may have wanted David Chase to make the safest, most cost-effective version of The Sopranos, but HBO was competing on quality.

33:11There might be a lesson here about golden ages, that if you're someone who makes stuff, one of the best places you could find yourself is at an upstart company trying to compete against the establishment. So with HBO, I mean, they were making money through subscriptions, and they were showing movies that they would license. they had dipped their tone to series, like with Larry Sanders and with Oz and others. And they were thinking, this is pretty good. Maybe we should try a bigger swing. Yeah. And so they were looking for something. So moment and different economic model because they don't need to have a big ratings winner.

33:45They just need some people who love a show. That's good for them. And then if you love different shows, that's okay because this group loves this show and they'll subscribe. And this other group loves this show and they'll subscribe. Good. Everybody doesn't have to love every show. So poised for that moment. And then he walks into it with his script to HBO, and they're asking the questions where everything's upside down. Instead of saying, like, okay, so we'll shoot it in L.A., and we'll do second unit in Jersey, right? Because that'll save money. They were like, you're going to shoot everything in Jersey, right?

34:19That's what David said. He's like, whoa, I felt like I had landed in an alternate universe. Like, they were going to let me do anything I wanted? And they pretty much did. Yeah. David felt he had landed in Bizarro World. It was like where the execs were encouraging him to engage his own creativity and to lean in to all the things that were important to him, as opposed to, you know, invest in the stereotypes that had become so successful. The Sopranos was not a confected corporate product. I mean, it wasn't at all in terms of its artistry and all of that. But it didn't come about because David thought, how can I make a lot of money?

35:01It came about because David was like, I'm obsessed with my mother. I mean, there's something funny about the idea that millions of dollars were spent and made for someone to just kind of have their dream. To work out their own personal shit about their mother. I totally agree. And that to me was the beauty of the moment. You came across a network who was like, fuck it. Let's roll the dice. Yeah. You know, what have we got to lose? But a lot. But a lot. I mean, it is true. And they were scared, too. I mean, because after they shot the pilot, they waited six, seven, eight, nine months before they made the decision to go ahead and order the series.

35:45They were terrified. Right. Because, like, how can you have a mobster who's the protagonist? Yeah. Somebody who kills people for a living is going to be the protagonist of this family drama, right? And they were really nervous about it. And one argument that David had with the creative executives at HBO was over Tony killing somebody on camera. And they were worried that they would turn viewers off. But David convinced them. They said, look, we're making a show about a mobster. If he doesn't kill the guy who was a snitch, then what are we doing? We're just making bullshit. And so they move forward.

36:33You actually, in the movie, you play a clip from that scene, which is kind of famous. It's episode five, first season. Tony Soprano takes his daughter Meadow on a college tour. And it's this moment where you're really seeing him as a sweet dad instead of as a mob boss. How'd it go? We got a 48 to 52 male-female ratio, which is great. Strong liberal arts program in this cool and art center for music. Usual programs abroad are China, India. You're just applying here. Already you're leaving? It's an option, Dad. Junior year. And then while he's on this college tour with his daughter, he happens to run into a guy who's in the Witness Protection Program, who had actually snitched on Associates of Tony's.

37:12And so it is like a moment where you feel the show challenging you as a viewer because you're seeing him in this very domestic, state, sweet dad guy, and then you're watching him plot the murder of this guy. The kill itself is very violent. Very violent and grisly. Yeah, he literally chokes him to death with a wire.

37:32Good morning, rat. Who are you? What is this? Don't make me laugh. You pimp! You fuck! Teddy, there must be something we could do. Tony. It's Tony, you fuck. You know how much trouble you're in now? You took an oath, and you broke it. I'd vaguely heard about the argument behind this scene, but the two things that surprised me that I understood in a different or deeper way watching your film, one is you have the HBO executive who's like, yeah, yeah, we totally were telling him to take this out. Like, you actually, you never see the suits. Like, people always talk about the notes from the suits, whatever, but the suits never show up and say, this is what I was thinking and why.

38:06So you have that. But then also they talk about how they did say, like, hey, if you're insisting on doing this, like, we can be convinced. We can be convinced by the argument that otherwise he's bullshit and the show is bullshit and you have to do this for the show to have integrity and for people to care about it. But could you make the guy he's going to kill a little bit more sort of... Malevolent. Yeah, and they do. There's this, like, moment where they're in the parking lot of the motel and you see the guy and he pulls out a pistol. He's in darkness. He's aiming at Tony and his daughter. And then he realizes there's other people at the motel and he can't get away with it and he puts the gun down.

