Bets & the Economy: Wells Fargo CEO Charlie Scharf & Fanatics CEO Michael Rubin 9/10/25

10 Sep 2025 · 50 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Squawk Pod Episode Summary: Bets & the Economy

Episode Details

  • Podcast Title: Squawk Pod
  • Episode Title: Bets & the Economy: Wells Fargo CEO Charlie Scharf & Fanatics CEO Michael Rubin
  • Air Date: September 10, 2025
  • Hosts: Joe Kernen, Becky Quick, Andrew Ross Sorkin
  • Producer: Katie Kramer

Overview In this episode, the discussion features insights from two prominent business leaders: Charlie Scharf, CEO of Wells Fargo, and Michael Rubin, CEO of Fanatics. The conversation navigates the current state of the U.S. economy, the challenges and opportunities within the banking sector, and the evolving landscape of sports betting and collectibles.

---

Key Themes

  1. Economic Insights from Charlie Scharf
  2. Consumer Spending:
  3. Consumer spending remains stable across various wealth levels.
  4. There exists a dichotomy between higher and lower-income consumers, impacting overall economic health.
  • Impact of Tariffs:
  • Scharf notes that initial fears regarding tariffs have lessened as businesses have successfully adjusted without significant price increases.
  • Business owners across states show a willingness to accept trade adjustments for long-term competitiveness.
  • Job Market Dynamics:
  • Despite stable consumer spending and business health, job creation remains subdued.
  • Companies, particularly in the middle market, are cautious in hiring due to uncertainties and the influence of AI.
  • AI Influence:
  • The ongoing AI revolution is still nascent but expected to reshape job requirements and productivity in the coming years.
  1. Michael Rubin on Fanatics and Sports Betting
  2. Growth of Fanatics:
  3. Fanatics is rapidly growing in the sports betting market, with a valuation of approximately $25 billion.
  4. Rubin discusses their innovative approach to customer engagement through "fan cash" rewards, enhancing customer retention.
  • Market Position:
  • Currently, Fanatics is positioned as the third-largest sportsbook in the U.S., with aspirations for significant growth.
  • The company aims to make its gaming segment 40% of its profits by 2030.
  • Customer Acquisition Strategy:
  • Rubin highlights the importance of offering value through fair play policies and fan loyalty programs, reducing reliance on traditional advertising.

---

Noteworthy Discussions

  • Economic Outlook:
  • Scharf provides a balanced view of the economy, acknowledging both strengths and weaknesses across different consumer segments.
  • Corporate Governance:
  • Discussion shifts to the independence of the Federal Reserve and its implications on business, with Scharf advocating for the Fed's autonomy.
  • IPO Market:
  • The episode touches on the current climate for IPOs, with Klarna's recent public offering serving as a backdrop for discussions around market activity.
  • Philosophical Views on Wealth:
  • The hosts engage in a philosophical debate on the implications of billionaire wealth on society, referencing Larry Ellison's recent surge in net worth.

---

Conclusion The episode wraps up with a reflection on the significance of business strategies in adapting to economic conditions and consumer behavior. Both Scharf and Rubin illustrate their approaches in navigating challenges, demonstrating a balance between innovation and traditional business practices.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Economic Resilience: Despite challenges, consumer spending remains robust, and businesses are adapting to tariff impacts.
  • Strategic Innovation: Fanatics' approach to sports betting emphasizes customer loyalty and innovative practices to differentiate itself in a competitive market.
  • Future of Work: The integration of AI into business processes is expected to drive productivity but raises questions about job stability.

For further insights and analysis, tune in to Squawk Pod episodes and follow the discussion on social media platforms.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Bring in show music, please. Hi, I'm CNBC producer Katie Kramer. Today on Squawk Pod, two big names in business. First, from the world of banking, Wells Fargo CEO Charlie Scharf. He shares his intel on America's businesses, consumers, and economic health. No one likes uncertainty. No one likes the idea of increased pricing, but they are hopeful that the tariffs wind up at a reasonable level. So far, that's been the case, and everyone's been able to share in that in a way which hasn't driven significant price increases. So they're looking at what the end result is, which is a more competitive set of companies in this country.

0:39Then from the world of sports, Fanatics CEO Michael Rubin, he's been building businesses since the late 90s. But this one outshines them all. And at a 25-ish billion dollar valuation, it's still growing. When you think about what gaming can be, in our five-year plan, we have gaming being 40 % of our profits. It's another big day on Squawk Box's 30th anniversary week. I had a better head of hair then. You did? We all did. We may be on memory lane today, but the best Squawk years are still ahead. With this withering back and forth you put up with every day, you should have a few more scars. You have no gray hair.

1:18It is Wednesday, September 10th, 2025. It's why none of us leave. We love it. Squawk Pod begins right now. Stand Becky by in 3, 2, 1. Cue it, please. Good morning, everybody. Welcome to Squawk Box right here on CNBC. We're live from the Nasdaq market site in Times Square. I'm Becky Quick along with Joe Kernan and Andrew Ross Sorkin. Oracle shares skyrocketing after quarterly results. Shares are well above the company's intraday all-time high of about$261 a share. Earnings and revenue falling slightly short of estimates, but nobody's going to focus on that right now. Now, AI demand is what is powering that stock higher, 30 percent higher.

1:57The company expecting cloud infrastructure revenue of 18 billion dollars this year. That's a 77 percent increase. And Oracle signed four multi-billion dollar contracts in the latest quarter, including with OpenAI and Google. Here's the company's CEO on the earnings call speaking about the cloud business and its RPO, which is its backlog. It was an excellent quarter and demand for Oracle cloud infrastructure continues to build. I expect we will sign additional multibillion-dollar customers and that RPO will likely grow to exceed half a trillion dollars. The enormity of this RPO growth enables us to make a large upward revision to the cloud infrastructure portion of our financial plan.

