In short
Podcast Summary: Nuclear Race to Power AI
Podcast Title
Sourcery Description: Interviews with top Investors, CEOs, & Founders.
Episode Title
Nuclear Race to Power AI: Valar Atomics, Fuse, Not Boring Description: In this episode, guests Isaiah Taylor (Valar Atomics), JC Btaiche (Fuse), and Packy McCormick (Not Boring) join host Molly O’Shea to discuss the pivotal role of nuclear energy in America's industrial resurgence and the race for AI dominance.
---
Key Concepts and Discussions
Overview of Nuclear Energy and AI Dominance
- Nuclear Energy as a Catalyst: The conversation delves into how nuclear energy (both fission and fusion) is crucial for powering industries and data centers, particularly in the context of AI development.
- Energy Demands of AI: The increasing power demands from AI models and data centers highlight the urgent need for sustainable and affordable energy sources.
Contributions by Guests
- Isaiah Taylor (Valar Atomics)
- Discusses plans to scale modular fission reactors in the U.S. to overcome decades of regulatory stagnation.
- Emphasizes the importance of energy sovereignty through the development of domestic nuclear power.
- Highlights regulatory hurdles and the potential for quicker testing and implementation of new technologies following recent executive orders.
- JC Btaiche (Fuse)
- Talks about advancements in fusion technology and the company's strategy focused on revenue generation while developing fusion capabilities.
- Introduces the Titan system, the world’s highest pulse power system, and its contributions to both defense and energy sectors.
- Underlines the need for a robust supply chain to support fusion technology.
- Packy McCormick (Not Boring)
- Connects the discussions on nuclear power and AI, arguing that energy-rich, hardware-driven businesses will shape the AI landscape.
- Provides insights into the importance of a differentiated brand in the current market saturated by AI-generated content.
Topics Explored
- Geopolitical Context: The urgency to advance nuclear technology in the U.S. to compete with China, which has a significant lead in nuclear reactor deployment and innovation.
- Regulatory Changes: Following executive orders aimed at revitalizing nuclear testing and innovation, there is a renewed focus on speeding up R&D cycles in the nuclear sector.
- Public Perception and Misconceptions: Addressing the environmental lobby's opposition to nuclear energy despite its low carbon footprint compared to fossil fuels.
- The Great Differentiation: Packy discusses how companies can stand out in an era of AI by embracing unique branding and creative marketing strategies.
---
Key Takeaways
- Nuclear Power as a Solution: The guests unanimously agree that nuclear energy is a key solution to the energy challenges posed by the AI boom.
- Importance of Regulation: Effective regulation is needed to foster innovation without stifling development. Recent executive actions have provided a glimmer of hope for faster progress.
- AI and Energy Interdependency: The growth of AI is directly tied to advancements in energy technology, making the development of nuclear power systems critical.
- Branding in the AI Era: Unique branding and differentiation strategies are essential for companies to thrive in a saturated market.
---
Closing Remarks The discussion at the Reindustrialize 2025 Summit underlines a pivotal moment for the U.S. nuclear industry as it seeks to reclaim its position in the global energy landscape and power the next era of technological innovation. The sense of urgency and commitment from leaders in the field is palpable, suggesting that significant advancements in nuclear energy are on the horizon.
Together, these conversations highlight the intertwined futures of energy production, technological innovation, and global competitiveness.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00The main bottleneck for data centers, for compute, for model, it's not really as much GPUs or construction capacity, it's literally how you power the data centers. Jensen Huang mentioned that one gigawatt of power to power data center is around$60 billion built. That's how much revenue Boeing makes a year. Energy is an undercurrent underneath everything. You care about the fact that we're putting more CO2 in the atmosphere every single year. And you look at all the options that we have for generation. Nuclear is the most obvious solution. It makes an enormous amount of energy and it has an extremely small impact on the environment.
0:31If there's all this AI slap out there and there's all this sameness, then that just creates this very big opportunity to do different stuff. We saw it with John Collison at Stripe doing Cheeky Pint in like a pub. Vlad Tenev doing the announcement about crypto token stocks in this like beautiful palace. It wasn't a Steve Jobs presentation. It was like a very unique kind of net new thing. We are behind a lot, especially against China. Yes. So China is like 7 to 14 years ahead of us. Do you think we can catch up to China? Are we left in the dust already? I believe we must. This is probably a controversial statement.
1:15Isaiah Taylor, welcome to Sorcery. Good to see you, Molly. Thanks for having me on. Thanks for coming. I know you're like one of the first people of the day. So what's it like downstairs at Reindustrialize? It's entertaining down there. There's a lot of people in the building. We've got some protesters outside just to make sure. Protesters. Yeah, we have some fun protesters outside the building. But, you know, it just gives you some aura as you're walking up. It makes you notorious. I'm like, man, I'm like Tony Stark walking up here. So yeah, it's fun. What are they protesting? I couldn't really tell, honestly.
1:43I think probably the fact that a lot of people here are making defense tech. So yeah, it's a fun way to walk up in the morning. Great. Well, all right. We'll see about that. Let's talk about you and let's talk about Valor. So for people who don't know what Valor is and your background, could you share more on that? Yeah. So I'm the CEO, founder of Valor Atomics. We are making nuclear reactors built for planetary scale. So nuclear in the last 40 to 50 years has been sort of a one-off industry. You have a plant built here, a plant built there. There were a couple of models and units of reactors built in duplicates around the world, but nobody has really been able to manufacture lots of reactors and plug them in in series.
2:21And that's what we're working on. So we have our first, what's called a non-nuclear reactor prototype in LA. We're doing temperature testing on it, pressure testing on it, and we're looking at criticality next year. So we're getting really excited. What's the current state of nuclear in the U.S. It seems to be laggard, but it seems like there's a lot of energy, no pun intended, around it. Yeah. You know, nuclear in the United States has been paused for about 46 years. It's been paused essentially since Three Mile Island. And there's some good reasons for that, some bad reasons for that. The industry sort of took a pause when Three Mile Island happened to, you know, reevaluate and make sure everything was safe.
