In short
Episode topic: Coverage of two G-7-related issues—(1) President Trump’s 14-point memorandum of understanding with Iran (including threats to resume bombing if terms aren’t met) and (2) AI safety and model review at the G-7, after Anthropic temporarily pulled access to new frontier models. It also includes CNBC market/policy chatter (Fed interest-rate decision; SpaceX stock/shorting debate; FISA/SAVE Act political developments).
Guests (and backgrounds)
David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security; former nuclear weapons inspector. Anish Chopra, former White House Chief Technology Officer; chair of the Arcadia Institute.
Key claims
Albright says the Iran MoU “gives away” U.S. leverage, uses “leaky” nuclear language (e.g., “produce” without standard prohibitions), and may allow weaker IAEA inspection commitments. Chopra argues there’s emerging global consensus for “early frontier model releases” to be reviewed by standards/safety bodies, but asks what went wrong in Anthropic’s case and calls for process improvements.
Notable examples
Strait of Hormuz reopening tied to ceasefire; Anthropic pulling “Fable 5” and “Mythos 5”; reference to U.S./U.K. AI standards and innovation bodies reviewing models; mention of possible cybersecurity concerns raised by another lab/hyperscaler.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOFederal Reserve's Interest Rate Decision
0:00 to 0:24
Discussion on the Fed's upcoming decision on interest rates.
“Bring it all together with EverPure, the platform that acts like a living system, delivering the latest in data performance, security, and innovation without ever slowing you down.”
Federal Reserve's Interest Rate Decision
2:16 to 4:16
Discussion on the Fed's upcoming decision on interest rates.
“Welcome to Squawk Box right here on CNBC.”
Historical Context of Interest Rates
4:19 to 6:01
Hosts reminisce about past Fed chairmen and their policies.
“I was thinking back today of the Fed chairman that I've known in my career and my consciousness, I guess, starting with Greenspan and working your way through.”
SpaceX Market Movements
6:02 to 7:59
Analysis of SpaceX's market cap and implications.
“I remember the, do you remember Mickey Mouse flipping the bird saying, hey, Iran?”
Trump's Comments on Intelligence Nominee
8:00 to 10:00
President Trump's remarks about a potential intelligence nominee.
“Well, you know, for years, people had to think about Amazon the same way.”
Trump's Comments on Intelligence Nominee
10:28 to 13:11
President Trump's remarks about a potential intelligence nominee.
“Coming up on Squawk Pod, President Trump's first televised comments of the day at the G7 in France.”
Trump's Remarks at G7 on Iran
13:21 to 14:00
Highlights from President Trump's comments regarding Iran.
“President Trump just finished taking questions from reporters with the president of Egypt at the G7 meeting.”
Analysis of the Memorandum of Understanding with Iran
14:00 to 24:41
The segment discusses the implications and potential issues of a new memorandum regarding Iran's nuclear ambitions and military actions.
“And if I don't like it, we'll go back to shooting at them, dropping bombs on their head.”
Regulation and AI: The Anthropic Dilemma
28:00 to 30:55
Learn about the complex regulatory landscape surrounding AI models, particularly Anthropic's challenges with government oversight.
“And these bodies, theoretically, will be positioned to identify potential harms or risks that could be mitigated collaboratively with industry.”
Evaluating AI Models: A Call for Improvement
30:55 to 34:20
Explore the need for a more effective process in evaluating AI models and the implications of their release.
“I realize all these other bodies may have signed off on it, but is Anthropic right?”
Show all 11 chapters
The Future of AI Regulation: Challenges Ahead
34:20 to 36:55
Discuss the ongoing challenges in AI regulation and the need for a cohesive strategy moving forward.
“And they seem to be at the forefront of AI when it comes to enterprise and what can be done with some of these things.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Your data lives everywhere. On-prem, in the cloud, across apps. Bring it all together with EverPure, the platform that acts like a living system, delivering the latest in data performance, security, and innovation without ever slowing you down. Sophisticated enough to anticipate your ever-changing data needs, yet simple enough to feel like second nature. Tame your data chaos with EverPure and make storage and data management the simplest part of your business. Visit everpuredata.com to learn more. Never bet against American grit or American energy. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost and a fraction of the time.