2:48And Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison also speaking on the call. Here's what he had to say about AI. It's AI inferencing that will change everything. Oracle is aggressively pursuing the AI, and we're not doing badly in the AI training market, by the way, but inferencing is bigger. Oracle is aggressively pursuing the inferencing market as well as the AI training market. And with this morning's jump in Oracle shares, Ellison's stake in the company now worth about$350 billion. If that gain holds through today, his net worth would increase by more than$70 billion. And according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, the previous single-day record for an increased net worth was$36 billion.

3:30That was for Elon Musk last April when Tesla shares gained more than 22 % in a day. This gain would smash that record. And I think we're up near$800 billion now for the market cap. $882 billion. Yeah, closing in on, I did it quickly. Well, I'm just looking. It's behind you on the screen. It's behind you on the screen. It's a 312. $882 billion with these gains, if you count it. So he owns a lot, still owns obviously a lot of the company. The other thing I think that he said on the conference call that was so important is that AI is so important. Oracle, he said, doesn't generally deal with CEOs.

4:06But now they're dealing with CEOs regularly. and even heads of state, because this is such an important play. And man, they are ramping up fast. And they'll own TikTok sooner or later, too. Safra Kotz also said that they're not investment light, the way Wall Street says, but they're investment sort of light, because they're spending their money on a lot of equipment, but not on land, not on buildings like some of their competitors. If you ask, probably, if you did a poll now, probably 50 % of these crazy people on the left would say that billionaires are bad for society. And I just, I don't understand it.

4:41It's not, and it's the old thing where Bono said, and maybe over in Ireland, you point at the hill and say, I'm going to get that guy over here in the United States. I want to be that guy. It's not a zero-sum game. Think of all the employees that, think of all the shareholders and how they've been enriched. Think of all the tax revenue that comes. Think of all the, the way that it is, it is revolutionized software. Then set that up of what's happening with the mayoral race in this town and wonder again. Is there another way to do it? I wonder if that's the case. I wonder if there are people saying, yeah, we want to get that.

5:10But is there another way to do it? Is there something that we should cap about, if he's the owner of all these Oracle shares, because he's the founder and the guy that's responsible for everything, and his stake goes to$350 billion, is there something the government should do to prevent that from happening over and over again? or should there's something the government be doing to help it happen again and again and again? Okay, now we're going to a very philosophical question. No, we're not. I wanted you to just say no. I don't want you to say anything about it. I know where he's going to go. There's a valid question around what you do with the taxation around that, right?

5:52Oh, I wasn't even going to go there. That's a good place. That's an okay place to go because if he never sells it, then he never... I think there is a big taxation question, which is... On the capital gains, which will never be realized. Capital gains, which is never going to realize, and then, therefore, whether other Americans, the workers, effectively subsidize that wealth creation. So that is actually a real question. I was actually going to go somewhere else, which is— I'm worried. You had said, do people want to be billionaires? I think people want to be billionaires. They just don't want to be known as billionaires.

6:24That's actually a very interesting thing. Which is bad. Why is that? No, that's what I mean. No, but I was going to say— I think it comes from what happened with Occupy Wall Street. But it's not just that. I think it's people don't like conspicuous consumption. I think it's the same reason. They aren't necessarily. Some of them are. He's got a pretty nice boat. I was going to say it's the same. It's not a boat. It's a ship. It's the same reason why I think actually people admire Warren Buffett as much as they do. Right. Because he's somebody who still lives in the same home that he did in the beginning.

6:51He carries a green American Express card, not the platinum card. And there's a reason for that, because he's not trying to suggest to the world that somehow he has more or he is better than others. I actually think that's a huge part of what is going on here with this sort of idea of billionaires. By the way, I think the capitalistic system is the system. That's a fair point, conspicuous consumption. I think there's something to this idea about why people get, and this is about inequality and why people get upset about it and this and that, beyond, like, should you want to be, yes, it would be great for everybody to be a billionaire, right?

7:29But everybody can't be a billionaire. But then it's also a question of what do you do with that money? How do you act with that money? With great power comes great responsibility. With great money comes great responsibility, I think, too. It's, you know, take it all back to Spider-Man. It's like all or nothing, though. So either you decide, look, you don't, if a guy has$350 billion, you really don't need it. The$349 could be used for something else. You could make that argument. You take your billion and, you know, live great for the rest of your life. We're going to use the$349 to do all this stuff for people that are, that's one way to go.

8:06But then you take away the incentivization for performing more. Elizabeth Warren can say that again and again and again, and no one's going to, I mean, on the face of it, it sounds normal. Three percent, three cents on every dollar. But the problem is if you start putting those restrictions in place, it takes away the incentive for people to perform at their highest levels in terms of capitalism. I just, I think Larry Ellison has been a great thing for society and everything that he's built. And I think it's been a positive. I don't understand. Are there people out there who are saying otherwise?

8:40About him? Not about him in particular, about billionaires. About billionaires. Really, they hate billionaires. They want to get rid of billionaires. They're sick of billionaires. They don't want billionaires. They think billionaires are horrible. Maybe if you inherit it, it's not quite as good. A federal judge blocking President Trump from removing Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors pending a legal challenge. The judge granted Cook's request for a temporary court order to keep her seat while she challenges her firing. The judge said her case is substantially likely to succeed because her termination didn't comply with the requirement that Fed officials can only be removed for cause.

9:18We've talked all about this, in fact, with with FHFA, with Bill Pulte. I guess it was last week. President Trump had cited an unproven at this point allegations of mortgage fraud in firing her. She needs her day in court. The Justice Department has since opened a criminal investigation, according to The Wall Street Journal. So big IPO online lender Klarna pricing its IPO at$40 a share. That's above the expected range. I think it was 37 to 39. Deal values the Swedish fintech buy now pay later company at$15 billion, raised close to$1.4 billion in the IPO. The stock is expected to begin trading today on the big board under the ticker symbols KLR.