2:56And unfortunately, when you pause an industry, it's kind of hard to restart it again. The tools atrophy, the labor's not really there anymore. The regulator is not in practice. And so we're really trying to reboot this and start over. But when you reboot an industry, you have to make sure that you are designing the reactors in a way that makes sense for the new methods of building things. Right. We build things differently in the United States than we used to 50 or 60 years ago. We don't do as well at like very large scale manufacturing or very large scale construction. We're much better at modular manufacturing.
3:27So that's really what we focus on is building a modular reactor that can be manufactured here and that we build thousands of throughout the United States. So what role exactly does Valor have in America's reindustrialization? I mean, I think energy is one of the most important inputs that you could possibly give the reindustrialization movement. Cheap energy is how we make metals, right? It's how we would make aluminum and steel and all of the base metals that we use to make parts. If you think about what's happening over the next 100 years in manufacturing and reindustrialization, we're essentially taking what was an extremely labor-heavy industry into being an energy-heavy industry.
4:02So instead of the manipulation of machines with hand lathes and these sorts of things, you have automatic lathes and automatic CNC. You have robots moving parts around. So we're really just starting to consume energy to create physical goods. And that's also true at the materials layer as well. So at the layer of making the steel, making the aluminum, you're essentially just consuming energy. So if we have cheap energy, we have a real shot at making all the stuff that we need to make for our nation and for other nations around the world. So it's very exciting. There's plenty of bottlenecks around this.
4:33You mentioned almost 50 years of stagnation. What exactly are the regulatory hurdles that are impeding on any progress? Yeah, you know, I think people miss the function of regulators. Regulators are really supposed to take technology that exists and add guardrails around them, right? So once a new technology is created, it's invented, it's tested out, now you want to do many of these pieces of technology around the world. This is a really general statement, right? It could be reactors, it could be cars, airplanes, and you add guardrails around that. The thing that you have to be careful about with regulation is that you need to still allow innovation to happen, right?
5:11So regulators and innovation don't play super well together. You really want a space of freedom to explore and to test things out. And that's what we've been able to do really well in things like cars and airplanes. We haven't done it so well in nuclear, right? If you want to go and turn on a test reactor and see how your technology works and, you know, get good at constructing small reactors before you do big ones, historically in the United States, it's taken five to six years, right? And five to six years is too long of an R &D cycle, right? You really want R &D cycles to be 12 to 18 months at most.
5:42So that's really what's been missing. I'm really excited today, though. There's a massive opportunity to do this in the United States now. President Trump signed some executive orders about a month and a half ago, which really opened up the opportunity for nuclear companies to turn on test reactors here. So we're working on that, and we're really excited to do that for the first time next year. That's great. What exactly are the executive orders that he signed? So he signed four of them. The one that's most relevant here is revitalizing nuclear testing at the Department of Energy. So the Department of Energy is a test authority in the United States.
6:14It has the authority to basically take a prime contractor and allow them to split an atom out in the middle of nowhere, somewhere it's very safe to do that. And that allows us to gather data, right? And data is the most important piece for a commercial regulatory process. If you want to take a reactor concept and scale it out all over the United States, you really want to have tested that somewhere and make sure that it's safe and make sure that you understand the characteristics. So that's what we're going to be doing. that executive order, you know, essentially takes the legal structure that's there in the DOE and points everybody in the same direction to say, let's do this quickly next year.
6:47So I want to pull back a little bit further on the geopolitical issues and tensions. Well, energy is never geopolitical at all. So I'm not sure what there is. No, I'm just kidding. Interesting. Yeah. Okay. So we are behind a lot, especially against China. Yes. So China is like seven to 14 years ahead of us. They are cranking out nuclear reactors. Absolutely. Yeah. What exactly is going on there and how far behind are we? So China has had a lot of success in building one type of reactor over and over and over again, which is really what we need to do. In order to do something well, you have to do it often.
7:30Right. And if you have the same design that you're doing over and over, you learn a lot, you get better at it over time. You shore up the supply chain. You have a labor base that understands that system. And they've been really successful at that. So they are ahead of us in terms of scale. Now, they're also ahead of us, unfortunately, in terms of new test reactors. They're also turning on innovative types of reactors that were invented in the United States in the 70s and 80s. And they sort of sat on the shelf and we never really tackled them. We ran into a bunch of regulatory roadblocks, and then we never turned them on.
8:00And China is now sort of taking those ideas and actually turning them on on the mainland. So they're being both very experimental and actually figuring out how to scale out. And those are all the ingredients you need to have a mature industry. So it's a scary place. I think that China understands that energy dominance over the next 100 years is going to be even more important than energy dominance was in the last 100 years. And it was already pretty important. So this is a four alarm, five alarm fire type situation that we need to get ahead of immediately. So valor is a key part of getting ahead of that.
8:32Is it realistic to think that the U.S. can do this alone, or will we have to work with allies? You know, I was talking to Eric Prince about that last night. He pointed out that Willow Run, which is about 20 minutes from here, is an airport here. And from about 1941 to 1944, that airport cranked out about 8 ,600 B-24 Liberators. That's one aircraft every 63 minutes, So when the United States recognizes that there's a problem, we get to work and we can solve it really quickly. So I think that we can absolutely solve this. It's solvable through very smart people who are working together with private capital and getting it done.
9:12And I think that we have the ingredients to come back right now. I think there's a window of time in which we could actually catch up and we can get ahead. So we're working on that day in and day out. You were recently on the Sean Ryan podcast. You've been making rounds in the media circuits. Have I? I've been trying to let people know the urgency of what we're trying to do. There's a lot of things going on in the United States. We're trying to reindustrialize. You've got tariffs happening. You've got all these different things. Energy is an undercurrent underneath everything. Energy is the determinant factor to whether or not we can have industries here.