0:45So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy.
0:57Bring in show music, please. Hi, I'm CNBC producer Katie Kramer. Today on Squawk Pod. President Trump at the G7 in France speaking about his memo of understanding with Iran. If they don't behave, we'll go right back to dropping bombs right smack in the middle of their head. Former nuclear weapons inspector David Albright says the document needs more work. This deal is giving away a lot of U.S. leverage. I mean, it's paying a very high price to get the Strait of Hormuz open. And there isn't going to be a lot of leverage left to deal with the nuclear questions. Also at the G7, Google, OpenAI and Anthropic.
1:39This meeting comes right after Anthropic suspended access to its newest AI models, former White House Chief Technology Officer Anish Chopra. What went wrong here? Was the model evaluated? What did they see? Did they miss something? Plus, SpaceX, Fed Day, and what goes around, comes around. Jimmy Carter was in the White House. He was lusted his heart. And Iran was in the news. It is Wednesday, June 17, 2026. Squawk Pod begins right now. Stand back to bye in three, two, one. Cue it, please. Good morning, everybody. Welcome to Squawk Box right here on CNBC. We are live from the a NASDAQ market site in Times Square.
2:23I'm Becky Quick along with Joe Kernan. Andrew is out today. And the Federal Reserve is set to issue its decision on interest rates today, the first under new chairman Kevin Warsh. The market widely expecting the central bank to stand pat on rates. The decision comes at 2 p.m. Eastern with a Warsh news conference scheduled for 30 minutes later. The FOMC also set to issue updated economic projections in the so-called dot plot, Most Fed watchers think that Warsh won't participate, either because he's too new at the Fed or because he wants to underline that he's not a fan of the dot plot and all the implications for all the forward guidance.
3:03Yeah, he's been talking about pulling that for a long time. He has. He thinks they talk way too much. And Greenspan did not. And it sort of all changed under Bernanke. What do you. There are pretty unusual circumstances with Bernanke. Good reason for maybe talking more frequently because of the financial crisis. They never, like government programs, once they're out, they never go back. They never go back. You mentioned oil. Yeah. What, 76? $76. 76. That's a different number than even a week or two ago that Warsh was going to be facing. Japan's raising interest rates because of oil prices. Japan's in a much more complicated position.
3:42But they use that for inflation, too? They use higher rates to end inflation? So they got the same tool. It just gives him, I think, a little more flexibility, maybe not to cut, but maybe not to indicate that the next move would be a hike. I agree. Look, I don't anticipate there'll be much difference in the communique that comes out. Maybe he'll want to get his fingerprints on that. But really, it's the meeting after the press conference afterwards to see what Warsh himself has to say, what he wants to put forward as the main points on his agenda that people will be watching. Right. It's true.
4:20He's, you know, it's his first meeting. So I don't know what. Yeah, I would tread kind of lightly. We'll see if he doesn't. That would be news. If he comes in blazing. Yeah. I kind of like to see it. I was thinking back today of the Fed chairman that I've known in my career and my consciousness, I guess, starting with Greenspan and working your way through. Yeah. Bernanke, Yellen, Powell, and now Warsh. And I've been around. I remember more presidents than I remember Fed chairmen. Who appointed Greenspan? Was that Reagan? Reagan. So that's where my, and, you know, I'm a lot older than you. And that's my beginning recollection, too.
5:03All I know is that there were a couple of predecessors to Greenspan that were totally pilloried because of that. Yeah, but Volcker, right, of what he did to have to raise rates. I'm sorry, Volcker is what I, yeah, that goes without saying, that everyone remembers that big tall guy taking rates. Yeah, but that was when I was first in the job market, and I was never going to buy a house because it was 16 % mortgage rates. I remember my parents having mortgage rates that were just unbelievable. 21.5%. Even as a kid, I remember the idea that if you could move and take your mortgage rate with you, your fixed mortgage rate with you, that was a big deal.