10:03It was originally aiming to go public earlier this year. plans were put on hold after president trump's tariff announcement rattled financial markets but they've wanted to go public since 2021 at least the company was worth 15 billion dollars now uh market it was 45 billion during the pandemic 45 billion and the revenues are higher now than during the pandemic but the higher interest rates everything else hurt uh hurt valuation but it's working this you're getting your wish you're getting your wish my wish ipos are hot. M &A is hot. He's wasting his wishes on that. Things are happening. Things are happening.

10:41They're percolating. The window is now open. The window is now open. So a little bit of animal spirits, that's a good thing. Is that just a reflection of where the major averages are? I mean, when you're closing at new highs every day, it feels like a good time to kind of get out there. And typically, I mean, it's interesting. In an IPO you want to go out when things are good. In merger land, the truth is people make people do their mergers when they have the most confidence which usually the worst time to do it right when they when everything's going terribly nobody wants to do a deal because they think they have to like you know fix up their own house first the problem is that most people do deals at the top of the market right you get a good price when things are is this question so it's above the range is it going to be one of these i mean it doesn't sound that sexy to me It's like a firm, isn't it?

11:31But is it going to be priced at$40 and open at$70? I don't know, but go back and look at Figma. Figma went nuts. Went nuts, but then didn't. So maybe that will be in people's minds. Coming up next on Squawk Pod, how America is doing economically. Our next guest knows the consumer, small, medium, and large businesses. Plus, he's in on artificial intelligence, too. Banking is big. Wells Fargo CEO Charlie Scharf. The market has certainly up till now gotten wrong with the impact of tariffs will be, both on prices in general, but also what the impact on markets are. And I think, you know, there was a view, certainly early on around Liberation Day, of just the extreme impact that tariffs at that levels could have.

12:19What you found is that the ultimate levels are more moderate than that.

12:28This is Squawk Pod, where we are celebrating 30 years of Squawk Box on CNBC and the 14-year-strong anchor team of Joe Kernan, Becky Quick, and Andrew Ross Sorkin. In fact, we rendered them speechless yesterday. They're already grown up by then. Oh my goodness gracious. You guys came in. How'd you get up from here? With a surprise visit from the families of all three right on set. You probably know by now. We are marking the 30th anniversary of Squawk Box this week. We haven't talked about it yesterday. I watched it. Having been here and then having watched it, it was two different things. Because it couldn't be necessarily shot right.

13:11I thought they were going to show a lot of video of my kids and growing up. so when I was introing it I was looking and expected to see Blake and Scott or whatever when they were like little kids but I did it looked like I was just introing them that they were here when I looked at the video that they showed I thought why are they starting with this later video that had been shot I thought that that I'm like wow where is that from and it wasn't until Blake touched my back and I turned around and saw her, I didn't realize, and then you, I think, looked over and were like, your kids are here. And I was talking about my family, and it's like, well, I would have invited my kids.

13:55Okay, this is the... Becky's gonna cry. I'm not gonna cry. Wow.

14:05Then next thing you know, Pilar and your kids, But the way it happened, none of us, for two and a half months, they kept this secret. And that's what brought the tears. You know, I was talking about the family, and it looked like I was just bringing them on. And why would I be surprising? They surprised us. Yeah. They did a great job of surprising us. They did. The real question is, what are you going to do with those big heads, what they call the fat heads? You heard Penelope, I said, I don't know why we're crying. And she goes, look at this. and you'll know why we're that big head. It's too big.

14:40And it's just a gap in the teeth. It's like this wide on the big. It's too big. Anyway, here's. You can auction them off to the highest bidder, but then you don't know what they'll do with them, which could be. Train puppies, maybe. Put it on the newspaper. Here is. I can think of worse. Dartboard. Yeah, dart. That's not worse than the puppy taking them. Anyway, here's a moment from the summer of 2000. We're going to go through some vignettes. This was 2011. Good morning and welcome to Squawk Box here on CNBC. I'm Joe Kernan along with our newest Squawk anchor. I'm happy to welcome and officially introduce Andrew Ross Sorkin.

15:19Woo-hoo! Do we get to go crazy all the time? No, I think we're going to be okay. Can I take the jacket off? Oh, gosh, there's something very unnerving. Is this okay? I'm a little nervous about doing this. Overaction, Carl. I'm sitting in your seat. I don't even know what to say about this. It's not my seat. It's your seat now. That is hilarious. Haynes gave everyone. I had a better head of hair then. You did. Haynes gave everyone a nickname. I mean, I was Kahuna in the brain, obviously, and the church of what's with Reverend Jim Bob Kramer. And I had one for you, and you were having none of it.

15:52But do you remember what it was? Raw. Because my son thought his name was Andrew Raw Sorkin. Oh, Raw. And I was a wrestler. I was doing a breath day. That's pretty cool, actually. It's Andrew Ross Sorkin. He's too big to fail. And we were going to do that. In the intro, you used your book title. Use it all in there. I was trying to be serious. I know. Those were the days you were trying to be serious. You learned. I was so young. All I wanted to do was be taken seriously. Now I'm not taken seriously. It's too late. It's too late. Actually, your hair's not that different. You know what? You're doing well.

16:26Yeah. I'm holding up. You are doing well. I'm holding up. With this withering back and forth you put up with every day, you should have a few more scars. You have no gray hair. There are some grays in there. Maybe you're a mess on the end. There are some grays. It's getting a little thinner. There's a lot of that. We don't need to get into all of it. You know what? It's true. I can take care of those grays for you. Yeah. His grays informe, yeah. No, I'm kidding. I do not. Why do I do that? I constantly... Nope. Amazing. You haven't... I'm worried about the insides. If you look that good on Dorian Gray up in the attic.

17:00Right. It could be. No, yeah. You could just fall apart later. Exactly. You're brittle.