38:40But so as a viewer, you're feeling a bit more like, okay, this guy, he's threatened him, whatever. And it was funny watching that moment. I was like, oh, you know, maybe the network was right. Like maybe the push and pull between the artist and the people who stand for skittish audiences, maybe it had produced something that worked. Yeah, I think that's right. And that's the best thing often about notes in general. You know, sometimes, particularly reaction, not so much the prescription, but the reaction to, like, this doesn't feel right. It's sometimes worth listening to.

39:21There's a moment in your film where you're interviewing the writers of The Sopranos. They say that they don't think the show could be made or made in the same way today. It would be too controversial. What do you make of that? I think they were talking about political correctness. you know, there was a willingness to say things that were downright offensive. And also a willingness, even in the writer's room, to get ugly. To talk about stuff in a way that was brutally honest and would reveal about themselves stuff that wasn't particularly elevating or inspiring. Maybe just the opposite. In Wise Guy, the Sopranos writers talk about the freedom and tension that came with inventing all these unlikable characters and then imbuing these unlikable characters with attributes that sometimes came from the writers themselves.

40:09You know, look at somebody like Uncle Junior or Tony or Pauly Walnuts. I mean, these are like petty, horrible people. So you felt free to talk about anything you wanted. It was all just, hey, there's a writer's room. We're writing about bad people. Bad people do bad things, and we got to access those parts of ourself. I mean, we said things that nowadays, you know, would be frowned upon. We could have been mistaken for being racist, sexist, you name it-ist, you know. We considered having an assistant in there for a while and realized we couldn't do that. But that to me was actually one of the great lessons of doing the show.

40:50It's like when you start to pre-censor yourselves all the time. We've all got weird, dark, inappropriate feelings or thoughts. And to the extent that they're routinely repressed, they'll come out in unexpected and sometimes dangerous ways. You know, what was that line about, if only Hitler's art teacher was a little bit more attentive? You could have just made some offensive paintings. The terrifying beauty of the show was that these people were so complex. Yeah. They were both so charming and brutal. And one of the things that they made a point of during the making of the show, which I thought was so great, is whenever it seemed that the characters were becoming too likable, particularly the mobsters were becoming too likable, they would have them do something brutal.

41:55Yeah. Just to remind you, because also in the back of his mind, you know, David is making this show, which is a character drama about a family, but it's also a commentary about America and the brutality of America and the rapaciousness with which capitalism sort of, you know, chews people up and spits them out. And The Sopranos is kind of the logical extension of that scene in The Godfather, you know, where they're all sitting around the table asking The Godfather to share all the bought politicians and police officers. And it's, we're willing to pay a fee. After all, we're not communists here.

42:35Right? But it's a brutal commentary on capitalism and America and the cruelty of the country. So all those things are going through their heads, and they're willing to be ugly. And I think that's what people ended up loving the show for, is it didn't pull punches. And suddenly the uncomfortable conversations that you shied away from because you might offend somebody, they were engaging in those conversations on screen. And that's what great art does, is it allows you to get into areas that maybe you're not permitted to as part of your daily life. Yeah, and it's funny. It's like what's so brilliant about it being a mob show is that one, once there's guns and murder, you can trick people into paying attention to family dynamics, which is part of what he wants to talk about.

43:20But also these writers can take ideas that they have or parts of themselves that might be uncomfortable. But now if it's coming out of like the mouth of a murdering mobster, that's a context in which we're willing to sit with those ideas without worrying if we're hearing art from a bad person. That's right. But at the same time, because they're all coming out of their personal experiences. I mean, it was supposed to be about David's mother. Then all the writers found out that they had major issues with their mothers. So it ends up being, you know, a lot of this experience ends up being universal.

43:56I think the other thing that makes this show so successful, too, is that, you know, There are a lot of conversations that are extremely unironic, and they're very funny for it because these brutal mobsters are having very sensitive discussions about how their feelings are hurt, or should I buy flowers for my wife on her anniversary? Stuff like that. You know, normally in most mob movies, you see the action. Yeah. You don't see the day-to-day interactions where you're trying to figure out whether or not you should show up for your son's soccer practice.

44:38After a short break, Alex Kidney, someone who has survived decades, all these different eras of technological and business shifts, who's learned both from his own work and from the work of people like David Chase, his advice on how to keep going during tough times.

45:22Thank you. mode cools things down in about 10 minutes. I recommend their dual zone setups so that one side of the bed can run cooler than the other side of the bed. And there's no water to refill and nothing snaking off the bed. It's just a slim topper that sips power. Set up is a few minutes. They offer a 30-night risk-free trial with free shipping and returns. If you, like me, are tired of sweating through the night, try Perfectly Snug.

46:15Thank you.