9:50If you have expensive energy, it doesn't matter how well you're doing the factories and how well you're bringing up the labor and all these different components. Your energy is too expensive. You can't build anything. So this is a really, really fundamental thing that we need to get right. Sorcery is brought to you by Brex, the financial stack trusted by more than 30 ,000 companies, including one in three venture-backed startups in the U.S. Nearly 40 % of startups fail because they run out of cash. Brex is literally built to help founders avoid that. Unlike traditional banks that let your money sit idle, shipping away at it with fees, Brex's designs help you spend smarter and move faster.
10:28Their all-in-one solution combines checking, treasury, and FDIC protection into one powerful account. You can send and receive money globally at lightning speeds, get 20 times the standard FDIC coverage through their partner banks, and even high yield from day one. With same day and even same hour liquidity, access your funds anytime. companies like scale ai doordash service titan hymns anthropic flexport robin hood and plaid trust and use brex start today at brex.com slash sorcery that's b-r-e-x.com slash sorcery one of the points that you talked with him about these still go to geopolitical tensions was about russia and funding campaigns that affect public perception of nuclear in the U.S.?
11:19Yeah, you know, it's always been funny to me that the environmental lobbies seem to be anti-nuclear. And that's funny to me because nuclear is so obviously, so clearly the best climate solution that you could find, right? So if you care about the fact that we're putting more CO2 in the atmosphere every single year, and you look at all the options that we have for generation, right? how do we put energy into the grid without putting CO2 into the air? Nuclear is the most obvious solution. It makes an enormous amount of energy and it has an extremely small impact on the environment. It's even smaller than solar or wind because the physical devices are so small that disposing of those devices takes up less space in a landfill, for example.
11:59So it's obviously the best climate solution. So why is it that the environmental groups have historically been the groups that are anti-nuclear? I actually believe that there's been a lot of foreign funding into our environmental groups to try to shut nuclear down because it is such an incredible technology. This was sort of a theory for a long time. But it's actually proven now that this did happen in Europe over the last 10 years. So Russian groups funded far left environmental groups in Germany to shut the reactors down in order to make it so that Germany would have to buy Russian gas. And this is something that's a matter of public record now.
12:32There's a big investigation into it. So I think that that's probably something that's happened a lot more than we recognize. And fortunately, I think that now that we're sort of in the age of the internet, age of the information, it's harder to pull plays like that, right? It kind of, it doesn't last for that long. You have enough people that Google, you know, how large is nuclear waste or how safe are nuclear reactors, and they start to actually read about it and understand it. And it doesn't last for that long. Eventually, you know, people kind of wake up to it. So I think it's a great time to be building.
13:01What do you think the biggest misconceptions are around nuclear waste and reactors. Is there still, are there still misconceptions? I feel like, I don't know, maybe I'm in an echo chamber, but I feel like everybody's on the same page. I think, I think there's definitely a little bit of a bubble in, let's say, American tech or, you know, American re-industrialization. And that's because I think we're all very, very tuned in with energy needs, right? We all recognize that energy is so important for what all of us need to do. Re-industrialization, artificial intelligence, national security, all of these things are energy issues.
13:32So I think that we're a little bit more tuned into it, but there is still pretty broad-based misunderstanding of nuclear and especially nuclear waste. I like to point out to people that if you took all of the nuclear waste ever generated inside the United States, right? And by the way, we generate a lot of power with nuclear today. About 20 % of our power comes from nuclear. But if you took all of that waste over the last 70 years, it would not fill up an Olympic-sized swimming pool. All of it, right? So we're talking about a very, very small amount of physical material. And when you have a small amount of physical material, it's actually very easy to protect, right?
14:06So we can encase it in concrete, we put it in safe places. And the comparison of that is, you know, carbon in the atmosphere, in particulate matter in the atmosphere when we talk about oil and gas. And oil and gas is fantastic. I love the industry. I think that it's powered humanity to this point. But if you do a comparison here, oil and gas puts about 600 ,000 sedan-sized blocks of carbon into the atmosphere every year, So imagine 6 ,000 Toyota Camrys of solid carbon into the atmosphere every year. If you replaced all of that power output with nuclear, you would have one sedan-sized block of nuclear waste encased in concrete, safely stored underground.
14:44So it's just such a power-dense technology that we really know how to deal with the waste of it, and we don't know how to deal with the waste from other forms of generation. In today's high-speed business world, staying ahead means using the smartest tools possible, including the powerful capabilities of artificial intelligence. Meet Turing Intelligence. Turing builds customizable AI systems designed to solve your mission-critical challenges, no matter your industry. From expert guidance to tailored projects, Turing helps top companies realize AI that's more capable, more adaptable, and more effective.
15:16With Turing, discover how AI can accelerate your business growth. To learn more, visit Turing.com slash sorcery, spelt S-O-U-R-C-E-R-Y. That's Turing.com slash sorcery. I want to talk about more of security around these facilities with geopolitical threats. Have you had to think about this when you're building out your reactors, when you think about your office, like all that kind of stuff? Like how sensitive do you have to be around privacy, protection, resilience? Yeah, absolutely. So off the bat, we have a lot of security at Valor, physical security, cybersecurity. And these are really good things to be practicing.
15:57Now, there's two things to notice here. One is our rivals are far ahead of us today. When you're building in defense tech or deep tech or these new technology areas, you're often worried about China copying your IP and scaling it out. These things have happened in nuclear. Unfortunately, they've happened so much that China is ahead of us at this point. right there's a certain extent to which china doesn't actually want my ip because they have something better already running in the mainland right so there's a lot of catch-up that we have to do before we even get to that point now we practice it anyway and we you know we practice these good uh cybersecurity practices because eventually we will surpass them but i like to to highlight like we have a lot of catching up to do before that's even you know the main problem now on the physical security of the plants and cybersecurity of the plants there's different types of reactors.
16:45Some nuclear reactors are vulnerable to meltdown if they're operated poorly, right? So if you had a cyber attack on a reactor, you could feasibly see a meltdown scenario if the, you know, control rods were operated incorrectly and, you know, various things were to occur. There's another type of reactor you can build called a Gen 4 reactor, where the worst that somebody could do is turn it off, right? So we get this question a lot, what would happen if a terrorist, you know, accessed the control room in your facility? And the answer is they could turn the reactor off, and that'd be kind of annoying.