5:38Or sell your house and be able to sell them the interest rate that came with it. I'd look it up, but I'll just guess. But they had a misery index at the time. Yeah, I remember that too. It was like 22 or something like that. Double-digit unemployment and double-digit inflation at the same time. Which is why what the Fed has to say matters. Jimmy Carter was in the White House with lust in his heart. And Iran was in the news. It was in 79. It certainly was. I remember the, do you remember Mickey Mouse flipping the bird saying, hey, Iran? That was, that was what was on all the T-shirts. I just remember our horrible losses when we tried to get them out and then we were stuck and we just felt horrible.
6:18Yeah. And here we are again. We're monitoring shares of SpaceX, which again gained yesterday and in the pre-market this morning up another 3 percent. And the shares rose 4 percent yesterday, 20 percent in each of the stock's first two days. And SpaceX overtaking Amazon's market cap at briefly top Microsoft's market value, just shy of$3 trillion. Investor Michael Burry made famous in the big short, arguing in a sub-stack post that options used to wager against SpaceX stock remain too expensive. And those began to trade for the first time yesterday. So a lot of people think that it's a good short, I guess, at this point, or at least overvalued.
7:09It's been, you know, when it overtook Amazon yesterday, kind of watching through. Okay, so you look at the market cap right now,$2.74 trillion to$2.64 trillion for Amazon. There's so much stuff in Amazon. If you consider it's not just the retailer. It's not just the cloud computing. It's got its own satellite program with Kuiper that's now been renamed to what is it? Leo. There's just program after program, you know, from the movie studios, Amazon Prime, video, on and on and on. And SpaceX has some huge promise, but, you know, again, you've got to figure out how quickly they're going to ramp up.
7:51Elon Musk has some pretty big numbers he's anticipating. What did he say? A trillion dollars in revenue by 2030. Yeah. But that's where you've got people who are going to start really looking at this. Well, you know, for years, people had to think about Amazon the same way. Yeah. Yeah. Right. And for Amazon, it wasn't going to be profitable for a long time because Jeff Bezos was trying to build it and make it bigger and bigger and bigger. So every time they had any money that came in, he was deploying it. It was all revenue growth at that point. Right. All right. President Trump says that a Senate confirmation hearing set for today on U.S.
8:25Attorney Jay Clayton's candidacy for director of national intelligence will be canceled. In an early morning post on Truth Social, the president accused Democrats of breaking a deal to allow an extension of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in exchange for removing acting director of national intelligence Bill Pulte. and clearing the way for Clayton to take that job. President Trump said that he doesn't want Clayton to leave his current position to take the intelligence post until Jamie McDonald is installed as the new U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. Trump saying in his words, to add a slight bit of intrigue, but for the good of the nation and the people of our country, I will not approve FISA without the Save America Act going along with it.
9:08The Save America Act is the president's proposed bill that would require proof of citizenship in order to vote. Yeah, some other provisions in there. And I did get to watch the majority leader an extended interview on another network with my buddy Brett. But it was a good interview, and a lot went on. He said a lot of things, and he was very forthcoming. We had him on last week. Yeah, we had him on last week. And he agrees with a lot of things the president's doing, but there are some sticking points in that relationship and in trying to do things. I don't know what the prospects are for that.
9:46They've brought the SAVE Act up I don't know how many times. It's not currently workable with the makeup of both Republicans. I think they've got 48 votes or something like that. So you don't even have all the Republicans at this point. And then if it goes into a voterama, it gets very deep in the weeds. But there are certain amendments that would go on to the voterama that would make it very tough for certain Republicans and tough districts to support. So it's, you know, literally really like, you know, the really gross, greasy sausage that goes into the intestine. It's not just making sausage.
10:24It's making the worst. It's making blood sausage. All right. People are just waking up. What is that from? Groundhog Day, right? It says some people eat blood sausage. Not me. No. Cheese will be next. Coming up on Squawk Pod, President Trump's first televised comments of the day at the G7 in France. The topic du jour, of course, is Iran. It's a memorandum of understanding. And if I don't like it, we'll go back to shooting at him. Former nuclear weapons inspector David Albright zeros in on that memorandum of understanding. And two paragraphs have what he calls leaky language. This one in particular really needs some serious amendments and work, and I hope that this is not the final.