17:08For a look at the economy, the consumer, the Fed, and so much more, we can go a million places this morning. Joining us in an exclusive interview is Wells Fargo CEO Charlie Sharf. And we're thrilled to have you at the table on this 30th anniversary week of Squawk Box, no less. Great to be here. And congratulations to you. 30 years, if anything, is an accomplishment. Thank you. So the big question is the state of the economy. Your colleague, former peer or peer, former colleague, Jamie Dimon, says the economy is weakening. Do you believe the economy is weakening? You know, first, I think it's complicated.

17:43And I think sound bites are awfully difficult to take out of context. And I put into two categories. Number one is what we see in our own data. The second is what you see more broadly. In our own data, things are remarkably stable. I mean, we look at, I know you guys have talked about it this morning and other times, consumer spend continues at the same year-over-year pace across almost all wealth levels. Consumer credit is as good as it's been in the last six months. In fact, it's probably trending a touch better. Companies are in really great shape. We look at signs for any kind of change, and you just don't see it.

18:22Having said that, there is this big dichotomy between higher income and lower income consumers, which continues and is a real issue. And when you look at just the overall data in terms of jobs, it's undeniable in terms of just job creation. So, yeah, things are actually feel very good today, certainly relative to what you think they could be. but it's not equal across wealth spectrums. And there's probably more downside than upside. So the high-end, low-end consumer spending, you see it, but it's the same as it was a year. It hasn't gotten any worse. Yeah, it's interesting what we see is we see fairly consistent spending levels across low-end and high-end, except the low-end is spending the money that they have.

19:12So their balances are below where they were pre-pandemic levels. They are living on the edge, hasn't impacted credit yet, but they're certainly not becoming more healthy and the affluent customers are bringing up the averages. Here's the weird thing. If consumers are still spending and businesses are still printing record earnings, stock markets at new highs, you would think businesses would be more inclined to hire people. Why do you have the jobs picture looking as weak as it is when businesses, you would think, would be feeling pretty good about things? Well, listen, it's hard to exactly know.

19:53What I would say, we spend a lot of time talking to our middle market customers across the country. And I think certainly tariffs do have an impact on it, which is that, you know, well, back up. It's actually very interesting. When you go around the country and you talk to middle market customers, it doesn't matter whether you're in a red state or a blue state. What you hear is more business owners and people leading these midsize businesses happy that this country is dealing with the trade inequities that have existed. So they feel good about that. They're willing to deal with the uncertainty, but they need to react to that.

20:29And so part of that is just being very prudent in how they're hiring. And so that certainly seems to be dampening the increase in jobs. and then beyond that, there's the whole AI revolution. I personally think we're still so early in the impact of AI that it's hard to actually believe that that's the meaningful driver today. But it certainly will be. When you've thought about job count, employment, have you gotten to a point where you've said the AI is so good that we can actually scale back in terms of new hires? For example, are you there yet? We're just starting to get there. I mean, you're starting to see it in those places where it's easiest and most obvious.

21:12Within technology, in terms of coding, I mean, you know, the efficiencies you can get by using the tools today are significant. And you can either get a lot more productivity and have the same number of people or you can deal with less people. We're growing our tech budget. So, you know, for us, it's less about having reduced headcount in technology and more about just being able to get more done. In terms of the credit score, if you will, of America, when you look at just how people are either taking on debt or not, in regards not just to mortgages, I'm talking about credit cards and the like, how much of that is a feature of what's happening in our economy?

21:48Well, it looks like when you look at what's happened in the credit spectrum that the financial institutions have been fairly prudent about not allowing people to overextend. So when you look at our credit card growth, we've grown substantially over the last four or five years with new products and whatnot, gone from$35 billion to$50 billion in receivables. That number has actually kind of leveled out over the last couple of quarters, partially because we've tried to be very prudent about who we extend credit to, but also because payment rates are very high. So, you know, certainly the credit segment where we participate, you know, I think, you know, financial institutions have been quite constructive.

22:31So you don't believe that people are sort of overextended in some other way that we don't know about? You've read, you know, over the summer there were a bunch of these articles about how maybe parts of the country were living beyond their means. You just don't see it. Again, when we look at early stage delinquencies across all the different folks that we lend to, it looks good. By the way, as a bank, we have this Klarna IPO coming up. How do you think about the sort of buy now, pay later and all of the sort of fintech companies that have come on that effectively are trying to compete away some of the more classic legacy businesses?

23:07Listen, I mean, it's competition. It's competition in lending. There's competition in the deposit space. Our view in terms of what we do and the benefits that we bring is it's a broad relationship. So it's not just about the credit card loan. It's not just about the mortgage. It's about all the things that we do. And I think that's one of the huge benefits that a substantial institution like ours brings is we can provide a broad set of advice and help you both on the deposit side, the loan side, investments, and all the other things that you need. The people who are naysayers and concerned about some of those fintech companies would say, hey, they don't know how to price loans appropriately.

23:47Do you share those concerns? You know, listen, I would say the following. I think when you look at consumer markets and when you look at wholesale markets, there's a huge amount of liquidity available for loans. Right. And whether it's in the public space, the private space, not everyone has been through a cycle. and I just think that, yes, some people understand it better than others. I don't know who really understands and who doesn't, but there will be casualties for sure. When there's a cycle, which there will be a cycle. Pretending that there won't be a cycle is just crazy. Charlie, there's criticism of the Fed paying banks to hold reserves instead of lending it out.

Read the full transcript

24:27I've seen numbers, how it adds into big banks to the profits. is that a real profit generator for you? No. It's not a real profit generator. Would demand, is there not enough supply to meet the demand for loans because you want to keep it in there and keep earning a nice interest rate on it? Does that actually happen? We want to lend. You want to lend. That's what we do. And it's not just about how much money we make. It's about when you lend to someone, it allows us to have a broader relationship and provide advice and treasury services and things like that. It's a much more profitable relationship.