17:13We'd have to turn it back on again. So this is a difference in technology. It's, you know, generation four reactors, incredibly passively safe. You basically can't make them melt down. It's, you know, a pure physics issue. So that's the type of reactor that we build. Right. This might be a wild question because this is so physical and it's an energy and industrials, right? So we're seeing AGI come into the scene. Maybe you call it super intelligence now, whatever you want to call it. But how does AGI and AI advancements, how do those affect getting nuclear online sooner and all these reactors up and running?
17:52So this is probably a controversial statement. And, you know, investors probably really, really want to believe that AI is going to, like, help us build a ton of reactors. I actually think that if you're looking for an investment that is protected from AGI, it's something like this where it's extremely physical. you're bending steel, you're stacking blocks, you're building plants, you're laying concrete. It's going to be a long time before AI touches that level of the physical world. There are a lot of things that are going to be automated first before that. The other thing I'll say is that our customers are going to be data centers, right?
18:26They're going to be people who want to actually power the AI. So interestingly, nuclear is sort of like the derivative to AI. If you believe that AI is going to go vertical, you should probably invest in nuclear, you know, because A, you're going to power it. B, you're going to be very insulated from the deflationary effects of that. And yeah, of course, we use LLMs and these sorts of things to help us do work management and help us control information and these sorts of things. But at the end of the day, this is a matter of we need to bend a lot of steel. We need to weld it together. We need to stack the blocks.
18:57Well, Sorcery is partnered with Rex. We'll get you a hat. They're really cool. They're like reflective. I actually, I can see that. If I'm running around outside on the road later today, I will be seeing at all times. They're technical fabric. Okay, nice. For technical founders. For technical founders. Fantastic. But Brex is all about performance and efficiency, especially in spending. I want to know more on the performance side of nuclear and energy. If there have been any trade-offs you've had to make or maybe misconceptions or people driving you the wrong way that you thought you had to accept in energy, but you've rejected it.
19:39So like, what are some things that you've been told that you thought were like truths, but actually, no, you could kind of just run through walls? Yeah, absolutely. So nuclear is generally presented as high uptime, right? So reactors run 24 seven, and they run for a long time, you only have to refuel them every 18 months, they last forever. And, you know, very safe as well, right? So it's an extremely safe way to make energy, but then expensive, right? That's the trade-off that's presented. So you're going to pay a lot more, but you get stability and you get safety. I actually think that's totally wrong.
20:15Nuclear will be all three of those. It will be the safest form of power generation. It will be the most reliable form of power generation, and it will be the cheapest. And I think this is a very techno-capital observation, right? Like techno-capital eliminates trade-offs of that kind all the time. You think that you've sort of hit the efficient edge of a technology. And then somebody says like, no, actually, this is better on all three categories. And that's exactly what nuclear has the opportunity to be here. So we expect the plants will essentially be the safest, cleanest, and cheapest form of energy across every category.
20:47And that's really what we need to accelerate in the next hundred years. If we want to see energy that's 10 times cheaper than today, you really need a breakthrough like that. What are you most looking forward to for the next 12 months for Valor? We're going to go split an atom for the first time. Yeah, it's going to be very, very exciting. I actually have a counter on my phone, the deadline to when we need to split an atom in order to hit this executive order. So yeah, we've got a lot of work in front of us. Are you feeling any pressure from this presidency term to get as much accomplished as possible because we don't know what the next one will bring?
21:20I would just say that this administration has thrown down the gauntlet to the nuclear industry and said, all right, you've been complaining for 20 years that this thing is wrong and this thing is broken. And the Trump administration just said, all right, we're fixing all of that. Let's see if you got it. Let's see if you actually have the goods. So yeah, the gauntlet's been thrown down and we're working very hard. CalShea has a market out right now that there's currently a 13 % chance that the U.S. grants a new license for a nuclear reactor. Do you think that's realistic? I will absolutely take the other side of that bet.
21:52I think you have to define what they mean by that. If it's an NRC license or if it's a DOE license, right, those are different things. we're going for DOE authorization next year and split the first atom. So maybe there's some clarification on that. NRC license, we'll see on that one. There's always fine print. Yeah. Yeah, it looks like NRC. Okay, NRC license. That's an interesting one. That's also not a bad bet either, I would say. There's a couple companies working on NRC certifications. I mean, look, the United States, sometimes we get in front of ourselves and we trip on our own feet and we kind of get lost in the bureaucracy.
22:29But when urgency, you know, is knocking at the door and we recognize that there are real problems, we know how to get up and move. And I think that's happening right now in nuclear. So, yeah, I would take the other side of that. What odds would you put against it? NRC, you know, this is not under my control, you know, as a CEO because we're going through the DOE license. So you're really asking about whether or not my competitors are going to be able to do this in time. And that's always a hard bet to take. But I would take, you know, 99 to 1 that we turn on a reactor next year. Lastly, as we close out, what do you think the largest source of global primary energy consumption will be by 2030?
23:072030. Yeah. That's not very much time. No. It'll still be around like 8 % or 9 % nuclear. Solar is going to tick up a little bit. But honestly, oil and gas is growing as well. I think what's more interesting is like 2050. Where are we at in 2050? I do believe that most of the world is nuclear at that point. I think that there will be some solar. but if valor is successful at building the cheapest form of energy that's also the safest and also the most reliable and also comes online fastest there's no reason why we won't scale all around the world and make the world's energy and that is the mission of the company is to make the world's energy so let's say 75 by 2050 is valor and then uh another 25 you know we'll let people sort out it'll be the rest yeah that's the rest of them yeah go global i mean listen like you know spacex launches 80 % of the world's kilograms to orbit.