11:12The language in this memorandum of understanding is kind of timid.
11:22Bitcoin is often talked about as an investment, but it was built to be used. With Cash App, you can actually do that. Send Bitcoin instantly, pay at local Square businesses that accept it, or move it to your own wallet whenever you want. It works more like real money and less like something locked in an account. For a limited time, new customers can get$10 added to their balance. Just use code CASHAPP10 when you sign up. And don't forget this part. Send at least$5 to a friend in the first two weeks. Terms apply. Cash App is a financial services platform, not a bank. Banking services provided by Cash App's bank partners.
12:07Bitcoin services provided by Block, Inc. Brand. For additional information, see the Bitcoin disclosures at cash.app slash legal slash podcast. At Venture Global, we think about what can be done, not what's usually done. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world, right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost in a fraction of the time. So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy. A text says, you're on my mind. A bouquet from 1-800-Flowers says, you're my everything.
12:53Heartfelt moments belong in the real world, not just your phone. For 50 years, 1-800-Flowers has helped millions of people make memories that'll last a lifetime with gifts they'll cherish forever. Their expertly curated arrangements and gift baskets shipped nationwide with a 100 % satisfaction guarantee. Don't wait for the next big moment. Make it when you visit 1-800-Flowers.com slash SXM today. That's 1-800-Flowers.com slash SXM.
13:21This is Squawk Pod from CNBC. Here's Becky Quick. President Trump just finished taking questions from reporters with the president of Egypt at the G7 meeting. There is some news breaking out of this. Megan Casella joins us right now with the highlights from that. Megan, good to see you again. Becky, that's right. This was the first time we heard from President Trump on camera today, and he was being asked specifically about that draft 14-point memorandum of understanding that we've been talking about for the past few days. And the president's suggesting here that this is not a final document, that things could still be changing, and that if he doesn't like the way negotiations go, the U.S.
13:54and Iran could return to active war. Take a listen to the president's comments. No, it's not final. It's a memorandum of understanding. And if I don't like it, we'll go back to shooting at them, dropping bombs on their head. If I don't like it, if they don't behave, we'll go right back to dropping bombs right smack in the middle of their head. Guys, the president here severely undercutting some of the stability that he and his top officials have been trying to generate this week with this deal. The argument we've been hearing all week from the Trump administration has been that, yes, this is a bare bones document and it leaves a lot to be left negotiated.
14:30But what it got the U.S. and the rest of the region was a lot of stability here while they worked out the harder details. It was extending the ceasefire. That is still true. But the president, of course, saying now that if he doesn't like the way things are going, potentially even within the next 60 days, he says he won't hesitate to return to dropping bombs. Becky. Yeah, I guess I can't say I'm completely shocked by this, Megan. And there's been a lot of pushback about the terms of the deal, how you make sure that the Iranians stick to the terms of some of these things, questions about all those issues.
15:01That's why I asked the last time you were with us about the idea of removing the military, because that's always been kind of the cudgel that President Trump will hang over anything to try and get them to the negotiating table and try and make some of the progress with some of those negotiations. I can't say I'm shocked to hear this. That's right. Right. And I think that's fair. I mean, he, of course, does not want to remove what he views as the U.S.'s biggest negotiating point is the power of the military. He doesn't want to take that off the table entirely. So in one hand, not surprising. On the other hand, though, the argument at the G7 all week and when talking with regional allies and specifically, especially European allies who really want to see this war ending has been, well, now we've gotten to firmer ground.
15:46We're going to pull tensions both sides. Cooler heads will prevail on both sides while they work out the rest of the agreements, which, of course, continue to be the hardest one. So, you know, the president in some ways may be trying to balance those two things, not wanting to remove what he sees as the biggest the U.S.'s biggest leverage point. But also this really does undercut that stability and things like markets that have been celebrating this deal because they think it means the end to this war clearly showing here we're not there yet. Look, I think what the European leaders want and many other areas like China and India, they want the strait reopened.