46:21No contracts, no hidden fees, and no surprise overjips. The best part, you'll save enough money each month, but toward actual fun stuff. Trips, concert tickets, you name it, instead of wasting it on your phone bill. This year, skip breaking a sweat and breaking the bank. Get this new customer offer and your three-month unlimited wireless plan for just$15 a month at mintmobile.com slash search engine. That's mintmobile.com slash search engine. Upfront payment of$45 required, equivalent to$15 a month. Limited time, new customer offer for first three months only. Speeds may slow above 35 gigs on the unlimited plan.

46:57Taxes and fees extra. See Mint Mobile for details.

47:04This episode is brought to you by State Farm. Checking off the boxes on your to-do list is a great feeling. And when it comes to checking off coverage, a State Farm agent can help you choose an option that's right for you. Whether you prefer talking in person, on the phone, or using the award-winning app. It's nice knowing you have help finding coverage that best fits your needs. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there.

47:44David Chase has said that this moment where The Sopranos was allowed to happen was a blip. Like, whatever window that opened for a moment that he snuck through, he doesn't think that window is open anymore. Do you agree with that? Well, it's not open under the current system. So something new is going to have to come along to blow it open again. Because HBO, also, remember, was a different kind of a system. And it was coming up and they knew they had to do something different or they weren't going to get anywhere. I mean, what's the point of trying to become another network. If you're far behind in a sailing race, it doesn't make any sense to follow the same wind that's already got those boats that are way ahead of you.

48:27You tack on a different course and hope to catch a different kind of a wind. So at the moment, it's pretty bleak for trying to do personal art that's going to connect with viewers. But the hope is, the hope at the bottom of Pandora's box, after a lot of bad shit has come out, is that there is a new distribution mechanism out there that will allow this relationship once again to find a way. You know, and it's kind of what you see happening in journalism. Like, the Substack model is interesting because suddenly you see some people are making bank on Substack by going directly to their readers. Interesting.

49:12That was the hope in podcasts for a while, too. And actually, I think podcasts, you know, some over time still find a way to get audiences, but it's not as easy as it seemed like it was going to be at first. Yeah. I mean, I think in podcasting, certainly, there was a moment where it's like you want the moments where the people with money kind of don't know what they're doing. Right. And they're just like betting on a lot of stuff and they're not tracking things very carefully. And what gets harder if you're trying to make something interesting is either they've figured out what works and they just want to do that over and over again.

49:45That's right. Or they're scared. That's right. And I think right now is the moment where they've both figured out which things work and they're scared. Right. And also, you know, some key players in the distribution universe are tech players who have other businesses. Yes. You know, if I'm Apple, do I want to do anything that's going to offend somebody and so they might not buy an iPhone or an iPad? And if I'm Amazon, do I want to do something that might offend somebody who might buy their sneakers on Amazon? You know? Yeah, and we're never going to be a big enough part of their business to be worth that much headache.

50:23And so I think it makes sense. And I don't think they think of it that way. Like, I don't have conversations. I mean, I think they think, let's do stuff that's entertaining. And they hire executives who've been in the business before. But over time, tendencies emerge. Yeah. And the tendencies are, let's do the thing that worked the last time. That was pretty good. Yeah. Or do you want to do the thing that might not work, and then you have to have a meeting? And, like, the meeting goes badly. Right. But it's funny. You know, what I get from this conversation with you, it's so funny to compare podcasting to film and television because they're, like, cities and we're just, like, some little, like, highway town.

50:57But there's this real sense of doom and gloom and end days and whatever, like, because there was, like, such a surge and then such a crash. But hearing the way you look at your industry and look at adjacent industry, it feels almost more like a sailor looking at tides, you know? Yes, I think that's right. And you're looking over into the distance for that swell that's going to be different. And I think it'll come because it's always been like that. You know, you go back to the 20s and the 30s and the 40s. Think about what radio producers must have thought with the advent of television. Yeah. It's over for us.

51:35It's over. Right. Yeah. No, and I felt, you know, when I got into radio, it was like there was public radio and there was some great programs. But I felt like, what are you doing? Like, this is a stupid thing to love. You're just a person out of time. I didn't get in thinking anything good would ever happen. There was something I heard the other night. I went to a benefit for this small little outfit up in Maine, which is a place called the Carpenter's Boat Shop, where people who have found themselves betwixt and between spend time at a place where they learn how to build boats. Okay. Cool. But this guy who's been doing that or, you know, who founded it and has been running that place for 45 years, you know, talked about his life.

52:24He said, I feel like my life is a rowboat. You know, I'm always looking backwards but moving forwards. And I was like, hmm, you know, it's not unlike this moment for creators. You know, you got to know what's happened behind. Yeah. But you keep going because, you know, there's always a place, you know, you can't stay still, right? Yeah, and you don't know even when you're living through a good moment. I mean, sometimes you do, but at a certain point it's like you're just the people who make stuff and they figure out a way to make stuff. That's right, yeah. What was it? Art is born of constraint and dies of freedom.