Read the full transcript
23:57You have these power laws about when you find a technology that is actually scalable and is actually cheap, it takes everything. And that's very much our intention here. Amazing. Well, Isaiah, it was a pleasure to have you on as the number one first guest of the day. First guest. I win. We have like 50 more of these. We could just probably close it up now, right? Yeah, mic drop, shut it down, turn off the lights, let's go. That's right, exactly. go enjoy re-industrialized. Thank you. Yeah, thanks, Bella. JC and Packy, welcome to Sorcery. Awesome to be here. Great to be here. Are we your first founder investor duo on Sorcery or no?
24:36I think so. Amazing. Oh, awesome. I think so, at least in the last 48 hours. We'll take it. You've done what, 50 podcasts in the last 48 hours? I think I'm approaching 172. That's awesome. Wow. A lot of hours of footage. People are going to love all that content. You wouldn't believe how many hard drives we've had to fill up. Is that true, actually? People don't talk about the file sizes on 4K video. Should we? No. Let's talk about Fuse. JC, could you bring us up to speed on Fuse? Yeah, so Fuse, our mission is to accelerate the worst transition to fusion energy. We work on fusion technology for both defense and national security as well as long-term clean, safe, abundant and on-demand energy generation.
25:24And so we've built the world's highest pulse power system ever called Titan. We fired that for the first time in March of this year and we live streamed it and published the results in Nature. We also built and a couple weeks ago published in Nature another paper on the most efficient neutron delivery system and pulsed neutron system that we also published in Nature. And more timely, just yesterday on July 16th on the 80th anniversary of the Trinity project, we announced a partnership with Los Alamos National Lab. It was very interesting spending time at Los Amos and hearing the tagline of the project, there's many, but one of is, you know, build a bomb to end the war.
26:11And that successfully happened in 1945. And 80 years later, I believe we're now in a sort of war where there's a very existential threat. threat and, you know, fusion, I believe, is going to help in, you know, ending this next phase of war and maintaining U.S. and Western society and values, supremacy and leadership in the world. Low key about it, but that's huge. Paki, from your perspective, you've been kind of like scouring the space for a while. Like you go super deep into it. You've written about it all over. could you explain fuses positioning within the map i would love to uh so we did a couple of years ago julia dewall and i did a podcast called age of miracles that jc was on we did half the season on fission half the season on fusion and in both cases i kind of want to just understand like energy i want to understand why we weren't doing fission when it was like this miracle source of power i wanted to understand how close we were to actually like getting to to fusion power but like at no point in that series that I think I was doing this as a way to meet companies that I might invest in because vision seems capex intensive fusion seems capex intensive plus unproven and so it's kind of more like I want to get the base energy goes into everything else that I'm interested in investing in but like I don't want to actually invest in any of these companies the big difference and there's like you know JC will do better at telling you like the technical differences and all the different kind of uh generator designs uh and it's like mind numbing the combination of different generators and fuels and all sorts of stuff.
27:49But the big difference, I would say, with Fuse and anybody else is they're already making revenue and that they're not going straight shot for commercial fusion power, but they're selling radiation kind of on the way up towards or down towards, depending on how you want to look at it, towards eventually doing commercial fusion power. And so it's a real business that is going to generate cash flow. And by making kind of more pulse power generators and more of the components that they need to sell radiation, bringing all the components in the eventual reactor down the cost curve. And you could talk about the kind of like three things that you're optimizing for here, but like the commercial business and government business in the short term helps get towards the power business.
28:28And to me, that's just like the most beautiful business model in all of fusion because it is an actual business model. Well, we're all sitting here at Reindustrialize in the beautiful city of Detroit. right? I have to ask you, what is FUSE's role in reindustrialization? Yeah, it's a great question. And I think Paki did a really exceptional job at writing a long memo on the company, which I still encourage a lot of people to read. And part of what was there is how hard it is from the supply chain. So when people talk about fusion, everybody's focused on Q greater than one. But in my mind, we can perhaps do that and show that Q is greater than one, but all the components, the supply chain, the reliability of the millions of parts that would go in a fusion generators need to be on par to meet the promise of fusion, which is a baseload power source.
29:21A fusion is not operational. A fusion power plant is not operational 99.9 % of the time. Or if you have to rebuild it every few months, it's pretty much useless. So therefore, there's a whole supply chain ecosystem that needs to be built that doesn't exist today, frankly. And therefore, there's a lot of components. There's an ecosystem. And even when you think about... So I'll give you one example of how it died and why we need to revitalize it. The National Ignition Facility, which is at Lawrence Livermore National Lab, is the most powerful laser on the planet. They're the only facility that's demonstrated fusion break-even.
30:01they have these very specialized components that they've built in the 1990s, early 2000s. And they've supported a whole ecosystem of suppliers. Some of them are even overseas, close allied countries. And those companies died because after NIF was built, there was no demand. And so we've lost a generation of know-how, of supply chain, of manufacturing, of reliability, of optimization. And we really need to rebuild that. And Fuse has invested significantly in vertical integration and bringing manufacturing in-house. You know, Titan has 40 ,000 parts. We make roughly 75 % of them in-house. And we're continuing to increase that percentage.
30:43Because otherwise, we have no way to get to the economic price point. As well as the technical requirements. And third, meeting just the timeline. So there's how do we make Fusion economically possible? as supply chain components in a large way. Second is continuing to meet the technical requirements for highly demanding technical specs. And third, continuing to respect timelines so we're on time and on budget. Can I jump in with a question? So obviously, I've gotten obsessed with this kind of vertically integrated model. I came up with that thesis for the fund, in part by seeing what you're doing at Fuse and seeing that if there's a piece or a component that is over cost or slow or whatever, you can just go make it.
31:32And it's beautiful to be able to iterate that fast. Do you think it's just a function of where we are, though? In an ideal world in 15 years, is there an ecosystem that's developed and you actually build less of the components? Or do you want to stay that vertically integrated kind of throughout? Well, so the choice to vertically integrate is like a really painful one, because every time we try not to vertically integrate and we start and we keep paying that same lesson over time, it's like, oh, this is a trusted supplier that seems to have worked with defense companies for like a decade or so, and I supply in others so we can trust them.