16:20And that's why we've seen oil prices. In fact, can we take a look at oil prices and just see where they stand at this moment? Oil prices were at$76 when we started. Now it's at$76.46. If there's an undercutting of the stability that you're talking about affecting the markets, I don't know what markets you're looking at. Yeah, I mean, this is we'll have to play this out and see. But right now, WTI is still sitting below$77 a barrel. That's the immediate stability that this has brought, the idea that the strait would be reopened. And I think the oil markets are going to reflect any concerns, any conditions that are brought up, because the war premium came out of that market immediately with this coming out the other day.
17:00Obviously, the president's saying this. That's going to catch some attention. We'll see how it plays out in the markets. But this is the first time he's been speaking on camera today. and Megan is following all of this very closely. Megan, thank you for bringing us those comments and continue to watch all of this and bring us any developments as they happen. Megan Casella. Joining us right now is former nuclear weapons inspector David Albright. He is the president of the Institute for Science and International Security. And David, I think we'd all like to see the world without Iran having nuclear ambitions.
17:32How likely do you think it is that they will give up those nuclear ambitions for some of the things that they seem to have been promised? I think based on just reading this available memorandum of understanding, I mean, you can't have a lot of confidence. This deal is giving away a lot of U.S. leverage. I mean, it's paying a very high price to get the Strait of Hormuz open. And there isn't going to be a lot of leverage left to deal with the nuclear questions. And the language in the memorandum of understanding isn't very good. I mean, it's not even using kind of the standard language that's been developed to say a country shouldn't develop or test or manufacture or produce nuclear weapons.
18:16It just uses the word produce. And we know from experience that that creates loopholes and countries have exploited that. Iran included has been exploiting that kind of imprecise language for years. And so the words not being able to test, not being specifically in the memorandum, they're not in the memorandum that is available publicly. Now, maybe this is the finalist version, we should say. Right. But Trump's been making statements that he wants to see improvements in it. And this is one area where I think he's been less than satisfied. But still, this is the the version out there that's being said is final.
18:56And it has leaky language. And it also has some language that talks about the nuclear issues will be addressed that are mutually agreed upon. I mean, that's not normal language in a deal. I mean, it should just be the issues that need to be dealt with. And mutually agreed could actually exclude robust International Atomic Energy Agency inspections aimed at making sure that Iran doesn't have on-declared nuclear material. I mean, Iran rejects that point of view of the IA completely. So it's highly contentious view from Iran's point of view. And we'll never mutually agree with the United States to look into that.
19:35So I think this paragraph, there's two, nuclear is in two paragraphs, but this one in particular really needs some serious amendments and work. And I hope that this is not the final. Now, there may be side deals. I mean, we had that in the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. But the side deals back then, which took a lot of effort to flush out, and the media was important in doing that, made things worse. So it was since the side deals can hide the even further problems and are there to hide embarrassments and weaknesses. And then I saw Vice President J.D. Vance recently saying that, you know, there are these secret arrangements.
20:20I think it was him. Let me not quote him saying it, but there are these secret arrangements. But we should know what this deal is about. It shouldn't be OK. It's a great deal because you don't see the secret part of it. We should know exactly what it is. And on its surface, it has some serious problems. David, I mean, this has been the question of dealing with Iran going back decades at this point. The idea that we don't want them to have a nuclear program. the idea that they will give as much as they have to, but they've never been very open or forthcoming. I'm sure you have the sense that they have not followed the spirit or the letter of any of these agreements to this point, that they've tried to evade detection of any of their programs that are there.
21:06How do you work within a regime like that? Well, I think you have to be very tough. I mean, that's the bottom line. And the language should be very clear that Iran has to accept robust International Atomic Energy Agency inspections and Iran should cooperate. I mean, that's the key word. I mean, this whole nuclear issue can be settled in a few months if Iran cooperates. And I think the language in this memorandum of understanding is kind of timid. It's not enough to push Iran to feel that it needs to do something. And the memorandum is a bit open ended about, you know, there's could just be renewed.