53:02Because I can remember there was a period in docs where it was like, I'm not going to do a film for under, you know,$2 million or$3 million. That's just the way it is. And then I remembered, like, there was supposedly a conversation between Louis Bunuel and Nicholas Ray in Spain at some point. And Bunuel, who had sort of learned how to save money by being a producer, was notorious for being very cheap and very efficient in his shooting. They used to call him Mr. Clapstick because, you know, to edit his movies, all you do is you cut out the clapsticks. And then you'd send it to the lab, right? But he was telling Ray, who was very frustrated after he had done King of Kings, he says, I just can't get my own movies made.

53:45He said, well, you know, maybe if you reduce your budgets by like 50%, you'd get them made. And Nicholas Ray said, nobody would ever respect me, you know, in the industry if I did that. It was kind of a deeply sad moment. And they both walked away from the dinner, like, not understanding what the other person was thinking about or saying. And it's hard because, you know, for documentaries, at a certain moment, instead of being the person who had to pretend that they weren't really interested in documentaries in order to get hired, me. Yeah. Right? You know, suddenly you could walk around and actually you could buy a house.

54:26You could think about sending your kids to college. You know, there was a business. There was an industry that could support people without you having to do some other job in order to do the job you wanted. On the other hand, you know, there comes a moment when if you really love what you're doing, you figure out a way to make it work. And screw the suits. Yeah. No, I totally agree, and it's weird. I identify with both people in that conversation. I understand the feeling of I don't want to make something at any less of a resource level than the highest resource level I've ever participated in.

55:02But I also understand the viewpoint of art is making it. Art is making it when it's hard. Art is doing it under constraints. Oftentimes, the money is a questionable gift. Do you know what I mean? Oftentimes, the things you invent because you have to are just as worthwhile and vital as the things that are much better catered. And it's funny. I always end up lost in these conversations, raging about the unfairness of the industry, because there's a part of me that feels it, and there's a part of me that's just like, get to work. Right. That's right.

55:38So, what did we learn this week about surviving as the kind of lunatic who wants to make things for a living? I think what I hear in Alex's story, and in David Chase's, is that to survive a creative dark age, It helps to have a kind of pathological stubbornness. It also helps to be willing to do work you don't love while you wait for the chance to do the work you do. And that we're at the mercy of changes in business models and audience expectations that are bigger than any one person. But that the people who make things, make things. And that success for a lot of people I admire came a lot later than I would have expected.

56:16I did have one last question for Alex. We've established that podcasting is certainly in decline TV is in decline. Documentary film is in decline. Do you feel like America itself is in decline? Yes. Yes. America is in decline because the country's been ignoring all of the contradictions that have been gnawing at it for years and years and just pretending that they don't exist. And now they're catching everybody. Where do you think it goes?

56:50look backwards and row forwards

56:59I don't think I'm gonna get a better answer than that

57:06Alex Gibney his new documentary is called Wise Guy David Chase and the Sopranos you can see it on a channel formerly called HBO max now.

57:34Search Engine is a presentation of Odyssey and Jigsaw Productions. It was created by me, PJ Vogt, and Shruthi Pinamineni, and is produced by Garrett Graham and Noah John. fact-checking this week by Holly Patton theme, original composition and mixing by Armin Bazarian our executive producers are Jenna Weiss-Berman and Leah Reese-Dennis thanks to the team at Jigsaw Alex Gibney, Rich Pirello and John Schmidt and to the team at Odyssey JD Crowley, Rob Mirandy, Craig Cox Eric Donnelly, Kate Rose, Matt Casey Maura Curran, Josephina Francis Kurt Courtney and Hilary Schuff our agent is Oren Rosenbaum at UTA If you'd like to support the show and get access to our incognito mode feed with no ads, no reruns, and bonus episodes, head to searchengine.show.

58:20You can also submit a question for us there, whether or not you're a paid subscriber. Follow and listen to Search Engine for free on the Odyssey app or wherever you get your podcasts. Thanks for listening. We'll see you next week.

58:41Thank you.

From the publisher

25 years ago, The Sopranos, the best television show ever created, premiered. This week, a new documentary called Wise Guy asks the question: how did a show considered so risky & uncommercial even get made? We’re interviewing Wise Guy director Alex Gibney about that question, and about how stubborn lunatics like him and David Chase got to make the projects they wanted to make.
Incognito Mode, our ad-free, no-rerun, bonus episode feed.

To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Search Engine

All 140 episodes
A stubborn lunatic’s guide to making great artSearch Engine · 56 min
Listen in VO