32:04And then we get disappointed more often than we would like. And sometimes we're not. There's some vendors we've worked with that are really great. And that's really awesome because that's one of the things we have to do. And so I'm really betting and hoping that over time, while we will still continue to take on the risks that we must take in order to continue to hit our timelines and milestones, I really hope and believe that there's going to be a time where supply chain in America becomes as reliable. And China has, for example, been reliable in electronics manufacturing. And so that's why people then feel the need to vertically integrate 10, 20 years or 30 years ago, right?
32:49And so there's examples of how an ecosystem of highly efficient suppliers is really rewarding to build fast. And right now, the only reason we have to do it, and I believe companies like SpaceX have to do it, is because just the culture of suppliers now, they're always late because it's increased your cost plus budget anyway. So there's really little incentive to be on time and on budget. Power and energy has become one of the hottest topics right now because we've entered this cascading transformative evolution of AI and it's just increasing demand across the board. And so we're just seeing so much uplift and sentiment around the new administration, around the tech industry, and that sort of thing.
33:33I'm curious from your perspective, going in and out of the White House, what is the sentiment there? And have they taken to fuse well? What's the What's the relationship like? Yeah, well, I think people are starting to realize that the main bottleneck for data centers, for compute, for model, is not really as much GPUs or construction capacity. It's literally how do you power the data centers. And Jensen Huang mentioned a couple months ago that one gigabyte of power to power a data center is around$60 billion to build. that's how much revenue Boeing makes a year. And so that's really untenable and uneconomical.
34:19And third, also unaffordable completely. And I think that the dollar per kilowatt hour is directly related to how much GDP outcome we can produce, how much compute you can use. And I believe more energy is directly equals more intelligence. And so therefore, our limiting factor to building compute is not the training models, it's not the data centers, it's literally how much power we can have. And right now there's, so, and first US has become, we've made it really hard to build and people realize that. You see a lot of people from Secretary of Energy to the president and and others in this administration that really realize that.
35:07It's very hard to build in America. And then second, energy is really the limiting factor for AI and a lot of other technologies that are on the agenda. And then third, China has been building really, really fast. If you look at their growth rate, they're surpassing and exponentially increasing their power capacity, and that's really concerning. Do you think we can catch up to China? Are we left in the dust already? No, I believe we must. And so whatever it takes, we need to do to get there. And the sense of urgency is felt by very smart people. And I believe that this country is built on hope and optimism, but also on being the underdogs and doing whatever it takes to win.
35:52And so I'm committed to winning that race. There's no choice for us to fail. We just can't afford for China to become for fusion or nuclear what other countries have become for oil. What do you think, Paki? No, I mean, I think you look at the solar charts out of China and they're terrifying. You look at nuclear plants being built in China versus nuclear plants being built here, and it's terrifying. You look at their ability to export them to other countries and desire to do that while we kind of sit back and I think for a lot of years just pretended that nuclear was dangerous and unsafe and unclean and all of those things.
36:31And thankfully now I think we're waking up. I mean, we're here at this conference. There's like multiple nuclear companies here. There's one fusion company here, I think. You're the only one here, which is great. There's a lot of companies working, not necessarily on solar panels here, but on like what you do with a ton of solar panels. So there's Terraform, which Casey does. There's other companies doing similar stuff. I think if we can build that kind of machine around energy production so that we can just like put as much power as we possibly can and find uses for it, we can catch up. But it's certainly not easy to be able to do that.
37:05Yeah, one more thing as well. And when you think about how do we beat them, I think we can be incremental. I think we have to think differently. And when you think about fusion, it's the energy density equation. If we solve fusion first, that's replacing from an energy density perspective. It's a million times more than oil or coal. So even if they built a million coal plants faster than us with one fusion plant, we can beat all of those from an energy output perspective or energy density. And I think how much they need to produce in order to beat us. So I think one way to win the race is really to continue doing what the U.S.
37:41has done historically, which is lead with innovation and with new technologies. Yeah, it's funny. Isaiah at Valor Atomics kind of makes this point about the fact I feel like China certainly is putting more nuclear online than we are, but they're using kind of old U.S. designs to do that. And like where we potentially win is on the innovation. Fusion is like the next kind of like bigger example of that, where ideally we get to commercial fusion power quickly and then just roll that out. And I think that could be a big source of advantage. With all your accomplishments to date, what are you most excited for in the next year?
38:18What's the next unlock? Well, we're bringing a new facility online and we're very excited about that. We'll also be announcing a new facility later this year. So, continuing to build, growing the team and continuing to serve customers. We got to get you out to one of these too. I went up for the test fires in Montreal and it's so cool. It's just like red light, these pulses happening. I felt it's like one of the coolest days I've had in the past couple of years. Sounds like a rave. we work hard and play harder and um so it's pretty cool i'm very happy to pack made it and the team is just absurd it's like yeah the the the combination of like jc who i think like if you can't tell already is like one of the most exceptional founders out there people who served in senior positions in the government uh the number of two kind of nuclear scientists uh in in iran who who came over here to kind of work on on our side here and then just like everybody that i met who was like you know working on the machines like top to bottom just like an unbelievably cool team i've like i i maybe this is like the wrong way to think about it and like that's more about me than the companies but like one of the things that i like is you know however like percent dumber i feel than the people that i'm like talking to up and down the stack of the company and i've like maybe never felt dumber than i did a few years they're like here's how you like plug something in and I'm like oh that's amazing that is so cool but like it just like on it was like so cool to see because like you hear about fusion is this thing that is like 20 years away and then to go there and see this like kind of messy like not in a dangerous way or anything but like facility where there's just like wires and like there's like things happening and being built all over the place is it was like very cool it made it very tangible and real that fuses like an actual business that's doing stuff right now yeah we got to get you the next one I'll be there just invite me.