25:09Yeah, that's the business. It's not, you know, we're not a red herring that you hear. It's just another way to complain about the Fed. Well, I think, you know, listen, there's a question about, you know, when you have this excess cash, which we have to keep for a bunch of reasons, you know, people decided what we should get paid on that. But listen, first and foremost, we want to be able to lend as much as possible. And given the situation that we're in now, it's a really exciting time for us because we can lend in ways that we were restricted when we had the restrictions prior to June. You've seen Ken Griffin has been critical of the Fed.

25:45Most CEOs in America have not been, I'm sorry, not critical of the Fed, critical of the president about undermining what he would argue is the independence of the Fed. Where do you stand yourself on the independence of the Fed issue? Listen, I mean, I absolutely support the independence of the Fed. The Fed has to be independent. And the Fed is independent. I mean, you know, the fact is, you know, these terms are not coterminous with those of elected officials for a reason. And so, you know, every president who appoints someone in any role, whether it's a Fed or not, takes into a lot of things into account, including, you know, in this case, views on interest rates.

26:26So that's not something new. And, you know, we just, you know, differentiate, you know, there's a big difference between the president having an opinion on interest rates and believing that that changes the level of independence of the Fed. Right. We've got we've got senators. We've got everyone from from progressive senators having a view on what the Fed should do all the way to the president. And that's not new. This president happens to be very vocal about it. But that sounds like you don't think it's that big a problem for the president to be this vocal about it. I think the administration is entitled to be vocal about it.

26:58And I think the Fed should do what it believes it should do based upon the information that it sees. Charlie, the market has closed at new highs again yesterday. Your stock has outperformed the market. I think it's up more than 15 percent year to date versus around 10 percent for the S &P 500. But your stock dropped in April just like everybody else's did. I think it was trading down at around$60 versus above$80 today. That was all around concerns around tariffs in April. Was that just a big head fake? Was that far too much concern that the market put into it? Or do you think the market is misreading the potential disruption for tariffs at this point?

27:40Well, I think you've got a couple of different things going on. I mean, the market, first of all, the volatility in the markets is extreme. Yeah. And a lot of it relates to who's owning stocks, why people are involved in these things, and the amount of information that just flows. And I think, listen, the market has certainly up till now gotten wrong with the impact of tariffs will be, both on prices in general, but also what the impact on markets are. And I think, you know, there was a view, certainly early on around Liberation Day, of just the extreme impact that tariffs at that levels could have.

28:12What you found is that the ultimate levels are more moderate than that, that businesses have been able to plan, have been preparing in many, many ways. And the impact ultimately on consumers will be far less. So therefore, the economic environment and the environment for banks is very different than people initially thought it could play itself out. And so, again, we sit here today. It's a pretty good environment for us. Right. Markets are open. There's an incredible amount of liquidity. Consumers are strong. Businesses are strong. And yeah, there are these questions that remain about employment and about what levels of pricing will be.

28:48But one thing that we do have overall is we have an administration, which is a pro-growth administration. And so, you know, that as a, you know, balancing all of these other things out there, I think, is part of what you're seeing in terms of where the market's reacting. You know, we talked about AI earlier, but I'm actually curious whether you think that the broader economy is being lifted by this AI boom. How much of the economy? And is that a pocket? Is that a gold rush, a sugar rush? What is that? You're on the board of Microsoft, so you have a pretty good insight into the idea of how much big tech is going to continue to spend and what kind of pace that will look like over the next five years.

29:26Yeah, like I said before, I think it's very early on. So I think in terms of what you're actually seeing in the ability of companies to get, to use AI to become more efficient and to drive more value, it's very, very early on. Everyone's focused on it. Everyone's spending. But people are figuring out you're just starting to see the impact. So I do think it's going to be meaningful. I think instead what you're seeing is you're seeing just normal kicking around. there are risks out there. People are thinking about employment. They're thinking about inflation. And we need to get smarter about how we run our business.

30:03We've got to control inventories. We've got to control headcount. And I think that is today's primary driver. But we do have this big benefit coming in terms of what the whole AI revolution means. You don't look at this and think that this is like fiber in 1998 or 99 in terms of these data centers? Because there's sort of a massive trickle-down effect, which is great in this moment. The question is, is that a sustainable scenario? What I think is that the use cases for the AI tools that now exist are huge. And even in our own company, there's almost nothing that we do that we shouldn't be able to do differently because of AI.

30:40It could be credit memos. It could be advice for customers. It could be a huge number of things. And it takes a huge amount of information and data to get that right. And where we are in terms of developing models, we're not at the end of that. I'm still thinking about it. You said in both red and blue states, plenty of corporations, medium, small, big, are saying we are okay with trying to correct the trade imbalances that have built up over the years. So we're not entirely opposed to tariffs. We just need to find a way to deal with them. Is that is that really what you said? I yeah, I've been I was surprised.

31:22I mean, I think when I'm surprised that you said we don't we never hear that or at least we put along. We wouldn't want that word getting out. So some people are saying I travel the country almost every week. I'm going to be in Phoenix later today. I'm having a dinner with commercial banking clients. And again, what they say is that there's a reality that trade has been unfair, that people can come in and compete in this market in a way where they're subsidized by foreign governments. We can't offer our products on a similar basis outside the country and many are happy that we're willing to take that on.

31:53No one likes uncertainty, no one likes the idea of increased pricing, but they are hopeful that the tariffs wind up at a reasonable level. So far that's been the case and everyone's been able to share in that in a way which hasn't driven significant price increases. So they're looking at what the end result is, which is a more competitive set of companies in this country, which we support because we're such a big American company. That's who we are. I would put, we never would, but I would put that out on CBC.com or that's Squawk.com, but don't wait for that anytime soon. Thank you. Charlie Sharp.

32:26May have just made it happen.

32:30Cheese will be next. Coming up on Squawk Pod, a longtime guest of the show, from many eras of e-commerce to the multi-billion dollar sports company Fanatics, Michael Rubin. If we had asked you in 1999 whether there'd be sports gambling in America, whether you would be one of the sort of leaders trying to make a real way in that space, would have you believed it? Yeah, absolutely. I'm honestly surprised how long it took. We'll be right back.