21:49There's no obligation that Iran complies before it gets the vast benefits that are being given to open the Strait of Hormuz. So I think you have to just be extremely tough with Iran. And I think that could require a return to military strikes. I mean, this is a ceasefire deal fundamentally. And I think if Iran doesn't perform, it should understand that military actions could resume. And so I don't think we should see this as an end to the war like World War II ended. I mean, this is an interim process that we're in, and military conflict could resume because Iran will not abide by even the basic requirements of international obligations like the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
22:41And so I think perhaps it's not good news for the economy per se, but I do think that this memorandum kind of reinforces the idea that we're in a very unstable situation. Do the threats ring hollow now, David? I could make the case either way, because the president has threatened many, many times in the last month or whatever it was. I'm going to, you know, we're going to do it again. We're going to do it again. We're going to do the bridges and infrastructure power plants. We're going to do it. And then it never happened. Yet he did do something right at the start that no one ever did before.
23:20So it's not like Iran can say, oh, we don't, you know, this guy's all talk because he really did do something initially, destroying the Navy, destroying someone. But but at this point, I don't know whether they're they think they have gotten beyond that, I think, to where they're I think they're they're acting with with impunity in a lot of ways for the last month. Yeah, and I think the deterrence has to be reestablished. I mean, Trump did, and with Israel, did serious damage to the nuclear program, including the parts of the program aimed at building the nuclear weapon itself. And so they've been seriously set back.
23:59And that's a real victory of these two wars. And it actually puts Iran in a weaker position. And that's why it's surprising to me to see that it's like the U.S. has put itself in a weaker position on something that was a U.S. victory or almost a U.S. victory. So so I think they have to have to reestablish deterrence. And I do think that President Trump has just made one too many or 10 times too many threats that don't mean anything. And Iran is reading that very accurately and pushing for an advantage. All right, David, thank you for joining us this morning. Thank you. Coming up next on Squawk Pod, AI in focus at the G7 meeting.
24:45Are the newest models effective and safe? We hear from Anish Chopra, former White House Chief Technology Officer. There appears to be some rough global consensus that we've got a model to keep the innovation machine running, but protecting against harms.
25:06There are moments that define who you are and who you're becoming. And when those moments arrive, what you drive should rise to meet them. The Range Rover Sport commands attention from the very first glance. Every line, every detail, engineered for impact. Inside, refinement takes over with sculpted 22-way heated seating with available massage and a 13.1-inch touchscreen that puts everything within easy reach. But the Range Rover Sport isn't just about luxury. It's about uncompromised performance, too. Delivering a powerful, agile drive that feels as confident as it looks. And with nearly endless ways to personalize, from interior finishes to wheels to unique colors and accessories, your Range Rover Sport becomes unmistakably yours.
Read the full transcript
25:52For those who expect more from every moment, there's a vehicle designed to meet it. The Range Rover Sport. Exclusive offers available now. Explore further at RangeRover.com.
26:31.com. Cup 2026. Introducing the total solutions advantage only from Comcast Business. It's the largest, fastest fiber-powered network for small business. Gig speeds with equipment and security included and a five-year price lock. No one does business like Comcast Business. Switch today. Get started for$60 a month for 12 months when you add an advanced solution to a qualifying internet package. Limited time offer. Restrictions apply. New customers only. Requires 300 megabits per second internet, security edge, and additional qualifying service. One-year agreement, paperless billing, and auto pay with bank account required.
27:02Taxes and fees extra. This is Squawk Pod. Stand by Joe in three, two, one, his mic, cue. You're watching Squawk Box on CNBC. I'm Joe Kernan, along with Becky Quick. We should bring up also at the G7 today, President Trump and other world leaders will meet with top executives from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and many other AI companies. Joining us right now to talk about it is former White House Chief Technology Officer Anish Chopra, who is the new chair of the Arcadia Institute. Anish, let's just talk about where things stand with open AI or with with AI writ large. The reason that this is so important and why this luncheon is taking place at the G7 is because every nation has to think about this.
27:50How how do you focus on this and how it plays out on the world stage? Well, the good news is there appears to be some rough global consensus, that we've got a model to keep the innovation machine running, but protecting against harms. And that emerging consensus looks a little bit like what President Trump signed in his executive order, early frontier model releases, now that they're showing much better capability to the point where they're starting to have impact on security, to be reviewed by, call them standards and innovation institutes in the U.S. or the U.K. Safety Institute. And these bodies, theoretically, will be positioned to identify potential harms or risks that could be mitigated collaboratively with industry.