40:05Send me a, send me a Cal invite. You need to do it like months in advance now, by the way. I try to get like a last minute conversation with somebody in Molly and she's like, are you kidding me? Like I can't do this. You send me like the week of, I'm like, Paki, I'm like in Paris right now. Like how am I going to get there in time? I'm not that fancy. So I'm able to hop on, but I understand that you're in Paris sometimes. So I need a mobile kit with me. You do. I do. Love premium merch just as much as we do. That's why sorcery uses fourth wall. Everyone from creators like Marcus Brownlee to podcasts like acquired to orgs like the Smithsonian Institute are using 4th Wall.
40:39They let you create and sell premium products without having to stress the details. They handle everything from production, shipping, customer support, taxes, even giveaways. When it's time to level up and make gear that people are actually proud to wear, that's when it's time to use 4th Wall. And that's why we've trusted 4th Wall for all of our brand wear at Sorcery since day one. Use my link in the description to get free credits for your first order. And for any VCs, DM me on X and I can get all your portfolio companies set up with a free samples credit deal. But yeah, so as we as we shift over to the packy side of this conversation, roaming around, I mean, we saw a robot on stage today, which was a part one piece of the great differentiation that you wrote about not too long ago, which I thought was like a really good solidification of like what brand personality has become and how important that is for companies today.
41:37We're in like a sea of AI slop left and right. Like people are not creative anymore. And there are some real leaders in this space that are super creative and putting a stamp on it. So from the horse's mouth, tell us about the great differentiation. Nay. No, so the idea behind it, actually, before I wrote this piece of great differentiation, I think you summarized it well, that kind of like there's, if there's all this AI slap out there and there's all this sameness, then like that just creates this like very big opportunity to do different stuff. And, you know, we saw it with John Collison at Stripe doing Cheeky Pint in like a pub that like another founder who's not Irish, like can't pull off doing the Guinness in a pub thing.
42:20Like it's very much like their thing or Vlad Tenev doing the announcement about crypto token stocks in this like beautiful, you know, palace in Cannes and like this well-produced thing with James Bond music in the background and like drawing on chalkboards. It was just like unlike it wasn't a Steve Jobs presentation. It was like a very unique, like kind of net new thing. seeing more examples of that from like the companies that have like taste or the companies that like understand that to stand out like you actually do need to do something that's both different but like different in a way that's that's unique to you I wrote the piece like I had actually written a full other draft like I've done this a few times where I like start writing like a kind of negative like impacts of AI draft I'm like that's a negative version of the story like let me talk about the positive version and then I saw the Robin Hood thing and I was like that is what I'm talking about.
43:10And I think like one of the things that I wrote about the piece that I think is true is like, it's understandable that if you're making kind of, you know, like B2B SaaS and love B2B SaaS, you know, there, there are some great B2B SaaS companies out there. I don't think we get to the spot that we're at here at re-industrialized if people haven't been building software for the past 50 years. So like, this is not a knock, but if you're building a product that like lives in this little screen and like, looks kind of like, you know, people have to be familiar with these products, you don't have that much room to kind of roam on, on your branding and messaging.
43:41A lot of these companies like do JC has, you know, has pulse power generators that like shoot just like a ton of energy at like this very small target and make red lights and, you know, loud, loud noises. Uh, you know, there's robots on stage and roll has, it's like anime, but it also has, it's like kind of full, you know, autonomous drones that it can fly out and take video of. And like for these companies, there's just like actually an opportunity to just show off what you're doing. And like that in itself is differentiated because it's so hard to do that like just actually getting the thing done, like kind of creates all of this unbelievable content for you that other people just like definitionally can't copy.
44:17I mean, I think like I wrote about Rainmaker in the piece right before Augustus got blown up. And I think did like an unbelievable job of handling it, but he's doing something that's just like so far outside of what other people are doing that everybody's going to talk about it. One of the reasons that I like investing in this type of company and writing about this type of company is because there's just this like built-in marketing and passion that people have for this stuff that I don't think you can get with a lot of other types of companies. I agree. I mean, I think it's like, we're only going to experience more and more, but we're also going to experience more and more of a slot, but also like extremely high quality production of everything.
44:55People are going to go to war for good product and good, I don't know, like marketing on it. It's like, you're telling a story, but now you have to tell a story like even better than anybody else. And I think like, I haven't seen your user numbers, but I would imagine like since AI has come out, like your numbers have probably spiked. Like you're a human with a personality and like people I'm sure come to Sorcery for the news and for the founders, but also cause like they've just gotten familiar with you. Like that stuff matters more now too. And like, that's awesome. Like I think whenever I get like a little sad about kind of like I see like a, you know, a stupid reply that is like clearly AI generated or something.
45:32I get a little sad and then I get happy that like it does always kind of like, you know, there is an equal and opposite reaction. So like the more of that stuff there is, the more people want people and fresh stuff and like things that nobody can copy. And so like the market is kind of self-correcting in that way, which is awesome. Every negative comment is a bot. Just remember that. I was wondering. Okay, good. They're all bots. I feel a lot better now. Every dunk that I've had, it's all bots. I'm not worried about it. Good. Me too. I got absolutely ripped by people for saying that you could summarize books with - That was so funny.
46:09I know. Faggy, that was hilarious. And those were real - That went really viral. It went really viral. I think it was like 12 million views. Okay. And I think there is just this visceral, I understand why people are mad if they didn't get the joke. I said that you could summarize Anna Karenina, which to me seems like the least summarizable full book imaginable and like would obviously defeat the whole purpose, but people didn't pick up on that. But there is, I can see, like, I understand that there is this like negative reaction to like, there are people out there who are like, I don't need to read the book.
46:37I'm just going to like do the chat GPT summary. And like, it completely misses the point. I think like, you know, I think I called AI super SAS last time. And I feel really good about that, uh, that, that bet, uh, going forward. But I think like it to me, like really calls into question, like what we're doing here in a lot of cases. Like if you're using ChatGPT to summarize Anna Karenina as like an extreme example, like why are you doing it? Like what is the point of doing that? And I think that's true with some jobs and some other things. So I don't know. I think the most interesting thing about AI is like what it's teaching us about ourselves, as cheesy as that sounds.