33:03You're listening to Squawk Pod during our 30th anniversary week with Joe Kernan, Becky Quick, and Andrew Ross Sorkin. And some of the folks that actually make the magic happen every day. This is the control room back in Eaglewood Cliffs. Guys, turn around for a minute. Lots of our friends and family who are here. The responsible parties. Greg Lord. Paul DeFabio, our director. Matt Greco. Terry King, Octavius Williams, Dave Evans, Dan Mescon, Rob Contino, Patrick Brooks, George Manises. And John LaFont's not in this control room. He sits over on the side, but he's our audio guy who has been with us for almost all of the last 30 years.

33:44Took a brief hiatus and then we lured him back. Oh, right there. There he is. I just saw him. Turn around, guys. Look at the camera. Look this way. Mwah! Joining us right now is another guest who's been coming on Squawk Box since the late 90s. I hope you have some video of this, Michael. Michael Rubin, CEO of Fanatics, is here. We've got a lot to talk about what's going on today. But you actually went back, I think, at like 99. I'm just happy I don't see any videos right now because I would have been like pudgy, less hair, a really awkward suit. So thank God there's no footage. Not yet. Not yet.

34:21I don't know where the producers are with the footage. Wait, less hair? You have more hair? Yeah, I get a little bit of hair from the back of my head to the front of my head. It's like you've got to stay younger. And you copped it. That's cool. Yeah, of course. I'm always very transparent. You look great. And look, we have incriminating videos about you, of course. I know. I do want to congratulate you after your comeback at Fanatics Fest this year. Thank you. We actually did catch a pass from Brady when he, like, underhand threw it to you because he wanted to give you, like, a, you know, like, a, you know, I want this guy to catch.

34:45With a bunch of, like, pine tar, like, it's sticky. We do what we've got to do. All of us. Both of us. Okay, so here's the question. If we had asked you in 1999 whether there'd be sports gambling in America, whether you would be one of the sort of leaders trying to make a real way in that space, would have you believed it? Yeah, absolutely. I think you have to look at the rest of the world. I think sports gambling has been a big business in so many geographies throughout the world for such a long period of time. I think it was only natural that a market that was big and vibrant but illegal here would migrate to a much legal and safer approach.

35:21So I think I'm honestly surprised how long it took. And so in the late 90s, you could have looked in England or Germany or France or any of these other markets that were fully regulated, had big businesses and said, this has to make sense. It's got to come to the U.S. How when you think about the valuation of your business, the whole the whole fanatics business, what is the sports book represent to you? Yeah, I think it represents a pretty meaningful part of our growth. I'll tell you, I just realized when I walked in here today, it's a two-year anniversary from when we started taking bets. And we're now the third largest player in the sports market in the U.S.

35:53We're the fastest growing sportsbook in the U.S. And it's really because we have a better value proposition and it's working. Last night, I went to a friend's tequila launch, and two different people came up to me and said, hey, thanks for what you did with creating fair play. Fair play is a policy where if your player gets injured in the first, it used to be the first quarter, now it's the first half of the game, we take them out of the player prop. And so hundreds of thousands of bets that would have lost, people actually won as a result of that. But we had one last week where it cost us a million and a half dollars, but it's the right thing to do to kind of give that insurance.

36:25And nobody else does that? Now competitors are copying us. By the way, DraftKings, Jason's a good friend of mine, they copied us. Okay? Other companies are copying us. You guys are the fastest growing. Where are you? That's because you started from zero base. You started from zero. Where are you just in terms of, like, raw numbers? How soon before you can do some of them? Three, right? Yeah, we're number three, but we have about eight. Look, FanDuel, DraftKings, absolute leaders. They've built incredible businesses. They're both really well run. And they each have about 35 % of the market. We have 8 % of the market, but we had 4 % a year ago and zero the year before.

36:57So we're definitely the fastest growing. And are you taking from either of them? I think we're taking from everybody. Look, they have great businesses. I think some of the small competitors have been easier to take from. But we went out and said, how do we make this better for sports bettors? And just our value prop. We had a lot of thought went into this. How do we do something that's different and better? And so instead of spending money in advertising, let's give it. That's what I was going to say. The customer acquisition costs have always been like this big killer. But you think you can acquire more customers without spending marketing?

37:22Well, our customer acquisition cost is definitely less than a DraftKings or FanDuel. And the reason is every time you bet with Fanatics, whether you win or lose, we give you fan cash that you can then make other bets with. You can get merchandise. You can get trading cards. That's what I was going to say. Tying it all together, do you find those synergies make it a much stickier place? How do you play with that? How do you use that? Much stickier, resonating really well. Look, we're going to give out a billion dollars of fan cash next year to bettors. Do you count that as customer acquisition cost when you do that?

37:52I think we just, look, we run a little bit of a lower margin, but I think we can make it up in volume and doing the right thing. Your customer acquisition cost is lower, but you're spending that money in other ways. Absolutely. Our customer acquisition cost is lower for sure, okay, than a FanDor or DraftKings. And we also have a lot of brand marketing for fanatics that we have from the commerce business, from the collectibles business. And so I think a lot, and we have 120 million customers, and more than 50 % of those customers, they know about the sportsbook. A lot of those customers use the sportsbook.

38:22I used some of your fancasts the other, on Monday night, and I won, but it's rare. Because what you have to do is, no, when you have normal balance, you bet$10, and you get the 10 back, and you make$30. When you do fan cash, all you get are your winnings. So most of the time you don't win, so the fan cash goes away. But it was a genius invention by Matt King, the CEO of our gaming business, who used to run a fan deal before he came to us. And he really came and said, look, I want to make this better for customers. What do we do different? He said we're going to do two things. Number one, every time someone makes a bet with us, we're going to give them fan cash.