28:37This is short of, obviously, formal rules and congressional action, but it is a model that appears to have legs, despite the kerfuffle we're in right now from last week. The U.S. administration and the trouble that Anthropic has run into once again with both Fable 5 and Mythos 5 being pulled from the market because of concerns that it could fall into the wrong hands and really lead to some problems in foreign hands. How would you think about this? How would you rule on some of these issues? Anthropic has been the one that seems to be most open to the idea of regulation, and yet it is the one that keeps getting caught up in it.
29:17So actually, Becky, it's a little maybe less understood, but the five of the major frontier lab, all the major frontier labs have already signed agreements with the United States AI standards and innovation body, the expert agency within the Commerce Department, whose job is to evaluate models early and give feedback. So that process has been in place. As you know, anthropic models, the Biden administration published technical reports at the end of its version of this, which was launched in 2024, or 2023 with reports coming out all the way through the end. And so the question really to ask Becky is, what went wrong here?
29:58Was the model evaluated by the expert agency that's evaluating models? What did they see? Did they miss something? Is there a process by which new information, as was reported, was brought in from one of the hyperscalers, could be used to sort of reopen the technical review? I hope if we look at this, instead of what looks like a very volatile, you're in, you're out, export control, 530, you know, memos saying you got to pull the product, that doesn't feel very stable or resilient. Certainly not to the investor audience who's like, we want to see the benefits of this. This feels a bit haphazard.
30:34But know that underneath that kerfuffle, there is a process. And so what's the after action report to make sure that that process is improved and it's more predictable in terms of what we think will happen when models are in for review? Let me just cut you off for a second, because a lot of this goes over people's heads. We're still trying to figure out what happened with Anthropic this week. If you read The Wall Street Journal, it suggests that this was a tip off from Amazon, from Andy Jassy saying that their people had discovered some problems with this that could really lead to cybersecurity issues in the wrong hands.
31:08I realize all these other bodies may have signed off on it, but is Anthropic right? And how much do I trust the government to be able to analyze the very cutting-edge stuff that's happening with AI at this point? It kind of makes me feel a little better that industry is checking in on this. Yeah, forgive me, Becky. We have to do two things at once. We want these capabilities in the hands of our defenders so we can fix bugs and improve software that is at risk when other people have these sorts of capabilities. So we already have a process where some of the folks that we're expecting to get access get access, and we want people that shouldn't have access not to have access.
31:45So there's these two levels of questions. One is how do we know who's accessing these models? Clearly, that is an area where there's been reporting, and I don't have any verified proof, that there may have been a list of potential future folks likely to get access that had not so great ties perhaps to the Chinese. So there is a dynamic here, which is what can we do to strengthen how we access sensitive models? And we've done this movie before in financial services. We have mechanisms for sensitive access. We created NSTIC in the Obama years to create digital identity. So we have stronger ways of knowing who you are and why you're accessing tools.
32:26So that's a problem. The narrow question here is whether or not someone that was slated to get access could have inappropriately moved beyond the guardrails that were put in place to protect against the thing giving you instructions and how to more easily break other people's systems. OK, let me just ask, should Anthropic have pulled back Fable 5 and Mythos 5 this week? Did that make sense to you? I have to defer to the experts in this discussion, Becky. The good news is the cybersecurity coordinator for the president, which is not an office that has like a flamboyant ideology. It's a more expert agency within the White House, came to the judgment that there was an issue and that issue needed to be resolved.
33:05It's unfortunate that export controls were the blunt instrument used to kind of address something. It ideally would have been handled more amicably and collaboratively, which is why I'm asking, let's fix the process that that is early. Which means what? They should have said nicely to Anthropic. Please pull it back from these people that we think are spies. No, no, no. I think that would mean that the experts who are reviewing the model, either they made the judgment that what they found was what exactly was reported by Amazon and they didn't view it as a major issue or it was an issue and it needed to be reimagined and reevaluated.