47:10But it is like very weird to see kind of how humans respond to this new thing that we have. If online shopping made us realize how lazy we were, this is going to unlock another level. I see it in myself too sometimes. Like I, I will take my, if I'm like stuck in writing an essay, I'll like take the draft, I'll put it in Claude and ask for feedback. And like the feedback is bad. And like, it always like tries to move me more towards average and I ignore it. But like, I just have a tick where I'm like, well, instead of just sitting here and like thinking like it'd be more productive to just like ask Claude for feedback.
47:45And it's like actually not. And like not being comfortable sitting there and just like being silent and thinking through a problem is like really bad and I noticed it in myself I've like had to delete you know x and I'm trying to like take my brain back and I'm sure I'll redownload it but like I do think like there has to be an active and it can't like climate change I think teaches us that like asking people to like you know do the good like it doesn't actually one make an impact like you need to do something better you need fusion as opposed to telling everyone to like turn off their lights because people just like aren't going to do that I wonder what that is going to be for attention because I think that's like dark that Elon is doing like all of this great stuff and then introducing waifus that are like taking over people's you know all of their time like it's insane to me before we wrap up or I guess as we wrap up there's something I need to address Paki we were recently called out by Will O 'Brien for being a part of the Irish cabal how do you feel about this what's your response yeah it's rich coming from a guy with an accent I'm just I'm just like a regular old American dude I will say we were texting me you and Will and I was reading a book on Esalen and like literally everybody involved in that and in charge of Esalen which is like this uh center out in California that was you know part of uh a huge part of like kind of western and American psychological and drug and whatever else history like everybody who led Esalen was Irish and like specifically from Cork County so I you know as a as a descendant of Irish people, I'm kind of proud that I don't think we get enough credit actually for, for the impact that we've made.
49:19We should get a lot of credit. I mean, we invented Halloween. Is that true? Yeah. Awesome. I know. Groundbreaking. Okay. Well, JC, Packy, it was lovely to have you on. Thank you so much. Thanks for having us. Thank you. Hey, it's Molly. If you enjoy our interviews, check out our newsletter, sorcery.dc, where we deliver a once a week top deals and tech headlines email and also go deeper on our podcast interviews. Subscribe to Sorcery today. And don't forget to subscribe to the podcast on YouTube, Spotify, Apple, or wherever you listen. Link in description to sign up.
From the publisher
Isaiah Taylor (Valar Atomics), JC Btaiche (Fuse), & Packy McCormick (Not Boring) join Molly O’Shea to explore how nuclear energy—fission and fusion—is at the heart of America's industrial resurgence and the race for AI dominance.
Isaiah unpacks Valar Atomic’s plan to scale modular fission reactors across the U.S., breaking decades of regulatory stagnation and reimagining how America powers its factories and data centers. JC shares Fuse’s rapid-fire progress in fusion technology, from breakthroughs in pulse neutron generation to vertical integration strategies that echo SpaceX. Packy ties it all together with insights from his investing & writing in Nuclear through Not Boring, explaining why energy-rich, hardware-driven businesses will define the AI age... Bonus we talk about his popular essay The Great Differentiation.
Together, we dive into:
• Fission to fusion, atoms to AI, and Detroit to D.C.
• The role of next-gen nuclear in energy sovereignty
• The strategic urgency to outpace China
• Regulatory tailwinds post-EOs and DOE testing
• Why AI’s energy demands are the catalyst
• How differentiated brand, design, & execution will define the winners in an AI slop world
This conversation is part of Sourcery’s “Made in America” Mini-Series recorded at the Reindustrialize 2025 Summit.
Connect with us:
1. Isaiah Taylor: https://www.linkedin.com/in/isaiahptaylor/
2. JC Btaiche: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jcbtaiche/
3. Packy McCormick: https://www.linkedin.com/in/packym/
4. Molly O’Shea: https://x.com/MollySOShea
5. Sourcery: https://x.com/sourceryvc
Brought to you by:
• Brex—The modern finance platform, combining the world’s smartest corporate card with integrated expense management, banking, bill pay, and travel.
As a Sourcery Listener you get: 75,000 points after spending $3,000 on Brex card(s), white-glove onboarding, $5,000 in AWS credits, $2,500 in OpenAI credits, & access to $180k+ in SaaS discounts. On top of $500 toward Brex travel, $300 in cashback, plus exclusive perks (like billboards..) visit → https://brex.com/sourcery
• Turing—Turing delivers top-tier talent, data, and tools to help AI labs improve model performance—and enables enterprises to turn those models into powerful, production-ready systems. Visit: turing.com/sourcery
• Kalshi—The largest prediction market and the only legal platform in the US where people can trade directly on the outcomes of future events: https://kalshi.com/sourcery
• Fourthwall—The #1 way to sell merch online — Fourthwall is the easiest way to launch a fully branded merch store—used by big brands like MKBHD, Acquired, & even the Smithsonian. 100+ products. No upfront cost. Visit Fourthwall to start today: https://fourthwall.com/
Follow Sourcery for the latest updates!
(00:00) The American Atomic Age
(01:15) Isaiah Taylor on U.S. nuclear industry
(03:34) Why modular reactors are the key to scale
(06:47) China’s nuclear lead
(08:32) Valar’s path to criticality & DOE testing
(11:06) Foreign funding & misinformation campaigns
(13:01) Nuclear myths: “It wouldn’t fill an Olympic pool”
(15:29) Why Gen IV reactors are meltdown-proof
(17:29) AI as a tailwind for nuclear infrastructure
(19:21) Misconceptions in nuclear & energy performance
(21:13) Pressure to deliver in this presidency term
(22:59) The future of global energy
(24:26) JC Btaiche: Building the world’s highest-power pulse system
(26:41) Fuse’s strategy: revenue today, power tomorrow
(28:34) Fusion’s role in reindustrialization
(33:12) The AI-power constraint: “Energy = Intelligence”
(35:31) Can we catch up to China in energy?
(38:13) Packy McCormick on vertical integration
(41:11) The Great Differentiation: Why brand matters in the age of AI