38:56That's a billion dollars we're going to give out next year they can use for merchandise, for tickets, to make more bets, to buy collectibles. That's really resonating well. Again, win or lose, you get the fan cash. Number two, this fair play, which is kind of like this free insurance. And that value prop is what's resonated so well. So that's where we've driven the growth of our gaming business. Do you see long term there's going to be more consolidation, though, in this space? Because the weirdest part about this business is you would think, you know, they would say the house wins. And therefore, it should be this massively profitable, crazy, over-the-top industry that just prints cash.

39:27And I think part of it is the acquisition cost. Part of it is the competition. most of these businesses have not been like wildly excessively profitable yet yeah so i'd say outside of the u.s they are wildly profitable and i think in the u.s they're becoming wildly profitable right in front of our eyes so if you look at draft kings that you know two years ago they were losing half a billion or billion dollars maybe three years ago this year they're going to make 900 million dollars i think fanduel is going to make a billion 250 this year so these companies have very quickly swung from tough businesses to very good businesses and what happened was i think in an environment when the market was a little bit ridiculous.

40:02And by the way, Wall Street had a part to play in, you know, they had a real role in this. You know, they were given free money away, so people spent illogically on customer acquisition. When we got into the business in 2021, what I said to my board was, look, I love this business long-term for fanatics, but I don't think the economics currently make sense. Let's bring Matt on, let's evaluate the market. It took us two years to launch, and by the time we launched, everything was more logical. And today it's the most logical it's ever been. So I'd say we're in a much more thoughtful market today, but the market is still just getting going.

40:35In terms of what you are going to spend that may cut into your margins to do things to win fan loyalty, to bring them back, is that a constant or is there a point where you can ease up on some of that? Because the thought with the customer acquisition cost is it would eventually go down. You would have people, you would buy loyalty, but it's a really tough competitive market. Sure. So the way to think about that is hold rate. How much do you keep from a customer? And I think if you look at a Flutter or FanDuel they could hold in the U.S., you know, 13 or 14 percent. The traffic against might hold 12 percent.

41:08Today we're at 10 percent. Maybe structurally we're always 100 basis points or 200 basis points lower. That's still a great business for us. And when you take the synergy of the Fanatics ecosystem and what it means to collectibles and what it means to the commerce business and how these things all integrate together, it's an incredibly big opportunity for us. When we look, you asked about the value of the business. When we think about what gaming can be, in our five-year plan, we have gaming being 40 % of our profits. Really? Okay? And we're very bullish about that. And where is it now? Yeah. I mean, today, we've spent$1.5 billion since we've launched, including the M &A deal we did.

41:45No. We'll lose about$300 million this year. We'll lose about$150 million next year. And then we'll make, you know, several hundred million dollars in 27. We feel great about that because if you look at what did Flutter and Fandul spend between the M &A, same way we look at it, they spent six to seven billion dollars. Same for DraftKings. So we look at a less than two billion dollars spend to get to profitability versus these guys having a six or seven billion dollar spend. Again, they built great businesses, but they spent a lot more to do it. Michael, we might be in a open window for IPOs. Do you even look at this moment at all and say, I want to use this window?

42:18No, I don't. We don't really get excited about market changes. We think about how do we build the best business. What I'm really excited about is look what's going on in our collectibles business. I mean, we are driving the entire collectibles industry. That business, we won all the rights in 2021. In January 1st, 2022, we bought Topps. It was a half a billion dollar business. It'll be more than a three billion dollar business. I have to say, watching what you've done with that has been really, really impressive. As somebody who's got a kid who collects all of these cards, I mean, that has been something to behold, to watch what you're doing with this stuff and how you ramp that up.

42:51Thank you. And I'll tell you the most interesting thing. When we bought the rights in 2021 from the sports leagues and the players associations, they all thought we were nuts. I did, too. Right. Because we're walking and saying, look, you're at an all-time COVID high. Collectibles has never been bigger. And we're going to walk in and guarantee you 100 percent of what you make. We're going to give you a higher royalty rate. We're going to let you participate in all the secondary markets that you don't participate in today. And then, by the way, we're actually going to start to market this category for the first time.

43:17But it was also based, if I believe, and maybe just the world changed, a little bit on digital cards. Remember, because it was a whole NFT craze, everyone thought maybe that was where this was all going to head. And most of this has been physical for you. It's all physical. We did get in and out of the NFT business very quickly. It was about four months. We raised$100 million and then gave the money back to investors. Probably we have the only investors that didn't lose money in the NFT business. But my point was, when I think about whether we should go public or not, what I'm thinking about right now is how do we build the best company?

43:46But when's the time to go public? Once you're profitable? When do you need the money and why? Well, we don't need the money. We have a good balance sheet. The company has no liquidity needs. But at some point, you're going to probably want to wait for employees and others. I think the most important thing about long term, I think you want to give your investors and your employees liquidity. But right now, we think about our business. We're growing so quickly. this year, you know, we thought it would be approaching$9 billion will be substantially over$9 billion. Next year will be over$12 billion.

44:15And so for us, we're just thinking about how do we build the best business? There's so much growth in collectibles, so much growth in gaming, so much growth in our core commerce business. And then you think, those three businesses alone, I'll tell you our plan. We think we can do over$5 billion in profits over 2030 in just the three businesses we're in. We have a couple other businesses we're launching. I know we've got to go, but I've got one final question for you. everybody's talking about how we are in this like sports. I don't know if it's a bubble or what's going on, but everybody's interested in the business of sports now, right?

44:48That is like the thing. No question. The thing. Everyone's buying into different leagues. And I'm not talking just about the NFL and the NBA and MLB. I'm talking about, you know, paddle and sailing and drone racing and all of this stuff. And so the question is how you actually see this whole space play out Also, because the media rights have become a huge component part of this. And again, even beyond sort of the majors or any of those pets dot com. I mean, it feels like an Internet. So I don't want some of those. I guarantee I've never watched it. I think obviously I think in the overall sports ecosystem, I think there's going to continue to be significant appreciations.