33:40So we haven't heard from the technical evaluators to know where they stood on that issue. And so there might have been a gap in this episode, but hopefully going forward, it's not going to be these 5 p.m. White House calls on products. The things that are so weird about this is, on the one hand, we want to be the leader in AI. We want to be out there first. We want to not give any ground. And the Trump administration has been seen as more open to that than the Biden administration was. That's just the overall assumption that you get from outside of Washington on these things. But at the same time, Anthropic has run into problems with the Trump administration time and time again.
34:20And they seem to be at the forefront of AI when it comes to enterprise and what can be done with some of these things. So it seems like they keep running into walls, whether it's with the Defense Department and having a different ideology than people within the Defense Department. And I guess the question is, where do we stand at this point? Are we in favor of pushing this out there or are we in favor of having pretty tight regulation to make sure that we are being safe rather than pushing to be the leader? We're back where we've had a conversation in the past where there's a voluntary commitment by the frontier model companies to provide their models with President Trump's 30-day advance notice for technical review.
35:00And that ideally they would be working collaboratively to surface problems and address them before those products come to market. Something fell short in this release. The hope is that it is the exception and not the norm, and that we'll have common order where that process is just put in place more solidly, because obviously from this moment forward, Becky, every major model will have achieved this level of capability. It won't be an anthropic personality issue. I think we've heard from the AI advisor, David Sachs, that this is separate from the DOD deal war matter. So I trust that that is that the other one felt more more of a personality.
35:37You've had this conversation on your show as well. This one clearly is something that looks more of like a technical gap. So it's not all the former Biden employee and all the woke the no, that's not what it is because the president definitely looks at things like, you know, he can't help everything informs his opinions on everything, it seems like. And you saw what Amadei said in that. Who was he talking to? Shareholders or it was in her. Internal employee. It was internal employee. It was like it sounded like, you know, Joy Behar. I get it. But if you look, your audience is very sophisticated to understand how do we make this capability work for the economy and have America's, you know, innovation ecosystem thrive.
36:24That story is, I want to separate the ideology matter and the personality matter. Department of War issue feels a lot more like that. It's kind of frustrating and sad that that situation has even happened. But this matter I would think of as more substantive. There are technical experts the president's put in place. They're doing their job. And I have confidence that while I wouldn't love, I would not have loved the export control blunt instrument, I feel like the security team felt they didn't have a choice because of the nature of that exchange. So we've got to improve that process, Joe. It's not about Anthropic, one company.
36:58This is going to be every model from here forward having to figure this out. Okay. Anthropic's on my shih tzu list anyway from yesterday, from Claude. Oh, Joe had an issue. They didn't know what year it was. Grok will give you real-time information, Joe, because it's got the Twitter stream. so it's got the real time. You're right. All right. There you go. It's 2020. Was I wrong? Is it 2026? No. Wednesday? Oh, boy. Anish, thank you very much. We appreciate it. Thank you for having me. And that is Squawk Pod for today. Thanks for listening. Squawk Box is hosted by Joe Kernan, Becky Quick, and Andrew Ross Sorkin.
37:45Tune in weekday mornings on CNBC at 6 Eastern. To get the smartest takes and analysis from our TV show right into your ears, follow Squawk Pod wherever you get your podcasts and listen anytime you want. We'll meet you right back here tomorrow. We are clear. Thanks, guys. Thank you so much.
38:34guests like comedian Andy Richter. Go beyond the map with Enjoy Illinois Let's Go, available now on your favorite podcast platforms.
From the publisher
At the G-7 meeting in France, President Trump commented on the memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Iran. CNBC’s Megan Cassella reports on the market reaction to the document, and David Albright, former Nuclear Weapons Inspector, reviews his concerns about the MOU’s “leaky language.” AI giants including OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google are also attending this year’s G-7 summit; former White House Chief Technology Officer Aneesh Chopra considers the importance of global coordination on AI development, particularly in light of Anthropic’s decision to suspend its top models Fable and Mythos.
Megan Cassella - 13:03
David Albright - 16:55
Aneesh Chopra - 26:27
In this episode:
Megan Cassella, @mmcassella
Joe Kernen, @JoeSquawk
Becky Quick, @BeckyQuick
Katie Kramer, @Kramer_Katie
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