45:28Why every day that goes by, people are trying to do more and more with fanatics. I think you're talking about sports team ownership. Look, there's only 32 NFL teams. There's only 30 baseball teams. So when you look at the scarcity and you look at the amount of money in this world, there's so many people chasing, you know, this small amount of teams. The same thing with Fanatics. Look, we think we can be the most valuable company in sport in the next five years. But to Andrew's point, WNBA is one thing to see that as a huge growth market. It's another thing when you get to I have found myself watching competitive pillow fighting for about five minutes.

45:59I haven't watched competitive pillow fighting. That could be done a certain way. Yeah. Is that the way you think? Is that at your house? with your husband and kids? Or is that like... Yeah, I was laughing with him. I was laughing with him. Like, this is hilarious. No, I meant it was a pillow fighting at your house. Oh, no, no, no. It's on YouTube. Are you going to watch Pickleball? So let me just... Look, I think in general, if you look at... Look, I don't understand AI the way you guys probably do and most people do today, but I will tell you... I bet you do. Well, here's what I'd say to you.

46:26I think there will be a lot of winners, but there will probably be more losers in that space as the market really just continues to develop. In sports, I think there's going to be a very high percentage of winners. So I think if you invest in sports teams, if you invest in sports companies, if you're a partner in Fanatics, I think you're going to be very fortunate because I think the momentum in sports is very clear, and I think there's a ton of wind behind our back. And so I think overall, will certain things fail? Of course. Do you ever miss owning a team outright? Not in the slightest. I can't believe that.

46:59You're such a fan. How do you not miss that? Because for me, there's so much fun about trying to build one of the most interesting consumer brands in the world. If I sit here today saying just the three businesses that we're in, we think can make more than$5 billion. The brainiac. Are you still have your seats? I feel bad saying this. I think I went to two Sixers games last year. The second I sold my ownership, I never looked back. Because you're a businessman first and foremost. Were you up in the rafters? You were not up in the rafters. Let me say this. Let me say this. I think it really became a conflict.

47:33I want to build our betting business and build our collectibles business. And we just kept getting bigger and bigger. It was too complicated. You are a monster businessman. I give you that. I can't believe that overtook your sports. It's the one thing I'm actually pretty decent at, and I love it. It's so fun. This is your game. It's my game. I get to play it every day. And it's a great thing. I say this all the time to some of my friends or some of the best athletes in the world. I am so lucky that until I die, I can do this from when I wake up until I go to bed every day and get to play a great game.

48:00And that's something that I'm so fortunate for. And so. As you laugh at them, like your days are numbered. Well, it's funny. You see certain people who can make an incredible transition and other people that can't. But I think it's very difficult to go from being one of the best athletes in the world to, hey, what am I going to do next? Now, some people make that transition incredibly well. Like I look at the drive Tom Brady has and like the same intensity. Steph Curry. Yeah, got him to win seven Super Bowls is why he's so successful in business. But I know I'm going to play this game for the rest of my life.

48:32And for me, I remember when I watched the Nike movie, Air, two years ago. And as soon as it got done, I looked at Camille. I'm like, how old do you think Phil Knight is now? And I went and Googled him. He was 85 two years ago. I'm like, I'm 51. Think what I can do over the next 30 years, what we can build fanatics into. The second half of your life should be better than the first half. And we're just getting started with fanatics. People say, oh, you're running a big company. We're not. We're only, whatever,$12 ,500,$13 billion next year, 22 ,000 people. we're just getting started. And so we have these three incredible businesses and so much to grow with them.

49:06I think it would be easier for you to win at business than to win an NBA title. Well, by the way, it definitely is easier because winning an NBA title is really hard and we never did it. And it's one of the things that really frustrated me is that we gave it everything we had. I think he means you. All right. No, I mean him. No, he went to Sixers. No, I think he means you winning it. No, the reason that Fanatics is, that he said, is not profitable is because I'm cleaning up day in and day out. And when you, you know, your margins are going to be squeaked. Listen, look, we're technically... join.

49:32You wouldn't be. And you know, we're terrified of having a business. That's what I mean. Back down. So you better be. We need you and everybody watching this show. Michael Rubin. Thank you. Thank you for coming on the show. As long as you have. Eighteen dollars the other night. Congrats. Congrats. We love following your progress. So thank you. Appreciate being here. Great to see you. And that is Squawk Pod for today. Thanks for listening. Squawk Box is hosted by Joe Kernan, Becky Quick and Andrew Ross Sorkin. Tune in weekday mornings on CNBC at 6 Eastern to To get the smartest takes and analysis from our TV show right into your ears, please follow Squawk Pod wherever you get your podcasts.

50:07We'll meet you right back here tomorrow. We are clear. Thanks, guys.

From the publisher

In an extended interview, Wells Fargo CEO Charlie Scharf shares his perspective on the health of America’s economy, including the dichotomy between low and high income consumers and the real impact of tariffs on U.S. businesses. Fanatics CEO Michael Rubin has been building sports businesses since his first appearance on Squawk Box in 1999. Now, he’s growing his company’s sportsbook and collectibles businesses and answering questions about his own IPO. Plus, Lisa Cook will remain Federal Reserve governor for now, Klarna is going public on the NYSE, and Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison has surpassed Elon Musk as the world’s richest person, thanks to a stock surge after Oracle’s earnings report. 

 

Charlie Scharf - 19:38

Michael Rubin - 37:26

 

In this episode

Michael Rubin, @michaelrubin

Joe Kernen, @JoeSquawk 

Becky Quick, @BeckyQuick

Andrew Ross Sorkin, @andrewrsorkin

Katie Kramer, @Kramer_Katie


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from Squawk Pod

All 546 episodes
Bets & the Economy: Wells Fargo CEO Charlie Scharf & Fanatics CEO Michael Rubin 9/10/25Squawk Pod · 50 min
Listen in VO